Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
cocc_p&z_agenda_packet_20250402
CAPE CANAVERAL PLANNING & ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY City Hall Council Chambers 100 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 April 2, 2025 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the public may provide comments to the Planning & Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency (PZB) regarding matters not on the agenda provided that the comments are relevant to the legal responsibilities delegated to the PZB by the City Code and law, and not related to pending quasi-judicial matters which will be heard at a subsequent PZB meeting. Public comments related to public hearing Agenda Items will occur during the public hearing. The PZB is not required to take public comments on emergency or ministerial items (e.g., approval of agenda, minutes, informational items). Members of the public will limit their comments to three (3) minutes. The PZB will not take any action under the "Public Participation" section of the agenda. However, if appropriate at the discretion of the PZB, the PZB may schedule matters commented upon during public participation at a future PZB meeting. OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes — December 11, 2024 2. Consideration of a Site Plan Application for multi -family dwellings (apartment 5-units) for the vacant lot on the southeast corner of Orange Avenue & Buchanan Avenue, approximately 0.42 acres, identified as Brevard County Tax Parcel 24 37 23 CG 67 1 3. Consideration of Site Plan Application for a Hotel and Restaurant on 5.75 acres at 8955 Columbia Road (Parcel ID 24-37-15-00-34) 4. Recommended for Continuance: Lot Split Application approval at 9009 Astronaut Boulevard, approximately 7.19 acres, identified as Brevard County Tax Parcels 24-37-15-00-252 and 24-37-15-00-267 REPORTS AND OPEN DISCUSSION ADJOURNMENT: Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, the City hereby advises the public that: If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the PZB with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not constitute consent by the City for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by law. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act: all interested parties may attend this Public Meeting. The facility is accessible to the physically handicapped. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in the proceedings should contact the City Clerk's office [(321) 868-1220 x207 or x206] 48 hours in advance of the meeting. CAPE CANAVERAL PLANNING & ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY City Hall Council Chambers 100 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 December 11, 2024 6:00 P.M. MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: A meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board (PZB) took place on December 11, 2024 at City Hall Council Chambers, 100 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida. Chairman Russell called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. The Board Secretary called the roll. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Lamar Russell John Price Susan Denny Nancy Gentilquore Steven Stroud MEMBERS ABSENT: Dr. Michael Miller OTHERS PRESENT: Brianna Soat Abigail Holmes Zachary Eichholz Anthony Garganese Renee Yother Chairman Vice Chairman Board Member Board Member Board Member Director, Community and Economic Development Manager, Resilience Planning and Services Chief Resilience Manager/ Emergency Operations Manager City Attorney Board Secretary BCSO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: None OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes - September 18, 2024. Motion to approve the minutes as written was made by Vice Chairman Price and seconded by Board Member Denny, vote carried unanimously. 2. Consider a Proposed Amendment to the City of Cape Canaveral Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element and Future Land Use Element to Mitigate and Adapt to Current and Future Flood Events. Mr. Eichholz gave a brief background of the Comprehensive Plan to its current status, conveying the need and reasons why the Proposed Amendment is needed. Mrs. Holmes briefly discussed her professional background and Peril of Flood. Discussion ensued regarding Peril of Flood Act, Senate Bill 1094 and its requirements for local governments to develop strategies to reduce the risk of flooding of coastal areas, Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes — December 11, 2024 Page 2 of 3 the community rating system with FEMA, the national flood insurance program, benefits of adopting the amendment. Attorney Garganese discussed issues regarding infield development and elevations of proposed new projects on adjacent properties and recommending an additional objective in the Peril of Flood revision. "The code of ordinances will require proposed new and redevelopment projects to have compatible elevations and mitigation techniques recommended by the city engineer to reduce the potential risk of flooding from new and redevelopment projects on adjacent properties and rights of way." Discussion ensued regarding potential unintended consequences, Land Development permitting process, future adoption of Land Development regulations, language for the Proposed Amendment, location and area coverage of the proposed Enhanced Resilience Area (ERA) within the City. Mr. Eichholz informed the Board that the State requires the City's current Vulnerability Assessment to be revised. The document will undergo a complete revision which will be rewritten by the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council. Discussion ensued regarding erosion on the Banana River and the City's Water Treatment Plant. Board Member Denny suggested to recommend the Proposed Amendment to the City Council. City Attorney Garganese advised a motion to state to "Recommend the Proposed Ordinance to City Council including adding an objective to the Ordinance to address the language that Attorney Garganese read in the record regarding compatible elevations and mitigation techniques." Vice Chairman Price motioned to make a recommendation to Council using the verbiage that the City Attorney has put together regarding neighboring elevations, seconded by Board Member Stroud. Vote carried unanimously. REPORTS AND OPEN DISCUSSION: Chairman Russell inquired about the City's reclaim water process. Mr. Eichholz explained the process and treatment. 1. Scheduling of next meeting on January 8 or 22: The Board agreed to January 8, 2025. 2. Scheduling of subsequent meeting on February 12 or 26: The Board agreed to February 26, 2025. Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes— December 11, 2024 Page 3 of 3 ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:25 PM. Approved on the day of , 2025. Lamar Russell, Chairman Renee Yother, Recording Secretary PLANNING AND ZONING (P&Z) BOARD April 2, 2025 REGULAR MEETING • ITEM #2 Subject: Consideration of Site Plan Application for multi -family dwellings (apartment 5-units) for the vacant lot on the southeast corner of Orange Avenue & Buchanan Avenue, approximately 0.42 acres, identified as Brevard County Tax Parcel 24 37 23 CG 67 1. The property is zoned R-2 (Medium Density Residential District). Summary: The applicant, Arthur Berger, is requesting approval for a Site Plan Application and Concurrency Compliance Review for the Buchanan & Orange Ave. multi -family dwellings, a new residential development consisting of five (5) multi -family dwelling units on a 0.42-acre site. The subject property has an R-2 Medium Density Residential Future Land Use Map and Zoning Designation. The R-2 designation permits up to 15 units/acre. Here, the applicant is proposing a density of 11.9 dwelling units per acre which is in compliance with the maximum 15 dwelling unit requirement set forth in City's Comprehensive Plan. The applicable area and dimension requirements for R-2 are set forth in Section 110-296 which state: In the R-2 medium density residential district, the following area and dimensions shall be required: (1) Minimum lot area shall be 10,000 square feet. (2) Minimum lot width shall be 75 feet. (3) Minimum lot depth shall be 100 feet. (4) Maximum lot coverage shall be 35 percent. (5) Minimum living or floor area shall be as follows: 750 square feet per dwelling unit (plus 200 square feet for each additional bedroom beyond two bedrooms). (6) Maximum height shall not exceed 25 feet, except that maximum height of public or recreational buildings and structures on land with a future land use designation of Public/Recreation (PUB) shall not exceed 35 feet. (7) Maximum length or width of a structure shall not exceed 185 feet. The applicable minimum setback requirements are stated in Section 110-297 as follows: (1) Front, 25 feet. (2) Side (interior lot line), eight feet or ten percent of width of lot, whichever is greater, up to 15 feet. City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting of April 2, 2025 Page 2 of 6 (3) Side (corner lot line), 25 feet; on all nonconforming lots of record, 15 feet. (4) Rear, 15 feet. (5) Public or private street, 25 feet. Furthermore, City Comprehensive Plan POLICY LU-1.3.2 states that "[t]he City shall require new development to be compatible with adjacent land uses." As such, Staff examined the adjacent properties and surrounding area for the purpose of determining whether the proposed project is compatible with adjacent land uses. Based on this examination, Staff determined that the adjacent properties and surrounding area consist of: townhouses, apartment complexes, and a variety of multi -family uses. The intersection of Orange Avenue and Buchanan Avenue is situated within a predominantly residential area. Each property in immediate adjacent to the development is within the R-2 Medium Density Residential District, and R-2 Future Land Use designation. The parcel to the east is the two-story Sea Moon Condominium. Immediately to the north are 308 and 304 Buchanan Avenue, two-story apartments. The property on the northwest corner of Orange Avenue and Buchanan Avenue is a one-story triplex. The property on the southwest corner of the same intersection are two-story townhouses. The immediate surroundings represent the character of the R-2 zoning district, with an eventual shift toward the R-3 zoning district to the east and the C-1 zoning district to the west toward State Road A1A. Community and Economic Development Staff professionally opines that the development is compatible with adjacent land uses, therefore aligning with City Comprehensive Plan POLICY LU- 1.3.2. The development will also feature two -bedroom units, with each unit containing two bathrooms. The total proposed building square footage is 6,326 square feet. The City's Community Appearance Board approved the design unanimously, with no conditions, on January 15th, 2025. Chapter 110, Article VI, of the City Code lays out the process by which the City will review and approve a Site Plan application: (1) representatives of the City's engineering, building, code enforcement, public works, and fire entities review and submit comments to the applicant who makes changes as necessary; (2) the Planning & Zoning Board holds a public meeting and makes a recommendation on the Site Plan; and (3) the City Manager's designee, the Community and Economic Development Director, takes final action on the request. Sec. 110-222(b) of City Code provides findings required for approval of the Site Plan. Prior to approving any proposed Site Plan, the applicant must demonstrate the following. 1) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the site plan, including its proposed density, height, scale and intensity, hours of operation, building and lighting design, setbacks, buffers, noise, refuse, odor, particulates, smoke, fumes and other emissions, parking and traffic -generating characteristics, number of persons anticipated using, residing or working under the plan, and other off -site impacts, is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses, and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. The proposed five -unit multi -family development is compatible with the surrounding land uses and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. The project is located within the R-2 Medium Density Residential District, which is already characterized by a variety City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting of April 2, 2025 Page 3 of 6 of multi -family residential developments, including townhouses, condominiums, triplexes, and apartment buildings. The two-story height of the proposed structure aligns with the scale of neighboring properties, such as the Sea Moon Condominium to the east and the two-story apartment buildings to the north and townhomes to the west. This ensures that the development will blend seamlessly into the existing residential fabric without introducing an incompatible building mass or disrupting the established character of the area. The project's density of 11.9 dwelling units per acre is within the allowable 15 dwelling units per acre, ensuring that the intensity of development remains consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. The site plan complies with all setback, height, lot coverage, and parking requirements, preventing overcrowding and maintaining appropriate separation between structures. Adequate on -site parking will prevent overflow onto adjacent streets, and the project's residential nature will generate a minimal increase in traffic, comparable to existing developments in the area. Additionally, the inclusion of landscaping and buffers will mitigate any potential visual or noise impacts, preserving the privacy and quality of life for neighboring residents. Because the surrounding properties are also residential in nature, the proposed development will not introduce any disruptive elements such as commercial or industrial uses. The gradual transition of zoning from R-2 to R-3 to the east and C-1 to the west supports a logical progression of density and land use intensity, reinforcing the appropriateness of this project within its immediate context. The development is designed to function harmoniously within the neighborhood while supporting its continued residential character. Given these factors, the project is consistent with the intent of the zoning district and will integrate well with the existing land use patterns, ensuring long-term compatibility with the surrounding area. 2) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to accommodate the proposed density, scale and intensity of the site plan requested. The site shall be of sufficient size to accommodate design amenities such as screening, buffers, landscaping, open space, off-street parking, safe and convenient automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian mobility at the site, and other similar site plan improvements needed to mitigate against potential adverse impacts of the proposed use. The site is adequately sized at 0.42 acres to accommodate the proposed density and scale of the development. The layout includes appropriate setbacks, buffers, and on -site parking to comply with City Code. Design elements such as pedestrian access and circulation are incorporated, with a condition for constructing a sidewalk along Orange Avenue to enhance pedestrian mobility. Internal circulation is efficiently designed for residents and service vehicles. 3) Whether the proposed site plan will have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values. The proposed development will not have an adverse impact on the local economy. Rather, it is expected to enhance property values by replacing a vacant lot with new residential units, positively contributing to the neighborhood. The project aligns with the City's growth strategy and will provide additional housing options without burdening local economic resources. City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting of April 2, 2025 Page 4 of 6 4) Whether the proposed site plan will have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. The development will not result in significant adverse environmental impacts. The site is outside the 500-year floodplain (Flood Zone X), and the project does not affect critical vegetation or wildlife. The development adheres to stormwater management requirements, and no concerns related to air, water, or noise pollution have been raised by City staff. 5) Whether the proposed site will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. The proposed site does not contain historic, scenic, or cultural resources. The project's design and placement will not obstruct any existing views or vistas, and no degradation of cultural or historic assets will occur. 6) Whether the proposed site will have an adverse impact on public services, including water, sewer, stormwater and surface water management, police, fire, parks and recreation, streets, public transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The project will be adequately served by existing public services, including water, sewer, stormwater management, police, fire, parks, and transportation infrastructure. The City's Public Works Director has confirmed that sufficient capacity exists to support the development, and no adverse impacts on public utilities or services are anticipated. 7) Whether the site plan and any related applicable traffic report provided by the applicant, details safe and efficient means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood and adequately addresses the impact of projected traffic on the immediate neighborhood, traffic circulation pattern for the neighborhood, and traffic flow through immediate intersections and arterials. The applicant has provided a site plan that includes safe and efficient ingress and egress through Buchanan and Orange Avenues. A traffic impact analysis has determined that the development will not create significant congestion at surrounding intersections. Additionally, on -site parking exceeds City Code requirements, ensuring adequate space for residents and visitors. 8) Whether the proposed site will have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality. The project will contribute positively to housing variety and neighborhood quality. The proposed townhome-style units align with the existing housing stock in the area and will provide additional residential options without negatively affecting social conditions or community dynamics. 9) Whether the proposed site avoids significant adverse odor, emission, noise, glare, and vibration impacts on adjacent and surrounding lands regarding refuse collection, service delivery, parking and loading, signs, lighting, and other site elements. The development is residential in nature and will not generate significant odor, emissions, noise, glare, or vibration. The site plan includes appropriate lighting and provisions for refuse collection to ensure minimal impact on adjacent properties. City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting of April 2, 2025 Page 5 of 6 10) Whether the applicant has provided an acceptable security plan for the proposed establishment to be located on the site that addresses the safety and security needs of the establishment and its users and employees and minimizes impacts on the neighborhood, if applicable. The project does not require a specialized security plan beyond standard residential safety measures. The design includes adequate lighting and compliance with applicable building and fire codes to ensure resident safety. 11) Whether the applicant has provided on the site an acceptable plan for the mass delivery of merchandise for new large footprint buildings (greater than 15,000 square feet) including the hours of operation for delivery trucks to come into and exit the property and surrounding neighborhood, if applicable. This criterion is not applicable, as the proposed project is a residential development and does not involve large -footprint commercial buildings requiring mass merchandise deliveries. 12) Whether the applicant has demonstrated that the site plan has been designed to incorporate mitigative techniques and plans needed to prevent adverse impacts addressed in the criteria stated herein or to adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. The applicant has incorporated mitigative techniques into the site plan to prevent adverse impacts, including adherence to City design standards and stormwater management provisions. The recommendation to construct a sidewalk along Orange Avenue and reduce lot coverage will further mitigate potential concerns. 13)1 f required by the city, whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the city including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code. A binding development agreement has not been deemed necessary for this project. However, the applicant will be required to comply with all conditions of approval, including sidewalk construction and lot coverage adjustments, as part of the final development approval. Statement of Public Notice: This application is in compliance with Sec. 110-28. - Due process; special notice requirements. Run Date of Newspaper Ad Notice: March 23, 2025 Submitted by: Connor Ford Attachments: 1. Site Plan Drawings 2. Vicinity Map 3. Planning Maps — zoning and FLU Map excerpts 4. Public Notice Advertisements Community and Economic Development Staff recommend the Board take the following action: Recommend approval of the Buchanan & Orange Ave Multi -Family Dwellings Site Plan and Concurrency to the City Council, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. Construct sidewalk within the right -of way along Orange Avenue prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting of April 2, 2025 Page 6 of 6 2. Callout and relocate the existing light pole to be relocated prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy and straighten the Buchanan -fronting sidewalk at this location within the City's right-of-way. Approved by Interim Director: Zachary Eichholz Date: March 27, 2025 r 1 BUCHANAN - ORANGE APARTMENTS B UCHANAN &• ORANGE A VE, , CAPE CANA VERAL, FL NOTE: �, • THE PROPOSED PROJECT 15 TO CONSTRUCT .- 44/T APART0ENT ON A 0-42 ACRE =ARCEL LOCATED AT SCL'Tr,' EAST CORNER OF ORANGE 6 BUC4AVAI\ AVE. • 0RO4OSED IMPERV0✓S /S LE55 Tti4N 50.E OF T2E ENTIRE SITE. • =ER SJRWI0D SECT ION 3 2 1, NEW CONSTRUCTION 8%1 LESS THAN 50 •IYFERVOJS DOES NOT NEED TO LII`^IT -4E n05T CONDITION RUNOFF TO nRE-COND/TI0N. • IN ADDITION FER F.5 62-330-020(2)(b) OR (C) 5!NCE IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR I. EP: C2LAR LSE ,5 LESS T4AN 4, 000 5. F 8 TOTAL !1'/5ERVIOL'S 554N8; LESS T4AN a 000 5.S_ PRO45CT S403LD BE EXE/PT FOR P05- COND/T/0N RJNOFS TO E5 LEss T4AN T,uE PRE-coN13/TON RUNG<S 4044315R, C TY OF CAPE CA n14 /ER4L O,e0. REQUIRES SOST GOND T,ON FOR 25 YE4R 2A HOUR STORM TO EE SA`/.5 OR LESS THAN nRE-COND,TION. • T4E ENTIRE PRD=OSED PROJECT 4RE4 /5 ! E55 THAN ID ACRES, TOE PROPOSED IMPER'✓/OL/S 5 LE55 T4AN 2 ACRES AND TPERE IS N0 EXISTING NE -LAND TO TRIGGER T45 5 J. R W. 8^ D. nERNITTING • TI-/EREFOR, T JJE PROPOSED 0ROJECT /5 EYEMPT SRO`/ _IMI-/NG -PE POST RUNOFF TO ORE-CONO,T/ON RUNOFF AND 0055 NOT REQUIRING 5. R_W. I" D_ PERMIT. r IA-/N�a �S S HEET N0. C-000 S -D01 C-100 C-200 C-./Da C-400 C-500 C-60(1 0-700 //11 L-001 SHEET TITLE CO/ER SHEE'l SURVEY (PREPARED BY OTHERS) SNAPP/DEMO PLAN SITE PLAN DRAINAGE PI AN UTILITY PLAN S11'L' SEC 'IONS FDOT STANDARD DFTAIL UTILITY DETAILS (1111,11'Y 4' DRIVEWAY DI- 1'AIIS LANDSCAPE DRAINNL'S PROJECT SURVEYOR MR JOHN CAMPBELL JOHN R. CAMPBELL, SURVEYING, LLC MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 541866 MERRITT ISLAND, FL 32954 TEL: 321-507-4811 EMAIL: JOHN•CAMPBELLSURVEYING.COM APPLICANT/OWNER KRSCH, LORNE. RAGOSTA, ROSA 3991 MAHOGANY ROW MISSISSAUGH ON L4W 2, CANADA EMAIL Iorne•Iorovest.com, rosa•lorovest.com higaph17•gmail.com ',EF5 \S• 1'1 1,ES- P/1f, -EAC- CERTIFICATION IS FOR C-100 TO C-701 AND L-100. ATTACHED SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY JOHN R. CAMPBELL AND IS NOT PART OF THE CERTIFICATION 7/31/2024 DATE. SECTON TIN, 2qS., RCE ERIE GENERAL STATE-1ENT TO CONSTRUCT 6 EVE (5) u 7 4TTACHE0 SINGLE STORY AF4R MENT5 11.T# SE.5ARATE SINGLE GAR GARAGE CONNECTED 70 MAIN 80.'I60: NG :vrT,y O'/ER✓'4NG FOR E?CN UN', 6,105G h/TH REQUIRED 0RI'VES, STORM NL4TER RETENTION s il7 LITI£5. LEG.,_ D5SCR/7I0N, (05/20/A� R£COR05 BOOK 7466, PAGE 5L,A) LOT( I, 2 AND 3O B! CK 67 ANON LOT(3) SEA, ACCORD NG TO 7,5 '74P OR PLAT THEREOF A RECORDED /N P_AT BOO< 5 PAGE(S) 7 OF T-15 PUB2IC RECORDS GP 55£7?.RD 0001,177, PLORD4_ PROJECT CIVIL ENGINEER WDROOR ASSOCIATES, INC. 8,T, TINED DI EH:NATURE AND DATE PRINTED COPIES OF THIS SEALED 6 THE SIONTTURE MUST BE VERIFIED ON ANT Civil - Structural Engineering - Inspections 580 N. Wickham Rd., Suite E Melbourne, FL 32935 PHONE' (321) 253-8233 FAX (321) 253-8232 EMAIL noel•droorassociates.com EB-0007218 1 i'/3d0-,17M JO IHP7I 3L3/M 50:00' ,_:70,8 OF PAVEMENT [8,1 VALVE 48' ✓✓IDE RIGHT OF WAY-2"EPV BU(`,6A \A)') AVE;V. r uaalu Lcc�E°-^�-r sz. Co. GRET_ uONLINSNI M84, CURB (TY AL1 150'6P) 149.81 '(v1) e 1 37'08 7 4 "E,, E'L'a, (4.49) 5 RCP eT = 11\ n 67 8,9 =3 q0N ROD 6 6946 (n9GAL, S\ATP. PLAN LOTS 1, 2 & 3, BLOCK 67 Parcel: 24-37-23-CG-67-1 AVON BY THE SEA P9 3, PG 7 S37"79'0.9"W 150'(P) 147. 63'(' ) u,10,NG LIY,T OCEAN TWIST CONDO Parcel: 24-37-23-CG-67-9. XA ORB 2096. PG 1815 FLOOR EL=7.62 (9.00) EDGE OF PAVEME, >8'Ll68T POLE, —_ _ uuR fiiV POLIND 5/3 ItiOa ROD 5- 7, -=,d3- -t9"en ._A.,S4�,a�... „tea TE s,o[wa 100'(P) 99.66'(M) PAR,. LOT 8R8P418SCALE TI scare r-1o' 5EA MOON CONDO Parcel: 24-37-23-CG-67-4XA FLOOR ELEVATION=6.17 ORB 3072, PAGE 1729 FLOOR EL=8.17 (9.545) It Opt or-9 Rost RosOor C f m_Te \ FDOT Spe6 ) p �� s Posi Pos't'or +- - - - --- w r ' e�) G a 90` Towara F ) d Ft =abr;r NOTE, 5 /t F_ E_EVAT ON'I's.. Gr-fECT/Oi\ To 3 c u Y 9p ervcirv.. <ecurv> ENTIRE vawe Post 'Cations: ?" R a" Or TYPE 3 SILT FENCE 2819L Steel CtArgi APPROVELT ORANGE BUCHANAN APARTMENTS E. 1101316671151 MEP 3WPP PLAN C-100 SHEETS OF 11 018Ro� co =bah. 0 81 n05 rn.7 rn05 E..,61 OF LOT F1 /E.REN SLET „Jn-, g - P, IFO, ROD -- - - _ - - L i , [n I I I , I I I I :0 - .'- -.I- ,• • • rf ;1' L 1 • -D D- FOUND s/s. 3'3 T 02 0' 6,6 P6LE '60 747.63-(M) 3211,,A, LA, 00849 9/S7 (0800 24-37-22-00-67-8 CA'? 2098. PC 1815 SITE PLAN TAY ACC 4,3470 2,INCEL 1 24-37- 3-CG-6 SITE 1AFORINITIOAI r rrice:e' Assocmr.f. 5ao NOFFAl• FO • N' NICKThr VP SECTION 23, ThIP 245 IRGE 37E AVER. KRE, RAGOSTA ROSA ,7117245=4":WTX4 1 <A ' 9D.RV.FROR. ..tOT;gt'Pt7XOTtf1iSlt6' 6.EVER, PT, TD,D, F.FPFPFFFT F DP, (P./ ,TTACNED SF., STORY LEGAL DESCRIPTION. (L‘C•7('.',At 7=1, 73f .r= e SEA, eolne • CaYffIRLCIIRZYSCPREIJA. PROPOSE, VS, 'BEDROOM .2 BA, S,G,E PA.,, RENTALS VE,C,AR LSE AR, PARK.. PROVDED• ONE (J., CAR GARAGE 11"0 DRAM DEEIMIED .'107Xv 03-ODEDRI ORANGE BUCHANAN APARTMENTS SED. oF oROME BIOVAPII CAPE CAMPER, FL FFFFAFFR FOF LA MT PEPOEFI ENTERPRISE, LLD IMICEBBIEMS CITY OcErrDP.07 CANAVERAL FDEP A EIBEEMBB SITE PLAN OMNI C-200 E8EE4 OF 11 FF,DFF• ,L2 ICscaL8 10 0 CURS 5 KP 20 48 WIDE RIGHT OF WAY OPEN y s'e BUCHANAN AVENUE,, 'I ml m1 _ _. I. I4/ (.' 0055 l MST 70/1150 Puri.3/ 2a-3J-23—�G—�]-9_XA GR3 2196, PG 1815 DRAINAGG PLAN 00 =11,1I4Vg herm OPIARD APPROVED 2023-48 ORANGE BUCHANAN APARTMENTS ODE _p F� ENTERPMEN EITLIMEMEI CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL IngSIBMINI DRAINAGE PLAN HEW C-300 SHEER _.OF ,11,Fn �eeec-r 41, or, Mr -I (p2 -on JI n T'- / Quo -----�� 48 WIDE IGHT OF WAY OPEN ,BUC ANAN AVENUE OCEAN MIST COG/DO Porcel: 24 - - 25- 2-62-9.XA 00 0 2094 PG 1015 us5u8 24 F-- UTILITY o I PLAN LEM. EXISTIHO WATER LIVE — semi cLEM'-our HO 09-04-102. IMESSIEBRE ORANGE BUCHANAN APARTMENTS BEG CRAKE alOBLILIFIMAN GOI.E FL MT moGER w. uc CITY OF CAPE CANANERAL CRT OF COCOA ISEMDIMININ UTILITY PLAN MIME C-400 SHEEG OF RECORD ZS I—B PLAN 4.3 SECTION r r, SECT "A" SECT "B" 0 TJTFALL STRUCTURE EMT TYPE C 'zts. SECTION RI SECTION 1 n PROFILE $ BUCHANAN ROAD CROSSING DE.YED CIECKED a3-06-2026 JCR Nze 2023-19 CEINENREEN ORANGE BUCHANAN APARTMENTS eac. OWN.. AIR ART BERGER ENTERPRISES. 1.1C CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL CRT 0,,7,g.oCoA EZNIMENIE/ SECTIONS WEER C-500 SNEEr7 OF 11 ,ru,,mniffiT117 rgrffTiqa,ci n'svx.sr../z-,4 SOILTRACKING PRFVFN LON DE V rig 're V-191 Illustration of a Soil Trwliing Prevention Device " 111, FI TYPE, I, AND H RFlIvr, n[1(11 S/061,11rce, An, ,,SH SHOW,. SIDE14,11, DESICIED CFECKE13 APPROVED DATE 00-64-2021, 4,re No 20.1-18 OMISSIONS ORANGE BUCHANAN APARTMENTS SEC oF cRANaE Aro CANAVElle, UR, ART BERL. AE1 ENTERPRISES, LLC 011315MMI CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL =OCOA EMMEN FDOT DETAILS EMS C-600 iH=EM1121-,. 66. ^�o 20 x20 ." PLAN N.E. 10 AND 12 REQUIRE A. CLAMPS AND FOUR RODS PER SIOE VALVES ...ALL D PER MaN.ACIPAIR'S RECOMMENDATION ON DIP AND PVC. VALVE INSRT FOR A.C. PIPE ni TYPICAL LOT SERVICE LINE LOCATION TYPICAL 3/4" 2" SERVICE LINE la TYPICAL REQUIRED .. �, I SEPARATION TYPICAL BORE PLAN DATE 03-04-20,1 JOB Ns 2/123-18 ORANGE BUCHANAN APARTMENTS MR ART BERM, p S, LLC CRY OF CAPE CANAVERAL UTILITY DETAILS HEW C-700 Sig Do Id / THIS AREA IS J:. RECLAIMED IRRIGATED WITH t WATER RECLAIMED ® �--� -- WATER (N+ DO NOT DR NK D0 NOT SWIM D0 NOT DRINK NO BEBER NO BEBER - NO NADAR I.. cl iwnr.,.aa.u:nr,:a. ,.,.n a.a� ice Plan SIDEWALK DETAIL 1 BUILDING , °.a K Ew .,Ex„: u j 00 0, J Ill= -- — II CONCRETE PAVING DETAIL BOLLARD DETAIL DRAWN DESKNED DATE ND GIUMEMENI ORANGE BUCHANAN APARTMENTS -NER ERF- aISES, LLC CITY OF CAPE RAL CITY OF COCOA MEP EIMMEDIN DETAILS C-701 EdO OOP ROAD 55552 SALE RCN 48' WIDE RIGHT OF WAY —OPEN ,BUCHANAN AVENUE EN ELIE EL. 43, EIL FIR EL. BE ee 00E97 u20 C09100 90.590 27-57— 25—C 0-57-9. XO 055 2095, P 75,5 FLC09 5755,62 5 5/,. 6,16 RON ,CD O PLANT SCHEDULE 55, ENIELE AREA 500 DESONED CHECKED DAM JOB No HO 03-04-20.1 2023-18 COMISIBRE ORANGE BUCHANAN APARTMENTS OH,C401111314.. FL �PF BEHOEP IMEZIERMII CRY OF GFE GNASH, CHF OF COCOA FDEP lifEENNWEI LANDSCAPE PLAN MEER L-100 11 OF 11 co =bah. 0 81 n05 rn.7 rn05 E..,61 OF LOT F1 /E.REN SLET „Jn-, g - P, IFO, ROD -- - - _ - - L i , [n I I I , I I I I :0 - .'- -.I- ,• • • rf ;1' L 1 • -D D- FOUND s/s. 3'3 T 02 0' 6,6 P6LE '60 747.63-(M) 3211,,A, LA, 00849 9/S7 (0800 24-37-22-00-67-8 CA'? 2098. PC 1815 SITE PLAN TAY ACC 4,3470 2,INCEL 1 24-37- 3-CG-6 SITE 1AFORINITIOAI r rrice:e' Assocmr.f. 5ao NOFFAl• FO • N' NICKThr VP SECTION 23, ThIP 245 IRGE 37E AVER. KRE, RAGOSTA ROSA ,7117245=4":WTX4 1 <A ' 9D.RV.FROR. ..tOT;gt'Pt7XOTtf1iSlt6' 6.EVER, PT, TD,D, F.FPFPFFFT F DP, (P./ ,TTACNED SF., STORY LEGAL DESCRIPTION. (L‘C•7('.',At 7=1, 73f .r= e SEA, eolne • CaYffIRLCIIRZYSCPREIJA. PROPOSE, VS, 'BEDROOM .2 BA, S,G,E PA.,, RENTALS VE,C,AR LSE AR, PARK.. PROVDED• ONE (J., CAR GARAGE 11"0 DRAM DEEIMIED .'107Xv 03-ODEDRI ORANGE BUCHANAN APARTMENTS SED. oF oROME BIOVAPII CAPE CAMPER, FL FFFFAFFR FOF LA MT PEPOEFI ENTERPRISE, LLD IMICEBBIEMS CITY OcErrDP.07 CANAVERAL FDEP A EIBEEMBB SITE PLAN OMNI C-200 E8EE4 OF 11 FF,DFF• ,L2 55552 SALE RCN 48' WIDE RIGHT OF WAY —OPEN ,BUCHANAN AVENUE EN ELIE EL. 43, EIL FIR EL. BE ee 00E97 u20 C09100 90.590 27-57— 25—C 0-57-9. XO 055 2095, P 75,5 FLC09 5755,62 5 5/,. 6,16 RON ,CD O PLANT SCHEDULE 55, ENIELE AREA 500 DESONED CHECKED DAM JOB No HO 03-04-20.1 2023-18 COMISIBRE ORANGE BUCHANAN APARTMENTS OH,C401111314.. FL �PF BEHOEP IMEZIERMII CRY OF GFE GNASH, CHF OF COCOA FDEP lifEENNWEI LANDSCAPE PLAN MEER L-100 11 OF 11 1111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111 uuuumoi uuuuuuuuuuuuuumiiiiui�„ uuu�ill I�ioYmmmum uumuuuuuuu I ulliiVluuuuuu�muuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummmmmi /r%///l/(fii uuuolVlwlhillWNrtin�Ilp�WuIWIImIIrIINY ldlMNrere��illiim mmmiO1YIYIYiIiIYIYI1lllll Iuii118YM8R801W11YIYIW11N1 Invoo 111111110.11 III i iiiiigllr«, �. � rF�R�IMV��I �1>19111V 11\ �� Nil I I V, � 4��i uuooiuuou 11uu g1g19ll�� of iiiiii""aaioi ���j vaorarar. )9,41>, /40/.7 /7 ,0 P°11 '� ail1"P ,.'R� i`u��l r� ii 01111 iiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil, I ' 2 I 10101111 101111111111111111111 y y I, / o ,`^i 1111111 ��/ � � \� \. \� \:v ^,,\. . \ \� 6. /� \ ii 1\.I,l� \ 1111 /� \ \/ . \ , A / ,1,1,i),..00100100111111111111111111111111111111011111110Y111M111, 7 ( \% $ 4/0 G„ �Iryfl 10010000l 110 441 000000000000000 Ily1IIIM ' P.IIIIIIIIp1 u 1111111 111111, ii fII I� u f n III wlll�wul��� L' 10 �V • 110.11.1.1111111111101111111111111111111110111111,0 111111111 II1I1111 1: ��,,,,1,,IIIJIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 puuuuuuuuuuuUlh 11' !! I'Illlf III�IIIIII�Vi'iilll,!IIIIIII�YII4IIII1111111111111��IIIIIh��„i�iiiiiiii mylmmlu I�IYI tIILtIi\iPI1 i/ /fir // ii /,/ ,0,119n "u 1111ulliillulUl11i11ulI 11Y111�10Wi011,1:11,lu10 mosoliooliyoullo ,iw rramuIJIIII rrrlrmlW J ip uurrrr rrrgl��rimnnnnnn boo 311110 A,,. O jii� 111:114f(1)11(?(\(((1 1 11 l,"11Jlllllylf///////Or, ,ilf',hY;�NIl01101hol liluuui uuum°im �„ �1y�1�11 1g44��4�1s1������������1111111111N11���11 ry '�0.,1,11���1Nhnh�llr m140,0044riorropip .' • V • 11 h 72/ /ii j/% as ////////%%%%%%%%/%��������///// 1�otiq IUIV�PiY�I((((h IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII jjjiil h� �II uuuuuuuuu��iigliiuuilj'E �. �(lJlli �r�l , III ,. lllll1,1)11 lff mlm goy,riio rrr IIIIIIII, 1111111. livolli111 liih II II 111111111111'1?1,,, Fl ��f:11.1i lllllllllllllliul dI I(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIIIII II luouuuuuumppl I.I(� I��U"' '"�s�� �'uuu!,',idi"i� :iijl�lr�� dVVl0.11!oW!!I0IIIII11IIIIIIIIIIIIvIIVIN1i101111111111ri 'l111if 1111➢I100 // uuuuuum,�Voi yy f Oa r. umuVIIIIIIIIIiiiiIIIIIP'�Is 'Sddl1 IIII11IIupIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIQV�Iu�ll'�p' u1II 1 °I�Iulllllllll��� ,H1011111111110P pIINPIRQmY"P'�mY dfi 1I11Y84 4 11111�J,a1�1 ,IID1DJ11 11111 IIII�IIIIIIIIII �' °0°�y;iN 000111111111.09111, l9iiluuiillor W to irn� 111 rP , m IIIIII IIIIIII^I^ uu• IVW „gym 1„,11un„w.m.uu 1111 ,� na / �II. �ui I III mupi�l�Ill�11 ifioIIIIIIII ,' � ,Ild��l�l�� itr ! lllllul�up 'I9, luo 1141N1 y a moo loll r 1% muoioi ululmupmp lumlumli ummpuu umlomlmuuuuumuil pi NIIM WAIIN� aai % OP luoi/ulnuuu/P� h�ik6S ��� ° '- ry ° I 4II .17 uuuuumuliuu 1,),1101111j,111 ,11 rroan�„ %% / %%/ / %/rrrrrrrrrrraa/D/////r umuuuouuuu°uu .1111 III ,1 1 IVIUIIIVIIIIV ;ld�� ° IIV (11IINII111111... 1%%„aiD%%iaii„ ra JII 4101011 a^IpIVIiIq IIpIIIIIl0111101111h11111 " � 111111 IIIII1.1) NNY�kV'9A loolvoloo nIII, .111111111111111111iIII 111 I i Opt poi `Ilull / // ,111 ��/� IIIIIuIhVimu 1YIVVIYi �I VU i m,,, I'ItlIIIIIPv����YN�'li�"u( w �/ mid iiiiiiVl�ry hlulp�iV11�l III NN11VVII"ji, rillooloollonh rhr,��I�luli1111lrlh1116II 1111,11Nlrlall tt��Ai��1111�� 1�11%1�(I IIIIbIIuIpI I, bI 'I lI lIlIlI I�IIII IIII1111111111111 I�IIiIallI�lIlIiiImIIlunu uluuuuuuu�uuululuuuuuuuuumulmoluI,I I H�i�nfI1111111111111111111111IIII N11111f�,1�l_ 11111111H1111111 1111111I1 11IIIIiffillmaIIII�I 11�a�+�IuI�h11�������� l�11 pll �, ull�ll I uluulull mmomm'r„1 pprrmmlI)) u�;�muIVV010N011111IIVllI rrr1� � �IIVIuHl�lllii;�, �1I111 1�IIhlllll�l���ll IIIII ,. w11J011HP II11 ' I11111111I1111II1111111V Ip� IIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111111 O0IpIVk9 rrulu WO Ipu1111hS1titii1lll1upmn (hil�lnl�'i11Vjrrlf!rr1rrrll11((���rru+dW!11jrlrfrl'°'lU(!+?+lilluHrallN'rpuUlgll(1�I1191�o 0PIROPERTY APPRAl$,Eltj 001H , 0 iroroakro Lour i;s; ifil1;1„1„1„1,11,11„1„,,;111,11,111 1,00,0(1101,11„,h,u Ilk 11,1,01)1111P 71111111' , .11 r_g1000,01111001110111414",ffl fi 11 I "It, 0„111 r lei ;hap, 4,1o, '''100 11r110"gg " 101111111111Ill 1„041111 ;H1611111101 1:41 ( 11111 11111'1'1'1'111111 i.z/i/ / X 110, 111111111111, 11* 1 * 11,11,1 H1111111'111 11 111 1,11'111P11111111111121'11'''11'1111 1 1, n1 111111/2101 ,0„ 0 18111" 1111111110 01,11,0r, 11111111111 1/0101111111 ' 'ig lillili 1111/11111111,1 (11 IAi111,'1,1111'1'14''' hillII 1011 ,0 li i' „„10110iiii000 ' 1,10 114 01,1,i '14 ll'"P 1,011,111,1;0; /yily,,,, Sjlimithi(en ituj!sritizse4iiiill:off,,,,1111# 1 p,, 1 11 '1111111/$i1111111' , n ' l'0‘kly 1111' n diffrffir,,,v4,i tui• mar:: 10001,0iTii, var ,r/ , , 0,100 07 irr; %. ) 1,114,1,11„,4 11,,;1041 1 ,„,,,,,,s,„„„„ 444,4,1, '111111 I 4" 11 4:4:' 444.144 11111'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'1'14;;;;"'0110„0, 000000hooluil0001111;2goi „ „1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,101,1010111',011tr, 111, illip#1111111111111111111010yore, 11,1,11,1101001,11v100y10000rmr00,;,, "10,1 15111(1 1111,(111,1 1(1, '111 1,11„. „ 011( MILIO „.11111 11.11.40„„odooliddlogilll 111„1„.„1„; 111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111010 1111 f, 1111111 1111111111111111111111111111111 M„ 11,1„11'1111111011,11111111111111111111111 11„,,`„° ,1101110 01) , 1 011110011 I 110010'1111111(11,101" ''ll'''11'11,00,11111111101,1111111112 frj1110 , ink 1111o1101101101(00,( „ifea',ff/4-6;,,1 , r„/' ize , A i N opy„„„1„1?„„1„1444111„1„;„,111, 1 ffiko,„itillillli:'-:' II. r.gi 'A ,I / rotvoi.410911g;"7' ' :In 1 /9 1111 i1,, [lijoi 1 VI --111' 111111 11111?111:61111i,lo,, 0MM' 1,, 1111 '11 ,11,11,0,10,A1111,2J „1111,1011111101111100,;0)')0k0a1111' 1,00001(111(111(111(1 1011111112 111.1,011,1'1,11k1111;11111111111 01k (1111110101,101,01 0 01 1111111111111111111111111 IVIV(11111111111111111110 u 0 0 0 ((ii 011; 1111111111,'" 1 I 11111111111111111111 '111111 ool00000 ''''11111111111111111111111111115 0111111111111111111111111111 ,,111111 ,,,(1(lik,110(00,00,0(0110110011(0!11,00100011,1 111111111,„,4r, !;1111;13;„,.. Hu 01111111111111111111km ,,,,,,1111,1"1"""" '11111, 12 11 011 0000/10,0„ 11,1001000000410001 „1 '110.1 111111111111111111111111111111111 (111111111?11111111111111111,111111111111111(rbiktinu '11111111111111111111111111111 11111,1111111111,001,11111, 1,1111,11„1,111,11111111111111111 IIVIVI1111111 1111111 1'1' 1111111111' 11 1111111w101 '11111 '11' ,1.11k 00 Ilillillii,'11'1111111,1 1111,1,11111i 00h1 JP0 0 , 11 )(' ii 0 ,, 1041 )1111111111111111111111111 11) A" „1„0.011.1„ 11114u,, („„10,1)))111111111111111(1111111111 I 1111 11111110 11(00#1111111' „ , u 4'10 'Irgr;f1 iffofrr 1,11 ; 1111, „„O00000 000000000mmll 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11;1 1,1,1111111111111111 011111111000, I, 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111 111111 1''''11,1,1111.1111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111110101010101011,11111111111111111 mm1111111 110,01111111011 111 11111 111111 1 1 1111111,110111,110w1,N1 0,1 ,, 1111111111 floo10111111 11,1110,122 111 1"011,,, „1„;,,1!111111 ;nn „111,1110,111;0,101,1,,,,y010;11,„1111'in11111„1,111111,1,,,,,l'41P,1,,!111111,1,1„,(91(,, 111„ „„, ,1111111111111111111111 1111111110k, 1,11001111,1,111(k. All BCPA 0 maps and/or m ap applications are maintained for assessment and illustrative purposes only and do not represent surveys, plats, or any other legal instrument Likewise, measurement and location tools are for assessment and illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect real -world conditions Due to the nature of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and colostral m apping, map layers may not precisely align and may not represent precise location, shape, and/or legal boundanes Only a Flonda-hcensed surveyor can determ ine legally -relevant properly boundanes, elevation, distance, area, and/or location in Florida Map tie (0 ed March 5, 2025 (map ric0 ria rri ay vary) Planning Maps Legend 1......_: City Boundary ,.._..,...,. Roadways City Parcels PUB/REC CON PD (Ordinance Nc..©8 2C�T j Zoning Excerpt Map 11111 IT h1,11,r nflm�� III IIIIIIII linom III MNimm illli1W Future Land Use Excerpt Map 11111111 kININ N N PLANNING AND ZONING (P&Z) BOARD April 2, 2025 REGULAR MEETING • ITEM #3 Subject: Consideration of Site Plan Application for a Hotel and Restaurant on 5.75 acres at 8955 Columbia Road (Parcel ID 24-37-15-00-34) Summary: The owner of the subject property is Grosvenor Port Hotel, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Owner"). The Owner is represented by Richard Stubbs (applicant). The Applicant requests Site Plan application approval for a hotel at 8955 Columbia Road, approximately 5.75 acres, identified as Brevard County Tax Parcel 24-37-15-00-34. The site area is 2.39 acres. The proposed hotel will consist of 156 units and meets the minimum 150 hotel unit requirements set forth in Sections 110-122 and 110-332(4) of the City Code. The property is located in the most northern portion of the City and is adjacent to the Canaveral Port Authority district boundaries. The surrounding area consists of vacant properties owned by the Canaveral Port Authority to both the south and the north, a parking facility owned by BRB Enterprises LLP to the east, and a vacant property owned by BRB Enterprises LLP to the west across Astronaut Boulevard. The Property is also zoned C-1 (Low Density Commercial District), has a C-1 Commercial Future Land Use Map designation, is located within the A1A Economic Opportunity Overlay District, and is within the boundaries of the City's Redevelopment Area. Hotels are listed as a permitted use in the C-1 zoning district. The City's Community Appearance Board (CAB) approved the design unanimously, with no conditions, on November 20, 2024. Pursuant to Section 110-624 of the City Code, the CAB also approved an increased building height of 65 feet, which is above the four stories or 45 feet limitation. Chapter 110, Article VI, of the City Code lays out the process by which the City will review and approve a Site Plan application: (1) representatives of the City's engineering, building, code enforcement, public works, and fire entities review and submit comments to the applicant who makes changes as necessary; (2) the Planning & Zoning Board holds a public meeting and makes a recommendation on the Site Plan; and (3) the City Manager's designee, the Community and Economic Development Director, takes final action on the request. Sec. 110-222(b) of City Code provides findings required for approval of the Site Plan (Attachments 5 and 6). Prior to approving any proposed Site Plan, the applicant must demonstrate the following. 1) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the site plan, including its proposed density, height, scale and intensity, hours of operation, building and lighting design, setbacks, buffers, noise, refuse, odor, particulates, smoke, fumes and other emissions, parking and traffic -generating characteristics, number of persons anticipated using, residing or working under the plan, and other off -site impacts, is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses, and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed site plan, including its density, height, scale, and intensity, is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses. The subject property is located in the northernmost portion of the City and is surrounded by vacant properties owned City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting of April 2, 2025 Page 2 of 6 by the Canaveral Port Authority to the north and south, a parking facility owned by BRB Enterprises LLP to the east, and a vacant property owned by BRB Enterprises LLP across Astronaut Boulevard to the west. Given that the surrounding properties are vacant or used for parking, the proposed hotel and restaurant will not adversely impact existing land use activities in the immediate vicinity. The proposed six -story hotel exceeds the standard height limit of four stories or 45 feet established by City Code. However, the Community Appearance Board (CAB) approved the increased height to 65 feet, recognizing that the project's location and design support the City's redevelopment and economic goals. The design incorporates architectural features consistent with the City's appearance standards and the A1A Economic Opportunity Overlay District (EOOD), ensuring that the increased height does not result in an incompatible or overbearing structure. The lighting plan is designed to minimize light pollution and spillover onto neighboring properties. Parking and traffic impacts have been addressed through the inclusion of valet parking and designated entry and exit points to manage vehicle flow. The development provides a total of 159 onsite parking spaces to accommodate hotel guests. Noise and refuse management plans comply with City Code, ensuring minimal disruption to surrounding areas. While the project is largely compatible with adjacent uses, a key condition of approval is required to mitigate traffic concerns. The estimated vehicle queue from the hotel may overburden the existing Columbia Road potentially causing congestion that could negatively impact traffic circulation and access to surrounding properties. To ensure the project remains compatible and harmonious with the area, the applicant is required to construct a right - turn lane on Columbia Road into the project site. This improvement will alleviate potential traffic conflicts, enhance overall site accessibility, and maintain the functionality of the surrounding roadway network. The project's location, adjacent to commercial and port -related uses, further supports its compatibility. The increased height will not overshadow any residential properties, and the building's design includes elements to mitigate visual impact. Additionally, landscape buffers meeting the 5-foot requirement on all sides will provide additional screening and enhance the aesthetics of the site. In summary, the applicant has demonstrated that the proposed site plan is compatible with adjacent land uses. While the building exceeds the standard height limitation, it was approved by the CAB and is appropriate for its location near various hotels along the State Road A1A Corridor. The project includes architectural features, a lighting plan, and parking strategies that ensure minimal impact on surrounding properties while supporting the City's redevelopment goals. However, to fully satisfy compatibility criteria, the applicant must construct a right -turn lane to mitigate traffic impacts and ensure the surrounding roadway network continues to function efficiently. 2) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to accommodate the proposed density, scale and intensity of the site plan requested. The site shall be of sufficient size to accommodate design amenities such as screening, buffers, landscaping, open space, off-street parking, safe and convenient automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian mobility at the site, and other similar site plan improvements needed to mitigate against potential adverse impacts of the proposed use. The applicant has demonstrated that the site's size, shape, access, and internal circulation are sufficient to support the proposed density, scale, and intensity. The development incorporates key design elements such as screening, buffers, landscaping, open space, and off-street parking to mitigate potential impacts. A total of 159 onsite parking spaces, including valet service, will accommodate hotel guests and restaurant patrons. The six -story structure will City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting of April 2, 2025 Page 3 of 6 provide premier views of Port Canaveral and space operations, second only to the Holiday Inn properties. The facade features an articulated design in accordance with the A1A Economic Opportunity Overlay District (EOOD) regulations outlined in Article X of Chapter 110 of the Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances (CCCO). The internal circulation plan includes a designated drop-off area, valet operations, and loading zones to prevent congestion within the site. Pedestrian connectivity is enhanced by sidewalks linking to existing pathways along Columbia Road. Landscape buffers meeting the City's requirements provide visual screening and aesthetic enhancement. To ensure adequate external access, the applicant is required to construct a right -turn lane on Columbia Road into the project. This improvement addresses potential queuing concerns, mitigates the risk of congestion, and enhances overall circulation efficiency. With these measures in place, the site is appropriately designed to accommodate the proposed intensity while maintaining functional and safe access. 3) Whether the proposed site plan will have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values. The proposed site plan will not have an adverse impact on the local economy. Instead, the proposed hotel will have a positive impact on the local economy. The hotel will provide additional hotel rooms which are needed to address the successful and growing cruise and space industry. This project will be a catalyst for economic development benefits to the City and the Cape Canaveral Community Redevelopment Agency by adding an additional, high value project to the tax rolls. Because the property is within the City's Redevelopment Area, the City CRA will benefit by increased tax increment financing revenues once the project is completed that can be used for redevelopment purposes throughout the CRA area. The new hotel will also add service and management jobs to the area. 4) Whether the proposed site plan will have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. The project site is currently vacant and does not contain significant natural features or protected habitats. The proposed development is designed to minimize environmental impact through compliance with all applicable stormwater, air quality, and noise regulations. The site is located in Flood Zone X, which indicates a low risk of flooding. Stormwater management will be handled through an on -site retention system that meets City and St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) requirements, ensuring proper drainage and preventing runoff from negatively impacting nearby properties and waterways. Air quality impacts will be minimal, primarily limited to emissions from vehicles accessing the site and typical building HVAC systems. Noise pollution will be controlled through the use of sound -absorbing construction materials and landscape buffers, which will help mitigate potential disturbances to surrounding areas. 5) Whether the proposed site will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. There are no known historical or cultural resources on the subject property. The hotel's design complements the coastal aesthetic of Cape Canaveral and is expected to enhance scenic views rather than obstruct them. The elevated position of the hotel may provide guests with panoramic views of the port and space launches, contributing positively to the area's tourism appeal. City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting of April 2, 2025 Page 4 of 6 6) Whether the proposed site will have an adverse impact on public services, including water, sewer, stormwater and surface water management, police, fire, parks and recreation, streets, public transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The Cape Canaveral Volunteer Fire Department is the closest building to the project. As a condition of approval, the applicant will create a right turn lane, southbound on Columbia Road to avoid any adverse impact on fire services. The project will connect to City of Cocoa water, with sufficient capacity available. Stormwater will be managed on -site per City and SJRWMD standards. 7) Whether the site plan and any related applicable traffic report provided by the applicant, details safe and efficient means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood and adequately addresses the impact of projected traffic on the immediate neighborhood, traffic circulation pattern for the neighborhood, and traffic flow through immediate intersections and arterials. The property is unique in that it is located within City proper but accessed through George King Boulevard in Port Canaveral. The property's access via George King Boulevard in Port Canaveral presents unique challenges, but the applicant will continue to coordinate with Port authorities to ensure safe and efficient ingress and egress. 8) Whether the proposed site will have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality. While the site is currently vacant, the Comprehensive Plan designates the property's future land use as commercial, supporting the proposed hotel use and its accessory uses (restaurant and pool). The site is adjacent to vacant land and surface parking serving the Port in both the City of Cape Canaveral and Port Canaveral. The project will complement nearby developments without displacing housing and will enhance the area by adding hospitality services and jobs. 9) Whether the proposed site avoids significant adverse odor, emission, noise, glare, and vibration impacts on adjacent and surrounding lands regarding refuse collection, service delivery, parking and loading, signs, lighting, and other site elements. The project will comply with City regulations to minimize odor, emissions, and noise impacts. Refuse collection and service deliveries will be managed within designated areas to reduce disturbances. Lighting will be shielded to prevent glare on adjacent properties, and no significant vibration impacts are expected. 10) Whether the applicant has provided an acceptable security plan for the proposed establishment to be located on the site that addresses the safety and security needs of the establishment and its users and employees and minimizes impacts on the neighborhood, if applicable. At the time of submittal, the applicant has not provided a security plan for the proposed project. The applicant herein is made aware of the need to ensure the proposed establishment addresses safety and security needs for its users and employees, while minimizing impact on the surrounding areas. 11) Whether the applicant has provided on the site an acceptable plan for the mass delivery of merchandise for new large footprint buildings (greater than 15,000 square feet) including the hours of operation for delivery trucks to come into and exit the property and surrounding neighborhood, if applicable. City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting of April 2, 2025 Page 5 of 6 Deliveries for the restaurant and hotel will occur at designated loading zones on -site. The applicant and any future property owner shall limit delivery hours to minimize noise impacts on surrounding properties. 12) Whether the applicant has demonstrated that the site plan has been designed to incorporate mitigative techniques and plans needed to prevent adverse impacts addressed in the criteria stated herein or to adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. The site plan incorporates mitigative measures such as landscape buffering and pedestrian - friendly design. The applicant has also committed to traffic management strategies, including the proposed right -turn lane and valet parking, to minimize congestion. 13) If required by the city, whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the city including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code. Because the property currently does not available sewer, a Sewer Line Extension Agreement will be required between the City and the Owner. The Agreement is currently being finalized by the City Attorney and will be presented to the City Council in the future following the P&Z Board's recommendation on the site plan. In general, the Owner has requested that the City allow them to connect the Property to the City's sewer system at an existing manhole connection point located south of the Property at real property currently owned by Sunbelt-12CF, LLC (Tax Parcel #24-37-15-00-23) ("Connection Point"), which Connection Point is primarily connected to and serviced by the City's regional sewer lift station located generally adjacent to Imperial Boulevard. In order to complete that connection, the City will need to acquire a sewer line easement from the Canaveral Port Authority and Sunbelt-12CF, LLC. The Owner will design, permit, and construct an eight (8) inch sewer line and related appurtenances to connect the Property to the City's sewer system at the Connection Point at Owner's expense and sole risk. In the event that the easements cannot be obtained, the Owner will have to find another acceptable alternative to connect to the City's sewer system. For instance, an alternative connection might require Owner to secure a right-of-way permit from the Florida Department of Transportation to construct a sewer line extending from the Property, through the U.S. Highway A1A right-of-way, to an existing City sewer connection point situated on the west side of U.S. Highway A1A, near the Racetrac property to the south (Tax Parcel#24-37-15-01-*-1). Final sewer engineering plans must be consistent with whatever sewer connection will be acquired and approved by the City. Furthermore, the applicant will be required to comply with all conditions of approval, prior to receiving Certificate of Occupancy. Statement of Public Notice: This application is in compliance with Sec. 110-28. - Due process; special notice requirements. Run Date of Newspaper Ad Notice: March 23, 2025 Submitted by: Connor Ford Attachments: 1. Site Plan Application 2. Construction/Site Plan Drawings 3. Elevation Sheet 4. Vicinity Map City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting of April 2, 2025 Page6of6 5. Planning Maps — zoning and FLU Map excerpts 6. Public Notice Advertisement 7. Traffic Impact Analysis Report 8. Geotechnical Report 9. Environmental Report Community and Economic Development Staff recommend the Board take the following action: Recommend approval of a Hotel and Restaurant at 8955 Columbia Road to the Community and Economic Development Director with the following conditions of approval. 1. Prior to any Building Permit approval on the subject parcel, the developer shall gain, in writing, Port Canaveral Staff approval of a southerly right -hand -only turn lane into the development's entrance. 2. Approval of a sewer line extension agreement by the City Council, and completion of the sewer line connection prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Approved by Interim Director: Zachary Eichholz Date: March 27, 2025 CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION PACKET Application Sheet 2 Payment Receipt 3 Site Plan Checklist 4-5 City of Cape Canaveral Site Plan Application - 09/2021 Pg. 1 CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION PACKET Application Sheet Date: 12/2/2024 Address of Request: Name of Project (if applicable): Cape Canaveral Hotel Legal Description: See attached Owner(s) Name: Grosvenor Port Hotel LLC 8955 Columbia Rd. OwnerAddress: 15260 NW 147TH DR STE 100 ALACHUA, FL 32615 s ccaule 'md ahoo.com Owner(s) Emaim1Y l: ... ... Phone Number: (352) 316-0732 Name of Architect/Engineer: Gregor/ Crawford Phone Number: (407) 895-0324 Agent/Applicant Name: Gregory Crawford Phone Number: (407) 895-0324 Email: gcrawford@feg-inc.us Agent/Applicant Signature: ,I-g-r7 '-a-(-feti City of Cape Canaveral Site Plan Application - 09/2021 Pg. 2 CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION PACKET Site Plan Payment Receipt Date: Project Name: Cape Canaveral Hotel 12/2/2024 Non -Refundable Application Fee $825.00 Site Plan Extension: $165.00 Site Plan Resubmission. 50% of Original Fee Applications will address items listed in Section 110-222 (a) (b) of the City Code. The Checklist on the following page provides a guide for completing the application. City of Cape Canaveral Site Plan Application - 09/2021 Pg. 3 CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION PACKET The following checklist has been prepared to assist in preparation of a required Site Plan. Please see Sec.110-222 of the City Code for a complete list of Site Plan criteria. Site Plan Checklist The drawing must be sealed and drawn to scale by an appropriately licensed design professional, no greaterthan one inch to 50 feet, on sheets two feet by three feet, showing the following site data: Site plan information (General): 1. Size, height, number of units and location of proposed and existing structures. lYes ❑ No ❑ N/A 2. Dimensions. lYes ❑No EN/A 3. Total gross area and percentage devoted to structures, parking and Iandscaping.lYes ❑No ❑ N/A 4. Number of Units. lYes ❑ No ❑ N/A 5. Traffic flow diagram to include total number and size of parking spaces and loading zones. IIlYes ❑No ❑N/A 6. Density (units per acre). ❑Yes ❑No NN/A Location and dimension for the following areas (If applicable): 1. Park(s). ❑ Yes ❑ No NI N/A 2. Canal(s). ❑Yes ❑ No II! N/A 3. Waterway(s). ❑Yes❑No NN/A 4. Boat slip(s). ❑Yes ❑ No II! N/A 5. Parking. lYes ❑ No ❑ N/A 6. Swimming pool(s). lYes ❑No ❑N/A 7. Driveway(s). IN Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 8. Recreation. ❑Yes ❑ No II! N/A 9. Trash. IN Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 10. Sidewalks. 6Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 11. Dune crossover(s). ❑ Yes ❑ No IN N/A 12. Other (specify) ❑ Yes ❑ No NI N/A 13. Type of enclosure for communal trash container(s). ❑Yes ❑No III N/A 14. Fire alarm and standpipe data. ❑Yes ❑No UN/A 15. Vicinity map. IN Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 16. Location of planned landscaping. IIIYes ❑ No ❑ N/A City of Cape Canaveral Site Plan Application - 09/2021 Pg. 4 CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION PACKET Finished grades for the following: 1. Entire parcel. 6Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 2. Finished floors. l Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 3. Streets. ❑Yes No PIN/A 4. Parking lots. 6Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 5. Sidewalks. 111Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 6. 10" of adjoining property. IYes ❑ No ❑ N/A Details, sections, and specifications: 1. Street lights. ❑Yes ❑ No PIN/A 2. Water and sewer. IYes ❑ No ❑ N/A 3. Paving and drainage. PYes No EN/A 4. Curbs. 6Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 5. Storm drains. PYes No EN/A 6. Sidewalks.6Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 7. Engineer's seal on drawings. PYes❑No EN/A Square footage of building areas: 1. Living. ❑Yes ❑ No PIN/A 2. Parking. ❑Yes❑No PIN/A 3. Other (specify) 4. Total under roof. IYes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑Yes ❑No IN/A Required notes: 1. Sidewalk and sanitary sewers to be constructed to City of Cape Canaveral standards. Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 2. Water lines to conform to City of Cocoa standards. CYes ❑ No ❑ N/A 3. Fire alarm system to be installed and connect to City of Cape Canaveral Fire Department standards ❑ Yes ❑ No 6 N/A Topographic survey: 1. USC and G.S. datum plane. lYes No EN/A 2. Existing street lights. ❑ Yes ❑ No • N/A 3. Storm drainage design calculations. PYes ❑No EN/A 4. Coastal construction setback line, where required. ❑Yes ❑ No IN/A Ten (10) hard copies of the drawings (24" x 36") must be submitted with the application as well as in electronicformat (.pdf). City of Cape Canaveral Site Plan Application - 09/2021 Pg. 5 CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS 8955 COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA OWNER/ PORT HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC APPLICANT: 15260 NW 147th DRIVE, SUITE 100 ALACHUA, FL 32861 PHONE: (407) 644-6900 SURVEYOR: ACCURIGHT SURVEYS OF ORLANDO, INC. 2012 EAST ROBINSON STREET ORLANDO, FL 32803 PHONE: (407) 894-6314 FAX: (407) 897-3777 GEOTECHNICAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDUSTRIES, INC. 1748 33RD STREET ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32839 PHONE: (407)304-5560 PERMITTING AGENCIES S.J.R.W.M.D.: ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT F.D.E.P.: WATER, WASTEWATER AND NPDES CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL: SITE PLAN APPROVAL F.D.O.T.: DRAINAGE CONNECTION PERMIT CITY OF COCOA: WATER UTILITY COMPANIES WATER: (321) 433-8799 SEWER: (321)8683308 RECLAIM: (321) 868-1240 ELECTRIC: (800)868-9554 TELEPHONE: (561) 997-0240 GAS: (321) 6383424 FIBER OPTIC (321) 727-6451 S 15, T 24S, R 37E PARCEL I.D. No. 24-37-15-00-34 CITY OF COCOA CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL FPL-BREVARD AT&T/DISTRIBUTION FLORIDA CITY GAS BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS LLC BREVARD SITE VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE FEG 011 PLAN INDEX C-1 COVER SHEET C-2 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (1 OF 3) C-3 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (2 OF 3) C-4 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (3 OF 3) C-5 LEGEND, NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS C-6 SITE DEMOLITION AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C-7 SITE GEOMETRY&STRIPING PLAN C-8 SITE PAVING AND GRADING PLAN (1 OF 2) C-9 SITE PAVING AND GRADING PLAN (2 OF 2) C-10 DRAINAGE SYSTEM PLAN AND DETAILS C-11 SITE UTILITY PLAN (1 OF 2) C-12 SITE UTILITY PLAN (2 OF 2) C-13 FORCEMAIN PLAN & PROFILE (1 OF 2) C-14 FORCEMAIN PLAN & PROFILE (2 OF 2) C-15 SITE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C-16 CITY OF COCOA AND BREVARD COUNTY UTILITY DETAILS C-17 SITE CROSS SECTIONS (1 of 2) C-18 SITE CROSS SECTIONS (2 of 2) C-19 FIRE TRUCK PATH PLAN C-20 LIFT STATION C-21 COLUMBIA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (10F 2) C-22 COLUMBIA ROAD IMPROVEM ENTS (2 OF 2) L-1 SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN L-2 SITE IRRIGATION PLAN FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP Engineering the Future 5127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200 Orlando, FL32809 Phone: 407-895-0324 Fax: 407-895-0325 www.feg-inc.us VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) ,cov0ren2 rE8RGE mc,,4 j GRAPHIC SCALE 20' 40' 80' 120' / / / ,//, /\":\ / MAP OF SURVEY ••••••••• DESCRIPTION 0.91666 HTIFIED 56,1014 606,,11666560,16616.7,16 6,7611,HrrOFNATIIPAI ,°,,,.EsErEaFFE.FrOIT.NgI=I7M72,°,5;0`''' NOTES 0°A 6 71115566761,606 MADE W1.61176,716617 71, 7 THIS SURVEVIS VALID 0.77067HE PAPTIES 70 W140,417 IS CERTIFIED ir=JPVINI,x61,66,7707766.6,767.6.6,1:16q7Nr551, r0,1,110,06 Z;-.X0r0°0T • C-2 SHEET 1 0, ACCURIGHT 417061E: kV/1.4-6616 BOUNDARY SURVEY DATE: 9/./. per 5113 051(38,1) 81,4814 8818,48,11418, Code BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY COMA 58185 UPDATE TOPOGRAPHY FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP T,r,n; MAP OF SURVEY W GRAPHIC SCAL BOUNDARY SURVEY DATE:: per SI-1].051(3)I(1)Florlda Administrative Code BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY Iola FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP MAP OF SURVEY N W 7 GRAPHIC SCALE 030' 120' =a0' 1.113 21'3 Or BOUNDARY SURVEY DATE: ,, 91181._ per 5J..12 O51(3)(d) Florida Adm fnlstrative Code BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ','ZZVorr rorAor FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP CEN RAL NOTES: NS' • N F;Fr TFI GEO:‘,1E-Y 1,10TES AR IN STRIPING & EIGN,GE NC,TES: AVINCg'aR RNU /RAIERU-' NR11.- WATER a, SEWER UTILITY TIOTET• FnEF CC EISRRLATION NATER, t 4 1 I , I mx„nrm 0 x•wini Ineva „v.! TP7FN YF LF N-Na„ I 1 I I , I , • I I I I I , I , I I , , I , I I NATERIAL SPE FICATIONS: gaIrMIL VE[14,010. rT, r.c.NERFTF CHTIRTREICTIOR UOTES: I Fi,Fis.ID r ri r [FT - V ',Hi -if C r I I Lr, 0 CRACING &DPAINACE JI IL I Y IT"E'TTL, ETE 1 1 R,ISED PER PER Aul-IORIN COMENTS GRC REVISIONS BY CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA FEG the Future Phone: 407.5-0324 Fax: 407-395-0325 mmfeg-incus LEGEND, NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS SEPTEMBER 2024 'ES7CD" DRJ:NNABV C'ErR7BV "F.R67ECDBV C-5 DEMOLITION NOTES E. THE CONTRACTOR SMELL LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BEFORE EXCAVATION. reEm Po a t Ecxx, u r fares fro aaNL'fg 2LREVEPrs anon01-`,7 EROSION CONTROL SITE DESCRIPTION NOTES: EROSION CONTROL NOTES: aeHED PER PER AUMORILL COMER. SRC DATE REVISIONS BY CALCILP SOIL TRACKING PREVENTION oPHra Posnrvc 1II EZ ar F( Pa'E `l Po r r H ErFn tUlr is iEBIEra ^z o.nIzEwPRIORro :. Dren,HE :roo .00REO.re H µ . u�oi F°.�� aE acuwEo o.�r.. ore HoaE EaEaOE,�. �. ao o�aE� a. PHE EHcwaa Hioa CAE W CO LU MHIA ROAD s<.a�OnP�OH o:5r r°�DGaA ao�.EEEE:Bwa To ,rE :rPo w. aE REo��Rm ro r� �h GkAPHIC SCALE MATCH T �,Oo ,R.CKEo SEE SHEET C-21 FOR CONTINUATION EROSION CONTROL NOTES (Cont.): PRI DIN EROSION COMROL PAN PS PERT OF TX S CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA FEG IM�Ro��° E— OO DEMOLITION KEYNOTES SAV-CULPLR (SEE HOPEDD. INLET insua oX/R ATE a.PE SnrEH.DS. RELIC, MI TING F.CE. TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PLAN LEGEND egega w.L CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FENCE COMA, BARRIER SITE DEMOLITION AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN EROSION CONTROLS FOR NON STORMWATER DISCHARGES: A) WASTE DISPOSAL. WASTE WIER, XL PERSONNEL WILL BE INSTRUCTED REGARDING THE CORRECT PROCEDURE FOR WASTE DISPOSAL. NOTICES SLATING THESE PlACTICX ALL BE POSTED Kr ME SUPERINTENDENT CONSTXCTION TRALER THE INDGIDUAL RESPONSIB. FOR LIEN.INO THIS T., ALL BE IDENTIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR ,LN.uS VIA RePOCEDURE EOR PPD. STE DISPOSAL. NOTICES PR WASTE WILL BE COLLECT. FRON THE PORTABLE UNITS A LEND. OF THREE MIES PER WEER BY A LICENSED SAN.. LIASTE NANACENENT CONT.TOR AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL REOULATON. 8) OFFSITE VEHICLE TRACKING: vvL Fr N))f TT FD.M-INT 'ONTAI EM TYPE III SILT FENCE C-6 r_ SITE LEGEND uTVRDUTY „P.. PANEMD,T _____J DETAIL A L______-_J�= DCALE AIL B� A, REVISED PER PErr DATE REVISIONS BY CANAVERAL PORT AUTHORITY LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL ZONING: M1 • CANAVERAL PORT AUTHORITY LAND USE: COMMERCIAL ZONING: C1 SEWER SYSTEM: WATER SYSTEM: BE omEo E cm LnlEs STORMWATER SYSTEM:NSD AND MNNaNSD S. mS Dn.SEPSR. SITE NOTES NL CURB .DII ARE TO BE ON., SS UT To EMCEED TME PARK. STALL DEPTH *AR PROIRMDE IMD 4. LOWER CASE IENT „NOTES SURVEY R/OP „1„„ COND.. INMPDATION. S .L MEASUREMENTS APE THE FACE OP CURB OR SOLE „ PAVEMENT. PHASING NOTE THIS.ILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN NE o, Pw.SE. CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA FEG OVIN° E- Engineering the Future COLUMBIA ROAD MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C-21 FOR CONTINUATION GRAPHIC SCALE BRB ENTERPRISES LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL ZONING: M1 Qe SITE STRIPING & SIGNAGE KEYNOTES S' al:HTry Zsr Poore ;171oaxio,->"" s'c" ® SITE CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES CMND Fore Mores FORMADro CB. TRERIPON KO. PAVERS ' (Wu._ DRE, ,=F R — PAVER WILE,. C„-cam MUMMPP E oE„ CLOY REE nRcDESM� P.A117 O Cs OTHERS C11 RETAINING ALL SWINDRAD UESI.NEEPAIRTED E, MX., (SEE SHEET .1) C10. BUSINESS ID., CATION ON UC BE DESIGNED AND PERMTTED BF WHEW CAL r. O'RERS. CS. PPISTINS CONIC,. PAVEMENT Phone: 407.5-0324 Fax: 407-395-0325 SITE GEOMETRY & STRIPING PLAN SITE DATA PROPER, LOCATION: PROPERTY ZONING. PROPERTY FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: EYISTING USE: PROPOSED .E: 114 MIT AR.: PROPOSED BUILDING FLOOR AREA BUILDING SETBACKS (REQUIRED) 8955 SAPE SAII%CEMAM. COLUMBIA` INDU BUILDING SETBACKS sDF Nn? 156 ROOM HOTEL 2.39* ACRES 5.75* ACRES (PROPOSED) AL BUILDING HEIGHT BITIN.9 HEIGHT PROPOSED ARTICLE Pr A. ECONOMIC OPROSTuNiTy Dwzuv DISTRICT rE„. LANDSCAPE BUFFERS (REQUIRED) PEEi UFFERS (PROPOSED) reF.Ax in¢u'rTM)� vr.,re i[sTTMj� z PARKING PARKING REQUIRED ass PAR.NC n sP.NSA 'z s12,2I x Ts> R Roots: SPA PARKING PROVIDED SITE AREA CALCULATIONS BUILD. „MT u`iuss TPAWOOS „NCR a00D . PONwA F.RM. PwEL Izooecose." D.TFn. Cs„TisDI.. SOIa auLL .. M H WETLAND sST lo.L STATEMENT THERE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STATEMAEONT swnv of LIGHTING NOTE reF DFPAmMFNr CHAFE CF PRDMDFD u MUNTMNFD_ SMI OF „PE CANAVERAL MOE OF ORDINANCES AE Aa ECONOMIIC M OPPORTUNITY OVERLAY DISTRICT DUMMPSTER NOTE FSHALL C. OF CAPE CE. wFRAL DOSE OF areDNAxcax SIGoNAGo ENOTE Cm OF CAPE „LAVE AV CODE OE ORDINANCES. GRD GRD C-7 SITE DRAINAGE Eo.KEmrol/ r De rvpICAL "xDExPxo DEx No 5-05 uL >Ex INDEx No. . rnn.r_ naED c�.o. „oawsn cBOnaliR .w«cED DRAM. E sasTED9 t.Dsa DI SITE LEGEND W I DONCRmE a...E.M GRAPHIC SCALE I �a GRADING KEYNOTES NOTE: 41719InaTAITA1:1E1% Mtn:. STORM DRAINAGE NOTES: DATE REVISIONS BY CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA Engineering theFuture FEGEl ER�N� phone: 407-305-0324 Fax: 40,305-0325 vv. f eg ins us SITE PAVING AND GRADING PLAN (1 OF 2) 20-03 NOTED GRC TIA DRC C-8 ®SITE DRAINAGE KEYNOTES DR ADO, MI MITERED MO SECTION PER INDEX NA 93.093 ,PI.L. De. YARD DANN aMIINuMMOPASED PPER ER WCESNANNA,SYSTEMS 0,3 SITE LEGEND CON.. RAVEN:NE /2I "E"w ourv.Psvwur PADEN. _r—r— SILL FENCE ER.. CONTROL BARRIER <>GRADING KEYNOTES NOTE: ALL DER, MS GRAPHIC SC AIE STORM DRAINAGE NOTES: SEE SIRE, C-9 FOR UNDERGROUND MORANIATER S,LELI ROOFS MULL C.Rral P. ROOF coLLEcnom INOLUD OFI DATE REVISIONS BY CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA Engineering FUN. FEG ��Ro�Np ERN� NAM feg ins uS SITE PAVING AND GRADING PLAN (2 OF 2) 20-03 NOTED C-9 SECTION A A SECTION B PLAN VIEW DETAIL A RE,SER PER PER nreC DATE REVISIONS BY SECTION A PLAN VIEW DETAIL B / SECTION B CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA FEG ��Ro�Np ENIN� Engineering the Future ®SITE DRAINAGE KEYNOTES DRAINAGE STRUCTURE LEGEND IN EL DRAINAGE SYSTEM PLAN AND DETAILS fE[uv. soEEi Li iGgEir NOTED RRR C-10 nay II GRAPHIC SCALE n 80 SEE DEwL 9 9O9 O � DF, ouzo Po`E,EDEENEZ 9 9J' U.� ReNED PEr PER. DATE REVISIONS BY CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA FEG OW - Engineering <>SANITARY SEWER UTILITY KEYNOTES 510 M FULL PO 15 BEND DETAIL #2 SITE UTILITY PLAN (2 OF 2) GRAPHIC SCALE ®WATER UTILITY KEYNOTES Al. 12. Pm m-am OR-14: Eu wNN, mIcal 12331T ME. 12.310. REDUCER ▪ 6. AHEM( VALVE. 12.36. o-R D. P. (DR-1M FicE .N, nPw.l AI 1. FIRE MORMA.S.BLY. Al2. POST INDICATOR WAVE WM. MALT REDUCER. `..4 CONN:TON ar CHECK V.D. aTE L.P. FEMME NE (PEN CITY OF :Da DRLITIEs SPELILIGLwNR 2.3, REDUCER. MADOO ORMB) WATER LINE. DDT M BEND. 1▪ 2.M. TAPPING SLEEVE AND D.: 12. PVC ro-s00 DR-18I WATER MAIN CAPIc>LA ringINTan Prewre ro carvsrreurnarv. sEE FireE PRmscnory Purvsj DTMT TEE. NEEDED FIRE FLOW: PER NFPA , wD 101 NEED. LINE FL. isN CR oRU ERVRIN t BLDG.) FIRE 10113.11: REQUIRED FIRE HYDRANTS PROVIDED NOTES MI C-12 �F (revE �Ofi .x - ISIS W A REVNED FER larMORFM COMIEVTS CRC REVISIONS BY CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA FEG the Future NahOPer2:3re''''' Phone: 407-305-0324 Fax: 407-305-0325 marve fe ins us SITE UTILITY PLAN (1 OF 2) GRAPHIC SCALE C.WATER UTILITY KEYNOTES Al. , (C-930 DR-14, FIRE HAIR TyRICR. 12. ES BEND. 153. 12W, TEE. IMAM REoucER V13. 1M GATE VALVE. • 10t BOuBLE DRECTOR CNEEE VASE. M CHECK vALap. • learet REDucER. VIS ir RAC (E-900 OR-14, EIRE NAM DRIC.R. uno. Irzteet TEE. All ARE Nyorems A.EueLy. Ala. ROM INDICATOR VALVE. una. REDuCER AIR. et FRE DERANDAErer CONNECTION wpt. CHEW ANL,. A13. r CATE VALVE. ALS M COREER SERFACE unE MER OM OF COCOA MILITES SpECIFICATIONS. AM. 1-1/M %ATER NETER. • M RF2 ampFLow FREAFRBER. WM Myr REDUCER .20. Ax pas m-900 DR-33, RmER NNE AM et EEND. Ma., GS BEND. • WISTRC 1M RECLANED RATER WI NER CI, OF GEE CARAVEWL uTILITI NM. A24. MEW (BRAM SLEWE ewe, Ass 4- NATE vAmE V126. T. FE IRRIGATION LINE. A2). It IRRIGATION NETER. Asa paw GE coNINEERGN GN-sTEIRRIGAR0N 1539. (C-000 DR-113) RATER WM MRCS, wa, 15- BEND. V.2r.2=N0"7=7,0".72"ETZr'Zrah7=''' NEEDED FIRE FLOW: PER NEPA 1 AND 101 BuILDING AR, 106.91.4 SF CONSTRUCTION DIRE: RIFE I-E CFRINELED REELED FIRE ELSA, 3.500 CNN uSE 750 Gpm MI CREDIT ro9 sproNFLEO BLDG, EIRE WIDRANTE REQuIREW 2 NTORMITS ERE arlDRANTS FRONDED. a FROWSED DETAIL # NOTES: ;',LRLE22TFToagElanc,717Trerg`Vo' CuAtZV'sEing°T7To.1%,!"° " ALL adartLnungu,:toR-aLTZTan?..ja ""' 'vm.'7,14..'.72vr,EuEvo';.,`r0ELl'or,T.t.7.7M,"grEER.Ingra°.REE.V."'E° NEW NOTABLE RATER Rate NEW/STING in ORIN. ED ARMS OF WE FLORIDA ADAWISTRATNE CODEG 5. SAWA. notheaDLE LIDS SNELL BE u5 FOuNDRE N DEL NSF8.55 RINE AND AC C.. TATA MANITARP CENTER LEN-ERNE. noPPLIrE.trg. g't-L.If.r.TuTA °F 7: 777 ahhoe. SEPTEMBER 2024 "sn'OE'" DTA' 'ErR7BY "MD' C-11 EtiNlYZEJ ASTRONAUT BLVD. (STATE ROAD Al A) QQ SANITARY FORCE MAIN KEYNOTES roEo.vreESiCwlreE o rP CU:EE ww FOR NAGOEPRNntr, Li, STATION REFER T.0 SHEET C-20 FOR Lirr STATION DESION OMR, 10 SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE LEGEND Ora L SHEET Cam: ixvfltr onAnory w. M RUT' SITE UTILITY NOTES: 0,710 ro Enn.r. 1ITI I OC L OE COMPEETI oFIRIEowreE" Mun CE ALL DISTURBED AREu TO BE SODDED (eexu) 8 SIGNING STRIPING S., BE PER D. T NOE% )11-001 LEGEND: EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED FORCER. PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT - PROPOSED SILT FENCE SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN NOTES: ON PL OR GRAPHIC SCATE KEY MAP 11+00 GRG DATE REVISIONS BY clirm 00 CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA 00 FEG EI�Ro��° ERING Engineering the Future 0mvi feg me us FORCEMAIN PLAN & PROFILE (1 OF 2) NOTED C-13 w _3GRAPHIC SCALE _ � 51E LIU LEGEND: EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE LEGEND PRoaosED FORCEMAIN Ns ® 1' _ J _ J PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT ;MI' ON SHEET c zoo s'Y"" ,—mot PROPOSED SILT FENCE m O SANITARY FORCE MAIN KEYNOTES SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN NOTES: SITE UTILITY NOTES:� TME uS.xEM kirex w o. &KZ:71MM TFSo x`EmAFSx x mare. sm PL« Fox EE.OTH. TT o"reosxm a FOR MG.. ., .., `MAE L SEEL« FORx xx.H ,Hµ E xO aortowk atzt,nSE OF HOSE PRIOR O LONE CLOSURES ore r.. wu �.. ®H�Nx O. TE LIFT STATION SµOREF��� Ewe MANHOLE FOR EST CONNECT Ham, mrem� DETAILS. ..� wux T x.. PROVIDEDFORCEMAIN R TEST RESULTS H..m REQUIRED ,O BE soeuinm ,O ENGINEER re�,� m� SUSS reEW�eHTm I1 m .� 1x r0 xn�wnax or Preoamm rOvcrw�N. �' mO�w"SS COATING rOESNEIS IN .x �x xx �� .H H „OWN N H O' z ,�.L w�maxrO BE FIELD Lc«r r or ooxsrreucT�OH� m PE�H SHEET C-1 4 OS, FglaWl,P,„:11,;,SIIT LITZ PrEftQTE OF FLORIDA EROSION „MIME, S P=RS:STSgFin'LlIAOSLTE,SIUSSNESIS/ST6M 'ATS=SDEVI ZEAN=S : :LLCM': 27RI:NrS:"BE7E1E7D'O'T'I'NOES ,„ -001 ,F.Ra .a E, S,.OESIOErea w,4,1,F s PCSF° '" 4=', s µO a OOu>L. OExESR a Dx SwEv OI rDre eo INA OrsUSI F.ms H 'SS SEE 'SS KEY MAP lo la a w� _ d 717 s D w z -E nv.1 T H .O rCSA _ - -3 CAPECANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL. FLORIDA FEG Engineering FLOR DA ENCNEERNs GROUP Future 200 325 inc �s FORCEMAIN PLAN & PROFILE (2 OF 2) .......wD3a •••�•=•,��m.o.o.LL.s` o„„,,,,,, • ^m°^•^°�^^ •°• a , NDTeD.•. .- SEPTEMBER wza sC14 a DATE A AreE`4 rEr TER. REVISIONS BY CHM, nng DRc LwDRD 3Rc F. mESEE.{,,.{.,."SHALL ,E.:r."Eo.�.o..oEw....Eoe".sEv..... �E.....".E.m"""..� .".A Lam... APP0.0 MATE ,ICKII ES .. mE.E..""....E.E..wh."E.w".E .:rmmwmxw.cme.uxemxoamEmwme •a."R..."�.5.m.mrouz..remm.m.em.®eo xvm En.,,"E.,"..E.E...E..E..�a.E..E..�..."e22.2mE 222 22=E... e....m.. ...h...LE auezegoc".E.wm E.roLe"".mEmewm"sswE.". mm.eummm.wwmS ..00m�x Eaumxc xmxoxcm .�..... ro. ..E ".rno...o,22:2°w.xewsm.m�x..ce.e — "E`"A°°""""'°""°°""" RBIS ,Eo"Ro.o�..E TM 0.6 "En"EmEEE..EE,w..,�,�."m."EEnE.,,","..E AGENCY .Ew.."."a.",E.,""s". Ea..a.LE..u.w...."".... a.EE�TEa...". ..EE.E.EEPo.E.....".. .,"..E,"E,r,m..E".oE:r.EEEOE.E. L BY H— — .," . ��-..N. �E HEAD CURB DETAIL L. ...Lo �_ "... ,.."""TOP VIE -' OKEYNOTES GENERAL N31-ES "ELT E,EE ,.". LL.,i o.T ,RLLi Eu o�. Lo"L,.' h HANDICAP PARKING DET AIL HANDICAP L ,- ... ..- ..EL SIGN DETAIL FRO, vEw , .EE .E. E ,EE "."L.L �" "Eu." ,.�" L oLV Lu. a E5 �. L. CON CRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL '1 R1 1 STOP SIGN DETAIL . - G, E ,��. �:.�� " ,EE E�i. L".,-" ,L" LL " 44 ~ r 7 EE E„" % re EE.. ,",,." - - ,. " E, E..,-", _...E.. RIBBON DETAIL WHEELCHAIR RAMP STRAIGHT DETAIL WHEELSTOP DETAIr IB U ,.. ,CURB - -� ... ...E � r L L _ _ -- _r_ 0 .. a.,T -.,�. 0 .:,: .. OKEYN DTES HEAVY DUTY T ASPHALT SEE -,. PAWING DETAIL CURBS RAMP oiT .. f .... -�.. DETECTABLE WARNING DETAIL F L .s.. T D.O.T. TYPE C INLET , �ETAIL AParkA Bike oo.��,.oBs"R��.owT,PPE "RLaL _", BIKE RACK DETAIL 1A. h �.uL",.., sEcv� raos _ . I IN—SITUNFILTROMETER DETAIL "uT T � T _, _ - - . - -.L�"_ ., ® i -'"_ `_., <. _ YB� s . u rr-111111 m .i ®V-YN] E /L .©//////L L"°r�eEre _r< if PLANAE PLAN CONCRETE SECTION"}u "' " ®PERVIOUS I- IlL alliiM / I ®KEYNOTES g w It a,r. SECTION F.D.O.T., TYPE D INLET DETAIL SECTION T FD.O.T. TYPE E INLET DETAIL JC LIGHB Y AS /,""T IT,DUTY ASPHALT ,60, 1O"� PAVING DETAIL �FORCEMAIN CONNECTION TO EXISTING MANHOLE DETAIL g EJ "�` E" ' 2,� "L .LL.." CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA FEG "h°8°ER"c Engineering . Future 5127S Orange Avenue Suite 25 w.ifeg inc u. SITE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS '""""°"�'_°""°"°°"" OXe.m,.n, •^Em""•^°�^"""""•°• ,,,, 3 tx L"" , EMBER'2a ree R PER PER ssC 15 " CRC iwnn s'D sRc DATE REVISIONS BY CADS o• ,W, w���, PiNrER n E FR nssFxals yb con mgigic JUMPER & METER ASSEMBLY 'I A SERVICE LINE mr� TYPICAL SERVICE LINE IAEEIN„ SAD,I I AND VA VP_ TAPPING SADDLE AND VALVE ReiEER PER PER DATE REVISIONS BY CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA FEG OVIN° E- Engineering the Future Phone: 407.5-0324 Fax: 407-395-0325 CITY OF COCOA AND BREVARD COUNTY UTILITY DETAILS NOTED RRR C-16 15 IL. 14 14 14 13 12 1^ 12 SECTION A -A SECTION C-C SECTION 13-5 12 16 13 12 11 10 SECTION D-D 6' CURB TOP EL 3 9- 11111 I- 1 Tr4 EL -.2 5 111111 1 111111 1 1 0,7Ua. 7,,,MTFILLED 1, 1 - - SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW TYPE D OUTFALL STRUCTURE DETAIL NTS PLAN VIEW 15 14 13 12 -;. B7Kr'Z'TVV,r`urrED "". 16 15 14 13 SECTION E-E RE,SED PER PER Aul-i0Rin. COMENTS REVISIONS BY C.11[0.14 CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA FEG Engineering the Future 1!112a'nct'Frr3T301Z"'"'"2" Phone: 407.5-0324 Fax: 407-395-0325 feg-in. us SITE CROSS SECTIONS (1 OF 2) 'TE SEPTEMBER 2024 'ES7CD" DR:NNABV C'ErR7 "PRZCD' C-17 ElglfiEJ SECTION F-F SECTION I -I 10 SFCTION G-G REVISER PER PER DATE REVISIONS BY CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA FEG Orr - Engineering Phone: 407.5-0324 Fax: 407-395-0325 feg SECTION H-H SITE CROSS SECTIONS (2 OF 2) NOTED RRR C-18 -vi e ,sm PER PER DATE REVISIONS BY CMEWE CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA FEG airNp E- Engineering the Future Orlando, FL 32 0 Phone 407-395-0324 Fax 407-395-0325 .200 FIRE TRUCK PATH PLAN GRC C-19 GRAPHIC SCALE GRAPHIC SCAIF RILEY & Company, Inc. (H-20 LP w/ BATTERY BACK-UP FOR AUDIO AND VISUAL ALARMS & GUARD PRO IV MONITORING SYSTEM RILEY 8 COMPANY, INC GUARD PRO IV MONITORING SYSTEM: GUARD PRO IV offers a remote control and mainIenance sunnier, allows you to create a deco-gra...1 aysrem mardlor d controltlevices. Up to elphf ddlerern V1117=0=117:=='; ;111711:::====inZ7 PUMPS. SPECIFICATION Submersible pUmps shuh 'Pe Ms../ m the H.20 FRP Wel well Waiting u dual slide Rfil sy 1e/n. tor wind.° snallne open type ulM CMss insulation d shall he hear -shrink lilted M., housing The use ol ph, bol. and other Matening ”33,3313 nor ac opal. A oaf sans ng and shag uurme, wultluKI m fors. Uppe /o echan/33/ seal, shahrhave Slficon Garblde“ Silicon Carbide. CONTROL PANEL: SPECIFICATION The Enclosure shall. NEM /X mfr.., 30" high a, 2.0. wide, 10. deep with a 3 pedal syslem. 33.0osure 30311/1333 exier33113333/130 Neff° allow for wall mounling. The Wowing component e be mounted through Ihe enclosure: 1. . Red Alarm I.con (L., GEO MO Degree viewaelo ranger NEMA 1. ea. Plann Horn Mum OCE, ROHS 3 Compliant. NEMA 4X The back panel WWI be fueukuted f rum .12S, 5052-.H32 marine alloy alummum. All compeller). Shall be Mounted by machined stamless steel screws. The forn componenrs shall Pe mounted to back panel: ee. RdeY Ouar d Pre W P.m°, e Munitermrl Unu ea. IEC sryle Moto, ConMotors 3. ea. Volt 313333311 P13 ;have Mon/Mr 13 Ph ,Ivr, WO 8 1 N/C Contacls 1. ea. Alternalor PO, Lead SWitch ea. Cornrol Transformer (00 Voll 001,014n. 500VAI ea. Model PCBSSAN Sat, aryBack.Up wf Smart CharpmIUPS, 2.1 Hr 20. ed. 1,13113313 For Fmk/ Con331313,33 uu. Per Munu s (Siug. Ph.su , ea. Ground, Lugs LIMIning, and Surge ProIeullon shall maeIMe 'WU 2ri0 Editron The Muer door shall have a coo... alumlnum piano The 1-01.,wong components she mounteci through the inner door 1.ea.Main arealroe UL989 1. ea. Emergency Circuil Breaker 4118 1. ea. Mechanical Ingerloc k For Emergency And Mam Breakers ...Listed) 2. ea. Shorl CIrculS Proteclorn Ainallary Cm-. acts 1. ea. Con./ Circ. Breaker. GEC, Circ. Breaker UL 489 1. ea. OR Duplex Convenience 00.1- NEW 5.45R TImuMuM, Nou.R.0.able WET WELL SPECIFICATION Wel PRP Wag musl Pe designed to withstand wall collapse or INICIOM(4 baSetl On ZUNI pally SpeUrftalkin9 and fit d3,1M1p110115 belOW. 3433.333/3/. Pressure: 32.4 103. Per SOF, ppp "Soil Modulus: 70010s Per SOF, •Plpe Saltness SpecIlledle ASTM 3763 The Kul well FRP MrMIlale must he constructed fo d or exceed 1wo times Me assumed loading Itu the complele depf h Um serucrum curd plate e positive means of looking Me door open he open arm and " -*" ""''""r7rur: arsVonf.:=17igrcOT ar IV::: =MITI: °flocking. The pre/Wu/cafe. FRP ...lion manufacrumr shall guarantee Me pretalulcal. fill Vat. per approVad draw:raga for period of or. year I. Fort, Me.. of deliver, In Me local, um on gm engineered cfrawIngs. MISCELLANEOUS. - with. Mr.° duct. manufactured in.house t.he sMtion supplier and be a 111,111.508A Certified) 133/3113 INSPECTION TESTING: A tact, reprosentalive shallbe peovkletl for a one Mame sMaum and eball have 01 MP planp MOTO: and COI e MUM, 1-110 pump, and Ohe e0nUOIU U11000.11.0I mechanical reliabil.y and proper operation. 10/28,4 STATION DESIGN CONDITIONS pp: ,I LA : ,,,,roU HAW CAPACITY 2110 6,GrPoMn RUN.01, PUMP CAPACITY nid .. RUN.01, TON nla .17.1 PUMP MODEL* Grunnfos R339033172, 1740 HORSEPOWER ELECTRICAL VOLTS/ PHASE 230`,3 PUMP DISCHARGE SIZE STATION ELEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS WET WELL DIAMETER 1A1 3.03 INVERT DIAMETER 151 PER EOR TOP OF WET WELL ICI 0.50. INLET UNVERT 0,1 213. WON LEVEL ALARM (KA, 1E1 2.00. .0 PUMP ON (LAG, M 2.00. 1st PUMP ON ILEAVI M 1.50. PUMPS OFF (0, 131 .0.W BOTTOM OF WET WELL 14 -2.50' DISCHARGE PIPE DIAMETER 01 33 GUIDE PAIL DIAMETER 1131 23 FM. PIPE DIAMETER ILI 4'. STATION MANUFACTURING MATERIALS DISCHARGE. PIPE HDPE u.n.Er PIPE PER EOR GUIDE RAIL 304 SS WET WELL FRP ASTMD.3353 WET 300 3135 PSE ALUM " CABLE BRACKET 304 SS 3/3/33/13 CHAIN 304 SS PLUG VALVE CAST IRON SWING CHECK VALVE CAST IRON VALVE SOX FRP VALVE SOX HATCH COVER 300 LIM PSF ALUM STATION VALVE BOX SIZES PO" X 36" 3 361. DEEP, FOR 3" DISCHARGE 1303 x 331.3 363 DEEP) FOR 3" DISCHARGE 1403 x 40" 3 36.. DEEP1 FOR 4" DISCHARGE STATION HATCH OPENINGS WET WELL DIA 98" BO' 71.' CONCRETE BALLAST REQUIREMENTS CUBIC...9 OP CONCRETE REQUIRED 0.3 5.50 y3131. CIPLUMPIMENCII °Ramo, wow (1/31 18.0" CIPLIAIMPPNLE oireemo,... 13, 15,03 33333.133.‘3331o3...3 IY, 1E303 EWES,. 01.1.1..L.0111...111 M 0.11.0" 18' PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER PUMP STATION FAC3.1311 OWNED 5, 3333: p3333333p33, FACILITY MAINTAINED DV: 33343. 1,11.1.1.113PR. STKOON LIFT STATION WILL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. NOTE: PRIOR TO STARTOP OVVNER MUST HAVE A MINIMUM YR. PREVENTIVE MAINTAINGE CONTRACT WITH A REPUTABLE LIFT STATION MAINTAINANCE COMPANY. ALUMINUM HATCH COVER (LOCKABLE) FIBERGLASS VALVE BOX CABLE BRACKET 3 2" FIE,1;1?..„1:T01..,LLED • rITAPICAL. CONOVITS. -------- INTEGRAL LIFTING --- COMPOSITE WATER.TIGHT 12ILT,A..EEVE wl SS NUTS ,x) (V) 9 IN. COMPACTED AM> STONE -- ALUMINUM COVER WI LOCKABLE ACCESS HATCH a rg;-='•'," fill DISCHARGE PIPE In GUIDE RAI. -EMERGENCY PUMPOUT .7firxYlAgEtr1=P CAST,RON -.INTEGRAL FIBERGLASS SLOPE -CI FLANGED PLUG VALVE - ...FLANGED SWING OHM( VALVE `1' ""= gESSIEUUTE SHUTOFF VALVE CONCRETE GROUT AS REQUIRED Y ENGINEER TO PREVENT FLOTATION Dij OF MIN .00 PSI RATED CONCRETE MAKE MONOLITHIC POUR • /4 FT.LOrINIrgll'CIrSCOn FTN=GRIrD WET WEI7=17.47NTO'N't0'. 13 ,11/151/3 ANTI -FLOTATION FLANGE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6' TALL COMMERCIAL GRADE - CHARM!. FENCING, WEED eARRiER, AND 6.' ,,2su-7,,,nr,.4.,TrsAiir. FENCE AND SEE CONSTRUCTI=LANS FOR 2-0 DBL. GATES 110 OPENING) NOTE: PUMP CONTROL PANEL SHALL BE LOCATED 3 FEET FROM WET WELL PERIMETER AT POINT 0,13" ELECTRICIAN NOTES: 1. DRAWING NOT TO SCALE 2. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES NOTE: 00 71 - ,0110111, L' 3,1610 41,11411NIMP031.9 -PVIAP POWER.C....413,0NOVIT.3, 11.11 HI ELECTRICAL RISER FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY - ISOLATION PLUG VALVE EMERGENCY PUMPAUT wl ISOLATION VALVE LIFT STATION C-20 REVISION, THIS IS A GO YRIGHTED DRAWING. AN """' '1'1/"RIPI'TeE'N'A7P l'30\a'%=1 r rrn COMPANY IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.3.-, I� 'i NOTE. SEE 'THEM C— 22 F=R CONSTRUSs SITF FNfI I]0 LEMOTES. �� � � coGRAPHIC SC_SLE eEx a' a> w w a w p xao j aa wo I, w p• I �Q za (AS o Nas, ores /� ,I a COLUMBIA ROAD 1 -O 1 Ro asnrv� w Ex,n„o ADE . �z REOE> w,� B - l PPaox ,o , sa r„B EXIST! OR P Pa x. ,oP o TONsaucnoN T o, 1 � � k» , e,os -a 0-00 E' tx R.�.E afro 1+00 2+00 NoR,oaEao e° ',w 6oa1E�ao VEp�.E 3+00 4 00 5 00 6 00 CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL ��a �.°..��m.°.�°°LL. 1'91;5,o CONSTRUCTION PLANS 512P S. Orange oO Su��25 COLUMBIA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (10F 2,®°� " m` ➢° 3 FEG "h°sT,°ER"c - -9z2° °,='EP' BER 2B2a .„,.o m...o.,..00a..., /,reE` oEEre E, COLUMBIA ROAD e^E^aa^B�M1BF0O1fB 212a •^°m°^°^°�^°^°°°•°• S. "P DATE REVISIONS By .nma CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA rES POD. BBc 2wnn BBc BBc 21C 2 0 COLUMBIA ROAD <9, GRAPHIC SCALE FLOUNDER STREET ITE L7.ErlD NLoOLI I ION KnYNO I LS Cy.OTF ENNTR r u - <>CRAIN KE-NOTEE' 0,111- N-YNol F ',HE NO REVISED PER PER Aul,ORin. COMENTS REVISIONS BY CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA FEG Orr - Engineering the Future 1!112a'nct'Frrf::" Phone 407-395-032 Fax 407-395-0325 OLUMBIA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (2 OF 2 SEPTEMBER 2024 DESInEr DP,AMBY 'Err "PRZCD BY C-22 LANDSCAPE NOTES 1\ ,..1'. G.- 1n1APE P a N na, GRAPHE " AL PLANTING ,., rulo.° 'L `''"Inerr.11,r'Ll'ZILVIt. rlSHRUB --L.- . I.. IIINIBassima '-'10‘ ''''. CM lk I i 0 141lia.797Tr514" T''' / -----:-----)1 -- - . ., .• TREE PROTECTION MEASURES ' It .3 II C/I LANJ LAFE —LC L • 6 ROf FRO'T OE' 4EnT 0' LF It rr KOFF K REOU FED C 0, TREE/ 5 OF U/S TF EE/ HITOA„D 6 VNOEI HEE .2., • , ,EE .1., ., MULTI TRUNK TREE STAKES co IFTEREFORE CK . HEREFOFE OK OU H IT EH EDO T(Th' ' r - viu u It , TREE PLANTING VERTICAL STAKES CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS 9 DA 5D2'S ..."e"e . e 2. II.,Ze SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN . P K . FEG et h°81a11,NEF NG FIAg350c9324 P S' ' EVBER '24 'JE;xf*''Ia:f:'x: COLUMBIA ROAD Fax 407 395 0325 ' e'. By HEc [, CAPE CANAVERAL FLORIDA $14,'.411 SPRINKLER HEAD 9ET1L ELECTRIC VALVE 2,ETT.1 FRIC,T Cr1 I F,-,•-1,D RPIC,,T 1.1„,„ PrIr PALI IP -1,1 „ 1„1, IPP LL•1.11„ „IP P •• • • •• • rf‘P-TA AlrrrP 'PUP' -UITU'FP 'I': FPI r• „ r „ ' ri „ GRAPHIC SCALE SPRINKLER FEALL A REVISED PER PER Aul-i0Rin. COMENTS REVISIONS BY CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PLANS COLUMBIA ROAD CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA FEG the Future 1!112a'nct'Frrf::"e'"'"2" Phone: 407.5-0324 Fax: 407-395-0325 feg-in. us SITE IRRIGATION PLAN SEPTEMBER 2024 7PrD " 'Mr "PRZCD L-2 lSOUTH90) ELEVATION 2EAST 9»tELEVATION TECTURE __s No Description Date SOUTH & EAST ELEVATIONS Project+ s a 2024.01 NORTH (REAR1. ELEVATION - _ _ ; 1 1111JL SCALE: SL-1 e 1,01 I I i r—s 0—I E E - - - '111 PORTE °OCHER,: 5551. CLEARANCE 1358", 2 WEST [EFT' ELEVATION oCALL-: e 1-0 2AP Revisions No. Description Date NORTH & WEST ELEVATIONS Date: .0;/30/24 3 Project#: 2024.01 PIROPERTY APPRIAlUltj flin R , kkdor'201 ce,wr (s" 1 vl 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111""m„„m 111111111111111111111 Vv‘Vg 11111 1111111111111111111111111111111vohp, 101111h111111111111111111111111100 11 111111 1,11j1„ „I,: 1"V1' VII:le'nk 1111111111"r' hi I y ii1 )11)) 111,11), I 11) 11 111 V VI '1 V ,1111,1111111 1"1 11 0 ,1 111 )11 1 1 I 1 1 0)111 yyI vv1 n -'1111" 1111 Illg 11111, 1,d6111111111 ,V/v0 111III","1„111,011,1IVA "1"1111111111111111111111111111Y111111111111111111111111111111111111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111„„ "011111111111111111111111111111111u „11111111111111111111111110000111 „ 11111111111 11011111111111 111111111 11111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110111111111111",1111 1111111111,1,1,v,v,v,v,v,v,v,v,v,v,v,v,v11,1,1,v,v,v,v,v,v,11,1,v,v,v,v,11,y1, I 111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111 ,,„,„„,",„1„1111'11111111111,11",11","4 ,11111"1"1"1"110F"'" 11111111111111)i 0111011111110111,,,111,1111,11,V, ,11111 ,;,111r 11 , 1111.,11 01111111111,1 ) 1111111111V 11 01111111g ....MI z$11, /lotopt:/,0 "11 )I/1 „1101 p r 11 11111111V, „ HI 11,1111,1IIIII1,1111111111i1,11,11:1111111111,, 11,"1"1"*04,41iPIII*111,0/10 „,„1 ,111111111:11111 LE.Ir44,, GE,IRII1,11,1,',11111,1111,11111111 1,0111„ 11 "411411111V,1 0' 1:I(f '10,01 INNII/Vhir viIVI1,11111„1„. 1[11111, 7,iIIIVFAV4TilT11: 4111: ovIllooloom1111111111oh'101111111111111111111111111°L1 1.1.1'1.1'1111'1'1'1'1111.1'11111 11111'11011 ilvf,$1111111111111111111111111`"1 1,411,1,1111, 11 44 , 11111111,111,1,11,1ijo0,,I; A '11111 , „„1„111111„111111„1„1„1„1„„„„111„1„1111„1„1„111„uullulluuluV4111„„I„I„111"1„141411411114111,4111,414„14111444„411,41VIIIIIV4,1„,141,444'1,04I44,4„„„„„44IIIVE4m1111 1 , „VI,nnv:1111''' V 'V , vvvv°11 ,11 111 1 1 1'11'111' I I 1 1, 111111 " 1111'11 ‘,111 „Tr "dontomfOuti, lik4P1411iMit , r 40, 40,4; oiogrfoir,o If -of AA -Ar Aqi ,11,11„, „y1V1 4)10141f101,tf'11V° )1 11111111 11111111111111ovylooly010000000 1111 All BCPA 0 maps and/or m ap applications are maintained for assessment and illustrative purposes only and do not represent surveys, plats, or any other legal instrument Likewise, measurement and location tools are for assessment and illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect real -world conditions Due to the nature of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and colostral m apping, map layers may not precisely align and may not represent precise location, shape, and/or legal boundanes Only a Flonda-hcensed surveyor can determ ine legally -relevant properly boundanes, elevation, distance, area, and/or location in Florida Map tie mi March 5, 2025 (map ric0 ria rri ay vary) Planning Maps 11.11. 1111 "Ilvill111111111111111111111111111111.1.1.1.1.1.viloolll'v.v.v.10VI.v.1.1.1.1.1.1.v.v.v.v.livomov.1.1„ Alt 1,..,III11111.11110 1 ""V11111111111,111111111111111111111 ,,,,,111101111111111111111111)111111,1111111" 11111oh111111 1111111 , ...v....................... ........1 ....................11.„1......4„vvvuuvvv.„11. vvvVII '"'''.?.":".11111111n1111111,111111111111111111V1.4111.11111111.1.1'. VIIIIIIIIIVI'VBH.11111.......... ,.. . • 11111 I 11 1 Legend [7::: City Boundary Roadways Ili City Parcels PUB/REC 1,11,111,i1,1111111,1111111,1 1111;11o:11 CON PD (Ordinance No. DE3'2019) C-2 M-1 Ri 1 R 2 r4JR3 Zoning Excerpt Map 11111111 1111111111111 II I i 11111,1i i i iiiiiiiiiiiiii 111 11 i i 1111 11,11,11,111.111„,1,11,11,111,111,11,11,11,1,1 11„11,11,111,III 1 1 1,1,1 ill 1 IIIIIIII11111111111 11111111 11E, 1111111111111111111111 i ' "111,11,1 '1 111 1111,11,11111111111,111111111111111111'111111j111111 111111111111111 1,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,11111' Future Land Use Excerpt Map 111111111111111111 Iv, ijD ilv'111111 11110 111111 '11i117."1 II HI 1111111111111111 I I I I, II 1''',',1,111:1:1:1:1:1:11111111111111111111111111111111111111:1: 1111:1:1:1:1:11: : 1, 11:1111111,11,11' 11111 '111'17.1 '''11111111111111111' 1 11111 11111111 T1 9 1111 1111„1111 110I I III IIIII 111 111 111 1111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111115. ipp/iiii pennon° ell 1"11111111,11,11,11,11,11,11,1,1111iiii"11111111(11116,„, // Ion 411111111111111111111111111111111111111111 00000000 1111 1111111111111111111111 11 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111,, 11111111111111111111111111 N N TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CAPE CANAVERAL HOTEL CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA Prepared for: Grosvenor Port Hotel, LLC 15260 NW 147th Drive, Suite 100 Alachua, FL 32615 Prepared by: Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. 535 Versailles Drive Maitland, Florida 32751 407-628-9955 September 2024 REVISED March 2025 TPD Ns 5959 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am a Professional Engineer properly registered in the State of Florida practicing with Traffic Planning and Design, Inc., a corporation authorized to operate as an engineering business, EB-3702, by the State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Professional Engineers, and that I have prepared or approved the evaluations, findings, opinions, conclusions, or technical advice attached hereto for: PROJECT: Cape Canaveral Hotel LOCATION: City of Cape Canaveral CLIENT: Grosvenor Port Hotel, LLC I hereby acknowledge that the procedures and references used to develop the results contained in these computations are standard to the professional practice of Transportation Engineering as applied through professional judgment and experience. NAME: Turgul P.E. No.: 204O'b DATE: March SIGNATURE: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 4 Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND TRIP GENERATION 6 Trip Generation Trip Distribution and Assignment PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 8 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis CONCLUSIONS 9 APPENDICES A Methodology and Related Correspondence B 2023 Space Coast TPO Historical Traffic Volumes LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1 Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis 5 Table 2 Trip Generation Summary 6 Table 3 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis 8 LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1 — Site Location 2 Figure 2 — Site Plan 3 Figure 3 — Project Trip Distribution 7 INTRODUCTION This analysis was conducted in order to assess the traffic impact of a proposed hotel development located in the City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County. The development is located at 8955 Columbia Road, in the southwest corner of the intersection of Columbia Road and Atlantis Road. Figure 1 depicts the site location. The proposed development is for a six -story hotel with 150 rooms. Access to the site is proposed via a full access driveway on Columbia Road. Figure 2 depicts the conceptual site plan and access configuration. The development will be completed by the end of 2026. This analysis was conducted according to the guidelines established by the City of Cape Canaveral. A study methodology was submitted to and approved by the City of Cape Canaveral, and is included in Appendix A along with related correspondence. Data used in the analysis consisted of site plans and development information provided by the Project Engineers, as well as the 2023 Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Historical Traffic Volumes Database. Cape Canaveral Hotel Project Ns 5959 Page 1 " • t:f !C; :71 • aro .......... LL Port . „Can ave ralL • i : B [Oki ototo „tot: C 0.Orto ge r n rn • • • tr'2. ooto 40. ... Rd •••••• IC) lov[ \\\\\\ 101111111111111'111111111111111t11 lillilli0111l111101101101111011I1011I1111;11111[1111 . v'S 000,o3"to.' oti'N Cape Canaveral Hotel Project Ng 5959 Figure 1 Site Location 4 vis LXS1NC SORMWAi..RPOko) Cape Canaveral Canaveral Hotel Project Ng 5959 Figure 2 CANAV, RA. POR ALJF.QkTY AAVA,t)1{ AU -0k; Site Plan EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS According to City of Cape Canaveral guidelines, developments that are expected to generate between 21 and 100 peak hour trips are required to perform capacity analysis for a total of five traffic count stations. Therefore, a capacity analysis was conducted at the five traffic count stations identified in the study methodology in order to establish the current operating conditions at the study roadway segments. This analysis was conducted in accordance with the procedures of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), utilizing existing roadway geometry along with existing peak hour traffic volumes in order to establish the current operating conditions in terms of Levels of Service. Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis A roadway capacity analysis was performed for the study roadway segments by comparing the existing P.M. peak hour directional traffic volumes of the segments with their corresponding capacities. Existing traffic volumes were obtained from the 2023 Space Coast TPO Historical Traffic Volumes Database and grown to the existing year. Table 1 shows the roadway segments along with their number of lanes, context classifications, adopted capacities, existing traffic volumes, and resultant Levels of Service. The results of the analysis indicate that the study roadway segments currently operate at satisfactory Levels of Service. Pertinent pages from the Space Coast TPO Historical Traffic Volumes Database are included in Appendix B. Cape Canaveral Hotel Project Ns 5959 Page 4 11111111111111111111111101110 SR A1A (Astronaut Boulevard) iiii110111111111111111101111111lillolli iiddd Table 1 Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis IIIII�III1.11I IbIIIIIII 11�u uu1 ilia uilm ` 9811111511 i1ii 111111111111 u��u111�1 111111111111111 uulmuul� uu mom 284 SR 401 to Central Blvd 4 C3C/C4 1,790 NB 1,190 SB 1,225 D 297 Buchanan Ave to McKinley Ave 4 C4 1,790 NB 1,178 SB 1,115 North Atlantic Avenue 300 George King Blvd to Central Blvd 2 C3R/C3C 1,070 NB 207 SB 205 299 Central Blvd to Canaveral Blvd 2 C3R 1,110 NB 238 SB 241 Central Boulevard 303 SR A1A to North Atlantic Ave 2 C3C 1,070 EB 188 VVB 184 George King Boulevard 310 Dave Nisbet Dr to North Atlantic Ave 4 C3C 1,810 EB 710 VVB 690 * Obtained from the 2023 FDOT Generalized Service Volume Tables ** Obtained from the Space Coast TPO Traffic Volumes Database; converted to Peak Hour volumes with K=0.09; grown to 2024 with 2% annual growth rate Cape Canaveral Hotel Project N9 5959 Page 5 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND TRIP GENERATION The proposed development will consist of a six -story hotel with 150 rooms to be completed by the end of 2026. To determine the impact of this development in the area, an analysis of its trip generation characteristics was conducted. This included the determination of the trips to be generated and the distribution/assignment of these trips to the study roadway segments. Trip Generation The trip generation of the proposed development was calculated using data obtained from the 11`h Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. The results of the trip generation calculation are summarized in Table 2. As shown in the table, the proposed development will generate 1,199 daily trips, of which 68 will occur during the A.M. peak hour and 83 during the P.M. peak hour. The ITE trip generation sheets are included in the study methodology in Appendix A. Table 2 Trip Generation Summary 310 Hotel 50 Rooms 1!11I III II IIIII 7.99 1,199 I �I I 0.45* III 38 hoIII �I 1.1111111 11 II II 30 68 II� IIII IIII�I� 42 III III( 83 IIIII * More than 20 studies available, the efore Equations used Trip Distribution and Assignment A distribution pattern for the proposed development was determined with the use of the Central Florida Regional Planning Model (CFRPM). Figure 3 depicts the trip distribution pattern for the development. The project trips were assigned to the area roadways based on this distribution. The model distribution plots are included in the study methodology in Appendix A. Cape Canaveral Hotel Project Ns 5959 Page 6 E Age err& er, Frd vvyvv, lree. r vr;v4,9 Rer le lel Ler,orr r'A a Ler • Cern tral %ere' erre rer,' Vele rr 1, Dr 11.1, V Meer111 8 lev Manatee 141141 r Er • • vvv,,v1:6.v eleeerr.eargArr Kling ...„ . CW'd• cyr 5?„, Ceerererr Par k rl fr[1} I've( Ber'Arrh Ire err k Har or 0 if J 4 1 .(24 111 •• • • • („Nrrell'ller rr,e,yr„,,,rrerr,r,s, • 1.3 Wert releL • ••• • • i're, LG. . • • e Greererr.rtl 111111 r.'46 Vfl Ill [I , IVI I r-' De ll '1,-,,h el r reh [.. ,,, li Per 5crer Aye, ,,l!e A rla rr,n Aver er ere rdl, pingrol, R ret '''''''''' ; 1, ,,,,, ,,,, ,y,,:r. le, e, 0 r0 A re V; rear I) er S1 lee, Ha NI i•lv ,'V11 A V e i 1 Jen tiwnereer Ref Amer ve', rrirr.re kV,/ V", , ,S71 Polk Ave, Can va il al ,,,,; 'T ,5y1nr Ave ,,.. V,4 0 Fit tl ego, ,r.r. A, er ri Frr,er, ere. Ave 'eeell'tell Sr: re trerleeari•rarr Aver Tv9 ,11 . rer r Cape Canaveral Hotel Project Ng 5959 Figure 3 Trip Distribution N vis PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Projected traffic conditions were analyzed in order to assess the impact of the proposed development on the study roadway segments. The analysis consisted of roadway capacity analysis using the total projected traffic volumes, which consist of background traffic combined with the project trips. Background traffic was determined through trends analysis of historical AADT's in the project vicinity. As explained in the study methodology, the trends analysis revealed an average annual growth rate of 0.93%; therefore, the minimum 2.00% annual growth rate was used to determine the background traffic growth. Detailed trends analysis worksheets are included in the study methodology in Appendix A. Proiected Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway capacity analysis was performed for the study roadway segments by comparing the total projected P.M. peak hour directional traffic volumes of the segments with their corresponding capacities, similar to the existing conditions analysis. The roadway capacity analysis is summarized in Table 3, which shows that the study roadway segments will continue to operate at satisfactory Levels of Service with excess capacity available upon the completion of the project. Table 3 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis SR A1A (Astronaut Boulevard) 284 SR 401 to Central Blvd 4 C3C/C4 1,790 NB ,238 SB ,274 60% 25 1,263 25 1,299 297 Buchanan Ave to McKinley Ave 4 C4 1,790 NB ,225 SB ,160 21% 9 1,234 1,169 North Atlantic Avenue 300 George King Blvd to Central Blvd 2 C3R/C3C 1,070 NB 215 SB 213 1% 216 0 213 299 Central Blvd to Canaveral Blvd 2 C3R 1,110 NB 248 SB 251 1% 1 249 251 Central Boulevard 303 SR A1A to North Atlantic Ave 2 C3C 1,070 EB 196 WB 191 1% 0 196 192 George King Boulevard Dave Nisbet Dr to 310 North Atlantic 4 Ave * Existing volume X 1.04 ** Highest on Segment Cape Canaveral Hotel Project Ns 5959 Page 8 C3C 1,810 EB 738 WB 718 92% 38 776 39 757 CONCLUSIONS This analysis was undertaken in order to assess the traffic impact of a proposed hotel development located in the City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County. The development is located in the southwest corner of the intersection of Columbia Road and Atlantis Road. The proposed development is for a six -story hotel with 150 rooms. The results of the analysis as documented herein are summarized as follows: • The proposed development will generate 1,199 daily trips, of which 68 trips will occur during the A.M. peak hour and 83 during the P.M. peak hour. • According to City of Cape Canaveral guidelines, developments that are expected to generate between 21 and 100 peak hour trips are required to perform capacity analysis for a total of five traffic count stations. Roadway capacity analysis conducted at the five count stations identified in the study methodology revealed that the study roadway segments currently operate at satisfactory Levels of Service with excess capacity available, and will continue to do so upon completion of the project in 2026. Cape Canaveral Hotel Project Ns 5959 Page 9 APPENDICES APPENDIX A Methodology and Related Correspondence Sean Smith From: Richard Stubbs <richard@stubbsarchitecture.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2024 3:08 PM To: Sean Smith; Turgut Dervish; Rita Merhi Cc: Greg Crawford Subject: Fw: Cape Canaveral Hotel TIA Methodology Good Afternoon Sean, Please see below from Kyle Harris. The city seems to be going through some changes as Dave Dickey is gone and Kyle Harris will be leaving the first week of October. I will forward the new contact at the city in separate email. Thank you, Richard Stubbs, AIA, CGC LEED AP BD+C CIlh°°IIIOFT' IiiliiCif CIII' IIIIIIIIII From: Kyle Harris <k.harris@capecanaveral.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2024 12:34 PM To: Richard Stubbs <richard@stubbsarchitecture.com> Subject: RE: Cape Canaveral Hotel TIA Methodology Richard, This methodology is good. Thanks, 111 ylllle Harris, iiiikliCOP Senior Planner CCity of Cape Canaveral) Office: (321) 868-1220 x139 Cell: (321) 626-2315 100 Polk Avenue — P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 From: Richard Stubbs <richard@stubbsarchitecture.com> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2024 2:01 PM To: Kyle Harris <k.harris@capecanaveral.gov> Subject: Fw: Cape Canaveral Hotel TIA Methodology 1 wruirrmliiiirtl;l-This email originated outside the City of Cape Canaveral mail system. Please review the sender's address. Report any suspicious mail by using the Phishalert button in Outlook. If that is not possible forward the suspicious mail to phishalert citvofca eca averal.ora Hey Kyle, Please let me know when this methodology is approved. We are coming up on 2 months since it was submitted. Thanks, Richard Stubbs, AIA, CGC LEED AP BD+C 13"T U IIIIII'l llllll'l,"'' III" C IIL.III IIL.L.IIIIIIIIII C..L. U III" IIIIIIIIII From: Sean Smith <ssmith@tpdtraffic.com> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2024 2:56 PM To: D.Dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org <D.Dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org> Cc: Greg Crawford <GCrawford@feg-inc.us>; Richard Stubbs <richard@stubbsarchitecture.com>; Turgut Dervish <turgut@tpdtraffic.com>; Rita Merhi <rita@tpdtraffic.com> Subject: Cape Canaveral Hotel TIA Methodology Good afternoon David, Attached please find our proposed study methodology for a hotel project located in the City of Cape Canaveral. Please review and let us know if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you, Sean Smith, E.I. Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. 535 Versailles Drive Maitland, Florida 32751 407.628.9955 www.todtraffic.com Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public -records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing. Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you 2 01101 TO: Kyle Harris, AICP Senior Planner, City of Cape Canaveral FROM: Turgut Dervish, P.E. DATE: July 25th, 2024 RE: Cape Canaveral Hotel Traffic Impact Study Methodology TPD No. 5959 The following is an outline of the proposed methodology for the Traffic Impact Study of a proposed hotel development located in the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida. The project site is located at 8955 Columbia Road. Figure 1 depicts the site location and the area roadways. 1. Proposed Development The proposed development will consist of a six -story hotel with 150 rooms. Access to the site is proposed via a full access connection to Columbia Road. Figure 2 depicts the conceptual site plan and access configuration. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2026. 2. Trip Generation Trip generation data from the 11th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual will be used for the trip generation estimation of the development. Table 1 provides a summary of the trip generation calculation. The proposed development is estimated to generate 1,199 daily trips, of which 68 will occur during the A.M. peak hour and 83 during the P.M. peak hour. ITE Trip Generation sheets are included in Attachment A. Table 1 Tr'p Generation Calculation Summary IIIIIII�IIIII i1111 1 lir11111. dl mlitili 1l uulu lulu d1111 II IIINN ifi a i i(1 ulmo 0V1� 111iii Mtdo�uoiliii 1flh ll1� Iluiiiiiululllui111 uw� IIIIII I�u� a uuum �II��II���1 �1 I1'11 i� 11 � i:r""1 Ill hoailul' ilu� 11111111111111 * More than 20 studies available, therefore Equations used 3. Trip Distribution A distribution pattern was determined with the use of the latest version of the Central Florida Regional Planning Model (CFRPM). The model distribution plots are provided in Attachment B. The trip distribution in the project vicinity is shown in Figure 3. This trip distribution pattern will be used to distribute the project trips to the study roadway segments. Tra is Planning and esin, Inc. 535 Versailles Drive, Maitland, Florida 32751 • Phone (407) 628-9955 • Fax (407) 628-8850 s vwww.tpdtraffic.com " • t:f !C; :71 • aro .......... LL Port . „Can ave ralL • i : B [Oki ototo „tot: C 0.Orto ge r n rn • • • tr'2. ooto 40. ... Rd •••••• IC) lov[ \\\\\\ 101111111111111'111111111111111t11 lillilli0111l111101101101111011I1011I1111;11111[1111 . v'S 000,o3"to.' oti'N Cape Canaveral Hotel Project Ng 5959 Figure 1 Site Location N 4 LXS1NC SORMWAi..RPOko) Cape Canaveral Canaveral Hotel Project Ng 5959 Figure 2 CANAVRA. POR AAVA,t)k, AU -0k; Site Plan N 4 E Age err& er, Frd vvyvv, lree. r vr;v4,9 Rer le lel Ler,orr r'A a Ler • Cern tral %ere' erre rer,' Vele rr 1, Dr Meer111 8 lev Manatee 141141 r Er • • vvv,,v1:6.v eleeerr.eargArr Kling ...„ . ,,VOCW'd• cyr 5?„, Ceerererr Par k rl fr[1} I've( Ber'Arrh Ire err k lb or 0 if OAIK •• • • • („Nrrell'ller rr,e,yr„,,,rrerr,r,s, • 1.3 Wert releL • ••• • • i're, LG. . • • e Greererr.rtl 111111 . 1Y, Vfl Ill [I , IN I r-' De ll '1,-,,h el r reh [.. ,,, li Per 5crer Aye, ,,l!e A rla rr,n Aver er ere rdl, on g P ,,,,[ rol, R ret ''''''''' ; 1, ,,,,, ,,,, ,y,,:r. le, e, 0 r0 A re C. rear I) er S1 lee, Ha NI i•1, ,';11 A V e i 1 Jen 4111 Ref Amer ve', rrirr.re kV q, , ,t1,1 Polk wrreer Can va il al ,,,,; 'T ,5y1nr Ave ,,.. V 0 Fit tl ego, ,r.r. A, er ri Frr,er, ere. Ave 'eeell'tell Sr: re trerleeari•rarr Aver T.FX ,11 . rer r Cape Canaveral Hotel Project Ng 5959 Figure 3 Trip Distribution N Cape Canaveral Hotel - TIS Methodology TPD N2 5959 July 25th, 2024 Page 5 4. Impact Area As per the City of Cape Canaveral TIA guidelines, developments that are expected to generate between 21 and 100 peak hour trips are required to perform capacity analysis for a total of five traffic count stations; one traffic count station shall be at the northern extreme of SR A1A within the city limits, and one shall be at the southern extreme of SR A1A within the city limits. The other three traffic count stations shall be those nearest to the development, but not on SR A1A. Therefore, the following count stations/study roadway segments shall be included in the analysis: • SR A1A (Astronaut Boulevard) o SR 401 to Central Blvd, Segment ID 284 o Buchanan Ave to McKinley Ave, Segment ID 297 • North Atlantic Avenue o George King Blvd to Central Blvd, Segment ID 300 o Central Blvd to Canaveral Blvd, Segment ID 299 • Central Boulevard o SR A1A to North Atlantic Ave, Segment ID 303 5. Traffic Impact Assessment Roadways • Collect P.M. peak hour traffic counts at the study roadway segments for use in the traffic analysis. • Determine background traffic by expanding the existing traffic counts to the buildout year with the use of a growth factor determined through trends analysis of historical AADT's in the project vicinity. Trends analysis of historical AADT data obtained from the nearest FDOT count stations on SR A1A and George King Boulevard revealed an average annual growth rate of 0.93%; therefore, the minimum 2.00% growth rate will be used to determine the background traffic growth. The detailed trends analysis worksheets are included in Attachment C. • Combine project traffic with background traffic to obtain total traffic volumes. • Perform P.M. peak hour roadway capacity analysis utilizing City of Cape Canaveral standards. 6. Traffic Report Prepare traffic report summarizing study procedures, analyses and recommendations. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact us at (407) 628-9955. Attachments Attachment A Trip Generation Worksheets Hotel (310) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday Setting/Location: Number of Studies: Avg. Num. of Rooms: Directional Distribution: General Urban/Suburban 7 148 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 7.99 5.31 - 9.53 1.92 Data Plot and Equation T = Trip Ends 2,500 2,000 1,500 1202 1099 1,000 500 00 X Study Site X X X X 000 50 100 150 200 X = Number of Rooms Fitted Curve Equation: T = 10.84(X) - 423.51 Fitted Curve X 250 Average Rate R2= 0.85 300 Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers Hotel (310) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: On a: Setting/Location: Number of Studies: Avg. Num. of Rooms: Directional Distribution: Rooms Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. General Urban/Suburban 28 182 56% entering, 44% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.46 0.20 - 0.84 0.14 Data Plot and Equation T = Trip Ends 300 200 100 69 613 00 X Study Site X X X X X X 1 0 100 200 300 400 X = Number of Rooms Fitted Curve Average Rate R2= 0.84 Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.50(X) - 7.45 500 Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers Hotel (310) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: On a: Setting/Location: Number of Studies: Avg. Num. of Rooms: Directional Distribution: Rooms Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. General Urban/Suburban 31 186 51% entering, 49% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.59 0.26 - 1.06 0.22 Data Plot and Equation T = Trip Ends 400 300 200 100 00 X Study Site XX X X x XX X X X X X X X X X X 100 200 300 400 X = Number of Rooms Fitted Curve Average Rate R2= 0.78 Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.74(X) - 27.89 X 500 Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers Attachment B Model Plots 41( 2.8 SR 628 George Kling 1131lvd 7 ' 0 o o ' 5 \ 1 \ 5\l'99 \ \ \ 1 Washington Ave George Klf14,1 Blvd 6 2 ,-• -, George Kling Bilvd . ni! , r, c.t. < 2w. a. , Central Blvd 1 1 Central Blvd 0 0) 0 a, 0 0 a, ° CFRPM v.7 11„, h icev' 6c1 t o Hall Rd 1 1 ill Rd 8 vicP 2.8 SIR.,11:528 2.8 22 5 „2:35 51R. 528ntru,D,W pallheLe;6,'11R. );.42.8 SO:Z.1[528 1 ( oo 8 C:swy ':,11Z, 4011 11 CFRPM v.7 (11„,hce s e t o Attachment C Trends Analysis Traffic Trends - V03.a SRA1A -- FIN# Location 1234 County: Station #: Highway: Brevard (70) 0354 SR A1A 50000 45000 40000 0 v 35000 U _ccu 30000 U 25000 1- > 20000 0 rn 15000 v 10000 5000 0 Observed Count -Fitted Curve 11 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 Year ** Annual Trend Increase: 1,012 Trend R-squared: 63.50% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 3.99% Trend Growth Rate (2023 to Design Year): 2.87% Printed: 24-Jul-24 Straight Line Growth Option Year Traffic (ADT/AADT) Count* Trend** 2014 23000 25600 2015 24000 26700 2016 29000 27700 2017 33000 28700 2018 32000 29700 2019 32000 30700 2020 31000 31700 2021 31500 32700 2022 31500 33700 2023 35000 34800 2024 Opening Year Trend 2024 N/A 35800 2025 Mid -Year Trend 2025 N/A 36800 2026 Design Yea Trend 2026 N/A 37800 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends *Axle -Adjusted Traffic Trends - V03.a GEORGE J KING BLVD -- FIN# Location 1234 1 County: Station #: Highway: Brevard (70) 7044 GEORGE J KING BLVD Average Daily Traffic (Vehicles/Day) 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Observed Count -Fitted Curve 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 Year ** Annual Trend Increase: -56 Trend R-squared: 43.92% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: -0.78% Trend Growth Rate (2023 to Design Year): -1.01 % Printed: 24-Jul-24 Straight Line Growth Option Year Traffic (ADT/AADT) Count* Trend** 2014 7100 7100 2015 7200 7100 2016 6600 7000 2017 7000 6900 2018 7200 6900 2019 6900 6800 2020 6700 6800 2021 6700 6700 2022 6500 6700 2023 6700 6600 2024 Opening Year Trend 2024 N/A 6600 2025 Mid -Year Trend 2025 N/A 6500 2026 Design Yea Trend 2026 N/A 6400 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends 'Axle -Adjusted APPENDIX B 2023 Space Coast TPO Historical Traffic Volumes SPACE COAST TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRAFFIC 541 Pfi 414 4,444 MrMM :41 tM11.0,40.1t,,,M YMR CHES, NOTE,la .o. wen, taken in 2015. 5535535 33g 3 3 5H- Eg Y. 5g 313333A 333 33 333 33 gal _E_E5 333 333 ,R4 2 2 P,5K•4 3- 8 8 33.133 33 3- 55 343 c3,-1 3-33 Engln Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Six -Story Hotel Columbia Road Port Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida PSI Project No. 07571430 11?t017?l 1'1 t01!, ThBuild On ng Consulting Testing Project Number: 07571430 November 11, 2015 Update: June 12, 2018 Professional Service Industries, Inc. 1748 33rd Street, Orlando, FL 32839 Phone: (407) 304-5560 Fax: (407) 304-5561 Mr. Daniel Esden Daniel Corporation 100 East Faith Terrace Maitland, Florida 32751 RE: Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Six -Story Hotel Columbia Road Port Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida Dear Mr. Esden: In accordance with PSI Proposal Nos. 0757-162697 and 0757-231580 your authorization, Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) has completed design level geotechnical engineering services for the planned hotel to be constructed in Port Canaveral, Florida. This report provides the results of PSI's subsurface exploration program, along with our geotechnical recommendations to guide design and construction of the project. This report has been updated to reflect the increased size of the structure and to include PSI's supplemental field investigation for the property. PROJECT INFORMATION The site under consideration herein is an undeveloped tract of land in Port Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida. The planned hotel will be a six -story hotel. The area of the proposed new hotel is located at the south end of Columbia Road just south of the intersection with George King Boulevard. Specifically, the site is bound by Columbia Road to the east, Florida A1A to the west, an existing wet retention pond ("Pond 2") and undeveloped land to the north, and wooded land to the south. The site is heavily wooded containing high grasses, tress, scrub and weeds. Some degree of clearing has taken place at different times over the years base don historical aerials from Google Earth Pro. Structural loads were not available at the time of this report. Based on our experience with similar projects, we have assumed the maximum wall and column loads for the structure will be 28 kips/foot and 470 kips, respectively. Maximum floor loads are anticipated to be 250 pounds per square foot or less. An under -pavement storm water exfiltration system will be constructed in the parking and drive areas off the development. The above listed information/assumptions have been used for the purpose of preparing this report. Adjustments to the evaluations and recommendations may be necessary if the planned development differs from the noted information/assumptions. Engineering Certificate of Authorization 3684 www.intertek.com/building Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation June 12, 2018 Page 2 of 13 SCOPE OF GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES The purpose of PSI's work was to obtain information on the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the proposed project site. The subsurface conditions encountered were then evaluated to develop geotechnical engineering recommendations for design and construction of the project. The following services were provided in order to achieve the preceding objectives: 1. Reviewed readily available published geologic and topographic information. This published information was obtained from the "Cape Canaveral, Florida" quadrangle map published by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the "Soil Survey of Brevard County, Florida" published by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 2. For the original field exploration program, executed a program of subsurface sampling and field testing. PSI performed a field exploration program comprising two (2) 100-foot deep and two (2) 55-foot deep Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings in the building footprint. In the borings, the upper 4 feet were augered by hand to confirm utility clearance. Below 4 feet, samples were collected and Standard Penetration Test resistances (N-values) were measured continuously to 10 feet and on intervals of five (5) feet thereafter. In addition to the SPT borings, PSI performed four (4) auger borings to a depth of 2 to 5 feet below existing grade in the pavement areas. The boring locations were established in the field using GPS equipment and the project plans provided to PSI. 3. As a supplemental exploration, PSI recorded the excavation of 21 test pits across the property. Permeability samples were obtained at test pit locations on the northwest and southeast portions of the site within the areas of the proposed below pavement stormwater systems. 4. Visually classified and stratified representative soil samples in the laboratory using the Unified Soil Classification System. Conducted a limited laboratory testing program to confirm soil classification and engineering properties. 5. Collected groundwater level measurements in the boreholes and estimated normal seasonal high groundwater levels. 6. The results of the field exploration and laboratory tests were used in the engineering analysis and in the formulation of our design level geotechnical recommendations for the project. The results of the subsurface exploration, including the recommendations and the data on which they are based, are presented in this report. www.intertek.com/building REVIEW OF PUBLISHED DATA USGS Topographic Map Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation June 12, 2018 Page 3 of 13 The topographic survey map published by the (USGS) entitled "Cape Canaveral, Florida" was reviewed for ground surface features in the area of the proposed hotel. Based on this review, the natural ground surface elevations in the vicinity of the site is on the order +5 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). A topographic survey of the site dated January 13, 2016 indicated elevations currently range from +7 feet to +10 feet NAVD88 (approximate elevations +8.3 to +11.3 feet NGVD). Refer to Figure 1 in the Appendix for an excerpt of the USGS map. SCS Soil Survey The "Soil Survey of Brevard County, Florida," published by the USDA SCS, was reviewed for general near -surface soil information within the project vicinity. This information indicates that there is one soil map unit within the vicinity of the proposed project. A summary of the mapped soil unit, and its general characteristics as provided by the SCS, is included in the following table. Soil Series Depth (inches) Unified Soil Classification USDA Seasonal High Groundwater Table Depth (feet) 58—Turnbull and Riomar Soils, Tidal 0 to 80 CL 0 Figure 2 in the Appendix provides the SCS soils map for the project vicinity. The noted seasonal high groundwater table is for sites that have not been filled and where no drainage improvements have been provided. FIELD EXPLORATION General The approximate locations of our borings and test pit excavations are shown on Sheet 1 in the Appendix. The boring locations and test pit locations were established in the field by PSI, utilizing hand held GPS equipment and using plans provided to us. Borings were performed in general accordance with the procedures of ASTM D-1452 and ASTM D-1586. The soil types encountered at the specific boring locations are presented in the form of soil profiles on Sheets 2 through 4 and the soils encountered in the test pit excavations are shown on Table 1 in the Appendix. Included with the boring profiles is a legend describing the encountered soils in USCS format, measured groundwater levels and results of PSI's laboratory testing. The soil stratification presented is based on visual observation of the recovered soil samples, laboratory testing and interpretation of field logs by a geotechnical engineer. Variations in the soil conditions should be anticipated between and away from PSI's borings, particularly due to the indications that uncontrolled fill containing rubble/debris is present across the site. www.intertek.com/building Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation June 12, 2018 Page 4 of 13 Soil Conditions Based on the borings PSI drilled for the project, subsurface conditions are somewhat variable across the site. Our reconnaissance of the site found that fill had been placed across the site as evidenced by the occasional asphalt or other similar debris protruding from the soil. Borings indicate that a minimum of 2 to 3 feet of fill exists across the site as noted by Stratum 1. Test pit excavations were performed to determine the depth and composition of the fill material. The test pit excavations indicated that the fill consists sand containing varying amounts of concrete rubble, asphalt, and construction debris. The fill was noted to depths of three (3) to five (5) feet over much of the site. However, a deeper area of fill was noted at Test Pit 18 on the northwestern portion of the property. Fill at Test Pit 18 was encountered to an approximate depth of ten (10) feet below existing grade. In addition, areas of fat clays (CH material) were noted at the ground surface in the area of boring B-3 and directly below the fills in the areas of borings B-2, B-4, and in the majority of the test pit excavations. This clay layer was noted to be approximately four (4) to six (6) feet thick. Beneath the fill and clay soils, borings encountered slightly silty fine sand with shells (SP and SP-SM soils) to a depth of approximately 18.5 to 48 feet below existing grade. At this depth alternating layers of clayey sand with shell (SC soils) and clay with some silt seams and shell (CH material) was noted to a depth of approximately 84.5 feet below grade in the deeper borings. At this depth silty fine sand with shell (SM soil) was encountered to the termination depth of the 100-foot deep borings. The SPT N-values recorded indicate the sands to generally be in a loose and medium dense condition and the clays in a very soft to stiff condition in the upper 20 feet, with the clays becoming very soft and soft from about 20 feet to about 55 feet. Below 55 feet, the clays grade very soft to stiff. The shelly silty sand encountered at the termination depths of borings B-1 and B-4 were in a loose to medium dense condition. The subsurface description is of a generalized nature intended to highlight the major subsurface stratification features and material characteristics. The boring logs should be reviewed for specific information at individual boring locations. These records include soil descriptions, stratification, and measured groundwater levels. The stratification shown on the boring logs represents the conditions only at the actual boring locations. Variations may occur and should be expected between and away from boring locations. The stratification represents the approximate boundary between subsurface materials, and the actual transition may be more gradual than shown. Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was noted in the borings at depths of about 4 to 6 feet below existing grade at the time of our borings (October 2015). Groundwater infiltration was not noted at our test pit locations; however, ponded water was noted to be present within the fills. It should be noted that our borings were performed at the end of the wet season while our test pit excavations were completed at the end of the dry season. Further, the presence of clay in the near surface profile will to some extent inhibit the stabilization of groundwater levels in the test pits due to their low permeability. Based on our review of the SCS Soil Survey, the conditions encountered in our borings, and our past experience in the project locale, we estimate the normal seasonal high groundwater table will be at +5.0 to +5.5 feet NGVD/MSL (approximately +3.6 to +4.1 feet NAVD 88). www.intertek.com/building Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation June 12, 2018 Page 5 of 13 It should be noted the estimated normal seasonal high groundwater level is not intended to define a limit or ensure that future seasonal fluctuations in groundwater levels will not exceed the estimated levels. Post - development groundwater levels could exceed the estimated levels as a result of a series of rainfall events, changed conditions at the site that alter surface water drainage characteristics, or variations in the duration, intensity, or total volume of rainfall. Permeability Testing PSI conducted two (2) laboratory permeability test on relatively undisturbed soil samples obtained from Test Pits Perm-1 and Perm-2 as depicted on Sheet 1. The tests were completed in a laboratory permeameter following standard falling -head procedures. The Shelby tube samples were collected from the test pits at a depth of approximately 2 feet below existing grade. The results of PSI's tests indicate a coefficient of vertical permeability of 2 to 19 feet per day. This is representative of the highly variable near surface soil conditions resultant from placement of uncontrolled, rubble/debris laden fill. It should be noted that the permeability samples were taken within the fill and that a "clean" fill sample was obtained. Detailed recommendations for stormwater design follow in a subsequent section of this report. SITE SUITABILITY Based on the results of PSI's borings and our experience with the subsurface conditions in the project vicinity, it is our opinion that subsoil conditions are generally suitable for the proposed hotel from a geotechnical engineering perspective. Due to the magnitude of the foundation loads and the encountered subsurface conditions, we do not consider a conventional shallow foundation system suitable for the proposed hotel. We recommend piling be utilized for support of the new building. Deep foundations consisting of driven square precast concrete piles or auger cast piles should be considered for support. It is estimated that deep foundations placed at a depth of 85 to 95 feet below existing grade should be adequate for the anticipated construction at this site. Additionally, due to the near surface undocumented fill and compressible clay, we recommend the site undergo a pre -load program following removal of rubble/debris throughout the site. Provided adequate separation is maintained between the normal seasonal high groundwater table and the bottom of the pavement base, pavements can be constructed using conventional asphalt or concrete sections. Further, at least 3 feet of separation should be provided between the pavement base and clay soils. For the under -pavement exfiltration systems to function/recover, we recommend all soils/fill below and around the exfiltration systems comprise clean, free -draining sand (i.e. sand containing no more than 5 percent by dry weight of material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve). Further, at least 2 feet of separation should be provided between the bottom of the system and the normal seasonal high groundwater level. More detailed recommendations regarding site preparation and foundation systems for the project are provided in the following sections of this report. www.intertek.com/building SITE PREPARATION CONSIDERATIONS General Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation June 12, 2018 Page 6 of 13 The following recommendations have been developed on the basis of the previously described project characteristics and subsurface conditions encountered. If there is any change in the project criteria, including the location or orientation of structures, a review must be made by PSI to determine if additional fieldwork and/or any modifications to our recommendations will be required. Once final design plans and specifications are available, a general review by PSI is strongly recommended as a means to check that the evaluations made in preparation of this report are correct and that earthwork and foundation recommendations are properly interpreted and implemented. Site Clearing/Stripping/Undercut Operations At the outset of construction, clearing and grubbing including root raking and removal of any organic -laden topsoil that may remain on the site should be completed. This normally includes removing the surface vegetation, stripping topsoil, grubbing major root systems, and removing any miscellaneous debris and/or other deleterious materials. Due to the concrete rubble and various debris contained within the fill across, the site additional undercutting and removal of this material within the building, pool, and under pavement storm water system areas will be required. Undercutting to a depth of 3 to 4 feet should be anticipated in the pavement and building areas, respepctively. At a minimum, it is recommended that the clearing/stripping and undercutting operations should extend at least ten feet beyond the proposed pavement and building perimeters, where possible. Material generated during stripping operations should be disposed of off -site in a proper manner as directed by the Owner. Initial site clearing and preparation work should be carried out under the observation of a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Fill Placement and Subgrade Preparation Following the clearing/undercutting operations, the exposed subgrade should be evaluated as directed by representatives of PSI to confirm that all unsuitable materials have been removed. Building and pavement areas should then be proof -rolled to provide a stable/unyielding subgrade prior to placing fill. Proof rolling should consist of compaction with a large diameter, vibratory drum roller. The roller should have a drum weight of at least ten tons. Proof rolling should consist of a minimum of ten overlapping coverages of the roller in a crisscross pattern with a maximum travel speed of 2 feet per second. Compaction can be completed in the vibratory or static mode in order to meet the minimum density requirements stated below. Where clay soils are present at the subgrade, the compaction equipment should be operated in the static mode and granular material/gravel may be needed to achieve a stable subgrade for placement of engineered fill. Based on past experience, we recommend compaction equipment be operated in the static mode within 75 feet of existing structures to reduce vibrations that could cause structural distress or disturb building occupants. Careful observations should be made during proof rolling to help identify any areas of soft/yielding soils that may require over -excavation and replacement filling. Following satisfactory completion of initial compaction of the stripped/undercut subgrade, the proposed development areas may be brought up to finished grades with engineered fill as required. to ert k www.intertek.com/building Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation June 12, 2018 Page 7 of 13 Preload Program Due to the undocumented fill and compressible clays at the site, we recommend the site be preloaded prior to development. Following clearing/stripping/undercutting the site, the development areas should be filled to finished grades with compacted engineered fill. The fill should remain in place for a least 6 weeks before starting construction. The subgrade should be observed during this period to assess if additional preload material and or time is needed to adequately address settlement of the near surface compressible soils. Engineered Fill Any off -site fill imported for the project should consist of clean fine sand with less than 10 percent by dry weight passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve and be free of rubble, organics, clay, debris and other deleterious material. Fill should be tested and approved prior to import and placement. Each lift should have a loose thickness not exceeding 12 inches. Density tests should be performed to confirm the required compaction is being achieved prior to placing the next lift. Prior to beginning compaction, soil moisture conditioning may be required. Soil moisture contents should be controlled in order to facilitate proper compaction. A moisture content within two percentage points of the material's optimum indicated by the modified Proctor test (ASTM D-1557) is recommended prior to compaction of the natural ground and fill. All engineered fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the material's modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557) maximum dry density. On -Site Soil Suitability Materials to be used for fill should be evaluated and if necessary tested by PSI prior to placement to determine if they are suitable for the intended use. In general, based on the boring results the on -site clean - sandy soils (Stratums 1 and 2) appear to be suitable to be used as engineered fill, provided the material is free of compressible material, debris and rubble, clay, roots and organics. Soil Stratum 3 consists of clay and exhibits a potential for high shrink/swell and compressibility. Due to the poor drainage and the potentially expansive/compressible nature of the clays (Stratum 3) these soils should not be used as fill. Samples of the soil to be used as fill should be tested during excavation as necessary to verify that the soils meet the requirements of engineered fill. Strata 4 and 5 consists of silty and clayey sands. These soils are moisture sensitive and poorly -draining. Strata 4 and 5 should not be used as fill. www.intertek.com/building DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Deep Foundations Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation June 12, 2018 Page 8 of 13 Due to anticipated structural loads and the soft and loose soils across the site, deep foundations should be considered for the proposed hotel. For a pile foundation support system, we consider driven precast concrete piles (14-inch square) or 16-inch diameter auger -cast piles suitable alternatives for the structure. Based on the borings, it is estimated that an allowable compressive capacity on the order 70 to 100 tons can be achieved for piles installed to depths in the range 85 to 95 feet below existing grade. The results of our analysis indicate that for a pile with a fixed -head condition at the pile cap, allowable lateral capacities of on the order of 5 to 7 tons per pile are achievable, depending on the pile size and type selected by the structural engineer. Additional lateral resistance can be provided by the passive earth resistance on the pile cap. Uplift loads can be resisted by tension in the piles. For properly reinforced piles, an allowable tension resistance of 25 to 40 tons should be achievable depending on the pile type and length. Piles should be installed at a minimum center to center spacing of 3 pile diameters/widths. To confirm pile capacities, we recommend that a load test program be carried out. A static load test should be performed for auger -cast piles while PDA monitored test piles should be used for driven piles. We suggest that three to four indicator piles be installed throughout the building footprint to confirm installation conditions and adequacy of piling equipment. The purpose of the indicator piles would be to confirm that the piles can be installed to the projected tip elevation across the full building footprint. Based on our understanding of building loads as noted herein, we estimate that the total settlement of pile supported foundations will be less than one inch. Differential settlement movements are anticipated to be one- half inch or less. Shallow Foundations for Covered Parking For the lightly loaded covered parking area to be constructed on the southeastern portion of the site, shallow foundations may be designed for a net allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 pounds per square foot (psf) provided that the unsuitable fills, clays and any organic soils are undercut from the foundation area during earthwork operations as discussed in the preceding sections of this report. The foundations should bear on properly placed and compacted cohesionless (sand) fills. A minimum of 3 feet of compacted engineered fill should be provided below the footings. All footings should be embedded so that the bottom of the foundation is a minimum of 18 inches below adjacent finished grades on all sides. Strip and wall foundations should be a minimum of 18 inches wide, while column footings should be at least 30 inches square. The subgrade soils should be compacted to a minimum density requirement of 95 percent of the material's modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557) maximum dry density for a minimum depth of two feet below the bottom of footings, as determined by field density compaction tests. Backfill soils placed adjacent to footings or walls should be carefully compacted with a light walk -behind roller or vibratory plate compactor to avoid damaging in - place footings or walls. All foundation excavations should be observed by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative to explore the extent of any fill, excessively loose, soft, or otherwise undesirable materials. If soft or undesirable materials are encountered in the footing excavations, then such materials should be removed and the subgrade re-established to ertek www.intertek.com/building Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation June 12, 2018 Page 9 of 13 by backfilling. This backfilling may be done with a well -compacted, suitable fill such as clean sand (engineered fill), gravel, or crushed FDOT No. 57 or FDOT No. 67 stone. Sand backfill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the material's modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D-1557), as previously described. Gravel/stone should be compacted to a firm/unyielding condition. Immediately prior to placement of reinforcing steel, it is suggested that the bearing surfaces of all footing and floor slab areas be re -compacted using hand operated mechanical tampers. In this manner, any localized areas that have been loosened by excavation operations should be adequately re -compacted. If the recommended subgrade preparation operations presented herein are properly performed, total foundation settlement for the covered parking should be on the order of 1 inch. Differential settlements should be approximately 50 percent of the total movements. These estimates are based on foundation loads discussed herein. Lateral loads that are applied to the foundations may be resisted by earth pressure mobilized on the buried vertical faces of the footings and by shearing forces acting along the footing-subgrade interface. Earth pressure resistance may be determined using an equivalent fluid density of 180 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for moist soil and 90 pcf for submerged soil. A friction factor of 0.4 should be used to determine base shearing resistance. The above values presume that the foundations are surrounded by well -compacted sand backfill and can withstand horizontal movements on the order of one -quarter to three -eighths inches. Horizontal restraint determined in accordance with the recommended values should be considered resistance that is available rather than allowable. Therefore, the design should incorporate a factor of safety and we recommend that this be taken as 1.5 or somewhat more. Floor Slabs The ground floor slab for the building can be supported as a slab -on -grade system provided the final subgrade elevation is densified and prepared as recommended herein and following the above discussed pre -load program. However, due to the clay (CH materials) at or near the ground surface, a minimum of 4 feet of sand (natural and/or fill) is recommended between the bottom of the floor slab and the clays (Stratum 3). All fill placed below the floor slab should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density. It is recommended that the floor slab bearing soils be covered by lapped polyethylene sheeting in order to reduce the potential for floor dampness which can affect the performance of floor coverings. This membrane should consist of a minimum six mil thick, single layer of non -corroding, non -deteriorating sheeting material placed to minimize seams and to cover all of the soil below the building floor slabs. Seams should be overlapped a minimum of 12 inches. For at -grade slabs supported on sandy soils prepared as noted herein, the subgrade modulus can be taken 100 pounds per cubic inch (pci). We recommend the floor slabs be provided with top and bottom reinforcement. www.intertek.com/building Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation June 12, 2018 Page 10 of 13 Below Grade Structures For the below grade structures associated with the project (i.e. elevator cores, utility vaults, etc.), the walls should be designed to resist pressures exerted by the adjacent soils and hydrostatic head, as well as building loads that may bear on the structures. Walls that are restrained should be designed assuming at -rest pressures. Recommended equivalent fluid densities for an at -rest pressure condition are presented below. At -Rest Pressure Above water table - 55 pcf Below water table - 90 pcf Below grade structures should be supported on a minimum of 3 feet of compacted engineered fill. Pavement Support Provided a minimum separation of 18 inches is maintained between the bottom of the pavement base course and the estimated normal seasonal high groundwater table, pavement base materials can consist of limerock, crushed shell or soil cement. It should be noted the reflective cracking should be anticipated if soil cement base is used. Based on experience, we recommend the following minimum pavement sections for light and medium -duty uses such as in the parking lots and driveway areas. Light -Duty (Car Parking Areas) 2.0 inches 6.0 inches 12.0 inches Type SP Asphaltic Concrete Limerock/crushed shell base course (LBR = 100) or soil cement (350 psi design or equivalent) Stabilized subgrade (FBV = 75) if a limerock/crushed shell base is used or a subgrade compacted to 95 percent of the material's ASTM D-1557 maximum dry density if soil cement is used as base material. Medium -Duty (Driveway Areas) 2.5 inches 8.0 inches 12.0 inches Type SP Asphaltic Concrete Limerock/crushed shell base course (LBR = 100) or soil cement (350 psi design or equivalent) Stabilized subgrade (FBV = 75) if a limerock/crushed shell base is used or a subgrade compacted to 95 percent of the material's ASTM D-1557 maximum dry density if soil cement is used as base material. www.intertek.com/building Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation June 12, 2018 Page 11 of 13 For heavy-duty uses, such as in dumpster pads and approach/truck apron areas, as well as in areas to receive heavy truck traffic, we recommend the following minimum pavement section. Heavy -Duty (Rigid Pavement) 7.0 inches 24.0 inches Portland cement concrete, minimum 28 day compressive strength of 4000 psi. Well -draining granular subgrade, compacted to 98 percent of the material's AASHTO T-180 maximum dry density. Pavement joints and reinforcing for concrete pavement should be in accordance with American Concrete Institute (ACI) standards. The recommended pavement sections are based on past experience with similar projects and the encountered subsurface conditions at the site. All pavement materials and construction should meet the more stringent of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and local city/county requirements. The noted pavement sections should be considered recommended minimums based on anticipated traffic loadings and our past experience. The project civil engineer should provide the pavement design using actual traffic loads, design criteria provided by the Owner, and the soil/groundwater conditions noted herein. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Site Dewatering It is expected that dewatering may be required for some excavations. Excavations that are only a few feet below the water table can likely be dewatered with a sump system. Deeper excavations will most likely require well - pointing or sock drains to achieve adequate drawdown. In either case, the dewatering system should be designed and operated to lower the groundwater table to a depth at least 2 feet below the bottom of surfaces to be compacted in any given area. The design and discharge of the dewatering system should be in accordance with Water Management District/regulatory criteria. Excavations In Federal Register, Volume 54, No. 209 (October 1989) the United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) amended its "Construction Standards for Excavations, 29 CFR, part 1926, Subpart P". This document was issued to better insure the safety of workmen entering trenches or excavations. It is mandated by this federal regulation that excavations, whether they be utility trenches, general construction excavations or footing excavations, be constructed in accordance with the new OSHA guidelines. It is our understanding that these regulations are being strictly enforced and if they are not closely followed the Owner and the contractor could be liable for substantial penalties. The contractor is solely responsible for designing and constructing stable, temporary excavations and should shore, slope, or bench the sides of the excavations as required to maintain stability of both the excavation sides and bottom. The contractor's "responsible person", as defined in 29 CFR Part 1926, should evaluate the soil exposed in the excavations as part of the contractor's safety procedures. In no case should slope height, slope inclination, or excavation depth, including utility trench excavation depth, exceed those specified in local, state, and federal safety regulations. www.intertek.com/building Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation June 12, 2018 Page 12 of 13 PSI is providing this information solely as a service to our client. PSI does not assume responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's or other parties' compliance with local, state, and federal safety or other regulations. STORMWATER SYSTEM We understand that a below pavement stormwater exfiltration systems will be constructed in the asphalt and parking areas of the proposed development. Samples were obtained of the sandy fill material in the areas of the planned stormwater system. It should be noted that the samples obtained excluded the concrete rubble, clay and debris that was present in most areas and that soil variability exists across the site. The following values can only be used following undercutting of the exfiltration /parking areas and placement of clean, free -draining sands as noted earlier. We are recommending the following parameters be used to model site conditions. Test Pit Perm-1 Parameter Value Unit Coefficient of Vertical Permeability Coefficient of Horizontal Permeability Elevation of SHWT Elevation of Confining Layer Porosity of Shallow Aquifer 10 15 +4.1 +3.5 25 feet per day feet per day feet (NAVD88) feet (NAVD88) percent Test Pit Perm-2 Parameter Value Unit Coefficient of Vertical Permeability Coefficient of Horizontal Permeability Elevation of SHWT Elevation of Confining Layer Porosity of Shallow Aquifer 10 15 +4.1 +3.5 25 feet per day feet per day feet (NAVD88) feet (NAVD88) percent The recovery of a given stormwater system is dependent on the soil permeability as well as the groundwater table, system bottom elevation, system geometry, confining layer and water level in the system. We recommend a commercially available computer program such as PONDS or MODRET be used by an engineer experienced in groundwater modeling to evaluate the proposed stormwater system. The system should be designed and constructed in accordance with Water Management District requirements. We recommend an appropriate safety factor be applied to the stormwater model. More detailed recommendations, including providing the elevations of the various pond design parameters, can be provided once detailed site topographic data and pond geometry/stage-storage information is provided to PSI. www.intertek.com/building Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation June 12, 2018 Page 13 of 13 REPORT LIMITATIONS Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This company is not responsible for the conclusions, opinions or recommendations made by others based on these data. The scope of the geotechnical study was intended to evaluate soil and groundwater conditions within the proposed development area and does not include an evaluation of potential deep soil problems such as sinkholes. The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the soil borings performed at the locations indicated. If any subsoil variations become evident during the course of this project, a re-evaluation of the recommendations contained in this report will be necessary after we have had an opportunity to observe the characteristics of the conditions encountered. The applicability of the report should also be reviewed in the event significant changes occur in the design, nature or location of the proposed hotel. The scope of our services presented herein does not include any environmental assessment or investigation for the presence or absence of hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, groundwater, or surface water within or beyond the site studied. Any statements in this report regarding odors, staining of soils, or other unusual conditions observed are strictly for the information of our client. CLOSURE PSI appreciates the opportunity to provide our services to Daniel Corporation and FEG on this project and we trust the information presented herein is sufficient for your needs at this time. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Certificate of Authorization No. 3684 Robert L. Smith, P.E. Senior Project Engineer Florida License No. 78130 07571430 (Design Report - Six -Story Hotel Port Canaveral)618 CC: Mr. Greg Crawford, P.E. - FEG Appendix: Table 1: —Test Pit Excavations Figure 1— USGS Vicinity Map Figure 2 — SCS Soils Map Sheet 1— Boring Location Plan Sheet 2 through 4 — Boring Profiles Robert A. Trompke, P.E. Principal Consultant/Department Manager Florida License No. 55456 www.intertek.com/building APPENDIX Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation. June 4, 2018 T-1 Table 1 Test Pit Excavations Proposed Holiday Inn Hotel Columbia Road Port Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida Test Pit Number Depth (feet) Soil Description Perm-1 0 to 0.5 Topsoil 0.5 to 4 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete Rubble 4 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 1 0 to 0.4 Topsoil 0.4 to 5 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete Rubble 5 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 2 0 to 0.4 Topsoil 0.4 to 4 Gray Brown Fines Sand with Concrete Rubble 4 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 3 0 to 0.5 Topsoil 0.5 to 3 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete and Construction Debris 3 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 4 0 to 0.5 Topsoil 0.5 to 5 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 5 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 5 0 to 0.4 Topsoil 0.4 to 4 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 4 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 6 0 to 0.3 Topsoil 0.3 to 4 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 4 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 7 0 to 0.5 Topsoil 0.5 to 4 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 4 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 8 0 to 0.4 Topsoil 0.4 to 4 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete Rubble 4 to 7 Green Clay Perm-2 0 to 0.5 Topsoil 0.5 to 5 Gray Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 5 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 9 0 to 0.4 Topsoil 0.4 to 3.5 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 3.5 to 7 Green Clay Project Number: 07571430 Daniel Corporation. June 4, 2018 T-1 Test Pit Number Depth (feet) Soil Description Test Pit 10 0 to 0.5 Topsoil 0.5 to 4 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 4 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 11 0 to 0.5 Topsoil 0.5 to 4 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 4 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 12 0 to 0.3 Topsoil 0.3 to 4 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 4 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 13 0 to 0.5 Topsoil 0.5 to 4 Gray Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 4 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 14 0 to 0.5 Topsoil 0.5 to 5 Gray Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 5 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 15 - First Attempt — Solid Concrete (large slab) 0 to 0.5 Moved 3 feet west — Topsoil 0.5 to 4 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete Rubble 4 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 16 0 to 0.3 Topsoil 0.3 to 3.5 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 3.5 to 4 Dark Brown Fine Sand with Trace Organics 4 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 17 0 to 0.5 Topsoil 0.5 to 4 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris Test Pit 18 0 to 0.3 Topsoil 0.3 to 10 Gray Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 10 to 12 Green Clay Test Pit 19 0 to 0.5 Topsoil 0.5 to 4 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 4 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 20 0 to 0.5 Topsoil 0.5 to 4 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete and Debris 4 to 7 Green Clay Test Pit 21 0 to 0.5 Topsoil 0.5 to 4 Gray Brown Fine Sand with Concrete Rubble 4 to 7 Green Clay Vrilrffry Nr,,;ri1yioml �I�II!UPt rll°u''1, 1,11,11,11,11,111 (IANORFITTIRMANNUM4ApprtqW ire„0e ���lh�uwu " TvI0u0111uu, Ampo REFERENCE: U.S. G. S. "CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA" QUADRANGLE MAP SECTION: 10 ISSUED: 1976 TOWNSHIP: 24 SOUTH PHOTOREVISED: 1976 RANGE: 37 EAST SCALE: 1 "=2000' VICINITY MAP PROPOSED 5-STORY HOTEL PORT CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA DifiAlf Information 111=1 To Build On Engineering • Consulting • Testing DRAWN: CHKD: DJW RS SCALE: NOTED PROJ. NO: 07571430 DATE: 10-26-15 FIGURE: J III IF 11111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIII 1111111111,1,1,1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111, 11111111111111111111111111111 uul llll , fi.1111 1111111112 111IIIIIII11111"".�I6��IIN�ii�ll����������� Iv' WCu����PIN,III!u^IIIIIII III dIiIIHIE'', 1 I II 1 EsIE APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION I11 1111 111111111111111111111111l1 11 ° "EuuE",4"11111111111111111111liiiiiiiiiiiii1111'v'v'w',w,vv dHIR1111111 nM1111I11111111111111111111111111111�� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, '"" idmIIIINII'II 11111II .111111111111111111111111IIIIlilin Ipl I MIVI mV �llill 1 1111E11I�V11�'K����Y� 41111k444,4.01g IIIIII Ilr umuuuuuul 1IIlpu111IV1111 II 11 1 11111 I I11I1 ''hliilllll1ll1,,,lllll"IIIVW loolIIIwWNI Illw�„ 911IIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIllll�lllllllWll ^"„mlkli l'^9 mIuIU aIII REFERENCE: U.S.D.A.—S.C.S. "BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA" SOILS MAP SECTION: 10 ISSUED: AUGUST 1989 TOWNSHIP: 24 SOUTH SCALE: 1"=500' RANGE: 37 EAST SOIL LEGEND 58 TURNBULL AND RIOMAR SOILS, TIDAL SOILS MAP PROPOSED 5—STORY HOTEL PORT CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA DIfif Information 14. 1 To Build On Engineering • Consulting • Testing DRAWN: CHKD: DJW RS SCALE: NOTED PROJ. NO: 07571430 DATE: 10-26-15 FIGURE: 2 J IIII I II II ii UH lrrrr pu 1.1411111 LOCATION PLAN SCALE 1"=8(Y 1�'tili, ry,n, I hVYh x I LEGEND APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF AUGER BORING TP-1 0 TEST PIT LOCATION O PERMEABILITY SAMPLE LOCATION GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED 5-STORY HOTEL PORT CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY. FLORIDA DRAHM /''gyp Information {M ' To Build On Engineering • Consulting • Testing DJW sc' NOTED 'k0J 07571430 RS 5-31-18 s"'s' 1 DEPTH IN FEET 0 5— -- - 10-20-15 10- 15- 20 — 25- 30- 35- 40- 45 — 50 B1 N Q MATCHLINE DEPTH IN FEET 50 MATCHLINE 55 — 60 — 65 70 75 - 80— 0 0 — 10 95 5 25 85 90 100 DEPTH IN FEET SOIL PROFILES SCALE: 1"=10' 0 — aa� 5 - 10-20-15 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 N 2 6 2 2 8 B-2 B-3 N 13 23 2 3 2 5 A 1 /I 1 A Q Q Q 6,9 OC_ H-16 H=il -1J LEGEND 0 BROWN FINE SAND (FILL), (SP) [0GRAY AND DARK BROWN SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE SAND WITH SHELLS, (SP, SP-SM) BLUE -GRAY AND GRAY FAT CLAY, TRACE ® OO SILT SEAM AND SOME SHELLS, (CH) O LIGHT GRAY CLAYEY SAND AND SHELL, (SC) ID OS GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH SHELL, (SM) (SP) UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION GROUP SYMBOL N STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE IN BLOWS PER FOOT USING AN AUTOMATIC HAMMER DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER LEVEL IN FEET 10-20-15 WITH DATE OF READING W NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT IN PERCENT -200 FINES PASSING #200 SIEVE IN PERCENT OC ORGANIC CONTENT IN PERCENT LL LIQUID LIMIT IN PERCENT PL PLASTIC LIMIT IN PERCENT PI PLASTICITY INDEX GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED 5-STORY HOTEL PORT CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA NAM CHIT j'11 Information It.4.11 To Build On Engineering • Consulting • Testing DJW SCALE NOTED PR0J N0' 07571430 RS DATE 10-26-15 SHEET, 2 0 5 10 15 ▪ 20 Z 25 0 O 30 35 40 45 50 MATCHLINE DEPTH IN FEET 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 SOIL PROFILE SCALE. 1"=10' MATCHLINE LEGEND 0 BROWN FINE SAND (FILL), (SP) [0GRAY AND DARK BROWN SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE SAND WITH SHELLS, (SP, SP-SM) BLUE -GRAY AND GRAY FAT CLAY, TRACE OO SILT SEAM AND SOME SHELLS, (CH) ® LIGHT GRAY CLAYEY SAND AND SHELL, (SC) ID OS GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH SHELL, (SM) (SP) UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION GROUP SYMBOL STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE IN BLOWS N PER FOOT USING AN AUTOMATIC HAMMER DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER LEVEL IN FEET 10-2o-15 WITH DATE OF READING W NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT IN PERCENT -200 FINES PASSING #200 SIEVE IN PERCENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED 5-STORY HOTEL PORT CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA NAM CHIT j'ff Information It.4.11 To Build On Engineering • Consulting • Testing DJW SCALE NOTED PR0J N0' 07571430 RS DATE 10-26-15 SHEET, 3 DEPTH IN FEET 0 5 5.0\ 10-22-15 AB-1 AB-2 10-22-15 SOIL PROFILES SCALE. 1"=5' AB-3 AB-4 0 <a r 10-22-15 0 0 LEGEND ▪ 0 BROWN FINE SAND (FILL), (SP) [0GRAY AND DARK BROWN SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE SAND WITH SHELLS, (SP, SP-SM) BLUE -GRAY AND GRAY FAT CLAY, TRACE OO SILT SEAM AND SOME SHELLS, (CH) ▪ O LIGHT GRAY CLAYEY SAND AND SHELL, (SC) ID OS GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH SHELL, (SM) (SP) UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION GROUP SYMBOL DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER LEVEL IN FEET 10-2o-15 WITH DATE OF READING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED 5-STORY HOTEL PORT CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA NAM CHIT j'11 Information It.4.11 To Build On Engineering • Consulting • Testing DJW SCALE NOTED PR0J N0' 07571430 RS DATE 10-26-15 SHEET, 4 February 28, 2024 ECO-065-01 Richard Stubbs, AIA, CGC Stubbs Architecture 2322 Kennington Cove DeLand, FL 32724 Subject: Cape Canaveral Property Parcel ID 24-37-15-00-00034.0-0000.00 Brevard County, FL Dear Mr. Stubbs, Inwood Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Inwood) performed a due -diligence assessment of the subject property on February 28, 2024. The purpose of the assessment was to evaluate the existing conditions on the property, including the limits of wetlands or other surface waters and the presence of suitable habitat for listed species. Further, Inwood completed a desktop review to determine if the property is compliant with existing permits for the property. Existing Permits The project is located within the jurisdiction of the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). In 1997, the SJRWMD issued Permit 4-009-16754-1 for the construction of a commercial business and an associated surface water management system. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) issued Permit 199402815, authorizing the wetland fill on the property. The site was cleared, and on -site wetlands filled but the project and system were never constructed. The wetland impacts were mitigated off -site and met success criteria. In 2018, the SJRWMD issued Permit 16754-3 for the subject property. The permit authorized the construction of a new hotel and surface water management system, the latter consisting of pipes, inlets, and an interconnected system of exfiltration trenches. The bottom of the trenches was to be constructed at elevation 5.5-ft NAVD88, and the system would discharge via a control structure with weirs at elevation 7.8-ft NAVD88. The stormwater was to discharge into an existing ditch on the west side of the property that drains west under SR A1A and into the Banana River. The hotel was never constructed and had become overgrown with Brazilian pepper, an invasive -exotic plant species. During the due -diligence assessment, Inwood staff observed that nearly 100% of the property continues to support Brazilian pepper with almost no understory (Figures). The ditch on the west side of the property that drains under SR A1A was present. The ditch held water; nearby, a few white lead trees and various upland grasses were present. The grade of the property dropped relative to the surrounding area, indicating previous earthwork on the property. The previously -referenced permits have expired. The property should be considered an upland based on its current condition and previously permitted activities. 3 00 4 Vveir ;i Dr Iv $uIfte2 «rr r liiiirl/'l! rff o 97! www. Inwood nc comilli Listed Species Inwood staff conducted a meandering pedestrian survey of the property to determine the potential occurrence of listed species. Listed species are those considered endangered, threatened, or species of special concern by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). Inwood identified mockingbirds, catbirds, red -winged blackbirds, and other small, non - listed bird species. The majority of the property contains a near monoculture of Brazilian pepper. While the fruit of the Brazilian pepper plant is eaten by many bird species, the lack of plant diversity provides little habitat diversity for listed species, many of which have very specific habitat requirements. Based on the above assessment and a desktop analysis of publicly available information, the property has the potential to support 14 listed species. Inwood evaluated the likelihood of occurrence for each species. This evaluation was based on each species' habitat preferences and if the species has been documented within one mile of the property. Additionally, the property is located within USFWS Consultation Areas for the piping plover, Florida scrub -jay, West Indian manatee; potential habitat for the American alligator, bald eagle, eastern black rail, and eastern indigo snake; and within a core foraging area for one wood stork nesting colony. Species Name Listing Status Likelihood of Occurrence Effect Determination American alligator FT(S/A) Low NLAA Bald eagle BGEA Moderate NE Eastern black rail FT Low NLAA Eastern indigo snake FT Low NLAA Florida pine snake ST Low NEA Florida sandhi!! crane ST Moderate NEA Florida scrub -jay FT Low NE Gopher frog ST Low N EA Gopher tortoise ST Low NEA Least tern ST Low NEA Piping plover ST Low NLAA Reddish egret ST Moderate NEA Snowy plover ST Low NEA Tricolored heron ST Moderate NEA American Alligator The American alligator is considered federally threatened due to their similarity of appearance to the American crocodile. However, the alligator population has thrived in Florida to the point where the state operates an active and popular hunting program. The alligator often occurs in freshwater swamps and slow -moving rivers and tributaries. These habitats do not exist on the property. The project is not likely to adversely affect the American alligator. Bald Eagle The bald eagle was removed from the Endangered Species List in 2007. However, the species remains protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The protection is mostly limited to nests, specifically activities within 660 feet of an active or alternate nest. According to the Audubon Society bald eagle watch website, the nearest bald eagle nest is more than 1,500 feet from the property. Therefore, the project will have no effect on the bald eagle. Eastern Black Rail The eastern black rail is a newly listed species the occupies fresh and brackish marshes. The species is relatively secretive, too. The habitat on the property is not ideal for the eastern black rail and the project is not likely to adversely affect the species. Eastern Indigo Snake The eastern indigo snake occurs in a variety of habitat types from uplands to wetlands. They are most commonly linked with gopher tortoises whose burrows provide refugia during cold months. Applying the USFWS' Programmatic Key for the eastern indigo snake results in the following sequential determination: A > B > C > D = NLAA. The developer will need to adhere to the Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake during site preparation and development. Florida Pine Snake The Florida pine snake occurs almost exclusively in upland habitats, particularly those also occupied by gopher tortoises. Like the eastern indigo snake, the Florida pine snake uses gopher tortoise burrows as refugia. The property does not contain suitable habitat for the Florida pine snake and the project will have no effect anticipated on the species. Florida Sandhi!! Crane The Florida sandhill crane is a non -migratory subspecies that forages and nests in shallow marshes but can be found in uplands near shallow wetlands. Suitable habitat is limited to areas outside the subject property boundary. Therefore, the project will have no effect anticipated on the Florida sandhill crane. Florida Scrub -Jay The project is located within the USFWS' Consultation Area for the Florida scrub -jay. This species occurs almost exclusively in xeric scrub habitats located on relic dune systems. These types of habitats do not occur on or near the subject property. Therefore, the project will have no effect on the Florida scrub -jay. Gopher Frog The gopher frog is a small amphibian commonly found in gopher tortoise burrows. Because gopher tortoise habitat does not occur on the property, there is little evidence to suggest that a gopher frog would occur either. Therefore, the project will have no effect anticipated on the gopher frog. Gopher Tortoise The gopher tortoise is found almost exclusively in upland areas with deep, sandy soils. These habitats do not occur on the property and gopher tortoise burrows were not observed during the meandering pedestrian survey. A formal gopher tortoise survey should be conducted prior to site development; however, the project appears at this time to have no effect anticipated on the gopher tortoise. Least Tern, Piping Plover, and Snowy Plover The least tern, piping plover, and snowy plover are small birds often found on barrier islands and beaches, dredged spoil, river islands, and other locations near coastal or estuarine waters. Sandy or flat areas where these species nest occur more than a mile from the property. The Banana River may provide some foraging habitat, but that resource is located west of the property and SR A1A. Therefore, the project will have no effect anticipated on the least tern or piping plover. Reddish Egret and Tricolored Heron The reddish egret and tricolored heron are considered wading birds. These species usually occur near freshwater or brackish wetland marshes. They require shallow waters for foraging and will often nest in colonies. These species were not observed in the property and suitable habitat does not occur in the area. Therefore, the project will have no effect anticipated on the reddish egret or tricolored heron. Environmental Permitting The SJRWMD issued Permit 16754-3 on July 19, 2018. The permit was valid for five years, expiring on July 19, 2023. The owner will likely need to apply for and obtain a new permit prior to construction. Alternatively, the owner may try to seek relief via permit extension request under Emergency Final Order (EFO) 22-2602. This request allows a two-year extension of permit timelines so long as the request is made within 90 days of the expiration of the emergency final order. By our review, EFO 22-2602 was amended in November 2023. In December 2020, the state of Florida assumed the federal dredge and fill permitting program under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act within most waters across the state. The previously issued Army Corps permit for the property expired on January 22, 2003, well before state assumption of the 404 program. The property is located in an area that would now require a Section 404 permit from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). However, a federal court recently ruled that FDEP must stop issuing 404 permits for now. The Army Corps has interpreted the ruling to also mean they will not issue Section 404 permits in areas they did not retain in 2020, including the subject property. The nearest retained area is located just west of the subject property and SR A1A (Figure). The recommendation is to demonstrate the proposed ditch that outfalls to the west (and into a retained area) is part of your project, thus allowing the Army Corps to process the Section 404 application. ;onsultrra eng I leers Please let us know if you need assistance in navigating the environmental permitting process or if you have any questions about the contents of this report. Very truly yours, Inwood Consulting Engineers, Inc. Ben Shepherd, PWS, CWB Project Manager I Senior Ecologist cc: Jason Houck, PWS, GISP consuMng engineers Picture 1. Facing subject parcel and Brazilian pepper looking west. A, l: Picture 2 Brazilian e er thicket in sub.ect Ili jj) lli q4,1! 1 01 i IA „)),,g„) t ki011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111 V Voll!i \ q tll ot 300 IDoiertil billvoo 0'1 Sue 20 „409 „409 " 1111"'4§T911 55 wwwjnwo o dine commilm conaLift.ng engineers Picture 3. Eastern bounda of sub ect •ro•erty (to the left). ,;111,111 I 11;11;11 111 11111001111111111111111311111111111111111111111111„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„„„„ I 1111111111 '1100' •• +.11„401.P.i:o Picture 4 Northern bounda • of subject property (to the left ''''?, 1,,,!Iii,111111h111111111h111111111111111111111111111111111111111010111111111111100010101000000000000000000010010101 vo Illii Illillillillillillilllllillillillilliiiiiiiiiin "filil 7,/y \,11P1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111L111111111111 11 ;%;, /,' lit, \ ... 01100000„1„1„1„1,1,1,1,1,1,1:1:1:1:1:1:0000000000,0,,000000000000,10000100,0001,00,, 000 ( , 300 Doi/era 11511v0......011"' IP81,1191111111111111" fit',497,9(fii 139155 vtiwminwoodlinic com in consulting engineers Picture 5. Facin south toward ditch at north end of subject property. Picture 6. Facin YiRlypN`% southwest toward ditch at north end of sub ect ro ert 300 IDoiertil billvoo 0'1 Sue 20 „429 ,„4,09 1111111— " wwwjnwoodinc commilm w 'd 41,1111111111111 1;1„" I'I ullul Id ollor'14quI 'IiI,I,I0,, ',1,,1„oyl,,,,"I,,,,, ^V hin 01'1,, ^-�.... _'''d4,1111,1r 1 "'IIIIII li 1111111(111111 1 11'11111, II1 iVII�dIr„I1d y1Ii'lilIi�lIilIlilIlIlu„pIllIlu lll lllIIlIlI,ld,IlI,Il,l,i,I'Il„llll'IIl i,lIllillu,lh,Il,l;ll',IIlml,l,l,IlIlIluIlIiuIiu"uuuu°,,u,uJIu„wiuWuuWu!!iil'iiiiWlWiiulli !1IIvll'lI�I��,II1"1jIu„gII ,y,,,.I»w1'✓•d;' "",IIM iffill IiIII�Ia IIII 1111111,1 1 11Illiiiillllllllllllll 111�!' ouuVnlI1 11111 lIIlu1111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIuIIuIIuIuu„°I„II„IIIIImilVlo1„1,, 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,11 0I IIIII "'''""' 11u11IlIIII"j d1� I l 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111Vv„ i,I'upuu, y,,,,, Idlli;;1,',uIW„III",uPdlilll muull uu11111, 1II ul II urMAVONgiVtawgami,00 hrav7r�rr�rrr 4nn'WII�'i i;p 1'14;14,,l111ii'l IIIIIII„ IVW[1i, PROJECT LOCATION AND RETAINED WATERS Parcel ID 24-37-15-00-00034.0-0000.00 Brevard County, FL