Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 04-05-2005 RegularCITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY HALL ANNEX 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida TUESDAY April 5, 2005 7:00 Phil MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: ROLL GALL: Council Members Present: Mayor Pro Tem Bob Hoog Council Member Steve Miller Council Member Buzz Petsos Mayor Rocky Randels Council Member Absent: Council Member Jim Morgan Others Present: City Manager City Attorney City Clerk City Treasurer Building Official Storm Water Coordinator PRESENTATION: Bennett Boucher Anthony Garganese Susan Stills Andrea Bowers Todd Morley Jeff Ratliff County Commissioner Update, Ron Pritchard Commissioner Pritchard distributed handouts to the Council. He referred to a letter from Mayor Randels regarding Palm Bay's succession from the Emergency Management System and expressed that he did not support providing a Certificate of Needs Assessment. Commissioner Prichard related that Congress Needleman has presented legislation that would increase taxes to municipalities instead of providing the services through ad valorem taxes. He stated that the County Service rates for emergency service for municipalities would not change if Palm Bay were to leave the system, nor would the level of service in operations. He referred again to Congressman Needleman's House Bill. Commissioner Pritchard expressed that he was an advocate of the three percent limit on City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 2 of 10 ad valorem taxes. Mayor Randels made note that Commissioner Pritchard spoke to Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA] during a legislative meeting and expressed concern that the Counties had to expend contingency funds subsequent to the hurricanes. Commissioner Pritchard stated that the City could assume ownership and maintenance of County roads within the City at any time. He referred to a data sheet that he provided the City Manager. Mayor Randels asked how the County paves owned roads within other cities. Commissioner Pritchard replied that he would need to inquire and return with an answer. Mr. Petsos expressed that the City supplies up to $3 million to County revenue and he anticipated some return in funding to the City. Commissioner Pritchard replied that road paving could not be expended from the County's General Fund. Mayor Pro Tem Hoog requested assistance from the County in paving the roads prior to the City assuming ownership of the roads. Commissioner Pritchard referred to a letter regarding the ad valorem taxes paid. He stated that the City paid $272,555 more than what it received in return in 2003. Mayor Randels summarized that those cities with denser population support those lower populated areas in the County. Commissioner Pritchard stated that he tasked his staff to discover which cities were actually paying taxes. He concluded that the City's return on its investment should be greater. Commissioner Pritchard stated that the municipalities were in business to diminish the County's services. He stated that the County government would still exist however the County would not perform the current services. He expressed the hope that the Growth Management Committee could help to make that decision. Commissioner Pritchard stated that his goal is to maintain Brevard's existing aesthetic not to create what he left in Broward County. He stated that there was no affordable housing being built in Brevard County at this time. Commissioner Pritchard expressed how the City of Cocoa is experiencing considerable redevelopment. He explained that the County is involved in entrepreneurial activities that are beyond its scope. Commissioner Pritchard related how using County staff in constructive processes could become cost prohibitive. He also stated that strategic plans that are not implemented waste time. Commissioner Pritchard related on a meeting with the Reynolds, Crawford and the Environmentally Endangered Lands [EELS] representatives. He stated that review of the Thousand Islands land purchase required reflective study at the appraisal process because of the potential land value. Commissioner Pritchard stated that the decision to find two appraisers was left to the principals involved and the EELS representatives. He stated that the land value has taken on historic significance. Mayor Pro Tern Hoog addressed the proposed after -hours playground at Cape View Elementary School. Commissioner Pritchard requested that the Council have the City Manager send him specific data for related costs. Mayor Randels summarized that the City would compile what the Recreation Director has proposed and what the School Board City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 3 of 10 would approve. Commissioner Pritchard replied to Mayor Randels that he asked the Florida Department of Transportation to look into a linear park. This would provide people more access to the adjacent river systems. Commissioner Pritchard affirmed to Mayor Randels that the roads along State Road 520 and 528 would become three lanes of traffic with bikes lanes. Mayor Randels thanked him for the County's support of fireworks legislation. Commissioner Pritchard remarked that fireworks violation signage has helped to curb discharge. Mayor Pro Tem Hoog said that activity would continue to lessen with consistent enforcement. Mr. Petsos asked if the City could receive a breakdown of costs on how the County expends revenue. Mr. Chic Bemerau, owner of Mountasia Miniature Golf Course on Holman Road and State Road Al A, reminded that the Sheriffs Work Farm has skilled laborers that can be utilized to build what is needed in the County and the cities, for example, a playground. Mr. Bemerau also related that he has other fundraising ideas. Mayor Randels encouraged Mr. Bemerau to meet with the City Manager on his fundraising concepts. Mr. Bemerau stated his telephone number as [321] 020.7004. Commissioner Pritchard thanked the Council for the opportunity to present his update. CONSENT AGENDA 1. city council Regular Meeting Minutes of March 15 2005. 2. Proclamation for Arbor Day. Mayor Randels asked if any member of Council, staff or interested party desired to remove any items from the Consent Agenda for discussion. No request was made to remove an item for discussion. A motion was made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Petsos to Approve Consent Agenda Items No. 'I and 2 as submitted. The vote on the motion carried 4=0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Hoog, For; Mr. Miller, For; Mr. Petsos, For and Mayor Randels, For. CONSIDERATIONS: 3. Motion to Approve: Fire Service Automatic Aid Agreement with the city of Cocoa Beach. (Removed from Consideration.) Mr. Boucher stated that this item was removed from consideration. The item will appear on a subsequent City Council Agenda. City of cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 4 of 10 ORDINANCES: Second Public Hearin 4. Motion to Adopt: ordinance No. 034005; Amending chapter 110, Zoning; Amending the Procedure by Which Site Plans are Reviewed and Approved; Granting the city council Final Decision - Making Authority Regarding Site Plan Applications, at second reading. Mayor Randels read Ordinance No. 03 -2005 by title. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 110 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE, ZONING; AMENDING THE PROCEDURE BY WHICH SITE PLANS ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED; GRANTING THE CITY COUNCIL FINAL DECISION - MAKING AUTHORITY REGARDING SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCORPORATION INTO THE CODE; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Mayor Randels reviewed the background of the ordinance beginning on February 1, 2005. He stated that Section 110 -223 authorizes the city Council with site plan approval and the City Clerk provides notice of the Council's actions. The City Attorney noted that in Section 110 -223, Subparagraph (h), under Review Procedures, the additional language, "another' in front of public hearing. Mayor Randels clarified that this might interpret two hearings being held before the Planning and Zoning Board and not a second hearing being held before the City Council. Ms. Bea McNeely stated that two public hearings would be held, one by the Planning and Zoning Board and a subsequent hearing by the City Council. The City Attorney recommended the language, "upon receipt of the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation, the City council shall make a final decision on the application at a public hearing." Mr. Boucher expressed than an applicant should request a public hearing. Discussion followed on whether city Council's review should be at the applicant's request. Mr. Petsos noted that he preferred that the Planning and Zoning Board provide subsequent review to all applications approved with conditions, Attomey Garganese suggested the language "upon receipt of the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation, the applicant may submit an application for review." Ms. McNeely explained that the Board's intent was to ensure that the applicant was aware of a subsequent public meeting. Council concluded to retain the ordinance's original language. Attorney Garganese referred to Subparagraph 0} on Page 3 and said that the Planning and Zoning Board desired to eliminate this paragraph. Mayor Randels clarified to strike Line 5, Subparagraph 6) on Page 3. Attorney Garganese stated that these were not substantive changes. Mr. Leo Nicholas pointed out that the application form should explain the site plan review process. He stated that the Planning and Zoning Board makes recommendation with approval by the City Council Should be noted on the application. Mr. Morley reviewed the application guidelines Discussion followed on a time limit between the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation and City council's City of Gape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 5 of 10 approval. Mr. Morley expressed the need for expeditious review. The City Attorney would provide language to address the review process timeline for a site plan application. There was no public Comment. A motion was made by Mr. Petsos and seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Hoog to Adopt Ordinance No. 032005 at second reading. The vote on the motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tom Hoog, For; Mr. Miller, For; Mr. Petsos, For and Mayor Randels, For. ORDINANCES: First Public Hearin 51 Motion to Approve: ordinance No. 05 4005; Amending Chapter 102, Vegetation; Providing for Land Clearing Permit Requirements; Providing for Standards of Review; Providing for Rules and Regulations Regarding the Preservation of Trees; Providing for Trey Replacement Guidelines; Providing a Limited Exception for Land with Three or Fewer Residential Dwelling Units; Providing Conforming Amendments to Chapter 110, sections 588 Through 558, at first reading. Mayor Randels read Ordinance No. 05 -2005 by title. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 102 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, VEGETATION; PROVIDING FOR LAND CLEARING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING FOR STANDARDS OF REVIEW; PROVIDING FOR RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING THE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION OF TREES; PROVIDING FOR TREE REPLACEMENT GUIDELINES; PROVIDING A LIMITED EXCEPTION FOR LAND WITH THREE OR FEWER RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS; PROVIDING CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 110, SECTIONS 568 THROUGH 568; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCORPORATION INTO THE CODE; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Mr. Petsos requested to review the memo from the Planning and Zoning Board Chair to the City Council relating to undesirable trees. Mr. Boucher explained that eleven (11) trees were identified as susceptible to damage in storms. Ms. McNeely reviewed material from the book Stormsca in - to Minimize Wind Damage in Florida and suggested amendments to the existing acceptable vegetation list. Ms. McNeely related that the three worst trees identified were the Australian Fine, the Ficus and the Laurel oak. Mayor Randels Clarified the removal of the Water oak, Red Bud, drake Elm, Benjamina Ficus and Tabebuia to undesirable list. Mr. Todd Peetz, City Planner, stated that perhaps these trees Could be transferred to a list of lesser points and not as totally undesirable for planting. Mayor Pro Tern Hoog pointed out that the Water Oak was the identified acceptable tree over which the mitigation ordinance Came into discussion. Mayor Randels City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 5 of 10 concluded that if Water Oaks were added to the list, then these predominate specimen trees could be removed and the developer would not be obligated to provide mitigation. Mayor Randels stated that several elements in the ordinance were changed. He noted on Page S, Section 102 -38, land that contained three or less lots was exempt. Mr. Petsos replied that these would be addressed at a later time. Mayor Randels affirmed that the mitigation table was in the City Council Agenda packet. Attorney Garganese stated that he included in Section 102-36 that planting preferred plant material would offer substantial mitigation credits. Mayor Randels pointed out that the ordinance outlined that no trees shall be planted under power lines. He also stated that no more than 25 percent of one tree species could be planted. Mr. Todd Peetz related that one application with a four -unit town house necessitated planting the majority of trees in the back of the dwelling. He expressed that in the future the City might need to amend the code to allow for wider garages in order to make room for landscaping in front of the dwelling. A motion was made by Mr. Petsos and seconded by Mr. Miller to Approve Ordinance No. 05 -2005 at first reading. The vote on the motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tom Hoog, For; Mr. Miller, For; Mr. Petsos, For and Mayor Randels, For. SITE PLAN: 5. Motion to Approve: Madison Cay Revised Site Plan. Mayor Pro Tom Hoog requested to Abstain from Voting on the Item since he is the electrician of record. Mayor Randels pointed out that originally the Shores of Artesia was approved with a swimming pool on its 1985 vested site plan. He stated that the former owner obtained a building permit in 1985 to install a maintenance shed on the premises. Mayor Randels noted the location of a small concrete building. He stated that the most recent owner desires to amend the pool to create six additional parking spaces. Ms. McNeely related that Mr. Roger Smith had no concern if the shed were removed. Mr. Smith affirmed that parking was a more defined need than a pool. He said that all current residents had no problem with removing the pool. Ms. Collette Cannon stated that she had a contract with Mr. Smith for the shed. Mr. Petsos expressed concern that the City is named as requiring the additional parking in place of the pool. For the record, Mr. Smith affirmed that he had nineteen signed contracts that affirmed that the prospective residents were aware that the pool was not forthcoming and he accepted the responsibility for making the amendment from a swimming pool to parking spaces. Mr. Boucher reviewed the elements in the Site Plan packet as: the Planning and Zoning Board recommendation letter, the site plan review recommendation, staff comments, the Planning and Zoning Board recommendation dated February 23, 2005 including a cut sheet without the storage shed, a ropy of the original vested site plan, a cut sheets with the storage shed and no swimming pool, and a letter from Nis. Collette Cannon dated February 28, 2005. Mr. Boucher concluded that Council action was needed on the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 7 of 10 Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation. Mr. Boucher explained that the City Planner's correspondence notes that the removal of the shed would create additional parking. Mayor Randels read that in the 1985 zoning regulations, when the site plan was vested, only two parking spaces were required per unit. Mr. Petsos noted that the Building Official stated further that a variance was necessary since the storage shed did not meet the setback requirement and he asked for clarification on the issue to retain the storage shed. Ms. Collette Cannon stated that she developed the Shores of Artesia in 1985 that required only two parking spaces at that time. The utility building was constructed in February 1985. She informed Mr. Smith that she wanted to protect the residents that live in the 21 townhomes and Mr. Smith was aware of the conditions of sale. She expressed that she does not want the utility building removed and the 21 residents have rights to the shed. Mr. Peetz explained that when the City received the application, staff was unaware of the existence of a shed. If the City had all of the information at the time of the application, he would have noted an error in that the building was not part of the vested site plan and that it was not within the required setbacks. He clarified two errors as: 1) the building was not part of the approved site plan of 1954, and 2} the building was too close to the property line that makes the building a variance requirement. Mr. Peetz stated further that when the building permit was approved, it created an error and vesting the site plan with the building created an additional error. Attorney Garganese stated that Council determined the site plan was vested and the vested site plan showed no building. However, since the vesting it was found that a permitted building application was issued in error for a maintenance shed building. The permit was issued after the site plan was approved. Attorney Garganese stated that the Building official at that time did not have the authority to sign off on a building permit that was not in compliance. The vested site plan did not have a building on it. He concluded that the building would need to either be removed or approved. Attorney Garganese asked if there were any other legal interest in the property. Mr. Smith replied no however he had an agreement with Ms. Cannon. Ms. Cannon affirmed that agreement. Mr. Boucher pointed out that the Building permit was not tied to a particular lot. Mr. Smith restated that he was agreeable to have the maintenance shed remain on the property. However, he did not want the shed to jeopardize acquiring Certificates of Occupancy on his project. Mr. Boucher contended that there were no facts on record to ascertain that a City official ever inspected the shed to state that it was completed as permitted. Ms. Cannon stated that Mr. Ards Gunn, former Building official, signed off on the project. Attorney Garganese referred to Paragraph 88, part of the Vested Rights Order. Mayor Randels read, "The City Council also recognizes the unique and extraordinary nature of this situation, the likes of which may not be seen again in the City of Cape Canaveral. Due to its unique character, it is the intention of the City Council that this determination of vested rights be limited to the individual and distinct facts of this application, and that its decision not be construed as precedential authority." City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City council Regular Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 8 of 10 A motion was made by Mr. Petsos and seconded by Mr. Miller to Approve the Vested Site Plan for Madison Day to Allow the Garage to Remain on the Premises and to Amend the Site Plan to Remove the Swimming Pool and to Develop Six (6) Parking Spaces. The vote on the motion carried 3-0 with voting as follows: Mr. Miller, For; Mr, Petsos, For and Mayor Randels, For. DISCUSSION: T. Canaveral Drainage Ditch Easements. Mr. Jeff Ratliff, Stormwater Coordinator, explained what was depicted on the area map and said that he included photos of the ditch. Mayor Randels noted the varied size of the easements. Mr. Boucher replied that there has been much discussion on how to develop the ditch. He stated that in order to proceed with development, the City would need to secure easement rights from Wendy's restaurant. Attorney Garganese replied to Mayor Randels that easements might not be needed where the ditch falls naturally within the required boundaries. Mr. Petsos inquired about a prototype to allow the area residents to gain buy -in on the project. Mr. Boucher stated that he wants Mr. Ratliff to seek grant funding to stabilize the shoreline. Mr. Ratliff informed he noticed erosion and water quality would improve with a stabilization project. Mayor Randels expressed the Council's support. REPORTS: 11 City Manager • Mr. Boucher announced the City Attorney distributed the proposed joint use agreement with the School Board for an after -hours playground at Cape View Elementary School. Mayor Pro Tem Hoog expressed concern with authorization for continued use if the School Board closed the school and asked that the Council to consider a provision to buy the playground area within the Agreement. • Mr. Boucher noted that the waiver on the hurricane related damage permits ceased today. Mayor Pro Tern Hoog inquired about the remaining level of damage. He requested an additional two weeks. Mr. Morley pointed out that the farther the City extended from the time of the hurricane, the City might become susceptible to fraudulent claims. ADD ON ITEM A motion was made by Mr. Petsos and seconded by Mr. Miller for an Add-on Item. The vote on the motion carried 44 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Hoog, For; Mr. Miller, For; Mr, Petsos, For and Mayor Randels, For. Discussion clarified that the waiver on hurricane related damage would occur in the Hometown News and on the City marquee. �., The chair clarified a Motion to Approve a Waiver for currently Recorded Building Permits Due to Hurricane Related Damage Until June 3g, 2006 and for unrecorded Building Permits City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting April 5, 2405 Page 9 of 10 Due to Hurricane Related Damage Until April 19, 2006. The vote on the motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tern Hoog, For; Mr. Miller, For; Mr. Petsos, For and Mayor Randels, For. Mr. Boucher reported that round -trip airfare to Portugal at $1,100. He stated that he would like to invite City Board members; however, they are responsible for their own expenses. Mr. Boucher would obtain an itinerary from the Portuguese host. 2. Staff Building official ■ Mr. Morley announced that the Building Department issued the first certificates of Occupancy for Majestic Bay. ■ Mr. Money also noted the construction activity at the hotel sites. Stormwater Coordinator • Mr. Ratliff' announced that he would attend a Beach Re- nourishment meeting. City clerk ■ Ms. Stills announced that cape Canaveral would host the space coast League of Cities dinner on Monday, April 11 th at the Radisson Resort. ■ Ms. Stills also announced the passing of the Town of Melbourne Beach, City clerk, Cindy Masny. -- city Attorney Attorney Garganese informed that the County has a Statutory obligation to maintain County roads once a road meets a collective road designation. Mr. Petsos requested to extend the City Council meeting for an additional fifteen minutes. The Chair acknowledged the request. Attorney Garganese informed of a case in the City of Miami Beach in which the Florida Supreme Court ruled for the first time in a 4 -3 decision that a beach -side City has the responsibility to inform of "natural transient hazards: for example, rip tides, sharks and jelly fish. The City could incur liability for natural occurrences. AUDIENCE To BE HEARD: Mr. Leo Nicholas asked if the City had recognized the passing of Jackie Coates, former Business and Cultural Development Board member. Mayor Randels announced her memorial service date on Wednesday, April 6 th at 6:00 P.M. at Beckman Funeral Home in Cocoa Beach. I city council Mr. Petsos Mr. Petsos inquired about the 24-hour service from law enforcement personnel. Mr. Boucher replied that the precinct would upgrades to ensure security. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 14 of 10 Mr. Petsos asked how the County was proceeding with the vacation rental ordinance. He pointed out activity on Presidential and Aurora Court. Code Enforcement will investigate. Mr. Petsos asked that staff look at the sidewalk from the Radisson Resort to the traffic light at Central Blvd. Mr. Miller • No report. Mayor Pro Tom Moog • Mayor Pro Tem Hoog reported on Legislative Day in Tallahassee. He reported on a proposed desalinization plant in the Port area. He met with Representative Bob Allen and Senator Mike Haridopolous. He remarked on the mix -use zoning in the Tallahassee area. • Mayor Pro Tem Hoog inquired about the sidewalk at Radisson Resort. The City Manager would provide a status report. ADJOURNMNT There being no further business, the Chair adjourned the meeting at 1 •19 P.M. (2, C�K UA - - ,, - - - ...... Rocky 13 '4 AYOR Susan tills, CITY.. CLERK WHO MUST FILE FORM 813 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea- sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whore he or she is retained (including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law, mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min- utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the for in the minutes. (Continued on other side) CE FORM 813 - EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 'I APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST hereby disclose that on __ (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain or loss; -__ inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, _ inured to the special gain or loss of- whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of _ _ _ ---- _-- ______ is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: AV1710 r o ate. e " ! ww- P . oci s ------ — - - - -- -- -- - - - - -- ------------- - - - - -- Date Filed Signature - -: 20 by which NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $1 0,000. CE FORM 8B - EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2