Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 01-21-2003 Regular CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY HALL ANNEX 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida TUESDAY January 21, 2003 7:00 PM MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: Council Members Present: Robert Hoog Jim Morgan Mayor Pro Tem Buzz Petsos Mayor Rocky Randels Council Members Absent: Richard Treverton Others Present: Anthony Garganese, City Attorney Susan Stills, City Clerk Andrea Bowers, City Treasurer Ed Gardulski, Public Works Director Todd Morley, Acting Building Official Others Absent: Bennett Boucher, City Manager CONSENT AGENDA: 1. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of January 7, 2003. Mayor Randels asked if any Council member, staff member or interested party desired to remove the item from the consent agenda for discussion. Attorney Garganese noted a correction on Page 2, Paragraph 2, Sentence 7 that should read "you can exclude permanent resident aliens from certain public positions of trust," striking the word not from the sentence. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting January 21, 2003 Page 2 A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos and seconded by Mr. Hoog to approve Consent Agenda Item No. 1 the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes as amended. The motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mr. Hoog, For; Mr. Morgan, For; Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For and Mayor Randels, For. CONSIDERATIONS: 2. Motion to Approve: Request for Proposal for City Attorney — Professional Legal Services. Mayor Randels stated for the record that Attorney Garganese chose to leave during the other candidate's interview as a matter of professional courtesy. Mayor Randels outlined that Council's task is to review the Request for Proposal and to choose an Attorney to represent the City from the following firms: Mark McQuagge, P.A., Mark McQuagge, principal and Chris Coleman, secondary and the firm of Brown, Ward Salzman and Weiss, Anthony Garganese, principal and Jeff Buak, secondary. The Council's criteria was to rate the firms on their ability to handle the workload as outlined in the Request for Proposal. Both applicants have previously served as City Attorney while working with other firms making them both qualified. The criteria list included billing rates, qualifications, their potential workloads and potential conflict of interest. Mayor Randels called on Attorney McQuagge and asked the Council to proceed with questions. Mr. Hoog questioned Attorney Coleman's experience with municipal law. Attorney McQuagge replied that Attorney Coleman worked predominately in real estate transactions and litigation. He did have municipal experience as a plaintiff's attorney. Attorney McQuagge disclosed that there might be one potential conflict of interest in acquiring Attorney Colemen as secondary in that he represented an entity on A1A for a period of time with a dispute with the City. This fact might preclude him from defending those issues. Attorney McQuagge stated that Chris Coleman has been an attorney since 1993 and he has been practicing as a partner for a majority of that time. Mr. Hoog stated that cost was the only difference in the two proposals. Attorney McQuagge replied that the prices were comparative and he expressed that he was equally qualified for this particular position. He addressed the difference between the set -ups of the two firms and explained how his proposal better met the criteria for the lowest responsible bidder. He related that he planned to cover all of the meetings as the primary Council. He explained that this would maintain continuity from one meeting to another without the need for pre - briefing between two attorneys prior to the subsequent meeting. He stated his manner saved cost for preparation time. Mr. Morgan stated that he had spoken to both attorneys and found them both qualified. Attorney McQuagge replied that he was brought to the City through Attorney Garganese and emphasized that the City would benefit with either choice. Attorney McQuagge stated ' that he was a sole practitioner and therefore the City would receive his primary attention. He also stated that he is principally a litigator and said that consideration should be given to the City's growth and the potential for litigious issues. Mr. Morgan reminded that 1 City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting January 21, 2003 Page 3 C Attorney McQuagge left previous employment with the City for a better opportunity and asked if another better opportunity might occur again. Attorney McQuagge replied that in hindsight he found that not all opportunities were to his benefit and he planned to continue his work as a sole practitioner at this time. II Mayor Pro Tem Petsos restated Mr. Morgan's concem of his being a sole practitioner and also that the City would be Attorney McQuagge's primary client. He asked if clientele requiring extensive litigation would take precedence as Attorney McQuagge's client list increased? Attorney McQuagge replied that the nature of the previous firm was an independent legal counsel set-up whereby he operated as a sole practitioner and that is no different from his current practice. He also planned to relocate within the City limits in order to provide a more adequate response time. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos asked if he had continued access to expert counsel. Attorney McQuagge replied that he would need to refer to others firms when he did not have certain expertise. item-by-item review of both proposals. He stated that he preformed an item -b Mayor Randels p Y pointed out Attorney McQuagge's intention to attend all meetings as a manner to retain continuity, which he had not considered up to this point. Attorney McQuagge restated that when he worked with the previous firm, he worked as an independent contractor. Attorney McQuagge stated that he had no questions at this time. He too requested to remove himself from the room during the other candidates's interview as a matter of professional C courtesy. Mayor Randels noted a letter of agreement from Attorney Chris Coleman to act as secondary and conflict counsel. Mr. Gene Petre, resident, addressed the Council and asked if any Council member had met with the attorney's one -on -one. Mr. Morgan stated that he had spoken with both attorneys however no other Council Member was present and there was no violation of the Sunshine law. Mayor Randels stated that both Attorneys contacted him by telephone and I asked if there was any other information that they could provide to assist the Council in the decision making process. Mr. Petre stated that Council members should ask the same questions of each candidate as a collective body. Mayor Randels clarified that the Council was not making a selection but a recommendation to the City Manager to negotiate with the top - ranking firm. Attorney McQuagge stated his only issue in that Council Member Treverton was not present. Mr. Morgan stated that Mr. Treverton was aware that the 1 proposal was in progress. Mayor Randels recommended that the City Clerk advise the I City Manager to contact Mr. Treverton for any further input prior to negotiations. Mayor Randels stated that a recommendation would be made at the next Regular City Council meeting once Mr. Treverton has heard the record of this meeting. Mayor Randels informed Attorney Garganese that a recommendation on the top - ranking firm would be made to the City Manager at the next scheduled City Council meeting due to the absence of Council Member Treverton. Mr. Hoog expressed that Attomey Garganese anese had done a good job. He stated that he carries the City's legal workload well and his responses are on target. Mayor Randels 1 City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting January 21, 2003 Page 4 responded to Mr. Hoog's question on why the City had initiated the proposal process and related that this would allow for review of the City's legal services contract in a public e9 p forum. Mr. Morgan expressed the high qualifications from both parties. He stated that Attorney Garganese had also addressed some issues outside of the regular scope of duty such as the new Code Enforcement procedures. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos expressed that Attorney Garganese has done an excellent job and found the firm's response time expedient with ample information. His only concern was that the billing rate had doubled since service was transferred from Amari, Theriac, P.A.. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos pointed out that pre - briefing has proven costly through the billing for two or more legal counsels. Mayor Randels referred to an itemized bill and stated that some of the research performed was at the direction of the City Council. Mayor Randels stated for the record that fees are paid by the hour with no retainer billing. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos replied that pre- briefing from one attorney to another was shown in some of the billing however if the agreement is awarded the City Manager might open this to negotiation. Attorney Garganese replied that there was a transition period that required additional work however with the transition's end, the billing should plateau to the City's financial benefit. He stated that the firm attempts to deliver a thorough work product to assist the Council in their decision - making. Mayor Randels inquired about the meaning of a Certified Specialist in that only six percent of attorneys comprise this field. Attorney Garganese explained that the Florida Bar has a Board Certification Program whereby lawyers can become Certified Specialist in their chosen area of practice. Attorney Garganese stated that he is a Certified Board Specialist in City, County and Local Govemment Law as well as his partner Suzanne D'Agresta. He said that there are only 112 lawyers in the State of Florida with this Specialist Certification. In addition, his partner Larry Brown is also certified in Trial Law and Trial Litigation as well as his partner John Ward. His partner Gary Salzman is Board Certified in Business Litigation. The firm heavily emphasizes pursuing Specialist certification in their chosen areas of practice and having Tess that 6 percent of lawyers in the state with certification relates the level of commitment that he and his partners have to their chosen area. Mayor Randels also commented on the Martindale, Hubbell Law Directory rating system and the firm's AN rating. Attomey Garganese replied that Martindale, Hubbell is the premier rating agency for law firms in the country and the highest rating is an AN and his firm is designated with an AN rating. Mayor Randels said that the firm currently employs 15 attorneys, 3 paralegals, 14 legal assistants and 6 administrative staff members. He mentioned that paralegals had performed some previous research work and they were able to work at a lower rate. Attorney Garganese replied that he had no questions at this time and he stated that he looks forward to continued work with the City and staff. Mayor Randels related Mr. Petre's question of a one - on-one conversation with any of the Council members. Attorney Garganese stated that he had attempted to contact the Council members in order to ascertain if they needed any additional information or clarification of the submitted information. Mayor Randels restated the concern regarding Mr. Treverton's absence and that he has the privilege to listen to the record and provide input on this discussion. A recommendation to the City Manager would be placed on the next scheduled City Council meeting agenda for consideration. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting January 21, 2003 I Page 5 f c 1 ORDINANCES: Second Public Hearing: 1 3. Motion to Adopt: Ordinance No. 01 -2003; Amending the City Code through the Adoption of a New Section 54-3 Entitled Fires Restricted. Mayor Randels read Ordinance No. 01 -2003 by title. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY CODE THROUGH THE ADOPTION OF A NEW SECTION 54-3 ENTITLED FIRES RESTRICTED; PROVIDING FOR THE RESTRICTION OF FIRES ON OR OVER THE BEACHES, PUBLIC PARKS AND PUBLIC RECREATIONAL LANDS IN THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION INTO THE CODE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos stated that the changes recommended by the Fire Chief were incorporated into the ordinance. Mayor Randels related to the audience that there was a I concern regarding bonfires on the beach and how the Fire Chief would enforce the Council's desire to prohibit this activity as a public safety concern. Mr. Hoog inquired about the Fire Chief's sole authority to designate approved cooking utensils and asked how would authority transfer in his absence? Chief Sargeant recommended that the language C include, "or his designee, " since an acting Fire Chief is designated in his absence." Mayor Randels clarified discussion was on Section 54 -3, Open Fires Restricted in that the last sentence referred to a device manufactured for cooking purposes and approved by the City's Fire Chief and the language would be amended to state, "or his designee." The City Attorney stated that this is a minor technical change. A motion was made by Mr. Morgan and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos to Adopt Ordinance No. 01 -2003 adding "or his designee" to the last line of Section 54- 3. The motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mr. Hoog, For; Mr. Morgan, For; Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For and Mayor Randels, For 1 DISCUSSION: 4. Stormwater Utility. Mayor Randels brought out for clarification that the City Manager had contacted the St. John's River Water Management District and Mr. Robert Day replied that the City could implement the plan and delay the billing. Mr. Jeff Earhart, of Berryman and Henigar, Inc. introduced Mr. Gordon England and Mr. John Pekar. He stated that Ms. Bowers and Mr. Bandish had developed a cost analysis per Equivalent Residential Unit. Mr. Earhart explained that Ms. Bowers and Mr. Bandish developed three different budgets based on ERU's from $3.00 to $5.00. Mr. Earhart explained how the expenses fit within the varied rate structures. He stated that the operating expenses varied the most of the three costs i me due to cleaning baffle boxes, cleaning the outfalls and repairing the basins. 1 City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting January 21, 2003 Page 6 Mr. Earhart displayed the differences in ERU rates. Mr. Hoog inquired why the maintenance cost would increase with the same operation. Mr. Bandish explained that he did a cost comparison on the infrastructure line maintenance over a period eight years at the $3.00 rate, five years at the $4.00 rate and Tess than three and one -half years at the $5.00 rate. He stated that the cost was allocated over several years to prevent a $600,000 maintenance cost if performed in one year. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos inquired if four -years were a requirement or if that were Mr. Bandish's choice to show? Mr. Bandish stated that the line had not been serviced in many years and that this would provide documentation and inventory however four -years is not a requirement. Mayor Randels pointed out on Page 82 that the idea is for the Council to decide the length of time to complete the maintenance. Mr. Earhart stated that more funds collected would result in a higher level of service. Mr. Earhart also explained that additional capital would allow for various other projects or for leverage with grant funding. Mr. Morgan stated that he would prefer to begin at the lower rate for the sake of the residents. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos supported Mr. Morgan's statement and said that he favored an incremental implementation. He explained that he preferred to show the residents the benefit of the utility first and he also stated that a larger percentage of the condominiums are working with a fixed income. Mr. Hoog inquired about the $40,000 job classification and asked if any one in the City is qualified to perform this job. Mr. Earhart replied that he recommended an environmental scientist with. a background in biology, plants and water quality to perform the job. He commented that the firm recommended a $5.00 charge for utility implementation. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos stated that all that was needed for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] permitting has been met and the $5.00 rate was not necessary. Mr. Gordon England stated that for ten years he was the lead engineer for the stormwater utility for the County. He related that the stormwater utility program needs a dedicated person for this utility to meet the regiment of the program. Mr. Ed Gardulski, Public Works Director, stated that he too favored the $5.00 charge. He related that the program has expanded and stringent documentation is needed however staff is minimal to perform the full rigors of the job. Mr. Gardulski stated that stormwater maintenance review is a necessity as the program continues and he emphasized the need for a dedicated person to cover tasks specific to stormwater management. Mr. Hoog asked who would perform this work when the department is already tasked out? Mr. Gardulski replied that several departments are involved in the process. Ms. Bowers stated that the full cost of all department services was included in the budget however staff was directed to compile the data. Mr. Earhart stated that one person is currently allocated, however if a person is needed to do certain types of maintenance, that job could be done by staff or outsourced. Mr. Hoog asked Mr. Gardulski how many people it would take to perform the job? Mr. Gardulski stated that one primary person is needed to manage the job however an additional lab person might be needed in the future. Mr. Morgan stated that there are ordinances on the books to enforce the stormwater management. Mayor Randels clarified that although there were ordinances on the books, a person is needed to regulate those ordinances and he also commented that the budget shown was pared down and may not reflect all 1 City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting January 21, 2003 Page 7 components such as the full costs for existing and proposed personnel. Mr. Hoog restated that there might be someone in the Public Works Department to handle some of the tasks. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos replied that some of the funding is available under Systems Maintenance. Mayor Randels asked for Mr. England's recommendation due to his expertise with the County's stormwater management program. Mr. England replied that initially one person could begin program management however approval of a line item budget is not needed at this time. Mr. Gene Petre asked if the utility could be started with the revenue generated from the City's growth. Mayor Randels replied that the work has been done using funding from other places. Ms. Bowers stated that money for the baffle box was transferred from the Sewer Enterprise Fund however it must be repaid. Mr. England commented on the advantages of having a designated utility especially for grant purposes. Mr. Earhart stated that Solana is receiving an 85 percent reduction due to stormwater mitigation. Mr. Leo Nicholas commented that growth revenue would not continue in future years. Ms. Shannon Roberts inquired toward Mr. Petre's concept to use revenue from growth. Ms. Bowers replied that the concern with growth is the service demand on a per unit basis. Mr. Gardulski stated that there is also a legal issue on using the funds on a utility since tax money from appraised property value could not be used for stormwater management in that it is a user fee. Mayor Randels pointed out that much of the sand is created due to run -off from State Road Al A. He asked how the Florida Department of Transportation (DOT) could be involved in the process. Mr. Earhart stated that cooperative agreements would be needed since the entity is responsible for the storm drains. Mayor Randels asked Mr. England what success the County had in sharing stormwater responsibility? Mr. England replied none in that the Department to date has not acknowledged joint responsibility. Mr. Gardulski related that DOT had performed some maintenance on the storm drains on State Road Al A water lines. Mr. England responded that clean up has happened for flow or flooding but not for water quality. Mr. John Pekar explained that within the last five to ten years the lagoon has been severely impacted and he expressed that with the changing times DOT would soon come to consider water quality. Mr. Thomas Graboski inquired about the Port's participation. Mr. Pekar replied that the Port has included a Master Plan for stormwater utility. Mayor Randels concluded that the consensus of the Council was in favor of the $3.00 charge for the utility. Mr. Earhart stated that the Town Meetings would be held on January 28 at 4:00 P.M. and 7:00 P. M. Mayor Randels asked how the residents would be notified. Mr. Hoog also asked what information was included in the mail -out. Mr. Earhart replied that the pamphlet displayed at the previous meeting would be used in the mail -out with the date and time however no cost was included. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos asked if something would be included in the newspaper. Ms. Roberts stated that she received a pamphlet through the mail however it had no date or time marked on it. Mr. Pekar stated that his firm performed the mail -out and replied that he would check with his office on the mailing and confirm with the City Clerk that the pamphlet was sent out with the date and time Mayor Randels City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting January 21, 2003 Page 8 stated that a Public Hearing would be held on February 4 on the Resolution and a First Public Hearing to adopt the Ordinance. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos and seconded by Mr. Morgan for an Add -On Item to the Agenda. The motion carried 4-0 for an Add -On Item with voting as follows: Mr. Hoog, For Mr. Morgan, For; Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For and Mayor Randels, For Resolution No. 2003-02 that refers to Resolution No. 2002 -47 to Adopt Certain Street Names in the City. Mayor Randels read Resolution 2003-02 by title. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR THE CORRECTION OF A SCRIVENER'S ERROR CONTAINED WITHIN PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION, 2002 -47 RELATING TO THE NAMING OF SEVERAL PRIVATE ACCESS/DRIVEWAYS WITHIN THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Mayor Randels stated that the intent of the correction is to amend Section One to read, "Access/ driveways located in Section 22 & 23" adding, and 23, to clarify the parcels for the newly named streets. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos and seconded by Mr. Hoog to Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -02. The motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mr. Hoog, For; Mr. Morgan, For; Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For and Mayor Randels, For. REPORTS: 1. City Manager • Ms. Stills read a message from the City Manager in regard to telephone calls in which two persons in the County were willing to adopt peacocks. 2. Staff Building Department • No report Public Works • Mr. Gardulski reported on the A1A Beautification Landscaping project kick -off meeting. P- • Mr. Gardulski also reported that he participated in the First Lego Robotics Competition. There were 40 teams of 10- 14- year -old children who were tasked to City problems using robotics. (1.4 City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting January 21, 2003 l' Page 9 City Clerk • Ms. Stills inquired if Council was ready to set a workshop date and time to continue the Code Review meetings. Council scheduled a City Code Review Workshop meeting Tuesday, February 4 at 5:00 P.M. City Attorney • Attorney Garganese referred to his report distributed for Council's consideration. The report included the sidewalk impact fee ordinance, a chart that summarizes Board residency or registered elector requirements in other municipalities and a legal opinion regarding fireworks on beaches. From the legal opinion the City may prohibit fireworks on its beaches and also can adopt a reasonable permitting scheme pursuant to Chapter 791 Florida Statutes. Enforcement would be an issue for the Fire Chief however the authority is at hand for consideration at a later date. Also, included in his report is a legal opinion regarding the constitutionality of the City solicitor ordinance. In the case for the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York versus the Village of Stratton the U.S. Supreme Court found that the door -to -door solicitor ordinance was unconstitutional because it required religious and political solicitors to acquire a permit and that requirement is not allowed under the U.S. Constitution. The Village could still impose reasonable restrictions on commercial speech in the solicitation of funds but not religious organizations or political campaigns. Attorney Garganese stated that the City code required clarity in that religious and political solicitors do not need to obtain a permit. Attorney Garganese replied to Mr. Morgan that the term religious organization is broadly defined. • Attorney Garganese also reported on development agreement and public beach access easement for the Villages of Seaport. This is an imposed requirement by the Planning and Zoning Board. The agreement and easement were forwarded to Mr. Salamone for consideration however no comments have been received to date. Attorney Garganese replied to Mr. Morgan's question that the Comprehensive Plan requires secure and public beach access. He explained that the property abuts a private driveway and the development agreement stated that when that private driveway is conveyed dedicated to the City then the developer will sign, execute and grant the public access easement that extends from the roadway to the beach. At this time, the public does not have access. • Attorney Garganese received an E -mail regarding Chap. 63 -1196 regarding the City incorporation date. City Attorney stated that Section I of the Law of Florida reads that the present municipal corporation of the City of Cape Canaveral in Brevard County, Florida is hereby abolished. He volunteered to research the first law that incorporated the City. 1 AUDIENCE TO BE HEARD: • Mr. Gene Petre inquired about the procedure for no- parking signs on City streets. Mayor Randels stated that a call to the City Manager would help to install a sign. Mr. Petre asked why parking is prohibited on both sides of the street on Chandler City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting January 21, 2003 Page 10 Street? He asked if this could come before the Council for amendment. Mayor Randels replied that throughout the City there is no parking in the right -of -way. Mr. Petre requested to eliminate no parking on the south side of Chandler Street. Mayor Randels replied that staff would provide research on the City's existing no parking ordinance. Attorney Garganese stated that Section 74 -58 authorizes the Chief Law Enforcement Officer to designate no parking zones with signs. • Mr. Nicholas spoke in favor of thinning the peacock population. He stated that in the past the peafowl were restricted to certain properties. He suggested a neutering program as is done with other animals. • Mr. Thomas Garboski stated that in the north eggs are removed from geese nest in order to help control their population. • Mr. Leo Nicholas requested support for the Canaveral Creek Trail. He said that the Beautification Board needs help regarding potential grants and conceptual drawings. Mr. Morgan commented that the water source along the path is polluted. Mr. England replied that part of the NPDES permitting would identify any illicit discharge. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos asked Mr. Petre to inquire if there were any County funding available through the Brevard Metropolitan Planning Organzation. Mayor Randels stated that the consensus of the Council favored any effort toward improvement of the Canaveral Creek Trail. 3. City Council Mayor Randels asked if there were a motion to continue past 10:00 P.M. No motion was made and the majority of Council members expressed to defered reports until the next scheduled meeting. Mr. Hoog • Mr. Hoog reported that he attended his first Space Coast League of Cities meeting. • Mr. Hoog inquired about the status of the reuse system. Mr. Gardulski stated that Brown and Caldwell, Inc. had completed the first draft. The City Manager had comments and the Council would review following further discussion between staff and the firm. Mr. Morgan • No report. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos • No report. Mayor Randels • Mayor Randels announced that Sections 18, Civil Emergencies through 26, Elections would be in review at the Workshop meeting. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting January 21, 2003 Page 11 • Mayor Randels displayed a hot rah of the new model shuttle McDonald's photograph p od at the McDonald s restaurant in Merritt Island. • Mayor Randels reported that he spoke with the County regarding Waste Management continuing their operations in Brevard County. He spoke on the City's success of working in partnership with Waste Management on dean -up events. ADJOURNMENT: There be � � ss, the Chair adjoumed the meeting at 10:00 P.M. b � sue 4 t . , _ 1 ! ` 11 1 1 ° ; .< Rocky Randelk MAYOR Susan - _ , „ 4 ._ Cri Cse 1