Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP & Z Board Packet for June 14, 2006 City of Cape Canaveral PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING CITY HALL ANNEX 111 POLK AVENUE JUNE 14, 2006 7:30 P.M. Call to Order Roll Call NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes: May 24, 2006. 2. Recommendation to the Board of Adjustment Re: Special Exception Request No. 06-04 to Allow Outside Storage of Recreational Vehicles, Trailers and Trailerable Items in the C-2 Zoning District, Section 15, Township 24 South, Range 37 East, West Portion of Parcel 760, (200 W. Central Boulevard) - Ahmad and Abulghasem Nasajpour, Petitioners. OPEN DISCUSSION ADJOURN Pursuant to Section 286.1015, F.S., the City hereby advises the public that: If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Board with respect to any matter rendered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not constitute consent by the City for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by law. This meeting may include the attendance of one or more members of the Cape Canaveral City Council, Board of Adjustment, Code Enforcement and/or Community Appearance Board who mayor may not participate in Board discussions held at this public meeting. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City Clerk's office at 868-1221,48 hours in advance of the meeting. 105 Polk Avenue · Post Office Box 326 · Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-0326 Telephone: (321) 868-1222 · SUNCOM: 982-1222 · FAX: (321) 868-1247 www.myflorida.com/cape · email: ccapecanaveral@cf1.rr.com PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING MINUTES MAY 24, 2006 A Regular Meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board was held on May 24, 2006, at the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida. Board Chairperson Bea McNeely called the meeting to order at 7:30p.m. The Secretary called the roll. All persons giving testimony were sworn in by Anthony Garganese, City Attorney. MEMBERS PRESENT Bea McNeely Chairperson Lamar Russell Vice Chairperson John Fredrickson Donald Dunn Harry Pearson John Johanson 1 st Alternate OTHERS PRESENT Susan Chapman Secretary T odd Peetz City Planner .Anthony Garganese City l\ttorney Robert Hoog Mayor Pro T em NEW BUSINESS: 1. Approval of Meetinq Minutes: Mav 10, 2006. Motion by Harry Pearson, seconded by Donald Dunn, to approve the meeting minutes of May 10, 2006. Vote on the motion carried unanimously. 2. Recommendation to City Council Re: Final Replat of Beroia Palms Townhomes - Replat of Lot 7, Block 70, Avon bv the Sea Subdivision - (223 & 225 Lincoln Avenue) - Ron Wallen, Applicant. John Johanson declared a conflict of interest. Todd Peetz, City Planner, gave an overview of the Final Replat and verified all requirements were met. He verified that the lots were conforming townhouse lots in the R-2 zoning district. Discussion was held regarding: minimum lot widths, setbacks, easements, firewalls, stormwater, and building color. Ron Wallen, Applicant, advised that the project was 98% completed. Motion by Donald Dunn, seconded by Harry Pearson, to recommend approval of the Final Replat of Beroja Palms Townhomes. Vote on the motion carried by majority, with John Johanson, abstaining. OPEN DISCUSSION Lamar Russell advised that he was not at the last meeting and asked for clarification of the proposed changes to the hotel/motel code. Anthony Garganese, City Attorney, explained the changes and read Section 110-122. Discussion followed regarding the Certificate of Occupancy that was issued to the Residence Inn. Lamar Russell explained the intent of the code section. He used the example that if a hotel had 300 units, the initial certificate of occupancy would need to be issued for a minimum of 150 G units. Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes May 24, 2006 Page 2 There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Sea McNeely, Chairperson Susan L. Chapman, Secretary cj) Meeting Type: Planing and Zoning Board Meeting Date: 6/14/06 AGENDA Heading Special Exception 06-04 Item #2 No. AGENDA REPORT PLANNIN AND ZONING BOARD THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: Special Exception request 06-04 to allow outside storage III an C-2 commercial manufacturing district DEPT./DNISION: Building Department Requested Action: Make a recommendation to the Board of Adjustment to approve or deny the request for outside storage in a C-2 commercial manufacturing district. Sununary Explanation & Background: The applicants are Abulghasem and Ahmad Nasapour, have requested a special exception for outside storage in the C-2 commercial manufacturing district. The property is currently vacant where the outside storage is being proposed. The parent property has an existing lumberyard on site. A special exception for outside storage was approved for the property to the east. Although the application allows for outside storage of boats, RV's and trailerable items, the concept plan provided shows only boat storage on-site. Exhibits Attached: #1 Application, #2 Legal description and owner related information, #3 Applicant information regarding the special exception, #4 Notification to Surrounding Property Owners, #5 Staff Report on the Special Exception. City Planner's Office Department: Building Department \ CV City of Cape Canaveral ~ " .ii.i{f. . Building Department Uf2e-Q,tal EK0- ~hOt1 O~-~ (Please Print Legibly or Type) GsaOCO fl ~+;., j DATE FILED 6-('5 -() fn FEE PAID d:y:vn DEPOSIT 01."23 /)f., >r CQ; hed lY\c4ln~ RECV'D BY: S71 L ($250.00 Filing Fee is non-refundable) NATURE OF REQUEST Special Exception is for what purpose (Brief Description) Use an existing vacant lot as a boat & RV storage area. AddressoE request (if applicable) Legal Description: Lot_Block_Parcel Subdv Section : 15 Township 24 Range 37 E STATEMENT OF FACT: State of Florida; County of Brevard; I Abulghasem Nasajpour , being duly sworn,. depose and say that ~ I am the property owner. - I am the owner(s) designated agent. (notarized auth~rization required) Owner(s) Name(s): Abulghasem Nasajpour, Ahmad Nasajpour Address: 200 W.' Central Blvd., Cape Canaveral, Fl. 32920 321-504-9770 Work Phone 321-784'-lt~B1ail none, Home Phone ~ -'- - .~ . Applicant(s) Names(s): Abulghasem Nasaj pour,. Ahmad Nasaj pour Address:200 W. Central! Blvd. :Cape Canaveral, Fl.' 32920 321-504-9770 Work Phone 32 1 - 7 84 - 1 't5:91ail Home Phone none All information, sketches and data contained ~d made part of this request, are honest and true to e best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of Applicant ~ \ ._-~""'.. fC\ ''-1 S"'Q~Ub 'n d before me on !his ~ day of j ebn.tQr;c:, ii!8~L~[JC SII' --== ...... .. "'. . ". ". . .'., IT OF FLORIDA C'O ,,~~ '0.' . '{ , ~ Su.a~ L, Chapman . '~).:'bl COfrlLtlJHJOl1 #DD384306 Notary Public, State of Flonda .~ ~. apl,." MAIl. 23, 2009 "ooA",>! H;rj,j 4<lilftllli 1lf!~4fu G I The completed request form and the $250 filing fee must be filed as fol1ows: Requests or If g'J nc. Variances, Rezoning and Special Exceptions (Except Telecommunication Towers), require a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the next regularly scheduled Planning & Zoning Board Meeting; Request for Telecommunications Towers, require a minimum of sixty (60) days prior to the Planning & Zoning Board meeting. The Board of Adjustment meeting will be set after the request is heard by the Planning & Zoning Board. (A deposit may be required per Section 110-92) ~\ ~".,o~ (j) rr=:\) I2 p., 'C~'\'\", i._. ,..,. \ I ~ l~;_:'_y,!,-,_:\;;-:-,' ~ ,\ ~ Uli[?;;;';;~ /"~, ,- ., . i" City of Cape Canaveral ' APPLICATION FOR SPECfhL EXCEPTION TI-ds application must be legibly completed and returned, wit."'1 all enclosures referred to therein! to the Building Department! a II'inimum of Thirty (30) days (sLXrj (60) days for TelecommlliIications Towers) prior to the next regularly schedu,led meeting L.'1 order to be processed for cOIlsiderat1on by the PlanrJ.ng & Zoping Board for study and recommendation to the Board of Adjustment. The owner or a owner representative are required to attend the meetings and will be notified by t.~e board secretEu. i of b.~e date and time of t.'1e meetings. The P' . n"7 . B d' 1 J 1 ~7 ,1 '"l d d ,HI-. W d 1 la.."'1Dlng &: LOI'.J.....Tlg - oar - nOlUS regwar meew.Ilgs on t....l1e ""n an q,u< e nesaays OJ: ""'.ve"""y mon+-h at 7.'10 Dm IOn f-hn ("'I"hoT H",rl Ar-nnex 111 Polk Avon"'" (-'~p~ .1 e .L, L ill _ J~J .l"~),.. .1.1. L..1.L'-- ........LJ ..L,J....a.l.. . ! .....L...i.. ~ 1. ..... \-. U'-/ ,--a. c Cal'1.aVerat Florida. ALL OF THE FOLLOvVING INFORMATION tvillST BE SUPPLIED PRIOR TO PROCESSING THE ftJJPLICATION. If you have any questions, please contact the Building Department at (321) 868-1222. I DATE: I 1 N- - ^ 1\.-'1-,::;' Ok' N' UPT i-rAN- TIC) Abulghasem Nasaj pour I Ahmad Nasaj pour _L ruvu...:.... -L .L, '- ~ 1........ ... - ADDRESS (if assigned) 200 ~v. Central Blvd.; Cape Canaveral; Fl. 32920 PHONE # 321-784-1450 FAX # 321-784-4337 E-MAIL none 2. COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: LOT: BLOCK: SlTBDIVISION: p ARCEL: ~7 & 0 'J ~~ N..ft~ ~ r[fijL~0 SIZE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IN AC~S: Z. 'i1 . '<' SECTION: 15 TOVv'NSI-np 24 '. RAl'--JGE 37 E DESCRIPTION: 3. ORDINA..1\JCES SECTION IJI'JuER WHICH SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS cnr Tr'"LT"T" ___nJU'J..L..Li \ (EXAIVIPLE, p,RTIO~E X, SECTION 2) l \ 0 .- -S Y ~ {f { 4. COlvIPLETE rrIE ATTACI1'ED ViORKSHEET It..J FULL. (INC01rfPLETE j\PPLICATIONS J'..AAY FRsULT IN DENIAL OF REQUEST) ~o PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION: (EX_AMPLE C-l, C-2, R-l, R-2, IVI-l EYe.) (;- 1.-- h PRnVT! ;j:;' THTRTRFN 1\'-1- :1) CGPTFS n~ STTR l"!J?LA f>.-.I n-'-"l< 11 PPPu"-YPRTATP V* J....................... ,.........-..1-.01 ~-..--......___~.. --J ______ ";..../..L ___..!.......! ...u.. '-" .... r~.....4.'" _,;..~ _............ DRA Vv'1NG(S) SHOVVING THE FOLLOVVING \VHEP~ APPLICABLE: (a) Adequate ingress an_d egress may be obtained to and from the property, -y'viLtlparticular refererlce to automotive artd pedestrian saferi and _ J conve~~er:ce! traffic flow and control, and emergency access in case of fire cD. "' or medIcal emergencv. r J J THE FOLLOWING ENCLOSURES ARE NEEDED TO COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION: i ' / . ~ *Paid receipffrom Finance Department for $250.00 Application Fee. ./" 1< Paid receipt from Finance Department for Deposit, if applicable. (rytake checks payable to the NCity of Cape Car}averal") ./' A listing ofleg::l1 descriptiop.s of ::Ill properties witbin a 500 ft radius of t..he boundaries: of the property contained in the request, together with the names anq mailing addresses (including zip codes) of all respective propertY dwners within the above refer~nced area. Include three (3) complete sbs of mailing labels of all property owners within a 500 ft. radius. (This can be obtained from the l1ax Assessor's Office.) The list shall be legible and the source of the information submitted stated here: This inforn\ation was obtain.ed from:V4cr(f'vcf-; /Jc7e.r7,4-fYA,~ V A propertY map showing properties within the 500 ft. radius, clearly I I outlining the subject property. Q,~ p~~ Aff~'~ e'" ~ ~j"" ~'l4-.. c. .' - I The Location map showing adjacent properties uses, zoning, streets, driveways~ canals and utilities. "loN(rJ6 VILA II,.., 'l. . ! .' ri'Y # r.;1'1'\.r II ~l~ ,~. Where Property is not owned by the applicant, a Power of Attorney must be r attached givinJg the Notarized consent of the property owner to the applicant f1 P to request the ppecial Exception. : -./ 8. Copy of reconjIed deed to subject pr~?~rty. , , , i ~9. Completed w9rksheet. .' ' I /10. If applicable, elevation drawing(s) or photograph(s) of proposed structure(s) . are encourage~. , , . . NOTE: Al?plication fee of $250.00 is non-refundable upon payment to the City. . NOTE: Any balance from required deposit will be returned to the applicant lfPon written request minus all associated costs. cP t:. ~...:..;:.,.,. ,:) ;~',:- l.t~;:!'~"'~;'''::-T'!~I'V f-~"C r A. p~ {--=- A r-.J' A V hP",,"\L ~. ,,:'.1 "J..! 1. ~J,. '-"'.io,.,Io. .iJ -- -. -. SPR(~TAL EXCEJ~110~.J .' . ......... . . WORKSPA.bET --' -. rif' .- .. .. 'I' 'f . -... M'\ R ,; _.. ~ n- ... - '! ~ --~-- Il>......-..__A T'~e ':::nL.,::,ose ot WlS WOTl"..sneet are t:'l\fo-tala: \..L J to asSLSt !;Ue rla.uw:-.g ana. LOrung OiJ(lio.L <: ~..,_ ~ ;. -=.. ,," ~'f ,,, _ ......"It ..... i____ ._J>..i.. 4t.i.......... l."'r~="'-="" and the board of Adpxsb::r-.ent in me eValuation at a~ ':ltena relev"'j'U. to M~C ap'p.J.~~~Ji.l: and iLl to educ~e the applicant as to the c...;.teri;:; whiCh must be addressed fu'!d sansuea. , ,. .... ... ~::f:;;:~~~e::'::;'ll::"c~::n:=~t~-:ld ~:e ;!';;:i:;':~ indication tl-..at th,e request for spe<--1>'ll exception rnay be rejected or that the application nlay not be acceptable ror procesgt.~g. CRITERIA (Bu~rTiTlg Official or Desigr1ee to Ver.J-f) ~. _ 'I! \,... 9",-:0 '" - ..J: .. . '!!.. ~ - --.1- 1) Does tt'.e ;:'Pec1i.H r:.xceptiofl create anv aa:verse u:npact to aalacem: propeny ~ ....... J _ ~.A .... '" trJougt~ the creation of noise, light, vibration. tr>...f..41.c, utility requirements, or , . storn:n.vater rm"loff that would not have been created had the properrj been _ , ... I. .... 1:.. . 'i ". ~ "I! . -.1 * !._. 'l' 1... developed as a prmcrple use m tne applicable ZOI1L.'1.g CllSmc~. No. This project will have a low impact on the area. ,",'I. -i. -. ~ - .. ,- ~ i 't:;" . ,! '\>... F= 0 ...... L.) wiH th~ 0peCla. .....xceptlOu create any unusual pOllce, :nre or emergency servIceS"! ! This should create nothing unusual. There is similar activity in the surrounding area. 3) wm the Special Exception meet all the requirements of t.lte zoning district in \"Jhich t'Iu:: requp~t is to be located, such as: lot requirements, buiidirtg st:!:barlc.E .. ~ ~ '!!,! ~ '" "" _ 0:'5 1'1" _ i:'r '" - = ~ reqm:retne!\ts, tOl: coverage, helgtlt, lJUll'ers, orr-Srr€e! parking. Slgr.s, storage, lar1dscaplll,~ EtCe? i Yes. 4'\,~ Is th,ere adequate ingress and e~lessF Wlu"1 nartiC'JIar reference to auto arid A _ "'_ .i. pedestda.t1 safety and convenience,' trar"fic flow 2rnd control, a."1d emergerlCj access in case of p..ze or medical erner2.-enc;? I v J : None bf the exterior accesses will be changed. 5) Is ttl€re adeauate ofr-street parkin.g and loading: areas available without creating: ~ _ J. .... - ; '"" 1..# UIlaue inoise, giare, odor or cU'1er detri""ental effects upon adjoiPing property ,.,. Q'\\<'11ers ( Yes. This should have little impact on adjoining property. 6) 1S th~€ adequate and prop;:>;ly located. utilities available or lllay be reasonably provided to serve the proposed development (if applicable)? Not Applicable. No utilities are to be added for this project. 7) Is there adequate screening and I or buffe-r'ffig provided to protect rlild. provif€ compatibility to adjoining propel. ;.;es? Yes. This use is similar to other businesses within a on~ block area. S) =~t;:a/;~i;s;:r~:;~~E~:~:~~~:r~ i:~ir~~~:? ;l:r: 7 No idditional lighting is pl'anned. 6) Is there adequate refuse and service areas? I We dQ not expect to generate mU9h refuse with this project. i 10) Do the. se~backs, landscaping, and open space met the requirements of the zoning di~trict? The set~acks and landscaping shbuld remain the same and the only ney construction is a sect~on of fence within the property. 11) Is the proposed use compatible with surrounding uses in its function, its hours of: operation, the type amount ofl traffic generated, structure size and setbacks, its relationship to land values and any other facts that may be used ~ measure or determine compatibility? The proposed use is similar to. other properties within a block br two in the surroundin~ area. 12) Is the Special Exception consistent with. the goals, objectives and policies of the Cqmprehen~ive Plan? Yes. I 13) Is the Special Exception consistent with the intent of the zoning district : i withwhfch the Special Exception is sought? . Yes. ITHis is light commercia\ ~ctivity. i 14) Has th~ petitioner met the minimum: requirements for the requested Special Exception and demonstrated enrtlement to the Special Exception which "'fill not adversely affect the publi~ interest? Yes. :This is in the public i~terest. This will allow the p~blic storage for trailerable items and RV's. 15) Should! the Special Exception be gra:t;lted with any noted limitations, restrictions and/ or conditions? .' l" . I . No.Pr~vided the petitioner agfees to follow through with trie submitted plans and d~es nothing to violate any current zoning re~uireme~ts or restrictions. cj 8 ' ~ N .. 5K~fCH Of- f\....01' Pl.-AN PRiPARiO fORI ~A5f COA5f MARIN~ OROK~R51 INC. w B ~ fOW OOAf U.5. PORf CANAV~RA~ . GRAPHIC SCALE ~.......~~ 5~NIOR o~~o PARC~~ o ~ ~ N (IN FBET ) ~ 1 INCH . 60 FEET . . ~ ... $ J~~ .,. ~ 1J..'It Sf TE Jf .)../t tl/q' U) .... i::J ~ ~ /d g~ 0 PROPOS~D 60Af $ fRAI~~R : : i~ ~ SfORA&~ YARD l ...!JI ,.; ~ 19) 350 SO. f'f i1 ! 38.23 ~ _\ . \33 ACR~S- tJ S8Q"8'.2',; : RE~: ~;~~ ;~:~R YARD ~ ~ i ~:j~ ~ ~ '" '" ! g : ~. W / f~J- CONCTAveT NEW SECURI TY CATE /' ~ l!!Jou 2' Jy 256. 9} 23.8' LEV S88' 15' 03' W ~ -1~O : I ~ g ~ SCALEI l' 80' n't J " (JJ 01 co o::S S~: ~~~ t ~: I ~''i UI z~: I u ~ -..: fTI~li '!! "' i~il, B~AGH MM'P I N& reI ANO tl ;g~:1 5URWY I N& ~ ~ ~ 1 t 00\ 0 NOl:H1 ~;~~N~b~ ~~o. 5Ul H 12 ~r Lx-...... CM'J CAN....Vt:f::M,1 nOf;:10^ :)1920 "'!l) ~ ! K, CONerRUCT NEW SECURITY GATE _ _ _ _ ' : \ \ " \ J LJ....__I__LLJ " r'A- PHON/> ';}21' 70~'1171 //"\ " / fAX -:)21' 70.:}'IOSO 1/ V t Exl S1I NG GATE ""I.-Of ""I.-AN LEGEND WOODEN POWER POLE 5"G. Ii, 1'WP. 21 6. t R't'tt. 37 t.. € GUY WIRE ..., BENCH ~ n LIGHT POt.E A SET NAIL a. DISC ; :~:: :~: N ~HaE ~;~~~. :::~~~~;:T=NT SURVEYOR' S NOTESI o CATCH BASIN 0 FOUNO"S AESAA 1. THIS SITE LIES IN FLOOD 'X' ACCORDING TO N.F.I.P. MAP NO. 123139C3313 E. CtN1RAI,.. t)OUI,..e.VARO @ SANl TARY SE~R MANHOLE . SET "S AEBAR (COfoMJNl TY NO. I 25lil94l 11-19-97. CAPe. GANAVtRAl.- .. (lAlE VAVLE - OIRe:CTlON 0;: FLOW 2. NO ENCROACHMENTS NOTED AT n ~ OF SURVEY. OReV ARO C,OUN1Y) fl.-OR I VA U' FIRE lirDRANT ..... HARSH 3. NOT VAll 0 UNLESS Et-eOSSED WI TH SURVEYOR'S I t-FRESSl ON SEAL. SHEET I OF I DRAWl NG NO. 06.019 ra N 5K~"CH O~ ~l.-O" fl.-AN PR~PARfJ.O fORI .." HSf COASf MARINI> BROKI>RS) INC. 1$ -roW BOAf U.S. PORf CANAVI>RAl.- SI>NIOR OHO PARCH- . .~. GRAPHIC SCALE ~~ 0 60 /20 "- ( IN FEET ) 152. 1'6 I INCH . W FEET t; / ~. .' ",' '" c,' ~ ~ - i~ ~ ~ m 51 TE 38.23 saq- 1 8' 02' E HEMAl NI NG LUMBER YARD '" ~ ~~ 1.738 ACRES 'w W' ~ j m JvSe. "9- 12' Iv .? BOUL 56'9, tl'IIIlRo SCALEI I' :: 80' PROf?OSI>O MAl' $ fRAIL-~R [ SfORA&~ YARO uoc s~ 49,350 SO, f'f i~ -\ . 133 AGR~S- z ~ " 55" 30' L-. O. A. X 10' B~AM BO A1" S 8:::: IjJ MACH MM'PIN& ANO 0URV~YIN& oOIO.f.lOJ:::fH An.AN;'Ic. Dt..VO. ::'J.Jl1"e: 12 P.O. 00'1. 512 c.Af'~ C....NAVtl;:^\-, nOR10A :i1l(20 -~~ LL. _I__LLJ f"110N~ ':ill' 70J" 1171 fAX ':i21' 70;}-lO50 Pl.-Of Pl.-AN wOODEN POweR POLE ~~G. Ii, fWP. 21 ~" R6~. ~7~. LEGEND f GUY WIRE '" BENCH MARl( DRAWN Bf: P: LICHT POLE V.LK L:l. SET HAIL 6. DIsC REvl SED By: "'POI!ERPOLE o rOUNO 4' H' CONCRETE l-ONuM;NT K. L. t-\, 8. @ STORM ORAIN MANHOlE . SET ~'X4' CONCRETE M'JNU"(OIT SURVEYOR'S NOTES: o CATCH BASIN o FOUND . 5 REaM 1. TH! 5 SI TE LI ES I N FLOOD' X' ACCORDl NG TO N. F. I. P. HAP NO. 120~9C031 3 E. CtNfRAl.- OOUl.-tVARO @ SANllAAr SE'oIER I"ANHOl.E . SET.5 REBAR (COi+UNITY NO. 125094) 11~1'1-97. CAPt CANAVtRAl.- D CATE ~A~l.E - 01 RECTI ON Of' FLOII 2, NO ENCROACHMENTS NOTED AT Tll'-'( OF SURVEY. ORtVARC> COUNfY, fl.-OR I C>A t!FIAEHYORANT .... MARSH 3. NOT VAll 0 UNLESS EMBOSSED Wl TH SURVEYOR' 5 1 t-f'RESSI ON SEAL. SHEET 1 OF I DRAWl NG NO. 06.019 . . 0 ~ .., s- !:: m .., s- CJ.) ;:j s- .., 0 CJ.) CJ.) e::: en CJ.) "'C tJ) s- ea m CJ.) 0 - c.. OJ ~ RADIUS MAP Brevard County Property Appraiser; Jim Ford BUFFER DISTANCE: 500 FEEl' APPLICANT NAME(S)j ADDRESS: Based on data from the Property Appraiser's Office MAP SCALE IS 1:6000 (one inch = 500 feet) NASAJPOUR, AB I 784-1450, This map was wmpiled from recorded documents and does not reflect LEGEND: an (l,Cttwl S'ltT1ley. The Brevard C01J.nty BiXJ.rd of Commissioners, Notification buffer OWNER NAME(S)/ ADDRESS: Property Appraiser, and Geographic Inforw:dion Services do not asS'ltme lZSZI Parcel/lot boundaries AB NASAJPOUR, TRUSTEE respilnsibitity for errors or ommissions contained hereon. 1301 PALACE DR, ROCKLEDGE, FL 32955 Produced by: Brevard County Planning & Zoning Office - GIS, January '(;I, 2006 Numbers on map correspond to mailing list Pro;.#IClZ -.....soo .....sQll-l.<mp Mav 25_ 2006 ----.I --, -- -.- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER(S): Special Exception Request No. 06-04 Notice is hereby given by the City of Cape Canaveral, that applicant Abulghasem Nasajpour and Ahmad Nasajpour, 200 W. Central Blvd., Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 have requested a Special Exception To Allow Outside Storaqe or Recreationai Vehicles, Trailers and Traiierable Items in the C-2 Commercial Zoninq Dirstrict, pursuant to the Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances, Zoning Regulations, Section 11 0-383(C)(7) for the property described as follows: Legal Description: Township 24S, Range 37E, Section 15, West Portion of Parcel 760 ParcellD: 24-37-15-00-00760.0-0000.00 (200 W. Central Blvd., Cape Canaveral, FL 32920) In accordance with the City Code of Ordinance No. 18-2002, this letter shall serve as notice that there will be a public hearing before the Cape Canaveral Planning and Zoning Board regarding the property noted above. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, June 14,2006, at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL. The Planning & Zoning Board is advisory in nature and will make a recommendation to the Cape Canaveral Board of Adjustment with respect to the above-named property. The final administrative approval or denial will come before the Board of Adjustment at a subsequent scheduled meeting. Since your property may be located within SOO-feet of this property comments can be made in person or may be submitted in writing at the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting or to the City Clerk's Office at 105 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not constitute consent by the City for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by law. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City Clerk's office (868-1221), 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Susan Stills, CMC City Clerk c@) CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SPECIAL EXCEPTION WORKSHEET Outdoor Storage 06-03 The purpose of this worksheet are two-fold: (1) to assist the Planning and Zoning Board and the Board of Adjustment in the evaluation of all criteria relevant to the application; and (2) to educate the applicant as to the criteria which must be addressed and satisfied prior to beginning the special exception consideration process. If the applicant can not satisfactorily address one or more of the following, this should serve as a preliminary indication that the request for special exception may be rejected or that the application may not be acceptable for processing. CRITERIA (Building Official or Designee to Verify) 1) Does the Special Exception create any adverse impact to adjacent property through the creation of noise, light, vibration, traffic, utility requirements, or stormwater runoff that would not have been created had the property been developed as a principle use in the applicable zoning district. The applicant's request for a Special Exception to allow outside storage parking of boats, and Trailers in a Commercial (C-2) Zoning district. The C-2 zoning district is consistent and compatible with the acfjacent properties. There are currentfy industrial uses to the north, east and west of the suf?ject properry, outdoor storage was approved on properry to the east. However, the suo/ect site cUfTentfy appears to be instiflicientfy buffered from Central Boulevard. Buffen"ng will be further evaluated during site plan revzew. In addition, the proposed special exception of outdoor storage of Boats and trailers would not appear to create additional noise, light, vibration, traffic, utili!J requirements, or stOTmwater runoff that would signijicantfy adversefy impact the acfjacent land uses. 2) Will the Special Exception create any unusual police, fire or emergency services? No unusual emergenry services are needed. 3) Will the Special Exception meet all the requirements of the zoning district in which the request is to be located, such as: lot requirements, building setbacks requirements, lot coverage, height, buffers, off-street parking, signs, storage, landscaping, etc.? Should the Special Exception request be granted, the properry owner is suf?ject to Special Exception criteria listed in the Cape Canaveral Land Development Regulations. The suo/ect property has the potential to meet these requirements. 4) Is there adequate ingress and egress, with particular reference to auto and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and emergency access in case of fire or medical emergency? This application requests outdoor storage of boats and trailers in a Commercial C-2Zoning district. The suf?ject site will gain access to Central Boulevard. 5) Is there adequate off-street parking and loading areas available without creating undue noise, glare, odor or other detrimental effects upon adjoining property owners? @ The applicant is proposing outdoor storage oj boats and trailers. TherifOre a substantial portion oj the concept plan is a parking lot. 6) Is there adequate and properly located utilities available or may be reasonably provided to serve the proposed development (if applicable)? Adequate utilities are available to the suf?ject site. 7) Is there adequate screening and/or buffering provided to protect and provide compatibility to adjoining properties? Applicant must meet the screening and btiffering requirements oj Chapter 102, Ciry oj Cape Canaveral Code oj Ordinances. In addition, the applicant mqy need to further screen the proposed use from trqffic on Central Boulevard. 8) Are signs and exterior lighting, if any, designed and arranged so as to promote traffic safety and to eliminate or minimize any undue glare, incompatibility, and disharmony with adjoining properties? All lighting and trqffic scifery requirements must be meet according to Ciry oj Cape Canaveral Code oj Ordinances. 9) Is there adequate refuse and service areas? There is adequate refuse capaciry. 10) Do the setbacks, landscaping, and open space meet the requirements of the zoning district? The suqject szte ?JZztst lneet the setbac/es, landscaPing and open space reqttirements of tbe Cape Canaveral Land Development Code. 11) Is the proposed use compatible with surrounding uses in its function, its hours of operation, the type amount of traffic generated, structure size and setbacks, its relationship to land values and any other facts that may be used to measure or deteffi'11}e compatibility? The proposed use has the potential to be consistent and compatible with the surrounding uses. This can be achieved through adequate screening and btiffering between the suf?ject site and Central Boulevard to the south. 12) Is the Special Exception consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? This 'Special Exception' request is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 13) Is the Special Exception consistent with the intent of the zoning district with which the Special Exception is sought? Yes, the Special Exception is consistent with the intent of the zoning district. @ 2 14) Has the petitioner met. the minimum requirements for the requested Special Exception and demonstrated entitlement to the Special Exception which will not adversely affect the public interest? To be recommended ry the Planning and Zoning Board and determined ry the Board of Adjustment. 15) Should the Special Exception be granted with any noted limitations, restrictions and/or conditions? To be recommended ry the Planning and Zoning Board and determined ry the Board of Acjjustment. 3 (if) BUILDING OFFICIAL OR DESIGNEE REVIEW 1. _ Zoning Amendment 2. - Variance Contiguous Zoning 3. X Special Exception North South East West 4. _ Administrative Appeal M-1 C-2 C-1 M-1 C-2 CONSIDERATIONS SETBACKS: Yes MEETS CODE _ CODE VIOLATION (Describe) COVERAGE: Yes MEETS CODE _ CODE VIOLATION (Describe) LOT SIZE: Yes MEETS CODE _ CODE VIOLATION (Describe) DENSITY: Yes MEETS CODE _ CODE VIOLATION (Describe) HEIGHT: Yes MEETS CODE _ CODE VIOLATION (Describe) ADDITIONAL REFERENCES Code Sect. Applicability Yes No PARKING 110-491 X LOADING ZONE NA - X SETBACKS (AlA Ridgewood/ Astronaut) NA - X LANDSCAPING 110-566-567 --X NON-CONFORMITIES NA - STRUCTURES NA - LAND USES NA - NOTE: The Planning & Zoning Board should also review Section 110-47 (1-11) COMMENTS: No additional comments {p/01oc :~~:~~ffiCWO~~ / / 4 GV MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Morley, Building Official FROM: Todd Peetz City Planner DATE: June 6, 2006 RE: Special Exception for Outdoor Boat Storage 06-03 I have reviewed the submittal of the special exception review for the above referenced project. My comments/concerns are addressed in the special exception worksheet attached to this item. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 407-629-8880. uY MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Morley, Building Official TO: Todd Peetz City Planner FROM: Ed Gardulski Public Works Director DATE: June 1, 2006 RE: Special Exception 06-04 AB Nasajpour The Public Works Department has reviewed the above stated project and has a concern about having outside storage in view of one of the City's main roadway. (j) Page 1 of 1 Todd Peetz From: John Cunningham [jcunningham@ccvfd.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 9:29 AM To: Todd Peetz Subject: Re: Special Exception 06-04 (outside storage) We have reviewed the special exception and have no comment at this time. @ 61712006