HomeMy WebLinkAboutFW Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln (7)Dave and Mike,
Let’s spend some time talking about this before we call the responsible
party.
We need to contact them tomorrow (Friday).
I’ll send a meeting invite.
Thanks,
Todd
Todd Morley, Director
Economic Development Dept.
City of Cape Canaveral
105 Polk Ave.
P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
(321) 868-1220 x 330
t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://www.cityofcapecanaveral.org/>
“If it is to be, it is up to me”
From: Todd Morley
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 5:17 PM
To: 'Anthony A. Garganese'
Cc: 'David Greene'; 'David Dickey'
Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Anthony,
The City Arborist got back with me today about the interpretive issue
we spoke about regarding bifurcated specimen trees.
The bottom line is: it is a specimen tree regardless.
We will proceed as discussed and will keep you apprised.
Thanks,
Todd
Todd Morley, Director
Economic Development Dept.
City of Cape Canaveral
105 Polk Ave.
P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
(321) 868-1220 x 330
t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://www.cityofcapecanaveral.org/>
“If it is to be, it is up to me”
From: Anthony A. Garganese [mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 11:51 AM
To: Todd Morley
Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Yes. They have two distinct, but related problems; (1) remediation
for the removal of the specimen tree; and (2) code enforcement. Both
have to be resolved. Hopefully, you can resolve cumulatively in one
settlement prior to going to the code board.
Anthony A. Garganese, Managing Shareholder
Board Certified City, County & Local Government law
111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000
Orlando, Florida 32801
P.O. Box 2873 (32802-2873)
Phone (407) 425-9566
Fax (407) 425-9596
Kissimmee (321) 402-0144
Cocoa (866) 425-9566
Ft. Lauderdale (954) 670-1979
Website: www.orlandolaw.net <http://www.orlandolaw.net/>
Email: agarganese@orlandolaw.net <mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net>
Any incoming e-mail reply to this communication will be electronically
filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result
in such reply being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our
site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we may not
receive your reply and/or we may not receive it in a timely manner.
Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are
particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains
privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this
e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and
delete it from your system. Thank you.
From: Todd Morley [mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 11:06 AM
To: Anthony A. Garganese
Subject: Re: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Anthony,
Ok. That would get us to:
• 92 inches (46 dbh x 2) of trees planted, or
• $4600 contribution to the tree bank @ $50 per inch (92x50=$4600), or
• A combination of plantings and tree bank contribution.
Including the $5000 authorized by 162 and the $500 penalty, we have a
starting point demand of just over $10K.
Am I on track?
Thanks
Todd
Todd Morley, Director
Economic Development Dept.
City of Cape Canaveral
110 Polk Ave.
P.O. Box 326
Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
(321) 868-1222 x14
t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/FZsScygwrhojoood7bbbNKVJZYQsEzC4PhOrvvd7a8VxNMS-
-qekhP3a9JZYQsI6zBxAQsCZ8X4zIfFUaH4_o8lfQNMddRyvI4aDWoU6CTCnnNTIfZvAm3hO
OZRXBQSkrYCYed7b_bnhIyyHssPOEuvkzaT0QSyr76XYCONtxdZZBcTsS02JapqHJJm-SMQP
YtfU02rDOJoD-m1lFjbltJGTSS6CvzF_00jrwV-XxI5-Aq81xrXil-1Ew1cvYQgrcQg8ICzA
QglQGq80H0SOyrLiF->
On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Anthony A. Garganese
<agarganese@orlandolaw.net <mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> > wrote:
Todd, given the developer must remove the specimen tree under
the circumstances, my thought regarding remediation is to use 102-41(b).
That section provides that the city has a right to impose remediation
for the removal of a specimen tree at a maximum 2 to 1 ratio per dbh.
As such, take the dbh of the removed tree and multiply by 2 as a
starting point demand.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, specimen
trees shall not be removed except for extraordinary circumstances and
hardships and only by final permit approved by the city council. As a
condition of removal of any specimen tree, the city council shall have
the right to require that replacement trees be planted or a contribution
to the tree bank be made in accordance with section 102-43
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr3x0SyMCMMMqemmnztPrXVEVh7c9CzAS--qekhP3zxJZY
QsEzC6kjrXVEVod7b39EVdWhS97ovjMlm9-MgGvFzwqrH4_o8lfQNMddLcKLzLovW_8I6zBB
XHTbFIETVdUsqen-mKzp55mUVDBgY-F6lK1FJcSedTVdByX2rXXapKVIDeqR4IMFOHs9mGx_
bUv8x7oBI5MHBJmYlJIdc_7jYJl3WpqG7yJnhmIk9gS5LEixl3MR0Uo2MO5h0e6x8c2EA5Qr
FxAq5h05wAd3gi2MI2Nke3gOC5h0i2EGc8TjbIcwA5wIq2gjdPVmIj_b0GQFBGKSRrXr3jfN
Q_w09JMs_tMS2_id40MJZFa_0Qg0Cf-q8dCq84mjhOq8aWld40lwrphdWd2CjnQ7> ,
except replacement and/or tree bank contribution shall be based on a
maximum of a two-to-one ratio of cumulative diameter (dbh) basis of
specimen trees removed using the data in Table 1.
Regards,
Anthony A. Garganese
Sent from IPad
On Feb 19, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Todd Morley
<T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote:
Anthony,
Thanks. Additionally, Section 102-38(b)(1) imposes a
$500 fine for the removal of a specimen tree.
Trying to apply remedial requirements is challenging.
Section 102-49(b) requires a restoration plan and gives
three choices:
1. Replacement of same size tree (not practical at
46” dbh), or
2. A 4X payment to the tree bank. However, for this
size of tree, there is no dollar amount provided. The table says “To be
preserved”.
3. Planting four desirable species in accordance
with section 102-54. However, for this size of tree, there is no number
of replacement trees specified. The table says “To be preserved”.
I’m trying to arrive a logical, reasoned approach to
remediation.
Any help? I am available to discuss today
Todd
Todd Morley, Director
Economic Development Dept.
City of Cape Canaveral
105 Polk Ave.
P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
(321) 868-1220 x 330
t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/1jWVIp6zqb2r38V5UQsK6XCTTPhOyeojd79JZYQsEzC773rX
VEVh7ccECTTPhOMqem6jhOrQzIieM-DwGIjZwxk_j70QTm9-MgGvFzwqrs8npsZx_HYMyCes
soWZOXBT-7nKUMejVqWdAklrIcYG7DR8OJMddECTPt-jpoKMC--OCrKr01mBcJlSSHvroqp-
eDY01MTfBqNfYI2HiCmGXrlLJIdc_7j-00CQhRS7PhOr1oQAq81xrXil-1Ew1cvYQgrcQg8I
CzAQglQGq80H0SOyrrLnEnLxL>
“If it is to be, it is up to me”
<image001.png>
From: Anthony A. Garganese
[mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 5:57 AM
To: Todd Morley
Cc: David Dickey; David Greene
Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Importance: High
Todd,
I’ve given this one some significant thought. It
appears that the developer intentionally damaged the tree before
applying for the requisite tree removal permit. The tree now appears to
be so far damaged and so close to the structure under construction that
it must come down or the structure removed in favor of trying to save
the tree that will forever be disfigured. As such, at this stage of
your investigation and case study, this appears to be a classic case of
an intentional violation of the City Code which is irreparable or
irreversible. Therefore, one approach to take is as follows:
1. Due to the intentional damage of the tree, the
tree no longer fits the definition of a specimen tree. As such, the
final removal of the tree does not require City Council approval.
However, as you pointed out, the violation requires that Staff impose
remedial action upon the developer under section 102-41.
2. In addition, and in conjunction with the
remedial action, Staff should promptly serve upon the developer a notice
of code violation for the intentional violation of the tree ordinance
and seek a fine not to exceed $5,000 for an irreparable or irreversible
violation of the City Code. Section 162.09(2)(a), Florida Statutes
provides:
A fine imposed pursuant to this section shall not exceed
$250 per day for a first violation and shall not exceed $500 per day for
a repeat violation, and, in addition, may include all costs of repairs
pursuant to subsection (1). However, if a code enforcement board finds
the violation to be irreparable or irreversible in nature, it may impose
a fine not to exceed $5,000 per violation.
(b) In determining the amount of the fine, if any, the
enforcement board shall consider the following factors:
1. The gravity of the violation;
2. Any actions taken by the violator to correct the
violation; and
3. Any previous violations committed by the violator.
3. You did not indicate in your email whether the
construction has been completed and a certificate of occupancy issued by
the City. If the certificate of occupancy has not been issued, the City
should seriously evaluate whether it should require the developer to
complete the remedial action and payment of the code enforcement fine
PRIOR to issuance of the certificate of occupancy or prior to issuing
any other final building inspections on the project. Once the notice of
code violation is served, you could attempt to settle (payment in full
in exchange for a release) the fine issue and dismiss the case before
the matter is actually heard by the Code Board in order to expedite a
final resolution of the matter. However, any agreed upon settlement
should be approved by the City Manager using the $5,000 cap and factors
stated above and should be commensurate with the egregious nature of the
violation that resulted in adversely affecting the Council’s
jurisdiction to make determinations regarding the protection of specimen
trees. The later point cannot be overemphasized because if this
situation were to frequently occur without appropriate sanctions imposed
by the City, the Council’s jurisdiction over these matters could be
severely diminished if developers found it easier to pay a small penalty
than protecting specimen trees as required by City Code.
If you have any questions on this matter, please
follow-up with a phone call so we can talk it through.
Regards,
Anthony
<image005.gif>
Anthony A. Garganese, Managing Shareholder
Board Certified City, County & Local Government law
111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000
Orlando, Florida 32801
P.O. Box 2873 (32802-2873)
Phone (407) 425-9566
Fax (407) 425-9596
Kissimmee (321) 402-0144
Cocoa (866) 425-9566
Ft. Lauderdale (954) 670-1979
Website: www.orlandolaw.net
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr3zqb2r38V5UQsK6XCTTPhOyeojd79JZYQsEzC773rXVE
Vh7ccECTTPhOMqem6jhOrQzIieM-DwGIjZwxk_j70QTm9-MgGvFzwqrs8npsZx_HYMyCesso
WZOXBT-7nKUMejVqWdAklrIcYG7DR8OJMddFCTPt-jpoKMC--OCrKr01lyvI4aDWoU6UrDOJ
oD-m1lFjbltJGTSS6CvzF_00jq8WX3VEVdwIqid40MJZFa_0Qg0Cf-q8dCq84mjhOq8aWld4
0lwrphdIZnZvnZI>
Email: agarganese@orlandolaw.net
<mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net>
Any incoming e-mail reply to this communication will be
electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering
process may result in such reply being quarantined (i.e., potentially
not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that
reason, we may not receive your reply and/or we may not receive it in a
timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending communications
to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other
than e-mail.
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to
it, contains privileged and confidential information intended only for
the use of the individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the
reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the
sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.
From: Todd Morley
[mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 2:04 PM
To: Anthony A. Garganese
Cc: David Dickey
Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Anthony,
Any news on this one?
Thanks,
Todd
Todd Morley, Director
Economic Development Dept.
City of Cape Canaveral
105 Polk Ave.
P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
(321) 868-1220 x 330
t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/1jWVIqdEI9ILCzB-X3xKVJZYQsEzC4PhOrvvd7a8VxNMS--q
ekhP3a9JZYQsI6zBxAQsCZ8X4zIfFUaH4_o8lfQNMddRyvI4aDWoU6CS4T7ZgovW_8zATATx
TnKnjhhLOrPz339EVVqWdAkRrEKsG7DR8OJMddECSjt-jpoKMC--OCrKr01mBcJlSSHvroqp
-eDY01MTfBqNfYI2HiCmGXrlLJIdc_7j-00CPhOyMMYr1oQAq81xrXil-1Ew1cvYQgrcQg8I
CzAQglQGq80H0SOyrCK4M>
“If it is to be, it is up to me”
<image006.png>
From: Anthony A. Garganese
[mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 9:28 AM
To: Todd Morley
Cc: Anthony Garganese; David Dickey
Subject: Re: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Hi Todd. I remember when it was pulled. I need to
analyze this situation and the applicable code provisions because I see
a potential overlap of jurisdictional duties between the code board and
council that I want to think through. I'll be in touch.
Regards,
Anthony A. Garganese
Sent from IPad
On Jan 27, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Todd Morley
<T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote:
Anthony,
You may recall that an item was pulled from the
December City Council agenda.
It was a request for Council to approve the
removal of a specimen tree at 139 Oak Ln.
Background:
A building permit application was filed with the
City to construct a new home. The submittal included plans and a survey
showing the intended location of the house.
The tree in question was indicated on the survey
as being in the proposed rear yard.
Because of its distance from the proposed
structure (approx. 10 ft.) it appeared to be intended for preservation.
There was no indication that it was proposed for removal.
The building permit to construct the home was
issued.
Several weeks later, the footings were dug and
concrete forms were put in place.
As required, the developer called for a slab
inspection prior to pouring the concrete slab. He submitted the
required “Form-Board Survey”.
The Form-Board Survey (the 2nd survey now
submitted) again indicated that the tree was approximately 10 ft. away
from the structure.
However, during the site inspection it was noted
that the tree was actually less than one ft. away from the structure
(form boards were in place).
The developer was contacted. He indicated that
he would need to remove the tree. He was informed that City Council
approval would be required prior to removal because the tree was a
Specimen Tree.
The slab inspection was approved with the
understanding that developer would timely submit an application to
remove the tree.
He subsequently submitted the attached tree
removal permit application. Staff prepared the attached Agenda Cover
Sheet.
The item was removed from the agenda because it
was discovered on the date of the Council meeting that the developer had
recently cut a large notch out of the side of the tree and had removed
more than 1/3 of the canopy to continue the construction of the new home
(concrete block walls were now up and the roof structure was complete).
The City Arborist was requested to inspect the
damage to the tree.
He reported that:
· The notching alone would not kill the
tree,
· The tree was so close to the structure
that it could cause damage to the structure,
· More than 1/3 of the canopy had been
removed,
· 24” of fill dirt was placed around the
house foundation and the base of the tree, and
· The combination of all of these items
will affect the overall life span of the tree.
These findings indicate violations of a number
of code sections [Sec. 102-44(d), (g) and (h)].
In a normal situation, the survey would have
accurately depicted the proximity of the tree to the proposed structure
and the developer would have indicated the need for removal and applied
for City Council approval prior to commencing construction.
When asked to explain the course of events, the
developer indicated that:
· He was unaware of the error in the
surveys until the form boards were in place.
· It was at that time that he realized the
tree needed to be removed.
· He continued construction despite the
pending approval, assuming the Council would approve the removal of the
tree.
Where to go from here.
Sec. 102-41 states:
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
division, specimen trees shall not be removed except for extraordinary
circumstances and hardships and only by final permit approved by the
city council. As a condition of removal of any specimen tree, the city
council shall have the right to require that replacement trees be
planted or a contribution to the tree bank be made in accordance with
section 102-43, except replacement and/or tree bank contribution shall
be based on a maximum of a two-to-one ratio of cumulative diameter (dbh)
basis of specimen trees removed using the data in Table 1.
It is probably a forgone conclusion that City
Council would approve the removal. After all, the tree is so close to
the house that it is going to have to be removed.
Council would certainly require mitigation.
Are you of any other avenue whereby this item
could be a straightforward Code Enforcement process (without Council
involvement)?
Sec. 102-49 – Remedial Action - provides a
method for Staff to deal with violations.
I look forward to discussing with you.
Todd
Todd Morley, Director
Economic Development
City of Cape Canaveral
110 Polk Ave.
P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
(321) 868-1222 x14 (321) 868-1247 (fax)
t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/5fHCN8e6zqb2qrbzz39EVdTdLLCzB4sMCqejrXVEVh7cee6T
TPhOyeophdLLCzBwQsIcCzATF7oAtxZf1loDX12F-Ce1FKIjZwxk_j70QSywUqehRC7-LPa8
VB7HTbFIInVNdxZ7BHEShjlKqenel3PWApmU6CQjqpK_9IInojvvpjdTdw0HiCmGXrlLJIdc
_7j-00UrDOJoD-m1lFjbltJGTSS6CvzF_00jrzP0VZcQsCNs1kzh0cbvqiLMd409z_Cy3pCy
15AQsCy2KBjh05o6Skjv5Ycdj9Jb777>
“If it is to be, it is up to me”
From: Jeff Ratliff
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 2:57 PM
To: Todd Morley
Cc: Kay McKee; Tim Davis
Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Todd:
I spoke with Kay and Tim:
Tim was asked to do a follow-up inspection of
the specimen oak tree at 139 Oak Lane. The construction company at the
property had to cut a notch in the trunk of the oak tree to finish the
construction of the house. The question is - will these activities kill
the oak tree? The notch alone will not kill the tree, but the
construction company also cut more than 1/3 of the canopy. Fill dirt was
also placed around the house foundation and the base of the tree. The
combination of all of these items will affect the overall life span of
the tree.
Also:
1). Cutting more than 1/3 of the canopy of an
oak tree at one time is not good practice.
2). Changing the original grade more than six
inches around the base of a tree can affect its health – the
construction company raised the grade approximately 24 inches.
All of these items may not kill the tree, but
will most likely affect the life span of the oak tree.
Thanks,
Jeff
From: Todd Morley
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 11:25 AM
To: Jeff Ratliff
Subject: FW: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Jeff,
I would like to talk with you about this.
Are you available for a call?
Todd
Todd Morley, Director
Community & Economic Development Dept.
City of Cape Canaveral
110 Polk Ave.
P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
(321) 868-1222 x14 (321) 868-1247 (fax)
t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr4x8gdEI9FIKeccCzATsS--qekhP2pEVdLLCzB4sMUUrv
vd7a8VxB4S--qem3hOMOqejuAtyhS7QY5lyvI4aDWoU6CWNfS25jZcs3jqa3xEV7movW_cEz
CkuLsKCONvD4S7QumKzp5dmVEVsVkffGhBrwqrjdFCXYCONtxdZZBcTsS02JapqHJJm-SMQP
YtfU03xKvaRyvVo5mBcJlSSHvroqp-eDY01dKfc3DQPhOr5M5id40MJZFa_0Qg0Cf-q8dCq8
4mjhOq8aWld40lwrphdIcZQwnhI>
“If it is to be, it is up to me”
From: Tim Davis
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 9:00 AM
To: Todd Morley; Michael German
Subject: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Good morning,
This e-mail is for the follow up inspection of
the specimen tree.You were concerned about the notch cut out of the
trunk next to the roof. I don’t think the notch or the trimming they
have done will kill the tree and have not seen any die back in the
canopy. The tree is so close to the house it could cause problems to
the roof or foundation in the future. If you need any more information,
please call me(321-863-7341).
Thanks,
Tim Davis
Florida has a very broad public records law. As
a result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As
a result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As
a result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As
a result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As
a result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As
a result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
<Agenda Cover Sheet.docx>
<139 Oak Lane Attachments.pdf>
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a
result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a
result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a
result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a
result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any
written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral
officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or
media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email
addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address
released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic
email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written
communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral
officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or
media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email
addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address
released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic
email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written
communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral
officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or
media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email
addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address
released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic
email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written
communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral
officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or
media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email
addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address
released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic
email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing
㟇ꛌ�㧎歫꺭ゝ귆ᨲ则歲祡絵⠪鹳ㆌ停㥉爹鞝ឋ洗鵊뾝㭂挵絠꺵휻㒼袢謹⽽醜扳㕑玃ⓓ罀ꙿퟪ↽ꖾ猳䅤睾⑱䨢奛ཤ娏閴阱ㅻ㨾剣㡉溄Ｐ㏌㭁Ꙋ⢅싞吷䑉䉂撔䭙ⴱ㍋娯籼킜ㆭ屬阺㶆窅ꝫㆌ綌鰾⪅钢㥇娶橼籁㝪璃괰剒佱積䉈㿠莜洰蹫趫鴩⪍瓬鵴鶽〲匬鲵猳㩢듎伳捍貌暻晦쳌⧗橸뭊㪲钭䬱鑋쏖⠷樨兙굔㺪佚欶葪᱆䴙瑻㩧稺ퟠ謼䩿摬筒⽫쓷蔶扻閚䑊䌹⌦汃䉣�㒶䭐ࡐÿ䠜ꂰ菁ገ尪냈쎡ႇ䨣䢜ꊱ诅㌘�뇈잣詃⤜謑鏉匨岪닉쮥쩣䦜ꚳ
鯍ᜰ쥢ꀶ쾁䂟ઃ䨝ꢴꏑ鍈崪듊펩䒧搇褳쬐䎀瓣�뗊悯諃䬝겶동퍨嶪身蝱怆령僳뮢�럋�肿ଃ䰞낸쏡Έ騟큪룪腄ܢ䆲莙쭥㊎癫ꨄꀰ荃䜎뒚펕瞧�ꔁᐵ뀮ࢹ䶙䡛�훨ꂍȷ쀏鸗뢠䋱鏈奿ﳎ菋쿧䠥亟몽돘�뷎蒻㛤滿Π摲㛊挮쳞㏙턨䮢䚛敭ﶵ냘콫鷆�鰷읱蜥獜䇋悧ఆ菠䘐ᒄ桖藡☍䎢猃萕ͅ␆饒簙薣ὃꭽ汚ῗo•焠ᨄࡘ캂㝅菝ѓ␙䐆椖釤♈䲒鏤♄b⢅擙帣ꉖ麉ㄱ⧌鳇諂暡讟龷ﺌ瀛�恈㩱죮芣砏粞짶钝穔ꈈ塹䞦笢
痮yቜᭂ鳚蚭沟눱忩㚍㧊鵧ùꒆ檖ꧪȘ⇚ὁ领童▛૿য়셡ᨫ掤ꐁꊕ按㉭뛞赩ꈷ꧳ꆁ罹莣โ킳⭆鎭嚪桉끱觥쫑�ዌ⫂뒫谱➤�殢ꩩ氙蹩⏘繴ꯦ뻯嗚꠫ꪽꈭँ퐤㌠ᤋ깓穖뮩槆玱&航躢岇뾡ຬ瀪覉잾굄�ણ젤䁨⒉뱢졃㼑繫뻀ㅫ角윬䨾搇펳괦틴鉍值鞢뛭ᣃ쮬ꨈꆤ㐰䣟컱㜧챃뫢떭⦛ᦾ肜漙㑌ﲾⷆ龷딄剤쨟ᡞὕ賿홵彛Ҡ鼹綀㚄�㙧㹭옠峝⋇湗졹罵Ӊ뙷㬲�숳ꂌڵ菁訔縔ﻬ磊滣Ḿ운㎒뜇쳑촢⟀劣磝
鹳⠙耬ꗨ㵫఼뫞裡켻콧捈ᶲ犹ᛉ㝣ꃼᯅꖪ졦⺃䡒菁꧳銻�|ሔ븯�닃门һࡲ캅⫧쇵㍪䡡�ꁆꜮ徫㘊舸᷼ກݖ᠂�푭騹芐싇刖䩫窫祥㟒䜵茌逝臈⨒栭ᗁ�Ḛ峿ʑ؟蠀b㹛Ꝡ⩡쉻愢۷뷴蔃奏쯥ᚢ䠙벨ꥩ杽잘專왁Ȳ纑ⱃ⍣ꆔሌ㐓ꉘ鼓㬸㨀蒮ⰃŐ뗯Ԡᦏꆂ貵ᧇ娉አЅ瀠֍͜ﺈᦈꀴૡ履蒋⼀䅸㠌菦ᐎ墫䕈娽牱叢뎡졜囊聢型拲堕訰跐Ҁ젂삩䚋胰ਘң�ನ쀁飡偃㐆瞎퇈檉趲䜨䔹ᄜ簐፯⦷堷䰆덽쓕ऐ鑧᱁ⳇ
熜栅扄큫䄠耉ັ顃᳃飉ᔆ凒㏿艧翐듒赣蛖ᚱࢠ⛍ⱴ艤蚆ꆬဦ䑙ߐ둍屔᠔逇䭗ꦗᕂ磔㖃끞솔␅̠㔰荐꺖ᙣ퀑ᢅ퇺એ≐⌝嫸脜䝐ᆆڇ@Ẏ惀рဠ见骃Ɓ䣉㌆鄲䐉ట荄ര氣ᇢࢋಒ䄞佖椠瘆Ϙ簛ୁᐔ٩灞ث낲砋싸阗⮐昆谐吊ീ〳⋒№䟗ꄐ䒭숲렮ѡ젣߂ࡨਆ䁐暋쌴㌒葸ؚ夁䧵ﳞᕦ퀨퇑䈩괊荸ށ蠼Ẃ裟슭臎ઇ裿ᶂ肒⪄✊䤉抐깰䋄Љᑃᗡ碯㉃⁺⊈愔쐛䉰渞菐뱦ᤂꢵ⩄惀쌂ꤌɰ᠘跐呮룠郌ƾ䲋䝔笆앸逹�䠍Ӈ硍ゅ㎤㈍ꆐ蒨ᨏҊ제뺗逸璁
恤溈堨ﰂ웸谫탐籤ഃ炛祮↷愌ꊼ떼ˈ鰬譛汚ᇣ퀙桓发憅皔焄熈∯要ᡘৣᦃ䀉⊈㠆쇥蘖䥌䡗炁屰⠆ᦣ莬�술툅ࢀ籄༃ꡄ㾆↚㼏싴뜖薸爦芠籝᭣�ᤀ설甌͔᧿ๆ膐ጄ憠묛梸搆ೠ롒ᠡ䂃ׅ샾䖠̌Î㐒ᑜᯠᢕ⚬탞㬇쇘�Ȱ벃舐М䆃傃⤆뇎ᤈ拸䐛Ұ∙花�ൂꢔʄ凴㾋ꈌ锒腘鈾桀敒鰔뒴ﰥ䟤錊ꏢ丒蜐䠳贀쐋뤬똾⮤ꆠኌ悔┌₸͇〽葂驭ރ倘䴉ǘ쁠֛䐑ᘂ쀛۵惌㬆ᩀ挞薨瘗葑ꀜൡ⢶᫆膞缇挔묆ڨ찷ꑚ豠䖓ᨁ䆸悤肐픘얠齞褑}Ҁ롸ࢃ뚆홒帇샿
缊⍸뒰菨봛ୁ吵ᠣ㡷ⵇ䃮娋쨛