HomeMy WebLinkAboutRE Ordinance change lot split East Central and Ridgewood
________________________________
Warning-This email originated outside the City of Cape Canaveral mail system. Please review the sender's address. Report any suspicious mail by using the Phishalert button in Outlook.
If that is not possible forward the suspicious mail to phishalert@cityofcapecanaveral.org
________________________________
City leadership still, a month later, has not provided anything that answers my questions about how David Dickey and Todd Morley recommended approval of the Dichristopher lot split.
I have not seen any measurements against the code, not been provided with any of the “in depth review” details nothing at all that shows any attention was paid to the requirements
of our ordinance. I did get an estimate of over a thousand dollars to meet my public record request for information.
From: Patrick Campbell <patrickcampbell@cfl.rr.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2022 8:13 PM
To: 'gentilquore11@gmail.com' <gentilquore11@gmail.com>; 'dr.michaelmiller@outlook.com' <dr.michaelmiller@outlook.com>; 'flyyaker@earthlink.net' <flyyaker@earthlink.net>; 'john@islandcremations.com'
<john@islandcremations.com>; 'susiekoz@comcast.net' <susiekoz@comcast.net>; 'm.kellum@cityofcapecanaveral.org' <m.kellum@cityofcapecanaveral.org>; 'w.morrison@cityofcapecanaveral.org'
<w.morrison@cityofcapecanaveral.org>; 't.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org' <t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org>; 'a.raymond@cityofcapecanaveral.org' <a.raymond@cityofcapecanaveral.org>;
'd.willis@cityofcapecanaveral.org' <d.willis@cityofcapecanaveral.org>; 'd.dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org' <d.dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org>; 'council.davis@cityofcapecanaveral.org'
<council.davis@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
Subject: RE: Ordinance change, lot split East Central and Ridgewood.
I want to be sure everyone involved has as much information about this subject as possible. I hope you question and validate everything I present.
First, early 2021, there was an attempt to change the ordinance based on Mr. Dichristopher’s need and just let whatever BCPA says exists. There was no need to change the ordinance and
City Council did not take action on the recommendation to do so. My submittal to the City Council is Section A.
Then on August 3rd 2022 a recommendation by Mr. Dickey to approve a lot split for Mr. Dichristopher was presented to the Planning and Zoning Board. A summary of my comments is Section
B. I spoke at the meeting and made it clear and said twice, once at Mr. Russell’s request, the split literally does not fit the ordinance requirements.
On August 17, 2022, I asked to be provided the math and measurement method associated with Mr. Dickey’s recommendation to approve the split. I wanted to see how a conclusion that the
requested split met the size requirements defined by our ordinances. This information should have been available as part of the recommendation to allow the split.
“From: Patrick CFL [mailto:patrickcampbell@cfl.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 7:38 AM
To: David Dickey <D.Dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:D.Dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >; Wes Morrison <w.morrison@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:w.morrison@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
>
Subject: Dichristopher lot split
Good morning. Please provide the document showing the math and measurement method associated with the determination that the lots resulting from the split meet the size and square footing
requirements of our ordinances”
During a meeting on September 6th 2022 among myself, Todd Morley and David Dickey, Mr. Dickey confirmed that in early 2021 the lot split process was discussed with Mr. Dichristopher.
Prior to the meeting I again asked for:
“So I can be equally prepared for our meeting, please provide the result of the in-depth review and the specific areas of the code that has been deemed inadequate and what the inadequate
points are. Also provide the comments/concerns from the attorney and consultant. I will expect to see the city evaluation of the split application against the code requirements.”
Today, I still do not have anything from the City that shows a review of the lot split application was compared to the ordinance requirements. The City is now claiming the words in the
ordinance are unclear. The words are not unclear, the words don’t fit the City’s narrative. If the words are unclear what was that not considered or discussed in January, 2021 or in
2010, or 2017 when lot splits were discussed.
I have made sure all of my communications can be obtained by a public record request to the city.
I am asking Council for an independent review of the Dichristopher request beginning at the first contact with Mr. Dichristopher or his agent(s)
Section A.
On January 27th, 2021 Mr. Dickey presented rationale for changes to Ordinance No. 11- 2021; amending Chapter 98, Subdivisions, Division 5. — Lot splits. The same rationale was presented
to the City Council on February 16, 2021.
Mr. Dickey misrepresented the need for this ordinance change in order to gain the support of the Advisory Board and Council. The Board and Council did ask appropriate questions, but
the answers provided were structured such that the Board and Council would believe the need for the change was driven by a feeling of “providing relief to the innocents,” Mr. Dickey
and the city attorney’s characterization of the aggrieved parties.
The city attorney added to the drama of the situation saying “property owner, the former property owner that authorized and did the unauthorized lots, but still owns one lot and the
innocent third party owns another that's one factual scenario.” However, the information provided by Mr. Dickey in replying to my request for the properties the change affects does
not include that “factual scenario.”
Among the plethora of disingenuous statements made by city leadership, another stand out is the city attorney’s flawed scare tactic reasoning that the city would “literally have to go
back through 60 years of city records and the title of the property to see whether or not something is has been hasn't been done according to the city code.” In addition to the obvious
intent, coercing a favorable response by preying upon the audience’s fears, the attorney introduces the probability that there are more properties that have not been reviewed at the
“60 years” of history level and may also be unauthorized.
The city attorney did ask a very important question – “how do we issue a development permit when we don't even recognize the division of land that occurred?” I would like to know what
database or authoritative source does the city use to determine a parcel is good or bad, authorized or unauthorized, split or not? I would also like to know parcel number, dates and
requestor for every recorded lot split in Cape Canaveral.
The citizens of Cape Canaveral, the City Council and Advisory Boards deserve accurate, complete and unbiased staff work. In this case that has not been provided.
There is no need for this ordinance change. Part of the presentations and discussions explored how to fix the problem. There is no problem that the current ordinance doesn’t cover. The
fix is for the aggrieved parties to simply go back to county and combine the lots to match what the city has using essentially the same process used to split the lots. Then, if desired,
the aggrieved can come to the City to apply for a lot split through the proper process. Mr. Dickey’s emotional manipulation of the Council and Board, his experience of “personally of
having to tell a person persons that the lot that they have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars (three hundred thousand to the Council) on they cannot build on it it's a not a not
a pleasant thing to do” is intended only to influence the Board and Council toward approval without relevant, compelling and factual data.
Nothing is prohibiting the owners from building on property they own except compliance with the ordinances established by the citizens. The aggrieved parties can build on properties
they own by bringing their property into compliance with the City’s requirements. What they can’t do is by-pass the ordinances established by the citizens of Cape Canaveral. The City
should not facilitate the by-pass action by unnecessarily changing the ordinance at the expense of citizen visibility and input. These are not “innocents” who “through no fault of
their own” are in this position. Of the three owners of the properties in question, two are real estate agents and one is a citizen with an extensive relationship with the City regarding
property. All have superior knowledge of City requirements.
As presented to the Board and Council, the Brevard county approach to a lot split is “they just go ahead and record whatever survey that's presented that's put down on their on their
counter in front of them.” It is just as easy to go back to the County and configure the lot to match the city record. (Again, I don’t know what the city record is) Once combined, the
aggrieved parties can request a lot split properly through the City processes. The aggrieved can also just request a lot split right now, using the city’s existing process.
The City lot split process includes proper notification to the surrounding owners - “Special notice for residential lot splits. Any proposed lot split of a residentially zoned property
shall require special notice be provided to adjacent property owners at least 14 days prior to the planning and zoning board and city council hearings on the proposed residential lot
split. Said notices shall be provided by regular mail to adjacent property owners within 500 feet of the property subject to the lot split application, and shall include the address
and legal description of the subject property, and the date, time and location of the planning and zoning board and city council hearings. Notice of the planning and zoning board and
city council hearings may be consolidated into one notice. Notices provided under this subsection are hereby deemed to be courtesy notices only and the failure to provide or receive
said notices shall not be a basis of appealing any decision made under this section. Applicants shall be solely responsible for the cost of the notices required by this subsection.”
Mr. Dickey also told the Council in response to my concerns “having two homes on a parcel that's not what this is dealing with.” This is exactly about intentionally taking a parcel intended
for a single family home on a large lot, dividing it and building two homes. Mr. Dickey’s diversionary word play and semantics is offensive and insulting.
Mr. Dickey further misdirected the Council by saying “and for all intents and purposes if they would come in the door today for approval of that lot split the city probably would approve
it without a doubt because it complies with the minimum standards of the city.” At least one clearly does not. This seems to communicate to the Council that the decision doesn’t matter
because it would be done anyway. From a citizen perspective this attitude indicates a predisposition that citizen inclusion mandated in our ordinances is not important or even a consideration,
a theme that permeates the citizen visible activities of city leadership.
Another comment was “not a widespread” problem. As provided to me by Mr. Dickey and shown in the included map, it may not be widespread when viewed as in the City whole, but for residents
on Central and Surf it is substantial.
It is the proper notice and ability for the surrounding owners and citizens of Cape Canaveral to review and weigh in on a lot split that the City is attempting to avoid.
The splitting of these properties and subsequent variance requests and construction would change the texture of the neighborhood and the notice and hearings mandated by the existing
ordinance give members of the community the opportunity to understand and comment on what is being requested. The proposed change to the ordinance is not necessary and should NOT be
considered.
There is no urgency, only a desire by Mr. Dickey to by-pass the City ordinance for a select trio of owners.
Section B.
Good evening. I am Pat Campbell. I am a 40 year resident of Cape Canaveral and live at 307 Surf Drive. I am here tonight to voice my objections and compel you maintain the texture of
our neighborhood and deny the splitting of the Dichristopher lot at the northwest corner of Central and Ridgewood.
You have seen this issue before, but in disguise. During the Planning and Zoning Meeting Jan 27, 2021 Mr. Dickey presented this board with an Agenda Item - Comprehensive Plan Amendments
the Consideration and Recommendation of Ordinance No. XX-2021; an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, amending Chapter 98, Subdivisions, Division
5. – lot splits . Mr. Dickey’s requested ordinance change essentially would have provided amnesty to anyone that had recorded a lot split with the county and thus avoid the process
required by the city. Fortunately, the City Council did not approve a change to the ordinance because it was not needed.
Through a painful series of back and forth questions and answers among myself, Mr. Dickey and the city the attorney, the reason, the starting point for the ordinance change request at
that time was the Dichristopher property split and the pending additional splits were properties at the end of Surf Drive and East Central
Among the disingenuous and misleading statements presented by Mr. Dickey during the January meeting the most egregious included:
• His reference to innocent parties that though no fault of their own have property they have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on but can’t build on
• His declaration to make it very clear, we're not talking about developers coming in and doing this, this is really for folks who are coming in they thought they had one
thing they don't and for no cause of their own they've found themselves in a bad spot
• And characterizing the magnitude of the problem as, less than 20 so it's not a widespread issue
The innocent Mr. Dickey is hoping to help get out of a bad spot, Mr. Dichristopher is a real estate professional that has accomplished around 300 property transactions in Brevard county
and is a named party in around 30 registered Florida corporations, many of which are real estate, development and investment related. Mr. Dichristopher is far from an innocent that
though no fault of his own has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on a property he can’t use.
The facts are, Mr. Dichristopher is a subject matter expert and nothing prevents him from building a single family home on an unsplit lot in harmony with the neighborhood.
While Mr. Dickey would like to characterize the magnitude of the problem as not widespread, the properties Mr. Dickey provided as issues - all the far east end of East Central and Surf,
represent 30 percent of the Surf Drive and East Central neighborhood.
Mr. Dickey has indicated that this issue is complicated because it “involves other government agencies.” Mr. Dickey is referring to the Brevard County Property Appraiser’s office and
the Brevard County Clerk of the Court. If there is a concern about the City not having the authority to approve lot splits then this request and the City’s lot split process has no
merit and the only topic for the board is can Mr. Dichristopher build on his county split lots. If there is a question about lot splits, City authority or County authority it is a matter
for the courts, not the Planning and Zoning Board. If there is not a question about authority and the City IS the authority, the issue is not complicated by the involvement of other
government agencies.
And to wrap up I will end with additional concerns about the Agenda Pack information. Mr. Dichristopher’s lawyer is presenting to the Planning and Zoning board a variance request in
the form of “In tandem with your consolidation of this application my client would also like the anticipated City approval to include clarification that the 25 foot building set back
along the “radius” of parcel 2 (as shown on the survey) would only apply to either the Central frontage OR the Ridgewood Avenue frontage, but not both.” This not only emphasizes my
position that the lot split and building two homes does not fit the character of our neighborhood, it literally does not fit, but this is not how a variance request should be made.
And last, the property information sheet describes the two properties and includes the words “less the West 25 feet. I don’t understand how those words apply and I don’t understand why
the package includes Restrictions, Party Wall Agreement that does not seem to have any bearing or relevance to this application.
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free.www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_sou
rce=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to
the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a
public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing.
洭ꄯ閴隈ᑞ흺ꔫ뾐漓厘괟┞㹵툷ᆔ㞸쁏�鬻ര厖漙ַ蛹앸䫓妆㉢䤳洛ꌨ㔧憍ÿሥﻯﾹ蔀鵆㽯㖉嶍傖瀗⣎潀⻃疕䞯霪寻怠꘏嬪ᢟ盩䶳젋壆퉎㊊씊៚㋢
ἁ紀뼪洼춬樴달㜐ႚ꠳糑ꝏ곫櫩달�䆎ᾆ䞅䶿滒ሄ쮻琷溈뤢ꢻ잖ᣢꨶ�ሃ挔証삗탖�ᝪ⠷岲葹త㓨ᛯ髩�䳊㏎躰홇⮷擏뚵釙두끀鵞稍ᴕ⬀堧ᷱ袆ᵲ乣﹘괕՜熬Ὺ긒衃祐�钎匁廄됥痖둚鑓둱麮꙱ሟ祚뻥⋞앸컚᷒䡿㢒◑ἲㆺꗚ翔ꗤ�餿Ρ崼墦짜툄鮷唟錃�魸둏틓秲⌊헽蔿멲齞휅䯄黧אּŇ䞆ꕊ鏢�똻뚷䦷㑒䓊ׄ⣎넃볒ꙡퟪ朿厊⛑ꕝ閾坣⛱ꎟ嵠䱊ꒇ쭩숟쮸᾽푝㬵虋蚲샔�㊌塅惐劋闱�禨洛ච㲙捯键畱尊謡㊌
粳붢됲龻벝깭原뚲攚斈縎屑膷ᔞ熼ܒ䬒㧎䟫㝰㺼據덖莽ᢑ屢杕ﻱ諌镦᫉䝥峣侒뼭㖁萶욐ቜ㟼榥璫扈桤曾ส둾ꔁ딆獥떦㏬蔇獗�暲ᒑ䕢敩흓峋㏗ྥ༢�ￃḀ跪ິ莃ṛ툇ޭ䦅全鮌ᚷ㐙툁毙稶龎�䍩蹃ꕏ䥣⤦럼싳ủ佩ᾬ弋ꑃ響铉�阫盂역흔潮尌ᛍ澙鬍℡Ǝ膡磑痶쎛Ⰻ锯剧㔈ﻇ翉炕荺ﲳ댴爮驷ﰷ궁ﾒ⨀렶⽶繖궫桚迨♹珅檀烽ÿꌒ浉ዬ옙ͨﱍꑻ灇뎱ᕌҎ纥칏⺶箵㵋쪲谼つ壯�ꞙ莯ڦ舘뺭앵�ꧫ碦伯ꡛ쐅ޗ⡤
껃︱Ĵ�뵋宻꙰�ု䜳⪃坻碞歆渉ꂬ徶洴䘨佫盅綩淢㤆垆⑨큺ﰃ깙㘖槏æ愉䱝鮞됝젳뉌ਨ즋殮䓢쭂뙅瀶낢ゕㆪ檞芿ᴖ﹆赋덑鱼漬⏼蓚㩥ኦ엥ÿᦔ浇﮴ឿ雩ቷⓁ暌ꪋ줨䨿별뾥竽൪숊輋䵲뤚腞箆聐ᑯ볣깶⋋䥵ᬆꣲ濵椗㶺럈�轉돼溈㵗ㄼ糙轇㰐遤ᦣ鯢篠⽸鷵᛭腋조谷傕ꁸ謎靾嶩됥뜒�懬㺂붵神歵潫⛱�⎢樂뷞夅쁉鄠僔䜝䕑灇�埊䊨ᡀ꾺⛝듲쪒⤹窫뽾ꥡ땙볍拃鬏շ땾ﻦ紗勣�⯂᪙ᥲ憤母
ứ퐚淞��片҄倜＆ﰀ稧멙‐粸�匱鼫掭ꍸ䏇홌㊡⾄�儯嗭꼬躈囗趰랭柡Ḁ誧그䦴㠖짊猦ꢷÅ퉴鹸᷆⼵⸤渣澃翌茊鮖�陽ⰳᅓ뎐툮镾쑓둚簚奐㷇飄蓘赦嚴忌䘀䡆溡븆ꢫꝅﻸ渙�䌘꿟묕虚⦖꯹㞴맒嫽�ꈽÜ⥔Ḡ誇ꔽ뺵殙ᄴ瞤⠫쫲Ḍ瓔䴂轱⳼Ⱍ瀂禎엖㜓샚걸䰝ᢍ德猩퍎澼잨溜㍂엩ഈ꾋띶ņ䳧烊ውn髻ꆖ崛㝩쩁쿂➻ㆎ鋁滎銬엦ⳤ왥쥈勯깸嵋≙㣲䜡扌삎㙴㧾廒㯪楖魑긊藫絪彲魘濖똴셡
珪�팾ꃭ퓰䔲⌊鑕蹠꼪䦈콫ጎ⇉ꔿ甀�팦�涣燙뺐ີ㌭빕⓻坙潩玥훷�䝼䲄芁䂦䨿護憭荎밵ᱫ㺍哒⍣萆伇碬쎒ꐮ�榤Ή꧂䧧隸茨鋈烈旅ᙖᒟ轚䯄窡ﲡﶔ뿚딣옷皖䢋㢒◑츯軑蓢ꀇ좩혇沊㑎쐁쥸葎 圙鴿穴袿瑬ٕ峮紳廔ﵘ猅㉾ÿꮑｂ글ﲫ࣪轢炗ꂗ숺쪃鋒ꀃ糓ꙧ睪�䠚㵥攖俚귒ﻪ댡嗑퐾饝㉆흜ⵈ놣랸⎍妸剀҃꧴繷ڣ枟靤쉗悊⫾᪹昻镴읺쌠啾ꤞ䤷椥鬥䊺袻⪮꿝떺㇔⧁ﲌ醱﹚똄ﻦ䬖㎃밃腤䂓ꄕⷖ
翵皈�ᒻ݇꺨亗쳾촚寓ﬖ짌犮孛潫炊駽କ陇挵｀鄀垯ÿ꡵布ᱟ쳆⒯ꒌ醂宮檏틑וּ渝ꛝ鞳縡럲縅즵㫼淓ᮞꓹ嶉揚ೋ鏣ⵕ뽶ꖮ�傾圡炦ͨ붧뻱斗浴雉卧炗굟퉜䭼⼷鐅�堆噺耟턦퉈ꑉ屢즰庪뜖랷跸▬ꪪྦ퀋ꁴ䀏䢦㓢稬錁ꙏ᱀ﻔ툾�䇖㙰ጜᙚ␞풰ᩬ⧶嬊▯惜㥗䛢喋叔퍇쟞䠳簔ꊢ闱窔蝟걬ᬠ椠졂᥇堃䇼Ӓ羻捾㳎鿐㍛噫澟蘲廦遪듒ÿ䟸꾼ἢ줫듫坺氏뱝ꤍ䥂叻뫩ᶐﹴ툾�䩷럱䕗꿊훔櫢뉶ⵘ쳪�츕霽⇼ു撼垒얓�롪
ㆬ䧂愞杜䶶ܶ㱮ꑽ鄛隂◚驚뾖ꕣꕙ쳍쯃鉣䫟�홏粯똼谶灭귣표ⶼ岩婨⥃⹙㊬㛆ഹސꃴ꜎鸽㎳潇듃뚉ꮶ裧몢㚿嘷浫ꍺᶠ걫֠ඬ왏瘚炕鑡⍍冯渒滅һ읂ᦠᚮ晝噽✽虍ᥑԾ甀ᨶ軽ꞥ뮴冢娟鏋��좬쫒龭毵㺒쮵㭸寍繍船ኩ唶͏횊秸媥茷䝖ᦅⶤ낸珏ᵀ鵞媬陪橿钵場⟉횷睼얤쀳榦酌咮䵽陲붒膖ꖭ喾衕瘀㔇䵓ﾱ萀ፎ쓤擞鵻҈誓츀ᷰ巒놬빉鐶㦕基屵쌗ꋸ垇鋕ǜ領ꮝꂽ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ鈂誖濼ꕵⷋ궽쯭⑅勀債ힾ᭴
曍껭켾쯛置댥鶷䯷㬒酺﹌돌ÿ碟ÿ髯ۭᄏꥍ뗽㳆ﾶ赛䅿쒟𥳐�ᡜ꺐ﺻ�ÿ奦ÿ볏῍雙`᱀ꭆ儇귕㹯㧈雇ﻜ墔恵鼍溈⾵㦶긳Ჷ⯽ﺷ돌ÿ碟ÿ髯댿Ｌ㿞㲀䷦䩗쒇橒㩖욛㼦徼뤭낫멫帔紡�暹ꑐ浹㋻ﻏÿ梾쳾ﾳ鼀ｸ㓢缭퉁㺮韶輭렭畈ӭ跸⎵��宾蕿ί雙`鹥㿞㲀涺䡛풱齦홉薼⃣嗱㷴䱷�详�툶煲ꕝÿ巃晴ᠱﻙ廰떆꿴椋㵚鎷楫꼚䝲ၚ露⟼ﳼﶷ濻ꏰ绾﹛럽囸齥ﯼｇ簀枙ÿ턾ÿ㓟
캚꒭婖얋癿远곊깍靨픚ꆞ랗དྷ�辜瞥�羖ﴟ䟳时ﲟ쟻ÿ큼ᔇꜰᷛ라︍뾭꧂髫薦䦨촍ﲭ�D⌎置㿋ﺏꏹ㋻ﻏÿ梾켃鿴�硃徳衈ူ�툵ÿ翂羡쯏�ﾶﻛ돌ÿ碟ÿ髯댿Ｌ㿚む迏⿴粒ﭯ�峡ꦾ㣢⽮箦慝�뜱�羶ﴟ䟳淶ﲟ쟻ÿ큼鸇�竸䇟쒞륞륹꿛嗥魵⯝퉑Ɑ핢踤ㄸ䚜㛟ਿ��錄迷茶ﮣ켶緾￣븀ͨ곍�⑭ᶈ챥옩ᯁꝴ驪邖釺펿✵皂㸟氣툟᾽㛻ﻏÿ梾췾ﾳ鼀ｸᑏ嫘퍎䲒惄阯ᗘﾻऀ菾ÿⴿÿ�⯼ﭯ켶緾￣븀﹨돌ÿ
梟ÿ髯쌀Ὧ⑨渐齛曺蕜ꇞ솥䮩ꑹ鉪晀琹�︄�羶ﴟ䟳淶ﲟ쟻ÿ큼鼇뫨覾穧ퟗ蓚�꯴⩞垟揻壦㛕淹㻛ￛ昀케羼췷�羖ﴟ䃳茘難ﰗ㟽ﯽﺣﴓ︋孾﷾�时ﲟ쟻ÿ텼鯽ｧ㸀�Ĵ쒗Ḟ滣滗Ფᆆᾷ䦥碢쎗人뚒橿⛦껴켶緾￣븀﹨돌ÿ碟ÿ髯퐖ﴴ퉗椵訡�왐ۘິꖹꉏ槍ꥷⳉ赢时ﲟ쟻ÿ텼駽ｧ㸀�Ĵ�돸땁绑㾷⦻㺽醕ꡯヨ牸㍭컭鉄㞙浹䎯쳾ﾳ鼀ｸ㾚ⲳÿ�胦⬸厽韃Ლ⼖ῠ舤젶锿퍖䆼딕䋌晽艇㠲�㿛
ﺏꏹ㛻ﻏÿ梾蘃ힳ牽鱗쪅⮅럥囸ᘖ爷틪᱅▧洌庁ﶝ枛ÿÿ㓟晿케羼췷瀀�팧퇢럧喓꺕㤥ᐒ㽮쥊贚䟄핓增惢糁㮽㋻ﻏÿ梾쳾ﾳ鼀ｸ泠於｡ऀ눼珉�詆趱莍瓅�슿ﾶ대Ｌ㿚㿋ﺏꃹ㌌︋魾﷾♖꾛㛨ﴚꏾퟶ较렭쟀皥ÿ뛙`齭ﯼￇ簀ߐ弝핁蹧�䣾ꍮ껻漣꛰幩뜤븥ⓖ᎑䓸쵭ེ淶ﲟ쟻ÿ텼駽ｧ㸀�ⴴ坽퉑土䭭푋랤ﺝᇸ᮶곴疉ᢋ厼祣וּ쏎뇯앓ｺ齭ﯼￇ簀ய럩녗뱜븋頮Ĕꚺ禑䞫榪鏺瓁殣ᬑ轠ꯊ
�❩띘꿔䤵騥츳녑ۓ枙迷茶ﺥ돍ÿ碟ÿ髯힠ᢴ䍼ꔶퟶ诌禌먔뼎韷�仭ḛ煛基ﵱ枛ÿÿ㓟晿ｙ케羼췷瀀ÿ퐘�௹뺍罛⺅꾓㫨꽮祻쟶椿��튏羻쯬錄迷茶ﮣ켶緾￣븀ͨ뢇듗밙ṉ澦魂뙼ÿ젊햻箴剝굛夯㧻ﲔ䇨竅퍹켬민ￇ簀㧗ﲨ턷ଵ뢦豨�杻z玽띍�쵗蠑阮銶踳�슿ጞ瓒罫툦ヒ刏♇㾴ⲳÿ�胦㼱㿡翐翛犅ꊧꡩ隌䫷䠰릍⯽㿑ⲳÿ�迦쯬錄迷茶ྠ笯⺝嗻䦖池웽箭瞍齁雄忛씰�콝淶ﲟ쟻ÿ텼鯽ｧ
㸀�Ĵ壄鸍熿ﶨ쾱�濋꣰䖼梬밚巑�応홵Ｖ㿯河ÿ�迦�錄迷茶ྠ팾䤼ᵯ䯚걽≉�暚ꦱ폨㿪퍯�淄廙ꉗ晿ｙ케羼췷�羶ﴟ䃳䘜㺭✘䝍祓ꎌ諛틍㴵䤳㙇隒왭鿴쯬錄迷茶ﮣ켶緾￣븀ͨ펃澵娎矩匶㑝캑㥉뾍닂풢㙣窶ꯔ큫贂⮐翔ⲳÿ�迦쯬錄迷茶ຠ쬒雭熋靦쾎逺ᣲⓛ슟梮⢞瓐⢝ﵙ�濋껰﮿켶緾￣븀﹨돌ÿ碟ÿ髯澨㰼窶྄䡝콤�늹亟㹽姣�㔂띺时ﲟ쟻ÿ텼駽ｧ㸀�Ĵ폧驪브蜚תּาⷯ슿澼�쏙�輦ᝨ嬾
ﱶꈫ쳾ﾳ鼀ｸ㾚河ÿ�胦㼱㿡翐翛犅㼞䛱ꮓ嫛ׅ燃⏬�羖ﴟ哳迚菀淋˃㲀뗥嬋⎸릵旖耶긌짆锞꺡硟具귭廯댗褹涄�ঽ뭴䀵�ļ뮏﵋枙ÿÿ㓟��䂋蛺⎯ⶴ¸辍寥益菞꩹�뗽�ㅆ럥ꔿ罷雙`齥ﯼￇ簀ߐᄟ㩨ნ濆簝ιÿ溫䬝驀௲㮻苧갘㝬硽䆯췾ﾳ鼀ｸ㾚ⲳÿ�胦匸畘뵗쥽谈ⶏ俩痓۽峇뾺毻㾟隷络�ÿ奦ÿ볏῍雙`᱀屮菶褷핣�ÿ鄢쮷讬埭띅曖튽辵벳茐ÿ�錄迷茶瞮ꉳ埪犍秱㝲�
퀺܇깣큩뻸옫箽ᎀ鏦⍩턵珸훆眉煻畽ሠ젿ᮥ嶁酖ᷡ䘣쮇뒵枌⎩媓䰣ᾳﴟ䃳鼘鿰忨뿭郂ﯸ⁁犃㿘췴슿㾷ⲳÿ�迦쯬錄迶茶ྠ뤳㓔䷛歊ᾭ鉔鰅瓮�ﰙ享쓋ზ쫘볒㣮赭矅�羖ﴟ䟳淶ﲟ쟻ÿ큼震ꡏ橚Ⅵ뗔鉷峙턶猛媃ℾ듕嘭弛徳刼齚針缛窅齥ﯼￇ簀枙ÿÿ㓟躚ꚣ诞酫㪪쏞㾌�闾�뭴䪭龜嗻䦒�㘐㼶窕齥ﯼￇ簀枛ÿÿ㓟觶殪樑䕒挤싥灔�叼鎬➤鸨扛㎽㛻ﻏÿ梾췾ﾳ鼀ｸ꿡�땟䗔迣瀡쬗莤큝횡漮䳷ﾸ嘀燜껴ﯫ
켶緾￣븀﹨돌ÿ碟ÿ髯봫◑�鯋㱗ⶏ誳㺷诖詎윫더㿆�闾忨뛙`齥ﯼￇ簀ߐሟ㩨飞ഭ꣣ᰄ淹ᗾ偛瓖�毻놏ﾁⰀ鳛ᕾ翞奦ÿ볏῍雙`᱀歃৺翪籬욅똼ÿ㔊羭핁ᶵ뫞鋽㍟嬞왳⬽ﺷ돍ÿ碟ÿ髯댿Ｌ㿞㲀巟㓖贫⽍痬浓ٴ쨏靘헺戴鿖並嶋洴ₗᜒ杽嫀딾촺ℴ儤좀䴪섛㘚妊鶕뮺䴎ࠈ잓ლὅ湩ﰇ濳쉿ꁿÿ쯏�ﾶﻛ돌ÿ梟ÿ髯댿Ｌ㿚㢀枍큟䵵왖뾮灥黛镾嵗瓕䈽⿹뗬 侺ᇢ㾷窥齭ﯼￇ簀枙ÿÿ㓟�馞筳옕ꪯ㽉
犔㾶⺕ꦯ㉩䯫鎺㻁隇⏘꿲﹈돌ÿ碟ÿ髯댿Ｌ㿞㲀싖䛷媃䩍勫妒虱㟊司潮쯴乭뵛吧ƒ쬱隧ﻘ�羖ﴟ䟳时ﲟ쟻ÿ큼鬇띩붦ꤞꔾ댤쌅贒ᗾ憡稶��ﵜᆠⶏﶸ뤫쳾ﾳ鼀ｸ㾚ⲳÿ�胦鼸砎䆇ꃐ㾚㮶蹹ﵛ罛䞅굯繸昭ᣯ슭⪅潣껰ﯫ켲緾￣븀꽩妥ᔺ턶賠队㲀疹⭽멎榔ҕ䦌ག鸔锆冫銹�З䨉벓姗䋃뢹䱩ͅ늜䎯�蝿촴픲⎭흘⢶㬃߽绾﹛럽哸ṗ턼脤⻕㏘)淹ݝ时ﲟ䟻ÿ텼鯽ｧ㸀�Ĵ훤珏딎鈠⑦ᮓ�䷵対ὤ믊㿋
ﺏꏹ㋻ﻏÿ梾쬃Ꞇ蜈鿬狛韽�ꖵ볕㰸琼滈䇝阠�︤�ÿ�ÿ볏῍뛙`᱀ꞥ璋洫夜굽⎎鿙뼭닂꽬㧼蜏䬛䧙㜤�䆯쳾ﾳ鼀ｸ㾚ⲳÿ�胦숼埛�砋맵츾辧뎑햊糕救봵�닪照뜱샍㛻ﻏÿ梾췾ﾳ鼀ｸ췳唗귑㌵�ཪ줵ܘ滋䨿㿪㿡翐翛涅ÿ奦ÿ볏῍雙`ᡀם铑뛜윈뛺ÿ榟災醴㯁攖�窽齥ﯼｇ簀枛ÿÿ㓟ᴺ藶䆤瑳鋄湣ÿ檅睸뫄褎䞢⽠舝齧묭煮敗駽ｧ㸀�缴奦ÿ볏Í噰꼚涇붣宎璶캺赁ﶸ⸫ﻚ쓒괵떮�
㙶꽀﹑돌ÿ碟ÿ髯댿Ｌ㿞㢀Ϗ幙ᗏ�Ⓧ믭勦밫⎨뚱랅ੇ稫嚁(誢(誢(誢(誢(誢(誢J⭚쐛䆏㈕⅍ᐋꭣ쀚⠾듖⋙嚛咲钵⫣ຠ諞痤ᣯꛉ囪홶ᦰ튍䁮樽꽞檦᛫陪夕ᵘ키䌇⭰ை鰻สꚦ㔙䄫逴⒴ÿᴀ쒧∶攫썸㱦聆ꆫ홅斕湩臖㯵֜侅왏肎푵쎵獭硈헥铬㭛夀籘瞵廄︰䯇舧㔿빮Ứꢽꨃ骠⇦黭㶛돶䚍偣鏀햞쭎ꄦ㴝핒䃎ᥦÅ❴豚⍫租�얱晩ꢹ귵⯞㵝僠凾ﵢ㷫懼岨靫嶚龅㒙�ݐ䕫穲訏夵��灃₃솃ᔕ諟᮵嫽ᵫ퐆ⵊ
Ⓨ躕紆̨ꊲ붸씳틷臸ꭴ俫䰦獲殐ꂳ阂趹兟雗ⳓ쒔㺃っᕟ翋癣慮䆭맞Í瑵슕妻곖淞쐮ᤑ餡ᦈ壅ᱚ⋷淟돍陭胦䨻ḫ巛羊贏蹍ῷ䝣㖆땙↝是쮏爒�㚀갨虸ࣙ⑃ᷲꂱ毮缆亏往楞淪ⰸ蘕穔ߐ䥳꿵┘膆꤆빬獬腠敉⯢槳ꄮ�Ⰸ㞕�∉㪀綇춈㏨환ꤛ䘣ÿ⑆̰⮮侟冃銶ퟶ셢Ⳁ쌲♸跼嘯梻䎰⠱獽ᵀ韆⺩檧䐦ݥಳ�⋗⣞⟻ꖂ⏖⦀Ό綰鱪⪞擗ퟓ뙒쟓䢆ຠ質ᷖ뮶︥란烶鉹산㢏냦ﱮ깑취옍撩튂끶ￊ鰀ߐ䕷繲�Ⴄ뺙ꩀ墯軭撫
툒싥ث椇Ĵ퇜粈㑐ҡ넶㿮ꃕ괿䬳㗔㧳ꔺ䞪㜆౮ꀸ騎뢒굎岪梇澯ᔃ㌲頏囻蚯䐼롵䦥悮뉭符ېᓽ㕗뼓ᚇꓘ慞胢娺ꬮꙥꃭ۹仠礫ᛵ՝뇲项⣼䴂啟䢏㞲谒㢨ᚫ䭷楹눰愨乜ꮳ뜶翠㊶ⷭㄦ㗴ﺠ䴡쌏Ԗ쭐⩱踅퐱棫Ხꟸ퉙若扝勍曒뤋籘媟拭䮐먒蚜言紀찕诸榱糺延鲋ḅ鳵卼梬凷뤮ᙦ嬉䐂ຠ鋞㾹砑硛좍毮䉟풸涮и鼭ʔᐏ괁獅⺞⯱牸␈ﱘ⏃쁭궨䎼ٽ㺟ꮡ衛锭❷ৌĴ勔卼ﶯﮗוֹⴸ傗蚥뻭ꦵ笛즔�䘪阺ຠ隚㮸ᒯ菸퍋僛
펾랁烆㊬閾⾡撋쎏㫖閏컍㴲䀳帝㝫홚톢퉭腙츪檦﹩鬝啑䟋ﰞ⽗쯢ꧣ乸ಆꆲ่৪큄莤肣䥅ﵜ涣媥鮮♪ꎑ阜᳀湖䪝稍⼭뙙纜퓩ংަ␑㚂ɺ㕹蹚像햆犣瀠脫룾㦞䢶셭ﴃ愘㕮ꂹⳖ⸭郭き鸤�Ɣ菕䮑Ꙝ颛憵梥栀�츙ၰ꼚䪝勃쾊땜褑㥅ꀙ츎릒弍帖䴠혲췘褤솔凯硛厫횲늡귖歄ﹱ풭䂃괝ᤥඬｲ夀퉠횬�꒹f氏ݐ䥁Ꝝﲇ煓絷蘽ࢩ鈑졁ꬢ訷洵䀻싰摰٢M읯䎯뼦鐦樂膨ꬵ潞췡歂裟牗䁞陠ȸ鎺毨㫅ꆖ쮨ꅫग़醇ᦏຠ諊
ᔿ콜뺫ꮓﵛ攩⇧哅�睫嵺ꞅ㒙션ȧ㮀轪ᇭ蒉흛⏌猻狍潺澊헣駆�꜈暐ܶꬡ鞝흐ÿ拡孭彠㣉猛胖䨽릖坍퍶懃湧뼥陱ᚵ꒵㗓熻눌욌苠괏甀闵꽱潃䖭㊧㊟�戍ﺦ埧侓쾄益⟇笀᱖羷洐푣ﰭ銙᰼茜்ݖ횦깍ල꿖舭ኩ㉄橍駗ÿ屩磚ᬻ㑳ꏮ㠃踂窠ᕥ嫆ꭸ덑拖뗓冻尓ᑱ婚蠟凟꿕﮴湋翜ㆴ胖⨺灂欲ⴂ䭾ኯꝉ魀袣ᩚ韌楑㖓ޚ⦘⟀Ĕ遣贱뛕쇵哩贴䥞◖줣ꙭ羸�牫糏䂲㸌潫썢ꗦ잨빖빬奦
㜼ꧢ겮㡵謼溻杘⪂�픩᭵ꎹⷑ鄄䡀执䠆ຠ諒ﳧ괣ⳇ읳工�䰥㗴箱ᕹ᎗∜騌넀驙떆蔝뷥䚻曬иԎ灳鏸핟例�똨聓蝝埍ⴵ孲�ᬦ斛껳ඉᶜᦧຠ�깆캨�鎢䧍翽흐옓렍옸�ᔹ◾ﾻ萀璍䚭ጁ箼돑ꇁ픁噒괆즯걩䦾㺏럂쪇溹Ô⯪몍囱羣䶪ꁥ襚ބ䰒Ç䨟疺뷻䜯聙쨤ꩰ㮧鑴๗䍼叢潪仓덟묁떝ﱽᱣᢞ괚撺ۤ핃ꕏ甀嘴푡磘땽뼍輰⭾밝≛䃸ừ챗契鑾혁屑砛嶳䶗劏펷�蘶끬귉旋탰ꗕ培�鿯J㏨ꝙ豚�统묳圜朿碭ﾖ쬀边塏鳭⯤츰칺偼⾶蜂鋙
Ր⿽譞빓떺䢍獫궆ÿ㘣ﺷÿ㗵僜䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䔁倔䤁䕋礀쓧䧻력ꛒỳ⌸鹄딚誽焱�䈐餴棍맸秵殧孛夭䭆굧陲䛚殹젲抚ꜝሠᓘ映ꗮ遬흸蕇摾硈﹖༡毴༌磹꽙먢㉽Ⱓ橃碞迫樓航䳣芉愰꣗ꂣ밗㍒梫忟䳩峗�팿滯ᚁ臬鄃髂玧褷ꕮ䦊존䖋俷儼춨䷢�믉ꇒ塀Ꞧ煩㒡점䮲숩떱噻ﺋ�ᦦ쥡㌽덜䪜岺쭮盓굸ꤋ䯼ⱹ䴲䒦ힹ澇鸬贝劣
ᯋカ餞댕殥籚淺䞻:ൔ閾췊碪ᐓ撺葌荠쒚䞏ኸꛇ棧ᐧ㨠睐䵼㨌ᬘ쪟슗㽪㓡ৗﰜﺜ陵碲⾕�⋓苳߭钞姫䷼睩찵携䥂벱췳쬀꣗轏凈蟉ꄟﲨ笋鴆ꩵ�踸븅ꨂﺴ欦磱존묱�帐ꪶÿ퉬瞄섉ݵꇦ퐃忬艐∼렃ဪ꽈捂䶀鹸�훵骢躍⎖ᡔ脁뫦ÿ뿭缗㻐혯膎ꯔ裏嵵⹅㦵ꄬ皶䡅틎籕蠨꺍刬㋉㾅鰻喓듮犽鮮赊潤랽피䢫䆼뉢᪬⩔ᠥ杬㳩耀屸轱뾙겙য়굚ﻕο쨯迭嗧澬儼�ᙹ擺鱊췱㩕袷ᕴ㋻爹촳瀏줫㱳❩垆祰⩧鐽ଛ뉔蚱㇞䖅ෲ㫄뚮롵헴ノ膡ꮮ濻
�ঠ瀼澭犷洂�뛖궻翘㟂䑰詈躪醤珅랗➾ⷔ㟌尺蜮춱䅤殣챐︤跋鲶㦅ꏀ肥玵ⵥ肷존Ʈ壜Ḝ뫂쥚脷䢤鱅䰏ᕖﻜ븥⊅䮛ꊈ脜ᗏ땡ᕟ㺴楓ᒱテ퉳ꢇ欣흄Ｔ⩡좮閶郯鴫쓰㻋꺇聈暅㽢夳䙣雖≳凩亀豊꿢夑쯛㨌⭔뼜౸쇐뤎湩㼆ﾻꄀĶꃠਿ壤襸운㪰彜湧춫﹚�촾鯽霗溷�⪂㫗荗ᚡ⎿ㅋ큽깸⇉懑嶚槪䠝纏ꡗ园䤐池䧛슄煎勍䚋揖ꆌꏒ煰�ᓣ퀂헚癗ꂩ杤ᾭ쮈ÿ䬒㼮鄿妬쐟즒贄쒥ཚힹ銊醙⦔츕᎙〪㥠⣪䬂豷꯴쳋駽�
ȇ�쭻鶶䙚㵜冏墶琮妨怔榫纶툡㋥ꙁ澡텼Ӥᑞ糒槫鏣류閳ℤྣ嶁蝯ꭴܝ埭窋ח츝鉫펾쬵鏫椻ꑱꦇ陏쓗�敭ꝯ᫇췳稀붕巂뉂狆킍᧗DZ霄䂺⌣婶讏괬脣菰�䷼㲨煍䒦⏆ꏁᶨ踇柢쏰刔恶咜欓䎖틀㊑ﮖ崹꺣奱⩾膸鞡襍蚑㤈㢬巴㝦㑢쪨肕럐븻䘘祰鲐㕾複⑭浻昊䢖䠃垝鶊衇亗䌖譊߈礻쾧褧氮ꑅ哚࠭諧୬홦⣶롞㊚ࡁ柒�쑚똠㖎唹Ő⢯튴쭵홉퍕锐9膓썛p㨍༬찭ꚫ䡼�논ᡍ삠ẫ뼻벶⏓뚴ⱱ㣲៚ꦑ袷磵嶂僩㪶爞鴪龆
墯╌⹍焷뛐ꁸ洍�覧㠴᧥䅤ἕ﨨魗㽏꺉鎹行Ή㳝埱뜆ÿ媿딀ױ똃࢜ᚈ屳ⷸ�鐟䀂澲粮ꡍ촘駆礓⭧Ꟗ卽狅扂㙽䈦䄰埪톱裴쥄蚂鹎ổꚹꉅꑃ亴�⁇ị톬殢扂ꗫ芢둳訓겳黵楞봑ጀ悊ꎎ竅违⋼鐳岕碼⬊뮟ｓ䧳җ֪렦떸�훐窖睙悔Ἔ뮖㔋㓱ᐚ氺沚䑒랉킜疊㚻ᓰ鋪榆��➸嫀ὗ᷇䝤殢긨�뉑울鳓턊宎䭟얈ԙ㱇聢欯굚볙께쬾鄔툍㵴Å拭ꎁ眤�︶䙚錚띒۱Ჩ煫쒥捌쌊ᔹ딕뮆㱩윳얤쓦걲鱳럐猃㋄Ḭ팻鑤䳭煣폺籙ꑭ
ᶺ嗊Ᾱ撅诪ⷢ束듚许젡ꭐ㗢খ댿⼣숈鸓Ȩ釾椺ဟㄵ百ꅽ옔폭ꦩ於綣浡쉦籉狀薽垇滚ꢴ꾋᥆�罍靌蟌衋컦䁨읬㸞䈤搘王ﾸ褀鋖｀阀念춊㋻㰯묍⛾难✩⋓衦俥值ꐇ芎謁凳횺坼ꝷ繉㛖Ꞃ�䢍꼵ėÿ媿퓆㕬䫭峬ꗋ◆쯮梞ᷪ턅햭卼쎨獯줵ᣲ遯鏤�殣捩浱ⁱ撎랕掽쏘缾�蕉ᡟ鸧땪駞庮᭝튆垣瘽髧퐀몰冏菸떨侷퐇図Ꮌٻ㖟ꗵࣛዧ걷⢻䇼�ꉽ䧟撅ᐪ麑ຕ斣檯祓ⱑ�䙳링綱樢ÿ民쑞寮屨傧偱矸땐귎쌝昄苛᩿ꚫ쉿ꑅண⩝
ⴥ맕껉홾嫛횾�孩褛ᓏ㬠昍㷢왛櫺齙젳鴻溇┓쒯�ࡦ沭❀㗗ꖑℍ宋煩湯玬㖚簸ꩃ幜絬朘水樂䛖ᵏ촳犬줯ᰢ땦볭樯엺콝☐朵操䇟т衊ﯬ캭㍅때㞗ڛ蚚텁碎Ρ簵眡鴎�蓱뱲钥熷畉䆨픦칭釠쏲姫镚붖�ꋒ輒峢鿦歩妯ऱ怐㤷ྠ睞��䑼ូ℄ᡥ卣ÿﺻ땾禍깥컞췳쒤繥캭뼆핢䮼媣ᅙ윣﹥訑值蝏栵쟤쩺ⷓﶵ䘦ඖ⼮Ｐᄀ毎夯ÿ䰓뽴᭝䀬ᐸ�≸듌樓輲峞₱䪟껩浆ﾤ琀鿗櫙⬾뒲ࢎꊂ㪀쟔ѱ㨝Ἤಭ✑꺁褢壵쉝
曈⥬勫৸먀軔㈹㻗骶竼広ꕇ닆➷妮硜供൩馾霒渹ƴꉡꣾ貱䄳ﷇ壳᧞볒믖嶎嗎늕혺쾂擢廔槴禑ヮ驛綡眆ཙ륒鋦뀃雰殃岦屝�퐽랒쳎쵳ኤС튶⭰펓锶訁䳗咍麜햼횶婼嗪㶈㑇⏘쉟뵺킈赡咥외伙혜護敝㛱쪝扤（瘀즹綴孮⢃乂屈헠㻷鄣駭뢴뚉ÿ흗㲊퇀ӱ澉緣䤾푎ۚ䩏Ѩ敩�딜莬όཫ何樑㻻ꗕ姄Ḻ⭲含ự큷댿禁쭓Ỡ䠳묎淂뷽岮汫霏놀캮≯劯྄볊䇏얓Ḻᖗ孴뽓ꔵ럽ߺ鉶惓삃逷ꝩ뉒熽정Ⲹ罷ẫ町펻뢠澷⠲ե㵗墩�ﺜ
멼歔瘯鯕嬻딦⹝褦莺梞긃睍㹏濣鵾褫뎵ﺛ嬐뛩䤰౮뢈ዾ噅☚⚴鮖鵳䶶觷뿙�戜㒀峟Ẳ簃ꕌ購쒚嗸ẜ髸迎홄癣䨣殏ॿ⯎ཀ䬃좋Ĵ웕碀〖ﰇ躺씵셝鸬딂႑䖲팃펊︗ᘩ흢㛻⠯�퉳芢ቯ摁坭葊竂کކꝫ囫�퇂⛜谊ﱺ졇叨챜㹚ඹ雀ㄽฆ듢徖괒뫨搚桞켘Ĵᇦ譸睜䏡鍤㗵�䍞�ꣃ져㪯벉͉㋜煩瀃ﴰ굹ן꧇惑㮇㎆胖ꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨ
ꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨᎀ툃ྌ婊Ĩ㴰쀨ꗴ肢̓賒䨏⡚、⠽ꊥᎀ툃ྌ婊Ĩ㴰쀨ꗴ肢̓ꯒ乚ꗻ趷풛ꮨ倴焄᳃똫唴䁟伱ꊥᎀ툃ྌ婊Ĩ㴰눩᱃뛋噄�綊Ĕ瀜ે超吕Ͷﰔ䨏⡚、⠽ꊥᎀ툃ྌ婊Ĩ㴰쀨ꗴ肢̓賒䨏⡚、⠽ꊥᎀ툃ྌ婊Ĩ㴰쀨ꗴ肢̓賒䨏⡚、⠽ꊥᎀ툃ྌ婊Ĩ㴰쀨ꗴ肢̓賒䨏⡚、⠽ꊥᎀ툃ྌ婊Ĩ㴰쀨ꗴ肢̓駒ᄬ믌䕤ꐢ肢䔫��랢宍⣔鐞傴怂兺䕋☀ꔇḘ뒔ɐ穠腑䯩Eܦᢥ鐞傴怂兺䕋☀ꔇḘ뒔ɐ穠腑䯩Eܦᢥ鐞傴怂卺ࠒ쮑⠪兒ी݆
ⶥẘ悔剺䃑脉䛩ꔇᐭ頀鐞穠텒ी║ᆤ摈酈멝庰䵍Eܦᢥ鐞傴怂兺䕋☀ꔇḘ뒔ɐ穠腑䯩Eܦᢥ鐞傴怂呺퉆㜃抚❃뛷右䁑脉䛩ꔇᐭ頀鐞穠텒ी݆ⶥẘ悔剺䃑脉䛩ꔇᐭ頀鐞穠텒ी⥆ꁨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ
訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂⠩栁ᦦ㠐썒続᐀ᩓ噔찊㴁椆 ⢊ʠ⢊ʠ⢊ʠ䪊镨쨙Ԇ冇ᑽ采ᥣv驻⩚랼뵇䃥ꤹ햑㋔ꦜؙᶀᑅŐᑅŐᑅŐᑅ稒
⩚渘롡꿈ꘆʠ⢊ʠ⢊ʠ⢊ʠ⢊ʠ⢊ʠ⢊ʠ⢊ʠ⢊ʠ殊욺鲅䃡㓉⻈먢첏쎅
䕋㵅囄呧겞䄙道᩺甀儔Հ儔Հ儔Հ儔Հ儔Հ儔Հ儔Հ儔Հ儔Հ儔Հ儔ՀЕ邷⩁⑅꺊ÿ፴Ꟗʠ薊ꅮ驹鄥譌䇕哤´冴E儔E儔E儔E儔E儔E儔䵑ᕳ蚺햙䰇誓阀䂊胁´䕑䕑偑睏뤍㩟䵅χ괧ꑌ鄑胒訖ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ꀨ訂ᤪ抮·鲀鰌聦ꈦ䢑酡諒娀ᠪꆮ馝酢꽘ཐ驊ꈨꈨꈨꈨꈨἪ䊵얼㿳麻橪⠀誢⠀誢⠀誢⠀뮦梬衙㤊픤㵋칚槾똢撝ﹸ߰¥ꉝ隒ꈨꈨ긩ᓁᲳ㈀㉍ꐫ岇⃣Ӑ冴E儔E儔E儔E儔E儔E儔E儔E儔E儔E儔E儔E줔
䜜㤛ꏨ鼦畕䘲熛꾷羖ಕ漎陃捭륞銼㬡猑ᗇ卿緱鶆浲ᴥ㭕睖辄짋ﴓ杠ꔿ楻�햝岲ㅉ寜㶒ʨ돞ﵹꎩ䪍鷁�⏮럚䯴꣱烩黏祙폺䬵ꉸ껑嗕䱕㡧�鈂ㅴ᳨ơ퇒ᑅ儀ᑅ儀ᑅ蘀榸♮绒오⎏驽ヵ㰁܂ÿ뭞⮒沍嫑櫙ྑ튞鉡ऽꌙᒨ◾㟪孠壚쭈㬡榛寭娶㳮漐뺙✹뇖陴ᑏ鋸큼็惍磏⹉Զ㓶莼뗌匴쌧룅醺�ṋ熃瓅绶팶≭뚐딼�꾪沍࿖䄄٬⠀娍튿厭胀圈Ԣ踝䶎�㼽跭ဨ癣웪잃氺ௗ夞蹕켕屃륎獳ÿ丈≇䉙侶踇Ꟶꑽ�骎쮖浥耚눶醓ᵀꖞ⯢Ⱍ⻄
賦Ⴊ�鉍ⷵ誙㠗湆힄꼳췶혆ﭵ食ᾭ媈뱽Ԛ놼ꩆ䫱墻䜎耢逻⥲뵪ឃ薱銛晐ꂧᨊ놶ꍫ率侷Ẵ㪪襷㖭⒃ꭑᒮ㻧侕竆츅ᒭ夓㊰�Ẃ喍漴ऐ驦ﻂ富ⱞ遧ᬰ폙蘡㯷툼⑤㗴鸔팹䊢屰ᕴ짳窝䥘눎ࢶ⯼鞮･ࠀޜ䛋ℒ윬½ⓞ풱ꛭ�쥍┈ꛏ萪㪞ᛓ␑퉬떷�踕琸秭옡꿀續缵沙⭼밣챪�値䴇깣笚䍞�掳뷱힄౫�洳㨌륦￩洀潝赏⮊ହ�똩뜗ሾ�슭�㶀丝ӥ≴沊뉎蹄ꮜ䜀鷒ᑀ嵵�띈껳ત螽播硛仧뢸願箴ᓎ䎷﹘Ȩ锆牧텿濶竚촖硩
俣侵䤎옢ꆜᰃ뻒殀竪黽낒풵嚁멯楽굴�鉗띅鏺룞ဟ濆쾴␎粒枘ꗟ嵺鲵蠶᠖Õᅓ䌽牵隖䷲숡�䵍繙Ｃ鄀맾욤쥦귣戵䘒⋍캓헞ꖫ囫붺麩䃖㫊䪏㻧枖ǃ⯊皗俜鬵嶡ꑅ멫໓∭逤机�㞂鷖씄炪땟�苸�䭍◩䌞ΐ歽몈풺紵權宋砋�噉䠽ꫵٓ⦴측୧탺뀳鸭掩չⲱ陼묻㕴셓蒚漚掃ꡀ猏慗祳ꡑ덯笞�꿳찍珷�쓪揅ㆻÿ쵵氝㌯痑匯官莴鞫讆눍♏釕靇粱ᑽ쵾!鴠轱枥뉸⻝ﱯ᰿⪃呾鶶ዛ쳈ꑰ㗴ꪧ盫㶚麨䃪븕顫붅馾⑭ꨱ
䠺₸詻纣％贀筴덛䒘쉁薞Ψ㱹ꙹᥠꍙ색�䢺夥䧡摘ᕗ퇂顴쭟畅涐ᗇ槖똉ÿ殮꣼푑寵♭췜綾�볦ꁣ곏䛚孭쐒w᩺넀碥멕䐰궮芌詻徎椚뒱니鈗蘣홑簝꒦暺撧ힶ㹻͆ᖆ쁋㚶쳚⪲讼'ߐꍓ黸始蹶쐆햋婏厇痱首큲眸떷侀农硘�胚鎛Բ쇴뚧疯�距옢踖⨶䧳틜갃뗒嶫흢뗏ᖐ紝㪫웻続ⴈ꼫�룚ÿ쬌楳꽩㰎진黂씁㹴뀃鎶≃ⳉ䮌ソ㼷⃡嶴弬⌢傽鶶瑵릐雂毨睇媦≚濹⨧Ŏ駢梩ﺺ謑桋뚼ᤌ쵉༈剉Ș䄎ꪥᇶ嚼⺧ƪ㜃흖㒭衦졝촓娸迍
㫇嵣⒈ṣ뫯탍俖면㓕ꑨ嫥齣ꏊ蟸�辮剦갰値ꐈ�㠾䗓샚聙둣楍嫪뛝檗첓ꯄ�깷앯涚Ẵ脐趣靕ౡ㤇㋅巣�雩�픭뇬嗥脩ꖷ뫸哇﮺ሲ麒�濩宼�䥝Ɐ붟ꪏ떎�ꆦ謗ힴ躽館歆쩆⯂袿濷蘲밊͐﮵퓔䴼�遇二늮繭ⷒ汉뮙픎ﳄ楇뗬ⶍ釁뙕直Ꟗꊀ몵湙緥颏ꨛ뛐ꤑට砰�곽砆鎤陼ॢ㥶赶늶冯縉ﰯ몎ꎆ翸宧⻋㒭蚑둿齣Υ봺쐟稖䳔꿶章ꖊ㹍솭㨲ꮽ낚感뚸棣識㴀홶쎇⯋湉䕤榒浥秬栽眃虅炫�靋�틃嶪�뙏梸璗亅꼘塁㔺জ뷣ᭆ⩼枴
偳漈᯼騽�渳왧䕙稀됭珫鉮�酱핒⹍᯲㫽講륎픞聪樫황熏숹ⶱ潼�ꓝ爇鰳温⿵㖋뒨⢛줓氻㎎ퟜꥡ斑�ᚼ킮骇Ḑꦅ蛸䧋⒒邺鐩븒캒�합잊列죕뛸濙轵䜏⨧但囩∾놇懐즊褂⤜χꖨැﱸꙵ㫉雇윊켁嵃爤꠬ฝ豔広畭殤覆娺敇ꥪ涴买멫淐뒧惒哦ᩜ桠쎚䋱ᡣ�宬㇆髫껝ﰿⶂÿꫫÿ䀱ﶺ誆톖䧜斵ꛂ핻籈ꝯ穋첶賌ેꅛ箮ᛆ痩⥲唆岥삏ￕᴀ槰늖ᩅ꒫ƪ耂唻쩠娚ꚩ洱�䦞羌딪᥀꺺枻㲤睫传뉦軏햴墹닜Ძ㴇⌫Ӣ�頻獌鄟¥꿖璊ⓛ鷰揆�
倖垊ૐ㭞斑㕍做ὁ孑�뛭殏鼏妒F쎓⌚䥊럢淵ｬ栀ꝁ�얥賘⼱䗑欀﹨눩⟖≨덢줨橒◞톲ⓘ駯䐏欝薆굯鯙軅ḹ묿펚ﳰぞⓔƼ㏞嚅䳭鬎똕ᒫắᇤ똌헮佂캱ᙐݥ윅潊䞎翶꾄댥鉀픶㗁㩶쟝ꆆᮆ嘫䢎狸低½嵺풭陗㓫搘刑ߖ뒃뷫䔯⽈籫Ő刽䧛殴릋 ൗ鹰㼴襦㥥ÿ祆쁲㳴俓校뇗뜮ꕱ奟䷚矋㈆匏⪞躟鿓ᐭ�넢꽵䲴콿﹔聢嬻晝ꘃￆ븀㹭龆걽�앜㍭ᑞ❗壢野榮�顰찑녽璩쌖鹪ꃙ洍됍枸骿觉�
➗ꢡ쟟恚쮄ᤛ戀澧噬蔯ﺿﻱ⽕뷃�㧼꼼댚㑉銀픁竩껕梭֤弇쭪잟琚䵗阊憓㋃ᗴ�稶�䋥肓猻ཝ䛫곰ᠲ�ⱕ秬ꛉ�糒故䦭夢볉嚫⾸쌃Ḕ픤ಒ༄῀h蕣툧柼䊧쟲뒼鲑ᴕꁫﶓﵛ瀍ཞ쒛걚ꂲ娏伴夒艫덏켿쌙븪쳀鑤啵峭듥읢㗢寺픮牫䟛�딁岲�H䃱ᘝ᱕㨀눌ꈞ殹Ἧ麬뤱邶�၂�ⴵ볝彶ⴑ탖夅祐붊먩ꑅꉮ▦⇚త詻ᬐ靌鯄近ṧ㛕缮�붼篕㹗載ܥफﳀ簩欉ₗ牉敦뤻߀䂊홴⅞붵箰䪰齆睻칪ᵟ跩䈸⅘ุ
噺쑷ࡺ㑋㠿因�뭎梨툢⬻豐⮟犂䡱욲螮쌪팠㎫뛃ᚷⵚូ㍧궈䀳�쏝湥컳⏡鉁獍잣槚ᾓ谸澜哭⑾挀莰塱齦蝬뛚瓯ᆛ즏艀ฮꤽ롴㸙〔數᧚ᖆ튗螏ꛍꙋ놆ᆷ秜㦾﹣屳䯬磧㝊ड짴뛂䗱ﯡ贶阂犉㗅ු沊겲㐱႒ꎪ鸤䀹ꮧｙ栀睩ꄖ馊깐橇씀᭟䧘≴㮈�궙홅軭隠ｻ簀룫樏瓢鯻ޯ皬굺䦒뽫㨋醌�뒭⟉궏䎤㳲꽀ᓓ혁뛅熝൭蝻默駦殫竖䄼撮뜀饫쏱ÿ긏潾莴슏ㆡꖦ៱볉㣦♢㴵Β㱩歍墬䕞먒薰ﶺ鸫蟰涉紴䐊뎘鲿藄巭ﶥᆤ띩ᱍꝊ滊微
沙ᗚ꿌댚쾼䖒㨰ᾝ땛귖�섁锞岣舯宐迸虖⌾䠎쩟ꪻ⠀誢⠀誢⠀誢⠀誢⠀誢⠀誢⠀誢⠀誢⠀誢⠀誢⠀誢⬀夿⇔摗둡岅殞饂䤤䎑䈏̨㳍綻�褼뉘嵳ⴋ歂ઝ柑鸻渳晘䂽뛩셬뒍蹄槻懟ﾶ鸀１�Ĵ㟧栱婒㜷籓貥欥骼孒鋂럹Ჩ�险셬�䜢뙃躦⣞핿ꯆᓴ━儔Հ儔Հ儔ՀṲ휤ﯴ䮻㊝⯢颏�뺮殠眻쵢ሊ酻Ṁ䬍颮ꃖ䱝여颋ꩈݗ롊嫱⟫䏭㸇遗驱�ÿ࣏ÿ髯쌾ｭ㰀Ｃ븀ͨ蠏ﴴ乳묖ꍮ茁쥧ꔧ煍篢贋政Ố䵘䧞쮮㛬㿂낏翛࣏ÿ
髯⾹謴ඏ閮靰덍죮‡굔絵ⵆ䦐岫늵ܞ仙煮꣗蛽ﻛ䝸ÿ텼寧ῡ᱀ꔆ墬ᝪ㟖�麎雷羪绺ꚽꄭꡛ쇰禷＠䨀㻮毃ÿ⌼ÿ梾ﲷ述茶ຠ�嬐ះ璓쩧⼵⟼ᾖ싳ﻫ㻨淃ÿ⌼ÿ梾ﲷ述茶ຠ尛叱葞㙭䓖淮ϋ멙ﱝ弑㖩헍⻋䗐傹툫쏾ｭ㰀Ｃ븀ﭨ뜍ﺏꃹ㰏痓⬽퍍浯ᚮ壦岮暳ㄒ슚횷퍢碠㔭鎩鋁ꘇ흫퉦⟭ꎉ⍸쏚ȇ꾹囸䟚銛ㄤ㯧焷᱀莇鯵䵋倿銅ꗤᅗ힓휼ꁁ虸䏃绒ᛄ仪�釤믖䴛옞�虡ペ펋ꧥ쎾ｭ㰀Ｃ븀ͨ㬵⍋瑉岲솒莼髲鋎緲墏릿횞༷该㍒窏
念�콿（㺚淃ÿ⌼ÿ梾鰃잋琚թ哐䜁迮睊⟼ᾖ웳ﻫ绨淃ÿ⌼ÿ梾ﲷ述茶ຠ쐋뚚꾗两瞫퐅琧衲呎僖骾捍멐랸芌ᘣ珅꿵ﭒ뜍ﺏꏹ㛬㿂㲀ÿ핖�ⴊ䧔�ℊ㔧翐秂｡㰀뼮퇯莮㛬㿂낏翛࣏ÿ髯ÿ㳡ﾰ鸀弗绖᭫◪谖抎�虽ﻛ䝸ÿ푼㩗ꕕ࿌쀋岛恒ﹸ羅潳֤頋䘒퐻局پය덈⻒륋氾ᎆ殒펻㯴㨭䇔ࠔ᱔⫲�罭蓧㛍鈇拇흴껔肍哈윖忍ힰ䥘驣뿴�콿（㺚淃ÿ⌼ÿ梾鄃ᙯ㙘沐뮼掮❹ᗓ鎈ᩀ쥴챴⦧萨Ꚃ➽㛬
㿂낏翛࣏ÿ髯赫�䗳슂篦ಹܲ怎妵痔㹭顏ꧽ읾㲎뵢�싳迦�콿（㳢㼍둝ੈ䟝莵쥧봧嚋⿒뒣驥훢�吞凞嗾翩뙡ÿᆞÿ㗟겙卸홎䑑泑㥤乖̨㗊澭䋻挨풼밦岝䄔�ꁗﻩ눷낷➂ꁲ퉇Ҿ듒臫鐿遥⽴⯎뼖싳胦Ｙⱏ힅錵碮⿑瓶囗⾲덿춖�땡ÿᆞÿ㓟虽ﻛ䝸ÿ큼餇韩⻱몬꾖촽쓝땫渱ⵔ謺圍멒린뚸უҗ롧梯ᘶ㿂펰鶥臢顉닥̨톅걯뷤黔䇮릴肀툇꒨懭灻ꭴ꯫孻�鯱灢땾�뙡ÿᆞÿ㓟虽ﻗ䝸ÿ큼鰇绸䳳ෑ濘캵㾷瑻
ꠦ릋ຉ羉浵萄ᮓᙛ竅�罭蓧῍뙡ÿᆞÿ㓟蹺掣�㷞巛쀭芀휛娕嫏ዔ陘哫銺㏞䗷ҩ궏潺淘羄췷感ﾶ鸀１�Ĵ겎䀕滲㾎釩羧秂｡㰀뼮퇯莮㛬㿂낏翛࣏ÿ髯봵佳깬먈뉏ﲾ⑹韦㫄鿮�Dž儗泹㸛㕉緝�磾ｇ簀漛ﴟ䃳东㼭텕쓖튭읭햞ꦍ每��畍祯뭪鹄㥁윘ÿ�ÿ࣏ÿ髯쌾ｭ㰀Ｃ븀ͨ揋⦚䮵䝽뭐麻⏢ÿ嘌ꚵꞵ磛綂ᝏ쵇�黤밫ﲷ述茶�싳胦㴸婣幝ꖋ㟻藺튪ᛪꦋ汵ﻄӱ蜄䖯ﲷ述茶�싳胦ସ戝쿂뭘㾿捪ꑲᔏ
蜧춵䈿䀗ꤋ턾Ｆ戤뾻�콿（㺚淃ÿ⌼ÿ梾考햶�晽쯅쀭䏁끢墓펷䘛曕뚶覕⎒�涽﮴і⌘昀뮹螟呺ረ猠傖ꁸἎ㫃귕붶瑷熍䠪㊘즈曋庭坪갭鷺돉蚓뉏轳흌Ế듓憻봍ֲ젝껦虽ﻗ䝸ÿ큼⤇碦䮳그舡擫轫䛵羭秂｡㰀뼮퇯螮㛬㿂낏翛࣏ÿ髯卼榬⋾覴佐䆎㠉謵鴻䁐孵맻ᚚ䈅მ꼸ﭘ뜍ﺏꏹ㛬㿂㲀ÿ핐﮴⧽왾輱ﰤ篕錖槍ձ࿖ᅆഞ彶뙡ÿᆞÿ㓟虽ﻛ䝸ÿ큼阇薚궺ힵ叙ﮠ츩㌽浝躿愬内몢ꍢㄙ欞ﮥ뜍ﺏꏹ㛬㿂㦀ÿ
俸㼬藧㗺笽흏⎭讀永⓹珗說ῡ�뽭蓧Íﹹꮧ橘騗ｴധ�朕蘍梷ᖐ辺٫鋏䩏ﻭ淃ÿ⌼ÿ梾ﲷ述茶ຠ흦훆혖쏑工訝㸗ꥉ뀼ÿឞퟨ漛ﴟ䟳淘羄췷礀蹟䌼걧�괪懄獜芰鐾⻙뿦�㫪풍⢶뇅蜅殦⿒㦼絡䂲ꊻ尹밊̀迈ͨ햀䵵︲컞鈈ᣪ裭Ъ䬕뵗轓퉑뫧릵ࡔ띉ࠬ䲯ﲷ述茶�싳胦숼篊땨痈쭛뮛钋氘䃀⸵綯㙭疤☝꭫錻迷䢐낯翛࣏ÿ髯쌾ｭ㰀Ｃ븀ͨ욒歪쾛焹ÿ걀箛췫縹韪�땆ꠤ췴띺淘羄췷感ﾶ鸀１�Ĵ
㫧覗튙�瘓ꚁ쮓뀠銮ᴿ⩘롮弛ﴟ䟳淘羄췷猀쟇ᾖ싳ﻫ볧꽙�듕捂浱洼ᦺꎼ檕⿴�콿（쾚㳖ꜱ㙫ᗫ⇄鱂亩㐈웺澸㖩࿓燵皈럦퓤뗬ᜍ띏溕正걲ॱ씹ᙵ>泒ᛮ赶疥볩䗨ꢅ�ຠ娧۱겙④䩗鈷㟼榮ι㻓ዊ埪됼ᎆ殒﮺꼍ﺏꏹ㛬㿂㲀ÿ핌ﵴ꼹絓䇽櫹蟇ﵵ䄿�ⷌ駔浶䧞丝롫ﲯ述茶�싳胦屮哋뻥蕹里柝顲안셠얬겦榱첺壑✱ニ潧殶擗淓败ꂑಏ縰邾鏒ʉ鈓뢛ຠ셇ﴚ鞞筽䬰↙늕麓됫ÿﻃ嵸�宣娶蔥늅ׁ憴ꘗ
塅ﲷ述茶ຠ뱹恷䟊疓쟈ꏺ멘뤮뜷W㽝�⮞﮻뜍ﺏꏹ㛬㿂㢀혤䓱릚䜗敼뼼혤쵥嫚㋪坷晖靣湃ፘꅞ說ῡ�뽭蓧Í�ꦇ槙迷繽執轷䏖᠁⫼䌝襐䋼洵�嵗⦲垸綥�磾ｇ簀漛ﴟ䃳Ԝ놾ᙣ疼ഩ뇓ꕍ荼柍嵞濇䦩ꅻ�둙消ϋꅞ說ῡ�뽭蓧Í뷶▏꾞픥軌ਈ돢䈽ם檲䋗烐�煎髩㿵�콿（㺚淃ÿ⌼ÿ梾騃賅ꈰ眴呌䤀ｒ숀慹ÿ⸼껑�싳迦�ÿ࣏ÿ髯콵椑㚗壷甿䞄紪魫휗ࢭ鮲멕Ⅻ�鲲끯翛࣏ÿ髯쌾ｭ㰀
Ｃ븀ͨ릁㓕틱趺⑹嫳杺Ⲍﴴᬾ볩த⒟諳ﻪ淃ÿ⌼ÿ梾ﲷ述茶ຠﹿ쬓羅痡ÿ赾빗귱춝놜띄䡑藫ॱ䴻ή뙡ÿᆞÿ㓟虽ﻗ䝸ÿ큼锇等ꡱ䖲㌗ꍚ�䠭ḧ珵뭛뺱楻떺뚹ꡐ䇞圼ﶤ�磾ｇ簀漛ﴟ䃳唞◦ꗦ罥�콝歱犋ḁꆕ檯ᨖ첝陗睭筫�䊐罎끟翛࣏ÿ髯쌾ｭ㰀Ｃ븀ͨ㓏ᇯⱜ깳箧灳䈤롢ꯈẞ۱ꆟ콩ᙪ䷪寎䤾欝﮷뜍ﺏꏹ㛬㿂㢀ÿ崋罚�ो붜컉∞纠�⥔ѩ륭䔢ꀾ푔儀ᑅ儀ᑅ儀ᑅ儀ᑅ儀ᑅ儀ⅅ֠릢詸쏣傶潍鄘邤༮돖㖯፟�䜍诉샬ㅮ鳧ݐ䕳驱
貿ퟞᛃ鷺憴䞚쨊歪札蹕䤭踣쯓꫞㴏̨ꢭ㗻銴㯣鰔ꩭ韸띘�ꈘ繋ᢨ냠骫衟奟꿑맢쮏膺摙穟恏㰶괽붮ꖥ⇢쑀ᾌ坣⻯괍鎬椄⤊ퟔ碚鍜Ã煩녆췄뤛턵�鸨䃻麽◢魛浕�䶑⾂⮟鉓壒沭巘�渘쀀瞑롢杭鍕흲⊲놫⨟槽הּዟꁉ�䕙蘐옸踕孵꛳䯘끲✵畢�剭琹Ǯ垷⬙儧�珱磜塒⅋釩鹙밯⿕╼獧녬犬뒪㢃㻁Ɣ櫛ꀺ펲�㵑賂捡櫪禣ᱧ⛦뢈쟎⯪뒍⭽苁嬸꽢Ɩ䇎剃䯱�됟墹峃懝豣큺圇灅᪷誏网ᑳ࠭餛爃堅ﳖ╣薧헡퀬㬻閪꣬
મ嫷ᷱ銵繪彌㡥ṣ앹冀ꀾ麺⻦䁱ꨗ褫讼⑹盆権ꪖ㿪ﾸ글ﱭΨ쬦˅䧳붸�ṉ푪꿒ꖎ䎧클⚼齁鶴횯龸弎鬾㷡వ맑Ḡ꾆쇏멖熬阩鉑ꖃ瘀閔忀诸ᛄᄖ뉪ὃᯙ逅䀞鮥�뒵謱᭕ᎊᓉ혁榳⍑겭᮷ㆎ樟�ᆄፅ㣜즄ꪍ珽峩牸凋▂煣蚌壭㱾垛�蠑䖚驣䇀踀誆뛁増䆋㈍潆쀱앓띳∾顫借갌ꨔ䠶ຠ篦篛䕖咞릌菂헜孝㩖멥뛊�㡮緄肫퓱듚뺚繹쵛뺘Ꝯ풣趵䝋⃑騸恶Τ䂑䴝�ॼ刡肻㴸䭅Ꙝ걹뒢뎷䦈特薠⯬蔦帚ᅪ◅₱䌸뒒�峑衯嶼蔵
貭ㇶ䖉ᣑ꤆嫪裷整ﺂ⣲鲍Ύ㰨㒨�偑쳚関䡺螡俣䆖伔琣䥐ޠ峑娴럶ᯢ캉浩ᔓꨛ藦㯢퓇폤栵㯖ᦔꝒꂆ똎ﱬ굏ᩫ춝貝輑轙촘ᙷ柞麐㱶糌ঠꪨ궚姓鍩⃜䛋¹⏗碠它ñ挨敋䡼�㮀⮚뢆㛱ꪥ獪棛䫾LJ㳃貍鮚콴梿ҵ螝퀠攇䵐ջ誼䪓춨䇷峯酦岇澍繭ⷎ뻙满奱㍞汭虸쯃怑낑䃯鸞䘎뙪碡浬愞쨓絔陫߱疈฿㛨Ꮧᭇ㯜⪅躧䡍䴵ᵦ萨眻饆ຠ䮋㪿銍慎䭸Ϳᗵ㕳鿉ﴖ슛�ᣋ꛳䐘늢얛ⴷ쬕⬤鰋ⶔᓈ픁岺ᨈቔ䒷櫮ꎖ㖭ﶅ낵骴ㅑ飇슘毽휦耼
謠寐垌靫纚ꖫ䷚气ߗ紎㍀ުᨠ⽵騗ⱚ퉪㽄卸�荸퉕碵땬䶴炳→ꃈ�㽵퇖€ⵗ攘穢楽㰭ꭁ뫩㛼숚夡춡瘀叴酗斚㫃霡脃ቀ峑ꤖ䶋ﬥ蔰頛릊梺鴴ǝ擻ᢡ쌞Ĕ퓘�≏駆嫆㲳ꩁꕋ跨ቷ炆섁㾮ퟆꖺ藯ᅡꒈ想郦혝ꦥ蚥᥅ꍋ⯪幰긒竬≗叇ÿ᪄ꥣ쀈蛲蟍唼ญ쓻숇펖ⅆ㺆炌齚㵰訮⳥怼㕙镋퇚릃片㸫䜝㟅鿖ლૅ䙂䋥≹㮀殺쒶谭뗣陲Ⲟ韃繗存溛༝喭痐珍虜섛椌ﱩ㱹ꖟ琀乚�뎜媣ݍ�❳緱嘫ⶹ嬛햾풡�阨Ὠ癪넆羵
䦣⢖⮚陧꺨䁳贞牅켺꺉ꮴ㠻ℊ⻔ᭀ쁳䄵䤼榫ꫩ帘�⡨쇙ຠ뇲뾵⸐㶏涴漙똹틧疲ᎏ䭞잫梥ꮱᗜ藇촕榬檰ꆱ背䎇풑͒铔僮橽놯䧚᤹뤈䯅�ꕟ흐甋芡䈓ퟕ퍚恓谤樟꿓횽➻覇⏓掍颉컥猷⹝秃��踨扛叜畠坔잞䷢ﹶ뗕儛娂喎뤙긢䗚郰⃕敀�䷊瘀埔ꔥ내䨝㣾뇢诲㳣곴뜦䖩邏좶핎셦⡠퀃긨漢쨚╼ꔦ⼊ᮟ攅谧埤獅䦨耖䁯쐛僸괆씕ᶼꧥ纗망殲╞䪗前战ɘ⣯쥉Ĕ嗟�榑Ⱨ擤ꕆ岱磣㇆磡サ銹聁䵖鮉롄骻质욻䁉ɹғ�뀆
랖薈㌃༮궱⮼ꚬ᳤糯簏勔譸蹞櫌쳾�ᒛ㶶訊뗢敋藺憜폅₅⯽䁣垛⚹䕭䠣斜鸂ͨ詶鈩報蟙ॐޠ峑꜍떉暽싒퐘녷듢㌼䯢诋췻嘻䭅溛侥挄Ĵ凗㉜恵뿎㩹뇨뛆뇰鉱윫鿕핋咣冹咐싰㪀⣚⾬欖㭚쉝�ᠰĴ䖻議嵍�阘鬠ㇶ諤枽㣣櫃깒揙ᴻᨽ㪀⯚Ⓩựᶽ풉럈・賹빻啬篭鋆磙쭺덑䢌╮⩔墳ߐ䕫뉱멫龾즥徨ᡅ肍퓲礞ꏵ뱅郴䡝㙠犲띂倠攇煅龺괋ᚭ椵ἢ皼ⴼ潇䥛ꇕ횳䶣Დ蠬쵳瘀埔ꨕꝸ佑ᴖ옞爅蛑❖ᒧ忋欐渚ල낎钑㾸ꄣÍᑷ๒걀ᆯ
퉅몤렋큻괆罣䋂鶓쬣밻㎯ᩙ㖈舆䏪浮᭥ꮊղ埗ｖሀ늀㲌寲尅᳴ꏷẨ䖓큰菸퉙�⬜측植㝫�⮹ࣇ�挣Ĵ䣒⏻같㼋┕ꗝԢᖣ휣䜕ﻂ려跕闽ꃲ떹┇䄎輕羢ᯈῄ헵ꖿ㬠嵖佧ꕋꅂ嚻玕͞ÿ溑윟ퟹ䵋ં蘫Ꙗ◾䦛膱聙觡䯩蠟赵夗떶소�䑒섹ꃴ쭵掍哎糓貥鞌놑籔뭋仍䷣䓔籾㬸박譄ᗢ㳓뢳컕妣㗕옾Ⅿ외४繮斾塖甼ྠꉄ綹尋횿㧵躤騐灺窬璵胢訖衏뀿Ⴍ黆쑥沧䍽㛅鼶鹯娨㜠愴ʹ㮀⮪햎戼磰ᵦ텎㌃劰꺦竸
壳᧔潮责ꐭ呐촃琀劔似㯢ⶫൊ씺䵐츰㣧耂ꍠꀧ궨⃯ⶺ䫤液洸ꮽ螜ዾꘑଢ଼�좘㩮㭗ꎵ畱䒸챛뤻篎ݐ冦Ꙝ疯綯侪禲䈑শ㒨ᘿ彜ퟨ㋯먨△͘㣁ຠ諊ﯳဏ譸퍜ᣊ←뱯뭱ꬕ�绸䓱�䤖�ݐ䦵᧴綬쐓갋煏옚쥗ꝭ맞巛쑟붚徳䏚�䪐ẫ単᭾㈏鍭聐꣯늢즵ᾷ죙䎆컝ꀀ娍茫ꬮ碧튂哃먰㙝棕㣛㘵䥽刼魴ᔘ⇷褡䃩딝쌕磚垃ힰ폣璵ᎏ넃粴鮵㻽˱湉긻ꁸ鸎诫ᓏ慉⤂覷巯ୀᑅŐᑅŐᑅŐᑅŐᑅŐ䭉案萃ꗸ茨뉎蚕칂膤ᗵ坯廱ﺚ甜斊
摩ꭀ龎彖믄昽䯮덕髲쳛⥜遌㩲勻ဿ蔉䷀찣鿫玳�切ꎞ╥膯䢙爯༎巣衯蹩䬐⍹眀돢㑮៏䙝쾱阮娡Ď뺩腀픾涧᠃䷲Ќ쟰翛䌏쐍⚰跗ຎ�쐏勷뫫ꮒጬ�貑媏ﱉ꼥䷜쫦䎚㤹�굵濃䟤頶掱䐛᠇异殇ޏ읇�훌蹆ꜱ蟸뗾涣碧캾�煤ࡘ쐔㳒ᩗ꧈阦뼄ࡼ蟖⎨�쉧�࣎뤕碤䲳슃ᦐ否譴㌆쿁ꃒ웾埱㻙뿋醟叅ࡿ깈霅盛༵⥐歁缬見ꠐᶝᆔ뗚䖵탢亀탘綜眪㳓╝뚩瑹σꔍᰌ荢�飽ꛍ㡹돛Ȕ薚鳃쩛冮【꜇ꤢ녫้䏽㱣툶逆
鰁甌炫濸雄㳰缱걤쭯뜨헠펦幼�楧쎴ㄖ좳씸夀볖ꙓ囹툉♙檏Ᶎ坺ꨱ䯙㔻႘痍怛待슇ﰺ褓䵣尡啛跫씳燗眬⊒䊐ᦴ踀Ɣ꾭ﾨ萀䅊ÿ알ꯎ꙯滸滁蘘ݐ艺Ὃ쬘訉赋ꌵᬣ鼕ᒏﶻ侣Ł⋊䃂Ⲡቺ琄ꬢ㿪ﾸ글ﱭ馫Ø�膝ÿ䵌漍埣굒ꝵ砐줣Ĵꞇ졿ꪉÿ羾ﾐ謀ꙩ憏歚ⶭמⱽｄ礀콾ꇁ澴㴕宪ᑦꧻ绶轂䇸掔៸哹⣑ 轱痹憎刍亗蓱称켲㒦�ᰰﵒ욃�Ꮘ黩㙖ㄎ굉뇃럎鏼⯝㹛漴�鹇⍎偉窳뽓㲱띤ꗝ䥹号ﳬ鈊䫯深뿵玑霮弤棝⤲Ꮀ鉶⛳殁
鼦瑥镇瘎횃羹䔑잦晫꽭畦蘤ฤ瑅Ꮿ輭쇘뻒﷏돏僱ဿ깛䴣ఠﻧࢃ쌓ᑱ낛櫹路ꅮ킼ꓭ醷䵤쫫펜ᚏ孟笋㒙⊹ᔝ좠ᨕ㹨踨淕듕▯䉎齽䂁璂矍푊劧뱭ꖠ캀מ硨쒻紺苦ⶓퟄ吘㭄㚍⽽ퟅ祐쬳㲦왘菖ꤢ硚쑓匶뙹ꓫ潡胒픠鹬쟊띀粘哨쨟㺷輡ꏸ嗾宅譧妮椚이爨ꂥ䯩ꝳ싸㉭ｈ먀ዐ稨풁ｨ눇ÿ⦮䙍鼦鹏הּ蓌쨏璹梬鞨灚ᡕ䈀ᑸ⯯ￆꟷ�䎓ꄅ暍䧓鮳푏ᘤ싳⇧�䗯讴碮禖匡㙍쏷⌞◔⻳鎆Ｃ砀汖鿴堖쯚쒥讞⠆輪ⷭ녍铉諫펷
崼칪䷐䚦삊橆⭿ￆꟷ�䂓븛Ａ退�珽贵㣠ÿ铢充曾銠웗䚓집꙳ゲہ촃�웃鄖괈폧䄣囑Ԃ爀⛚斛괆宨띪歏锩䦙ꅢ⒁受╺몡芹㩳쒕二⩆벆ꥉ笸Კ雔涊�ᬈ䡊ꪛ纋ᴍ준蚦遲ｧ輀汵ᾭ�묕꿑蘮㶹䜅萇﮵ﱹ폨坈 鯽岥톽埼䊨묢䮓ޕ큀聦쓽먷鹆㫰蛈㧡㼇⯄̨ﶁ菆翢꒳됛ኣꨜ鿽檀뛔㉞⎞뜔欚Φÿ䮄뱈杔�枠殎낶䛱㶗᮴ꌮ䰨鿳接鬮﮶촺ࢦ赱䞞䈕य艸鄋椼Ⲥ漑탐�퓍幖댽뢼䢙砌⨝ᑏ鏊꯸硄㋘퉇ﮒꕆꕭ띋
ﶝ톭精慞蟻￬眀䃩琕뢫㾼巣畉팥蹯F勫詸᷶广賳᥎㦝鼃鉚ÿꙆ밀⩭瑜濝劜桘✞㏓㛶ꋒ먧΄Ꭽ앯䄙괜譿ﳇ穀﵇ﹴꎔ뭰䈷⽝⏏ﰅ熎㙋觫奒펥팝掕∇솎툯㲲筓踽熅뀵戾걶➟�羧鏟陌웗䚓집꙳ゲہ촃ࠦ⻥鿎멦ﶚ믧䆑蘱ܹ叩䣪ᘽ凥宊ᵈ㫰嘌續휑盡轤Ոﾺꌀ퍕�鑽ꗉ韇燤悊Ꮿ�뉌ꢻ圛熜ꏞ臗蝯쐖瘂ㆺ懇썑ⷡൾ嫞ͩ彷櫴�譧힞췬頮왡ᠶꀸ漉糯숈嗞겐ᰠŤ毠㽮藥�筸후㲐ᴰ〈뱿�嚃놢賱ᛓ〠䀔話舻령ꚬ
ꗀ㦚쀝痍徚㒋扇烟ᗄ掣좆ㄝ⁕㳓歝踙琙䚴ᛪ唌붆︤䝳ឤ珎櫶蜀띏벑갻ᗞᰫ铤甄긙솟៊뛁ಠ燖糓浞쾾槧䦞�᳤ꅓ벍᠂㑮賔ԌᰐՐਯ噩헺쏕䐅㲗⫽̍퍘ᶵ䵎卟袼䠾ᦉ쪇�Ṩ砦趤銎䍒厗셯莪髁ꉯÿⷠ䔀磣렢瓗䗍濤鎰觌軛溵Ἵ륀랹�㬍㸔櫮髄訯뎥긖出ಀ㘄ૼ榭忡堑◌嶷ᰥ≴ꗟ؈�裯ൗﭽ⺸祐띲N촘씷헚ﺭꚹ棃棞ఒ⌇岽㓔ᐿ裪꧴�꠸裏십蚈뮒䙎鶴ݐώ뗺嗺砝쑿쏽Ṙ赏䮇㮽ﳾ䦚밭⩩鈔䷧㱥怐〴�倄⠼컟鮹㤛簯꼿ࡁ찻䂬쐞
龾뱘➨ᇓ먿Ⴐ뀩繩딭ꗋ쒖栝腺ⷛ級ᔎ풺ञ癑Ꮙ刹툏碯亃늲䟰悗쉋柒봧漾컳酦舴뎟ꭵꎏ그䗭䦻颥䑇ﰶِꎶफ़慨㌟恛︁燭ᬾ튰䤟꿲ݵ骷ꬼ컆ꆮ뱭表渑悠␏巖蓇䆼㥵撚᧒勏舘퓑غꎳ�ﯯ됤墨稾좓瞫⩾困餣博�紬䠪�䔗ᛓ挜荠ꆊ萟枤춀耚뤪⏒늎ῧ皍ㄈ볠퍿ﺷ壋䚇凱ᚵ⒯㿻㼕볘绲ꛑ磹럛㣈蜖츖噵虥챍啝ÿ㳉⼩㊕趼턎Ꭸ癤�툤Ꮦ˼⨎应휒釠㒞ϒ強櫴촀㥛䐗噢曹恧戵쏂뭁⋒뗳刦ٔ릌㻈춘썬碦�
쯰⒦ﰼຂ㬫ჾ篽뵼縣齳瞳Π盅혶㙺澇鍫�뤍열㝷뛩㔉淃⢌嗾췊䤣튤揝䀹ﭠꊦ뛪೫雷ᐡ薃誈껭阅렿⋃㾝觺�젵槃䣣䠡⛷憜뇱ᬄ㮽︇骘蜀ꫀ됿䌵憐橬冴뼴甐흸ὠࣸ㚫柺궋�됉쯈놜ࡘ㍍짅흴⸫➖뱿䟾耦砪嘣통멠뗓ᘗꓳ�㝾䴂歉㲞阗顠䀡장楂�ꌞ餧㑴ᾙ웻髟斳侷쮏鞴襋ᙽ倌㬖≾侸묌㡣煰陋㝞ÿ붟︻髼꽝盒췜⩧Ὧ焬栐池硘䮯슇춨ꬺ㢬쿲컞⬽᪖픽臇�텾頹㤦燚汗◼䶯ѯ㷆瀫赑臨똵밬Ⅴ藲鯆簛貃셐瘘ᨖ혅蚐䥭⮗貆쾹᧓
ẫ넫늷瓐慲鄗㿣ཚ㿓ᯩ鳳髽춯툸㑩䢷擈ฆ璄䞠ꥇ醭싑遟⨠✁炵칦ሽ�㯃ꋡ묍굨鶫씻烷渘팦谤ÿ䀋呱ﳬफ�ꑡ辣ᛢ퇼揔ꭴﳈ䭭䣻䯹�釣璺昜ꞹ槛⛬렱瑦Ǥ媟ﾒ䈀仱ꂦ㙞⺕渺캷똩㻱鎙�䑔寷偼疀液ꋸ軠멅鹔ᤱ⻱ﾑ崀ꔿ패尼촮鯗禦揤씹閹騤ㅝໝ豕⠝߬齪繱龕ம팦疝Ђ섍뀦齼༛篹뿓짯꺨帘拂龹鉌픳ɚEⱢꇫᙫꊩ᭟斘ᡬ溃⯚㽚暈ﴜᾔꯖ쑟ቖ陹䧃﹇런귦⾍ꋅ湞滣ÿ鰣ᩏ毤冚鼃嘴幊Ꞧ嶮ꭇ㕟䖺袍湛汅ꙏ멸䓦ꙹᷓ
草厥袿枯尓┍ῤ淄ꓹᒐ￤숀깍鿽衱い뽛騧䒛ÿ㞐㾈꯫䩿涽춦䫟鲍扭ꗈ䢏峱≉騤걚⺧ἄൌŏÿ럈꺥�웃鄶폧䅣囑訃쪗뿱﷼�惓앢�뿩긑톍곘ޠ脣꧉喼솨ᷢ䩣펰䱘仑鄥郓ả趵謞䯢Ꮯ襜鏅⢻쿜⨉냝뒉ⷆ瑦風⯵药͉帪譞ᓟ杍�갵ꠐ㜈൭䟅סẶ밼谖ᣭ虑ﱮෟ鏸鑑畋鏽輣毢驼�鱍斞榻빑뤱䁨섻܊㖉軓羬毲䜹��䲃痱늴抺蜼嘮꘎ꖃ듸쮠禦웘ÿ騣鼀뫁惢៩衱槣�䔽㛃뮦䰗出璜헼⮿ￆꟷ�䂓︕䔠㜤渺놡ᮞ獹
̠ᔸ啳廱⚗Ↄ礤ଓ鰚纶底㽫尙捆瑍䄽⊳蛰ҿ泾섁⋈ꗛī寂пⱚ䇊聻俛䵠㹺ꆖ쭴㽰飧嗾쿊踵둩䗇9鳁푘�셩G♹겘㕶빇⎕뢿筛ᾅ翚茺ﲿ헤䌍ﻃ픧欈틆憥뗐梾鸘퐑�푐�䉚뮿꾛婯ᄼ䎨�뮝ꯈ⪻뇩틤叢Ⳕ촘㱄뱕䌷⣻罎完䃳혙灷㸔⨀䑕k꼈뺨࿙