HomeMy WebLinkAboutP & Z June 27, 2007
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING
CITY HALL ANNEX
111 POLK AVENUE
JUNE 27, 2007
AGENDA
7:30 P.M.
Call to Order
Roll Call
NEW BUSINESS
1. Approval of Meeting Minutes: May 23,2007.
2. Recommendation to City Council Re: Mermaid Key North and
South Site Plan - Martin Greene, Applicant.
3. Recommendation to City Council Re: Caribbean Vistas Site
Plan - James E. Morgan, Applicant.
4. Discussion Re: Evaluation and Appraisal Report - Section 1.
5. Recommendation to City Council Re: Completed Evaluation
and Appraisal Report.
OPEN DISCUSSION
ADJOURN
Pursuant to Section 286.1015, F.S., the City hereby advises the public that: If a person decides
to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Board with respect to any matter
rendered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose
that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not
constitute consent by the City for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise
inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise
allowed by law. This meeting may include the attendance of one or more members of the Cape
Canaveral City Council, Board of Adjustment Code Enforcement and/or Community Appearance
Board who mayor may not participate in Board discussions held at this public meeting. Persons
with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the
City Clerk's office at 868-1221, 48 hours in advance of the meeting.
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
MAY 23, 2007
A Regular Meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board was held on May 23,2007, at
the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida. Chairperson
Bea McNeely called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The Secretary called the
roll.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Bea McNeely Chairperson
Lamar Russell Vice Chairperson
John Fredrickson
Donald Dunn
Harry Pearson
John Johanson 1 st Alternate
MEMBERS ABSENT
Ronald Friedman 2nd Alternate
OTHERS PRESENT
Robert Haag Mayor Pro T em
Shannon Roberts Council Member
Bennett Boucher City Manager
Todd Morley Building Official
David Sargeant Fire Chief
Anthony Garganese City Attorney
Todd Peetz City Planner
Susan Chapman Secretary
NEW BUSINESS
1. ApproYElI of Meeting Minutes: May 9, 2007.
Donald Dunn made corrections to the meeting minutes. Motion by Bea McNeely,
seconded by Donald Dunn, to approve the meeting minutes of May 9, 2007, as
corrected. Vote on the motion carried unanimously.
2. Review & Recommendation to City Council Re: Regulation of Resort
Dwellinq Units - Anthonv Garganese. City Attorney.
Anthony Garganese, City Attorney, stated that the Building Official and Fire Chief
were present at the meeting to discuss existing public safety issues and
concerns. He encouraged the Board to make a recommendation at this meeting
to the City Council because of existing life safety concerns.
Planning & Zoning Board
Meeting Minutes
May 23, 2007
Page 2
Bennett Boucher, City Manager, explained that single family homes, townhomes,
and condominium units were permitted and issued a Certificate of Occupancy for
residential use. He advised that units with frequent rentals may trip the threshold
to require compliance with Florida Statute, Chapter 509 (F.S. 509), which
regulates transient type short-term rentals. He advised that the State is the
regulatory authority for the short-term rental facilities with 51 % or more units
being rented. He noted that Royal Mansions and Cape Winds were issued
Certificates of Occupancy by the City as residential condominiums; and
according to reports, both facilities do not meet the requirements of F.S. 509 or
NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) Life Safety Code.
Todd Morley, Building OfficiaL stated that he was present at the meeting to
inform the Board that they needed to make a decision because inaction was only
going to make it worse. He directed the Board members to a memo from Todd
Peetz, City Planner, and asked Mr. Peetz to read the memo for the record.
Todd Peetz, City Planner, read his memo for the record regarding resort
dwellings and resort condominiums and his opinion regarding consistency with
the Comprehensive Plan. He advised that his research concluded that resort
dwellings and resort condominiums, located in the residential zoning districts are
not consistent with the current Land Development Regulations or the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Policy LU-3.1. He explained that rentals
of 30 days or more are not considered a business as they are not regulated by
DBPR.
Todd Morley, Building Official, stated that short-term rentals are considered
transient and must comply with F.S. 509, which means that they are regulated as
a hotel. He reiterated that resort dwellings and resort condominiums are not
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan because they are not residential uses.
He highlighted the different types of occupancy classifications, and reiterated that
Royal Mansions and Cape Winds were issued C.O.'s as residential
condominiums, where the occupants are primarily permanent in nature.
David Sargeant, Fire Chief, advised that the State found both Royal Mansions
and Cape Winds in noncompliance with F.S. 509 and the NFPA Life Safety Code
because they meet the State classification as transient rentals. He noted that the
State has written a citation for noncompliance of F.S. 509, and the fire
department wili be issuing a citation under the NFPA Life Safety Code. He
further advised that there are existing three-story, single family, resort dwellings
that do not meet the requirements of the NFPA Life Safety Code.
Discussion followed regarding: establishing enforcement procedures, defining
the use, types of occupancy use, resort tax, defining resort dwellings,
establishing time frames for compliance.
Planning & Zoning Board
Meeting Minutes
May 23, 2007
Page 3
Anthony Garganese and Lamar Russell established a flow chart of options on the
electronic dry-erase board (which was later printed on paper). A lengthy
discussion followed.
Motion by Donald Dunn, seconded by Harry Pearson, to recommend the use of
resort dwellings and resort condominiums, for the City Council's consideration, as
follows:
. Do not create resort dwellings and resort condominiums as a principal use
in the R-1, R-2, and R-3 zoning districts.
. Create resort dwellings and resort condominiums as a principal use in the
C-1 zoning district, with the contingency that the property has been
granted a special exception for residential use by the time this ordinance
is adopted.
. Allow existing rentals, whether licensed or not, in all zoning districts, to
continue provided all the following are met:
1. Property owners of resort dwellings and resort
condominiums shall register for the use, with the
City Manager, within 30 days from adoption of this
ordinance.
2. Submit to the Building department a life safety plan within 30
days from the date of the first inspection by the fire
department.
3. Submit to the Building department technical drawings within
90 days from the date of the first inspection by the fire
department.
4. A license from DBPR must be obtained and all applicable
laws met for the use within 365 days from adoption
of this ordinance. (Note: An applicant may file with the
building department a request for a hardship extension for
approval by the Building Official and/or Fire Official).
Vote on the motion carried unanimously. (Note: Chairperson McNeely stated for
the record that she reluctantly voted for the motion to move the issue forward to
the City Council.)
Planning & Zoning Board
Meeting Minutes
May 23, 2007
Page 4
3. Discussion Re: Evaluation and Appraisal Report, Sections 2, 3, 6 & 7 -
Todd Peetz, City Planner.
Todd Peetz, City Planner, reported that the City is required to review their
Com prehensive Plan approximately every (7) years to stay current with
legislative changes, special topics of State concern, evaluate the effectiveness of
implementation and evaluate financial feasibility. Other topics to be reviewed in
future meetings include the existing conditions of the City. The issues to be
discussed in Sections 2, 3, 6 & 7 are public participation, assessment of the
current plan, major issues identified in the public participation activities and a
listing by element of all the potential amendments from the various elements of
the comprehensive plan as identified in the previous sections. Sections 4 and 5
were reviewed at the last meeting of May 9,2007. He noted that the Evaluation
and Appraisal Report only evaluates and recommends it does not change the
Comprehensive Plan. The proposed changes will follow a "Finding of
Sufficiency" (sufficiently reviewed the Comprehensive Plan), by the Department
of Community Affairs. Once found to be sufficient, the proposed amendments
are then reviewed for adoption into the Comprehensive Plan, which will
essentially revise and update the Comprehensive Plan at that point. The Board
members reviewed a table of contents which identified other areas to be
reviewed in future meetings. Brief discussion followed,
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 10:07 p.m.
Sea McNeely, Chairperson
Susan L. Chapman, Secretary
Meeting Type: Planning & Zoning
Board
Meeting Date: 6/27/07
AGENDA
Heading Site Plan Revision
Item #2
No.
AGENDA REPORT
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL
SUBJECT: Mermaid Key - Site Plan
DEPT./DIVISION: Building Department
I Requested Action: I
Review and recommend to City Council the proposed site plan for Mermaid Key.
This site plan is for 140 condo units and approximately 25,800 square feet of commercial.
Summary Explanation & Background:
This request is to buHd 140 residential condominium units and approximately 25,800 square feet of commercial.
The proposed project is west of AlA and south of Thurm Boulevard north and south of the Canaveral River.
I I
I
I
, I
Exhibits Attached: #1 Application, #2 Staff Memos, #3 Site plan and Landscape Plan
I I
I City Pl.nner', Office I D " , Building Department I
I epanmcnr: I
FROM :CITY 0F CAPE CANAVERAL FAX NO. :321 868 1247 Jan. 12 2005 11:37AM Pi
~
CITY OF CAPE CANA VERAL
SITE PLAN PAYMENT RECEIPT
Project Name: Greene Building - S.R. A-I-A(j1Le1
RESIDENTIAL:
- I, 2 & 3 Residential Units .............................................TOT AL: $37.50
Total # of Unit.<;?
- (4) or more Residential Units $50.00 (1st (4) Units), $50.00
Plus _ Units @ $7.50 per unit $
Total: $
COMMERCIAL:
$150 per acre of land, or portion thereof. - 0
1.08 Acres X $150 CTOT~~-=:...........-=-~~300. ~
SITE PLAN EXTENSION:..... ............ ............. ....... ......... .... TOTAL: ............... .$150.00
SITE PLAN RESUBMTSSION: 50% of original fee.........TOTAL:..............$ -
=====;-=~~==~-==~====~=~-~===========~======~=~~=====~~--==
DEPOSIT TOVv ARDS REVIEvV FEES:
RESIDENTIAL: 1 to 4 Units ...................... $700.00
Over 4 Units to 50 Units.................. $1,800.00
Over 50 Units Or Hotel/MoteL......$2,800.00
COMMERCIAL: Up to 4 Acres...........C$L80nOD~
Over 4 up to 8 Acres.....$2,300.00
Over 8 Acres ~ Review fee to be established after pre-
application meeting based on hourly rates estimated in Exhibit A of City
Engineer contract.
Total Acres: 1.08 ac.
-
Office Use Only: Escrow Account # 1-202.2400
===~~===~========e=~~;======~=~~=_=~~===~~~=_~====;=====~;=
TOTAL REVIEv\1 DEPOSIT RECEIVED: $ I f!;, _ ~ ____
Ij<:>OU.~":-'
TOTAL SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL FEE RECEIVED: $-,'2, 0 0 . $'L~
PAID RECEIPT NO. DA TE RECV'D
I BOO J)O .. .
_~ SSA 02/;l\D5
::1,00, CO .. .1
- jB~.J . 6(' - n\<.\\er Le9~ Kxf 2-/?>4
.~
From:CITY CAPE CANAVERAL BLDG. DEPT321 868 1247 02/08/2007 00:50 #119 P.003/008
-
....
APPLICATION toR SIn PLAN'RF.VIF:W
FEE: DATE- '2---(1-(/7
'.-..-
-
PROJECT NA."Y[E: . mlile.m IJ-IIJ ~.~
I <. J . -
lEGAL DESCRIPnON: . OeE /l17JTv!e;J ~/TA/,,-
. -
-..m~1:R(s) K-\."iE;-=-~ - J?!.Fl" /7J /!/A A~) cL(!. _
m\~1:R(S) ADDRESS: .6s dO . A). :r72r9-/l/17C./l1:C~ ,Y'JZ:--J8
f!/I1Jf~ ~/JJ/~ ~. /'L ~7PO
1;;3;p) ..-,Llc_ -r;. '" L~ ~
PH01\'E r-.-C"'11lER: (' t, / 7 7 0"/'7 7 . .
l\A\IE OF ARCmTECTfE:-iGD.'EER: O(l/;:>fP.-() ;5ot/
-/ .
PHO!',}: !\1.?YD3ER: 32/ Z5d-~7S7S
-........,..'" ,.."...- .. ........."'.-...--.
........- ...n...... __.,. _.........___.._. .n ,~..,., I, Q.f:~'~~~-
fi-PPLICA."\-rs SlG:';An"RE: .. ~ --~. -.. 'V'.,-- < . ___
t _
O"V~tER OR AnENT ~
/:-) "\ - /,l""7.. ~ a
PHO,,'!: i'.Tl\rnER: L:::52/ ) ) CZ '7 -tJ 77 7
( /'
1/95
Memorandum
To: Todd Morley, Building Official
From: Todd Peetz, City Planner
Date: June 18, 2007
Re: Mermaid Key Site Plan
I have reviewed the Mermaid Key Site Plan and have the following
comments;
1. Please provide permit for vacation of the 10' wide sewer easement
when available.
2. It appears that the latest submitted site plan depicts a change on
the 6' deck on the commercial building located on the south parcel
(Sheet (2 of 5 of the South Parcel Landscaping plan). With the
recent change, the deck now appears to encroach 2 V2 feet into the
front setback from A-I-A. This encroachment issue shall be
addressed during the building permitting process.
The following conditions of approval shall be applied to the subject site:
a) A shared parking access easement shall be granted for
overflow parking of the commercial use, into the residential
parking area of the condo units. The shared parking access
easement shall apply to both the north parcel.
b) 11J.. cross access easement shall be granted for the both north
and south parcels. The easement will allmv access from
State Route A -1-A through the commercial portion of the
south parcel so that access may be gained to the residential
portion of the site.
If you have any questions, or need further information please feel free to
contact me at 407-629-8880.
Page 1 of 1
Todd Peetz
_._~-"""--'~~--""",,--~-"'~-"~'~'~"._"'''"~~-",""_.,-_._"",,-,~,~--~~-'--"""'---~"-"-""._"----~---~~-~,"",~,"-",_.",,,----"---~,,-"-'~-'~"~'---'-'--~"--"--'~-""~"._"'.._--"----"'''-
From: John Cunningham Dcunningham@ccvfd.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 10:45 AM
To: Todd Peetz
Subject: Re: Mermaid Key (5th site plan)
Todd,
We have reviewed the site pan and have no comments at this time.
Under Florida Statute 668.6076, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your
email address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail
to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing.
This message contains information which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise
protected from disclosure and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an
addressee; any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is
prohibited.
If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender by reply e-
mail and destroy the original message and all copies.
Messages sent to and from us may be monitored.
(v.le)
6/20/2007
MEMORANDUM
TO: Todd Peetz
City Planner
FROM: Jeff Ratliff
Stormwater Administrator
City of Cape Canaveral
868-1240
DATE: 06/18/07
RE: Mermaid Key - 5th Submittal
Public Works staff has reviewed the referenced site plan and has no comments. Previous
stormwater and sanitary sewer easement issues have been addressed in this version of the site
plan.
05/19/2007 20:30 321-783-7055 STDTTLER PAGE 02
June 20, 2007 SSA
Mr. Todd Peetz
Miller-Legg & Associates
631 South Orlando Avenue
Suite 200
Winter Park, FL 32789
RE: Site Plan - Mermaid Key - Review #5
SSA Job No. 05..0025, Task 046-1004
Dear Mr. Peetz:
SSA has reviewed the above-referenced project and based on our review, SSA
recommends said plan for City approval.
This review does not relieve the applicant from other local, state, and federal agencies
having jurisdiction over the project site. Should you have any questions regarding this
letter, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Stottler Stagg & Associates
Architects, Engineers, Planners, Inc.
~/?av~--
John A. Pekar, PE
Sr. Vice President - Citv Enainef:lr
- - - - -~,; ~_Cv'------
City Engineer's Review Fee for Review #5 - $190.00
NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL FEES
As this project is being reviewed under the original City contract,
Engineering Fees for all reviews after 2nd review will be billed at $95.00 per hour.
SIDTTIER STAGG & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS, INC.
868Cl Norll1 Atlantic Avenue P. O. Box 163Cl Cape Canaveral, Florid. 32920 Tel 321-783-1320 Fax 321-783-7065
J:ICIViL\Project.s\CAPE\I-mermalo key review 5 APPROVEd"" Uc. #MCOOO329 #EBOOOO762 #LBDOO6700
City of Cape Canaveral
Site Plan
Mermaid Key
Applicant: Mermaid Key, LLC
Location: Range: 37 Township: 24 Section: 15
Total Acreage: North Parcel 7.59 +1- Acres, Residential (7.283 ac),
Commercial (0.307)
South Parcel 3.52 +1- Acres, Residential (2.45 ac),
Commercial (1.07)
Permitted 15 DU per acre: North Parcel- 109 units
South Parcel- 36 units
Proposed Number of Units: North Parcel- 108
South Parcel - 32
Proposed Density: North Parcel- 14.8 DUlAC
South Parcel- 13.1 DUlAC
Current Future Land Use: Residential R-3 I Commercial C-l
Current Zoning: Residential R-3 I Commercial C-l
Description:
The applicant proposes to build 140, condo units and 25,776 square feet of office, retail
and restaurant space on two parcels totaling approximately 11.11 acres of land. The
maximum proposed heights for the proposed structures is 45 feet. The subject site is
located south of Thurm Boulevard and west of State Rout A-I-A.
I I North I South I West
tast
Zoning C-l Commercial R-3 Residential C-I Commercial R-3 Residential
Comp Plan C-l Commercial R-3 Residential C-l Commercial R-3 Residential
Existing Commercial / Multi Family / Commercial Single Family
Conditions Blarney 67 INC Condos Residential /
_ J Discovery Bay I
Public Services and Facilities in Amendment Area:
The Level of Service for parks and recreation is one (2) acres of park land per 1,000
residents. Approximately twenty-four (24) acres of park land exist in Cape Canaveral.
This equates to a population of approximately 12,000 residents. The City's population as
AlA is operating at Level of Service "A" with 283 available peak hour trips between
North City Limits to Central Blvd. AlA from Central Blvd to North Atlantic has a level
of Service is "A" with 325 excess trips. The residential portion of the site could generate
91 weekday PM peak hour trips. A more complete traffic study is required at the time of
site plan submittal to realize the potential commercial/office trip generation..
The City of Cape Canaveral provides wastewater treatment. The wastewater treatment
capacity is 1.8 million gallons per day (MOD). The existing usage is 1.26 MOD with an
excess capacity of .54 MOD. The Level of Service for wastewater capacity is 118
gallons per capita per day. At 2.35 persons per household, X's the proposed 140
households, X's 118; the projected demand for the proposed development IS
approximately 38,822 gallons per day of wastewater. There is adequate wastewater
treatment capacity available.
The City of Cocoa has a total capacity of 56 MOD and currently provides 48 MOD.
Approximately 24.4 MGD of water is being used on an average daily basis, leaving 23.6
MOD available. The Level of Service for potable water is 264 gallons per household per
day. At 264 X's 140 households; the projected demand for the proposed project is
36,960 gallons per day of potable water. There is adequate potable water service
available with the proposed change.
Brevard County provides facilities for solid waste disposal. At this time, the County
does not foresee any deficiency with their solid waste facilities.
Environmental Description of Amendment Area:
The site is Canaveral Complex, gently undulating (Ca) soil type. Canaveral Complex
consists of nearly level and gently sloping soils that are mixtures of s(l~l}d and shell
fragments. There appear to be no wetlands on site. \Vetland detemlinations or
verification are permitted by St. Johns River Water Management District There is no
known Aquifer Recharge or Floodplain areas associated with this parcel. There are also
no known endangered species living on the site.
Historical and Archaeological Resources in Amendment Area:
There are no known historical or archaeological resources on site.
Population Projections and Trends:
The population at 2.35 person per unit at 140 units is 333 potential new persons to the
City.
of April, 2006 was 10,034. This is still adequate park space available.
Meeting Type: Planning & Zoning
Board
Meeting Date: 6/27/07
AGENDA
Heading Site Plan Revision
Item #3
No.
AGENDA REPORT
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL
SUBJECT: Caribbean Vistas - Site Plan
DEPT.lDIVISION: Building Department
Requested Action:
Review and recommend to City Council the proposed site plan for Caribbean Vistas.
This site plan is for 4 townhomes.
Summary Explanation & Background:
This request is to build 4 residential townhomes.
The proposed project is located at the northeast comer of Poinsett and Madison Avenues.
I
I
I
,
Exhibits Attached: #1 Application, #2 Staff Memos, #3 Site plan
I I
I I
I City Planner', Offiee I Department: Building Department I
CITY OF CAPE CANA VERAL
SITE PLAN PAYMENT RECEIPT
,
/'~\ tj
( f, .0 -,;::;>r1 i. ,
Project Name: j7K: A I J~E/i-rlLi (j t, S ~S
RESIDENTIAL:
1I2 & 3 Residential Units .............................................TOTAL: $37.50
j(,
'\ / Total # of Units? Lt /--:='____"
/'\ (4) or more Residential Units $50.00 (1st (4) Units), ($50.00)
, "'---/
Plus Units @ $7.50 per unit $
'. W,,~'G) __
--------TotaL-$-- .~
COMMERCIAL:
$150 per acre of landI or portion thereof.
Acres X $150 TOTAL:...............$
SITE PLAN EXTENSION:...... ..... .......... .... ... ...................... TOTAL:......... .......$150.00
SITE PLAN RESUBMISSION: 50% of original fee.........TOT AL:..............$
-----------------------------~-~---------------------------
----------------------~~-----------------------------------
DEPOSIT TOWARDS REVIEW FEES:
RESIDENTIAL: 1 to 4 Units f................G;~~.00
Over 4 Units to 50 Units...::~=~~:..... $1,800.00
Over 50 Units or HoteljMotel........$2,800.00
COI'vHvfERCIAL: Up to 4 Acres...."...........$l,800.00
Over 4 up to 8 Acres.....$2,300.00
Over 8 Acres - Review fee to be established after pre-
application meeting based on hourly rates estimated in Exhibit A of City
Engineer contract.
Total Acres:
Office Use Of'Jy: Escrow Account # 1-202.2400
--------------------------------------------~--------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL REVIEW DEPOSIT RECEIVED: $ v-r (( ,C (
TOTAL SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL FEE RECEIVED: $_ )~)C 1(',(
PAID RECEIPT NO. DATE RECV'D
~- 7~~:'::-i~7C+ IXLi. ~'o(l)J,r2( 11 520. 00 U! i:.i''; ',:: " if .
- . /1-1- I., i/1., ,(
1-' /.-- ?",' \O~I
- '~l.-.',. ....."
-~
....
APPLICA nON FOR SITE PLAN'REVIEW
c. .-
DATE:_ ~ ~ .... /j-o~l -
,
~
PROJECT NAvIE:[~R( i3CJ7~ - () f (j-/1 r -
LEGAL DESCRIPTIO~-;
. -
-
-- -
-OVV-:"LR(S) X.~\lE; Vn/J i ~rH'1 CD c/uS"
. 7
I bo y- -
On~TR(S) ADDREss: D76 ~:.)r .~ (, J .~
7"D
'-"'- -
ClI /1/ tI C 12- 19- L ---:---.. --::::> 2 e:"',
r- ~/~"7 L-. .c..->
C% of / 0--, /?'7-5/1 - f'? /;1
PHO!."'-E l',L?YIBER; ,Ii t;;lf s~- ~ _ (
"'-.HIE Of ARCmTECT/DiGI\TER: L<. / ,r- r /-)
(~~j ~ ~
-
PHO!."iE I\1.?YIBER; ~S- 3 c"_ --3 _s~ b, _S-
r~')r / ,ft".,..-- C'(:5 ".-t).i" -/'-
h/ t: ~ /f'':y-If;''A::L~ j..
?/~-- t' '__
A_Pp LI CA. "T 5 5I GNA YeRE: _/.+-- Pc/~,._ 'B --.::zr--~7'L "'_,__, -
/~/ / OVv;.,ER OR AGEl'jt
\'---...-/
----J :yc-/// &-z
--~ .:..... .., ;7 _ /
PHO:\E I'i1.:\IBER: / ,.::;} .: / ,y-
/95
05/19/2007 22:39 321-783-7055 STOHLER PAGE 02
June 20, 2007 SSA
Mr. Todd Peetz
Miller-Legg & Associates
631 South Orlando Avenue
Suite 200
Winter Park, FL 32789
RE: Site Plan - Caribbean Vistas Site Plan - Review #3
SSA Job No. 05-0025, Task 051-1004
Dear Mr. Peetz:
SSA has reviewed the above-referenced project and based on our review, SSA recommends
said plan for City approval.
This review does not relieve the applicant from other local, state, and federal agencies having
jurisdiction over the project site. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please do
not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Stottler Stagg & Associates
Architects, Engineers, Planners, Inc.
<.tI~a
John A. Pekar, PE
Sr. Vice President - City Engineer
( City Engineer's Review Fee for Review #3 - $190,00 \
I NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL FEES I
As this project is being reviewed unde, the o'iginol City con~oct, J
Engineering Fees for all reviews after 2nd review will be billed at $95.00 per hour. _
STO'ITLER STAGG & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PlANNERS, INC.
8680 North Atlantic Avenue p, 0, Box 1630 Cape Canaveral. Florida 32920 Tel 321-783-1320 Fax 321-783-7065
Uc, #AAC1lOO329 41EBOOOO762 #LBOOO6?OO
J:\CIVIL\ProJecls\CAPE\I-Ga~~bean vistas slle plaB ,,"viaw 3 APPROVE.ooe
MEMORANDUM
TO: T odd Peetz
City Planner
FROM: Jeff Ratliff
Stormwater Administrator
City of Cape Canaveral
868-1240
DATE: 06/13/07
RE: 2nd Site Plan Review - Caribbean Vistas
Public Works has reviewed the site plan amendment for the referenced property and has no
comments.
Page 1 of 1
Todd Peetz
"~"""~"-~~'-___~_'___'_"__"~~'".'~__'._~_'."~ffl_"_'~____~_~'m'"""'~__,,,,,,,,"~_"'''_'_~_''''~=_"~O_~'.''.~'m~,"'_'',"".~_,~"_~.."__~'"_"_'_"""~__._e'~'~"_._~",,~"_,~.__,",,"_,_,,~_~__"._,"~,~"'~"'".,."..,,__""''''''"''
From: John Cunningham Dcunningham@ccvfd.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 10:39 AM
To: Todd Peetz
Subject: Re: Carribean Vistas (Site Plan)
Todd,
We have reviewed the site plan and have no comments at this time.
Under Florida Statute 668.6076, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your
email address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail
to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing.
This message contains information which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise
protected from disclosure and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an
addressee; any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is
prohibited.
If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender by reply e-
mail and destroy the original message and all copies.
Messages sent to and from us may be monitored.
(v.le)
6/20/2007
Memorandum
To: Todd Morley, Building Official
From: Todd Peetz, City Planner
Date: June 18, 2007
Re: Caribbean Vistas Site Plan
I have reviewed the Caribbean Vistas Site Plan and have no comments at
this time.
If you have any questions, or need further information please feel free to
contact me at 407-629-8880.
City of Cape Canaveral
Caribbean Vistas Site Plan
Applicant: Jim Morgan
Location: Section 23, Township 24 South, Range 37 East
Proposed Amendment Acreage: 0.287 +/- Acres
Permitted 15 DU per acre: 4 units (maximum potential units for whole site)
Proposed Number of Units: 4
Current Future Land Use: R-2 Residential
Current Zoning: R-2 Residential
Description:
The applicant proposes a preliminary replat of lots located at 420 Madison A venue,
Parcel No. 24-37-23-CG-00016.0-001O.00. The replat will result in four (4) lots created
out of the existing ones, all with frontage onto Poinsetta A venue. The subject site is
located north of and adjacent to Madison Avenue and east of and adjacent to Poinsetta
A venue.
North South East West
Zoning R-2 Residential R-2 Residential R-2 Residential R-2 Residential
Comp Plan R-2 Residential R-2 Residential R-2 Residential R-2 Residential
Existing Single Family Single/Multi Multifamily Single Family
Conditions Residential I Fa~ily Residential Residential Residential
Public Services and Facilities in Amendment Area:
The Level of Service for parks and recreation is two (2) acres of park land per 1,000
residents. Approximately twenty-four (24) acres of park land exist in Cape Canaveral.
This equates to a population of approximately 12,000 residents. The City's population as
of April, 2006 was 10,034. There is still adequate park space available.
AlA is operating at Level of Service "A" with 283 available peak hour trips between
North City Limits to Central Blvd. AlA from Central Blvd to North "t....tlantic has a level
of Ser'/ice ".ll..'" \~vith 325 excess trips. If developed COmpletely as residential, the site
could generate 2 to 4 PM peak hour hips.
The City of Cape Canaveral provides wastewater treatment. The wastewater treatment
capacity is 1.8 million gallons per day (MGD). The existing usage is 1.26 MGD with an
excess capacity of 0.54 MGD. The Level of Service for wastewater capacity is 118
gallons per capita per day. At 2.35 persons per household, X's the proposed four (4)
households, X's 118; the projected demand for the proposed development IS
approximately 1,109 gallons per day of wastewater. There is adequate wastewater
treatment capacity available.
The City of Cocoa has a total capacity of 56 MGD and currently provides 48 MGD.
Approximately 24.4 MGD of water is being used on an average daily basis, leaving 23.6
MGD available. The Level of Service for potable water is 264 gallons per household per
day. At 264 X's four (4) households; the projected demand for the proposed project is
1,056 gallons per day of potable water. There is adequate potable water service available
with the proposed change.
Brevard County provides facilities for solid waste disposal. At this time, the County
does not foresee any deficiency with their solid waste facilities.
Environmental Description of Amendment Area:
The subject site consists of Galveston-Urban land complex (Ga) soil type. The soils in
this complex are well-drained Galveston sand and sandy soils that consist of reworked
and leveled sandy materials that resemble Galveston sand. The water table generally is
below a depth of 60 inches; it is between 40 and 60 inches for short periods during the
ramy season. There appear to be no wetlands on site. Wetland determinations or
verification are permitted by St. Johns River Water Management District. There is no
known Aquifer Recharge or Floodplain areas associated with this parcel. There are also
no known endangered species living on the site.
Historical and Archaeological Resources in Amendment Area:
There are no known historical or archaeological resources on site.
Population Projections and Trends:
The average household size is 2.37 persons. The four (4) units will probably
accommodate nine (9) to ten (10) new persons.
Meeting Type: Planning & Zoning
Meeting Date: 627/07
AGENDA
Heading Discussion
Item #4
No.
AGENDA REPORT
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL
SUBJECT: Discussion - Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) Section 1 (Data and Analysis)
DEPT./DIVISION: Building Department
Requested Action:
Review Section 1 of the EAR for discussion and direction to staff.
Summary Explanation & Background:
The City is required to review their Comprehensive Plan approximately every 7 years to stay current with
legislative changes, special topics of State concern, evaluate the effectiveness of implementation and evaluate
financial feasibility. The issues to be discussed in Section 1 are the data and analysis updates of current
comprehensive plan. This includes new information to keep the plan current with appropriate data and analysis.
Sections 2,3,4,5,6 and 7 were reviewed during the P&Z meetings of May 9th, and May 24th, 2007. Note: the
EAR only evaluates and recommends, it does not change the Comprehensive Plan. Proposed changes will
follow a "Finding of Sufficiency" (Acknowledge the City sufficiently reviewed the Comprehensive Plan) from
the Department of Conm1Unity Affairs. Once found to be sufficient, the proposed amendments are then
reviewed for adoption into the Comprehensive Plan, which will essentially revise and update the Comprehensive
Plan at that point.
I I
I
I
Exhibits Attached:
I The proposed EA_R Document from previous agenda item. I
I I
I Planning Official's Offiee I Department I
Meeting Type: >.jJ>lanning & Zoning
Meeting Date: 5/23/07
AGENDA
Heading Discussion
Item #5
No.
AGENDA REPORT
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL
SUBJECT: Review and Recommend to City Council the Proposed - Evaluation and Appraisal Report
(EAR)
DEPT./DIVISION: Building Department
Requested Action:
Review and recommend to City Council the proposed EAR for Tra...'1smittal to the DCA.
Summary Explanation & Background:
The City is required to review their Comprehensive Plan approximately every 7 years to stay current with
legislative changes, special topics of State concern, evaluate the effectiveness of implementation and evaluate
financial feasibility. Other topics to be reviewed in future meetings include the existing conditions of the City. .
The EAR Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 were reviewed during the P&Z meetings of May 9th, May 24th and June
20th, 2007. Note: the EAR only evaluates and recommends, it does not change the Comprehensive Plan.
Proposed changes will foIlo\'1 a "Finding of Sufficiency" (acknowledge the City sufficiently reviewed the
Comprehensive Pian) from the Department of Community Affairs. Once found to be sufficient, the proposed
amendments are then reviewed for adoption into the Comprehensive Plan, which will essentially revise and
update the Comprehensive Plan at that point.
I I
This recommendation is to Transmit the EAR to the DCA. The DCA wiii make comments cmd
recommendations and send the EAR back for consideration prior to adoption of the EAR.
I Exhibits Attached: I
The proposed EAR Document from previous agenda item.
Planning Official's Office Department
I I c3J