The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-05-1975 Regular MeetingRECD MEETING MICROFILMED 4- 24 -84" CITY COUNCIL. 5 AUGUST 1975 i I i A REGULAR NfETING OF THE CITY CODICIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE aMVERAL WAS FIELD CST 5 AUGUST 1975 AT CITY HALL, i 105 PCLC AVENUE, CAPE CMVERAL, FLORIDA AT 7:30 P. M. i THE METING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY MAYOR FlVWIsYN P. NfA=. THE iWI MS 4C'S= B HE CITY \.wLIL4M. C 1' lCid• W PRESENT WERE: MAYOR FRANRLNN P. NACLAYy COUNCLTAi E. HARRISON 4 I " RHAME, LED NIaME AS, G. J. SALVAGGIO AMID MRS. ANN 1i1V1 . CITY MASER Ate J. FRMM, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY RICHARD SCOTT, CITY G'Tx a ANITA J. OSTRCm. THE NINETIES OF 22 JULY WERE APPS AS rMD. l to LNISHED BUSINESS ITEM 1. ORDINANCE 10 -75 C7OMR'iVE zaTniG. " B I �� I M 011W C MR. , ►�C+\.RAWJM BY NE S. a AND A UNA1MU S VOTE, THIS ITEM WAS POSMPMM UW= METER DISaJSSIC N PERIOD AT THE END OF = AGENDA. I ITM4 2. REPORT ON MOBILE HCME CST OAR LANE BUILDING C1F'FICTAL ELVIN ALLEN STATED HE HAD INSPECTED. i i THE Ir+1O 1I HCME IN QUESTIC N. TfUM WAS `NO ' CNE . OCCXTYING,. M TRAILER I AND THEY WERE IN .M PROCESS CF GETTING A WARRANT TO HAVE THE ? y TRAILER REM3VED. • I ITEM! 3. AUMMZATIC N FOR SUIT C IN TWO SEWER AC=NXS MR. SCOTT TOLD COUNCIL THAT A SUIT BY M PROPERTY INVOLVED, APPEARED TO BE IMKINENI;. BUT- ` "HAD NOT BEEN. FILED. HE RFMvmm THAT IF SUCH SUIT WAS NOT FILED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS, THE CITY SHOULD GO FOB WITH THEIR SUIT. MR. NIC HCLAS MM THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY BE AUTHORIZED TO PARE A SUIT FOR COUZCIIC N OF THE CITY'S MONEY. MR. MWE SEamm THE MOTIC N.. VOTE WAS AS FOlWWS IN FAVOR MAYOR N.ACLAY, MR. NIC MI AS, MR. ,1 MiAME, MR. SALVAGGIO, : UVWED YM. THURM. NOTION CARRIDD. MICROFILMED 4-24-Ml 4. ORDnow= 19-75 zamG. �Ap CEMNGE • M-1 (PERMISSION TO• • • R `i MAYOR I• N A :• Eil THAT AUMORIZATION Ei • ADVERTISING, MR. MANE SECONDM rME MOTION. j ••rM /• 'M � 1�!Iff •'•fr• N fN f K Nat Will •) N F-11VI Hf •,• ' li N .•. r N• •; • N •. vQo •r' • Q.I -I ' •�• r• r • �1 om 1 • {( SOME DISCUSSION Foumm immmm-SPOT ZONING, AND OPPOSED ML NICEMM AND ML SALVAGGIO. MXION CARRIED. ITEK S. •E f 1 `N E 18-75 ANENDM I! r R ;E •Jf PFDNM 'J (2ND •J?1' I f SALOo �•. J! • M.'IDI• j: ifry{' �: �,f)'J�.. "ilkf • � • i/• M` / �' • • M •)�!• • '�i' I�! '�•' : �1f •i• D. 111 la 4m Di 4 4 7 I'. 'di1 l •' L}if • ' 411 1 •.' !, `1'J"o9 ; 10 Bil I' ' W •)• 1 v ua�• k r• r•f t I 1i`I�1•J P • li�af (( I i':I �► N IS I • • M ' .'f'0�• 'J•� '�•. Y7 . • 'JI r P N" �t Y• :i '1.1f •�•, I f�',M ' v liffoRn Ill ,I ON P I e! -kzsj Y . 4`.r Y� / ' •� W' •; I rt i M i }►M I�1 r Mnq= OF 8 -5-75 PACE 2 OF 5 MICROFILMED 4 -24 -80 NEW BUSIlOW ITEK 1. AMITOR' S CM URA= MR. FRANCIS READ A`LETTER FROM AUDITORS GIVING THEIR PROPOSAL FOR THE YEARS`AUDIT. MR. SALVAGGIO MOVED TO APPROVE TM CONTRACT. MR. 14-MM SECONDED TE M OTCC No A QUESTION AROSE AS TO WWlMR OR NOT AN AUDIT OF THE POLICE OFFICERS mw FUND WAS maum IN m= PEAL OF $8500, AND IF NOT WHO WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PAY ANY ADDITIONAL FEE. BY MOTICU OF MAYOR MACLAY, SECOWED BY MR. SALVAGGIO AND IDUQ MOITS•: VOTE, THIS . ITEM .WAS POSTPONED M= NEXT M WrMG. ITEM 2. DISCUSSION ON PURCHASE OF RUBBISiM CcNnT ACT MR.�= --BHURAtEAD . :-.Toi , AN. ANALYSIS OF CASE FUN MUCH HE HAD PREPARED. MR. SCOTT REPORTED THAT HE HAD RED THE , THE HOME RULE ACT AND THE j CONTSTITLFTIONi RELATIVE TO M JNICIPAT T' IES, BORFiONfM AND PLEDGING i Eum. HE • STATE THAT= QTY C *wr PLEDGE AD VALORE14- TAXES FOR MORE THAN ONE YEAR WIC A REFERE mm , BUT ow mmu couLD BE BORROWED IF NO PLEDGE OF FUNDS WAS ROQLTIM). MR. SALVAGGIO MOVED THAT MR. IUMM AND CITY ATTOIRW i SCOTT CONTINUE TO WORK ON THE POSSIBILITY OF THE GARBAGE CONTRACT- PURCHASE AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL AT TIM NEXT MEETING. MR. NICHOLAS SEccNDEO THE MOTIC N, VOTE' AS FO 1 IN FAVOR MR. NICHOLAS, MR. RHAME AND MR. SALVAGGIO, OPPOSED MAYOR MACLAY, MRS. THURM, MCTIO N CARRIED. ITEM! 3. CITIZEN COMPLAINT P MAYOR MAj= STATED THAT rm RmscN FOR PUTTING 'PHIS ITEM ON TEE AGENDA WAS THAT HE DID NOT CET WHAT HE FELT WAS A PROPER AIISWER TO HIS OOWlAINTaAND THAT IT WAS NOT ANSWERED AT THE PROPER TIME. MR. FPIU%M STATED THAT THE MAYOR'S ANSWER WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN MAILED TO HIM, BUT AT THE TIME MR. FRANCIS WAS ON VAO;A MCN. MR. NICHOLAS FELT THAT THE REPLY TO THE COMPLAINT SHOULD HAVE BEEN AN IlMRPREPATIC N .OF rM ZONING ORDIlVA = BY THE BUILDING C MC IAL. MR. FRANCIS WILL DIRECT THE BUILDING CFEW[AL -m GIVE A WRITTEN WIERPRRnMC N. MINUTES OF 8 --5 -75 PAGE 3 OF 5 MICROFILMED 4-24-80 ITEK 4. INTERPRETATION CF COUNCIL POWERS RE: FINANCING CITY PROJECTSi ETC. IT TAAS UENTEIM4INW THAT THIS ITEM HAD ALFWMY BEEN COVERED UNDER ITEM 2. NO FURTHER DISCUSSION. ITEM[ 5. BUDGET DISCUSSION MR. FRANCIS GAVE A BRIEF KN DOWN CWTHE PROPOSED BUDGET sHcmG APPFaamAWas $loo,000.00 DEnciT AND ASKED FOR DIRECTION BY MOTION • MR. MM,, SM= BY MAYOR MACIM AND ,UNANE-IM VOTE,: A -P a•1 Mf=G ;W SET FOR TlffJrSDAY NIGHT X=W 7, 1975 AT 8:00 P.M. TO BEGIN WORK ON THIS PROPOSED BUDGET. J(w w1p READING OF THE ACrn= REPORT FUR THE POLICE INFIOM-STION I=WT FROM[ STATES ATTamvs0FFICE REGARDING 1; rnUM. MAYOR READ A LETTER RiDGAMING A NEW SAVINW AM IOAN M BE •M` Yaps -IN CAPE CANNVERAL ACROSS F••K CITY HALL.. HE ALSO IEMD A LETTER FROM THE ATMK'qEY FOR r= PORT ALMU= IUMMING A PUELIC BEARING TO BE HELD ON SEWER REGULATIONS AT 7M POW. MR. EML•UGH ANNOUNCED A SPECIAL MEETING • THE PLANNING ZONING BOARD CN,uAwlmHmS.LvE PLAN,, VEENESDAY AUGUST 6j 1975 AM ASK THAT MORE COUNCIL MIRW ATTEND. ML SALVAGrmE0 BROUGHT UP rM POSSIBILITY OF POLICE AT THE PORT. COUNCIL FELT 713AT rm Pore sHoaElD FOIW= MQUEST A PROPOSAL ET04 THE CnY. BY MOTION OF MR. K9AMEj, SEC== BY MAYOR MAC LAX AND U92MUMVIOTEr AWITE24WASAMEDTOTHEAGENDA: J;Igs()TJMCN NO. 75-29 AUTHORIZATION FOR 7KE CITY TO ENTER INTO AN AGR104ENT WIM SMMM I. GETZ AS SUPERVISOR • THE COMPLEX. TEE MAYOR READ RESOLUTICN NO. 75r29 ENTITLED: A RES0=ON AUTHORIZING 711E CITY OF CAPE N• t• • ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT V= SEYWRE I. FOR OF CF A RECREATIONAL COMPLEX; PROVID3NG AN EFFECTIVE DATE. A $I r AN t 10 DID • ov oil • VA VD MINUTES OF 8-5-75 PAGE 4 OF S. MICROFILMED 4.24 -80 vNFINISHED BUSINESS ITEM 1. ORDINANCE 10-75 MX?REHENSIVE ' ZaMqG COIN= SEGART r REVIEW OF PROPOSED AMMMM TS ARID COVERED SIX OF THESE AMENDMENTS. MAYOR NAY MOVED TO ADjOM THE MEETING AT 10:55 P. M. MR. NICHOLAS SEccNDED THE M=cN, VOTE WAS AS FOLLOWS: IN FAVOR MAYOR MMM, MR. NICHOLAS, MR. SALVAGGIO, MRS. THURM, OPPOSED MR. XMME, MOTICN CARRIED. - i MEETING ADJOURNED. APPROVED THIS 12TH DAY OF AUGUST UST . 1975.. j f MINUTES OF 8 -5-75 PACE 5 OF 5