HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06-07-1999CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING
JUNE 7, 1999
MINUTES
A meeting of the City of Cape Canaveral, Community Appearance Board, was
held on June 7, 1999, at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue,
Cape Canaveral, Florida. The Secretary called the roll.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Nadena Easler Chairperson
Walter Bowman Vice Chairperson
Alice Nielsen
MEMBERS ABSENT
Karen Hayes
Eddie Hall
OTHERS PRESENT
Carl Bohne Attorney
Dennis Franklin, C.B.O. Building Official
Susan Stills Assistant City Clerk
Beatrice McNeely Planning & Zoning Chairperson
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Mr. Bowman made a motion and Ms. Nielsen seconded the motion to approve
the amended meeting minutes of May 17, 1999. Ms. Easter requested a change
regarding Ms. Hayes' name on page one. Motion carried unanimously.
Ms. Easler welcomed Mr. Carl Bohne of Barlow & Bohne as the presiding
attorney for this application due to Attorney Bennett's conflict of interest. Mr.
Bohne swore in all persons giving testimony.
1. Request No. 99-12, Solana Lakes and Townhomes; Maath Bennett,
Applicant.
Mr. Bennett introduced Ms. Joyce Gumpers of Allen Engineering. He explained
the project that includes 180 units with living quarters on the first floor. He
described the five-acre lake with a bulk-headed beach and surrounding area with
walkways and pavilions. Mr. Bowman queried about the key-shaped drive. Ms.
Gumpers stated that this is the gated entrance. Mr. Bennett explained that the
section in question is another gated community, Solona Shores is the first gated
City of Cape Canaveral, Florida
Community Appearance Board Meeting
June 7, 1999
Page 2
community, and both properties will use exits at Eberwein Road and in the Port
area. Ms. Nielsen asked for the guard location. Mr. Bennett pointed out the
entrances and exits. Mr. Bennett affirmed Ms. Easler's question that he would
use ribbed tiles for the roof. Ms. Easler questioned about the balcony color. Mr.
Bennett stated white as the railing color with possibly a light color top cap. Ms.
Nielsen asked if he would use metal on the railing. Mr. Bennett stated aluminum.
Mr. Bowman asked about the color for the windows and the sliding glass doors.
Mr. Bennett responded white. Ms. Easler asked Mr. Bennett if he still planned to
retain many trees. Mr. Bennett affirmed that he would although clearing has not
yet begun. He stated that the property is dense and predominately scrub,
however, healthy trees would be retained. Mr. Bowman asked if the sales trailer
is a doublewide. Mr. Bennett affirmed. Ms. Nielsen asked for clarification that the
sales trailer would cease to exist when the project is complete. Mr. Bennett
affirmed. Mr. Franklin queried about a previous discussion on the sales trailer as
a permanent building to be destroyed at a later date instead of a modular
building. Ms. Gumpers affirmed and stated that that decision changed. Mr.
Bennett explained how the new design was more aesthetically pleasing. Mr. John
Rebar of M.R.I. Architects explained further that the engineering for the
permanent structure was not practical.
Mr. Bowman made a motion and Ms. Nielsen seconded the motion to
approve the application for Request No. 99-12 as submitted. Motion carried
unanimously.
DISCUSSION:
Ms. Easler asked Mr. Franklin if Mr. Bowman's suggestion regarding the City
design contest was presented to Council. She then related Mr. Bowman's
suggestion. Mr. Franklin stated that the idea was good but he was not aware if it
were presented to Council. Ms. McNeely affirmed that Attorney Bennett related
the suggestion to Council and perhaps the City Manager would provide follow
through. Ms. Easler asked Mr. Bowman if he could meet with the City Manager
and collaborate on planning the contest.
Mr. Franklin related that the Collier County speaker was present at the previous
City Council meeting and made a proposal at a cost of $18,500. Ms. McNeely
stated that the City Council asked the firm to present the proposal as various
tasks with varied amounts. The first two tasks were to meet with businesses and
citizens who were concerned and to solicit input. After that, the firm would
address the code. Mr. Franklin related that after some discussion, it was decided
that the firm would lay the foundation and give staff direction. Mr. Bowman stated
that this outcome differed from the original concept in that the Appearance Board
would review the options presented by the firm. Mr. Franklin explained that the
City Manager coordinated to have the Collier County firm make a presentation at
the Council meeting and perhaps the Board would have benefited from attending.
City of Cape Canaveral, Florida
Community Appearance Board Meeting
June 7, 1999
Page 3
Ms. McNeely related that Mr. Hancock suggested having a third party mediator,
such as City Council, during meetings with the community.
Ms. McNeely stated that the Collier County firm's concept is not applicable to
definitive rules, such as Canaveral's City Code. Mr. Bowman responded that the
pictorial option of good versus bad design is their successful rule of application.
Mr. Franklin queried about Code Enforcement's reference for applied rules if
there are no stipulations in writing. He asked if a Code Enforcement officer would
refer to a picture in regard to a violation. He stated that the concept is difficult,
although Collier County states that it has not been challenged. Ms. McNeely
responded that what Cape Canaveral has in place is seldom challenged. Mr.
Bowman clarified Ms. McNeely's response in that the City has specifics that are
dependable based on specific facts. He stated that the Appearance Board could
not be done in that manner and the Board researched for a successful method
that the Board could apply. Mr. Bowman stated that the visual presentation
provided such a mechanism. Mr. Franklin expressed his concern with the
enforcement issue.
There being no further business, Mr. Bowman made a motion and Ms. Nielsen
seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:28 P.M.
( Signature )
Nadena Easler, Chairperson
( Signature )
Susan Stills, Secretary