HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07-29-2002City of Cape Canaveral
Board of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
July 29, 2002
A Meeting of the City of Cape Canaveral Board of Adjustment was held on July 29, 2002
at the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida. Chairperson
Rigerman called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. The Board Secretary called the roll.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Marilyn Rigerman
Earl McMillin
Robert Laws
Ronnie Farmer
Connie McKone
Paula Collins
Chairperson
Vice Chairperson
1 st Alternate
OTHERS PRESENT
Bea McNeely
Leo Nicholas
Charlie Crawford
Thomas Bubb
Susan Chapman
Ex- Officio Member
Planning & Zoning Board Member
City Attorney
Assistant Building Official
Board Secretary
All persons giving testimony were sworn in by Charlie Crawford, City Attorney.
NEW BUSINESS
Motion to Approve the Meeting Minutes of June 24 2002
Motion by Mr. McMillin, seconded by Mr. Laws to approve the meeting minutes of June
24, 2002 as submitted. Vote on the motion carried unanimously.
2. Variance Request No. 02 -09 to Allow Two Roof Overhangs to Protrude 2 ft 10
in. into the Required Side Setback at 127 & 129 Ocean Garden Lane Patrick
and Jennifer Wigglesworth David and Kathy Reed Property Owners
Patrick and Jennifer Wigglesworth, David and Kathy Reed testified that the plans were
submitted to the Building department in December and approved by the City when the
building permit was issued; the overhangs were constructed and a truss inspection
revealed that the overhangs were too large, the Building Official had advised that the
details for the overhang were not initially provided on the plans; the overhangs did not
protrude on neighboring properties; the overhangs were located on the side entrances;
and it would cost approximately $800 per overhang to bring them into compliance; they
had paid the city $500 for the construction plan review; they should have been informed
by the city plans reviewer that additional information was requested prior to the permit
being issued.
Tom Bubb, Assistant Building Official testified that an outside plans reviewer hired by the
city had reviewed the plans; he had discovered the problem with the overhang during the
inspection; the prints were ambiguous; the submitted truss drawings did not match what
was constructed. The Board members reviewed the submitted construction plans. Mr.
Bubb depicted the overhangs from the submitted construction plans. Mrs. Wigglesworth
further testified that she did not know that the plans reviewer was looking for dimensions
of the overhangs during the plan review and noted that the drawings were to scale. Mr.
Wigglesworth reiterated that the building permit was issued based on the plans reviewer
approving the submitted construction plans.
Board of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
July 29, 2002
Page 2
Charlie Crawford, City Attorney advised that the city code suggests that the Board not
grant any special privilege that is denied to other lands, structures or dwellings in the
same district. Mr. Crawford directed the Board through the Variance process as depicted
in the city code.
Chairperson Rigerman read a letter into the record, from Mr. William Bennix, an adjacent
property owner, (Exhibit A), stating his opposition to the variance as it would lower the
value of his property. City Attorney Crawford advised that no one could cross - examine
the contents of Mr. Bennix's letter as he was not present at the meeting. Mr. Harold
Hunter responded that the letter authorized him to act on Mr. Bennix's behalf.
Carl Maag, 130 Ocean Garden Lane, testified that his property was the closest to this
townhouse. He was a member of the associations construction development committee,
he and three other committee members had reviewed the plans, they were aware of the
city setbacks, questioned the overhangs with the property owners, and
had approved the drawings knowing that the overhangs were encroaching.
Ronald Schaffer, 128 Ocean Garden Lane, testified that he lives directly across the
street from this new townhome and personally had no objection to the overhangs. He
responded to the letter from Mr. Bennix and advised that the property was a perpetual
easement, a retention pond for the community, and approved by the St. Johns River
Water Management District, and it was the Associations responsibility for the
maintenance of the property. Mr. Schaffer advised that the Association was under the
impression that the property would eventually be turned over to the Association by the
developer (Mr. Bennix).
The Board members held discussion and voiced their various opinions. Mr. Nicholas,
Planning & Zoning Board member responded to Mr. Farmer's inquiry regarding why he
was the only Board member that had recommended that the Variance be denied. Mr.
Nicholas responded that the overhangs were a code violation and he heard no testimony
at this meeting that would have swayed his decision. Mr. Laws voiced his opinion that
$800 to correct the violation was not a hardship and the request did not meet the
requirements for a Variance because the petitioners built the overhangs. Mr. McMillin
stated that he did not care about personal opinions; before construction began the
Association and petitioners knew there was an encroachment and this was verified by
sworn testimony at this meeting; and read the first paragraph of Section 110 -538,
Encroachments of the city code. Mrs. Rigerman explained that this Board could not
grant a Variance for a self- imposed hardship because granting this Variance could set a
precedence for someone else at a later date with similar circumstances. Mr. Farmer
added that the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of this request. He
voiced his opinion that they should be able to do what they want on their own property.
Ms. McKone questioned the petitioners as to what information they had received in
writing from the building department during plan review about how and what issues
needed to be addressed. Mrs. Wigglesworth responded no information was requested
for the overhangs. Ms. McKone voiced her opinion that a Variance was not the solution.
Attorney Crawford verified that the request went through the correct process.
Motion by Mr. McMillin, seconded by Mr. Laws to deny Variance Request No. 02 -09 due
to the fact that the Request did not meet the requirements of Section 110 -92, (a) & (b) of
the Cape Canaveral Code. Vote on the motion was as follows: Mr. Farmer, against; Mr.
Laws, for; Ms. McKone, for; Mr. McMillin, for; and Ms. Rigerman, for. Motion carried by
majority.
Board of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
July 29, 2002
Page 3
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m.
Approved this y
pp 3 — da of , 2002.
Marilyn Riger an, hairperson
Susan L. C n, Boa 'M Secretary