The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRe Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln (10)Todd, given the developer must remove the specimen tree under the circumstances, my thought regarding remediation is to use 102-41(b). That section provides that the city has a right to impose remediation for the removal of a specimen tree at a maximum 2 to 1 ratio per dbh. As such, take the dbh of the removed tree and multiply by 2 as a starting point demand. Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, specimen trees shall not be removed except for extraordinary circumstances and hardships and only by final permit approved by the city council. As a condition of removal of any specimen tree, the city council shall have the right to require that replacement trees be planted or a contribution to the tree bank be made in accordance with section 102-43 <https://www.municode.com/library/FL/cape_canaveral/codes/code_of_ordina nces?nodeId=SPBLADECO_CH102VE_ARTIITRPR_DIV2LACL_S102-43TRREGU> , except replacement and/or tree bank contribution shall be based on a maximum of a two-to-one ratio of cumulative diameter (dbh) basis of specimen trees removed using the data in Table 1. Regards, Anthony A. Garganese Sent from IPad On Feb 19, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Todd Morley <T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote: Anthony, Thanks. Additionally, Section 102-38(b)(1) imposes a $500 fine for the removal of a specimen tree. Trying to apply remedial requirements is challenging. Section 102-49(b) requires a restoration plan and gives three choices: 1. Replacement of same size tree (not practical at 46” dbh), or 2. A 4X payment to the tree bank. However, for this size of tree, there is no dollar amount provided. The table says “To be preserved”. 3. Planting four desirable species in accordance with section 102-54. However, for this size of tree, there is no number of replacement trees specified. The table says “To be preserved”. I’m trying to arrive a logical, reasoned approach to remediation. Any help? I am available to discuss today Todd Todd Morley, Director Economic Development Dept. City of Cape Canaveral 105 Polk Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1220 x 330 t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/1jWVIp6zqb2r38V5UQsK6XCTTPhOyeojd79JZYQsEzC773rX VEVh7ccECTTPhOMqem6jhOrQzIieM-DwGIjZwxk_j70QTm9-MgGvFzwqrs8npsZx_HYMyCes soWZOXBT-7nKUMejVqWdAklrIcYG7DR8OJMddECTPt-jpoKMC--OCrKr01mBcJlSSHvroqp- eDY01MTfBqNfYI2HiCmGXrlLJIdc_7j-00CQhRS7PhOr1oQAq81xrXil-1Ew1cvYQgrcQg8I CzAQglQGq80H0SOyrrLnEnLxL> “If it is to be, it is up to me” <image001.png> From: Anthony A. Garganese [mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 5:57 AM To: Todd Morley Cc: David Dickey; David Greene Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Importance: High Todd, I’ve given this one some significant thought. It appears that the developer intentionally damaged the tree before applying for the requisite tree removal permit. The tree now appears to be so far damaged and so close to the structure under construction that it must come down or the structure removed in favor of trying to save the tree that will forever be disfigured. As such, at this stage of your investigation and case study, this appears to be a classic case of an intentional violation of the City Code which is irreparable or irreversible. Therefore, one approach to take is as follows: 1. Due to the intentional damage of the tree, the tree no longer fits the definition of a specimen tree. As such, the final removal of the tree does not require City Council approval. However, as you pointed out, the violation requires that Staff impose remedial action upon the developer under section 102-41. 2. In addition, and in conjunction with the remedial action, Staff should promptly serve upon the developer a notice of code violation for the intentional violation of the tree ordinance and seek a fine not to exceed $5,000 for an irreparable or irreversible violation of the City Code. Section 162.09(2)(a), Florida Statutes provides: A fine imposed pursuant to this section shall not exceed $250 per day for a first violation and shall not exceed $500 per day for a repeat violation, and, in addition, may include all costs of repairs pursuant to subsection (1). However, if a code enforcement board finds the violation to be irreparable or irreversible in nature, it may impose a fine not to exceed $5,000 per violation. (b) In determining the amount of the fine, if any, the enforcement board shall consider the following factors: 1. The gravity of the violation; 2. Any actions taken by the violator to correct the violation; and 3. Any previous violations committed by the violator. 3. You did not indicate in your email whether the construction has been completed and a certificate of occupancy issued by the City. If the certificate of occupancy has not been issued, the City should seriously evaluate whether it should require the developer to complete the remedial action and payment of the code enforcement fine PRIOR to issuance of the certificate of occupancy or prior to issuing any other final building inspections on the project. Once the notice of code violation is served, you could attempt to settle (payment in full in exchange for a release) the fine issue and dismiss the case before the matter is actually heard by the Code Board in order to expedite a final resolution of the matter. However, any agreed upon settlement should be approved by the City Manager using the $5,000 cap and factors stated above and should be commensurate with the egregious nature of the violation that resulted in adversely affecting the Council’s jurisdiction to make determinations regarding the protection of specimen trees. The later point cannot be overemphasized because if this situation were to frequently occur without appropriate sanctions imposed by the City, the Council’s jurisdiction over these matters could be severely diminished if developers found it easier to pay a small penalty than protecting specimen trees as required by City Code. If you have any questions on this matter, please follow-up with a phone call so we can talk it through. Regards, Anthony <image005.gif> Anthony A. Garganese, Managing Shareholder Board Certified City, County & Local Government law 111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000 Orlando, Florida 32801 P.O. Box 2873 (32802-2873) Phone (407) 425-9566 Fax (407) 425-9596 Kissimmee (321) 402-0144 Cocoa (866) 425-9566 Ft. Lauderdale (954) 670-1979 Website: www.orlandolaw.net <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr3zqb2r38V5UQsK6XCTTPhOyeojd79JZYQsEzC773rXVE Vh7ccECTTPhOMqem6jhOrQzIieM-DwGIjZwxk_j70QTm9-MgGvFzwqrs8npsZx_HYMyCesso WZOXBT-7nKUMejVqWdAklrIcYG7DR8OJMddFCTPt-jpoKMC--OCrKr01lyvI4aDWoU6UrDOJ oD-m1lFjbltJGTSS6CvzF_00jq8WX3VEVdwIqid40MJZFa_0Qg0Cf-q8dCq84mjhOq8aWld4 0lwrphdIZnZvnZI> Email: agarganese@orlandolaw.net <mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> Any incoming e-mail reply to this communication will be electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we may not receive your reply and/or we may not receive it in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail. Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you. From: Todd Morley [mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 2:04 PM To: Anthony A. Garganese Cc: David Dickey Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Anthony, Any news on this one? Thanks, Todd Todd Morley, Director Economic Development Dept. City of Cape Canaveral 105 Polk Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1220 x 330 t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/1jWVIqdEI9ILCzB-X3xKVJZYQsEzC4PhOrvvd7a8VxNMS--q ekhP3a9JZYQsI6zBxAQsCZ8X4zIfFUaH4_o8lfQNMddRyvI4aDWoU6CS4T7ZgovW_8zATATx TnKnjhhLOrPz339EVVqWdAkRrEKsG7DR8OJMddECSjt-jpoKMC--OCrKr01mBcJlSSHvroqp -eDY01MTfBqNfYI2HiCmGXrlLJIdc_7j-00CPhOyMMYr1oQAq81xrXil-1Ew1cvYQgrcQg8I CzAQglQGq80H0SOyrCK4M> “If it is to be, it is up to me” <image006.png> From: Anthony A. Garganese [mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 9:28 AM To: Todd Morley Cc: Anthony Garganese; David Dickey Subject: Re: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Hi Todd. I remember when it was pulled. I need to analyze this situation and the applicable code provisions because I see a potential overlap of jurisdictional duties between the code board and council that I want to think through. I'll be in touch. Regards, Anthony A. Garganese Sent from IPad On Jan 27, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Todd Morley <T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote: Anthony, You may recall that an item was pulled from the December City Council agenda. It was a request for Council to approve the removal of a specimen tree at 139 Oak Ln. Background: A building permit application was filed with the City to construct a new home. The submittal included plans and a survey showing the intended location of the house. The tree in question was indicated on the survey as being in the proposed rear yard. Because of its distance from the proposed structure (approx. 10 ft.) it appeared to be intended for preservation. There was no indication that it was proposed for removal. The building permit to construct the home was issued. Several weeks later, the footings were dug and concrete forms were put in place. As required, the developer called for a slab inspection prior to pouring the concrete slab. He submitted the required “Form-Board Survey”. The Form-Board Survey (the 2nd survey now submitted) again indicated that the tree was approximately 10 ft. away from the structure. However, during the site inspection it was noted that the tree was actually less than one ft. away from the structure (form boards were in place). The developer was contacted. He indicated that he would need to remove the tree. He was informed that City Council approval would be required prior to removal because the tree was a Specimen Tree. The slab inspection was approved with the understanding that developer would timely submit an application to remove the tree. He subsequently submitted the attached tree removal permit application. Staff prepared the attached Agenda Cover Sheet. The item was removed from the agenda because it was discovered on the date of the Council meeting that the developer had recently cut a large notch out of the side of the tree and had removed more than 1/3 of the canopy to continue the construction of the new home (concrete block walls were now up and the roof structure was complete). The City Arborist was requested to inspect the damage to the tree. He reported that: · The notching alone would not kill the tree, · The tree was so close to the structure that it could cause damage to the structure, · More than 1/3 of the canopy had been removed, · 24” of fill dirt was placed around the house foundation and the base of the tree, and · The combination of all of these items will affect the overall life span of the tree. These findings indicate violations of a number of code sections [Sec. 102-44(d), (g) and (h)]. In a normal situation, the survey would have accurately depicted the proximity of the tree to the proposed structure and the developer would have indicated the need for removal and applied for City Council approval prior to commencing construction. When asked to explain the course of events, the developer indicated that: · He was unaware of the error in the surveys until the form boards were in place. · It was at that time that he realized the tree needed to be removed. · He continued construction despite the pending approval, assuming the Council would approve the removal of the tree. Where to go from here. Sec. 102-41 states: (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, specimen trees shall not be removed except for extraordinary circumstances and hardships and only by final permit approved by the city council. As a condition of removal of any specimen tree, the city council shall have the right to require that replacement trees be planted or a contribution to the tree bank be made in accordance with section 102-43, except replacement and/or tree bank contribution shall be based on a maximum of a two-to-one ratio of cumulative diameter (dbh) basis of specimen trees removed using the data in Table 1. It is probably a forgone conclusion that City Council would approve the removal. After all, the tree is so close to the house that it is going to have to be removed. Council would certainly require mitigation. Are you of any other avenue whereby this item could be a straightforward Code Enforcement process (without Council involvement)? Sec. 102-49 – Remedial Action - provides a method for Staff to deal with violations. I look forward to discussing with you. Todd Todd Morley, Director Economic Development City of Cape Canaveral 110 Polk Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1222 x14 (321) 868-1247 (fax) t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/5fHCN8e6zqb2qrbzz39EVdTdLLCzB4sMCqejrXVEVh7cee6T TPhOyeophdLLCzBwQsIcCzATF7oAtxZf1loDX12F-Ce1FKIjZwxk_j70QSywUqehRC7-LPa8 VB7HTbFIInVNdxZ7BHEShjlKqenel3PWApmU6CQjqpK_9IInojvvpjdTdw0HiCmGXrlLJIdc _7j-00UrDOJoD-m1lFjbltJGTSS6CvzF_00jrzP0VZcQsCNs1kzh0cbvqiLMd409z_Cy3pCy 15AQsCy2KBjh05o6Skjv5Ycdj9Jb777> “If it is to be, it is up to me” From: Jeff Ratliff Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 2:57 PM To: Todd Morley Cc: Kay McKee; Tim Davis Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Todd: I spoke with Kay and Tim: Tim was asked to do a follow-up inspection of the specimen oak tree at 139 Oak Lane. The construction company at the property had to cut a notch in the trunk of the oak tree to finish the construction of the house. The question is - will these activities kill the oak tree? The notch alone will not kill the tree, but the construction company also cut more than 1/3 of the canopy. Fill dirt was also placed around the house foundation and the base of the tree. The combination of all of these items will affect the overall life span of the tree. Also: 1). Cutting more than 1/3 of the canopy of an oak tree at one time is not good practice. 2). Changing the original grade more than six inches around the base of a tree can affect its health – the construction company raised the grade approximately 24 inches. All of these items may not kill the tree, but will most likely affect the life span of the oak tree. Thanks, Jeff From: Todd Morley Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 11:25 AM To: Jeff Ratliff Subject: FW: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Jeff, I would like to talk with you about this. Are you available for a call? Todd Todd Morley, Director Community & Economic Development Dept. City of Cape Canaveral 110 Polk Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1222 x14 (321) 868-1247 (fax) t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr4x8gdEI9FIKeccCzATsS--qekhP2pEVdLLCzB4sMUUrv vd7a8VxB4S--qem3hOMOqejuAtyhS7QY5lyvI4aDWoU6CWNfS25jZcs3jqa3xEV7movW_cEz CkuLsKCONvD4S7QumKzp5dmVEVsVkffGhBrwqrjdFCXYCONtxdZZBcTsS02JapqHJJm-SMQP YtfU03xKvaRyvVo5mBcJlSSHvroqp-eDY01dKfc3DQPhOr5M5id40MJZFa_0Qg0Cf-q8dCq8 4mjhOq8aWld40lwrphdIcZQwnhI> “If it is to be, it is up to me” From: Tim Davis Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 9:00 AM To: Todd Morley; Michael German Subject: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Good morning, This e-mail is for the follow up inspection of the specimen tree.You were concerned about the notch cut out of the trunk next to the roof. I don’t think the notch or the trimming they have done will kill the tree and have not seen any die back in the canopy. The tree is so close to the house it could cause problems to the roof or foundation in the future. If you need any more information, please call me(321-863-7341). Thanks, Tim Davis Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing <Agenda Cover Sheet.docx> <139 Oak Lane Attachments.pdf> Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing 佄쉊ⶐ쉭䙰樄뙢䫰呇卓읡瘰䙺쥟뾰窠偠嘰捚烁ꂽs欱桺挰癢焀䱩摍〴䀹彺祃瀳郍б䄵⇌㉹䉋䅪ꃌ漵匶졫㔀夀摣㥪扊Ｗ냏ྡᾢ⚣ྼ᾽⾾㾿샿셏쉟썯쑿얏욟잯﾿쿈�ￋ࿍῎⯏⾦ꟽ眺䃨胓龨꾩뾪쾫곿귟껯냿넏눟듯뽏徵澶羷辸龹겺㺫ꝩ豉贯謿譪㥀㸳證崠 ɠΐ拡ﭥ䁂琀Ͱ僡褁＼䏭諻쿫⿮㿯俰忱濲ӿ紐﫟泩杭瀏幤ྰ【≂ヨ摩桴ဏ萱㌸耓敨杩ꃾ࿇ጠ玀捲ဏ胨搬ሺರ旰ム⸳炀杮぀䐱ဖ䄀䐰㤮㝁㸸ᙄᏁྀᒠ傱猰ꁣ楲瑰佩㫀⅐ᢥ倩P畴聂༱￁＄༆ἇ⼈㼉伊弋漌෿歽ະ퍱㫀һ≏ഏ﾿켎�翽迾伥：༜᷿ḟἯ‿⅏♟㩿⤟ﾟ伵弶漷缸輹ἧ⼨㼩⨫멏抻뭀Ꝣ䙉㕲Ⱥ⽯驃觪䨠黣ⱐ勰瑡⁂䅈ﰢㇲ愻牢륀ᅂო㼳㹟⯆㻰䌟䐿卍Ý❴罅轆螎桔摳懔穹䫐灞㍵崐鿀烤큺偂烤ご㔺僼䡍䫿䬏䰟䴯丿㵏桗⽔倐兏剟潧⁤ꡍ唣嘏土堯余彚捃⽜㽝螎䮦䁓ၟ䭣惓刻￐뀒쀘灺ꀀ轟齠꽡뽢揇擏俟留橢₠⽐染躯剸ᡅ厰ᆠ뀒�刀믐窰䠠厀헰 激歡䰠⵮⿿／ἰ⼱㼲弴伽�⓿绿罏聟腯艿㺏㾿ￏ�輫鼬쾅潷罸轹竿箟粯綿蛏裿褏訟Ｏ㊋퉞౲⾏㾐侑徒澓铿长随鞟颯馿诏豏｟澍羛辜龝꾞뾟循�ꉟꏯꗿ꘏ꜟ䤬ပﱰ歯끵ꀓ퀓䍩ラ_櫿鬁ꭏ곯껿꼏뀟넯＿侲徳澴羵辶ྨᾩ⾪맿멿뮏벟붯좿뽟샟�￁࿃ῄ媚ᅪ퉷ហ⺠띳忠Ā擑⁡曈汯Ù⵷ꄁꁬ쟿焀ᣑ皁䠰Ꮠ痐ힰ殂㍵䉶畴侙剶ラ噥刮痑掰逘�畐ퟫ�淰Ñ롮�鹂䕰쬀台棠홡ణ畣耀ꃖ潮捴룯汀��渱ペᗘ៙ǽ曑ꁬꀀ䂸䋘ﯚᗘ梐畯�熅ᡵ﬐쏗ꄀጭ횑淠톟윒ｇ翼パ䇘郢ꀗ뇗恪ᢳᡰ‐�㽫ꏚ�팔ᡠ랐�򆅒恓��泇Óꏝ洞ビ쇞䃝恵⼱ 괳ۘ롣�秐郚꿲逻铕狮퉰掐ᇖ췿롰혧䢑힀﯒ꊸ䋘퉢��ﲖ扭ꁬ쓳ᇘ惓ჩᓘ数橭�Ꮻ䡡煀�癤䣿�죺즿쫏쯟￯ￌ࿎῏⿐㿑俒忓�엿웯죿️ÿďȟ̯缿�弅漆缇輈鼉ꠊａ燮Ᾱ⼏㼐休弒漓缔ᖟᚏស᢯ᦿ㇏��湐㾳ﳘ틪僨䁵鋣拫潧廿�︠᲏ᴯḿｏ弟漠缡輢鼣꼤뼥켦㈶⡧�牳潩脺8怬畤⢰玘槼흸�횦ﾠ叙䇰샷샕8ㆸ෽㥀聫�웛ꃠዖ�㭑憤�碱ၪ聈旼卬⻠㰠ⷕ⹏⽟ｯ缰輱鼲꼳뼴켵�㣿௿౏ ൟ䕯䘟䜯䠿ｏ彉ｓ罋轌齍꽎뽏⬚⠞榀⠓䆐０⇽ৼ㿽ᛙ뽄录囿坯塿妏媟宯岿巏￟｟网轒齓齧꽨뽩櫿每盟浿濿瀏焟爯媚獫瘬矟磯ེύ⽼㽽佾彿澀羁狹䫾㽥獀瓯盿萏＿侅徆澇羈澓龊꾋뾌跿軏珟鄿鉏饟鑯长ﾏ龖꾗뾘쾙�煀㳺ჱ鹶ꦿ꬟걿궏㾟꾮뾯依從澟羠戼뙕戫粒�淀ᰛ漹䊪હᢧⱔ䵀떙泀䑥눀㆛뀱ﳑ牢⦶膷耫꾨滸ﾷ맫쀏叇면믯뷿倈畨獲냳䩰甠肨D㔱烬삷즳�㇀ꔺ᪠䷀徾뿿쁯셿슏쎟첯뷘얐랟꿆޽ꎐ⭒敀暡翊쬿첏춟캯쾿쓏疹Ṣ 㽪텡튟붯䘇㩗앝灀怿섫ဿ⭔ㄅ㏤⨹䲣ꍮꑯꕿ㾏龦꾧志쾩뾲춳〱듽⿁ಱ�濨翩迪鿫뎯듟뗯럿ꀏꆯ￯迡鿢꿣뿤쿥迸῱遏茛璘𢡊ﯟ￯࿾῿⼀㼁伂弃漄䥶큣瀽뵬擀⢂濐⣟ა⩰提䃠礡瀽ぃ拾瀽䉥,㽧켆�৿௿ఏടฯ༿၏ᅟ뙯⡁ᒱ瘓䁂빢밐映耟焾dᔿ／἖⼗㼘伙弚漛缜輝ỿᾟ芯붏⎡⒏▟⚯﾿켧�Ｊ༬Ἥ⼮〟㇟㋯㓿㔏？뼿㼷伸㾰漻콅⽈꼹㪟㮿⿏뷧揕䒀Ⅹ￀僜ཀὁ⽂㽃佄彅䚿䭯䱯䵿亏㲟䌮삺洸湵큡㶾浡㺅♪捅湯삺椤兣敠摶澰 뇟恤遢瑰４ནὔ嗿嘯圿塏奟婯孿岏閟꽝彃漒烔慃烟烥滁〢牥偮꽣뽤旿曏柟棯櫿欏氟洯伿佮⸼탕潐鄓ａ끢齣뽲콳�ｶླྀ礟稟笯簿絏偟伮⸀䈠硯㌠聉�새䱆憌僝熃翿聟腯艿莏蒟薯蚿⿏�ﾉ䰼谨ㅰ耩㠠㠶ㄭ鬲砠㐱彟㼾伿徜鴧뵯騖㓪騷曐ﱡ⥸㾎侏徐澑羒输铿閟隯鞿飏㳟�⍮稐Ⅸ曀キ낭怢䀓聣뵭䃳郟 ꁰ〣�煱⸶邭굧曬㕩쁢ꩤ暂쀒თ瑳笀奈䕐䱒㡉䭎넠뉏덟絥ཽ膴쀒烈䂬捜ㅦ峾뀒꧄��俯⊯쾼㿻�慓溤ﾣྥᾦ⾧ꣿꤿ꩏ꭟ걯굿꺏꾟ί뢰悠灴⼺振灖삺〣 ⸐ၢŭ欯䬭㑲x朸䕤㥉䥆䬂胟䍣䅺獔匀ⴭ敱桫聐瀲噅䱤테P㑂䵳啕癲皀㝤㡡硖냒톁涣栳䵏텏࣐番彁栠㝓Q㕙祬䥶愴䐀潗㙕坃ю卦샂婪獣ꀳ煪㍡퉸㝀킺瘀彗䕣䍺k䱵䭳佃癎䐆냓Õ浵穋ၰ搵噭䃒噳ū逅桇牂煷䁲摪䍆奘ᇘ䁴摸婚捂臑а䨲䡱䩊䁭匭免奐탃⩕혰䯠䀢핒噐ѯ洵汊卓H牶煯⵰䑥夠㄰䭤邻䐳�퐐爰䴵椵d〴䩍䙚彡〤졑䎐텦㣀扤㑐橭ピ僠١቗�池牷桰搀捉党湷﹨덉듏뗟컦쿏탟퇯࿓῔⿕㿖俗忘濙翚􏲏��룧﷯調勺묀뱟뵯빿ﾏ龿꿀 뿁쿂�⿾࿇좿줟쨯쬿챏쵟楬椾঺ﾟ⪞㌹䤮퀓ꀒᑳ澠敢偑됒ॵᎰ挑＀䄒ﲛ菿쨍࿾漀缁輂Ͽҟᚯۯߏࣟ৯௿댏Ἄ⤍杭〓뀡煤饰倡∰烺胵桴倡ㄈ㌸쀥敨杩ႏ⇠ቐ╠珀捲倡滋擀␺῰攰ꂀ瀮杮䒀냲㔀㜵䈮㑅硃䈱┳↱⛠拱玐推楲灣扩㨠腢⪥偩恢畴遑∱！㼗优弙漚缛輜鼝꼞῿纽⁰䥀ᛋ㒏὏༡ἢ⼣뼏켐輷㼭伮⿿たㅯ㉿㎏㢟﾿谴ﺐ㘼㱬䜹䢏䦟䪯䮿忏弹漺缻輼篍剢拻몥䘉ô㩭꼔唯栗짼吠聢偱㰵ㄲꅍ牢勒兔敮䔿兿㸆倰啟噿厍籥瑮뽗콘흙灗胵癡赹⪐ 捀䃪䀓聐踱费咐鮐⃠㨹䀨绽䷠ཛ὜⽝㽞佟彠椽周偁形潣摯摨䴠焻⬐棰憲惣䜠瀥끒杮㼏Ὠ⽩㽪佫彬楡扵櫞㽢⽯졙뉓ⓑ⿰ၢ做烎ቡ㇀耳‹慯⁫牌ｼཁὂ⽃㽄佅彆潇罶㗿㛯藿蚿蟏裟觯僿﾿콑�輽鼾㾍�胿苿茏萟蔯踿软避玏龑Ꚓ潇〔肠葉悵Ⱨྖᾗ⾘㾙侚魿鱟鵯鹿龏ꂟ銯吮梲ⵥ抶툒깦蜀ꀦᆱ汬睯툓뗿띡⫡網闠넀뉢籢싣絴⹁潙冀╰孰恽ღ敮ꎐ攠q赡〥ት뇀湢瑯쁱궟땀떡늒돵痰繮紐ꁴ땸Ꮁ넠ﬀ⸀₰⁉⩤ዐ㉁쀒鏿鐯锿♊縀딐뇘�灚ꍭ녁祒僎釻룏緲╠뇠⃀뽫띲ﴤ剽煮븀뛃뤑몏閟締﬐祰轵ퟂฟ疿곧谀細扠捡纏넀ﭓ潡祰삸냟쀰ሥ귡귐潁䃄ڸ棾傴䃄濁翂䪕ꈒღ累熰ﬀ쭠⃁戀燽浐䚸抽₱肷⁥닻좣曵ꂵℬ솸뒿瑠떠쑂ꊠ쫲湑↱껷⨠Ꮂ灠偱炭䋉膿ᐁ⡀㈳ⴱ㘸㌀㜭㐳⤱Ｎ辣龤꾥뾦쾧�ﾪ곿괏긟鈯찯촏锟흟ｏ忘濙翚进⿦꿝뿞쿟࿶ῷ⿸㿹俺忻濼翽ﾏƯʿϏӟׯ༇Ἀ⼉㼊伋弌漍缎࿿ႏᆟኯᎿᓏᗟᛯ༘Ἑ⼚㼛伜弝漞缟⃿↏⊟⎯Ⓙ●⛟⟯༩Ἢ⼫㼬伭弮漯缰ㇿ㊏㎟㒯㖿㛏㟟㣯༺Ἳ⼼㼽伾弿潀罁䋿䎏䒟䖯䚿䟏䣟䧯ཋὌ⽍㽎住彐潑罒叿咏喟嚯垿壏姟嫯ཛྷ噰轝齞콜콠�揿旿昏期栯椿橏歟ｯ罬轭齮꽯뽰콱�瓿盿眏砟礯稿筏籟ｯ罽轾齿꾀뾁쾂�藿蟿蠏褟訯謿豏赟ｯ美辏龐꾑뾒쾓�雿飿餏騟鬯鰿鵏鹟ｯ羟辠龡꾢뾣쾤�ꟿ꧿ꨏ꬟갯괿깏꽟ｯ羰辱龲꾳뾴쾵�룿뫿묏밟봯븿뽏쁟ｯ翁迂鿃꿄뿅쿆�짿쯿찏촟츯켿큏텟ｯ習迓鿔꿕뿖쿗�󏳿��ｯ翣迤鿥꿦뿧쿨�ｯ翴迵鿶꿷뿸쿹 �ﳿ／įȿ͏џｯ缅輆鼇꼈뼉켊�෿࿿ဏᄟሯጿᑏᕟｯ编輗鼘꼙뼚켛�ỿ⃿ℏ∟⌯␿╏♟ｯ缧輨鼩꼪뼫켬�⿿ㇿ㈏㌟㐯㔿㙏㝟ｯ缸輹鼺꼻뼼켽�䃿䋿䌏䐟䔯䘿䝏䡟ｯ罉轊齋꽌뽍콎�凿叿吏唟嘯圿塏奟ｯ罚轛齜꽝뽞콟�拿擿攏星术栿楏機ｯ罫转齭꽮뽯콰�珿痿瘏真砯礿穏筟ｯ罼载齾꽿뾀쾁�蓿蛿蜏蠟褯訿譏豟ｯ羍辎龏꾐뾑쾒�闿響頏餟騯鬿鱏鵟ｯ羞辟龠꾡뾢쾣�꛿ꣿꤏꨟ꬯갿굏깟ｯ羯辰龱꾲뾳쾴�럿맿먏묟밯봿빏뽟ｯ翀迁鿂꿃뿄쿅�죿쫿쬏찟촯츿콏큟ｯ翑迒鿓꿔뿕쿖��􏰏��ｯ翢迣鿤꿥뿦쿧�ｯ翳迴鿵꿶뿷쿸�ﯿ﷿️？/Ŀɏ͟ｯ缄輅鼆꼇뼈켉�೿໿༏ဟᄯሿፏᑟｯ缕輖鼗꼘뼙켚�᷿῿‏℟∯⌿⑏╟ｯ缦輧鼨꼩뼪켫�⻿ヿㄏ㈟㌯㐿㕏㙟ｯ缷輸鼹꼺뼻켼�㼏䇿䈏䌟吣慨䡮獫䌬㉻䐴㱐漠瀺紾챆㈵䜍⿀灜牡䑽プ灃䅊ᡋ嵃꼷≉่偃㉊䠠㘬녇瀀挠慬獳=䴢潳潎浲慨≬顉䌠䲐尷泼䵩䎐䑟䉯原咯﾿콕�ｘཚὛ⽜㽝廿彏恟慯承掏撟斯﾿콦�ｩཫὬ⽭㽮濿灏煟牯獿璏疟皯﾿콷�ｺོώ⽾㽿胿腏艟药葿薏蚟螯﾿쾈�ﾋྍᾎ⾏㾐釿鉏鍟鑯长随鞟颯﾿쾙�ﾜྞᾟ⾠㾡ꋿꍏꑟꕯꙿꞏꢟꦯ﾿쾪�ﾭྯᾰ⾱㾲돿둏땟뙯띿뢏릟몯﾿쾻�ﾾ࿀῁⿂㿃쓿앏왟읯졿즏쪟쮯﾿쿌�ￏ࿑ῒ⿓㿔헿홏흟��󷲯﾿쿝�￠࿢ΰ⿤㿥﾿쿮�￱࿳ῴ⿵㿶寧﩯ﭿﲏﶟﺯ﾿쿿�＂༄ἅ⼆㼇ࣿॏ੟୯౿ඏຟྯ﾿켐�３༕ᰖ７᛿ᨯᬯ᰿ᵏṟὯⁿﾏ鼡꼢뼣켤�Ｇ ༩⫿⬟Ⱟⴿ⹏⽟はㅿﾏ鼲꼳뼴켵�Ｘ༺㯿㰟㴯㸿㽏䁟䅯䉿ﾏ齃꽄뽅콆�ｉཋ䳿䴟丯伿偏兟副卿ﾏ齔꽕뽖콗�ｚཛྷ巿帟弯怿慏扟捯摿ﾏ齥꽦뽧콨�ｫ཭滿漟瀯焿牏獟瑯畿ﾏ齶꽷뽸콹�ｼཾ翿耟脯舿荏葟蕯虿ﾏ龇꾈뾉쾊�ﾍྏ郿鄟鈯錿鑏镟陯靿ﾏ龘꾙뾚쾛�ﾞྠꇿꈟꌯꐿꕏꙟꝯ꡿ﾏ龩꾪뾫쾬�ﾯྱ닿댟됯딿뙏띟롯륿ﾏ龺꾻뾼쾽�￀࿂쏿쐟씯옿읏졟쥯쩿ﾏ鿋꿌뿍쿎�￑࿓퓿픟혯휿��ﾏ鿜꿝뿞쿟�￢࿤ﾏ鿭꿮 뿯쿰�￳࿵錄祐ﭟﱯﵿﾏ鿾꿿뼀켁�＄༆߿ࠟयਿ୏౟൯๿ﾏ鼏꼐뼑켒�５༗᣿᤟ᨯᬿᱏᵟṯ὿ﾏ鼠꼡뼢켣�Ｆ༨⧿⨟⬯ⰿⵏ⹟⽯みﾏ鼱꼲뼳켴�Ｗ༹㫿㬟㰯㴿㹏㽟䁯䅿ﾏ齂꽃뽄콅�ｈཊ䯿䰟䴯丿住偟兯剿ﾏ齓꽔뽕콖�ｙཛ峿崟帯弿恏慟扯捿ﾏ齤꽥뽦콧�ｪཬ淿渟漯瀿煏牟獯瑿ﾏ齵꽶뽷콸�ｻཽ绿缟耯脿艏荟葯蕿ﾏ龆꾇뾈쾉�ﾌྎ迿速鄯鈿鍏鑟镯陿ﾏ龗꾘뾙쾚�ﾝྟꃿꄟꈯꌿꑏꕟ꙯ꝿﾏ龨꾩뾪쾫�ﾮྰ뇿눟댯됿땏뙟 띯롿ﾏ龹꾺뾻쾼�﾿࿁싿쌟쐯씿왏읟졯쥿ﾏ鿊꿋뿌쿍�￐࿒폿퐟픯혿흏��Ώ鿛꣜楔⁭慄癈獩䯝㐲⃞‼㩯㹰㖼ല냡�岶慰絲꟞���㜭�•᳢¡⁰汣獡㵳∀獍乯牯桭污₈惝⟦䱜楬胧⃝汆ル偩慤栠ꃪ盀攀祲戠潲⁡⁤異挀栠敲搰î郪顷‮獠�⫐渐烮璐Ѵ湥烪浯畭ワ瑡潩ꇱ惯䃲旎탮ル勯楥䃮탮抂烮桴⁥애烮�䍀灡ㇴñ暑ワ䕠Ǯ旐灭热ꙹ椰抠ヴ摐ヴ烠慐ჯ琰옠‐灵燲惯燼ᇴ獀��鿴럞僜⿦염ラ硥ꇶ璺ჰ䱗搐ﲁ⼠Ǯ惯ჰ�祀⁵滀냻ヱñӿҐĠﻱ響�ﱰ维辶ҷﱅ掀瓾ꃮᇲ蔁돸郠郶퀄͡ޱҀ绐੡Ԑ烡桾烲ヴ⇳섆䋱쀆ｧ俼忽濾忡濢翣迤鿥？⿯㿰俱忲濳翴迵鿶樂𢡊ﯟ࿯ᇿ／？⼀㼁伂弃漄缅輆鼇ࣿযિ௏೟෯࿿⸏＿伯㼒伓弔漕编꽂鼘᧿᪯ᮿ᳏ᷟữ⃿ℏ？⼢㼣伤弥漦缧輨鼩⫿⮯ⲿ䃏䇟⿯ㇿ㈏？⼳㼴伵弶漷缸輹鼺㯿㲯㶿㻏㿟忯怟䌯？⽄㽅但彇轳罉轊齋䳿䶯亿俏僟凯叿吏？⽕㽖佗彘潙罚轛齜巿熯犿秏懟拯擿攏？⽦㽧佨彩潪罫转齭滿澯炿迏釿猏痿瘏？⽷㽸佹彺潻罼载齾翿肯膿苏菟蓯蛿蜏？⾈㾉侊律澌羍辎龏ꏿꪯ銿鏏铟闯響頏？⾙㾚供徜澝羞辟龠ꇿ삯쇟싯ꗿꛯꣿꤏ鼟⾪㾫侬徭〱䇗⿺ꂾ끶�혈�깿ｯ羯辰龱꾲뾳쾴�럿맿먏묟밯봿빏뽟ｯ翀返鿕꿃뿄쿅�죿쫿쬏찟촯츿콏큟ｯ翑迒鿓�쿖���ଏ��ᅟ윿鼓ꤔ샨捯鹠ᕥᚏសಯ㤃ശ￰漙뷥漛缜舝尕἟⼠ ∿୚㢋瀌锦ဌ✻㱘ᠣ杁脃䍰⃱旐肋﷠揰⥸期㨪＾ἣ＋།Ἆ⼏㼐漯弒⓿ᑏ᩿㔏㝟ᢿᦿ㫏ｿ輻＜켽༣㼡伢轃䑿▟♿䚏⣏⦯⪿㇌㏀‹慏恵ߡ盱ؠ梠냳胾僽ﱰ晤㽍⼮潇估弱漲㏿㑿㖏㚟䢯㢟㻏䝟﾿彜༽ἾὟ⽠齉꽊뽋㎡＿俬忭濮翯述鿱꿲뿳য়揯說﨏ײַﰯ＿俽忾濿缀輁鼂꼃뼄׿ۏߟ磯礿穏呟喿ￏ�ｘཚὛ뽤㽝콢揿雟攏柿栏椟樯欿ｏ彬潭置软齰꽱뽲콳瓿痟盯磿谏頟箏簿ｏ彽潾罿辀龁꾂뾃쾄藿蛟蟯觿訏謟긯꽯ｿ徎澏羐辑龒꾓뾔�髿鯯鷿鸏鼟ꀯꄿꉏ｟澣群辥龦꾧뾨쾩�꯿곯쇿숏뀟넯눿덏｟澴羵辶龷꾸뾹쾺�볿뷯뿿쀏�썟쑏｟濅翆过뿳꿉뿊龖꾗刺ﲯ쬉춻컯탿턏툟Ｏ㿓俔忕濖翗还鿙꿚􏲿�೙̿ﾟ࿿뗡迣鿤꿥뿦쿧�｟缔蠕㯺￶۸뿼쿽輕ﯿ惟拿Ⰿ賈⴯Ư﾿㼃伄弅漆缇輈鼉꼊௿ಿාໟ࿯ᇿሏጟＯ�伕弖漗缘輙鼚꼛᳿ᶿỏ῟⃯⋿⌏␟㼯罅轆弧漨缩痴㠵⽱漲祤滵켭담圷臶鋸淵帳絥끡