Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 7-16-13 (OCR)CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL City of Cape Canaveral CITY COUNCIL MEETING CAPE CANAVERAL LIBRARY MEETING ROOM 201 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida Tuesday July 16, 2013 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS / INTERVIEWS: 6:05 p.m. — 6:10 p.m. AGENDA Interview Applicant Joseph H. Mathos for appointment to the Community Appearance Board. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: 6:10 p.m. — 6:15 p.m. AUDIENCE TO BE HEARD: 6:15 p.m. — 6:30 p.m. Comments to be heard on items that do not appear on the agenda of this meeting. Citizens will limit their comments to five (5) minutes. The City Council will not take any action under the "Audience to Be Heard" section of the agenda. The Council may schedule such items as regular agenda items and act upon them in the future. CONSENT AGENDA: 6:30 p.m. — 6:35 p.m. 1. Approve Minutes for City Council Meeting of June 18, 2013. 2. Resolution No. 2013-11; appointing a Member to the Community Appearance Board of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida; providing for the repeal of prior inconsistent resolutions; severability; and an effective date. (Joseph H. Mathos). 105 Polk Avenue • Post Office Box 326 • Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-0326 Telephone (321) 868-1220 • Fax: (321) 868-1248 www.cityofcapecanaveral.org • email: info(ucityofcapecanaveral.org City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Meeting July 16, 2013 Page 2 of 3 3. Approve Task Order in the amount of $123,155 to Baskerville -Donovan, Inc. for Architectural and Engineering Services related to the renovation of the main Wastewater Treatment Plant building and authorize the City Manager to execute same. 4. Approve Task Order No. 3 in the amount of $99,870 to Tetra Tech, Inc. for Phase I Engineering Design and Construction Monitoring Services related to the replacement of the sanitary sewer line between Lift Stations #9 and #2 and authorize the City Manager to execute same. 5. Award the Bid for Lift Station # 1 Improvements Project to Hinterland Group, Inc. in the amount of $148,890 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Construction Agreement for same. PUBLIC HEARING: 6:35 p.m. — 6:55 p.m. 6. Ordinance No. 08-2013; amending Chapter 90, Floods, of the Code of Ordinances related to construction site stormwater runoff control; making conforming amendments to Chapter 2, Administration; providing for the repeal of prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions; incorporation into the Code; severability; and an effective date, second reading. 7 Ordinance No. 10-2013; amending Chapter 110, Zoning, of the Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances related to Vacation Resort Campuses; providing requirements for Vacation Resort Campuses; excluding Vacation Resort Campuses from the rental restrictions on dwelling units set forth in Section 110-487; providing for the repeal of prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions; incorporation into the Code; severability; and an effective date, second reading. 8. Ordinance No. 09-2013; amending Chapter 78, Article II, Division 3 of the Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances related to sanitary sewer system impact fees; revising sewer impact fee assessment procedures consistent with the findings and recommendations set forth in the City's Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Report dated April 2013; providing for the repeal of prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions; incorporation into the Code; severability; and an effective date, first reading. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Meeting July 16, 2013 Page 3 of 3 ITEMS FOR ACTION: 6:55 p.m. — 7:15 p.m. 9. Resolution 2013-12, adopting a tentative proposed millage rate for the levy of Ad Valorem Taxes for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 on all taxable property located within the City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida; providing for an effective date. 10. Discuss/approve Task Order No. 1 in the amount of $254,975 to GLE Associates, Inc. for Architectural and Engineering Services related to the design of a new City Hall and authorize the City Manager to execute same. REPORTS: 7:15 p.m. — 7:30 p.m. 11. Council. ADJOURNMENT: Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, the City hereby advises the public that: If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not constitute consent by the City for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by law. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act: all interested parties may attend this Public Meeting. The facility is accessible to the physically handicapped. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in the proceedings should contact the City Clerk's office (868-1220 x220 or x221) 48 hours in advance of the meeting. City of Cape Canaveral City Council Agenda Form City Council Meeting Date: 7/16/2013 Presentations/Interviews Subject: Interview Applicant Joseph H. Mathos for appointment to the Community Appearance Board. Department: Planning and Zoning Summary: On May 29, 2013 the Community Appearance Board interviewed Mr. Joseph H. Mathos to fill a vacancy. Mr. Mathos has been a Cape Canaveral resident for two years. He is retired, has served as Deputy Superintendent of Schools for Dade County and has served on numerous boards. He selected the Community Appearance Board as his number one preference for service on advisory boards. Based on his interview and obvious interest in the appearance of Cape Canaveral, the Board recommends that he be appointed by the City Council. Submitting Department Director: Barry BrownR/PA Date: 7/3/2013 Attachments: Board Application and Community Appearance Board Recommendation Memo to Council. Financial Impact: Staff time to prepare item. Reviewed by Finance Director: John Deleo The City Manager recommends that City Council Interview Applicant Joseph H. Mathos. Date: I t 7,4). ke the following action(s): Approved by City Manager: David L. Greene &`1M- Date: 7/Q /,,? City Council Action: [ ] Approved as Recommended [ ] Disapproved [ ] Approved with Modifications [ ] Tabled to Time Certain CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO CITY ADVISORY BOARD OR COMMITTEE Pursuant to Section 2-171, Cape Canaveral Code City Code requires prospective and existing board members to fill out an application. City._ prohibits a person from serving on a City Board or Committee if that person bias _bek '-c n felony, unless their civil rights have been restored. • Please complete the following in the space provided: A. GENERAL 1. Applicant Name: i 1 v i C p fl 1-f rr i-/7 4 2. Home Address: �q Sy nip v• "La tip/ 1 d Psi P rope 3. Home and Cellular Telephone: /-- 955 6//- 9.2 7/ 4. Occupation: Cn ni s w 7 4(74 5. Business Telephone: / - 9X,Y 47 ?'/ 6. Business Address:A Sc'? 4 In vra / L(/ i/ eite2 --/ %s, tin r/ 7. E -Mail: Nth( /i 5A ao/ . Co`1► 6. ELIGIBILITY The information provided in this section is for purposes of determining whether you are eligible to serve on a City advisory board or committee. ,i FEB - 4 201: de also Crz•vgagra / 41 • 1. Are you duly registered to vote In Brevard County? 2. Have you been a resident of the City of Cape Canaveral for 12 months or longer? • 3a. Are you a Business owner. 3b. If yes to 3a, please list the name: (Y) �N) (Y) (N) 7;sr 1-V71{1V7'ser boAi et 1 4a. Have you ever been convicted or found guilty, regardless of adjudication, or a felony in any jurisdiction? Any plea of nolo contendere (no contest) shall be considered a conviction for purposes of this question. 4b. If yes to 4a, have your civil rights been restored? 5a. Do you presently serve on any other City of Cape Canaveral advisory board or committee? 5b. If yes to 5a, please list each: Page 1of3 (V) (Y) CO (N) (N) y...-- 6. City ordinance requires that all persons applying for a City advisory board or committee must voluntarily consent // to a standard criminal background check before being H /j7 appointed to a board or committee. Do you voluntarily initials consent to having a standard background check performed on you by the City of Cape Canaveral? (Y) J— (N) 7a. Are you related to a City of Cape Canaveral Council member by blood, adoption, or marriage? (Y) (N) 7b. If yes to 7a, please provide name(s) of person(s) and relationship to you: C. INTERESTS/EXPERIENCE 1. Briefly state your interest in serving on a City advisory board or committee: age d mi./4 Cp?' C424/et 1/C'r4/ frl %/ -f7/ne rrhe c+ 1-W0 /eS i ld e rl /d Otto 7%1 /.;Mn/eWd41 714e ze41 e rt W//11,es irereal' 2. n numerical sequence'l = most Interested), please rank which advisory board or committee on which you wish to serve: a. Board of Adjustment* b. ot Business and Economic Development Board c. Code Enforcement Board* d. / Community Appearance Board* e. Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals* f. Culture and Leisure Services Board g. Library Board h. Planning and Zoning Board* 1 Other. • *Member of these boards are required to complete and file with the supervisor of Elections a Financial Disclosure Form upon appointment to said board and prior to July 1 of each year following the initial appointment while sti11 a member of said board. 3. Briefly state any prior experiences in serving on any govemmental board or committee: Served ar deoUtv.(w /rid?4,Yd ifschee/ Pop Pah 0. Serthad ,<'Vvi>1Pv?z'J hsr rI. /2r..50 4 NOWalk 4. Please list any specialized skills and training (e.g., architect, engineer, general contractor, etc.) that you feel help to qualify you for membership on the desired board orpommittee. r1 rise Ads' roam /74 A4 / , s(7 � /p /I.5 c <'4V < Ads* D. STATE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Section 760.80, Florida Statutes, requires that the City annually submit a report to the Secretary of State disclosing race, gender, and physical disabilities of board and committee members. Please check the appropriate boxes: Page 2 of 3 RACE • GENDER African-American • �' Male Asian -American Female Hispanic -American Not Known Native -American Caucasian DISABILITY Not Known Physically disabled YOU HEREBY REPRESENT TO THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED HEREIN IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE, AND THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL HAS THE RIGHT TO RELY ON THAT INFORMATION. • • YOU HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THE EXISTENCE OF THE CODE OF ETHICS FOR PUBLIC OFFICERS [SECTIONS 112.311-326, FLORIDA STATUTES] AND THE FLORIDA "SUNSHINE LAW" [SECTION 288.011, FLORIDA STATUTES], WHICH MAY PERTAIN TO YOU IF YOU ARE APPOINTED TO A CITY ADVISORY BOARD OR COMMITTEE, AND IF APPOINTED, IT IS YOUR SOLE OBLIGATION AND DUTY TO COMPLY WITH SUCH LAWS. PLEASE NOTE: • Appointment to any City board is subject to City Council approval following a brief interview before the City Council at a regularly scheduled meeting. • Your application will remain effective for one year from date of completion. • If you should have any questions regarding the completion of this application, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (321) 868-1220 ext. 221. 40 Signature:' (.:.G Z/ • 1- .�i..� Please retuifi to: City of CapeC(naverai Office of the City Clerk 105 Polk Avenue Cape Canaveral Florida 32920 1 11 For Office Use Only: " Date application received: :2A//ice/ /i 3 Date Appointed: Appointed by: Board Appointed to: Term Expires: Page 3 of 3 Date: ���'2 ?y 1 . 1 1111 11 • Date: To: From: Susan L. Chapman, Board Secretary Through: Randy Wasserman, Chairperson Re: Recommendation to City Council to Appoint Joseph H. Mathos as a Board Member to the Community Appearance Board City of Cape Canaveral May 30, 2013 Community & Economic Development Department Barry Brown, Planning & Zoning Director On May 29, 2013, the Community Appearance Board interviewed Joseph H. Mathos as a potential new Board member. By unanimous vote, the Board recommended that City Council appoint Mr. Mathos to the Board. 7510 N Atlantic Avenue — P.O. 13ox 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-0326 Telephone (321) 868-1222 -- Fax (321) 868-1247 www.citvofcanecanaveral.orti e-mail: info(ii?cit ofcaoecanaveral.ora CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CAPE CANAVERAL LIBRARY MEETING ROOM 201 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida TUESDAY June 18, 2013 6:00 PM MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: The Chair called the Meeting to Order at 60 :M, and led the pledge of allegiance. Mayor Randels reminded everyone to speak int0'the microphone. ROLL CALL: Council Members Present: Mayor Pro Tem Council Member Council Member Mayor Council Member Others Present: t 1 City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Finance Director Community &,,.,conomic" ® eveloprnent: Planning &' iiitit o I.., Leisurey ervices Director P ublic Works orks ServiceOirector P ublicsWorks Services Deputy Director Brevard C'©(linty Sheriff Major CITY ATTORNEY'S REP,e RT: None AUDIENCE TO BE HEARD: None •M t • John Bond' Bob Hoog Buzz' Petsos Rocky‘Randels Betty Waish CONSENT AGENDA: • • 1. ir.:ectoi • • • David L Greene Anthony Garganese Angela Apperson John DeLeo Todd Morley Barry Brown Gustavo Vergara Jeff Ratliff Lonnie Dunn Mike DeMorat Mayor Randels inquired if any items are to be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. No items were removed 1. Approve Minutes for City Council Meeting of Mav 21, 2013: City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting June 18, 2013 Page2of5 2. Approve Agreement for Consulting Services in the amount of $60.000 to The Berrvhill Group. LLC for providing consulting services related to City wastewater/stormwater improvement proiects in the State Revolving Fund Loan Program as administered by Florida Department of Environmental Protection and authorize the City Manager to execute same: 3. Approve Task Order No. 3. in the amount of $98,785, to Quentin L. Hampton Associates, Inc. for engineering design services for the Sludge Belt Press System p Improvements Project at the Wastewater Treatment Plant Facilitv=and authorize the City Manager to execute same: 4. Approve Task Order No. 4, in the amount of $87,9974o:.9uentin L. Hampton Associates, Inc. for bidding and construction monitotinc Mservices;or:.the North Atlantic Avenue Streetscape Project and authorize the City Mar ager to execute. same: 4 5. Approve Interlocal Agreement for Building. Inspection & Plan Review Services between the City of Cape Canaveral and the Cnaverai P o rt Authority ,.and authorize execution of same: A motion was made by Council Member Hoog, set. onded by Council Member Walsh, to approve the five items on, the. Consent Agen`dI; 9The motion carried 5-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Bond, For; Council Member Hoog, For; Council Member Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, for; and Council Member Walsh, For. PUBLIC HEARING:. 6 Ordinance No. 06=201.3; =amendina,.Chaoter 110, Zoning, of the City Code related to parking ":-and:.,paving rdauirements; -°amending definitions: providing for temporary parkinq<on unpaved.,areas; providing for the repeal of prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions; incorporation into -the Code; severability: and an effective date, second readint :.:City Attorney Garganese read the Ordinance title into the record and provided a brief explanation of same. A motion was made by Council Member Petsos, seconded by :Mayor Pro Tem Bond, for approval of Ordinance No. 06-2013 on second reading. The Public Hearing was opened. No comments were received and the Public Hearing was * closed. The motion carried 5-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Bond, For; Council Member Hoog, For; Council Member Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; and Council Member Walsh, For. 7. Ordinance No. 07-2013; amending Chapter 78. Utilities. of the Code of Ordinances related to illicit discharges and connections to the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4): providing for the repeal of prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions: incorporation into the Code: severability: and an effective date, second reading: City Attorney Garganese read the Ordinance title into the record and provided a brief overview of same. A motion was made by Council Member Hoog, seconded City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting June 18, 2013 Page3of5 by Council Member Walsh, to approve Ordinance No. 07-2013 on second reading. The Public Hearing was opened. No comments were received and the Public Hearing was closed. The motion carried 5-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Bond, For; Council Member Hoog, For; Council Member Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; and Council Member Walsh, For. 8. Ordinance No. 08-2013; amending Chapter 90, Floods. of the Code of Ordinances related to construction site stormwater runoff control; making conforming amendments to Chapter 2, Administration; providing for the rejeaLof prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions; incorporation into the Code; severability; and an effective date, first reading' City Attorney Garganese read the Ordinance_ ,title into the record and provided an explanation of same. p A motion was made byilayor Pro Tem Bond, seconded by Council Member Petsos, for approval. Discussion ensued and included: that the Ordinance only applies to parcels over 1 acre; how,the Ordinance will impact development;by g, that fees will be considered Resolution on seco _d• reagin •fees will be set to recover the costs to enforce the Ordinance requirements; the: , ro p osed flat fee is to be a percentage of the cost fort the site work; possibly creating a tiered/laddered approach to the fee, and that the percentage fee should be below that of Brevard County. The Public Hearing was opened. No comments were received and the Public Hearing was closed. Thea 'motion carried 5-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Bond, For; Council`xaMember Hoog, For Council Member Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; and CounciltMeniber Walsh, For. t 9. Ordinance No. 10-2013; amending \Chapter 110, Zoning, of the Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances....related to Vacation Resort Campuses; providing requirements for Vacation Resort Campuses; excluding Vacation Resort Campuses from the rental restrictions on dwelling units set forth in Section 110-487; providing for the repeal of prior inconsistent ordinances:' and.. resolutions incorporation into the Code; severability; and an effeetivte.ate, first readinq• Attorney Garganese read the Ordinance title into the recon , suggested'ia change to the third "Whereas" to read "The City recognizes that ti_ a``acation resort,�.campus, as defined herein, can help to promote economic deve�loprnent and tourismin the: City of Cape Canaveral;" and provided a detailed explanations of _the Ordinance. Ken Ward, representing Cape Caribe Resort, explained the events which lead to the creation of the Resort, how the Resort operates and advocated for passage of the Ordinance. Council Comments included: the current need to house prospective ..tenants at hotels outside the City; that the passage of this Ordinance may allow the next building to be built sooner; and the facility is well landscaped. A motion was made by Council Member Petsos, seconded by Council Member Walsh, for approval of Ordinance No. 10-2013. The Public Hearing was opened. Pat Walden asked if the seven day limitation to rental will be removed; to which City Manager Greene and Mr. Ward responded the limitation will only be removed for the resort and will remain in the rest of the City. Attorney Garganese recapped the proposed amendment. The Public Hearing was closed. The motion carried 5-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Bond, For; Council Member Hoog, For; Council Member Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; and Council Member Walsh, For. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting June 18, 2013 Page 4 of 5 ITEMS FOR ACTION: 10 Designate one (1) City Official to be the Voting Delegate at the 87th Annual Florida League of Cities Conference scheduled for August 15-17, 2013 — World Center Marriott, Orlando, Florida: Council Member Hoog, seconded by Council Member Walsh, nominate John Bond. The nomination carried 5-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Bond, For; Council Member Hoog, For; Council Member Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; and Council Member Walsh, For. 11. Ratify the Composite City Manager Performance Evaluation and discuss/determine how to proceed with the provisions: of. Section 2, Salary, and Evaluation, of the Employment Agreement between the City °f::Cape Canaveral and City Manager David L. Greene: Mayor Randels provided, an overview of the process, the areas that were evaluated, the scoring system; and the need- to decide on an amount of salary increase, if any. The amount/percentage of the salary: increase was discussed. A motion was made by Council1111ember H o og, secondec``by;Mayor Pro Tem Bond, for a five (5) percent increase. The motioncarried5-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Bond, For; Council Member Hoog, For; Council Member Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; and Council Member Walsh, For. City Manager Greene thanked the City Council and'indicated this is a team effort. REPORTS: 12. Council • Council Member Walsh noted the work of Todd Morley, Jeff Ratliff and Duree Alexander with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to reduce the City's classification from an eight to 4a seven, which( will save residents money on their flood insurance ,:prer._tt uh s. She relayed positive comments received related to the performance of Leisure Services Director Gustavo Vergara. Manor Pro Tem Bond thanked Major DeMorat for allowing him to ride along with CorporalZiebel. He indicated it was an interesting experience. He noted the need for improvementslupgrades to the radio system; the need for signage on the beach, near the crossovers;,‘which is visible from the beach, so individuals will be able to tell emergency services where they are located; and the need to make improvements at certain properties to be able to see the address from the street. He also thanked City Manager Greene for the outstanding performance. Mayor Randels noted his attendance at the Governor's Mansion for dinner where he shared items of interest in the City; he also met with Department of Economic Opportunity Representatives and secured funding for training for the certain workers at the Assisted Living Facility; the settlement between the National Fair Housing Alliance, Fair Housing Continuum and Wells Fargo related to Real Estate Owned homes; and a City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting June 18, 2013 Page 5 of 5 new law which may speed up the eviction process for a landlord who is not receiving rental payments. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, the Meeting adjourned at 7:20 P.M. Rocky Randels, Mayor Angela M. Apperson, MMC, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk City of Cape Canaveral City Council Agenda Form City Council Meeting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. 2 - Subject: Resolution No. 2013-11; appointing a Member to the Community Appearance Board of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida; providing for the repeal of prior inconsistent resolutions; severability; and an effective date. (Joseph H. Mathos). Department: Legislative Summary: On May 29, 2013, the Community Appearance Board interviewed Applicant Joseph H. Mathos to fill a vacancy. Based on Mr. Mathos' civic interests and previous experience, the Board recommends that he be appointed by the City Council. After having conducted an interview at tonight's meeting of Applicant Joseph H. Mathos, it is now incumbent upon the City Council to appoint a Member to the Community Appearance Board. Submitting Department Director: Angela Apperson Attachment: Resolution. No. 2013-11 Financial Impact: Staff time to prepare item. Reviewed by Finance Director: John DeLeo Date: 07-03-2013 Date: 7/5113 The City Manager recommends that City Council tike the following actions): Adopt Resolution No. 2013-11. Approved by City Manager: David L. Greene 0 -1)-4-- Date: 7 J ) (? City Council Action: [ ] Approved as Recommended [ ] Disapproved [ ] Approved with Modifications [ ] Tabled to Time Certain RESOLUTION 2013-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA; APPOINTING A MEMBER TO THE COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT RESOLUTIONS; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, has by City Code Section 22-37 created a Board known as the Community Appearance Board; and WHEREAS, it is now incumbent upon the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral to appoint a Member to said Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are deemed true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference as a material part of this Resolution. Section 2. Appointments to the Community Appearance Board. Pursuant to Section 2- 171(e) of the Cape Canaveral City Code, the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral hereby appoints Joseph H. Mathos to the Cape Canaveral Community Appearance Board for a three year term. Section 3. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Resolutions. All prior resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereto. Section 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption by the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida. ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, assembled this 16th day of July, 2013. (Signature page follows) City of Cape Canaveral Resolution No. 2013-11 Page 1 of 2 ATTEST: Angela Apperson, Asst. City Manager/City Clerk Approved as to legal form and sufficiency For the City of Cape Canaveral only by: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney Rocky Randels, Mayor Name FOR AGAINST John Bond Bob Hoog Buzz Petsos Rocky Randels Betty Walsh City of Cape Canaveral Resolution No. 2013-11 Page 2 of 2 City of Cape Canaveral City Council Agenda Form City Council Meeting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. .3 Subject: Approve Task Order in the amount of $123,155 to Baskerville -Donovan, Inc. for Architectural and Engineering Services related to the renovation of the main Wastewater Treatment Plant building and authorize the City Manager to execute same. Department: Public Works Services Summary: The main Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) building was constructed in 1966. When other areas of the WWTP were rehabbed in 1995, the main building was not included in the upgrades. As this building is approaching 48 years old, there are numerous major deficiencies that are affecting the operational efficiency and work environment (health and safety) for employees. The deficiencies include, but are not limited to, the following: • Poor location for the Plant Operator Control Room (needs to be moved to bay area); • Outdated restroom and shower facilities; • Lacking adequate HVAC system throughout building; • Electrical wiring and lighting outdated; • Plumbing outdated throughout building; • Major electrical distribution panels obsolete (1960s vintage); • Hurricane window hardening needed; • Deteriorating cabinets in Wet Lab; • Mold/mildew in walls; • Men's and women's locker rooms needed; • Building needs to be sealed, stucco applied and painted on outside; • Deteriorating kitchen cabinets in break room; • Hot water tank and laundry washbasin replacement needed; • Fecal Area needs to be moved out of Wet Lab; • Training/conference/meeting room needed; • Unused electrical equipment; and • Poor location for chlorine storage tanks. Capital Funds were set aside in the approved FY 2012/2013 Budget for design and engineering of the renovation of the main WWTP building. After review of engineering firm qualifications for similar -type projects completed in other municipalities, Public Works Services Staff selected Baskerville -Donovan, Inc. (BDI) of Melbourne, Florida to perform the project tasks. BDI is one of the engineering firms selected for Professional Engineering/Surveying, Planning, Consulting and Architectural Services in Request for Qualifications #2011-01. A Master Services Agreement for these services has been executed. The scope of work for this Task Order (Attachment #1) includes, but is not limited to, the performance of the following tasks: City Council Meeting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. Page 2 of 2 tasks: • Develop existing building drawings; • Perform structural analysis of existing building; • Prepare design drawings and documents; • Bid document preparation and bidding/negotiation services; • Permitting; and • Construction administration. The main WWTP building will be remodeled to include: (1) a large crew room for Staff and training meetings, (2) new restroom facilities, (3) new locker rooms with shower facilities, (4) an updated laboratory facility and (5) a new monitoring room for treatment plant operators. The Project also will include repairs to the building structure, replacement of windows and painting of the inside bay area. Photos of the existing conditions (Attachment #2) of the main WWTP building and a sketch of the proposed renovations (Attachment #3) are enclosed. The projected cost of actual renovation is $750,000, which will be included in the FY 2013/14 budget. Anticipated milestone dates: • Design documents complete: November/December 2013; • City Council approval of selected contractor/award of Bid: early 2014; and • Construction completion: late summer/early fall. Submitting Director: Jeff Ratliff jielApr Date: 06/25/2013 Attachments: #1 - BDI Task Order #2 - Main WWTP Building Existing Condition Photos #3 - Renovation Area Layout Sketch Financial Impact: $123,155 to Baskerville -Donovan, Inc. for Architectural and Engineering Services related to the renovation of the main Wastewater Treatment Plant building funded by the Wastewater Fund through the contingency or the unrestricted reserves. Staff time and effort to prepare this Ag nda Item. Reviewed by Finance Director: John DeLeo Date: 4V113 The City Manager recommends that City ncil take the following action: Approve Task Order in the amount of $123,155 to Baskerville -Donovan, Inc. for Architectural and Engineering Services related to the renovation of the main Wastewater Treatment Plant building and authorize the City Manager to execute same. Approved by City Manager: David L. Greene O Date: 7 /i /13 City Council Action:[ ] Approved as Recommended [ ] Disapproved [ ] Approved with Modifications Attachment #1 BDI Task Order TASK ORDER CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL MAIN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT BUILDING RENOVATION ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES Section I. BACKGROUND The City of Cape Canaveral has an existing main building located at the Wastewater Treatment Plant site. This Task Order will allow the BDI/BRPH Team to provide the architectural and engineering services for the renovation of this building. Section II. SCOPE OF SERVICES The BDI/BRPH Team will provide Architectural, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, and Structural design services as outlined below for the following renovation to the main WWTP building. • Remodel of the existing laboratory, limited to; doors, windows, lighting, wall finish, ceiling, and fecaVautoclave location adjustments • Complete remodel and expansion of the existing break room into a multipurpose room (break/training/conference) • Remodel of the existing bay area, limited to; doors, windows, lighting, wall/ceiling/floor finish, and removal of unused electrical equipment • New male and female locker rooms within the bay area • New elevated operator control room within the bay area • New hot water tank and washbasin within the bay area • New fecal area near the lab within the bay area • New chlorine tank storage building extension on the east side of the existing building, excluding tank, new piping, and chlorine equipment relocation. • New exterior finish of the existing building DESIGN/DRAWINGS The BDI/BRPH Team will prepare final construction documents ready for bid consisting of Architectural, Mechanical, Electrical, Structural and Plumbing drawings and specifications. • Architectural design plans and specifications including floor plans, elevations, details and life safety plans. • Interior Design and Finish Plans. • Architectural, electrical, mechanical, structural and plumbing design, including power, lighting, and fire alarm design. • Complete structural plans indicating foundation and superstructure. The BDI/BRPH Team will provide Design Submittals and conduct review meetings at the 50% and 100% phases of design, and provide one set of responses for each phase. PERMITTING The BDI/BRPH Team will assist with obtaining the required City building permit. Preparation of a response to one (1) Request for Additional Information (RAI) from the Building Official is included in this Task Order. Additional responses will be in accordance with corporate hourly rates. BIDDING AND NEGOTIATION SERVICES: The BDI/BRPH Team will perform the following services during the bidding process: • Preparation and assembly of construction bid documents, including; plans, specifications, and contract documents. • Preparation and distribution of addenda as may be required during the bidding and negotiation process. • Participate in a pre-bid conference. • Field bidder questions and provide responses to those questions, along with any necessary clarification/interpretation of the bid documents. • Evaluate submitted bid packages. • Provide a recommendation of award. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES: The BDI/BRPH Team will perform the following services during the construction period: • Attend ten (10) periodic meetings during construction. • Review required submittals, shop drawings, and samples for work under our design. • Answer formal Requests for Information (RFI's) prepared by the Contractor. • Prepare and issue Architect's Supplemental Instructions (ASI's) when appropriate to incorporate modifications or clarifications. • Perform a Substantial Completion inspection and issue a punch list (PL) of items to be completed for Final Completion. • Perform a Final Completion inspection. • Draft final record drawings from Contractor red -lines for project closeout requirements. • Provide electronic version of record drawings. EXCLUSION The following work is not included in this Task Order, but can be performed as additional services: • Roof replacement is not included (except for the existing chlorine area roof, which is included). • No work is scheduled for the Sludge Holding, CCC, and Filtration & Effluent transfer pumps. Section III. SUBCONSULTANTS BRPH will serve as a subconsultant to BDI providing architectural services for this project. Section IV. OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY The City of Cape Canaveral will provide all available design related information on the existing Main WWTP building. The City will review and provide one set of comments each on the 50% and 100% design documentation. The City will work in conjunction with the Architect -Engineer Team to assist with construction observation. The City will be responsible for all permit fees. Section V. DELIVERABLES The BDI/BRPH Team will provide the following deliverables to the City of Cape Canaveral: 1. Three (3) sets of the 50% Plans and Cost Estimate. 2. Three (3) sets of the 100% Plans, Specs and Cost Estimate. 3. Three (3) sets of signed and sealed final construction documents for permitting. 4. One (1) Electronic copy of the Final 100% Contract Documents in PDF format. Section VII. SCHEDULE BDI/BRPH Team project schedule is as follows: Task Receive City approval Design Team — Program Validation & Kick -Off Prepare floor plans Present floor plans Revise floor plans (if necessary) Receive Client approval of floor plans & design Prepare 50% construction documents Receive Client comments & approval of 50% CD's Prepare 100% construction documents Receive Client comments & approval of 100% CD's Final construction documents Final submittal Bidding / Permitting: Construction contractor approval Start Construction: Substantial completion Schedule 7/16/13 7/19/13 2 weeks 1 week 4 weeks 1 week 4 weeks 1 week 1 week 4 weeks 6 to 7 months 6/13/14 Section VIII. METHOD OF COMPENSATION The City of Cape Canaveral shall compensate the BDI/BRPH Team for the not -to -exceed lump sum fee amount as listed below for a total value of One Hundred Twenty Three Thousand One Hundred and Fifty-five Dollars and Zero Cents ($123,155) for the scope of services as specified prior in this task order. The cost breakdown for this project is as follows: Task Develop Existing Drawings Structural Analysis Design Development (50%) Construction Documents (100%) Construction Admin Total 10,245 6,565 11,769 68,818 25.758 123,155 The fixed costs listed above include the following expenses: plotting and reproduction for in- house design purposes; three sets of black line drawings for owner review at each design milestone; and three sets of signed and sealed final construction documents for permitting. SECTION IX. ACCEPTANCE If the above scope and fees meet your approval, please indicate by your signature in the space provided below and return one (1) signed copy which will constitute an "Agreement and Notice to Proceed" for the accomplishment of this work. BASKERVILLE-DONOVAN, INC. CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL Keith Hil P.E. EVP/CO / ka June 12.2013 Date Date Cape Canaveral WWTP Rnovatton BDI & BRPH Fee Workup Task Develop Existing Drapings Structural Analysis Design Development (50%) Construction Documents (100%) Construction Admin BRPH Fee BDI Fee Reilional Mgr Hrs S 8,768.00 1 S 5,968.00 S 9,608.00 S 60,018.00 S 21,144.00 Totals S 105,504.00 $ 200.00 Dollars S 200.00 1 S 200.00 1 $ 200.00 4 S 800.00 1 S 200.00 8 S 1,600.00 Project Mgr S 150.00 Hrs Dollars 3 S 450.00 2 S 300.00 4 S 600.00 32 S 4,800.00 24 S 3,600,00 65 S 9,750.00 Engineer $ 150.00 Hrs Dollars 4 S 600.00 0 S - 8 S 1200.00 32 S 48600.00 16 S 2,400.00 60 S 9,000.00 Admin Hrs 1 1 1 2 2 7 S 60.00 Dollars S 60.00 $ 60.00 $ 60.00 $ 120.00 S 120.00 S 420.00 Expenses Dollars S 167.00 5 37.00 $ 101.00 S 282.00 $ 294.00 S 881.00 Discounts BRPH $ $ S 1,000.00 S 1,000.00 $ 2.000.00 et Total 801 $ - $ 10,245.00 $ - S 6,565.00 $ - $ 11,769.00 $ 1,000.00 S 68,818.00 S 1,000.00 S 25,758.00 S 2,000.00 S 123,155.00 BRPH Estimation Form Project 6 6460M Name: CCC WWTP Renovation Revised Client Ci4OfCapeCanaveral Proj. Mgr. NXG - 002875 Office Location: Melbourne BST Cont f:: 6480 Discipline ORG ISr. Proi Mor 502 IPr fy}gf 502 iPr Mmin. 512 5208.00 7v�s1 -J22 15r. Arch. 612 Arch 512 51.760.00 Nch Oesji ner 612 52.720.00 Arch Drafter '612 Corg Rate S145.00 5120.00 552.00 542.00 5120.00 5110.00 585.00 570.00 5120.00 5110.00 585.00 570.00 5120.00 5110.00 585.00 570.00 5120.00 5110.00 585.00 570.00 5120.00 5110.00 585.00 570.00 5120.00 5110.00 585.00 570.00 5115.00 585.00 585.00 590 00 3100 Record travnngs Start Dale SI Date 4/15/2013 4/38/2'013 S/Manpve Hrs 5580.00 Sr. civil enc. Civil enc CM Desrer Civil Drafter Sr. Elec Ener. Elec Ene. Elec Dearer Elec Drafter Sr. Meth Encr. Meth Encr. Mech Deslf ner Mech Draper Sr. Fre pro Encr. Plumb Enqr. Feroo Desioner Plumb Drafter Sr. Struct Enar. Struct Effnw. Saud Desi 'ner Struct Drafter Sr. dosino r Desifi1er Drafter Cost Est Field Rep ODC 622 622 622 622 632 632 632 632 642 642 642 642 652 652 652 652 662 662 662 662 672 672 702 712 0000 51.760.00 5680.00 5440.00 5420.00 5200.00 t 4.00 4.00 16.00 32.00 18.00 8.00 4.00 6 00 3250 Structural analysis Start Dale 5,7 Date 4(29/2013 5/162013 51Manpwr Hrs 5580.00 4.00 5208.00 4.00 3500 Design Development Start Date S/lsr Date 5/7/2013 617!013 S/Manpwr Hrs 51.450.00 10.00 5208.1 4.00 51,540.00 52,210.00 1 51.760.00 5680.00 54 400.00 40.00 5660.00 8.00 5100.00 14.00 26.00 16.00 8.00 5440.00 4.00 5440.00 4.00 5680.00 8.00 5200.00 1 3700 Canstrucliorrl0 ocu ments Start Date Stgg Date 6/10/2013 761/2013 SlManpwr Hrs 54,640.00 51.664.06/ 5672.00 55280.00 518700.00 220.00 4500 Constructlon dminlstration Start Dale SV2jDale 1 8/12013 06/2014 5/Manpwr Hrs 32.00 55,800.00 40.00 32.00 51.664.00 32.00 16.00 48.00 54.400.00 40.00 52,040.00 24.00 53.520.00 32.00 54400.00 510,200.00 120.00 40.00 51.100.00 10.00 5880.00 8.00 54.080.00 48.00 1 1 51.100.00 10.00 5860.00 1 8.00 54.080.00 48.00 51360 00 16.00 5880.00 8.00 51.360.00 16.00 51.360.00 16.00 5500.00 I 5200.00 W:1664001 - Fire Station - City 01 Cape CanaveratlCCCWWF photos\CCCWWF-teeProposalRevised.xls 5/16/2013 Page 1 Other Direct Costs Worksheet Items Ground Travel (Subsistence IRekinoduclion IPosl ne 8 Shipping ILO Phone, Fax !Plotting, ILEED Documentation C,S,MEP !Diskettes 'Site Survey NA !Graphics Fire Protection eng. (Total ODC 3100 Record drawings 5100.00 5100.00 5200.00 5200.00 3250 Structural analysis 5100.00 5100.00 5100.00 3500 Design Development 5100.00 5100.00 5200.00 5200.00 3700 Construction Documents 5200.00 1 5300.00 S500.00 5500.00 1 4500 Construction Administration 5200.00 5200.00 5200.00 I DISCIPUNE TOTALS 502 TOTAL 512 TOTAL 522 TOTAL 612 TOTAL 622 TOTAL ail TOTAL 542 TOTAL S52 TOTAL 562 TOTAL 572 TOTAL 702 TOTAL 712 TOTAL 0000 TOTAL DISCIPLINE TOTALS 5580.00 5208.00 50.00 54,480.00 50.00 52.440.00 50.00 S860.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 5200.00 58,768.00 31001 4. 4.00 0.00 48.00 0. 24.00 o.00 10. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 5580.00 5208.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.015 50.00 55.080.00 S0.00 S0.00 50.00 5100.00 55,968.00 3250 3500 3700) 4500 4.00 51,450.00 10.00 54,640.00 32.0d 55.800.00 40.00 4.005208.00 4.00 51,664.00 32.00 51,664.00 32.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 5672.00 16.00 50.00 0.001 0.00 53.750.00 40.0 523.980.00 268.00 56,440.00 64.00 0.00 50.00 0.01 50.00 0. ) 50.00 0.00 0.00 52.440.00 24.00 S13.720.00 152. 54.400.0 40.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 55.180.0 58.00) 5880.00 8.001 0.00 5440.00 4.00 55.180.00 56.06)) 5880.00 8.00 48.00 5440.00 4.00 53,120.00 32.OU 5880.00 8.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.� 50.00 0.00 0.00 5880.00 8.00 51.360.0 16.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0. 50.00�/ 0.00 0.00 5200.00 0.00 S500.00 0.00) 5200.00 0.001 50.00 59,608.00 94.00 580.016.00 664.0 521.144.0 200.00 W:1664001 - Fire Station - City of Cape Canaveral\CCCWWF photos(CCCWWF-feeProposalRevised.xls 5/16/2013 Page 2 PHASE TOTALS 3100 3250 3500 3700 4500 502 TOTAL 580.00 4.00 580.00 4.00 1,450.00 10.00 4.640,00 32.00 5.800.00 40.00 512 TOTAL 208.00 4.00 208.00. 4.00 208.00 4.00 1.664.00 32.00 1.664.00 32.00 522 TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.0 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 872.00 1600 0.00 0.00 512 TOTAL 4.480.00 48.00 0.00 0.00 3.750.001 40.00 23.980.00 268.00 6.440.00 64.00 .322 TOTAL 0.06'0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.06' 0.00 532 TOTAL 2.440.00 I 24.00 0.00 1 0.00 2.44000 24.00 1 13.720.00 152.00 4,400.00 i 40.00 ;42 TOTAL 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 5.180.00 58.00 880.001 8.00 152 TOTAL 860.001 10.001 0.00 0.001 440.004.001 5.180.00 58.00 880.001 8.00 362 TOTAL 0.00 1 0.00 5.080.00 4800 440.00 I 4.00 1 3.120.00_ 32.00 880.00 1 B 00 00 572 TOTAL 0.001 0.001 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 0. 0.001 0.001 0.00 102 TOTAL 0.001 0.001 0.00 0.00 680.001 8.001 1.360.00 16.001 0.001 0.00 r12 TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.00 )000 TOTAL 200.001 0.00 100.00 0.001 200.0 0.001 500.00 0.001 200.001 0.00 ,HASE TOTALS 8.768.001 90.001 5,968.00 56.001 9.608.0 1 94.001 60.016.00 664.001 21.144.001 200.00 =ROJECT TOTALS r 105,504.00 1 1 104 00 1 W:1664001 - Fire Station - City of Cape CanaveraOCCCWWF photos\CCCWWF-teeProposalRevised.xls 5016/2013 Page 3 Attachment #2 Main WWTP Building Existing Condition Photos WWTP Remodel Pre -Construction Photos POLLUTION , CONTROL I:ACILIT 'CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL MAYOR RICHARD R. THURM CITY COUNCIL FRANK" M. HOOG MARTIN F. SCHRID ' JACK HURCK LEO 8. COLLIN JOSEPH A. RICKARDS 1 CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK DONNA ANDERSON BRILEY, WILD & ASSOCIATES ' CONSULTING ENGINEEkS HARRY PEPPER COMPANY CONTRACTORS 1966 WWTP Remodel Pre -Construction Photos 21Pa ge WWTP Remodel Pre -Construction Photos 3IPage WWTP Remodel Pre -Construction Photos 4 1 un smoLId uoi1JnJI.suo3-aad Iapow@H d1MM WWTP Remodel Pre -Construction Photos 61 WWTP Remodel Pre -Construction Photos 7IPage WWTP Remodel Pre -Construction Photos 8 I Page Attachment #3 Renovation Area Layout Sketch 11 J SLUDGE Ft- 77•174' WAS,r / \ 4� 6" DRN z TI $ :1:1 I I1 FT-FILTR EFFLUENT TRANSFER & II 1 TRANSFER PUMPS Z'FM:8" S.. 51" d - J JIIL 1- City of Cape Canaveral City Council Agenda Form City Council Meeting Date: te: 07/16/2013 Item No. Subject: Approve Task Order No. 3 in the amount of $99,870.00 to Tetra Tech, Inc. for Phase I Engineering Design and Construction Monitoring Services related to the replacement of the sanitary sewer line between Lift Stations #9 and #2 and authorize the City Manager to execute same. Department: Public Works Services Summary: The sanitary sewer line located between Lift Stations #9 (Banana River Drive) and #2 (Center Street) is approximately 4,500 feet in length. The sewer line was slip -lined, which has resulted in the line being undersized with an inside diameter of less than 5 -inches in several locations (original pipe inside diameter of 6 -inches). In addition, manholes along Holman Road were installed above the finished floor elevation of several residences, which has resulted in the flooding of the residence located at 399 Holman Avenue with wastewater on a number of occasions. A preliminary investigation (Lift Station No. 2 Gravity Sewer Evaluation) and report of findings were completed by Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech) in 2012 and recommended the following tasks be performed to correct sewer system deficiencies along Holman Road: • Install gravity sewer line (8 -inch diameter) from the residence at 399 Holman Road southward to Lift Station #9 (approximately 670 feet). This will eliminate the existing connection to the manhole above the finished floor elevation of the residence and also allow for an increase in capacity for future development in the area • Increase the capacity of the entire sewer system from the manhole near the southern terminus of Holman Road northward to Lift Station #2. The upsizing of these sewer lines will eliminate back-up of the system into residences and allow for an increase in capacity for future development in the area. This Project is one of ten submitted to Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as part of the City's State Revolving Loan (SRF) Application. The work will be divided into three phases (see Attachment #1) as follows: • Phase I - Install approximately 670 feet of gravity sewer from 399 Holman Road to Lift Station #9 and replace 570 feet of gravity sewer along Holman Road (upsize pipe to 8 -inch diameter). • Phase II — Replace 680 feet of gravity sewer along the Banana River (upsize pipe to 8 -inch and 10 -inch diameter) and replace 1,050 feet of gravity sewer within the Cape Shores Condominium Development (upsize pipe to 10 -inch diameter). • Phase III — Replace 810 feet of gravity sewer within the Cocoa Palms Mobile Home Park and replace 700 feet of gravity sewer between Cocoa Palms and Lift Station #2 (upsize pipe to 12 -inch diameter). The scope of work for the Phase I activities includes the following tasks: • Survey, engineering design and permitting for all three work phases (I, II and III) as required by the SRF Program; and City Council M eting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. Page 2 of 2 • Bidding, award and construction assistance for the Phase I activities only. P hases II and III of the Project will then be completed, in part, based upon the results of activities completed in Phase I. The location of the sanitary sewer line is shown on the aerial photograph included as Attachment #1, which also delineates the three work phases. Tetra Tech's cost estimate for the Phase I activities is included as Attachment #2. After review of engineering firm qualifications for similar -type projects completed in other municipalities, Staff selected Tetra Tech of Orlando, Florida, to perform the Project tasks. Tetra Tech is one of the engineering firms selected by the City for P rofessional Engineering/Surveying, Planning, Consulting and Architectural Services in Request for Qualifications #2011-01. A Master Services Agreement for these services has been signed between the City and Tetra Tech. S ubmitting Department Director: Jeff Ratliff *'S Date: 07/02/13 Attachments: #1 — Location of Sewer Line and Work Phases #2 — Tetra Tech Cost Estimate Financial Impact: $99,870.00 from SRF to fund Tetra Tech, Inc. for Phase I E ngineering Design and Construction Monitoring Services related to the replacement of the sanitary sewer line between Lift Stations #9 and #2 Staff time and effort to prepare this Agenda Item. • Reviewed by Finance Director: John DeLeo Date: l % The City Manager recommends that City Council take the following action(s): Approve Task Order No. 3 in the amount of $99,870.00 to Tetra Tech, Inc. for Phase I E ngineering Design and Construction Monitoring Services related to the replacement of the sanitary sewer line between Lift Stations #9 and #2 and authorize the City Manager to execute same. Approved by City Manager: David L Greene 191.41s. Date: 7 City Council Action: [ ] Approved as Recommended [ ] Disapp ove in [ ] Approved with Modifications [ 1 Tabled to Time Certain Attachment #1 Location of Sanitary Sewer Line and Work Phases ,t, N Possibly Upslzo Ornvi y Mnin to •inch Grnvil Alp' ow oar - 115 X1114 ARUM B Amer Liar. 2011 Parcels — - Existing Force Main — - Exiatog Gravity Main - Uasae Gravity Main to 8' r_ Upslzo Gravity Main to 10' - PosmtlY Urr;0e Grontr Main to 12" TETRA TECH • Manhole Lll Station No.2 • Litt Stabnn Southern Tributary Aroa (Zones 1 -5) -, L51 Station No 0 Trowry Area 0 N co Fcct WASTEWATER PUMP STATION AND GRAVITY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY CF CAPE CAP:AYERAL CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS IN LIFT STATION NO. 2 SOUTHERN TRIBUTARY AREA FIGURE 7 TASK ORDER No. 3 PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL LIFT STATION NO. 2 GRAVITY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT I. PROJECT OVERVIEW Under an initial phase of a multi -phased project, the City of Cape Canaveral (City) intends to perform gravity sewer improvements along North Banana River Boulevard and Holman Road to address some conveyance issues. More specifically, the City intends to construct the following components under Phase 1. • Approximately 670 linear feet (LF) of new gravity sewer in an existing easement and along North Banana River Boulevard. This segment will start in the vicinity of 399 Holman Road and extend south to Lift Station No. 9. • Replacement of approximately 570 LF of gravity sewer along Holman Road. This segment will start at 399 Holman Road and extend north to an existing manhole located near 301 Holman Road. Subsequent phases of the improvements program will include the following: Phase 1I: This phase addresses "Zone 2" and "Zone 3" as defined in the "Lift Station No. 2 Gravity Sewer Evaluation" prepared by Tetra Tech. • Replacement of approximately 680 LF of gravity sewer located in several easements across Tots for single family homes along the Banana River. • Replacement of approximately 1,050 LF of gravity sewer in a single easement within the Cape Shores Condominium Development. Phase III: This phase addresses "Zone 4" and "Zone 5" as defined in the "Lift Station No. 2 Gravity Sewer Evaluation" prepared by Tetra Tech. • Replacement of approximately 810 LF of gravity sewer located in a single easement within the Cocoa Palms Mobile Home Park. • Replacement of approximately 700 LF of gravity sewer in multiple easements between the Cocoa Palms Mobile Home Park and Lift Station No. 2. JDF/sma/lsc/GS Replacement/Phased Cape Canaveral Gravity Sewer - 070213 Tt #200BP Gen/Cape Canaveral -1- 070213 • Prior to initiating the survey and design work for Phase 3, a closed circuit television inspection (CCTV) will be conducted for the sewers included in this phase to determine if the existing facilities can be reused or cost-effectively rehabilitated. This proposal is for professional engineering services associated with survey, final design, and permitting for Phases I, II and III. Bidding, award, and construction assistance is included for Phase I only pursuant to the City's request. Services will be performed in accordance with the City of Cape Canaveral/Tetra Tech, Inc. Continuing Consulting Contract for Professional Engineering Services. 11. SCOPE OF WORK A. Survey & Investigative Services Tetra Tech will provide a topographic/route survey which will address approximately 4,480 LF of pipeline corridor as summarized above. The survey will include the following tasks: 1. Establish all horizontal and vertical control for a topographical survey of the project based on State Plane Coordinate System NAD83 (2007) Florida East Zone, NAVD 1988. 2. Survey data will include topographic information; baseline control points every 1,000 feet (maximum spacing), vertical control points, section corners, subdivision control points, PRMs, right-of-way monuments, and spot elevations. The survey limits will include the full street right-of-ways and the full width of the existing easement. 3. Review right-of-way deeds of record and recorded plats for determination of existing right-of-way or easement widths along the route. Right-of-way or easement and property boundaries will be plotted on survey drawings for the project route. The cost for supplemental title work. if reouired. will be paid by the City. 4. Cross section elevations will be shown to describe the nature of the topography and will be provided at a minimum spacing of 50 feet along the proposed route to identify changes in grade. Cross sections will also be provided at locations determined by the Engineer to clarify the nature of the proposed work. Water surface elevations of all water bodies within the surveyed area will be provided. 5. Improvements along the corridor will be surveyed and elevations taken. In general, the following entities will be shown and identified: existing right-of-way, existing easements, swales, wetland boundaries as flagged by others, cross sections of topography, existing buried utilities, structures, JDF/sma/Isc/GS Replacement/Phased Cape Canaveral Gravity Sewer - 070213 Tt #200BP Gen/Cape Canaveral -2- 070213 tree trunk and foliage outline for trees 4" in diameter and larger, foliage outlines, sidewalks, culverts, end walls, water bodies, curbing, fences, driveways, valve boxes, utility poles, fire hydrants, utility boxes, utility markers, roadway (paved or unpaved), roadway signs, billboards, mail boxes, and manholes. For the area surveyed, the existing underground water, sewer and reuse water utilities will be field located by the City and existing power, communication and gas will be field located by a subconsultant retained by Tetra Tech (Southeastern Surveying & Mapping). 6. Set horizontal control points throughout the project route. These points will consist of iron rebar with caps and shall be set at all baseline turns. 7. The surveyor will provide the elevation of benchmarks throughout the project route. The benchmarks will be located approximately every 600 feet along the utility alignment. 8. This proposal includes an allowance for the location of existing utilities at 10 locations via "soft dig" techniques. 9. A CCTV inspection of the gravity sewers will be conducted by a qualified subconsultant (Altair Maintenance Services) to ascertain the condition of the existing sewer lines. Subsequent to the CCTV work, the video file will be reviewed to determine if the existing facilities can be reused or cost- effectively rehabilitated. B Geotechnical During design, Tetra Tech will arrange and pay for an independent soils investigation/testing firm to provide necessary soils data and other pertinent information required for design. Soil boring logs and classifications, existing groundwater levels and estimated seasonal high levels, and pipe trench and backfill requirements will be submitted in report format. It is estimated that the soils investigation will include nine (9) standard penetration tests (SPTs) to a depth of 20 feet. C. Final Design The final design will result in preparation of the appropriate number of bidding and contract documents, engineering drawings and technical specifications, which will be submitted to the City for review at the 90- and 100 -percent completion levels. Three (3) sets of drawings and specifications will be provided to the City for each review. A review meeting will be held with the City following the 90% submittal. To ensure proper design of the facilities, Tetra Tech will discuss and receive approval from the City for any substantial changes in the design prior to JDF/sma/lsc/GS Replacement/Phased Cape Canaveral Gravity Sewer - 070213 Tt #200BP Gen/Cape Canaveral -3- 070213 incorporation in the final design. The tasks to be completed during this phase are summarized below: 1. Prepare construction drawings and specifications for the facilities defined in Section 1. Documents shall include drawings and specifications covering the following for each phase: a. Cover sheet, index, general notes and project location map. b. Plan and Profile drawings (scale 1"= 20' horizontal and 1 "= 2' vertical) for the gravity sewer main. Drawings will be prepared using AutoCAD, Release 2011. c. Maintenance of traffic (MOT) detail sheets. d. Standard and special construction details sheets and other required drawings. e. A comprehensive project manual to contain bidding and contractual documents (Divisions 0 and 1) and technical specifications for competitive bidding (Divisions 2 through 16). The project manual and its contents will be formatted in accordance with the Construction Specification Institute (CSI) in Microsoft Word. f. A final opinion of construction cost based on previous bid tabulations, vendor quotes and estimates provided by contractors. D Permitting Tetra Tech will prepare and submit the permit application and supporting documentation to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as required to secure a construction permit for improvements detailed above. Tetra Tech will also respond to requests for additional information (RAIs) from FDEP to clarify the original application. It is assumed that all three (3) phases will be covered under a single permit application. All permit application fees will be paid by the City. E. Bidding and Award Upon advertisement of the project by the City, Tetra Tech will assist the City with bidding of the project and will complete the following tasks for the improvement address under Phase I: 1. Provide one (1) copy of the Contract Documents (engineering drawings and specifications) and any addenda, which may be issued to bidding service agencies, such as Dodge Reports. Additional sets required for bidding will be sold to bidders or others for a nominal fee approximately equal to the cost of printing and handling. JDF/sma/lsc/GS Replacement/Phased Cape Canaveral Gravity Sewer - 070213 Tt #200BP Gen/Cape Canaveral -4- 070213 2. Attend and conduct one (1) pre-bid meeting with representatives of the City and potential bidders. 3. Respond to questions and prepare and issue addenda as required to interpret, clarify or expand the bidding documents. 4. Review and evaluate the apparent low bidder's qualifications for undertaking the work. 5. Consult with and advise the City as to the acceptability of subcontractors and other persons and organizations proposed by the prime contractor. 6. Assist the City in evaluating the bids and make recommendation of the award of the contract. 7. Prepare three (3) copies of a conformed set of Contract Documents for the City and one (1) reproducible set for the recommended Contractor. F. Construction Administration During the construction phase of the project, Tetra Tech will complete the following tasks: 1. Attend and conduct a preconstruction conference with the City, selected Contractor, subcontractors, and regulatory agencies and prepare meeting summary. 2. Provide a total of two (2) monthly site visits to the construction sites to observe construction of the project and attend two (2) monthly progress meetings. The site visits will be to observe the progress and quality of the construction and to document general conformance with the Contract Documents. The site visits will be conducted following each progress meeting. Tetra Tech will be responsible for developing summaries of progress meetings. 3. Provide interpretation or clarification for RFIs regarding the design documents when requested, and prepare change orders required for clarification or minor modification of the Contract Documents. 4. Review shop drawings and other required Contractor submittals up to two (2) times per submittal for general conformance with the Contract Documents. 5. Review test reports for soils, concrete and other materials. 6. Conduct a substantial completion inspection at each site and develop a JDF/sma/lsc/GS Replacement/Phased Cape Canaveral Gravity Sewer - 070213 Tt #200BP Gen/Cape Canaveral -5- 070213 punch list of items to be corrected by the Contractor. 7. Conduct a final completion site visit to each site to determine if the punch list items have been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents and if the Contractor's obligations are fulfilled, and recommend final payment to the Contractor. 8. Prepare two (2) hard copies and an electronic file of the record drawings for the City incorporating changes made during construction based on record information furnished by the Contractor. III. COMPENSATION SUMMARY The proposed compensation for the Scope of Services described in Section 1I is summarized below. The Table below presents a task breakdown of the estimated compensation for the Scope of Services. An additional man-hour breakdown is provided in Attachment A. Task A. 1 Survey & CCTV Inspection Fee $ 47,925 1 B. Geotechnical 1 B. Final Design 1 C. Permitting 1 D. Bidding and Award E. Construction Total Lump Sum: $ 6,0001 $ 34,4551 $ 1,2801 $ 4,380 S 5,830 $ 99,870 Note: If the CCTV inspection for Phase III gravity sewers shows that the existing sewers can be reused without extensive rehabilitation, surveying, geotechnical, and design services will not be needed for Phase III. This scenario will decrease the overall fee by $22,139. IV. SCHEDULE A project schedule that addresses each activity is presented in the Table below. 1 1M111111 Notice to Proceed Weeks from Notice to Proceed 0 Survey CCTV Inspection 90% Design Complete /Permit Submitted City Review and Meeting 100% Design Complete Construction Documents Permitting Bidding/Award Construction 4 8 12 15 19 23 31 39 JDF/sma/lsc/GS Replacement/Phased Cape Canaveral Gravity Sewer - 070213 Tt #200BP Gen/Cape Canaveral -6- 070213 V. SERVICES NOT INCLUDED A. Permit Application Fees — The check(s) for the permit application fee(s) will be issued by the City. B. Other Permits — This proposal does not include permitting services for any permits not previously listed. C. Cost of Supplemental Title work, if required for survey (not anticipated to be required). D. Field locates for survey of existing City water, sewer and reuse water utilities other than as specifically described herein. E. Cost of advertising the project shall be paid for by the City. F. Bidding, construction administration and regulatory certification of completion services for Phases II and III. JDF/sma/Isc/GS Replacement/Phased Cape Canaveral Gravity Sewer - 070213 Tt #200BP Gen/Cape Canaveral -7- 070213 Attachment #2 Tetra Tech Cost Estimate ri-bI Attachment A Lift Station No. 2 Gravity Sewer Improvements Survey, Design. Permitting, Bidding, & Construction Administration Submitted lo: City of Cape Canaveral Project Phases / Tasks 43un7/Mamma IAnityLe tes/CCIV5.4er Yapwdon(Phan i it t114 rionesan UMW Off. 4MagreaM Inky teb10 See Dip ---- - [CTS Nappy 04 (3048000.141 ke.Mun.Me r.pe.an g.efee7nla Musat L a{R f nMea11a.04katg. G nal beds. lMoleslee, & pia Tann Sleet. Geeeea8 Nan. [eeetlee Mao farateles S44617 Steels Pee P844i le4eM6 aebnut•ses Seen Pm MPH G.4.es Non Poe a 11.111.3 (7 S4ee4 116I841 MOT en051191032 Per easel 544444.4 Ona% 11 SM.t Per r..asel ----_ — -- O a... a Ceevan Dereme.h sea Tabwar 39.14kab» PROP Irae..l Pn Maul 034445 d Cat O 901; Somme! ------ W0[ Retie. henry 171tteetetp 4010wu0M homes D. PerrM lne3P 4M1 ii IIQ 1f10a,e4643.410[P4p1444. ,51141 Re.me.n,Wr !norm. 0. kwAly sod Mord Rhea I17et�_ 444'404Cewea manna. aM Tadao Rpn04e4 /wee 40!4.44 hpMefisons Innen Caienon [ra4Wta P.N Ma mane Ifeeta oeeann CGM3ret 004.mrela 4letbut0ble ltete Man F.Cp4WO1011Mute IOetyj Imre Peter/Duette/ Ca1lerea. Sae Y.sR.MenIOM Marne Mrreemate /411 ane/set - Pee Ora*.'I Oa.r_ U we. Tett Mean Seiraael Ca.peotte In4pea4n S.rcomcleten aaoeasp -- leered po.. p a [mleaDe es ami aR.nh.nmN [.peMft Labor Plan 9 Labor Resources 0, 110 CO 13 CC 1.100 MO> 0103 n: ..m 5 ii s c= d Total = I Labor His _ iF 7551 ef, R W .. of 10 _� a sl g11 31 a to 50 .1 a N Da ro g 7N 2 •I 74 tm, 7701 12 a b 14 Task Pn[inp Totals Specify Adan Fees on Setup Technolo,``v Use Fee 'rola! Price Pricing by Resource labor Sant 72.355: 27.106 I 99.870 99,870 Task Pricing ooc. Totals 7701 99.270 &Ia 7 1073. eras {Dr{ •I _1 -1 .I .i •1 74- St l 111 N N1 171 241 •l_ -1 •I -I WIC { f 950 NO tl PAP e pe a.s» aro a» we Men L OP ON 34.4IS 2110 60 lf4 N u If 18,110 3. N N - • ___ _ .____ 0.11* » _ 7 f-_ 9 - a j» ii— SAO 10 t Mei i 1 1.40. s • 171 1 7 i 7 .• 1 1 u s' r 71 4 17 N1 -1 4.0! -I -1 7p01 •1 1SPe SLC LAS 5303 LIP 240 100 7.730 1/704.2N 430 1_.540 140 4330 350 40 1MO 4. 730 534 4. Le 1.M0 -1 �NOj leo eM LOW __-1750 PIO 800 71 -1 3N rep 44 1 344 »7 I 84 N >m rN a 71355 77105 1 retro Tech. Confidential and Proprietary Page 1 d 1 7101 411.170 Primed 7(127013 City of Cape Canaveral City Council Agenda Form City Council Meeting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. 6— Subject: Award the Bid for Lift Station # 1 Improvements Project to Hinterland Group, Inc. in the amount of $148,890 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Construction Agreement for same. Department: Public Works Services Summary: Public Works Services (PWS) invited qualified Licensed Contractors in accordance with the City's Purchasing Policy and Florida Statutes to submit a Bid for Lift Station # 1 Improvements Project. Staff advertised this bid opportunity on May 28, 2013 by posting a legal ad in the Florida Today newspaper and a notice on the City's web page. Three (3) sealed bid submittals were received and publicly opened at the City Clerk's Office on June 21, 2013. PWS Staff analyzed the bid submittals and recommends the City award the bid/contract to Hinterland Group, Inc. of Cocoa, FL which provided the lowest bid in the amount of $148,890. The next lowest bid was provided by Danus Utilities, Inc. in the amount of $220,500. Reference checks (via telephone) performed by Staff with Florida Gov. Utility Authority, City of St. Pete Beach, Seacoast Utility Authority and Palm Beach County personnel revealed positive responses concerning Hinterland Group, Inc. to perform this type of work. A proposed Construction Agreement is included as Attachment #1. A Bid Tally Sheet is included as Attachment #2. The Hinterland Group, Inc. Bid is included as Attachment #3. Submitting Department Director: Jeff Ratliff dP• /AA Date: 07/01/13 Attachments: #1 - Construction Agreement #2 - Bid Tally Sheet #3 - Hinterland Group, Inc. Bid Financial Impact: $148,890 from Wastewater Fund for Lift Station # 1 Improvements Project to Hinterland Group, Inc. Staff time and effort to prepare this Agenda It m. Reviewed by Finance Director: John DeLeo Date: `�a 13 The City Manager recommends that City Council ake the following action(s): Award the Bid for Lift Station # 1 Improvements Project to Hinterland Group, Inc. in the amount of $148,890 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Construction Agreement for same. Approved by City Manager: David L. Greene '91L-2 Date:'7/t//'� City Council Action: [ ] Approved as Recommended [ ] Disapproved [ ] Approved with Modifications [ ] Tabled to Time Certain Attachment #1 Construction Agreement Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida SECTION 00 50 00 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT This Agreement made this day of , 2013 between the CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, a Florida municipal corporation (herein referred to as OWNER) and Hinterland Group, Inc., a Florida corporation authorized and duly licensed to do business In the State of Florida (herein referred to as CONTRACTOR), as follows: 1. DESCRIPTION OF WORK - CONTRACTOR shall perform the work, in accordance with the Contract Documents for the completion of structural improvements and the general rehabilitation of Lift Station Number 1 located on Washington Avenue. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS - The Contract Documents consist of this Agreement; Exhibits and Addendum to the Agreement; the Engineering Pian and Drawings prepared by Infrastructure Solution Services, dated May 28, 2013; Bid Documents issued by the City, dated May 28, 2013; Contractor's Bid Submittal, dated June 21, 2013; General Conditions, if any, Supplemental Terms and Conditions by the City, if any; all Change Orders approved by the City after execution of this Agreement, and Amended Contract Documents (if required). These Contract Documents are hereby incorporated into this Contract by this reference. 3. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE - In case of inconsistency in any of the documents bearing on the Agreement between the OWNER and the CONTRACTOR, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order a. Agreement Exhibits and Addenda; Contractor's Bid Submittal b. Change Orders c. Supplemental Terms and Conditions d. General Terms and Conditions e. Engineering Plans and Specs Any inconsistency in the work description shall be clarified by the OWNER and performed by the CONTRACTOR. 4. AGREEMENT INTERPRETATION - At its discretion, during the course of the work, should any errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies be found in the Agreement or specifications, the OWNER at its sole discretion will interpret the intent of the Agreement and work descriptions and the CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to abide by the OWNER's interpretation and agrees to carry out the work in accordance with the decision of the OWNER. When the material, article, or equipment is designated by a brand name and more than one brand name is listed, it will be understood that the work is based on one brand name only. The CONTRACTOR will be responsible for all coordination necessary to accommodate the material, article, or equipment being provided without additional cost to the OWNER. A substitute material, article, or equipment is allowed if it is reasonably equivalent to the brand name specified. The OWNER has full discretion to decide whether a substitute is reasonably equivalent. CONTRACTOR must notify the OWNER prior to use of the substitute for a specified brand 2013-02/CCV001 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 00 50 00 -1 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida name and allow the OWNER to make a determination before CONTRACTOR uses the substitute. 5. CONTRACT TIME - The CONTRACTOR shall begin work within 10 days after the issuance of a written Notice to Proceed and shall complete the work of substantial completion within 90 calendar days from the date of the Notice to Proceed and complete the work of the final completion within 105 calendar days of the Notice to Proceed. Extensions, if any, are authorized by OWNER, and may only be granted in writing. The bypass pumping and taking of Lift Station Number 1 wet well offline shall start within 60 days after the issuance of a written Notice to Proceed and shall be completed within 70 days after the issuance of a written Notice to Proceed. 6. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - OWNER and CONTRACTOR recognize that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that OWNER will suffer financial loss if the Work is not substantially complete within the time specified In Paragraph 5 above, plus any extensions thereof allowed in accordance with the General Conditions. They also recognize the delays, expense, and difficulties involved in proving in a legal or arbitration proceeding the actual Toss suffered by OWNER if the Work is not substantially complete on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, OWNER and CONTRACTOR agree that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty) CONTRACTOR shall pay OWNER $1_ for each day that expires after the time specified in Paragraph 5 for the completion of bypass pumping, for substantial completion, and for final completion until the work is finally complete. The OWNER has paid to CONTRACTOR the consideration of Ten ($10.00) Dollars as consideration for this provision. 7. CONTRACT PRICE. UNIT PRICE CONTRACT - The OWNER will pay the CONTRACTOR in current funds for the performance of the work, subject to additions and deductions by Change Order, the Total Contract Price of One Hundred Forty-eight Thousand, Eight Hundred Ninety Dollars and Zero Cents ($148,890.00). Payments will be made to the CONTRACTOR for actual quantities installed on the basis of the Bid Schedule included as a part of the Bid, which shall be as fully a part of the Contract as if attached or repeated herein. • 8. TERMINATION: DEFAULT BY CONTRACTOR AND OWNER'S REMEDIES - The OWNER reserves the right to revoke and terminate this Agreement and rescind all rights and pnvileges associated with this Agreement, without penalty, for convenience. Further, the OWNER reserves the right to revoke and terminate this Agreement in the following circumstances, each of which shall represent a default and breach of this Agreement: a. CONTRACTOR defaults in the performance of any material covenant or condition of this Agreement and does not cure such other default within seven (7) calendar days after written notice from the OWNER specifying the default complained of, unless, however, the nature of the default is such that it cannot, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, be remedied within seven (7) calendar days, in which case the CONTRACTOR shall have such time as is reasonably necessary to remedy the default, provided the CONTRACTOR promptly takes and diligently pursues such actions as are necessary therefore; or b. CONTRACTOR is adjudicated bankrupt or makes any assignment for the benefit of creditors or CONTRACTOR becomes insolvent, or is unable or unwilling to pay its debts; or 2013-02/CCV001 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 00 50 00 - 2 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida c. CONTRACTOR has acted negligently, as defined by general and applicable law, in performing the Work hereunder or d. CONTRACTOR has committed any act of fraud upon the OWNER; or e. CONTRACTOR has made a material misrepresentation of fact to the OWNER while performing its obligations under this Agreement; or f. CONTRACTOR is experiencing a labor dispute, which threatens to have a substantial, adverse impact upon performance of this Agreement without prejudice to any other right, or remedy OWNER may have under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, in the event of a default by CONTRACTOR, the OWNER shall have the right to exercise any other remedy the OWNER may have by operation of law, without limitation, and without any further demand or notice In the event of such termination, OWNER shall be liable only for the payment of all unpaid charges, determined in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, for Work properly performed prior to the effective date of termination. 9. FORCE MAJEURE - Any delay or failure of either party in the performance of its required obligations hereunder shall be excused if and to the extent caused by acts of God; fire; flood; windstorm; explosion; riot; war, sabotage; strikes (except involving CONTRACTOR's labor force); extraordinary breakdown of or damage to OWNER 's affiliates' generating plants, their equipment, or facilities; court injunction or order federal and/or state law or regulation; order by any regulatory agency; or cause or causes beyond the reasonable control of the party affected; provided that prompt notice of such delay is given by such party to the other and each of the parties hereunto shall be diligent in attempting to remove such cause or causes. If any circumstance of Force Majeure remains in effect for sixty days, either party may terminate this Agreement. 10. SEVERABILITY - In the event any portion or part thereof of this Agreement is deemed invalid, against public policy, void, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of law, the parties, at the sole discretion and option of the OWNER, shall negotiate an equitable adjustment in the affected provision of this Agreement. The validity and enforceability of the remaining parts of this Agreement shall otherwise be fully enforceable. 11. PROGRESS PAYMENTS - OWNER shall make progress payments on account of the contract price to CONTRACTOR, on the basis of application for payments submitted to the OWNER or OWNER's Project Manager, by CONTRACTOR as the work progresses, and in accordance with the Contract Documents. Progress payments may be withheld it a. Work is found defective and not remedied; b. Contractor does not make prompt and proper payments to subcontractors; c. Contractor does not make prompt and proper payments for labor, materials, or equipment fumished him; d. Another Contractor is damaged by an act for which Contractor is responsible; e. Claims or liens are filed on the job; or f. In the opinion of the City of Cape Canaveral, Contractor's work is not progressing satisfactorily. 2013-02/CCV001 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 00 50 00 - 3 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida 12. FINAL PAYMENT - OWNER shall withhold up to 10% of the Contract Price throughout the project in accordance with the Local Government Prompt Payment Act ("Act"). After 50% completion of the project, OWNER may reduce to 5% the amount of the retainage withheld from each subsequent progress payment made to the CONTRACTOR unless the project is subject to Federal funding, in whole or in part, and the project is subject to laws and regulations contrary to the Act. The term "50% completion of the project" shall mean the point at which the OWNER has expended 50% of the total cost of the construction services purchased under this Agreement together with all costs associated with existing change orders and other additions or modifications to the construction services provided for in this Agreement. After 50% completion, the Contractor may present to the OWNER a payment request for up to one-half of the retainage held by the OWNER. Owner shall promptly make payment to the CONTRACTOR unless the OWNER has grounds, under the Act, for withholding the payment of the retainage. The remaining retainage amount withheld shall be released with the Final Payment after the issuance of the Final Completion Certificate. OWNER shall make final payment to CONTRACTOR within thirty (30) days after the work is fully and properly completed, if the contract has been fully and timely performed, but subject to the condition that final payment shall not be due until CONTRACTOR has delivered to OWNER a complete release of liens arising out of the contract, or receipt of releases of lien fully covering all labor, materials and equipment for which a lien could be filed, or in the alternative a bond satisfactory to OWNER indemnifying him against such claims. By making payments OWNER does not waive claims including but not limited to those relating to: a. Faulty work appearing after substantial completion has been granted; b. Work that does not comply with the Contract Documents: c. Outstanding claims of liens; or d. Failure of Contractor to comply with any special guarantees required by the Contract Documents. 13. DESIGNATION OF PROJECT MANAGER OR ENGINEER: DUTIES AND AUTHORITY The duties and authority of the OWNER are as follows: a. General Administration of Contract. The primary function of the OWNER is to provide the general administration of the contract. In performance of these duties, Jeff Ratliff, Public Works Services Director, or his authorized representative is the OWNER's Project Manager during the entire period of construction. The OWNER (CITY) may change the Project Manager during the term of this contract. b. Inspections. Opinions, and Progress Reports. The OWNER shall be kept familiar with the progress and quality of the work by CONTRACTOR and may make periodic visits to the work site. The OWNER will not be responsible for the means of construction, or for the sequences, methods, and procedures used therein, or for the CONTRACTOR's failure to perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. c. Access to Worksite for Inspections. The OWNER shall be given free access to the worksite at all times during work preparation and progress. The Project Manager is not obligated to make exhaustive or continuous onsite inspections to perform his duties of checking and reporting on work progress, and any such inspections shall not waive Owner's claim regarding defective work by Contractor. 2013-02/CCV001 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 00 50 00 - 4 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida d. Interpretation of Contract Documents: Decisions on Disputes. The OWNER will be the initial interpreter of the contract document requirements, and make decisions on claims and disputes between Contractor and Owner. e. Rejection and Stoppage of Work. The OWNER shall have authority to reject work which in its opinion does not conform to the Contract Documents, and in this connection may stop the work or a portion thereof, when necessary. f. Payment Certificates. The OWNER will determine the amounts owing to CONTRACTOR as the work progresses, based on CONTRACTOR's applications and OWNER's inspections and observations, and will issue certificates for progress payments and final payments in accordance with the terms of the Contract Documents. 14. PROGRESS MEETING — OWNER'S Project Manager may hold periodic progress meetings on a monthly basis, or more frequently if required by the OWNER, during the term of work entered into under this Agreement CONTRACTOR's Project Manager and all other appropriate personnel shall attend such meetings as designated by the OWNER'S Project Manager. 15. RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONTRACTOR - CONTRACTOR's duties and rights in connection with the project herein are as follows: a. Responsibility for Supervision and Construction CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for all construction under this contract, including the techniques, sequences, procedures and means, for the coordination of all work. CONTRACTOR shall supervise and direct the work, and give it all attention necessary for such proper supervision and direction. b. Discipline and Employment CONTRACTOR shall maintain at all times strict discipline among his employees, and he agrees not to employ for work on the project any person unfit or without sufficient skill to perform the job for which he was employed. c. Furnishina of Labor. Materials. etc. CONTRACTOR shall provide and pay for all labor, materials and equipment, including tools, construction equipment and machinery, utilities, including water, transportation, and all other facilities and work necessary for the proper completion of work on the project in accordance with the Contract Documents. d. Payment of Taxes: Procurement of Licenses and Permits. CONTRACTOR shall secure all licenses and permits necessary for proper completion of the work, paying the fees thereof. CONTRACTOR warrants that it (and subcontractors or tradesmen, if authorized in the Contract Documents) hold or will secure all trade or professional licenses required by law for CONTRACTOR to undertake the contract work. e. CONTRACTOR will provide written guarantee for work and materials for one (1) calendar year after acceptance by OWNER. 16. ASSIGNMENT - CONTRACTOR shall not assign or subcontract this Agreement, or any rights or any monies due or to become due hereunder without the prior, written consent of the OWNER. a. If upon receiving written approval from OWNER, any part of this Agreement is subcontracted by CONTRACTOR, CONTRACTOR shall be fully responsible to 2013-02/CCV001 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 00 50 00 - 5 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida OWNER for all acts and/or omissions performed by the subcontractor as if no subcontract had been made. b. If OWNER determines that any subcontractor is not performing in accordance with this Agreement, OWNER shall so notify CONTRACTOR who shall take immediate steps to remedy the situation. c. If CONTRACTOR, prior to the commencement of any Work subcontracts any part of this Agreement by the subcontractor, CONTRACTOR shall require the subcontractor to provide OWNER and its affiliates with insurance coverage as set forth by the OWNER. 17. THIRD PARTY RIGHTS - Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than OWNER and CONTRACTOR. 18. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES - CONTRACTOR warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONTRACTOR, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual, or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONTRACTOR, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. 19. NO JOINT VENTURE - Nothing herein shall be deemed to create a joint venture or principal - agent relationship between the parties and neither party is authorized to, nor shall either party act toward third persons or the public in any manner which would indicate any such relationship with the other party. 20. INDEMNIFICATION — CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, and city attorneys (individually and in their official capacity) from liability, losses, damages, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness or intentional wrongful misconduct of CONTRACTOR and persons employed or utilized by CONTRACTOR in the performance of this Agreement. The indemnification provided above shall obligate the CONTRACTOR to defend at its own expense or to provide for such defense, at the option of the OWNER, as the case may be, of any and all claims of liability and all suits and actions of every name and description that may be brought against the OWNER or its officers, employees, and city attorneys covered by this indemnification. In all events the OWNER and its officers, employees, and city attorneys shall be permitted to choose legal counsel of its sole choice, the fees for which shall be reasonable and subject to and included with this indemnification provided herein. 21. SAFETY - CONTRACTOR shall be solely and absolutely responsible and assume all liability for the safety and supervision of its principals, employees, contractors, and agents while performing work provided hereunder. 22. CORPORATE REPRESENTATIONS BY CONTRACTOR - CONTRACTOR hereby represents and warrants to the OWNER the following: a. CONTRACTOR is duly registered and licensed to do business in the State of Florida and is in good standing under the laws of Florida, and is duly qualified and authorized to carry on the functions and operations set forth in this Agreement. 2013-02/CCV001 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 00 50 00 - 6 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida b. The undersigned signatory for CONTRACTOR has the power, authority, and the legal right to enter Into and perform the obligations set forth in this Agreement and all applicable exhibits thereto, and the execution, delivery, and performance hereof by CONTRACTOR has been duly authorized by the board of directors and/or president of CONTRACTOR. In support of said representation, CONTRACTOR agrees to provide a copy to the OWNER of a corporate certificate of good standing provided by the State of Florida prior to the execution of this Agreement. c. CONTRACTOR is duly licensed under all local, state and federal laws to provide the work stated in paragraph 1.0 herein. In support of said representation, CONTRACTOR agrees to provide a copy of all said licenses to the OWNER prior to the execution of this Agreement. 23. BOND - CONTRACTOR shall supply a materials, performance and payment bond(s) in form approved by the OWNER's City Attorney and in accordance with Florida law and in an amount specified in the Contract Documents. 24. INSURANCE - During the term of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for providing the types of insurance and limits of liability as set forth below. a. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain comprehensive general liability insurance in the minimum amount of $2,000,000 as the combined single limit for each occurrence to protect the CONTRACTOR from claims of property damages which may arise from any Work performed under this Agreement whether such Work is performed by the CONTRACTOR or by anyone directly employed by or contracting with the CONTRACTOR. b. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain comprehensive automobile liability insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit bodily injury and minimum $1,000,000 property damage as the combined single limit for each occurrence to protect the CONTRACTOR from claims for damages for bodily injury, including wrongful death, as well as from claims from property damage, which may arise from the ownership, use, or maintenance of owned and non -owned automobiles, including rented automobiles whether such operations be by the CONTRACTOR or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the CONTRACTOR. c. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain, during the life of this Agreement, adequate Workers' Compensation Insurance in at least such amounts as are required by law and Employer's Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $2,000,000 for all of its employees performing Work for the OWNER pursuant to this Agreement. Special Requirements. Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirements herein identified shall be maintained during the term of this Agreement. A copy of a current Certificate of Insurance shall be provided to the OWNER by CONTRACTOR upon the Effective Date of this Contract which satisfies the insurance requirements of this paragraph 24. Renewal certificates shall be sent to the OWNER 30 days prior to any expiration date. There shall also be a 30 -day advance written notification to the OWNER in the event of cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage. The OWNER shall be an additional named insured on all stipulated insurance policies as its interest may appear, from time to time, excluding workers' compensation and professional liability policies. 2013-02/CCV001 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 00 50 00 - 7 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida Independent Associates and Consultants. All independent contractors or agents employed by CONTRACTOR to perform any Work hereunder shall fully comply with the insurance provisions contained in these paragraphs for Section 24. 25. MEDIATION/VENUE - The parties agree that should any dispute arise between them regarding the terms or performance of this Agreement, both parties will participate in mediation. The parties agree to equally share the cost of the mediator. Should the parties fail to resolve their differences through mediation, then any cause of action filed hereunder shall be filed in the Circuit or County Court for Brevard County, Florida. 26. GOVERNING LAW & VENUE - This Agreement is made and shall be interpreted, construed, govemed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any state action or litigation shall be Brevard County, Florida. Venue for any federal action or litigation shall be Orlando, Florida. 27. ATTORNEY'S FEES - Should either party bring an action to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, to the extent permitted by law, to recover from the non -prevailing party the costs and expenses of such action including, but not limited to, reasonable attomey's fees, whether at settlement, trial or on appeal. 28. NOTICES - Any notice or approval under this Contract shall be sent, postage prepaid, to the applicable party at the address shown on the first page of this Contract. 29. WORK IS A PRIVATE UNDERTAKING - With regard to any and all Work performed hereunder, it is specifically understood and agreed to by and between the parties hereto that the contractual relationship between the OWNER and CONTRACTOR is such that the CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor and not an agent of the OWNER. The CONTRACTOR, its contractors, partners, agents, and their employees are independent contractors and not employees of the OWNER. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to establish any relationship other than that of an independent contractor, between the OWNER, on one hand, and the CONTRACTOR, its contractors, partners, employees, or agents, during or after the performance of the Work under this Agreement. 30. DOCUMENTS - Public Records: It is hereby specifically agreed that any record, document, computerized information and program, audio or video tape, photograph, or other writing of the CONTRACTOR and its independent contractors and associates related, directly or indirectly, to this Agreement, may be deemed to be a Public Record whether in the possession or control of the OWNER or the CONTRACTOR. Said record, document, computerized information and program, audio or video tape, photograph, or other writing of the CONTRACTOR is subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and may not be destroyed without the specific written approval of the OWNER's City Manager. Upon request by the OWNER, the CONTRACTOR shall promptly supply copies of said public records to the OWNER. All books, cards, registers, receipts, documents, and other papers in connection with this Agreement shall at any and all reasonable times during the normal working hours of the CONTRACTOR be open and freely exhibited to the OWNER for the purpose of examination and/or audit. The CONTRACTOR acknowledges that the OWNER is a Florida municipal corporation and subject to the Florida Public Records Law. CONTRACTOR agrees that to the extent any 2013-02/CCV001 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 00 50 00 - 8 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida document produced by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement constitutes a Public Record; CONTRACTOR shall comply with the Florida Public Records Law. 31. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY - Notwithstanding any other provision set forth in this Agreement, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of the CITY'S right to sovereign immunity under Section 768.28, or other limitations imposed on the CITY'S potential liability under state or federal law. As such, the CITY shall not be liable, under this Agreement for punitive damages or interest for the period before judgment. Further, the CITY shall not be liable for any claim or judgment, or portion thereof, to any one person for more than two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00), or any claim or judgment, or portion thereof, which, when totaled with all other claims or judgments paid by the State or its agencies and subdivisions arising out of the same incident or occurrence, exceeds the sum of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00). 32. HEADINGS - Paragraph headings are for the convenience of the parties only and are not to be construed as part of this Agreement 33. INTEGRATION: MODIFICATION - The drafting, execution, and delivery of this Agreement by the Parties has been induced by no representations, statements, warranties, or agreements other than those expressed herein. This Agreement embodies the entire understanding of the parties, and there are no further or other agreements or understandings, wntten or oral, in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof unless expressly referred to herein. Modifications of this Agreement shall only be made in wnting signed by both parties. 34. WAIVER AND ELECTION OF REMEDIES - Waiver by either party of any terms, or provision of this Agreement shall not be considered a waiver of that term, condition, or provision in the future. No waiver, consent, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of each party hereto. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be considered an onginal agreement; but such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. 35. DRAFTING - OWNER and CONTRACTOR each represent that they have both shared equally In drafting this Agreement and no party shall be favored or disfavored regarding the interpretation of this Agreement in the event of a dispute between the parties. 36. NOTICE - Any notices required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be delivered by hand or mailed, postage prepaid to: For CONTRACTOR: Daniel Duke III President Hinterland Group Inc. 5580 State Road 524 Cocoa, Florida 32926 2013-02/CCV001 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 00 50 00 - 9 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida • For OWNER: Jeff Ratliff Public Works Services Director P O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Either party may change the notice address by providing the other party written notice of the change. Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the presence of: Attest CONTRACTOR: Hinterland Group, Inc. Name Title Business Address City, State Zip Date OWNER CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL A Florida municipal corporation Attest: Angela Apperson, Assistant By: David L. Greene, City Manager City Manager/City Clerk Business Address City, State Zip Date 2013-02/CCV001 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 00 50 00 -10 Attachment #2 Bid Tally Sheet Canaveral. Lift. Station •Ntiiiber� 1Prbj•e•Froje�ct ... Bid Opening - Bid #201342 June 21, 2013 (oi 3:05 pm Firm 4.7,444.6 �s-ovt0 acs., 4.2.Coott/ S# %.2✓,C. pvt,-,e/s 0504.:s , 2;7 c. Bid Amount 4,171 Eye . vesi 420, S o. dO Attachment #3 Hinterland Group, Inc. Bid Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida SECTION 00 30 00 BID FORM For City of Cape Canaveral Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Cape Canaveral, Florida Submitted in Triplicate: June 14, 2013 City Clerk, City of Cape Canaveral 105 Polk Avenue Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Gentlemen: The undersigned, as Bidder, hereby declares that the only person or persons interested in the Bid, as principal or principals, is or are named herein and that no other person than herein men- tioned has any interest in the Bid of the Contract to which the work pertains; that this Bid is made without connection or arrangement with any other person, company, or parties making a bid and that the Bid is in all respects fair and made in good faith without collusion or fraud. The Bidder further declares that he has examined the site of the work and has fully satisfied himself that such site is a correct and suitable one for this work and he assumes full responsibil- ity therefore. This determination was made based on his personal knowledge and experience and/or having made sufficient test holes and other subsurface investigations. The Bidder states that he has examined the Drawings and Specifications for the work and based on his own expe- rience or professional advice, he has determined that the Drawings and Specifications are suffi- cient for the work to be done and that he has examined the other Contract Documents and all addenda relating thereto, including the Advertisement for Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Bid, Non- collusion Affidavit of Prime Bidder, Public Entity Crimes, Contract, Performance, Payment and Maintenance Bonds, Certificate of Insurance, General Conditions, Special Conditions, Technical Specifications, Appendices, and Drawings and has read all addenda prior to the receipt of bids, and that he has satisfied himself fully, relative to all matters and conditions with respect to the work to which this Bid pertains. It is the responsibility of the Bidder to determine all quantities and costs for descriptive items in the BID SCHEDULE. If during the Bidding Process, the Bidder discovers any additional items not listed in the BID FORM, the Bidder shall bring this information to the attention of the Engineer prior to the Bid date. The Bidder proposes and agrees, if this Bid is accepted, to contract with the City of Cape Ca- naveral in the form of Construction Agreement specified, to furnish all necessary materials, equipment, all necessary machinery, tools, apparatus, means of transportation, and labor nec- essary to complete the work specified in the Bid and the Contract, and called for by the Draw- ings and Specifications and in the manner specified. The Bidder further proposes and agrees to comply in all respects with the time limits for com- mencement and completion of the work as stated in the Contract Form. The Bidder further agrees that the deductions for liquidated damages, as stated in the Construction Agreement, 2013-02/CCV001 BID FORM 00 30 00 -1 • • i 1 1 1 • 1 • • ..c • - • • • •Y• • • oa a • -• •• . ..• ify .floc '• r•• •• •, ••• •'Name and Address of Surety or Sureties who will sign Bonds: • Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida constitute fixed, agreed, and liquidated damages to reimburse the Owner for additional costs to the Owner resulting from the work not being completed within the time limit stated in the Con- struction Agreement. The Bidder further agrees to execute a Construction Agreement and furnish satisfactory Per- formance and Payment Bonds, each in the amount of one -hundred percent (100%) of the Con- tract pace, within ten consecutive calendar days after written notice being given by the Owner of the award of the Contract. Absent a Change Order, there shall be no increase in the lump sum payment. It is understood that the unit prices quoted or established for a particular item are to be used for computing the amount to be paid to the Contractor in the event of a Change Order, based on the quantities and unit price information. The undersigned agrees to accept in full compensation therefore the total of the Contract price for the lump sum prices named in the following schedule actually constructed as determined by the applicable measurement and payment portion of the technical specifications. Name of Bidder Hinterland Group, Inc. Bidder's Occupational License No. as 45. Signature of Authorized Officer; • • •• • • ills president • • z\ gwitirees Address 5580 State Road 524 State Florida Zip 32926 Performance Bond Wagner Bonding & Insurance P.O. Box 91147, Lakeland, Florida 33804 Payment Bond Wagner Bonding & Insurance P.O. Box 91147, Lakeland, Florida 33804 2013-02/CCV001 BID FORM 00 30 00 - 2 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida BID SCHEDULE Bidder agrees to perform all the work described in the Contract Documents for the below unit prices or lump sum: NOTE: 1. BIDS shall include sales tax and all other applicable taxes and fees. 2. BIDS shall be on the basis of a combined unit price - lump sum amount and shall be compensation in full for the complete work. 3. The undersigned herewith submits the following Unit Prices that shall be applicable for any revisions to the extent of the work (either additions or omissions) as indicated on the original Contract Drawings, The unit prices hereafter listed are understood to include all charges for layout, insurance, taxes, field office and supervisions, overhead and profit, bonds and miscellaneous items needed to complete the work. 4. The City of Cape Canaveral reserves the right to reject any and all bids in whole or in part, or to limit quantities under Bid Items, or to waive any informalities in the bidding or bidding documents, whichever may be in the City's best interest. 5. The Owner may elect not to construct any part of the Contract, and reserves the right to delete them from the Contract at Award. 6. The Contractor and Surety, for value received, hereby stipulate and agree that any and all claims, demands, actions or suits whatsoever, arising under this contract and/or bonds, shall be subjected to the jurisdiction and venue of the Circuit Court of Brevard County, Florida. The Contractor and Surety do agree, by execution of these documents, that the jurisdiction and venue in said forum is proper and appropriate since performance of the underlying contract for which these documents are executed is to be accom- plished within Brevard County, Florida. • 2013-02/CCV001 BID FORM 00 30 00 - 3 • • • 1 • Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida BASE BID # Description • 1 Mobilization/ Demobilization (5% + Total Bid) 2 Restoration & Repair of Wet Well 3 Replacement of Submersible Pump Related Equipment 4 Replacement of Pipe Inside Wet Well 5 Replacement of Pipe Outside Wet Weil 6 Replacement of All Valve Related Equipment (Inside Valve Box) 7 Replacement of All Valve Related Equipment (Outside Valve Box) 8 Construction of Fence 9 Bypass Pumping System Installation Only 10 Site Vegetation Removals and Restoration of Site to Original 11 All Other Aspects of Project for Fully Functional LS #1 Unit Price ($/unit or LS) 5,000.00 25,000.00 3,500.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25„000.00 Total Lump Sum Base Bid: $ 148, 890.00 25,000.00 7.500.00 2,500.00 4,500.00 890.00 Quantity Subtotals (units) ($) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5,000.00 25,000.00 3,500.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 7,500.00 2,500.00 4,500.00 890.00 (In words) One Hundred Forty Eight Thousand, Ei9ht Hundred Ninety Dollars and 00/100 ALTERNATE BID ITEMS # Description 1 Bypass Pumping Operation and Maintenance Only (Additive $) 2013-02/CCV001 Unit Price ($/unit or LS) 40,000.00 BID FORM Quantity Subtotals (units) ($) 1 40,000.00 00 30 00 - 4 • • • • • • • i•• • • • • • • Uft Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida BASIS OF CONTRACT AWARD The Contract will be awarded to the lowest, responsive, responsible Bidder acceptable to Owner based on the total Base Bid. The Alternate Bid Item will not be part of the Base Bid selection. Owner will select Alternate Bid Items based on available funding. The Bidder agrees that he will, when so authorized by the City, through the change order pro- cess, perform additional work in accordance with General Conditions. SUBCONTRACTING: The Contractor will be allowed but not required to subcontract certain items of this contract, but must complete at least 33% of the total project. The Bidder understands and agrees that he is completely responsible for all items of this Bid whether subcontracted or of his own construction, for the life of this Contract. The subcontractors listed below shall not be changed without the express written consent of the Owner. List names and addresses of the major subcontractors to be used for the portions of the work listed below: N/A Category Name of Subcontractor Address RE? T JULLy SUBMITTED, 4Siw'r r¢sidel,a_ V !Title %• . .• • • • • . •• • • .c.Ggg2,03 s4 lac (Fe l ibar (if applicable) _. SEfig'=, lt• Bi is by a corporation) -- , .. • • 2013-02ICCV001 CONTRACTOR: Hinterland Group, Inc. Address 5580 State Road 524 Cocoa, Florida 32926 321-633-7066 Phone Number June 21, 2013 Date BID FORM • 003000-5 • 1 r•• a Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida TRENCH SAFETY Any trench safety excavation having a depth In excess of five (5) feet will be subject to the Ex- cavation Safety Standards established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration 29 C.F.R. s. 1926.650 Subpart P. By the signature of its undersigned authorized representative, the Bidder hereby assures the City that any such excavation performed by the Bidder will be performed in compliance with all applicable trench safety standards. The cost of compliance with applicable trench safety standards is estimated by the Bidder to be $ loo . oo , which cost is included in the amount of the Bid. The specific methods of compliance with applicable Trench Safety Standards, and the related cost of compliance are as follows: Method Unit of Measure Trenching LF AUTHORIZED OFFICALDdryte (IF MORE SPACE IS EDED, USE BELOW THE LINES OF THIS FORM) Unit Unit Cost Extended Cost 1.00 100.00 100.00 . • • .• • lb. .,,_. 2013-02/CCV001 BID FORM 00 30 00 - 6 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project Chit ► of Cape Canaveral,, Florida CONTRACTOR EXPERIENCE RECORD In order for the City to satisfy himself regarding the Bidder's qualifications, the Bidder shall pro- vide In the space below Information regarding previous work comparable with the proposed work in size, capacity, and complexity of construction which he may have completed during the past five years. Following receipt of bids, each Bidder shall be prepared to furnish such addi- tional information as the City may reasonably request regarding his equipment, personnel, and financial resources. The information provided herewith shall constitute an integral part of the Form and Inadequate Experience Record may be a basis for an unacceptable Bidder. In addi- tion, the Bidder shall provide the same information for each major Subcontractor he plans to use on the project. 1 2 March 2012 3 June 2010 4 April 2010 Date Constructed July 2010 5 6 7 August 2012 August 2012 August 2011 8 May 2010 2013-02JCCVOO1 Description Manhole & Lift Station Rehabilita- tion Lift Station Rehabilitation Manhole & Lift Station Rehabilita- tion Lift Station Rehabilitation Lift Station Rehabilitation Lift Station Rehabilitation Lift Station Rehabilitation Lift Station Rehabilitation Name Of Owner Brevard County BOCC Palm Beach County WUD City of Lake Worth City of Eustis Florida Gov. Utility Auth. City of St. Pete Beach Seacoast Utility Authority 'South Seminal & North Orang County Waste - Authority BID FORM Phone No. 321-633- 2089 561-493- 6000 561-586- 1685 352-483- 5430 239-543- 1005 727-363- 9254 561-627- 2900 407-679- 5358 Construction Cost $213,250.00 $1,530,131.00 $308,710.00 $121,686.00 $234,000.00 $116,112.00 $780,209.00 $120,000.00 00 30 00 - 7 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida SUBCONTRACTOR EXPERIENCE RECORD Each major subcontractor (> 25% of work) shall provide the same information as provided for on page 00030-6. Date Constructed 1 N/A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Description Name Of Phone Construction Owner No. Cost • Acknowledgment is hereby made of the following Addenda received since issuance of Plans and Specifications: Addendum No. 1 Dated: 6/7/203.3 Addendum No. Dated: Addendum No. 2 Dated: 6/12/2013 Addendum No. Dated: NOTES: 1. Bid price includes applicable appurtenances to make proper connection of proposed force mains to existing piping mains. Removed equipment and other appurtenances shall be- come property of City of Cape Canaveral Public Works Services Department. 2. Bid price includes removal and restoration of existing asphalt and base pavement, concrete curb and gutter, and concrete sidewalk, as applicable. 3. The Contractor shall estimate unit quantities for the preparation of his Bid and required field changes only. END OF SECTION 00 30 00 2013-02/CCV001 BID FORM 00 30 00 - 8 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Gape Canaveral. Florida SECTION 00 41 00 BID SECURITY BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. That we. Hinterland Group, Inc, of hereinafter called Principal. and Me rid". and Deposit Cwpu`Y o[ 1Maziaad . _•._.... hereinafter called Surety. a corporation organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Maryland , and authorized to transact business in the State of Florida. as a Surety are held and firmly bound unto The City of Cape Canaveral. hereinafter called Obligee. in the penal sum of five percent (5%) of the amount of Principals Bid. $ rics of181,cI Anxzsnk. good and lawful money of the United States of America. for the payment of which the Principal and Surety bind Themselves. their heirs. executors. administrators. successors and assigns. jointly and severally. firmly by these presents_ The Condition of this Obligation is Such. that. WHEREAS the Principal has submitted a Bid to the Obligee on a contract for the construction of: 20134 UFT STATION NO. 1 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NOW THEREFORE if the Obligee shall accept the Bid of the Principal and the Principal shall enter into a contract with the Obligee in accordance with the terms of such bid. and give .... such bond or bonds as may be specified in the Bid or Contract Documents with good. gttti sued • . and sufficient surety for the faithful performance of such construction for the prompt gaSrs rrr$stt-ef--•.:_ tabor and material furnished in the prosecution thereof. then this obligation shall ttPS gill gwe , void: otherwise this bid is to remain in full force and effect for the payment to O gge tit- • - . -•� . •-a. stated penal sum hereo In witness whey- • , we 20 n all ours art to Principal // am•w S1 _ • • •' - 4.• .% •+ reunto set our signatures and seal this 12 day o'�::Jc't!e: rization. By Sure By Attorney The Fidelit n. 3fo •.•any of Mary d in accord - n - `th the tt ched Power of Attorney Daniel F. Wagner (Seal) STATE OF 1"-' 1 Or; cA ct 1 ) ss: COUNTY OF 'Need of ) •••- •• •• • • • I. 1 naiad .1 %no..r' e . a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid. do hereby certify that -tarcie1 F. Wasincr . and. whose names are signed to the foregoing bond. this day personally appeared before me in my State and County aforesaid and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand and seal this ',Aunt tz 20j) rt).Qs1 tg. • S hcIss pz (Notary Public) END OF SECTION 00 41 00 2013.02/CCV00i My commission expires: ANDREA L. SHARPE ( ;eat) MY COMMISSION *D0940169 EXPIRES November 16, 2013 (407) SS&O153 Fla ld.HowYetreta som - BID SECURITY BOND 00 41 00 - 1 • 1 • • EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF THE COMPANIES "Article V, Section 8, Attomevs-in-Fact. The Chief Executive Officer, the President, or any Executive Vice President or Vice President may, by written instrument under the attested corporate seal, appoint attorneys -in -fact with authority to execute bonds, policies, recognizanccs, stipulations, undertakings, or other like instruments on behalf of the Company, and may authorize any officer or any such attorney-in-fact to affix the corporate seal thereto; and may with or without cause modify of revoke any such appointment or authority at any time." CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Vice President of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney is still in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that Article V, Section 8, of the By -Laws of the Companies is still in force.. This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 15th clay of December 1998. RESOLVED: "That the signature of the President or a Vice President and the attesting signature of a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the Seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any Power of Attomey...Any such Power or any certificate thereof bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company." This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 5th day of May, 1994, and the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 10th day of May, 1990. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Vice -President, Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed. IN TESTEMOItY WHEREOF, I have h to subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seals of the said Companies, this l Z day of v , 2011 • • Geoffrey Delisio, Vice President Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • 2013-021CCV001 BID SECURITY BOND 00 41 00 - 2 1 1 1 1 • 111 • • • Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida SECTION 00 41 50 DRUG FREE WORKPLACE FORM In accordance with Section 287.087, Florida Statutes, preference must be given to BIDDERS submitting a certification with the Bid which certifies that the BIDDER has a drug-free workplace. Whenever two or more Bids which are equal with respect to price, quality, and service are received by the State or by any political subdivision for the procurement of commodities or contractual services, a Bid received from a business that certifies that it has implemented a drug-free workplace program shall be given preference in the award process. Established procedures for processing tie Bids will be followed if none of the tied BIDDERS have a drug-free workplace program. In order to have a drug-free workplace program, the BIDDER shall: 1. Publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance Is prohibited in the workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition. 2. Inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace, any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs, and the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. 3. Give each employee engaged in providing the commodities or contractual services that are under Bid a copy of the statement specified in subsection (1). 4. In the statement specified In subsection (1), notifying the employees that, as a condition of working on the commodities or contractual services that are under Bid, the employees will abide by the terms of the statement and will notify the employer of any conviction of, or pleas of guilty or nolo contendere to, any violation of Chapter 893 or of any controlled substance law of the United States of any state, for a violation occurring in the workplace no late than five (5) days after such conviction. 5. Impose a sanction on, or require the satisfactory participation in a drug assistance of rehabilitation program if such is available in the employees community, by any employee who is so convicted. 6. Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through ;mplementation of this section. • 2013-02/CCV001 DRUG FREE WORKPLACE FORM 00 41 50 -1 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida As the person authorized to sign the statement, I certify the following: (Check one and sign in the space provided) x This firrn complies fully with the above requirements. This firm does not have a drug-free workplace program meeting the above requirements at this time. Hinterland Group, Inc. Daniel Duke III, President B IDDERS Name BIDDERS Title l B I D'ER ature END OF SECTION 00 41 50 • • • 1411 ........... 2013-02/CCV001 DRUG FREE WORKPLACE FORM 00 41 50 - 2 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida State Of Florida County of Brevard ) Daniel Duke 111 SECTION 00 48 00 NONCOLLUSION AFFIDAVIT OF PRIME BIDDER } • being duly swom, deposes and says that: (1) He is Presidentof Hinterland Group,,the Bidder that has submitted the attached bid: Inc. (2) He is fully informed respecting the preparation and contents of the attached Bid and of all pertinent circumstances respecting such Bid; (3) Such Bid is genuine and is not a collusive or sham Bid; (4) Neither the said Bidder nor any of its officers, partners, owners, agents, representatives, employees or parties in interest, including this affiant, has in any way colluded, conspired, connived or agreed, directly or indirectly with any other Bidder, firm or person to submit a collusive or sham Bid in connection with the Contract for which the attached Bid has been submitted or to refrain from bidding In connection with such Contract, or has in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by contract, or has in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement or collusion or communication or conference with any other Bidder, firm or person to fix the price or prices in the attached bid or of any other Bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the Bid price or the Bid pnce of any other Bidder, or to secure through any collusion, conspiracy, connivance or unlawful agreement any advantage against the City of Cape Canaveral, or any person interested in the Contract; and (5) The price or prices quoted in the attached Bid are fair and proper and are not tainted by any collusion, conspiracy, connivance or unlawful agreement on the part of the Bidder or any of its agents, representatives, owners, employees, or parties of interest, including affiant. • • ...• •••• •. Swom to and subscribed before me this STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Brevard Personally known X OR Produced Identification (Type of Identification) N/A 13th ANDREA L SHARPE •`: MY COMMISSION 0 D0940169 •. -r EXPIRES November 15.2013 (407) 305.0163 F7c$fdjNowySimo&corn END OF SECTION 00 48 00 2013-02/CCV001 day of June • Notary Public - State of Florida My Commission Expires 11/15/2013 Andrea L. Sharpe (Printed, typed or stamped commission name of notary public) CL.no.U.QP •S\raec)4 NONCOLLUSION AFFIDAVIT OF PRIME BIDDER 004800.1 Lift Station No.1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2013-02/CCV001 NONCOLLUSION AFFIDAVIT OF PRIME BIDDER 00 48 00 - 2 Lift Station No.1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida SECTION 00 49 00 PUBLIC -ENTITY CRIMES A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. Therefore, prior to entering into a contract (formal contract or purchase order) in excess of the threshold amount established by law to provide goods or services to the City of Cape Canaveral, a person shall file a sworn statement with the contracting officer or Purchasing Director, as applicable. The attached statement or affidavit will be the form to be utilized and must be properly signed in the presence of a notary public or other officer authorized to administer oaths and properly executed. The inclusion of the sworn statement or affidavit shall be submitted concurrently with your quote or bid documents. Ion -inclusion of this document may necessitate resection of your auote or bid. 2013-02/CCV001 PUBLIC -ENTITY CRIMES 00 49 00 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Brevard BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Daniel Duke III statement: who, being by me first duly swom, made the following The Business address of 5580 State Road 524, Cocoa, Florida (name of bidder or contractor) is Hinterland Group, Inc. 2. My relationship to Hinterland Group, Inc, (name of bidder or contractor) is President (relationship such as sole proprietor, partner, president, vice president). I understand that public entity crime as defined in Section 287.133 of the Florida Stat- utes Includes a violation of any state or federal law by a person with respect to and di- rectly related to the transaction of business with any public entity in Florida or with an agency or political subdivision of any other state or with the United States, including, but not limited to, any bid or contract for goods or services to be provided to any public entity or such an agency or political subdivision and involving antitrust, fraud, theft, bribery, col- lusion, racketeering, conspiracy, or material misrepresentation. 4. I understand that "convicted" or conviction" is defined by the statute to mean a finding of guilt or a adjudication of guilt, in any federal or state trial court of record relating to charges brought by indictment or Information after July 1, 1989, as a result of a jury ver- dict, nonjury trial, or entry of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere. 5. I understand that "affiliate" is defined by the statute to mean (1) a predecessor or suc- cessor of a person or a corporation convicted of a public entity crime, or (2) an entity un- der the control of any natural person who is active in the management of the entity and who has been convicted of a public entity crime, or (3) those officers, directors, execu- tives, partners, shareholder, employees, members, and agents who are active in the management of an affiliate, or (4) a person or corporation who knowingly entered into a joint venture with a person who has been convicted of a public entity crime In Florida during the preceding 36 months. 2013-02/CCV001 PUBLIC -ENTITY CRIMES 00 49 00 - 2 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida 6. Neither the bidder or contractor nor any officer, director, executive, partner, shareholder, employee, or contractor nor any affiliate of the bidder or contractor has been convicted of a public entity crime subsequent to July 1, 1989. (Draw a line through paragraph 6 if paragraph 7 below applies.) There has been a conviction of a public entity crime by the bidder or contractor, or an officer, director, executive, partner, shareholder, employee, member or agent of the bid- der or contractor who is active in the management of the bidder or contractor or an affili- ate of the bidder or contractor. A determination has been made pursuant to Section 287.133(3) by order of the Division of Administrative Hearings that it is not in the public Interest for the name of the convicted person or affiliate to appear on the convicted-• •.. dor list. The name of the convicted person or affiliate is N/A• . • • ., A copy of the order of the Division of administrative Hearings is attached 16 �i;>�•� e ment.•— .•• �% • �, • '.• • • • (Draw a line throuparagraph 7 if paragraph 6 above applies.)• • • • : ' : ; i• • • 1 • •• ▪ • • Dani nf/� S. natOre • ,. ••• • ••• `` •• • •• • .. ••• • • ▪ •• • • Sworn to '`and subscribed before me in the state and county first mentioned above on the 13th day of June 20 13 , ast-eciitJa.c) iecv ()A Notary Public My commission expires: 11/15/2013 • • END OF SECTION 00 49 00 (affix seal) ANDREA L. SHARPE fl MY COMMISSION # 00940169 EXPIRES November 15.2013 Nor) 39840133 forSCeNctelYSomaam 2013-02/CCVO01 PUBLIC -ENTITY CRIMES 004900-3 Lift Station No. 1 Improvements Project City of Cape Canaveral, Florida 2013.02/CCV001 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PUBLIC -ENTITY CRIMES 00 49 00 - 4 1 1 1t Ai AA BAC zea LIMITED WARRANTY Global Materials Company warrants REFRATTA HAC 100 produced following strict standard specifications and is formulated to material specification, within industry recognized tolerances and supplied free from non -advertised changes to said formulation. REFRATTA HAC 100 as packaged and distributed will be free from defects and contamination. Assuming all technical specifications and installation guidelines are adhered to, Global Materials Company warrants to the owner of rehabilitated structure, the repair of areas deemed by Global Materials Company and inspected by representatives of Global Materials Company for a period of TWELVE (12) years from application date. Application for warranty claim must be made within the initial TWELVE (12) years of installation of the REFRATTA HAC 100 material though either direct communication with applicator or Global Materials Company. REFRATTA HAC 100 does not warranty against damages exhibited from mechanical abuse, chemical abuse or Acts of God. The sole remedy for "owner" of structure rehabilitated with REFRATTA HAC will be replacement of material and labor to repair sections of said structure deem to have suffered "failure". No other claim including but not limited to, incidental or consequential damages for Injuries suffered to person or property shall be made available to `owner" or "applicator". The above warranty is offered as valid this day of 20and issued to GLOBAL AM COMPANY Version 2011.10.1 Andi Sharpe From: Sent To: Subject: Bid No • Bid Date...: Quoted By: Customer.: Chase Rogers Friday, June 21, 2013 1:43 PM Andi Sharpe RE: Canaveral final #'s Price Quotation # 8226858 FEI-POMPANO BEACH WW #125 1950 NW 18TH STREET POMPANO BEACH, FL 33069-1394 Phone : 954-9734100 Fax : 954-917-3134 B226858 06/12/13 GM **BID PLANT CONTRACTOR** FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY POMPANO BEACH, FL 33069 Cust PO#..: CAPE CANAVERAL Item SP -FAB Description • 1 1CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL 1LIFTSTATION #1 IMP. 1 I BID DATE: 6/13/13 1ENG: ISS 1 IPER ADDENDUM #1 1 1 1 1VERIFY OWNER FURNISHED 1 1 1WET WELL ---- ISPECIAL FABRICATION 18X6 FtED X 2010 X 90 X 5'0 PE 1 Cust Phone: 954-973-8100 Terms : NET 10TH PROX Ship To • **BID PLANT CONTRACTOR** FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY POMPANO BEACH, FL 33069 Job Name.: LIFT STATION #1 Quantity Net Price UM Total i 1 1 1 1 1 SP M080A2600601 DI I BFGX FTP4X CFX K633FALX K634BALX FPPELXP FPPELXX 1FPPELX10 1MJRP4LA12X 1M.14P4LAI 2 iMJYP4LAI2X MJTP4LA 12X D118MJGLA12 D461SS 1AFT35OPP412 I E111200IAP 1E1108001AP 1 DS46NDM 1S40 316SS (6" SIDE OF RED FLG) "PLANS ARE NOT TO SCALE!!" 1 YR MFG WARRANTY 1 1 1 18 FLG SWG CHK VLV BR7JRUB SEAT/FACE l YR MFG WARRANTY 18 CI FLG N/LUBE PLUG VLV W/GEAR 12YR MFG WARRANTY 18 DI 125# FLG P-401 TEE 11YR WARRANTY ON ALL FITTINGS 18 DI 125# CI 10 THRD COMP FLG F/ STL 18 ALUM MALE NPT ADPT 8 ALUM CAP F/ ADPT 8X4'0 FLGXPE EPDX DI SPL IYR WARRANTY ON ALL FLG PIPING 8X8'0 FLGXPE EPDX DI SPL 8X10'0 FLGXPE EPDX DI SPL 12X8 MJ C153 P-401 RED UA 12MJC153P-40145 BEND UA 12X8 MJ C I S3 P-401 WYE UA 12X8 MJ C153 P401 TEE UA 12 Mi N/LUBE PLUG W/GEAR VLV UA 2YR MFG WARRANTY 2PC SC CI VLV BX 19-22 SWR 12 CL350 P401 DI FASTITE PIPE 12 MEGALUG F/DI W/ IMJBGPI2 8 MEGALUG F/DI W/ IMJBGPX SUBTOTAL GAUGE ASSY ---- 11/2X3 SS S40 316 NIP 1 • • • • i • • • • • • • • • 1 1 DS46NDM FNW200AD IS6CTTD FNW200AB DS46NBK IS6CTBDB PG0100R 1/2X3 SS S40 316 NIP 1/2 SS 1000# THRD 2PC FP BV LL 1/2 SS 316 150# THRD TEE 1/4 SS 1000# THRD 2PC FP BV LL 1/4X2 SS S40316 NIP 1/2X l/4 SS 316 150# THRD BUSH 4-1/2 PRES GA 0 - 100 PSI W/DIAPHRAGM SEAL & SNUBBER SUBTOTAL • 3 Detail by Entity Name FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS 2l1-noz Detail by Entity Name Florida Profit Corporation HINTERLAND GROUP INC. Filina Information Document Number P06000086423 FEI/EIN Number 205156844 Date Filed 06/26/2006 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 5401 NORTH HAVERHILL ROAD,SUITE 114 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33407 Changed: 04/17/2013 Mailing Address 5401 NORTH HAVERHILL ROAD,SUITE 114 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33407 Changed: 04/17/2013 Reaistered Aaent Name & Address DUKE, DANIEL A, 111 5401 NORTH HAVERHILL ROAD,SUITE 114 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33407 Name Changed: 04/09/2013 Address Changed: 04/09/2013 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title PSTD DUKE, DANIEL A, III 5401 North Haverhill Road Suite 114 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33407 Annual Reports Page 1 of 2 6/71 /71111 Detail by Entity Name Report Year 2011 2012 2013 Document images Filed Date 02/17/2011 04/19/2012 04/11/2013 04/11/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT j 04/19/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT I 02/17/2011 — ANNUAL REPORT I 02/15/2010 — ANNUAL REPORT 04/16/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT' 01/20/2008 -- ANNUAL REPORT, 01/09/2007 -- ANNUAL REPORT 06/26/2006 -- Domestic Profit • View Image In PDF format View image in PDF format View image In PDF format View Image In PDF format View image in PDF format View Image in PDF format View image in PDF format View Image in PDF format Caoyriaht 0 and 'Vivaty Panda State or Flonda, Department 0 State Page 2ot2 Ps. ,,,,, R T _ r:.,_t.....io ATfrinn,..,,ontornnua/,► nnronhnxlf .icences/Florida%20Denart... 6/21/2013 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD (850) 487-1395 1940 NORTH MONROE STREET TALLAHASSEE FL 32399-0783 DUKE, DANIEL AMOS HINTERLAND GROUP INC 5580 STATE ROAD 524 COCOA FL 32926 Congratulations! With this license you become one of the nearly ane million Floridians licensed by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Our professionals and businesses range from architects to yacht brokers, from boxers to barbeque restaurants. and they keep Florida's economy strong. Every day we work to Improve the way we do business in order to serve you better. For information about our services, please log onto www.myfor(dallcense.com. There you can find more information about our divisions and the regulations that impact you, subscribe to department newsletters and learn more about the Department's initiatives. Our mission at the Department is: Ucense Efficiently, Regulate Fairly. We constantly strive to serve you better so that you can serve your customers. Thank you for doing business in Florida. and congratulations on your new license! DETACH HERE STATE OF FLORCDA AC# 6 b 4 SO 118 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION CGC1520354 05/30/12 118194872 CERTIFIED GENERAL CONTRACTOR DDRB, DANIEL+,' o 3 HINTERLAND ''ROUP INC I9 CIDRTIFIED nodes the provi.ioos of Cb.409 n tcptslttoo wag AVG 31, 2014 1.12033001166 TI IIS DOCUMM AS A COLORED BACKGROUND • MICROPRUNTI17G • LINENA PATENTED PAPER AC# 6145018 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD SEQ#L12053001166 DATE BATCH NUMBER LICENSE NSR 05/30/2012 118194872 CGC1520354 The GENERAL CONTRACTOR Named below IS CERTIFIED Under the provisions of Chapter 489. FS. Expiration date: AUG 31, 2014 DUKE, DANIEL AMOS HINTERLAND GROUP INC 5580 STATE ROAD 524 COCOA FL 32926 RICK SCOTT GOVERNOR 4., • DISPLAY AS REOUIRED BY LAW KEN LAWSON SECRETARY 1 1 • • • ANNE M. GANNON coNU11TUTIONAL TAX COLUCTOR Savona Paha Reath Cohn, Serving you. MI of $%AD453 1t 13•o0!► UNOCRORatll1�G own a £J CAVATIG. P O Box 3715. West Paint Beach. FL 33402.3715 "LOCATED AT" www laxcoaectorpbc can Tel (551) 355.2264 Owr.a ouxE CANNEL A dl This document to valid ordy when racaiptad by the Tax Collectors Otfics HINTERLAND GROUP INC HINTERLAND GROUP INC 5401 NORTH HAVERHILL RD STE 114 WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33407 IIiIIIIIIIIhIIIIIN,,fl lJ 1 5401 N HAVERHILL RD Sle 114 WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33407 CEatlslwTIOrr• I RECOPY ADA SE PAID CuC1214131 + 011 irr020 • CS» 12 AUT PAC s,00WOKS et.• STATE OF FLORIDA PALM BEACH COUNTY 201212013 LOCAL BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT LBTR Number: 201139576 EXPIRES: SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 TMs r000lpt grants Inc prMIDgO of engagnp h or managing any business profession or ooeupatlon within its jurisdiction and MUST be conspicuously displayed al Ulu place 01 business and to such a manner as to be open to the vxUw of the pubbc • Company NameI Contact Name i_ _.- -r--- ity of Cocoa_ •_ ;Gary Parker ity of West Palm •Beach as.. Roberge 4004 4110M• ity of Weston :ity of Wellington •Corey Robinson :ity of Orange City _- Cheryl Bredbenner» )isney, Cinderella's Castle Jeff Wargo :ity of Port• St. Lucie_ Mike Jolly :ity of Orlando_ at, Buster Falls • :ity of Coral Springs Steve Seigfried • :ity of Eustis Tracy Jeanes Dave Bochenek south Seminole and North )range County Wastewater frans_mission Authority aty of West Melbourne ieacoast Utuit_y Authority casco County lorida Governmental Utility 4uthority City of Cape Canaveral• . City of St. Pete Beach _ City of Altamonte Springs City of Lake Worth_ Brevard County • Palm Beach County City of St. Cloud City of Ft. Lauderdale City of Winter Park City of Highland Beach City of North Lauderdale City of Dee•rfield Beach Ft. Pierce Utility Authority City of Lakeland i Marc Cannata .Cynthia Hanscom !Keith Haas ;Ron Walker_ I Dave a.Mason Steve Courtney __ Renee Cooper • James Wickert #Monica Morandi •Craig Helpling iDuane Palumbo (Rick Mauro_• •- ;Steve Roberts !Robert Guest 'William •Moore Michael Shield_ s Fred Scott __ Mark Kobbe !Drew Adcock • • • Hinterland Group, Inc Current Manhole and Lift Station Totals Telephone #i- _ _ Email Address ..__ ..liam.••• j321-433-8755 GaarkerCThcoco_ail.org 1561-822-2100 Droberueewob.org 1954-275-58191 Dbochenek@westonfl.org 1286-775-5449 cbredbenneriaci-orange-citv►.fl=us 1407-908-9746 Jeff.i.wareo@disney.com !772-344-41211Miollvecitvofosicom __,. 407-246-37561 Hector.sa nchezp citvoforla ndo.net 1954-753-4380 StevesCufiadistricts.com 352-483-5475 JeanesT@ci-eustis.fl.us 561-753-2464 jCrobinsonla wellingtonfl.gov i X407-679-535_8 Macannata@reisseng.com 321-837-7774 Chanson@westmetbourne.org ;561-627-2900_ Khaas,ausa.com• 727-847-8194 Riwalkerf5?nascocountyfl.net 1 1239-222-1439 DmasonPuswatercorp.net Work Completed- _��..._(MH&IS) ! 22 MH & 2 LS !Manhole & Lift Station Rehab _...• __ M_. _..� .r _•— _w..i_ .� n.. ..•.. .. ROO.. __ ._ .. to 05/14/2013 -_ Project Information • Naga 1LS 72 LS 6 IS 11S_ _.. _. ._I 1 .. ... * ..._ 11_ LS • _ 14 LS !2 LS :321-868-1233,Scourtney(:?cittofcapecanaveraLorg ' 727-363-9254 R.co_oner a�stpetebeach.org 1407-571-8560 Jwickert1aitamontesorings.com ' 561-586-1798 Mmorandiplakeworth.org ' 321-633-2089 }Craie.heloline@brevardcountv.us 1561-308-4272 Dpalumbo@obcwater.com nbcwater.com . _ .._�__ - ...._. 407-957-7432. Rmauroastcloud.org 954-828-_7854 Srobertsirefortiauderdale.org 140? -691-7853 Reuest@city, ofwinteroa rk.o rg • 561-243-2084 Bm_oore�aici phi ,hlenrJ-beach_.fi.us !954-724-7070 tMlshieids@plauderdaie.org 654-480-4403 Fscott(deerfield-beach.com _ 772-466-16001Mkobbe@fpua.com (863-834-fi322 Drew.adcock@lakelandaov.net • • • GO 1 15_13. 11 LS 1115 1115 i 124MH&5 LS 1-250MH&1[S i46MH&1LS M — 14H&2L5 .. i7 MH & 2.LS ;1 MH&3LS I1MH&8LS _:37MH l6MH 9 MH L6MH _ _3 MH 14-49-1VIN 1 MH 11 MH • • • Lift Station Rehabilitation • Lift Station Rehabilitation Lift Station Rehabilitation Lift Station Rehabilitation i Lift Station Rehabilitation Lift Station Rehabilitation Lift Station Rehabilitation i Lift Station Rehabilitation Lift Station Rehabilitation 1 !Lift Station Rehabilitation •• Lift Station Rehabilitation Lift Station Rehabilitation !Lift Station Rehabilitation • `Manhole •• Manhole ▪ Manhole _Manhole Manhole !Manhole :Manhole IManir! _!Manhole Manhole 1 Manhole Manhole 1 Manhole Manhole ;Manhole • & LiftStation Rehab & Lift Station Rehab & Lift Station Rehab & Lift Station Rehab & Lift Station Rehab & Lift Station Rehab & Lift Station Rehab Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation _ Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation tat • • 1 • City of Frost Proof City of Haines_ City _ City of Oakland Park city of Tamarac City of Sunrise .. City_of Boynton Beach Charlotte County Martin_County City of New Smyrna Utilities Commission • j Bill Dean • James Keene M_ ichael Stripling Susan Smith Brian London f Hinterland Group, Inc 05/14/2013 Current Manhole and Lift Station Totals 1863-635-7862 f{MstriPknz@clhalnes-cItvsfi.us keene(a?citvoffrosgproof.com x863-421-3777 954-630-4432 Susans()oaklandparkfl.Rov 954-597-3763 Briian@tamarac.o2 _ _ __ .....11.1a Perk .!/.11P9.1 1._ _ Christopher Roschek Larry Johnson Ted Robbins City of Lantana Town of Bay Harbor Toho Water Authority • TOTAL • !Jerry Darr sa }Randy Daniel Tim Noyes • 1954-888-6081 tDsimoson sunrisefl.eov . `4561-742-6413 Roschekc@bbfl.us _ 2941-764-4555 Larry_iohnsonfT?charlotte.com '772-223-7943 TTrobbins + , martin.fl.us • jWdeanEucnsb.org }386-547-1555 1114 _ am • •. _�14 MH -_... __.J6MH&1LS ._ _ 5_61-540-5758 jid_arr ►lantana.org 305-861-1799 iRdaniet@bavharborislands.net 1407-944-5018 ITnoyesjtohowaterm.co-^._. • ••-... _ .._ . a.. _ . • • • 4 • • • (LMH L1MH__� _MH 1MH 1_ MH '1 MH F77MH !? 1109 MH • • lips -thole Rehabilitation Manhole Rehabilitation ;Manhole & Lift Station Rehab !Manhole Rehabilitation __!Manhole Rehabilitation - lManhole Rehabilitation - .. Manhole Rehabilitation 'Manhole Rehabilitation 1 } Manhole Rehabilitation • I747MH&122 LS Manhole_ Rehabilitation_ Manhole Rehabilitation Manhole Rehabilitation • tot • • City of Cape Canaveral City Council Agenda Form City Council Meeting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. l Subject: Ordinance No. 08-2013; amending Chapter 90, Floods, of the Code of Ordinances related to construction site stormwater runoff control; making conforming amendments to Chapter 2, Administration; providing for the repeal of prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions; incorporation into the Code; severability; and an effective date, second reading. Department: Public Works Services and Community & Economic Development Summary: As part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for the City of Cape Canaveral (City), an Ordinance is required to address construction site stormwater runoff control. These runoff control measures are required for all land -disturbing activities over one acre in area. As part of the Site Development Permit, applicants must submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for review and approval by the City. The Plan must contain the following elements: • Natural resources map identifying soils, forest cover and resources protected under other sections of this Code. • Sequence of construction of the development site, including stripping and clearing; rough grading; construction of utilities, infrastructure and buildings; and final grading and landscaping. Sequencing shall identify the expected date on which clearing will begin, the estimated duration of exposure of cleared areas, areas of clearing, installation of temporary erosion and sediment control measures and establishment of permanent vegetation. • All erosion and sediment control measures necessary to meet the objectives of this subdivision throughout all phases of construction and after completion of development of the site (depending upon the complexity of the project, the drafting of intermediate plans may be required). Also required as part of the Site Development Permit are construction site waste controls which shall include, but are not limited to, the following: • Designation of a collection area on site that does not receive a substantial amount of runoff from upland areas and does not drain directly to a water body; • Provision of waste containers with lids that shall be covered during periods of rain • Scheduled waste collection to prevent waste containers from overfilling; • Provision of extra containers and more frequent waste pickups during the demolition phase of construction; and • Collection, removal and disposal of all construction site wastes at authorized disposal areas. Violators of this Ordinance are subject to suspension of the Site Development Permit and a civil citation as specified in Chapter 2, Article VI, Division 3, Sec. 2-283. City Council Meeting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. Page 2 of 2 As this item was developing, it was noticed that the model ordinance included references to "Site Development Permits" as issued by the City. As a conforming amendment, all existing references to "permit" in current Chapter 90 were revised to "site development permits". This distinguishes them from "building permits". It is a common practice among many jurisdictions to separate these two types of permits. Stated more simply, building permits are for vertical construction (buildings) and site development permits are for horizontal construction (site work). Seemingly unrelated, for several months Staff had been reviewing other municipalities' procedures for capturing site development review and inspection fees intended to offset costs incurred for ensuring compliance with site development -related technical codes. An example of City services currently absorbed by the City is included. The fee for a Site Development Permit is separate from and additional to a Building Permit Fee for projects over one acre. A closer look into the City's Ordinance, Appendix B, Schedule of Fees, revealed that a category had long been established for such a permit under Sec. 90-131, but no fee was established. At a future meeting Staff will present a separate Resolution which will propose a reasonable fee structure for a Site Development Permit. The Ordinance passed first reading on June 18, 2013. This item was advertised in Florida Today on June 27, 2013. gd.iwt Submitting Directors: Jeff Ratliff and Todd Morley Date: 07/01/2013 Attachments: 1. Ordinance No. 08-2013 2. Example of City services currently absorbed Financial Impact: Cost to prepare, advertise and incorporate the Ordinance into the City Code. Site Development Permit revenue will increase as projects over one acre are developed. Reviewed by Finance Director: John DeLeo The City Manager recommends that City Coun Adopt Ordinance No. 08-2013, second reading. Date: 7/fJ3 take the following action: Approved by City Manager: David L. Greene 01—'2 Date: 7/g/j City Council Action:[ ] Approved as Recommended [ ] Disapproved [ ] Approved with Modifications [ ] Tabled to Time Certain ORDINANCE NO. 08-2013 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 90, FLOODS, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION SITE STORMWATER RUNOFF CONTROL; MAKING CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 2, ADMINISTRATION; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCORPORATION INTO THE CODE; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHERAS, the City is granted the authority, under Section 2(b), Article VIII, of the State Constitution, to exercise any power for municipal purposes, except when expressly prohibited by law; and WHEREAS, the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, maintains a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection; and WHEREAS, the permit requires the City adopt an ordinance addressing construction site stormwater runoff control as set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the City also desires to update existing provisions of Chapter 90 consistent with the new construction site stormwater runoff control regulations adopted herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, hereby finds this Ordinance to be in the best interests of the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Cape Canaveral. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL HEREBY ORDAINS, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby fully incorporated herein by this reference as legislative findings and the intent and purpose of the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral. • Section 2. Amendment to Chapter 90, Floods. Chapter 90, Floods, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, is hereby amended as follows (underlined type indicates additions and stiikeeet type indicates deletions, while asterisks (* * *) indicate a deletion from this Ordinance of text existing in Chapter 90. It is intended that the text in Chapter 90 denoted by the asterisks and set forth in this Ordinance shall remain unchanged from the language existing prior to adoption of this Ordinance): CHAPTER 90. FLOODS *** City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 08-2013 Page 1 of 10 ARTICLE IV. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1. GENERALLY * * * Sec. 90-120. Enforcement and penalties. This division shall be enforced pursuant to section 90-206 of this code. (e) Ur der this artioleri-f the buildir g-effieial determines -that a pr ' ' approv :..- - g Barri without a required -permit, he is aut o••ized to (1) Iosu a •• rine notice to the -applicant the -allege lianee, including a dem of necessary remedial actions. odor: of t all orawork which rk has tisfaetien of -the -building official. The applicant shall then bring erbe subject to a denim' of the cezti foate of occupancy for the prejeet: (2) I •ork ord a. . • a :- :: - =RP - • • • - .... _ IN V/ • • - •• • • • . -— woo ._. • • • • • -- • • (-3) ,- : ; - :. ...- .: - : . (1) orWel-This-section-shall became in the order requests, it writingrby-eertifiefkmailra icial n^later thn„ te»� workitg days-after—the-date written-netioc shall be grounds for r ' e isssea ter—that SyStent tthe rA (b) A -• - • - ' ; - -- - - - a - : ed any section of this article or such v ' •ith any of -the -requirement, of this article ivalent to -the cost of having eompli Each calendar day -when such violations occur shall constitute a separate offense. In addition to any other remedies, the violations of this article mcy be—restraited by in any ma Sec. 90-131. Required. No person may structure or change its * ** DIVISION 2. PERMIT subdivide or make any changes in the use of land or build or rebuild a size, except as exempt in section 90-132, without first obtaining a site City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 08-2013 Page 2 of 10 development permit from the city building department as provided in this code digin. Since the following activities may alter or disrupt existing stormwater runoff patterns, they shall, unless exempt pursuant to section 90-132, require the issuance of a city site development permit prior to onset by paying a fee as set forth in appendix B to this code: Sec. 90-132. Exemptions. 131: * * * The following activities shall be exempt from the permitting requirements of section 90- * ** (6) Emergency exemptions in accordance with section 90-207. as -follows: (a) Th'- — - •: •: 46 - - ad INP: - : ARTICLE V. CONSTRUCTION SITE STORMWATER RUNOFF CONTROL Sec. 90-200. - Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Clearing means the removal of vegetation from land, not including the mowing of grass. Drainage way means any channel that conveys surface runoff throughout the site. Erosion control means a measure that prevents erosion. Erosion and sediment control plan means a set of plans prepared by or under the direction of a licensed professional engineer indicating the specific measures and sequencing to be used to control sediment and erosion on a development site during and after construction. Grading means excavation or fill of material, including the resulting conditions thereof. Land disturbing activity means activity associated with construction including, but not limited to, land preparation such as clearing, grading and filling; installation of streets and walkways; excavation for basements, footings, niers or foundations; erection of temporary forms; and installation of accessory buildings such as garages. Perimeter control means a barrier that prevents sediment from leaving a site by filtering sediment laden runoff or diverting it to a sediment trap or basin. Phasing means clearing a parcel of land in distinct phases, with the stabilization of each phase completed before the clearing of the next. Sediment control means measures that prevent eroded sediment from leaving the site. Site means a parcel of land or a contiguous combination thereof, where grading work is performed as a single unified operation. Site development permit means a permit issued by the City of Cane Canaveral for the construction or alteration of ground improvements and structures for the control of erosion. runoff and grading Stabilization means the use of practices that prevent exposed soil from eroding. Start of construction means the first land -disturbing activity associated with a development, including land preparation such as clearing, grading and filling; installation of streets and walkways; excavation for basements, footings, piers or foundations; erection of temporary forms; and installation of accessory buildings such as garages. City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No 08-2013 Page 4 of 10 Watercourse means natural or artificial stream, creek, slough, channel, ditch, canal, waterway, gully, ravine or wash in which water flows in a definite direction and which has a definite physical channel, bed or banks. Waterway means a channel that directs surface runoff to a watercourse or to the public storm drain. Waste control means measures that prevent construction site waste from leaving the site. Sec. 90-201. - Permits. IA) A site development permit is required for land -disturbing activity that would require the clearing of at least one acre of land. No site development permit shall be issued without the approval of an erosion and sediment control plan by the City as reauired by Section 90-203. 021 No site development permit is required for the following activities: (1) Any emergency activity that is immediately necessary for the protection of life, property or natural resources. (2) Existing nursery and agricultural operations conducted as a permitted main or accessory use. W. Each application shall bear the name(s) and address(es) of the owner(s) or developers) of the site, and of any consulting firm retained by the applicant, together with the name of the applicant's principal contact at such firm, and shall be accompanied by a filing fee. fith Each application shall include a statement that any land clearing, construction or development involving the movement of earth shall be in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan. The applicant may be required to file with the City a faithful performance bond, letter of credit or other improvement security in an amount deemed sufficient by the city engineer to cover all costs of improvements, landscaping, maintenance of improvements for such period as specified by the City and engineenng and inspection costs to cover the cost of failure or repair of improvements installed on the site. Sec. 90-202. - Review and approval. An erosion and sediment control plan shall be reviewed and either approved or disapproved by (i) the building official or designee for land -disturbing activity that would otherwise require any permit to be obtained through the City or (ii) the city engineer for all other land -disturbing activity that does not otherwise require a permit to be obtained through the City. Sec. 90-203. - Erosion and sediment control plan. Lai The erosion and sediment control plan shall include the followings al A natural resources map identifying soils, forest cover and resources protected under other chapters of this code jj A sequence of construction of the development site, including stripping and clearing: rough grading; construction of utilities, infrastructure and buildings: and final grading and landscaping Sequencing shall identify the expected date on which clearing will begin, the estimated duration of exposure of cleared areas. areas of clearing, City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 08-2013 Page 5 of 10 installation of temporary erosion and sediment control measures. and establishment of Permanent vegetation. al All erosion and sediment control measures necessary to meet the obiectives of this article throughout all phases of construction and after completion of development of the site Depending upon the complexity of the proiect. the drafting of intermediate plans may be required. 1121 Modifications to the plan shall be processed and approved or disapproved in the same manner as set forth in Section 90-202. and may be authorized by the City by written authorization to the permittee. Modification applications shall include: Maior amendments of the erosion and sediment control plan submitted to the City as appropriate; and 1'Q Field modifications of a minor nature. Sec. 90-204. - Design requirements. SI Clearing and grading of natural resources. such as forests and wetlands, shall not be permitted except when in compliance with all other chapters of this code. Clearing techniques that retain natural vegetation and drainage patterns shall be used to the satisfaction of the City. ,u Clearing, except that necessary to establish sediment control devices, shall not begin until all sediment control devices have been installed and have been stabilized. fel Erosion control requirements shall include. but are not limited to. the following: ill Soil stabilization shall be completed as quickly as practical after clearing or inactivity in construction; al If seeding or another vegetative erosion control method is used, it shall become established as quickly as practical or the City may require the site to be reseeded or a nonvegetative option employed; and ill Techniques that divert upland runoff vast disturbed slopes shall be employed. WI Sediment control requirements shall include. but are not limited to, the following: fp Settling basins, sediment traps or tanks and perimeter controls; W Sediment barriers for any component of the MS4 system located immediately outside of the perimeter of the site. such as. for example. inlets. catch basins, grates. ditches or swales; QJ Settling basins that are designed in a manner that allows adaptation to provide long term stormwater management. if required by the City; and (4) Protection for adiacent properties by the use of a vegetated buffer strip in combination with perimeter controls. fel Waterway and watercourse protection requirements shall include, but are not limited to, the following* al Stabilization of the watercourse channel before. during and after any in -channel work; and al Stabilization adequate to prevent erosion located at the outlets of all pipes and paved channels. in Construction site access requirements shall include, but are not limited to, the following: A temporary access road provided at all sites; and City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 08-2013 Page 6 of 10 al Other measures required by the City in order to ensure that sediment is not tracked onto public streets by construction vehicles or washed into storm drains. L1 Construction site waste control requirements shall include. but are not limited to. the following: al Designation of a collection area on-site that does not receive a substantial amount of runoff from upland areas and does not drain directly to a water body; al Provision of waste containers with lids that shall be covered during periods of rain; Scheduled waste collection to prevent waste containers from overfilling (4) Provision of extra containers and more frequent waste pickup s during the demolition phase of construction; and 0,1 Collection, removal and disposal of all construction site wastes at authorized disposal areas. Sec. 90-205. - Inspection. The City, as applicable pursuant to Section 90-203, shall make inspections as hereinafter required and either shall approve that portion of the work completed or shall notify the permittee wherein the work fails to comply with the erosion and sediment control plan as approved. Plans for grading, stripping, excavating and filling work bearing the approval of the City, as applicable, shall be maintained at the site during the progress of the work. To obtain inspections, the permittee shall notify the City. as applicable, at least one (1) working day before the following: ill Installation of sediment and erosion measures; j,) Start of construction; Completion of site clearing; j Completion of rough grading; U) Completion of final grading; and 1'kl Completion of final landscaping j The permittee or his/her agent shall make regular inspections of all control measures in accordance with the inspection schedule outlined on the approved erosion and sediment control plan(s). The purpose of such inspections will be to determine the overall effectiveness of the control plan and the need for additional control measures. j The City shall have the authority to enter the property of the applicant as deemed necessary to make regular inspections. Sec. 90-206. - Enforcement, inspections and penalties. The following enforcement options shall be available to address violations of this article, each of which shall be non-exclusive: Code Enforcement. The City may pursue violations of this article through the code enforcement proceedings set forth in Chapter 2, Article VI, Division 2 of this Code. (b) Stop -work order: revocation of permit. The City may suspend or revoke a site development permit in the event that a permit -holder violates this article. or the terms of the permit. or implements site development in such a manner as to materially adversely affect the public health. welfare or safety. City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No 08-2013 Page 7 of 10 Code enforcement officer investigations. City code enforcement officers shall be granted access to inspect property for compliance with this article. Violations of the terms and conditions of a site development permit that are consistent with this ordinance shall also be deemed to be violations of this article. Each day of violation shall constitute a sen arate violation. Civil citations. In addition to all other remedies. a person who has been determined to have violated a provision of this article mav be subiect to a civil citation as sn ecified in section 2-283 of this Code. j Penalties. In addition to any other penalty authorized bv this section. anv person,, partnership or corporation convicted of violating any of the provisions of this article shall be required to bear the expense of restoration. including but not limited to. the costs of investigation and testing Sec. 90-207. - Emergency exemption. dal This article shall not be construed to preclude the doing of any act necessary to prevent material harm to or destruction of real or personal propertv as a result of a present emergency or when the property is in imminent peril and the necessity of obtaining a permit is impractical and would cause undue hardship in the protection of the property. Q A report of any such emergency action shall be made to the City bv the permit holder as soon as practicable. but no more than ten (10) days following such action. Remedial action mav be required bv the City subiect to appeal to the city council in the event of dispute. *** Section 3. Conforming Amendments to Chapter 2, Administration. Chapter 2, Administration, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, is hereby amended as follows (underlined type indicates additions and steilEeeut type indicates deletions, while asterisks (* * *) indicate a deletion from this Ordinance of text existing in Chapter 2. It is intended that the text in Chapter 2 denoted by the asterisks and set forth in this Ordinance shall remain unchanged from the language existing prior to adoption of this Ordinance): CHAPTER 2. ADMINISTRATION * ** ARTICLE VI. CODE ENFORCEMENT * * * DIVISION 3. CODE ENFORCEMENT CITATIONS * * * Sec. 2-283. — Applicable codes and ordinances; class violation. (a) The following city codes and ordinances may be enforced by civil citation to the Brevard County Court, and are assigned the violation classification enumerated below: City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 08-2013 Page 8 of 10 II. * * * (15) Chanter 90. article V. construction site stormwater runoff control...Class * * * Section 4. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Council, or parts of ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 5. Incorporation Into Code. This Ordinance and all Exhibits hereto shall be incorporated into the City of Cape Canaveral City Code and any section or paragraph, number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing. Grammatical, typographical and like errors may be corrected and additions, alterations and omissions, not affecting the construction or meaning of this Ordinance and the City Code may be freely made. Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption by the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida this 16th day of July , 2013. ATTEST: ANGELA APPERSON, City Clerk First Reading: June 18, 2013 Legal Ad published: June 27, 2013 Second Reading: July 16, 2013 ROCKY RANDELS, Mayor John Bond Bob Hoog Buzz Petsos Rocky Randels Betty Walsh City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 08-2013 Page 9 of 10 For Against Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for the City of Cape Canaveral only by: ANTHONY A. GARGANESE, City Attorney City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 08-2013 Page 10 of 10 1 foe4ay.e4 ?. JOHN A. PEKAR, P.E., LLC Civil Engineering/Consulting 102 Columbia Drive Suite 207 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Office Phone: 321-613-2959 Cell Phone: 321-288-1040 johnpekarpe@gmail.com Rani Fiowe roni}lowe@gmail.com Office Manager Ce!! Phone: 321-403-9899 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST Game Abscibgel THE FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION CHECKLIST IS PRESENTED AS AN OVERVIEW OF ANTICIPATED INSPECTOR ACTIVITIES THAT MIGHT BE PERFORMED ON VARIOUS SITE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL. THIS LIST DOES NOT DETAIL THE COMPLETE AND COMPLEX RANGE OF ALL POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION ACTIVITIES THAT MIGHT BE ENCOUNTERED. THESE LATTER ISSUES WOULD BE HANDLED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS. Obtain copy of approved drawings. Obtain copies of permits (and approvals) and review permit conditions. Pre -construction meeting with Contractor. Review of shop drawings. Review of erosion control on site. Review any environmental issues, if any. Hold regular contractor meetings. Inspect earth moving/demucking. Photograph throughout Prepare and maintain inspection logs. Review buried utility placements. Water Sewer Storm drainage Coordinate with power company, if needed. ioksvag 4144:14:, JOHN A. PEKAR, P.E., LLC Civil Engineering/Consulting 102 Columbia Drive Suite 207 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Office Phone: 321-613-2959 Cell Phone: 321-288-1040 j ohnpekarpe@gmail.com Rani Fiowe roniflowe@gmail.com Office Manager Cell Phone: 321-403-9899 Coordinate with gas company, if needed. Coordinate with cable company, if needed. Review density test(s). Inspect drainage systems. Inspect rough grading. Inspect pavement subgrade/base placement. Review paving operations. Continue to review Contractor draws for approvals. Coordinate any change orders or field charges. Review miscellaneous construction. Review landscaping. Prepare Contractor walk-thrus, develop punch lists. Support agency walk-thrus. Coordinate with testing lab. Review if off site impacts. Obtain test reports. Fences Pavement and Striping Signage Lighting Sidewalks Detention Basins 1 „fakir .4 g'ska v J6. e. JOHN A. PEKAR, P.E., LLC Civil Englneering/Consulting 102 Columbia Drive Suite 207 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Office Phone: 321-613-2959 Cell Phone: 321-288-1040 johnpekarpe@gmai.com Rai Fl owe romflowe@gmnil.com Office Manager Cell Phone: 321-403-9899 Prepare project certifications. Water Management Potable Water Sewer City of Cape Canaveral City Council Agenda Form City Council Meeting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. 7 Subject: Ordinance No. 10-2013; amending Chapter 110, Zoning, of the Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances related to Vacation Resort Campuses; providing requirements for Vacation Resort Campuses; excluding Vacation Resort Campuses from the rental restrictions on dwelling units set forth in Section 110-487; providing for the repeal of prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions; incorporation into the Code; severability; and an effective date, second reading. Department: Community and Economic Development Summary: The Ron Jon Cape Caribe Resort is a timeshare vacation resort that is actively engaged in marketing timeshare units. An important component of their marketing effort includes providing lodging for prospective buyers before or after touring the property. They prefer to provide lodging on site, but there are not enough units available so prospects are often provided lodging off site and in Cocoa Beach hotels. It is important to keep prospects on the resort campus to more effectively market the timeshare units. Accordingly, Cape Caribe, Inc. is requesting that they be able to use the building on the oceanfront, and zoned R-3, for stays of less than the seven (7) day minimum per code section 110-487. This will also allow Cape Caribe to better serve other "short stay" resort guests who may prefer an oceanfront room. The Cape Caribe Resort is a unique project and the only true vacation resort property in the City. Currently, there is not a definition in the Code for this type of project. Defining this property as a Vacation Resort Campus and adding Vacation Resort Campus to the list of exclusions from the minimum seven day rental requirement will allow Cape Caribe to more effectively market the Resort, expedite construction of new buildings, more efficiently utilize existing units and better accommodate desires of resort guests. If the Ordinance is adopted and when the next building is completed, they anticipate moving approximately 50% of the off-site hotel "stays" to the Cape Caribe property which equates to approximately 105 nightly stays per week. Proposed definition and ordinance revision: Sec. 110- 491. - Vacation Resort Campus. A Vacation Resort Campus is a multiple building property that includes a hotel, condominium, cooperative or timeshare plan. or any combination thereof. and is also a transient public lodgina establishment duly licensed pursuant to Chapter 509, Florida Statutes. and in which the units are master planned and oraanized in a campus arrangement that meets the followina requirements; a) The campus shall be master planned pursuant to the terms and conditions of a negotiated development aareement approved by the city council; b) The campus as used herein shall contain a minimum of twenty-five (25) contiguous acres of C-1 zoned property or a combination of C-1 and R-3 zoned property in which a hotel operation must exist within the campus; City Council Meeting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. 7 Page 2 of 2 c) The campus shall have direct access on a thoroughfare or high capacity roadway; d) The campus shall provide indoor and outdoor recreational amenities customarily provided by a resort for their guests. such as a pool. theater. restaurant. daycare, etc.: e) The campus shall include a food service facility that is open to the general public: f) The total number of units in the campus shall not exceed the maximum density of the underlvina zoning category; and 9) All development criteria shall be governed by the underlvina zoning categorv. including but not limited to building setbacks, building separation, required parking, height limits and density, unless otherwise agreed by the city in the master plan development agreement required by this section. Sec. 110-487. - Rental restrictions on dwelling units. It shall be unlawful for any person to rent a dwelling for less than seven consecutive days in any zoning district, excluding hotels and motels under subsection 110-332(4), and vacation rentals in the C-1 zoning district. and a vacation resort campus under subsection 110-491. At first reading, City Attorney Garganese suggested a change to the third "Whereas" to read: "The City recognizes that a vacation resort campus, as defined herein, can help to promote economic development and tourism in the City of Cape Canaveral." This change is reflected in the attached Ordinance. Submitting Director: Barry Brown 6bi Date: 7/1/2013 Attachments: 1) Ordinance No. 10-2013, 2) Application for Code Amendment, and 3) Planning & Zoning Board recommendation to City Council. Financial Impact: Cost to prepare, advertise and incorporate the Ordinance into the City Code. Passage of this Ordinance has the likelihood of increasing Ad Valorem revenue as well as supporting existing businesses in the community. �/ Reviewed by Finance Director: John DeLeo Date: j/ /3 The City Manager recommends that City Coun take the following adtion(s): Adopt Ordinance No. 10-2013, second reading. Approved by City Manager: David L. Greene J - Date: 3) g 1(3 City Council Meeting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. Page 3 of 2 City Council Action: [ ] Approved as Recommended [ ] Disapproved [ ] Approved with Modifications [ ] Tabled to Time Certain ORDINANCE NO. 10-2013 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 110, ZONING, OF THE CAPE CANAVERAL CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATED TO VACATION RESORT CAMPUSES; PROVIDING REQUIREMENTS FOR VACATION RESORT CAMPUSES; EXCLUDING VACATION RESORT CAMPUSES FROM THE RENTAL RESTRICTIONS ON DWELLING UNITS SET FORTH IN SECTION 110-487; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCORPORATION INTO THE CODE; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City is granted the authority, under Section 2(b), Article VIII, of the State Constitution, to exercise any power for municipal purposes, except when expressly prohibited by law; and WHEREAS, section 110-487 of the City Code currently prohibits the rental of dwelling units for less than seven (7) consecutive days except for hotels and vacation rentals located in the C-1 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes that a vacation resort campus, as defined herein, can help to promote economic development and tourism in the City of Cape Canaveral; and WHEREAS, the City desires to authorize dwelling unit rentals for less than seven (7) consecutive days when such rentals occur as part of a "vacation resort campus," as further described herein, and subject to certain requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, hereby finds this Ordinance to be in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Cape Canaveral. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby fully incorporated herein by this reference as legislative findings and the intent and purpose of the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral. Section 2. Code Amendment. Chapter 110, Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, is hereby amended as follows (underlined type indicates additions and strikeout type indicates deletions, while asterisks (* * *) indicate a deletion from this Ordinance of City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 10-2013 Page lof4 text existing in Chapter 110. It is intended that the text in Chapter 110 denoted by the asterisks and set forth in this Ordinance shall remain unchanged from the language existing prior to adoption of this Ordinance): CHAPTER 110. ZONING * * * ARTICLE IX. SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS DIVISION 1. GENERALLY * ** Sec. 110-487. — Rental restrictions on dwelling units. It shall be unlawful for any person to rent a dwelling for less than seven consecutive days in any zoning district, excluding hotels and motels under subsection 110-332(4)2 and vacation rentals in the C-1 zoning district, and a vacation resort campus under section 110-491. * * * Sec. 110-491. — Vacation resort campus. A vacation resort campus is a multiple building property that includes a hotel, condominium, cooperative or timeshare plan, or any combination thereof, and is also a transient public lodging establishment duly licensed pursuant to Chapter 509, Florida Statutes, and in which the units are master planned and organized in a campus arrangement that meets the following requirements: Laj The campus shall be master planned pursuant to the terms and conditions of a negotiated development agreement approved by the city council; lbj The campus, as used herein, shall contain a minimum of 25 contiguous acres of C-1 zoned property or a combination of C-1 and R-3 zoned property in which a hotel operation must exist within the campus; Lci The campus shall have direct access on a thoroughfare or high capacity roadway; isil The campus shall provide indoor and outdoor recreational amenities customarily provided by a resort for their guests, such as a pool, theater, restaurant, daycare, etc.; Lej The campus shall include a food service facility that is open to the general public; if The total number of units in the campus shall not exceed the maximum density of the City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 10-2013 Page 2 of 4 underlying zoning category, and igi All development criteria shall be governed by the underlying zoning category, including but not limited to building setbacks, building separation, required parking, height limits and density, unless otherwise agreed by the city in the master development agreement required by this section. Section 3. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Council, or parts of prior ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 4. Incorporation Into Code. This Ordinance shall be incorporated into the Cape Canaveral City Code and any section or paragraph, number or letter, and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing Grammatical, typographical, and like errors may be corrected and additions, alterations, and omissions, not affecting the construction or meaning of this Ordinance and the City Code may be freely made. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption by the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida. 4 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, this day of , 2013. ATTEST: ANGELA APPERSON, City Clerk / Assistant City Manager First Reading: Rocky Randels, Mayor John Bond Bob Hoog Buzz Petsos Rocky Randels Betty Walsh City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 10-2013 Page 3 of 4 For Against Legal Ad published: Second Reading: Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for the City of Cape Canaveral only by: ANTHONY A. GARGANESE, City Attorney City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 10-2013 Page 4 of 4 • • • • DATE FILED 4-I2-13 RECEIVED BY 5 . bt own City u'Cape Canaveral Building Department (Please Print Legibi ar Type) & cso t) FEE PAID Paso, Of•_ . DEPOSIT P 1 444. dU S 250.00 FILING FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE • NATURE OF REQUEST SPECIAL EXCEPTION VARIANCE ___ REZONING APPEAL _ x _ CODE (IF REQUEST IS FOR A TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER ATTACH SHEET 01 OF TOWER DESCRIFI1ON OF REQUEST (Insure that the specific sections of the Zoning Ordinance that allow & support your request are noted) (Mach separate sheet 1f necessary) Adopt new code definition for Vacation Resort Campus • See attached draft • . Address of request • n / a Legal Dere LOT BLK. SUB. Range STATEMENT OF FACT: State of Florida, County of Brevard; 1, Ken Ward , being duly sworn, depose and say that: I am the owner. x lam the owner's designated agent'.(Attach notarized letter of authorization) Owner's Name Cape Caribe, Inc Address 1000 Shorewood Drive • Home Phone # (If other than owner) Applicant's Name Ken Ward Business Address 1000 Shorewood Drive Home Phone # Al information, sketches and of my knowledge and belief. Swot!)and sub cubed w - ore this day of • City Cape Canaveral State Zip Work Phone # 321-784-8093 Other • • • City Cape Canaveral state Fl Zip 32920 Work Phone # 321-784-8093Other �111Gu�; Kwaffle ru komteb»+owneIcont contained arid made part of this request, are honest and tru to the WE JO GENTRY TARP PUBLIC TATE OF FL m# DDp953405 ares 3/31/2014 0 Notary Public, `State o 'Florida of Appli The complexed request form and the 5250.00 filing fee must be filed as follows Requests for Vainness and Special Exceptions (Excepting Telecommunication Towers) ,14 days prior to the Planning & Zoning Board Meeting; request for rezoning, 30 days prior to the Planning & Zoning Board meeting; Request for Telecommunications Towers, sixty days prior to the Plr.+rdng & Zoning Board meeting. The Board of Adjustment meeting will be Set atW the rcqu st i3 heard by the Planning & Zoning Board. (A deposit may be required, see code section 110-92 for applicability) • • FOR CITY USE ONLY Notice of Public Hearing Published in Newspaper on Notice to applicant by Certified Mail No. Notice posted on Bulletin Board on Nada posted an subject property on Prop. owners within 500 fL notified on • • APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO I tm CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL 15-13 ian cadlon .5� . CODE OF ORDINANCES + Pay ,f `f ` �- DATE: April 12, 2013 App��ANT: Cape Caribe, Inc. ADDRESS: 10 0 0 Shorewcsod Drive • • State Florida ZIP 32920 DBA City Cape Canaveral TELEPHONE: 321-784-8093 REQUESTING AMENDMENT TO CODE SECTION New Ordinance SECTION PRESENTLY READS: N/A • • REQUESTED CHANGE TO READ: See attached REASON FOR REQUESTED CHANGE: Promote Economic Development • (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) FEE FOR REQUEST: $250.00 • • ti:./x/1'23 2:22 PHb'1.-=- ..• -•;'• 1- r • t - • Vacation Resort Campus Ordinance: The enactment of this ordinance is precisely in line with the City's Visioning Plan to "support businesses that enhance economic viability and serve Cape Canaveral residents and visitors". The Vacation Resort Campus ordinance establishes strict parameters that are intended to address compatibility issues with adjoining properties. The ordinance requires that a Vacation Resort Campus must obtain City Council approval of its overall master plan and developer's agreement and shall be duly licensed pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 509. The twenty-five (25) acreage minimum requirement ensures that a Vacation Resort Campus will have sufficient land to create the resort setting that is attractive to surrounding properties as well as the owners and visitors of the resort. In addition, a portion of the Campus must be "anchored" by a hotel operation in a C-1 zoning district that meets the hotel and motel requirements already established in the City Code. The ordinance further requires a Vacation Resort Campus to have a direct connection to a high capacity roadway. This requirement is intended to diminish any adverse impacts on the transportation infrastructure although there is sufficient data to indicate that a Resort has minimal impact on transportation infrastructure. This is primarily due to the leisurely nature of a Resort and its variable stay times of owners and visitors. The ordinance requires a Vacation Resort Campus to provide for food service facilities and sufficient recreational amenities which further enhances the resort atmosphere that local residents and visitors will find attractive. The ordinance preserves the development standards of the underlying zoning district within the Campus. For example; any building located in the C-1 or R-3 zoning district must still be developed in accordance with the underlying restrictions such as density, height, building and unit sizes for that zoning district. Additionally, each building must be constructed and operated in compliance with all life - safety requirements, including fire sprinklers and emergency access. This ordinance recognizes the uniqueness of a Vacation Resort Campus and distinguishes it from the standard hotel and motel classifications. Unlike a standard hotel operation, a Vacation Resort Campus may expect to have visitors that stay anywhere from one night to several weeks. Having the flexibility to provide nightly service, particularly for a development of this size, is crucial to the overall success of a project. This new ordinance will allow the existing Ron Jon Cape Caribe Resort® (RJCCR) to operate more efficiently and service the needs of its owners and visitors. The relief of this seven night rental restriction will allow the RJCCR to accelerate the next phase of construction. The RJCCR exemplifies the type of establishment that the City of Cape Canaveral should seek to support when considering adaptation of codes and ordinances. The RJCCR enhances the economic viability of the City with very minimal impact on city services. The increase of local jobs and direct dollars of economic activity would be substantial to the City of Cape Canaveral. This family -friendly Resort has both indoor and outdoor amenities that are designed to reduce foreseeable compatibility issues. The Resort seeks every opportunity to seamlessly blend the activities of its owners and visitors with the surrounding properties. This is has been consistently demonstrated for nearly a decade. It is our hope that you will support this ordinance and add it to the exceptions under Section 110-487 of the City Code. How this ordinance affects the Ron Jon Cape Caribe Resort®: • • Allows the acceleration of the next phase of construction and future buildings. • Provides operational cost savings associated with the occupancy management. • Provides an additional incentive for ownership which will increase sales pace. • Reduced operational risk due to greater efficiency and flexibility. New Definition Section • Sec. 110- 491. — Vacation Resort Campus. A Vacation Resort Campus is a group of units in a multiple building site in a hotel. condominium, cooperative or timeshare plan. or combination thereof. that is also a transient public lodging establishment duly licensed pursuant to Florida Statutes. Chapter 509 and in which the units are, master planned and organized in a campus arranaement that meets the following requirements; (a) The campus shall be master planned pursuant to the terms and conditions of a negotiated development agreement approved by the city council; (b) The campus as used herein shall contain a minimum of twenty-five (25) contiguous acres of C-1 zoned property or a combination of C-1 and R-3 zoned property in which a hotel operation must exist within the campus; (c) The campus shall have direct access on a thoroughfare or high capacity roadway; (d) The campus shall provide indoor and outdoor recreational amenities customarily provided by a hotel for their quests; (e) The campus shall include a food service facility that is open to the general public; (f) The total number of units in the campus shall not exceed the maximum density of the, underlvina zoning category, and (g) All development criteria shall be governed by the underlying zoning cateaory including but not limited to building setbacks, building separation, height limits and density, unless otherwise agreed by the city in the master plan development agreement required by this section. Code Amendment Section Sec. 110-487. - Rental restrictions on dwelling units. It shall be unlawful for any person to rent a dwelling for less than seven consecutive days in any zoning district, excluding hotels and motels under subsection 110-332(4), vacation rentals in the C-1 zoning district and a vacation resort campus under subsection 110-491, City of Cape Canaveral Escrow Deposit Request Date: A.9rj 15. 2 -01. - Requested by: S �hnmCt.ri Project Name: Ccuoto. �' � bp.-tnr_. Project Number: N,A. Account Number: 001-000-000-202240 • Special Exception J Preliminary Plat ▪ Site Plan Final Plat ▪ Variance Lot Split • Rezoning Records Request • Comp Plan Amendment ❑✓ Other 2 -'inti (-fa c • Voluntary Annexation Special Instructions: l iva �Z-) I cya.l n041 c.es c_eproX. <o9Tl_oo �QGh TOTAL: $ I , aq G . oo Clerk's Office Services Provided: 17I0.« (z) 1 1 r1o{,mss. Community Dev Dept. Services Provided: lvrlke./prntrie-lp, 1 no-haec rnr Initial Deposit Required: it, 1.7 qq 17ubi,+-n lerKs Off -tele - City of Cape Canaveral Date: May 22, 2013 Community & Economic Development Department To: Barry Brown, Planning & Development Director From: Susan L. Chapman, Secretary, Planning & Zoning Board Through: Lamar Russell, Chairperson, Planning & Zoning Board Re: Recommendation to City Council - Ordinance No. XX -2013 Amending Code Section 110, Zoning, relating to Vacation Resort Campuses; providing requirements for Vacation Resort Campuses; excluding Vacation Resort Campuses from the rental restrictions on dwelling units set forth in Section 110-487 On May 22, 2013, the Planning & Zoning Board considered proposed Ordinance No. XX -2013, revising the Code relating to Vacation Resort Campuses. Following review and discussion, the Board unanimously recommended that Council approve the ordinance as presented. 7510 N Atlantic Avenue — P.O. Box 326 — Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-0326 Telephone (321) 868-1222 -- Fax (321) 868-1247 www.citvofcanecanaveral.org e-mail: info u.citvofcaoecanaveral.ora City of Cape Canaveral City Council Agenda Form City Council Meeting Date: 7/16/2013 Item No. g" Subject: Ordinance No. 09-2013; amending Chapter 78, Article II, Division 3 of the Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances related to sanitary sewer system impact fees; revising sewer impact fee assessment procedures consistent with the findings and recommendations set forth in the City's Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Report dated April 2013; providing for the repeal of prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions; incorporation into the Code; severability; and an effective date, first reading. Department: Public Works Services and Community & Economic Development Summary: Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. ("Raftelis") conducted a Study to review and update the City's method of determining Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees, which are directed at recovering capital costs for major wastewater facilities. The results of the Study are transmitted in the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Report, attachment one. Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees are a mechanism to recover costs of capacity -related Treatment and Transmission improvements which provide system capacity benefits for new service and existing connections requesting additional services. The Fees are intended to mitigate a portion of the financial burden on existing customers to pay for capacity improvements benefiting future customers. The Study utilized a consumption -based methodology, which assumes that new service connections will utilize portions of both existing and new facilities. Wastewater Treatment and Transmission facilities improvements historically funded through resources of the Wastewater Enterprise Fund are eligible for cost recovery through the Impact Fee. Wastewater Treatment and Transmission activities are considered the primary functional services for Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee purposes. The Study reviewed the level of service (LOS) criteria contained in the existing Code for both applicability and appropriateness. After review and discussion with City Staff, it was determined that the sanitary sewer LOS should be revised to better reflect the characteristics of customers within the City's service area. It is important to note that increasing the sanitary sewer LOS to a more accurate figure produces a corresponding reduction in the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees. A summary of the existing and updated LOS and Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees for an Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) is shown in Table 1. Table 1. Level of Service and Existing and Updated Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees. LOS Existing 198 gpd/ERU Updated 240 gpd/ERU Amount Difference Percent Difference Note: gpd — gallons per day. Treatment Transmission Total $1,940.38 $1,135.20 ($805.18) -41% $397.43 $2,337.81 $213.60 $1,348.80 ($183.83) ($989.01) -46% -42% City Council Meeting Date: 7/16/2013 Item No. g Page2of4 Other Community Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees Comparisons of the City's existing and updated Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees to those of other nearby communities for new residential wastewater service (representative of 1 ERU) are provided in Table 2. Table 2. Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Comparisons (Single Family/1 ERU) City of Cape Canaveral Existing Updated Other Communities Barefoot Bay North Brevard Indian River County City of Cocoa City of Cocoa Beach City of Holly Hill City of Melbourne City of New Smyrna Beach City of Ormond Beach City of Palm Bay City of Vero Beach City of West Melbourne Average of Other Communities Amount $2,337.81 $1,348.80 $275.00 $671 00 $2,796.00 $1,250.00 $2,200.00 $1,908.00 $1,583.00 $1,250.00 $1,950.00 $2,965.00 $2,290.00 $3,000.00 $1,844.83 LOS (qpd) 198.24 240.00 150.00 1-3 bedrooms 300.00 250.00 275.00 234.00 240.00 250.00 15 fixture units 210.00 15 fixture units 300.00 City Staff identified a need to provide for alternative methods of determining Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees for new connections that would (1) accommodate a variety of circumstances, (2) be easily understood and applied, (3) ensure compliance with 163.31801 F.S. as amended and (4) provide a cost -friendly economic incentive for businesses wishing to locate to or expand in the City. To address these needs, three methods were developed that allow for accurate/convenient assessment of a connection's ERU and corresponding Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees. The three methods include the following: 1. ERU Basis: This method utilizes a table that reflects ERUs associated with characteristics of typical residential and commercial applications to determine the appropriate ERU and corresponding Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee amount. 2. Fixture Unit Basis: This method consists of determining total Sewer Load Factor by utilizing the number of fixture units associated with the applicant's property, to determine the appropriate ERU and corresponding Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee amount. 3. Flow Basis: This method requires that the applicant provide the property's average daily gpd of sewer flow to determine the appropriate Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee amount. City Council Meeting Date: 7/16/2013 Item No. 8 Page 3 of 4 Using these alternative methods establishes a City policy whereby the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee will be the greater of 1 ERU or the amount calculated in one of the alternative methods. The concept is that each of these three methods would be available such that new customer's characteristics can easily be associated with one of the methods through the classification and application process Using this new policy to determine the appropriate Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees will (1) serve as an economic development incentive by significantly reducing development/redevelopment costs, (2) e nsure compliance with Section 163.31801 F.S. as amended and (3) provide a fair and reasonable alternate assessment method for non -conventional uses. The Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees reasonably represent the costs of certain improvements together with related financing costs that provide wastewater services to n ew connections within the Utility's service area. The Impact Fees were developed to be compliant with Section 163.31801 F.S Attachment two "Summary Letter" from Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. explains that there may potentially be a small number of sewer impact fee increases even after the Ordinance is in effect. The increases have nothing to do with the City's efforts to lower the Equivalencies. They have to do with the adoption of the flow values established by the Florida Administrative Code which are incorporated into the Report. These flow values more accurately reflect flow characteristics of devices and reclassifications of u ses. Examples: 1. It is now known that a Laundromat machine produces a much higher flow than the ordinance was previously attributing. 2. It is more accurate to look at the number of restrooms in a store than the number of sq. ft. in the store. Because there may be a small number of increases, the City must meet a Statutory requirement to advertise the Ordinance 90 days before incorporating any changes into the code. The 90 -day requirement will be complied with by making the effective date of the Ordinance 90 days after approval. The recommended Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees represent the maximum amounts supported by the data, assumptions and estimates. City Council can elect to establish policies regarding the amount of the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees provided that such amount does not exceed the amount identified in the attached Report. Amounts not recovered through Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees will, for the most part, be recovered from revenues generated by existing and future user rates and charges. Ordinance No. 09-2013, attachment three, is presented for first reading It incorporates required changes into the City Code to implement the Report findings. Resolution No. 2013- , attachment four, outlines the proposed fees and is presented for information. It will be considered after the Ordinance passes second reading. 0R/A-4- etti fAA Submitting Department Directors: Jeff Ratliff and Todd Morley Date: 07/02/13 City Council Meeting Date: 7/16/2013 Item No. `' Page 4 of 4 Attachments: 1. Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Report 2. Summary Letter from Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. 3. Ordinance No. 09-2013 4. Resolution 2013 - Financial Impact: Forgone Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee revenue, cost to produce the Raftelis Report, and cost to prepare, advertise and incorporate the Ordinance into the City Code. r1JReviewed by Finance Director: John DeLeo Date: o-03 The City Manager recommends that City Cou ciI take the following action(s): Adopt Ordinance No. 09-2013, at first reading. Approved by City Manager: David L. Greene Date: 7 % 3//3 City Council Action: [ ] Approved as Recommended [ ] Disapproved [ ] Approved with Modifications [ ] Tabled to Time Certain A-- -14 a c ivr) 1 - SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE REPORT Prepared for the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida April 2013 FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS. INC. 976 Lake Baldwin Lane Orlando, FL 32814 FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS INC. April 3, 2013 Mr. David Greene City Manager City of Cape Canaveral Post Office Box 326 Cape Canaveral, F132920 976 Lake Baldwin Lane Phone 407 .730. 5944 www.raftelis.com Suite 204 Fax 407 .730. 5941 Orlando, FL 32814 Subject: Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Report Dear Mr. Greene: Pursuant to your request Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. ("RFC") has conducted a study to update the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee for the City of Cape Canaveral ("City") Sewer Utility System (the "Utility") as presented and documented in this Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Report (the "Report"). The Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee is a mechanism intended to recover capital costs that benefit new connections and existing connections requesting additional service. As updated herein the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees reasonably represent the costs of certain improvements together with related financing costs that provide wastewater services to new connections within the Utility's service area. The Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees presented herein were developed to be compliant with Section 163.31801 F.S. The updated Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee represents the maximum amounts supported by the data, assumptions and estimates. The City can elect to establish policies regarding the amount of the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee provided that such amount does not exceed the amount identified in this Report. However, it should be clearly understood that amounts not recovered through Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees will for the most part be recovered from revenues generated by existing and future user rates and charges. As a final note, our thanks and appreciation to you and other City staff members that provided data and assisted in the development of this update. Very truly yours, RAFTELIS FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC. Marco H. Rocca, CMC Director of Florida Operations Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES 1 Overview ES 1 Findings and Conclusion ES 3 Findings ES 3 Conclusions ES 3 INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Impact Fee Overview 1 Other Considerations 3 METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH 5 General 5 Background 5 Localized Wastewater Collection 5 Wastewater Transmission 5 Wastewater Treatment and Disposal 5 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Methodology and Approach 5 EXPANSION FACILITY CAPITAL COSTS AND CAPACITIES 7 General 7 Wastewater Treatment and Transmission 7 CAPITAL FINANCING ASSUMPTIONS AND CREDIT CRITERIA 8 General 8 Financing Assumptions 8 Debt Funded 8 Financing Terms 8 Debt Service Paid by Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee 8 Financing and Credit Cost Coefficients 9 LEVEL OF SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT METHODS 10 General 10 Existing Level of Service 10 Updated Level of Service 10 Assessment Methods 10 ERU Basis 11 Fixture Unit Basis 11 Flow Basis 11 CALCULATION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE 12 General 12 Cost Per Unit of Service and Level of Service Capacity 12 Calculation of Treatment and Transmission Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees 12 1 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study Comparison to Existing 13 Comparison with Other Utilities 13 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 15 General 15 Findings 15 Conclusions 15 LIST OF TABLES TABLE ES -1 TABLE ES -2 TABLE 1 TABLE 2 TABLE 3 TABLE 4 TABLE 5 TABLE 6 Updated and Existing Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees ES -2 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Comparison ES -2 Sanitary Facility Summary 7 Financing Assumptions 9 Financing and Credit Coefficients 9 Calculation of Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee 13 Updated and Existing Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee 13 Sanitary Sewer Comparison 14 LIST OF SCHEDULES SCHEDULE 1 Sanitary Sewer Asset Listing 17 SCHEDULE 2 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee by Classification and Amount 21 SCHEDULE 3 Sanitary Sewer Fixture Unit Schedule 22 ii SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview The City of Cape Canaveral (the "City") requested that Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. (RFC) update the Sewer System's (the "Utility") existing Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee, which is directed at the recovering capital costs for major wastewater facilities. The Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee was established on May 5, 1992 pursuant to Ordinance 5-92 and revised to current levels by resolutions. Historically, impact fees for Florida utilities were developed and designed to comply with common law findings; however, in 2006, Section 163.31801 F.S. was added providing specific statutory requirements. The statute was amended July 1, 2009 to require governments prove by preponderance of evidence that the impact fees meet the requirements of the statute and prohibits courts from using deferential standard in court actions. The Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee is a mechanism to recover the costs of capacity -related treatment and major transmission improvements, installed and funded by the City, which provide system capacity benefits for new service and existing connections requesting additional service. Collection of Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees is intended to mitigate a portion of the financial burden on existing customers to pay for capacity improvements benefiting future customers. Localized wastewater collection improvements such as gravity sewers and lift stations, etc. together with associated appurtenances and soft costs are generally contributed by the landowner/developer, provided through assessments or otherwise not funded by the Utility, and therefore, are not included for cost recovery through Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees. This study utilizes a "Consumption" based methodology, which assumes that new service connections will utilize portions of both existing and new facilities; as compared to an "Improvements" based methodology that assumes a new set of service facilities is provided for each increment of new service. Improvements included for cost recovery through the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee include wastewater Treatment and Transmission (major backbone) facilities funded through resources of the Utility (reserve funds, bond proceeds, grants and contribution through agreements). Wastewater Treatment and Transmission activities are considered the primary firnctronal services for Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee purposes. The approach to determining the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee amount for each functional service consists of dividing the adjusted improvement costs (including financing costs less amounts recovered from grants and other sources) by the average day capacity of such improvements resulting in a cost per gallon per day (gpd) of capacity. The study process also considers identifying the appropriate level of service (LOS) for each of these functional services. Costs, capacities and other pertinent data were provided by the City's Public Works Services staff along with guidance concerning LOS criteria The study incorporated considerations for financing costs and importantly credits associated with revenues provided from sources other than Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees. The appropriateness of the LOS criteria contained in the existing Code was reviewed for both applicability and appropriateness. After reviews and discussions with City staff, it was determined that the sanitary sewer LOS should be revised to better reflect the characteristics of customers within the City's service area. A summary of the updated and existing Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee and LOS for an Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) are shown below in Table ES -1. It should be noted that the existing Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee presented below is based on the existing LOS, which differs from the updated LOS. Therefore, the amount difference is attributed to a combination of both cost per gpd and the revised sanitary sewer LOS. Executive Summary Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study ES -1. Updated and Existing Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees LOS Updated 240 gpd/ERU Existing 198 gpd/ERU Amount Difference Percent Difference Treatment $1,135.20 $1,940.38 ($805.18) -41% Transmission $213.60 $397.43 ($183.83) -46% Total $1,348.80 $2,337.81 ($989.01) -42% Comparisons of the City's existing and updated Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees to those of Other Communities for new residential wastewater service (representative of 1 ERU) are provided in Table ES -2. The amounts shown for Other Communities are based on the schedules that were in effect as of October 1, 2012 and do not include charges for other customer service related fees applied to new system connections (i.e. tap fees, application fees, inspection fees, etc.) Caution should be taken when comparing impact fees as difference can be attributed to various reasons including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Compliance status with Chapter 163.31801 F.S.; 2. Cost used by others may not be representative of actual or "Current Local Costs;" 3. Level of financing costs recovered; 4. The LOS criteria may be either higher or lower; 5. Other cost recovery from contributions, grants or other sources may be applicable; 6. Local government may elect to phase-in or not implement the total recovery amounts; and 7. Treatment processes and availability of resources may be different. Table ES -2. Sanitation Sewer Impact Fee Comparison Single Family / 1 ERC Amount LOS (gpd) City of Cape Canaveral Existing Updated Other Communities Barefoot Bay North Brevard Indian River County City of Cocoa City of Cocoa Beach City of Holly Hill City of Melbourne City of New Smyrna Beach City of Ormond Beach City of Palm Bay City of Vero Beach City of West Melbourne Average of Other Communities 1. Per the community's ERU equivalency ES 2 $2,337.81 $1,348.80 $275.00 671.00 2,796.00 1,250.00 2,200.00 1,908.00 1,583.00 1,250.00 1,950.00 2,965.00 2,290.00 3,000.00 $1,844.83 basis unless 198.24 240.00 150.00 1-3 bedrooms 300.00 250.00 275.00 234.00 240.00 250.00 15 F.U.s 210.00 15 F.U.s 300.00 otherwise noted. Executive Summary Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study Discussions with City staff identified a need to also provide for alternative methods of determining Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees for new connections that would 1) accommodate a variety of circumstances; and 2) be easily understood and applied. To address these needs three alternative methods were developed that allow for accurate and convenient assessment of a connection's ERU and corresponding Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee. The concept is that each of these methods would be available such that new customer's characteristics can easily be associated with one of methods through the classification and application process. Findings and Conclusion In the preparation of this Report, certain information has been used and relied upon that was provided by other entities including the City Such information includes, but is not limited to, the Utility's capital improvements plan, SRF loans, asset depreciation summary/listing, capacities, cost data, fee schedules for the Cit) and other Communities, and other information provided by or through the City. Additionally, reasonably conservative assumptions were developed to establish the basis for certain required study elements that are not, have not or cannot be specifically defined through existing data. To the extent that future conditions differ from those assumed and utilized in the Report, the results of the analyses may vary from those developed herein. Findings 1. The City's recordkeeping provides sufficient information to address the requirements of updating the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee. 2, The Utility's service area is not expected to require any wastewater capacity expansions. 3. The LOS criteria should be updated to better reflect the characteristics of the potable water provider and Utility customers. 4. The method of determining and assessing the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee can be revised and expanded to better accommodate different requests for service. Conclusions Based on the reviews, analyses and assumptions provided herein, it is concluded that: 1. Due to the adequacy of Treatment and Transmission capacity to provide for the service area future needs, the current local cost requirements in updating the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee herein are based on actual and expansion -related actual costs. 2. The Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee developed herein reflects net amounts that are equitable and provide for reasonable recovery without exceeding current local cost of the capital improvements associated with providing wastewater capacity to new connections. 3. The City currently imposes other connection charges, deposits and other fees for new customers connecting to the system. Such fees are related to recovery of operating costs associated with establishing a new customer rather than capacity to serve the customer. As such, these other charges are not related to the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee. 4. As available the updated Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee can be budgeted to pay for the expansion related portion of the State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan debt service, which will reduce the burden on user rates. Furthermore, Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees collected beyond the retirement of the SRF loans can be used to reimburse the Utihty for historic debt payments made at times when Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee revenues were insufficient. 5. The City should have a policy in determining the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee which states the amount owed shall be the greater of 1 ERU or the amount calculated in one of the 3 methods discussed herein. ES 3 SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE STUDY INTRODUCTION General The City of Cape Canaveral (the "City") requested that Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. (RFC) update the existing Sanitary Sewer system's (the "Utility") impact fee, which is directed at recovering capital costs for major sanitary sewer facilities. The Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee was established on May 5, 1992 pursuant to Ordinance 5-92 and revised to current levels by resolutions and may not adequately reflect the appropriated cost recovery for facilities providing wastewater services within the service area. Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees paid by new and increased service connections is a mechanism to appropriately recover the facility costs for such services; thereby, reducing or eliminating the burden on existing connections to subsidize improvements for the benefit of new service connections Localized wastewater collection improvements such as gravity sewers and lift stations, etc. together with associated appurtenances and soft costs are generally contributed by the landowner/developer, provided through assessments or otherwise not funded by the Utility, and therefore, are not included for cost recovery through Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees. The purpose of the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee is to assign, to the extent practical, growth -related capital costs to those customers responsible for such additional costs. Sound financial and equitable cost recovery practice promotes the assignment of the identifiable additional growth related capital costs for utility services to connections responsible for such costs rather than existing connections. Generally, this practice has been labeled as "growth paying for growth" without burden on existing connections. Impact Fee Overview Impact fees are referred to by a number of different terms including impact fees, capital charges, capital facility charges, facility fees, connection fees, capacity reservation charges, system development charges, capital connection charges or other similar terminology. In general, these are one-time charges established as a means to recover in whole or in part, but not to exceed, the costs associated with system capacity. Such capital costs generally include the construction of improvements together with general plant, engineering, administration, surveying, land, legal and financing costs. Historically, impact fees in Florida were a result of home rule powers with the requirements associated with the development, administration, accounting and expenditure governed by case law. However, in 2006, Section 163.31801 was added to the Florida Statues, which reinforced, enhanced, clarified and added to the provisions of case law. This section was amended in 2009 and Section 163.31801 F.S. is currentl) as follows: 163.31801 Impact Fees; short title; intent; definitions; ordinances levying impact fees. (1) This section may be cited as the "Florida Impact Fee Act." (2) The Legislature finds that impact fees are an important source of revenue for a local government to use in funding the infrastructure necessitated by new growth. The Legislature further finds that impact fees are an outgrowth of the home rule power of a local government to provide certain services within its jurisdiction Due to the growth of impact fee collections and local governments' reliance on impact fees, it is the intent of the Legislature to ensure that, when a city or municipality adopts an impact fee by ordinance or a special district adopts an impact fee by resolution, the governing city complies with this section. 1 Introduction Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study (3) An impact fee adopted by ordinance of a city or municipality or by resolution of a special district must, at minimum: a. Require that the calculation of the impact fee be based on the most recent and localized data. b. Provide for accounting and reporting of impact fee collections and expenditures. If a local governmental entity imposes an impact fee to address its infrastructure needs, the entity shall account for the revenues and expenditures of such impact fee in a separate accounting fund. c. Limit administrative charges for the collection of impact fees to actual costs. d. Require that notice be provided no less than 90 days before the effective date of an ordinance or resolution imposing a new or amended impact fee. (4) Audits of financial statements of local governmental entities and district school boards which are performed by a certified public accountant pursuant to s. 218.39 and submitted to the Auditor General must include an affidavit signed by the chief financial officer of the local governmental entity or district school board stating that the local governmental entity or district school board has complied with this section. (5) In any action challenging an impact fee, the government has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the imposition or amount of the fee meets the requirements of state legal precedent or this section. The court may not use a deferential standard. History.—s. 9, ch. 2006-218; s. 1, ch. 2009-49; s. 5, ch. 2009-96; s. 5, ch. 2011-14; s. 1, ch. 2011-149. Although the statute provides criteria, certain precedents originally set by common law need to be addressed to meet the legal requirements associated with impact fees. Common law precedent for impact fees in Florida was originally set in the landmark Florida Supreme Court decision, Contractors and Builders Association of Pinellas County vs. City of Dunedin. Florida. The litigation and judgment regarding the validity of capital -related fees provides that an equitable cost recovery mechanism, such as impact fees, can be levied for a specific purpose by a Florida municipality as a capital fee for services. In the ruling, the court identified certain conditions as necessarily present in order to have a valid fee. In general, the court decision addressed the following: 1. The impact fee should be reasonably equitable to all parties; that is, the amount of the fee must bear a relationship to the amount of services requested; 2. The system of fees and charges should be set up so that there is not an intentional windfall to existing users; 3. The impact fee should, to the extent practical, only cover the capital cost of construction and related costs thereto (engineering, legal, financing, administrative, etc.) for increases in or expansions of capacity or capital requirements that are required solely due to growth. Therefore, expenses due to normal renewal and replacement of a facility (e.g , replacement of a capital asset) should be borne by all users of the facility or municipality Similarly, increased expenses due to operation and maintenance of that facility should be borne by all users of the facility; and 4. The local government must adopt a revenue-producing ordinance that explicitly sets forth restrictions on revenues (uses thereof) that the imposition of the impact fee generates. Therefore, the funds collected from the impact fees should be retained in a separate account, and separate accounting must be made for those funds to ensure that they are used only for the lawful purposes described. Based on the criteria provided above, the development of impact fees herein will* 1) include local current costs of improvements associated with the capacities to serve new customers; 2) not reflect costs of improvements associated with the renewal and replacement (R&R) of existing capital assets 2 Introduction Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study that are allocable to existing users of the system; and 3) not include any costs of operation and maintenance of the improvements associated with the system. It is also important to note the relationship of the local government's Comprehensive Plan to the use of impact fees for funding incremental capital improvements. The Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act requires capital expenditures and local development regulations to be consistent with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Other Considerations In addition to the Dunedin decision, there have been several other landmark cases dealing with the levying of impact fees in Florida. In the Hollywood, Inc vs. Broward County case, a challenge was made regarding the applicability of levying a capital charge for parks and recreation. Essentially, the Broward County ordinance provided for a park contribution agreement between the developer and the County and directed that a fee per residential unit be collected. The court upheld the imposition of the fee and addressed the more difficult question of whether the ordinance was constitutional. The major criteria associated with this case dealt with whether the fee was correlated to the benefit received (the "Rational Nexus Test"). As stated in the decision, the government must show a reasonable connection or correlation between the expenditures of the funds collected and the benefits that accrue to the payee. In order to satisfy this requirement, the ordinance must specifically earmark capital charge funds for acquiring capital improvements that benefit new residents. Palm Beach County adopted a "Fair Share Contribution for Road Improvements" ordinance requiring payment of a transportation capital charge prior to the issuance of a building permit to address a degrading level of service resulting from growth. The capital charge based on estimated trip generation rates for particular customer classes survived a challenge by the Home Builders and Contractors Association of Palm Beach County per the findings that the fee was not a tax having met the Rational Nexus Test. The courts in Florida determined and affirmed that impact fees are valid to fund increased capital cost associated with the incremental improvements for growth. Specifically, impact fees must represent the incremental cost of the capital improvements to provide services for increased growth of the jurisdiction and some reasonable basis must exist between the amount of the fee and the benefits accrued to the new or incremental customer. Furthermore, impact fees are not considered special assessments or additional taxes. A special assessment is predicated upon an estimated increment in value to the property assessed by virtue of the improvement being constructed in the vicinity of the property and the assessment must be directly and reasonably related to the benefit the property receives. Impact fees are more directly related to the value of the improvements and to the level of service provided to the property. With respect to a comparison to taxes, impact fees are distinguishable primarily in the direct relationship between the impact fee amount and the measurable quantity of benefits/improvements. Regarding taxation, there are no requirements that payments be in proportion to the quantity of public services consumed and funds received by a local government from taxes can be expended for any legitimate public purpose. It should be further noted that the calculation of impact fees involves the use of a significant amount of historical capital cost, funding and engineering data. To this extent, the courts have also stated that: "costs of expansion" may sometimes be difficult to identify precisely when certain kinds of capital expenditures are made: to this matter. too. "nerfection is not the standard of municipal duty.' Rutherford v. City of Omaha, supra 160 N.W.2d at 228. 3 Introduction Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study The above represents a very limited non -legal overview of impact fee legal criteria for general information purposes only No legal assurances are given nor should any be interpreted by the reader on the summary provided herein. Actual legal opinion should be obtained from the City's legal counsel on such matters. 4 SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE STUDY METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH General The selection and use of a methodology and approach are vital in development of the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee for full compliance with the applicable statutes and case law. Since there are several different methodologies it is important to fully understand the background of the capital costs providing benefits and delivery of associated benefits Background Properties within the Utility's service area are provided sanitary sewer services through three distinguishable utility functional service improvements categories: 1) Localized Wastewater Collection, 2) Wastewater Transmission; and 3) Wastewater Treatment and Disposal. These functional service Improvements are further described below. Localized Wastewater Collection These improvements consist of localized piping and equipment that serve as the conduit for wastewater service between the wastewater Transmission improvements and the customer's point of connection. Wastewater Transmission These improvements consist of interceptor (trunk) gravity lines, master -pumping stations, and selected force mains serving as the backbone piping transferring wastewater from localized wastewater collection improvements to the wastewater plant. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal These improvements generally consist of treatment, disposal and sludge management equipment and buildings. Disposal is generally provided through the reclaimed water facilities. Cost recovery through the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee is limited to wastewater improvements associated with Treatment and Transmission (major backbone). Such improvements are generally funded through resources of the Utility including bond proceeds, loans, grants, developer agreements, and utility reserve funds. Treatment and Transmission improvements are considered as the primary functional service facilities for impact fee purposes. The remaining Localized Collection improvements are site specific with costs that can vary from location to location within the service area. Therefore, the Utility's uniform policy should require that such Localised Collection costs be paid through developer contributions, assessments programs or other methods that do not involve subsidies by properties not benefiting from such improvements. Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Methodology and Approach This study utilizes a "Consumption" based methodology, which assumes that new service connections will utilize portions of both existing and new improvements; as compared to an "Improvements" based methodology that assumes a new set of' service improvements is provided for each new service connection. The approach to determining the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee for each functional service consists of dividing the adjusted improvement costs by the average day capacity of such improvements resulting in an adjusted cost per gallon per day (gpd) of capacity. The Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee methodology provides that the amount to be recovered adequately and reasonably represents the current costs of expansion improvements consistent with the level of 5 Methodology and Approach Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study service (LOS) provided by the Utility. More specifically, the methodology uses current costs, plus financing costs, less any related cost recovery from other sources resulting in the establishment of the total cost basis. The cost basis is then divided by the ADD facility capacities taking into consideration inflow and infiltration (I&I) and other operating criteria. The Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee amount to be charged is determined by LOS needs, which are also representative of ADD criteria. The approach to address the methodology is predicated on establishing a uniform cost per unit of capacity for each area of functional service. These uniform costs per unit of capacity are then related to the LOS capacity associated for each customer class, size of connection or other criteria relative to the connection's request for service. Identification of current expansion facility cost and related capacities for the utility functional services along with the LOS criteria for water and wastewater service provides the basis for the cost per unit of capacity relationship The total current facility cost is adjusted to consider financing cost and interest, less credit for contributions, grants, and/or amounts included in user fees for the amortization of debt related to the capital improvements. This results in the current cost basis for each of the primary functional services. The related capacity is also adjusted to consider I&I associated with wastewater. The cost per unit of capacity for each of the primary functional services is determined utilizing the current cost basis and adjusted LOS capacities. The tasks associated with this approach consist of identifying: 1. Current costs for each functional service element based on information provided by the Utility's staff. This information consists of capital asset records that either represent or are adjusted to reflect facility actual cost associated with complete functional services, including land, general plant, engineering, permitting and all other relative soft costs. 2 Relative capacity and engineering design criteria for each functional service component associated with the project costs. 3. Historic and current policies on funding capital cost for Treatment and Transmission functional service improvements. 4. Relative financing costs and interest expense associated with the funding policies of the Utility 5. Credits attributed to cost recovery provided by grants and other sources. 6. Relative cost per unit of capacity. Data for the identification of current facility costs and related capacities were obtained from the accounting and operating records of the Utility as reviewed and noted by the City's Public Works Services staff. Wastewater capacity analyses are generally based on the average day design capacity of the wastewater treatment plant. Wastewater Transmission capacities are rated with consideration for infiltration and inflow. As previously discussed, credits or adjustments to eliminate the potential of double payment or over recovery of facility costs are considered based on the Utility's current financing policies, capital structure and relative amount of expansion improvements funded from existing debt. The System has two items that are directing the approach consisting of: 1) the service area is nearly built out, therefore, the amount of new connections to the system is limited; and 2) no further expansion of capacity to Treatment or Transmission is contemplated. These two items modify the approach such that the facility costs basis instead of current local cost will be predicated on the recorded actual cost basis. 6 SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE STUDY EXPANSION FACILITY CAPITAL COSTS AND CAPACITIES General The process of establishing current facility costs that reasonably reflect the costs associated with the relative capacities of such improvements consists of: (i) identify the original costs associated with improvements to the facilities through the 1995 and 1996 SRF loans; and (ii) allocating costs across appropriate functional improvement areas. Data for existing improvements, actual costs and capacities were obtained from City records as reviewed by City staff. Since no material expansion is anticipated within the service area and the existing facilities have sufficient capacities to meet the forecasted capacity requirements, no CIP is included in this Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee update. Wastewater Treatment and Transmission Wastewater Treatment improvements consist of wastewater treatment plants and any direct disposal/reclaimed water facilities. Transmission improvements consist of force mains and master pumping stations located throughout the service area. Localized collection improvements consisting mainly of gravity sewers and local lift stations are not included as wastewater Transmission improvements. The existing wastewater Treatment and Transmission costs and capacities are summarized in Table 1. These costs and capacities were provided by the City's Director of Public Works Services based on asset records as shown in Schedule 1. Table 1. Sanitary Sewer Facility Summary Capacity Item ExistingCIP 2 Total (MGD) Transmission Mains $3,052,294 $0 $3,052,294 Subtotal $3,052,294 $0 $3,052,294 1.80 Treatment Plant $14,375,602 $0 $14,375,602 General Plant; 940,071 - 940,071 Subtotal $15,315,673 $0 $15,315,673 1.80 Total $18,367,967 $0 $18,367,967 1. Categorized facilities and costs provided by Cit} ; Schedule 1. 2. System has sufficient capacit) for the foreseeable future. 3. Land and 70% of total of General Plant allocated to Sanitary Sewer. 7 SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE STUDY CAPITAL FINANCING ASSUMPTIONS AND CREDIT CRITERIA General Development of the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee for full cost recovery less credits requires that capital financing costs are included and amounts anticipated to be recovered from other sources of revenues are excluded (credits). The Utility's capital structure is based on the mixed use of long- term debt, user fees and Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees to fund the improvements. As a result, it is necessary to account for financing costs associated with the long-term debt including interest over the life of the debt. These financing costs are directly related to the benefits provided by system's capacity improvements. Since cash flows derived from Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees do not coincide with the timing of annual debt service payment requirements, the Utihty is required to use user fee revenues to amortize the debt associated with both the used and reserve system capacities. This requires that consideration of credits to address the amounts provided by other revenue sources, primarily user fees, is incorporated in the updating of the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee to eliminate over recovery or payments above the identified amounts. Financing Assumptions The process to determine the level and costs of financing for the purpose of identifying appropriate credits consist of developing assumptions associated with the: (i) relative portion of expansion improvements funded through debt; (ii) financing terms associated with the capital funding program used by the City; (iu) portion of the expansion debt anticipated to be paid from Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees; and (iv) relative portion of debt service paid by other revenue sources. These assumptions as summarized in Table 2 are used to develop the Financing and Credit Cost Coefficients discussed in this Report. Debt Funded A review of the historical Treatment and Transmission funding activities together with discussions with City staff identified that the improvements were funded from grants, SRF loans and direct Utility cash resources. Financing Terms For the purpose of this study, financing terms for long-term debt consist of: (i) average number of years based on the SRF loans, (ii) average interest of the SRF loans; (iii) issuance cost associated with the SRF loans; and (iv) assuming an average of 1.50 years of capitalized interest for the SRF loans. Debt Service Paid by Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Full recovery through the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee is not practical due to the lag time between the funding/construction of improvements and Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees derived from the connection of new customers. As a result, the development of the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee herein assumes that future Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee revenues will be used to amortize the existing debt and to the extent available reimburse the Utility's reserve fund. The debt service not paid from Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee revenues are provided from user fees and constitute the basis for certain credits in the determination of Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee this update. 8 Capital Financing Assumptions and Credit Criteria Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study Table 2. Financing Assumptions Item Criteria Debt Funded 53.66% Amortized by Impact Fee 46.34% SRF Loans Term (Years) 20 Interest Rate 3.05% Issuance Expense 2.00% Capitalised Interest Yrs 1.50 Financing and Credit Cost Coefficients The financing assumptions are used to develop individual coefficients that cumulatively reflect the total facility cost and consist of: 1) debt financing costs; 2) debt interest expense; and 3) credits arising from cost recovery for expansion improvements derived from sources other than Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees (primarily User Fees). The Utility's funding for the existing facilities utilized two primary sources of funding for the improvements to be recovered from Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee revenue: 1) Direct, which consist of Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee reserves that are directly used to pay the cost of improvements, (Direct also includes expansion improvement contributions in lieu of Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees); and 2) Debt, which consist of proceeds derived from the SRF loans. Grants will be addressed later as the credit against cost. Table 3 provides a summary of the salient coefficients used in the calculation of total cost and credits. Table 3. Financing and Credit Coefficients Direct Debt Total Project $0.4634 $0.5366 $1.0000 Debt Financing Costs 0.0115 0.0115 Total Interest Expense Pe 0.2123 0.2123 Total Requirement SO.1634 $0.7604 $1.2238 Provided by User Fees (AMM 0.7224 0.7224 Impact Fee Requirement $0.5014 9 SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE STUDY LEVEL OF SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT METHODS General The approach to updating the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee herein takes into consideration City policy regarding LOS for the Sanitary Sewer system The LOS is an important element that contributes to equitable recovery of costs and should reflect the potential flow characteristics of customers within the Utility's service area. Assessment methods refer to the process used to determine the amount of Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee, based on the uniform LOS standard, for connections of differing classifications and flow characteristics on an equitable basis. Existing Level of Service The City's Comprehensive Plan provides the Sanitary Sewer LOS for single family, multi -family and mobile homes to be approxunately 198 gpd per household (118 gpd/person at 1.68 persons/household based on 2010 population data). Furthermore, for commercial connections, the LOS is based on the schedule found in the City's Code's Appendix B — Schedule of Fees, Chapter 78 — Utilities. For Industrial and other commercial facilities not specifically mentioned in Appendix B, the Code provides that the determination of the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee will be predicated on the number of fixture units divided by 18 (single family equivalent) or the number of workers in an office building but not less than $2,337.81. After review and discussion with City staff it was concluded that both the existing LOS and assessment methods are confusing and present City staff with challenges to identify equitable Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees for new connections other that residential. The City's water provider, City of Cocoa, uses 265 gpd as the LOS for potable water. This relatively low potable water LOS together with reclaimed water available to many properties, means that the Sanitary Sewer LOS needs to reflect a flow that is less than potable water. Updated Level of Service After a review of the current LOS standards and discussions with City staff it was determined that the standard for customers should be adjusted to better reflect the community's characteristics. Single family residential properties in nearby coastal communities generally have wastewater LOS criteria in the range of 150 to 275 gpd Data obtained during the Utility's last rate study together with operating records indicate that wastewater demand for single family properties suggest a LOS of 240 gpd per ERU. This updated LOS also correlates well with both the potable water LOS of 265 gpd per ERU and a 16 fixture unit loading standard for single family residential properties in the Utility's service area. Assessment Methods A critical need in determining the appropriate amount of Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee to be paid by properties other that residential dwelling units relies on the methods used to equate the LOS of such other properties to that establish for an ERU. Discussions with City staff identified a need to provide for alternative methods that would: 1) accommodate a variety of circumstances; and 2) be easily understood and applied. To address these needs three alternative methods were developed consisting of: 10 Level of Service and Assessment Methods Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study ERU Basis This method utilizes a table that reflects ERUs associated with characteristics of typical residential and commercial applications, as provided in Schedule 2, to determine the appropriate ERU and corresponding Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee amount. This method provides for the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee amount to be calculated by: 1) accumulating the applicant's ERU pursuant to the appropriate characteristics in the Schedule 2; 2) rounding the ERU to the nearest tenth; and 3) multiplying the ERUs by the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee per ERU. The ERU for categories not included in this table are required to be determined using one of the other methods. Fixture Unit Basis This method consists of determining total Sewer Load Factor by utilizing the number of fixture units associated with the applicant's property, as provided in Schedule 3, to determine the appropriate ERU and corresponding Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee amount. This method provides for the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee amount to be calculated by: 1) accumulating the applicant's total Sewer Load Factor pursuant to the provisions in Schedule 3, 2) multiplying the total Sewer Load Factor by the load factor per fixture unit of 15 gpd; 3) dividing the resulting gpd by the LOS criteria of 240 gpd/ERU; 4) rounding the ERUs to the nearest tenth; and 5) multiplying the rounded ERUs by the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee per ERU. Flow Basis This method requires that the applicant provide the property's average daily gpd of sewer flow to determine the appropriate Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee amount This method provides that the property's requested average daily gpd of sewer flow capacity is: 1) divided by the LOS criteria of 240 gpd/ERU, 2) rounding the ERUs to the nearest tenth; and 3) multiply the rounded ERUs by the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee per ERU. 11 SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE STUDY CALCULATION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE General Updating the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee requires that the current cost per unit of service and Level of Service Capacity be identified for each functional service. Once identified the cost per unit of service is then used together with the LOS criteria to establish the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee. Cost Per Unit of Service and Level of Service Capacity Prior sections of this Report provided the cost basis, system capacities and financing assumptions for each functional service. In determining the cost per unit of service it is necessary to: (i) adjust the capital costs for grants; (ii) include costs incurred for funding the capital improvements; and (iii) adjust to address probable amounts provided from sources other than Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees. The remaining amount subsequent to these adjustments represents the Total Cost Basis utilized to determine the Cost per Unit of Service. The updated LOS criteria discussed earlier represent capacity levels at the customer's point of connection. To maintain consistency between the LOS criteria and facility capacities used to determine the Cost per Unit of Service, it is necessary to adjust the facility capacities to account for additional flows from inflow and infiltration (I&I). Information provided by City staff suggests that an I&I allowance of 10 percent reasonably represents the current system conditions. The adjustment for I&I reduces the Treatment and Transmission facility capacities from 1.8 MGD to 1 62 MGD, which is representative of capacity available at the customer's point of connection on an average day basis. Calculation of Treatment and Transmission Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees The calculation of the Sanitary Sewer Treatment and Transmission Impact Fee based on the data and assumptions discussed heretofore are provided in Table 4. The first portion of the table provides for the costs and grant reductions providing the Net Cost Basis. The second portion provides for the inclusion of financing and interest cost, which results in a Subtotal that is reduced by probable amounts anticipated to be recovered from other sources, leaving the Impact Fee Cost Basis. The next portion reduces the system capacities by the I&I allowance providing the Net Level of System Capacity, which when divided into the Impact Fee Cost Basis provides the Cost per Unit of Service. The Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee is the result of multiplying the Cost per Unit of Service by the LOS associated with a connection. For one ERU the LOS is 240 gpd, which results in a combined Treatment and Transmission Sanitary Sewer Impact of $1,348.80. 12 Calculation of Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study Table 4. Calculation of Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Item Cost Basis Less Grants Net Cost Basis Financing Cost Interest Cost Subtotal User Fee Credit Impact Fee Cost Basis System Capacity: Average Day Capacity in MGD Allowance for Infiltration and Inflow Net Level of Service Capacity MGD Impact Fee Determinants: Cost Per Unit of Service Level of Service (gpd) Impact Fee Treatment $15,315,673 23,250 $15,292,423 176,000 3,246,000 $18,714,423 11,046,000 $7,668,423 1.80 10.00% 1.62 $4.73 240 $1,135.20 Transmission $3,052,294 189,120 $2,863,174 33,000 608,000 $3,504,174 2,068,000 $1,436,174 1.80 10.00% 1.62 Total $18,367,967 212,370 $18,155,597 209,000 3,854,000 $22,218,597 13,114,000 $9,104,597 $0.89 $5.62 240 $213.60 $1,348.80 Comparison to Existing A summary of the updated and existing Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees are shown in Table 5. It should be noted that the existing Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee presented below at based on the existing LOS, which differs from the updated LOS. Therefore, portions of the differences are attributed to a combination of both the Cost per Unit of Service and the proposed adjusted LOS. Table 5. Updated and Existing Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Updated Existing Amount Difference Percent Difference LOS 240 gpd/ERU 198 gpd/ERU Treatment $1,135.20 $1,940.38 ($805.18) -41% Transmission $213.60 $397 43 ($183.83) -46% Total $1,348.80 $2,337.81 ($989.01) -42% Comparison with Other Utilities The comparisons provided in Table 6 identify the capacity -related charges for new residential wastewater connections for one equivalency calculated under the existing and updated Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees of the City and those of Other Utilities The amounts shown for Other Utilities are based on the schedules in effect as of October 1, 2012 and do not include other customer service -related fees applied to new system connections (i.e. tap fees, application fees, inspection fees, etc.) Caution should be taken when comparing impact fees for many reasons including the following: 1. Cost used by others may not be representative of "Current Local Costs;" 2. The LOS criteria may be either higher or lower; 3. Other cost recovery from contributions, grants or other sources may be applicable; 13 Calculation of Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study 4. Local government may elect to phase-in or not Implement the total recovery amounts; and 5. Treatment processes and availability of resources may be different. Table 6. Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Comparisons ' Single Family / 1 ERU Amount City of Cape Canaveral Existing Proposed Other Communities Barefoot Bay North Brevard City of Cocoa City of Cocoa Beach City of Holly Hill City of Melbourne City of New Smyrna Beach City of Ormond Beach City of Palm Bay City of Vero Beach City of \Vest Melbourne Average of Other Communities 1. Per the community's ERU equivalency 14 $2,337.81 $1,348.80 $275.00 671.00 1,250.00 2,200.00 1,908.00 1,583.00 1,250.00 1,950.00 2,965.00 2,290.00 3,000.00 $1,758.36 basis unless otherwise noted. LOS (gpd) 198.24 240.00 150.00 1-3 bedrooms 250.00 275.00 234.00 240.00 250.00 15 F.U.s 210.00 15 F.U.s 300.00 SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE STUDY FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS General In the preparation of this Report, certain information has been used and relied upon that was provided by other entities including the City. Such information includes, but is not limited to, the Utility's capital improvements plan, SRF loans, asset depreciation summary/listing, capacities, cost data, fee schedules for the City and other Communities, and other information provided by or through the City. Additionally, reasonably conservative assumptions were developed to establish the basis for certain required study elements that are not, have not or cannot be specifically defined through existing data. To the extent that future conditions differ from those assumed and utilized in the Report, the results of the analyses may vary from those developed herein. Findings 1. The City's recordkeeping provides sufficient information to address the requirements of updating the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee. 2. The Utility's service area is not expected to require any wastewater capacity expansions. 3. The LOS criteria should be updated to better reflect the characteristics of the potable water provider and Utility customers. 4. The method of determining and assessing the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee can be revised and expanded to bettei accommodate different requests for service. Conclusions Based on the reviews, analyses and assumptions provided herein, it is concluded that: 1. Due to the adequacy of Treatment and Transmission capacity to provide for the service area future needs, the current local cost requirements in updating the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee herein are based on actual and expansion -related actual costs. 2 The Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee developed herein reflects net amounts that are equitable and provide for reasonable recovery without exceeding current local cost of the capital improvements associated with providing wastewater capacity to new connections. 3. The City currently imposes other connection charges, deposits and other fees for new customers connecting to the system. Such fees are related to recovery of operating costs associated with establishing a new customer rather than capacity to serve the customer. As such, these other charges are not related to the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee. 4. As available the updated Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee can be budgeted to pay for the expansion related portion of the State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan debt service, which will reduce the burden on user rates. Furthermore, Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees collected beyond the retirement of the SRF loans can be used to reimburse the Utility for historic debt payments made at tunes when Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee revenues were insufficient 5. The City should have a policy in determining the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee which states the amount owed shall be the greater of 1 ERU or the amount calculated in one of the 3 methods discussed herein. 15 SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE STUDY SCHEDULES 16 Schedules Asset 15023 15029 1712 1737 1783 2079 2181 2182 2234 2266 2267 2296 2306 2323 2413 2417 2425 2487 2489 2498 2499 2518 2522 2525 2528 2565 2585 2586 2594 2608 2612 2654 2658 2663 2683 2749 3001 3022 3023 3063 3064 3085 3098 3100 3213 3399 3400A 3400B 3404 3458 3459 Category GP GP GP GP GP G P G P G P GP GP GP G P GP GP GP GP GP GP G P G P GP GP GP G P GP GP GP G P GP G P G P G P GP GP GP GP GP GP GP G P GP GP GP G P GP G P GP G P GP GP GP SCHEDULE 1 SANITARY SEWER ASSET LISTING Description Improves Other than Bldg. Crew Room/Labor & Material BOD Incubator Chlorine Kit B Hose Tester & Adapter Sterilizer Analytical Balance PH Meter Refrigerator Air Pack/Case - Crew Room Concrete Mixer 5000 Watt Generator Analytical Scale MCD Duphcator Public Works Admin. Bldg. Water Jacketed Incubator Roof & Mansard on Maint. Build Hydrauhc Press 1997 Harben Sewer Pipe Cleaner Cabinets & Counters Lettering on Plant Portable Liquid Sampler Lifepak IOC Monitor/Difibrillator Trbidmeter 900Max All Weather Refng Smpl Lab Expansion CL2 Titrimeter Fume Hood & Assembly Spectrophoto Meter Acid Storage Cabinet Self Contained Breathing Appar PH Meter Ikon Digital Copier Microscope Phase 115V/60 Elect Cabinet/Workstation Elite SL300 Security Gate Heart Defribrillator BOD Refrigerator Flask Heater Posicheck 3 Air Pack Maint. Tester Maintenance Building Maintenance Building Lightning Protection System Pressure Washer Lab Pure Water System A/C System 5 -Ton Server & Installation Server & Installation Konica Copier Chlorine Titrator Autoclave Steralizer & Stand 17 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study Purchase Date 9/30/1991 3/5/1993 1/16/1987 7/31/1987 9/16/1988 5/24/1991 12/20/1991 12/20/1991 8/11/1992 1/1/1994 1/1/1994 6/17/1994 12/20/1994 9/29/1995 9/30/1996 8/13/1996 8/21/1997 5/7/1997 6/23/1997 2/3/1997 1/21/1997 3/11/1998 2/19/1998 3/11/1998 4/8/1998 3/30/1998 6/11/1999 6/24/1999 2/22/1999 5/10/1999 9/23/1999 4/4/1999 3/31/2000 2/3/2000 1/25/2000 1/25/2001 1/10/2001 5/10/2001 5/25/2001 4/12/2001 9/27/2001 9/30/2002 4/26/2002 5/9/2002 12/20/2002 1/28/2005 4/7/2005 4/7/2005 1/23/2004 3/14/2005 3/24/2005 Cost $10,196.34 4,781.12 1,846.88 1,004.70 1,654.95 4,346.00 2,285.00 1,888.00 1,875.00 2,772.50 3,066.00 1,367.10 1,933.61 1,375.00 60,550.00 2,480.26 2,886.00 3,230.25 29,762.00 1,176.00 1,200.00 3,001.90 6,492.50 1,590.00 4,995.00 33,129.42 2,111.00 10,872.02 4,662.00 1,550.00 3,187.49 2,195.97 10,772.00 1,659.72 1,788.55 5,095.00 15,106.55 3,604.22 1,883.85 2,266.90 4,650.00 1,500.00 4,950.00 2,173.95 6,419.37 2,345.00 2,078.16 3,705.65 18,241.76 3,022.00 6,797 42 Schedules Asset 3460 3461 3462 3520 3521 3523 3524 3548A 3560 3579 3580 3585 3586 3587 3588 3589 3605 3606 360610 360620 360630 3615 3650 3651 3653 3681 3689 3698 3708 3712 3713 3716 3719 379123 3800 3803 3830 3855 3885 3886 3964 5042 3128 3519 2569 2684 2685 15004 15005 15006 15007 15008 15016 Category GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP L T T T T T T T T SCHEDULE 1 CONT. Description Total Chlorine Process Analyzer All Weather Sampler (Refrigerated) Motor CTL Room A/C Unit O ffice Furniture -Asst PW Director O ffice Furniture -Env. Analyst Macro Kjeldahl Heating Mantle Turbidity Meter Caterpillar 416D Backhoe Loader Spectrophoto Meter 2100N IS Laboratory Turbidimeter Sigma 900 Max Sampler Lifepak 500 AED Defibrillator Lifepak 500 AED Defibrillator Lifepak 500 AED Defibrillator Lifepak 500 AED Defibrillator Lifepak 500 AED Defibrillator GLI/Hach P53 PH Moonitor & Probe Public Works Maint. Bldg Public Works Maint. Building Improvements Public Works Maint. Building PW Maint Building Impact Fee Weather Station NAPCO 8000 Water jacketed Incubator Top Loading Balance Meter P53 pH Meter with Probe 2007 Dodge Caravan SE Trane Air Conditioner -Admin Bldg Commercial Link Fencing for PW Facility Steamscrubber Freestanding Dishwasher O ffice Furniture for Plant Supervisor Xerox Work Centre 7132 O ffice Furniture for Asst. PW Director Shelves for New Maint. Building O ebutel 20mb Point -to -Point Antenna Towers Precision Gravity Oven Manitowoc SD -0322A Ice Machine (50/50 w/401) Whelen Super LED Light Bar Fume Hood for Lab Balance Link System & Software Life Pack Defibrulator Lab Oven Lab Incubator Accordian Hurricane Shutters CL17 Total Chlorine Analyzer Parcel 502 at WWTP Reuse Phase II Reuse Phase III Lift Station #8 Thurm Blvd Lift Station #1 Washington Lift Station #4 Harbor Drive Lift Station #6 Imperial List Station #7 W. Central Lift Station #2 Center Street 18 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study Purchase Date 6/29/2005 4/22/2005 7/15/2005 1/10/2006 4/7/2006 2/21/2006 2/21/2006 8/25/2006 6/5/2006 3/26/2007 3/26/2007 9/28/2006 9/28/2006 9/28/2006 9/28/2006 9/28/2006 9/11/2006 12/20/2005 1/31/2007 11/27/2007 11/26/2008 6/15/2006 3/26/2007 3/26/2007 1/26/2007 5/18/2007 11/27/2007 4/3/2008 12/13/2007 3/4/2008 2/1/2008 6/13/2008 5/21/2008 4/30/2010 7/22/2010 8/18/2010 8/19/2011 8/5/2011 6/4/2004 6/4/2004 6/29/2004 12/7/2011 5/23/2002 12/20/2005 7/31/1994 3/2/2000 2/7/2000 10/1/1967 10/1/1967 10/1/1967 10/1/1967 10/1/1967 9/30/1988 Cost $2,611.75 4,933.70 1,950.00 1,048.44 1,365.86 2,264.00 1,950.00 39,313.50 11,572.00 1,758.00 5,790.00 1,750.00 1,750.00 1,750.00 1,750.00 1,750.00 1,462.00 27,922.07 239,634.98 353,162.95 1,728.00 1,055.50 4,423.38 2,986.20 1,450.00 18,176.10 4,075.00 6,200.00 5,176.30 2,558.12 7,480.00 1,351.04 3,479.85 6,317.00 1,318.41 1,076.40 1,382.26 8,155.03 3,749.28 1,795.00 1,386.78 5,576.01 4,215.00 2,750.00 226,084.12 2,552.83 415,093.50 46,305.00 231,525.00 57,881.00 69,458.00 108,156.00 287,667.37 Schedules Asset 15017 15018 15019 15020 15025 15026 2357 2365 2543 2609 2644 2682 3106 3358 3465 346510 346520 3574 3700 3701 3702 3704 3705 3706 3707 3717 3751 3795 3861 5035B 5035C 5035D 5035E 5035F 5035G 5036 5038 3552 2501 3053 3055 3056 3068 3141 3477 15001 15002 15003 15013 15014 15021 SCHEDULE 1 CONT. Category Description T Lift Station #3 W. Central T Lift Station #5 Columbia Dnve T Lift Station #9 Banana River T Lift Station # 12 Longpoint T Lift Station T Pump Statio T 200 Long Point Road T 12 Effluent Force Main T Telemetry Sys / Lift Stations T Upgrade Lift Station A & B T 200 Long Point Road T Telemetry System T Sanitary Sewer Force Main T Forcemain LS1 to Thrum Blvd T Sanitary Sewer Force Main Project T Force Main, Lift Station 1 T Force Main Lift Station 1 T Upgrade/Replacement to Lift Station #5 T Lift Station Back up Pump T Lift Station Back up Pump T Lift Station Back up Pump T Tac Pack TCU & Install Kit (Back up) T Tac Pack TCU & Install Kit for LS #3 T Tac Pack TCU & Install Kit (Back up) T Tac Pack TCU & Install Kit for LS #1 T Tradewinds Power Generator T 20 hp Lift Station Pump (Back up) T Tradewinds Generator 60Hz, Three Phase T Generator Model TJ 125KW T Telemetry Control Unit T Submersible Level Transducer T Submersible WW Pump LS#9 T Transient Filter Shield T Flygt pump base installation T 4x4 Discharge Connection T 20KW Generator T Forcemain Replacement LS#3 T Upgrade Lift Station 5 TP Reuse Phase I TP Pond TP Reuse Phase IV TP Reuse Phase III TP Reuse Phase II TP Reuse Phase III TP Re -use Extension Project 04/05 TP WWTP onginal construction TP Aerobic Digestor TP Chlorine Contact Basin TP Aeration Basin TP Clarifier Basin TP Expansion Funds Cost 19 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study Purchase Date 9/30/1989 9/30/1989 9/30/1990 9/30/1990 3/1/1992 3/1/1992 9/30/1995 4/9/1996 5/14/1998 5/24/1999 1/29/1999 5/25/2000 7/29/2002 8/5/2004 7/15/2005 12/20/2005 3/6/2009 12/18/2006 12/13/2007 12/13/2007 1/11/2008 12/13/2007 12/13/2007 12/13/2007 12/13/2007 6/13/2008 9/23/2008 3/31/2010 5/26/2011 2/10/2012 2/10/2012 2/10/2012 2/17/2012 2/17/2012 1/6/2012 4/27/2012 7/3/2012 8/25/2006 8/31/1999 5/7/2001 8/2/2001 2/2/2001 9/27/2001 8/26/2002 12/14/2004 10/1/1967 10/1/1967 10/1/1967 9/30/1983 9/30/1983 9/30/1991 Cost $287,667.37 89,768.34 111,394.21 241,364.82 182,946.00 68,249.29 146,404.15 184,322.25 80,739.00 9,900.00 40,895.87 4,393.70 33,071.56 21,472.00 5,120.00 5,384.96 3,462.75 42,200.00 5,319.00 5,806.00 10,039.00 4,542.68 4,542.68 4,542.68 4,542.66 63,880.00 10,360.00 47,539.00 46,574.00 5,039.75 535.00 4,482.00 88.00 600.00 704.00 37,828.00 2,371.00 15,564.00 145,413.36 2,114.83 141,827.11 4,903.77 1,518.75 1,678.34 38,674.58 831,945.00 218,764.45 169,561.80 1,400,189.14 357,775.39 37,164.16 Schedules Asset 15208 1614 2359 2419 2421 2422 2423 2524 2566 2572 3037 3304 3304A 3373A 3454 3454A 3518 3525 3573 3576 3584 3652 3654 3680 3696 3709 3755 3790 4012 5039 5041 Category TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP SCHEDULE 1 CONT. Description 1995 \VWTP Upgrade 500 PSI Air Compressor WWTP facilities - part of original plant WWTP Engineering Fees Bldg. Pmt Fees-WWTP Expansion WWTP Site Plan Review Fees 1995-96 WWTP Upgrade Frequence Controls Sewer Plant Improvement -1997 Sewer Plant Improvement -FY 95/96 Encore 700 Metering Alum Pump Wastewater Facility Improvement WWTP Improve 2004, Permit Fees WWTP Improvement 2003-04 Sludge Press Maint. Bldg. Sludge Press Maunt. Bldg. -Office Sutorbilt Rotary Positive Blower Ultramag Magnetic Flowmeter w/ Converter Compressors for Plant Filters Flygt Submersible Mixer Sodium Bisulfite Sy stem Compressors for Plant Filters Hach 1720E Turbidity Monitor Snyder 6,200 Gal Alum Tank Cleated Belt for Belt Press Sodium Hypochlorite Tank Belt Press Room Roof Vortiblend Emulsion Feed System for Sludge Press Flygt Mixer for Plant Mixer WWTP Oxidation Ditch WWTP Oxidation Ditch 20 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study Purchase Date 8/30/1995 9/27/1984 9/30/1995 9/30/1996 9/30/1996 9/30/1996 9/30/1996 3/4/1998 9/30/1997 9/30/1996 8/2/2001 1/23/2004 4/7/2005 12/20/2004 3/24/2005 2/20/2006 11/14/2005 2/21/2006 11/17/2006 2/8/2007 5/31/2007 11/17/2006 1/26/2007 5/31/2007 12/13/2007 1/11/2008 3/27/2009 12/18/2009 10/12/2010 8/2/2012 9/30/2012 Summary Treatment Plant (TP) Transmission (T) General Plant (GP) Total Cost $519,656.00 9,735.00 1,048,952.15 88,544.23 15,085.10 2,638.50 6,179,810.00 8,385.94 1,263,731.75 1,162,274.16 2,278.39 124,699.10 3,914.35 397,454.68 72,399.33 4,456.99 4,600.00 4,322.33 8,968.74 6,750.00 15,800.00 8,968.74 2,155.00 10,520.80 9,500.00 7,950.00 16,575.00 6,313.20 7,681.85 9,452.50 497.50 $14,375,602.00 3,052,294.42 1,342,958.14 $18,770,854.55 Schedules Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study SCHEDULE 2 SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE BY CLASSIFICATION AND AMOUNT ERUs Amount' SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE PER ERU ON $1,348.80 RESIDENTIAL: (a) Single Family 1.0000 $1,348.80 (b) Multiple Family (Per Dwelling Unit/ERU) 1.0000 $1,348.80 (c) Each Mobile Home Space 1.0000 $1,348.80 COMMERCIAL2: (a) Barber and Beauty shops, per chair 0.3125 $421.50 (b) Bowling Alleys, per lane 0.2083 $281.00 (c) Churches, per seat 0.0125 $16.86 (d) Dentist Office, per dentist 1.0417 $1,405.00 (e) Doctor Office, per doctor 1.0417 $1,405.00 (f) Food Service Operations (1) Restaurant, per seat 0.1667 $224.80 (2) 24-hour Restaurant, per seat 0.2500 $337.20 (3) Bar and Cocktail Lounge, per seat 0.0833 $112.40 (4) Drive -In Restaurant, per car space 0.2083 $281.00 (g) Hospitals, per bed 0.8333 $1,124.00 (h) Hotels, Motels, per room (1) Regular per room 0.4167 $562.00 (1) Resort hotels, camps, cottages per room 0.8333 $1,124.00 (1) Add for establishments with self service laundry facilities per machine 3.1250 $4,215.00 (i) Laundry Facilities, per washing machine 3.1250 $4,215.00 0) Nursing, Rest Homes, per person 0.4167 $562.00 (k) Office Building, per worker 0.0625 $84.30 (1) Schools, per student 0.0417 $56.20 (m) Service Stations, per water closet and per urinal (1) Open 16 hours per day or less 1.0417 $1,405.00 (2) Open more than 16 hours per day 1.3542 $1,826.50 (n) Shopping Centers without Food or Laundry, per square foot or floor space 0.0004 $0.56 (o) Stores, per bathroom 0.8333 $1,124.00 (p) Theaters, indoor, per seat 0.0167 $22.48 (q) Recreational vehicle space for overnight stay, without water and sewer hookup per vehicle space 0.2083 $281.00 (r) Recreational vehicle space for overnight stay, with water and sewer hookup per vehicle space 0.3125 $421.50 1. All Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees shall be determined based on the greater of 1 ERU or the amount calculated pursuant to applicable provisions in the Code. 2. Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees for Connections not specifically identified above shall be determined by using the Fixture Unit basis (Schedule 1) or the Flow Basis. 21 Schedules Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Study SCHEDULE 3 SANITARY SEWER DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS LOAD FACTOR NO. OF TYPES FIXTURE TYPE "A" "B" AxB=C Automatic clothes washers, commercial (a,g) 3.00 Automatic clothes washers, residential (g) 2.00 Bathroom group (<=1.6 gpf water closet, toilet, 5.00 sink, tub and shower) (f,h) Bathroom group (>1 6 gpf water closet, toilet, 6.00 sink, tub and shower) (f,h) Bathtub (with or without overhead shower or 2.00 whirlpool attachments) (b) Bidet 1.00 Combination sink and tray 2.00 Dental lavatory (bathroom sink) 1.00 Dental unit or or cuspidor 1.00 Dishwashing machine (domestic) (c) 2.00 Drinking fountain 0.50 Emergency floor drains 0.00 Floor drains 2.00 Kitchen sink, domestic 2.00 Kitchen sink, domestic with food waste grinder 2.00 Laundry tray (1 or 2 compartments) 2.00 Lavatory (bathroom sink) 1.00 Shower 2.00 Service sink 2.00 Sink 2.00 Urinal 4.00 Urinal, <1 gpf (e) 2.00 Urinal, non water supplies (e) 0.50 Wash sink (circular or multiple) each set of faucets 2.00 Water closet, flushometer tank, public or private (toilet only) (e) 4.00 Water closet, private (1.6 gpf, toilet only) (e) 3.00 Water closet, private (>1 6 gpf, toilet only) (e) 4.00 Water closet, public (1.6 gpf, toilet only) (c) 4.00 Water closet, public (>1.6 gpf, toilet only) (e) 6.00 Total Total Load Factor x 15 = GPD / 240 = ERUs LOAD FACTOR GPD * Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee shall be the greater of 1 ERU or the amount calculated based upon above data. a. For traps larger than 3", use Table 709.2 of the 2007 Florida Plumbing Code. b. A showerhead over a bathtub or whirlpool bathtub attachment does not increase the drainage fixture unit value. c. See Sections 709.2 through 709.4 of the 2007 Flonda Plumbing Code for methods of computing unit value of fixtures not listed in this table or for rating of devices with intermittent flows. d. Trap size shall be consistent with the fixture outlet size. e. For the purpose of computing loads on building drams and sewers, water closets and urinals shall not be rated at a lower drainage fixture unit unless the lower values are confirmed by testing. f. For fixtures added to a dwelling unit bathroom group, add the DFU value of those additional fixtures to the bathroom group fixture count. g See Section 406.3 of the 2007 Honda Plumbing Code for sizing requirements for fixture dram, branch dram, and drainage stack for automatic clothes washer standpipe. h. Bathroom group is defined in Section 202 of the 2007 Florida Plumbing Code. 22 RAFTELIS FINANCIAL. CONSULTANTS INC June 12, 2013 950 South Winter Park Drive Phone 407. 960.1806 www.raftelis.com Suite 240 Fax 407. 960.1803 Casselberry, FL 32707 Todd Morley Community & Economic Development Director City of Cape Canaveral 7510 N. Atlantic Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Subject: Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Dear Mr. Morley: Ail c, (A n1 en d - This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding the general effect the identified Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee adjustments will have on future connections. The Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Report, dated April 2013 (the"Report"), provided for: (i) an adjustment to the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU); (ii) an adjustment to the Level of Service (LOS) per ERU; and (iii) an update to the criteria used in determining ERUs for various categories of users. One or more of these will affect any comparison between the amount paid pursuant to the existing ordinance and the amount calculated based on provisions in the Report. If the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee provisions in the Report are adopted the vast majority of connections will experience a reduction as compared to the existing requirement. However, certain categories of connections may experience an increase. Increases will vary based on the connection's specific classification and characteristics and are not due to the amount of Sanitary Impact Fee per ERU. Any increase is directly associated with the proposed ERU criteria by classification, which was updated in the Report to reflect the estimated flow criteria currently contained in Florida Administrative Code Section 64E-6.008. We wish to express our appreciation to be of service in this matter and should you have any questions please feel free contact me as provided on the letterhead. Sincerely, RAFTELIS FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC. Marco H. Rocca CMC Director of Florida Operations fr9+achale4+ 3 ORDINANCE NO. 09 -2013 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 78, ARTICLE II, DIVISION 3 OF THE CAPE CANAVERAL CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATED TO SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEES; REVISING SEWER IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES CONSISTENT WITH THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE CITY'S SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE REPORT DATED APRIL 2013; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCORPORATION INTO THE CODE; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City is granted the authority, under Section 2(b), Article VIII, of the State Constitution, to exercise any power for municipal purposes, except when expressly prohibited by law; and WHEREAS, sanitary sewer impact fees allow the City to recover the costs of capacity - related treatment and major transmission improvements installed and funded by the City, and WHEREAS, the City currently imposes sanitary sewer impact fees on new development and modified uses of structures increasing the original sewer impact caused by the use; and WHEREAS, the City recently consulted with Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. ("Raftelis") to review the City's existing sanitary sewer impact fees and recommend appropriate updates to the fee structure based on the City's current level of service, costs and capacity; and WHEREAS, Raftelis prepared a Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Report dated April 2013 ("Report"), which comprehensively analyzes the City's sanitary sewer impact fee structure; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update its sanitary sewer impact fees consistent with the recommendations of the Report in order to more efficiently recover the costs associated with the collection, transmission, treatment and disposal activities comprising the City's sanitary sewer system; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that updating the City's sanitary sewer impact fee schedule will promote increased economic activity within the City of Cape Canaveral by reducing the financial burden the impact fees have on development and redevelopment activities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, hereby finds this Ordinance to be in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Cape Canaveral. City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 09-2013 Page 1 of 5 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby fully incorporated herein by this reference as legislative findings and the intent and purpose of the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral. Section 2. Amendment to Chapter 78, Utilities. Chapter 78, Utilities, of the Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances is hereby amended as follows (underlined type indicates additions and sleek type indicates deletions, while asterisks (* * *) indicate a deletion from this Ordinance of text existing in Chapter 78. It is intended that the text in Chapter 78 denoted by the asterisks and set forth in this Ordinance shall remain unchanged from the language existing prior to adoption of this Ordinance): CHAPTER 78. UTILITIES ARTICLE II. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM DIVISION 3. IMPACT FEES Sec. 78-121. Established. There shall be paid an assessment to defray the cost and expense of collection, transmission, treatment and disposal of sewage and for necessary equipment, repairs, replacement and additions and for any new sewer plant expansion for the city. Such assessment shall be for the sewer system on all new construction and all structures initially connecting to the city sewer system. The assessment schedule shall be as set forth in appendix B to this Code. Construction, expansion or alteration of facilities on citv-owned property shall not be subject to the fees established by this division. Sec. 78-122. — Payment. The assessments as set forth in this division shall be paid by certified funds at the time of issuance of a certificate of occupancy for such new construction, 78 123. Except as provided in section 78-34, a building permit shall not be issued unless a sewer permit has been first obtained. The amount of the assessment shall be determined in accordance with the rates established in section 78-121 in effect at the time a sewer permit is issued by the city. A sewer permit shall not be issued until a city sewer main line is placed within 150 feet of the applicant's property. If the assessment is not paid by the 30th day following that for which a billing has been rendered, then an amount equal to five percent of such assessment due shall be added thereto as a late charge Upon failure of any user to pay for the assessment within 60 days from being billed, the city shall shut off or cause to be shut off the connection of such user and shall not furnish him or permit him to receive from the system further service until all obligations City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 09-2013 Page 2 of 5 owed by him to the city on account of the services shall have been paid in full. If such sewer service is shut off pursuant to this section, then before such service shall be restored, the user thereof shall pay a reinstatement fee in the amount as set forth in Appendix B to this Code in addition to any other assessments and charges due. In addition [to], and as an alternative means of, collecting such assessment, last late charges and penalties, the city shall have a lien on such lot or parcel of land for which the sewer connection has been made, for which such lien shall be of equal dignity with the lien of state and county and municipal taxes. Such lien may be foreclosed by the city in the same manner provided by the laws of the state for the foreclosure of mortgages upon real estate. Sec. 78-123. - Excessive quantity of wastewater. For those establishments whi chall calculate the impact quantity of discharge actually introduced int :ten. 01) An impact fes dcpoeit o (2) Th shell fee based on the e the impact fee: six eensecutivc months follar g-installatie of the a foresaid sewer line () The sin month riod of (1) T diocha: ge in ga ze chall be-divided--by-400 to est r unit ono, the -sewer impa (5) If the -sewer impact assessment for th© ftrct Din mo - i obit made, the user shall •ithin 1$ days after written notification to user of the required adjustmentrilewever, if the acoeoc gent as ealeu ated above does not exceed the initial deposit, the city agrees -to reimburse the difference to the user no 1 ineniteiting-peFieflt 1�(6) For dig bin month p shall be ine sued. To the extent that average daily effluent outflow in -any -subsequent -fin month pecied exceeds the amount paid for impact fees, initial cin , an additional impact fee for the excess shall be levied as calculated and as provided for in subsections (3) and (4) of this division section. Any addition d chall be paid tot 'n 15, dayo e f written .,oti fcation to user; City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 09-2013 Page 3 of 5 (2)( 7) For the- irntial Qin ni ly; if t d, the city shall refund the sedge n of t fee as set forth abeve—For subsequent-siam month monitfring-pe ieds, Tthere shall be no refunds of impact fees, regardless of effluent outflow volumes. *** Sec. 78-128. - Change of use. For aAny structure or use of structure which is modified such that the sewer impact assessment is greater than the amount collected for which th - ' - ' the owner shall be assessed additional impact fees in accordance with sections 78-121 and 78- 122. For any ehenge of use which ine al im •hio'.1 tli ' constru - : - : - : - • • - - : .:SA : ' ' : - . -- UP ID Li in aseefflactee with ccction 78 -1For any change of' ci:nilar uce vi. tablishm al nu •epoced to be oonatn,eted, in aeoordenee-with aec ien 78 121. Section 3. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Council, or parts of ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 4. Incorporation Into Code. This Ordinance and all Exhibits hereto shall be incorporated into the City of Cape Canaveral City Code and any section or paragraph, number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing Grammatical, typographical and like errors may be corrected and additions, alterations and omissions, not affecting the construction or meaning of this Ordinance and the City Code may be freely made. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective 90 days after the date of adoption by the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 09-2013 Page 4 of 5 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida this day of , 2013. ATTEST: ANGELA APPERSON, City Clerk First Reading: Legal Ad published: Second Reading: ROCKY RANDELS, Mayor For Against Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for the City of Cape Canaveral only by: ANTHONY A. GARGANESE, City Attorney John Bond Bob Hoog Buzz Petsos Rocky Randels Betty Walsh City of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 09-2013 Page 5 of 5 A-Veteivh en 1- r RESOLUTION NO. 2013- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE REPORT PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL BY RAFTELIS FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC. DATED APRIL 2013; AMENDING APPENDIX B, SCHEDULE OF FEES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REPORT'S RECOMMENDATIONS; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF PRIOR, INCONSISTENT RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATION INTO APPENDIX B OF THE CAPE CANAVERAL CODE OF ORDINANCES, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, sanitary sewer impact fees allow the City to recover the costs of capacity - related treatment and major transmission improvements installed and funded by the City; and WHEREAS, the City currently imposes sanitary sewer impact fees on new development and modified uses of structures increasing the original sewer impact caused by the use; and WHEREAS, the City recently consulted with Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. ("Raftelis") to review the City's existing sanitary sewer impact fees and recommend appropriate updates to the fee structure based on the City's current level of service, costs and capacity; and WHEREAS, Raftelis prepared a Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Report dated April 2013 ("Report"), which comprehensively analyzes the City's sanitary sewer impact fee structure; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update its sanitary sewer impact fees consistent with the recommendations of the Report in order to more efficiently recover the costs associated with the collection, transmission, treatment and disposal activities comprising the City's sanitary sewer system, and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that updating the City's sanitary sewer impact fee schedule will promote increased economic activity within the City of Cape Canaveral by reducing the financial burden the impact fees have on development and redevelopment activities; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds this Resolution to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Cape Canaveral. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are deemed true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference as part of this Resolution. City of Cape Canaveral Resolution No. 2013 - Page 1 of 7 Section 2. Report of Raftelis Financial Consultants. The City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral hereby adopts the Raftelis' Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Report dated April, 2013 and incorporates the fees and calculation methodologies proposed therein into the City's Schedule of Fees. Section 3. Amendment to Appendix B, Schedule of Fees. Appendix B, Schedule of Fees, to the Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances is hereby amended as follows (underlined type indicates additions and stkeeut type indicates deletions, while asterisks (* * *) indicate a deletion from this Resolution of text existing in Appendix B It is intended that the text in Appendix B denoted by the asterisks and set forth in this Resolution shall remain unchanged from the language existing prior to adoption of this Resolution): Appendix B Schedule of Fees Chapter 78. Utilities (e) Impact Fees: * * * * * * SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE BY CLASSIFICATION AND AMOUNT 1 ERUs I Amount ' _ $1,348.80 SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE PER ERU _RESIDENTIAL: (a) Single Family (b) Multiple Family (Per Dwelling Unit/ERU) (c) Each Mobile Home Space _COMMERCIAL 2 : (a) Barber and Beauty Shops, per chair (b) Bowling Alleys, per lane (c) Churches. per seat (d) Dentist Office, per dentist (e) Doctor Office, per doctor (f) Food Service Operations (1) Restaurant, per seat (2) 24-hour Restaurant. per seat (3) Bar and Cocktail Lounge, per seat (4) Drive -In Restaurant. per car space (g) Hospitals, per bed (h) Hotels. Motels, per room (1) Regular per room (2) Resort Hotels. Camps. Cottages per room (3) Add for establishments with self-service laundry facilities per machine (i) Laundry Facilities. per washing machine (1) Nursing. Rest Homes. per person City of Cape Canaveral Resolution No. 2013 - Page 2 of 7 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.3125 0.2083 0.0125 1.0417 1.0417 0.1667 0.2500 0.0833 0 2083 0.8333 0.4167 0.8333 3.1250 3.1250 0.4167 $1,348.80 $1,348.80 $1,348.80 $421.50 $281.00 $16.86 $1.405.00 $1,405.00 $224.80 $337 20 $11240 $281.00 $1,124.00 $562.00 $1.124.00 $4,215.00 $4,215.00 $562.00 (k) Office Building, ner worker (1) Schools, ner student (m) Service Stations, ner water closet and ner urinal (1) Open 16 hours ner day or less (2) Open more than 16 hours ner day (n) Showing Centers without Food or Laundry. ner sauare foot or floor space (o) Stores, ner bathroom (n) Theaters. indoor per seat (a) Recreational vehicle space for overnight stay, without water and sewer hookup ner vehicle space (r) Recreational vehicle space for overnight stay. with water and sewer hookup per vehicle space 0.0625 0.0417 1.0417 1.3542 0.0004 0.8333 0.0167 0.2083 0.3125 $84.30 $56.20 $1,405.00 $1,826.50 $0.56 $1,124.00 $22.48 $281.00 $421.50 1. All Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees shall be determined based on the greater of 1 ERU or the amount calculated pursuant to the above table. 2. Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees for Connections not specifically identified above shall be determined by using greater of the Fixture Unit basis or the Flow Basis. SANITARY SEWER DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS (D.F.U.) LOAD NO. OF LOAD FIXTURE TYPE FACTOR TYPES FACTOR ,tA„ ,_B„ ',et AxB=C Automatic clothes washers, commercial (a, g) 3.00 Automatic clothes washers, residential (g) 2 00 Bathroom group (<=1.6 gpf water closet, toilet, sink, tub 5.00 and shower) (f,h) Bathroom group (>1.6 gpf water closet, toilet, sink, tub 6.00 and shower) (f,h) Bathtub (with or without overhead shower or whirlpool 2.00 attachments) (b) Bidet 1.00 Combination sink and tray 2.00 Dental lavatory (bathroom sink) 1.00 Dental unit or cuspidor 1.00 Dishwashing machine (domestic) (c) 2.00 Drinking fountain 0.50 Emergency floor drains 0.00 Floor drains (d) 2.00 Kitchen sink, domestic 2.00 Kitchen sink, domestic with food waste grinder Laundry tray (1 or 2 compartments) Lavatory (bathroom sink) Shower Service sink Sink City of Cape Canaveral Resolution No. 2013 - Page 3 of 7 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Urinal Urinal. <1 guf (e) Urinal. non water supplies (e) Wash sink (circular or multiple) each set of faucets Water closet, flushometer tank, public or private (toilet only) (e) Water closet, private (1.6 Qpf, toilet onlv) (e) Water closet. private (>1.6 gpf, toilet only) (e) Water closet, public (1.6 gpf, toilet only) (e) Water closet, public (>1.6 apt; toilet only) (e) Total _D.F.U. FORMULA Total Load Factor: x 15 = GPD / 240 = ERUs ERUs x $1,348.80 = 1 GPD 4.00 2.00 0.50 2.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 * Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee shall be the greater of 1 ERU or the amount calculated based upon above data. * gpf = gallon per flushing cycle a. For traps larger than 3", use Table 709.2 of the Honda Plumbing Code adopted by City Code section 82-31. b. A showerhead over a bathtub or whirlpool bathtub attachment does not increase the drainage fixture unit value. c. See Sections 709.2 through 709.4 of the Florida Plumbing Code adopted by City Code section 82-31 for methods of computing unit value of fixtures not listed in this table or for rating of devices with intermittent flows. d. See Sections 709.4 and 704.4 of the Florida Plumbing Code adopted by City Code section 82-31 e. For the purpose of computing loads on building drams and sewers, water closets and urinals shall not be rated at a lower drainage fixture unit unless the lower values are confirmed by testing f. For fixtures added to a dwelling unit bathroom group, add the DFU value of those additional fixtures to the bathroom group fixture count. g. See Section 406.3 of the Florida Plumbing Code adopted by City Code section 82-31 for sizing requirements for fixture dram. branch drain. and drainage stack for automatic clothes washer standpipe. h. Bathroom group is defined in Section 202 of the Florida Plumbing Code adopted by City Code section 82-31. SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE BY FLOW BASIS Flow Basis This method requires that the applicant provide the property's average daily gpd of sewer flow to determine the appropriate Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee amount. This method provides that the property's requested average daily end of sewer flow capacity is 1) divided by the LOS criteria of 240 gpd/ERU: 2) rounding the ERUs to the nearest tenth: and 3) multiply the rounded ERUs by the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee per ERU. _FLOW BASIS FORMULA Avg Daily Sewer Flow (ADSF): ADSF / 240 gpd per ERU = Round to nearest tenth = x Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee per ERU = City of Cape Canaveral Resolution No. 2013 - Page 4 of 7 (-1-) ResiElential+ a. Each single family dwelling unit nit, , c. Each condominium unit d. Each mobile home space 93 Qermnereia' Th.. impact assessment fee shall be the greater of $2,337.81 or the amount casted for the uses describe a. Barber and b r chair br r lane c. Churches, per seat d. Dentist offs m, per dentist c. Doctor o€leeser doctor 93 1. Restaurant, per seat 2. 24 hour restaurant, per seat 2 Bar and cocktail lounge, per seat 1 r ,pace— g Hospitals, per bed h. Hotels, motels, per room achinne-- j. Nursing, rest homes,per-person k. Offie er worker - 1. Schools, per student— m. E t and per unnal n. Shopping centers wit r square foot of floor op -ace o. Etores w t heut food service, per ;quare f : sprace- p. Theaters, indoor, per seat e. Trawl trail r. TraN a. InIpact fern for iuduc ial or other commercial facilities net' td eve n City of Cape Canaveral Resolution No. 2013 - Page 5 of 7 2,337.81 2,337.81 2,337.81 2,337.81 5-84A4 581.15 17.25 1,161.11 1,'161.11 292.23 438.35 171.87 292 23 1,461.11 1- 2,337.81 584.45 117.37 146 12 1,161.11 048 048 28.75 438.35 581.15 moat resent -plumbing II of thio coder -Standard Plumbing Code. The tab13 31-4111 be reviewed annually Each 18 fixture units, or fraction the $2,337.31 to d 2. T shall be multiplied by a buil r umber of workers shall mine the -applicable impact fee. Om Oa wt. trial and ether commercial mercial Section 4. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Resolutions All prior inconsistent resolutions adopted by the City Council are hereby expressly repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 5. Incorporation Into Appendix B, Schedule of Fees. This Resolution shall be incorporated into Appendix B, Schedule of Fees, to the City of Cape Canaveral City Code and any section or paragraph, number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing. Grammatical, typographical and like errors may be corrected and additions, alterations and omissions, not affecting the construction or meaning of this Resolution and the City Code may be freely made Section 6. Severability. If any section, clause, phrase, word, or provision is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive or procedural reasons, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon the effective date of Cape Canaveral Ordinance No. 09-2013. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] City of Cape Canaveral Resolution No. 2013 - Page 6 of 7 ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, assembled this day of' , 2013. ATTEST: Angela Apperson, City Clerk Approved as to legal form and sufficiency For the City of Cape Canaveral only by: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney Rocky Randels, Mayor Name FOR AGAINST John Bond Bob Hoog Buzz Petsos Rocky Randels Betty Walsh City of Cape Canaveral Resolution No. 2013 - Page 7 of 7 City of Cape Canaveral City Council Agenda Form City Council Meeting Date: te: 07/16/2013 Item No. Subject: Resolution 2013-12, adopting a tentative proposed millage rate for the levy of Ad Valorem Taxes for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 on all taxable property located within the City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida; providing for an effective date. Department: Financial Services Summary: Adopt a Tentative Proposed Millage for FY 2013/14. This is a preliminary millage which includes four segments: 1 General Government Police millage 1 General Government Fire/Rescue millage 1 General Government Beautification millaqe 1 Library Dependent Special District 2.0000 mills 1.5000 mills 0.5000 mills 0.0739 mills The rates proposed total 4.0739 mills, which is 4.2371% above the rolled -back rate of 3.9083. Per "Truth in Millage Compliance", the highest intended millage rate must be proposed at this meeting and Ad Valorem Tax Rates can be lowered from the initial rate proposed. However, the tax rate cannot be increased after this meeting. There will be two more meetings concerning the Ad Valorem Tax rate to be implemented for the City's Fiscal Year 2013/14: 1. September 3, 2013: a Tentative Millage rate will be established. 2. September 17, 2013: a Final Millage rate will be established. Submitting Department Director: John DeLeo Date: 7-8-13 Attachment: Resolution 2013-12 Financial Impact: The proposed millage rate of 4.073 provides a property tax revenue stream of $3,382,243. These revenues are represented in the Proposed FY 2013/14 Budget at a 95% receipt rate and allow for a balanced budget. Reviewed by Finance Director: John DeLeo The City Manager recommends that City Council t1ake the following action(s): Adopt Resolution 2013-12. Approved by City Manager: David L. Greene 0 `1.)—a- Date: 7Jg%// City Council Action: [ ] Approved as Recommended [ ] Disapprovdd [ ] Approved with Modifications [ ] Tabled to Time Certain Date: 7•Y- 13 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING A TENTATIVE PROPOSED MILLAGE RATE FOR THE LEVY OF AD VALOREM TAXES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the electors approved in the 1985 referendum election the construction, maintenance and operation of a library by Ad Valorem Taxes; and WHEREAS, the electors approved in the 1986 referendum election the imposition of Ad Valorem Taxes for beautification projects; and WHEREAS, the electors approved in the 1990, 1994 and 2001 referendum elections the imposition of Ad Valorem Taxes for Fire/Rescue Services; and WHEREAS, the electors approved in the 1990, 1994 and 2002 referendum elections the imposition of Ad Valorem Taxes for Police Services; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to impose said Ad Valorem Taxes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida, as follows: Section 1. The total millage for all City operating purposes is 4.0739 mills on the dollar of taxable value for the 2013/2014 Fiscal Year for the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida. This millage is a 4.2371% increase from the rolled -back rate of 3.9083. Section 2. The City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida, hereby adopts and imposes a tentative proposed millage rate of 0.5000 mills for Beautification General Operating City of Cape Canaveral, Florida Resolution No. 2013-12 Page 2 Millage, as approved in the 1986 referendum election. This tentative proposed Ad Valorem Tax shall be levied upon the 2013 Tax Assessment Roll for Ad Valorem Tax on all taxable property located within the City of Cape Canaveral and is to be used for the City's Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 2013 and ending September 30, 2014. Section 3. The City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida, hereby adopts and imposes a tentative proposed millage rate of 0.0739 mills for the Library Dependent Special District, as approved in the 1985 referendum election. This tentative proposed Ad Valorem Tax shall be levied upon the 2013 Tax Assessment Roll for Ad Valorem Tax on all taxable property located within the City of Cape Canaveral and is to be used for the City's Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 2013 and ending September 30, 2014. Section 4. The City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida, hereby adopts and imposes a tentative proposed millage rate of 1.5000 mills for Fire/Rescue Service General Operating Millage, as approved in the 1990, 1994 and 2001 referendum elections. This tentative proposed Ad Valorem Tax shall be levied upon the 2013 Tax Assessment Roll for Ad Valorem Tax on all taxable property located within the City of Cape Canaveral and is to be used for the City's Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 2013 and ending September 30, 2014. Section 5. The City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida, hereby adopts and imposes a tentative proposed millage rate of 2.0000 mills for Police Services General Operating Millage, as approved in the 1990, 1994 and 2002 referendum elections. This tentative proposed Ad Valorem Tax shall be levied upon the 2013 Tax Assessment Roll for Ad Valorem Tax on all taxable property located within the City of Cape Canaveral and is to be used for the City's Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 2013 and ending September 30, 2014. Section 6. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida Resolution No. 2013-12 Page 3 ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida, this 16th' day of July, 2013. ATTEST: Angela Apperson, MMC, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Approved as to Form: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney Rocky Randels, Mayor Name For Against John Bond Robert Hoog Buzz Petsos Rocky Randels Betty Walsh City of Cape Canaveral City Council Agenda Form City Council Meeting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. M Subject: Discuss/approve Task Order No. 1, in the amount of $254,975, to GLE Associates, Inc. for Architectural and Engineering Services related to the design of a new City Hall and authorize the City Manager to execute same. Department: Administration Summary: City Hall was built in 1966/67 and has served the City well. The building no longer meets the City government's needs. It is ripe for redevelopment and continuation as part of the government services campus. Possible uses could include a City Welcome Center where local business brochures, historic items and/or art could be displayed. The Space Shuttle on the front lawn is already a draw for tourists. A lease agreement with a non-profit agency to operate the facility is an option to reduce costs to the City. The facility could also be utilized to expand leisure services activities such as a senior center, youth center, multi -generational center or community center. A new City Hall has been part of the community conversation since the mid 1990's. More recently, in May 2007 Architects Design Group, Inc. (ADG), at a cost to the City of approximately $52,000, developed a Spatial Needs Assessment and Master Plan Report for the Cape Canaveral City Hall. ADG gathered data related to existing operations, staffing levels, equipment utilization, the City's service delivery philosophy, quantifying land and other resources. The following entities and departments were included in the assessment of square footage space needs: City Council, City Manager, City Clerk/HR, Financial Services and Community & Economic Development. ADG estimated that in 2015, these departments would need a total of 16,182 square feet and in 2025 would need 17,687 square feet. Several of the departments identified in the 2007 Spatial Needs Assessment are challenged to properly function in three separate buildings. Two that were built in the late -1960s and early -1970s are aging/obsolete: • The Canaveral Public Library multi-purpose room (2,024 square feet) serves as the City Council chambers and hosts approximately 50 Public Meetings/events every year. It is used for Library/Public activities, as well. The City incurs regular costs/inefficiencies by Staff continually having to set up/break down Council/Public seating and computer/projector/sound systems, which amounts to 100+ Staff/personnel hours per year at an annual cost of approximately $2,500. The loud air conditioning is also a distraction during meetings. • The current City Hall building (3,108 square feet) has been addressed as an unhealthy working environment due to poor air quality/mold issues. An air quality sampling and mold remediation treatment was conducted on 8/24/12 at a cost of $2,950. The building needs regular repairs for roof/window leaks, along with continuing electrical/air conditioning/plumbing problems. Since 2007, $39,217 has been spent on the roof and air conditioning. Staff uses the same restroom facilities as the Public, which includes washing dishes as there are no kitchen facilities in the building. The conference room accommodates six people. Staff is frequently required to meet with groups of 8-10 people, resulting in very crowded City Council Meeting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. /0 Page 2 of 4 conditions. Since the 2007 Spatial Needs Assessment, there has been an increase of two employees in the building even though Community & Economic Development Staff moved to another building. To make room for the additional desk/office requirements, the break room is now extremely small and there is no space available for Staff training It is not energy efficient due to leaky windows and an acoustical ceiling which does not form an air barrier (insulation installed o n a suspended ceiling with removable ceiling tiles does not meet the minimum thermal resistance of roof insulation required unless the roof/ceiling cavity is sealed from the exterior environment — it is not). There is very limited on site records storage; annual cost for off-site records storage is $4,200. • The current Community & Economic Development building (1,734 sq ft) is also an unhealthy working environment in need of constant repairs for air quality, mold/mildew issues, electrical problems and space -needs. An air quality sampling was conducted on 11/11/2012 at a cost of $550, followed by treatment o n 11/27/2012 at a cost of $1,750. As in City Hall, Staff must use the same restrooms as the Public. Since the 2007 Spatial Needs Assessment and moving to the new building, renovations have occurred which have added a level of security and created a small area where Staff can interface with the Public/hold Departmental meetings However, to accomplish this office space was reduced. With increased demand for services, the 2013/14 Budget calls for a Plans Examiner/Building Inspector. The new employee will likely be placed in this area, rendering the facility without a meeting area. The building does not have wind impact resistance for its glass areas. It is not energy efficient due to leaky windows, an undersized air conditioning unit and an acoustical ceiling which does not form an air barrier (insulation installed on a suspended ceiling with removable ceiling tiles does not meet the minimum thermal resistance of roof insulation required unless the roof/ceiling cavity is sealed from the exterior e nvironment — it is not). There is no break room, conference room or training area and the parking lot is largely unpaved and not in compliance with City Code. • The restrooms in the City Hall and Community & Economic Development buildings are not ADA compliant. The building entrances meet the minimum code; however, they pose challenges for individuals with disabilities as there is n o automated entry feature at either building In October 2012, a City Hall Facility Committee (CHFC) was formed. Members include: Todd Morley (Committee Lead); Angie Apperson; Lonnie Dunn; Kim McIntire; Joe Tichich (Citizen Volunteer); and John Pekar (City Engineer Consultant). The CHFC reviewed the as -is condition of City offices/meeting facilities, the 2007 Spatial Needs Assessment and the ongoing conversation/documented perceptions of citizens, businesses and community development entities. Efficiencies/image improvements can be realized by combining the three building uses into one. Current low construction/financing costs provide a unique opportunity that will likely not be repeated. The CHFC reviewed prospective architectural/engineering firms' qualifications of those having performed similar type projects for other municipalities The CHFC selected GLE Associates, Inc. (GLE) of Tampa, Florida to perform the project tasks GLE is one , City Council Meeting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. /O Page3of4 of the engineering firms selected by the City for Professional Engineering/Surveying, P lanning, Consulting and Architectural Services in Request for Qualifications #2011-01. The CHFC held meetings with GLE, reviewed/successively revised draft proposals and stressed the incorporation of the best principles of the Economic Opportunity Overlay D istrict (i.e., a front -loaded building, parking in the rear, architectural treatments, proportion, scale, etc.), thus leading by example. The CHFC also included sustainable (LEED-type) design elements where possible. These items include, but are not limited to: • Public transportation access, • Water efficient landscaping using reclaimed irrigation, • Minimum energy performance equipment and appliances, • Increased ventilation, • Bicycle storage, • Low -emitting adhesives/paints/carpet and • Lighting systems controllability. A Master Services Agreement for these services was approved by the City Council on May 17, 2011 and subsequently entered into between the City and GLE. The project scope of work for this Task Order includes, but is not limited to, the performance of the following tasks: • Site Plan Development; • 30% and 60% Schematic Design Drawings and Documents; • 60% and 90% Civil Construction Drawings and Documents; • Final Construction Drawings and Documents; • Permitting; • Road Closure Design; • Landscape, Hardscape & Irrigation; • Meetings and Public Involvement; • Bid Document Preparation and Bidding/Negotiation Services; • Construction Administration; • Construction Site Visits; • Surveying, and • Geotechnical Engineering Anticipated milestone dates: • Design Document Complete: Fall/Early Winter 2013 • City Council Selection of Contractor: Early 2014 • Construction Completion: Early 2015. Capital Expansion Funds were set aside in the approved FY 2012/2013 Budget for the design and engineering of a new City Hall. The proposal currently includes a two or three story, 18,000 square foot City Hall at the site of the current Community & Economic Development building at 7510 N. Atlantic Avenue, which will require , City Council Meeting Date: 07/16/2013 Item No. /� Page 4 of 4 demolition of the existing building. The site was selected because it is just over a half - acre in size, is centrally located within the City limits and will accommodate the retention of stormwater on-site. The City has had appraisals performed to determine the value of potentially available adjacent lands. The projected cost of a new City Hall is $2.5 million dollars, which is included in the Proposed FY 2013/14 Budget. Submitting Department Directors: Todd Morley & Angela Apperson Date: 7/8/2013 Attachments: #1 - GLE Task Order #2 - GLE Capabilities Statement #3 - GLE Conceptual Design Financial Impact: Staff time and effort to prepare this Agenda Item. $601,453 is currently reserved for a new City Hall. The $254,975 GLE Design Proposal will be funded from these reserves as budgeted in FY 12/13. The construction of the new City Hall could be financed at an estimated cost of 2.5 million dollars or the financing reduced by use of the remaining reserved funds ($346,478). Reviewed by Finance Director: John DeLeo \ " Date: °7/1/13 The City Manager recommends that City C6uncil take the following actions: Discuss/approve Task Order No. 1, in the amount of $254,975, to GLE Associates, Inc. for Architectural and Engineering Services related to the design of a New City Hall and authorize the City Manager to execute same. Approved by City Manager: David L. Greene Jam- Date: 7/f//3 City Council Action: [ ] Approved as Recommended [ ] Disapproved [ ] Approved with Modifications [ ] Tabled to Time Certain Facilities and Environmental Consultants June 5, 2013 Mr. Todd Morley Community & Economic Development Department Director City of Cape Canaveral 7510 N. Atlantic Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 RE: Architectural / Engineering Services Cape Canaveral City Hall Task Order No. 1 GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -Revised 6.5.13 Dear Mr. Morley: GLE Associates, Inc. (GLE) is pleased to present this proposal to provide professional consulting services to the City of Cape Canaveral (CCC), herein referred to as the `Client,' for the referenced project. This proposal outlines our understanding of the Scope of Services, and presents an indication of the fees that we will require to complete the project. UNDERSTANDING GLE has been requested to provide this proposal to develop the design, prepare the construction documents and provide bidding and construction administration services for an approximate 18,000 square foot City Hall office building. GLE's understanding of the preliminary Scope of Work has been depicted in the initial proposed conceptual design and site plan prepared by GLE. SCOPE OF SERVICES GLE proposes to perform the following services: CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES The Scope of Services for the Civil Engineering services is as follows: GLE Associates, Inc. 4300 W. Cypress Street, Suite 4001 Tampa, Florida 36607 1 813-241-83501 Fax: 813-241-8737 Jacksonville 1 Orlando 1 Ft. Lauderdale l Miami [ Gainesville l Atlanta 1 Houston 1 Nashville Architecture AA 0002369 • Engineer CA 5483 • Asbestos ZA 0000034 • Geology GB 0000297 Mr. Todd Morley GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -rev June 5, 2013; Page 2 Task C1- Due Diligence Attendance via phone or in person, one pre -application meeting with the following agencies in order to determine requirements applicable to the conceptual site plan presented to the City of Cape Canaveral on October 31, 2012 which will be used as an exhibit of the proposed project. • City of Cape Canaveral Steering Committee • FDOT — District 5 • St Johns River Water Management District — Palm Bay Office • Brevard County • City of Cocoa for potable water • City of Cape Canaveral for sanitary sewer • FPL for electric • Space Coast Area Transit (SCAT) for bus routes/street closing • Brighthouse Networks and AT&T • Florida Natural Gas Task C2 - Site Plan Development Based on the boundary and topographic survey provided by the project surveyor and the approved building footprint, this task will consist of generating a site plan for the proposed development based on our interpretation of the City of Cape Canaveral Land Development Regulations and the conceptual site plan presented to the City on October 31, 2012. The site plan will include the following information: • Owner Information • Existing Land Uses and Zoning • Building, Parking, Driveways • Required Setbacks, and Stormwater Detention Areas • Hardscape, Landscape, and Streetscape Design • Traffic Statement and Road Closure Design • Utilities • Anticipated Regulatory Permits Required • Topographic Information The site plan will be forwarded to the client for review and comment. Included in this task are three (3) rounds of comments and revision to the site plan. Mr. Todd Morley GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -rev June 5, 2013; Page 3 Task C3 - 60% and 90% Civil Construction Drawings Based on the site plan submitted in Phase I, this task will consist of the preparation of 60% and 90% construction drawings for the proposed development to submit for review and approval through the City of Cape Canaveral and other regulatory agencies. The plans will be prepared in accordance with local, state and federal guidelines and will be suitable for construction and submittal to agencies for review. This application package will include the following construction documents: A. Cover Sheet B . General Construction Notes C. Site Plan D. Erosion Control Plan and Details (SWPPP) E Horizontal Control Plan F. Signing and Marking Plan and Details G. Hardscape, Landscape, and Reuse Irrigation Design H. Traffic Statement and Road Closure Design I. Stormwater Management System Design, site specific storm drainage profiles as part of utility coordination Paving and Grading Design and Details J. Utility Plan and Details, including preliminary layout of dry utilities K. Water Distribution System Design L. Sanitary Sewer Collection and Transmission Systems, Plan and Profile M. Demolition Plan(Structures and Right -of Way) This proposal is based on the assumption that existing potable water and sewer gravity and force mains are abutting the project area, have enough capacity to serve the site and that no offsite utility improvements, design and analysis are required. The plans will reflect the size of potable water pipe and sewer lines available within the public R/W along Polk Avenue. Included in this task are two (2) rounds of comments and revisions to the 60% construction drawings and one (1) round of comments and revisions to the 90% construction drawings. Task C4 - Permitting This task will consist of the preparation and submittal of the following applications for the Owner's signature and associated documentation, for subsequent transmittal to the following agencies: • Florida Department of Environmental Protection Notice of Intent to Use the General Permit for Construction of Water Main Extensions • Florida Department of Environmental Protection Notice/Application for Constructing a Domestic Wastewater Collection/Transmission System • NPDES, Florida Department of Environmental Protection NOI -- Stormwater Discharge Mr. Todd Morley GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -rev June 5, 2013; Page 4 • St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) - Environmental Resource Permit • FDOT Drainage Connection Permit • FDOT Utility Permit • FDOT General Use Permit • City of Cocoa, Utility Construction Permit for potable water • City of Cape Canaveral, Tree Removal/Land Clearing Permit • City of Cape Canaveral, Utility Construction Permit for sanitary sewer • City of Cape Canaveral Site Development Permit We will also provide responses to one (1) request for clarification of information required during the review and approval of the permits. City is responsible for initial application fees. Task C5 — Road Closure Design This task will consist of the preparation of a set of roadway plans suitable for submittal to the City of Cape Canaveral. This task includes off-site roadway design associated with road closure of City of Cape Canaveral right -or -way (Polk Street). This task includes redistribution of traffic pattern, signing and marking, drainage, traffic control and utilities. No signal design or coordination is included. This task includes coordination with FDOT on any ROW issues. Task C6 - Landscape, Hardscape & Irrigation Preliminary Landscape Design Phase This task includes the preparation of a code landscape plan for the project and submitted to the City as part of the site plan approval process and conceptual level hardscape design plans. This task includes the following* 1. Attend Kick-off meeting with project team to establish concept direction and budget. 2. Site Visit to inventory existing landscape material 3. Review of pertinent land development codes for the City of Cape Canaveral. 4. Coordination with architectural floor plans and elevations, etc. 5. Coordination with proposed grading, utility locations, drainage structures, etc. 6. Preparation of 20 or 30 scale (24' x 36" drawing match line sheets) landscape design plans addressing improvements including: a) Landscape Design b) Conceptual Hardscape Design c) Specialty Feature Suggestions (Le. future fountain, walkable paths, decorative lighting, sun dial, mosaic planet and benches) 7. Meeting with project team to discuss preliminary design plans and budget as necessary. Mr. Todd Morley GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -rev June 5, 2013; Page 5 8. Provide "code" landscape plan for the project of sufficient detail to meet minimum requirements for the City of Cape Canaveral Codes and Ordinances, using CAD technology suitable for submittal to the City of Cape Canaveral as part of the site plan approval process. This plan will be reviewed with the Client. This Task will include three (3) rounds of revisions and a resubmittal to the City as part of the site plan approval process. Please note that the final design of specialty features such as fountains, arbor/trellises, public art, etc. will be considered additional services and a scope and fee will be provided once these items are established. Site Furnishings e.g benches, trash receptacles, pedestrian lighting, flagpoles, etc., will be selected and detailed by others. Landscape Construction Document Phase Upon Client approval of Preliminary Design Phase and Approved Code Landscape Plan by the City as part of the site plan approval process, we will provide the following 1. Preparation of 20 or 30 scale landscape construction plans (24" x 36" matchline drawing sheets) suitable for bidding and construction depicting landscape locations; quantities; and sizes including planting details, general notes, and specifications 2. Preparation of 20 or 30 scale construction plans for hardscape areas (24" x 36" matchline drawing sheets) depicting paving materials, grading, critical dimensions, site furnishings, such as benches, details and installation notes. 3. Preparation of 20 scale irrigation plans in compliance with City of Cape Canaveral Codes and Ordinances, using CAD technology suitable for submittal to The City of Cape Canaveral and bidding by Contractors. The irrigation plans shall include all head, main, and valve sizes and locations, controller type and location, specifications, detailed drawings, and installation notes. Task C7 - Final Construction Drawings Based on the 90% construction drawings prepared in Task C3 and applicable changes outlined above, this task will consist of the preparation of final construction drawings for the proposed development to submit for review and approval through the City of Cape Canaveral along with an Opinion of Probable Costs (OPC) for the approved design. Task C8 - Meetings and Public Involvement This task will consist of arranging and attending meetings as specified below with the project/client team, City staff, and/or public meetings in support of the development application. Further meetings shall be provided on an as -needed basis at the hourly rates provided. It is anticipated that the following formal and informal meetings and presentations will be required: Mr. Todd Morley GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -rev June 5, 2013; Page 6 1. Project Management: Attend meetings with the Client to discuss and review the design documents. We assume that six (6) meetings will be required for this task. 2. Planning and Zoning Board: One (1) presentation to the P&Z Board. 3. Community Appearance Board: One (1) presentation to the Community Appearance Board. 4. City of Cape Canaveral City Council: One (1) presentation to the City Council. Note: All presentation materials will be provided to the client for public record purposes. Task C9 — Construction Phase Bid Document Preparation and Contractor Notification Preparation and assembly of construction bidding documents, including specifications for the subject Work and the construction contract, based on "Standard General Conditions of the Construction Contract" (EJCDC No. C-700, 2002 edition) prepared by the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee. Issue bid packages for the submittal of quotations to perform the work and conduct pre-bid meetings with potential bidders. Tabulate the bids received and evaluate the compliance of the bids received with the bidding documents. Prepare a written summary of this tabulation and evaluation. If requested by the Client, Consultant will notify the selected Contractor. Construction Administration Respond to reasonable and appropriate Contractor requests for information and issue clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents as appropriate to the orderly completion of Contractor's work. Perform such work within two (2) working days of receipt. Scope performed under this task is estimated to be performed up to 40 hours. Additional time will be billed as an additional service at the contractual hourly rate. Construction Site Visits This task consists of making on-site construction observation visits. Site visits to observe construction of site improvements related to the certification of completion for applicable agencies and Contractor is estimated to be performed up to 40 hours. Additional time will be billed as an additional service at the contractual hourly rate. Mr. Todd Morley GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -rev June 5, 2013; Page 7 Shop Drawings This task consists of the review of one (1) round of Shop Drawings and approve or take other appropriate action with respect to water, sewer and drainage Shop Drawings, within three (3) working days of receipt, and other data which Contractor is required to submit, but only for conformance with the information given in the Contract Documents. Such review and approvals or other action will not extend to means, methods, techniques, equipment choice and usage, sequences, schedules, or procedures of construction or to related safety precautions and programs. MOT provided by contractor. Plans will reference applicable FDOT standards. Civil Engineering Services Not Included Any other services, including but not limited to, the following are not included in this Agreement: • Title research Civil Engineering Additional Services Any services not specifically provided for in the above scope, as well as any changes in the scope will be considered additional services and will be performed at our then -current hourly rates. Additional services we can provide include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Site Plan revisions beyond those specified above 2. Civil Engineering beyond those stated above 3. Off-site Roadway, Intersection, Drainage and Utility Design beyond those specified above 4. Landscape and Irrigation design other than that specified above 5. Platting Services 6. Additional traffic data collection, studies and analysis not specified above 7. Agency permitting and fees beyond that stated above 8. Meetings and site visits other than those specified above, including attendance at public hearings 9 Further Construction coordination, bid document preparation, permitting 10 Environmental Services Mr. Todd Morley GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -rev June 5, 2013; Page 8 ARCHITECTURAL AND BUILDING ENGINEERING SERVICES (Architectural, MEP, Structural) GLE and the Client have discussed incorporating sustainable design elements where possible and where feasible for the project budget. LEED certification is excluded from this proposal, although throughout the design process GLE will review specific sustainable items with the client. These items include, but are not limited to, the following• • Public Transportation Access • Bicycle Storage • Water Efficient Landscaping and reclaimed irrigation water where necessary • Minimum Energy Performance appliances • Recycled content building materials, where achievable, • Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring • Increased Ventilation • Low -Emitting Adhesives, Paints and Carpet • Lighting systems controllability Task A1.0 -Schematic Design Documents (30%), services consisting of continued development of the previously proposed conceptual design and include but not limited to: 1. Review space allocation provided by owner. The desired building is to be approximately 18,000 gross square feet. 2 Schematic building plans. 3. Schematic building elevations. 4. Preliminary selection of building systems and materials. 5. Development of approximate dimensions, areas and volumes. 6. Written Narrative of proposed MEP (Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical and Backbone for Communications) systems. Task A2.0 -Design Development Documents (60%), services consisting of continued development and expansion of the owner approved Schematic Documents and include but not limited to: 1. Preliminary plans, sections and elevations. 2. Typical construction details. 3. Final materials selection. 4. Equipment layouts. 5. Preparation of a Statement of Probable Construction Cost. 6. Specifications: Mr. Todd Morley GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -rev June 5, 2013; Page 9 a. Development of architectural outline specifications or itemized lists and brief form identification of significant architectural materials, systems and equipment, including their criteria and quality standards. b. Coordination of similar activities of other disciplines. Task A3.0 -Construction Documents, services consisting of preparation of: 1. Drawings based on approved Design Development Documents setting forth in detail the architectural construction requirements for the Project. 2. Specifications: a. Assistance to the Client in development and preparation of bidding and procurement information which describes the time, place and conditions of bidding, bidding forms, and the form(s) of Agreement between the Client and Contractor(s). b. Assistance to the Client in development and preparation of the Conditions of the Contract (General, Supplementary and other Conditions) c. Development and preparation of architectural Specifications. d. Coordination of the development of Specifications by other disciplines. e. Compilation of Project Manual including Conditions of the Contract, bidding and procurement information and Specifications. Task A4.0 -Bidding and Negotiations services consisting of: 1 Bidding Materials services consisting of organizing and handling Bidding Documents. 2 Addenda services consisting of preparation and distribution of Addenda as may be required during bidding or negotiation. 3 Bidding/Negotiation services consisting of: a. Participation in pre-bid conference. b. Responses to questions from Bidders or proposers and clarifications or interpretations of the Bidding Documents. c. Attendance at bid opening. d. Documentation and distribution of bidding results. 4 Bid Evaluation services consisting of: a. Evaluation of bids or proposals. b. Recommendation on award of Contract(s). c. Preparation and distribution of sets of Contract Documents for execution by parties to the Contract(s). Mr. Todd Morley GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -rev June 5, 2013; Page 10 Task A5.0 -Contract Administration, services consisting of: 1 Submittal Services consisting of: a. Processing of submittals, including receipt, review of, and appropriate action on Shop Drawings, Product Data, Samples and other submittals required by the Contract Documents. b. Distribution of submittals to Client, Contractor and/or Architect's field representative as required. 2 Periodic observation services consisting of a maximum of (10) visits to the site to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the Work completed and to determine in general if the Work when completed will be in accordance with Contract Documents; preparing related reports and communications. 3 Evaluation of Applications for Payment and certification thereof. 4 Project Closeout services initiated upon notice from the Contractor that the Work, or a designated portion thereof which is acceptable to the Client, is sufficiently complete, in accordance with the Contract Documents, to permit occupancy or utilization for the use for which it is intended, and consisting of: a. Review of the project for determination of Substantial Completion. b. Issuance of Certificate of Substantial Completion. c. Inspection upon notice by the Contractor that the Work is ready for final inspection and acceptance. d. Final inspection with the Client's representative to verify final completion of the Work. e. Determination of the amounts to be withheld until final completion. f. Receipt and transmittal of warranties, affidavits, receipts, releases and waivers of liens or bonds indemnifying the Client against liens. g Securing and receipt of consent of surety or sureties, if any, to the making of final payment(s). h. Issuance of Final Certificate for Payment. 5 The following services are included within the scope of GLE's Contract Administration Services stated above: a. A maximum of (10) site visits during construction b. Up to two (2) reviews of each Shop Drawing, Product Data item, sample and similar submittal of the Contractor. c. Up to two (2) inspections as a part of the scheduled Site visits for any portion of the Work to determine whether such portion of the Work is substantially complete in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. d. Up to one (1) inspection as a part of the site visits for any portion of the Work to determine final completion. Mr. Todd Morley GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -rev June 5, 2013; Page 11 6 This proposal assumes that the Contractor will perform its responsibilities in a timely and professional manner. Therefore, the following items have been excluded from this proposal. These services will be provided by GLE, if requested and compensated by the Client: a. Exceeding the limits established above for the project. Our proposal assumes construction duration of up to 12 months. b. Change Orders and Construction Change Directives requiring evaluation of proposals, preparation of supporting graphic material or revisions to the Contract Documents which are beyond the scope of work as presented in the construction documents. c. Preparation of design and documentation for alternate bid or proposal requests once the construction phase begins. GLE and the Client have discussed various project delivery methods (ie: traditional bid, construction management at risk). This proposal is based on delivering the project via traditional bid If the Owner elects to employ another project delivery method, the costs for the Bidding and Construction Administration may be modified, upon mutual consent. SURVEYING SERVICES Site surveying services will consist of the preparation of a Certified Boundary and Topographic Survey and Specific Purpose Tree Survey to include the following* a. Establish Horizontal & Vertical control on county datum b. Prepare an ALTA/ACSM Land Title Boundary and Topographic Survey c. Locate surface features within the approximate 2.00 acre project area d. Locate surface features within the Polk Avenue and Tyler Avenue ROW adjacent to the new City Hall site e. Locate surface features at the intersection of State Road A 1 A and both Polk Avenue and Tyler Avenue for the use in the potential vacating of ROW f. Surface features include: pavement, driveways, walks, 4" or larger trees, and visible utility features g Measure elevations sufficient to develop 1 -foot contours h. Underground utilities to be located by Sunshine 811. Surface utility marks will be located i. Accessible (via manhole/inlet) pipe size and invert data will be collected Surveying services indicated below are based on ordinances, regulations and procedures in force on the execution date of this Task Order by the appropriate governing bodies having jurisdiction over the project. Any significant modification in these ordinances, regulations, procedures, etc. shall be justification for re -negotiation of the surveying services compensation. Mr. Todd Morley GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -rev June 5, 2013; Page 12 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES Geotechnical Engineering services will consist of the following: Field Services: a. Drill five (5) Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings to depths of 20 to 40 feet below existing land surface (bls) within the proposed building footprint b. Drill one (1) SPT boring to a depth of 10 feet bls within the proposed retention basin footprints c. Drill two (2) SPT borings to a depth of 5 feet bls within the proposed parking area d. Obtain two (2) undisturbed shelby tube samples (one horizontal and one vertical) of the near surface soils e. Install temporary piezometers at the SPT boring locations and obtain stabilized groundwater level readings Laboratory Services: a. Two (2) wash #200 sieve tests to determine silt/clay content of the soils b. Two (2) laboratory permeability tests (one horizontal and one vertical) Engineering Services: a. Utility clearance and staking boring locations b. Engineering Analysis and Geotechnical Report including estimates of the typical wet season groundwater levels at the boring locations, recommendations for site preparation procedures and foundation and pavement design parameters, and general comments concerning the anticipated infiltration characteristics of the retention basin subsoils If groundwater contamination is encountered and casing of boreholes to the top of any confinement layer is required, then it shall be at a rate of $35.00 per lineal foot COMPENSATION GLE will complete the above basic services for the following fees: Civil Engineering Services: Civil Engineering services as described above will be performed for the total lump sum fee for each Phase as indicated below. All permitting, application, and similar project fees will be paid directly by the Client. Mr. Todd Morley GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -rev June 5, 2013; Page 13 Task Cl Task C2 Task C3 Task C4 Task C5 Task C6 Task C7 Task C8 Task C9 — Due Diligence — Site Plan Development — 60% and 90% Civil Construction Drawings — Permitting — Road Closure Design —Landscape, Hardscape & Irrigation — Final Construction Drawings — Meetings and Public Involvement - Construction Phase Services Civil Engineering Sub Total $ 3,600.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 66,700.00 Architectural and Building Engineering Services: GLE will provide the A/E services described above for a lump sum fee of $177,000.00. is based on the conceptual drawings to date. Task A1.0 - Schematic Design Task A2.0 - Design Development Phase Task A3.0 - Construction Document Phase Task A4.0 — Bidding Task A5.0 — Construction Phase Architectural and Building Engineering Subtotal: Surveying Services: Subtotal: Geotechnical Engineering Services: Subtotal: Total Project Lump Sum Fee: $ 26,400.00 $ 35,200.00 $ 63,480.00 $ 5,280.00 $ 46,640.00 $177,000.00 $ 7,425.00 $ 3,850.00 $254,975.00 The fee GLE will provide electronic pdf files and three full size sets for review at the Schematic, Design Development and Construction Document Phases. In addition, GLE will provide 10 full size sets for Planning and Zoning review and six sets for permitting. Electronic files shall be provided and distributed for bidding purposes. AUTHORIZATION Should this proposal meet with your approval, please complete the attached Proposal Acceptance Sheet (PAS). The signed PAS and the current Model Form of Agreement between Owner and Design Professional will serve as Task Order #1 authorizing us to proceed. GLE appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal, and we look forward to working with you on this project. Should you have any questions concerning the proposal, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Mr. Todd Morley GLE Proposal No.: 13 -40474P -rev June 5, 2013; Page 14 GLE appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal, and we look forward to working with you on this exciting project. Should you have any questions concerning the proposal, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, GLE Associates, Inc. ifi•tet...A.. AltAr4..A.... Derek A. Weaver, RA, LEED AP Manager of Architectural Services DAW/CJG/dd Craig J. Gars et, AIA, LEED AP Director of Facilities and Construction Management Services F:\Work'Arch\13000\Cape Canaveral City HalhProject Infonnation\ProposalW0474P Cape Canaveral -revised 6.5.13.doc 0GLE Facilities and Environmental Consultants PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE SHEET Project Architectural / Engineering Services - Cape Canaveral City Hall Task Order No. 1 Cost See Proposal Proposal No./Date/PM 13-40474P-rev/June 5, 2013/DAW PAYMENT OF SERVICES Charge Invoice to: Firm Address Attention Title Telephone Fax REPORT DISTRIBUTION/CORRESPONDENCE Reports will be sent to: Firm Address Attention Title Telephone Fax SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS PROPERTY OWNER IDENTIFICATION Firm Address Attention Title Telephone Fax PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE The Terms and Conditions of this Proposal are: As indicated in our current Agreement between GLE Associates and the City of Cape Canaveral Accepted this day of Print or Type individual, firm or corporate body name Signature of authorized representative Print or type name or authorized representative and title Zip Code Zip Code Zip Code , 2013 GLE uses a multi -disciplinary annroach. Combining Architecture, Engineering & Environmental Consulting services. This saves clients time & money. GLEig ves back. We are an ■ active member in our communities. • GLE Architecture - Eneineerine - Environmental City of Cape Canaveral V Capabilities Statement 11.1111111111111111111 1-888-453-4531 - www.gleassociates.com CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL Table of Contents Section is Firm Overview Section 2: Project Experience Section 3: Key Personnel 1. Firm Overview GLE Associates, Inc. (GLE) specializes in pro- viding architectural and engineering, environ- mental, and construction consulting services to both private and public sectors. Our staff con- sists of nearly 70 multi -disciplined profession- als. We have worked on many complex issues for various property types. Since our inception in 1989, we have steadily grown. We provide innovative solutions in a timely and cost-effective manner. There is no better advertising than our work. Seventy percent of GLE's work has been earned from repeat business. GLE offers various services backed by a highly accredited staff. Choose GLE and enjoy a multi- disciplinary approach. Our clients value GLE's multi -disciplin- ary approach to projects for many rea- sons. When issues arise on projects, GLE's use of in-house professionals saves time and money, also your current contract is not affected, a second contract for the sub - consultant does not have to be created and lastly, many issues can be solved with a quick answer, GLE can provide you with that seamless response. Architecture: • Section 504/UFAS/ADA Compliance • Conceptual Design & Rendering Services • Programming • Space Nanning • Redevelopment/Revitalization Design • Site Planning • Modernization/Renovation • New Construction • Green Retrofit, LEED Consulting • Forensic A&E Engineering: • Mechanical Engineering • Electrical Engineering • Plumbing Engineering • Civil Engineering Construction Management • Physical Needs Assessments (PNAs) • Property Condition Assessments • Site Disposition Evaluations • Owner's Representative • Cost Estimating • Construction Contract Administration Environmental: • Asbestos Consulting & Abatement • Indoor Air Quality, Mold & Water Damage Investigations & Remediation • Lead Based Paint Inspections, Risk Assessments & Remediation • Environmental Site Assessments & Investigations • Contamination Assessments • Remediation Design • Turnkey Remediation and Construction • Operations & Maintenance 2. Project Experience St. Lucie County Architectural/ Engineering Consulting Services Under an ongoing AE services contract with St. Lucie County, GLE (Prime) worked on various projects. Although a general program often exists, GLE typically works with County officials refine the program, prepare CDs, and administer the contractor's construction activities. The estimated value of this contract is $4,500,000. St. Lucie County Health Department & Central Services: GLE was contacted to study the conversion of an existing Sam's Store purchased by the County for three different county departments' offices. The conversion consisted of approximately 46,000 SF of the 130,000 SF building. At the completion of the study, GLE was retained to develop complete construction documents, bidding, and contract administration. The feasibility study was important in determining whether or not the conversion was possible and allowed the city to allocate budgets early, before the project started, allowing for a seamless project. The modifications provided various offices, exam rooms and other miscellaneous spaces as needed to support the St. Lucie County Health Department. St. Lucie Parks and Recreation Equestrian Arena: GLE completed the design and engineering of a 3,400 SF restroom addition to their existing Equestrian Arena located at the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds. A well -conceived plan based on the philosophy of form following function, resulted in maximum efficiency in meeting the comfort needs of the arena patrons, as a 300 SF addition to the concession area was centered within the fairgrounds. Also included in the design and engineering scope of services was a free standing 2,200 SF office building. jimmimmis Utilizing a split plan concept and a sharing of common areas, GLE was able to meet the needs of both the staff of the Fair Association and St. Lucie County. The projects were designed and engineered concurrently and construction documents were delivered ahead of schedule. St. Lucie County Library System: GLE was the program and design Architect through construction documents and specifications for a 15,000 SF two-story new library building on an existing Elementary School site for St. Lucie County. The program was open to the public and used for after hours and special learning classes related to the Elementary curriculum and included an enclosed outdoor reading and story telling patio area. St. Lucie County Library System Additions: GLE worked on two new addition projects recently approved by the St. Lucie County Library System, the first is a 15,000 SF addition to the Morning Side Branch. This addition included a new public meeting area and additions to the library's research sections. The second was a 4,500 SF addition to the Zora Neale Hurston Branch. Client: St. Lucie County Contact Person: Jess Baxley, Project Manager Address: 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 349$2 Phone: 772-462-1259 E-mail: baxleyj@co.st-lucie.fl.us Contract Term: 2005-2011 Role: Prime Architect & Engineer 2. Project Experience ®II Zora Neale Library • F E%t c u 1 ax.1 i :nrar"n. •r, tit* ;Pr Tyr 7 hilt 411110 ryr loor • 2. Project Experience Hillsborough County Architectural/Engineering Continuing Services Contract GLE (Prime) served as one of Hillsborough County's term contract architect/engineers. Projects have included: Emergency Operations Center: GLE provided AE services for a complete interior renovations to the EOC. Prior to design, the County determined that several of the existing spaces in the EOC were functionally obsolete with respect to the requirements of the current work force and therefore required upgrade. In addition, the existing building suffered from poor indoor air quality (IAQ) due to high humidity. Renovations in the existing building included demolition of existing spaces, construction of new walls, ceilings, doors, floors, etc., replacement of plumbing fixtures, modifications to HVAC to include a fresh air unit to pre -treat the outside air, and modification and upgrade of electrical power and lighting systems and a new chiller design. Glover School: GLE provided renovations to Glover School, a building under the Historic Preservation Act (built in 1932), including new plumbing, electrical and HVAC systems installation. The original Glover School classroom building was built in 1932. Fire Stations & Transportation & Maintenance Divisions: GLE completed Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Engineering services for over 3o Hillsborough County Fire Station Generator upgrades, including new generator electrical back-up equipment installation. The 3o installations are currently under construction and GLE is managing the construction administration activities including cost review, responses to contractor questions, shop drawing review and field inspections. GLE is also completed a renovation for the Transportation Maintenance Division, including an upgrade of existing restrooms at the central and west service units. Mosquito and Aquatic Weed Control Facility and Maintenance Warehouse: GLE completed the AE design of a new Hillsborough County Mosquito and Aquatic Weed Control Administration Building and Maintenance Warehouse. The facility includes a 4,50o SF administrative office building with an adjacent 1,50o SF warehouse/storage pre- engineered metal with a vehicle maintenance bay. The vehicle maintenance bay includes 22 feet high walls, roll -up doors, a lube oil area with hazardous waste piping, collection and storage, exhaust fans, a four post vehicle lift, and increased space for tractor/trailer deliveries and mosquito control vehicle parking. Subsequent to the completion of the construction documents, the County reviewed a previous architect's design and decided to have the project redesigned by GLE, based on our past performance and track record with Hillsborough County; and our ability to design the facility in a more efficient and economical manner, that would also more easily accommodate future expansion. Client: Hillsborough County Address: 601 East Kennedy Blvd, 2lst Floor Tampa, FL 33602 Contact Person: Craig C. Clements, Senior Architect Phone: 813-307-1032 E-mail: clementsc@hillsboroughcounty.org Contract Term: 2007-2010 Role: Prime Architect & Engineer 2. Project Experience Mosquito Buildrig 'tailikell—ilmeite. I e &eel I.& 111$1.11,1.• • PZ ••• Uri ...IIrr- -mi 1 1 201c or: 2. Project Experience Pinellas Coun Architectural/Engineering Services Term Contract GLE has held an architectural/engineering contract (Prime) with Pinellas County since 2000. GLE has provided programming, design, construction, furniture design, signage and graphics services. We have also completed additions and renovations throughout numerous projects for Pinellas County. One large project was the renovation of the 501 Building. This landmark to -story downtown office building into the new headquarters for 10 departments of Pinellas County Government was accomplished, in six months. Approximately 90,000 square feet of space was involved in the overall renovation. In most cases, the floors of the building were demolished down to the bare structure and reconstructed to meet the specific needs of each department and bring the building into code compliance. Security issues were of prime importance in the design and placement of various Departments. Multiple Courtrooms were also a part of the project scope, as were Judges' Chambers, Interview Rooms and Detention Rooms. Selection of floors for specific Departments was chosen based upon the need for that specific Department's interaction with the public. GLE also designed the addition and renovations to Pinellas County's Logan Laboratory. This laboratory is responsible for ensuring water quality of all Pinellas County residents. GLE developed a radiused design solution, sympathetic to the adjacent structures of this building which is located among a water tank farm. Other projects recently undertaken for Pinellas County by GLE are the Sheriff's Department Canine Training building and Oakhurst Pump Station Park. Client: Pinellas County Address: 14 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Contact Person: Frank Marin, Facilities Management Phone: 727-464-4346 E-mail: fmarin@co.pinellas.fl.us Contract Term: 2000 -Ongoing Role: Prime Architect & Engineer 2. Project Experience MacDill Air Force Base Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Working with Design -Build Partner Danner Construction, GLE has been awarded several projects under the Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) at MacDill Air Force Base, in Tampa, FL. GLE has the unique opportunity to offer all of these design services in-house. Projects include: Building 53 - Design -Build Renovation: GLE provided design services for the renovation of Building 53 and demolition of Buildings 2020 and 258. Demolition: The two buildings that were demolished required all utilities to be capped. They also required new exterior grading and sod to finish the site. Renovation: The scope of work for building 53 involved a complete interior and exterior renovation. The interior renovations included: • New offices • Auditorium with fixed seating and raised speaker area • Classrooms • Instructors offices • Computer lab • Heritage Room • Lounge • Required support spaces MEP Desion: The MEP design included a new 70 ton chilled water VAV air conditioning system. GLE also put in new occupancy sensor switches in order to increase energy efficiency and comply with the energy code. Marcent Building - Design -Build Renovation: GLE provided A/E design services for the Marcent Building. Renovations included the command deck, hallways, vending area, male latrine and the construction of security and manager's offices. Basewide Roof Repair - Design -Build: GLE is providing design services for nine buildings at MacDill Air Force Base. Three of these buildings are barrel vault hangar roofs. The project will consist of replacing various types of roofing material from modified bitumen to single ply. Building 238 Dormitory Repair Design - Build Renovation: GLE is providing design services for the renovation of a Dormitory. The scope of work includes: • Construction documents to provide new finishes throughout • Repairs to the existing exterior stairs and handrails to comply with the Life Safety Code New "roof over system" to create a pitched roof over the existing flat roof Client: Danner Construction Address: 6040 W. Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, FL 33625 Contact Person: Dick Danner, President Phone: 813-969-2343 E-mail: rgdanner@dannerconstruction.com Contract Term: 2010 -Ongoing Role: Prime Architect & Engineer 2. Project Experience 1 111111,11 J 1(11 1 111 2. Project Experience Winter Haven Housing Authority Community Center and Office Space Rehabilitation GLE was selected by the Winter Haven Housing Authority to complete their Lake Deer Community Center Rehabilitation (Building Renovation). GLE's proposed design for the Lake Deer Community Center transitions a vacant vandalized building into an aesthetically pleasing and functional community center and office space. The renovation involved creating a reception area to control entry into the facility, open office spaces and two executive office suites. The other existing spaces, such as the community center, storage rooms, kitchen and restrooms, were upgraded to meet accessibility requirements, as well as the building occupant's needs. The interior remodel included the installation of new lighting fixtures with controls as a sustainable feature to allow the user to control the amount of artificial light required. The HVAC system was also be upgraded to allow for a better Indoor Air Quality. The restrooms required new plumbing fixtures and were redesigned to meet ADA requirements. The kitchen was also upgraded to meet ADA requirements and features Energy Star appliances as a sustainable feature. The exterior renovation consisted of rehabilitating the existing skylights to allow for natural light to flow into the space. This will give the user better lighting and create a more airy sense of space. The existing rotted T1-11 was removed and replaced with new exterior sheathing and stucco to give the building an up to date appearance. 1 The design also features a brick wainscot around the perimeter of the building to aesthetically tie the structure together. Upon inspection of the building it was clear that the existing exterior storage needed to be demolished and rebuilt. GLE's design reconstructed the exterior storage to match the aesthetic of the existing building by installing a pitched roof and finishes to match the rest of the building. There were also exterior doors that are not required as a means of egress, so GLE removed them as a security measure and installed windows in their place. A key feature of the design was creating a main entry to the building; this is done by installing a modern entry and walkway canopy to the existing and new columns. Besides giving visitors a clear visible entry, these canopies now provide shaded seating areas and protection from the weather upon entering the facility. A new monumental sign also designates this building as being occupied by the Winter Haven Housing Authority. Construction cost was $269,000. Client: Winter Haven Housing Authority Contact Person: Lisa Landers, Executive Director Address: 2670 Avenue "C" S.W, Winter Haven, FL 33880 Phone: 863.294.7369 ext.107 E-mail: llanders@tampabay.rr.com tampabay.rr.com Contract Term: 2010 Role: Prime Architect & Engineer 2. Project Experience Before Winter Haven Housing Authority After 2. Project Experience City of Casselberry Architectural/Engineering Term Contract Senior Center Renovation: GLE served as the architectural consultant for the renovation of the Senior Center, completed in March of 2008, the $450,000 project included ADA upgrades, restroom improvements, handicap ramp, rails and parking upgrades, electric entrance doors, new fans, interior dry wall repair and insulation, a new 20 - ton air conditioning system, front entryway drainage improvements and floor and window replacement. Issues GLE encountered during the renovation included water damage to areas of the building envelope and air conditioning unit, due to planters that were built too close to the wall during the original construction. GLE's engineers worked to renovate the HVAC system while GLE's architectural team decided to remove the planters, giving the building a refreshing new look. GLE added landscaping and new functions to the building, including a Porte Conchere. Fire Station No. 25: GLE provided water damage repair consulting and the design and specifications for the upgrade of the mechanical system at Fire Station No. 25. Ballroom and Meeting Facilities: GLE provided a cost analysis for the City of Casselberry for a new 10,000 square foot Ballroom and Meeting Facilities for the community. GLE added valuable insight into this development, including the need for parking once the Ballroom was built. The City of Casselberry is in the process of purchasing an adjacent acre to fill the need for parking, GLE performed a feasibility study to determine what type of structure and occupancy will be needed. GLE also pointed out that the determined location of the ballroom, to be built on a beautiful lake, would be hidden by a police station. The City of Casselberry is currently waiting for funding to move on with the proposed project in which GLE will be the A/E consultant. Police Station: GLE completed a Property Condition Assessment of the existing site. Client: City of Casselberry Contact Person: Kristen Chamberlain, Special Projects Coordinator Address: 95 Triplet Lake Drive, Casselberry, FL 32707 Phone: 772-462-1259 E-mail: kchamberlain@casselberry.org casselberry.org Contract Term: 2007-2009 Role: Prime Architect & Engineer Derek A. Weaver, RA, NACRB, LEED AP Manager of Architectural Services AMINIMINEL Introduction Mr. Weaver has more than eleven years of experience in design, project management and construction documents. As Manager of Architectural Services at GLE, Mr. Weaver contributes to project delivery, project planning, design development, contract documents, bidding and construction administration services. He has provided these services on several educational projects, including major projects for both the Pinellas and Manatee County School Districts, as well as for GLE's ongoing term contracts with the School Board of Broward County, DeSoto County School District, and Hillsborough, Pinellas, and St. Lucie Counties. In addition, he has provided design services on major renovation and Section 504/ADA compliance projects for various public housing authorities throughout the state of Florida, including the Clearwater, Crestview, Pasco County, Pinellas County, Winter Haven, Ft. Myers and Union County Housing Authorities. Mr. Weaver is also currently providing design phase services for multiple projects for the Ft. Pierce Housing Authority. Projects include a new 12,000 Sq. Ft. Community Center, Kitchen renovations, HVAC installation and new basketball courts with a pre -manufactured metal structure canopy for the Garden Terrace and the Garden Terrace Annex Apartments. Additional work includes various renovations at multiple apartment communities, which includes new monumental signage, stucco applications, site lighting, mailbox kiosks, playground equipment and HVAC installations. Additionally, Mr. Weaver is currently providing project management and design services for GLE's Design -Build partnership with Danner Construction Company for a Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) at MacDill Air Force Base. Project Experience Hillsborough County: Mr. Weaver served as project manager for this Architectural/Engineering term contract with Hillsborough County. Projects included a water intrusion assessment of the Museum of Science and Industry (MOSI). This included designing water resistant construction joints for the IMAX and Omni Phase facilities. Mr. Weaver also managed the renovation and design of a 5,000 SF addition to the Hillsborough County Emergency Operations Center as well as serving as the Project Architect for the county's new Mosquito and Aquatic Weed Control Facility replacement project and the Glover School historic renovation project. Education • Bachelor of Science, Kent State University, 2001 • Bachelor of Architecture, Kent State University, 2004 Registrations • Licensed Professional Architect, FL/AR 94673 • Licensed Professional Architect, MS /4706 • Licensed Professional Architect, GA /RA013158 • NCARB Certification • LEED Accredited Professional Derek A. Weaver, RA, NACRB, LEED AP Manager of Architectural Services MacDill Air Force Base Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC): Mr. Weaver serves as the project manager for this design -build contract at MacDill Air Force Base and provides design proposals, construction documents and construction administration services for multiple projects in partnership with Danner Construction Company. MacDill Air Force Base: GLE was selected in 2009 to provide all the architectural, mechanical, electrical and civil design services for the Rehabilitation of Dorm Room No. 375 at MacDill Air Force Base. Mr. Weaver served as the project manager and architect for this project. He completed all programming, design and construction document services. Specific elements Mr. Weaver designed include the renovation of the dorm rooms, the second and third floor lounge areas and a complete exterior remodel, which included the integration of a pitched truss roof installed over an existing flat roof. This fast track $3,5oo,00o project required all drawings to be due 73 calendar days from the start of project. GLE met this deadline. Building 53 Renovation at MacDill Air Force Base: GLE provided Architectural, Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing design services for the Building 53 renovations and demolition of building 2020 and building 258 at MacDill Air Force Base. Mr. Weaver provided project management and served as the architect of record. The two buildings demolished required all utilities to be capped and new exterior grading and sod to finish the site. The scope of work for Building 53 involved a complete interior and exterior renovation. The interior renovation included new offices, auditorium with fixed seating and raised speaker area, Classrooms, Instructors offices, Computer lab, Heritage Room, Lounge, and required support spaces. The exterior received new windows, doors and stucco finish, as well as a new pitched roof truss system installed over an existing flat roof. The new roof design received a new standing seam metal roof panel finish. The MEP design incorporated the architectural design, but also included a new 70 ton chilled water VAV air conditioning system. The system has three air handlers with variable frequency drives, 5o VAV's with reheat coils, associated chilled water pumps, air separators, suction diffusers, etc. for a complete system. The electrical design included new interior and exterior lighting, mass notification system, lightning protection as well as power and panel upgrades. Additionally, GLE put in new occupancy sensor switches in order to increase energy efficiency and comply with the energy code. Continuing Education • 501 Carpet for Educational Facilities • Acoustic Ceilings: For the Eye, the Ear and Mind • BURSI Update • Designing Commercial Projects with MVM • Engineered Sports Floors • Expansion Joint Covers • Florida Building Code Administrative Core • Florida Energy Code — Commercial Buildings • Project Manager to Principle is Foundations of Management • Home Technology within the Design/Build Process • Introduction to Metal Building Systems • Is it Really Green? • LEED Looks at Lighting • Ram Jack Foundation Solutions Design & Analysis Workshop • Roofing Materials -Flexible Membranes • Severe Storm AIA • Silicate Coatings • Sustainable Design Low Emitting Paints and Coasting AIAoo2 • Sustainable Construction: Polyiso Wall Insulation for Masonry Walls • Understanding Quartz Surfacing • Understanding the Critical Elements of Air and Vapor Barriers • Johns Mansville Roofing • 2007 Florida Energy Code • Architect and Engineer Design Coordination Derek A. Weaver, RA, NACRB, LEED AP Manager of Architectural Services Sarasota Housing Authority —MLK Mediterranean Townhome project: Mr. Weaver is currently working on the design and construction documents for 28 new apartment homes for the Sarasota Housing Authority. The existing 66 units will be demolished and the site will be redesigned so that the units face MLK Jr. Way and Maple St., with parking, retention and a play area located behind the units. The site plan was designed to minimize blind spots for security and safety purposes. Other safety design elements include proper site and building lighting, the use of landscape buffers and a 4'-o high decorative fence along MLK Jr. Way and a 6'-o high decorative fence along the side and rear property lines. Utilizing the tree report provided, GLE was able to keep all the trees categorized in good condition. The unit types will include 5 three bedroom two story units, 13 two bedroom two story units, 2 three bedroom one story ADA units and 8 one bedroom one story units. The design resembles a row house/brownstone appearance with raised stoops and front porches. The exterior finishes consist of various cultured stone veneers and stucco. The design also consists of many elements to achieve a high level of energy efficiency and sustainability. To list a few, a high design R -value has been implemented, Energy star appliances, low -e glazing, recycled materials and light colored roof material to reduce heat gain. Sarasota Housing Authority —Tuttle apartments: Mr. Weaver is currently working on the design and construction documents for the renovation of 15 apartment units for the Sarasota Housing Authority. A feasibility study was completed by GLE to determine the construction cost of demolishing the structures and reconstructing versus renovating. GLE and the client determined it was more cost effective to renovate the existing structures. The site consists of three buildings with five two bedroom units each. One unit will be renovated to meet the section 504 ADA compliance. All units will remain two bedroom but they will be redesigned to allow for an open floor plan. Site elements will include providing an ADA parking stall, the existing parking will be resurfaced and new sidewalks will be provided. Stennis Space Center, MS — Roof Replacement: Mr. Weaver serves as the Architect of Record for this design -build contract at the Stennis Space Center in Mississippi. Mr. Weaver provides design proposals, construction documents and construction administration services for 200,000 square feet of various roof system replacements in partnership with Sauer Incorporated. Ft. Myers Housing Authority -Broadway Apartments: Mr. Weaver served as the Architect of Record for the design and construction of two 20 -unit buildings that underwent a complete renovation and modernization. This LEED for Homes project incorporated high performance windows, enhanced insulation, highly efficient HVAC units and ultra low consumption plumbing fixtures. The showcase of the design is the photo -voltaic (PV) system on the building roof for solar domestic hot water heaters. Additional design components include section 504 accessibility complaint units, enlarged kitchens in the one bedroom units, interior and exterior finishes throughout and roof replacement with a standing seam metal roof. The renovations also included the modification of parking ingress/egress and construction of additional parking areas as required to providing code compliant parking. Pinellas County: GLE has held an Architectural/Environmental contract with Pinellas County since 2000. GLE has provided programming, design, construction documents and construction administration services, including phasing plans to keep the County facilities operational during construction. Mr. Weaver serves as Project Manager and Architect on the renovation of the Pinellas County Landfill scale -houses, as well as the Oakhurst pump station renovation and park design, which is now known as "The Greens at Seminole." Client Success Since 1989. Derek Weaver, RA, NCARB, LEED AP Manager of Architectural Services Ammoomm- The Housing Authority of the City of Ft. Pierce: The Housing Authority of the City of Ft. Pierce (HACFP) selected GLE to design a new Management Center titled "The Williams Center" to serve the Garden Terrace Apartment Community. GLE has recently released the bid documents for this project. Mr. Weaver, as the architect of record, provided project management and design services for this new 12,000 sq. ft., one story facility. The Williams Center will include the following offices and organizations: The HACFP Garden Terrace Management Office, Ft. Pierce Police Sub Station, Boys & Girls Club and The Young Ladies First. Additionally, each of the programmatic spaces will function around an oval community space for the local residents to share during special events and gatherings. The overall site design included the addition of a retention pond, landscaped areas and additional parking to serve both the Williams Center and the adjacent ALPI Head Start facility. Winter Haven Housing Authority: GLE was selected by the Winter Haven Housing Authority to complete their Lake Deer Community Center Rehabilitation (Renovation). Mr. Weaver provided design solutions for the interior and exterior renovations that were functional and within budget. The end result is an aesthetically pleasing and functional office space for the Winter Haven Housing Authority. Mr. Weaver provided quality control and coordination efforts between disciplines to deliver accurate bid documents to the client. DeSoto County School District: In 2008, GLE won a continuing services contract with the DeSoto County School District. Mr. Weaver developed the proposed design for the winning presentation based on the school district's program requirements, while integrating design features such as clerestory windows at interior classrooms, sun shades at exterior windows, vision panels between labs and classrooms and proposed an exterior courtyard for the art and carpentry labs. Miami Dade County General Services Administration (GSA): GLE provided consulting services to calculate a solution to eliminate the water intrusion problems in the building envelope of the Miami Beach Regional Library and to repair existing stucco cracks on the exterior walls of the building. Mr. Weaver served as project manager and provided services that included review of existing drawings, visual evaluation of the building, recommendations for repairs, production of construction documents, cost estimates and participated in bidding and construction administration. Verizon Wireless: Mr. Weaver worked with Verizon Wireless for eight years as a project manager. He provided `Tenant Build -Out' design, code research, and construction document services for hundreds of Verizon Wireless retail locations throughout Florida. Client Success Since 1989. Craig Gardei, AIA, LEED AP Director of Facilities & Construction Manavem en t Services Introduction Mr. Gardei has been involved in all aspects of the operation of architectural/construction consulting firms since 1982. His experience includes the inspection and evaluation of existing real estate portfolios for both public and private sector clients throughout the United States. In addition he has extensive experience in providing forensic architectural services, roof consulting services, as well as construction oversight and management services for large-scale projects as well as multi -building construction programs. As Director of Facilities and Construction Management Services for GLE, Mr. Gardei manages GLE's construction consulting and inspection services operations. In this capacity he is responsible for overseeing each project manager's budget, scheduling and project compliance. In addition to his overall operational responsibilities, Mr. Gardei serves as the client manager for several of GLE's multi -facility clients, including several national lending institutions, national insurance companies, numerous developers and public sector entities including the Hillsborough County School District, St. Petersburg Housing Authority, Pompano Breach Housing Authority and Hillsborough County Municipal Government. Project Experience • More than 10o Property Condition Assessments for numerous clients nationwide • More than 50 forensic architectural investigations • Plan and cost review/inspection services for 15 major lending institutions (more than 225 projects) ranging from $200,000 to $15,000,000 • More than 75 Cause and Origin investigations for national insurance companies and over 4o for Citizens Property Insurance Corporation • Project Principal for HUD's Green Physical Needs Assessment Beta Test Program • More than 4o campus -wide building envelope evaluations and remediation design for public school districts • Numerous ADA, handicap accessibility compliance surveys HUD compliant Physical Needs Assessments for more than 3o public housing communities • Code compliance plan review and inspection services for numerous public and private sector clients • Construction monitoring and management for numerous construction projects up to $45 million in construction cost Education • B.D., University of Florida, 1981 Registrations / Certifications • Professional Architect/AZ2ol2o • LEED Accredited Professional — 2009 • FHA Approved Building Inspector • NIOSH 582: Sampling & Evaluating Airborne Asbestos Dust • RMD's LPA -1 Lead Paint Inspection System (XRF) Continuing Education • Understanding the Critical Elements of Air and Vapor — W.E. Grace & Company • AIA Florida ADA Compliance Training Program • NCIAQ, Healthy Buildings Investigation Training Program • Building Systems Inspector, TER, Inc. • Designing Commercial Projects with MVM Affiliations • American Institute of Architects (Florida Central Chapter) • Florida Gulfcoast Commercial Association of Realtors • Real Estate Investment Council Craig Gardei, AIA, LEED AP Director of Facilities & Construction Manaeement Services • Project director for hurricane hardening programs for 34 Hillsborough County Fire Stations • Project director for campus -wide ADA surveys for the University of South Florida (67 buildings total) • Hurricane hardening study and roof consulting services for the Tampa Bay Performing Arts Center Client Success Since 1989. Richard A. Calise Project Designer Introduction Mr. Calise has more than ten years of experience in the design, development of construction documents and project management on multi -family projects. Mr. Calise contributes to project planning, design development, contract documents, bidding and construction administration services. He has provided these services on several public housing projects. In addition, he has provided design services on building renovations and Section 504/ADA compliance projects for various public housing authorities throughout the state of Florida, including Brooksville, Crestview, Union County and Sarasota Housing Authorities. Mr. Calise also handles the day to day operations of the Orlando office and business development. He is cross trained in building sciences to offer expanded service lines to his existing client base. His background in architecture coupled with environmental acumen makes him a tremendous asset to any project. Project Experience Sarasota Housing Authority: In 2012, GLE was selected to create a renovation plan for three 5 -unit buildings for the Sarasota Housing Authority. The buildings are undergoing a complete renovation and modernization. This project will incorporate high performance windows, enhanced insulation, highly efficient HVAC units and ultra low consumption plumbing fixtures. Included in this renovation is the incorporation of a Section 5o4/ADA unit and accessible parking. The project will also receive exterior changes to update and enhance the appearance of the buildings. Gainesville Housing Authority (GA): In 2011, GLE was selected to provide Physical Needs Assessments and Viability Assessments for the Atlanta Street Apartments (8o units)and Green Hunter Homes (51 units). Based on the findings from these assessments, GLE is preparing a Master Plan and providing additional consulting services for the redevelopment of the property. Mr. Calise is assisting in identifying the accessible conditions in the site plan and assisting in the development of the accessible units and common areas. Haines City Fire and Rescue Station #2: In 2008, GLE was selected for an architectural continuing services contract with the City of Haines City. Under this contract, our first task was to design a proto- type fire station that could expand as the city grows. Mr. Calise is serving as the project manager for the new 9,500 SF Fire Station. He has been working closely with the Fire Chief to meet all the firefighter needs now and for the future. Education • BA, Architecture, 2002 Florida Atlantic University Slalls / Abilities • Revit 2012 • Autocad 2012 • SketchUp • Adobe Photoshop Certifications • Asbestos Inspector Richard A. Calise Project Designer .mom City of Casselberry: Mr. Calise provided construction administration services for water damage repair consulting services and the design and specifications for an upgrade of the mechanical system at Fire Station No. 25 in Casselberry, Florida. Housing Authority of the City of Ft. Myers: In 2010, GLE was hired to provide AE renovations to the City of Ft. Myers Housing Authority's Broadway Apartments. Mr. Calise served as the Project Manager and was responsible for the production of the documents. These two 20 -unit buildings are undergoing a complete renovation and modernization. This LEED for Homes project will incorporate high performance windows, enhanced insulation, highly efficient HVAC units and ultra low consumption plumbing fixtures. Mr. Calise is currently assisting with the construction administration on this project. Ft. Pierce Housing Authority: In 2010 GLE was hired to provide AE renovations and site improvements for the Ft. Pierce Housing Authority's Lawnwood Terrace Apartments. Mr. Calise served as the project manager and was responsible for the production of the documents. The forty two 2 -unit buildings were modernized with the addition of HVAC systems. Site improvements consisted of repaving the parking areas around the community center, the renovation of the shuffle board courts with a covered canopy and centralized gazebo. This project was on budget and delivered ahead of schedule. New Smyrna Beach Housing Authority: Mr. Calise served as GLE's Project Manager for window replacements at 8o units for the New Smyrna Beach Housing Authority. GLE was tasked with meeting the deadline for the allotment of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funding. In less than three weeks, GLE was able to produce drawings, review bids and select the contractor to meet the strict funding deadline. DeSoto County School District: Mr. Calise served as the Project Manager for a 22,000 SF renovation and conversion of the DeSoto County High School in Arcadia, Florida. GLE utilized unused space within the existing building to create an additional eight classrooms and relocate the current Arts and Industrial classrooms and laboratories. St. Lucie County — Zora Neale Hurston Branch Library Expansion: Mr. Calise served as the Project Manager for a 4,500 SF expansion to the Zora Neal Hurston Branch Library in Ft. Pierce, Florida. The architectural style of this addition was designed to match the existing building's texture and style and will complete the original library design, which was broken into two phases. GLE designed the library in such a way that existing staff could be accessible, operating from key central areas, ensuring that no additional staff would have to be hired to manage the new addition. Mr Calise is currently performing the construction administration on this project. Walt Disney World / Facilities Asset Management: In 2011, GLE was selected by Disney to design a new roofing system using synthetic roof shingles to replace the aged wood shingles on a building within the park. The existing wood shingles and sub assembly were removed down to the decking. Working within the original roof details, a new sub deck had to be designed to replace the thickness of the sub assembly. This required the redesign of the mounting plates for the roof mounted elements to meet current wind loads. Mr. Calise was the designer and project manager on this 1,600 sq. ft. roof replacement project. St. Lucie County — Parks and Recreation Equestrian Arena: Mr. Calise provided final construction administration services for GLE's design and engineering of a 3,400 SF restroom addition to an existing Equestrian Arena located at the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds. A well conceived plan based on the philosophy of form following function, resulted in maximum efficiency in meeting the comfort needs of the arena patrons, as a 300 SF addition to the concession area was centered within the fairgrounds. Also included in the design and engineering scope of services was a free standing 2,200 SF office building. Utilizing a split plan concept and a sharing of common areas, GLE was able to meet the needs of both the staff of the Fair Association and St Lucie County. The projects were designed and engineered concurrently and construction documents were delivered ahead of schedule. GLE was also responsible for the coordination of the bidding phase services for both projects, as well as the construction administration services performed by Mr. Calise. Client Success Since 1989. Harold K. Ward, III, RA Project Manager MIL Introduction Mr. Ward has more than sixteen years of experience in design, project management and construction documents in a wide variety of project types, and project delivery methods. As a Project Manager, Mr. Ward contributes to code research, project development, consultant coordination, and document orientation. He has provided these services on several projects at GLE. Project Experience The Housing Authority of the City of Ft. Pierce — The Williams Center: The Housing Authority of the City of Ft. Pierce (HACFP) selected GLE to design a new Management Center titled "The Williams Center" to serve the Garden Terrace Apartment Community. The new facility is a 12,104 square foot, one story structure. The Williams Center will include the following offices and organizations: The HACFP Garden Terrace Management Office, Ft. Pierce Police Sub Station, Boys & Girls Club and The Young Ladies First. Additionally, each of the programmatic spaces will function around an oval community space for the local residents to share during special events and gatherings. The overall site design includes the addition of a retention pond, landscaped areas and additional parking to serve both the Williams Center and the adjacent ALPI Head Start facility. Pinellas County Schools, Largo High School— Roof Replacement: GLE was contracted as the designer to replace the roof on the building to meet a 150 m.p.h. wind gust. Mr. Ward served as project architect. Hillsborough County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) — Roof Replacement: GLE was contracted as the designer to replace the roof on the building to meet a 175 m.p.h. wind gust. Mr. Ward served as project architect. Housing Authority of the City of Pompano Beach -Ben Turner Ridge Apartments Redevelopment: Mr. Ward worked as project manager on the redevelopment of an existing site where fire damaged the structures. Two separate single story buildings with five units each were designed for the site. Florida Army National Guard Snake Creek Training Site: Two Metal Buildings were designed for the project to be used for training purposes. Mr. Ward served as project architect. Education • Minor in Electronic Design, Savannah College of Art and Design, 1996 • 5 year Master of Architecture, Savannah College of Art and Design, 1996 Registrations • Licensed Professional Architect, FL/AR 92903 Continuing Education • ADA Guidelines 2012: Building Blocks • Building for Senior Living: Continuing Care & Active Adult Communities • Business Communications: Effective Professional Presentations • Cost Estimating: Fundamentals • Designing Commercial Projects with MVM • Engineered Sports Floors • Introduction to Metal Building Systems Harold K. Ward, III, RA Project Manager 1 Sarasota Housing Authority — Mediterranean Apartments Redevelopment: Mr. Ward worked as project manager on the redevelopment of an existing 66 unit apartment community. The intention is to raze the current structures to redevelop the property, resulting in a lower density affordable residential community. The overall new site plan and design calls for 28 new townhome style units, play area and parking among other site requirements. This high profile project consists of four basic unit types; one, two and three bedroom units incorporated with accessible units to meet the various needs of families. The use of `Green Friendly' design features and Fair Housing Act guidelines are being incorporated. Mr. Ward's contributions include code research, project development and coordination. MacDill Air Force Base Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC): Mr. Ward has been involved in various projects awarded to GLE under a MACC contract held by Design -Build teaming partner Danner Construction. Projects include various building renovations that involve interior and exterior r renovations including new roofing design, energy efficiency controls, ADA ramps and new finishes. Mr. Ward is providing project management support, ensuring code compliance, project development and schedule adherence. Professional Experience STH Architectural Group, A Leo A Daly Company: In 2009, Mr. Ward was a Project Manager working directly with the managing principal. His responsibilities included code research, construction documents, consultant coordination, project development, and document coordination. He was involved in various religious and mercantile projects including new construction and renovation work on the First Baptist Church of Orlando. HKS Architects: Mr. Ward served as a Project Architect in 2007 and was responsible for team workload allocation, site meetings, consultant coordination, project development, and document coordination for the Palazzo Retail/Condominium Tower (5o -story mixed-use) in Las Vegas, NV. Client Success Since 1989. Michael V. Presti, LEED AP Project Designer Amok AidiwodhodElmai- Introduction Mr. Presti has more than seven years of professional architectural experience in a variety of projects ranging from institutional to residential projects. At GLE, Mr. Presti is responsible for all aspects of project management, ensuring that all architectural projects are designed within budget and on schedule and ultimately turning his client's "ideas into a reality." Mr. Presti has been a key team member on many GLE projects, including the library expansions for St. Lucie County, renovations to various buildings at MacDill Air Force Base, and new building complexes for Hillsborough County. In addition to these larger projects, Mr. Presti works on many of the Architectural/Engineering continuing services contracts for GLE's public sector clients, including various counties, municipals, public housing authorities and school boards, which have included ADA/Life Safety and modernization upgrades. Project Experience Hillsborough County: Mr. Presti served as Project Designer for this Architectural/Engineering term contract GLE held from 2007-2010 worth over $2,000,000. Under this contract, Mr. Presti provided design services for the renovation and 5,000 SF addition to the Hillsborough County Emergency Operations Center. Mr. Presti also served as the Project Manager for the Hillsborough County Mosquito and Aquatic Weed Control Facility. He was involved in the design, documenting, and construction administration of the $1,400,000 project which consisted of a 5,000 SF administrative and support facility and a 3,500 SF warehouse storage building. Pinellas County: Mr. Presti provides design and documenting services for numerous Pinellas County projects under an Architectural/ Engineering term contact GLE has held since 2000. Projects have included the renovation and upgrade of county scale -house buildings at the Pinellas county utilities waste collection center and upgrading the Pinellas County Housing Authority offices. St. Lucie County: GLE was contacted in 2008 to design an expansion of two branch libraries for St. Lucie County. Mr. Presti was the lead designer and Project Manager for the Morningside Library expansion project, which consisted of a 15,000 SF+ addition and partial reconfiguration and upgrade of approximately 13,000 SF of the existing library. The design of the addition and renovation took careful consideration, as the County required GLE to maintain the integrity of the original design, while increasing the functional needs of the end users. Education • A.A.S Architecture, Northampton Community College, 2000 • Bachelor of Architecture, Temple University, Tyler School of Art, 2004 Certifications • LEED Accredited Professional — 2009 Affiliations • Associate Member of American Institute of Architect, Tampa Bay Chapter • Member of Emerging Tampa Bay Architects Continuing Education • Engineered Sports Floors • Understanding the Critical Elements of Air and Vapor Intrusion Michael V. Presti, LEED AP Project Designer MIL 411111110NEft MIK MacDill Air Force Base Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC): GLE has partnered with several construction firms under a design -build agreement for various projects at MacDill Air Force Base. Mr. Presti has been the Project Manager for most of the projects under this contract. A recent project includes a $1.4 million renovation of building 89 for JCSE who specializes in coordinating communication of operations around the world. Their use of high level electronics required the design to incorporate raised anti -static access flooring and sound rated secure walls. It also required high levels of HVAC work to accommodate the electronics and a redundancy system to keep the communication center operational 24/7. The project also addressed accessibility by constructing a new entry ramp and reconfiguring the bathrooms. Another recent project was the $2.8 million renovation and reconfiguration of the 20,000 SF Building 53 for the Airmen Leadership School. The exterior was also renovated with new windows, doors, and stucco finish. The existing flat roof was retrofitted with an insulated pitched roof. The installation of a new 70 ton chilled water air conditioning system with almost 50 variable air volume controls with reheat coils helped increase the energy efficiency of this building. Other recent projects include the accessibility improvements at the Wounded Warrior Marina, a reconfigure and renovation of 3o restrooms in multiple hangers and an interior finish renovation and pitch roof installation to dormitory building 238 at Avon Park Air Force base. Other past projects under this agreement include, replacing the exterior overhead doors of Building 1051, an exterior facade repair for Building 1058, upgrading interior finishes for MARCENT, and the interior renovations of Building 56, which include modifications for a secure room and reconfiguration of work spaces. Stennis Space Center, MS — Roof Replacement: GLE was contracted as the designer to replace/repair roofs on eight buildings at the Mississippi Army Ammunitions Plant at the Stennis Space Center. Under the master design/build contract, this roofing contract 1711 was one of the 16 various projects occurring at the Space Center which included various disciplines, infrastructure and utilities work. The roofing aspect consisted of replacing built up roofing with 3 layer modified bitumen system and retrofitting standing seam metal roofing over existing metal roofs. MacDill Air Force Base, Dorm No. 375: Mr. Presti served as Project Manager for the Rehabilitation of Dorm No. 375 at MacDill Air Force Base. As Project Manager, he led the redesign of the existing building, which included a base standard pitched roof and an upgrade of the common lounge areas used by the tenants. Each dorm room was reconfigured and upgraded to serve the individual tenant's modern needs. All finishes were also upgraded and many existing structural and aesthetic issues were repaired. The project was delivered on time to Chugach Management Services, Inc., and MacDill Air Force including all consulting work from mechanical, electrical, plumbing, structural, civil and landscape architects within 73 calendar days after the start of this project. University of South Florida: Mr. Presti provided design and documenting services for a continuing service Architectural/Engineering contract GLE held with the University of South Florida (USF) from 2007- 2010. Some projects have included the design and documenting for ADA upgrades of more than 50 public restrooms throughout the USF campus, a Life Safety survey of the main library, and the design for the MLK Plaza renovation, which extended the trellis themes from an adjacent plaza into a grassy common area making it a more vibrant student activity area. Manatee County School District — Martha B. King Middle School: Mr. Presti served as a Project Designer when GLE was selected for the Manatee County School District's Martha B. King Middle School project. GLE was selected due to our success in designing three prototype middle schools for the School Board of Pinellas County. GLE modified our prototype to fit all of Manatee County Schools' requirements, which included creating an innovative and lively Client Success Since 1989. Michael V. Presti, LEED AP Project Designer .1.111Mmil. MU, interior through more dynamic colors and patterns, specifically within the corridor walls and floors that lead the students through an exciting educational atmosphere. Emphasizing security, the campus is completely closed off by site security walls and has only one access point for visitors, through the administration building. The school, which consists of 168,00o SF and 1,150 student stations, was completed on time in July 2006. Ft. Pierce Housing Authority: Mr. Presti has served as the project manager for several projects at the Fort Pierce Housing Authority. Projects include the Garden Terrace apartment community, where 229 units were modified for the installation of new HVAC systems and upgraded with new kitchens. The South 27 apartment community, where all the units were also upgraded with new HVAC systems. This site was also renovated with the installation of a new community entry sign, mailbox shelter, and playground. Three other sites had various renovations and all five projects were concurrent and delivered to the client on time on a fast track schedule. Another past project for the Fort Pierce Housing Authority was the Wildwood residential complex. Mr. Presti was the Project Manager for the renovations of mostly duplex type homes with a total of 6o units. The project included accessibility upgrade to three units and adding upgrades to all the building. This scope included HVAC renovations, exterior door replacement, addition of gutters and downspouts, modification of driveways, replacement of mailboxes, and addition of storage sheds to each unit. Verizon Wireless: Mr. Presti provided design and facilities management services for Verizon Wireless, one of the nation's largest cellular service providers. While the design components are prototypical to establish brand identity and continuity from region to region, the GLE team consistently met the challenges of site-specific needs and the associated issues. As a result, nearly 200 stores in seven southern states have benefited from the collaborative efforts of the Verizon staff and GLE design team members. Winter Haven Housing Authority: Mr. Presti worked for the Winter Haven Housing Authority on the renovation and addition of a 3,100 SF community center and site improvements at Deer Lake Apartments partly funded by a government stimulus program. This complete remodeling project included the reconfiguration of spaces and repairing an abandoned structure into a new community center and housing authority office. Various Public Housing Authorities: Mr. Presti provides design and documenting services for various Architectural/Engineering renovation and modernization projects for GLE's Public Housing Authority contracts. Clients have included the Brooksville, Clearwater, Ft. Pierce, Pasco County, Pinellas County, St. Petersburg and Winter Haven Housing Authorities. Client Success Since 1989. Christine Sanchez, AAIA Designer, Architectural Services Ast Introduction Ms. Sanchez has over six years of educational experience and over four years professional design experience within the architectural field. Currently, she is working towards her Architectural licensure through the National Council of Architectural Registration Board (NCARB). Ms. Sanchez is currently a designer at GLE, focusing on schematic design, design development and construction documents. Ms. Sanchez is proficient in various computer programs including AutoCad and the 3D rendering software, SketchUp. She has also contributed to the design of several projects at GLE, including various renovation projects for the University of South Florida, Sarasota Housing Authority and the Beasville Group among others. Project Experience The Housing Authority of the City of Ft. Pierce — The Williams Center: The Housing Authority of the City of Ft. Pierce (HACFP) selected GLE to design a new Management Center titled "The Williams Center" to serve the Garden Terrace Apartment Community. It is anticipated that the new facility will consist of an approximately 12,104 square foot, one story structure. The Williams Center will include the following offices and organizations: The HACFP Garden Terrace Management Office, Ft. Pierce Police Sub Station, Boys & Girls Club and The Young Ladies First. Additionally, each of the programmatic spaces will function around an oval community space for the local residents to share during special events and gatherings. The overall site design included the addition of a retention pond, landscaped areas and additional parking to serve both the Williams Center and the adjacent ALPI Head Start facility. Ms. Sanchez worked on the conceptual design and programmatic space planning with the client and users. She developed the schematic design as well as exterior and interior elevations for the center which is currently in the bidding phase. Religious Community Services -Outreach Building: Ms. Sanchez worked with the Religious Community Services (RCS) of the City of Clearwater on the conceptual design and programming of a new Outreach Building. Part of the design included the redevelopment of a portion of the property to include the new 5,00o square foot facility. Additionally, the site was designed to acquire additional associated parking areas and a brick sponsor path. Ms. Sanchez created renderings, elevations and a feasibility design report to submit to the owner for approval onto the next phase of design. Education • Master of Architecture, University of South Florida, 2008 Skills • AutoCad 2006-2016 • SketchUP • Adobe Suite: InDesign, Photoshop, Reader • Microsoft Office: Excel, PowerPoint, Word Continuing Education • Designing Commercial Projects with MVM • Engineered Sports Floors • Understanding the Critical Elements of Air & Vapor • Sustainable Construction: Polyiso Wall Insulation for Masonry Walls • 501 Carpet for Educational Facilities • "Is It Really Green" — Crossville, Inc. • Silicate Coatings Presentation • Mike Lin Graphic Workshop Special Skills • Bilingual: English & Spanish WI i Christine Sanchez, ARIA Designer, Architectural Services Jam .41Maisimimmew-- MacDill Air Force Base- Wheel &Tire Shop Relocation: GLE was awarded several projects at MacDill Air Force Base under the Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) with Design -Build partner, Danner Construction Company. Project scopes included building renovations, interior build -outs, electrical engineering studies and distribution upgrades, complete HVAC replacements, pavement repair and building demolition and site restoration. Specifically, Ms. Sanchez was the project manager for the Hangar II Wheel & Tire Shop Relocation project. It consisted of developing construction documents in order to relocate the wheel & tire shop from hangar IV to hangar II. Ms. Sanchez coordinated with Structural and MEP engineers to ensure that all equipment, fixtures and finishes corresponded to the new space as required by the owner. Sarasota Housing Authority — Mediterranean Apartments Redevelopment: Ms. Sanchez worked with the Sarasota Housing Funding Corporation on the redevelopment of an existing 66 unit apartment community. The intention was to raze the current structures in order to redevelop the property, resulting in a lower density affordable residential community. The overall new site plan and design called for 28 new townhome style units, play area and parking among other site requirements. This high profile project consisted of four basic unit types; one, two and three bedroom units incorporated with accessible units to meet the various needs of families. The use of `Green Friendly' design features and Fair Housing Act guidelines have been implemented through various stages of the design. Ms. Sanchez originally created the 3D renderings of the proposed building and site plan for owner review and presentation purposes. Currently the Apartments are under construction with an anticipated completion date of December 2012. Gainesville Housing Authority - Atlanta Street Redevelopment: Ms. Sanchez worked with the Gainesville Housing Authority (GHA) for the state of Georgia, in the preparation of a mix use master plan. GLE was selected to provide physical needs and viability assessments for the existing Atlanta Street Apartments and Green Hunter Homes. Ms. Sanchez met with the GHA to develop a concise list of program requirements and needs of the community of Gainesville. The site includes approximately 150 residential units for both senior citizens and the developmentally disabled which are the intended market of the redevelopment. In addition to the residential units, a community center, ample parking areas, commercial/retail spaces and a centralized plaza are integrated into the overall design. Ms. Sanchez furthered developed the master plan into 3D, in order to give a visual tool that will initiate discussion and design intent on a larger scale. Awards • Ethel Percy Andrus House of Freedom National Design Competition — 3rd Place, 2008 • League of United Latin American Citizen Award, 2003 Publications • Aging with Identity: Integrating Culture into Senior Housing — Master of Architecture Thesis, 2008 • Ethel Percy Andrus House of Freedom — AIAS Crit Journal, 2008 Christine Sanchez, ARIA Designer, Architectural Services University of South Florida — Various Renovation Projects: GLE provided various projects under a continuing Architectural/Engineering contract with the University of South Florida (USF). Under this contract GLE completed various campus -wide projects, including the renovation for the Into USF Program, which encompassed three different buildings on the Tampa campus: FAO, CIS, and BSN. Ms. Sanchez worked closely with the USF project manager to ensure the renovations for each building were completed as needed by the program and within a quick turn -around deadline. In addition to construction documents, she also developed 3D rendering options for the new exterior canopy structure to be presented and approved by the President of USF. Other USF projects included renovations of the USF -Main Library 6th floor and stairwells. Glover School: Ms. Sanchez worked on a Historic Rehabilitation (Renovation) project funded through the Beasville Group and Hillsborough County Affordable Housing. The project was for the State Historic Preservation Office approved restoration of Glover School, located in Plant City, Florida. Ms. Sanchez began the project with a site analysis and also contributed to the construction administration phase of the 3,500+ SF building which is currently under construction. Client Success Since 1989. Heather Tank, PE Engineering Services Department Manager Oft Introduction Ms. Tank is a registered Professional Mechanical Engineer with over six years of experience in the design and construction of mechanical and plumbing systems. As the Manager of the Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) Engineering Department at GLE, Ms. Tank oversees all MEP project planning, design, project management and project budgets. Ms. Tank also maintains a diverse client base consisting of both public and private sector clients. Ms. Tank's project approach includes building a cohesive design team that includes the Owner, GLE and all other stakeholders from the start of each project. This collaborative team and unified effort ultimately leads to a better design and more successfully executed project. Ms. Tank has completed work for numerous commercial retailers, libraries, restaurants, and schools. She is responsible for the design of all underground fuel tank removal and aboveground tank installation projects at GLE. Ms. Tank has significant experience in schematic design, design development, construction documents, and construction. All these characteristics allow projects to be completed in a timely manner and under budget. Project Experience Hillsborough County: Ms. Tank provided engineering support for an Architectural/Engineering term contract GLE held with Hillsborough County. Projects included renovations for the Transportation Maintenance Division, including an upgrade of existing bathrooms at the central and west service units, and the 5,000 SF addition to the Hillsborough County Emergency Operation Center, which involved a new chiller design. Ms. Tank also supported the engineering efforts for the renovation of Glover School, a building under the Historic Preservation Act and the construction of a new Hillsborough County Mosquito Building. MacDill Air Force Base Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC): GLE has partnered with Danner Construction under a design - build agreement for various projects at MacDill Air Force Base. Ms. Tank has been responsible for the mechanical design for all projects under this contract. Projects include, installing an air displacement system for the CATM firing line, renovating the Wheel and Tire shop, and the interior renovations of Building 89, which included a modification for a data room and reconfiguration of work spaces. Ms. Tank was also involved in a $2.5 million renovation and reconfiguration of Building 53, a 20,000 SF building which consisted of offices, classrooms, and training center. Education • B.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of South Florida, 2003 Registrations / Certifications • Florida Professional Mechanical Engineer, No. 71569 • Georgia Professional Mechanical Engineer, No. 036524 • BPI Certification: Building Analyst, No. 5041994 Continuing Education • ASHRAE Moisture Control Seminar • Severe Storm AIA Presentation • Understanding the Critical Elements of Air and Vapor — W.E. Grace & Company • Silicate Coatings Presentation, KEIM • "Dedicated Outdoor Air Systems -A Path to Balancing Energy & IEQ" • Booster Pump Sizing — HVAC & Plumbing • Building Plumbing Design Workshop • Design Methodologies for Active & Passive Sustainability • Earth Wise Sustainability Design Heather Tank, PE Engineering Services Department Manager Okeechobee County: Ms. Tank was responsible for the project management of the HVAC upgrades and lighting replacement at 13 sites throughout Okeechobee County. The work was funded through an energy grant that required compliance with the 'Buy American Act.' Citrus County School Board: In collaboration with GLE's Jacksonville environmental department, GLE's MEP engineering department designed the removal of underground fuel tanks and installation of new above ground fuel tanks at three sites within Citrus County. The total construction cost exceeded $2,000,000. The scope of work also included electrical system upgrades and new bus wash installation. School Board of Broward County: GLE held a continuing services contract with the School Board of Broward County. Under this contract, Ms. Tank oversaw the construction of the replacement of thirteen air handlers at Cross Creek Elementary. She also worked on the design of a complete HVAC system upgrade at Forest Hills Elementary. This upgrade resulted in improved Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) for the school. DeSoto County School District: GLE completed the design for a 26,000 SF renovation at DeSoto High School. The design included an addition of six classrooms and a renovation to the AC Lab, Art Lab, Wood Shop and Agricultural Lab. The addition required an upgrade of the existing chiller and cooling tower system. This involved a complete new design, including an ice tank storage system. Thermal energy storage (TES) was incorporated into the design, which will yield energy savings to District of $30,000 per year and will yield a payback of less than six years. University of South Florida: Ms. Tank provided engineering support for an ongoing Architectural/Engineering term contract with the University of South Florida (USF). Projects included an upgrade of the existing bathrooms at the Library and Student Services building. Ms. Tank also worked on heat pipe installation for 12 air handling units throughout the USF campus. Winter Haven Housing Authority: Ms. Tank was responsible for the mechanical and plumbing systems at the Winter Haven Housing Authority's Lake Deer Community Center. The interior remodel included the installation of a complete HVAC system to allow for better Indoor Air Quality (IAQ). The restrooms and kitchen fixtures were upgraded for ADA accessibility. ■ Continuing Education Energy Modeling for LEED Energy & Atmosphere CR -i Workshop Green Building: Commercial High Performance Guidelines How Macro Trends in Sustainability Affect Property and Facilities Strategies LEED Certification and Green Building LEED Green Associate Qualification Certificate: Green Building Principals Mechanical Design: Heating, Ventilating & Air Conditioning Moisture Control Seminar Ram Jack Foundation Solutions Design & Analysis Workshop RTU+ERV=Efficient Outside Air Solution Sustainable Construction: Polyiso Wall Insulation for Masonry Walls Sustainable Design — An Integrated Process Understanding the Critical Elements of Air & Vapor Using Novel Control Strategies to Attain Permanent Load Shifting Variable Refrigerant Flow Water heater Application & Selection Heather Tank, PE Engineering Services Department Manager 1111 LIU 1 Iilasli ulinid.1 1 11 Lei 1 1 .1 1 in. ■ Department of Military Affairs (DMA): GLE was contracted to design an addition to the Florida National Guard Armory vehicle maintenance facility in Haines City, Florida. This six bay facility is used to maintain and repair National Guard vehicles. Ms. Tank led the engineering efforts on this project, with diverse systems including a 15 -ton overhead bridge crane, a vehicle wash, overhead lubrication system and overhead vehicle exhaust system. The owner was so pleased with the outcome that GLE was requested to complete another design on a maintenance bay in West Palm Beach, Florida. Client Success Since 1989. Gregory C. LaPierre, PE Electrical Engineer Introduction Mr. LaPierre has more than twenty years of experience in electrical engineering. As a Senior Electrical Engineer at DMHM & Harris, Mr. LaPierre was responsible for designing electrical distribution systems for airports, trains and subway stations. He was also accountable for developing engineering contracts and bidding documents. As a Senior Electrical Engineer at GLE, Mr. LaPierre is responsible for designing electrical systems for various projects. Duties have included upgrading fire alarm and HVAC systems, creating and inputting information for energy calculations and designing electrical, communication and security systems. Project Experience MacDill Air Force Base Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC): Mr. LaPierre serves as the Electrical Engineer for various projects awarded to GLE under a MACC contract held by Design -Build teaming partner Danner Construction. Projects include various building renovations that involve upgrades to the lighting systems these include design of a lightning protection system for basewide roof repairs, power and panel upgrades and the addition of new occupancy sensor switches to increase energy efficiency and comply with energy codes at various buildings. City of Haines - City Fire Station: Mr. LaPierre is serving as the Electrical Engineer for the design of a new fire station located in the northern part of Haines City. The station will be constructed as a 9,500 SF, single -story, two -bay substation facility, the construction cost is estimated at $1,900,000. Mr. LaPierre is providing energy compliance oversight and schedule adherence for this project. Bardmoor Elementary School: Mr. LaPierre is serving as the Electrical Engineer for the upgrade of Bardmoor's fire alarm system. Ft. Pierce Housing Authority — The Williams Center: Mr. LaPierre is serving as the Electrical Engineer for the design of a community center located in Ft. Pierce. The community center is a 12,000 SF, single -story, multi -use facility housing the police sub -station, the Ft. Pierce Housing Authority offices, the Boys and Girls club and the Ladies First Organization. Mr. LaPierre is providing energy compliance oversight and schedule adherence for this project. Client Success Since 1989. Education • B.S., Electrical Engineering, Oral Roberts University, 1991 Registrations • Florida Professional Electrical Engineer Continuing Education • Fundamentals of Engineering, 1997 (New Hampshire) • Florida Engineers' Law & Rules • Lighting Fixtures & Energy Efficiency Todd Alan Rebhahn Engineering Designer Introduction Mr. Rebhahn has more than twenty years of experience in design, construction and management on educational, commercial, retail, residential, and medical facilities. Mr. Rebhahn provides design and management support for plumbing, mechanical, and electrical projects from initial client contact through facility occupation and completion follow up support. Project Experience MacDill Air Force Base Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC): Mr. Rebhahn has been involved in various projects awarded to GLE under a MACC contract held by Design -Build teaming partner Danner Construction. Projects include various building renovations that involve upgrades to the mechanical systems. Mr. Rebhahn has served as a mechanical designer for work on a new mechanical system and a new 4o ton chilled water room air conditioner for Building 89 and various other projects throughout the historic hanger facilities including new locker facilities with new mechanical systems, new workshops with compressed air and nitrogen distribution systems and a new ventilation system with supply fans for Building B881A. Mr. Rebhahn has ensured code compliance, schedule, and budget adherence. Sarasota Housing Authority — MLK Mediterranean Townhomes & Tuttle Apartments: Mr. Rebhahn is serving as a mechanical designer for 28 new apartment homes and the renovation of 15 apartment units for the Sarasota Housing Authority. Housing Authority of Ft. Pierce — Williams Center: Mr. Rebhahn is actively involved in the engineering of a new 12,000 sq. ft. community center that will serve multiple roles including a Boys & Girls Club, a community policing station, central community room, as well as providing office space for the housing authority and other small groups. Client Success Since 1989. Education • Bachelor of Science in Architectural Studies, University of Wisconsin, 1991 Continuing Education • Building Information Modeling (BIM) — An Introduction • HVAC Design Overview • Mechanical Design: Heating, Ventilating & Air Conditioning TO REINFORCE CITY CAMPUS • Streets, Trees • Lighting • Signage • Sidewalk connections BUS STOP • Shelter • Bench CROSSWALK BUS STOP ADD BETTER PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS $ tvitiviocittcv ADD PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK 1414441141)S TO REINFORCE CITY CAMPUS • Streets, Trees • Lighting • Signage • Sidewalk connections 1 —1- t-- City '— Ct y of CH272 Caraveral; New City a •^ ♦ • a • • w • • f • • w — • •• .• ar ' • ° ! lam • — • an • a • — ••� • w • yam••— •' -• 3 1i�I•l'J' j' • Desagn _ m - a • 4 1 a • av • al • a • a • a • all • a •IF • a •• = . -.••... • •• •• •.a • ..... • ,_.v • al , ... • rw • at. • au • ..• • ..,.. . a • w+ • M-. . ..• • a • a • ..a • a • w • o. • a • r • a .•• • — • aa • ISM, • a • w. • a • a • a • — • aw • are • w • r • -•• 1 Building issues/ Design • tit -4 let • 4' ""ifflY a:anu••••••4xabaa'nf A' • • did CAPE C,I T Y OF C i P E M A U V AV E 1 11 .A L 01 Y --- " r sem:..• • • • .stra.bI S4 ,a -t• Site Plan II -II IL a- --11 -1111. a-- -s- North Atlantic Avenue (Al A) Retention vv/ VVater Features Vedorawnssalswiti Proposed City Hall RI Attrf.)JMCR $A'+1 S.Vvt' V JY4•111 � '..• ` SULAK `JCCN 1r Et .1/VLK r(AK 4C'tV 4t;GW Witt - hiIC uh1MC IniCW s't 1'A' +f :Jhk..,L /�t110Wtee LK Stepped building draws the visitor to the main entry and roundabout • Building Orientation allows for diffused Tight at East and West facades .*- Use of sun screens at South facades \ \\\\ Conrtectivity to City cacti :ties Existing City Hall S -11 11. .1 -1. s=r itaaarat k as Design and program based on 2015 spatial needs assessment and city hall facility committee meeting minutes , Varilatio rs to those rcufLs llrtc j3 Peg W Iran Relocated builchg department from 1st to 2nd floor Relocated human resources from 2nd to 3rd floor I st FLOOR )OR i,EGEND 7)900 SF Council Chambers L,OL)b\ Main Conference ROOM °< Restrocnns illt-1111111-11111111111111111111111-111,�� 2nd FLOOR LEGEND 6,200 SF Clot Clerk Office • Building Department * f.obb% Open to belos, ▪ Restrocnn Main Conference Room • 6,200 SF 3rd FLOOR. LEGEND Human Resources Department 4 Financial Services Department * Lobby Open to below • Restroom Main Conference Room 111111111111111111111 a Sun, Space + Sea Sundial: Abstract representation of city hall clock Solar System: Artistic representation of solar system within plaza pavers Water Feature: Representing surf and sea 461 11 JR Sunscreens on South Elevation • t",11, p4 4' l ` C. •N ) •) - • e- fir. •^•.. µr'.. r` •-+. r -- overlay Distri©t Je&ign 0uidelunes O Surface parking located at rear of building w/ pedestrian access Building orientation towards Al A, to encourage pedestrian activity Articulation/Human Scale Entry treatment: dominant front and rear entries Windows and transparency Building elements and colors inspired from adjacent city facilities persaistworPi,-- t I • 1 t 1 � 111111111111sta a Li Z it it It ON a rspectives 4%SSSSKU IS a Mats it a Or ti.. • • • • ft .1 IA • aranitz. .ttha' !..1- 1"c - - - • ligratarata Taiit /Ct --.--ir-"---- -.,------,-.-•:. .1.. i 147x.c 1.• [ _ 2__. • tLI11LJI r ' • - • • k • • J • •' • • • • .• ow •••4••••••••• F • Mae S IMA Mit -I IT • Ouestiont Answer _ • .•• • .... • a• • • am . .� • _ a •. • tat t • sr t' OM. SS• la• .� • a . • _ _ _ •_ • _ • a 11 ••••• aa • • _ • _ • r • _ • • • >r • 4,41a , a • �• • r 0•1111 . ••••• _ . MI• la• al a • Vas • •.• • a . •••• . MIS • MS• _ • OM• SSP• _ • al • •••• • • .. • ... • al a .G.. • • w • _ • .A • ... • r • a . .rw • .Y • a • a • _ • _ • _ . r a _ • _ 4 r • _ • _ • Ma • _ • _ 4 _