HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Agenda Pkt. 6-12-2013CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
� 1 -
%..,ity of Cape Canaveral
201 POLK AVENUE
JUNE 12, 2013
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
I . Approval of Meeting Minutes: May 22, 2013.
2. Recommendation to City Council Re: Planned Development No. PD 2013-01 to Allow for
a Helicopter Tour Business on Vacant Parcel 804.0 - Mark Grainger, Authorized Agent for
Sheldon Cove, LLLP, Property Owner. (Request is Continued from February 27, 2013
Planning & Zoning Board meeting.)
0
Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, the City hereby advises the public that: If a person
decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning & Zoning Board with respect to any matter
considered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose
that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not
constitute consent by the City for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise
inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise
allowed by law. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act: all interested parties may
attend this Public Meeting. The facility is accessible to the physically handicapped. Persons with
disabilities needing assistance to participate in the proceedings should contact the Community &
Economic Development Department (868-1205) 48 hours in advance of the meeting.
7510 N Atlantic Avenue — P.O. Box 326 — Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-0326
Telephone (321) 868-1206 — Fax (321) 868-1247
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
May 22, 2013
A Meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board was held on Wednesday, May 22, 2013, at the
City Public Library, 201 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida. The meeting was called to
Order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairperson, Lamar Russell. The Secretary called the roll.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Lamar Russell Chairperson
Harry Pearson Vice Chairperson
John Fredrickson
Ron Friedman
Bruce Collins
John Price
MEMBERS ABSENT
Donald Dunn
OTHERS PRESENT
Susan Chapman Secretary
Kate Latorre Assistant City Attorney
Barry Brown Planning & Zoning Director
NEW BUSINESS
Approval of Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes - May 8, 2013.
Motion by Harry Pearson, seconded by Bruce Collins to approve the Meeting Minutes of
May 8, 2013. Vote on the motion carried unanimously.
2. Recommendation to Citv Council Re: Ordinance No. XX -2013; amending City Code
Chapter 110 Zoning related to Vacation Resort Campuses; providing requirements
for Vacation Resort Campuses; excluding Vacation Resort Campuses from the rental
restrictions on dwelling units set forth in Section 110-487; providing for the repeal of
prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions; incorporation in the Code; severability;
and an effective date.
Barry Brown gave his staff report and summarized the request. He explained that the Ron
Jon Cape Caribe Resort is a timeshare vacation resort that is actively engaged in marketing
timeshare units. An important component of their marketing effort includes providing lodging
for prospective buyers before or after touring the property. They prefer to provide lodging on
site, but there are not enough units available so prospects are often provided lodging off site
and in Cocoa Beach hotels. Cape Caribe, Inc. is requesting that they be able to use the
building on the oceanfront, which property is zoned R-3, for stays of less than the seven (7)
day minimum, per Code. This will also allow Cape Caribe to better serve other "short stay"
resort guests who may prefer an oceanfront room. The Resort is a unique project and the
only true vacation resort property in the City. The current Code does not define this type of
Use. He noted that if the ordinance is adopted and when the next building is completed,
they anticipate moving approximately 50% of the off-site hotel "stays" to the Cape Caribe
property, which equates to approximately 105 nightly stays per week.
Planning & Zoning Board
Meeting Minutes
May 22, 2013
Page 2 of 2
Ken Ward, Representative for Cape Caribe, Inc. gave a presentation, summarized the
request, and described how the Resort fits into the proposed ordinance definition of a
Vacation Resort Campus.
The Board reviewed and discussed the proposed ordinance. Barry Brown verified that the
proposed ordinance clearly delineates Vacation Resort Campuses from a Hotel; and that a
Vacation Resort Campus shall contain a minimum of twenty-five (25) contiguous acres.
Motion by Ron Friedman, seconded by John Price to recommend that City Council approve
the proposed ordinance as presented. Vote on the motion carried unanimously.
Chairperson Russell requested a 5 minute recess at 8:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at
8:09 p.m.
3. Recommendation to City Council Re: Ordinance No. X-2013; providing for the
regulation of signage; providing for comprehensive amendments to Chapter 94,
Signs, of the Code of Ordinances; amending the signage requirements for the A1A
Economic Opportunity Overlay District; providing for repeal of prior inconsistent
ordinances and resolutions, incorporation into the code, severability, and effective
date.
Todd Morley described each item of the proposed ordinance through page 6, item (4).
Board members suggested various minor changes.
Due to the late hour the Board agreed to conduct further review of the proposed ordinance
at a subsequent scheduled meeting.
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 8:56 p.m.
Approved on this day of , 2013.
Lamar Russell, Chairperson
Susan L. Chapman, Secretary
City of Cape Canaveral, Florida
Planning and Zoning Board
June 12, 2013
STAFF REPORT
Request: For Planned Development Zoning and Land Use Plan to allow for a Helicopter Tour
Operation per section 110-609 and to retain all uses allowed in the C-2
Commercial/Manufacturing Zoning District.
Applicant (authorized agent): Mark Grainger of Florida Biplanes & Helicopters
Owner of property: Sheldon Cove, LLLP
Subject property: Vacant 2.56 acre parcel at the northeast comer of SR A1A and Imperial
Boulevard.
Future Land Use and Zoning designation: C-2, Commercial in the A1A Economic
Opportunity Overlay District.
Surrounding zoning and uses:
Zonina
North C-2, Commercial
East M-1, Industrial
South C-2, Commercial
West C-1, Commercial
Use
AJT Building
Brewery — Florida Beer Company
Sheldon Cove building
Racetrac, Beachwave Complex
Summary
The applicant owns Florida Biplanes & Helicopters and he wants to operate a Helicopter Tour
Business at the northeast comer of SR A1A and Imperial Boulevard. This property is located
within the A1A Economic Opportunity Overlay District. The proposed use is considered an
Attraction and Destination Use and may be approved pursuant to the Planned Development
Process. The Planned Development Process includes review and recommendation by the
Development Review Committee, review and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Board, and approval, approval with conditions, or denial by the City Council.
See the Planned Development Land Use Plan for a summary of the proposed business and
history of company.
The Planning & Zoning Board first heard the request on Feb. 27, 2013. Staff presented the
application and staff report and the Board heard testimony from the applicant and citizens. The
Board discussed connection to City sewer, compatibility with surrounding uses, impact of noise
on surrounding businesses and residential neighborhoods, distraction for drivers on SR A1A,
safety concerns, quality control of pilots, and monitoring/enforcement of flight routes.
Property owners/residents expressed concerns about: noise, compatibility/incompatibility,
safety, privacy, distraction to motorists, effect on property values, quality of life, serenity,
annoyance, aesthetics, appropriate site utilization, traffic, and revenues to the City, etc.
After discussion the Board voted to continue the hearing to a later date. The Board requested a
helicopter demonstration flight and the following additional information prior to the next hearing:
1. Helicopter demonstration flight — conducted on Tuesday May 14, 2013.
2. Measure decibel levels — see Decibel Report on the Helicopter Demonstration Flight
prepared by Todd Morley, Community & Economic Director.
3. Helicopter data for Robinson R44 — see attached documents for helicopter performance
and decibel levels for R44 or equivalents.
4. FAA requirements — An FAA representative, Robert Potts, attended the demonstration
flight, but has not submitted a report to the City. See attached email, FAA notification
requirements and application provided by applicant. Mr. Grainger has not filed an
application with FAA as they want local government approval first.
5. FDOT requirements — FDOT requires heliport registration and site approval. See
attached.
6. Explore security options — Applicant to address at the meeting.
7. Study emergency response capability — the helicopter is equipped with a fire
extinguisher and fire extinguishers will be provided on site. A fire hydrant is located at
the southwest comer of the property, at the comer of SR A1A and Imperial Boulevard.
Also, see email from John Cunningham, Assistant Fire Chief.
Issues addressed by the Development Review Committee:
Office and restrooms — the Code call for provision of a building and plumbing facilities: Section
110-481. Building required for commercial uses. "All commercial uses shall provide at least the
minimum size building required for the district in which the use is to be located. The building
shall contain plumbing facilities adequate to serve the needs of the customers and employees of
the commercial use."
Temporary office structure — The applicant is requesting a temporary office structure for a
period of 36 months; to run with the life of the property lease. The Code authorizes the Building
Official to issue a permit for a temporary structure for up to six months. Therefore, the
requested longer period for the temporary office structure will need to be addressed in the PD.
Utilities — The building shall be connected to the central water system operated by the City of
Cocoa. Connect to City sewer system within six to 12 months, use bladder system in temporary
office structure in the interim.
Access — Access to the site shall be from Imperial Blvd.
Parking — Parking will be provided on an existing paved parking area. The parking area will
need to be maintained/refurbished per Section 34-97(b): The owner of every.... commercial or
industrial properly, his appointed agent and occupants, operators, tenants or anyone otherwise
using the property in any form or manner shall provide: (3) parking areas in good repair, free
from erosion, property marked and clear of litter and debris.
Landscaping and clean-up of site - Undesirable plant species are to be removed and all open
areas are to be grassed.
K
Noise and flight path — A helicopter flight demonstration was conducted and a Decibel Report
is included with the Staff Report. Flight paths as depicted in the Cape Canaveral Hellpad
Proposal — March 3013 will be east of SR AIA and north to the Port over commercial and
industrial properties.
Hours of Operation — Monday through Sunday, 9am to dusk or 7pm whichever occurs first.
Planned Development Worksheet
A Planned Development means an area of land developed as a single entity or in approved
phases in conformity with approved land use and site plans by a property owner or a property
owner's authorized agent, which is comprehensively planned to provide for a variety of land
uses and common open space.
The Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation shall be based on consideration of the
following criteria:
1. Degree of departure of proposed planned development from surrounding areas in
terms of character, density, and intensity of use. This is a unique use that is considered
a tourist/hospitality use and an extension of existing hotel and attraction uses along this
stretch of SR AIA.
2. Compatibility within the planned development and relationship with surrounding
neighborhoods and other uses. Immediate surrounding properties are all commercially or
industrially zoned and in commercial/industrial uses or undeveloped.
3. Prevention of erosion and degrading surrounding areas. The site will be grassed to
prevent erosion and excessive dust disturbance.
4. Provision for future public education (if required), recreation facilities, transportation,
water supply, sewage disposal, surface drainage, flood control and soil conservation,
as shown in the land use plan. If the Planned Development Zoning is approved, a site
plan will be prepared that addresses utility service and stormwater drainage.
6. The nature, intent and compatibility of common open space, including the proposed
method for the maintenance and conservation of the common open space. Not
applicable to this project.
6. The feasibility and compatibility of the specified phases contained in the land use
plan to exist as an independent development. Not applicable to this project.
7. The availability and adequacy of water and sewer service to support the proposed
planned development. Adequate utilities are available to support the project.
8. The availability and adequacy of primary streets and thoroughfares to support traffic
to be generated within the proposed planned development. Roadways have capacity to
handle traffic generated by the project.
9. The benefits within the proposed development and to the general public to justify the
requested departure from the standard land use requirements inherent in a planned
development. This is a unique use, but no departures from the standard land use
requirements are being requested.
10. The conformity and compatibility of the planned development with any adopted
development plan of the City. There is no adopted development plan for this portion of
the City.
11. The conformity and compatibility of the proposed common open space and land uses
within the proposed planned development. Not applicable.
Development Review Committee Recommendation
The Development Review Committee recommends approval of the requested Planned
Development Zoning and Land Use Plan with the following conditions:
1. Hours of Operation — Monday through Sunday 9am to dusk or 7pm whichever occurs
first.
2. Land Use Plan — the site is to be developed and business is to be operated in
accordance with the Land Use Plan and its Exhibits.
3. Utilities — the temporary office structure shall connect to the City of Cocoa water system
and after a period of six months to one year shall connect to the City sanitary sewer
system.
4. FAA and FDOT approvals — The applicant shall receive necessary approvals and
permits from the FAA and FDOT prior to commencement of operations.
5. Signage — ground signs on the site shall be monument signs.
4
HELICOPTER TOUR BUSINESS
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LAND USE PLAN
Applicant: Mark Grainger of Florida Biplanes and Helicopters
Site Planner & Engineer: Mike Allen of Allen Engineering, Inc.
Proposed Use: A Planned Development for a business providing helicopter tours in the
Cape Canaveral area. See attached Land Use Plan and Cape Canaveral Helipad
Proposal — March 2013.
Subject Property: A vacant 2.56 acre parcel at the northeast corner of SR A1A and
Imperial Boulevard.
Property Owner: Sheldon Cove, LLLP
Future Land Use and Zoning designation: C-2, Commercial in the A1A Economic
Opportunity Overlay District.
Surrounding zoning and uses:
Zoning
North C-2, Commercial
East M-1, Industrial
South C-2, Commercial
West C-1, Commercial
Use
AJT Building
Brewery — Florida Beer Company
Sheldon Cove building
Racetrac, Beachwave Complex
Summary: The Planned Development Zoning is for a Helicopter Tour Business on the
subject property to include helipad, office structure, and parking area. The land use
plan is depicted on attached exhibits including site plan and aerial. An office structure
will be provided, including restrooms, to meet requirements per section 110-481. A
temporary office structure will be allowed for a period of up to three years, after which a
permanent structure shall be constructed. The temporary office structure will connect to
Cocoa water system and after a period of 6 months to one year will connect to City
sewer system.
Access to the site will be from Imperial Boulevard. Parking will be provided on an
existing paved parking area. The parking area will need to be maintained/refurbished
per Section 34-97(b): The owner of every.... commercial or industrial property, his
appointed agent and occupants, operators, tenants or anyone otherwise using the
property in any form or manner shall provide: (3) parking areas in good repair, free from
erosion, property marked and clear of litter and debris.
The subject property will need to be cleaned up and landscaped prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy. Undesirable plant species shall be removed, mounds of dirt
and debris shall be removed and the property properly graded. All open areas are to be
grassed and properly maintained/mowed. At the site plan stage, the need for additional
landscaping will be determined. Hours of operation will be Monday through Sunday, 9
am to dusk or 7pm whichever is earliest.
2
Cape Canaveral Helipad Proposal
March 2013
Mark Grainger -President
Fl*rii?. Viy1mmn—,",-e �,�rs
475 Manor Drive, Hangar 5
Merritt Island, FL
(321) 392-4122
Mark@FloridaBiplanes,com
--sfi a IT.Mil' -M Fr 71
operation within the boundaries of Cape Canaveral. The proposed location is the
currently undeveloped 2.5 -acre lot at 8880 Astronaut Boulevard.
The location is zoned C2 Industrial, and within the boundaries of the recently created
AIA Economic Opportunity Overlay District (EOOD). The ride operation is a service
business providing both locals and tourists with aerial sightseeing tours of the local area.
Florida Biplanes and Helicopters began operations at the Merritt Island Airport in
October of 2010. We started with one WWII -era vintage Waco UPF-7 open -cockpit
biplane and have grown to add a second biplane and our first vintage helicopter, a Korean
War -era Hiller UH -12. We are in the process of acquiring a second helicopter, a
Robinson R-44 Raven 11, to support our growing in helicopter ride business. To date we
have given over 2,300 rides to over 4,000 passengers and are the top rated outdoor
activity on Trip Advisor, a major internet review and ranking website. The business has
been profitable since it's 2'd month of operations.
Our rides vary from 5 to 45 minutes in length and our current aircraft have capacity for
two passengers per flight. The Space Coast is an excellent location for scenic flights
because of its very close proximity to the rivers, beaches, Port Canaveral, and the
Kennedy Space Center Complex (KSC). We have established a great relationship with
both NASA and Patrick AFB. Our rides often include "low passes" down both the former
Space Shuttle landing runway as well as the runways at PAFB.
We operate rides daily, year round and intend to continue growing our biplane and
helicopter ride business at the Merritt Island Airport. However, a helicopter's ability
operate from virtually any open area provides a unique opportunity to increase the
bility and therefore the business to a level that is impossible to do at an airport.
I
The idea is to base the helicopter ride operations as close to the port as possible and with
convenient access to AIA as possible. Close proximity to the port means we can deliver a
high-quality ride, with unparalleled sightseeing in as little flight time as 5 -minutes.
Helicopters are relatively expensive to maintain and operate. A shorter flight means a
lower cost per ride. This will allow us to offer a quality experience at a starting price
point of around $40 per person. Cape Canaveral's general layout, with industrial areas
abutting the Port, is ideal in that it allows a helicopter flight path that avoids all
residential areas. To repeat: the proposed location will allow flights that avoid all
residential areas.
Having the business located close to AIA is extremely advantageous. A helicopter ride is
a very exciting and unique experience. While many customers respond to traditional
marketing and advertising, a large portion of sales are from "impulse purchases" (they
see it and immediately want to experience it). Significantly, the purchase of a helicopter
ride is not something that is typically on someone's mind until the moment they see the
helicopter.
We can find no better area that satisfies both of these objectives than our proposed
location. Simply put, it's a "home run". The proposed lot has the most clearway and
overall area than any other property nearby. Most importantly, it is located far away from
all residential areas. It also has an existing paved parking area and "off -AIA" access via
Imperial Avenue.
PROPOSED OPERATIONS
Florida Biplanes & Helicopters will create a neat, clean, and attractive business that
meets the AIA EOOD guidelines and goals to "improve the appearance, enhance the
identity, and promote the pedestrian environment of the district." We will transform an
existing vacant lot into an aesthetically pleasing area that is both professional and
attractive.
It will be requested to begin operations from a temporary office structure. Our intent is to
start with an aesthetically pleasing mobile office with space for customer interactions as
well as restrooms and air conditioning. Electric and water/sewer hookups will be
according to code.
Proposed hours of operation are daily, from 9am to 7pm. We intend to employ the
highest safety standards and practices consistent with our unblemished safety record at
Merritt Island. We have explicit authorization from the FAA to conduct commercial air
tours and carry full liability insurance. All safety related personnel are subject to FAA &
DOT initial background and drug tests, as well as an ongoing random drug test program.
Overnight helicopter storage will either be at the Merritt Island Airport or a secured area
on the property. Fueling of aircraft will be in accordance with FAA, DOT, and NFPA
standards. There will be no fuel (or any other hazmat) storage on the property.
FLIGHT TRACK / NOISE & SAFETY CONCERNS
The location of the property offers the best overall solution to minimizing the noise
footprint of a helicopter ride operation. Because we can operate on flight paths that
completely avoid residential areas, there should be very little issue with noise. It is
important to note that the business model is geared towards upselling rides to longer
durations. This increases revenue, decreases fuel and maintenance cost per flight hour,
and reduces the overall number of daily flight operations.
The following map shows the proposed flight tracks:
NOTE: We plan to always utilize flight paths that always arrive and depart from over the
Port and industrial areas to the North.
Currently there are at least 5 helicopter ride businesses located in the Greater Orlando
area. This is a testament to their popularity and public demand for this type of outdoor
activity. As the only helicopter ride offering near the Port and beaches, we believe the
business potential is excellent. The economic impact to Cape Canaveral will be positive.
We forecast the immediate need for 3 full-time employees and believe this could grow to
at least a half-dozen newly created jobs.
Cape Canaveral will gain the addition of a thriving, well-respected and energetic
business. A helicopter ride offering will be positive draw to bring cruise ship and port
related tourists into the City. The business also stands to capture much of the vehicle
traffic that currently bypasses Cape Canaveral for destinations South. Locals make up
almost 40% of our ride business at Merritt Island and we expect to satisfy a similar
portion of the local 3 tolmlation looki-OV, to see the btautp of their hometown from a new
perspective.
Having a helipad in Cape Canaveral is a good resource. Florida Biplanes & Helicopters
can make our helipad available to the City for non -routine use of other helicopters
(Medevac, BSO, VIP transport, etc.)
OWNER QUALIFICATIONS
Florida Biplanes & Helicopters is founded and owned by Mark Grainger, an experienced
pilot and businessman with a strong background in aviation, sales, and marketing. Mr.
Grainger has over 33 years of flying experience in a wide range of aircraft from hang
gliders to F-16 fighter jets and currently flies wide-body airliners internationally for Delta
Air Lines (past 22 years). Mr. Grainger has successfully led and owned start-up
companies in the amusement, vending, and Internet industries. He also has successful
corporate experience, serving as Vice President of Business Development for a security
related software company headquarted in Washington DC. Mr. Grainger currently
resides in Cocoa Beach with his wife and two children.
SUMMARY
Although there are valid concerns for both citizens and their elected representatives
regarding the basing of helicopter ride business within the City, a professional operation
that is focused on maintaining minimal noise and maximum safety can be a benefit to
Cape Canaveral. There are helicopter tour operators in almost every major City in
America. They are successfully operating in virtually every tourist location as well. The
key is having a helipad away from residences, flight paths that provide the minimal noise
and no residential overflight, and a management that strives to make and uphold a
commitment to the community to be a good business neighbor. Florida Biplanes &
Helicopters proposes to do just that.
Barry rownfgfE' 1)rPT
From:John Cunningham <jcunningham@ccvfd.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:14 AM
To: Barry Brown
Subject: Declined: DRC Meeting - Helicopter Tour Business application & land use plan
I have given the fire code requirements to the applicant. As far as allowing the use in the city, there's nothing in the fire
code that prohibits it. If there is an event on site, we will handle as we do anything else.
E. " V Fwomlom
SND
NFO
A Decibel Report on the
Helicopter Demonstration Flight
Sound levels dBA
May 14, 2013
Todd Morley, Community and Economic Development Director
Sound pressure levels are measured in decibels. Below are some common decibel levels:
(Wikipedia)
200-250 dB Cannon at 12 feet
175-200 dB Saturn Rocket firing
150 dB Airplane at takeoff
130 dB Above this can damage the ear quickly, and pain is felt.
120 dB Diesel engine, ball mill
100 dB Lawn mower, factory
90 dB Band or symphony, above this can damage the ear if heard extensively.
80 dB Police or fire siren, electric shaver
70 dB Radio sound level, crowded neighborhood.
50 dB Can normally awaken a sleeping person.
30-35 dB Very quiet conversation, private office noise
20 dB Rustling leaves, whispering
10 dB Sound -proofed room, the minimum most human ears can hear
0 dB Hearing threshold.
Methodology:
1. Using the City -owned Extech Model 407732 Digital Sound Level Meter and its matching
Extech Model 407722 Sound Level Calibrator, the meter was calibrated on the day of the
demonstration flight.
2. The meter was used as instructed in the owner's manual, including an adjustment to each
of the following settings:
a. "Fast" Response Time Mode, and
b. "Hi" Range Setting.
3. Two decibel reading ranges were measured at each location, one before the helicopter was
in the vicinity and one while the helicopter was in the vicinity.
4. The readings were video -recorded using my city -issued cell phone. Videos show the
meter in the foreground and the helicopter in the background as it approached and
departed. Videos are on file on the City Server.
5. Videos were reviewed to determine the lowest decibel reading when the helicopter was
not in the vicinity and the highest decibel readings when the helicopter was in the vicinity.
6. These readings were captured as screenshots and pasted into the table below:
Location Lowest dBA — helicopter not Highest dBA - with helicopter in
I in vicinitV I VicinitV
Intersection of
Imperial Blvd.
and AIA
..�EL 1JEWN 1:
A.J.T. Building
at 8910
Astronaut Blvd.
t
768 Lago Dr. at
Puerto Del Rio
Condos
A.J.T. Building at IDune crossover at
— I I — . mni-lislandAIA T-TckA%nr T-Tp;ahte
786 Lago Dr. Ocean Gardens Ln.
Puerto Del Rio Condos
t-1 E L_ l C 0 1 E R C Mfg A INJ Y
.... .. . ... . ... . m„m.. ..... .... .... . .... . . .....
i r p c f �' E) i � v c�, T u r � a, � i c' r"C f 190540 b (310) 5391 0�1)06 [Fax
CaICUlation of Community Noise LE-quivalent Level (C ELS For, the R44 11 Helicopter.
Reference NASA Contractor Report CR -2376, HANDBOOK OF NOISE RATINGS, Page 200,
Community Noise Equivalent Leveirnay be calculated without taking actual field noise measurements as
follows:
CNEL = SEL + 1 O*Iog (N,1 + 3*NF + I 01N,) - 49.4
Where: SEL is the Sound Exposure Level per flight (SEL has replaced Single Event Noise Exposure Level
(SENEL) as the preferreo baseline unit since initial publication of CR -2376).
N, is the number of daytime flights (7 AM to 7 PM) in a 24 hour period.
N;.: is the number of evening flights (7 PM to 10 PM) in a 24 hour period.
N, is the number of nighttime flights (10 PM to 7 AM) in a 24 hour period,
ftL can be seen that the equation logically vveights night operations and large numbers of operations heavily
as these have the greatest overall impact on the cornmunity. Conversely, occasional daytirne operations
have little effect on overall community noise.
The Sound Exposure Level for the R44 H helicopter Measured using Federal Aviation Regulation Pail 36,
Appendix ,J procedures is 131.0 dB(A), (Reference R44 H PHot's Operating Handbook. Page 5-7. attached.)
For a proposed site, aSSLime approxirnately 12 operations per month or 0.4 operations per day are
anticpated. Allowing one takeoff and one landing (2 'IYOVerS) per operation results in 0.8 flyovers per day -
Note that less that one flyover per day actually subtracts from the baseline SEL (log of a number less than
one is negative) Therefore. flyovers will be conservative@y rounded to one per day. No evening or night
operations are planned
FoT the R4411-3tthe proposed site
CNEL = 81,0 + 10"iog (11 + 0 + 0) - 49 4= 31.6 dB
Because the SEL!s measured during a 500 foot flyover, the calculated 3`9.6 dB CNEL can be approximated
as a 500 foot ring from the helipad. Standard free -field sound propagation produces a 6 dB change for each
halving or doubling of distance. Using this assurription, the 125, 250, 500, and 1000 foot rings of a
theoretical CNEL footprint for the R44 11 are plotted on the following page.
Dale Taft
Manager. FAA Cerdfication arid Experimental Flight Test
Robinson R44 Raven II Calculated Noise Footprint in CNEL
Refer to 21 Oct 2003 document, Calculation of Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for the R44 11 Helicopter_
ROBINSON SECTION 5
MODEL R44 U PERFORMANCE
SECTION 5
PERFORMANCE
CONTENTS
Page
General ................................ 5-1
Demonstrated Operating Temperature ............
5-1
Airspeed Calibration Curve ...................
5-2
Density Altitude Chart ......................
5-3
IGE Hover Ceiling Vs. Gross Weight .............
5-4
OGE Hover Ceiling Vs. Gross Weight ............
5-5
Height -Velocity Diagram ......................
5-6
Noise Characteristics .......................
5-7
FAA APPROVED: 3 OCT 2002 54
INTENTIONALLY BLANK
ROBINSON SECTION 5
MODEL R44 H PERFORMANCE
SECTION 5
PERFORMANCE
GENERAL
Information contained in Section 5 is approved by the
Federal Aviation Administration.
Hover controllability has been substantiated in 17 knot wind
from any direction up to 9800 feet density altitude. Refer
to IGE hover performance data for allowable gross weight.
Indicated airspeed (KIAS) shown on graphs assumes zero
instrument error.
CAUTION
Performance data presented in this section
was obtained under ideal conditions.
Performance under other conditions may be
substantially less.
DEMONSTRATED OPERATING TEMPERATURE
Satisfactory engine cooling has been demonstrated to an
outside air temperature of 38 ° C (100 ° F) at sea level or
23°C (41 °F) above ISA at altitude.
FAA APPROVED: 3 OCT 2002 5-1
ROBINSON SECTION 5
MODEL R44 1I PERFORMANCE
140
130
120
N
Q 110
U
Y 100
W90
W
N80
70
Q
W60
a 50
m 40
J
V30
20
10
NOTE: INDICATED AIRSPEED ASSUMES ZERO INSTRUMENT ERROR
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
INDICATED AIRSPEED - KIAS
AIRSPEED CALIBRATION CURVE
FAA APPROVED: 3 OCT 2002 5-2
ROBINSON SECTION 5
MODEL R" II PERFORMANCE
20
18
16
H
W
W 14
W
0
0 12
K
W 10
0
H
p 8
a
4
�. 6
H
M
W 4
Ci
2
0
-2
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
TEMPERATURE, DEGREES C
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
TEMPERATURE. DEGREES F
DENSITY ALTITUDE CHART
LSSA
P
FAA APPROVED: 3 OCT 2002 5-3
U-
0 0
0
0
X
C.
w
a
0
H
J
Q
W
U)
V3
W
ir
(-
ROBINSON SECT•
MODEL
14
13
12
m
9
8
rl
6
IN GROUND EFFECT AT 2 FOOT SKID HEIGHT
FULL THROTTLE
ZERO WIND
GROSS WEIGHT - KG
950 1000 1050 1100 1150
2100 2200 2300 2400 2500
GROSS WEIGHT - LB
F
22
4
L4
32
50
58
36
04
IGE HOVER CEILING V5. GROSS WEIGHT
*Hover controllability with 17 knot wind substantiated
up to 9800 feet density altitude.
-��AA APPROVED: 3 OCT 2! 4 4444
DENSITY ALTITUDE
9800 FT*
MEN■ii
2100 2200 2300 2400 2500
GROSS WEIGHT - LB
F
22
4
L4
32
50
58
36
04
IGE HOVER CEILING V5. GROSS WEIGHT
*Hover controllability with 17 knot wind substantiated
up to 9800 feet density altitude.
-��AA APPROVED: 3 OCT 2! 4 4444
C7
Q
F-
W
W
ROBINSON SECTION 5
MODEL R44II PERFORMANCE
DEMONSTRATED CONDITIONS:
SMOOTH HARD SURFACE
WIND CALM
AVOID OPERATION IN SHADED AREAS
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
KIAS
FAA APPROVED: 3 OCT 2002 5-6
ROBINSON SECTION 5
MODEL R44 II PERFORMANCE
NOISE CHARACTERISTICS
The following noise level complies with 14 CFR Part 36,
Appendix J noise requirements and was obtained from
FAA -approved data from actual noise tests.
Model: R44 H
Engine: Lycoming 10-540-AE1A5
Gross Weight: 2500 lb (1134 Kg)
Vh: 109 KTAS
The Sound Exposure Level (SEL) for a level flyover at 492
feel AGL is 80.9 dB(A) for a clean helicopter configuration
with doors on.
NOTE
No determination has been made by the Federal
Aviation Administration that the noise level is
or should be acceptable or unacceptable for
operation at, into, or out of any airport.
FAA APPROVED: 10 JUL 2012 5-7
Barry Brown
From: Mark Grainger < mark@floridabiplanes.com >
Sent Sunday, May 05, 2013 2:22 PM
To: Barry Brown
Subject: 1*** SUSPECTED SPAM ***] Help with Helicopter operations approval
Attachments: FAA AC Helipads.pdf, ATT00001.htm; Florida Aviation Database - Private Airport
Registration & Site Approval.pdf; ATT00002.htm
Hi Barry,
I thought you might want to have access to a document from the FAA with regards to requirements for a
helipad.
I have attached FAA AC 150/5390-2C (Advisory Circular) which describes in detail the FAA's
recommendations for helpads. Note that these are guidelines only, however it is my intent to follow them to the
letter in my application with the FAA for the helipad.
Please understand that I will be filing FAA Form 7480-1 (Notice of Landing Area Proposal) for a PPR (Prior
Permission Required) heliport. This is a privately owned/operated field that is available to the general public
with "Prior Permission Required" from the helipad owner/operator. Paragraph 110 (C) is where you will find
the meat of what the P&Z board is looking for with regards to "what's the FAA's requirements for Mark putting
a helipad in our city". Note that the FAA's role is wholly based on the operational aspects of the field (nearness
to obstacles, size of landing field, impact of nearby airspace issues (There are no issues with any of these, btw).
Also please look at paragraphs 115 & 116. They discuss state and local roles.... basically say the FAA just wants
to make sure the applicant abides by those.
The FDOT simply has an application (on line) that requires that I "abide by local codes/regulations".
I have also attached a pdf taken from the FDOT website that is basically the online application the State of
Florida uses for airport registration. If you look thru it, you will see that is lists many steps that are all "maintain
a copy of......." and those steps spell out what the state is looking for .... (basically local approval and FAA
approval)
The big picture is that the State approves the heliport if I am in compliance with the FAA and all local
ordinances (which my application with the city is for), and the FAA approves the heliport by conducting an
"aeronautical study" to make sure it is safe with regards to the immediate ground operations and areas, has
appropriate arrival/departure pathways, and has no impact, nor is impacted by any existing nearby airspace
restrictions. (I have spoken on several occasions with FAA representatives and am thoroughly familiar with all
their requirements. I made sure both Mr. Mays' lot as well as the Beer company lot meet or exceed all these
(and any other) requirements.
Hope that helps.
I am off to Europe twice this week but available by email if you have any questions. Also, if you need the phone
number of the FAA guy in Orlando who handles all the above, let me know.
I am very hopeful that we can get back on the next soonest meeting agenda as possible.
Best,
Mark
Mark Grainger
President
AC 150/5390-2C 4/24/2012
uu. Unshielded obstruction. A proposed or existing obstruction that may need to be marked or
lighted since it is not near another marked and lighted obstruction whose highest point is at the same or
higher elevation.
109. Selection of approach/departure paths. Design heliports to the extent practicable for two
approach/departure paths. Consider items such as the following in selecting the approach/departure paths:
a. Wind. Well-designed approach/departure paths permit pilots to avoid downwind conditions
and minimize crosswind operations. Align the preferred flight approach/departure path, to the extent
feasible, with the predominant wind direction. Base other approach/departure paths on the assessment of
the prevailing winds or, when this information is not available, separate such flight paths and the
preferred flight path by at least 135 degrees. If it is not feasible to provide complete coverage of wind
through multiple approach/departure paths, operational limitations may be necessary under certain wind
conditions. See paragraph 101.
b. Obstructions. In determining approach/departure paths, take into account the obstructions in
the vicinity of the heliport and, in particular, those likely to be a hazard to air navigation. See paragraph
111.
c. Environmental impacts. In environmentally sensitive areas, select the final
approach/departure path(s) to minimize any environmental impact, providing it does not decrease flight
safety. See paragraph 113.
110. Notification requirements. Part 157 sets requirements for persons proposing to construct,
activate, deactivate, or alter a heliport to give advance notice of their intent to the FAA. This includes
changing the size or number of FATOs; adding, deleting, or changing an approach or departure route; or
changing heliport status. An example of a heliport status change would be a change from private to public
use or vice versa. When notification is required, file Form 7480-1 (see Figure 1-1) with the appropriate
FAA Airports Regional or District Office at least 90 days before construction, alteration, deactivation, or
change in use. See the FAA Airports web site at htip://www.faa.gov/airports/ for contact information.
a. Draw the heliport layout plan to scale showing key dimensions, such as the heliport elevation,
TLOF size, FATO size, safety area size, distance from safety area perimeter to property edges, and
approach/departure paths showing locations of buildings, trees, fences, power lines, obstructions (including
elevations), schools, churches, hospitals, residential communities, waste disposal sites, and other significant
features as specified on Form 7480-1 and as suggested in Figure 1-2.
b. The preferred type of location map is the 7.5 -minute U.S. Geological Survey Quadrangle Map,
available from the US Geological Survey at nationalmap.gov. Web -based maps are also acceptable. Show
the location of the heliport site and the approach/departure paths on the map. Point out the heliport site on
this map with an arrow. Indicate the latitude and longitude of the proposed heliport in North American
Datum of 1983 (NAD -83) coordinates. See Figure 1-3.
c. The FAA role. The FAA will conduct an aeronautical study of the proposed heliport under
part 157. Title 14 CFR Part 157.7, FAA determinations, states: "The FAA will conduct an aeronautical
study of an airport proposal and, after consultations with interested persons, as appropriate, issue a
determination to the proponent and advise those concerned of the FAA determination. The FAA will
consider matters such as the effects the proposed action would have on existing or contemplated traffic
patterns of neighboring airports; the effects the proposed action would have on the existing airspace
structure and projected programs of the FAA; and the effects that existing or proposed manmade objects
(on file with the FAA) and natural objects within the affected area would have on the airport proposal.
While determinations consider the effects of the proposed action on the safe and efficient use of airspace
by aircraft and the safety of persons and property on the ground, the determinations are only advisory.
Except for an objectionable determination, each determination will contain a determination -void date to
4/24/2012
AC 150/5390-2C
facilitate efficient planning of the use of the navigable airspace. A determination does not relieve the
proponent of responsibility for compliance with any local law, ordinance or regulation, or state or other
federal regulation. Aeronautical studies and determinations will not consider environmental or land use
compatibility impacts."
U.S. DepaMiera of Transportation NOTICE OF LANDING AREA PROPOSAL
Fed -1 AVWVM AdminlaWlan
Name of Proponent, Individual , or Organization
Address of Proponent, Individual , or Organization
(No., Street, City, State, Zip Code)
❑Check if the property owner's name and address are different than above,
and fist property owner's name and address on the reverse.
Establishment or Activation Deactivation or Abandonment Airport Ultraflight Flightpark Vertiport
❑ Alteration ❑Change of Status } OF ❑Heliport ❑ Seaplane Base ❑ Other (Specify)
A. Location of Lending Area
1. Associated City/State 2. County/State (Physical Location of Airport)
3. Distance and Direction From
Associated City or Town
6. Name of Landing Area 5. Latitude
6. Longitude
7. Elevation
Miles
Direction
B. Purpose
Type Use
❑ Public
❑ Private
Use of Public Land/Waters
If Change of Status or Alteration, Describe Change U
ient or
Establshm
change to traMc
pattern (Describe
on reverse
Construction Dates
To BegInMegan
Est. CompletionE3Private
C. Other Landing Areas
Ref. A5
aboveta
p se
Direction
From
Landing
Area
Distance
From
Landing
Area
Se. or FlicthtparkRwy 81 Rwy #2 Rwy 03 Rwy Rwy Rwy
Magnetic Bearing of Runway (s) or
Sealane
Length of Runway (s) or Sealane (s)
in Feet
Width of Runway (s) or Sealane (s)
In Feet
Type of Runway Surface
(Concrete, Asphalt, Turf, Etc.)
2. Heliport
Dimensions of Final Approach and
Take off Area (FATO) in Feet
Dimensions of Touchdown and
Lift -Off Area (TLOF) in Feet
Magnetic Direction of Ingress(Egress
Routes
E.Obstrucflons
Direction
From
Landing
Area
Distance
From
Landing
Area
Type
a"dam
La,
r,,,aap
Type of Surface
(Turf, concrete, rooftop, etc.)
3. All
L -rift
Description of Lighting (If any)
Direction of Prevailing Wind
A—
F. Operational Data
1. Estimated or Actual Number Based Aircraft
Airport. Present Anticipated Heliport Present Anticipated
Ffl"6rk, (It est. Indicate 5 Years (If est. indicate 5 Years
Seaplane base by letter -E7 Hence by letter "E') Hence
Multi -engine iYtl WC ra. MGW
Single-engine 0-rww m .Mow
Gilder
G. Other Considerations
Direction
From
Landing
Area
Distance
From
Landing
Area
2. Average Number Monthfy Landings
Identification
Present Anticipated Present Anticipated
(It est. Indicate 5 Years (k est. Indicate 5 Years
by letter -E-) Hence by letter'E' Hence
Helicopter
Turboprop Ulralight
Prop Glider
3. Are IFR Procedures For The Airport Anticipated
❑ No ❑ Yes Within Years Type Navaid:
[H�.AppflcEation for Airport LkrensingMade❑
Not Required ❑ County
ade ❑ State ❑ Municipal Authority
I. CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby certify
that all of the above statements
made by me are true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Name, title (and address if different than above) of person filing
this notice —type or print
Signature (in Ink)
CAA c...... "nn..��...__
Date of Signature
—
Telephone No. (Precede with area code)
—� .. ..+......... . c.,.....i ��.u;, . a.ene9. neg— CIO44aNC newebn per AGE 825 (1•97)
Figure 1-1. Form 7480-1, Notice of Landing Area Proposal
AC 150/5390-2C
4/24/2012
— – – – — EARHART AVENUE – – –
----------- ---
FATO LIGHTS
.� FLUSH TLOF PERIMETER LIGHTS �.
LANDING DIRECTION APPROACH/
° I ° °1 �' I DEPARTURE
LIGHTS SURFACE
APPROACH/ I i TLOF r•
DEPARTURE I i
SURFACE — _f _ IN -GROUND FATO EDGE MARKERS
L — — — — — SAFETY AREA
HELIPORT PROPERTY LINE
Note: Draw layout diagramsto scale with key dimensions shown as TLOF size, FATO
size, safety area size, distances from safety area perimeter to property edges, etc.
Figure 1-2. Example of a Heliport Layout Plan
d. Penalty for failure to provide notice. Persons who fail to give notice are subject to civil
penalty under Title 49 United States Code 46301, Civil Penalties, of not more than $25,000 (or $1,100 if the
person is an individual or small business concern).
e. Notice exemptions. Paragraph 157.1, Applicability, of part 157 exempts sites meeting one of
the conditions below from the requirement to submit notice. These exemptions do not negate a notice or
formal approval requirement prescribed by state law or local ordinance. For the purposes of applying the
part 157 exemption criteria cited in (2) and (3) below, a landing and associated takeoff is considered to be
one operation. Part 157.1 projects are:
(1) [A heliport] subject to conditions of a federal agreement that requires an
approved current heliport layout plan to be on file with the FAA, or
(2) [A heliport] at which flight operations will be conducted under visual
flight rules (VFR) and which is used or intended to be used for a period of less than 30
consecutive days with no more than 10 operations per day.
AUTO PARKING AREA
N
w
w
rL
aOFFICE
a
FUTURE HELICOPTER PARKING
U
1
U
----------- ---
FATO LIGHTS
.� FLUSH TLOF PERIMETER LIGHTS �.
LANDING DIRECTION APPROACH/
° I ° °1 �' I DEPARTURE
LIGHTS SURFACE
APPROACH/ I i TLOF r•
DEPARTURE I i
SURFACE — _f _ IN -GROUND FATO EDGE MARKERS
L — — — — — SAFETY AREA
HELIPORT PROPERTY LINE
Note: Draw layout diagramsto scale with key dimensions shown as TLOF size, FATO
size, safety area size, distances from safety area perimeter to property edges, etc.
Figure 1-2. Example of a Heliport Layout Plan
d. Penalty for failure to provide notice. Persons who fail to give notice are subject to civil
penalty under Title 49 United States Code 46301, Civil Penalties, of not more than $25,000 (or $1,100 if the
person is an individual or small business concern).
e. Notice exemptions. Paragraph 157.1, Applicability, of part 157 exempts sites meeting one of
the conditions below from the requirement to submit notice. These exemptions do not negate a notice or
formal approval requirement prescribed by state law or local ordinance. For the purposes of applying the
part 157 exemption criteria cited in (2) and (3) below, a landing and associated takeoff is considered to be
one operation. Part 157.1 projects are:
(1) [A heliport] subject to conditions of a federal agreement that requires an
approved current heliport layout plan to be on file with the FAA, or
(2) [A heliport] at which flight operations will be conducted under visual
flight rules (VFR) and which is used or intended to be used for a period of less than 30
consecutive days with no more than 10 operations per day.
P rwil' e Ah�,) i,; r�3,,,, Stl
Introduction
As of October 1, 2003, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) requires all private airports, heliports and ultralight facilities to register with the State of Florida.
Private seaplane bases are now exempt from registration, ie. if you operate your aircraft from any body of water; you no longer are required to notify FDOT. You may still be
required to notify the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) vial yr it 7F9 C),:.:I-, Notice of Landing Area Proposal. FAA Form 7480-1.pdf
Private airports with ten or more based aircraft may request to be inspected and licensed by the Department. However, all private airports must complete the online site
approval and registration process prior to requesting licensure. For licensure inquiries, contact the Airport Inspection and Safety Manager at 850-414-4500. Additional
information is available at C-P)6L ,, we,[ L>.
Beginning the Site Approval Process - Print this page for future reference.
There are several steps in order to receive site approval and register your facility. First you will need to create an account with the department's Private Airport Registration
and Site Approval web site. Upon submittal, a login name and password will be emailed to you via the email address you provide along with a link back to the Private Airport
Registration and Site Approval web site.
Once you have created an account, login using the login name and password and begin your private airport site approval process. The Site Approval Data Entry Wizard will take
you through 3 steps. First you will select the type of facility you will be operating. Second you wilt be asked to confirm your contact information, provide facility and landing
area data and the third and final step will be to certify the following information.
Note: Private airport applicants are not required to submit supporting documentation to FDOT. However, all private airport site approval applicants shall retain, in their
personal possession, all of the required documentation related to this site approval application, in order to be able to respond to any future local, state, or federal
inquiry.
® Property Rights - Airport site approval applicant shalt maintain proof of ownership, option to buy, or lease agreement for the real property that comprises the site
on which the proposed airport would be located. Although adequate safety areas surrounding an airport site are important and a factor in consideration of the
Department's approval determination, the applicant is not required to hold property rights over those real property areas that would constitute runway approach
surfaces.
® Local Government - Maintain a copy of each of the letters of notification, showing the recipient's name and mailing address, that have been submitted to each
zoning authority having jurisdiction for the municipality and county in which the site lies or which is Located within five (5) nautical miles of the proposed airport
site. The applicant shall also maintain a copy of all related correspondence from each city or county authority, including a statement that the proposed airport site
is in compliance with local zoning requirements or that such requirements are not applicable.
o FAA Approval - Maintain a copy of the notification to the FAA for the proposed airport site and a copy of the FAA's airspace approval correspondence.
e Facility Diagram - Maintain a scale drawing showing the size and dimensions of the proposed facility; property rights-of-way and easements; lighting, power, and
telephone poles; location of buildings) on property and surrounding areas; direction, distance, and height of all structures over 25 feet within 1,000 feet of the site
perimeter.
® Geodetic Position - Maintain a copy of a U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle map or equivalent with the proposed site plotted to the nearest second of latitude and
longitude.
® Location Map - Maintain a copy of a map or sketch, at least 8.5 x 11 inch in size, showing the location of the proposed site with respect to recognizable landmarks
and access roads to the site clearly marked.
m Aviation Facilities - Maintain a list of names and mailing addresses for adjacent airports, including a sample copy of the letter submitted as proposal notification to
these airports, and keep a copy of all airport correspondence in reply.
1. For a proposed airport, list all VFR airports and heliports within five (5) nautical miles and all IFR airports within 20 nautical miles.
2. For a proposed heliport, list at[ VFR airports and heliports within three (3) nautical miles and all IFR airports within 10 nautical miles.
e Adjacent Property - Maintain a list of the names and mailing addresses of all real property owners within 1,000 feet of the airport site perimeter or within 300 feet
of the heliport or helistop site perimeter, including a single copy of the letter of notification submitted as notification to these adjacent real property owners, and
keep a copy of all real property owner correspondence in reply.
« Public Notice - Maintain a copy of the notice and of the letter, showing the recipient's name and mailing address, requesting publication of notification of the
proposed airport site in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the proposed airport site is located and counties within five (5) nautical miles of
the proposed airport site.
« Waste Sites - Maintain written confirmation that the runway(s) on the proposed airport would not be located within 5,000 feet of any solid waste management
facility, for a proposed airport serving only non -turbine aircraft, or within 10,000 feet of any solid waste management facility for a proposed airport serving turbine -
driven aircraft.
• Air -Traffic Pattern - Maintain written confirmation, including a graphical depiction, demonstrating that safe air-traffic patterns can be established for the proposed
airport with all existing and approved airport sites within three (3) miles of the proposed airport site. Keep a copy of a written memorandum of understanding or
letter of agreement regarding air-traffic pattern separation procedures between the parties representing the proposed airport and any existing airports or approved
airport sites located within three (3) mites of the proposed site.
• Safety Factors - Maintain written confirmation that the runway and taxiway design criteria and airport design layout of the proposed airport have appropriately
taken into account consideration of the manufacturer's performance characteristics for the type(s) of aircraft planned to be operated; the frequency and type(s) of
flight operations to be anticipated; planned aviation -related or non -aviation activities on the airport; and any other safety considerations, as necessary, to ensure
the general public health, safety, and welfare of persons located on or near the airport, as may be required by the Department for licensing or registration.
o Security Factors - Maintain written confirmation that the proposed airport site owner or lessee, as appropriate, is aware of their responsibility to protect the
general public health, safety, and welfare through secure airport operations and that they wit( develop and implement appropriate airport security measures to
safeguard airport and aviation -related assets from misappropriation or misuse in order to prevent potential loss or public endangerment, as may be required by the
Department for licensing or registration.
Upon submittal, FDOT will respond with an approval or denial to the email address you provided within 30 days. You may also check your airport's site approval status by
togging into FDOT's Private Airport Registration and Site Approval web site.
Airport site approval becomes final 45 days after issuance and is valid for 2 years. Once the airport site approval has become final, you may register your airport. If your
airport is not registered by the airport site approval expiration date, a new airport site approval is required.
Private Airport Registration
Private airport registration is valid for a period of 2 years. You may certify your airport's information at any time within 2 years. The registration is then valid for an additional
2 -year period. Failure to certify the airport's data by the registration expiration date will require a new airport site approval.
If you require assistance, please contact the Airport Registration Program Manager at 850-414-4500 or email at i puji(,�flugda wihtiondatobasr mom.
12/20/2012
3/3/11
8900.1 CHG 140
VOLUME 8 GENERAL TECHNICAL FUNCTIONS
CHAPTER 3 MISCELLANEOUS TECHNICAL FUNCTIONS
Section 3 Evaluation and Surveillance of Heliports
8-210 PROGRAM TRACKING AND REPORTING SUBSYSTEM (PTRS) ACTIVITY
CODE. Initial evaluation: 1695.
8-211 OBJECTIVE. The objective of this task is to perform an evaluation of a proposed or
existing heliport. Successful completion of this task results in a completed heliport evaluation
report to the Airport Division through the regional Flight Standards division (RFSD)
All Weather Operations Program Manager (AWOPM).
8-212 PREREQUISITES AND COORDINATION REQUIREMENTS.
A. Document Prerequisites. The heliport proponent should have submitted the
following documents for the evaluation packet:
1) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Form 7480-1, Notice of Landing Area
Proposal, with the applicable data filled;
2) The heliport layout diagram that is drawn to scale showing key dimensions of the
heliport size, safety area size, distance from safety area perimeter to property edges, and
approach/departure paths in relation to buildings, trees, fences, power lines, and other significant
features; and
3) A heliport location map showing the location of the heliport site and the
approach/departure paths (on this map, an arrow should point out the heliport site).
B. Personnel Prerequisites. This task requires knowledge of the regulatory
requirements of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) parts 77 and 157, the
current editions of FAA Order 7400.2, Procedures of Handling Airspace Matters, Advisory
Circular (AC) 150/5390-2, Heliport Design, and FAA policy. The following personnel are
authorized to conduct heliport evaluations:
1) An FAA Flight Standards Operations aviation safety inspector (ASI) or an FAA
Airspace System Inspection Pilot (ASIP); and/or
2) A Procedure Evaluation Pilot (PEP) that is authorized by the Flight Technologies
and Procedures Division, AFS -400, to conduct heliport evaluations of heliports per this
guidance.
C. Equipment Prerequisites. The following equipment is the minimum needed in order
to complete an onsite evaluation of the proposed heliport:
1) Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver capable of verifying latitude and
longitude in degrees, minutes, and seconds,
1
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11
2) Inclinometer and compass,
3) Laser range finder,
4) One hundred foot tape measure,
5) Digital camera, and
6) Calculator that is capable of doing tangent functions.
8900.1 CHG 140
D. Coordination. This task may require the Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) to
coordinate with the Regional Airports Division, RFSD AWOPM, and the applicant/owner or
operators of the heliport being evaluated.
8-213 HELIPORTS.
A. Types of Heliports. Heliports are one of two types: public use or prior permission
required (PPR), also known as a private heliport. Both types can be used for either General
Aviation (GA), which is the most common, or transport helicopters. Heliport specifics on both
can be found in AC 150/5390-2. The evaluator must determine if the heliport will be limited to
PPR use or for public use, and if it is for GA or transport helicopters.
1) Public use heliports can be publicly or privately owned and can be used by any
qualified pilot without requirements for prior approval from the owner or operator. The evaluator
should consider the heliport facility requirements with regards to AC 150/5390-2 if they are to be
used in the pubic interest; e.g., air carrier usage.
2) A PPR heliport is developed for exclusive use of the owner and persons
authorized by the owner. The heliport owner and operator should ensure that all pilots are
thoroughly knowledgeable about the heliport (including such features as approach/departure path
characteristics, preferred heading, facility limitations, lighting, obstacles in the area, size of the
facility, etc.).
3) Heliports at hospitals should be treated as special cases because they are used by
professional helicopter pilots providing a unique public service. Hospital heliports may be either
PPR or public use. They are normally located in close proximity to a hospital emergency room or
medical facility. Special considerations for standards relevant to a hospital heliport are found in
AC 150/5390-2.
B. Definitions and Elements of a Heliport. See Figure 8-113, Helipad Minimum
Dimensions for General Aviation Heliports Job Aid, in this guidance for heliport layout and
dimensions.
1) Heliport Location. Heliports may be located on the ground, water, rooftop level,
or helideck.
2) Touchdown and Liftoff Area (TLOF). A TLOF is a load-bearing helideck or
helipad normally centered in the Final Approach and Takeoff Area (FATO) where the helicopter
2
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11
8900.1 CHG 140
lands or takes off. The TLOF must be at least 1 times the rotor diameter of the design helicopter
of intended use. Dimensions of the design helicopter are used to determine the size of the TLOF
and can be found in Figure 8-1, Helicopter Data Chart Job Aid, and Figure 8-1A, Helicopter
Dimension Data Job Aid, of this guidance.
3) FATO. A FATO is a defined area over which the final phase of the approach to a
hover or a landing is completed and from which the takeoff is initiated. The FATO may include
one or more TLOFs within its borders at which arriving helicopters terminate their approach in a
hover or a landing. Objects or structures should be outside the FATO to permit at least one clear
approach/takeoff path aligned with the prevailing winds. The FATO must be at least 1.5 times
the overall length of the design helicopter (the helicopter, usually the largest for which the
helipad was designed) of intended use. Dimensions of the design helicopter are used to
determine the size of the FATO and can be found in Figures 8-1 and 8 -IA.
4) Safety Area. The safety area is a defined area on a heliport surrounding the
FATO, intended to reduce the risk of damage to helicopters accidentally diverging from the
FATO. The actual width of the safety area is determined by the ultimate use of the heliport and
the suggested dimensions can be found in AC 150/5390-2.
The FATO and the safety area must be free and clear of objects such as parked helicopters,
buildings, fences, or objects that could be struck by the main or tail rotor or catch the skids of an
arriving or departing helicopter. The safety area may have frangible mounted objects required for
Air Navigation (AN) purposes.
5) Protection Zone. A protection zone is an area off the end of the FATO and under
the approach/takeoff path, established to provide for the protection of people and property on the
ground. The protection zone is the area under the 8:1 approach/departure surface starting at the
FATO perimeter and extending out for a distance of 280 feet (400 feet for transport helicopters).
The heliport proponent should own or control the property containing the protection zone. This
control should include the ability to clear incompatible objects and to preclude the congregation
of people. For PPR heliports, a protection zone is optional.
6) Approach/Takeoff Path. The approach/takeoff path, also known as the
ingress/egress routes for the heliport, has a clear slope free of objects. The clear slope is an
imaginary 8:1 slope (8 units horizontal and 1 unit vertical, or 7.125 degrees) surface centered on
the approach/takeoff path and conforms to the dimensions of part 77 subpart C, Obstruction
Standards. The slope can be determined by the use of an inclinometer. The actual dimensions of
the approach/takeoff path can be found in AC 150/5390-2.
a) Approach/takeoff paths should avoid congested areas, heavily populated
urban areas, existing air traffic operations, or environmentally sensitive areas. The function is to
enhance the protection of persons and property on the ground, to permit the clearing of
incompatible objects, or to exclude congregations of persons or activities from the
approach/takeoff surface. Approach/takeoff paths may curve to avoid objects and/or
noise -sensitive areas. In many situations, portions of the approach/takeoff paths can use the
airspace existing above public lands and waters, freeways, streets, parks, rivers, and lakes.
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11 8900.1 CHG 140
NOTE: There is currently no guidance on curved approach/takeoff paths.
b) Public use heliports should have more than one approach/takeoff path aligned
as nearly as possible with the prevailing winds. Public use heliports should have an 8:1 sloped
approach/takeoff path protection zone to a distance of 4,000 feet from the forward edge of the
FATO.
c) A PPR use heliport will have at least one approach/takeoff path. It is
recommended that a second approach/takeoff path (when site conditions permit) will provide an
additional safety margin as well as operational flexibility.
8-214 REFERENCES, FORMS, AND JOB AIDS.
A. References (current editions):
• Title 14 CFR Parts 1, 77, and 157;
• Program Tracking and Reporting Subsystem Procedures Manual (PPM);
• AC 20-35, Tiedown Sense;
• AC 70/7460-1, Obstruction Marking and Lighting;
• AC 150/5020-1, Noise Control and Compatibility Planning for Airports;
• AC 150/5190-4, A Model Zoning Ordinance to Limit Height of Objects Around
Airports;
• AC 150/5200-30, Airport Winter Safety and Operations;
• AC 150/5230-4, Aircraft Fuel Storage, Handling, and Dispensing on Airports;
• AC 150/5345-27, Specification for Wind Cone Assemblies;
• AC 150/5345-28, Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) Systems;
• AC 150/5345-52, Generic Visual Glideslope Indicators (GVGI);
• AC 150/5390-2, Heliport Design;
• AC 150/5390-3, Vertiport Design;
• FAA Order 1050.1, Policies and Procedures for Considering Environmental
Impacts;
• FAA Order 5050.4, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Implementing
Instructions for Airport Projects;
• FAA Order 7400.2, Procedures of Handling Airspace Matters;
• Office of Environment and Energy Noise Division (AEE -100), Helicopter Noise
Model;
• National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Pamphlet 10: Standard for Portable
Fire Extinguishers;
• NFPA Pamphlet 403: Standard for Aircraft Rescue and Fire -Fighting Services at
Airports; and
• NFPA Pamphlet 418: Standard for Heliports.
B. Forms. FAA Form 7480-1, Notice of Landing Area Proposal, can be found at
http://forms.faa.gov/forms/faa7480- l .pdf.
C. Job Aids. Included in this guidance:
4
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11 8900.1 CHG 140
• Figure 8-1, Helicopter Data Chart Job Aid;
• Figure 8-1A, Helicopter Dimension Data Job Aid;
• Figure 8-1B, Helipad Minimum Dimensions for General Aviation Heliports Job
Aid;
• Figure 8-1 C, Heliport Evaluation Process Flow Chart (Normally Accomplish);
• Figure 8-2, Heliport Evaluation Checklist Job Aid; and
• Figure 8-213, How to Determine Obstruction Height Job Aid.
8-215 GENERAL. Not applicable to PEPs. A flowchart is provided in Figure 8-1C for
informational purposes of the heliport evaluation process.
A. Request for Onsite Evaluation. The Airports Division (ADO) will enter the heliport
information into the Obstruction Evaluation/Airport Airspace Analysis (IOE/AAA) database as a
Non -Rulemaking Airport (NRA) action and the ADO or RFSD will forward the NRA to the
FSDO requesting an onsite evaluation. The FSDO manager assigns an inspector to the evaluation
task or requests the RFSD AWOPM for support. A helicopter operations inspector or the most
qualified person (with respect to helicopter operations) should be assigned to evaluate the
proposal.
B. Evaluation Reference Materials. To evaluate proposed and existing heliports and to
resolve an applicant's questions, the delegated inspector needs to be familiar with the contents of
AC 150/5390-2, FAA Order 7400.2, parts 77 and 157, and the guidance in this section.
C. Data Required. It is the responsibility of the FSDO to determine if helicopter flight
operations can be conducted safely within specified current guidelines and regulations. The
FSDO evaluates the suitability of the proposed or existing heliport and advises the RFSD
AWOPM of the findings. For recording the factual data, Figure 8-2 is provided in this guidance
to assist the inspector on the heliport evaluation.
8-216 PROCEDURES.
A. Open PTRS. Upon receipt of a heliport evaluation request, open a PTRS 1695 file.
B. Contact Applicant. Contact the applicant to ensure the following items have been
completed or are being considered:
1) The appropriate building permit and zoning application approval from the local
municipality, if applicable. Some communities have enacted zoning laws, building codes, and
fire regulations that can impact heliport establishment and operation, so the applicant is
encouraged to contact the local zoning authorities and inform them of the proposed heliport.
2) The appropriate approval from the State aviation authorities (AA), if applicable.
Many State AAs require prior approval or licensing for the establishment and operation of a
heliport, so the applicant is encouraged to contact the State AA to inform them of the proposed
heliport.
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11
8900.1 CHG 140
3) The designation of the responsible agent for completion of the Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) has been addressed in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1. Contact the
RFSD AWOPM if there are any questions on this issue.
C. Application Review. The evaluator reviews and confirms the details on
FAA Form 7480-1 for accuracy and completeness by conducting an onsite evaluation. The
evaluator may use Figure 8-2, to help in confirming and recording the details of the evaluation.
The following are guidelines for the required sections on the FAA Form 7480-1:
1) Section A. Determine that the geographic coordinates shown on
FAA Form 7480-1 are the same as the actual location. Use of a GPS receiver is necessary to
determine the latitude/longitude (in degrees, minutes, and seconds), elevation, and
distance/direction information for the heliport. If there is a large discrepancy between the actual
coordinates and FAA Form 7480-1, the evaluator should make note of this on the checklist job
aid and consult with the RFSD AWOPM.
2) Section B. Determine the proposed use and type design helicopter to be used.
Public use or PPR (private) use determines the standards for dimensional requirements.
3) Section C. Consider other visual flight rules (VFR) of landing areas located
within 5 nautical miles (NM) of the proposed site and instrument flight rules (IFR) of
airports/heliports within 20 NMs. Use of an aviation GPS receiver can be used to determine this
information.
4) Section D. Using Figures 8-1 and 8-1A, determine the design helicopter size of
intended use for designed surface, FATO area, TLOF areas, approach/takeoff paths, and safety
protection zones, as required.
a) Determine suitability of site location with regard to approach/takeoff paths.
b) Verify that the dimensions of the FATO listed in Section D2 of
FAA Form 7480-1 are equal to or larger than the dimensions shown in the design criteria of
AC 150/5390-2.
c) Verify that the dimensions of the TLOF listed in Section D2 of
FAA Form 7480-1 are equal to or larger than the dimensions shown in the design criteria of
AC 150/5390-2. The minimum TLOF dimensions should be equivalent to the rotor diameter of
the design helicopter of intended use. Refer to AC 150/5390-2 for specific dimensions and
requirements on unique helipads; e.g., elevated heliports, heliports used by transport helicopters,
or PPR heliports that are partially paved.
d) Confirm the type of surface of the touchdown area listed in Section D2 of
FAA Form 7480-1.
e) Verify that the information provided is enough to advise the applicant of the
suitability of the proposed landing surface, and ensure that the applicant is aware of the
following penalties or advantages associated with various TLOF surfaces:
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11
8900.1 CHG 140
1. Loose surface(s) (gravel, dirt, etc.) may cause visibility problems or
foreign object damage (FOD) to the engines or blades;
2. Soft asphalt may cause dynamic roll-over; and/or
3. Soft surfaces may contain ruts or surface irregularities.
f) A general inspection of the heliport should be completed and any of the
following miscellaneous items annotated if applicable:
• Wire marking;
• Wind direction indicators/windsock;
• Rescue and firefighting equipment and access;
• Security, including fences, personnel safety devices, nets, if elevated,
escape netting, and evacuation routes;
• Parking, access gates, signs;
• Surface markings (do the heliport's construction, markings, and safety
features meet the requirements of AC 150/5390-2 criteria);
• Communications systems, equipment, and procedures;
• Fueling systems, equipment, markings, signs, and fencing;
• Is Magnetic Resonance Imagery (MRI) equipment nearby;
• Taxiway/taxi routes;
• Heliport parking;
• Heliport markers and marking;
• Heliport lighting;
• Marking and lighting of obstructions;
• Safety enhancements;
• Personnel access and control;
• Anything noteworthy of the TLOF, FATO, safety area, and the
approach/takeoff paths; and
• Zoning and compatible land use consideration.
NOTE: Contact the RFSD AWOPM if there are any questions on any of the
above subjects or issues.
g) Determine the adequacy of lighting, if any, for the intended operation and
direction of prevailing winds. Prevailing winds may be determined through contact with the
National Weather Service (NWS) or other appropriate source.
5) Section E. Determine if a visual inspection of the proposed area is necessary to
confirm obstructions that may affect operations. Log the type of obstruction and height above the
helipad that is within 5,000 feet and which penetrate the 25:1 surface (2 degrees elevation). Use
of an inclinometer, laser range finder, scientific calculator, and the job aids found in this
guidance can be used to accurately determine obstructions and their height. See Figure 8-2A and
Figure 8-213 for help on the obstruction calculations.
7
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11
Figure 8-2A, Obstructions to Annotate
8900.1 CHG 140
r --- ------ —------- ---------—
• raa era
Tot. Awo (FATO)
� I1
�I
25:1 SURFACE /
6) Section F. Determine if the applicant's projected information is suitable. The
weight-bearing capacity of the landing area should be no less than 1.5 times the maximum gross
landing weight of the design helicopter of intended use. The applicant is responsible for the
structural integrity of the landing area. The applicant should consult with a contractor or architect
to ensure that elevated or rooftop landing sites are capable of supporting a landing helicopter
with adequate safety margin.
7) Section G.
a) List schools, churches, and residential communities within 1 NM. Hospitals
and wildlife areas are also noted due to the noise sensitivity issue. Although potential
noise -sensitive areas are not safety related, the applicant needs to know of them so that the
helicopter operators are aware of the areas and try to avoid them whenever possible.
b) FAA Order 1050.1, AC 150/5020-1, and the Helicopter Noise Model,
available from the Office of Environment and Energy Noise Division (AEE -100), can provide
the applicant with additional information.
8) Section H. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain the required State and local
permits, authorizations, and licensing. Zoning ordinances and local permits are not a Federal
issue and are handled by the State and local government, but the applicant is encouraged to
coordinate with the State and local authorities for heliport establishment and operation.
9) Section I. Check for completeness.
8
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11
D. Submit Report.
8900.1 CHG 140
1) Submit the completed report, including the checklist and completed evaluation to
the RFSD AWOPM with one of the following conclusions and statements:
a) "No objection." It will not adversely affect the safe and efficient use of
airspace by aircraft.
b) "No objection with provisions." It will not adversely affect the safe and
efficient use of airspace by aircraft provided (give conditions). The following are examples (but
not all) of provisions and recommendations:
1. "We have no objection for this heliport provided:
• All helicopter approach/departure route operations are conducted in
an area from degrees clockwise to _ degrees using the
touchdown pad as the center of a compass rose.
• All operations are conducted in VFR weather conditions, and
• The landing area is limited to PPR use (if applicable).
• The takeoff/landing area is appropriately marked.
• A non-obstructing wind indicator is maintained adjacent to the
takeoff/landing area.
• The landing area is constructed in accordance with AC 150/5390-2.
• The heliport proponent will reexamine obstacles in the vicinity of the
approach/departure paths on an annual basis in accordance with
AC 150/5390-2. Any new obstacles noted will be forwarded to the
appropriate airport district office (ADO) or RFSD."
2. "We recommend:
• No night helicopter operations are conducted unless the
takeoff/landing area and wind indicator are lighted and a heliport
identification beacon is installed;
• Unauthorized persons are restrained from access to the
takeoff/landing area during helicopter flight operations by use of a
non-obstructing safety barrier;
• Fire protection is provided, if required, in accordance with the
NFPA, local fire code and AC 150/5390-2;
• The proponent refers to AC 150/5390-2 in establishing an acceptable
level of safety for helicopter operations at this heliport;
• Approach and departure paths from heliports should meet the
standards depicted in AC 150/5390-2; and/or
• A representative of Flight Standards Service (AFS) evaluates the
heliport for compliance prior to operational use."
9
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11
8900.1 CHG 140
c) "Objection." It will adversely affect the safe and efficient use of airspace by
aircraft (give reasons).
2) Submit any comments or recommendations to provide continuity, to recommend
1 good operating practices, or to enhance safety in the report to the RFSD AWOPM.
3) Include a statement on the report to show that a recommendation is not a
condition of objection, but is an option left to the discretion of the applicant.
4) Inspectors should cite any safety-related conditions and limitations to the RFSD,
which will become part of the RFSD's response to the ADO.
E. Close PTRS. Not applicable to PEPs.
8-217 TASK OUTCOMES. Completion of this task results in:
• A completed safety evaluation;
1 • Submittal of the evaluation report to the RFSD AWOPM; and
• Retention of a copy of the completed safety evaluation in the office files.
8-218 FUTURE ACTIVITIES.
• Future surveillance for work plans.
• Evaluation of heliport for modifications or additional uses.
10
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11
8900.1 CHG 140
Figure 8 -IC, Heliport Evaluation Process Flow Chart (Normally Accomplish)
Proponent Proponent
researches completes the
>o td CFR 157 Proponent 7480-1, Heliport
a Heliport notification contacts the ADO sketch, map
requirements and submits to
ADO
Operation ASI
completes the V
inspection and -7
forwards the ADO enters
results to the RFSD notifies theADO notifies the the data
RFSD. The RFSD FSDO RFSD into iOEJ
completes the AAA
Flight Standards
response to the
ADO
Letter Of
ADO issues a Determination and
Letter of FAA Form 5010-2 FAA Form 5010 Proponent returns
Determination 01 is triggered are forwarded to o the 5010 to the
proponent for ADO
completion
Proponent Proponent NASDR completes ADO forwards
completes annual 4 - receives heliport Heliport ID and information to the
inspection ID issues to NASDR
proponent
I1
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
Notifies
ADO/RFSD
ofchanges
01,{ Process complete
I1
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3V]l
Figure 8-1, Helicopter Data Chart Job Aid
A. Manufacturer and helicopter model.
B. Maximum takeoff weight jnpounds.
C. Overall length in feet.
(Rotors attheir maximum extenaiomj
D. Overall height in feet.
(Usually atail rotoc)
E. Rotor diameter in feet/no. of blades.
F Rotor plane c|msronms in feet.
G. Distance rotor hub totail infeet.
H.Tail rotor diameter (in feet).No. ofBlades
8900.1 CHG 140
i Tail rotor ground clearance infeet.
J. Gear pattern.
K. Undercarriage length infeet.
(Strut to strut.)
L Undercarriage width infeet.
(The distance between tire orskid oentena.)
M. Number and type ofengines.
N. Number of crew and passengers.
O. Standard fuel capacity ingallons.
NO7 : Figures O-1and 8 -|& contain selected helicopter data needed by
heliport designer. The data represent the most critical weight, dimensional, m
other data entry for that helicopter ulodoL recognizing that specific Ycrnicmo of the
model may weigh less, be smaller in some feature, carry fewer passengers, oto.
There is also a list of helicopter dimensions in AC 150/5390-2, appendix 1.
Figure 8-1 A may not have the most current model of helicopters, and if more
specific data imneeded, the helicopter manufacturer should be contacted.
12
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FS[K4S toverify current version before using
711 =1/11
305
2.900
32,9
8.1
28,71.1 a 19 On
3
%%4wOAbdl
61
6.8
W
Enomm
480ME-28
3flW
30.1
9.7
321.1 65 2I2 5.OP-
3.6
skid
92
8
roam"",
MAM
sm
MwMSLmm
5070
423
1012
36213 1011 20 6A11
31
Add
102
7.$
I -T
1 IM 1
SA-334Pum
16,315
-"A
16.9
49514 14.4 35 IOJIV5
6
wheel
I33
9.8
2-T
2"
SA-14Y3420azele
4,100
395
101
U -V3 8-9 23 Fen5ftm
2-4
Add
6.4
6.6
I -T
W
AS -353 TwinSbc
5,732
42-5
9,9
35N3 103 25 6.102
2,3
sidd
96
7.1
1 2-T
IM
3
AS -i65 Ds
H-65 Dbh)hin
9,480
45.1
13.3
39.214 IL4 24 Feb. mu
16
Wfiftl
1119
6,2
1 2,T
I&I
..........
417
12.6
36.114 it 2.5 6.412
6,3
ddd
IIA
U
1 2-T
1&10
om ME
EC I30
5 91
41.5
ILS
35.113 11 23.7 Fe nwm
5.3
ddd
105
7.9
1 1
M7
42-7/4
13
361/4 11.3 28 &Q
10.7
Aid
9-5
7.9
VT
IM
EC -223 1
24.230
64
$3,115 15A 38 10-1/4
17.2 1
9. M82,T
1 2A24
Km
M
E
nm
S14-243 SME!jo
14,20
3233
IS.I
44A 8 -Ig
VAMI
2-1
9Rdt
n
f7
�• (")
�`
"�7 "%y
C/] (�
C/2 r
O d
•? n
�° a
�C .�„�"
v'. f�
O
� r
�o
��
��
�� a
CfQ
W
�.
W
3/3/11
8900.1 CHG 140
Figure 8-1B, Helipad Minimum Dimensions for General Aviation Heliports Job Aid
TLOF
FATO
ALF � Safety Area _ J
A — Minimum TLOF Width: 1.0 RD
B — Minimum TLOF Length: 1.0 RD
C — Minimum FATO Width: 1.50L
D - Minimum FATO Length: 1.5 OL
E — Minimum separation between the perimeters of the TLOF and the FATO: [0.5 (1.5 OL —1.0 RD]
F — Minimum Safety Area Width:
RD: Rotor diameter of the design helicopter
OL: Overall length of the design helicopter
NOTE see AC 150/5390-2 for further guidance
16
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11 8900.1 CHG 140
Figure 8-2B, How to Determine Obstruction Height Job Aid
1. This job aid is to assist the evaluator in how to calculate the height of obstacles around the
heliport. Due to the differences in equipment operation, this is not intended to teach how to use
the inclinometer or laser range finder. This job aid is also not intended to be the only way to
assess obstacle heights but does show an easy, accurate way of doing so.
2. Start by standing in the center of the heliport. It helps if you are able to make a rough sketch of
the layout of obstacles and surrounding features of the helipad. This is also a good time to get the
latitude/longitude position from the Global Positioning System (GPS), log the radial and distance
of nearby airports (if the GPS has that function), and take digital photos.
3. Evaluate each obstacle (or groups) that penetrate the 25:1 surface (2 degrees elevation) out to
a distance of 5,000 feet of the heliport and recording the bearing from the compass.
4. The laser range finder will help determine the range to an obstacle. Note that most range
finders read in meters or yards, so you must convert to feet to get the proper calculations.
5. By using the inclinometer from the center of the helipad, you can determine the angle from
you to the very top of the obstacle. This angle must be converted to a Tangent to complete the
trigonometry function; this can be done with a scientific calculator by typing the angle and
pressing the "function" key; e.g., 24 degrees tangent would be .445.
6. The formula for finding the height of an obstacle is: tangent x distance to the obstacle (in feet)
= height (in feet).
Sample problem: .445 x 600 feet = 267 feet. (See example below.)
Heigbt of tosser = distance from tower a tan(angle)
Fzample 267 feet = 600 feet r A45tan(24 degrees)
•yam
w Tangent (Angle) from Inclinometer
.445 tan (24 degrees)
Distance from tosser in feet
from Laser Range Finder
600 feet
Height of tosser
267 feet
17
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11 8900.1 CHG 140
Figure 8-2, Heliport Evaluations Checklist Job Aid
NOTE: Use this checklist to complete and confirm correct data on the
FAA Form 7480-1.
NRA Tracking Number
1. Heliport Design:
A. Permanent Temporary
B. Ground Level Heliport _ Water Heliport Ship/Barge Heliport_ Elevated_
C. Design Helicopter to Use the Heliport
2. Proponent Contact Information:
A. Name
B. Address
C. Telephone Number
D. E-mail Address
3. Location of Heliport:
A. Street Address
City
State
B. Latitude Longitude Elevation
NOTE: Use GPS to confirm the latitude/longitude/elevation. Conduct by making
an onsite analysis.
4. Type of Use:
A. Public Use Private (PPR) Private Use of Public Land/Waters
B. General Aviation Heliport ❑ Transport Heliport ❑
C. Visual Flight Rules (VFR) Use
D. Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) Use (Identify Approach)
5. Communication Plan: ❑ Yes ❑ No
6. Dimensions of Touchdown and Liftoff Area (TLOF) for Proposed Helicopter Operations:
18
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11
E��ZIII��i�C�l,
7. Dimensions of Final Approach and Takeoff Area (FATO) for Proposed Helicopter
Operations:
8. Dimensions of Safety Area for Proposed Helicopter Operations:
9. Suitability of Approach/Takeoff Paths: ❑ Yes ❑ No
NOTE: Confirm the 8:1 slope (7.125 degrees) is satisfactory from the forward
edge of the FATO to 4,000 feet. For 8:1 slopes that require termination at a hover
height other than landing on the helipad, mitigate the reason for the termination.
10. Type of Surface: ❑ Concrete ❑ Asphalt ❑ Metal ❑ Water ❑ Wood
11. Weight Limitation
12. Approved Heliport Markings: ❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Description of Lighting (Diagram):
A. Advisory Circular (AC) Recommended Lighting: ❑ Yes ❑ No
B. Are Night Vision Goggle (NVG) Operations Planned? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
C. Does the Heliport have a Heliport Beacon? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Required
14. Does the Heliport have Fire Protection? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Required
A. Describe the Kind of Protection
B. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 418 Approved: ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Wind Direction Indicator.
A. Does the Heliport Have a Wind Direction Indicator? Yes No
B. Describe the Kind of Indicator
16. Other Landing Areas in the Vicinity (if within 5 nautical space (NM) of site):
A. Name/Location Identifier/Type of Facility (i.e., Airport, Seaplane, Heliport):
B. Direction from Heliport Site
C. Distance from Heliport Site
19
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11
NOTE: Use a continuation sheet if there are others.
8900.1 CHG 140
17. Observed Obstructions in the Vicinity of the Approach Departure Protection Area,
Obstruction Type(s):
A. Direction from Heliport Site
B. Degrees
C. Distance from Heliport Site feet (FT)
NOTE: Use a continuation sheet if there are others.
18. Possible Noise Sensitive Areas in the Vicinity; Description (i.e., School, Public Area,
Wildlife, etc.):
A. Direction from Heliport Site
B. Degrees
C. Distance from Heliport Site FT/NM
NOTE: Use a continuation sheet if there are others.
19. Does the Heliport's Construction, Markings, and Safety Features Meet the AC 150/5390-
2 Criteria?
A. ❑ Yes ❑ No
B. Explain
20. Does the Proponent have the Appropriate Building Permit and Zoning Application
Approval from the Local/City/County Municipality? ❑ Yes ❑ No❑ N/A
21. If Required, Does the Proponent Have the Appropriate Approval From the State Aviation
Authorities? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
22. Has the Proponent Addressed Environmental Assessment Requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No.
23. Is the Heliport Satisfactory for Helicopter Operations? ❑ Yes ❑ No
• Reasons for Response:
20
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
3/3/11
8900.1 CHG 140
24. Does the Heliport Meet the Design Criteria in AC 150/5390-2 for the Following Subjects:
A. General ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
B. TLOF ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
C. FATO ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
D. Safety Area ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
E. VFR Approach/Departure Paths ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
F. Magnetic Resonance Imagers (MRI) ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
G. Windsock ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
H. Taxiways and Taxi Routes ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
I. Helicopter Parking ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
J. Heliport Markers and Markings ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
K. Heliport Lighting ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
L. Marking and Lighting of Obstructions ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
M. Safety Enhancements ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
N. Zoning and Compatible Land Use ❑ Yes ❑ No Reason
25. Inspector Concurs/Nonconcurs with the Proposal:
A. Reasons for Nonconcurrence:
B. Inspector signature, Name, and Contact Information:
21
UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED
Check with FSIMS to verify current version before using
City of Cape Canaveral
Planned Development Zoning Application
Address of Project:
Name of Project:
Legal description: Lot(s) Block Subdivision
Section IS Township Range
Future Land Use and Zoning designations: C', 2,
Owner and Authorized Agent Information:
am a tenant. (Attach notarized letter of authorization).
I am authorized agent other than a tenant: (Attach Written Power of Attorney)
Owner(s) Name: k- -Y
,''. wiling Address: cA, �,l
Phone number(s):
Email(s): 3
Name of Authorized Agent: 1111� Ir"17-v. (2,
Mailing Address:
Phone number(s):
Email(s): VAAQ. 6�, C, ",5
WHONFIMM
Planned Development Zoning Application - 121712
Cash k"ourit $(31 00
L'h,.-tnue 0.00
U',", #10952�j 0 11 0 01
Sheldon
Cope
8810 Astronaut Blvd. a Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 • (321) 783-2400 Ext. 202 a Fax: (321) 784-1559
1, _William R. Mays, authorize Mark Grainger to act on my behalf regarding the Zoning Exception
and the zoning exception only on my property located at 8880 Astronaut Blvd in Brevard County,
Florida /3
William R. Mays Managing
Sheldon Cove LLLP
STATE OF Florida Brevard FL
Before me the undersigned authority, personally appeared William R. Mays ,who is personally
known by me to the person described and who executed the foregoing instrument for the purpose
therein and it true and correct.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this day oft _, 20 .
State of Florida
County of Brevard
Witness my hand and official seal, this day of c � T- 20_L3,
Notary Signature��v1
My Commission Expires vD"�'- r �. (SEAL)
���:::;�'�
SUSAN LYf�d (2iROSTOW6IA
*
MY GOMMMION t EE 114245
*
EXPIRES: SeWber 4,20`16
0014r4"V
9a�dedTieuBuepNNof�1►
Dana Blickley
Wv Brevard County Property Appraiser
I- . W,
North Government Complex Viera Government Center South Services Complex Palm Bay Service Complex
400 South St, 5th Floor 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Wy 15 15 Sarno Rd 450 Cogan Dr, SE
Titusville, FL 32780 Viera, FL 32940 Melbourne, FL 32935 Palm Bay, FL 32909
Telephone: (321) 264-6700 Telephone: (321) 690-6880 Telephone: (321) 255-4440 Telephone: (321) 952-4574
Document content intended for assessment purposes only. Not a survey. Map layers may not precisely align. Other disclaimers apply.
Printed Thursday, February 7, 2013 at 3:42 PM. www.BrevardPropertyAppraiser.com
I : 2.000
Page I of I
2/7/2013
North Government Viera Government
Center South Services Palm Bay Service
Complex Complex Complex
400 South St, Sth Floor i 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson I 1 S1 S Sarno Rd I 450 Cogan Dr, SE
Titusville, FL 32780Melbourne, FL 32935 Palm Bay, FL 32909
y era, FL 32940
Telephone: (321) 264-6700 Telephone: (321) 690-6880 Telephone: (321) 255-4440 Telephone: (321) 952-4574
Document content intended for assessment purposes only. Not a survey. Map layers may not precisely align. Other disclaimers apply.
Printed Sunday, January 13, 2013 at 9:03 PM. www.BrevardPropertyAppraiser.com
1 : 9DO
This instrument prepared by:
Leonard Spielvogel, Esq., of
DEAN, MEAD, SPIELVOGEL, GOLDMAN 6 BOYD
Attorneys -at -Law
P. 0. Box 541366
Merritt Island, Florida 32954-1366
File No. 13217/23589
QTY DEED
Sandy Crawford
chuk or coatis. Brevard CoaAIY
IrPgs 8 SNamas92.00
Trull. cxcrse: Sen 0.00
450 Re0' 0.00
r,,A- 2.825 00 nl Tax: 0 00
im. 0 00
111111111111101111111111
CFN 97094788 06-03-27 10:21 am
OR eo*Wage: 3677 / 4215
THIS WARRANTY DEED, made and given this 30th day of May,
1997, by and between D b S REALTY, a Co -Partnership existing under
the laws of the State of Florida ("Grantor"); and SHELDON COVE,
LTD., a Florida limited partnership ("Grantee"), whose mailing
address is AAln Aatrnna11t R1uA , rape ranageralf V1 11aln _ j
W I T N E S S E T H:
That Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN
AND 00/100 ($10.00) DOLLARS, and other good and valuable
consideration to Grantor in hand paid by the Grantee, receipt
whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to
the Grantee, its, his or their heirs or assigns forever, the
following described unimproved real property ("Property") situate,
lying and being in the County of Brevard, State of Florida:
(See Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof by reference for
description of the Property.)
SUBJECT to taxes for the year 1997 and
subsequent years, zoning, restrictions,
prohibitions and other requirements imposed by
governmental authority, restrictions and
matters appearing on the plat or otherwise
common to the subdivision, and public utility
easements of record; this reference to
restrictions shall not serve to reimpose
the same;
The Property is being conveyed to Grantee subject to a
restrictive covenant ("Covenant") prohibiting the use of the
Property or any portion thereof for an Adult Entertainment
business, with the right in Grantor or Grantors assignee or
successors in interest of that real property, or any portion
thereof, described in Exhibit "B" ("Dominant Parcel"), which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof, to enjoin the continued use
of the Property if and when in violation of this Covenant.
The definition of "Adult Entertainment" as used in this
Covenant is adapted from the City of Cape Canaveral Code (1996 )
Article IV. Adult Entertainment, and includes, but is not limited
to, adult arcade, adult bookstore, adult entertainment
establishment, adult materials, adult motel, adult motion picture
booth, adult motion picture theater.
Adult arcade means an establishment where, for any form
of consideration, one or more motion picture projectors, slide
projectors or similar machines for viewing are used to show films,
motion pictures, video cassettes, slides or other photographic
reproductions which are characterized by emphasis upon the
depiction or description of specified sexual activities or
specified anatomical areas. For the purposes of this Covenant,
adult arcade is included within the definition of adult motion
picture theater.
Pi\DJ\"ar9hal l .wd
1179191
Adult b.. Astor* means a place that distri des, sells or
offers for sale, for free or for any form of consideration, adult
materials, the gross sales of which represents more than ten
percent of the gross sales of the place or that comprises more than
ten percent of the individual items it displays on its premises as
its stock in trade in any one or more of the following categories:
(1) New publications.
(2) Used publications.
(3) New merchandise.
(4) Used merchandise.
B
CFN 97094785 77 1 4216
OR 800wpagc 36
Adult dancing establishment means an establishment that
permits, suffers or allows employees to display or expose specified
anatomical areas whether or not employees engage in the act of
dancing during such display or exposure. Any establishment on
whose premises an employee, who need not be the same employee,
displays or exposes specified anatomical areas on more than one day
in a 30 -day period shall be deemed an adult dancing establishment.
Adult entertainment establishment means an adult motion
picture theater, a massage establishment, an adult bookstore, an
adult motel or an adult dancing establishment. Any commercial
establishment that displays on within 100 feet of the Property a
sign or other form of advertisement capable of leading a reasonable
person to believe that the establishment offers adult entertainment
shall be deemed an adult entertainment establishment under the
appropriate category.
Adult materials means any one or more of the following:
(1) Books, magazines, periodicals or other printed
matter or photographs, films, motion pictures,
video cassettes, slides or other visual
representations or recordings, novelties and
devices which have as their primary or dominant
theme matter depicting, illustrating, describing or
relating to specified sexual activities or
specified anatomical areas; or
(2) Instruments, devices or paraphernalia which are
designed for use in connection with specified
sexual activities.
Adult motel means any hotel or motel, boardinghouse,
roominghouse or other lodging used predominantly for transient
customers which includes the term "adult" in any name it uses or
otherwise advertises and actually permits the presentation of filth
material which has as its primary or dominant theme matters
depicting, illustrating or relating to specified sexual activities
for observation by patrons thereof. For the purposes of this
Covenant, an adult motel is included within the definition of an
adult motion picture theater.
Adult motion picture booth means an enclosed area
designed or used for the viewing by one or two persons of motion
pictures, films, video cassettes, slides or other photographic
reproductions which have as their primary or dominant theme matters
depicting, illustrating or relating to specified sexual activities
or specified anatomical areas. For the purpose of this Covenant,
an adult motion picture booth is included within the definition of
an adult motion picture theater.
Adult motion picture theater means an enclosed building
or a portion or part of an enclosed building or an open air
theater, designed to permit viewing by patrons seated in
1ADAMArshall.W
1/)s/f7
CFN 97094788 4,Z 7
ort e„ WPape: 3677 I
automobiles, used to present on a regulaa oasis, for free or for
any form of consideration, film material which has as its primary
or dominant theme matters depicting, illustrating or relating to
specified sexual activities for observation by adult patrons
thereof and includes any hotel or motel, boardinghouse,,
roominghouse or other lodging for transient customers which
advertises and actually permits the presentation of such film
material. For the purposes of this Covenant, an adult motion
picture theater includes both an adult arcade, an adult motel and
an adult motion picture booth.
Massage establishment means a site, premises or vehicle
or portion thereof upon which any person, who is an employee,
manipulates the superficial tissues of the body of another person
with any portion of the hand, foot, leg, arm or elbow, but this
definition does not include the following:
(1) Florida Licensed health care facilities;
(2) Florida Licensed physicians or nurses engaged in
the practice of their professions;
(3) Establishments licensed under F.S. Ch. 480 (1995)
provided that all employees of such establishments
who manipulate the superficial tissues of the body
of another person are licensed under F.S. Ch. 480
(1995).
Specified anatomical areas means:
(1) Less than completely and opaquely covered:
a. Human genitals or pubic region;
b. The anal cleft of the human buttocks;
C. Any portion of the human female breast below
the top of the areola (the colored ring around
the nipple). This definition shall include the
entire lower portion of the breast, but shall
not be interpreted to include any portion of
the cleavage of the breast exhibited by a
dress, blouse, shirt, leotard, bathing suit or
other wearing apparel, provided the areola is
not so exposed.
(2) Human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state,
even if completely and opaquely covered.
Specified sexual activities means:
(1) Human genitals in a state of sexual stimulation,
arousal or tumescence;
(2) Acts of human anilingus, bestiality, buggery,
cunnilingus, coprophagy, coprophilia, fellation,
flagellation, masochism, masturbation, necrophilia,
pederasty, pedophilia, sadism, sadomasochism,
sapphism, sexual intercourse, sodomy, urolagnia or
zooerasty;
(3) Fondling or other erotic touching of human
genitals, pubic region, buttock, anus or female
breast; and
(4) Excretory functions as part of or in connection
with any of the activities set forth in subsections
(1) through (3) of this definition.
179117
�'191ge
CFN 97094788
OR sookwpapa: 3677 / 4218
This Covenant (i) shall run in perpetuity; (1i) can as
canceled or modified only by a document in writing executed by the
then owner or owners of the entire Dominant Parcel and recorded in
the Public Records of Brevard County, Florida; (iii) shall be
liberally construed and enforced in favor of the Dominant Parcel.
If the owner or owners of the Dominant Parcel or any of
them engage legal counsel to enforce this Covenant, the then owner
of the Property shall pay the reasonable legal flea and costs
incurred in such enforcement effort.
And the Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to the Property
and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons
whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents
to be signed in its name by its duly authorized officer and its
corporate seal affixed, the day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered
iq the pres@Qnce of:
T ^ttness signature
gnature
1
1]n�nh. L
P7 nt name
W�tne s si#naturp
Print" name '
(Witnesses as to W. Dan Stiltz)
eMq
Witness signature
' 2)aay.t.'Va21-
Frint name
&
, 4.-- —04 d—Z
WTtnes§ s�i/gn tore
LL
Print'name
(Witnesses as to Paul Ducanis)
D 5 Y-3Zv:;M-t
nership
By:
W. Dan St z, Part er
Address: ' p0. X -Ox
/��✓: d.
oft, Tel. .0 70 f'/
k
Paul Ducanis, Partner
Address:'/. .Ak nwir
L3A-� 00.,.1E By: -' fitimx, a /u—a�
Witness si nature Clarice C. Ducanis, Partner
70�. �wa�—
Pr-4W-4662ree ms Address: �0. F�,c /9Y'9
ask
i v. +170 F/
Wis a '
E ✓�/� 0
Print dame
(Witnesses as to Clarice C. Ducanis)
(Witnesses as to Joseph T. Ducanis)
1i�w�M�uMll.rd
By:
c
septi T. Ducanis, Partner
Address: _26.1! poll -<p
UffAj /A04 30
dd
name
Print name r
(Witnesses as to William Ducanis)
STATE OF TENNESSEE
COUNTY OF - �n &-„Aeu. --
CFN 97094788
oR Boot/Pdye: 3677 / 4219
By: 0.1 .-C.:z2-i&4
William Ducanis, Partner
Address:
le 72--xf
(collectively, "Grantor")
The
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
-21* day of `M n.._ , 1997, by W. Dan Stiltz, as partner
of D & S REALTY, a Co -Partnership, on behalf of said partnership.
no is ❑ personally known to ms or who ❑ has produced
as identification.
Print Names Nntdiv Pya hda `ala
Commission No.
My Commission E s C:,r” •r: r .
SEAL T b� • • '.•r.:
�•,�tAl U' :rte
STATE OF �14tt�.�lM•Mo.aac. s•1= Cr
C
COUNTY OF ' 04.11occ.��' •+ ��
rot, •,�
Th @ foregoing instrument was acknowledged befgta•.me this
�
�day of )v ft , 1997, by Paul Ducanis, as Partner
of D & S REALTY,'a Co -Partnership, on behalf of said partnership.
Be is ❑ personally known to sis or who D has produced
as identification.
STATE OF'
COUNTY OF :
I/ 5QOM2 t. tsme
Notart PublicJEAN
C.LAPPS .
Print Names
Noldry PW*C. A6M&Ce. IW
Commission No.
> . • ..
My Commission Expimf ' •:
SEALfit
V '
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me -this
21A; -day of 'M , 19970 by Clarice C. Ducanis, as
Partner of D 6 S REALTY, a Co -Partnership, on behalf of said
partnership. She is ❑ personally known to s:e or who ❑ has puced
as identifi ion.
...,.' .P?!,I.r
Print Name:
Commission No.
My Commission
(SEAL)
F I NDAMarsM ll.vd
1.,29/97 5
Nov"Co..*f•..
^.f.4
STATE OF sgax 1 hR
COUNTY OF ' ADE
cfry e709478
OR sooty -a 3677
14220
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
qday of XA4 , 1997, by Joseph T. Ducanis, as
Partner of D & S REALTY, a Co -Partnership, on behalf of said
prtnership. He is ❑ personally known to ms or who Erbas produced
TJ52- 1198- /7• o9.3 - j2 FdA * as identification.
"OFFICIAL SEAL"
aAA
Ada F. Bravo Notary Public
�., ,• My Com ob*nFj&1l1VM Print Name:
►,,,. commfsslon+rr�CCC0642 Commission No.
My Commission Expires:
SEAL
STATE OF ' L<oA i OA
COUNTY OF F
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
4 day of til , 1997, by William Ducanis, as
Partner of D & S'REALTY, a Cc -Partnership, on behalf of said
partnerhipp. He is O personally known to ms or who 9 has produced
Fd 4 I9.'l,9 - 940 - /9 -14(6- O as identification.
Notary Public
Print Name: _
Commission No.
My Commission Expires:
SEAL
'OFFICIAL SEAL-
.. Ada F. Bravo
'a 1.IyCommisslonFxp6es31f3fZ00f
t
�'►.,. CWM flOn arCGC 539842
FAA ar"►.it.w
ulrn7
CFN 97094788 4221
OR 5oowa•9•: 3677 /
A portion of Section 15, Township 24 South, Range 37 Bast,
Brevard County, Florida, more particularly described as
follows:
Commence at a point on the Easterly right of way line of State
Road #401 (A -1-A), a 100 foot right of way, said point being
2448.56 feet North as measured at right angles to, the South
line of said Section 15; thence N 52 degrees 38' 50" B for a
distance of 496.00 feet to the point of Beginning; thence 8 37
degrees 21' 10" E for distance of 225.00 feet; thence 8 52
degrees 38' 50" W for a distance of 471.00 feet to a point of
curvature of a curve to the right having a radius of 25.00
feet; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve thru a
central angle of 90 degrees 00' 00" for a distance of 39.27
feet to a point of tangency on said Easterly right of way line
of State Road #401; thence N 37 degrees 21, 10" W along said
Easterly right of way line for a distance of 125.00 fest;
thence N 52 degrees 38, 50" B for a distance of 200.00 feet;
thence N 37 degrees 21, 10" W for a distance of 75.00 feet;
thence N 52 degrees 38, 50" B for a distance of 296.00 feet to
the point of beginning.
Together with:
A portion of Section 15, Township 24 South, Range 37 Bast,
Bravard County, Florida, more particularly described as
follows:
Begin at a point on the Easterly right of way line of State
Road #401 (A -1-A), a 100.00 foot right of way said point being
2448.56 feet North of as measured at right angles to the South
line of said Section 15; thence North 52 degrees 38' 50" Bast,
for a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 37 degrees 21'
10" Bast, for a distance of 75.00 feet; thence South 52
degrees 38' 50" West, for a distance of 200.00 feet to a point
on the Easterly right of way line, thence North 37 degrees 21,
10" West along said Easterly right of way line, for a distance
of 75.00 feet to the point of beginning.
EXHIBIT "A"
CFN 97094788Mflook/Paga: 3677 / 4222
A portion of Section 15, Township 24 South, Range 37 East, Brevard
County, Florida, more particularly described as follows:
Commence at a portion on the Easterly right of way of STATE ROAD
#401 (AIA), a 100 foot right of way, said paint being 2448.56 feet
North of, as measured at right angles to, the South line of said
Section 15; thence N. 52 degrees 38150" E. for a distance of 520.00
feet to th Point of Beginning; thence S. 37 degrees 21'101' E. for
a distance of 225.00 feet; thence S. 52 degrees 3815011W. for a
distance of 495.00 feet to a point of curvature of a curve to the
right having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along the
arc of aid curve, thru a central angle of 90 degrees 00100" for a
distance of 39.27 feet to a point of tangency on said Easterly
right of way line of STATE ROAD 4401; N. 37 degrees 2111011W. along
said Easterly right of way line a distance of 125.00 feet, thence
N. 52 degrees 38'50" E. for a distance of 200.00 feet; thence N. 37
degrees 21'10"W. for distance of 75.00 feet; thence N. 52 degrees
38150"E. for a distance of 320.00 feet to the Point of Beginning.
LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING:
Section�, portion of 15, Township 24 South, Range 37 Bast,
Brevard County, Florida, more particularly described as
•'
Commence at a point on the Easterly right of way line of State
Road 1401 (A -1-A) , a 100 foot right of way, said point being
2440.56 feet North as measured at right angles to, the South
line of said Section 15; thence N 52 degrees 301 50" 9 for a
distance of 496.00 feet to the point of Beginningl thence S 37
degrees 211 10" E for distance of 225.00 feetj thence S 52
degrees 381 50" W for a distance of 471.00 feet to a point of
curvature of • the rightr+ a radiusof 25.00
feet; thence Northwesterly along the are of sold curve thru a
central angle of 90 degrese, 00' 00" for a distance of 39-27
eat to a point of
of •.• 1 •:. 1' W along said
rightEasterly of • r a distance of 125.00
degreesthence N 52 f11 9 for a distance of 200.00
thence N 37 degrees 21' 1 for distance of 75.00 feetj
thence N 52 • . f for of . I F feet to
the point of beginning.
Together witht
portion • Section • • 24 South,
Brevard County, Florida, more particularly described as
followel
Begin at a point on the Easterly right of way line of State
Road 1401 (A -1-A) , a 100.00 foot right of way said point being
2440.56 feet North ofas measuredat right
line of • Section 15; thence Northdegrees 50"
for distance 200.00 feet; thence South 37 degrees
1 East, for a distance of 10 feet; thence South 52
degrees 381 50" Went, for a distance of 200.00 feet to a point
on •' of •'
10" West • • said Easterly rightof • distance
of 11 feet to the point of • r»'
I'-Y�.o, Ji Y� iflitf� luU 6�11�iP Y.A H' 6x B't �%W1 fi'�fi1
t' HEREBY RTY that the above and forgoing is
a I'm copy of "gip j%noi fled ill tws office:.
Exhibit "B" E ;aCQT rt US i.` i Unity coin¢
F: \ D j \ DD
RADIUS A
SHELDON COVE LLLP
allenengineering
Buffer
1:6,000 or 1 inch = 500 feet ;Subject Property
Buffer Distance: 1000 feet
Notify Property
1,. This map was compiled from recorded documents and does not reflect an Parcels
actual survey. The Brevard County Board of County Commissioners does
not assume responsibility for errors or omissions hereon.
3 Produced by the Brevard County Planning and Zoning Office - GIS Section Date: 5/28/2013
Action: Parcel Info Distance 0 W
Decrease Zoom Bat I Aerial View Range Increase
Page I of I
v'22
htt-ps://www.brevardDroDertvaDDraiser.com/scrir)ts/esrima.n.dII?Name=Brev.qrciI k.Cmd=qO 7/14/?(11I
View
fa Map Aerial
Change i
Locate
Parcel ID L(
Zoom to
Brevard County
Printable Versioi
Map Previ
Check below the
Parcels
Schools
RoadNarnes
5 X"
Water
Update
?
Help
Attention: The I
Zoom
level must be I(
click to select tf
parcel.
v'22
htt-ps://www.brevardDroDertvaDDraiser.com/scrir)ts/esrima.n.dII?Name=Brev.qrciI k.Cmd=qO 7/14/?(11I
Dana Mickley
Property Appraiser
Brevard County, FL
0 40,
r� A0
Property
Research
01- �
.. . ....... .
General Parcel Information for 24-37-15-00-0804.0-0000.00 20 11 Trini MAice 20 12 Triin Notice
16=..
24-37-15- 1 Millage 0 Use
Id: 00-00804.0 M�!11-11--S'a k S. M�kiOQ- 6�dla- Code: Z(AA- Exemption: Code: 2-8-I-
,
1-0000.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
* For site address information only, please contact Brevard County Address Assignment at (321) 690-6846, Ext. 1, or you may
email them at Address,AsSjQ��Bb 0))'Zlrd(��OUMVAIS.
kax unfionnaflon isavafliibk,,� as die Nrevdarcl CR. untvTax ("oflector's w
(Select the back button to return to the Property Appraiser's web site)
OwnerInIbrination
7
SHELDON COVE LLLP
Market Value
P 0 BOX 9002
City, State -
P E F; � K7'
Zicode:
p
��32920
Value Summary
Description
�PART OF SE 1/4 AS DESC IN ORB
�3677 PG 4215
Land Inforiinat.ion
Acres: 2.56
Site Code: 340
" This is the value established for ad valorem purposes in accordance with sJ 93.01 l(l) and (8), Florida Statutes. This
value does NOT represent anticipated selling price for the property.
" Exemptions as reflected on the Value Summary table are applicable fior the year shown and may or may not be
applicable if an owner change has occurred.
https://www.brevardpropertyappraiser.com/asp/Show parceI.asp?acct=2430971&2en=T&t... 2/19/2013
Market Value
Total:
'Agricultural Market
Yalue:
Assessed Value No•n-
JSchool:
Assessed Value
School:
omestead
"Exemption:
Additional
:Homestead:
i Other
1r 1:1
YYIITaxable Value
�Non-School:
Taxable Value
School:
Description
�PART OF SE 1/4 AS DESC IN ORB
�3677 PG 4215
Land Inforiinat.ion
Acres: 2.56
Site Code: 340
" This is the value established for ad valorem purposes in accordance with sJ 93.01 l(l) and (8), Florida Statutes. This
value does NOT represent anticipated selling price for the property.
" Exemptions as reflected on the Value Summary table are applicable fior the year shown and may or may not be
applicable if an owner change has occurred.
https://www.brevardpropertyappraiser.com/asp/Show parceI.asp?acct=2430971&2en=T&t... 2/19/2013
Brevard County Property Appraiser— Online Real Estate Property Card
Page 2 of 2
The additional exemption does not apply when calculating taxable value for school districts pursuant to amendment
1.
Sales 111rorynation
OfficialSale Deed 1 *:1," Sales Sales Physical
Records Sale Date Amount Type Screening Screening Change Vacant/Improved
Book/Pagel I Code Source Code
67 2/4 % C< 5/30/1997 $375,000 M) V
L�=5/1/19831 $11,300„'�
� l4” * Sales Screening Codes and Sources are from analysis by the Property
Appraiser's staff. They have no bearing on the prior or potential marketability of the
property.
Extra Feature Inforniation
Data Last Updated: Tuesday, February 19,2013- Printed On: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
New Search 11 Help I
https://www.brevardpropertyappraiser.com/asp/Show parcel.asp?acct=2430971&gen=T&t... 2/19/2013
Extra Feature Descriptin
o
'PAVING
Taxinf, Authorities
Taxing Authorities
Ad Valorem
Ad Valorem
)iCounty
School
!'School
,City and/or MSTU
Uty and/or MSTU
Management
ater Management
�SP District
"SP District
'�Debt Payment
;Debt Payment
Total Ad Valorem
Jf
lotal Ad Valorem
Data Last Updated: Tuesday, February 19,2013- Printed On: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
New Search 11 Help I
https://www.brevardpropertyappraiser.com/asp/Show parcel.asp?acct=2430971&gen=T&t... 2/19/2013