Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP & Z January 23, 2008 City of Cape Canaveral PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING CITY HALL ANNEX 111 POLK AVENUE JANUARY 23,2008 AGENDA 7:30 P.M. Call to Order Roll Call NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes: December 12,2007. 2. Election of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson. 3. Review and Recommendation to City Council Re: Burger King Site Plan - Tracy E. Kirkland, Interplan LLC, Agent for Burger King Corporation. 4. Presentation & Discussion Re: Ideas for a Citizen Awareness Participation Plan (CAPP) - William Mays, Presenter. 5. Discussion Re: Mixed Use Development - Todd Peetz, City Planner. 6. Discussion Re: Building Height in Commercial Districts - Todd Peetz, City Planner. 7. Discussion Re: Planning & Zoning Board's Priorities for the year. OPEN DISCUSSION ADJOURN Pursuant to Section 286.1015, F.S., the City hereby advises the public that: If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Board with respect to any matter rendered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, itvhich record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not constitute consent by the City for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by law. This meeting may include the attendance of one or more members of the Cape Canaveral City Council, Board of Adjustment, Code Enforcement and/or Community Appearance Board 'vvho mayor may not participate in Board discussions held at this public meeting. Personsl'1t'~t~ ~bilities~7edi'l!li assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should 'ffi~iYi\g . f:J~o/8~ fl}~2 g~f11~~lfe~&~m~~~e meeting. 1. -.. : 82-1222 .. FAX: (321) 868-1247 www.myflorida.com/cape .. email: ccapecanavera1@cfl.rr.com PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2007 A Regular Meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board was held on December 12, 2007, at the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida. Chairperson Bea McNeely called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The Secretary called the rol/. MEMBERS PRESENT Bea McNeely Chairperson Lamar Russell Vice Chairperson John Fredrickson Donald Dunn Harry Pearson John Johanson 1 st Altemate MEMBERS ABSENT Ronald Friedman 2nd Alternate OTHERS PRESENT Robert Haag Mayor Pro Tern Shannon Roberts Council Member Kate Latorre Assistant City Attorney Todd Morley Building Official Todd Peetz City Planner Susan Chapman Board Secretary NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes: November 28. 2007. Motion by Lamar Rusself, seconded by Bea McNeely, to approve the meeting minutes of November 28,2007. Vote on the motion carried unanimously. 2. Presentation & Discussion Re: Sheldon Cove Plaza Proiect Concept - Arthur Berger. Presenter. At the request of City Council, Bill Mays, General Partner, Sheldon Cove, LLP, gave a power-point presentation of a proposed Sheldon Cove Plaza project that he was very interested in pursuing. He advised that the project would be located at the Northeast corner of the intersection of Astronaut and Central Boulevards, and the project cost would be approximately $30 million. ( ~ \ t '1 \, 1/ '<........--....". Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes December 12, 2007 Mr. Mays advised that the project would encompass a 200,000 sq. ft. building and would be of 21st Century architectural design. It will have 40,000 sq. ft. of upscale retail and professional services space, and 160,000 sq. ft. of executive offices. He explained that the project would provide a place for residents to shop and dine; and provide a place for legal, medical, and business professionals to conduct business, while providing needed services to residents. He noted that the project would create approximately 1 ,272 new jobs, with an average annual salary of $72,303. Direct financial benefits to the City would include: annual tax revenues, impact fees to support City operations, business licensing fees, and increased property values. The Board members reviewed various schematic drawings of the proposed plaza. Mr. Mays advised that the plaza would require an increase to the current height restriction for commercial buildings. He explained that in order to meet current building codes and needs of the tenants; the proposed structure would be five stories, with a building height of 65 ft. The current restrictions did not allow construction of structures over 45 ft. He asked if the City desired a building with beautiful and creative architecture, as shown in the presentation, or a 45 ft. box shaped building. He voiced his opinion that the location of the plaza would not create any dramatic change of view for residents, nor directly affect any residential neighborhood, because it would be completely surrounded by commercial property. Mr. Mays concluded his presentation. The Board members held discussion. Chairperson, Bea McNeely, questioned what the traffic impact would be? Arthur Berger, Sheldon Cove representative, answered that a traffic study was performed when the 8810 Astronaut Boulevard building was constructed, and the traffic impact was less than a 1 % increase. City Planner, Todd Peetz, advised that this new project would create a lot of peak hour trips, because of the types of uses. Mr. Berger responded that another tiaffic study would need to be done if this new project was approved. Mr. Peetz suggested that a traffic study be performed, as soon as possible. Donald Dunn questioned how the South bound traffic would enter the project? Mr. Berger responded that there was a turn lane on Central Boulevard. Harry Pearson requested that Sheldon Cove create a Citizen Awareness and Participation Plan (CAPP) and have meetings for public input regarding the proposed project. Mr. Mays advised that he would like the citizens to know what they were proposing, and welcomed their input and suggestions. He added that he would definitely be interested in public communications throughout the entire project. Council Member, Shannon Roberts, stated for the record, that a community survey was performed by the City's Business and Cultural Development Board, which was a City supported survey, and the City had received statistically significant feedback from the survey regarding the residents' wants and needs. ( ~) \......~/ Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes December 12,2007 Vice Chairperson, Lamar Russell, advised that on December 12, 2007, the City Council asked the Planning & Zoning Board to evaluate and make recommendations to the City Council regarding this concept. Mr. Russell commented that traffic was a large concern. Although this project was not going to significantly impact the existing traffic, because the project would be located at the North end of the City's main corridor; therefore, the traffic from this project should not impact the rest of the City. Mr. Russell questioned if the City wanted to continue restricting commercial building height to 45 ft., which looks like a big square box; or consider increasing the height? He also questioned how the City could allow what was being requested? Mr. Russell questioned how the Board could study and recommend a 65 ft. height limit? He advised that the existing process would require a zoning amendment. Mr. Russell outlined the following options to increase height: Option #1 Sheldon Cove, LLP could request a zoning amendment. (Which he noted would be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board.) Option #2 The Planning & Zoning Board could recommend a zoning amendment to the City Council to allow 65 ft. height for this one project Option #3 The Planning & Zoning Board could recommend 65 ft. height for defined lot depths along A 1 A Option #4 The planning & Zoning Board couid incorporate 65 ft. height allowance into the Mixed Use Development (MUD) consideration. In which, the City Council could approve specific MUD sites, with recommendation from the Planning & Zoning Board. Mr. Russell commented that the proposed project was worthy of serious consideration, because it was a good project that would support today's market. He asked the Board members to be opened minded in considering this concept. He noted that Sheldon Cove was the first to consider this concept, and their project could be a forerunner for future commercial projects. He recommended that mixed-use developments be considered on a site-by-site basis. Mr. Mays confirmed that residential was not a consideration for this project. i" ;;, \) l]/ Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes Page 4 Discussion was held regarding height limit. Mr. Dunn advised that he saw a problem with South bound traffic, and a problem with increasing the height to 65 ft.. He suggested that the City consider increasing the height limitation to 100 ft.. Ms. McNeely commented that the voters previously made it clear that changing the rules for one development was not fair; other requests to increase height had been turned-down; the 45 ft. height limit was based on a referendum, and past history. Mr. Johanson advised that the referendum was done in the 1970's (34 years ago). Ms. McNeely rebutted that the City has held the line for so long, and questioned why the City was now considering increasing the 45 ft. height limitation for this one project. Mr. Johanson suggested that the Board members be opened minded. He added that this idea was part of the planning duties of the Board. Mr. Russell agreed with Ms. McNeely, that thei City has defended the line, which got the City to where it is today. He commented that Cape Canaveral is a community of choice, and now it was time for change, on a case by case basis, and the City would still be able to control the overall height. Mr. Pearson advised that the CAPP would answer what the citizens want. Chairperson McNeely announced that due to the time and lengthy agenda, the Board would continue this discussion at another meeting. The Board made no recommendation to the City Council. 3. Discussion Re: Creating a Zoning Matrix - Todd Peetz. Citv Planner. Todd Peetz, City Planner, explained that a zoning matrix had been suggested as part of the land Development Code review. He advised that the proposed zoning matrix had been updated to reflect the comments from the November 28, 2007 Planning & Zoning Board meeting. The Board members reviewed the updated matrix. Todd Morley, Building Official, stated that he supported approval of the matrix; and commented that it should have been created a long time ago. Kate latorre, Assistant City Attorney, questioned if the matrix was going to be part of the City code. lamar Russell suggested that the matrix be used as a tool for the Building department staff and the public. Bea McNeely suggested that the matrix be named "Summary Zoning Code Matrix". Discussion followed regarding setbacks. Todd Peetz advised that he would update the matrix, based on the Board's discussion, and bring the matrix back to the Board for recommended approval. Motion by Bea McNeely, seconded by Donald Dunn, to continue this agenda item at the next meeting. Vote on the motion carried unanimously. /' (j/ Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes Page 5 Lamar Russell suggested that the order of agenda, items #4 and #5, be switched. Bea McNeely polled the Board members. All the Board members agreed to move the order of the agenda items. 4. Review and Recommendation to City Council Re: Consideration of a Citizen Awareness and Participation Plan (CAPP) Process - Todd Peetz, City Planner. Todd Peetz, City Planner, advised that residents had made comments during some of the recent City Council and Planning & Zoning Board meetings, regarding the developer of Sheldon Cove not discussing the proposed project with them. He explained that there was no requirement to have community meetings with residents or neighboring property owners with developers. He stated that the creation of the CAPP process would have the developer meet with residents to discuss and resolve community issues, before bringing the project to public hearings. He noted that at the November 28, 2007 Planning & Zoning Board meeting, the Board members expressed interest as to how the CAPP would be implemented. He advised that the Board did not want to add time and cost to the City, or an impediment to a developer. The Board members reviewed the City of Vvinter Springs CAPP Handbook. Discussion followed. The Board members questioned if there would be associated costs to the developer; would there be City expenses; how should the City encourage early and effective citizen participation; notification requirements; project delays; and encouraging, not requiring, a formal report from the developer; if the CAPP was already implemented, would the tank farm issues be resolved; should Sheldon Cove have participation with the entire City; should the notification be extended past 500 ft.; should the media be involved; how should the citizens be approached; how much time would be involved with the City staff and the Board; and should the CAPP apply to a single family development? Bill Mays, developer, advised that the City was made up of a lot of renters, not just property owners. Dawn Mays advised that they would like the opportunity to come back to the City with ideas of how to communicate with the public and present viable statistics. Discussion followed. Motion by Bea McNeely, seconded by Donald Dunn, to table this agenda item until Mr. Mays comes back with ideas to implement the CAPPo Discussion followed. Mr. Mays advised that he should have some information by the January 9th, 2008 meeting. Vote on the motion carried unanimously. b Planning & Zoning Board December 12,2007 Page 6 5. Discussion Re: Creatino an Open Space Provision - Todd Peetz. City Planner. Todd Peetz, City Planner, advised that at recent City workshops and City Council meetings, the topic of open space had come up. He explained that there were concerns regarding not enough open space being required. He further explained that generally, open space for an individual lot was provided through setbacks and necessary drainage areas. He advised that setbacks are used for parking; drainage; and in some cases can be located underground; or in small townhouse projects, the drainage could be located at one end of the property or the other. He advised that the Board packet included information pertaining to how open space is provided for in other communities. He noted that open space is often required in Planned Unit Developments (PUD), just like in the City's Residential Planned Unit Development Code Section 110-438. He noted that at the November 28, 2007 Planning & Zoning Board meeting, it was requested that staff bring back open space and green space definitions that are being used by similarly situated cities. He advised that the Board packet contained those definitions. He highlighted the various cities definitions of open space; and noted that Cape Canaveral would be the first city to have green space defined in their code. Bea McNeely commented that she would like to see more vegetative open space. Mr. Peetz suggested that the City include vegetation with open space. He noted that the current City code did not require any open space. He noted that up to 50% of property could be used for ponding in some of the other cities codes; and that 30% of open space seemed viable for both residential and commercial. He advised that the City may want to establish a minimum lot size before requiring green space. He stated that in his opinion open space was the same as green space. He advised that open space would need to be defined and then the Board would need to figure out how it should be applied. He stated that the way to get more open space/green space was for the City to increase minimum Jot sizes. Due to the time, Chairperson McNeely polled the Board members to continue discussion at another meeting. All the Board members agreed. 6. Discussion RA: Verification of Minimum 5 Acres for Hotel Sites - Residence Inn and Country Inn & Suites - Todd Peetz. City Planner. ~) Planning & Zoning Board December 12, 2007 Page 7 Todd Peetz, City Planner, advised that the existing hotel sites in question met the minimum five acres requirement, with the Residence Inn site having 6.23 acres, which includes the South out-parcel for the proposed Burger King; and Country Inn & Suites having 7.17 acres. John Fredrickson questioned what the City's recourse would be if the hotels did not have the required minimum acreage? Todd Peetz answered that they would be considered non-conforming and would need to be replatted to meet the minimum five acres requirement. Kate Latorre, Assistant City Attorney, added that the parcels could not have been subdivided without prior approval from the City. Lamar Russell commented that the property owners just need to make sure they keep a minimum of five acres for the hotel sites. Kate Latorre advised that staff would look into the matter of the Burger King and HertZ Rent-A-Car out-parcels, and would report her findings back to the Board. OPEN DISCUSSION Todd Morley, Building Official, advised that staff was working on a new procedure for courtesy notices to residents within a 500 ft. radius for the Board's consideration at an upcoming meeting. Todd Peetz, City Planner, advised that the Florida Redevelopment Association could provide an associate to review, comment, and make suggestions to the Board about mixed use developments; however, the City would need to provide per diem and overnight hotel accommodations to send the associate to speak to the Board. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 10:07 p.m. Bea McNeely, Chairperson Susan L. Chapman, Secretary lY Meeting Type: Planning & Zoning Borad Meeting Meeting Date: 1/23/08 AGENDA Heading Election of Chairperson Item 2 No. AGENDA REPORT PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: Election of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson for 2008. DEPT.IDNISION: Building Department Requested Action: Nominate and Elect a Chairperson and Vice Chairperson for 2008. Summary Explanation & Background: The Planning and Zoning Board have a Chairperson who chair's (leads) the meeting. In the event the Chairperson is not present at the meeting or wishes to "pass the gavel," then the Vice Chairperson acts as the chair of the meeting. The elections are generally held at the fIrst meeting of the year. In 2007, the Chairperson was Ms. Beatrice McNeely and Vice Chairman was Mr. Lamar Russell. I I Exhibits Attached: City Pianner's Office Department: Building Department ;' /7 l ~I \k~' Meeting Type: Planning & Zoning Borad Meeting Meeting Date: l/23/08 AGENDA Heading Review and Recommend Item 3 No. AGENDA REPORT PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: Review and Recommend to City Council the proposed Burger King Site Plan DEPT./DIVISION: Building Department Requested Action: Review and Recommend to the City Council the proposed Burger King Site Plan Summary Explanation & Background: The proposed Burger King site plan is located as an out parcel of the Residence Inn, which is located at the south side of the entrance to Residence Inn on AlA. The proposal is to build a 2221 s.[ building with 25 parking spaces, plus 2 handicapped spaces. This property also represents an out parcel north of the Race Trac Service Station. I I I Exhibits Attached: Staff Reports and Site Plan I City Planner's Office Department: Building Department o- f q' l \, '''....~-"'' City of Cape Canaveral Burger King Site Plan Applicant: Tracy Kirkland Location: Section 24 Township 37 Range 15 Proposed Amendment Acreage: C-l Commercial: 1.43 +/- Acres Permitted 15 DU per acre: Commercial C-1 N/ A Proposed Number of Units: N/A Proposed Density: N/A Current Future Land Use: Commercial C-l Current Zoning: Commercial C-1 Description: The applicant proposes to construct an 18.25 foot high, 2,221 square foot Burger King on a 1.43 acre lot. The subject site is an outparcel of the larger 7.66 ALA Acquisition Group LTD parcel, located adjacent to and west of Astronaut Boulevard and north of West Central Boulevard. North South East West Zoning C-I Commercial C-I Commercial ROW C-l Commercial and R-3 Residential Comp Plan C-I Commercial C-l Commercial ROw C-I Commercial and R-3 Residential I ~xis~~~ Hertz Rental Cars Vacant! Outparcel ROW The Residence Inn I CondltlOlls I Marriott Public Services and Facilities in Amendment Area: The Level of Service for parks and recreation is one (2) acres of park land per 1,000 residents. Approximately twenty-four (24) acres of park land exist in Cape Canaveral. This equates to a population of approximately 12,000 residents. The City's population as of April, 2006 was 10,317. There is still adequate park space available. / "- ! . ,. '~ \ ! // ,~< --,/ North Atlantic is operating at Level of Service "D" with 261 available peak hour trips from George King to Central Blvd. North Atlantic from Central Blvd to AlA has a level of Service is "D" with 277 excess trips. If developed as proposerl, the site cOllld generate 121 pm peak hour trips. The City of Cape Canaveral provides wastewater treatment. The wastewater treatment capacity is 1.8 million gallons per day (MGD). The existing usage is 1.17 MGD with an excess capacity of .63 MGD. There is adequate wastewater treatment capacity available. The City of Cocoa has a total capacity of 56 MGD and currently provides 48 MGD. Approximately 24.4 MGD of water is being used on an average daily basis, leaving 23.6 MGD available. There is adequate potable water service available with the proposed change. Brevard County provides facilities for solid waste disposal. At this time, the County does not foresee any deficiency with their solid waste facilities. Environmental Description of Amendment Area: The site is Canaveral Complex sand soil (ype. C~~averal Complex soils are nearly level and gently sloping soils that are a mixture of sand and shell fragments. The water table is between depths of 10 and 40 inches for 2 to 4 months a year. There appear to be no wetlands on site. Wetland determinations or verification are permitted by St. Johns River Water Management District. There is no known Aquifer Recharge or Floodplain areas associated with this parcel. There are also no known endangered species living on the site. Historical and Archaeological Resources in Amendment Area: There are no known historical or archaeological resources on site. Population Projections and Trends: The average household size is 2.37 persons. This project is for commercial development, and is not expected to directly generate any additional persons. \ l ' MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Morley Building Official FROM: Walter Bandish/Jeff Ratliff City of Cape Canaveral 868-1240 DATE: 12/20/07 RE: Burger King Site Plan Review - 2nd Submittal Public Works staff has reviewed the referenced site plan submittal and has no additional comments. Further review will be conducted during the permitting process for compliance of all local and state codes. The Engineer-of-Record is responsible for any requirements not identified by the City. (1. Page 1 of 1 Todd Peetz --------~._---- -...-~----------,..-.- From: John Cunningham [jcunningham@ccvfd.org] To: Todd Peetz Subject: Re: Burger King (Site Plan) Todd, We have reviewed the site plan and have no comments at this time. Under Florida Statute 668.6076, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing. This message contains information which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended only for the individual{s) named. If you are not an addressee; any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender by reply e- mail and destroy the original message and all copies. Messages sent to and from us may be monitored. (v.le) 1/15/2008 (\ //' ......~ ' January 4, 2008 SSA Mr. Todd Peetz Miller-Legg & Associates 631 South Orlando Avenue Suite 200 Winter Park, FL 32789 RE: Site Plan - Burger King - Review #2 SSA Job No. 05-0025, Task 55-1004 Dear Mr. Peetz: SSA has reviewed the above-referenced project and based on our review, SSA recommends said plan for City approval. This reVi8\V does not relieve the applicant from other local. state, and federal agencies having jurisdiction over the project site. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Stottler Stagg & Associates Architects, Engineers, Planners, Inc. --)1 /}~~ c:. v {~{ c/f~-v- - John A. Pekar, PE Sr. Vice President - City Engineer /' '\ ( City Engineer's Review Fee for Review #2 = Included in 1st Review I NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL FEES I As this project is being reviewed under the original City contract, Engineering Fees for all reviews after 2nd review will be billed at $95.00 per hour. SIUTI1ER srAGG & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PlANNERS,INC. 8680 North Atlantic Avenue P. O. Box 1630 Cape Canaveral. Florida 32920 Tel 321-783-1320 Fax 321-783-7065 (1t1 :J Uc. fMCOOO329 J1EBOOOO762 fLB0006700 J:\CIVILiProjectsICAPE\20071J-burger king review 2. APPROVE.doc "-....~,,___;...f Memorandum To: Todd Morley, Building Official From: Todd Peetz, City Planner Date: January 15, 2008 Re: Burger King Site Plan Review I have reviewed the Burger King Site Plan and have one comment at this time. A replat is required to complete the site plan. If you have any questions, or need further information please feel free to contact me at 407-629-8880. (!<; ~.. Page 1 of 1 ~ ( \~ '''..''---/- http://www.brevardpropertyappraiser.comlscripts/esrirnap.dll?narne=Brevardl&id=200801...1/16/2008 Page 1 of 1 "''tM~'' ~ \\'\' ~~-f~~\~ , '" ., \ ""'",,\ < \ ., (0; http://www.brevardpropertyappraiser.com/scripts/esrimap.dB ?name= Brevard 1 &id=20080 1... 1/ 16/2008 CITY OF CAPE CANA VERAL SITE PLAN PAYMENT RECEIPT Project N a11le: Bu ~ EI2..1<uJ.'t- . __..____w~ _. m _ __._,_____~__~_"'_,_"'____._w _..._ .--- .-- . -" - RESIDENTIAL: 1 2 & 3 R 'd ti lIT 't CFA'FAf ~ 5(1n.--..--- ...... n m --..-.. ---.. . --- . .L .. .1< eSl en a. ill S- m .".....;..,;.;..;;.~;;~;.;-;-;-;;::.:.;:_:n _.. ...... :.u . .'- ". . . .. .. Total # of Units? - (4) or more Residential Units $50.00 (1st (4) Units), $50.00 Plus Units @ $7.50 per unit $ 'I'otal;.$ ---- COMMERCIAL: $150 per acre of land, or portion thereof. ~ Acres X $150 TOT AL:...............$~ SITE PLAN EXTENSION:............... ............ ...... ....... ...... .... TOTAL:........... .....$150. 00 SITE PLAN RESUBMISSION: 50% of original fee.........TOTAL:..............$ -------------------------=~~------------------~------------ -------------~~=--------------~---------------------------- DEPOSIT TOWARDS REVIEW FEES: RESIDENTIAL: 1 to 4 Units ...................... $700.00 Over 4 Units to 50 Units.................. $1,800.00 Over 50 Units or HoteljMoteL......$2,800.00 COlvIlvIERCIAL: V"'Up to 4 Acres.................$t800.00 Over 4 up to 8 Acres.....$2;300.00 Over 8 Acres - Review fee to be established after pre- application meeting based on hourly rates estimated in Exhibit A of City Engineer contract. Total Acres: \. 43 Office Use Only: Escrow Account # 1-202.2400 ----------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------~= TOTAL REVIEW DEPOSIT RECEIVED: $ f I BC>O ( c;s! TOTAL SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL FEE RECEIVED: $ /:}/-4 50 ~. r:)_iJ,~ TE RE(~\lrn ( <7\ PAID RECEIPT NO. \lY @11l9rQ?!.5:2B04772 PUI PlU 2 $214.50, . r~_ __ ,..~ .-- 1\ /d.- /'1 f'!:7 ;.-{ /") ,'7 .... APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN"REvlE1V FEE: tff!.jO 14.5D DATE: \ t-.!OVEHBEt, 2cc, PROJECT NA.v!E: 13ut;>~~ ~UJ,~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~ It> ~ 24. 2'1'I'5.Q<). QX)2.':i.D-ClO:IO.OO fl.U.i.. I.wt..I'HIIlIWl) ~ CoVEll S~ (c.,) '* EN..Ii ~f Of et..tu~~__ ~..... ...... __ --- -O-YV"\~R(S) XA_\IE: Bu~_Ee.. \s(l~ (' nP.PoeAnofIJ. O\\-:\TR(Si ADDRESS: ~S05 ~WE LAGtw...a D2\~ ~ 14.tAMl, FL. ~3l2~ PBOr--iE l\L-:\illER: SQ,. ~. l~ (eo.J'CPCr: LUIS e, ,,~) l\"A...\IE OF P..RCBITECT/E::.\"G:L\EER: _\\.l.l"'2.P\..,kU LLc... PHO~\E l\l?rillER: Ao1. "4-5' ~ APPLICA.\TS SIGNATIKE: ~tt;,1f'41{ - 1RICf E. Kl~ O'rY~E OR AGENJ - PHO~E ?\L?rffiER: 32\. ~~ ~'2.5 1/95 .- SITE PLAN APPROVAL lNFORlVIATION SlTE PL~'"\I APPROVAL PROCEDURE: Step 1. Site PIan L - I\-ew commercial building or structure? - - ~-ew residenti:J.l structures with three or more dwelling uni ts? -- Commerci:J.1 addirions exceeding 850 sauare feet? ~ ~ - - If yes bas bee n ch eol; ed 0 u 'II1cL-'lfth "-'In 0 v e,-:LSit"-f>laa-snbmimtanar e ;'1"';'-- -------is-required:-----------~- Step 2. Submir five (5'., copies of the sire pbn signed and sealed by a ProfeSSion:rl Engineer, licensed in the State of Florida along with a filing fee to the Building Department 30 days prior to the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. (The Board meets the 2nd and 4th Wednesday of every month.) The Bnilding Department shall distribute the site plans to the following departments and return comments to the applicant within 10 days of its sub mi uaL 1. Cit:- Engine€r j Building Depan:rnent 3', Fire Officbl 4. Florida Department of Environmental Protet:tion (if appropriate) Step 3, The applic:lnt shall return uine (9) copies of the revised site plan along with written responses to all comments at Iea.st seven (7) days prior to a Pbnning and Zoning meeting. Step 4, CompU:J.nce with Stormw:J.te~ Concurrency IYbnagement. S te n 5. The Building Dep:1rtment will return one (1) copy of the site plan to the .. applic.::mt m::lrked with the Board's approval subject to contingencies (if appiiClbIe.) ..... SITE PLAN CHECKLIST ... --SITE PLi;.l'{ Ir,1l0RivIATION: (G€neral) Yes 1\0 1\.A. L - - Size, height~ number of units and location of proposed and existing structures. -L Dimensions . - - -L~~ ~--J:gu~-aF~.l--afltl-l'=ge aevotea to structures, - parking and bndscaping. - - / ;...- umber of unitS -L - - :\u.mber of parking spaces and loading zones V Traffic flow diagram - - ./ Density (units per acre) - - LOc.:J.tion and dimension for the fOlIowin2: are:.1S: ,/ Parkes) - - V Canal(s) - - - - ./ \Yater~.av(s) .. - - ~ Boat sIip(s) / - - Parking - - L Swimming pool(s) ../ - - Driveway(s) ./ Recreation -- - SITE PLAt'.; CHECKLIST (COlfIlNUED) PAGE 2 - ./ T r:J.Sh - - ./ Sidewalks - - - ./ Dune crossovers J - - ~ ./ Other (specify) i - - . ~ .... ./' - --=-__________I~~i1fj:J1s:19~Qre _fa r-~-om.munaLtr_ash-containeF(5~ --"----,-----._,~---_.._"..._- ~ L - - Fire alarm and st3.ndpipe data - /' 'Vicinir:-" map ; X- - - .L Location of planned bndscaping ~ - - t Finished ~des for the folIowin~: r I i ./ I I Entire parcel I - - - ! .:L - - Finished floors ./ Streets V' - - V ParkinlJ" lots I - - :::: I I I ./ Sidewalks I ~ - - ,/ - - 10" of adjoining property DetaiI<:. s€{'tions and specifications - ~ Street lights ./ . "'-... \Yater and sewer - - .... SITE PLAN CHECKLIST (CO~I1i'{UED) . PAGEl " - Yes No N vi' Pa ving and drainage - - - -L - - Curbs L - - Storm drains L - - Sidewalks . ./- - ------- - - -- E nzin e~r: s5€3.L-OIi -dra-wings---- ~--- - -- - ---- --------- - Sauare foot..::l2"e of huildin2" are3S ../ Living - - .... - ./ Parking - - - - - L Other (spe-dfy) L - - T otaI under roof Reauired notes: L - - Sidewalk and sanit::lf}' sewers to be constructed to City of Cape Canaver;)I standards L - - \Yater lines to conform to City of Cocoa St::lndards L - - Fire alann system to be instIlled and Conne~t to City of Cape Canaveral Fire Department standards. TOPOGR~HICSL~v~Y .L - - CSC and G.S. datum plane ; Existing str~t lights 1- - - Meeting Type; Planning & Zoning Borad Meeting Meeting Date: 1123/08 AGENDA Heading Presentation & Discussion Item 4 No. AGENDA REPORT PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: Presentation and Discussion: Ideas for a Citizen Participation Plan Sheldon Cove, by Bill Mays. DEPT./DNISION: Building Department Requested Action: Presentation and Discussion to provide applicant and staff direction with a proposed Citizen Awareness Participation Plan. Summary Explanation & Background: On December 12th 2007, representatives from Sheldon Cove gave a presentation of a conceptual project they are considering. The presentation identified location, size, appearance, activities and benefits to the community. There was an element of the project (height) that was greater than the current code permits. The discussion included if Sheldon Cove could go higher, then how would that process be accomplished? It was encouraged that Sheldon Cove present the concept to the community to determine the level of acceptance from the public before getting to far into the design and layout of their site plan. I The Citizen Awareness Participation Plan being proposed includes a mailer, website and media releases to . notify the public. There is also recommendation to have a community meeting at the Cape Canaveral library to discuss the project and take public feedback about the project. The public participation and feedback is important to determine if this project is desirable within the City, even if the heights exceed the permitted code I requir~ments: If the p~oject ~ppears t~ h~~e the support ,of the p~blic, then the City may wish to consider a code I - amendment that WOUld permIt greater heIghts at appropnate locatIOns. Exhibits Attached: Applicant's Citizen Awareness Plan 2008 City Planner's Office Department: Building Department i 4 \ \1Y} Citizen Awareness Plan 2008 The Citizens Awareness Plan is made of four main elements. Each element builds towards a publ!\,; HH::diug and will be designed to give an overvIew ot the project as well as opportunities for thp. riti7p.n<: ofr::lp'" r::ln;;lUeral to glue feedba~k at ~ach phae8 ofnotifieation. Eaeh olemt)ftt shall include tracking and auditing for viewing and inspection. Mailer A mailer should be sent to property owners and business owners within the city limits that will be directly affected by the proposed project. This mailer should include a brief description of the project, renderings of the project, information regarding the upcoming public meeting, and contact information to facilitate feedback from the recipient. The mailer can direct the recipient to a website which provides more information regarding the project. Web site A website can be constructed to allow the public access to a more in-depth look at the project and gain feedback. The web site could include such items as: the information presented to the City Council and Planning and Zoning Board regarding the project, a Frequently Asked Questions Section, renderings and aerial photography, and a brief history ofthe project. The website should also contain information regarding an upcoming public meeting. Media Release & Association Notification A media release should be sent to news sources, public information venues, and resident associations within the city limits regarding the project, the website and the upcoming meeting. The project's team should be available for presentations to interested groups as needed and/or requested by the City Council and/or the Planning and Zoning Board. Public Meetim! A public meeting should be held to educate the public as to the project as well as to receive feedback. This meeting should be held within the city limits at an accessible iocation such as the City Hall meeting room or Cape Canaveral Library. At this meeting, a presentation and an oppOliunity for the public to ask questions regarding the project will be given. Attendees will be requested to register and give feedback to the project. At the conclusion of the plan a summary should be produced and presented to the City Council and/or Planning and Zoning Board. This summary will review the overall participation, feedback and findings of the Citizens Awareness Plan. / \ \iY Meeting Type: Planning & Zoning Borad Meeting Meeting Date: ] /23/08 AGENDA REPORT PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: Discussion: Continued Discussion on Mixed Use Districts. DEPT./DIVISION: Building Department Requested Action: Discussion to provide staff direction pertaining to mixed use districts. Summary Explanation & Background: The Planning and Zoning Board on several occasions have discussed the mixed use development. This is a continuation of a previous meeting about location(s), height, density, intensity, open space, traffic, pedestrian access, types of uses, appearance and any other issues that are important to the Planning and Zoning Board. I I Exhibits Attached: City Planner's Office Department: Building Department I I I .L (iy'\ Meeting Type: Planning & Zoning Borad Meeting Meeting Date: 1/23/08 I AG~DA I . ;;' I :~=;'" AGENDA REPORT PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: . Discussion: Building Heights in Commercial Districts. DEPT./DNISION: Building Department Requested Action: Discussion to provide staff direction pertaining to building height in commercial districts. Summary Explanation & Background: The Planning and Zoning Board has discussed mixed use development having greater height than 45 feet and also recently heard from a property owner requesting the Planning and Zoning Board to consider height to be greater than 45 feet. The discussion will be in two parts, one whether height greater than 45 feet in a commercial district should be allowed? If so, then two where, when and how should that height be determined? I I Exhibits Attached: Ciry Planner's Office I Department: Building Department I I rf.. C1~' Meeting Type: Planning & Zoning Borad Meeting Meeting Date: 1/23/08 AGENDA Heading Discussion Item 7 No. AGENDA REPORT PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: Discussion: Planning and Zoning Board's Priorities for the Year. DEPT./DIVISION: Building Department Requested Action: Discuss the Planning and Zoning Board's priorities for the year (2008) and provide direction to staff Summary Explanation & Background: The Planning and Zoning Board is encouraged to set priorities going fonvard for the year in 2008. These priorities will help the board focus on key issues that may be affecting the City and assist the staff in setting future meetings and obtaining the necessary information. This is intended to be an open discuss lead by the Planning and Zoning Board. I I I I Exhibits Attached: City Planner's Office Department: Building Department I I t. (:L^\)