Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-Packets (Agenda)-03-08-2006Weston Subdivision, (8817 N Atlantic Avenue) - Allen Engine City of Cape Canaveral u PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING CITY HALL ANNEX 111 POLK AVENUE MARCH 8, 2006 7:30 P.M. `11/45Y\ Call to Order Roll Call NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes: February 22, 2006. f`r\-\"\\t0' 2. , '' Recommendation to the Board of Adjustment: Special Exception Request No. Lo''',w,t 06-01 to Allow Residential Use in the C-1 Zoning District, Section 14, Township Artie a� 24 South, Range 37 East, Lot D Part of Lots A & C and Part Designated Age for Don W. Applegate, Peti iongr Lao' L�ti t ( Z jCirkol oar- . 3 Recommendation o the Board of Adjustment: Special Exception Request No. -k �� 06-02 to Allow Residential Use in the C-1 Zoning District, Section 23, Township 24 South, Range 37 East, 4-8, Bloc , von by the Sea Subdivision - r (Washington Avenue) - n Wilson, Designate .Agent for L. Joyce Carlton, t 4iscussion Re: Evaluation and Appraisal Report Process - Todd Peetz, City Planner. OPEN DISCUSSION ADJOURN Pursuant to Section 286.1015, F.S., the City hereby advises the public that: If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Board with respect to any matter rendered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not constitute consent by the City for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by law. This meeting may include the attendance of one or more members of the Cape Canaveral City Council, Board of Adjustment, Code Enforcement and/or Community Appearance Board who may or may not participate in Board discussions held at this public meeting. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City Clerk's office at 868-1221, 48 hours in advance of the meeting 105 Polk Avenue • Post Office Box 326 • Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-0326 Telephone: (321) 868-1222 • SUNCOM: 982-1222 • FAX: (321) 868-1247 wwwmyflorida.com/cape • email: ccapecanaveral@cfl.rr.com • itv tc PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 2006 A Regular Meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board was held on February 22, 2006, at the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida. Board Chairperson Bea McNeely called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The Secretary called the roll. All persons giving testimony were sworn in by Kate Latorre, Assistant City Attorney. John Johanson stated for the record that he submitted a form to the Board Secretary declaring a conflict of interest on agended items 2 and 7. He advised that he would not participate in discussion or motions regarding those items. MEMBERS PRESENT Bea McNeely Chairperson Lamar Russell Vice Chairperson John Fredrickson Donald Dunn Harry Pearson John Johanson 1st Alternate OTHERS PRESENT Susan Chapman Todd Peetz Kate Latorre Robert Hoog NEW BUSINESS: Secretary City Planner Assistant City Attorney Mayor Pro Tem 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes: February 8, 2006. Motion by Lamar Russell, seconded by Donald Dunn to approve the meeting minutes of February 8, 2006, as corrected. Vote on the motion carried unanimously. 2. Recommendation to City Council Re: Preliminary Replat of Villagio Del Mar - Block 6, Lots 1 & 2, Avon by the Sea, (Washington Avenue) - Ronald Wallen, Applicant. Todd Peetz, City Planner, made a few corrections to his written report. He advised that this request was for a preliminary replat; the property is located on the south side of Washington Avenue, on .3 acres; the developer is proposing to replat two existing lots into three townhouse lots; the property is surrounded by multi -family residential; the property is zoned R-3. He gave an overview of the lot dimensions. He noted that the Public Works Director has requested all existing easements to be vacated. David Welsch, Developer, advised that the development will be developed similar to the surrounding structures; he also owns the vacant lot to the south, but not the lot to the east; he is proposing to construct three townhouse units on lots 1 & 2. Ronald Wallen, Applicant, verified that there are no existing easements. He referred to note #7 on the submitted plat. Brief discussion followed. 0 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes February 22, 2006 Page 2 Motion by Chairperson McNeely, seconded by Harry Pearson, to recommend approval of the Preliminary Replat of Villagio Del Mar. Vote on the motion carried unanimously. 3. Recommendation to City Council Re: C-1 Moratorium Ordinance for Residential Special Exceptions (R-2) on A1A - Kate Latorre, Assistant City Attorney. Kate Latorre, Assistant City Attorney, advised that this proposed ordinance extends the current moratorium date to September 30, 2006. Lamar Russell, Vice Chairperson, advised that this time extension allows the Business and Cultural Development Board to perform their study. Motion by Donald Dunn, seconded by Harry Pearson, to recommend approval of the proposed Ordinance to extend the time of the moratorium, as presented. Vote on the motion carried unanimously. 4. Recommendation to City Council Re: Transportation Access Management Ordinance - Todd Peetz, City Planner. Todd Peetz, City Planner, advised that this Ordinance was a result of the Transportation Access Study Report. The Board members reviewed the draft Ordinance. Todd Peetz read and explained new code Sections 110-600 through 110-604. Discussion was held regarding: service connection roads, and the maintenance responsibility of them. Lamar Russell, Vice Chairperson, suggested that maintenance standards be established and added to the proposed Ordinance. The Board further discussed creating distance requirements from the main roads. Review and discussion continued regarding deceleration lanes and turning lanes. The Board further suggested that enforcement provisions be established. Todd Peetz offered to research other City's codes as to how they enforce similar ordinances. Motion by Lamar Russell, seconded by Donald Dunn, to postpone this agenda item until the next meeting to allow staff and the Board time to work on the proposed Ordinance. Vote on the motion carried unanimously. 5. Recommendation to City Council Re: Changes to Chapter 110, Sections 87-108 - Todd Peetz, City Planner. Kate Latorre, Assistant City Attorney, gave an overview of the proposed Ordinance. She advised that the Ordinance is a verbatim of the language provided by the Building Official. Brief discussion followed. Motion by Lamar Russell, seconded by John Fredrickson to recommend approval of the proposed Ordinance, as presented. Vote on the motion carried unanimously. 0 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes February 22, 2006 Page 3 6. Discussion Re: Residential Use in the C-1 Zoning District - Todd Peetz, City Planner. Todd Peetz, City Planner, advised that this agenda item is a result of a City Council workshop held on January 31, 2006. He explained that if the City were to discontinue special exceptions in commercial, there are a number of properties that will be impacted; the idea of the conversation with City Council is to understand some of those impacts and how 149, Ci should address them; some of the comments were to administratively rezone i l' to residential; and to look at a mixed -use district along the presidential streets where residential may be appropriate. Chairperson McNeely explained that if the applicant met certain criteria then they were entitled to the special exception. She suggested that additional criteria be added, such as: maximum 10 units per acre, increase square footage, and increase minimum lot sizes. She reviewed suggestions for added criteria that were suggested by Todd Peetz. Vice Chairperson Russell advised that the definition of mixed -use would need to be redefined. Discussion was held regarding density; possibility of creating a new zoning district; and rezoning certain properties where there currently exist residential uses in the C-1 zoning district. The Board members reviewed City maps provided by Todd Peetz depicting the existing uses. John Fredrickson commented that there are some deep Tots zoned C-1 that are not conducive to commercial use. Further discussion was held regarding the character of N. Atlantic Avenue being changed as a result of granted special exceptions for residential use and therefore, N. Atlantic Avenue is no longer considered a commercial district; defining more restrictive criteria for compatibility and transition zones; extend buffering and setback criteria between commercial and residential adjacent uses; allowing residential in commercial not by special exception but, as a permissible use by meeting certain criteria. Councilman Robert Hoog advised that the problem is not criteria. He advised that the City allows R-2 in C-1 by special exception. He pointed out that some developments are built 5 to 6 units per acre. He voiced his opinion that the problem is that residents do not like the commercial uses next door to where they live because, the commercial uses are infringing on their privacy. He advised that if someone wants to build residential and the commercial zone, they should need to go through the rezoning and a Comprehensive Plan change. He commented that special exceptions are not good for the City and should not be allowed. He explained that if a business is allowed in the C-1 zone, they have every right to be there. He voiced his opinion that the City is wrong in allowing residential next to commercial. He suggested that there should be a 300 ft. setback requirement on A1A before allowing residential. Following discussion, by consensus of the Board members, this agenda item should not be placed on the next agenda. The Board may revisit this issue in the future. Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes February 22, 2006 Page 4 7. Discussion Re: Changing C-1 Zoning to R-1 Zoning on Lots 2 & 3, Harbor Heights West Subdivision - Todd Peetz, City Planner. Todd Peetz, City Planner, gave an overview of the Board of Adjustment meeting where the Board postponed the Special Exception request until March 13th to allow the property owner time to work with the City to possibly allow the City to purchase the property. Joe Ross, 227 Coral Drive, advised that City code Section 110-331, is intended for commercial uses to be located on major arterial streets. He commented that Sea Shell Lane did not meet that requirement. He read portions of the Planning & Zoning Board Minutes of May 22, 2002, regarding Special Exception Request No. 02-07; and Planning & Zoning Board Minutes of January 26, 2006, regarding Special Exception Request No. 05-15. He noted that 12 residents spoke to the Board about their concerns. He read the Board's motion recommending denial of the Special Exception. He gave his 50 year vision of the City, where the South end and North end of the City would be parking lots with busses running in between them to pick up and drop off residents because of the traffic situation. Judith Lau, 211 Coral Drive, advised that the property was in litigation for 10 years. She questioned if multi -family belongs in a single family residential neighborhood. She suggested that the City do what's right and rezone the property to R-1. She commented that some residents choose not to live in a multi -family neighborhood. Following discussion, the Board determined that the Board of Adjustment and City Council should first make their decisions to work with the property owner. Motion by Chairperson McNeely, seconded by Donald Dunn, that this item not be placed on the next agenda because the Board has already made its recommendation regarding this property. Vote on the motion carried unanimously. OPEN DISCUSSION John Fredrickson asked what happened with the issue on short-term rentals. Kate Latorre, Assistant City Attorney, responded that the City Attorney is working on a draft Ordinance. Donald Dunn inquired as to the status of a new City Hall. Councilman Hoog responded that the City Manager was directed by City Council to make an offer on the Stottler Stagg building for the Sheriff to move into. Then the Annex building could be renovated for the new City Hall. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Bea McNeely, Chairperson Susan L. Chapman, Secretary Meeting Type: Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Date: 3/08/06 AGENDA AGENDA REPORT PLANNING & ZONING BOARD THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL Heading Special Exception 06-01 Item No. #2 SUBJECT: Special Exception request 06-01 to allow Residential use in a Commercial district. DEPT./DIVISION: Building Department Requested Action: Consider and make a recommendation to the Board of Adjustment for approval/denial of residential use in a commercial district. Summary Explanation & Background: The applicant is Allen Engineering representing the owner of Southgate Mobile home Park. They have requested a special exception for residential use in a commercial district. This property has currently has 90 to 95 mobile homes/pads on -site. The request is only for the west side of North Atlantic and no portion east of North Atlantic. The proposed number of units is 102 condominiums. The project is located between portside villas (north) and villages at the port (south). Exhibits Attached: #1 Application, #2 Legal description and owner related information, #3 Applicant information regarding the special exception, #4 Notification to Surrounding Property Owners, #5 Staff Report on the Special Exception. City Planner's Office Department: Building Department City of Cape Canaveral Building Department (Please Print Legibly or Type) DATE FILED I -a,3 -Q(p RECV'D BY: 5C FEE PAID �.Cta,Q 5cqihon �06-oi ,yam �o�'�gr�,lnoticem01/ DEPOSIT S7 rasa. c� I�%Z ($250.00 Filing Fee is non-refundable) NATURE OF REQUEST Special Exception is for what purpose (Brief Description) This parcel lies in C-1 zoning (Low Density Commercial District). Therefore, Cape Canaveral Code, Division 5, Section 110-334(c)(10), Special exceptions permissible, allows for the construction of multiple -family dwellings. Address of request (if applicable) 8817 N. Atlantic Ave., Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Legal Description: Lot D Block Parcel Subdv CM Weston Subdivision Section 14 Township 24 Range 37 STATEMENT OF FACT: State of Florida, County of Brevard; , being duly sworn, depose and say that: I am the property owner. _X_ I am the owner(s) designated agent. (notarized authorization required) Owner(s) Name(s): Don W. Applegate, Trustee Address: 8817 N. Atlantic Ave., Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Home Phone Work Phone E-Mail Applicant(s) Names(s): Allen Engineering, Inc., John M. Allen & Joyce Gumpher Address: 106 Dixie Ln, Cocoa Beach, FL 32931 Work Phone: 321-783-7443 E-Mail: jgumpher@alleneng.net All information, sketches and data contained and made part of this request, are honest and,tr : to es f my e and belief. Si; atitre of Applicant Sworn to and subscribed before me on this 23 day of Notary Public, State of Florida , Coanry 0 F art ,A t, The completed request form and the $250 filing fee must be fi1 ... Variances, Rezoning and Special Exceptions (Except Telecommunication Towers),require oa r minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the next regularly scheduled Planning & Zoning Board 200(0 . DCWMA Molly. $t6 Malt 0, of Florida Comm. -Esping May 22,20 Commission a DDt20564 I /,0 3g452--, City of Cape Canaveral APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION This application must be legibly completed and returned, with all enclosures referred to therein, to the Building Department, a minimum of Thirty (30) days (sixty (60) days for Telecommunications Towers) prior to the next regularly scheduled meeting in order to be processed for consideration by the Planning & Zoning Board for study and recommendation to the Board of Adjustment. The owner or a owner representative are required to attend the meetings and will be notified by the board secretary of the date and time of the meetings. The Planning & Zoning Board holds regular meetings on the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays of every month at 7:30 p.m. in the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MUST BE SUPPLIED PRIOR TO PROCESSING THE APPLICATION. If you have any questions, please contact the Building Department at (321) 868-1222. 1. NAME OF APPLICANT(S): Allen Engineering, Inc. ADDRESS (if assigned): 106 Dixie Ln., Cocoa Beach, FL 32931 PHONE# 321-783-7443 FAX# 321-783-5902 E-MAIL: jgumpher@ alleneng.net 2. COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: LOT: D, p/o A & C, tract A SUBDIVISION: CM Weston Subdivision PARCEL: SIZE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IN ACRES: 7.29 SECTION: 14 TOWNSHIP: 24 RANGE: 37 DESCRIPTION: See attached legal description 3. ORDINANCES SECTION UNDER WHICH SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS SOUGHT (EXAMPLE, ARTICLE X, SECTION 2) Division 5, Section 110-334(c)(10) 4. COMPLETE THE ATTACHED WORKSHEET IN FULL. (INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY RESULT IN DENIAL OF REQUEST) 5. PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION: C-1 6. PROVIDE THIRTEEN (13) COPIES OF SITE PLAN OR APPROPRIATE DRAWING(S) SHOWING THE FOLLOWING WHERE APPLICABLE: (a) Adequate ingress and egress may be obtained to and from the property, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and emergency access in case of fire or medical emergency. See enclosed plan sheet 2. (b) Adequate off-street parking and loading areas are provided without creating undue noise, glare, odor or detrimental effects upon adjoining properties. See enclosed plan sheet 2. (c) Adequate and properly located utilities are available or may be reasonably provided to serve the proposed development. See enclosed plan sheet 2. (d) Adequate screening and/or buffering will be provided to protect and provide compatibility with adjoining properties. Landscaping and buffering will meet or exceed Cape Canaveral code. (e)Signs and exterior lighting, if any, will be so designed and arranged so as to promote traffic safety and to eliminate or minimize any undue glare, incompatibility, or disharmony . with adjoining properties and will be permitted and in compliance with all adopted codes and ordinances. Signage & lighting will meet or exceed Cape Canaveral code. (f) Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the issues relating to (a) and (b) above. See enclosed plan sheet 2. (g) Required setbacks and other open space. See enclosed plan sheet 2. (h) Height. See enclosed plan sheet 2 site data. (i) Landscaping. Landscaping and buffering will meet or exceed Cape Canaveral code. (j) Renewal and/or termination dates relating to a lease, if applicable. N/A (k) That the proposed use will be reasonably compatible with surrounding uses in its function, its hours of operation, the type and amount of traffic generated, structure size and setbacks, its relationship to land values and any other facts that may be used to measure or determine compatibility. The site is surrounded by residential property. The proposed multi -family condominium use is compatible with the surrounding area in hours of operation, type and amount of traffic generated, structure size and setbacks, relative land values for compatibility. The property to the south and to the north is zoned C-1 with a special exception for R-2 residential uses. The south parcel has two story townhouse type units with approximately 2,000 s.f of living area. The parcel to the north has two story condominium units with approximately 1,200 s.f. and 1,300 s.f. living areas. The proposed Southgate project has townhouse and two story condominium units with approximately 1,200 s.f. and 1,300 s.f. living areas. Setback requirements are the same both north and south of the subject parcel. The granting of this special exception is compatible with surrounding uses in this area. PLEASE NOTE: In granting any Special Exception, the Board of Adjustment may prescribe appropriate conditions, stipulations and safeguards to ensure conformity with the foregoing. STATE REASON FOR REQUEST (attach additional sheet if necessary): To construct multiple -family dwellings in a C-1 zoning district. THE FOLLOWING ENCLOSURES ARE NEEDED TO COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION: X *Paid receipt from Finance Department for $250.00 Application Fee. * Paid receipt from Finance Department for Deposit, if applicable. (Make checks payable to the "City of Cape Canaveral") X_ A listing of legal descriptions of all properties within a 500 ft. radius of the boundaries of the property contained in the request, together with the names and mailing addresses (including zip codes) of all respective property owners within the above referenced area. Include three (3) complete sets of mailing labels of all property owners within a 500 ft. radius. (This can be obtained from the Tax Assessor's Office.) The list shall be legible and the source of the information submitted stated here: This information was obtained from: Brevard County Property Appraiser _X_ A property map showing properties within the 500 ft. radius, clearly outlining the subject property. ._X_ The Location map showing adjacent properties uses, zoning, streets, driveways, canals and utilities. 7. Where Property is not owned by the applicant, a Power of Attorney must be attached giving the Notarized consent of the property owner to the applicant to request the Special Exception. Enclosed 8. Copy of recorded deed to subject property. Enclosed 9. Completed worksheet. Attached 10. If applicable, elevation drawing(s) or photograph(s) of proposed structure(s) are encouraged. Enclosed • • NOTE: Application fee of $250.00 is non-refundable upon payment to the City. • • NOTE: Any balance from required deposit will be returned to the applicant upon written request minus all associated costs. CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SPECIAL EXCEPTION WORKSHEET The purpose of this worksheet are two -fold: (1) to assist the Planning and Zoning Board and the .Board of Adjustment in the evaluation of all criteria relevant to the application; and (2) to educate the applicant as to the criteria which must be addressed and satisfied prior to beginning the special exception consideration process. If the applicant can not satisfactorily address one or more of the following, this should serve as a preliminary indication that the request for special exception may be rejected or that the application may not be acceptable for processing. CRITERIA (Building Official or Designee to Verify) 1) Does the Special Exception create any adverse impact to adjacent property through the creation of noise, light, vibration, traffic, utility requirements, or stormwater runoff that would not have been created had the property been developed as a principle use in the applicable zoning district. No, residential development would create less of an adverse impact than commercial development. 2) Will the Special Exception create any unusual police, fire or emergency services? No. 3) Will the Special Exception meet all the requirements of the zoning district in which the request is to be located, such as: lot requirements, building setbacks requirements, lot coverage, height, buffers, off-street parking, signs, storage, landscaping, etc.? Yes, all items will meet or exceed Cape Canaveral code. 4) Is there adequate ingress and egress, with particular reference to auto and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and emergency access in case of fire or medical emergency? Yes, there is existing access within an ingress/egress easement (ORB 3271, Pg 0658) over the property to the south to accommodate these services. 5) Is there adequate off-street parking and loading areas available without creating undue noise, glare, odor or other detrimental effects upon adjoining property owners? Yes, see Site Plan. 6) Is there adequate and properly located utilities available or may be reasonably provided to serve the proposed development (if applicable)? Yes, existing water and sewer are available at the site. Water & sewer will be designed to meet flow requirements. 7) Is there adequate screening and/or buffering provided to protect and provide compatibility to adjoining properties? Landscaping and buffering will meet or exceed Cape Canaveral code. 8) Are signs and exterior lighting, if any, designed and arranged so as to promote traffic safety and to eliminate or minimize any undue glare, incompatibility, and disharmony with adjoining properties? Signage & lighting will meet the requirements of Cape Canaveral code. Lighting will be designed to minimize any undue glare to adjacent properties. 9) Is there adequate refuse and service areas? Yes, see Site Plan. 10) Do the setbacks, landscaping, and open space meet the requirements of the zoning district? Yes, see enclosed plans for setbacks & open space. Landscaping will be provided in accordance with Cape Canaveral code. 11) Is the proposed use compatible with surrounding uses in its function, its hours of operation, the type amount of traffic generated, structure size and setbacks, its relationship to land values and any other facts that may be used to measure or determine compatibility? Yes, the site is surrounded by residential property. The proposed multi -family condominium use is compatible with the surrounding area in hours of operation, type and amount of traffic generated, structure size and setbacks, relative land values for compatibility. The property to the south and to the north is zoned C-1 with a special exception for R-2 residential uses. The south parcel has two story townhouse type units with approximately 2,000 s.f of living area. The parcel to the north has two story condominium units with approximately 1,200 s.f. and 1,300 s.f. living areas. The proposed Southgate project has townhouse and two story condominium units with approximately 1,200 s.f. and 1,300 s.f. living areas. Setback requirements are the same both north and south of the subject parcel. The granting of this special exception is compatible with surrounding uses in this area. 12) Is the Special Exception consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? Yes, the site will meet the requirements for water, sewer, drainage, traffic and solid waste goals, objectives & policies of the Comprehensive plan 13) Is the Special Exception consistent with the intent of the zoning district with which the Special Exception is sought? Yes, Cape Canaveral Code, Division 5, Section 110-334(c)(10), Special exceptions permissible, allows for the construction of multiple -family dwellings. 14) Has the petitioner met the minimum requirements for the requested Special Exception and demonstrated entitlement to the Special Exception which will not adversely affect the public interest? 15) Should the Special Exception be granted with any noted limitations, restrictions and/or conditions? 16) Should the Special Exception be specifically granted to the petitioner or run concurrently with the property? The applicant requests the Special Exception run concurrently with the property. FORM "A" AUTHORIZATION TO ACT AS APPLICANT I, Don W. Applegate authorize Allen Engineering, Inc. to act as applicant, representing me in Public Hearings before the City of Cape Canaveral pertaining to an Application for Special Exception. State of Florida, County of Brevard Sworn and subscribed to before me T . • r day of-Gilkv� , 2005. (b.061„.a_ .J Notary Public My Commission Expires: feta dYN Atifl Form of Id ntification PATRICIA A. WOODARD Comm# DD0255602 Expires 10/52007 landed Ilru (e00)4324254 IlaklsWol�r NApoNtr.: City of Cape Canaveral February 8, 2006 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER(S): Special Exception Request #06-01 Notice is hereby given by the City of Cape Canaveral, that Allen Engineering representing Don W. Applegate, 106 Dixie Lane, Cocoa Beach, FL 32931 has requested a Special Exception To Allow Residential Use in a Commercial Zoning District, pursuant to the Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances, Zoning Regulations, Section 110-334(C)(10) for the property described as follows: Legal Description: Township 24S, Range 37E, Section 14, Lot D, Part of Lots A & C and Part of Tract A. Parcel ID: (24-37-14-27-00000.0-000D.00) Lot D, Part of Lots A & C and Part of Track A CM Weston Subdivision (8817 N. Atlantic Ave., Cape Canaveral, FL 32920) In accordance with the City Code of Ordinance No. 18-2002, this letter shall serve as notice that there will be a public hearing before the Cape Canaveral Planning and Zoning Board regarding the property noted above. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL. The Planning & Zoning Board is advisory in nature and will make a recommendation to the Cape Canaveral Board of Adjustment with respect to the above -named property. The final administrative approval or denial will come before the Board of Adjustment at a subsequently scheduled meeting. Since your property may be located within 500-feet of this property comments can be made in person or may be submitted in writing at the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting or to the City Clerk's Office at 105 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920. if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based This notice does not constitute consent by the City for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by law. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City Cleric's office (868-1221), 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Susan Stills, CMC City Clerk br .- �aFLr+Tti i . P ATLaz+r:c/ 105 Polk Avenue • Posc Office Box 326 • Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-0326 Telephone: (321) 868-1220 • SUNCOM: 982-1220 • FAX: (321) 868-1248 wwwmyflorida.com/cape • e-mail: ccapecanaveral@cfl.rr.com APPLICANT NAMES)/ADDRESS; LARSEN, DARRELL — ALLEN ENGINEERING OWNER NAMES)/ADDRESS r oiJloz-LAR. sos 1arSO1-1mp RADIUS MAP YWRGE t HAT 4 Brevard County Property Appraiser. Jim Ford SROREf00R OR 1 BUFFER DLSTANCR 500 FEET SEAPORT H.VD Based on data from the Property Appraiser's Office MAP SCALE IS L6000 (one inch = 500 feet) This map was compiled from recorded documents and does not reflect an actual survey. The Brevard County Board of Commissioners, Property Appraiser, and Geographic Information Services do not assume responsibility for errors or ommissions contained hereon. Produced by: Brevard County Planning h Zoning Office — GIS, January 05, 2006 N LEGEND: Notification buffer Parcel/lot boundaries Numbers on map correspond to mailing list niovaru .ounty rroperty appraiser-- unime Kea! Estate Property Card Page 1 of 2 (Home] [Meet JimFord] [Appraiser's Job] [FAQ] [General Info] (Save Our Homes] [Exemptions] [Tangible Property] (Contact Usj [Locations] (Forms] [Appeals] (Property Researchj (Map Search] (Maps & Data] (Unusable Property] [Tax Authorities] [Tax Facts] !Economic Indicators] [What's New] [Links] [Press Releases] [fax Estimator] General Parcel Information for 24-37-14-27-00000.0-000D.00 Parcel Id: * Site Address: 24-3 7-14-27-00000.0- 000D.00 Map Millage Code: 26G0 Exemption: 8817 N ATLANTIC AV, CAPE CANAVERAL, FL 32920 Use Code: Tax Account: 2893 2429663 * Site address assigned by the Brevard County Address Assignment Office for mailing purposes; may not reflect community location of property. Owner Information Owner Name: (Second Name: Mailing Address: City, State, Zipcode: APPLEGATE, DON W TRUSTEE 8817 ATLANTIC AVE N LOT 44 CAPE CANAVERAL, FL 32920 Value Summary for 2005 ** Market Value: $1,550,000 Agricultural Assessment: $0 Assessed Value: $1,550,000 *** Homestead Exemption: $0 ***Other Exemptions: $0 Taxable Value: $1,550,000 Legal Description Plat Book/Page: 0001/0025 CM WESTON SUBD LOT D, PART OFLOTSA&C AND PART OF TRACT A OF PB 1 PG 22 ALL AS DESC IN ORB 2444 PG 755, 3307PG 3376 View Plat (requires Adobe Acrobat Reader - file size may be large) Land Information Acres: Site Code: 7.69 341 ** This is the value established for ad valorem purposes in accordance with s.193.011(1) and (8), Florida Statutes. This value does not represent anticipated selling price for the property. *** Exemptions as reflected on the Value Summary table are applicable for the year shown and may or may not be applicable if an owner change has occured. Sales Information II 11 II 11-11 II II II 0 http://www.brevardpropertyappraiser.com/asp/Show_parcel.asp?acct=2429663&gen=T&... 02/02/2006 lil February 3, 2006 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER(S): Special Exception Request #06-01 Notice is hereby given by the City of Cape Canaveral, that Allen Engineering representing Don W. Applegate, 106 Dixie Lane, Cocoa Beach, FL 32931 has requested a Special Exception To Allow Residential Use in a Commercial Zoning District, pursuant to the Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances, Zoning Regulations, Section 110-334(C)(10) for the property described as follows: Legal Description: Township 24S, Range 37E, Section 14, Lot D 24-37-14-27-00000.0-000D.00, CM Weston Subdivision (8817 N. Atlantic Ave., Cape Canaveral, FL 32920) In accordance with the City Code of Ordinance No. 18-2002, this letter shall serve as notice that there will be a public hearing before the Cape Canaveral Planning and Zoning Board regarding the property noted above. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL. The Planning & Zoning Board is advisory in nature and will make a recommendation to the Cape Canaveral Board of Adjustment with respect to the above -named property. The final administrative approval or denial will come before the Board of Adjustment at a subsequently scheduled meeting. Since your property may be located within 500-feet of this property comments can be made in person or may be submitted in writing at the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting or to the City Clerk's Office at 105 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not constitute consent by the City for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise inadmissible orirrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by law. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City Clerk's office (868-1221), 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Susan Stills, CMC City Clerk R1 RESIDENTIAL R2 RESIDENTIAL R3 RESIDENTIAL Cl COMMERCIAL C2 COMMERCIAL M 1 INDUSTRIAL CO m , I. =„9 l /2 :31v3S .., V) 2 W W :r r • W W V) 2 W • S W W •I: CO Z ' O 44P- O 1001J PuZ „t-, L l ONV8 000nls O 2 � tD OH '0N8 ..8-,OZ ci)J > A - - ■ee • _� i a■■k :�■_� •-•_- �. - e , 10- � •■� -' ; ;--■E . a ■� e. !Wiz 1--■- � a _ . ■m - -mom, § e§. • �a�. - ;■§ ,E ._§�� |§a =; 1 �-e-■ ' ' -■ ! @■� � � � F: -■■ . --� -a■M-■ ' ■...M ■- 117:IIIIJ, : - , : --■- Hisz-011 � ■-_ §-m Er mi §- �a, '19H MOONIM „0 1. , ur V) W W t•: t ,. • NO014 PuZ „V- arrow oO3nis e. `•1. 1: •� 1. .. t, . '1 . I . 1 • \I: H MOONIM .„.V- oa _°; • W W N 2 W Ca CO s W z oc c 0 N cn 7 3i k WIN =gi 1•11, IMP a esill wore: kill Wellr••• :MEW17 _ NO MIONILna MN Ell• =*11Mallff, relffine EibtliVa mg • —an mat=iinzi Fist Nis; zaingizirk aiiira =BIM 1. 4111 I •••-a-mion, iiMie!=ire.1! .n•M'111 _ •=—,.,is_. ,i-ase=.1w ipmez-fip. — M.MME=111M -21111E..iimen EIMS..,amen IME=171, ••••=m1,7 war CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SPECIAL EXCEPTION WORKSHEET The purpose of this worksheet are two -fold: (1) to assist the Planning and Zoning Board and the Board of Adjustment in the evaluation of all criteria relevant to the application; and (2) to educate the applicant as to the criteria which must be addressed and satisfied prior to beginning the special exception consideration process. If the applicant can not satisfactorily address one or more of the following, this should serve as a preliminary indication that the request for special exception may be rejected or that the application may not be acceptable for processing. CRITERIA (Building Official or Designee to Verify) 1) Does the Special Exception create any adverse impact to adjacent property through the creation of noise, light, vibration, traffic, utility requirements, or stormwater runoff that would not have been created had the property been developed as a principle use in the applicable zoning district. The special exception is for 102 residential units. The requirements found in the land development code should be able to minimize any impacts created for adjacent property owners. Traffic would generate four to six additional peak hour trips. If developed as a commercial use, more than likely it would generate more peak hour trips. It should be noted the existing site is the southgate mobile home park with approximately 90 mobile home/pads 2) Will the Special Exception create any unusual police, fire or emergency services? There should be no unusual needs or requirements for police, fire or emergency services. 3) Will the Special Exception meet all the requirements of the zoning district in which the request is to be located, such as: lot requirements, building setbacks requirements, lot coverage, height, buffers, off-street parking, signs, storage, landscaping, etc.? The lot should be able to accommodate all of the above requirements. This will be determined during site plan review. 4) Is there adequate ingress and egress, with particular reference to auto and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and emergency access in case of fire or medical emergency? There should be appropriate ingress and egress from this site. The access being proposed will be to Anchorage Avenue. 5) Is there adequate off-street parking and . loading areas available without creating undue noise, glare, odor or other detrimental effects upon adjoining property owners? It would appear that adequate off street parking could be accommodated on site. This will be determined during site plan review. 6) Is there adequate and properly located utilities available or may be reasonably provided to serve the proposed development (if applicable)? There are a full set of utilities available to serve the subject property. 7) Is there adequate screening and/or buffering provided to protect and provide compatibility to adjoining properties? It would appear Landscaping will be required per the landscaping code. A landscape plan was not included with the application. 8) Are signs and exterior lighting, if any, designed and arranged so as to promote traffic safety and to eliminate or minimize any undue glare, incompatibility, and disharmony with adjoining properties? Being a request for residential use the property should be compatible with the surrounding uses. This would be further evaluated as part of the site plan review. 9) Is there adequate refuse and service areas? There is adequate refuse capacity. Refuse service would be curb side pick up service. 10) Do the setbacks, landscaping, and open space meet the requirements of the zoning district? The project appears to be able to meet setbacks and open space requirements. Landscaping will need to be enhanced consistent with the code. 11) Is the proposed use compatible with surrounding uses in its function, its ours of operation, the type amount of traffic generated, structure size and setbacks, its relationship to land values and any other facts that may be used to measure or determine compatibility? The proposed use should be compatible with the surrounding uses, provided limited traffic impact and meet setback requirements. However, a traffic study will be required at the time of a site plan. 12) Is the Special Exception consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? This special exception request is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 13) Is the Special Exception consistent with the intent of the zoning district with which the Special Exception is sought? 2 cis-D This special exception request can meet the requirements for this zoning district found in the land development code. 14) Has the petitioner met the minimum requirements for the requested Special Exception and demonstrated entitlement to the Special Exception which will not adversely affect the public interest? To be recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board and determined by the Board of Adjustment. 15) Should the Special Exception be granted with any noted limitations, restrictions and/or conditions? To be recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board and determined by the Board of Adjustment. 3 BUILDING OFFICIAL OR DESIGNEE REVIEW 1. Zoning Amendment 2. Variance 3. X Special Exception 4. Administrative Appeal Contiguous Zoning North South East West Cl C1 C1 M1 CONSIDERATIONS SETBACKS: COVERAGE: LOT SIZE: DENSITY: HEIGHT: Yes MEETS CODE Yes MEETS CODE Yes MEETS CODE Yes MEETS CODE Yes MEETS CODE CODE VIOLATION (Describe) CODE VIOLATION (Describe) CODE VIOLATION (Describe) CODE VIOLATION (Describe) CODE VIOLATION (Describe) ADDITIONAL REFERENCES PARKING LOADING ZONE SETBACKS (A1A Ridgewood/Astronaut) LANDSCAPING NON -CONFORMITIES STRUCTURES LAND USES Code Sect. 110-491 NA Applicability Yes No X 110-536 X 110-566-567 X NA NA NA X NOTE: The Planning & Zoning Board should also review Section 110-47 (1-11) COMMENTS: No additional comments Date Reviewed by Building Official o( q6�gs ee: Z Signature: 4 City of Cape Canaveral Southgate Condominiums Special Exception Applicant: Allen Engineering Inc. Location: Range: 37 Township: 24 Section: 14 Acreage. 7.29 +/- acres Allowable Number of Units:109 Dwelling Units Existing Mobile Home Pads: 93 mobile homes/pad sites Proposed Number of Units: 102 Condominium Units Current Future Land Use: Commercial C-1 Current Zoning: Commercial C-1 Description: The applicant desires to use the property for residential condominium use in a Commercial C-1. The subject property itself is the existing Southgate mobile home park and is located on the west side of North Atlantic Avenue. N North South East West Zoning C 1 Commercial C 1 commercial C 1 Commercial MI Industrial Comp Plan C 1 Commercial C 1 Commercial C 1 Commercial MI Industrial *Existing Conditions * cc. _ Residential SE, Condominiums Residential SE, Condominiums Vacant, Residential Vacant/ Industrial w/Canaveral Bulk storage and proposed Cape Office Building project — Has special exception Public Services and Facilities in Amendment Area: The impact on public services for one (1) residential unit is, the Level of Service for parks and recreation is one (2) acres of park land per 1,000 residents. Approximately twenty-four (24) acres of park land exist in Cape Canaveral. This equates to a population of approximately 12,000 residents. The City's population as of April, 2005 was 10,034. This is still adequate park space available. The traffic on North Atlantic is operating at Level of Service "D" with 150 available peak hour trips between North Atlantic and Central Blvd. North Atlantic south of Central Blvd is operating at a level of service "D" with 195 available peak hour trips from Central Blvd to Al A. The maximum peak -hour volume acceptable is 810 representing a LOS of "E". The proposed development will have a net increase of approximately 10 to 12 dwelling units could generate 5 to 7 additional peak hour trips per day and this would not create a traffic deficiency. The City of Cape Canaveral provides wastewater treatment. The wastewater treatment capacity is 1.8 million gallons per day (MGD). The existing usage is 1.26 MGD with an excess capacity of .54 MGD. The development with the net increase would generate 3,600 gallons per day. There is adequate wastewater treatment capacity available. The City of Cocoa has a total potable water capacity of 56 MGD and currently provides 48 MGD. Approximately 24.4 MGD of water is being used on an average daily basis, leaving 23.6 MGD available. The development with the net increase would consume 3,600 gallons per day. There is adequate potable water service available with the proposed change. Brevard County provides facilities for solid waste disposal. At this time, the County does not foresee any deficiency with their solid waste facilities. Environmental Description of Amendment Area: The subject parcel has Pb — Palm Beach soil associated with sandy soils, fast draining and low water table. Ca — Canaveral Sand very well draining soil and Pk — Parkwood soil fine sand moderately well drained soil. There are no known wetlands, floodplains or endangered species currently identified on site. Historical and Archaeological Resources in Amendment Area: There are no known historical or archeological resources on site. Population Projections and Trends: The average single family dwelling unit may contain 2.37 persons per unit or 28 persons. This should not have a significant affect on the population projections. MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Morley, CBO Building Official TO: Todd Peetz City Planner FROM: Ed Gardulski Public Works Director DATE: February 2, 2006 RE: Special Exception Request No 06-01 Residential in Commercial Southgate Condo The Public Works Department has reviewed the special exception request and does not have any comments or concerns with the residential usage in Commercial zoning. MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Morley, Building Official FROM: Todd Peetz City Planner DATE: - February 28, 2006 RE: Special Exception Residential in Commercial Zoning 06-01 I have reviewed the submittal of the special exception review for the above referenced project. My comments are addressed in the special exception worksheet attached to this item. Further review will be conducted during the permitting process for compliance of all local and state codes. The Engineer of Record is responsible for any requirements not identified by the City. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 407-629-8880. .. : MEMORANDUM To: Todd Peetz, Legg & Assoc. Building Department From: John J. Cunningham, Asst. Fire Chi 1? ' , /7 iP,',V,;.1; ,',,`• "e' ''''-, Re: Special Exception 06-01 Date: 02-01-2006 - •-• i We have reviewed the spect exceptionand have thefq owng comments: 1. The Southgate Site Plan doesn't rneet the access requirements of the Fire Department. • ' " • .. 4 Station #1 190 Jackson Avenue • Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 (321) 783-4777 • Fax: (321) 783-5398 •• • • • • •-,;•-•;,.:,„1.-.-• Station #2 8970 Columbia Road • Cape Canaveral, Florida 329 (321) 783-4424 • Fax: (321) 783-4887 www.ccvfd.org Meeting Type: Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Date: 3/08/06 SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT PLANNING & ZONING BOARD THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL AGENDA Heading Special Exception 06-02 Item No.. #3 Special Exception request 06-02 to allow Residential use in a Commercial district. DEPT./DIVISION: Building Department Requested Action: Consider and make a recommendation to the Board of Adjustment for approval/denial of residential use in a commercial district. Summary Explanation & Background: The applicant is Ken Wilson representing the owner of Treasure Key Town homes. They have requested a special exception for residential use in a commercial district. This property is currently vacant on the south side of Washington Avenue. The proposed number of units is eight (8) Town homes. The project is located between Poinsetta (east) and North Atlantic Avenue (west) on the south side of Washington Avenue. Exhibits Attached: #1 Application, #2 Legal description and owner related information, #3 Applicant information regarding the special exception, #4 Notification to Surrounding Property Owners, #5 Staff Report on the Special Exception. City Planner's Office Department: Building Department 1 a8GG ii 11 City of Cape Canaveral Building Department (Please Print Legibly or Type) DATE FILED ‘(O6v FEE PAID tW 50, OC.) DEPOSIT 45 15,29 RECV'D BY:5AC ($250.00 Filing Fee is non-refundable) 3d�J a(42-cu Td q ItHi-H75,2_ NATURE OF REQUEST Special Exception is for what purpose (Brief Description) % oo �ot/Lr.7 77)ui,/" (W4-S4i,v-6TDB _Ave_ Address of request (if applicable) OooO/..Opoo f Legal Description: Lotij-RBlock Parcel o . 0000ubdv / 'ool' Section 211 Township 3 ? Range o7 3 STATEMENT OF FACT: State of Florida, County of Brevard; I ,!'it ice/ 4460/V , being duly sworn, depose and say that: I am the property owner. i/ I am the owner(s) designated agent. (notarized authorization required) Owner(s) Name(s): .L • .10yC Address: 93 Or L-A-.v,ve y 4v, cocoa 32 9 ZZ Home Phone 32/-73.?-Xa.3kWork Phone.-32/-5/2.73/n7E-Mail Applicant(s) Names(s): gtAi Ma-5 cv\e Address: yo "Tg tAite- 4M 14,0 ryle4a,77— 2701,,d40 P. r /• Home Phone32f-q/s3-i»1 Work Phone3 / Z1 -(CYe E-Mail All information, sketches and data contained and made part of this request, are honest and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of Applicant Sworn to and subscribed ore me on this 30 day of Qan 11 q , 20 Oto. L7ii •1 £ . a cK cult cL U Notary Public, State of Florida r-fb es�4eff - �� r'T NOTARY PUBLIC -STATE OF FLORIDA Nitza L. Packard Commission # DD431715 Expires: APR. 26, 2006 Bonded Thru At]antic Bonding Co., Inc The completed request form and the $250 filing fee must be filed as follows: Requests for Variances, Rezoning and Special Exceptions (Except Telecommunication Towers), require a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the next regularly scheduled Planning & Zoning Board Meeting; Request for Telecommunications Towers, require a minimum of sixty (60) days prior to the Planning & Zoning Board meeting. The Board of Adjustment meeting will be set after the request is heard by the Planning & Zoning Board. (A deposit may be required per Section 110-92 ) http://fcn.state.fl.us/cape/building permit_files/SPECIAL%20EXCEPTION.htm 08/23/2005 t/ Iso 'f n City of Cape Canaveral APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION This application must be legibly completed and returned, with all enclosures referred to therein, to the Building Department, a minimum of Thirty (30) days (sixty (60) days for Telecommunications Towers) prior to the next regularly scheduled meeting in order to be processed for consideration by the Planning & Zoning Board for study and recommendation to the Board of Adjustment. The owner or a owner representative are required to attend the meetings and will be notified by the board secretary of the date and time of the meetings. The Planning & Zoning Board holds regular meetings on the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays of every month at 7:30 p.m. in the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MUST BE SUPPLIED PRIOR TO PROCESSING THE APPLICATION. If you have any questions, please contact the Building Department at (321) 868-1222 7 DATE: //_g0f0� 1. NAME OF APPLICANT(S) ��n/ /1/450nI ADDRESS (if assigned) 4h/0 774gitSti % PJ'P L PHONE #3zl-`153 kO FAX # 32/- ys3-��� - E-MAIL 321 .24 7 -664'6 2. COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: LOT: y- S BLOCK: -- SUBDIVISION: ,4i/aAJ -Ay - i-}.f - Se PARCEL: % 00001/. p /, o13t9D5 0 SIZE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IN ACRES: r 1 02 SECTION: r? y TOWNSHIP 3 7 RANGE a3 DESCRIPTION: 14f1 T 3. ORDINANCES SECTION UNDER WHICH SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS SOUGHT (EXAMPLE, ARTICLE X, SECTION 2) 4. COMPLETE THE ATTACHED WORKSHEET IN FULL. (INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY RESULT IN DENIAL OF REQUEST) 5. PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION: (EXAMPL , i C-2, R-1, R-2, M-1 ETC.) 6. PROVIDE THIRTEEN (13) COPIES OF SITE PLAN OR APPROPRIATE DRAWING(S) SHOWING THE FOLLOWING WHERE APPLICABLE: (a) Adequate ingress and egress may be obtained to and from the property, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and emergency access in case of fire or medical emergency. http://fcn.state.fl.us/cape/building_permit__files/SPECIAL%20EXCEPTION.htm 08/23/2005 (b) Adequate off-street parking -and loading areas are provided without -creating --- undue noise, glare, odor or detrimental effects upon adjoining properties. (c) Adequate and properly located utilities are available or may be reasonably provided to serve the proposed development (d) Adequate screening and/or buffering will be provided to protect and provide compatibility with adjoining properties. (e) Signs and exterior lighting, if any, will be so designed and arranged so as to promote l affic safety and fi ehif mate or muunnze any undue glare, incompatibility, or disharmony with adjoining properties and will be permitted and in compliance with all adopted codes and ordinances. (f) Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the issues relating to (a) and (b) above. (g) Required setbacks and other open space. (h) Height. (i) Landscaping. (j) Renewal and/ or termination dates relating to a lease, if applicable. (k) That the proposed use will be reasonably compatible with surrounding uses in its function, its hours of operation, the type and amount of traffic generated, structure size and setbacks, its relationship to land values and any other facts that may be used to measure or determine compatibility. PLEASE NOTE: In granting any Special Exception, the Board of Adjustment may prescribe appropriate conditions, stipulations and safeguards to ensure conformity with the foregoing. STATE REASON FOR REQUEST (attach additional sheet if necessary): ( ASKINfr (��. "1Z1`� SP�G+at_ gt.e. 110-o_ovv1 C- 1 m ✓Yluurl eat N HewiES , -rife at,P e o..w Q 1 j E 1 c.5 f►,e c I L R,esia,,t, L, eert, Sr ti-14O e rt -'i 44V►1 tL j Qf2 bee R-TI CS, TEFL "tb 4 1 ires tQ& e_ofv.& . 6.\ To TH- °xttiR�wn�F71h1� F90eneries _ Ht.RE ALL GC A- TerrriL oc cCS' u-tV'Ts NN"P-w‘Ikrj 1t g 2 OrsT2.Ze,vraa.4.i2 ►-we.a4 .1 hnp://fcn.state.fl.us/cape/building_permit files/SPECIAL%20EXCEPTION.htm 08/23/2005 1 11.15V V V1 11 THE FOLLOWING ENCLOSURES ARE NEEDED TO COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION: *Paid receipt from Finance Department for $250.00 Application Fee. * Paid receipt from Finance Department for Deposit, if applicable. (Make checks payable to the "City of Cape Canaveral") / A listing of legal descriptions of all properties within a 500 ft radius of the boundaries of the property contained in the request, together with the names and mailing addresses (including zip codes) of all respective property owners within the above referenced area. Include three (3) complete sets of mailing labels of all property owners within a 500 ft. radius. (This can be obtained from the Tax Assessor's Office.) The list shall be legible and the source of the information submitted stated here: This information was obtained from: CgAoithc5 Dept I/ A property map showing properties within the 500 ft radius, clearly outlining the subject property. The Location map showing adjacent properties uses, zoning, streets, driveways, canals and utilities. �7. Where Property is not owned by the applicant, a Power of Attorney must be attached giving the Notarized consent of the property owner to the applicant to request the Special Exception. /8. Copy of recorded deed to subject property. ,./9. Completed worksheet. 1 10. If applicable, elevation drawing(s) or photograph(s) of proposed structure(s) are encouraged. • NOTE: Application fee of $250.00 is non-refundable upon payment to the City. • NOTE: Any balance from required deposit will be returned to the applicant upon written request minus all associated costs. http://fcn.state.fl.us/cape/building_permit files/SPECIAL%20EXCEPTION.htm 08/23/2005ec‘) CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SPECIAL EXCEPTION WORKSHEET The purpose of this worksheet are two -fold: (1) to assist the Planning and Zoning Board and the Board of Adjustment in the evaluation of all criteria relevant to the application; and (2) to educate the applicant as to the criteria which must be_ addressed and satisfied prior to beginning the special exception consideration process. If the applicant can not satisfactorily address one or more of the following, this should serve as a preliminary indication that the request for special exception may be rejected or that the application may not be acceptable for processing. CRITERIA (B"iulding Offici i or Designee to -Verify) 1) Does the Special Exception create any adverse impact to adjacent property through the creation of noise, light, vibration, traffic, utility requirements, or stormwater runoff that would not have been created had the property been devel ped as a principle use in the applicable zoning district. No, -its pgcser (ALL Co►Jt - v -Tr) p e -( ea -Tics y T8f u 1-4n�m�s wtu. 0P- rT !i- ltlii-sC eL-£ lmpigCF$� w flf !fieisc trtlT, TIZA e-i:.. S70Rw, w a ct. g\kp Lot t ! eivar rye ,p✓�p 'to a .g e. NY° i tm pA-ccerNi Qi Pest--riE.S 2) Will the Special Exception create any unusual polite, fire or emergency services? Not Ttze. SooLLt-43 Bc x mac' e,'3E i ,.l u,ousu m, emea ervci SefRAitces Ou,E -TO -11* Tb *-) 1Abert.ES, 3) Will the Special Exception meet all the requirements of the zoning district in which the request is to be located, such as: lot requirements, building setbacks requirements, lot coverage, height, buffers, off-street parking, signs, storage, landscaping, etc.? \1 �s, Au. o4 T t1-E ?.*N i'46- P akmze r.e+v-rs r'ne+v-Tro&t o wt t,t Be inter, As o emsaileo 'I o(4N} TN£. CoN&tui--10.5 o-� PQe .,tONA-t- 5,ete•VICeS erv[rripega/t d wo c..4. vtS 4) Is there a equate ingress and egress, with particular reference to auto and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and emergency access in case of fire or medical emergency?'j s, ?die teat-4-ee r� QUPr1t ✓ioeess b Fac,n4 -rtle itopetiTy Tolt..2(,. A c See-vlcP: StDEK.44..1LS Gllltt_ e.ttsurkeS7iZtwN gA Awe,oncT IQ-T12if -*L L FLow wIu. e.-e. t� .1'�t rri4-12_e , 5) Is there adequate off-street parking and loading areas available without creating undue noise, glare, odor or other detrimental effects Ripon adjoining property owners? Vt?S j Q=z w tt,L (3C a c 9 (a s weAk. A3 Su.- ict af,wf 4 a --Tv u ;,Alva w r &c. y i E -foe_ su. 6) Is there adequate and properly located utilities available or may be reasonably provided to serve the proposed development (if applicable)? �45 Li -nut -vies t eef° i-oc.#- tQ QA) e g vo ft 2. wr- , -71 ' e.E,Qu. ttn zt pwJfl w u,L f3 t Su t t:,t e.u-t , Tzo Oev t-eei )� 7) Is there adequate screening and/or buffering provided to protect and provide compatibility to adjoining properties? Vf_ �r4N�DScApt N l u i l-� II4QC AS r cwet-L �l vac, PetA ce-A-Lc�vcj The r�i� o �t � (�op�R� s ty pR.vt) of ctervr o t ►'�/ , 0ev g,LoPf - i.'t LA- ("bit- Ope1,1 ' t 12,10j t � stca L 71 c t Yrl n-q c 8) Are si and Oct nor lighting, if g g, any, designed and arranged so as to promote traffic safety and to eliminate or minimize an undue Tare, incom atibility, ,and disharmony with ad1'o�inin roperties? 1E5t -Tti ' os t e�ei-vpn"e r �`'►�`- e- Ot$,e-NF mA�dvEP- �0.1.- nror ��+pe�t3 �,n+� c�t�ifr�w►�� c.f�t.sz tsouEs -�;Q, t 0+2 i-l+t-Rolvk_teS u> i-rm- t orotAirt., p u--t€.S , http://fcn.state.fl.us/cape/building_permit_files/SPECIAL%20EXCEPTION.htm 08/23/2005 9) Is there adequate refuse and servije areas? *5, As w mt y DTI'- e9-40(T� 9Et0e e . o''t►E wow 6►� fWoNSir3L i fen. ROE tiewtg N eirk-- PUL O^: tJ - Or_ na At . ;a TNISL ti-E_ e EASE w➢t_ - G r� 11e 1- of - aP- 5eQ 7 10) Do the set acks, landscaping, and open space meet the requirements of the zoning district? VES 1 4. sen3ti kS, l-RPosc_rif1,Jf ,- A.wo ePeA) SP A R-- 4 (46 toev- 1''t3 Re Ttr•-r'r-t 6 to w wt.- ilwirn ee i 02 6, Geed 2 ©).) t lkJ 1 4 L Vn r 1 " - . 5e4Vtc-e.S o-P Sat/Eyort.S q kvo evL_aAi, cta- t,uiLA (3c us eFt4 ezr4- 11) Is tI prop e use compatible with surrounding uses in its function, its hours of operation, the type amount of traffic generated, structure size and setbacks, its rely ionsiup to land values and any other facts thalmay be used to measure -Dr determine compatibility? YES) 1'r(-e tN .Rom es t,) i LL. r3z Jk,.y emp,4-ri 4N0 Oar 1- t 1(E_ 1G tv D9 Ntry ON IN 1 )4 2 \l C. .t (Z E. j (34i- g ME E ,q,v i F'u,Nc-11 Dv, -r1+►5 toecas cr �►t,L -ef LE -MG 4•1,0(94+[ion-Ni3 ; tl-.►o Lulu_ (3E R- paStn v e 1 Me-goytLm•o. 1=©2 -TTCg- .A-9€f-. 12) Is the Special Exception consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? Its, -TFtis PRE-60-J 15 ,nppt-el- sutz{ce ,e IN *4 t-kegAs r►n $� .N i�-�1.-� F&141 .R ES LIDe ) LE , ` rg e- E S ow Ato vve..s Lo u- er mo A E Cor.Nll .3T ii-itiO 4 '�0-vni lvj ter %1-H -The. Su.R „ ev-01, en--T1 ES, -Tth' 6i C'oogr eia-t+v}t- eP-ex e .19"fr 1 4-A, Lec- --c-tor - 13) Is the Special Exception consistent with the intent of the zoning district with which the Special Exception is sought? WS f4-b-s.t,& io,a14 1 0rvnes w t u.. 13 v► tit- Nsno is-Pero-F. few 0 O o v P hurl s ,.ty j® 5 P-cz.3 wo s o) Yv71 04:9-44 /Y1ta-c-, F%-L 14) Has the petitioner met the minimum requirements for the requested Special Exception and demonstrated entitlement to the Special Exception which will not adversely affect the public interest? kt'S D ecivu s it- MVO S e e-t eM OeveLoP rw a s i N I- I N CE, 0 e©N-oe-rv‘s -to 1-7-1-t-t Suaeo u7 /Wen- m+,o ? eR?-1es , .T-ti. IVbaet W ► 6t- W-0T- 11t P J yuir1.�, t v-Egs P i- t'!- FFf.c r-'it(>U f31..1 c.._ 1,N-tec2- es-i 15) Should the Special Exception be granted with any noted limitations, restrictions and/or conditions? NO. --ri{-E. ea Sf 0 Oev 1-0Pme" iuti. rnee,f flu. U� i ttt Keuv t rrtv_w S€i , Avvo L ri.,� 0o DLW'. t) rflF 1n e-e-r . 0 Scity�- 2- s 16) Should the Special Exception be specifically granted to the petitioner or run �^ concurrently with the property? VEs I --nit._s7�t excep .� 5 � u Lp a & 1?4t9to --co -rake.ee-rc 1 nN E4' - o w ThE c -- r A-- -71" Pb'sC-1). D pntie i ► ' w10 �:E., 0.-9 tscc,5 '' e2 C c_S -rf4 -11 t-t- C u.ct.(L_e e 4._ Zo +4 ► ry . 11+1 S QR-05t t_T ut ► LL * T DO-1 r N i4-144-Nt-e. 'Mt. AelZAX- y 6 WT' W ► t-%-- ‘ m V q- T* - 144tut, S e F GJc tR-2eu..nso t t%per t t S, F 14- Co t w €41-c t vt-k- ,(2-0 tT 1 s A-4-1- w . i uv t t_t_. i4,0 1 -arf nsE Q � r 04- a f.-6-&--rt v` E- 'F4e.c-T- et-ti i14-t- GLA-9-0-&,-L,"->-0 z � ()%A.9.,5 http://fcn.state.fl.us/cape/building permit__files/SPECIAL%20EXCEPTTON.htm 08/23/2005 City of Cape Canaveral February 8, 2006 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER(S): Special Exception Request #06-02 Notice is hereby given by the City of Cape Canaveral, that Ken Wilson representing L. Joyce Carlton, 440 Treasure Lagoon Lane, Merritt Island, FL 32953 has requested a Special Exception To Allow Residential Use in a Commercial Zoning District, pursuant to the Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances, Zoning Regulations, Section 110-334(C)(10) for the property described as follows: Legal Description: Township 24S, Range 37E, Section 23, Lots 4-8, Block 1 Parcel ID: 24-37-23-CG-00001.0-0004.00 through 0008.00, Avon by the Sea (Washington Ave., Cape Canaveral, FL 32920) In accordance with the City Code of Ordinance No. 18-2002, this letter shall serve as notice that there will be a public hearing before the Cape Canaveral Planning and Zoning Board regarding the property noted above. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL. The Planning & Zoning Board is advisory in nature and will make a recommendation to the Cape Canaveral Board of Adjustment with respect to the above -named property. The final administrative approval or denial will come before the Board of Adjustment at a subsequently scheduled meeting. Since your property may be located within 500-feet of this property comments can be made in person or may be submitted in writing at the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting or to the City Clerk's Office at 105 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not constitute consent by the City far the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by law. Persons with disabifrties needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City Clerk's office (868-1221), 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Susan Stills, CMC City Clerk 518 548 1581114921111i87654751 ?Id HIM : 258 7I I i 11 I_ILN <; i DI LH i 1„Si 1 T•F 254 — i 1.81 112119I}1A11415 Dif':u itlf12 _Li1 c _P AD 258 1 !:!ii2lip4.910ii' 1 Io Pu!ryfk--�---�- `�—!�- rM 284 1 12 125678 �1 2 56y 83 '141 8 118 11 105 Polk Avenue • Post Office Box 326 • Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-0326 Telephone: (321) 868-1220 • SUNCOM: 982-1220 • FAX: (321) 868-1248 wwwmyflorida.com/cape • e-mail: ccapecanaveral@cil.rr.com RADIUS MAP LORD POW RD RR M CERFRADTli CARYRR 3I 8 a cou Q H 6 6 6 ea 4 Z3UUUS AaR34.33$ AI 3s 46 45 4 21 45 es 12 ADAIB AY 65 64 52 Ae a to 1 Ae Ao 70 ur arnategor p55, YA➢Bgl AY WNROR AY n JACKSON AY n 8ARRIDOR AY IA®ox AY APPLICANT NAMES)/ADDRESS; fIISON, KEN 266-6668, O!NER NAMES)/ADDRESS L JOYCE CARLTON, TRUSTEE P.O. BOX 540545, MERRITT ISLAND, FL 32954 r,44.r102 •YYrtRxro Brevard County Property Appraiser. Jim Ford Based on data from the Property Appraiser's office me SCALE IS L6000 (one inch = 500 feet) /NO This map was compiled from recorded documents and does not reflect an actual survey. The Brevard County Board of Commissioners, Property Appraiser, and Geographic Information Services do not assume responsibility for errors or omissions contained hereon. Produced by; Brevard County Planning k Zoning Office — GIS, January 27, 2006 .4eR100-1,cmy BUFFER DISTANCR 500 FEET N LEGEND: Notification buffer Parcel/lot boundaries Numbers on map correspond to mailing list tirevard County Property Appraiser-- Online Real Estate Property Card Page 1 of 2 (Home] (Meet JimFordl (Appraiser's Job] [FAQ( (General Info] (Save Our Homes] (Exemptions] [Tangible Property] (Contact Us] [Locations] [Forms] [Appeals] [Property Research] [Map Search] (Maps & Data] [Unusable Property] [Tax Authorities] ]fax Facts] (Economic Indicators] (What's New] [Links] [Press Releases] (Tax Estimator] • (Parcel Id: * Site Address: ___General L'arcel_Infarmation-for-2 -3 23-CG-0000-1.0-0004.00 24-3 7-23-CG-000 01.0- 0004.00 Map Millage Code: 26G0 Exemption:) 'Use Code: I Tax IAccount: 1000 Site address assigned by the Brevard County Address Assignment Office for mailing purposes; may not reflect community location of property. Owner Information Owner Name: I Second Name: I Mailing Address: City, State, Zipcode: CARLTON, L JOYCE TRUSTEE P 0 BOX 540545 MERRITT ISLAND, FL 32954 Value Summary for 2005 I** Market Value: II $20,630 !Agricultural Assessment: II $0 (Assessed Value: I $20,630 I*** Homestead Exemption: II $0 I***Other Exemptions: II $01 !Taxable Value: II $20,6301 Legal Description 2433269' Plat Book/Page: 0003/0007 AVON BY THE SEA LOT 4 BLK 1 View Plat (requires Adobe Acrobat Reader - file size may be large) Land Information !Acres: (Site Code: !Land Value: 0.141 OI $20,6301 ** This is the value established for ad valorem purposes in accordance with s.193.011(1) and (8), Florida Statutes. This value does not represent anticipated selling price for the property. *** Exemptions as reflected on the Value Summary table are applicable for the year shown and may or may not be applicable if an owner change has occured. Sales Information OR Book/Page Sale Date Sale Amount Deed Type *** Sales Screening Code *** Sales Screening Source Vacant/Improved http://www.brevardpropertyappraiser. com/asp/Show_parcel. asp?acct=2433269&gen=T&... 02/01/2006 Brevard County Property Appraiser-- Online Real Estate Property Card Page 2 of 2 5382/0315 II11/2004II$500,000II WD II PT II II V 4666/1461 1800/0938 0493/0537 7/2002 10/1977 $100 $3,000 $18,000 TD V *** Sales Screening Codes and Sources are from analysis by the Property Appraiser's staff. They have no bearing on the prior or potential marketability of the property. Tax information is also available at the Brevard County Tax Collector's web site (Select -the -bask but-ten-to-retur —t -the /roperty--Appraiseris web site) Data Last Updated: Tuesday, January 31, 2006- Printed On: Wednesday, February 01, 2006. New Searc Help' [Home] [Meet JimFord] [Appraiser's Job] [FAQ] [General Info] [Save Our Homes] [Exemptions] 'Tangible Property] [Contact Us] 'Locations] [Forms] 'Appeals] property Research] 'Map Search] "Maps & Data] 'Unusable Property] [Tax Authorities] [Tax Facts] [Economic Indicators] 'What's New] JLinks]'Press Releases] 'Tax Estimator] Copyright © 1997 Brevard County Property Appraiser. All rights reserved. Disclaimer Applies to Results http://www.brevardpropertyappraiser. com/asp/Show_parcel.asp?acct=2433269&gen=T&... 02/01/2006 CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SPECIAL EXCEPTION WORKSHEET The purpose of this worksheet are two -fold: (1) to assist the Planning and Zoning Board and the Board of Adjustment in the evaluation of all criteria relevant to the application; and (2) to educate the applicant as to the criteria which must be addressed and satisfied prior to beginning the special exception consideration process. If the applicant can not satisfactorily address one or more of the following, this should serve as a preliminary indication that the request for special exception may be rejected or that the application may not be acceptable for processing. CRITERIA (Building Official or Designee to Verify) 1) Does the Special Exception create any adverse impact to adjacent property through the creation of noise, light, vibration, traffic, utility requirements, or stormwater runoff that would not have been created had the property been developed as a principle use in the applicable zoning district. The special exception is for eight (8) residential units. The requirements found in the land development code should be able to minimize any impacts created for adjacent property owners. Traffic would generate four to six additional peak hour trips. If developed as a commercial use, more than likely it would generate more peak hour trips. 2) Will the Special Exception create any unusual police, fire or emergency services? There should be no unusual needs or requirements for police, fire or emergency services. 3) Will the Special Exception meet all the requirements of the zoning district in which the request is to be located, such as: lot requirements, building setbacks requirements, lot coverage, height, buffers, off-street parking, signs, storage, landscaping, etc.? The lot should be able to accommodate all of the above requirements. This will be determined during site plan review. 4) Is there adequate ingress and egress, with particular reference to auto and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and emergency access in case of fire or medical emergency? There should be appropriate ingress and egress from this site. The access being proposed will be to Washington Avenue. 5) Is there adequate off-street parking and loading areas available without creating undue noise, glare, odor or other detrimental effects upon adjoining property owners? It would appear that adequate off street parking could be accommodated on site. This will be determined during site plan review. 6) Is there adequate and properly located utilities available or may be reasonably provided to serve the proposed development (if applicable)? There are a full set of utilities available to serve the subject property. 7) Is there adequate screening and/ or buffering provided to protect and provide compatibility to adjoining properties? It would appear.. Landscapingwill be required per the -landscaping -code.- A landscape plan was not included with the application. 8) Are signs and exterior lighting, if any, designed and arraneci sci as to promote traffic safety and to eliminate or minimize any undue glare, incompatibility, and disharmony with adjoining properties? Being a request for residential use the property should be compatible with the surrounding uses. This would be further evaluated as part of the site plan review. 9) Is there adequate refuse and service areas? There is adequate refuse capacity. Refuse service would be curb side pick up service. 10) Do the setbacks, landscaping, and open space meet the requirements of the zoning district? The project appears to be able to meet setbacks and open space requirements. Landscaping will need to be enhanced consistent with the code. 11) Is the proposed use compatible with surrounding uses in its function, its ours of operation, the type amount of traffic generated, structure size and setbacks, its relationship to land values and any other facts that may be used to measure or determine compatibility? The proposed use should be compatible with the surrounding uses, provided limited traffic impact and meet setback requirements. 12) Is the Special Exception consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? This special exception request is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 13) Is the Special Exception consistent with the intent of the zoning district with which the Special Exception is sought? This special exception request can meet the requirements for this zoning district found in the land development code. 2 101 14) Has the petitioner met the minimum requirements for the requested Special Exception and demonstrated entitlement to the Special Exception which will not adversely affect the public interest? To be recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board and determined by the Board of Adjustment. 15) Should the Special Exception be granted with -any noted limitations, restrictions and/or conditions? To be recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board and determined by the Roard of Adjustment. BUILDING OFFICIAL OR DESIGNEE REVIEW 1. Zoning Amendment 2. Variance 3. X Special Exception Contiguous Zoning North South East West Administrative Appeal C1 C1 R2 C1 CONSIDERATIONS SETBACKS: COVERAGE: LOT SIZE: DENSITY: HEIGHT: Yes MEETS CODE Yes MEETS CODE Yes MEETS CODE Yes MEETS CODE Yes MEETS CODE CODE VIOLATION (Describe) CODE VIOLATION (Describe) CODE VIOLATION (Describe) CODE VIOLATION (Describe) CODE VIOLATION (Describe) ADDITIONAL REFERENCES PARKING LOADING ZONE SETBACKS (A1A Ridgewood/Astronaut) LANDSCAPING NON -CONFORMITIES STRUCTURES LAND USES Code Sect. 110-491 NA 110-536 110-566-567 NA NA NA Applicability Yes No X X NOTE: The Planning & Zoning Board should also review Section 110-47 (1-11) COMMENTS: No additional comments Date Reviewed by Building Official or Designee: Signature: 4 City of Cape Canaveral Treasure Key Special Exception Applicant: Applicant Representative, Ken Wilson. Location: Range: 37 Township: 24 Section: 14 Lots 4 thru 8, Block 1 Acreage: .72 +/- or an Acre Allowable Number of Units:10 residential units Proposed Number of Units: 8 residential units Current Future Land Use: Commercial C-1 Current Zoning: Commercial C-1 Description: The applicant desires to build 8 town home units. The subject parcel is currently vacant located on the southwest corner of Washington Avenue and Poinsetta Avenue N North South East West Zoning C 1 Commercial C 1 Commercial R2 Residential C 1 Commercial Comp Plan C 1 Commercial C 1 Commercial R2 Residential C 1 Commercial Existing Conditions Residential Townhomes Residential, Townhomes Residential, apartments Residential, town homes/Automotive repair facility Public Services and Facilities in Amendment Area: The Level of Service for parks and recreation is one (2) acres of park land per 1,000 residents. Approximately twenty-four (24) acres of park land exist in Cape Canaveral. This equates to a population of approximately 12,000 residents. The City's population as of April, 2005 was 10,034. This is still adequate park space available. A1A is operating at Level of Service "A" with 373 available peak hour trips between North City Limits and Central Blvd. A1A South of Central Blvd to North Atlantic has a level of Service is "A" with 368 excess trips. This development could generate 4-6 more peak hour trips as added into the Traffic Impact Analysis and capacity is available. The City of Cape Canaveral provides wastewater treatment. The wastewater treatment capacity is 1.8 million gallons per day (MGD). The existing usage is 1.26 MGD with an excess capacity of .54 MGD. This project could generate approximately 2,400 gallons daily. There is adequate wastewater treatment capacity available. The City of Cocoa has a total capacity of 56 MGD and currently provides 48 MGD. Approximately 24.4 MGD of water is being used on an average daily basis, leaving 23.6 MGD available. This project could require approximately 2,800 gallons daily. There is adequate potable water service available with the proposed change. Brevard County provides facilities for solid waste disposal. At this time, the County does not foresee any deficiency with their solid waste facilities. Environmental Description of Amendment Area: The site is vacant Galveston Ga soil type. Galveston Soils are well drained sandy soils that consist of reworked and leveled sandy materials that resemble Galveston sand. There are no known wetlands, Aquifer Recharge or Floodplain areas associated with this parcel. There are also no known endangered species living on the site. Historical and Archaeological Resources in Amendment Area: There are no known historical or archaeological resources on site. Population Projections and Trends: The potential addition of 8 new town home units would equate to at 2.37 persons per household to 18-19 new persons to the City. MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Morley, Building Official ROM: Todd-Peetz DATE. RE: City Planner February 2R, 2006 ------------ Special Exception Residential in Commercial Zoning 06-02 I have reviewed the submittal of the special exception review for the above referenced project. My comments are addressed in the special exception worksheet attached to this item. Further review will be conducted during the permitting process for compliance of all local and state codes. The Engineer of Record is responsible for any requirements not identified by the City. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 407-629-8880. MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Morley, CBO Building Official TO: Todd Peetz City Planner FROM: Ed Gardulski Public Works Director DATE: February 2, 2006 RE: Special Exception Request No 06-02 Residential in Commercial The Public Works Department has reviewed the special exception request and does not have any comments or concerns with the zoning usage. MEMORANDUM To: Todd Peetz, Legg & Assoc. Building Department From: John J. Cunningham, Asst. Fire Chie Re: Special Exception 06-02 Date: 02-01-2006 We have reviewed the special exception an Station #1 190 Jackson Avenue • Cape Canaveral, Florida (321) 783-4777 • Fax: (321) 783-5398 NELEITE 2io7, Station #2 32920 8970 Columbia Road • Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 (321) 783-4424 • Fax: (321) 783-4887 www.ccvfd.org Meeting Type: Planning & Zoning Meeting Date: 3/08/06 AGENDA REPORT PLANNING & ZONING BOARD TIC-GITY-OF-EAPE-CANAVRR*L AGENDA Heading Discussion EAR Process Item No. #4 SUBJECT: Discussion — Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) — Discuss Process DEPT./DIVISION: Building Department Requested Action: Discussion on the EAR Process. Summary Explanation & Background: The City's Comprehensive Plan is required to be updated every seven (7) years, the next evaluation is in August 2007. The Department of Community Affairs strongly encourages community involvement and incorporating that community participation into the EAR process. We discussed having public workshops with the community in the Spring and early Sumner to get the ball rolling. The discussion tonight should focus on what type of public meetings/involvement we should be trying to encourage. Different means to collect information from residents and how to use their feedback to make recommendations for plan amendments. Exhibits Attached: 1) Resolution 2005-38 Planning Official's Office Department