Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcocc_p&z_agenda_pkt_20220824 CAPE CANAVERAL PLANNING & ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY City Hall Council Chambers 100 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 August 24, 2022 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Member of the public may provide comments to the Planning & Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency (PZB) regarding matters not on the agenda provided that the comments are relevant to the legal responsibilities delegated to the PZB by the City Code and law, and not related to pending quasi-judicial matters which will be heard at a subsequent PZB meeting. Public comments related to public hearing Agenda Items will occur during the public hearing. The PZB is not required to take public comments on emergency or ministerial items (e.g. approval of agenda, minutes, informational items). Members of the public will limit their comments to three (3) minutes. The PZB will not take any action under the “Public Participation” section of the agenda. However, if appropriate at the discretion of the PZB, the PZB may schedule matters commented upon during public participation at a future PZB meeting. OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS A.Board Matters: B.Quasi-Judicial/Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Legislative – Public Hearings): 1.Consideration and Recommendation Re: Site Plan Approval for a drive-thru accessory carwash at the Marathon Gas Station located at 8101 Astronaut Boulevard on Parcel #24- 37-23-00-255 per City Code of Ordinances, Sec. 110-223 – MDM Services, Inc., Applicant. 2.Presentation by Kimley-Horne regarding the Presidential Streets Master Plan. REPORTS AND OPEN DISCUSSION 1.Discussion item regarding adding a mixed-use land use category in the Comprehensive Plan. ADJOURNMENT: Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, the City hereby advises the public that: If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the PZB with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not constitute consent by the City for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by law. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act: all interested parties may attend this Public Meeting. The facility is accessible to the physically handicapped. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in the proceedings should contact the City Clerk’s office \[(321) 868-1220 x207 or x206\] 48 hours in advance of the meeting. CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL PLANNING AND ZONING (P&Z) BOARD August 24, 2022REGULAR MEETING · ITEM # Subject: Recommendation for Site Plan Approval for a drive-thru accessory carwash located at the Marathon Gas Station located at 8101 Astronaut Boulevard on Parcel #24-37-23-00-255. Summary:This request is for Site Plan Approval for a proposed accessory car wash structure located atthe Marathon Gas Station at 8101 Astronaut Boulevard on Parcel #24-37-23-00-255 (Attachment 1). The parcel is within the A1A Economic Opportunity Overlay District (District) and is zoned C-1. A car wash is a permitted use in this zoning district. The application (Attachment 2) includes a site plan showing an 851 square foot accessory car wash on a .88-acre parcel. The parcel contains an existing Marathon gas station. The existing ice vending building will be removed as part of this project. The proposed structure is 15 feet in height and includes a single-lane drive-thru. The proposed structure meets all of the dimensional requirements of the C-1 and A1A Economic Opportunity Overlay districts (page C-2.0 of Attachment 3). The project area is located in Flood Zone X, which indicates that the area is outside the 100-year flood zone. There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the project area. Maximum impervious area allowed in the A1A Economic Opportunity Overlay District shall not exceed 80 percent. The project, as designed, will not increase the impervious surface of the parcel. As required by Section 110-221(1) of the City Code, any new commercial development must submit an application for Site Plan Approval and be approved prior to its construction. Section 110-223 establishes the process that must be followed. In general, the application is first reviewed by the various City review departments to determine its consistency with applicable rules and regulations. The application is then considered by the Planning and Zoning Board (Board), and a recommendation is forwarded to the Community and Economic Development Director for a final decision. Section 110-222 of the City Code establishes criteria that must be addressed by the Site Plan Application package. Attached is a Site Plan Checklist (see Attachment 2) that inventories the application’s consistency with the submittal requirements. Sections 110-567 and 110-686 and 687 of the City Code establishes landscaping requirements that the project is required to meet. In this particular case, the project is limited to the addition of an accessory structure, so certain standards will not be required. The landscaping plan included in the site plan set (pages L-1 & 2 of Attachment 3) proposes drought tolerant species as defined by the St. Johns River Water Management District, and is consistent with applicable standards. As the project is limited to the construction of an accessory drive-thru car wash, no parking spaces will be required above those that already exist on the site. Due to the nature of the project, a traffic analysis for the project was not required. Plans indicate that vehicular circulation will include a south-to-north movement. City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting · August 24, 2022 Agenda Item # Page 2 of 2 As the property is located within the EOOD, the project is required to meet certain architectural/site design guidelines applicable to development within this area. However, due to the nature and scope of the project, these standards will not be applied. Water is provided by the City of Cocoa and the City of Cape Canaveral is the wastewater provider as indicated on page C-3.0 of the site plan set. Stormwater will be treated via the parcel’s existing stormwater system. Note that City Code requires that the proposed car wash use a water recirculating system which recycles at least 50 percent of wash and rinse water (see Sec. 110-461 (c)). As required by Section 110-606, the Community Appearance Board (CAB) will convene to consider the proposal prior to the issuance of a City Building Permit. Should an action of the CAB require a revision to the site plan approval, a modification will be presented to the Board. On June 14, 2022, the City Engineer issued review comments regarding the submitted site plan set. th Materials were received from MDM Services, Inc. on July 12in response. On July 13, 2022, the City Engineer approved the application as amended. Attachment: 1 - Aerial 2 - Site Plan Application 3 - Site Plan Set Community and Economic Development Staff recommend the Board take the following action: Recommend approval of the Site Plan for the Hyatt Place Hotel located at 9009 Astronaut Boulevard. Approved by Director:David Dickey Date: CITYOF CAPE CANAVERAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION PACKET Application Sheet ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Payment Receipt ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Site Plan Checklist ........................................................................................................................................................ 4-5 Pg.1 City ofCapeCanaveral Site Plan Application -06/2021 CITYOF CAPE CANAVERAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION PACKET Application Sheet 1603703133 Date: 9212BTUSPOBVUCMWEDBQFDBOBWFSBMGM43:31 Address of Request: THE$719Nbsbuipo Name of Project (if applicable): S 320 FT OF N 516 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LYING W OF ST RD 401 EX W 40 FT PAR 256 Legal Description: TVOTIJOFSFBMFTUBUFIPMEJOHTMMMD Owner(s) Name: 2761OX98UIBWFEPSBMGM44283 Owner(s) Address: n{bnpsbAtvotijofhbtpmjof/dpn Owner(s) Email: 911.588.6911 Phone Number: EbjnjboE/Mftmjf0NENTfswjdft-Jod/ Name of Architect/Engineer: :65.538.4187-fyu423 PhoneNumber: QbvmEptt0NENTfswjdft-Jod/ Agent/Applicant Name: :65.538.4187-fyu412 Phone Number: qbvm/epttAnentfswjdft/dpn Email: Agent/Applicant Signature: Pg.2 City ofCapeCanaveral Site Plan Application -06/2021 CITYOF CAPE CANAVERAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION PACKET Site Plan Payment Receipt 1603703133 Date: $719Nbsbuipo Project Name: Non-Refundable Application Fee ..................................................................................... $825.00 Site Plan Extension: ................................................................................................................................................... $165.00 Site Plan Resubmission: ................................................................................................................. 50% of Original Fee Escrow Deposit Residential: O0B 1 to 3 units....................................................................................... $825 $ O0B 4to 50units .................................................................................... $825 $ 936/11 $ Commercial: ...................................................................$825 1/96: Total Acres: Total Escrow Deposit: $ Applications will address items listed in Section 110-222 (a) - (b) of the City Code. The checklist on the following page provides a guide for completing the application. OFFICE USE ONLY Total Escrow Deposit: $ Total Site Plan Submittal Fee:$ Date Received: Escrow Account#: 001-000-000-202240 Pg.3 City ofCapeCanaveral Site Plan Application -06/2021 CITYOF CAPE CANAVERAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION PACKET ThefollowingchecklisthasbeenpreparedtoassistinpreparationofarequiredSitePlan.Pleasesee Sec.110-222 of the City Code for a complete list of Site Plan criteria. Site Plan Checklist The drawing must be sealed and drawn to scale by an appropriately licensed design professional, no greater than one inch to 50 feet, on sheets two feet by three feet, showing the following site data: Siteplaninformation(General): 1. Size, height, number of units and location of proposed and existing structures. Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 2. Dimensions. 3. Total gross area and percentage devoted to structures, parking and landscaping. Yes No N/A 4. Number of Units. Yes No N/A 5. Traffic flow diagram to include total number and size of parking spaces and loading zones. Yes No N/A 6. Density (units per acre). Yes No N/A Location and dimension for the following areas (If applicable): 1. Park(s). Yes No N/A 2. Canal(s). Yes No N/A 3. Waterway(s). Yes No N/A 4. Boat slip(s). Yes No N/A 5. Parking. Yes No N/A 6. Swimming pool( s). Yes No N/A 7. Driveway(s). Yes No N/A 8. Recreation. Yes No N/A 9. Trash. Yes No N/A 10. Sidewalks. Yes No N/A 11. Dune crossover(s). Yes No N/A 12. Other (specify) Yes No N/A 13. Type of enclosure for communal trash container(s). Yes No N/A 14. Fire alarm and standpipe data. Yes No N/A 15. Vicinity map. Yes No N/A 16. Location of planned landscaping. Yes No N/A Pg.4 City ofCapeCanaveral Site Plan Application -06/2021 CITYOF CAPE CANAVERAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION PACKET Finishedgradesforthefollowing: 1. Entire parcel. Yes No N/A 2. Finished floors. Yes No N/A 3. Streets. Yes No N/A 4. Parking lots. Yes No N/A 5. Sidewalks. Yes No N/A 6. 10" of adjoining propert y. Yes No N/A Details, sections, and specifications: 1. Street lights. Yes No N/A 2. Water and sewer. Yes No N/A 3. Paving and drainage. Yes No N/A 4. Curbs. Yes No N/A 5. Storm drains. Yes No N/A 6. Sidewalks. Yes No N/A 7. Engineer's seal on drawings. Yes No N/A Square footage of building areas: 1. Living. Yes No N/A 2. Parking. Yes No N/A !Dbs!Xbti 3. Other (specify) Yes No N/A 4. Total under roof. Yes No N/A Required notes: 1. Sidewalk and sanitary sewers to be constructed to City of Cape Canaveral standards. Yes No N/A 2. Water lines toconform to City of Cocoa standards. Yes No N/A 3. Fire alarm system to be installed and connect to City of Cape Canaveral Fire Department standards . Yes No N/A Topographic survey: 1. USC and G.S. datum plane. Yes No N/A 2. Existing street lights. Yes No N/A 3. Storm drainage design calculations. Yes No N/A 4. Coastal construction setback line, where required. Yes No N/A Ten (10) hard copies of the drawings (24" x 36") must be submitted with the application as well as in electronic format (.pdf). Pg.5 City ofCapeCanaveral Site Plan Application -06/2021 *Issued for site plan review * * * * * * * * * REMOAL SCOPE O OR: DEMOLITION NOTES: EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES NOTES: EROSION  SEDIMENT CONTROL PER DOT INDE  N.T.S. TRACIN PAD N.T.S. DROP INLET N.T.S. DAIMIAN D. LESLIE, P.E. FL REG # 73113 LEEND: REMOAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"21147 : EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS TO BE REMOVED TEMPORAR CONSTRCTION ENCIN SCALE: N.T.S. G.C. SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. G.C. SHALL VERIFY THE DEPTH AND LOCATION OF THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERAL PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. G.C. SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OF FINDINGS AND DISCREPANCIES. G.C. SHALL COORDINATE ANY REWORK OF ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER LINES WITH THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. SITE: ZONING DATA (CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL CODE OF ORDINANCES) 8101 ASTRONAUT BLVD, CAPE CANAVERAL FL 33324 SITE ADDRESS: FOLIO NO:24-37-23-00-255 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 11 (ABBREVIATED) SOUTH 320 FT OF NORTH 516 FT OF NW OF NW LYING WEST OF 44 ST RD 401 EX WEST 40 FT OF PARCEL 256 MAP LOCATION PROPERTY OWNER:SUNSHINE GASOLINE DISTRIBUTORS INC MAILING ADDRESS: 1650 NW 87 AVE MIAMI FL 33172 0.88 ACRE GROSS LOT AREA: BASE FLOOD ELEV.:FLOOD ZONE "X" PROPERTY USE:1130 - CONVENIENCE STORE WITH GAS PUMP ZONING DISTRICT:C-1 - COMMERCIAL BLDG HEIGHT: 15'-0" AREA% OF SITE BUILDING:1,943 S.F. 5.23% CANOPY: 1,296 S.F.3.49% 2.29% CARWASH:851 S.F. REQUIRED / ALLOWED PROVIDED / PROPOSED FRONT 55 FT (ASTRONAUT BLVD) 25 FT REAR10 FT 10 FT MIN SETBACK (Table 27-624.c.2) 101.9 FT (COLUMBIA DR) 25 FT SIDES 25 FT 166.6 FT (LONG POINT RD ) NOTES: DAIMIAN D. LESLIE, P.E. FL REG # 73113 SITE PLAN 21147 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" ABC311 WELDED TO WELDED TO POSTPOST ABC311 SUNSHINE GASOLINE DISTRIBUTORSMARATHON GAS STATION #608 8101 ASTRONAUT BLVD.CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA 32920 WELDED TO WELDED TO POST POST 10-20-21 JCC 3 EB #004857 (954) 427-3076 2 3251 SW 13th DRIVE, SUITE "D", DEERFIELD BEACH, FL. 33442 PLANS PREPARED BY: 1 ABC DAIMIAN D. LESLIE, P.E. FL REG # 73113 21147 G.C. SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. G.C. SHALL VERIFY THE DEPTH AND LOCATION OF THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERAL PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. G.C. SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OF FINDINGS AND DISCREPANCIES. G.C. SHALL COORDINATE ANY REWORK OF ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER LINES WITH THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. 0.00 MEG 0.00 SECTION "AA" N.T.S. MEG 4.90 AA 1 " x 2" sawcut 8 New 6" thick 3500 psi concrete trench, 4.90 reinforced with 1-layer 6x6-w2.9xw2.9 wwm. Existing concrete 4.65 4.75 16"l. x #5 dowels TRAIC BEARIN CLEANOT DETAIL Backfill disturbed areas with @ 24" c.c., drill & epoxy N.T.S. crushed stone (1/8", < 1/2") to adjacent concrete or pea gravel (1/8", < 3/4") CONCRETE DRIEA REPAIR N.T.S. CLASS "C" BEDDIN OR CONCRETE N.T.S. NOTES: DAIMIAN D. LESLIE, P.E. FL REG # 73113 ATER SEER  RADIN PLAN 21147 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" ZONING DATA (CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL CODE OF ORDINANCES) 8101 ASTRONAUT BLVD, CAPE CANAVERAL FL 33324 SITE ADDRESS: FOLIO NO:24-37-23-00-255 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 11 (ABBREVIATED) G.C. SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO SOUTH 320 FT OF NORTH 516 FT OF NW OF NW LYING WEST OF 44 CONSTRUCTION. G.C. SHALL VERIFY THE DEPTH AND LOCATION OF THE EXISTING SANITARY ST RD 401 EX WEST 40 FT OF PARCEL 256 SEWER LATERAL PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. G.C. SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OF FINDINGS AND DISCREPANCIES. G.C. SHALL COORDINATE ANY REWORK OF ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER LINES WITH THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. SITE: PROPERTY OWNER:SUNSHINE GASOLINE DISTRIBUTORS INC MAILING ADDRESS:1650 NW 87 AVE MIAMI FL 33172 0.88 ACRE GROSS LOT AREA: BASE FLOOD ELEV.:FLOOD ZONE "X" PROPERTY USE:1130 - CONVENIENCE STORE WITH GAS PUMP ZONING DISTRICT:C-1 - COMMERCIAL BLDG HEIGHT: 15'-0" AREA% OF SITE BUILDING:1,943 S.F. 5.23% CANOPY:3.49% 1,296 S.F. 2.29% CARWASH:851 S.F. MAP LOCATION REQUIRED / ALLOWED PROVIDED / PROPOSED FRONT55 FT (ASTRONAUT BLVD) 25 FT REAR10 FT 10 FT MIN SETBACK (Table 27-624.c.2) 101.9 FT (COLUMBIA DR) 25 FT SIDES 25 FT 166.6 FT (LONG POINT RD ) E X I S T I N G C - S T O R E DAIMIAN D. LESLIE, P.E. FL REG # 73113 LANDSCAPE BETTERMENT PLAN 21147 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" L-1 DAIMIAN D. LESLIE, P.E. FL REG # 73113 21147 L-2 SOIL TREATMENT: ALL SOIL TO BE TERMITE TREATED AS REQUIRED PER FBC 1816.1.6. TREATMENT IS REQUIRED BENEATH FLOOR SLAB AND ONE FOOT BEYOND FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS (B.L.). SUNSHINE GASOLINE DISTRIBUTORSMARATHON GAS STATION #608 8101 ASTRONAUT BLVD.CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA 32920 CARWASH EQUIPMENT NOTES: FILLED BOLLARD CENTER ON PARKING SPACES (TYP.) 3'-6" 10-20-21 6" REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT SURFACE JCC 1'-9" GENERAL ELECTRICAL NOTES: INSTALL CONCRETE FOOTING PRIOR TO POURING 6" REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB 6" BUMPER POST DETAIL ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE: EB #004857 (954) 427-3076 ROOMFLOORBASEWALLSCEILINGREMARKS PRIMER 5483-2174SEE ROOM FINISH NOTE 1 WASH BAYCONCRETENONEPAINTED OVER 3251 SW 13th DRIVE, SUITE "D", DEERFIELD BEACH, FL. 33442 PLANS PREPARED BY: PAINT 5524OFF-WHITE WH-740 WATER PROOFING DOOR SCHEDULE: QUANTITY T.REMARKS DOORHT.W.COREMTL.FRAME NOA21-0216.07 (VISION ALUM. HOLLOW METAL LIMITED), 1-3/4" 6'-10"3'-4"MTL.MTL.2 LOUVERS (POSITIVE  NEGATIVE) ROOM FINISH NOTES: 1.INTERIOR SURFACES OF WASH BAY TO RECEIVE "XYPEX" WATER-PROOFING. APPLY ONE SLURRY COAT OF "XYPEX" CONCENTRATE AT THE RATE OF 1.5 lb/.d. AN OPTION FOR THE INTERIOR SURFACES OF THE WASH BAY CONSISTS OF BRUSH, ROLL OR SPRAY APPLIED EPOXY BLOCK FILLER IN A THREE PART SYSTEM EPOXY, ENAMEL INTERMEDIATE AND POLYURETHANE ENAMEL FINISH COAT. COATING SYSTEM AS FOLLOWS: A.SURFACE PREP. - HAND TOOL CLEANING AND/OR POWER TOOL CLEANING B.PRIMER - EPOXY PRIMER OR EPOXY BLOCK FILLER DAIMIAN D. LESLIE, P.E. C.INTERMEDIATE - EPOXY ENAMEL, HIGH SOLIDS FL REG # 73113 D.FINISH - POLYURETHANE ENAMEL TO ALLOW ADEQUATE CURING TIME, WATER PROOFING OF WASH BAY CONC. BLOCK IS TO OCCUR IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF WALLS. 21147 CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL PLANNING AND ZONING (P&Z) BOARD August 24, 2022REGULAR MEETING · ITEM # Subject: Presentation by Kimley-Horn regardingthe Presidential Streets Master Plan Summary: At the March 2021 Strategic Planning Retreat, City Council endorsed the Staff proposed Presidential Streets Master Plan (Plan), which calls for the systematic redevelopment of each Presidential Street via a design process involving heavy community member input, updated environmental, demographic and traffic analysis and incorporating the latest in future-ready infrastructure. In Summer 2021, the City engaged the planning and design firm Kimley-Horn to develop, research and draft the desired Plan. Background: The Study Area of the Plan is approximately 256 acres including approximately 13.16 miles of roadway extending from SR A1A eastward to the dune line and from Washington Avenue southward to Grant Avenue. The Study Area has a population of 2,836, which is approximately 28 percent of the City’s total population. It also includes 1,674 households with an average household size of 1.69 and a median age of 54.3 years old. The majority of housing in the Study Area is rental (58.7) verses owned (41.3%). The vision for the Plan is to ultimately create a Study Area-specific destination that includes the concept of Complete Streets, improved stormwater management, safer pedestrian access, more efficient traffic management, and enhanced resilience against climate-related hazards such as extreme flooding and heat waves. The key elements of the Plan supporting this vision include the following: o Strong sense of place o Equitable, environmentally sustainable community o Connected, efficient multi-modal transportation This Plan builds upon local momentum to implement several initiatives and projects between now and 2035 that involve improving the overall sustainability and resilience of the City’s existing infrastructure codified by past City documents such as the 2021 Resiliency Action Plan, 2019 Vulnerability Assessment, 2017 Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility Master Plan and the 2012 Community Redevelopment Plan. The project’s intent is to create a framework that identifies planning recommendations that can be implemented and constructed as funds become available for capital improvements and as opportunities arise within the market for investment and redevelopment. This Plan is also intended to create a design concept framework for future above ground improvements in the Presidential Streets such as rain gardens, bicycle-related infrastructure, solar-powered street lighting, etc.; and only addresses underground improvements to stormwater and utilities systems in conjunction with the streetscape improvements. City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting · August 24, 2022 Agenda Item # Page 2 of 3 Community Engagement: Throughout the research and planning phase of the project, there was significant community member and stakeholder engagement that informed the formation of the recommendations and strategies outlined in the Plan. The engagement process included two community workshops and an online MetroQuest survey. In addition, a subsequent SurveyMonkey survey was virtually distributed allowing interested community members to provide additional feedback following the second community workshop. The MetroQuest survey was open from January 3, 2022 to March 11, 2022, allowing seven and a half weeks before the first community workshop and two and half weeks after the first community workshop (a total of 10 weeks) for community members to participate and provide valuable input. The first community workshop was held on February 23, 2022 at the Cape Canaveral Public Library. The second community workshop was held on May 10, 2022 at Cape Canaveral City Hall. The SurveyMonkey survey was open for one week between May 23, 2022 and May 31, 2022. Overall, respondents prioritized flooding/stormwater and safety and the two biggest concerns within the Study Area. Recommendations: Recommendations are centered on addressing the three key elements of the Plan mentioned above: o Strong sense of place Great Streets Great, Connected Public Spaces Great Places to Live o Equitable, environmentally sustainable community Create an Economically and Environmentally Sustainable Model Update Built Environment for Resiliency Update Stormwater Management Facilities to Reduce Flooding Create an Accessible Environment for All Users o Connected, efficient multi-modal transportation Create a Safe, Convenient Place for all Modes of Transportation A Framework Plan Toolkit is provided that includes specific improvements that can be utilized to accomplish the three Plan goals, including: 1.Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements 2.Roadway Improvements 3.Intersection and Crossing Improvements 4.Placemaking Design Improvements 5.Traffic Calming Tools City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting · August 24, 2022 Agenda Item # Page 3 of 3 6.Beach Ends 7.Stormwater Improvements 8.Resiliency Improvements The documents concludes with a series of appendices, including: A - Community Engagement B - Stormwater Analysis C - Recommended Landscaping Guide D - Resiliency Assessment E - Grants A representative from Kimley-Horn will be in attendance at the Board meeting and will provide a presentation to the Board. Attachment: Presidential Streets Master Plan Community and Economic Development Staff recommend the Board take the following action: Review the Plan and provide Staff with direction. Approved by Director:David Dickey Date: DRAFT August2022 City of Cape Canaveral Todd Morley | City Manager David Dickey | Community and Economic Development Director Brenda Defoe-Surprenant* | Senior Planner Zachary Eichholz | Deputy Community/Economic Development Director & Sustainability Manager Alexis “Lexi” Miller, P.E. | Resilience Engineering Services Manager Capital Project Director Tim Carlisle | Capital Projects Deputy Director John A. Pekar, P.E. | City of Cape Canaveral Consulting Engineer Jim Moore | Public Works Director June A. Clark | Deputy Public Works Director Kyle Harris | Senior Planner *Formerly with the City Kimley-Horn and Associates Kelley Klepper, AICP Brian Ashby, P.E. Colleen McGue, AICP Macy Falcon, AICP Mike Vaudo, AICP Lindsay Slautterback, AICP Monet MooreCharlie Johnson, PLA Chad DavisSteve Romano, P.E. Alyssa FlandermeyerTrevor Poole Alexa Sikoryak THANK YOU from your Kimley-Horn Team! The City of Cape Canaveral Presidential Streets Master Plan is the direct result of a collaborative process and guided the development of this Plan. Everyone’s time, input, and energy are greatly appreciated. pg. i TABLE OF Contents ............................................................................................................................................................2 Community Engagement ....................................................................................................................................20 ...............................................................................................................................................42 ..........................................................................................................................................................74 ............................................................................................................................................................83 ..................................................................................................................................................................84 TABLE OF Tables .....................................................................................................................................75 ...........................................................................77 .........................................................78 .........................................................79 ......................................................................... TABLE OF Figures ............................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................ ....................................................................................................... ...................................................... ........................................................................... ................................................22 ......................................................................................24 ..........................................63 .......63 ................................................................................65 .............................................................................................66 .............................................................................................67 ..........................................................67 .....................................................................................................68 ..................................................................................................68 ..................................................................................................69 ..................................................................................................69 TABLE OF Maps ................................................................................3 .............................................................. .................................................................................62 .....................................................................................82 pg. ii Section 1 Introduction Section 1 Introduction Introduction The vision for the Presidential Streets Master Plan (the “Plan”) is to create a destination that includes Strong Sense of Place •Creation of great streets throughout the Presidential Streets area, including shade trees and • •Improve and expand pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the area, connecting residents and visitors • transportation Equitable, Environmentally Sustainable Community • equitable use • • • This Presidential Streets Master Plan builds upon local momentum to implement several initiatives recommendations that can be implemented and constructed as funds become available for capital improvements and opportunities arise in the market for investment and redevelopment. This Plan is pg. 2 Background The Presidential Streets are the “core” of the City of Cape Canaveral, connecting the primary transportation residential area and include access to the beach and community points of interest. The purpose of pg. 3 Map 1 Hall, Cape Canaveral Library, Veteran’s Memorial Park, the City of Cape Canaveral Community Center • Resilient Cape Canaveral Action Plan (2021) • • Presidential Streets Small Area Study (2019) • Resilient Cape Canaveral (2019) • Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility Master Plan (2017) • Community Redevelopment Plan (2012) • Polk Avenue Streetscape project (2017) are eight categories of Action Items the City is recommended to take to improve resiliency, each of • Green and Resilient Economy• Built Environment • Natural Systems• Equity and Quality of Life • Transportation• • Energy• Storm Readiness and Sea Level Rise pg. 4 critical need of redevelopment so that a prioritization plan can be formulated. Several upgrades to the pg. 5 • Increase speed enforcement presence• Install speed humps • Establish a Neighborhood Alert Program• • • • • Vulnerability Analysis – • Public Engagement – engage and educate the public on identifying and mitigating the study area’s • Strategy and Policy Development – develop strategies for the City based on public input and best practices for integration strategies into the formulation of comprehensive plan policies for compliance • Economic Impact Analysis – This study recommended the City should obtain major intersections. The City prioritized projects that protect the health of Indian River Lagoon and provide a mechanism to reduce surge impacts. green infrastructure such as promoting shared parking and reducing minimum number of parking spaces requirements, developing, and implementing a program to help businesses their property more resilient and sustainable, and updating its Comprehensive Plan to include goals, objectives, and policies to address sea pg. 6 connectivity, and help plan for a more active, healthy, safe and enjoyable pedestrian friendly City. • • • • • • • residents pg. 7 The Envision Cape Canaveral process, the Finding of conditions and assignment (delegation) of certain County items, the City established a community redevelopment area for the purposes of reinvesting tax generated funds into a targeted portion of the City. The Community a series of goals and initiatives. The CRP turns those Agency (CRA) to support local businesses and promote and projects recommended in the CRP for public • • • • • This project examined the Polk Avenue corridor bounded access point to the east from an overall “movement” of people and vehicles perspective. The focus of the project corridor, and options near the beach ending point. Key Figure 4 include a shared use path, pedestrian plaza, and an option to recommendations for this Plan. pg. 8 What Makes this Plan Unique? This Presidential Streets Master Plan builds upon local momentum to implement several initiatives recommendations that can be implemented and constructed as funds become available for capital improvements, and opportunities arise in the market for investment and redevelopment. This Plan is management, and resiliency. 1. 5. 2. 6. Beach Ends 3. Intersection and Crossing Improvements7. 4. Placemaking Design Improvements8. Resiliency Improvements According to the University of Florida Bureau or Economic and Business Research (BEBR), the estimate decrease from the recorded U.S. Census Bureau population as of April 1, 2020 of 9,972. Utilizing ArcGIS Business Analyst Esri data and the U.S. Census Bureau data for the Presidential Streets Study Area demographics of the Presidential Streets area. pg. 9 2,83654.31,674 $37,152 POPULATIONMEDIAN AGEHOUSEHOLDS MEDIAN DISPOSABLE INCOME 2,800 2,700 2,600 WHITE COLLAR 55% BLUE COLLAR 23% $43,347 SERVICES 2.3% MEDIAN UNEMPLOYMENT HOUSEHOLD 23% RATE INCOME pg. 10 8% 65% 27% 65+ 21.6% MILLENNIAL 22.3% GENERATION X M X 9.4% GREATEST GEN 9.4% GENERATION Z Z 35% BABY BOOMER 2.2% ALPHA B A pg. 11 Housing coastal nature of the area and proximity to beaches. According to the data, the majority of housing is 41.3% OWN 58.7% RENT Mortgage Indicators $7,239 24.1% SPENT ON MORTGAGE INCOME SPENT AND BASICSON MORTGAGE pg. 12 pg. 13 to provide incremental changes and improvements based on this and other Plans. The predominate Map 2 pg. 14 pg. 15 on by private property (including but not limited to mailboxes and landscaping), inconsistency in stop these site visits demonstrating some of these constraints. pg. 16 Desktop Audit longitudinal and transverse cracking than pavement outside of intersections. conditions combine to create an inconvenient and, at times, hazardous environment for pedestrians. surface. The City has installed racks throughout the project area, including at the beach and functional accent to the streetscape and create a sense of place. From a streetscape and placemaking street, so implementation infrastructure has been challenging and inconsistent. Additionally, there is a general lack of street trees, as landscaping. pg. 17 Section 2 Community Engagement pg. 20 pg. 18 pg. 19 Community Engagement Community Workshop #1 community (provided in • Understand the community’s visions and values, • Identify community priorities, and • Inform recommendations and design alternatives. This activity captured existing sentiments and future hopes for the priorities. thoughtful and concise, describing the Presidential “irregular”, “shabby”, and more. Participants described “beautiful”, “revitalized”, and “safe”. pg. 20 participants to the study area and provided visual representation of the community. received the greatest “concentration” of dots (i.e., comments). pg. 21 improvements. During the Money Madness exercise, participants improvement categories. The categories included bicycle facilities, infrastructure, beach access, and parking. “Cape Canaveral cash” and could spend • Bicycle Facilities • Streetscape Improvements • Safer Intersections • • • • Parking • Beach Access The participants prioritized Flooding Improvements and • • • • • • • • pg. 22 the public on the project and planning process. pg. 23 (Figure 8). 30% Related to Safety 640 25%Related to Shade Trees Comments 45% pg. 24 Community Workshop #2 for this Plan. to the community to gather feedback. The locations of existing conditions, the cause for concern, and a LocationConcern Flooding and poor pedestrian facilities N. Atlantic Avenue and Tyler AvenuePedestrian Safety Magnolia Avenue and Tyler Avenue Fillmore Avenue management Poinsetta Avenue connectivity report provided similar information on the existing conditions of the Study Area. Code. The questions could be accessed via a mobile phone or computer and a total of 19 participants evaluation (program). pg. 25 1) 2) 3) pg. 26 4) 5) pg. 27 6) 7) pg. 28 8) a. Raised intersectione. b. f. Shade trees c. g. d. h. Pedestrian lighting 7 Raised intersection5 Pedestrian Lighting3 2 rather than via SlideLizard. 0 0 Shade trees0 9) 10) pg. 29 11) 12) 13) pg. 30 on the above survey questions. The themes of the responses both virtually and verbally during the systems, and creating additional parking near the beach ends. Additionally, some of the improvements 1) pg. 31 2) pg. 32 3) pg. 33 4) pg. 34 5) pg. 35 6) pg. 36 7) pg. 37 8) pg. 38 9) pg. 39 10) pg. 40 •95 comments (15%) related to Flooding Section 3 Recommendations pg. 47 pg. 41 Recommendations Canaveral’s Presidential Streets Master Plan. This chapter, the Recommendations, focuses on the constructed as funds become available for capital improvements and opportunities arise for investment and redevelopment. Based on the existing conditions, the site visits, and feedback from the community path to success is provided. that achieve the community oriented goals community Improvements pg. 42 variety of potential strategies and actions to achieve the vision. These Statement Goals are to create a strong sense of place, an equitable and environmentally sustainable community, and one that is Creating a strong sense of place typically involves three key components – creating great streets, great connected public spaces, and great places to live. Each of these items are related and can be achieved •Great Streets generally meet the needs of multiple users, are safe, and include high quality streetside • Great, Connected Public Spaces promote social interaction, are accessible and inviting, and provide connection to key destinations. • Great Places to Live are memorable, have high quality infrastructure, are safe, and are vibrant community destinations. Create Great Streets • • Intersection and Crossing Improvements – • Improve safety for all users and the convenience of the pedestrian and pg. 43 Pre-Construction 6 Construction 7 “Making the Program Evolution 2 Ideal Real” “Making the Getting it Done Ideal Real” 1 The “Ideal” Pre-Design Phase Getting it Done Assign Relative 5 Value 8 4 Construction Documentation Use/Operations/ The “Real” Design Development (60%) Maintenance Identify and Communicate the 3 Issues “Making the “Making the Schematic Design (30%) “Realize”the Real Ideal” Real Ideal” Vision Create the Vision Create the Vision “Creating the Vision” Communicate the Concepts pg. 44 Create Great, Connected Public Spaces • tourists to the beach access point on the east end of the corridor. Additional information regarding Create a Great Place to Live • Intersection and Crossing Improvements – • Placemaking Design Improvements – and Tyler Avenue can also create a sense of place if community members are part of the design process. There are four important components to creating an equitable, environmentally sustainable community Create an Economically and Environmentally Sustainable Model • Beach Ends – Beach parking is limited at some access points. Creating additional beach parking improvements is on Fillmore Avenue. The proposed improvements for Fillmore Avenue can be used as a template for future improvements to other beach ends. • amount of permeability in the materials used during resurfacing and construction is important, not just Update Built Environment for Resiliency • Update Stormwater Management Facilities to Reduce Flooding • pg. 45 Create an Accessible Environment for All Users • Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements – By taking advantage of existing infrastructure near North • Intersection and Crossing Improvements – creating an accessible environment for all users. The Magnolia Avenue and Tyler Avenue intersection presents an opportunity to accomplish this. of transportation to travel. Create a Safe, Convenient Place for all Modes of Transportation • Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements – Avenue and Tyler Avenue is an ideal test case due to its currently limited features. • Intersection & Crossing Improvements – • Raised intersections can be applicable to multiple improvement categories but due to the excessive speeding that occurs near Magnolia Avenue and Tyler Avenue, this area on pg. 54) and “pinch” points (description on pg. 54) can be placed along Poinsetta Avenue to create a safer, convenient place. pg. 46 pg. 47 the area, and solve other raised issues. Many neighborhood concerns could be addressed by multiple successful Plan also relies on community engagement and support. 1.Pedestrian Improvements5.Placemaking Design Improvements 2.6.Beach Ends 3.Intersection & Crossing Improvements7. 4.8.Resiliency Improvements In order to create great streets, improvements are needed to provide safer and more convenient implementation in Presidential Streets, design can vary based on context (e.g. urban versus suburban), activity, create a more comfortable pedestrian environment. environments for pedestrians and motorists. pg. 48 R Having the appropriate speed limit on a street improves safety for all users of the street, including drivers, pedestrians, and bicyclists. In business or residence districts, the maximum posted speed limit must especially if there is a high degree of pedestrian or bicycle activity on the street. on intersections of minor roads. pg. 49 Shared lane markings alert drivers to the potential presence of bicyclists bicycle travel. They are sometimes protected by a curb in order to the other direction, and this change can have a negative impact on impact. pg. 50 Great streets must also be safe and convenient to cross and accessible for all users. Improvements that makes it extremely clear to all users of the intersection – including cars, buses, pedestrians, and bicyclists – that there are designated clearer and more noticeable to oncoming vehicles, thus creating a safer available space for street furniture and plantings. pg. 51 locations. parking, speed humps and speed tables. pg. 52 of public space available on a corridor that can be used for seating, bike racks, landscaping, and other amenities. C Minimizing the size of a corner radius improves safety for pedestrians reducing the crossing distance of the intersection. Raised intersections, similar to speed humps and speed tables, reinforce intersections are best suited for minor intersections and also provide an opportunity for intersection murals. speeds at minor intersections and are ideal for uncontrolled intersections. pg. 53 detect the speed of an approaching vehicle and relay vehicle speed information to drivers. support retail businesses. Speed humps reduce speeds to 15 to 20 mph and can serve the dual than speed humps. Speed tables may be used on streets that range from 25 to 45 mph. pg. 54 and green infrastructure. and bicycling. Street furniture can improve the comfort and appearance of the Street furniture includes elements such as benches, pedestrian scale and planter boxes. motorists to pedestrian activity. pg. 55 Green infrastructure can be installed throughout a community to provide protect biodiversity, and beautify the community. Some examples of green infrastructure include rain gardens, native Florida landscaping, also adding shade and aesthetic improvements to the built environment. A proposed planting list and photos of these plants are provided on the . pg. 56 suitable native plants for the Presidential Streets as these are appropriate and tend to be readily available in the East Central Florida Bursera simaruba (Gumbo Limbo)* Ilex cassine (Dahoon holly) Sabal palmetto (Cabbage Palm) Chrysobalanus icaco (Coco Plum) Hamelia patens (Firebush)* Myrcianthes fragrans (Simpson’s Stopper) Zamia integrifolia (Coontie) pg. 57 Eragrostis elliottii (Elliott’s Lovegrass) Muhlenbergia capillaris (Muhly Grass)* Mimosa strigillosa (Sunshine Mimosa) Salvia coccinea (Scarlet Sage) Spartina patens (Cordgrass) points that are not experienced in other areas of the Study Area, accessibility and resiliency surfaced as major concerns at the Beach Ends. To assist in solving those concerns, the Plan suggests the There is a suggested need for additional parking at the beach ends as any construction. There are also options to construct additional parking near existing park areas and beach ends. pg. 58 electric scooters, electric bicycles, and automated vehicles creates better connectivity to the beach ends. This tool compliments the parking tool if located in close proximity to one another. Creating additional parking for bicycles also creates better connectivity to the Beach Ends. Bicycle racks or stations can also be forms of art that need to be protected in order for the area to become more resilient. This can be accomplished through fencing certain areas, providing pg. 59 beach ends. •A portion of Canaveral Basin •International Basin •Center Street Basin • • •Construction plans and drainage report for Canaveral City Park pg. 60 Please see • • • • • coordinate resource distribution and services before, during, or after a natural hazard event. D basis. This Assessment is considered a foundational aspect for implementing solutions that mitigate . 1. Elevating and Undergrounding Critical Facilities 2. 3. Promoting Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity 4. 5. 6. Identifying Appropriate Green Infrastructure that can be implemented and constructed as funds become available for capital improvements and opportunities arise in the market for investment and redevelopment. Based on the existing conditions, Map 3 may be replicated in other portions of the Presidential Streets. pg. 61 pg. 62 Concern: Flooding and poor pedestrian facilities Workshop/Survey Feedback: vehicles and utility poles. •Raised intersection• ••Shade trees •• ••Solar lighting Figure 9 Figure 10 intersection art. pg. 63 Concern: Pedestrian safety Workshop/Survey Feedback: and the crossings are unsafe. This location is prone to speeding vehicles. ••Solar lighting for bus shelter ••Pedestrian lighting •Green infrastructure• on opposite side of N. Atlantic Ave •Shade trees and other landscaping pg. 64 Concern: management Workshop/Survey Feedback: increase pedestrian safety. See Figure 11 for an example of bulb outs and pedestrian art integrated •Raised intersection • permeability • •Pedestrian lighting • •Bulb outs pg. 65 Concern: Workshop/Survey Feedback: lighting, speeding vehicles, and the need for more shade trees. Figure 12 Figure 13 permeable pavement and adding benches, bicycle parking, and shade trees. ••Shade trees, rain garden bulb outs, pervious curb • • • • beach pg. 66 •• beach •10 ft drive aisle eastbound •Shade trees, rain garden bulb outs, pervious • curb • • • •Additional bicycle parking, benches, and shade trees at beach access pg. 67 treatments could be implemented at other locations throughout the Presidential Streets. OPTION 1: OPTION 1-A: pg. 68 OPTION 2-A: OPTION 2-B: gardens. pg. 69 Concern: Workshop/Survey Feedback: Avenue, Fillmore Avenue, Harrison Avenue, and Pierce Avenue. Flooding is a concern at the Avenue. • Chicanes and “pinch” points• Raised intersections • • placement of stop signs • • pg. 70 for the Presidential Streets project area and implement the vision over time. This Master Plan provides local economic conditions and overall quality of life. It also provides solutions to existing and future economic conditions by identifying redevelopment objectives and laying the foundation for capital potential implementation and redevelopment strategies to build upon prior successes and establish from the City’s Community Redevelopment Area Master Plan to further bolster not only the strategy but 1. Construct and improve public facilities and infrastructure. 2. 3. 4. 5. Continue to provide and improve recreation facilities and public spaces through partnerships 6. Incorporate housing revitalization through housing maintenance programs and rehabilitation services. a. 7. Establish a unique identity to promote the Vision of the Presidential Streets through branding and marketing programs. a. Streets. b. promotional campaigns. c. Support festivals, exhibits, performances, and other special events designed to attract residents and visitors to the Presidential Streets. d. Encourage consistent architectural and site design themes to promote a style or quality the Presidential Streets. e. can safely navigate Presidential Streets. pg. 71 • Flexible Zoning and Land Development Regulations • • Public Parking Facilities • • • • • accommodate additional landscaping. pg. 72 Section 4 Action Plan pg. 78 Action Plan summary of available grant opportunities for these types of projects that can supplement the funding sources. Vision and Political Will require a spirit of collaboration and close coordination to identify priority projects, funding sources, and implementation. Persistence And good fortune often rules the day given the lengthy time horizons for implementing a plan of this magnitude. Changing market forces and trends in community development can occur multiple times in Implementation anticipated in 10 or more years after plan adoption. pg. 74 Improvement TypeFramework Actions/RecommendationsTiming Intersection and CrossingRaised intersection Intersection and Crossing Intersection and Crossing Shade trees Solar lighting Intersection and Crossing Pedestrian lighting Intersection and Crossing Bicycle parking Install park benches Beach EndsAdditional beach parking (striping only) Beach Ends turnarounds Chicanes “Pinch” points Stop sign evaluation Beach Ends Seek funding opportunitiesContinuous ResiliencyGreen infrastructureContinuous pg. 75 Capital Improvements Work Program mentioned, these locations are project examples and the same projects could be implemented at similar intersections and along similar corridors throughout the Presidential Streets. Some of these are larger in scale and may require additional design and permitting in order to apply for grant funding improvements and or items discovered during the detailed engineering and design phase. pg. 76 Typical Cost for Implementation Project locationRecommendationNotes $ (<10k), $$ (10k-25k), $$$ (25k-75k), $$$$ (>75k) Raised Intersection Inexpensive and can be implemented quickly but temporary and gutter and potential drainage impacts and irrigation Fillmore Ave at irrigation irrigation irrigation Includes storm inlets, pipe, connect to existing Lighting (solar) Raised intersection Inexpensive and quick to implement, but temporary Lighting (solar) Inexpensive and can be implemented quickly but temporary irrigation irrigation North Atlantic Ave at Tyler and gutter and potential drainage impacts and irrigation Ave Solar lighting for bus shelter Pedestrian lighting per pole 40mph speed on N. Atlantic Ave across N. Atlantic to SB bus shelter Raised Intersection Inexpensive and can be implemented quickly but temporary Includes storm inlets, pipe, connect to existing Magnolia Ave at Tyler Ave and gutter and potential drainage impacts and irrigation Permeable pavers pg. 77 Pedestrian lightingPer pole Typical Cost for Project Implementation RecommendationNotes location$ (<10k), $$ (10k-25k), $$$ (25k-75k), $$$$ (>75k) Chicanes and "pinch" points Road resurfacing Inexpensive and can be implemented quickly, but temporary Raised intersections Stop sign evaluation Lighting (solar) Poinsetta Ave irrigation irrigationirrigation and irrigation gutter and potential drainage impacts Includes storm inlets, pipe, connect to existing Underground utilities (FPL) Cycle track (no separated curb) Striping and bicycle markings Fillmore Ave, One-Way irrigationirrigation and irrigation gutter and potential drainage impacts Raised intersection Inexpensive and quick to implement, but temporary Lighting (solar) pg. 78 Typical Cost for Project Implementation RecommendationNotes location$ (<10k), $$ (10k-25k), $$$ (25k-75k), $$$$ (>75k) Road resurfacing milling and paving per 100SF Fillmore Ave, irrigation Raised intersection Inexpensive and quick to implement, but temporary Lighting (solar) Additional beach parking Road resurfacing milling and paving per 100SF Permeable pavers Vacuum truck Bicycle parking, decorative Benches, decorative Shade structure, decorative Fillmore Ave, Beach End irrigationirrigation irrigation and irrigation gutter and potential drainage impacts Pavement for turnaround, permeable Lighting (solar) pg. 79 projects throughout the Presidential Streets for funding in the City’s Capital Improvements Program. • Crash data• • • have a large impact on prioritization. From this, Fillmore and Lincoln have been given tier 1 priority. for this area. The remaining priority areas to address based on the initial analysis are located in the southeast section of the study area. General observations on the analysis include the limited number in prioritization. Flooding is persistent throughout the entire Study Area. Projects that appear to have pg. 80 LocationFramework Actions/RecommendationsPriority 1Tier 1 Raised Intersection 2Tier 1 Raised Intersection 3Fillmore AveTier 1 4Lincoln AveTier 1 5Tier 1 Raised Intersection 6Harrison Ave and Magnolia AveTier 1 Raised Intersection 7Poinsetta Ave and Pierce AveTier 1 8Tier 2 9Tier 2 10Tier 2 Ave and Monroe Ave 11Tier 2 12Tier 3 13Tier 3 14Tier 3 15Tier 3 “Hammer head” turnarounds 16Tier 3 “Hammer head” turnarounds pg. 81 pg. 82 Conclusion In conclusion, the Presidential Streets have the potential to be destination that includes complete Canaveral. The action plan outlines the proposed investments needed to accomplish the overall vision pg. 83 Grants crossover improvements, paving fund, and corner improvements for ADA accessibility and inlet. In There are a variety of grant and funding opportunities available to leverage the funding that the City has listing is not intended to be exhaustive as there may be additional funding opportunities that can further state, and national levels. • • Streetscape • Education• Land Acquisition • • Economic Development • Design• • Planning• • • • A detailed table that provides funding agency and project category is included in . pg. 84 Section # Title Appendix A Community Engagement pg. 71 CityofCapeCanaveral PresidentialStreetsMasterPlan Building A Better Community Workshop Community Together The City of Cape Canaveral is seeking Where your input for the Presidential Streets Cape Canaveral Master Plan to design a path forward Public Library for implementing street improvements for 201 Polk Ave the community! Cape Canaveral, FL When Community Engagement February 23, 2022 The goal of the Presidential Streets Master 6:00 p.m. to Plan is to build upon local momentum to 8:00 p.m. implement several initiatives and projects over the next several years to create a destination that includes management, stormwater management, public investment, and sense of place. Come join the City of Cape Canaveral for an interactive community workshop where you can share what your vision looks like for the Presidential Streets network and identify ways to achieve it! Interactive Survey In addition to the community workshop, make sure to take the fun and interactive Survey to further inform the recommendations and design evaluation process for the Presidential Streets network: Per CDC guidelines: everyone 2 years or older who is not fully vaccinated www.cityofcapecanaveral.org/projects should wear a mask in indoor public place. If you are fully vaccinated, to maximize protection and prevent possibly spreading COVID-19 to others, wear a mask indoors in public if you are in an area of substantial or high transmission. Section # Title Appendix A B Stormwater Analysis Community Engagement pg. 71 Presidential Streets Existing Stormwater Collection System Review Prepared for City of Cape Canaveral, FL Presidential Streets Existing Stormwater Collection System Review City of Cape Canaveral, FL Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Orlando, Florida 148192004 January 20, 2022 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2022 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. City of Cape Canaveral Î Presidential Streets 4 ¡«¤ ®¥ #®­³¤­³² 1. Summary ............................................................................................................................3 2. Documents Provided by City of Cape Canaveral .............................................................4 3. Ridgewood Avenue Improvements (SJRWMD Permit #122353-1) ..................................4 4. City Park Stormwater Retrofit (SJRWMD Permit #140486-1) ..........................................6 5. Cape Canaveral Multi-Gen Facility (SJRWMD Permit #140486-2) ...................................6 6. Cape Canaveral Multi-Gen Facility (SJRWMD Permit #140486-3) ...................................6 Exhibit A: Base Map..................................................................................................................7 Exhibit B: Stormwater Map of Cape Canaveral .......................................................................8 Exhibit C: Project Site and Infrastructure Map .......................................................................9 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. City of Cape Canaveral Î Presidential Streets 1. SUMMARY ŷĻ ƦǒƩƦƚƭĻ ƚŅ Ʒŷźƭ ķƚĭǒƒĻƓƷ źƭ Ʒƚ ƭǒƒƒğƩźǩĻ YźƒƌĻǤΏIƚƩƓ͸ƭ ŅźƓķźƓŭƭ ƩĻƌğƷźƓŭ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ ĻǣźƭƷźƓŭ ƭƷƚƩƒǞğƷĻƩ ƒğƓğŭĻƒĻƓƷ ĭƚƌƌĻĭƷźƚƓ ƭǤƭƷĻƒ ǞźƷŷźƓ ƷŷĻ ğƩĻğ ƉƓƚǞƓ ğƭ ͻtƩĻƭźķĻƓƷźğƌ {ƷƩĻĻƷƭ͵ ŷźƭ ƩĻƦƚƩƷ outlines the findings and the information that will required to further analyze the existing stormwater collection system. Kimley-Horn has reviewed documents provided by the City of Cape Canaveral and historical documents permitted through St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) for projects within the overall study area. The overall study area ranges from Chandler Street (North) to Johnson Ave (South) and from the beach (east) to A1A (west). This area lies within the following drainage basins which all ultimately discharge to Banana River: - A portion of Canaveral Basin - International Basin - Center Basin The focus area ranges from Harrison Ave (north) to Pierce Ave (South) and from the beach (east) to A1A (west). This area lies within the following drainage basins which all ultimately discharge to Banana River: - A portion of International Basin - A portion of Center Basin Exhibit A ͻBase Mapͼ ķĻƦźĭƷƭ ƷŷĻ ƭƷǒķǤ ğƓķ Ņƚĭǒƭ ğƩĻğ ŅƚƩ Ʒŷźƭ ķƩğźƓğŭĻ ƩĻǝźĻǞ͵ Exhibit B ͻStormwater ağƦ ƚŅ /ğƦĻ /ğƓğǝĻƩğƌͼ depicts. From the SJRWMD permit research the two most relevant projects to this drainage analysis were the Ridgewood Avenue Improvements project (SJRWMD Permit #122353-1) (Section 3, this document) and the Cape Canaveral Multi-Generational Facility projects (SJRWMD Permits: #140486-1, #140486-2, #140486-3) (Sections 4 thru 6 this document). Information gathered to be used for further stormwater analysis: !ƩĭDL{ ƒƚķĻƌ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ͸ƭ ƭƷƚƩƒǞğƷĻƩ ƭǤƭƷĻƒ Λ{ĻĭƷźƚƓ Ћ͵ЊΜ As-built information of the exfiltration system within City Park (Section 4.3) Construction plans and drainage report for Ridgewood Ave Improvements (Section 3) Construction plans and drainage report for Canaveral City Park (Section 4) To further analyze the existing stormwater collection system, Kimley-Horn will require the following information to provide a recommendation to the City. Surveyed as-built information of the exfiltration systems constructed along Ridgewood Ave. Surveyed as-built information for the stormwater collection systems within the subject basins. Survey to include rim elevation, pipe sizes, inverts, and slopes. A drainage model of the existing conditions will need to be created with the as-built information. This will be used as a basis to show how the system is currently performing and how potential changes will impact the system. Geotechnical exploration to be required as needed where new systems are to be proposed. Topographic survey or LIDAR to analyze and establish drainage basins and flow patterns. 3 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. City of Cape Canaveral Î Presidential Streets 2. DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL 1. ͻcocc_stormwater_mapͼ źƭ ğ ŅƚƌķĻƩ ƚŅ ŅźƌĻƭ ǞźƷŷ !ƩĭDL{ ķğƷğ ƦƩƚǝźķźƓŭ ƷŷĻ ŅƚƌƌƚǞźƓŭ information: a. Basin Area and delineation (no topo provided to support) i. Sub-basin area delineations are not provided b. Location of existing stormwater inlets c. Location of existing inlets that are in the process of being improved d. Does not include structure information e.g. pipes, inverts, direction of flow, structure top elevations, etc. 2. ͻCoCC MGF_Conformed_CIVIL 2020-10-16ͼ ğƩĻ ĭźǝźƌ ĭƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷźƚƓ ķƚĭǒƒĻƓƷƭ ķğƷĻķ hĭƷƚĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЉ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ ͷ/ğƦĻ /ğƓğǝĻƩğƌ aǒƌƷźΏDĻƓĻƩğƷźƚƓğƌ CğĭźƌźƷǤ͸͵ ŷźƭ ƦƩƚƆĻĭƷ ƦƩƚƦƚƭĻƭ Ʒƚ ķĻƒƚ ƷŷĻ southern ball field to propose a future skate park and future playground expansion. This project also proposes to demo the basketball hoops and soccer field to the north and replaces them with a multi-generational facility. a. Project lies between Monroe Ave (North) and Harrison Ave (South) and between Magnolia Ave (East) and Orange Ave (West). b. Project proposes on-site stormwater management system with a retention area. c. These plans do not show the as-built exfiltration system permitted by Geosyntec on plans dated January 2015 submitted to SJRWMD (permit #140486-1). Need to confirm if exfiltration system was modified. 3. ŷĻ ͻStormwater Map of Cape Canaveralͼ ķğƷĻķ bƚǝ͵ ЋЉЉЏ a. depicts basins, outfalls, inlets, pipes, and flow path (no topo to support). 4. Photos of the existing conditions 3. RIDGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS (SJRWMD PERMIT #122353-1) This permit proposed to retrofit (17) existing stormwater inlets with exfiltration boxes along Ridgewood Ave. The project consists of ±6,600 LF beginning at Grant Ave and ending at Central Blvd, which occupies more than 16 blocks of residential neighborhoods. Available Documents: 1. Drainage Report by Stottler Stagg & Associates dated September 25, 2009. This report provides the design conditions of the stormwater exfiltration system and details the Ridgewood Avenue construction phasing. a. Results for storm scenarios were not included as part of this report. b. Pre/Post Basin delineation exhibits i. Basin delineations are a standard offset from the centerline of the roadway and do not model the overall existing conditions. ii. Design inlet information (inverts, pipes sizes, rim elevation) are provided as part of these exhibits 4 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. City of Cape Canaveral Î Presidential Streets 1. Stormwater model can be recreated using the design information, but it would analyze the design condition and not the as-built condition. c. Pre/Post Basin calculations for CN d. TC calculations not provided for pre/post basins e. Exfiltration system information i. Typical section, Standard detail, and total storage volume per unit. 2. Drainage Report by Stottler Stagg & Associates dated October 16, 2009. This report provides updated exfiltration system information. a. This revision upsized the total cumulative volume of the exfiltration systems from 477CF to 642CF. 3. Subsurface Soil Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation report by Ardaman & Associates dated September 25, 2009. Study was done to evaluate the existing pavement profile and soil stratigraphy beneath the pavement and proposed pedway to provide recommendations for site preparation of the proposed pedway. a. Estimated SHWT provided b. Existing pavement depth information 4. Phase I Construction plans by Stottler Stagg & Associates dated July 2009. These plans propose to reduce the existing driveway width from 29.5 FT to 22 FT and proposes an 8 FT wide pedway ğƌƚƓŭ ƷŷĻ ǞĻƭƷ ƭźķĻ ƚŅ wźķŭĻǞƚƚķ͸ƭ wh‘͵ 9ǣŅźƌƷƩğƷźƚƓ ƭǤƭƷĻƒƭ ğƩĻ ğƌƭƚ ƦƩƚƦƚƭĻķ ğƭ ƦğƩƷ ƚŅ Ʒŷźƭ construction plan. Aerial imagery confirms this phase has been completed. 5. Phase II Construction plans by Stottler Stagg & Associates dated January 21, 2010. Plans propose the milling and resurfacing of the existing asphalt roadway. 6. Phase III and Phase IV Construction plans were noƷ ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ŅƚƩ ķƚǞƓƌƚğķ ƚƓ {Ww‘a5͸ƭ ƦƚƩƷğƌ͵ Per the drainage report, these phases propose hardscape and landscape improvements, and demolition of the remaining structures which are behind the ROW. 7. 60% Construction plans by Geosyntec dated September 30, 2014. These plans are the 60% version of the construction plans permitted under SJRMWMD permit #140486-1 for the proposed exfiltration systems under the City Park ball fields (see Section 4). a. At this time is not clear why these construction plans were uploaded as part of this permit as it does not show any work along Ridgewood Ave. Further investigation is needed to determine if Ridgewood Ave. stormwater collection system is collected within the exfiltration system permitted under SJRWMD Permit #140486-1 (see Section 4). b. ŷĻƭĻ ƦƌğƓƭ ƦƩƚǝźķĻ ğ ƭŷĻĻƷ ƷźƷƌĻķ ͻ/ΏЋ hǝĻƩğƌƌ 9ǣźƭƷźƓŭ {ƷƚƩƒ 5ƩğźƓğŭĻ {ǤƭƷĻƒͼ Ǟŷźĭŷ źƭ ğ bƚķğƌ 5źğŭƩğƒ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ͻLƓƷĻƩƓğƷźƚƓğƌ .ğƭźƓͼ ƭŷƚǞƓ źƓ ͻStormwater Map of Cape Canaveralͼ ķğƷĻķ bƚǝ͵ ЋЉЉЏ ƦƩƚǝźķĻķ ĬǤ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ ƚŅ /ğƦĻ /ğƓğǝĻƩğƌ ΛƭĻĻ {ĻĭƷźƚƓ Ћ͵ЍΜ͵ 8. ͻProject Site and Infrastructure Mapͼ ĬǤ Geosyntec dated March 2014. This map shows the location of the proposed exfiltration systems (SJRWMD Permit #122353-1) in relation to the ƚǝĻƩğƌƌ ͻLƓƷĻƩƓğƷźƚƓğƌ .ğƭźƓͼ ğƓķ ƭƷƚƩƒǞğƷĻƩ ĭƚƌƌĻĭƷźƚƓ ƭǤƭƷĻƒ͵ See Exhibit C. a. At this time, it is not clear why this plan was uploaded as part of this permit and not SJRWMD Permit #140486-1 (see Section 4) 5 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. City of Cape Canaveral Î Presidential Streets 4. CITY PARK STORMWATER RETROFIT (SJRWMD PERMIT #140486-1) Submittal by Geosyntec which proposes two large exfiltration systems underneath the ball parks. Available Documents: 1. Drainage Report by Geosyntec dated October 2014 2. Permit Set Construction Plans by Geosyntec dated January 2015 3. Surveyed As-builts by Donoghue Construction Layout dated January 2017. Info provided for: a. AB Curb b. AB Irrigation Improvements c. !. 5ƩğźƓğŭĻ LƒƦƩƚǝĻƒĻƓƷƭ Α ƦźƦĻƭͲ źƓƌĻƷƭͲ ĻǣŅźƌƷƩğƷźƚƓ ƭǤƭƷĻƒ͵ 4. Geotech Report by Ardaman & Associates dated August 15, 2013 5. CAPE CANAVERAL MULTI-GEN FACILITY (SJRWMD PERMIT #140486-2) This permit modifies SJRWMD Permit #140486-1. The existing condition discharges the on-site irrigation runoff directly to Banana River Lagoon. This permit modifies the site to capture and treat on-site irrigation runoff within the exfiltration system, reducing the TN and TP pollutant loads. From DĻƚƭǤƓƷĻĭ͸ƭ ƩĻƦƚƩƷͲ ͻŷĻ /źƷǤ Ǟźƌƌ ĭƚƓƷƩƚƌ ƷŷĻ ķźƭĭŷğƩŭĻ ƚŅ ƩĻĭƌğźƒĻķ ǞğƷĻƩ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ ĻǣŅźƌƷƩğƷźƚƓ ƚƓ ğƓ ğƭ needed basis based on the operational needs of the WRF. The automated control valve will be connected to telemetry that will allow the City to open and closed the valve remotely. A control panel will be constructed above ground to power the ĭƚƓƷƩƚƌ ǝğƌǝĻ ğƓķ ƦƩƚǝźķĻ ƷĻƌĻƒĻƷƩǤ ƭĻƩǝźĭĻ͵ͼ Available Documents: 1. Construction Plans by Geosyntec dated August 2018 2. Drainage Report by Geosyntec dated August 2018 3. Surveyed As-builts by Donoghue Construction Layout dated January 2017. Info provided for: a. AB Reclaim Water b. AB Electrical 6. CAPE CANAVERAL MULTI-GEN FACILITY (SJRWMD PERMIT #140486-3) Change of engineer from Geosyntec to Allen Engineering. This permit reflects the design proposed in the /źƷǤ tƩƚǝźķĻķ 5ƚĭǒƒĻƓƷ ͻCoCC MGF_Conformed_CIVIL 2020-10-16ͼ Λ{ĻĭƷźƚƓ ЊΜ͵ ŷźƭ ƦƩƚƆĻĭƷ ƦƩƚƦƚƭĻƭ to demo the southern ball field to propose a future skate park and future playground expansion. This project also proposes to demo the basketball hoops and soccer field to the north and replaces them with a multi-generational facility. Available Documents: 1. Construction Plans by Allen Engineering dated February 2019. Please see plans provided by the City (See Section 2.2) for latest available. a. Latest plans revise the swale geometry and stormwater collection system 2. Drainage Report by Allen Engineering dated January 2019. 6 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. City of Cape Canaveral Î Presidential Streets Exhibit A: Base Map 7 StudyArea Focus Area ve A s am d A e v A on rs ffe Je ve A on ks ac J e v A n a n a h c u B e v A ln o c in L Miles 00.10.20.05 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. City of Cape Canaveral Î Presidential Streets Exhibit B: Stormwater Map of Cape Canaveral 8 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. City of Cape Canaveral Î Presidential Streets Exhibit C: Project Site and Infrastructure Map 9 D R G N I T S I X E V A D O O W E G D I R OR S LA NI A D V VA D NILASOR VA AILONGAM VA EGNARO VA ATTESNIOP C I T N A L T A N VA CITNALTA N VA C ITNALTA T C N Y L E V E XE ITSI R GN D Section# Title Appendix C pg. 90 Planting List This plant list is not comprehensive in nature but should be used as a guide in selecting suitable native plants for the Presidential Streets, as part of the East Central Florida Region. Canopy Trees Acer rubrum (Red Maple) Bursera simaruba (Gumbo Limbo) Magnolia grandiflora (Southern Magnolia) Quercus virginiana (Live Oak) Simarouba glauca (Paradise Tree) Taxodium distichum (Bald Cypress) Ulmus americana (Florida Elm) Understory/Ornamental Trees Conocarpus erectus var. sericeus (Silver Buttonwood) Cornus foemina (Swamp Dogwood) Ilex cassine (Dahoon holly) Ilex vomitoria (Yaupon Holly) Myrica cerifera (Wax Myrtle) Palms Acoelorrhaphe wrightii (Paurotis Palm) Sabal palmetto (Cabbage Palm) Shrubs Cephalanthus occidentalis (Buttonbush) Chrysobalanus icaco (Coco Plum) Coccoloba uvifera (Seagrape) Ernodea littoralis (Golden Creeper) Hamelia patens (Firebush) Myrcianthes fragrans (SimpsonÓs Stopper) Psychotria nervosa (Wild Coffee) Sabal minor (Dwarf Palmetto) Serenoa repens (Saw Palmetto) Viburnum obovatum (WalterÓs Viburnum) Zamia integrifolia (Coontie) pg. 1 Ornamental Grasses Aristida stricta (Wiregrass) Eragrostis elliottii (Elliott's Lovegrass) Muhlenbergia capillaris (Muhly Grass) Tripsacum dactyloides (Eastern Gama Grass) Tripsacum floridanum (Dwarf Fakahatchee Grass) Perennials and Groundcovers Helianthus debilis (East Coast Dune Sunflower) Mimosa strigillosa (Sunshine Mimosa) Rudbeckia hirta (Black-eyed Susan) Salvia coccinea (Scarlet Sage) Stachytarpheta jamaicensis (Blue Porterweed) Yucca filamentosa (AdamÓs Needle) Rain Garden Plantings Canna flaccida (Yellow Canna) Crinum americanum (Swamp Lily) Hibiscus coccineus (Scarlet Hibiscus) Pontederia cordata (Pickerelweed) Spartina patens (Cordgrass) pg. 2 Image Credit: Florida Association of Native Nurseries, Florida Native Plant Society, Florida Wildflower Foundation, Google Street View Î Gainesville, FL, and UF IFAS. Florida Native Plant Society Î Brevard County Plant List https://www.fnps.org/plants?searchtype=filter&zip=&county%5B%5D=brevard&sortview =form Section 4 Implementation Plan pg. 3 Section# Title Appendix pg. 90 Presidential Streets Master Plan Resiliency Assessment Executive Summary The coastal City of Cape Canaveral is no stranger to the potential impacts and threat of climate change. With a recently completed Resiliency Action Plan, local leaders and staff have a clear picture of the potential threats they face that could critically impact the wellbeing and way of life in this area; some of these threats include sea level rise, storm surge, coastal flooding, and day to day reoccurring flooding.The City has identified these threats and opportunities to mitigate the risk for all citizens.Building community resilience can impact nearly every aspect of civic life, including the implementation of sound public policy and good governance. As part of the Presidential Streets Master Plan, a Resiliency Assessment was completed for the core area within Cape Canaveral, knownas thePresidential Streets. Within Presidential Streets, this assessment highlights a Focus Area made up of a grid network, with six (6)east-west corridors (Pierce Avenue, Fillmore Avenue, Taylor Avenue, Polk Avenue, Tyler Avenue, and Harrison Avenue) and five(5)north-south corridors (Atlantic Avenue, Poinsetta Avenue, Orange Avenue, Magnolia Avenue, and Ridgewood Avenue).This area is generally known to have the greatest civic and governmental uses within the City and is primarilyresidential. As part of this assessment, an existing conditions review was completed to identify specific focus areas and outline high-level resiliency solutions that can be implemented in conjunction with or as part of other initiatives being completed by the City of Cape Canaveral. As noted, the City of Cape Canaveral has been extremely proactive in addressing and mitigating climate change risks, and this resiliency assessment is another opportunity to continue this effort on a micro scale. These initiatives are important for ensuringthe longevity of the City and prioritizingthe safety, security and well- being of residentswhile also continuing to prioritize the important status as a socioeconomic, multimodal hub for tourism within the Space Coast industry. pg. 1 Existing Conditions Assessment In order to identify resiliency solutions that fit the character and need of the Presidential Streets, an existing conditions assessment was conducted for a variety of resiliency related factors, also known as shocks and stressors, to get an idea of the overall risk facing this specific area of the City of Cape Canaveral. This was done through a mapping analysis to identify where these factors are located within the Presidential Streets, and where local populations and physical infrastructure are most at risk. The four (4) major themes that were evaluated in this assessment include the following: Critical Facilities The project team evaluated critical facilities located in Presidential Streets that are important for building resiliency and mitigating impacts when disasters do occur. These facilities include fire service and law enforcement buildings, transportation operation facilities, gas stations, grocery stores, educational facilities, waste facilities, government-owned buildings, public utility stations, and HazMat facilities. Flood Hazards & Storm Surge Risk Due to the coastal nature of Cape Canaveral and specifically the Presidential Streets, the area is susceptible to flood risk and sea level rise. Flood hazard mapping was completed to help identify areas that are most at risk and develop specific recommendations. Transportation Characteristics and Facilities Several factors related to transportation were evaluated as part of this resiliency assessment. These characteristics include evacuation routes, crash data, average annual daily traffic counts (AADT) and the location of specific transportation facilities. These elements all play a role in the resiliency of a community in that the facilities must be easily accessible and properly located. Social Vulnerability A social vulnerability analysis was also completed to understand the general need and the vulnerability of the population in the Presidential Streets when facing potential natural disasters or other risks. This analysis evaluated data including socioeconomic status, household composition & disability, minority status & language, among other factors. A breakdown of the specific data sources used for each of the themes is available in Figure 1. The analysis allowed the project team to identify specific areas where conditions are resilient and where there are vulnerabilities. This section will review the data evaluated in the existing conditions assessment. Based on this assessment, solutions and recommendations for focus areas were outlined, which will be discussed in more detail in the following sections. pg. 2 1 Data Analyzed Source Major Themes Fire Stations, Gas Stations, Government Buildings, Police City of Cape Canaveral, Critical Facilities 2022 Stations, Public Libraries, and Schools Florida Department of Transportation Transportation (FDOT), Evacuation Routes Facilities 2022 Federal Emergency Management Federal Emergency Flood Hazards & Management Agency Agency (FEMA) 1% Annual Chance Storm Surge (FEMA), 2021 Flood Event East Central Florida Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges for Regional Planning Flood Hazards & Hurricanes (SLOSH) Category 3 Council (ECFRPC), Storm Surge Storm Surge 2021 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Transportation Space Coast Transit, Characteristics and Roadways, Sidewalks, Bus Routes City of Cape Canaveral, Facilities Various Years Transportation City of Cape Canaveral, Characteristics and Street Criticality 2022 Facilities Transportation Vehicular, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Signal Four Analytics, Characteristics and 2022 Crashes Facilities Florida Department of Transportation Annual Average Daily Traffic Transportation (FDOT), Characteristics and (AADT) 2022 Facilities Persons Below Poverty Unemployed Population Median Income per Capita Population 17 Years Old and United States Census, Social Vulnerability 2018 Younger Population 65 Years Old and Older Population with Disabilities Household with No Vehicle pg. 3 Critical Facilities Critical facilities provide an important and invaluable role in the resiliency of a specific area. The appropriate location of these critical facilities and residentsÓ abilities to access them during emergencies or disasters can reduce disruption, limit risk, and provide critical and needed resources. Critical facilities include locations such as hospitals, fire stations, gas stations, government buildings, police stations, public libraries, and schools. These facilities are typically functional to some degree shortly after emergencies to offer any needed services or goods. In the Presidential Streets, critical facilities are located heavily on the western edge of the Study Area. No facilities are currently located east of Orange Avenue outside of Cape View Elementary School, and this is likely due to the areaÓs proximity to the Atlantic Ocean. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), critical facilities should not be located in floodplains and should be provided a higher level of protection. As shown in Map 1, critical facilities in the Presidential Streets are concentrated near N. Atlantic Avenue (A1A) which serves as the areaÓs sole evacuation route. This location allows for better access to these facilities, and from the facilities to evacuation if needed. Critical facilities found within the Presidential Streets include: City of Cape Canaveral City Hall Brevard County SherriffÓs Office Î Cape Canaveral Precinct Cape Canaveral Culture and Leisure Services Department Cape Canaveral Public Library Canaveral Fire Rescue Station 53 Cape View Elementary School Gas Station - BP Gas Station Î Circle K City of Cape Canaveral Community Center (C5) While many of these locations are identified as critical facilities for the purposes of this assessment, it is important to note that not all of these facilities may be functioning during an emergency. Many of the critical facilities outlined in this resiliency assessment were also identified in the Resilient Cape Canaveral Action Plan as part of a larger network of facilities in the City of Cape Canaveral. pg. 4 1 pg. 5 Flood HazardsandStorm Surge Risk Floodsas a result of natural disasters and inundations arehazardous as theycan cause significant property and infrastructure damage while also be life threatening. While all areas in the US are prone to flooding to some degree, in the state of Florida, many communities are located within flood zones that carry significant risk due to their proximity to the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico.The Presidential Streets Study Areais extremely susceptible to storm surge and floodingdue to its coastal location. However, there is variation in the level of risk experiencedbased on locationwithin the Study Area. For this assessment,FEMA National Flood Hazard information was used to identify the flood risk in the Study Area. Based on this information,coastal Presidential Streets are located in an area at risk for a 1% Annual Chance Flood Event. A 1% Annual Chance Flood Event, also known as the 100-year flood, is defined as an area that has a 1% chance or higher of flooding inany given year. As shown in Error! Reference source not found., the eastern edge of the Study Areaand coastline, including most of Ridgewood Avenue, arelocated in this area,indicating a significant flood hazard. In addition to evaluating flood hazards, storm surge riskwas evaluatedusing the Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes Model, also referred to as theSLOSH model. The SLOSH model was developed by the National Weather Services (NWS) and is used to estimate storm surge height. The categories displayed on the SLOSH model arethesame categories used on the Saffir- Simpson Hurricane Wind scale. For example, any area within a Category 3 storm surge areawould be potentiallyimpacted by a Category 3 hurricane, based on the projected atmospheric pressure, size, forward speed, and track of that storm. Based on this data, much of the Presidential Streets is located withinan area of potentialCategory 3 storm surge, with some coastal areas located in a Category 2. The western edge of the Study Area, where the majority of the Presidential StreetÓs critical facilities are located,alsohas some small and isolated areas that are located in a Category 4 Storm Surge, indicating an area that is slightly more elevated. The Storm Surge map is shown in 2. pg. 6 2 pg. 7 pg. 8 Transportation Characteristics and Facilities As previously mentioned, the Presidential Streets Focus Area is made up of six (6) east- west corridors and five (5) north-south corridors. The area has some multimodal opportunities including bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities, but lacks overall connectivity for these modes. As noted throughout the Master Plan document, several improvements are needed to create a well-connected roadway network that provide and promote multimodal connectivity. For the purposes of the existing conditions assessment, these facilities were evaluated on a very high level in conjunction with transportation data including crash information and AADT. This evaluation determined that the network is characterized by the following: Lack of multimodal (sidewalk and bicycle facilities) connectivity within the Presidential Streets. Transit facilities and routes are concentrated along N. Atlantic Avenue (A1A), the area's sole evacuation route and a main artery for Cape Canaveral. The majority of roads in the area are low-speed, low-volume corridors that are mostly residential. This excludes N. Atlantic Avenue (A1A), which is a major corridor with high volumes and speeds. Crashes with bicyclists and pedestrians are concentrated at major intersections, mainly on N. Atlantic Avenue (A1A). The location of existing roadways, sidewalks, and transit facilities in and surrounding the Presidential Streets is shown in 4. This analysis also looked at the criticality of the roadway facilities in the Study Area. Criticality is a measurement developed by the City of Canaveral staff to prioritize pavement and street repairs based on the needs of the facility. Factors used to determine criticality include the following: Volume of Traffic Presence or Absence of Four-Way Stops Presence or Absence of Traffic Lights Zoning Designation Redevelopment Potential As shown in 5, the majority of the streets that run east-west (Tyler Avenue, Polk Avenue, and Fillmore Avenue) in the Study Area are categorized as low to medium criticality, while all of the streets that run north-south (Poinsetta Avenue, Orange Avenue, Magnolia Avenue, and Ridgewood Avenue) have a high criticality. Streets with a high criticality likely have issues related to significant cracking due to aging roadways, cracked intersections, and weakening base materials. pg. 9 4 pg. 10 5 pg. 11 For this analysis, crash data was also evaluated.These crashes were analyzed using the University of Florida GeoPlan Center Signal Four Analytics. This crash analysis tool is developed and maintained by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and provides the detailsof every crash in Florida. Forthis analysis, crashes that occurred duringa five-year rangebetween 2016 and 2021were mapped, as shown in Map 6. These crashes include both vehicular crashes, and those that involved a bicyclist or pedestrian.Areas on the map highlightedin green have fewer vehicularcrashes, while the areas with yellow and red highlightareas with a largernumber of vehicular crashes. In the Study Area, the majority of these high-densitycrash areas are located along N. Atlantic Avenue (A1A), which is the most utilized roadway by vehicles in the area. Additionally, this map displays the . specific locations of bicycle and pedestrian crashes. Five (5) crashes involved a bicyclistand twelve (12) involved a pedestrian between 2016 and 2021. These crashes involve vulnerable users and can be more severe than vehicle-only crashes.This data paints an important picture of which intersections inthePresidential Streets are most dangerous for multimodalusers.These unsafe intersections include: Harrison Avenue and N. Atlantic Avenue (A1A) Tyler Avenue and N. Atlantic Avenue (A1A) Taylor Avenue and N. Atlantic Avenue (A1A) Fillmore Avenue and N. Atlantic Avenue (A1A) Pierce Avenue and N. Atlantic Avenue (A1A) Taylor Avenue and Ridgewood Avenue Finally, Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)data for the Study Areas roadswas also mappedin Map7to understand traffic volumes within the Study Area. Currently, FDOT does not collect AADT for local roads, and makes an assumptionbased on the FDOT Quality Level of Service Handbook that the AADT for these local roads is under 5,000.It can be inferred that these roads have a relatively low traffic volume, making these corridors generally safer for multimodal users without significant facilities. N. Atlantic Avenue (A1A)and Ridgewood Avenue are the only corridors in the Study Area with recorded AADT. TheAADT of these corridors are33,500 and 2,700 respectively.N. Atlantic Avenue (A1A)has by far the highest AADT in the Study Area.The main importance of analyzing AADTfrom a resiliency perspectiveis determining the needs for maintenance and improvements based on the usageofthese roads. The more a road is used, the more likely it is to need repairs in the short-termdue to the constant toll that comes from the vehicles utilizingit. pg. 12 pg. 13 pg. 14 Social Vulnerability Social vulnerability of the Presidential Streets area was also evaluated as part of the Resiliency assessment. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has created the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) to measure the potential for negative impacts on at-risk communities. The themes used in the index are shown in Figure 2 and include socioeconomic status, household composition and disability, minor status and language, and housing type and transportation. For the purposes of this study, the specific factors that were analyzed include age, poverty level, income, transportation access, disability, and employment status. Figure 3 below shows how the Study Area, which is entirely contained within Census Tract 685.02, compares to Brevard County overall in each of these vulnerability themes identified in the SVI. The area included in Census Tract 685.02 encompasses more than the Presidential Streets Study Area. However, since this tract includes the Study Area population it is the most accurate and representative source of data available for the purpose of this assessment. Study Area (Census Vulnerability Theme Brevard County Tract 685.02) Socioeconomic Status 0.197 0.2929 Household Composition and 0.2273 0.2892 Disability Minority Status and Language 0.3939 0.1114 Housing Type and Transportation 0.1061 0.4651 Overall Vulnerability 0.1212 0.241 pg. 15 In the Census vulnerability data, the higher the value indicated for each theme the more vulnerable the community is. The Presidential Streets neighborhood is more vulnerable than the overall County with regards to socioeconomic status, demographics and disabilities, and housing type and transportation. Notably, the value for housing type and transportation is at 0.4651 in the Study Area, compared to just 0.1061 in the county, indicating a major gap and potential for an at-risk community. The first of these vulnerability factors analyzed in this assessment is the percentage of the population of the Study Area below poverty, which is shown on Map 8. As shown on the map, the percentage of the population in poverty in the Presidential Streets area is higher than that of the neighboring census tracts. This indicates a high level of vulnerability for the Presidential Streets neighborhood in terms of socioeconomic status. The percentage of unemployed people in the Study Area is shown in Map 9. 3.2% of the population in the Study Area is unemployed, compared to 2.5% in Brevard County, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, yielding a slightly higher rate than that of the County. Map 10 displays the medium income per capita of the Study Area. This map shows that residents of the Study Area take in significantly less income than those in neighboring census tracts. The median income per capita for the Study Area is $31,862, while the median income for the surrounding census tracts ranges between $35,000 and $65,000. Maps 11 and 12 show the minor and senior populations that live in the Study Area. As the maps display, there is a higher minor population (17 and younger) and a lower senior population (65 and older). This implies that there are more families and fewer retirement aged people than the nearby census tracts. Additionally, according to Map 13, the Study Area also has a slightly lower percentage of the people with disabilities than the surrounding census tracts. This is likely due to the fact that the Study Area has fewer senior residents than its neighboring census tracts. The final social vulnerability map, Map 14 shows the percentage of households in the Study Area with no personal vehicle, which is 15.7%. This is higher than that of neighboring census tracts, which likely stems from the lower income in the Study Area. As noted, the social vulnerability for the Presidential Streets neighborhood is higher than that of Brevard County and higher, in most cases, than the neighboring census tracts within the City limits of Cape Canaveral. The neighborhood is representative of a younger population bringing in less income than other parts of the City, some of whom are considered in poverty. That said, this population is employed at a similar rate to the rest of the County, so their lower income could be related to lower education level or the industries in which they are working. These are unique socioeconomic characteristics for a Florida coastal community, and are unlike similar geographically located communities that have more wealth, higher incomes, and an older population. The socioeconomic vulnerability for the Presidential Streets translates into a neighborhood that may be at- risk for negative impacts, and should be addressed through resilience policies. pg. 16 pg. 17 pg. 18 pg. 19 pg. 20 pg. 21 pg. 22 pg. 23 CurrentResiliencyPlanningInitiatives The City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County, and the East Central FloridaRegional Planning Council are highlycoordinated in the planning and implementation of resiliency initiatives to ensure that the City of Cape Canaveral is ÐFuture-Ready.Ñ This ensures that Cape Canaveral remains a strong and sustainable municipality that is able to address and mitigate challenges that could potentially arise. Several plans have been written, adopted, and are in various stages of implementation in the region, which provide a strong foundation for theresiliency solutions outlined in this assessment. These plans include: Brevard County Local Mitigation Strategy (2020) Resilient Cape Canaveral Action Plan (2021) ECFR2CStrategic Resiliency Action Plan(2021) Through these specific plans the City of Cape Canaveralintends toimplementresiliency solutions that will positively impact the community far into the future and improve its overall resiliency, especially in vulnerable areas such as the Presidential Streets.The following solutions are currently underway as part of each of these monumental and important plans andare generally reflective of the resiliency solutions that will be presented later in this assessment.This list of plans and assessments discussed in this section is not exhaustive, and the project team recognizes that there are several other vulnerability assessments and guiding documents that are part of the larger resiliency strategy. Brevard County Local Mitigation Strategy Brevard County is required to complete a Local Mitigation Strategy, or LMS, every 5 years to ensure that sustained actions are taken to help reduce and mitigate any future disasters or emergencies that may occur. This can help ensure resiliency within communities throughout Brevard County. This document consists of a vulnerability assessment and hazard profile for each of the municipalities located in Brevard County. The City of Cape Canaveral was extremely participative and will continue to remain involved as the LMS is updated. This level of analysis is extremely important and allows municipalities the opportunity to gain a deeper level of understanding of the risk they face and the strategies that may implement for mitigation purposes. The LMS accounts for pre and post disaster resilience and establishes committees to take preparative actions. Resilient Cape CanaveralAction Plan The City of Cape Canaveral completed a Resiliency Action Plan in 2021 that includes dozens of actions to create a resilient and sustainable future.This plan was preceded by the Resilient Cape Canaveral 2019 Vulnerability Assessment.This Action Planwas unanimously adopted by pg. 24 the City Councilin June 2021and is representative of thecommitment to ensuring a resilient and futurethrough the implementation of actionable items, or Preparedness Targets.The resiliency solutions presented in this assessmentare consistent with the below recommendations from the Resilient Cape Canaveral Action Plan. Plant native and Florida-friendly trees and plants (Preparedness Target 10) Use Low Impact Development (LID) or Xeriscape practices on roadways (Preparedness Target 14) Cover all bus stops and illuminate via solar powered lighting (Preparedness Target 23) Introduce Complete Street design and install ADA compliant sidewalks (Preparedness Target 24) Convert 100% of CityÓs streetlights to solar by 2050 (Preparedness Target 29) Capture stormwater for reuse through stormwater chambers, rain barrels, or green roofs (Preparedness Target 36) At least 25% of new City roads, parking, and sidewalks should be permeable (Preparedness Target 37) ECFR2C Strategic Resiliency Action Plan This plan was completed by the East Central FloridaRegionalResilience Collaborative, or R2C, and the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council. This plan represents a collaborative effort by many different stakeholdergroups to not only identify vulnerability and risk in the region, but also identify goals for a larger resiliency strategy. Many of the goals align with those of Cape Canaveral, which is identified as a formal partner in the plan. Some goalsfrom this plan that are in line with some of the resiliency concerns in Cape Canaveral, and more specifically, the Presidential Streets, include the following: Implement infrastructure projectsto reduce heat island effect (Infrastructure Goal 1) Increase the implementation of regionally (cross-jurisdiction significant resilient infrastructure projects.(Infrastructure Goal 7) Decrease flood impacts across the region.(Infrastructure Goal8) Developanintegratedregionalscaleriskandhazardassessmentaccountingfor socialvulnerabilities,climatesensitivities,andfutureconditionsbasedonscientific data.(socialvulnerabilities+riskanalysis+historicalhazardoccurrence/future conditions)*mustsatisfymultiplefederallevelriskassessmentrequirementsand couldincludenaturalandhumanmade.(RegionalRisk&VulnerabilityGoal1) Goal:Developaregionallistofmitigationprojectsemphasizingalignment, interactions,andstrategies.(RegionalRisk&VulnerabilityGoal2) pg. 25 Local Resiliency Projects In addition to planning initiatives, there are several notable projects going on that promote green infrastructure and resiliency in Cape Canaveral and the larger region. The following two projects highlight examples of improvements that may be incorporated into the Presidential Streets area. Installing Flood Barriers to Increase Resiliency at Critical Facilities in Cape Canaveral As part of its resiliency initiative, the City of Cape Canaveral installed flood barriers in 2020 at two critical facilities: the Water Reclamation Facility and the Public Works Services Administration Building. While the City has likely installed more of these in other locations, this is an excellent example of making resilient-minded upgrades to address 1 flooding concerns that will result from sea level rise and hurricanes in the future. Minutemen Stormwater and Streetscape Improvements in Cocoa Beach Cocoa Beach offers an example for using green infrastructure techniques to address resiliency and conservation issues faced by a community. This project installed urban planters, rain gardens, tree wells, exfiltration vaults and permeable pavers to allow stormwater runoff to mimic the natural water cycle, remove nutrients from the water, and return it back to the Banana River Lagoon. This provides an excellent local example of opportunities for treating stormwater and incorporating it back into the natural ecosystem 2 without causing adverse impacts. 1 Eichholz, Z. (2021, May 26). City of Cape Canaveral Installs New Flood Barriers to Increase Resilience at Critical Facilities. Preferred Governmental Insurance Trust. (https://pgit.org/city-of-cape-canaveral- installs-new-flood-barriers-to-increase-resilience-at-critical-facilities/) 2 Florida Department of Environmental Protection (2017, August 2). DEP Celebrates Completion of Minutemen Stormwater and Streetscape Improvement Project in Cocoa Beach. Press Release. (https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/FLDEP/bulletins/1ac80ed) pg. 26 Resiliency Solutions Based on the existing conditions and current initiatives taking place in the Study Area and in the larger City of Cape Canaveral, several broad resiliency solutions were identified that fit into the overall resiliency strategy but are specific to the Presidential Streets. These solutions are intended to provide a general framework for initiatives that can be incorporated into future and planned projects as part of a larger resilience strategy already in place. These solutions are general suggestions and should be incorporated on a case- by-case basis where and when appropriate, but should be heavily focused on the following five (5) focus areas that were identified within the Presidential Streets based on the desktop analysis and community feedback via the surveys and workshops: ¤ Focus Area 1: Fillmore Avenue ¤ Focus Area 2: Poinsettia Avenue ¤ Focus Area 3: Magnolia Avenue and Tyler Avenue Intersection ¤ Focus Area 4: N. Atlantic Avenue (A1A) and Tyler Avenue Intersection ¤ Focus Area 5: Fillmore Avenue and Ridgewood Avenue Intersection These resiliency solutions include a short description, the solutionÓs priority for implementation, the identified responsible agency, and the general cost range to implement the identified objectives. Figure 4 below can be considered a key and identifies the different ranges that may be encountered on the following solution pages. Priority Priorities may be low, medium, or high Focus Areas for Implementation 1, 2, 3, 4 and/or 5 Any identified local agency that may be applicable. This typically will include the municipality and/or Responsibility county as primarily responsible. Other partners may be identified in the future. These estimates are planning level cost estimates and are not associated with any other plan. They are intended to be general ranges solely for the purposes of this assessment: Cost $ - $0 to $50,000 $$ - $50,000 to $250,000 $$$ - $250,000 to $500,000 $$$$ - $500,000+ pg. 27 Solution 1: Elevating and Undergrounding Critical Facilities& Utilities Priority:Low Focus Areas for Implementation: All Responsibility:City of Cape Canaveral,Florida Power and Light (FPL),Brevard County Cost:$$$$ In order to ensure that critical facilities and utilities are offline for the shortest time possible and able to provide critical needs and services to the public, the City of Cape Canaveral should explore opportunities for elevating these critical buildings and burying utilities where appropriate. The City may be able to implement these resiliency solutions when roadways and other transportation facilities need to be updated in the future, or in locations where right-of-way permits. Elevating critical facilities and undergrounding utilities can make the area less vulnerable to severe weather and other externalities that can damage these facilitiesand cause mass power outages. Additionally, when elevating critical facilities, gas stations and grocery stores should be included to reduce the impacts of flooding and increase the ability of residents to access them in times of need. . OBJECTIVES FOR IMPLEMENTATIONOF SOLUTION 1 Objective1.1:Elevatethe followingcritical facilities in the Presidential Streets area. These facilities may be elevated and upgraded based on their uses in times of disaster or in emergencies as identified by the City of Cape Canaveral. ¤Cape Canaveral City Hall ¤Brevard County SherriffÓs Office ÎCape Canaveral Precinct ¤Cape Canaveral Culture and Leisure Services Department ¤Cape Canaveral Public Library Objective 1.2:Work with business owners of critical facilities that include grocery stores and gas station owners and identify solutionsfor safeguarding these locationsin case of future disasters or emergenciesby elevating them above flooding levels. Objective 1.3:Identify opportunities for undergrounding utilities in the Presidential Streets area. Action1.3.1:Identify areas with robust right-of-way. Action1.3.2:Developgeneral cost estimates for undergrounding utilitiesin the Study Area. Action 1.3.3:Develop a planning level document to prioritize undergrounding needswithin the Study Area. pg. 28 Solution2:Identifying Opportunities to UpdateRoadway Amenities Priority:Medium Focus Areas for Implementation: All Responsibility:City of Cape Canaveral, FPL, FDOT, Space Coast Area Transit Cost:$$ Roadway amenities include streetlights, signage, and seating such as benches along a corridor. Increasing the amount of street lighting and signage can improve safety conditions along corridors and improves travelersÓ abilities to find destinations in times of emergency.These roadway amenities should also be selected and upgraded to accommodate the flood hazard and storm surge risk and should be designed to withstand the Category 3 risk and 100-year flood zone issues identified previously in this assessment. OBJECTIVES FOR IMPLEMENTATIONOF SOLUTION 2 Objective 2.1:Inventory and identify existing roadway amenities within Presidential Streets. Objective 2.2:Using the completed inventory, identify opportunities to replace lighting structures with solar powered, resilient lighting optionsthat can withstand flooding and storm surge. Objective 2.3:Create a signage and wayfinding package for the Presidential Streets area that includes emergency response signage that identifies critical facilities and evacuation routes. pg. 29 Solution 3: Promoting Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Priority:Medium Focus Areas for Implementation: All Responsibility:City of Cape Canaveral, FDOT Cost:$$ Increasing the connectivity of bicycle and pedestrian facilities can provide opportunities for alternative transportation for both recreation and travel, which can indirectly impact the resiliency of a community.ThePresidential Streets area has several opportunities for promoting connectivity of sidewalks and bicycle facilities through the construction of new sidewalks and bicycle amenities, improvement of existing facilities, and signage and wayfinding opportunities. OBJECTIVES FOR IMPLEMENTATIONOF SOLUTION 3 Objective 3.1:Complete a bicycle and pedestrian master plan for the City of Cape Canaveral to identify the existing network and make recommendations for network connectivity. This plan should be heavily focused on the aspects of bicycle-pedestrian travel that can increase resiliency and mitigate vulnerability in the City of Cape Canaveral, and specifically, the Presidential Streets. Objective 3.2:Identify opportunities for encouraging alternative transportation within the community. Objective3.3:Provide opportunities for bicycling within the community through micromobility programs like bicycling sharing initiativesthat will encourage more use of alternative transportation. pg. 30 Solution 4: Implementation ofRoadway Improvements Priority:Medium Focus Areas for Implementation: All Responsibility:City of Cape Canaveral, FDOT Cost:$$ to $$$ Roadway improvementscan be a usefultechnique to create complete streets, which can positively contribute to resiliency by providing multimodaland reliable corridors. Roadway improvements appropriate for the Presidential Streets area includeone-way street conversion, narrowing the pavement to achieve traffic calming,identifyingadditional traffic calming solutions,and adding greenery and green infrastructure treatments for stormwater infiltration.These improvements can improve safety, quality, and resiliency of the roads and contribute to a more multimodal friendly atmosphere in the Presidential Streets. Many of these improvements were discussed in detail in the main Master Plan underthe ÐRoadway ImprovementsÑ section. OBJECTIVES FOR IMPLEMENTATIONOF SOLUTION 4 Objective 4.1:Identify specific areas inthePresidential Streets that have a need for roadway improvementsthat would contribute to the resilience of the area. Objective 4.2:Include specific projects identified in local plans for future feasibility studies, design phases, construction, or implementation. pg. 31 Solution 5: Identifying Policy Solutions Priority: High Focus Areas for Implementation: All Responsibility: City of Cape Canaveral Cost: $ Policy changes can be a great way to implement resiliency solutions at the local level. Below are a few policy-related methods that can be used to reduce the vulnerability of local infrastructure: Provide courses and educational materials to residents explaining when and how to evacuate from severe weather conditions; Prepare available resources for citizens post disaster such as food, water, blankets, and generators; Incorporate community Resilience Hubs that can serve as central location that provides citizens a variety of resources when disruption occurs and supports initiatives for recovery and ongoing communication; Prepare a transit strategy in order to maintain public transportation options directly before and after a disaster; Promote green infrastructure through a variety of local initiatives that are in part funded by the community or grants. OBJECTIVES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF SOLUTION 5 Objective 5.1: Develop a Communications and Marketing Plan to identify strategies for enhancing disaster preparedness and to share and promote larger initiatives identified in the Resilient Cape Canaveral Action Plan. Objective 5.2: Identify any gaps in the current resilience strategy that may be exploited during an emergency or natural disaster. Objective 5.3: Determine opportunities for funding a small grants program to encourage property owners and local residents to implement resilient technology and green infrastructure on their own property. Objective 5.4: Identify a location within the Presidential Streets area to serve as a Resilience Hub, and determine any outstanding resource or facility needs for properly equipping that location. pg. 32 Green Infrastructure Opportunities Green infrastructure provides an excellent option for integrating resilience strategies into the Presidential Streets area. The following green infrastructure initiatives offer opportunities to incorporate green infrastructure and strengthen resiliency, and should be explored for integration with any projects in any of the 5 focus areas identified: tĻƩƒĻğĬƌĻ tğǝĻƩƭ Permeable pavers should be explored and implemented where appropriate and feasible. These types of pavers allow water to permeate the surface and can assist communities in reducing stormwater runoff while also allowing the water to reach soils and thus, nearby plants and flowers. Flooding issues and the pooling of water can also be limited through the implementation of permeable pavers, which contributes to overall resilience of the community. These can be creatively incorporated into sidewalk and multi-use path design or crosswalks depending on the implementing agency. .źƚƭǞğƌĻƭ Bioswales, like permeable pavers, offer the community an additional resource for handling stormwater runoff that can contribute to flooding and the pooling of water. According to the National Association of City Transportation Officials, or NACTO, these vegetated, shallow, landscaped depressions can be integrated into medians, cul-de-sacs, bulb outs and other traffic calming strategies (NACTO, 2022). This provides an excellent opportunity for Cape Canaveral and the Presidential Streets area as it provides elements that address both the transportation system and its overall resilience. LƓŅźƌƷƩğƷźƚƓ Infiltration is another option for collecting stormwater and redistributing it for other uses. Opportunities exist to create stormwater drains and other infrastructure to create an infiltration system that is highly dependable and reduces strain on other water providing systems in the community. Both bioswales and permeable pavers are examples of infiltration systems. wĻĭƌğźƒĻķ LƩƩźŭğƷźƚƓ The reuse of highly treated wastewater for non-potable use is an option for limiting use of treated water and conserving it for other uses. Non-potable uses include watering plants and landscaping, which is something many communities in Florida are currently doing. {ƷƩĻĻƷ ƩĻĻƭ ğƓķ \[ğƓķƭĭğƦźƓŭ Street trees and landscaping are considered part of green infrastructure due to their ability to enhance a sense of place while increasing the general green space. It is important for local communities to plant the right kind of vegetation (local, non-invasive) in the right places where they will thrive. Street trees can provide shade and improve overall quality of life for local communities. pg. 33 9ƓĭƚǒƩğŭĻ ğƓķ {ǒƦƦƚƩƷ ƷŷĻ \[ƚĭğƌ /ƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ While the City of Cape Canaveral has the opportunity to implement resiliency solutions on a City-wide scale, the ability of individual property owners and general members of the public to implement resiliency strategies on their own cannot be understated. Local members of the public can make changes to their properties or participate in local programs that can have a significant impact on the resiliency of the community. These programs include Adopt-A-Tree programs and the implementation of rain gardens or other infiltration systems in their own backyards. This type of green infrastructure on a more grassroots level can be encouraging for individuals, and opportunities for partial funding for undertaking these initiatives should be explored. DĻƓĻƩğƌ /ƚƭƷƭ ŅƚƩ DƩĻĻƓ LƓŅƩğƭƷƩǒĭƷǒƩĻ Figure below indicates the general cost ranges for each of the identified green infrastructure solutions. These costs are planning level cost estimates and are not intended to give a cost for any specific project the City may be interested in undertaking. It is recommended that the City of Cape Canaveral complete a Green Infrastructure Implementation Plan to identify more specific treatments, their locations, and their costs if the City is interested in pursuing this option as part of its ongoing resiliency strategy. Green Infrastructure Opportunity Planning Level Cost $50,000 to $75,000+; this cost depends on the Permeable Pavers number of pavers needed and the specific type of project being implemented. Rain Gardens, Bioswales $20,000 to $25,000 per 100 linear feet. These costs are highly variable depending on Infiltration System size of system and area, and the complexity of the desired system. These costs are highly variable depending on Reclaimed Irrigation System size of system and area, and the complexity of the desired system. $20,000 to $55,000 per 100 linear feet; costs Street Trees and Landscaping highly depend on location with right-of-way or outside of it, and type of landscaping and plants There is no specific cost associated with this; the Grants Program to Support Local City of Cape Canaveral may determine the funds Grassroots initiatives based on type of projects they are interested in supporting. pg. 34 Plan Alignment The previously outlined resiliency solutions as part of the Presidential Streets Master Plan are consistent with localplans and have a level of overlap for integration into planned and upcoming projects.Cohesive and well-aligned plans can help improve the likelihood of integrating resiliency solutions into local projects and processes, and ensures the long- term success of the community in this effort. The following matrix shown in Figure shows existing relevant plans and how they align with solutions outlined in this document. Solution 1: Solution 2:Solution 3: Solution 5:Green Solution 4: Critical RoadwayyBicycle-yPolicy yInfrastruc- Road Diets FacilitiesAmenitiesPedestrianSolutionsture Existing Plans Cape Canaveral Capital XXXXXXXXXX Improvement Plan (CIP) Brevard County Local Hazard XX Mitigation Strategy Brevard County Stormwater XXXX Management Plan Cape Canaveral Stormwater XXXX Management Plan City of Cape Canaveral XXXXXXXXXX Comprehensive Plan Strategic Resilience XXXXXXXXXX Action Plan (SRAP) Resilient Cape XXXXXXXXXXXX Canaveral (2019) ResilientCape Canaveral XXXXXXXXXXXX Action Plan (2021) pg. 35 Relevant CIP Projects The following projects were identified in the Cape Canaveral Capital Improvements Plan and provide examples of upcoming projects that have elements that fall within the solutions outlined in this assessment and are in the Presidential Streets area. These projects offer upcoming opportunities to reassess and incorporate any solutions that have been outlined in this document that may fit into the project to amplify the resiliency of the initiative. ¤ CIP # CR-2 Î City Promenade ¤ CIP # CR-3 Î Sidewalk Construction throughout CRA area ¤ CIP # CR-4 Î Polk Avenue Streetscape ¤ CIP # CR-5 Î Corner Improvements in the Presidential Streets Area ¤ CIP # IM-4 Î Paving Fund ¤ CIP # IM-5 Î Mobility Plan ¤ CIP # IM-7 Î City Hall Maintenance ¤ CIP # IM-9 Î Solar Light Replacement ¤ CIP # IM-10 Î BCSO Office Solar Array ¤ CIP # IM-11 Î EV Charging Station Upgrade ¤ CIP # WW-2 Î Reclaimed Water Pump/Motor Replacement pg. 36 Funding Opportunities Grant opportunities for resiliency, conservation, and restoration are widely available, and can positively impact the CityÓs overall resilience through strategies both large and small. The City of Cape Canaveral has the opportunity to apply for a number of different grants depending on the identified projectÓs purpose and the intent. Figure below provides a general list of these grants that could be used to fund resiliency solutions identified throughout this assessment document. These grants may also be useful in the implementation of larger scale projects that contribute to resiliency, conservation, or restoration. Funding Agency Grant Name National Civilian Community Corps (NCCC) Î Traditional AmeriCorps Disaster Response, FEMA Corps Bikes Belong Coalition Community Grants Program Community-Based Coastal and Marine Habitat Restoration NOAA Fisheries Grants Department of Commerce Î Economic Planning and Localities Technical Assistance Program Development Administration (EDA) Department of Economic Opportunity Community Development Block Grant - Mitigation Department of Energy Energy Management Program Federal Highway Administration ¤ Bicycle & Pedestrian Program (FHWA) ¤ National Transportation Enhancements Clearinghouse ¤ Beach Erosion Control Program ¤ Brownfield Redevelopment Program ¤ Coastal Partnership Initiative ¤ Florida Communities Trust Î Parks and Open Space Florida Department of Environmental ¤ Florida Forever Program Protection (FDEP) ¤ Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program (FRDAP) Grant ¤ Total Maximum Water Quality Restoration Grant ¤ Nonpoint Source Management Program ¤ State Water-Quality Assistance Grant Florida Department of Transportation Beautification Grant (FDOT) Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways and Cooperative Assistance Program United States Department of Managing Community Forests Grant Agriculture (USDA) Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) Easements United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Coastal Wetlands (State Governments) (USFWS) National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Resilient Communities Grant (NFWF) PIG Difference The PIG Difference Grant Program Environmental Protection Agency Wetlands Program Development Grants (EPA) pg. 37 Section# Title E Appendix Grants pg. 90 Funding AgencyEducationInfrastructure/CapitalDesignPlanningStreetscapeLand AcquisitionEconomic DevelopmentGreen Energy/Electric Vehicles American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) Community Challenge •• Grant American Hiking Society •• American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) • AmeriCorps's National Civilian Community Corps •• Bikes Belong Coalition ••••• Community-Based Restoration Program Coastal and Marine Habitat • Restoration Grant Conservation Fund - Kodak America Greenways Award Program • Department of Commerce EDA - Build to Scale Program •• Department of Commerce EDA - EDA Public Works and Economic ••• Adjustment Assistance Program Department of Commerce EDA - Planning and Localities Technical •• Assistance Program Department of Commerce EDA - Research and National Technical • Assistance Department of Economic Opportunity - CDBG:MIT •••• Department of Economic Opportunity - Community Planning Technical • Assistance (CPTA) Grants Department of Economic Opportunity- Florida Job Growth Grant • Department of Energy - Energy Management Program •• Department of Energy - Property Assessed Clean Energy Programs • Department of Energy - Weatherization and Intergovernment Programs •• •• Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program Department of Justice - Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant • Department of Transportation - Federal Aviation Administration - Airport •• Zero Emission Vehicle Funding AgencyEducationInfrastructure/CapitalDesignPlanningStreetscapeLand AcquisitionEconomic DevelopmentGreen Energy/Electric Vehicles Department of Transportation - Federal Aviation Administration - Voluntary • Airport Low Emissions Program Department of Transportation- Federal Highway Administration - • Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement Department of Transportation- Federal Highway Administration - Highway •• Infrastructure Program Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration - State • Planning and Research Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration - Surface • Transportation Block Grant Program Department of Transportation - Federal Transportation Administration - •• Accelerating Innovative Mobility Department of Transportation - Federal Transportation Administration - • Integrated Mobility innovation Department of Transportation - Federal Transportation Administration - • Public Transportation Innovation Department of Transportation - Federal Transportation Administration - • Safe Streets and Roads for all Grant Program Department of Transportation - Federal Transportation Administration - Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART) Grant •• Program Department of Transportation - Federal Transportation Administration - ••• Transit-Oriented Development Pilot Program Department of Transportation - Federal Transportation Administration - • National Infrastructure Project Assistance (MEGA) Economic Development Administration - Economic Development • Assistance Program Federal Emergency Management Agency - Building Resilient Infrastructure •• and Communities (BRIC) Federal Emergency Management Agency - Hazard Mitigation Grants ••• (HAZARD-MIT) Federal Highway Administration - Bicycle & Pedestrian Program •• Federal Highway Administration - Discretionary Grant Program - National •• Scenic Byways Federal Highway Administration - National Transportation Enhancements •••• Clearinghouse Funding AgencyEducationInfrastructure/CapitalDesignPlanningStreetscapeLand AcquisitionEconomic DevelopmentGreen Energy/Electric Vehicles Federal Highway Administration - Transportation, Community, and System • Preservation Program (TCSP) Federal Transportation Administration - Discretionary Grant Program • Florida Department of Economic Development - Community Development • Block Grants Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Land and Water • Conservation Fund Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Recreational Trails •• Program Florida Department of Environmental Protection - 319(h) Nonpoint Source • Stormwater Management Grant Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Beach Erosion Control •• Program • Redevelopment Program Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Coastal Partnership ••••• Initiative (determined by County) Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Environmental Education • Grants Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Florida Communities •• Trust - Parks and Open Space Florida Forever Program Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Florida Forever Program •• Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Florida Recreation •• Development Assistance Program (FRDAP) Grant Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Land & Water •• Conservation Fund (LWCF) Florida Department of Environmental Protection - State Water-Quality •••• Assistance Grant Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Total Maximum Water •• Quality Restoration Grant Florida Department of State - Division of Cultural Affairs • Florida Department of State - Florida Historic Preservation & Arts Grants • Florida Department of State - Safe Routes to Schools • Funding AgencyEducationInfrastructure/CapitalDesignPlanningStreetscapeLand AcquisitionEconomic DevelopmentGreen Energy/Electric Vehicles • Florida Inland Navigation District - Waterways and Cooperative Assistance • Program Florida SUN Trail Program Funding ••• Managing Community Forests Grant •• National Coastal Wetlands (State Governments - Florida is listed) •• National Endowment for the Arts - Challenge America Grants • National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) - Resilient Communities ••• Grant National Park Service - Rivers, Trails & Conservation Assistance Program •• National Park Service- Historic Grants • National Trails Fund • National Trust for Historic Preservation • Nonpoint Source Management Program •••• PIG Difference Grant - New Pig Corporation • Rebuild Florida CDBG-MIT - General Infrastructure Program • Resilient Florida Grant Program • South Florida Water Management District Cooperative Funding Initiative • State Water-Quality Assistance Grant •••• Surdna Foundation •••• The Funders Network Partners for Places ••• US Department of Transportation Rebuilding - American Infrastructure with • Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Grant Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) Easements •• Wetlands Program Development Grants ••• CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL PLANNING AND ZONING (P&Z) BOARD August 24, 2022REGULAR MEETING · ITEM # Subject: Discussion regarding mixed-use Summary:Mixed-use developmentis an alternative to single-use zoning. It places multiple uses within a site, such as street-level retail with residential units above (vertical mixed use), or co-locates uses within a designated area, such as neighborhoods that offer residential, commercial, and civic spaces within walking distance (horizontal mixed use). This development approach varies from traditional zoning where land uses are separated into distinct zones. The mix of different uses makes it possible for people to live near everyday destinations, such as places of work, and thus, provides a variety of environmental, economic, social, and health benefits that can align with existing community priorities. The concept of mixed-use is established in several City policy documents, such as: 1.A1A Economic Opportunity Overlay District – wherein it states that “The main street component of the District is intended to provide a mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented focus for the proposed Town Center, with land uses serving Town Center residents and visitors. This sub-district provides the City of Cape Canaveral with a small-town style walkable center that is convenient, useful, safe and attractive for pedestrians and lively, yet relaxed. Small-scale retail and other commercial uses shall occupy as much of the ground floor frontages along Central Boulevard as the market will bear. Upper stories shall be office or residential along these main streets.” 2.Community Redevelopment Plan – within the Flexible Zoning and Land Development Regulations section, it states that the “City should continue efforts started with the A1A EOOD to provide for mixed use zoning and flexible development regulations.” It continues in the Planning Studies section that “ The CRA may fund planning studies to include, “creation of CRA specific zoning regulations that allow flexibility in accommodating development/redevelopment of undersized properties; create architectural design guidelines and signage standards; development of mixed use zoning/land use designations to allow for a Town Center/Downtown project; and other similar initiatives.” 3.2022 Strategic Planning Retreat – Summary Report – within the SWOT analysis portion of the Report, under the Opportunities section, it states “More Mixed-Use Options (Retail/Restaurants/Grocery Shopping). The use of land in the City is primarily governed by the Comprehensive Plan (Plan) and the Unified Land Development Code (LDC). The City’s Plan describes the various future land use categories which are illustrated on the future land use map in the Plan. All future development or redevelopment of property must be consistent with the Plan and with the future land use map. The LDC establishes specific, detailed development standards related to various zoning classifications and is intended to implement the Plan. In the event of a conflict between the Comprehensive Plan and the LDC, the provisions of the Plan shall take precedence. City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting · August 24, 2022 Agenda Item # Page 2 of 3 The City of Cape Canaveral Comprehensive Plan currently does not contain language that expressly authorizes mixed-use development. Rather, the Plan only establishes traditional land use categories, which are found in Policy LU-1.3.3 as indicated below: POLICY LU-1.3.3 The City shall enforce its requirements pertaining to densities and intensities of land use in each land-use category--i.e. R-1, Low Density Residential: maximum 5.808 lots/acre. R-2, Medium Density Residential and Townhouse Apartments: maximum 15 units/acre. R-3, Duplex/Multi-Family/Townhouse Apartments: maximum 15 units/acre. M-1, Light Industrial: maximum 4.356 lots/acre. C-1, Commercial: zoning regulations impose a variety of requirements, depending upon type of use. C-2, Commercial: zoning regulations impose a variety of requirements, depending upon type of use. PUB, Public and Recreation Facilities. CON, Conservation. On the other hand, the City’s LDC authorizes mixed-use through the PD zoning category. Mixed- use development is defined as “A type of development which may include one building, set of buildings, or defined project area for more than one purpose and may include any combination of uses, but not limited to residential, retail shops, eating establishments including rooftop restaurants, professional offices, industrial, and civic uses in either a horizontal or vertical setting.” Mixed Use projects are specifically permitted in the EOOD as a PD (see Sec. 110-609). Furthermore, Sec. 110-722 defines the following types of PD zoning: 1.Planned commercial centers. Complementary and compatible residential uses, office uses and industrial uses may be included if they are compatibly and harmoniously designed into the commercial center within a planned development zoning district. 2.Planned attraction and destination uses. Complementary and compatible residential uses may be included, provided that their design within the planned development zoning district will produce a reasonable living environment. 3.Planned mixed-use development uses. Complementary and compatible residential uses may be included, provided that their design within the planned development zoning district will produce a reasonable living environment. 4.Planned industrial and office parks. Complementary and compatible commercial uses may be included if they are properly integrated into the total industrial or office park within a planned development zoning district. 5.Other uses. Any other private, public or semipublic use that is complementary to, and compatible with planned commercial, attraction and destination, mixed-use, office or industrial developments. City of Cape Canaveral P&Z Board Regular Meeting · August 24, 2022 Agenda Item # Page 3 of 3 As indicated above, when there is a conflict between the Plan and LDC, the Plan takes precedence. In this situation, as the Plan does not provide for mixed-use, it is not authorized. In order to resolve this conflict, a Plan amendment must be processed to allow for mixed-use development. Staff is requesting that the P&Z Board discuss the issue and provide Staff with direction on processing an amendment to the Plan to establish a mixed-use land use category. The amendment may include general development guidelines such as density/intensity standards, etc. Attachments: None Community and Economic Development Staff recommend the Board take the following action: Provide Staff with a recommendation on moving forward with an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to establish a mixed-use land use category. Approved by Director: David Dickey Date: