HomeMy WebLinkAboutFW Community Appearance Board Meeting - Tuesday February 28 2012 - QuestionsBarry,
FYI, I intend to advise Ms. Rezanka that the Order should be executed
by Friday at the latest. I think Susan is out today but the Order
should be priority tomorrow so the applicant can efficiently exercise
its option to appeal.
Thanks,
Kate
From: Kim Rezanka [mailto:KRezanka@deanmead.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 3:05 PM
To: Kate Latorre
Cc: David Greene (D.Greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org); Angela Apperson;
B.Brown@cityofcapecanaveral.org
Subject: RE: Community Appearance Board Meeting - Tuesday, February 28,
2012 - Questions
Kate,
Thank you for your professionalism and guidance last night.
Do you know how soon we will receive the official notice of approval
with conditions, as provided for in Sec. 22-43?
Also, can you advise if there is any particular form of Notice of
Appeal from the CAB to the City Council? Sec. 110-33 does not provide
detailed information regarding such an appeal. Xtreme Fun, LLC intends
to appeal two (2) of the conditions imposed by the CAB.
Finally, do you know when the City will provide comments on the site
plan application? It has been nearly two months since the application
was filed.
Your continued assistance is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Kim Rezanka
<http://www.deanmead.com/>
Kimberly Bonder Rezanka
Attorney at Law
KRezanka@deanmead.com <mailto:KRezanka@deanmead.com>
Dean Mead
8240 Devereux Drive, Suite 100
Viera, Florida 32940
321-259-8900 . Fax 321-254-4479
www.deanmead.com <http://www.deanmead.com/> .
www.floridatrustsestatesblog.com
<http://www.floridatrustsestatesblog.com/>
Orlando | Fort Pierce | Viera | Gainesville
________________________________
PRIVILEGED INFORMATION DISCLAIMER: This email is intended solely for
the use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this email is not the
intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please delete this email, destroy any hard copies thereof, and notify us
immediately by telephone. Thank you.
________________________________
REGULATORY DISCLAIMER: As required by United States Treasury
Regulations, please be aware that this communication is not intended or
written by the sender to be used, and it cannot be used, by any
recipient for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties that may be imposed
on the recipient under United States Federal Tax Laws, or (2) promoting,
marketing or recommending to another party any plan or arrangement
addressed herein.
________________________________
Think Green! Please consider our environment before printing this
e-mail.
________________________________
From: Kate Latorre [mailto:klatorre@orlandolaw.net]
<mailto:[mailto:klatorre@orlandolaw.net]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 1:55 PM
To: Kim Rezanka
Cc: David Greene (D.Greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:D.Greene@cityofcapecanaveral.org> ); Angela Apperson;
B.Brown@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:B.Brown@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
Subject: RE: Community Appearance Board Meeting Packet - Tuesday,
February 28, 2012 - Clarification Requested
Ms. Rezanka,
The Community Appearance Board’s review of your client’s application is
governed by sections 22-36 through 22-47 of the Cape Canaveral Code.
The applicable review criteria is set forth in section 22-41(c). This
is a separate review from the one conducted for site plans set forth in
Chapter 110. In my opinion, Barry’s comments in the agenda packet touch
on applicable CAB review criteria.
As we discussed a few weeks ago, your client’s site plan will be
reviewed under the City’s current site plan review procedures and
criteria, and not on the proposed overlay district standards.
Please feel free to contact me should you desire to further discuss
this. I will be the Board attorney at the meeting tonight.
Kate Latorre
From: Kim Rezanka [mailto:KRezanka@deanmead.com]
<mailto:[mailto:KRezanka@deanmead.com]>
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 4:13 PM
To: Susan Chapman; City Attorney’s Office; Clerks Office; Barry Brown;
David Greene; Kelley, Joyce - CAB; Hamilton, Joyce; Nicholas, Leo;
mellis@brev.org <mailto:mellis@brev.org> ; Wasserman, Randy - CAB;
'Bowman, Walter - CAB '; Wolf, Rosalie - CAB; Rick Neale
(rneale@floridatoday.com <mailto:rneale@floridatoday.com> ); Building;
Council Members; angray8@aol.com <mailto:angray8@aol.com> ;
mjtichich@gmail.com <mailto:mjtichich@gmail.com> ; 'Nienstadt, Bob';
Mosh; Dave Menzel
Cc: Kate Latorre
Subject: RE: Community Appearance Board Meeting Packet - Tuesday,
February 28, 2012 - Clarification Requested
Dear Mr. Garganese and Ms. Latorre:
From my discussions with Ms. Latorre, I understood that the Beachwave
Complex's Site Plan Application was to be governed by the existing City
standards, not the proposed Overlay District standards. From Mr.
Brown's opinions regarding the "deficiencies" of the Site Plan, it
appears that he is indeed imposing the proposed standards to this
project. Please clarify what standards are intended to be utilized
tomorrow night by the CAB.
Further, we will object to any presentation of the proposed standards
during the public hearing on this matter.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Kim Rezanka