The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFW Corruption in the City Of Cape Canaveral (3)All, FYI. David From: Kim McIntire On Behalf Of Info Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 3:04 PM To: David Greene <D.Greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> Subject: FW: Corruption in the City Of Cape Canaveral FYI From: Alward, Elizabeth M [mailto:Liz.Alward@brevardcounty.us] On Behalf Of Commissioner, D2 Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 12:48 PM To: Info <Info@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:Info@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > Cc: Barfield, Jim <Jim.Barfield@brevardcounty.us <mailto:Jim.Barfield@brevardcounty.us> > Subject: FW: Corruption in the City Of Cape Canaveral Angela, All the County Commissioners received the enclosed email on Saturday. This doesn’t seem to be a first of its kind email. If there is anything we can do let me know. Thanks, Liz ______________________________________________________ Liz Alward, Senior Legislative Aide District 2 Commission Office 2575 N. Courtenay Parkway Merritt Island, Fl 32953 Phone: (321) 454-6601 Fax: (321) 454-6602 liz.alward@brevardcounty.us <mailto:liz.alward@brevardcounty.us> From: Bernie [mailto:abc777@cfl.rr.com] Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 2:27 PM To: Commissioner, D2 Subject: Corruption in the City Of Cape Canaveral Mr. German 2/14/2016 I am Bernie Lennon, 126 Oak Lane Cape Canaveral. I talked with Alicia Spring (120 & 122) Oak Lane yesterday about the Sheropa development at 127, 131, 135, and 139 Oak Lane. Alicia said you informed her about 2 competing surveys for the Sheropa development. You may remember when I talked to you before construction started on 127 and 131 Oak Lane that 135 and 139 Oak were located in the setbacks and I had told the Cape Canaveral Building department and the developers about the error before any construction began. Your response was you could do nothing because 135 and 139 had a certificate of occupancy before you started working at Cape Canaveral building department but you would make sure 127 and 131 Oak Lane would be located correctly. The Sheropa development survey is not in competition with any local survey. Tim, at 123 Oak Lane who paid to resurvey the Sheropa development, has determined that all local surveys are in agreement except the Sheropa development. 120, 122, 123, 124, 126 Oak Lane, the Sea Spray Townhomes and Ocean Gardens are all in agreement. The Sheropa developer and the City of Cape Canaveral were informed about the error before any construction began. They decided to start construction without getting a second independent survey. Once the construction started, Harrack Trucking and Clearing started clearing for 135 & 139 Oak Lane. The next day I found 5 car tires on my property. I threw them back onto the cleared lots expecting to never see them again. Then about 200 loads of fill dirt arrived. One of the dump trucks broke down in front of my property and was in various stages of repairs for over a week, leaving behind broken parts and possible used oil. The developer then placed a dumpster and porta toilet in front of my property, and any wind would blow the trash in my yard. I could then determine what tradesmen were at work by the debris in my yard; wheelbarrows of sand, broken cement block, large rocks, insulation, driveway pavers. One Friday evening I noticed a landscaper walk to the Circle K and came back with an 18 pack of Corona beer. The next morning, I had to pick up 18 Corona bottles. Harrack Trucking and Clearing returned for final landscaping so did the 5 car tires. They also ripped out two 35-foot-tall palm trees by the roots and hid then in my yard along with two loads of yard debris. It took 2 weeks to get it removed. At some point I started complaining to the developer about all the work it was keeping things clean, but I was not met with cooperation. I then started complaining to Duree Alexander in the code enforcement department on a regular basis without much success. Harrack Trucking loaded a bulldozer in front of 123 Oak Lane about 6 months ago and crushed a cement water meter cover and put large gouges in the yard. Duree asked me to email her pictures of the damage. After reviewing the pictures, she assured me it would be fixed. Last week they picked up the dumpster at 127 Oak Lane and gouged out 15 feet of asphalt 3 inches wide by 3 inches deep. All work at Sheropa development should conform to all building codes. And any of the local neighbors who have spent money or performed work to rectify the problems should be reimbursed or compensated for any work. Thank You Bernie Lennon Bernie, 2/16/2016 I have contacted the City of Cocoa Water Department today, and they will send a representative out within the week to inspect the damaged water meter cover at 123 Oak Lane. Duree Alexander Mr. German, 2/18/2016 Last year when 135 and 139 Oak Lane were in this phase of construction (installing the doors, windows, insulation, drywall, painting) the door knobs don’t get installed until last. The doors banging all night make it difficult to sleep so I suggested to the developers it may be in both of our interest to put door knobs on because of possible damage to the buildings. Nothing happened until I informed them 3 weeks later that a homeless person had moved in. No homeless person this time. The wind storm 3 weeks ago made 120 & 121 Oak Lane look like hurricane Andrew had gone through because of fiberglass insulation covering the entire property. I have to park my car in the back of the house to avoid it getting paint spray when the painters open the water main shooting water 40 feet into the air to clean their paint rollers. The lowest area in the city of cape Canaveral is the end of Oak Lane. The 2009 storm left about 6 inches of standing in that area that’s approximately the level of one of the homes. Thank you Bernie Lennon Mr. Greene 2/20/2016 I have been trying to contact Michael German at the building department. When I select the hyperlink (m.german@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:m.german@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ) it populates the email with (J.lombardi@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:J.lombardi@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ) I have been trying both without success. Can you please let me know the proper way to contact Mr. German and forward the following information to him. Thank You Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane Cape Canaveral Mr. Lennon, 2/22/2016 Please provide me with a contact number and I will be happy to contact you concerning Oak Lane. Thanks, Michael German Mr. German 2/22/2016 We have been discussing the surveying error for over a year now but construction continues. Last week FPL placed a marker at the end of my driveway to place a phone pole that I believe is also located with a faulty survey. Can you explain how all of the problems will be fixed? To contact me simply select the “reply all” button at the top of the page and a copy of your response will go to : Bernie Lennon, Alicia Spring, David Dickey and David Green. Thank you Bernie Lennon abc777@cfl.rr.com <mailto:abc777@cfl.rr.com> Mr. German 2/23/2016 As I lay awake because of doors slamming I remember when my house was being built the contractor installed old recycled door knobs from prior houses he had built to keep the doors from slamming. Is it possible that could solve this problem? Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane Mr. Lennon, 2/25/2016 I will contact the Builder today and request that the doors be properly secured. Thank you, Michael German 2/25/2016 Hi Bernie. As we have discussed on numerous occasions, the City relied on a signed/sealed survey from a licensed surveyor to issue the building permit for the property in question on Oak Lane. When your concern came to our attention we requested supporting documentation, which was subsequently provided. My understanding is that the two surveyors are working through the discrepancy in the surveys and once they reach consensus will submit their findings. Please note that a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until this issue is resolved. I don't want to conjecture what the findings will be or what may occur thereafter. However, I will reiterate that this more than likely will be a civil matter between private parties. David Dickey Mr. Dickey 2/26/2016 The property owners of 120, 122, 123 and 126 Oak Lane have been complaining to the code enforcement and the building department about the Sheropa development since before construction began. It started with survey markers that were not in the correct location followed by a year and a half of complaints of unsupervised construction. The complaints included damage to city property, damage to the environment, construction debris scattered through the entire area, entire days of loud yelling and cursing, drunk landscapers, parking in the middle of the street, disabled excavator dump truck and many more issues. It was also brought to the attention of the building department early on about the homes not meeting the minimum elevation requirement. 139 Oak Lane is most likely not even 2 feet above sea level let alone the crown of the road. Most of the complaints were ignored the rest “there is nothing we can do about it”. Then the retaliation by the city, using bulldozers they pushed debris onto my property (126 Oak Lane) that was 15 feet tall 60 feet long and 20 feet wide. It took 6 tractor trailers to remove the debris. Your suggestion is for private parties to battle in court. This is permanent damage that cannot be repaired. Construction continues so future power poles, water meters, driveways, sidewalks and landscaping will not be located correctly. The City of Cape Canaveral was founded in 1963 to eliminate this type of anarchy. We are now left in a situation where nobody can win except the lawyers. Bernie Lennon Mr. Dickey 2/26/2016 Can you direct me to the rules being used for this surveying dispute? Since this dispute involves other property owners and myself, I would like to know why we have been excluded? Also will this dispute be open to the public to make sure no back room deals are being made? What are the time frames? If any of the owners disagree with the results how could they appeal before Certificate of Occupancy? Thank you Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane Mayor Hoog, 3/3/2016 The City of Cape Canaveral has been remapping Oak Lane with Sheropa LLC. My requests to be included in this remapping have been ignored. Also, the City of Cape Canaveral used a bulldozer to push debris on to my property at 126 Oak Lane. My attempts to find who ordered this and why have been ignored. Could you please help me get to the bottom of this? Thank you Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane 3/3/2016 Good afternoon Bernie. I can assure you that the City has/is not taking any action that will “remap” Oak Lane. As this is a public right-of-way, any closing/reconfiguration would require the passage (by the City Council at a publically-noticed meeting) of a resolution. As you and I have previously discussed, when the City issued a building permit for the construction of a house at 128 Oak Lane, it relied upon a survey from Walker Surveying, a licensed surveyor in the state of Florida, which indicated property lines, setbacks, the location of improvements, etc. Subsequent to this, there were suggestions by adjacent property owners that the submitted survey was incorrect. The City requested documentation in support of this claim. A second survey was completed by Riehl Reliable Surveying and Mapping that showed a conflict. The City asked that the two surveyors get together and determine the nature and scope of the conflict. To date, we have not seen anything in response to this request. In my email to you on February 23rd, I explained the situation and assured you that a Certificate of Occupancy would not be issued until this issue was resolved. To resolve this issue in a timely manner, the City will engage a surveying company which is on our continuing contract list to review the two surveys and determine what, if any, discrepancies exist. The cost to perform this review will be equally shared between the City, the developer and the two property owners. The City Attorney’s Office is drafting an agreement that all of the parties will sign that stipulates their financial participation as well as its commitment to abide by the results of the review. Regarding the debris, the City does not own a bulldozer and its employees have not been involved in any debris removal in the recent past on Oak Lane. I will inquire with the developer to determine if they were involved with this activity. I hope this answers all of your questions. Dave Mr. Dickey 3/4/2016 I am surprised that neither Duree Alexander or Michael German filled you in on the City of Cape Canaveral bulldozing 6 tractor trailer loads of debris onto my property because they are the ones who told me the city did it. It was moved after I complained, but I couldn’t believe the city had done this after I had been talking to Duree about having this same kind of issue with the developer. One of the few times that Duree Alexander from code enforcement came to investigate my complaint of 2 wheelbarrows of paver that were dumped onto my property, she was displeased because I could not prove that the Sheropa development had dumped the pavers (that matched those being used across the road). I thought to myself it would not take the number one CSI team in the country to prove they actually had dumped the pavers, but my response to Duree was I am not trying to prove anything, just trying to get them to stop it. So a few weeks later when Harrack Trucking and clearing loaded a very large machine onto a tractor trailer, I watched him crush the utilities and gouge out the vegetation. I immediately took pictures and showed them to Duree. This time I had proof, so surely things would get better, I thought. Now 6 months later the soil washes down the street every time it rains and the utilities have not been repaired. Mr. Dickey all of these questions have gone unanswered. Sheropa development seems exempt from all rules and this is impacting my own property. I am unclear about the review you are suggesting will happen. I hope you are not expecting that I or any of the neighboring property owners be held financially or otherwise responsible for this mess. Additionally, since this impacts my property—the entire acre opposite these houses—I want to know the outcome and any recourse for appeal BEFORE these homes receive a certificate of occupancy. I raised the issue of the survey in the past when the first two homes were built and the city’s response was, “It’s too late since we’ve already issued certificates of occupancy, but we won’t let this happen with the next two houses.” Of course, the city did nothing to follow up which is why we’re having this problem now. My specific questions are then: Why has the city allowed this developer to go unchecked in causing concerns to neighbors on Oak Lane, and even participated in the issue (dumping truckloads of debris on my property)? Why was the survey not reviewed earlier in the process when the city was told there was a problem? Will I be held financially responsible in any way for the review of the survey (your e-mail was unclear about who those two property owners are who are to bear part of the responsibility)? Will I be informed of the outcome of this survey dispute and have a chance to have input or appeal? Thank you Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane Cape Canaveral, FL. Mayor Hoog, 3/10/2016 For a year and a half now myself and most of my neighbors have been in a constant struggle with the City of Cape Canaveral and the Sheropa development on Oak Lane. So I have spent the last few days researching what went wrong and this is what I have uncovered. The owner of Sheropa LLC. Is a former Mayor of Cape Canaveral and you were his Vice Mayor. During this time the Mayor was convicted of conspiracy to defraud the U.S. Customs Service and making false statements and was sentenced to 5 years, 11 months in federal prison. I have been excluded from backroom deals between Sheropa LLC. and the City of Cape Canaveral. The backroom deals have come up with some bizarre results “The City Attorney’s Office is drafting an agreement that all of the parties will sign that stipulates their financial participation as well as its commitment to abide by the results of the review.”. Construction on Oak Lane has accelerated to around the clock 7 days a week to rush Certificate of occupancy for the last two homes hoping we would then have no recourse, the same as you did with the first two homes. 3/16/2016 Hi Bernie. I didn’t see a specific question in your email of March 10th, but let me reiterate several points I have previously made. * When the City issued a building permit on October 6, 2015 for the construction of a house at 127 Oak Lane, it relied upon a survey from Walker Surveying, a licensed surveyor in the state of Florida, which indicated compliance with City Code requirements, including property lines, setbacks, the location of improvements, etc. Subsequent to this, there were suggestions by adjacent property owners that the submitted survey was incorrect. The City requested documentation in support of this claim. A second survey was submitted to the City by the resident of 123 Oak Lane on or around January 15, 2016. This survey was conducted by Riehl Reliable Surveying and Mapping and it did show a conflict with the Walker survey. The City asked that the two surveyors get together and determine the nature and scope of the conflict. To date, we have not seen anything in response to this request. In my email to you on February 23rd, I explained the situation and assured you that a Certificate of Occupancy would not be issued until this issue was resolved. * I am not aware of any “backroom deals” with Sheropa, LLC or any other party regarding this matter. The City’s records related to this item are available for anyone to review, make copies, etc. * To bring this issue to closure, the City is proposing to have a third-party surveyor review the two surveys and determine what, if any, conflicts exist. I have asked the City Attorney’s Office to prepare an agreement that each of the affected parties will sign that stipulates their financial participation as well as its commitment to abide by the results of the review. The parties to the agreement will be the City, the builder (Turnkey Construction) and the parties that own/reside 123 & 127 Oak Lane. * In your March 4th email, you ask whether you will be informed of the outcome of this survey dispute and have a chance to have input or appeal. The affected parties will be notified of the results of the review. * I want to clarify a statement I made in my email of March 2, 2016 to you where I indicated the City was not involved with any debris removal impacting your property. That is incorrect. I have been informed that a debris pile was placed there as a result of a contractor performing maintenance on a City drainage canal. Once City staff was made aware of the oversight, the pile was immediately removed. Regarding your assertion that the City has allowed the developer to go unchecked, the record does not support that. When a complaint has been lodged, Code Enforcement Staff has investigated and taken appropriate action. For example when it was reported that a dumpster was improperly located on your property, Staff contacted the developer and had it removed. When you informed Code Enforcement Staff about a portable toilet improperly placed on your property, it was removed. To assist me in moving this issue forward, I need to fully understand how the disputed survey impacts your property. Thank you. Dave Mayor Hoog 3/17/2016 Is it true that the City of Cape Canaveral knew many months ago that Walker survey and Riehl Reliable Surveying have not been on talking terms? Is it also true that the City of Cape Canaveral knew a long time ago that Walker survey admitted his survey is incorrect and Riehl Reliable Surveying is correct? Is it true that David Dickey knows this and is pretending he doesn’t know so that Sheropa LLC can accelerate construction and get a certificate of occupancy before anything can be done? Is it true that the owner of Sheropa LLC is a former Mayor of the City of Cape Canaveral and you were his Vice Mayor? Is it true that the 36 complaints I made to the City of Cape Canaveral involving Sheropa LLC and numerous complaints from the other owners on Oak Lane the only results were the City requested Sheropa LLC to remove the dumpster and porta toilet they put on my property and to install door knobs so the neighbors could sleep? It took over a year and 7 complaints to get the door knobs installed and only after I told then how my developer built my house without a single complaint from neighbors. David Dickey uses this as proof that Sheropa LLC and the former Mayor is not receiving special treatment. When my house was built in 2009 I was required to build it 3.14 feet above the crown of the road measured from the center of the home. My surveyor insisted the law was only 2 feet but Dennis Clements demanded higher because any future resurfacing would increase that number. Why was Sheropa LLC exempt from that requirement? I was required to pay $1789 For underground power. Why was Sheropa LLC exempt from that requirement? David Dickey makes no mention of all the complaints made against Sheropa LLC that were ignored, like dumping oil on my property from 2 different lengthy repairs of heavy equipment. Mayor Hoog, who ordered 6 tractor trailers loads of debris bulldozed onto my property in the exact location that I had numerous complaints against Sheropa LLC for dumping? This is also the location that Harrack Trucking and Clearing was dumping oil from his heavy equipment. Most important why was this ordered? I believe it was retaliation for my complaints of dumping. It is 12 noon Thursday 3/17/2016 Oak lane is currently blocked with heavy equipment installing driveways at the Sheropa LLC development. WE now all know the driveways will be located more than 10 feet incorrectly. Will the taxpayers be responsible for relocating them correctly? Will the taxpayers be responsible for relocating all of the utilities (water, sewer, power)? Will the taxpayers be responsible for repairing all the damage Sheropa LLC created? Mayor Hoog, could you please answer these questions BEFORE issuing a certificate of occupancy to 127 and 131 Oak Lane because that has been used as an excuse for no recourse on 135 and 139 Oak Lane. Could you please select “Reply All” so that a copy of your response will go to 'tampa.division@ic.fbi.gov'; 'Michael German' <M.German@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:M.German@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >; 'Kim Kopp' <kkopp@orlandolaw.net <mailto:kkopp@orlandolaw.net> >; 'David Greene' <D.Greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:D.Greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >; 'David Dickey' <D.Dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:D.Dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >; Alicia Spring asrapp@aol.com <mailto:asrapp@aol.com> Thank you Bernie Lennon Mayor Hoog 3/17/2016 In the last half hour the Sheropa LLC has put large tire tracks and scraped out the vegetation in front of my house leaving behind more trash. They also just dugout the asphalt on Oak Lane to place the drives way into the middle of the road. Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane Cape Canaveral, FL. 32920 Mayor Hoog, 3/18/2016 I would like to recap your unannounced visit to my home today 3/18/2016 1:15 pm. Your aggressive stance was an obvious attempt to intimidate me and my out of town guests. I was stunned by the story of your father building some of the first mobile home parks in Cape Canaveral without a survey and therefore, you said, you believe surveys are not worth a damn. It appears you are in support of Sheropa LLC building these homes on an incorrect survey, even if they stretch into the neighbor’s easement by several feet and are also several feet too close to the road. You also said the large tire ruts, scraped out vegetation and construction debris in front of my home was a normal process of construction and for me to get over it. At that point I determined you to be irrational and terminated our discussion, then walked back to my house. Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane Cape Canaveral, FL. Mayor Hoog 3/19/2016 Yesterday when you and I were in front of my house inspecting the damage from Sheropa LLC, we could hardly talk because of the loud roar of two gas powered saws cutting paver bricks that had us covered in a thick fog of cement dust. That’s when I told you that my house was built without a single complaint from the neighbors. You barked out an angry response “that’s because there were no neighbors back then.” After I spent the whole morning cleaning cement dust from inside my house I researched Brevard County Property appraiser’s website. In 2009, my home had 15 neighbors within 300 feet. In 2015, Sheropa LLC only had 9 neighbors within 300 feet. So I thought to myself why were there no complaints when my house was built and almost everyone is complaining about Sheropa LLC? Are we too picky now as you suggest? NO. The answer is my contractor was very courteous and careful in his work. For instance, he used wet saws that are much quieter and make no dust. So the local neighbors did not complain because they could hardly hear the saws and did not need to clean their homes the next day. Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane 3/21/2016 After consultation with the City Attorney's office, we have determined that the City has the obligation and the right to rely on the survey submitted by the applicant as part of the building permit application for 127 Oak Lane <x-apple-data-detectors://0> . The applicant submitted an original signed and sealed survey from a registered surveyor. The application also included a warranty deed with a legal description consistent with the survey. At this time, the City considers this matter closed. Thank you. Dave Mr Dickey 3/21/2016 I reviewed the plans submitted to the Cape Canaveral building department by the Sheropa LLC. developer. The plans that I reviewed did not include digging up Oak Lane and installing driveways in the middle of the road. You yourself informed me that would require public hearings. Mr Dickey you may want to consider reopening this issue. Bernie Lennon Mayor Hoog 3/21/2016 It’s just so sad that you would use your power to take away from a family who has the least in our community and give it to your friend who has more than all of us combined. Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane Cape Canaveral Mayor Hoog 3/24/2016 The City of Cape Canaveral required 123 Oak Lane to pay for a survey. Riehl Reliable Surveying and Mapping, a licensed surveyor in the state of Florida submitted a signed/sealed survey to the City of Cape Canaveral. You decided to ignore that survey. That has allowed Sheropa LLC. to take 9 feet of property from 123 Oak Lane. This has made 123 useless because it no longer meets the minimum requirement for the City of Cape Canaveral’s R1 zoning. On Friday 3/18/2016 Sheropa LLC. removed several feet of asphalt in two locations from Oak Lane and installed paver brick driveways extending into the road. On Monday morning 3/21/2016 I reminded you that Oak Lane is a public right-of-way, any closing/reconfiguration would require the passage by the City Council at a publically-noticed meeting. By Monday night 3/21/2016 Sheropa LLC. removed the paver bricks from the road and the asphalt they had removed had been replaced with compacted dirt to make it look like they had not tampered with the road. I have brought many issues about the Sheropa LLC. development to your attention and you have decided to ignore most of them. This will not make them go away in fact it will make it worse. The 4 homes that Sheropa LLC. have built are being sold to family’s who are unaware of the issues. Mayor Hoog, Oak Lane needs to be repaired to its original condition, 123 Oak Lane needs to be returned to its proper owner and every single issue that has been brought to your attention needs to be addressed to the letter of the law. Thank you Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane Mayor Hoog 3/25/2016 Since Sheropa LLC has taken away more than 10 feet of Oak Lane last Friday two-way traffic is impossible without driving on my property. Oak Lane needs to be restored to its original condition as soon as possible. Can You please give me a time frame when this will be completed? Thank you Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane Mayor Hoog 3/27/2016 Since Sheropa LLC. has taken more than 10 feet away from Oak Lane, the garbage truck had to drive off the road and come within inches of making contact with the high voltage power lines. The next time they may not be so lucky. Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane 3/29/2016 Good morning. Based on your report, the City’s Building Official and I went to Oak Lane to inspect to conditions related to the power poles/lines. We did not witness the conditions you describe. The alignment of Oak Lane has not changed as a result of the construction activity. Further, the new poles that have been erected due to the construction do not pose any danger to vehicle traffic. Thank you. Dave You need to look at the other side of the road. 3/29/2016 Thank you Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane Mayor Hoog 4/3/2016 On Monday March 21 2016 you gave Sheropa LLC developer more than 10 feet of Oak Lane for all 4 of its properties. Prior to that 127, 131, 135 Oak Lane had previously been mapped as 50 feet wide. 139 Oak Lane was mapped as 66 feet wide. This leaves you with only 3 choices: 1) You remap Oak Lane from 50 feet to 39 feet? 2) You take more than 10 feet from my property (126 Oak Lane) and 120, 122 Oak Lane? 3) Sheropa LLC returns that property to Oak Lane? Mayor Hoog a timely answer to this question would be greatly appreciated. Thank you Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane Mayor Hoog 4/9/2016 I have a video of a Sheropa LLC truck parked on my property that is within 4 inches of contacting the power lines. This truck is much smaller than the garbage truck or it would have made contact. Public safety requires immediate action. Bernie Lennon 126 Oak Lane Cape Canaveral "Under Florida Law, email addresses are Public Records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to public record requests, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing." Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing ⹴ｄཆ὇鿬꿭뿮༓鿩쫧䥗䭲伨䫑グ⨹条㞂㹂౩㰀䫃ᇂ㍰種搱暠탿焁?ᔹ｣ဗ䀢阤ဗ뀆⃻⁁㟿⾱ᢧﬀ⊠⭤䤒ְﴐ䁎⭍ﲀ勴ᢒર㟠ﾢራ恡჻艧錵ꍪ쁊࿫￁滠﹃呠⢢｠뀪ㇻ뀪瀌퀊鉊ဌ懶牋䋻㭦沀哱囿朏彣攊晲罷挿넋慔腋㌂愮샿齲䁎ꁦ耫艧硥烾䕍㌂թꉔᄁ뽨[⭕⒀胫核䚀焤掠慳杲ꄮ⌺ħ佻彼緿཯拜ﰠ劰泒ﮡᦠＢꄫ刽卫�錪灤ᄪ쀘痿癏睟੯㝥˫❂㸃胿兩Ь榐냼猹㫟㯁⾮妣ዠ昰ꁪ ䷿︱｠Ȁ㔰寂椀぀�胧‫烺耫ቩ呰墯ｏ彙潚罛轜齝꽞뽟콠慗⑜䡄ꀽ蹧着䧻⮰犐ꆀ넷ꀩ⫿鳠ꄐ㪁パӑڠ銰祓뀪牢쁊怽뀒ｺ넷釻ᆆ碌Ⅸራꆡӿ᪑ᥱȢ⨳ɰ⹀⩏�斈�넛Ꚏခ੔ᇒ眲ꌁ牰⮦靈ꄰ䂑咀᣿á౳牒鞑礰鵣袐￟㾙攊몎ꌯ툊꺒〤濾区ㅍꂠ풁጑ꃿ绥｢ව䨐⠱桲Äａヾጙ튩줩쒎龓铿閯隿韏食駯鯿鰏�⾝㾞駷Ũ怨백￰ᄀꂪý摳녿柫∱烿㖑มﴢ鄀㔢ﺱᩐ뿰냼瀌뉋躳ؽꍤﭐ胺聧ﭹˑᙤ䫪됥ﱄ䕗燿愄愽጖䌹ퟌ䯿㶰ᱡꛑ㜓ﮱ㚀ឃﺱ挱檠ண㖷膰톑⭒ﴒ恤罸ァￂ껀꾯삿Ｏ硸债勾튩 ᒦ鈀⯿⼠폐Ƈ퐐픿㕂�｟旚刽ꔤ耻퀺耨ꀌ怨⣾聧섀䂎聋ħ䂎䎁⥾뿛쿜훝ኒꛞ䌹｡ヅꀙ�扔놶龺꾻뾼뷿뻏뿟샯싿쌏쐟씯缿徟抠吿숦䍺僺㽳ħȫ腋挷ℙ怨䕂䛸剏烏掭９ᬟ⨇쟡䄰ಠㅒㄳ죿㗓球Ȧȳ핀ｂ䯡ｱ兄䈑ရ腋튩ƆČ⛯バ㗐沈㖑嗹聨뫿俯忰濱�䯮䲀徐콣ᄔ郈气г勘㾻㗠䆱惑㼍䈎ᐱ﹬дᛘᝁ⬠⚃�뜂叝鉋懑⩧⫱⟰恤⥹懠逮ⷐ䰐ꑐ䀰蕁⹀扦⹩瑶㬧倖蕍⅀랰†䟖ဧ䅳ധ☯偤ᥥ㱖�㝤䰼栰냓佦选ည退⹍쐘뽀T瀫ꀫ탷 म껰੧랰搠㽦ƀሽ䡻偙剅灌义⁋弝漞生ṽ⁽㾑む擐屐晣ㆼ㙜휐摯樥㡰瀀擷ﳰ㝑禐遌选胓恊爼䬺⺰퀰㜰碠�伊뗲Ｂﰞ찦젵ǀ翰뤩⠃ᜦ⼯㴰䬙봹툁a操醒斠㸙젱㮞迕鿖Ｑ뗘䬧⃴烐⼙㼚弸弜⋩歵㩫䁑⇉⁃烽⺡䃺鴩뼠켡⼿㍀⓿⛿✏⠟⤯옿䌋䂏ａἭ⼮缰⽎㽏漲缳輴㖷ᚚ葐䟔냓ꃻ㩥鼻ｐ뼽產⭄嘠⬃ﾟ漟ὁ⽂뽚콛뼤꽅뽆䟿䣏䧟惯Ⱏ䰯䵟佯﾿彬齐꽑뽒콓뼵켶�㣿嗯薅嘴坟畯妏徏ﾧ㒅콨齜꽝뽞彼潽拿擿攏星术脿榿機ｯ罫콭ﾍ꽮뽯콰��ჿ瞀뢠ꒀ늰玁璏뾟쾐佻錢怉ま⅋蝡ﺀꜮ绡羯↿髽莝蓏￟ﾆྈெ鲚ﾌ侏ꣿꥯ酿鈿Oŏɟͯｿ輄鼅꼆뼇켈�ெ냇猪괲긟꼯뀿녏罟澲羳辴龵꾶뾷枿뵂퀘�ﬀ쾠源ﾹ믿및봟븯뼿쁏셟쉯齿迃鿄翌过�扮悢໹憛툰좯짯쯿찏？⿍㿎俏忐濑俲哳뿔헿훏ﾯ뿩쿪�￭࿯῰⿱烈ﾯ뿺쿻�ༀἁ⼂ϿпՏٟݯࡽय़ݯﾟ鼋꼌뼍켎�１༓ᓿᔟᘯ᜿ᡏᥟᩯ᭿ﾏ鼜꼝뼞켟�Ｂ༤◿☟✯⠿⥏⩟⭯Ɀﾏ鼭꼮뼯켰�Ｓ༵㛿㜟㠯㤿㩏㭟㱯㵿ﾏ鼾꼿뽀콁� ｄཆ䟿䠟䤯䨿䭏䱟䵯乿ﾏ齏꽐뽑콒�ｕབྷ壿够娯嬿屏嵟幯彿ﾏ齠꽡뽢콣�ｦཨ槿樟欯氿浏湟潯灿ﾏ齱꽲뽳콴�ｷཹ竿笟簯紿繏罟聯腿ﾏ龂꾃뾄쾅�ﾈྊ诿谟贯踿轏遟酯鉿ﾏ龓꾔뾕쾖�ﾙྛ鳿鴟鸯鼿ꁏꅟꉯꍿﾏ龤꾥뾦쾧�ﾪྫྷ귿긟꼯뀿녏뉟덯둿ﾏ龵꾶뾷쾸�ﾻ྽뻿뼟쀯섿쉏썟쑯앿ﾏ鿆꿇뿈쿉�ￌ࿎쿿퀟턯툿퍏푟핯홿ﾏ鿗꿘뿙쿚�￝࿟ﾏ鿨꿩뿪쿫�￮࿰ﾏ鿹꿺뿻쿼�༁˿̟ЯԿُݟ࡯ॿﾏ鼊 꼋뼌켍�０༒᏿ᐟᔯᘿᝏᡟ᥯᩿ﾏ鼛꼜뼝켞�Ａ༣⓿┟☯✿⡏⥟⩯⭿ﾏ鼬꼭뼮켯�Ｒ༴㗿㘟㜯㠿㥏㩟㭯㱿ﾏ鼽꼾뼿콀�ｃཅ䛿䜟䠯䤿䩏䭟䱯䵿ﾏ齎꽏뽐콑�ｔབ埿堟夯娿孏屟嵯广ﾏ齟꽠뽡콢�･ཧ棿椟樯欿汏浟湯潿ﾏ齰꽱뽲콳�ｶླྀ秿稟笯簿絏繟罯聿⼳㜱㈯㄰㘒ᮁ㐲漼䠺㹰葽㖌蔲⾀蕃肣屶慰色ぷ臟舐袈蠁胘㟽캅耫蟰⃲蔶灱汣獡㵳䴢猀乯牯慭ᩬ蜢⁘め湉ဠ桴⁥憎⁴捨わႀ潨豵郰史鄉爀衯䱌慃熑⁳異悑悎≲酧琐物慲挄鍫慀摮猠揲悔数悑癜鍥臐钰漀킐啩킐鉦源悑聯洐禊슑酳攑癡낖杠戠桥낖荭㎔桳‮酔最肗わ킎樠삗悑杵蚕炎酰鞁逡磐慏鉫铐鏀髡瀰躍捠Ƒ牤险礀䂓慷肗낖醜摩顤需進臱脛翰쒌螂₀ﾉ邒ﱡ⹤辄龅꾆뾇쾈�諿误跿踏輟꠯ꏟ臯＿侂ྯ侥徦澧羨辩龪꬯겯궿迏䋻肒楮釡䰐湥陮꾀낯﾿꾴뾵쾶�ﾹྻᾼ뷣씯ㄇ㘲龿꿀쇿슿쏏쓟엯쟿젏줟�㿊ߒ镃�滁ₘ肒휡ⱀ䘠饌㎐︲萹챀춟캯쾿탏퇟￯ￒ࿔῕⿖㿗�㾱닿��ﾟ꿢뿣쿤�￧࿩Ὺ ﾟ꿳뿴쿵�￸࿺Ώﳿﴯ࠿￟_ůɿΏඟ舍鵍ዠ⁀潈ﱯⱧ弆漇缈༕἖⼗᣿᤿ᩏ᭟ᱯᵿẏᾟﾯ뼠켡�Ｄ༦ἧ⼨⧿⨿⭏ⱟⵯ⹿⾏ゟﾯ뼱켲�Ｕ༷Ἰ⼹㫿㬿㱏㵟㹯㽿䂏䆟ﾯ뽂콃�ｆ཈Ὁ⽊䯿䰿䵏也佯偿冏功ﾯ뽓코�ｗཙ὚⽛峿崿幏彟息慿抏掟ﾯ뽤콥�ｨཪὫ⽬淿渿潏灟煯牿玏璟ﾯ뽵콶�ｹཻὼ⽽绿缿聏腟良荿蒏薟ﾯ뾆쾇�ﾊྌᾍ⾎迿逿酏鉟鍯鑿閏隟ﾯ뾗쾘�ﾛྜྷᾞ⾟ꃿꄿꉏꍟꑯꕿꚏꞟﾯ뾨쾩�ﾬྮᾯ⾰뇿눿덏둟땯뙿랏뢟 ﾯ뾹쾺�侾徿辽쇿슏쎟쒯얿웏쟟죯࿊Ή⿌㿍俎忏濐翑틿펏풟햯횿ퟏ��࿛῜⿝㿞俟忠濡翢࿬῭⿮㿯俰忱濲翳紐﫟ﯯ࿽῾⿿㼀企异漃缄׿ڏޟࢯি૏௟೯༎Ἇ⼐㼑伒弓演缕᛿តᢟ᦯ᪿᯏ᳟ᷯ༟ἠ⼡㼢伣弤漥缦⟿⢏⦟⪯⮿ⳏ⷟⻯༰ἱ⼲㼳伴張漶缷㣿㦏㪟㮯㲿㷏㻟㿯ཁὂ⽃㽄佅彆潇罈䧿䪏䮟䲯䶿仏俟僯དྷὓ⽔㽕佖彗潘罙嫿宏岟嶯庿忏惟懯ལὤ⽥㽦佧彨潩罪毿沏涟溯澿烏營狯ུή⽶㽷佸役潺罻糿綏纟羯肿臏苟華྅ᾆ⾇㾈侉徊澋羌跿躏辟邯醿鋏鏟铯ྖᾗ⾘㾙侚徛澜羝黿龏ꂟꆯꊿꏏꓟꗯྦྷᾨ⾩㾪侫徬澭羮꼁㎄ㄯ⼸〲ㄤ꼶㋫뀴㳀遯瀺紾岳㈵傴⾆玴䚯灜牡䞱ゾ墱톶ꢷ춯딷垲麴삯슶될㚼䆴p挠慬獳∽䴀潳潎浲㑡≬⢶뀠렀䧇潷汵⁤楬欀⁥潴爠㑥慣½뽹므痀衮湡뽮滀散瘠獩瑩勀祭ₐ潨쁭摂쉡Ơ잲ㄠㄺ‵끰⹭夠ˁ邰쁧傽癩䃀끳솀뾱쎠䂽⁮扯Â삿왁琱整灭䏂瑮浩썩윰술뾀䃀惁釂삿䃂깯◠惀왷杠앵琰彳胄醿⇆ꃅ䃁셮拑싹璠앨붂죐껡샠軳읦쬀뭠 拀極윽枰郅틂䋉懋楦狾ꃅ산钻垱쾸쿻묅淐胆Í䃀쏂톶毦テ냇䌠샀䃀烓쇻앐牰¾ꂿヂ샂ᇉ慾郅Ⴡ烅ꃂ鋈鋌뉥뵦旐쀬엢憐È훩扄쁥攐狅Ꮥ㇆삽ₐ胁䃂낿샐푨�ッ湭⇊쇔퍰뚐￠テ拖䋘䇓Õ퇘㋉匊ꇌ뙯⃐䱌��凋퉳왴漰惆准쟽掰킽釀䃂ӕ䃖臗�촁싓얠삠璐�ༀ뇇烀勋杩扨붃꿐⏯㈸㜱㮱㧼퀲외򜄀숰쟠翀迎鿏꿐뗑⇋ポӔ﹦졀�빂봀샼㭠烀₽��懠齤菄䗪뇖䏋ソ杲䇀캗쥡猐䃖捳⃔폿뾐짰씂뀰잀�毃䃞甑郞䋰�扥쉲판昲샇짿숲욖�뵱쓢 �쇠￀傽㋉쯰鋈ǖ勈懀왗푰윁璠胄쉁桁쟻쐀潐뇇膿郱⃇쟿솰텟횵쁢｡䃗ꃇ惞⏰㇔珕珸⇈뭲췀옐싐�훀㝀凋惆჆쁬쬰愁쉫왗旐댮둟땯ｿ辶龷꾸뾹쾺�ﾽߵ䈇냌흮��셠ﺀŮʟίҿ׏۟߯鿿༉Ἂ⼋㼌᜔㈱俔a䲰惁๥ྯ﾿켐�３༕἖⼗㼘᧏⅏팗홼䙀Ō᲏ﾯ뼝켞�Ａ༣ἤ⼥⛿⸿⥿꾏뇿꼏⨿⯯༭Ἦ⼯㼰伱弲漳벾䷖䃃枀켶�㣿䗯䙯䝿䢏䦟䪯䮿ￏ�ｎཐὑ⽒㽓佔嗿噟坯塿妏媟宯岿ￏ�｟ཡὢ⽣㽤佥替束桯楿檏殟沯涿ￏ�ｰི έ⽴㽵佶矿硟祯穿箏粟綯线ￏ�ﾁྃᾄ⾅㾆侇裿襟詯譿貏趟躯辿ￏ�ﾒྔᾕ⾖㾗侘駿驟魭鱏驟麏龏ꂟﾯ뾡쾢�ﾥྦྷᾨ⾩꫿ꬿ걏굟깯꽿낏놟ﾯ뾲쾳�ﾶྸᾹ⾺믿밿뵏빟뽯쁿솏슟ﾯ뿃쿄�ￇ࿉Ὴ⿋쳿촿칏콟큯텿튏펟ﾯ뿔쿕�￘࿚Ί⿜��ﾯ뿥쿦�￩࿫Ῥ⿭ﾯ뿶쿷�￺࿼´⿾?ŏɟͯѿ֏ڟﾯ뼇켈�＋།Ἆ⼏ჿᄿ቏፟ᑯᕿᚏសﾯ뼘켙�＜༞἟⼠⇿∿⍏⑟╯♿➏⢟ﾯ뼩켪�Ｍ༯ἰ⼱㋿㌿㑏㕟㙯㝿㢏㦟ﾯ뼺켻�＾ཀὁ⽂䏿䐿䕏䙟䝯䡿䦏䪟ﾯ뽋콌�ｏདὒ⽓哿唿噏坟塯奿媏実ﾯ뽜콝�｠རὣ⽤旿昿杏桟楯橿殏沟ﾯ뽭콮�ｱཱིὴ⽵盿眿硏祟穯筿粏綟ﾯ뽾콿�ﾂ྄ᾅ⾆蟿蠿襏詟譯豿趏躟ﾯ뾏쾐�ﾓྕᾖ⾗飿餿驏魟鱯鵿麏龟ﾯ뾠쾡�ﾤྦᾧ⾨꧿꨿ꭏ걟굯깿꾏낟ﾯ뾱쾲�ﾵྷᾸ⾹뫿묿뱏뵟빯뽿삏솟ﾯ뿂쿃�ￆ࿈Έ⿊쯿찿쵏칟콯큿톏튟ﾯ뿓쿔�ￗ࿙Ὶ⿛��㎗⼀㤱㈯㄰श⯣㐲ä漼瀺㺤㖜⾐돧岆慰ょ⃣㜍� ã ﳧ炁挠氀獡㵳䴢s乯牯慭≬⁨䃣߬教瑳攀摲祡眠h湥礠畯愠渰⁤攐Ƞ暠潲瑮ꨠ洠僳珐鋴敐瑣냴⁧浴胳朰郴ᱭ匠胳ც䰠屌ⱃ凴僰탳栠搠泀⁫抺䃶沲탳﫱睒⁯ㅧ胰瀠猠扡ﭷ揰瑵揶ც썶ჳ샹楲正냶懾⃵ჹ⃴샵ꇸ臽懼ﶰ濐郶䇵捘浥郳⃵瓀⸘吠䇾⿣㠣ꐲ㜱篤㈹ųﾫä퓮韤モ࿬┅ჯ珳瑀ﻂ睷ﮱ拡極냣想垰탳⃵ჸ汱鋸㹭溲健杩扨ჱų奀拑⃪ﱫୡ＃ﺀ Ǒʯﮱ僦ఃسﺘ༲ˏο쟹뇶致援ﭮධഇ돡뇶⹮２툐ᐱ﹜ش᭏㽟濭翮迯鿰꿱ã晁ࡰ�♭渐狶急⤀ꠀ哷Ƕ摩ㄩ蛵䃴ླ⤱狰䈠胴癲⇹䌠탳ჵ僳蝐ჳĮ灡牰‌⃐ᣁᓏᔯੀ髐ť䥀ꃳ僦㤰惸sﺰㅳ᜵ਖ਼㌳旐ť㈱㓳띀惸맷ヵ葉﹑㦂漴㗿Ѳ֯↿ܯ㗕ᯃᲟﾯ뼝켞�Ａ༣ἤ⼥⛻䈿叇냻鄈ꇵ」鄨ﯷ泐⃢烳凳狴᛿ង଱㋗ংຟ＠H倩怭ჳ샳 ꃴﹷ௒慲倍ᄋ맷쀧댖ꄈ냻ﵰᝐﯰ珂၊ヷ冹亐ŏ猀懴俿⸐䝐ૐ቏ꋸC麟ﺀﾢӐ㪟䉯ߟ症큇ū䙀텕Ƕ샣ｮ退惸쇶쇵⃴惴⃵鏼ﺗ圳畠焠瀊㗿﷠䜂໰ᜠĢ䤄蓺큗栗⭤ហ＠혋凞獖胳녅닶鏼戂ശﰀ䩡⥡榢䗯㏀ﺲఒ磢䃳伽㻿㽟䁯䅿䊏䎟䒯䖿矏�塮⤐䲐ថ梠櫿欏氟洯缿佮彯潰罱轲齳蝻瀱㘲传⃸ô･ὶ⽷㽸佹彺潻罼载绿羟肯袿莏蹟﾿ﾄ྆ᾇ⾈㾉侊律澌跿蹿醏鈏鴟鿿ꀏꄟＯ㾢侣徤澥羦辧龨 꾩꫿ꮿ곏귟껯냿넏눟Ｏ㾳侴徵澶羷辸龹꾺믿벿뷏뻟뿯쇿숏쌟Ｏ㿄俅忆濇翈迉鿊꿋쳿춿컏쿟탯틿팏퐟Ｏ㿕俖志濘翙迚鿛꿜��Ｏユ俦忧迥迩鿪꿫뿬＿俶忷濸翹迺鿻꿼뿽ￏßǯϿЏԟد＿伇弈漉缊輋鼌꼍뼎࿿჏ᇟዯᓿᔏᘟᜯ＿优弙漚缛輜鼝꼞뼟⃿⇏⋟⏯◿☏✟⠯＿伩弪漫缬輭鼮꼯뼰ㇿ㋏㏟㓯㛿㜏㠟㤯＿伺弻漼缽輾鼿꽀뽁䋿䏏䓟䗯䟿䠏䤟䨯＿佋彌潍罎轏齐꽑뽒叿哏嗟囯壿夏娟嬯＿作彝潞罟轠齡꽢뽣擿族曟柯槿樏欟氯＿佭彮潯罰轱齲꽳뽴痿盏矟磯竿笏簟累＿佾彿澀羁辂龃꾄뾅蛿蟏裟觯诿谏负踯＿侏徐澑羒输龔꾕뾖響飏駟髯鳿鴏鸟鼯＿侠御澢羣辤龥꾦뾧ꣿꧏ꫟꯯귿긏꼟뀯＿侱徲澳羴辵龶꾷뾸맿뫏믟볯뻿뼏쀟섯＿係心濄翅迆鿇꿈뿉쫿쯏쳟췯쿿퀏턟툯＿俓忔濕翖迗鿘꿙뿚􏳏��＿俤忥濦翧迨鿩꿪뿫＿俵忶濷翸迹鿺꿻뿼﷿ﻏ￟ï˿̏Пԯ＿伆弇漈缉輊鼋꼌뼍໿࿏ჟᇯ᏿ᐏᔟᘯ＿众弘漙缚輛鼜꼝뼞῿⃏⇟⋯⓿┏☟✯＿伨弩漪缫輬鼭꼮뼯ヿ㇏㋟㏯㗿㘏㜟㠯＿伹强漻缼輽鼾꼿뽀䇿䋏䏟䓯䛿䜏䠟䤯＿佊彋潌罍轎齏꽐뽑勿叏哟嗯埿堏够娯＿佛彜潝罞轟齠꽡뽢揿擏旟曯棿椏樟欯＿佬彭潮罯轰齱꽲뽳瓿痏盟矯秿稏笟簯䌿佽卾⼳ㄲ邁␰㘱ꭾ㐲聿漼㪐㹰艽㔜茲蘐茯縳将慰聲븇縰肠蔘蚑繨㞍犄荗繞薀₂粃茶瀁汣獡㵳"獍乯牯慭汴萢⃨쁾辇⍿ఱ㠴ႃ큿湡猠琐汹豥昰湯琀猭穩㩥1⸲瀰㭴楬満ⵥ敨杩삍逡ダ┵逻昳a業祬☺畱漂ₑ楔敭⁳乀睥删豯溰鎁Ⱄ敳楲豦웬罦趀䆸瑦킋遉獀罵琱適⁀眠瑩⁨ₘ⁥䏊႘陹瓀豴醐Ѡ❹ 낓景楦豣ⱥ炘慨顶�敤삒悑顤靁侠䢘䂚낓劘扯䂑罧꒗邏⊛炘솑䂘絯삝鉥駠辀颠青牠驷顠韀扠삒ᆛ﹢繹隫訑聣阗ꀩ詝톐劘灡酰捀邏炛鲟蔱鮑饰颐扃鉵𢡄酤材슚놤䒤뎗逿蜰繁翏ꋟ蹏㗅鼶膄犏歷종齾愼゚鹥晠れ⵸㊤炑ⵤꂗ꽡驠採ƙ㩳⾨〯ⶕ鹩摰튧昆삏䡻偙쁅䱒义⁋羚紼镽ꗡ냰꠰局ㅦ靜ꉰ踿辿郏꟟ﾒྔ㭦゗豬⚐頺鴀潠陷磰ݴ⾕ᢶス‷慏䰠ꩥꮟ겯승힟꿃徶您萹慲涃辷롿릟몯뮿铏빿웿⸒ꃯꅟ앯ꏯ咅த颟賿쮐쨀負지쬀鬀鴂콒⃎삌ᆛ▟牦烍䂝鸿핑즰츐휰谇⺐欠�ҝ豬⁠ꃊ邚㇕ꂅꑲ频髀羐ᆛΘ炮䃉邚ﹳ칣쩀靠韂�ꑂ颡＇⒟䃙䆘䃘䂘퇌飿�髓낐�貴龰韡笑낽⃎�졂샠�甐�䑀冚࿁ῂ꿅羂较蓿薟蚯衟觟諯賿／ᾍ翦迧㾨侩꿲￩ﭯ﹍䐰삙饫ｯ翶＃༅ἆ⼇㼈伉૿ୟ౯ൿຏྟႯᆿￏ�４༖἗⼘㼙会᯿ᱟᵯṿᾏ₟↯⊿ￏ�Ｅ༧Ἠ⼩㼪伫⳿ⵟ⹯⽿わ㆟㊯㎿ￏ�Ｖ༸Ἱ⼺㼻似㷿㹟㽯䁿䆏䊟䎯䒿ￏ�ｇཉὊ⽋㽌位仿佟偯兿劏原咯喿ￏ�ｘཚὛ⽜㽝佞忿恟慯承掏撟斯暿ￏ�ｩཫὬ⽭㽮佯烿煟牯獿璏疟皯瞿ￏ�ｺོώ⽾㽿侀臿艟药葿薏蚟螯袿ￏ�ﾋྍᾎ⾏㾐侑鋿鍟鑯长随鞟颯馿ￏ�ﾜྞᾟ⾠㾡侢ꏿꑟꕯꙿꞏꢟꦯ꪿ￏ�ﾭྯᾰ⾱㾲侳듿땟뙯띿뢏릟몯뮿ￏ�ﾾ࿀῁⿂㿃俄엿왟읯졿즏쪟쮯첿ￏ�ￏ࿑ῒ⿓㿔俕훿흟��󷲯�ￏ�￠࿢ΰ⿤㿥俦ￏ�￱࿳ῴ⿵㿶俷寧﩯ﭿﲏﶟﺯ﾿ￏ�＂༄ἅ⼆㼇伈৿੟୯౿ඏຟྯႿￏ�３༕἖⼗㼘伙᫿᭟ᱯᵿẏᾟ₯↿ￏ�Ｄ༦ ἧ⼨㼩伪⯿ⱟⵯ⹿⾏ゟㆯ㊿ￏ�Ｕ༷Ἰ⼹㼺伻㳿㵟㹯㽿䂏䆟䊯䎿ￏ�ｆ཈Ὁ⽊㽋佌䷿也佯偿冏功厯咿ￏ�ｗཙ὚⽛㽜佝廿彟息慿抏掟撯斿ￏ�ｨཪὫ⽬㽭佮濿灟煯牿玏璟疯皿ￏ�ｹཻὼ⽽㽾使胿腟良荿蒏薟蚯螿ￏ�ﾊྌᾍ⾎㾏侐釿鉟鍯鑿閏隟鞯颿ￏ�ﾛྜྷᾞ⾟㾠価ꋿꍟꑯꕿꚏꞟꢯꦿ菏�㌠㈯꼱ࠐ㄰갶ㄛ㠴Ƞ괼慀⁮瑳y敬∽潦瑮ⴀ楳敺ㄺ2〮瑰氻湩旀栭楥ꭧ늀㔰∥괾걸ꬰএ鎬㐲漼瀺돓뒐㗼뀲⾐ᾶ傰㗼뜶끡뎲궙ꭷ듰節끜狀ࢺႬ袭䆻 ᢼ꯽㟽劷㺶醺䆻ᮬ㘂⁰汣獡猂傱獍乯牯浸污辳澽쾬� ⁉敲楶睥斐⁤뉴⃐셰Ҡ獮扵業詴이潢菇慃쥰•慮敶쉲⁰ၢ極摬邲⁧뙤뭥썁斀邱⃊읹ኃ뉓狐끯⃀䱌䏬쨮즱泐⃌郌哶Ꟈ郇쭡왐쫩읰�潮僋邲郁쩵컀ᓱ杧苊셵佰歡쳿끐쟐낰쟐뉰놐숀፰膲ꇊ楲탉慷佹჈邲菇惈摤ケ丠꭯윐첒愐챤妐澐⁵푹犐챳￠Ⴋ邲炱僂惇௄Ӏ앿멷쎧쓭맠쯰촠矴퓷쪐왠燱䃊Ç샇䃈늹掀눠믐쩐玁郌䷊ダ�欐쭥풀뿁ビ郒킰僋퇈녣�삱샊ダÇǍ쩮잂욐퉩솱痀⹥ﾴྶ럿먛뮿볏뷟뻯샿섏묟 ⿂㯃쥂�읠䲰ニ쿽湀濟翠迡鿢꿣뿤쓿Ｏ㿅Ὸ忮濯翰迱鿲꿳䷫郒ဆ潈杯⿺㿻俼켈৿૟௯෿ฏ༟ုᄿｏ弒漓缔輕鼖꼗뼘켙᫿ᯟᳯỿἏ‟ℯ∿ｏ弣漤缥輦鼧꼨뼩켪⯿ⳟⷯ⿿』ㄟ㈯㌿ｏ弴漵缶輷鼸꼹뼺켻㳿㷟㻯䃿䄏䈟䌯䐿ｏ彅潆罇轈齉꽊뽋콌䷿仟俯凿刏匟启唿ｏ彖潗罘轙齚꽛뽜콝廿忟惯拿挏搟支昿ｏ彧潨罩轪齫꽬뽭콮濿烟燯珿琏生瘯眿ｏ彸潹罺轻齼꽽뽾콿胿臟苯蓿蔏蘟蜯蠿ｏ徉澊羋辌龍꾎뾏쾐釿鋟鏯闿阏霟頯餿ｏ徚澛羜辝龞꾟뾠쾡 ꋿꏟꓯ꛿꜏ꠟ꤯꨿ｏ徫澬羭辮龯꾰뾱쾲돿듟뗯럿렏뤟먯묿ｏ徼澽羾辿鿀꿁뿂쿃쓿엟웯죿줏쨟쬯찿ｏ忍濎翏运鿑꿒뿓쿔헿훟ퟯ��󗰯�ｏ忞濟翠迡鿢꿣뿤쿥ｏ忯濰翱迲鿳꿴뿵쿶璘ﯿﰏﴟ︯＿ｏ开漁缂較鼄꼅뼆켇ࣿয়૯೿ഏฟ༯ဿｏ弑漒缓輔鼕꼖뼗켘᧿᫟ᯯ᷿ḏ἟ ℿｏ弢漣缤輥鼦꼧뼨켩⫿⯟⳯⻿⼏〟ㄯ㈿ｏ弳漴缵輶鼷꼸뼹켺㯿㳟㷯㿿䀏䄟䈯䌿ｏ彄潅罆轇齈꽉뽊콋䳿䷟仯僿儏刟匯吿ｏ录潖罗轘齙꽚뽛콜巿廟忯懿戏挟搯政ｏ彦潧罨轩齪꽫뽬콭滿濟烯狿猏琟甯瘿ｏ彷潸罹轺齻꽼뽽콾翿胟臯菿萏蔟蘯蜿ｏ很澉羊辋龌꾍뾎쾏郿釟鋯铿锏队霯頿ｏ徙澚羛辜龝꾞뾟쾠ꄟꋟꏯꗿ꘏—⼳㉄ꤱば㘱箦ȲꜴ㱐㩯㹰楽ﲩ㈵꬯ꔓ峖烨牡힧꘰ꝰ귨筱䢮嶦갷ꭒ꘾교⁢ꬅ㙜⁰汣a獳∽獍乯潀浲污갢⃈ꚓ꾐䥧ꙴ⍿ꤸኀꜷ㧋꼲獘樠用瑳ス륯愰ၤ琠慨邹潹둵眠肺멬뤀数抺늡灠睯뉥瑠삹꜅欐セ睡祡〠牦浯炼삼浡槤뱬瞰륨뫀뤰㍀₺セ敬邹湩抻뱣淰湵ቩ뱴憰멮最癩뮟뼰뮠믲뱓槐뽥緱뚽둭뭰먰븡든沠븯ꗰ륰뽰戲 킾摥⻾ﾩྫᾬ⾭㾮侯徰뇟뉯덿뒏즟䉗킻邿믅䰰僁潮썮쓯࿆ῇ⿈㿉俊忋濌翍캃횏ㅧ㘲传䂼탻뾀无￐࿒ΐ⿔㿕홿흏��䍧慌뭰渰쁡牀��｟濥翦迧鿨述鿫龦꾧㝟濴翵段뱍Ҡ₰潯紐﫟߯࡯ｿ載鼊꼋뼌켍�０ዿጏᐟᔯᘿᝏᡟ᥯ｿ輚鼛꼜뼝켞�Ａ⏿␏┟☯✿⡏⥟⩯ｿ輫鼬꼭뼮켯�Ｒ㓿㔏㘟㜯㠿㥏㩟㭯ｿ輼鼽꼾뼿콀�ｃ䗿䘏䜟䠯䤿䩏䭟䱯ｿ轍齎꽏뽐콑�ｔ囿圏堟夯娿孏ꡟ嵮｟潞齜齠꽡뽢콣�替棿椏樟欯氿浏湟ｯ罯轰齱꽲뽳콴�矿秿稏笟簯紿繏罟ｯ羀辁龂꾃뾄쾅�裿諿謏谟贯踿轏遟ｯ羑辒龓꾔뾕쾖�駿鯿鰏鴟鸯鼿ꁏꅟｯ羢辣龤꾥뾦쾧�꫿곿괏긟꼯뀿녏뉟ｯ羳辴龵꾶뾷쾸�믿뷿븏뼟쀯섿쉏썟ｯ翄迅鿆꿇뿈쿉�쳿컿켏퀟턯툿퍏푟ｯ翕迖鿗꿘뿙쿚���ｯ翦迧鿨꿩뿪쿫�ｯ翷迸鿹꿺뿻쿼�ǿȏ̟ЯԿُݟｯ缈載鼊꼋뼌켍�ჿዿጏᐟᔯᘿᝏᡟｯ缙輚鼛꼜뼝켞�⇿⏿␏┟☯✿⡏⥟ｯ缪輫鼬꼭뼮켯� ㋿㓿㔏㘟㜯㠿㥏㩟ｯ缻輼鼽꼾뼿콀�䏿䗿䘏䜟䠯䤿䩏䭟ｯ罌轍齎꽏뽐콑�哿囿圏堟夯娿孏屟ｯ罝轞齟꽠뽡콢�旿柿栏椟樯欿汏浟ｯ置软齰꽱뽲콳�盿磿礏稟笯簿絏繟ｯ罿辀龁꾂뾃쾄�蟿觿訏謟谯贿蹏轟ｯ羐辑龒꾓뾔쾕�飿髿鬏鰟鴯鸿齏ꁟ཯羡辢龣ꚤ⼳㐲ꡱ【㘱⮥₨¦‼㩯㹰꡽㖜ല邩꤯꒳岆慰絲螦ꔰ꘠겘갑ꗨ㜍ꪯ꧲ꗞ가 ﲩꤶ⁰汣獡㵳∀獍乯牯桭污ꬢ⁨䂥ޮT敨䌠瑩⁹漢₤慃둰懱ၮ癡牥䂳爠ࡥ畱뙩撀ㄠ耲″慏⁫때뇰潴갠딐晀Ⴓ⁀⁡畳 뙲礠⹀删敩뙨剠敀楬扡둬台롑槃杮肸뙮䷰딵炠膺렬릁掰ﱥ獮뒸憸肺킷玚삥둴뗰䙡덬摩銸浢₵炽룉榑띧撰밯대㽀ូ튷ʽ᾵⎶Ⴙ潙痠搠捥Ⴞ뿻댡攐⮥¦풰鞦イ껿쐏넥봐봀론뒧쟐啡僇롳沀뙷叡삙犠걯뜐䲀륃霐拀悷냀령敀읥嵰⇁쥰뙑쀰曱僉ﭭஷ졩좀덢숰랐七뱵뤀닰ₐ쉢憠췟볱쟀썰뭠澠邺ザ촟쩐좡부븂満浩痮탋薶샏읮롰쁒莟⾥㠣ㄲ꘷౻㈹飅胈ㅒ稠쿻멠⺁龨꾩뾪쾫�굿껯냿넏눟댯�侧벝䛠ʾ僒¨㠱䎨짛턜漱₶↼뙥쨤�⃡읰ꕐ벰矃㋏郎瓼콩졠쮀 랣멗뫂羀䆽냈냚↶惎¾浣炷빤똀眠₸胈﹥뵸며뫐몂삀쥥쵐ｰ⿗㿘俙忚濛翜违鿞�䷛惏틣ꃥ狖䥔狥肺쉿볒슐읰띃챗룱炐빟뭠뚱뽰ⶠ烒�懫熻퉮漀Ⴟ邺⿪肶콣晠₿삸⏨⃲샧汵薶냰ꔰ틐戀䇀쉃㹠쉮뚰읠ﵡ젶禡Ｍ惃ヨ킻싏ￖ࿮`ﶟழ퉂縷킥ﶀ﫡﾿싥䐁矪痨ꛬ뎺ʽۧ뷿툁읐Pឤ캲뭰균熶཰Р瞂ヒཨﬀ샋쀈빣਀런࿒䇊띯륰쪰ᝁｧ䄄ᇊザ昙꿬켅�߿࣯૿ଏటയ฿ཏ｟漐⇻僇₶ꇪ惂䈒)ﻟ첱룰캰렰技惂䌗짯순뚐봠烠发룿빱톡p먢﯂⫢싃Ǻ䂽拒ƽ챭ᦵ좐Ʞꌜ̛ሲ朠絡슼ᩦ측㋢ᯃ狀볯윀틲ꘀ栀샋ℬ䏇즿⨫뛄⅑ǰ旡膺쏿쒯⎿웿⣕°랑㓡�肾င迓鿔귕㙷㣀￣ℴᄁ픫弞漟缠⇿⊏⎟⒯▿⛏⟟⣯塈»銼ᭈ뮐띡띗�ǐ烎뙡쏃﬒멧뚀ｑ炻᮷豐롴뿀允쯆ﴔ惒띷뢰멱툒ｐ２ᓼ拈댘ᘫ輮筐췿츐숱뷤뤂뻰嚡ﭡ⑂큌䉷䏯䗿䘏䜟Ｏ㽈佉彊潋罌轍㪴럿ﭰ巡廏忟惯拿挏？⽤㽥佦彧潨ザ胐틭䰀惃橮殟沯﾿콭�ｰིέ⽴㽵緿뜗ጐ 뜀睖碯禿竏￟ｼཾ὿⾀㾁侂ᾊ藿ꔯꙏ遟虏螏袟覯﾿쾊�ﾍྏ潎瑏徒鏿鑯ꁿꋿꌏꐟꔯ꘿ｏ徧澨義辪龫꾬뾭쾮꿿냟뇯돿됏딟똯뜿ｏ徸澹羺辻龼꾽뾾쾿샿쇟싯쓿씏옟윯젿ｏ忉濊翋迌鿍꿎뿏쿐퇿틟폯헿혏휟��ｏ忚濛翜违鿞꿟뿠쿡ｏ快濬翭迮鿯꿰뿱쿲蘭隷﬿ｏ忼濽翾迿鼀꼁뼂켃ӿןۯࣿएਟଯిｏ弍漎缏輐鼑꼒뼓켔ᗿᛟ៯᧿ᨏᬟᰯᴿｏ弞漟缠輡鼢꼣뼤켥⛿⟟⣯⫿⬏Ⱏ⴯⸿ｏ弯漰缱輲鼳꼴뼵켶㟿㣟㧯㯿㰏㴟㸯㼿ｏ彀潁罂轃齄꽅 뽆콇䣿䧟䫯䳿䴏丟伯倿ｏ彑潒罓轔齕꽖뽗콘姿嫟寯巿帏弟怯愿ｏ形潣罤轥齦꽧뽨콩櫿毟泯滿漏瀟焯爿ｏ彳潴罵轶齷꽸뽹콺篿糟緯翿耏脟舯茿ｏ径澅羆辇龈꾉뾊쾋賿跟軯郿鄏鈟錯鐿ｏ徕澖羗辘龙꾚뾛쾜鷿黟鿯ꇿꈏꌟꐯꔿｏ徦澧羨辩龪꾫뾬쾭껿꿟냯뇻늿냏듿뛿／ᾷ⾸㾹侺徻澼羽达뿿삟솯슿쏏쓟엯쟿／Ὲ⿉㿊俋忌濍翎迏탿톟튯펿퓏헟훯�／Ῑ⿚㿛俜忝濞翟迠／Ὺ⿫㿬俭忮濯翰迱﫿／Ώ⿼㿽俾忿漀缁輂Ͽҟ֯ڿߏࣟ৯௿／Ἄ ⼍㼎伏弐漑缒輓ᓿᖟᚯឿᣏ᧟᫯᳿／Ἕ⼞㼟传弡漢缣輤◿⚟➯⢿⧏⫟⯯ⷿ／Ἦ⼯㼰伱弲漳缴輵㛿㞟㢯㦿㫏㯟㳯㻿ဉ⼳㔲ꁁ㄰श묾㐲逿漼瀺㺤䉽㔬䌲⼠䍃㺡尖慰䁲〗뀾䃯䔨䚡㹸㞝艄湃逾䔕ₒ豃䌶瀑挠氀獡㵳䴢s乯牯慭≬䐍⃸퀾靇楓据敂偎敨潲ꁅꀠ䱌⁃䱨‐倿欀湥愠慷汹洠ꁌꁎ佴傀㄀㺁暐敥⁴㵯纰住俐倰仠䲠儁䙰爈摩䅐睴ⵯ倁琲慲晦捩₄佩榠灭䱯䠠扩乬瞠偩激疪灑剤皰灎內㖀P偭灐祴⸦롑⁒摥ꅏ⁯拞ꁎ遐灒腐坤嗒ꁏꁌ杩灎큌擺U啩俱䲑婰呄 큖偃姡さ䁖쁔၌介妠癰ꁎ敭묾逿䫿䁤㴧䟀嶟䪥侠娠]けꁓš乷僐倀﯀ᅔ奬墰夑哐呐變坴㾠⽂㽃佄彅潆䝿䡿䦏䪟䮯䲿棏哇僻凑秠さ彣潤罥车柿梟榯檿每泟淯痿劗乂滠乩䲠ｮ⽰㽱佲彳潴罵轶真碟禯窿苏ㆧ㘲凿綷縿罏聟腯艿莏ﾟ꾄뾅쾆�꾏뾊�闿賟负踯輿遏酟鉯㝿输龔魍偍ꍀ⃐﵈끚靧飯髿꘏ꞏꢟﾯ뾩쾪�ﾭྯᾰ⾱닿댿둏땟뙯띿뢏릟ﾯ뾺쾻�ﾾ࿀῁⿂쏿쐿앏왟읯졿즏쪟ﾯ뿋쿌�ￏ࿑ῒ⿓퓿픿홏흟��ﾯ뿜쿝�￠࿢ΰ⿤ ﾯ뿭쿮�￱࿳ῴ⿵寧﩯ﭿﲏﶟﾯ뿾쿿�＂༄༅ἆӿࡏॏ੟୯౿ඏຟﾯ뼏켐�３༕἖⼗᣿᤿ᩏ᭟ᱯᵿẏᾟﾯ뼠켡�Ｄ༦ἧ⼨⧿⨿⭏ⱟⵯ⹿⾏ゟﾯ뼱켲�Ｕ༷Ἰ⼹㫿㬿㱏㵟㹯㽿䂏䆟ﾯ뽂콃�ｆ཈Ὁ⽊䯿䰿䵏也佯偿冏功ﾯ뽓코�ｗཙ὚⽛峿崿幏彟息慿抏掟ﾯ뽤콥�ｨཪὫ⽬淿渿潏灟煯牿玏璟ﾯ뽵콶�ｹཻὼ⽽绿缿聏腟良荿蒏薟ﾯ뾆쾇�ﾊྌᾍ⾎迿逿酏鉟鍯鑿閏隟ﾯ뾗쾘�ﾛྜྷᾞ⾟ꃿꄿꉏꍟꑯꕿꚏꞟﾯ뾨쾩�ﾬྮᾯ⾰뇿눿 덏둟땯뙿랏뢟ﾯ뾹쾺�ﾽ྿῀⿁싿쌿쑏앟왯읿좏즟ﾯ뿊쿋�ￎ࿐ῑ⿒폿퐿핏홟흯��ﾯ뿛쿜�￟࿡ῢ⿣ﾯ뿬쿭�￰࿲ῳ⿴說奔ﮏﲟﾯ뿽쿾�！༃ἄ⼅ۿܿࡏय़੯୿ಏඟﾯ뼎켏�２༔ἕ⼖៿ᠿ᥏᩟᭯᱿ᶏẟﾯ뼟켠�Ｃ༥ἦ⼧⣿⤿⩏⭟Ɐ⵿⺏⾟ﾯ뼰켱�Ｔ༶ἷ⼸㧿㨿㭏㱟㵯㹿㾏䂟螯뽁콂핃⼳㜲ぇえ㘱䭄㐲⁅‼㩯㹰䝽㖼ല끈䠯䏓岦慰絲ꝅ䐰䕀䮸䰱䐈㜭䪯䠒䓾䬠•᱉䠶¡⁰汣獡㵳∀獍乯牯桭污䨢₈恄❍ၓ湩散 敨ɲ䭯‰䱌⹃ਠ全₠敫⁮涶げご啴唠ㆠ⁄昀敥⁴睡왡噹咀涀传灕쁔噙攰嘬吁朰䁋换畲坣喠搠喁潐搠楲呶ﰰ景䁃≘联兙ざ恙捦偗ご楷ၖT缠Ŕ恔䁕ၚ끕灕Tᅛ䑮揠쁖牛ፘꁛ朲ꁝ潶퉄ご潰睲灔氠T⁜U쭔ㅘ噸瓀孩塁꜡ၗ偒ၗ潮쁖呢R ř⹹뽇콈�䫿䯯䷿丏伟倯儿剏ꕟ蝧呂湰呩䰰違懽渐ὢ⽣㽤佥彦潧栿楿檏殟沯璿㆗︲圶潷瀯焿牏獟瑯ｿ轵齶꽷뽸콹龁꽼潄䗿蝿经缏耟脯舿荏｟澄羅辆龇ᾊ⾋ྗᾘ駿騯鬿鱏鵟鹯齿ꂏﾟ꾡뾢쾣�ﾦྨᾩ꫿꬯갿굏깟꽯 끿놏ﾟ꾲뾳쾴�ﾷྐྵᾺ믿밯봿빏뽟쁯셿슏ﾟ꿃뿄쿅�￈࿊Ή쳿촯츿콏큟텯퉿펏ﾟ꿔뿕쿖�￙࿛῜��ﾟ꿥뿦쿧�￪࿬῭ﾟ꿶뿷쿸�￻࿽῾/Ŀɏ͟ѯտڏﾟ꼇뼈켉�，༎Ἇჿᄯሿፏᑟᕯᙿតﾟ꼘뼙켚�＝༟ἠ⇿∯⌿⑏╟♯❿⢏ﾟ꼩뼪켫�Ｎ༰ἱ㋿㌯㐿㕏㙟㝯㡿㦏ﾟ꼺뼻켼�＿ཁὂ䏿䐯䔿䙏䝟䡯䥿䪏ﾟ꽋뽌콍�ｐདྷὓ哿唯嘿坏塟奯婿宏ﾟ꽜뽝콞�｡ལὤ旿是朿桏楟橯歿沏ﾟ꽭뽮콯�ｲུή盿眯砿祏穟筯籿綏ﾟ꽾뽿쾀�ﾃ྅ᾆ蟿蠯褿詏譟豯赿躏ﾟ꾏뾐쾑�ﾔྖᾗ飿餯騿魏鱟鵯鹿龏ﾟ꾠뾡쾢�ﾥྦྷᾨ꧿ꨯꬿ걏굟깯꽿낏ﾟ꾱뾲쾳�ﾶྸᾹ뫿묯밿뵏빟뽯쁿솏ﾟ꿂뿃쿄�ￇ࿉Ὴ쯿찯촿칏콟큯텿튏ﾟ꿓뿔쿕�￘࿚Ί��ﾟ꿤뿥쿦�￩࿫Ῥﾟ꿵뿶쿷�￺࿼´Ｏ?ŏɟͯѿ֏ﾟ꼆뼇켈�＋།Ἆ࿿ုᄿ቏፟ᑯᕿᚏﶟ꼗ᠠᦿ៏᯿᷿ḏ？⼟㼠伡弢漣缤輥鼦⟿⢯⦿⫏⯟⳯⻿⼏？⼰㼱伲弳漴缵輶鼷㣿㦯㪿㯏㳟㷯㿿䀏？⽁㽂佃彄潅罆轇齈䧿䪯䮿䳏䷟仯僿儏？⽒㽓佔录潖罗轘齙嫿宯岿巏廟忯懿戏？⽣㽤佥彦潧罨轩齪毿沯涿滏濟烯狿猏༟⽴㽵佶呷⼳㤲窑゠㘱뭷㐲選㱀㩯㹰筽㔬㈚⁼簯睃尖慰狺᝹眰禰縨羡睸庝紷粂睮纐ₒ豼Ķᅼ⁰汣獡s∽獍乯牯淐污索⃸큷鞀䝀潯⁤蕭溠楀杮‮蕂攐螁澐⁮潹荵࢐敲蕰璠‬聴敨䌠瑩睹₿㠣ㄲ礷㤋蔲袀衳田汩蝤胱传晦捩蕩࣐愠蝮䦐眠ᑥ瑮邉赯憰⁫䰾傎삉Ə捥軍揣ꂈ炍楴ꂈႍ觻蔠琀熈Əꊉ䂉낎莃覐汀獥氯鈻裐圠삉炍邇潮軽矠↓ ႍꊉꦐ톈鎃銐提楲敢₈咆놉킅杩浮슎澶끶㞏蕨錐揓႘裿蠀詰砫莐祤瘧胀鞟薙ꂃ↘襡猑硵썀䊗ꖔ瑳畲䂐Ƒ軛鹀癁₈衆觰襲辄瞐钒醉肑Ƙ目삉ゖ삎鈠遰蠱畤ꎏ龝轤錐觢נּ悈䆎鍹颐莲辐ꄁ츠赨鋰觀犐赡雒傎傏톈₈ꅄ笑簯＿佽彾潿羀辁龂꾃뾄藿곏ꞿ矏磟닯ꧯꨯ＿侫徬澭羮辯龰ꚱ詏鈀뇀녠狠蝧ⷰ扆㩭蜰㯰솉⻌쌰㇐瑰ᾲ볝处ꆕ邏꒑蝬轰ｐ토ꊉ膟낓Ǉ璝狠慯⹤ﾴྶᾷ죿짯쯿찏촟츯켿큏｟濑習迓鿔꿕뿖쿗��󋳿��｟濢翣迤鿥꿦⼛뿨쿩 ｟濳翴迵鿶꿷뿸쿹�ﯿﳯ／įȿ͏｟漄缅輆鼇꼈뼉켊�೿෯࿿ဏᄟሯጿᑏ｟漕编輗鼘꼙뼚켛�᷿ữ⃿ℏ∟⌯␿╏｟漦缧輨鼩꼪뼫켬�⻿⿯ㇿ㈏㌟㐯㔿㙏｟漷缸輹鼺꼻뼼켽�㿿䃯䋿䌏䐟䔯䘿䝏｟潈罉轊齋꽌뽍콎�僿凯叿吏唟嘯圿塏｟潙罚轛齜꽝뽞콟�懿拯擿攏星术栿楏｟潪罫转齭꽮뽯콰�狿珯痿瘏真砯礿穏｟潻罼载齾꽿뾀쾁�菿蓯蛿蜏蠟褯訿譏｟澌羍辎龏꾐뾑쾒�铿闯響頏餟騯鬿鱏｟澝羞辟龠꾡뾢쾣�ꗿꛯꣿꤏꨟ꬯갿굏｟澮羯辰龱 꾲뾳쾴�뙡㏤㈯먹쌰㛰띉㉋뼴濡봺㊎㔴뼲⿰펻ꚶ灜싻룰ェ䂷뢸ㆾࢿ⶷㝞ኽﺻ₷⊾밠㘜묁炡挠慬獳㴀䴢潳潎큲慭≬袽뜠쁠ܯ쾷�닆桔湡礠畯뾺쾻�뻿샿섏숟쌯쐿앏콟ߟ翇迈拖敂湲i⁥敌湮湯쫿쭯챿춏캟쾯킿퇏࿟ￓ࿕쟟㈱‶俔쩡䰐��ｯ翜违鿞꿟뿠쿡�훟ퟏｏ快濬翭迮鿯꿰뿱쯲䴌쩡︰䣠潯ｧ࿵ῶ⿷꼃뼄켅�ࣿ૿ଏటയ฿ཏၟｯ缑輒鼓꼔뼕켖�᧿᯿ᰏᴟḯἿ⁏⅟ｯ缢輣鼤꼥뼦켧�⫿⳿ⴏ⸟⼯〿ㅏ㉟ｯ缳輴鼵꼶뼷켸�㯿㷿㸏㼟䀯䄿䉏䍟ｯ罄轅齆꽇뽈콉�䳿仿伏借儯刿协呟ｯ罕轖齗꽘뽙콚�巿忿怏感戯挿摏敟ｯ罦轧齨꽩뽪콫�滿烿焏爟猯琿畏癟ｯ罷轸齹꽺뽻콼�翿臿舏茟萯蔿虏蝟ｯ羈趉澊羋꾉꾍뾎쾏郿釟鋯铿锏队霯頿ｏ徙澚羛辜龝꾞뾟쾠ꇿꋟꏯꗿ꘏ꜟ꠯ꤿｏ循澫羬辭龮꾯뾰쾱닿돟듯뛿뜏렟뤯먿ｏ徻澼羽达龿꿀뿁쿂쏿쓟엯쟿젏줟쨯쬿ｏ忌濍翎迏鿐꿑뿒쿓퓿헟훯��󛰿ｏ忝濞翟迠鿡꿢뿣쿤ｏ忮濯翰迱鿲꿳뿴쿵﫿﬏ﰟﴯ︿ｏ忿漀缁輂鼃꼄 뼅켆߿ࣟ৯௿ఏടฯ༿ｏ弐漑缒輓鼔꼕뼖켗᣿᧟᫯᳿ᴏḟἯ‿ｏ弡漢缣輤鼥꼦뼧켨⧿⫟⯯ⷿ⸏⼟〯ㄿｏ弲漳缴輵鼶꼷뼸켹㫿㯟㳯㻿㼏䀟䄯䈿ｏ彃潄罅轆齇꽈뽉콊䯿䳟䷯俿倏償刯匿ｏ彔潕罖轗齘꽙뽚콛峿巟廯惿意戟振搿ｏ彥潦罧轨齩꽪뽫콬淿滟濯燿爏猟琯甿ｏ彶潷罸轹齺꽻뽼콽绿翟胯苿茏萟蔯蘿ｏ徇澈羉辊龋꾌뾍쾎迿郟釯鏿鐏锟阯霿ｏ徘澙羚辛龜꾝뾞쾟ꃿꇟꋯ꓿ꔏꘟꜯ꠿ŏ妩⼴⼳〲ሱꨶ㈋ꨴ㳠㩯灈紾沭㈵悮䌯莮暩灜牡枫�ª碫뢱꼷껂⮮튰긠㛌冮 ⁰挀慬獳∽M潳潎浲污√㢰ꨠ눠俗⁮䷀湯慤륹냀惰档㈠먱궐‱礀畯朠癡䁥匠敨潲䀠䱌⁃敤肻㍬킻洠邻桴愊낹ꤱ曠敥쑴漠©慏뱫봠햀邻띦⃠Ⴘ걬뻐怢瑩⁳뭰믡瓐椀獥‮牐ᥩƿ潴劽Ⴞ㈱툷봬㎠성㗒墾炽撎肼獵멬뵢맰뢰瀀킼ッ傷⃤봵矅뱩쁰솠�븹睘쇄壄묶씀Ｈ澭羮辯龰꾱뾲쾳�떏뛯룿촏哇楨泼뭥뽱믠씢뵰빠ਠ썮㏑გ潨捩샽㪀忈濉翊迋鿌꿍츯쾿탏퇟䳬냔側�ꩠ炠䍨卸炐楆≠٠푹틠瑰硥⵴榆⃄㩴⸭კ펀�ㅴꨩㄋ縴휸ꯐ봰뻅ⷀ猀穩㩥⸷逰瑰氻胣ⵥ삻椔�㩀낽┵℻쏧慦業탃☺熈潵ꃨ楔항䀡敎⁷潒䥮铪猬킻晩峤ｦ㿜羪辫࿮`⿰㿱羚�釭⏟䟻꿭䛦묵�˧槤裚夠ㆻソ凄빻뭙淠⇁＿�￘࿚Ί⿜㿝俞�䵼胅푤ﮯ뿣꺸？⿫㿬俭�￻꼜뼝ỿ῏⃟⇯⏿␏┟☯缿伧㿽俾忿漀簁瀨睫邻᾽㐃멭쀠먅⠠셷뮠븀⥦₿釁ﴰ퇁ܲ븠Ѧֿۏߟ￯（༊Ἃ⼌㼍伎淡ꂾᆏኟ횯ጠᓟᗯ៿／Ἐ⼙㼚伛�Ｉ䷿俿倏償刯匿呏啟ｯ罖轗㼫伬弭漮못뷡琰牵뽮쇠㉓ｇ⇁鼴 꼵뼶켷�Ｚ㳿㴏㸟툯䉯뫯묱欠潈杯₿傽䅉퇃뷹玀뱷쇡퐣䢱샠惀情セ썬쐰묀齐ソ烁艰烄ソ楣烁쓿좐摏政晏束桯楿ﾏ齪꽫뽬콭潹轘齙퓿북뺀뮀琡甏瘟眯＿佸役潺罻轼齽꽾㞉䊺킻쁮뱰쐠渠菿蓏藟蛯裿褏訟謯＿侌徍澎㣥爐�ﾒ铿锏队霯頿饏驟魯❿侣꽄⍁潣낼㩲⎀䘱㤴䐷꾨꧿麿肏膟궯鿏巬序ﾟ椁쾠�ﾣྥᾦ⾧ꣿ괿ꩯꭟ걯뽿깿꾟ﾯ뾰쾱�ﾴྶᾷ⾸맿먿뭏뱟뵯빿쾏쁯ﾯ뿁쿂쿕ￅ࿇�⿉쫿쬿챏쵟칯�퀿톟ﾯ뿒쿓￘뿥ￖ࿘࿫翞􏰿��ﾯ 뿣쿤�￧࿩Ὺ俯濿Ͽя՟ٯｿ輇鼈꼉뼊켋�．ჿᄏሟጯᐿᕏᙟᝯｿ輘鼙꼚뼛켜�？⇿∏⌟␯┿♏❟⡯ｿ輩鼪꼫뼬켭�Ｐ㋿㌏㐟㔯㘿㝏㡟㥯ｿ輺鼻꼼뼽켾�ａ䏿䐏䔟䘯䜿䡏䥟䩯ｿ轋齌꽍뽎콏�ｒ哿唏嘟圯堿奏婟孯ｿ轜齝꽞뽟콠�｣旿昏期栯椿橏歟汯ｿ轭齮꽯뽰콱�ｴ盿眏砟礯稿筏籟絯ｿ轾齿꾀뾁쾂�ﾅ蟿蠏褟訯謿豏赟蹯ｿ辏龐꾑뾒쾓�ﾖ飿餏騟鬯鰿鵏鹟齯ｿ辠龡꾢뾣쾤�ﾧ꧿ꨏ꬟갯괿깏꽟끯ｿ辱龲꾳뾴쾵�ﾸ뫿묏밟봯 븿뽏쁟셯ｿ迂鿃꿄뿅쿆�￉쯿찏촟츯켿큏텟퉯ｿ迓鿔꿕뿖쿗�ￚ��ｿ迤鿥꿦뿧쿨�￫ｿ迵鿶꿷뿸쿹�／įȿ͏џկｿ輆鼇꼈뼉켊�－࿿ဏᄟሯጿᑏᕟᙯｿ輗鼘꼙뼚켛�＞⃿ℏ∟⌯␿╏♟❯ｿ輨鼩꼪뼫켬�Ｏㇿ㈏㌟㐯㔿㙏㝟㡯ｿ輹鼺꼻뼼켽�｀䋿䌏䐟䔯䘿䝏䡟䥯ｿ轊齋꽌뽍콎�ｑ叿吏唟嘯圿塏奟婯ｿ轛齜꽝뽞콟�｢擿攏星术栿楏機歯ｿ转齭꽮뽯콰�ｳ痿瘏真砯礿穏筟籯ｿ载齾꽿뾀쾁� ﾄ蛿蜏蠟褯訿譏豟赯ｿ辎龏꾐뾑쾒�ﾕ響頏餟騯鬿鱏鵟鹯ｿ辟龠꾡뾢쾣�ﾦꠃꤏ‖⼴⼹䠲㄰ꤶ㊛ꨴ㱰漠瀺紾ಭ㈵긍⼀⎮灜牡ꩽヷ邩ࢫ膰墱綩꼷抯亮炩犰긠㙬瀀挠慬獳=䴢潳潎浲慨≬�ꤠ늰䥷慨敶愠耠楶敤⁯ꡯ䆐낹桓牥끯₀䰀䍌琠畲䑣⁫膰敫멤渠₸祭邻놺ꂺ뱴ɐ르瑠椠⁳멷뵩椀₼炪삽멣鮐悽ㆺ뱣ꨐ挰뵴䛀뱧맱炐睯ꂺ옠뵬뻀⹐吠낽悽뮋뵄浑悻⁨띳庡뽬뷑밁뼠杢邰㽢䂪邹䒻肷䂽ソ潷痼뭬맰띣릠뻰삦⡐畐쁢挀郁晡斂톼敲畱왩텠悽浩뭭槠₽醹뿻밁⸐ ྭᾮ⾯㾰侱뉿덟둯땿뚏랟춯䉷먉溠륩䲐湥ｮႼ࿈Έ⿊㿋俌忍濎켟큿톏튟�ㆇ㘲₨慏肻쉌敀῕훿휯��󫱿�枟꿞뿟蟧慃ꂼ䇮ﵮ熹｟濧翨迩鿪꿫뿬꿴뿯꧿꪿𢡊｟濶翷迸鿹꿺뿻쿼�￯ǿȏ̟ЯԿُ罟漇稈郁킼瀈ɲ뵧ⷀ潢瑴⡯㩭봰㯀�〮᪡㇠瑰쀻ⴂ邺槴ቧ㫠�琌ೇᗠಿㆰ㠴逋」숋ᡁ晥솾猭穩攼ᩐᯐ℡易쁡業祬☺胆候㬌왔뻰乑睥丠ᥒ슀≀ⳤ멳榠曺簜Ṧᶱ౟⊇ෳ㉨☢唈륮ᗰ䛠ݬ“睡‬䀜ꀢꂹ摤뇆ꀤ悽ᄧ뤀얐劅빥犰镤䇀൉秠Ä搠Ⴚ퓿쏠싑뵀ⰰᗱᯠ⪀羚准䀈솽뇆ꂿꀤセႺ앰요Ⱡ왒肋傾獴怪㔭ꀤ怩瀪쇿뿠먀풰앰⫐ん북ﾡ悽샔Ⴟ킼ꄬ䀰惇냄⳾眍Ｅ䜞떾㑛먔昰샅邹뱢桑볯뤐쎐벒眠쀤኿ﳇ⟿⡿⦋릧⭠륡뫀베빐멢쒰グ붬ࡠ眰僀䇮∿뇆Ⴤ⩴쉠뱀�䈻惇₼낾Ç㍵뵡＠쇇〗惆凇ℱ뀛맯뮀㫰뽑䍢ꄴ⊺峮㦛쟔汀愫숲灭쀩秼빥뵑솀㫐쑀릅ﵰꄪ액゠뽣앣䞔ႁᏇ甠ℰ缵輶鼷㣿ㆥ⪕䍠선⿠ᤁ멐肽儰硥셇凅弩漪⯿䁳Ⱌ⶯⺸⽯み릁ﶰ됰䀭來㉧㌿剄㎴Եꚾ₺ᄮ콋�㢿㪥૫ஏྟᾌ㔼烡࿿⃰᱒ᆉ愨ၧᇯ懿ﾯἔ⼕㼖众弘漙缚輛᳿沟ẟ᾿⃏⇟⋯⓿／ἥ왶輾鼿꽀뽁콂�䓿䗯䟿䠏䤟〯瞥恏ﾟ�ꔸ뽊�ｏདὒ⽓哿唿噏坟塯奿媏実ﾯ뽜ꚾ⾌㾍侎뙢潞촺揿旿昏期栯椿橏歟꽯ﾡ轭齮쥸꘰⽱デ盾ྮ枰魯ｵ콿�臿苯蓿蔏蘟蜯蠿襏｟澊ｉᾐ⾑㾒䞓쾟�돿㡏鎥铯雿霏頟餯＿侚徛澜羝辞὞㾤脻읿졯쥿꺅ၻ걟㭆㗋秥⾁ꁲ祤�辰⊦㜮拉킦P