HomeMy WebLinkAboutNew Board of Adjustment Meeting - Tuesday November 22nd - 6pm re Variance No 16-02Good afternoon Mr. Lennon,
Per our phone conversation this afternoon, it was discovered property
owners were not properly noticed for the 8-23-2016 Board of Adjustment
Meeting and the recently cancelled Appeal Hearing regarding Variance No.
16-02. Therefore, a new Board of Adjustment Meeting has been scheduled
regarding Variance No. 16-02 for Tuesday, November 22, 2016 in the Cape
Canaveral Library Meeting Room at 6pm or soon thereafter. You and the
other property owners involved will be receiving the proper Notices
which are now being prepared for distribution.
Thank you.
Mia
<http://www.cityofcapecanaveral.org/>
Mia Goforth, CMC
City Clerk
m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
321-868-1220 Ext 220 321-868-1248 fax
105 Polk Avenue. P.O. Box 326
Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://www.cityofcapecanaveral.org/>
Launch your connection…
<https://www.facebook.com/CityofCapeCanaveral>
<https://www.instagram.com/cityofcapecanaveral/>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/city-of-cape-canaveral-the%20https:/tw
itter.com/CapeCanaveralFL> <https://twitter.com/capecanaveralfl>
-----Original Message-----
From: terrilynbowman@yahoo.com [mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 9:34 AM
To: Anthony Garganese <agarganese@orlandolaw.net>
Cc: David Greene <D.Greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org>; Mia Goforth
<M.Goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org>; Daniel LeFever
<D.LeFever@cityofcapecanaveral.org>; David Dickey
<D.Dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
Subject: RE: Oak Lane and Variance Request No. 2016-02; Public Records
Request under Ch. 119
Anthony and all:
Thank you very much for this decision. I will reach out to Mr. Lennon
and explain that I requested this and the reasons.
I look forward to hearing of the new date.
Kind Regards,
Terri
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 10/26/16, Anthony A. Garganese <agarganese@orlandolaw.net
<mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> > wrote:
Subject: RE: Oak Lane and Variance Request No. 2016-02; Public Records
Request under Ch. 119
To: "Terri" <terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com>
>
Cc: "d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> "
<d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >,
"m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> "
<m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >,
"d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org> "
<d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >, "David Dickey"
<D.Dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:D.Dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >
Date: Wednesday, October 26, 2016, 9:14 AM
#yiv6238115375
#yiv6238115375 --
_filtered #yiv6238115375 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15
5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
_filtered #yiv6238115375 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11
6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
#yiv6238115375
#yiv6238115375 p.yiv6238115375MsoNormal, #yiv6238115375
li.yiv6238115375MsoNormal, #yiv6238115375 div.yiv6238115375MsoNormal
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}
#yiv6238115375 a:link, #yiv6238115375
span.yiv6238115375MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv6238115375 a:visited, #yiv6238115375
span.yiv6238115375MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv6238115375 p.yiv6238115375MsoAcetate, #yiv6238115375
li.yiv6238115375MsoAcetate, #yiv6238115375 div.yiv6238115375MsoAcetate
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:8.0pt;}
#yiv6238115375 span.yiv6238115375BalloonTextChar
{}
#yiv6238115375 span.yiv6238115375EmailStyle19
{color:#1F497D;}
#yiv6238115375 .yiv6238115375MsoChpDefault
{font-size:10.0pt;}
_filtered #yiv6238115375 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
#yiv6238115375 div.yiv6238115375WordSection1
{}
#yiv6238115375 Teri, The City will reschedule a BOA meeting. At that
meeting, the BOA will be advised to rescind their prior decision and
conduct a new hearing. At that point, Mr. Lennon’s appeal will be moot
and not necessary. Public notice will be provided shortly. Staff
will be contacting Mr.
Lennon and the Developer and advising them of this change.
The City will briefly explain to Mr. Lennon the basis of this decision
and why his appeal is not going forward at this time. Should you be in
contact with Mr. Lennon on this matter, the City will appreciate your
explaining to him that this rescheduling decision was made by the City
at your
request. Regards, Anthony From: Terri
[mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com> ]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 9:49
AM
To: Anthony A. Garganese
Cc: d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
Subject: Re: Oak Lane and Variance
Request No. 2016-02; Public Records Request under Ch.
119
Thank
you.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 24,
2016, at 9:07 AM, Anthony A. Garganese <agarganese@orlandolaw.net
<mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> > wrote:Terri,
I will review your position and request with the City Manager and get
back to you.
Anthony
-----Original Message-----
From: terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com>
[mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com> ]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 8:52 AM
To: Anthony A. Garganese
Cc: d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
Subject: RE: Oak Lane and Variance Request No.
2016-02; Public Records Request under Ch. 119
Good Morning Anthony,
Thank you for taking the time
to speak to me on Friday. I also very much appreciate that you
cancelled the October 24 hearing with the Special Hearing Officer.
I want to
correct a statement in your email below, however. While I certainly
requested that the Oct. 24 hearing be cancelled, my request regarding a
new hearing, as expressly stated in my prior emails, is that the City
should reschedule the original hearing before the Board of Adjustment
(it should not reschedule the "appeal" with the special hearing
officer). The special hearing officer could attend the rescheduled BOA
hearing in order to provide the City Council with an independent view.
The proper procedure is to vacate the first hearing (Aug. 23) and
reschedule a new Board of Adjustment Hearing. As I am sure you are
aware, this is what courts require under due process in this instance,
given that the Applicant did not provide notice of that August 23
hearing to my LLC, me, or the other owners of the houses he built on
Oak Lane (those most directly impacted). Such notice is was required
by the City Code Due Process section and Variance Application section
(and Constitutional Due Process and State law). While I understand
your explanation for a reason for lack of notice, that doesn't cure the
due process errors, particularly when Applicant had actual knowledge
of my and my neighbors contact information.
Rescheduling the BOA meeting would allow me and others who may want
to participate to have a full opportunity before the Board of
Adjustment, utilizing all the procedures outlined for such a hearing in
the Code. As you acknowledged on the phone with me, there are no
procedures in the Code for an "appeal" before a special hearing
officer. Any "appeal" from the BOA decision would then be heard by the
City Council utilizing the quasi-judicial procedures as required by
law.
Again, this should not result
in any delay, because if the City Council has the authority to obtain
an independent view from a "hearing officer" before making its decision
(after a full quasi-judicial hearing of its own), that hearing officer
could attend the same BOA hearing on this matter and review the same
evidence he otherwise would have reviewed.
Moreover, unless the process is started from the beginning and
according to City Code, the objections to the process will likely
continue and both the Applicant and the City will likely be required to
start over 3 months from now, which would really cause a delay.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. Also, thank you for
sending me the surveys of 123 and 127 Oak Lane. I will review these
documents and look forward to receiving the responses to my remaining
Public Records Requests. I would be happy to discuss prioritizing the
requests or offer key words for searches if records are kept
electronically.
Kind
Regards,
Terri L. Bowman
Cypress Shareholders, LLC
202-276-2700
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 10/21/16, Anthony A. Garganese <agarganese@orlandolaw.net
<mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> >
wrote:
Subject: RE: Oak
Lane and Variance Request No. 2016-02; Public Records Request under
Ch. 119
To: "Terri"
<terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com> >
Cc: "d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> "
<d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >,
"m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> "
<m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >,
"d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org> "
<d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >
Date: Friday, October 21, 2016, 5:46 PM
#yiv6395755436
#yiv6395755436 --
_filtered #yiv6395755436
{font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15
5 2 2 2 4
3 2 4;}
_filtered #yiv6395755436
{font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11
6 4 3 5 4
4 2 4;}
#yiv6395755436
#yiv6395755436 p.yiv6395755436MsoNormal,
#yiv6395755436 li.yiv6395755436MsoNormal, #yiv6395755436
div.yiv6395755436MsoNormal
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}
#yiv6395755436 a:link, #yiv6395755436
span.yiv6395755436MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv6395755436 a:visited, #yiv6395755436
span.yiv6395755436MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv6395755436 p.yiv6395755436MsoAcetate,
#yiv6395755436 li.yiv6395755436MsoAcetate, #yiv6395755436
div.yiv6395755436MsoAcetate
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:8.0pt;}
#yiv6395755436
span.yiv6395755436BalloonTextChar
{}
#yiv6395755436
span.yiv6395755436EmailStyle19
{color:#1F497D;}
#yiv6395755436 .yiv6395755436MsoChpDefault
{font-size:10.0pt;}
_filtered #yiv6395755436 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
#yiv6395755436
div.yiv6395755436WordSection1
{}
#yiv6395755436
Terri, It was nice talking to you this afternoon and I
hope I was able to clarify a few points for you. As
we discussed, apparently the City received outdated address
information from Brevard County that did not include the 5/17/2016
recent purchase of your property.
That explains why your LLC did not receive actual mailed
notice. It is my understanding from talking to you
that you are seeking additional time to prepare for the hearing
before the advisory hearing officer. Under the circumstances, the
City Manager understands that your property is located adjacent to the
subject variance property, although on the opposite side of the
subject variance request. As such, he has agreed to your request to
postpone the hearing on Monday, October 24,
2016 to afford you the additional time that you seek so that you can
determine for yourself whether this
variance request may impact your property. Attached is
a Notice of Cancellation which is in the process of being
distributed by the City. In addition, for your
convenience,
I have attached the three (3)
surveys that we discussed for your consideration. The surveys are
numbered in the right hand corner 1 through 3.
The first is the original Walker Survey (dated 10-21-15) relied
upon by the City to issue the building permit for the construction of
the new single family home at 127 Oak Lane. The second survey is the
Riehl Reliable Survey (dated 1/15/16) that was subsequently presented
to the City by the owner of 123 Oak Lane (Turner) contesting the
accuracy of a portion of the Walker Survey.
Specifically, Riehl Reliable Survey depicts and calls out a
slightly angled common boundary line between
127 Oak Lane and 123 Oak Lane. This survey was apparently presented
to Walker Surveying and they apparently concurred with the Riehl
Reliable Survey because they withdrew the
10-21-15 survey
and resubmitted a revised survey for 127 Oak Lane using the common
boundary line surveyed and depicted in the Riehl Reliable Survey. The
Third, revised Walker Survey (dated 8-11-16) is the current survey
being relied upon by the City. As I understand it, because the
eastern boundary of the property located at 127 Oak Lane was
redrawn further west on an angle, the house under
construction was no longer in compliance with the 8 foot
zoning minimum side setback requirement. Therefore,
Sheropa LLC decided to seek a 4 foot side setback variance
on the east side of the house near the common boundary
between 127 Oak Lane and 123 Oak Lane. No other variance
is being requested by Sheropa LLC for 127 Oak Lane.
As we further discussed, you will
note that the two Walker Surveys depict and describe the same western
boundary, which is the common boundary with your property. Further,
the side setback of the proposed single family house near your common
property line appears to be noted as 11.5 feet. In addition, you will
note that all three surveys, the two by Walker and the one by Riehl
Reliable, depict and describe the same southern right-of-way boundary
line for Oak Lane (S 89 38’ 33” E).
Lastly, unrelated
to the variance
request, I mentioned to you
that the City is in the process of having preliminary design plans
prepared for possibly paving the existing Oak Lane ROW and improving
drainage. However, the preliminary plans have not been finalize and
formally presented to the City Council for review and consideration at
one or more public meetings. At this time, no decision has been made
by the City to pursue and construct the Oak Lane project.
Although I understand that these preliminary plans are incomplete
and a “work-in-progress,” I believe the City has made these
preliminary, incomplete plans available for inspection on the City’s
website. You can inspect them on the website or at City Hall. Please
contact me if you have any questions regarding this
matter. Regards, Anthony Anthony A
Garganese, EsquireBoard Certified City, County &
Local Government LawGarganese, Weiss & D’Agresta, P.A.
111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000
Orlando, Florida 32801
P.O.
Box 2873 (32802-2873)
Phone (407) 425-9566
Fax (407) 425-9596
Cocoa (866)
425-9566
Website:
http://cp.mcafee.com/d/avndy0Od1NJ5wsephp78LCXCTTPhOyeojd79JZYQsEzC773r
XVEVh7ccECTTPhOMqem6jhOrQzIieM-DwGIjZwxk_j70QTm9-MgGvFzwqrj8cn-XP_nVcQsI
fI8LZuVt5V5XDXFTpuuVqWdAklrFIYG7DR8OJMddECQPt-jLuZXTLuVKVIFRoDX12F-Ce1FK
vNz8YJ0xkMHI0kmQDmLbCQXEIL6Mmd96y0cqld40lS7Cy3o86y0cX6mMJVEw1vyPvQCq80pn
zh0Dt5MLtc46y0bdA3Vmd40b-RoEkd40bYmr-APh0T13UCy0i9Yq84kjhOrupdF6sPb3f1c5
mk
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/avndy0Od1NJ5wsephp78LCXCTTPhOyeojd79JZYQsEzC773r
XVEVh7ccECTTPhOMqem6jhOrQzIieM-DwGIjZwxk_j70QTm9-MgGvFzwqrj8cn-XP_nVcQsI
fI8LZuVt5V5XDXFTpuuVqWdAklrFIYG7DR8OJMddECQPt-jLuZXTLuVKVIFRoDX12F-Ce1FK
vNz8YJ0xkMHI0kmQDmLbCQXEIL6Mmd96y0cqld40lS7Cy3o86y0cX6mMJVEw1vyPvQCq80pn
zh0Dt5MLtc46y0bdA3Vmd40b-RoEkd40bYmr-APh0T13UCy0i9Yq84kjhOrupdF6sPb3f1c5
mk>
Email: agarganese@orlandolaw.net <mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net>
Any incoming e-mail reply to this communication will be
electronically filtered for "spam"
and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply
being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all)
and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we may not receive
your
reply and/or we may not receive it in a timely manner.
Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which
are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than
e-mail. Confidentiality
Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the
individual(s) or entity named
on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that reading it is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system.
Thank you. From: Terri [mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com
<mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com> ]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 12:48
PM
To: Anthony A. Garganese
Cc: d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
Subject: Re: Oak Lane and Variance
Request No. 2016-02; Public Records Request under Ch.
119
Anthony,
Thank you for your below
response. I
don't follow how this hearing is appropriate under the Code
provisions you cite and given the lack of notice to me or, as is now
apparent, any of the homeowners on Oak Lane other than the applicant
of the August hearing.
That is a violation of Constitutional due process, Florida law,
your code, and your practice and procedures. In this instance
generalized notice is not sufficient.
I repeat
my objection to the October 24 Hearing and repeat my request for a
new hearing on the variance request to be scheduled in accordance with
the Code.
It is inaccurate and improper for the City to assume that the
variance request does not impact my property rights. The issue
underlying the variance request seems to involve a dispute regarding
property lines.
I own an adjacent parcel to the offending parcel -- the issues
involved in this hearing are highly relevant to my property rights. I
should have been provided the opportunity to participate in the August
variance hearing to determine the extent of any issue.
This request to re-schedule the original hearing is particularly
important because the City has not responded substantively to my
Records Requests.
I
asked for expedited response given the very short notice I received
of the "appeal" hearing (having had no
notice of the underlying hearing). The failure to respond to my
requests has simply perpetuated the problem created by lack of notice.
The City should do the right thing here and reschedule this hearing
and give proper
notice.
I have
received
no direct communication regarding responses to my
requests, submitted more than a week ago. I reviewed the
website - when it is functioning - and while I see a lot of email
correspondence with Mr Lennon and miscellaneous items, I do not see
the responses to my requests. If they are posted, please indicate with
specificity by file and
subtitle where I may find the responses to my specific
requests.
Also,
please
indicate to whom I may send my statement and objection for submission
into the public record for the October 24 hearing if it proceeds.
Thank you. Respectfully, Terri BowmanCypress Shareholders
LLC202-276-2700
Sent from my
iPhone
On Oct 14,
2016, at 6:52 PM, Anthony A. Garganese <agarganese@orlandolaw.net
<mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> >
wrote:Ms. Bowman,
The
undersigned is the City
Attorney. It is my
understanding that the City Clerk has been in contact with you
regarding your public records request and the City will be handling
that request in accordance with its records policy.
I noticed
that several requests in your letter (the first sequence, numbered 1
through 5) are not really a public records but a request for
background information that may or may not be contained in a record.
As a courtesy to you, I would like to provide that background
information to you.
1. The appeal to the
City Council regarding the Board of
Adjustment's decision on the variance application is provided under
Sections 110-27 and 110-33, City Code.
2. The advisory hearing
officer was
authorized by the City Council
at the City Council's September 6, 2016 meeting in accordance with
the City Council's general and home rule powers.
3. The
hearing officer's
name is attorney Drew
Smith.
4. The general
standard of review and
procedures for the
hearing are set forth in Chapter 110, Article II, of the City Code.
Variances in particular are also governed by Sections 110-36 and 37.
Such proceedings are also governed by applicable case law.
5. The hearing for the
advisory hearing officer is scheduled for Monday, October 24, 2016
at 4:30 p.m. at the City of Cape Canaveral Public Library, 201 Polk
Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida. The hearing officer will deliver a
written recommendation to the City Council for its final decision at
its December 20, 2016 regular meeting to be held at
6:00 p.m. in the Cape Canaveral Public Library, 201 Polk Avenue, Cape
Canaveral, FL.
Have a good weekend.
Anthony A
Garganese, Esquire
Board
Certified City,
County & Local
Government Law
Garganese,
Weiss & D’Agresta, P.A.
111 N. Orange
Avenue, Suite
2000
Orlando, Florida
32801
P.O. Box 2873
(32802-2873)
Phone (407) 425-9566
Fax (407)
425-9596
Cocoa (866) 425-9566
Website:
http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr6x8q6jqb0UsOyOehvdTdLLCzB4sMCqejrXVEVh7cee6T
TPhOyeophdLLCzBwQsIcCzATF7oAtxZf1loDX12F-Ce1FKIjZwxk_j70QSCgoLZTD-LOpEVo
vohvWZOWbObTfTjKOYZORQr8EGTjpVkffGhBrwqrjdFCXYDuZXTLuZPtPpjGNfS25jZcs3js
_z6hVq12Fxno0EJFeJundFThpudwIqid40oQGq80HIfd46Mgd40pScJxrPh02_5C_FcQg0OL
6y1eWbxuWo8d40mr87OIq80nZGNgEq80nUITZ9Cy1K27Nd40AjUQg8ECzASYOr3_hE4w4A
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr6x8q6jqb0UsOyOehvdTdLLCzB4sMCqejrXVEVh7cee6T
TPhOyeophdLLCzBwQsIcCzATF7oAtxZf1loDX12F-Ce1FKIjZwxk_j70QSCgoLZTD-LOpEVo
vohvWZOWbObTfTjKOYZORQr8EGTjpVkffGhBrwqrjdFCXYDuZXTLuZPtPpjGNfS25jZcs3js
_z6hVq12Fxno0EJFeJundFThpudwIqid40oQGq80HIfd46Mgd40pScJxrPh02_5C_FcQg0OL
6y1eWbxuWo8d40mr87OIq80nZGNgEq80nUITZ9Cy1K27Nd40AjUQg8ECzASYOr3_hE4w4A>
Email: agarganese@orlandolaw.net <mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net>
Any
incoming
e-mail reply to this communication
will be electronically filtered for "spam"
and/or "viruses."
That filtering
process may result in such reply being quarantined (i.e., potentially
not received at our site at
all)
and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we may not receive
your reply and/or we may not receive it in a
timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending
communications to us which are particularly important or
time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any
attachment to it, contains privileged and confidential
information intended only for the use of the individual(s)
or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
reading it is strictly prohibited.
If you have received
this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and
delete it from your system. Thank you.
-----Original
Message-----
From: terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com>
[mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com> ]
Sent: Thursday, October 13,
2016 7:10 AM
To: Anthony A. Garganese; d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
Cc: terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com>
Subject: Oak Lane and Variance Request No.
2016-02; Public Records Request under Ch.
119
SUBJECT: Oak Lane
and
Variance Request No. 2016-02; Public
Records Request under Ch. 119
Dear Mr. Garganese,
Mr. Greene,
Ms Goforth, and Mr. lefever:
I write in my individual
capacity and as the owner of Cypress
Shareholders, LLC, which is the owner of 131 Oak Lane, Cape Canaveral
FL 32920.
Please see the
attached
letter.
I can be
reached by phone at 202-276-2700 or by email at
terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com> .
I would be happy to discuss any of these requests.
Thank you,
Terri L. Bowman
Individually
and as
Member/Manager of
Cypress
Shareholders LLC terrilynbowman@yahoo.com
<mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com>
202-276-2700
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written
communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral
officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or
media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email
addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address
released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic
email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written
communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral
officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or
media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email
addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address
released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic
email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing
�⾗뚰糹㞩媊쑉뒍䙊䍷퓘齡哹懝遛蕲ꊉ쓏汝깳ԟㄗ㑁릪趠橕혬某ꤹ⢮㓔༇佮ඕֵ聐ሳਬछ级닙쫚厈�鮌殀弋듞ᗙ㉡栰ၬज़웎ᡜ菮曚鰛蕀㗛�荕衺큹㈇ꟿ퇄젗⢜峗鵻ꮖᣢ樵뺔บ叺䇡ꂁ䠹篡榠㧠醲㚞펠쀁뾁襢㘂숶柇噮簘ﾩ烖ᄐ琼弬弲紞⧼롙ⷁ筍⽜嬽이껂艂먦户㈝ⲷ渒낙±ᢌꕸ뇿Ⴟﮅ㼹혁螚솆Ⓝ䐈䘍ឤ䎐扌䯪ꅸɠ됒⓳㫆뚡冂騑凞䕝២ά饐샪图懱壕℈哅윫�ඐ蝓蜰㬾〈雗ꆁﵳ䪰萅࿐ꯒḥ蒉쇈曦쇮
侂洉숅䒫㭴뭙㏃쏭촄裣탏횧䂄읅訧딳㢍倓҃쯷蝎퐮쐛⇧뉭꼒끯ᚾ㹳槿ઁᐿလ瀙謲솄些첔ꢱ㗈쯩餲閷�틬�嚝ꃠ䵀﹀鰴驈掠蛈뭛耯䂤㲘ᢘ笲쮸�珡믊鴊�͉脒캝䈋䅭䨅霮䥗截İ瀣�䫂痹푅嬅铷솵崵壓쳕弯殒�껢窋Ꜻ넸䅃腡쑲웂㒥硛⒍䉅袈㋀ퟓ댁ⴡᶞ偀᯳ᣄ㘙⫪ꉵﱼ鯓엲ꜷ贗렯ꉄퟫ釫诀�餏졝㻕䤜緄迥륐ꕆ郭ᬷ红隫鈯弗啹䙾熆譜ꑓ룟몑�遵왫聸⦔ᣙ劓撌ཀ虜✈ⵘ룈쁥ᘽ벙㙎肏膗ॲ走告짆覍咹屪퍣ꫴ怙䰃췎縌桮㘘
垙㈙욐㈪ꀤﲵ틬䗮‒姢鞚䑊휏�䭗⦎嚉➝씃䕥驡臰쀪쳝乒ٮ숰4ֽ㙀脶ុਸᨥ砟쀑᭧뗋⟡徵啝횥焉앆䋠E懄鶖㫙䆊⿱ꠓ윆鞿袶깷㮈菦䖅俚謮욤◘Ľ♛좉ຜ匵萞칩ꨦ⭿臸喆鯎륑ꃡ婓ⷣ㿸鵶貏䊏鬲癝ᢃ๛嘮䨂䜰㷛��ﻎ㗬廧흴ᾝ프벲좉﵌嗞裞쩋넪䈓⮥俟覅䃁制뜋㗢㍉ꠉ䂣蒀ᚈ컿懠쨍약첡⧗㿧ﬢّ闹�瞑㤿乛礻鲠鉹包배ｸ䅙㐸ᒶ㶣쇮말駎漭ﶾ첾뙝≗䜳꽈ퟑଫ跞꭪퍆頲硏䘆膨髚냽刂ᨈᦜ껬摴ዱ灰럀ꛥ賈࢙冘
斅뼤갚㨔䖩簕裚ⰳꝅዏ뉾倛�墳凜袐䤪㣑ᑞ廪抰膬犽쌃륯膻ּ仐ൈ㠇瀃됺︖遧鳾냹鸽�豓⋿甓䴊쁨휗⓵ꇱ萡씛䡠ﴄ湅쾔ઔᚍㄧ༈쀸ズ⣙㦚暟㔯踭慐闢쯾ਅ礧윅ս阋틜⹏領鐂煸粭뒽晜环무茴ᑥ⪉薴Ȩ쯷꘦�䭠焛났퓟阰㘓ਮ蠣ⵌ螆骁桖蠰�뢥ⲫ꡵윣酶菉祹됮�쁻䏵㳎屖ᛣ皼ꯠ躗䶦ⲿ뢫ꢾ⨢邫ⲻ繭킒䭟ᒒ鬨頨갭䂥ֶഁ넣胀Ϲ붰ﰙ䕋降퐼ﯹ韴⾽銮뷁쮛枙⪜虃휎⥇ffl潱㾜碚ຍ緼️脐惹䵪ጽ탼
Ἇ缚믚㭻琊⽾䵟䧻╙ⱖࠒȒẛ☶篐莣�⣞措⽸颡０릎炅↔Ⴉ娈쨬䖌빡䩲汀敃橉ԛ衷熾ϳ輿ᘾુ帒鳙芓㠱쌇ᔟ庵⧉톭큵픲颉紣項㳹뿰ြ࢚ꑔέᔨ⁄Ϙ隟䋱跆싔簣ꑏꦐϝ㦸딖崞᱀沽ං�鐅잏꙳覤蠃㔝খ隕公䩩㈱뒣វ瑅汬ꀮ蠐쏬䀬젍輯驎麑翽䂹྅ज़㪡＇솦ﯟﻜﮎ暶㞾䪿潦줰᷒�掁X鐫웤顨氐ꚜ醈ꏕ慎䎖伃睊䙴嶟ᖞू슳輖䡱땱龜栯쌫뵲⩰溗錭얽ꏱ�㛙懢捜쳝龯딱뽯귽駦�䟓�ٙ䃡劋Ꞥ윤뿽껶츃�篗禛�虴蘁æᅃ
Б용贖欦欒赖贛屫뗝ᆍ䱫옱푮暘ᣁ苄ꠥ袨툨ッ뾽禙竳䐽蓔癟ॣ飼젻삓↭⎀뒉䅴履咧┼ᨇ杞얜기ﳼ넒쳰‛�瘩繮屃㿲ᆿ쑻ᦜ젵촣딑厵㎄欓ﰝ늀ഫꗾ韋豍홽ɽ粱勇룉鼻筽襷�⥚뱖媹�縁榚⢸甞㢶ᩦᕘ꣣踢ࡓ茆줪铿╁␈楖餆잽铟䠚㺋篴싲鞠֎筽ῦ姹䖓ꩌ᧢䶓䜑櫬⦐밊뜇䪍ⱉꔲב㇂붱Ⱙﮆ˒䌥睠똫뼄䂛謞鴨捞⢓蒰ǀ灚ᳵ膄ꖺ婢飒ꉬ恬䎡䄑䎷輘ਃ⧁绿퐘ࡘ咴⚈�영〒猨�贰읬砃煯뜷顿㓈
ﰪꃃ㵭殌冭綯싫⻙ꕦ蛄袦ꧮ럚᩶酄⬛膋部塼�♪㩾瑸쨊鴡⬁濸냆Ì䰴禸㢱濼嶈싆〘�軾�귗�鯗皼죚䗁忧纏�䔆焔᧒뻟ꋶⱗ⯱죏젨㒞�逜ཾ翷ঀ睂앏�쉂㓭ﰬ腘䴂ᭆ㏴跑䆣뚼㗩ᒱ旒쭮拃搄辡㚙갑퇰顠×Ꞓ爛燠츜拾쿔偄��㘢�혬�똨�揷ベ䈖ㅨ幱戍ᲁ骙㎈⒧ﲫ퓨蒩벎ت牌ꔪ<㊍⸈狍鏢㩐鹖ẖꇂ톴까弃ภ鳈뙹蛓࢜᳄헭摽苊㺫ཱྀ思ﱮᐮ᩹握䏧遗㫢롺ᒓ酮樒䜼Dz绩噡ऱ愎ႄ鴽쵕ᢀ艦齆꿝쵺ࠁ㮡틋㴋ᓻ욃猄舟쭸
㣵⸁㢠揉揘中夙녡譭蜡렼�忛⓹殌调ⱪ鼯啮蕭⟽挺寪ⅷ핷䐗⫕ᦤ얪浉奁䉖㜶麤᪼駈ﻁ龑Ⲩᬌ穽Ꭳ⮀슒裡瑅엷ᝄ䪛ᣯἐ�봦톶響땅刺翴쵼돺럅뛝맩渧须冒럃�奤㧔꣠ 쇘垰뙁㳪퍗ﰌጯ檛阞闇ფᒄᬖ糵夈鸖ꥰ砜堃骹㜚泏�竍垠䀏俋䘫ᕗ벉靜⼨ᘫꁥ餞轥衜£暶䣮ᮮ鞄ⴁƃÑ娎娩ᣔǶ鴒뵝潢⭃翼뵭蜍�抉쵦레遖싿ꎱ김�ꛉ饧尔㗕앰聐ἑ媄劍䖌㳈ᮠ徇ãꠌ찤寊蔳늀撣恵餟䂂蛩콱⧜́ǹĹ輠㌡퉡䣛ᢡ佰崛ᝀᒘ⠰⼄⁚
᪣㝴䁉◤堈贔攁싒뉩䈭�侲낌䤷훴쪅ހ१㰆ꔔ壌甉Ὲ瓡蝿온팦ဪ鞢莗搎ὀ퓰鮟㢘뇬ű⳽⩛䷋蕡깢ć谨ᔫꑢᔞఋ쌕乜퉧칏籮ﰎ敶䑄늕ꀮۺ㧑►麤㱸롦큽菥儲̘랢捕佨뻘놻种껳ﹽ援迴᳠앟绗ⴳ㍛⛮ۚ汲쑾ᡥ૽⟞躖㕩恸㥈쩁책涜홦㧇ⶐ䕍ౘ㭎쀐ጱਗん戨潢ὓ냈ꋍ坾ꠣ�ꗐ蟘沸⢋㒶ځ銃좮࿕ḻꐂᢌ쒡죮꓁䝭轀岁쑪응貞㙎㉹⣡ࣣ藨⦑쌐搀ꟼ園팮緶ꂁ崋旵律ᛸA囹螁낂乇爐朕れₛ᎖톢硘㌺ꕇ
唰ꙉƦ嘃솦휊簛춏쀊䦣〾⢨㦌䇅쩃䏥团ꔲ㸍뵍휨홁尞譾┣蠜킛߅꓆麕ณ骏倝鍣嵮䍶쎝럟깽叱킙ꐣꤾ䅌莳懩勜⸳倄㵀镬峆⒈뉚൞ㄯ⚹㟅맱㇝ㆋ⸙苰䃱䪸㗱֧ᐷ蓮ᔩᆎ響졵ꂃ撍⸨�て鿕꺱焵곚꽓륝䚰ⷪᡲ鷖沯園�庚㻔Ụໝ릝�株쪱㐤‵惤ム끥嶝ꕝㆭ꾳㙖븚┢즓䒮駱⪠䋴䘈ⵟ쫲ㅀ簙ఢ얙씻ﲸ�쨗톞椷밌鍈贱䤞措묣⨺䦆ڔ茄ꘊ䤁矝눨課늅俳샖柔밎ᗇ⺘켿�왽呑嗡䞴ᬣ ᆳ逼ᔐ祱㑶鰠夣툍㊾ณ鶯겈
ྼ喔鰦玍릖縪ꉎ쨻◜䦭ƞ溠喀梽푟⨎념㨗ࠜ튶襘砢롮䨅ᥞ鯮뇔㰳姝쒬님ও톍溊⚋㟦뢅켔矷齿ﳉ濵腽Ԇ‱గ㌁ᡐ�\勵렖ఊ�暮孊奮佷䣌荑㹔밐荍â㎗䕫䩞橬衎࣭괽㍰邝࠙ꖋ樟䶛彳⇝囦紜ߍฅ쿝遰㽷뙘䟸둿慠駝崍ꮚ矷橫ꋻൖ菸轀桐홆퀐阥逤䑲街澆덤倷②蓺瑫瑌翠矒좢쟜닁蟮牄䖊ᡷ鱠쏐浸㸇見ਖ਼曍✇歗ﲎ昘险퍹뢘⩿⚽䀰䒉༪꾎쬫䙑嚧亮♒⠙퉗迌ꧯ셚㽸᷹ጉﻱ姱締⺆頊�뮧ﶆὂ홂脭䝋⽔봥㌻䧳匓࣬䎾䑶⽡饬
铈䬅ȩ㰡�̐䁮み訡ड쌭嘳ꋕ䂡舂⦥畘璌갢⹂想ꅀមᅁ煄̌鮪밇鬀Ữ୴쫡翅ㆄ齱ꁟ楁攵蘀�쒐ˤ莃躃倏�ಙ쬭ก倘�懲砟྇馐쉸쪱靓牬㍆ヸ�诮鐔攉᠆騱ꁏ廤㼋꩝蠓軦�윉懔䲷筅▥淏⑈䭳ﯿ暈ꚵꀧﰬ럅嵠箕青붾㭝㞥㞜ݣ萜曺晒⪀㬦비夑ᡸፒ診튄승�쀂赝剃ꢜ샻曳苹啜紩�᎕鲋㇅늳源ⁿ汗᭬쌒냁᪷䚐泆㏝蔐㟾ꤒꃠꌋ谮䠱縙큀飒찲㔎줉ꦱ篦為镲ፓ뒓ΟꝆ눦갢䫇і騋㑍᎖骝䋤顰ੰ漸肮༨�허繗ᬭ攛䜦㹪�ⱡꈤ⍈돢
柆⍏ᓊ䩼䫳₋쁖娀뤪ڀﯓ풐ᠰ鉓噵浠偸毵⺅㉈騅쨔줙補ണ슧㮘ᡜꂊԪཷ茛ꇚ䉿劃炶棌碋浮鑜㡺擻縹쾑㬻ṱⅸ竳䷦⫩된ᧉ牗ܾ鲝㍵舃叮깙ഞ㓉ݢ꩖Ệ䠥䛯১术⑁ጎѠ贚厦挻퓢毥冢雫�娠轧�랓ﰴ꺼�罿㔬悲緊�⩣筵鰶ꬶම脩ྱ뼼涫睭ᯛ瘴칍軺뜂턾痚胆墶怹ﭙ久嵸煳ꚮ䝹绨ᣭ麭ꬊ퉄蟷쨆륽廕횈⎴듮賙⍅檛੫∇鬎ヅﵱ�滱催렦즞䥸̙䙭ꌦ鯱媪뗦䐪뾕뜫ꅐ쩵씭씠쩄熀ᑍ䇷軸뵏摍ꐦ㿘ꋋ緸Ǹ갲첡㼱
딣㡀좉勥邭ʄ贎贊ᾉ菉㒁夜袺ꠕ㞷尠⡅뀞殚㕐퓫퀇⛆㰨̶ᗚﶣ퀍Ҽ⛒䌜坟寄慁㴬鑊䫔喪縋휠须멒ᬟ蝙쟷렗襂焛箊鐦ஊ纞㭟ၼ퐺렞�蠎돴ು楩Ἶ⯑ꀎ݊쐒볒騾⦉෭弨䉌啜鞞묔⏁羃긎䠢ꏘ肜̃奵훠䅷�흪ﶝ㞫뢅闷嗸憮滗፯뿋唽羿幔鄭콫錄뼛ﷸ㜇낿톺ᗉ勞澟ઘףּ뿇쮃Ḛ둸갘鞫ꪮ벟斢본似屜쬰읻᷾좯ﲟ㏼쉻༧벤弢侻獼탒읋ᩍݻ鹤ḫ멞賭ﭵꟃﾞ엀⺷�箸䳰㺫썮㌽᭒逃ꝱ鶌∔抨賐ꠛ庮ꇾ桲즪̆쓘坊虙䢡볈萏犢
䨿孺郕띑ࡳ묫瀙よ�氣驎᱒녕훤녑艈ሷ唩⸙랖嵧奠⌲覍펯锈틁補燞⏭黔ᔀ욊έ愈蛓비�牂⌱쑐뵂쨛灴좾兛Ո䠙횙秄僛ꆚ笵ꮨ㩹Ꝣ뿺똵⿾翯١அ쉫�ｵ㭓둣惘風饖ꅙ쾍䫒룿糱ᛲ臰皨⤽蘥༼ਁꎎ㜬颗ἆើ뫰髇卄鑮ಂ䗩䐳ϳ簈삵ꑻ詙于䲢嵚䡧ᤷ䟤쀿�ጓ폃嗾꺸왽䖲颞롵罫郻휯贒㜷鳇恼 ᾎ牞談宵㟖᷌ྵ�뫟氜广碼ꢕ㟌椾ᾩ뤼﵊흃㡞泿㇯亷椺쓁꿽ꝙﵿ垪퀆Қ튼拊콗෪諾㧴ꃂ瀯꒺䓫鱨踫⼄ʟ否ꐔ䭄த鑇꼌搛럹Ỻ蘚
崎ტ䋺⣉왉餵㚺ᨲ⛐䐨⭲쩫⊰�≧뉕䭶ꊫ⒘痠羸씬︈┫㈌窚鯸▔�롤鈘鑮来㯰錬毇鯔준试䈔녹Ꭷ፱鳤셻䝦鍝䰁⣵湻敡।Ẽ悲끩㷡稀✊袝⠺鵴枃翾阱遼偦鏙箃ﱣ鳾充ᶂ䴑큟符쫂娀䆙篆룿睛ദَᖹ梃䚦鞈ᶳ◟擂ᰆ脍ᬆ휹脎赃ᔃꍌ㛞樿抭∢繽ḥ튒䬲䈏逦ꈀ荋戽땦ⶥ⛚罡Ⴜ稄轧酛덠똒闤氟䱭몘ǃ꾋횲诸忨碷鷱皲켣澣菌漢㈛֑せ罎죵ﮨ喅ᎍ漍쐏➴㨎䶢뾯謚�甔歺惬䝿急嚣츈尢鍰䃴뢵葂튁ء긶贷콸紀椎ᡈ룰
㢴⮌䈜᱂킕㪈嘠ဂ㔁⅙ⷄ阆쁡ڰ풂䁟螼췁麼ᣙ稇䕨뷀䪓䳂₃蜑쁢煁㳏鑶쁟䠋ﲰ옝쳄Ɂ堉ᖧ蛧枦쐱᪖�㙊齤舂툛앧㓫飆ꎰ꺗焙儱ꠑՁ끀ꄢ琰쁅ꏧϦꑖ㬠炕쭥㠠ဦ䵙꣡䘺跤쑛덻㬙擿萧᷃蝌맹�゠騂巊쵚ꎢ࿙抣棶栌Ԭ�ΰ혹禇ݕ౿䛏ᇪ岰됺��폿路㬙觛뿂睘ꛓ볈⹓췺뇔밣翭ꔊ뾏ᰦ譳龧鱎뱱粳㧖ﺩ嗺뽟筲껃蒁쿟誂䗲�諾漫⚬₂沂㙴躷揋�总럙ᅯ麁揣䭳䱯췯ቅ캈ꢾӝ䫈嵴槀鼱챵犄ᥴ鑫㱧늪峈㖼ج�賊졲쐎ꔼᗙ䩻
审祿鏶鐃앝幖諢큼쉢구늇ꀐ襡⩢ᐑ㨝㘡湵晽㇞篞鳀ⷈꆒ�罤큚ꯣ缺剙婨�阥覯矅跫彷絒梖뺸Έ㋘華㟏磽瞖訪觝뽩롩ꃋᗛ⪫컗嘿꯵珪㖾몷닽閱嶞⺹趽䋪�罟톮ﵖ駵ᷥ퍵ᗆ宾≲⚝穮퍸㶩෧樯짽늨�欫韭愚ୀ薧�쾹쥼䙑㺝搣䳇☰
⬚掞긌샧郠⸨쭲於渄ᱞ煡密묆㤋푆ꄨ桅凕ꆂ䨻⨧ᔣﭢ뤡뾦っ粯ఉ甪䘗鹿볨䍩䑫䍬䜉戍瘚鞛䮫왦鐽秤ꗨ慥俳袸弙煍⣡Ῥꯪ小흻畵뽇叴˺Ⲣ揟ꧭ뛣模¬㝗둵ꦬ⺭�挃妱䴝➑�칸⮝燮궂헜⠬橴ၐ㖘䐿�릔羢鋍ⱸ�띡빞浼毰䖹ە遽䪖㫤⦤蛕⮥ጷᙣ띫ﶶ⸫ㄼ鐸Ꙩ菾舗䗁㮛⚻澽蝣팛㿦⇱놌ྩ㙞藩韛怴傥唠쮞�Ꮃⰹ㶴䊵�墌䫏還ᆃꞴ㛤滘櫫캟♷쭣齯ﮚ髟뺿㧅�懨羫紆楅ﷱ颬�뚨㱄꛶뻫㿩櫮祚緻אָ㚶韴웧
꼏缿퍊྅衴璖鵺칣᭵ㅿ튶컲�輋ᓴ쒸龿徤�㯝ꑿஅ뛦㫦蓠㊉셟䭛⨨갮䗾ጊ톐晐㑰��諾쏗펼ㆾ焐櫻묛䍺᳁饺ꐻ蟛諙Ɜ陎쁯없ﻙ崴ꬤ�ꆬ䐟멖⛯憰뾘쵤ᩬ鏗秄炢Ҝ鸣쿅翍᳛ෂ鐊犯ꮺﺯ속㹬ꛫ퉓ﾶ巸뒢펾䘬ꠖ䐢剙ׁΛ剗㹔쭽뾲틩䫉菜뿐缬寔넺ᛄﾷ摒䚋䳕颽餅ꆱ�λ䜉氐鑈警ᇃ潂ज셐�쾭鴫᧣酵낻萄࢛顤礓掳�랩헔ﰙ�꼻汹챧捨궘즓圂ḧ쐳䟐亓篛祐싘훲晋忻델翾솂⿸㼮瑳牗ꝍ赬头젇ØḬꔛᚳ�籄ᗆ
꿷䩿䚋祥⠮戲燣䂍ﱏ悉㇀쏯鬶䭴⥵灐긳㇏埥㫹霶ᷮᢴ藷埡ݫ宍當㑪Ҿ针ﶝ됆곢묒�ʊ鐾篋⡏顊䓋뺙晻殰鏗퀠ｶꧢ켇綠蟲랗ᬚ�覎㤥ᨿ떈溉腿�軞愢凅鯝扆韚⥃钀꓂葮ሯ攄졪욌瀉眩㗝�韇玿젚朁Խ鞠鿑쭲뮙ڒ텅멦袀�Ĝᇷ⧢䀨獤厏䯾䪇ა嵲貜ꉣ檬좔⤟⪋YʻᎫｺ⾷ꃜ襸鎼꒔࣑俚讅訞✋찘扽䂒ꙑ贳̊⩌䭩ᣎ輻ء鞈↣遘ᅔピ鉬埤㌔磦礜幋햮ᯛᢚ옉륒ᘺ꽇쫊ﻟ�袚宿題쉴ꝅ熟࿙⠴⁑舓⠋㻝즣倬㚛
ꈁꖓ㳷샰僦蛓泙昪权爎ᆕ壟줵롸䟍乕ష숆筢䃯橤죍↜ⁿব큢첹譙ﭪ⬫퓏禜鋥캴刲談뻆ﲂ禩࢝旌㆙Ø굩욑ሸ㳁阏끈ྀ稅쟨흤齧笶㑷ᗩ꺶믆疞罍榻굜㤖욬盎亻陝︐揓盾왱즃ײַ썵ʏ˿긫ᠱ巒⾌⬩⳩亂뛎ꛍᖩꚦꆡׁ⮣䪋㡏ꯖ෫ⱆഭ斱拥滕ꯞ㿦킚�믙ꀧ湽䅛筞ꝷ矫例빽ᠷ��퉝珷놳塰쎮礖㰟�畵皱僛Ȭᮜ枩挼│첬誕鉆䄁廌㣉[飂ﱑ鯇䄙㝳䀽Ⱟ憡痵焘�뜰鲨琊蝜ᔠ덽뽱뺕綰ꃪ嬔頯爑밼哒둎䀗ᴲ谺䩠鯥䃔⊗
ᤢ뭟増ꋁ炁쑠䦤뿳呙ᔑ꿯ᕽ艱ٖ颰턲눷㛉듻캋妵ϐ괶ꢙ㢸뾐㣡␞孖嫷䗄ꯉ钆잠ﬔ灵ᵬ䓜젷㒜쮨㶿뺵휤暼ᯩ�됶皰쥬週状騯㘽涺᭶镴閕恴빜콂䶜䣍笘꘢폚ᜓ趑̼�㿒꒳쾣涨벳鄚Ⓚ謵ॴ䒸䗈龅틝꾟쮙尲�鴱嗿랽ꓞ㓻쎯㰒�㔕닦绣誖褖ꓮំ圇鄱캂ꘓ襀㧮ᇌ救봌瀩魇簿娹䳩嘙랚ﴂ䭏䱺ᜎꑕ㲊悖ϝ伫㪜쉶䏅⚃힍ነ瓤茙�싶ᆌጕ᱿흆譸ꜱ胘佸麏㴵⧽웛샺羍寮滯轮�罗圽थ鐁㥈鰲윏ڀ쓼計⤟䌠搾ᔊᄄʰ듸ኩ䖫㳢
ẁ㕣♓飁벜E㹼挿Ǣ咿蔆ﾋꓔᳯ罣爜⼏蠏쎩슌츆噟♰ꔙ웍䴥婽鏰聻ᆓ쑌☆膏䫺嘅껗븁缒矩�誏王㗘怆�ⵤ羻싅Η媸媄熾翷뚟鳷圻㒧ꔅ♹Б埉Ი羅榊䢠鮔쌐ɋ繛治殓蛵ᵽ嬙㊰⍎赼ކ녜罙譣璧崌హᵯ뿪黧䭟禌繯ꁿ港⨼鰭�嶹䒜᎘⮣偻晴ߪ쵸埶拚펚嚜쑣䠟芚Ⓤ鈍⦣퀴揕䉕⤞ꦵ鰭閰씦喿ᅭ뺵넁�诠沶캺㱞៥ﶃ좑ퟚ鶞켙玲�枙ꂣ쎿辡揄Ὁ憪ὀ釂稄ﴇ
襲錜ꜹ茖ᚢ鄵犈庒ꎧ拏鬭칽羏ꯧ뛒꒼㰯ⓖ膕쉙�詣䯹₎培❀옅⤈♞�핬䔔霽쨆ℱ�扛錓ෆ詃狼耛띑츝兩ﳿ韌ꃊ慸ꨰ谸埪퓧辦잊ｾ၆捌⢃⭰㝖歇柃�䃈ꫦ鑏⾲伙뾽濂崱瓏�誀䬥൲퇝Ν�숝滽ゼត嵁䷓尷㽕梦菿㴆蕢띤㺫煔톖䰳少謱䂍Ꭲ䴵绽ꬿ쮫症禴폌㓷㠗䧊ᆇ鷢촍ᴖ蘣硕籅仛㡄柑當뚂뛃置錘䨿갌ꘆ粒⑬솩洜형ᛁ】䉗싗ꮤ鯢䩮陓퉮픝ᴖ᳆破ጦ╂ꥦ⚵罳뙸涮퍇뺟ꛓꑕ崮뷦連債�𧻓྅癛䭼暃ར벿턳韹Ȳ
왣땩�╽앻䊔픰ꟑ杶坣矱믎琉ψか哳鮎�銴�变礋⤆훅ᇒ먨뽉诗饀켗뺽믷藅臣ﴗ담꼙納鄫袎囧㧬應㦮ꨛ雀⩄㞪ꏟ帗Ｐ忸�┝䫵怇명泥⧛ꎫᲩࣹꁌ儘쫶ᤥ娗耕�⛂㖮個Å쵉꠶ꓸ睖鸣夁鿥㎥貨뵑ꌏ퍻㋅횃⯀抃�氜♬䛫攦橫碕骇ꟁｿ�潖ᣭ㕑葦툴뛺�ị롪埐⡙ฅﮏ㺷ꚷꪩ�跷壍寛诵陷矗瑰딛期こ퇖ₔ䂄䝜휱⿽왎陡�잢畗ඬ霷臃쵠粍︸煖싼뛒뛷髯剛陒㐳ᤔ훕ࠕ堙݄䣏ᚎᙬ횓폤ꕷ贗뾷ꅳꩨ䬑웰눎ሕ컑酤
㥈ꀊ菤ႜ풤胂墺铫⌄뺮칠蘍ꅓゃꖸꔥﷹ儮㽝▘渢啽漧嶔贞荅鵚휃툹挭졂뵶䞵�醔쳇功紀碅႙訣ᙲ窬ꫮ伢彎ꃯ兩ෙㅫ㷌⬞ࡌ㚭濗稜䨊絇䓱葿帉즧ၓ��䋺汼嵦湎씚ꤝ뮺�峈鮣胖ą⛈롧�礲뵊ཉ몃䃥椲⥌餸更″ܦ猊퓐ⲱ除᧥搙냵쪇쯿뼇ڔ㆕喪ꨰፌ뺬ᥳ홐鹞늇硴ⱛ逝鞜�䒲뇵㸌㈀ᦺ꽈ຣ裂ຘ硴ⱛ逝鞜�䒲뇵邳䐳㷦쨩㸇㤀ᦽ꽈ຣ佈ጿ