Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRE Holiday Inn Hotel Sewer Line Route (26)Thanks Todd. Everything you mention below makes sense. I had a good conversation with Craig Langley today and I hope to get everything wrapped up as soon as possible. Again, please feel free to contact me anytime with questions or concerns. Thanks, Joey A. Joseph Posey, Esquire Glenn D. Storch, P.A. 420 S. Nova Road Daytona Beach, FL 32114 Phone: 386-238-8383 Fax: 386-238-0988 joey@storchlawfirm.com <mailto:joey@storchlawfirm.com> From: Todd Morley [mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org] Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:04 AM To: joey@storchlawfirm.com Cc: David Dickey <D.Dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org> Subject: FW: Holiday Inn Hotel / Sewer Line Route Joey, The City currently has secured easements (and there is a sewer line in the easement) from Lift Station No. 6 up to the south side of the Pindziak property. The Homewood Suites Hotel (LBA) currently utilizes this sewer line. LBA is under contract to obtain the Pindziak property. Our intention is to condition the site plan approval of the LBA hotel to require an additional easement across the Pindziak property up to the Port property south of our project. I’ve made some corrections to the map. See below. To your other questions: Do we know when the City will receive the easement across the Pindziak property? No, as mentioned earlier, the preliminary steps are contingent upon parties/dealings outside of City control. Will the City provide an indication/no objection in writing to assure the Port about the proposed sewer route? We can provide a letter that the route depicted in green below is the route the City supports. In the event the Pindziak easement isn’t obtained by the City, what are the potential options? Your client is free to obtain other paths to sewer that do not require City easements. I want to stress a reminder note: Staff cannot approve less than a 150-room hotel and we cannot be certain less than 150 rooms would be approved. 150 rooms are required per City Code section 110-627. Developments that are inconsistent may be approved pursuant to a planned development (PD) approved by the City Council on a case-by-case basis (below) . * Sec. 110-627. - Project size. * (1) All uses within a project shall be sized to provide sufficient building setback and to encourage a pedestrian-oriented environment. a. All uses shall have a minimum lot size consistent with the area required to meet the building setback, lot coverage and development standards of the underlying zoning district. b. There shall be no minimum lot size for hotel development within the District. However, there shall be a minimum of 150 units that must be constructed at the same time. c. Building setback, lot coverage and developments that are inconsistent with these requirements may be approved pursuant to a planned development (PD) approved by the city council on a case-by-case basis. Sincerely, Todd <http://www.cityofcapecanaveral.org/> Launch your connection… <https://www.facebook.com/CityofCapeCanaveral> <https://www.instagram.com/cityofcapecanaveral/> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/city-of-cape-canaveral-the> <https://twitter.com/CapeCanaveralFL> From: joey@storchlawfirm.com <mailto:joey@storchlawfirm.com> [mailto:joey@storchlawfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 3:52 PM To: Todd Morley <T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > Cc: glenn@storchlawfirm.com <mailto:glenn@storchlawfirm.com> ; David Dickey <D.Dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:D.Dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > Subject: RE: Holiday Inn Hotel / Sewer Line Route Todd Thanks again for speaking to me yesterday. I appreciate that both you and David want to work with us to get our client’s project up and running. That being said, I ran our discussion and the proposed route by our client and engineers, and I believe they are on board for making the Lift Station No. 6 (Imperial Dr.) route a reality. If I understood you correctly yesterday, the City currently has secured easements from Lift Station No. 6 up to the Pindziak property and will be obtaining an additional easement across the Pindziak property up to the Port property south of our project. The attached map is my best attempt at trying to depict the situation. Please feel free to correct me if something I wrote is not correct. Also, I foresee a couple of potential issues that we probably need to discuss. First, do you know when the City will receive the easement across the Pindziak property? As you can image, our client is under a lot of pressure to show Holiday Inn progress with the project. Any certainty you can provide would be appreciated. Second, will the City give us an indication/no objection in writing to assure the Port about the proposed sewer route? Getting something in writing will allow us to finalize our agreement with the Port. Obviously the route will have contingencies and the Port doesn’t expect an outright approval but I’m sure they want to avoid surprises. Third, in the event the Pindziak easement isn’t obtained by the City, what are the potential options? I would think that the RaceTrac route is the logical second choice, and as I mentioned over the phone, our client is willing to construct, absorb the cost of construction and dedicate the route to the City. Your thoughts are welcome and I’m happy to discuss further. Thanks again Joey A. Joseph Posey, Esquire Glenn D. Storch, P.A. 420 S. Nova Road Daytona Beach, FL 32114 Phone: 386-238-8383 Fax: 386-238-0988 joey@storchlawfirm.com <mailto:joey@storchlawfirm.com> From: joey@storchlawfirm.com <mailto:joey@storchlawfirm.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 4:20 PM To: 'T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org' <T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > Cc: Glenn D. Storch (glenn@storchlawfirm.com <mailto:glenn@storchlawfirm.com> ) <glenn@storchlawfirm.com <mailto:glenn@storchlawfirm.com> > Subject: Holiday Inn Hotel / Sewer Line Route Todd My name is Joey Posey and I’m one of the attorneys at Glenn Storch’s office in Daytona Beach. I believe Glenn met with you and the other Cape folks a while back to discuss the Holiday Inn development. I thought everyone was on the same page until I received a forwarded email today from Laila Witwicky regarding the Cape’s position on the sewer line for the project. I was hoping to discuss the issues you mentioned since I think there was some confusion about what the Port Authority wanted in terms of assurance. I tried to leave a message on your voicemail but the machine cut me off while I was explaining why I called. Anyways, we want to work with you guys so please let me know a good time to chat. Thanks Joey A. Joseph Posey, Esquire Glenn D. Storch, P.A. 420 S. Nova Road Daytona Beach, FL 32114 Phone: 386-238-8383 Fax: 386-238-0988 joey@storchlawfirm.com <mailto:joey@storchlawfirm.com> Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing 䦩⻺㇍鐚猄䠧ፏ�揼퉇褗᩻ᜦ毒怳墔夛鎅캙呦荆鰣枎鍍茰돀⛴Ⴕ옺∥ⴐ苇꣌䈐斥ᑨ⽲리�倮灔ࠌ徤秖됆㑏ᅧ煍舤쵤ꡢ靽ꩰ鹑䙅椌娱秺무㘘⡲袚玴铈㈵중გՅ⦆Ǘꖉᇝཨꭙ熘䮔雔娘龏臭잺﹮ا瑘뱤茒ㅗʸ⮃쑰زа渏觯䲙챪霒ꖆ坶嚇㉲抖凔⑖⚠İ疒啖춸ဩ葞䉚蠫곁ᐡ䂷蟪䜉箚ʴ楙冘왘쒒웞⟨稒ꝼ袹曎ᙾ鸢픨幫渄㙚촶퉋⎤屫八שּ鐤̵꒝䈳픂쭉⅏䪚遲核㓓ᘊꇊ鶃�蜦炊⏆⳪䐻ꖙ鹇턗犼瑞젶ﲜ骔ꚏꃵ莾顤尩樳證룾럮Ẋ鹼뱽ᅦ�ຎ妧 ꁴᆠ勑Ჟ镼圆灠踅ᖜ戸̙兮そ準籼㪃럩᥏薐閛䆑଎䟑碘險䂜㘡酖״澸爷舣㷰흀䂈ゃ㌣板ဧꅔ萑킑肖삪≨ᘄ륉Ꙉ膏ݾ⳦憐낐恚ꈫ褹槟뉮∢ૉ臍✦펥쭚�ၧ췒�䗃忩渒翭궍쟬㐔历臚�䅁Ⴘ龱뤂ᅢ妋踑˛ꘌ椮f딂舀넩帢휚䒖漲䰜鸯腚ತ䓿欬㹁㠇챀䰦鬮辰נ硏蚭䎿芟�錠ڰ솷᠕腜朣踅왈馠쒏༱醼ꈍ萯䵰脰ᕑ煩주ř䋑㴳﵄鼲⁀肄⁰㖝ꂂ嵻䃀ﴂ爤孩倿鍇姒༌璮䭐�᠈즡ﮈ眘狊窗ᇔ᭳਴㰏嘴⍂탣䙌肌徢橂琍퍁삿ड़ߩ撽먄ꂮ∕砪 㖏⿢뤳揵ᦥ✼嶨李㗔㒈駰曷詇咾䨙뿂̑ꃣşҾ⍜줳〓씻≡艊䀍ڡ娦렖㵣연援䍟剝慼㖮뤿祆渀忩䭁⠸秈ح撯հ�瀫㇄〆鐅쳪뛪◤嫿墡請戓啬䱌춪榈啃먱砒癋ꐻൾ㯊ȃ菛펚鈠Ⱐ앦䑬朜줊涡ﺀ荎穨爀葩惶匈㛊盁く陋蓓㬓쀋း䙵섧┚踣梴樥఍՛댲哔梴뚣햠⹅Ũ䦚༩乂Ⅶ䊭䎒頔Ꚁ䠼耏練뿨éﱶ驅둸줌㑿䒦䉾㦷桍㏀샜䭕⟃㲂␏槪पᡕ䢪鐌ග纉々꾧ᅔᕇ䚳漙匇跘弟搚Ἂꉯ砱䟵૾焜膌ດ廳곘<Ủꊋ퓢共笱䖴禔쪀㜸숼풚㭎紺」撊짲轢弱 摚䷭�ﰀ᠍ૌ䋿撧ᔣ⑮엂ꊁ傌奔鎄ᢖ벅င፣㸉퀜ٔ癨㹢ᶃ셌猡䀙◴蝬試挢Ѣᚐ⏺茹ﱆ磥㉚咝뀪㙉龢ႇ㳚㒽줭듃ிⓖ擉䧤ﷴ訲ꆉ鲮☔媭ƅۥդ㤶ꚬ택§┨페钀ꒊ톸ꤕ᧘䶓엋삃ﭜ싩뾅ḍ꿹ต삮ૠ褜↌ꊲ꼩물⣑㷊焉铖覴䪨䀗Ⰸᄰܨ㰬꧀⢁⡛⏝衐ࢹꌎ춒ᇛ†࣍⦢䘍㉇怜ᣀ钭茀෨ↂ퉂ꂧ欑槾᪔ᚈ䫖龩旉䐩İ乏ጘ脚ᚦ❁ⲵബ괂ڱ悔겈윀♩膻槎冝簌फ़ꆻ鞙Դ삢瑰获Ꞟ⣀樦刧턛ᘝ饒籇瀔儠༨汀ᾅ✦䳦謴㕉죹劈ΰ➹ଝ︗遲఩诒ᗁ 飸사씑怘⩆﷿묵쏺넀醟ᜒ洞퓋�ꀓ횁ᙬ单䨌ℂ⹌剫䤨ƃ점諎΄鰳铃膢⾴鞆䖛餤츒荒쎰ᐞ⚌䴮㟺둂ﰆ蠐酓僋耨襃ഞ狹펰婫鉁䷘㳠⇌ᰠ儝墊脋䬚钁噫芠䅣膞௻搏ᦁ杈ꚇ週䠕忉㥆㏑趡馬㒗䏆蝇ᬬ措ꁸ➜痂풑霣⃍铆됡飖㹜㲪ㇸ⊆㼰䘔傗᫙ﳖ㛠ʸ⮃뇰腙訣䶮୯垨�놚崝ᐗ㺟⛚詪꣌恡艰ᄿ偠ࠑ슴薜ݢ⧪ꇀ䝌ᖰ摎ࡢ蛵⃋䫪扌黋璸❒糡�묁䑻됣鋌↖カ᥃叡술댨䶝ᓔذ៳趩⁨鑻뗚☨ᨖ࣒셶ꀏ遙௶㨸줷㐋䊭鸚蚤㧁乩䉬桚춉蕚夺収鲚래ኁꠀ才 搴r㏰참躙啑㠢캾ꮲ�瞘⶘퇀뀷躠蘂滠鬟擗䋰圇ʵᩇᡣ㌅ⶒ輘⾋㓌ᆈ꣥⌯経ꐱ挜ܫ遦䐗観摶뭄悑菦ꃚⅤ篲ꨜ૨䗄⨳騝瘬ɑ∠펷騪࡯캡蠂ឯ爅퀒젎豈㷰Ǹ䄓沨㷍봠퀎됞㘄᰻�ㆈ脔䷌鼁䀑ᘼ炥첵ⁿ鋦�셎ꁏ໹⛴햏퀒棈搤焇꒍ᥳग़쇎�䌌襏䠜ࣵ뇱뷌䂐颂얫躘៕鐛筒踦㩚䙛讔蕠磊쾋杮拽�Ƅ䬭垬偢㈍辅ᴗ반쇚�կᢎÆ鈳甗橍籖险챑渘쑊젒勦蛒㹴຿묔矂ರᎵ遂꟪卆쁙ᤀᛡ궆∝ㄿ⪁겊ᨒ㦃찆⁥萌臛͚ၞၳ淰ڝᕨ玬쐦ༀ郁﹕難됇⟟ꎀ崒᧖ᙨ ᅽ疔陂ᦴ觽쩮࠼龢錠㓡ျ㶨馱缴鴀꣚⦨Թµ忔⃖妽ႌ㐥⢓৔ꓜ勤å柺�荕�䗙庨玉菹쒱灎躬Ꝓ瞒틙๭্暕郿덒쐋첟ᖠ怌臣華ಚ삮ૠ豼憈렌厇퇃唩뼹葷毉ꬷ豀首ٞꪏ刺곙쁷뉅쇍쩤鬍檻ペ胯㬸䬐褴ႎ紲䧃凔規啱턮낄�堭⇫䨧ᥝ讷⋊뮆ꔦꜩ쟌棴᳦가ﴉ쉡곮䎰⍂륁ᄵ⎇蕚襙䯈䈶쁨ᓬ朌ᙳ䮄섙鰥偰禔ඡꐠᨴ뚍ዠ嘲홣痦�则뇫씫ꔍஊ糀ꂛ氹ᬳ�霢ᚱ聀蝾�珩喚筀᧷⤌ࣔ꾎浃㹊৞脰�ꎠ㻟琽렲茂瀫긄釀ᣄ㥶輊㼣젂ꢥ饧⏳ 도ᄈ⠹陂ᦱ䘍⤛鰞晐캠媣ౝ詉別䐱脀嬰ຜ⟠ƥ醃멄r㋺怇覩਼츢㈄㟰㫌ᡑꏬ挙䑮�葠衩퐐ลደ릠脺ᆢʊ캮撨皼䷵�ᦴࡿ蟀޽玉큍䨊⫌杦믈榓觅઼鈫ꫠﱀ㥗祬丿㞷쪚쟷㸂낗ᦂ儅൸苺픋Н䌪↫㉼ࡒ旟揫ၡⓍ쭄㖕炾꿡䴇䝂䯠砻草废⎁ㆉ㧴⁓⺬⇓➈⬁ᩇ蹟蕜據䌶὜즇뮖鳠ᄽ鰆∙䚗ኤ力猘䪽뼮좢鹥燢毦愂đ鴘騍놇様肗ࡷꕵ❩몃꫎픓僐蝅룕뤎ﭠ꡷퍆にꄠ饚뀁۟踘⁲맞⃵싎닪⹖㚈뎊笋븑▏顓잔鿨ꁡ迫돢ⴍꟻ縛㕽ヘ࿓菸〫ʸ ᰊ谱☁䨐诋⍡ꊏ꣱벹Ȍ뫹⹴◻祉ʣ僛㝾哩䐟근㎰䒍绬䙈牘䅮騍獧僷﨤丽皔噆��Ҭ䉍のﴬ䢽宄檄癮Ꞡ̎㢝ꏯ錌хᖪ察飸鿌芏⣯͟逞롙꟰駻큦냗族꣐矖⌾撀烈ᐨ炿䨁ค荮〫ʸ⮃忰腜蘣ᐱブ䢑凬뀝㳶㢋竕⢵썪﹠b 䛬蘭翩乞఻詀셨䮏᝶�Ṷ욁䮱ᠱ�⢍ⳃ県⋍ゑ퐣̧唳⨗倲螒᣻ລ膰瞰및இyⱕꐼ軤﮾芘䘾젰︔澋ީ恗հ귶￀㴇圵�