Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcocc_case_no_22-093_romano_SPECIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, A Florida Municipal Corporation, Complainant, V. Case No. 22-093 ANTONIO ROMANO and LIDIA ROMANO, 3951 Hunters Isle Drive Orlando, FL 32837 Respondents. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Special Magistrate of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida on January 24, 2023, for consideration after due and lawful notice to the Respondents, ANTONI0 ROMANO and LIDIA ROMANO, 3951 Hunters Isle Drive, Orlando, FL 32837, to determine whether that certain property located at 618 Madison Ave. Cape Canaveral, FL. 32920 (the "Subject Property") is in violation of the City of Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances. Having heard the arguments and testimony, and having reviewed the record evidence and being fully advised, the Special Magistrate issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order, as set forth herein. FINDINGS OF FACT The Special Magistrate finds as follows: 1. Respondents own the Subject Property. 2. Inspections by the City occurred on September 15, 2022, November 17, 2022, and January 24, 2023, 1 3. The City's inspector observed and documented major cracks, holes, and spalling in multiple areas of the exterior wall and foundation. A header above a window is crumbling. Stairs and balconies have rotting and cracking wood. Paint is faded, chipped and peeling. The roof soffit is missing in multiple locations. 4. A fence is in disrepair and has rotten, missing and broken slats throughout. The fence is leaning in multiple areas. Chipped, faded and peeling paint is on the fence surface. Part of the fence was demolished so that Universal Engineering could bring equipment onsite for soil boring. 5. The City served a Notice of Violation on June 16, 2022 via U.S. Certified Mail and received a return receipt indicating service on June 17, 2022. 6. The City served a Notice of Hearing on December 28, 2022 via U.S. Certified Mail and posted the Subject Property and City Hall on January 13, 2023. 7. The Subject Property is a hazard to public health, safety, and welfare and is a blight on the neighborhood. 8. In May 2022, Respondents retained Fulvio Romano, a licensed architect, a redesign the Subject Property. Fulvio Romano testified that Respondents acquired the Subject Property in March 2022. 9. In August 2022, Respondents retained a structural engineer, Mason Zie, ASE Engineering in Orlando, to prepare engineering drawings. 10. Fulvio Romano expects to have new schematic drawing of the Subject Property by the end of January 2023. He testified that Respondents would submit an application with plans for partial demolition to the City by the end of January 2023. He expects to have final architectural and engineering plans by the end of March 2023. He expects construction to commence in July 2023 and last approximately nine months. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The City's service of the Notice of Violation and Notice of Hearing complied with the Section 2-253 of the City Code and Florida Statutes § § 162.06 and 162.12. 2. The City adopted the International Property Maintenance Code (the "IPMC") at Section 82-221 of the City Code. 3. The rotten fence in disrepair, with missing and broken slats, is in violation of section 302.7 of the IPMC (Accessory Structures), which states, "Accessory structures, including detached garages, fences and walls, shall be maintained structurally sound and in good repair." 4. The Subject Property is in violation of Section 304.1 of the IPMC (General), which states, "The exterior of a structure shall be maintained in good repair, structurally sound and sanitary so as not to pose a threat to the public health, safety or welfare." 5. The Subject Property is in violation of Section 304.1.1 of the IPMC (Unsafe Condition), which states: The following conditions shall be determined as unsafe and shall be repaired or replaced to comply with the International Building Code or the International Existing Building Code as required for existing buildings: .... 5. Structural members that have evidence of deterioration or that are not capable of safely supporting all nominal loads and load effects; .... 7. Exterior walls that are not anchored to supporting and supported elements or are not plumb and free of holes, cracks or breaks and loose or rotting materials, are not properly anchored or are not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; .... 12. Exterior stairs, decks, porches, balconies and all similar appurtenances attached thereto, including guards and 3 handrails, are not structurally sound, not properly anchored or that are anchored with connections not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects. 6. The Subject Property is in violation of Section 304.2 of the IPMC (Protective Treatment), which states: 304.2 Protective treatment. Exterior surfaces, including but not limited to, doors, door and window frames, cornices, porches, trim, balconies, decks and fences, shall be maintained in good condition. Exterior wood surfaces, other than decay -resistant woods, shall be protected from the elements and decay by painting or other protective covering or treatment. Peeling, flaking and chipped paint shall be eliminated and surfaces repainted. Siding and masonry joints, as well as those between the building envelope and the perimeter of windows, doors and skylights, shall be maintained weather resistant and water tight. Metal surfaces subject to rust or corrosion shall be coated to inhibit such rust and corrosion, and surfaces with rust or corrosion shall be stabilized and coated to inhibit future rust and corrosion. Oxidation stains shall be removed from exterior surfaces. Surfaces designed for stabilization by oxidation are exempt from this requirement. 7. The Subject Property is in violation of Section 304.4 of the IPMC (Structural members), which states, "Structural members shall be maintained free from deterioration, and shall be capable of safely supporting the imposed dead and live loads." 8. The Subject Property is in violation of Section 304.5 of the IPMC (Foundation Walls), which states, "Foundation walls shall be maintained plumb and free from open cracks and breaks and shall be kept in such condition so as to prevent the entry of rodents and other pests." 9. The Subject Property is in violation of Section 304.6 of the IPMC (Exterior Walls), which states, "Exterior walls shall be free from holes, breaks, and loose or rotting materials; and maintained weatherproof and properly surface coated where required to prevent deterioration." 10. The Subject Property is in violation of Section 304.10 of the IPMC (Stairways, decks, porches and balconies), which states, "Every exterior stairway, deck, porch and balcony, 4 and all appurtenances attached thereto, shall be maintained structurally sound, in good repair, with proper anchorage and capable of supporting the imposed loads." 11. The Subject Property is in violation of Section 304.12 of the IPMC (Handrails and guards), which states, "Every handrail and guard shall be firmly fastened and capable of supporting normally imposed loads and shall be maintained in good condition." 12. The Subject Property is in violation of Section 301.1.1 of the IPMC (Unsafe conditions), which states: Where any of the following conditions cause the component or system to be beyond its limit state, the component or system shall be determined as unsafe and shall be repaired or replaced to comply with the International Building Code or the International Existing Building Code as required for existing buildings: 2. Concrete that has been subjected to any of the following conditions: 2.1. Deterioration; 2.2. Ultimate deformation; 2.3. Fractures; 2.4. Fissures; 2.5. Spalling; 2.6. Exposed reinforcement; or 2.7. Detached, dislodged or failing connections. 4. Masonry that has been subjected to any of the following conditions: 4.1. Deterioration; 4.2. Ultimate deformation; 4.3. Fractures in masonry or mortar joints; 5 4.4. Fissures in masonry or mortar joints; 4.5. Spalling; 4.6. Exposed reinforcement; or 4.7. Detached, dislodged or failing connections BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Respondents shall have until February 27, 2023 in which to submit an application for a demolition permit for partial demolition of the Subject Property. 2. Because of the serious safety hazards on the Subject Property, any and all tenants or other inhabitants must vacate the premises no later than February 27, 2023. 3. Respondents shall have until April 30, 2023 in which to submit an application for a construction permit with all required architectural and engineering drawings and shall thereafter submit all applications required for construction in accordance with the Florida Building Code. 4. Respondents must keep all permits in good standing. 5. Respondents shall bring the Subject Property into full compliance with the City Code, including sections of the IPMC incorporated into the City Code, before expiration of all necessary construction permits. 6. If Respondents fail to comply within the time -periods set forth in this Order, the Code Enforcement Officer shall schedule a compliance hearing before the Special Magistrate and duly notify Respondents of the hearing in accordance with law. Respondents shall have an opportunity to appear and present testimony and evidence as to whether the violation is continuing on the Subject Property. 7. The Special Magistrate shall make a final determination at a compliance hearing whether Respondents have achieved compliance, and if not, will impose fines. Upon a finding that the Subject Property remains in violation, the Special Magistrate shall issue a fine in an amount up to $250.00 per day for a first violation and up to $500.00 per day for each repeat violation, per violation, until the Respondents have corrected the violation. In addition, a fine may include any costs of repair incurred by the City as well as the City's enforcement costs. 8. Any fines which may be imposed may become a lien in favor of the City on the Subject Property and upon any other real or personal property of the Respondent, pursuant to Section 2-252(e) of the City Code and Florida Statutes § 162.09(3). 9. All non -homestead real property subject to a code enforcement lien is subject to foreclosure pursuant to Florida Statutes § 162.09(3) and the City may obtain an award of its costs, including a reasonable attorney's fee, pursuant to Florida Statutes § 162.10. DONE AND ORDERED at Cape Canaveral, Florida, this 27th day of January, 2023. RICHARD S. GELLER Special Magistrate City of Cape Canaveral STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ORANGE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by physical presence or online notarization o this a-1*' day of , 2023 by Ric ar . e er. Said person (check one) is personally known to me, produ ed a driver's license (issued by a state of the United States) as identification, or ❑ produced other identification, to wit: (Affix Notary Seal) MyCM%$"#WWM eondea inn, trotary auapc t�nderwrMers 7 Notary Public -State of Florida CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I furnished a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order on Violation(s) by certified and regular U.S. Mail to the Respondents, ANTONIO ROMANO and LIDIA ROMANO, 3951 Hunters Isle Drive, Orlando, FL 32837, this 31 day of Tan uaru , 2023. Code Enforcement Officer S:\RSG\CLIENTS\Cape Canaveral, City OASpecial Magistrate Services C761-25271\Hearings\Hearing 2023\01 24 23\Findings Of Fact, Conclusions Of Law & Order - Romano - 125 23.Docx 0