HomeMy WebLinkAboutRE Oak Lane and Variance Request No 2016-02 Public Records Request under Ch 119 (5)Teri,
The City will reschedule a BOA meeting. At that meeting, the BOA will
be advised to rescind their prior decision and conduct a new hearing.
At that point, Mr. Lennon’s appeal will be moot and not necessary.
Public notice will be provided shortly.
Staff will be contacting Mr. Lennon and the Developer and advising them
of this change. The City will briefly explain to Mr. Lennon the basis
of this decision and why his appeal is not going forward at this time.
Should you be in contact with Mr. Lennon on this matter, the City will
appreciate your explaining to him that this rescheduling decision was
made by the City at your request.
Regards,
Anthony
From: Terri [mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 9:49 AM
To: Anthony A. Garganese
Cc: d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org;
m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org; d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
Subject: Re: Oak Lane and Variance Request No. 2016-02; Public Records
Request under Ch. 119
Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 24, 2016, at 9:07 AM, Anthony A. Garganese
<agarganese@orlandolaw.net <mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> > wrote:
Terri,
I will review your position and request with the City Manager
and get back to you.
Anthony
-----Original Message-----
From: terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com>
[mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 8:52 AM
To: Anthony A. Garganese
Cc: d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
Subject: RE: Oak Lane and Variance Request No. 2016-02; Public
Records Request under Ch. 119
Good Morning Anthony,
Thank you for taking the time to speak to me on Friday. I also
very much appreciate that you cancelled the October 24 hearing with the
Special Hearing Officer.
I want to correct a statement in your email below, however.
While I certainly requested that the Oct. 24 hearing be cancelled, my
request regarding a new hearing, as expressly stated in my prior emails,
is that the City should reschedule the original hearing before the Board
of Adjustment (it should not reschedule the "appeal" with the special
hearing officer). The special hearing officer could attend the
rescheduled BOA hearing in order to provide the City Council with an
independent view.
The proper procedure is to vacate the first hearing (Aug. 23)
and reschedule a new Board of Adjustment Hearing. As I am sure you are
aware, this is what courts require under due process in this instance,
given that the Applicant did not provide notice of that August 23
hearing to my LLC, me, or the other owners of the houses he built on Oak
Lane (those most directly impacted). Such notice is was required by the
City Code Due Process section and Variance Application section (and
Constitutional Due Process and State law). While I understand your
explanation for a reason for lack of notice, that doesn't cure the due
process errors, particularly when Applicant had actual knowledge of my
and my neighbors contact information. Rescheduling the BOA meeting
would allow me and others who may want to participate to have a full
opportunity before the Board of Adjustment, utilizing all the procedures
outlined for such a hearing in the Code. As you acknowledged on the
phone with me, there are no procedures in the Code for an "appeal"
before a special hearing officer. Any "appeal" from the BOA decision
would then be heard by the City Council utilizing the quasi-judicial
procedures as required by law.
Again, this should not result in any delay, because if the City
Council has the authority to obtain an independent view from a "hearing
officer" before making its decision (after a full quasi-judicial hearing
of its own), that hearing officer could attend the same BOA hearing on
this matter and review the same evidence he otherwise would have
reviewed. Moreover, unless the process is started from the beginning
and according to City Code, the objections to the process will likely
continue and both the Applicant and the City will likely be required to
start over 3 months from now, which would really cause a delay.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. Also, thank
you for sending me the surveys of 123 and 127 Oak Lane. I will review
these documents and look forward to receiving the responses to my
remaining Public Records Requests. I would be happy to discuss
prioritizing the requests or offer key words for searches if records are
kept electronically.
Kind Regards,
Terri L. Bowman
Cypress Shareholders, LLC
202-276-2700
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 10/21/16, Anthony A. Garganese
<agarganese@orlandolaw.net <mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> > wrote:
Subject: RE: Oak Lane and Variance Request No. 2016-02; Public
Records Request under Ch. 119
To: "Terri" <terrilynbowman@yahoo.com
<mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com> >
Cc: "d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> "
<d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >,
"m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> "
<m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >,
"d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org> "
<d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org> >
Date: Friday, October 21, 2016, 5:46 PM
#yiv6395755436
#yiv6395755436 --
_filtered #yiv6395755436 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15
5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
_filtered #yiv6395755436 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11
6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
#yiv6395755436
#yiv6395755436 p.yiv6395755436MsoNormal, #yiv6395755436
li.yiv6395755436MsoNormal, #yiv6395755436 div.yiv6395755436MsoNormal
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}
#yiv6395755436 a:link, #yiv6395755436
span.yiv6395755436MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv6395755436 a:visited, #yiv6395755436
span.yiv6395755436MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv6395755436 p.yiv6395755436MsoAcetate, #yiv6395755436
li.yiv6395755436MsoAcetate, #yiv6395755436 div.yiv6395755436MsoAcetate
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:8.0pt;}
#yiv6395755436 span.yiv6395755436BalloonTextChar
{}
#yiv6395755436 span.yiv6395755436EmailStyle19
{color:#1F497D;}
#yiv6395755436 .yiv6395755436MsoChpDefault
{font-size:10.0pt;}
_filtered #yiv6395755436 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
#yiv6395755436 div.yiv6395755436WordSection1
{}
#yiv6395755436 Terri, It was nice talking to you this
afternoon and I hope I was able to clarify a few points for you. As
we discussed, apparently the City received outdated address information
from Brevard County that did not include the 5/17/2016 recent purchase
of your property. That explains why your LLC did not receive actual
mailed notice. It is my understanding from talking to you that you
are seeking additional time to prepare for the hearing before the
advisory hearing officer. Under the circumstances, the City Manager
understands that your property is located adjacent to the subject
variance property, although on the opposite side of the subject
variance request. As such, he has agreed to your request to postpone
the hearing on Monday, October 24,
2016 to afford you the additional time that you seek so that
you can determine for yourself whether this variance request may impact
your property. Attached is a Notice of Cancellation which is in the
process of being distributed by the City. In addition, for your
convenience,
I have attached the three (3) surveys that we discussed for
your consideration. The surveys are numbered in the right hand corner
1 through 3. The first is the original Walker Survey (dated 10-21-15)
relied upon by the City to issue the building permit for the
construction of the new single family home at 127 Oak Lane. The second
survey is the Riehl Reliable Survey (dated 1/15/16) that was
subsequently presented to the City by the owner of 123 Oak Lane
(Turner) contesting the accuracy of a portion of the Walker Survey.
Specifically, Riehl Reliable Survey depicts and calls out a slightly
angled common boundary line between
127 Oak Lane and 123 Oak Lane. This survey was apparently
presented to Walker Surveying and they apparently concurred with the
Riehl Reliable Survey because they withdrew the
10-21-15 survey and resubmitted a revised survey for 127 Oak
Lane using the common boundary line surveyed and depicted in the Riehl
Reliable Survey. The Third, revised Walker Survey (dated 8-11-16) is
the current survey being relied upon by the City. As I understand it,
because the eastern boundary of the property located at 127 Oak Lane
was redrawn further west on an angle, the house under construction was
no longer in compliance with the 8 foot zoning minimum side setback
requirement. Therefore, Sheropa LLC decided to seek a 4 foot side
setback variance on the east side of the house near the common boundary
between 127 Oak Lane and 123 Oak Lane. No other variance is being
requested by Sheropa LLC for 127 Oak Lane.
As we further discussed, you will
note that the two Walker Surveys depict and describe the same
western boundary, which is the common boundary with your property.
Further, the side setback of the proposed single family house near your
common property line appears to be noted as 11.5 feet. In addition,
you will note that all three surveys, the two by Walker and the one by
Riehl Reliable, depict and describe the same southern right-of-way
boundary line for Oak Lane (S 89 38’ 33” E).
Lastly, unrelated to the variance
request, I mentioned to you that the City is in the process of
having preliminary design plans prepared for possibly paving the
existing Oak Lane ROW and improving drainage. However, the preliminary
plans have not been finalize and formally presented to the City Council
for review and consideration at one or more public meetings. At this
time, no decision has been made by the City to pursue and construct the
Oak Lane project. Although I understand that these preliminary plans
are incomplete and a “work-in-progress,” I believe the City has made
these preliminary, incomplete plans available for inspection on the
City’s website. You can inspect them on the website or at City Hall.
Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Regards, Anthony Anthony A Garganese, EsquireBoard Certified
City, County & Local Government LawGarganese, Weiss & D’Agresta, P.A.
111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000
Orlando, Florida 32801
P.O.
Box 2873 (32802-2873)
Phone (407) 425-9566
Fax (407) 425-9596
Cocoa (866) 425-9566
Website:
http://cp.mcafee.com/d/avndy0Od1NJ5wsephp78LCXCTTPhOyeojd79JZYQsEzC773rX
VEVh7ccECTTPhOMqem6jhOrQzIieM-DwGIjZwxk_j70QTm9-MgGvFzwqrj8cn-XP_nVcQsIf
I8LZuVt5V5XDXFTpuuVqWdAklrFIYG7DR8OJMddECQPt-jLuZXTLuVKVIFRoDX12F-Ce1FKv
Nz8YJ0xkMHI0kmQDmLbCQXEIL6Mmd96y0cqld40lS7Cy3o86y0cX6mMJVEw1vyPvQCq80pnz
h0Dt5MLtc46y0bdA3Vmd40b-RoEkd40bYmr-APh0T13UCy0i9Yq84kjhOrupdF6sPb3f1c5m
k
Email: agarganese@orlandolaw.net
<mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> Any incoming e-mail reply to
this communication will be electronically filtered for "spam" and/or
"viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply being
quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all) and/or
delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we may not receive your reply
and/or we may not receive it in a timely manner.
Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us
which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than
e-mail. Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it,
contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the
use of the
individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of
this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and
delete it from your system. Thank you. From: Terri
[mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 12:48
PM
To: Anthony A. Garganese
Cc: d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
Subject: Re: Oak Lane and Variance
Request No. 2016-02; Public Records Request under Ch.
119
Anthony, Thank you for your below
response. I don't follow how this hearing is appropriate under
the Code provisions you cite and given the lack of notice to me or, as
is now apparent, any of the homeowners on Oak Lane other than the
applicant of the August hearing.
That is a violation of Constitutional due process, Florida
law, your code, and your practice and procedures. In this instance
generalized notice is not sufficient.
I repeat
my objection to the October 24 Hearing and repeat my request
for a new hearing on the variance request to be scheduled in accordance
with the Code. It is inaccurate and improper for the City to assume
that the variance request does not impact my property rights. The issue
underlying the variance request seems to involve a dispute regarding
property lines.
I own an adjacent parcel to the offending parcel -- the issues
involved in this hearing are highly relevant to my property rights. I
should have been provided the opportunity to participate in the August
variance hearing to determine the extent of any issue. This request
to re-schedule the original hearing is particularly important because
the City has not responded substantively to my Records Requests.
I asked for expedited response given the very short notice I
received of the "appeal" hearing (having had no notice of the
underlying hearing). The failure to respond to my requests has simply
perpetuated the problem created by lack of notice. The City should do
the right thing here and reschedule this hearing and give proper
notice.
I have
received no direct communication regarding responses to my
requests, submitted more than a week ago. I reviewed the website - when
it is functioning - and while I see a lot of email correspondence with
Mr Lennon and miscellaneous items, I do not see the responses to my
requests. If they are posted, please indicate with specificity by file
and subtitle where I may find the responses to my specific requests.
Also,
please indicate to whom I may send my statement and objection
for submission into the public record for the October 24 hearing if it
proceeds. Thank you. Respectfully, Terri BowmanCypress Shareholders
LLC202-276-2700
Sent from my
iPhone
On Oct 14,
2016, at 6:52 PM, Anthony A. Garganese
<agarganese@orlandolaw.net <mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> >
wrote:Ms. Bowman,
The undersigned is the City
Attorney. It is my understanding that the City Clerk has been
in contact with you regarding your public records request and the City
will be handling that request in accordance with its records policy.
I noticed that several requests in your letter (the first
sequence, numbered 1 through 5) are not really a public records but a
request for background information that may or may not be contained in
a record. As a courtesy to you, I would like to provide that
background information to you.
1. The appeal to the
City Council regarding the Board of Adjustment's decision on
the variance application is provided under Sections 110-27 and 110-33,
City Code.
2. The advisory hearing officer was
authorized by the City Council at the City Council's September
6, 2016 meeting in accordance with the City Council's general and home
rule powers.
3. The hearing officer's
name is attorney Drew Smith.
4. The general standard of review and
procedures for the hearing are set forth in Chapter 110,
Article II, of the City Code. Variances in particular are also governed
by Sections 110-36 and 37. Such proceedings are also governed by
applicable case law.
5. The hearing for the
advisory hearing officer is scheduled for Monday, October 24,
2016 at 4:30 p.m. at the City of Cape Canaveral Public Library, 201
Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida. The hearing officer will deliver
a written recommendation to the City Council for its final decision at
its December 20, 2016 regular meeting to be held at 6:00 p.m. in the
Cape Canaveral Public Library, 201 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL.
Have a good weekend.
Anthony A
Garganese, Esquire
Board Certified City,
County & Local Government Law
Garganese,
Weiss & D’Agresta, P.A.
111 N. Orange
Avenue, Suite 2000
Orlando, Florida
32801
P.O. Box 2873 (32802-2873)
Phone (407) 425-9566
Fax (407)
425-9596
Cocoa (866) 425-9566
Website:
http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr6x8q6jqb0UsOyOehvdTdLLCzB4sMCqejrXVEVh7cee6TT
PhOyeophdLLCzBwQsIcCzATF7oAtxZf1loDX12F-Ce1FKIjZwxk_j70QSCgoLZTD-LOpEVov
ohvWZOWbObTfTjKOYZORQr8EGTjpVkffGhBrwqrjdFCXYDuZXTLuZPtPpjGNfS25jZcs3js_
z6hVq12Fxno0EJFeJundFThpudwIqid40oQGq80HIfd46Mgd40pScJxrPh02_5C_FcQg0OL6
y1eWbxuWo8d40mr87OIq80nZGNgEq80nUITZ9Cy1K27Nd40AjUQg8ECzASYOr3_hE4w4A
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr6x8q6jqb0UsOyOehvdTdLLCzB4sMCqejrXVEVh7cee6T
TPhOyeophdLLCzBwQsIcCzATF7oAtxZf1loDX12F-Ce1FKIjZwxk_j70QSCgoLZTD-LOpEVo
vohvWZOWbObTfTjKOYZORQr8EGTjpVkffGhBrwqrjdFCXYDuZXTLuZPtPpjGNfS25jZcs3js
_z6hVq12Fxno0EJFeJundFThpudwIqid40oQGq80HIfd46Mgd40pScJxrPh02_5C_FcQg0OL
6y1eWbxuWo8d40mr87OIq80nZGNgEq80nUITZ9Cy1K27Nd40AjUQg8ECzASYOr3_hE4w4A>
Email: agarganese@orlandolaw.net
<mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net>
Any incoming
e-mail reply to this communication will be electronically
filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses."
That filtering process may result in such reply being
quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at
all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we may not
receive your reply and/or we may not receive it in a timely manner.
Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are
particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it,
contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the
use of the individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader
of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that reading it is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com>
[mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 7:10 AM
To: Anthony A. Garganese; d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
Cc: terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com>
Subject: Oak Lane and Variance Request No.
2016-02; Public Records Request under Ch. 119
SUBJECT: Oak Lane and
Variance Request No. 2016-02; Public Records Request under Ch.
119
Dear Mr. Garganese,
Mr. Greene, Ms Goforth, and Mr. lefever:
I write in my individual
capacity and as the owner of Cypress Shareholders, LLC, which
is the owner of 131 Oak Lane, Cape Canaveral FL 32920.
Please see the
attached letter.
I can be
reached by phone at 202-276-2700 or by email at
terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com> . I would be
happy to discuss any of these requests.
Thank you,
Terri L. Bowman
Individually
and as
Member/Manager of Cypress
Shareholders LLC terrilynbowman@yahoo.com
<mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com>
202-276-2700
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written
communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral
officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or
media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email
addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address
released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic
email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing
stment's decision on
the variance application is provided under Sections 110-27 and 110-33,
City Code.
2. The advisory hearing officer was
authorized by the City Council at the City Council's September
6, 2016 meeting in accordance with the City Council's general and home
rule powers.
3. The hearing officer's
name is attorney Drew Smith.
4. The general standard of review and
procedures for the hearing are set forth in Chapter 110,
Article II, of the City Code. Variances in particular are also governed
by Sections 110-36 and 37. Such proceedings are also governed by
applicable case law.
5. The hearing for the
advisory hearing officer is scheduled for Monday, October 24,
2016 at 4:30 p.m. at the City of Cape Canaveral Public Library, 201
Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida. The hearing officer will deliver
a written recommendation to the City Council for its final decision at
its December 20, 2016 regular meeting to be held at 6:00 p.m. in the
Cape Canaveral Public Library, 201 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL.
Have a good weekend.
Anthony A
Garganese, Esquire
Board Certified City,
County & Local Government Law
Garganese,
Weiss & D’Agresta, P.A.
111 N. Orange
Avenue, Suite 2000
Orlando, Florida
32801
P.O. Box 2873 (32802-2873)
Phone (407) 425-9566
Fax (407)
425-9596
Cocoa (866) 425-9566
Website:
http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr6x8q6jqb0UsOyOehvdTdLLCzB4sMCqejrXVEVh7cee6TT
PhOyeophdLLCzBwQsIcCzATF7oAtxZf1loDX12F-Ce1FKIjZwxk_j70QSCgoLZTD-LOpEVov
ohvWZOWbObTfTjKOYZORQr8EGTjpVkffGhBrwqrjdFCXYDuZXTLuZPtPpjGNfS25jZcs3js_
z6hVq12Fxno0EJFeJundFThpudwIqid40oQGq80HIfd46Mgd40pScJxrPh02_5C_FcQg0OL6
y1eWbxuWo8d40mr87OIq80nZGNgEq80nUITZ9Cy1K27Nd40AjUQg8ECzASYOr3_hE4w4A
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr6x8q6jqb0UsOyOehvdTdLLCzB4sMCqejrXVEVh7cee6T
TPhOyeophdLLCzBwQsIcCzATF7oAtxZf1loDX12F-Ce1FKIjZwxk_j70QSCgoLZTD-LOpEVo
vohvWZOWbObTfTjKOYZORQr8EGTjpVkffGhBrwqrjdFCXYDuZXTLuZPtPpjGNfS25jZcs3js
_z6hVq12Fxno0EJFeJundFThpudwIqid40oQGq80HIfd46Mgd40pScJxrPh02_5C_FcQg0OL
6y1eWbxuWo8d40mr87OIq80nZGNgEq80nUITZ9Cy1K27Nd40AjUQg8ECzASYOr3_hE4w4A>
Email: agarganese@orlandolaw.net
<mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net>
Any incoming
e-mail reply to this communication will be electronically
filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses."
That filtering process may result in such reply being
quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at
all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we may not
receive your reply and/or we may not receive it in a timely manner.
Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are
particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it,
contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the
use of the individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader
of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that reading it is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com>
[mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 7:10 AM
To: Anthony A. Garganese; d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:m.goforth@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ;
d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:d.lefever@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
Cc: terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com>
Subject: Oak Lane and Variance Request No.
2016-02; Public Records Request under Ch. 119
SUBJECT: Oak Lane and
Variance Request No. 2016-02; Public Records Request under Ch.
119
Dear Mr. Garganese,
Mr. Greene, Ms Goforth, and Mr. lefever:
I write in my individual
capacity and as the owner of Cypress Shareholders, LLC, which
is the owner of 131 Oak Lane, Cape Canaveral FL 32920.
Please see the
attached letter.
I can be
reached by phone at 202-276-2700 or by email at
terrilynbowman@yahoo.com <mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com> . I would be
happy to discuss any of these requests.
Thank you,
Terri L. Bowman
Individually
and as
Member/Manager of Cypress
Shareholders LLC terrilynbowman@yahoo.com
<mailto:terrilynbowman@yahoo.com>
202-276-2700
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written
communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral
officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or
media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email
addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address
released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic
email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing