HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-02-1993 SpecialA Special Meeting
September 2, 1993,
Canaveral, Florida.
Mayor Salamone.
ROLL CALL:
CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
September 2, 1993
of. the Cape Canaveral City Council was held on
at the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape
The meeting was called to order at 6:30 P.M. by
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
City Manager
Acting Deputy City Clerk
City Attorney
BUSINESS:
1. Discussion Re: Future wastewater treatment, effluent disposal.
slud•e treatment facilities and the financial im•act on s stem users.
Mr. Boucher introduced Mr. Ted Hortenstine, of Dyer, Riddle, Mills &
Precourt, Inc., who had been working on the City's application for
State Revolving Loan funding. He explained that Mr. Hortenstine's
presentation and the public hearing were required by the Department
of Environmental Protection (DEP) for the State funding. Mr.
Hortenstine stated that the Facilities Plan was developed in support
of the City's application for State funding. He asked that copies of
the overheads displayed during his presentation be made a part of the
minutes. He explained that the reasons for the Facilities Plan was
to evaluate the existing conditions of the City in general, establish
design needs for the wastewater treatment facilities over a 20 year
planning period, evaluate the best alternatives for the City, provide
recommendation for the best alternative, identify the environmental
impact, and identify financing needs.
Mr. Hortenstine explained in detail each of the attached overheads:
1) Existing land use acreages;
2) Planning Area (Port Canaveral was taken into consideration,
but not City of Cocoa water);
3) Statistics: Climate - moderate
Soils - good for development
Beach soils -
Surface water
Joy Salamone
John Porter
Arthur Berger
Joan Calvert
Rocky Randels
Bennett Boucher
Susan Chapman
John Kancilia
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Air quality
Plant & Animal populations
not suitable for development
- Banana River - aquatic
preserve
- generally good, except for
periodic emissions from
power plants in the area
- WWTP won't significantly
impact any endangered
species
4) Existing Process Flow Schematic - currently operating at
20 mg /1 total suspended
solids, 14.2 mg /1
biochemical oxygen
demand; 11.8 mg /1 total
nitrogen; 0.61 mg /1
total phosphorous; 5
mg /1 dissolved oxygen;
5) Historical WWTP Flows - generally stayed constant;
infiltration inflow was not significant;
6) Indian River Lagoon Act, Chapter 90 -262, Laws of Florida;
7) Population and Wastewater Flow Projections
through 2013 - increasing flow through 2013 up to 1.7 mgd
which was chosen as the design perimeter for the treatment
plant;
400 0
City of Cape Canaveral, Florida
City Council Special Meeting
September 2 , 1993
Page 2
8) Effluent Disposal Options Analysis revealed that the
wetland reuse option was the most beneficial to the
environment, the most feasible to implement, and the most
cost effective to the City.
9) Capital and Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Summary;
10) Effluent Parameters;
11) Wastewater Treatment Options Analysis Summary;
12) Sludge Treatment and Disposal Options Analysis Summary;
13) Proposed Process Flow Schematic;
14) Proposed Sludge Stabilization Process Schematic;
15) Estimated Project Cost - $8, 603, 017;
16) Capital Funding Plan - Data Utilized in Analysis;
17) Capital Financing Plan Summary - Provided for an average
increase of $2.08 per residential user/per month;
18) Implementation Schedule;
19) Wastewater System Facilities Plan Recommendations.
2. Resolution No. 93-23 , Adopting the Wastewater System Facilities
Plan for the City of Cape Canaveral.
z
Mayor Salamone read the title of the Resolution.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA;
ADOPTING THE WASTEWATER SYSTEM FACILITIES PLAN FOR THE CITY OF CAPE
CANAVERAL; REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Motion by Mr. Randels, seconded by Mr. Berger to adopt Resolution No.
93-23. Motion carried with members voting as follows: Mayor
Salamone, For; Councilman Berger, For; Councilwoman Calvert, For;
Councilman Randels, For.
3. Resolution No. 93-24 , Adopting a Dispute Resolution Process
E associated with the Planning, Design, Construction and Operation of
Facilities financed by a loan from the State Revolving Loan Fund
authorized by Chapter 403. 1835, Florida Statutes.
1
Mayor Salamone read the title of the Resolution.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA;
ADOPTING A DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLANNING,
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF FACILITIES FINANCED BY A LOAN
1 FROM THE STATE REVOLVING FUND AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 403 . 1835, FLORIDA
STATUTES; REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Motion by Mr. Randels, seconded by Mrs. Calvert to adopt Resolution
1 No. 93-24 . Mr. Kancilia advised that the Florida Administrative Code
_ regulations required a Dispute Resolution Process for the City to
' adjudicate disputes when landowners were adversely affected. He
3 stated that it was a mediation type process wherein disputes would be
x negotiated and resolved. Motion carried with members voting as
,follows: Mayor Salamone, For; Councilman Berger, For; Councilwoman
Calvert, For; Councilman Randels, For.
3
_, There bein r--ther business, the meeting adjourned at 7: 00 P.M.
t r
Approved\this 7th`+ 1 day of September , 1993 .
4J _'C If / , / Q
u w IA +-" Jo C.! Salamone, MAYOR
ATTESJ• !/
"4, ! ���y
usan Chapman, Act ng Deputy City Clerk
Attachment to Special Council tines- Minutes of September 2,
official minutes.
/4-e. wt-cat -e,s
C;-1-9
M- 2.. -1 \- -Lc7
. Filed with
5
77—t.-CO 1"\c, A :YR ItAr\-.
a.;; 6'?t a ft eki
/ c, %e ":44./r._
c( t( C
joj J(ro,e_
Z' t:74A)
#117-gem St-0z 66--/t-
Pale 16tAt<Wh
M tcAa61 G 1 a,s i k,1141t4 Wmr/i)W ''
(4o1) gIC4 -0S4�-
Cht°9) aa.1
/1.3
fd7 7J se 9Y re.
c'
44 tr) - SbiSt
ya7 -~7g3.e OOz
253 -4-732
253- 4732
7fr9'
17P3 7(C,(
. ,�..43 7r
Attachment to Special Council ting Minutes of September 2, illp - Filed with
official minutes.
REFERENCES
City of Cape Canaveral Reuse Feasibility Study, June 1992, Post,
Buckley. Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.
2. The City of Cape Canaveral - Wastewater Treatment Plant
Improvements and Wetland Reuse System Preliminary Design Report,
April 1993, Hartman & Associates, Inc.
3. Initial Capacity Analysis Report for the City of Cape Canaveral
Wastewater Treatment Plant, June 1993 Hartman & Associates, Inc.
4. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida Comprehensive Plan (as revised by
Adopted Amendment #1, Janu ,l, 1990), October, 1985, Briley, Wild
& Associates.
Preliminary Rate Study, Burton and Associates, 1993.
6. City of Cape Canaveral, Utilit System Budget.
7. Request for Inclusion on the SRF Priority' List, Hartman & Associates,
Inc.
DYER, RIDDLE, MILLS
AND PRECOURT, INC.
•
•
EXISTING LAND USE ACREAGESA
LAND USE
CLASSIFICATION
AVERAGE
DENSITY
PER
ACRE
PERCENT
OF PERCENT OF
AREA, TOTAL DEVELOPED
ACRES CITY ACRES
Single Family Residential
Duplex Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Mobile Home Residential
TOTAL RESDENTIAL
Commercial
Industrial
Public & Semi -Public
Recreation & Open Space
Agriculture & Conservation
Streets, Highways & Drainage
Facilities
TOTAL DEVELOPED
ACRES
Vacant Land
7.88 units
8 units
14.2 units
11 units
105.48 7.53
28.75 2.05
297.48 21.24
64.54 4.61
496.25 35.43
72.21 5.165
61.29 4.38
25.54 1.80
13.80 0.99
0.00 0.00
170.53 12.18
839.32 59.93
561.22 40.07
12.57
3.43
35.44
7.69
59.13
8.6
7.3
3.0
1.64
0.00
20.32
100.00
TOTAL ACRES
1400.54 100.00
AThis table was presented by Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. in the Reuse
Feasibility Study (June, 1992).
m
N!
-1
O • >
3m
O 0
O >
m z
N m
'fl z
O D
r
z�
0
r
N c
W �o
m
OXIDATION
DITCH
ALUM
FACILITIES
CLARIFIER
CHLORINATION
FACUTIES
WAS
SLUDGE
HOLDING
Ys
riCHLORINATION
BASIN
TO SLUDGE
DRYING BEDS
LEGEND
AL ALUM FEED UNE
CE CHLORINATED EFFLUENT
CS CHLORINE SOLUTION
F -E FINAL EFFLUENT
INF INFLUENT
MLSS MIXED LIQUOR SUSPENDED SOLIDS
RAS RETURN ACTNATED SLUDGE
WAS WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE
F -E TO THE
BANANA RIVER
HISTORICAL WASTEWATER FLOWS
CAPE CANAVERAL WWTP
MONTH
1988
1989
YEAR
1990
1991
1992
1993
.January
0.580
0.892
1.058
0.923
1.090
0.980
February
n/a
0.892
1.068
1.008
1.130
1.050
NI arch
1.125
0.970
1.063
1.048
1.290
1.120
April
1.124
0.961
0.969
1.245
1.120
1.000
May
1.080
0.897
0.902
1.153
0.880
0.84
.June
1.085
0.913
0.940
1.180
1.057
0.83
July
0.782
0.922
0.983
1.137
1.130
n/a
August
0.805
1.005
1.027
1.144
1.070
n/a
September
0.715
0.938
1.015
1.130
0.940
n/a
October
0.814
1.220
0.998
1.390
1.070
n/a
November
0.947
1.183
0.924
1.120
.930
n/a
December
0.823
1.140
0.853
1.120
0.880
n/a
AVERAGE
0.898
0.994
0.983
1.133
1.049
0.970
Source: City of Cape Canaveral FDER Monthly Operating Reports
n/a - Indicates data not available
INDIAN RIVER LAGOON ACT
CHAPTER 90 -262, LAWS OF FLORIDA
The Act requires each owner of an existing wastewater treatment
facility discharging to the Lagoon or its tributaries to:
Cease discharging or demonstrate the need for continued
discharge by July 1, 1995.
Investigate the feasibility of utilizing reclaimed water for
beneficial purposes by July 1, 1992.
CAPE CANAVERAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
POPULATION AND WASTEWATER FLOW PROJECTIONS
One- fourth
Seasonal
Year Population Population
1993 8,560 850
1994 8,680 888
1995 8,880 925
1996 8,940 963
1997 9,080 1,000
1998 9,220 1,038
1999 9,360 1,075
2000 9,500 1,113
2001 9,700 1,150
2002 9,900 1,188
2003 10,100 1,225
2004 10,300 1,263
2005 10,500 1,300
2006 10,660 1,338
2007 10,820 1,375
2008 10,980 1,413
2009 11,140 1,450
2010 11,300 1,488
2011 11,450 1,526
2012 11,600 1,563
2013 11,750 1,600
Notes:
Total
Contributing
Population
9,410
9,568
9,725
9,903
10,080
10,258
10,435
10,613
10,850
11,088
11,324
11,563
11,800.
11,998
12,195
12,393
12,590
12,788
12,976
13,163
13,350
City
Flow
(MGD)(1)
1.026
1.043
1.060
1.079
1.099
1.118
1.137
1.157
1.183
1.209
1.234
1.260
1.286
1.308
1.329
1.351
1.372
1.394
1.414
1.435
1.455
Port
Flow
(MGD)(2)
0.088
0.096
0.104
0.112
0.120
0.129
0.137
0.145
0.153
0.161
0.169
0.177
0.185
0.193
0.201
0.210
0.218
0.226
0.234
0.242
0.250
Total
Flow
(MGD)
1.114
1.139
1.164
1.192
1.219
1.247
1.274
1.302
1.336
1.370
1.403
1.437
1.471
.1.501
1.531
1.560
1.590
1.620
1.648
1.677
1.705
1. City flow is calculated utilizing the total contributing population and per
capita flow of 109 gpd.
2. Port flow is calculated by interpolating between the metered flow value
of 80,000 GPD in 1992 and an estimation obtained from the Port
Authority of 250,000 GPD in 2013.
3. This table was obtained from the Capacity Analysis Report developed by
Hartman & Associates, Inc., June, 1993.
EFFLUENT DISPOSAL OPTIONS
No Action - Maintain existing discharge but upgrade to A%%T
Standards
Public Access Reuse - Maximuin, moderate and minimal reuse
Rapid Infiltration Basins
Adsorption Fields
Wetland Restoration
CAPE CANAVERAL REUSE
CAPITAL AND OPERATION & MAINTENANCE (O &M)
SUMMARY
Description
Capital Cost,$
O &M Cost,$year
No
Action
Wetland
Reuse
Only
Maximum
PAR+
Wetland
Medium
PAR+
Wetland
Minimal
PAR+
Wetland
Treatment - AWT Discharge to Banana
$4,090,000
River
$360,000
Treatment- Dual Media Filtration
$1,890,000
$1,610,000
$1,260,000
+ High Level Disinfection
$110,000
595,000
$80,000
Storage - One day (ip, Average Annual
$774,200
$583,800
$408,800
Reuse Flow
4
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
Pumping - High Service
$434,000
$392,000
$3$0,000
$55,000
$48,000
$40,000
Distribution System
$4,193,000
$2,959,000
$2,330,000
$168,000
$118,000
$93,000
Wetland System
$4,992,500
$4,992,500
54,992,500
$4,992,500
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
SUBTOTAL CAPITAL COST, $
$4,090,000
$4,992,500
$12,283,70
$10,537,30
$9,341,300
SUBTOTAL O &M COST, $ /year
$360,000
$100,000
$443,000
$371,000
$323,000
WWTP Renovation
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
52,500,000
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
Note 1: Treatment, Storage & Pumping Capital/Construction Ratio = 1.4
Wetland, Distribution System CapitaUConstruction Ratio = 1.25
Note 2: AWT Treatment includes Denitrification filters, High level disinfection, Dechiorination and Off-Spec.
1.8 MgaL Storage
Note 3: Subtotal Capital and O &M costs include only those costs associated with the particular alternative,
i.e., costs associated with WWTP renovations or existing level of treatment are not included in
subtotals.
Note 4: WWTP Renovations are to be implemented for all alternatives.
Effluent
Parameter
EFFLUENT PARAMETERS
Wetlands Influent/
Plant Effluent
Wetlands Effluent/
Discharge to
the Banana. River
BOD5 5.0 mg/1 5.0 mg/1
TSS 5.0 mg/1 5.0 mg/1
TN 10.0 mg/1 1.0 mg/1
TP 0.3 mg/1 0.1 mg/1
Chlorine Residual 0.01 mg/1 0.0 mg/1
•
•
CAPE CANAVERAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPTIONS ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Unit Process
NUTRIENT REMOVAL
Annual
Operating Present Subjective
Capital Cost Cost Value. Ranking*
A/O Process $874,784
A2 /O Process 755,405
Five Stage Bardenpho
Process 1,031,285
Activated Sludge
Nitrification with
Chemical Addition 760,000
FILTRATION
Continuous Backwash
Filters
Pulse Bed Filters
Deep Bed Filters
Traveling Bridge
Filters
DISINFECTION
Chlorination
Dechlorination
Ultraviolet Disinfection
Ozonation
$330,000
270,000
431,900
430,000
$8,500
167,500
412,500
* The highest number represents the most
$92,962 $4,058,535 17
21,435 1,489,497 25
36,217 2,271,652 21
262,908 9,764,072 7
$1,478
538
636
$380,627 45
308,423 21
453,698 37
62 432,109 10
$19,067
13,298
41,095
$661,504
622,937
1,819,932
favorable option.
32
37
16
•
•
CAPE CANAVERAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
SLUDGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OPTIONS
ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Unit Process
SLUDGE STABILIZATION
(without dewatering)
Aerobic Digestion
ATAD
Lime Stabilization
SLUDGE STABILIZATION
(with dewatering)
Aerobic Digestion
ATAD
Lime Stabilization
Lime Pasteurization
Auuival
Operating Present Subjective
Capital Cost Cost Value Rankine*
$336,000 $218,720
940,000 150,170
307,744 133,421
$583,000
1,187,000
490,744
575,000
$115,407
46,857
26,608
25,358
$7,826,716
6,083,018
4,877,142
$4,535,445
2,791,747
1,402,003
1,443,449
* The highest number represents the most favorable option.
26
34
8
26
34
8
8
m
17
.0
mn
0
�m
n
nz
H< 3.
0 rn
0r
0
m
0
CA G)
s C
i
FERMENTATION
BASIN
MECHANICAL
SCBREEN GRIT
REMOVAL
ANOXIC
BASIN
`MLSS
ALUM
FACILITIES
r-)
L,J
di
OXIDATION
DITCH /- -
LEGEND
NR AIR
AL ALUM FEED LINE
BYP BYPASS
CE CHLORINATED EFFLUENT
CS CHLORINE SOLUTION
FE FILTER EFFLUENT
F -E FINAL EFFLUENT
IR INTERNAL RECYCLE
NF INFLUENT
MLSS MIXED LIOUOR SUSPENDED SOLIDS
RAS RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE
RET RETURN
ROW RAW WASTEWATER
WAS WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE
PROPOSED STRUCTURE
EXISTING STRUCTURE
CONTRACT
HAULER
LIME
STABLIZATION
CHLORINATION
FACILITIES
r-�
L,J
CI
• T
cm 5
1 C
14 33
• •
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
Construction Related Item
Estimated
Cost
Administration (including legal and fiscal services $ 43,256
prior to obtaining loan) (0.6% of Construction Cost)
Basic engineering services for planning, design, 273,441
and construction procurement (6.45% of Construction Cost)
Legal and teclurical services during construction 170,600
Start -up Services 170,600
Construction and related procurement 3,854,000
Eligible land (for wastewater /residue reuse or 2,970,000
ultimate disposal only)
Contingency (10% of construction) 385,400
Interim financing (excluding SRF capitalized interest) -0-
Cost of refinancing (such as underwriter fees) -0-
Close -out audit 30,000
Other (Loan Reserve Fee) 157,946
Subtotal 8,055,244
Service Fee (2.5% of Subtotal) 197,432
Capitalized Interest Estimate 350,341
(18 month const. period, 3% interest)
Total Cost $8,603,017
Note: Loan Service Fee, Loan Reserve Fee and Capitalized Interest are calculated
for the SRF Loan Amount only ($7,435,017)
CAPITAL FUNDING PLAN
DATA UTILIZED IN ANALYSIS
SRF FUNDING ASSUMPTIONS
Borrowed Amount $8,603,017
SRF Interest Rate 3%
Repayment Period 20 Years
Annual Debt Service $499,750
Loan Repayment Reserve $157,946
(2% of Construction Cost Borrowing)
Pledged Revenue Coverage 15%
Payments Begin March, 1996
OTHER DATA
Household Income $ 17,920
Household Size 1.5 persons
Population Growth 2% per year
Expenses:
Total Existing Expenses
Total Incremental Expenses
Total Expenses
CAPITAL FINANCING PLAN
SUMMARY
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
$1,082,000 $1,048,000 $1,056,000 $1,058,600 $1,059,000
437,356 729,712 734,712 739,712 739,712
1,519,336 1,777,712 1,790,712 1,798,312 1,799,084
Revenues:
Operating $1,261,356 $1,518,114 $1,563,595 $1,579,231 $1,595,024
Non - Operating 128,000 97,000 103,000 103,000 103,000
(Interest Earning)
Impact /Connection Fees 130,000 138,000 140,000 140,000 140,000
Total Revenues 1,519,356 1,783,114 1,806,595 1,822,231 1,838,024
User Fee Increase Required 3.6% 21.5% 0 0 0
CAPITAL FINANCING PLAN
SUMMARY
YEAR
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Wastewater Management Data
Total estimated annual $1,519,356 $1,777,712 $1,790,712 $1,798,312 $1,799,084
wastewater management
costs
Non - residential share of 561,594 650,637 659,310 662,108 662,392
total annual wastewater
management costs
Residential share of total 957,762 1,127,076 1,131,402 1,136,204 1,136,692
annual wastewater
management costs
Number of households
Average residential user
charge /per month /customer
Average connection fee per
residential unit
6,302 6,365 6,429 6,493 6,558
12.67 14.75 14.67 14.58 14.45
Average impact fee per $2,156 $2,156 $2,156 $2,156 $2,156
residential unit
• •
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Draft Facilities Plan and Capital Financing 7/23/93
Plan submitted to the City
City Review Period 7/23- 7/30/93
Advertise Public Hearing for Facilities Plan and 7/31/93
Dedicated Revenue Hearing (30 day advertisement
period required)
Submittal Package to FDER. to include: 8/7/93
a. Facilities Plan with certified copy of
public hearing advertisement
b. Capital Financing Plan with certification of the
City's chief financial officer
c. Current wastewater service agreement with
Port Canaveral
d. Sewer Use Ordinance
e. User Charge Ordinance
Public Hearing - Facilities Plan and Dedicated
Revenue Hearing - City Council to pass the
following Resolutions:
a. Adoption of Facilities Plan
b. Adoption of Dispute Resolution Process
9/2/93
Submittal of Resolutions and Public Hearing 9/93
minutes to FDER
Notice of Intent to permit construction of 10/93
treatment plant issued
Sign SRF loan agreement 11/93
Advertise for Bids 11/93
Open construction bids 12/93
Approve low bidder 12/93
Start treatment plant construction 1/94
Complete construction of treatment plant 3/3/95
Begin SRF loan repayments 3/3/96
Certify operational performance of the 3/3/96
treatment plant and close out project
WASTEWATER SYSTEM
FACILITIES PLAN
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Adopt the facilities plan which should consist of the following:
Implement the most feasible effluent disposal alternative of
creating a 33 -acre natural wetlands system for effluent
disposal and final nutrient removal.
Implement the cost - effective alternative of upgrading the .
treatment facility to include a new pretreatment system,
system additions to achieve biological nutrient removal,
additional clarification systems, and new disinfection and
filtration systems.
Implement the cost- effective sludge management alternative
of providing dewatering and lime stabilization prior to land
disposal.
2. FDEP issuance of Finding of No Significant Impact (FNSI).
Site Certification for All Project Sites Plant & Wetlands.
Construction Permits for Project - Plant & Wetlands.
5. FDEP Modification of Project Status from Planning to Fundable
(30 -45 Day Public Notice Period).
6. Execution of Loan Agreement.