The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBLDG PERMIT #9243 (compaction test) 4 • Glenn Pereno From: Tim Saunders <tsaunders@dwenet.com> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:28 AM To: Glenn Pereno Cc: Dave Menzel Subject: Beachwave Complex Compaction Test Results Attachments: Beachwave Complex - Compaction Test Results.pdf Importance: High Glenn„ Please find attached the compaction test results for the Beach Wave Complex. Test results include all compaction test from bottom of de-mucking operations to top of building pad and bottom of footers. Should you require any additional information, please let me know! Thank You! .9-knelno/Sauadere/✓9a/ecI✓fawager Doug Wilson Enterprises, Inc. ,(JI Construction Manager/General Contractor 6121 N. Atlantic Ave., Suite 102 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 9j '43 Office: 321-783-0903 /o� Fax: 321-783-7941 Cell: 321-403-2461 ( / n Email: tsaundersdwenet.com �/ 1 gpU N I V E R S A L UES Project No: 0310.1300052.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES UES Report No: 23902-1 DT031113 164 Consultants In:Geotechnical Engineering•Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services•Construction Materials Testing•Threshold Inspection Building Inspection•Plan Review•Building Code Administration 820 Brevard Avenue • Rockledge,FL • 32955 321.638.0808 Fax:321.638.0978 In-Place Density Test Report Client: Doug Wilson Enterprises P.O. Box 865 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Project: Beach Wave Store Central &Astronaut Boulevard, Cape Canaveral, FL Area Tested: subgrade for proposed footings Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Date of Test: 3/11/13 Lab: ASTM D-1557 Technician: Joseph Beasley Requirements: 95% of Proctor maximum dry density. These tests apply to the fill and/or surficial soil conditions only and do not address the condition of the underlying soils below the tested depths. Field Dry Test Test Test Proctor Density Field % Comments Thickness Moisture # Location of Test Elev.(FT) (IN) (2) (PCF) % Compaction (3) 1 sw cr.footing 0 12 15354 110.6 8.5 100 A 2 se cr footing 0 12 15354 108.2 9.3 97 A 3 aprox center of a footing 0 12 15354 107.7 8.4 97 A 4 ne cr footing 0 12 15354 106.9 9.1 96 A 5 nw cr footing 0 12 15354 107.9 8.2 97 A (1) Ref. Datum: 0 = Bottom of Footing (3)Comments Key (2) A. Compaction meets min. requirements Proctor Maximum Optimum B.Compaction does not meet min. requirements # Dry Moisture C. Moisture does not meet requirements Density Content D. Recompaction required 15354 111.0 12.0 This test was performed without deviation from ASTM procedures. This report shall not be reproduced,except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. lipUNIVERSAL UES Project No: 0310.1300052.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES UES Report No: 23733-2DT022713 1640 Consultants In:Geotechnical Engineering•Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services•Construction Materials Testing•Threshold Inspection Building Inspection•Plan Review•Building Code Administration 820 Brevard Avenue • Rockledge,FL • 32955 321.638.0808 Fax:321.638.0978 In-Place Density Test Report Client: Doug Wilson Enterprises P.O. Box 865 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Project: Beach Wave Store Central &Astronaut Boulevard, Cape Canaveral, FL Area Tested: fill for bldg. pad Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Date of Test: 2/27/13 Lab: ASTM D-1557 Technician: Randy Craven Requirements: 95% of Proctor maximum dry density. These tests apply to the fill and/or surficial soil conditions only and do not address the condition of the underlying soils below the tested depths. Field Dry Test Test Test Proctor Density Field "/o Comments # Thickness Moisture Location of Test Elev.(FT) (IN) (2) (PCF) % Compaction (3) 4 south west corner of bldg. pad 0 12 15318 104.3 13.9 96 A 5 north west corner of bldg.pad 0 12 15318 103.6 10.7 95 A 6 north east corner of bldg. pad 0 12 15318 104.3 9.9 96 A 7 south east corner of bldg.pad 0 12 15318 104.4 8.9 96 A 8 middle of bldg. pad 0 12 15318 103.4 9.4 95 A (1) Ref. Datum: 0 = Top of Fill (3)Comments Key (2) A. Compaction meets min. requirements Proctor Maximum Optimum B.Compaction does not meet min. requirements # Dry Moisture C. Moisture does not meet requirements Density Content D. Recompaction required 15318 109.0 12.0 This test was performed without deviation from ASTM procedures. This report shall not be reproduced,except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 liplJ N I V E R S A L UES Project No: 0310.1300052.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES UES Report No: 23734-1 DT 022713 1640 Consultants In:Geotechnical Engineering•Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services•Construction Materials Testing•Threshold Inspection Building Inspection•Plan Review•Building Code Administration 820 Brevard Avenue • Rockledge,FL • 32955 321.638.0808 Fax:321.638.0978 In-Place Density Test Report Client: Doug Wilson Enterprises P.O. Box 865 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Project: Beach Wave Store Central &Astronaut Boulevard , Cape Canaveral, FL Area Tested: fill for bldg. pad y Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Date of Test: 2/27/13 Lab: ASTM D-1557 Technician: Randy Craven Requirements: 95% of Proctor maximum dry density. These tests apply to the fill and/or surficial soil conditions only and do not address the condition of the underlying soils below the tested depths. Field Dry Test Test Test Proctor Density Field % Comments Thickness Moisture # Location of Test Elev.(FT) (IN) (2) (PCF) % Compaction (3) 1 north west corner of bldg. 7.0 12 15318 103.5 12.4 95 A 2 north west corner of bldg. pad 6.0 12 15318 104.2 12.8 96 A 3 north west corner of bldg. pad 5.0 12 15318 104.6 13.3 96 A 4 north west corner of bldg.pad 4.0 12 15318 104.9 13.6 96 A 5 north west corner of bldg. pad 3.0 12 15318 105.3 14.0 97 A 6 north west corner of bldg. pad 2.0 12 15318 105.8 14.5 97 A 7 north east corner of bldg. pad 7.0 12 15318 104.1 12.2 96 A 8 north east corner of bldg. pad 6.0 12 15318 104.6 12.8 96 A 9 north east corner of bldg. pad 5.0 12 15318 104.9 13.3 96 A 10 north east corner of bldg. pad 4.0 12 15318 105.3 13.6 97 A (1) Ref. Datum: 0 = Bottom of Excavation (3)Comments Key (2) A.Compaction meets min. requirements Proctor Maximum Optimum B. Compaction does not meet min.requirements # Dry Moisture C. Moisture does not meet requirements Density Content D. Recompaction required 15318 109.0 12.0 This test was performed without deviation from ASTM procedures. This report shall not be reproduced,except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. UES Project No: 0310.1300052.0000 lip UES DOCS No: ENGINEERING SCIENCES UES Report No: 23734-1 DT 022713 Consultants In:Geotechnical Engineering•Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services•Construction Materials Testing•Threshold Inspection Building Inspection•Plan Review•Building Code Administration 820 13revard Avenue • Rockledge,FL • 32955 321.638.0808 Fax:321.638.0978 In-Place Density Test Report Client: Doug Wilson Enterprises P.O. Box 865 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Project: Beach Wave Store Central &Astronaut Boulevard , Cape Canaveral, FL Area Tested: fill for bldg. pad Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Date of Test: 2/27/13 Lab: ASTM D-1557 Technician: Randy Craven Requirements: 95% of Proctor maximum dry density. These tests apply to the fill and/or surficial soil conditions only and do not address the condition of the underlying soils below the tested depths. Field Dry Test Test Test Proctor Density Field % Comments Thickness Moisture # Location of Test Elev.(FT) (IN) (2) (PCF) ,/o Compaction (3) 11 north east corner of bldg. pad 3.0 12 15318 105.8 14.0 97 A 12 north east corner of bldg. pad 2.0 12 15318 105.2 13.5 97 A 13 south east corner of bldg. pad 7.0 12 15318 103.5 9.6 95 A 14 south east corner of bldg. pad 6.0 12 15318 103.9 10.4 95 A 15 south east corner of bldg. pad 5.0 12 15318 104.2 10.6 96 A 16 south east corner of bldg. pad 4.0 12 15318 104.0 11.0 95 A 17 south east corner of bldg. pad 3.0 12 15318 104.8 11.5 96 A 18 south east corner of bldg.pad 2.0 12 15318 105.3 11.9 97 A 19 south west corner of bldg. pad 7.0 12 15318 103.8 12.5 95 A 20 south west corner of bldg. pad 6.0 12 15318 104.4 13.0 96 A (1) Ref. Datum: 0 = Bottom of Excavation (3)Comments Key (2) A.Compaction meets min. requirements Proctor Maximum Optimum B. Compaction does not meet min. requirements # Dry Moisture C. Moisture does not meet requirements Density Content D. Recompaction required 15318 109.0 12.0 This test was performed without deviation from ASTM procedures. This report shall not be reproduced,except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. U ES Project No: 0310.1300052.0000 UES DOCS No:qp ENGINEERING SCIENCES UES Report No: 23734-1 DT022713 %twill Consultants In:Geotechnical Engineering•Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services•Construction Materials Testing•Threshold Inspection Building Inspection•Plan Review•Building Code Administration 82013rcvard Avenue • Rockledge,FL • 32955 321.638.0808 Fax:321.638.0978 In-Place Density Test Report Client: Doug Wilson Enterprises P.O. Box 865 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Project: Beach Wave Store Central &Astronaut Boulevard , Cape Canaveral, FL Area Tested: fill for bldg. pad Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Date of Test: 2/27/13 Lab: ASTM D-1557 Technician: Randy Craven Requirements: 95% of Proctor maximum dry density. These tests apply to the fill and/or surficial soil conditions only and do not address the condition of the underlying soils below the tested depths. Field Dry Test Test Test Proctor Density Field % Comments # Thickness Moisture Location of Test Elev.(FT) (IN) (2) (PCF) % Compaction (3) 21 south west corner of bldg. pad 5.0 12 15318 104.0 13.4 95 A 22 south west corner of bldg. pad 4.0 12 15318 104.9 13.9 96 A 23 south west corner of bldg. pad 3.0 12 15318 105.5 13.3 97 A 24 south west corner of bldg. pad 2.0 12 15318 105.0 14.8 96 A 25 middle of bldg. pad 7.0 12 15318 104.1 11.9 96 A 26 middle of bldg. pad 6.0 12 15318 104.4 12.4 96 A 27 middle of bldg. pad 5.0 12 15318 105.0 12.8 96 A 28 middle of bldg. pad 4.0 12 15318 105.3 13.6 97 A 29 middle of bldg. pad 3.0 12 15318 106.6 14.0 98 A 30 middle of bldg. pad 2.0 12 15318 106.0 13.7 97 A (1) Ref. Datum: 0 = Bottom of Excavation (3)Comments Key (2) A. Compaction meets min. requirements Proctor Maximum Optimum B. Compaction does not meet min. requirements # Dry Moisture C. Moisture does not meet requirements Density Content D. Recompaction required 15318 109.0 12.0 This test was performed without deviation from ASTM procedures. This report shall not be reproduced,except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences.