Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRE Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln (5)All, I concur with the City Attorney. Let’s wrap it up. David From: Anthony A. Garganese [mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net] Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 9:36 AM To: Todd Morley Cc: Anthony Garganese; David Greene; David Dickey; Michael German Subject: Re: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Todd, can you call me on this. I'm not clear why you are bringing this matter to the code board if you reached a pre-hearing settlement. I previously explained to you that if a settlement is reached before the code board hearing, there are two general ways to implement it: (1) a straight up settlement agreement abating the hearing until payment and/or mitigation is made and then dismissal; or (2) seek a consent order from the code board with the settlement terms approved. Depending the terms of settlement, there are pros and cons for each that I would like to discuss with the group. I'm not sure you need to bring this to the code board if the $5000 settlement is implemented in short order. Regards, Anthony A. Garganese Sent from IPad On Mar 19, 2015, at 8:41 AM, Todd Morley <T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote: Anthony, Status update: The Community Development Director, Building Official and I met with the two gentlemen developing the property where the specimen tree issue is located. After some negotiation the Parties agreed to a mitigation of $5,000, which represents a doubling of the “per-inch” mitigation requirement. They indicated interest in planting a portion of the mitigation and will submit a proposal for Staff review and consideration. Pending Staff approval, the item will continue to code board with a Staff recommendation. They understand that the Code Board can accept or reject the Staff Recommendation. Todd Todd Morley, Director Economic Development Dept. City of Cape Canaveral 105 Polk Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1220 x 330 t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr6xESyMCUesud7apEVdTdLLCzB4sMCqejrXVEVh7cee6T TPhOyeophdLLCzBwQsIcCzATF7oAtxZf1loDX12F-Ce1FKIjZwxk_j70QTWb5JK-_R-huvLs tRXBQSjhPvCn66mhTbnhIyyHt5_BgY-F6lK1FJ4SzsTvASmbI9LLIFCXCM0lFjbltJGTSS6C vzF_00sdPVmIj_b0GQFBGKSRrXr3jfNQ_w09J5NZx54S2NF8Qg32TSAHY3h02o_VEwSpEwhp d79EwHFkQg1m1JB4SmFlp5sbJiTW> “If it is to be, it is up to me” <image003.png> From: Anthony A. Garganese [mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 6:36 PM To: Todd Morley Cc: David Greene; David Dickey Subject: Re: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Okay. Sent iPhone (please excuse errors) On Mar 12, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Todd Morley <T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote: Anthony, The City Arborist got back with me today about the interpretive issue we spoke about regarding bifurcated specimen trees. The bottom line is: it is a specimen tree regardless. We will proceed as discussed and will keep you apprised. Thanks, Todd Todd Morley, Director Economic Development Dept. City of Cape Canaveral 105 Polk Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1220 x 330 t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/5fHCMUe6xEidEI9K8CzB-W8UTsS--qekhP2pEVdLLCzB4sMU Urvvd7a8VxB4S--qem3hOMOqejuAtyhS7QY5lyvI4aDWoU6CWNfS25jZcs3joVxeWtTT-LOt T6kSkuLsKCOCzPbPXzPyvbnjIyyHt5PBgY-F6lK1FJ4Sqejt-jpoKMC--OCrKr01mBcJlSSH vroqp-eDY01MTfBqNfYI2HiCmGXrlLJIdc_7j-00CQmnTQjhOr1oQAq81xrXil-1Ew1cvYQg rcQg8ICzAQglQGq80H0SOyrcoKT> “If it is to be, it is up to me” <image001.png> From: Anthony A. Garganese [mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 11:51 AM To: Todd Morley Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Yes. They have two distinct, but related problems; (1) remediation for the removal of the specimen tree; and (2) code enforcement. Both have to be resolved. Hopefully, you can resolve cumulatively in one settlement prior to going to the code board. <image004.gif> Anthony A. Garganese, Managing Shareholder Board Certified City, County & Local Government law 111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000 Orlando, Florida 32801 P.O. Box 2873 (32802-2873) Phone (407) 425-9566 Fax (407) 425-9596 Kissimmee (321) 402-0144 Cocoa (866) 425-9566 Ft. Lauderdale (954) 670-1979 Website: www.orlandolaw.net <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/FZsS938Ocy1J5xdN4QsLTh76XCTTPhOyeojd79JZYQsEzC77 3rXVEVh7ccECTTPhOMqem6jhOrQzIieM-DwGIjZwxk_j70QTm9-MgGvFzwqr7c9TjK-_R-jK UOCOzRXBQSkQupuvsusjVqWtAklrEKsG7DR8OJMddFCPhOrLOrb5S4TTSkPtPo0aIjZwxk_j 70T3s-lH4_OMaJapqHJJm-SMQPYtfU02rhpvvhd79I5zihEw65LJ9nU6y04N_Ph1IPh0yOqe jh1niFEw2I3ra9JU9nZpd9> Email: agarganese@orlandolaw.net <mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> Any incoming e-mail reply to this communication will be electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we may not receive your reply and/or we may not receive it in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail. Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you. From: Todd Morley [mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 11:06 AM To: Anthony A. Garganese Subject: Re: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Anthony, Ok. That would get us to: • 92 inches (46 dbh x 2) of trees planted, or • $4600 contribution to the tree bank @ $50 per inch (92x50=$4600), or • A combination of plantings and tree bank contribution. Including the $5000 authorized by 162 and the $500 penalty, we have a starting point demand of just over $10K. Am I on track? Thanks Todd Todd Morley, Director Economic Development Dept. City of Cape Canaveral 110 Polk Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1222 x14 t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/FZsScygwrhojoood7bbbNKVJZYQsEzC4PhOrvvd7a8VxNMS- -qekhP3a9JZYQsI6zBxAQsCZ8X4zIfFUaH4_o8lfQNMddRyvI4aDWoU6CTCnnNTIfZvAm3hO OZRXBQSkrYCYed7b_bnhIyyHssPOEuvkzaT0QSyr76XYCONtxdZZBcTsS02JapqHJJm-SMQP YtfU02rDOJoD-m1lFjbltJGTSS6CvzF_00jrwV-XxI5-Aq81xrXil-1Ew1cvYQgrcQg8ICzA QglQGq80H0SOyrLiF-> On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Anthony A. Garganese <agarganese@orlandolaw.net <mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> > wrote: Todd, given the developer must remove the specimen tree under the circumstances, my thought regarding remediation is to use 102-41(b). That section provides that the city has a right to impose remediation for the removal of a specimen tree at a maximum 2 to 1 ratio per dbh. As such, take the dbh of the removed tree and multiply by 2 as a starting point demand. Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, specimen trees shall not be removed except for extraordinary circumstances and hardships and only by final permit approved by the city council. As a condition of removal of any specimen tree, the city council shall have the right to require that replacement trees be planted or a contribution to the tree bank be made in accordance with section 102-43 <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr3x0SyMCMMMqemmnztPrXVEVh7c9CzAS--qekhP3zxJZY QsEzC6kjrXVEVod7b39EVdWhS97ovjMlm9-MgGvFzwqrH4_o8lfQNMddLcKLzLovW_8I6zBB XHTbFIETVdUsqen-mKzp55mUVDBgY-F6lK1FJcSedTVdByX2rXXapKVIDeqR4IMFOHs9mGx_ bUv8x7oBI5MHBJmYlJIdc_7jYJl3WpqG7yJnhmIk9gS5LEixl3MR0Uo2MO5h0e6x8c2EA5Qr FxAq5h05wAd3gi2MI2Nke3gOC5h0i2EGc8TjbIcwA5wIq2gjdPVmIj_b0GQFBGKSRrXr3jfN Q_w09JMs_tMS2_id40MJZFa_0Qg0Cf-q8dCq84mjhOq8aWld40lwrphdWd2CjnQ7> , except replacement and/or tree bank contribution shall be based on a maximum of a two-to-one ratio of cumulative diameter (dbh) basis of specimen trees removed using the data in Table 1. Regards, Anthony A. Garganese Sent from IPad On Feb 19, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Todd Morley <T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote: Anthony, Thanks. Additionally, Section 102-38(b)(1) imposes a $500 fine for the removal of a specimen tree. Trying to apply remedial requirements is challenging. Section 102-49(b) requires a restoration plan and gives three choices: 1. Replacement of same size tree (not practical at 46” dbh), or 2. A 4X payment to the tree bank. However, for this size of tree, there is no dollar amount provided. The table says “To be preserved”. 3. Planting four desirable species in accordance with section 102-54. However, for this size of tree, there is no number of replacement trees specified. The table says “To be preserved”. I’m trying to arrive a logical, reasoned approach to remediation. Any help? I am available to discuss today Todd Todd Morley, Director Economic Development Dept. City of Cape Canaveral 105 Polk Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1220 x 330 t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/1jWVIp6zqb2r38V5UQsK6XCTTPhOyeojd79JZYQsEzC773rX VEVh7ccECTTPhOMqem6jhOrQzIieM-DwGIjZwxk_j70QTm9-MgGvFzwqrs8npsZx_HYMyCes soWZOXBT-7nKUMejVqWdAklrIcYG7DR8OJMddECTPt-jpoKMC--OCrKr01mBcJlSSHvroqp- eDY01MTfBqNfYI2HiCmGXrlLJIdc_7j-00CQhRS7PhOr1oQAq81xrXil-1Ew1cvYQgrcQg8I CzAQglQGq80H0SOyrrLnEnLxL> “If it is to be, it is up to me” <image001.png> From: Anthony A. Garganese [mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 5:57 AM To: Todd Morley Cc: David Dickey; David Greene Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Importance: High Todd, I’ve given this one some significant thought. It appears that the developer intentionally damaged the tree before applying for the requisite tree removal permit. The tree now appears to be so far damaged and so close to the structure under construction that it must come down or the structure removed in favor of trying to save the tree that will forever be disfigured. As such, at this stage of your investigation and case study, this appears to be a classic case of an intentional violation of the City Code which is irreparable or irreversible. Therefore, one approach to take is as follows: 1. Due to the intentional damage of the tree, the tree no longer fits the definition of a specimen tree. As such, the final removal of the tree does not require City Council approval. However, as you pointed out, the violation requires that Staff impose remedial action upon the developer under section 102-41. 2. In addition, and in conjunction with the remedial action, Staff should promptly serve upon the developer a notice of code violation for the intentional violation of the tree ordinance and seek a fine not to exceed $5,000 for an irreparable or irreversible violation of the City Code. Section 162.09(2)(a), Florida Statutes provides: A fine imposed pursuant to this section shall not exceed $250 per day for a first violation and shall not exceed $500 per day for a repeat violation, and, in addition, may include all costs of repairs pursuant to subsection (1). However, if a code enforcement board finds the violation to be irreparable or irreversible in nature, it may impose a fine not to exceed $5,000 per violation. (b) In determining the amount of the fine, if any, the enforcement board shall consider the following factors: 1. The gravity of the violation; 2. Any actions taken by the violator to correct the violation; and 3. Any previous violations committed by the violator. 3. You did not indicate in your email whether the construction has been completed and a certificate of occupancy issued by the City. If the certificate of occupancy has not been issued, the City should seriously evaluate whether it should require the developer to complete the remedial action and payment of the code enforcement fine PRIOR to issuance of the certificate of occupancy or prior to issuing any other final building inspections on the project. Once the notice of code violation is served, you could attempt to settle (payment in full in exchange for a release) the fine issue and dismiss the case before the matter is actually heard by the Code Board in order to expedite a final resolution of the matter. However, any agreed upon settlement should be approved by the City Manager using the $5,000 cap and factors stated above and should be commensurate with the egregious nature of the violation that resulted in adversely affecting the Council’s jurisdiction to make determinations regarding the protection of specimen trees. The later point cannot be overemphasized because if this situation were to frequently occur without appropriate sanctions imposed by the City, the Council’s jurisdiction over these matters could be severely diminished if developers found it easier to pay a small penalty than protecting specimen trees as required by City Code. If you have any questions on this matter, please follow-up with a phone call so we can talk it through. Regards, Anthony <image005.gif> Anthony A. Garganese, Managing Shareholder Board Certified City, County & Local Government law 111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000 Orlando, Florida 32801 P.O. Box 2873 (32802-2873) Phone (407) 425-9566 Fax (407) 425-9596 Kissimmee (321) 402-0144 Cocoa (866) 425-9566 Ft. Lauderdale (954) 670-1979 Website: www.orlandolaw.net <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr3zqb2r38V5UQsK6XCTTPhOyeojd79JZYQsEzC773rXVE Vh7ccECTTPhOMqem6jhOrQzIieM-DwGIjZwxk_j70QTm9-MgGvFzwqrs8npsZx_HYMyCesso WZOXBT-7nKUMejVqWdAklrIcYG7DR8OJMddFCTPt-jpoKMC--OCrKr01lyvI4aDWoU6UrDOJ oD-m1lFjbltJGTSS6CvzF_00jq8WX3VEVdwIqid40MJZFa_0Qg0Cf-q8dCq84mjhOq8aWld4 0lwrphdIZnZvnZI> Email: agarganese@orlandolaw.net <mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> Any incoming e-mail reply to this communication will be electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we may not receive your reply and/or we may not receive it in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail. Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you. From: Todd Morley [mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 2:04 PM To: Anthony A. Garganese Cc: David Dickey Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Anthony, Any news on this one? Thanks, Todd Todd Morley, Director Economic Development Dept. City of Cape Canaveral 105 Polk Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1220 x 330 t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/1jWVIqdEI9ILCzB-X3xKVJZYQsEzC4PhOrvvd7a8VxNMS--q ekhP3a9JZYQsI6zBxAQsCZ8X4zIfFUaH4_o8lfQNMddRyvI4aDWoU6CS4T7ZgovW_8zATATx TnKnjhhLOrPz339EVVqWdAkRrEKsG7DR8OJMddECSjt-jpoKMC--OCrKr01mBcJlSSHvroqp -eDY01MTfBqNfYI2HiCmGXrlLJIdc_7j-00CPhOyMMYr1oQAq81xrXil-1Ew1cvYQgrcQg8I CzAQglQGq80H0SOyrCK4M> “If it is to be, it is up to me” <image006.png> From: Anthony A. Garganese [mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 9:28 AM To: Todd Morley Cc: Anthony Garganese; David Dickey Subject: Re: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Hi Todd. I remember when it was pulled. I need to analyze this situation and the applicable code provisions because I see a potential overlap of jurisdictional duties between the code board and council that I want to think through. I'll be in touch. Regards, Anthony A. Garganese Sent from IPad On Jan 27, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Todd Morley <T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote: Anthony, You may recall that an item was pulled from the December City Council agenda. It was a request for Council to approve the removal of a specimen tree at 139 Oak Ln. Background: A building permit application was filed with the City to construct a new home. The submittal included plans and a survey showing the intended location of the house. The tree in question was indicated on the survey as being in the proposed rear yard. Because of its distance from the proposed structure (approx. 10 ft.) it appeared to be intended for preservation. There was no indication that it was proposed for removal. The building permit to construct the home was issued. Several weeks later, the footings were dug and concrete forms were put in place. As required, the developer called for a slab inspection prior to pouring the concrete slab. He submitted the required “Form-Board Survey”. The Form-Board Survey (the 2nd survey now submitted) again indicated that the tree was approximately 10 ft. away from the structure. However, during the site inspection it was noted that the tree was actually less than one ft. away from the structure (form boards were in place). The developer was contacted. He indicated that he would need to remove the tree. He was informed that City Council approval would be required prior to removal because the tree was a Specimen Tree. The slab inspection was approved with the understanding that developer would timely submit an application to remove the tree. He subsequently submitted the attached tree removal permit application. Staff prepared the attached Agenda Cover Sheet. The item was removed from the agenda because it was discovered on the date of the Council meeting that the developer had recently cut a large notch out of the side of the tree and had removed more than 1/3 of the canopy to continue the construction of the new home (concrete block walls were now up and the roof structure was complete). The City Arborist was requested to inspect the damage to the tree. He reported that: · The notching alone would not kill the tree, · The tree was so close to the structure that it could cause damage to the structure, · More than 1/3 of the canopy had been removed, · 24” of fill dirt was placed around the house foundation and the base of the tree, and · The combination of all of these items will affect the overall life span of the tree. These findings indicate violations of a number of code sections [Sec. 102-44(d), (g) and (h)]. In a normal situation, the survey would have accurately depicted the proximity of the tree to the proposed structure and the developer would have indicated the need for removal and applied for City Council approval prior to commencing construction. When asked to explain the course of events, the developer indicated that: · He was unaware of the error in the surveys until the form boards were in place. · It was at that time that he realized the tree needed to be removed. · He continued construction despite the pending approval, assuming the Council would approve the removal of the tree. Where to go from here. Sec. 102-41 states: (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, specimen trees shall not be removed except for extraordinary circumstances and hardships and only by final permit approved by the city council. As a condition of removal of any specimen tree, the city council shall have the right to require that replacement trees be planted or a contribution to the tree bank be made in accordance with section 102-43, except replacement and/or tree bank contribution shall be based on a maximum of a two-to-one ratio of cumulative diameter (dbh) basis of specimen trees removed using the data in Table 1. It is probably a forgone conclusion that City Council would approve the removal. After all, the tree is so close to the house that it is going to have to be removed. Council would certainly require mitigation. Are you of any other avenue whereby this item could be a straightforward Code Enforcement process (without Council involvement)? Sec. 102-49 – Remedial Action - provides a method for Staff to deal with violations. I look forward to discussing with you. Todd Todd Morley, Director Economic Development City of Cape Canaveral 110 Polk Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1222 x14 (321) 868-1247 (fax) t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/5fHCN8e6zqb2qrbzz39EVdTdLLCzB4sMCqejrXVEVh7cee6T TPhOyeophdLLCzBwQsIcCzATF7oAtxZf1loDX12F-Ce1FKIjZwxk_j70QSywUqehRC7-LPa8 VB7HTbFIInVNdxZ7BHEShjlKqenel3PWApmU6CQjqpK_9IInojvvpjdTdw0HiCmGXrlLJIdc _7j-00UrDOJoD-m1lFjbltJGTSS6CvzF_00jrzP0VZcQsCNs1kzh0cbvqiLMd409z_Cy3pCy 15AQsCy2KBjh05o6Skjv5Ycdj9Jb777> “If it is to be, it is up to me” From: Jeff Ratliff Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 2:57 PM To: Todd Morley Cc: Kay McKee; Tim Davis Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Todd: I spoke with Kay and Tim: Tim was asked to do a follow-up inspection of the specimen oak tree at 139 Oak Lane. The construction company at the property had to cut a notch in the trunk of the oak tree to finish the construction of the house. The question is - will these activities kill the oak tree? The notch alone will not kill the tree, but the construction company also cut more than 1/3 of the canopy. Fill dirt was also placed around the house foundation and the base of the tree. The combination of all of these items will affect the overall life span of the tree. Also: 1). Cutting more than 1/3 of the canopy of an oak tree at one time is not good practice. 2). Changing the original grade more than six inches around the base of a tree can affect its health – the construction company raised the grade approximately 24 inches. All of these items may not kill the tree, but will most likely affect the life span of the oak tree. Thanks, Jeff From: Todd Morley Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 11:25 AM To: Jeff Ratliff Subject: FW: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Jeff, I would like to talk with you about this. Are you available for a call? Todd Todd Morley, Director Community & Economic Development Dept. City of Cape Canaveral 110 Polk Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1222 x14 (321) 868-1247 (fax) t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr4x8gdEI9FIKeccCzATsS--qekhP2pEVdLLCzB4sMUUrv vd7a8VxB4S--qem3hOMOqejuAtyhS7QY5lyvI4aDWoU6CWNfS25jZcs3jqa3xEV7movW_cEz CkuLsKCONvD4S7QumKzp5dmVEVsVkffGhBrwqrjdFCXYCONtxdZZBcTsS02JapqHJJm-SMQP YtfU03xKvaRyvVo5mBcJlSSHvroqp-eDY01dKfc3DQPhOr5M5id40MJZFa_0Qg0Cf-q8dCq8 4mjhOq8aWld40lwrphdIcZQwnhI> “If it is to be, it is up to me” From: Tim Davis Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 9:00 AM To: Todd Morley; Michael German Subject: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln Good morning, This e-mail is for the follow up inspection of the specimen tree.You were concerned about the notch cut out of the trunk next to the roof. I don’t think the notch or the trimming they have done will kill the tree and have not seen any die back in the canopy. The tree is so close to the house it could cause problems to the roof or foundation in the future. If you need any more information, please call me(321-863-7341). Thanks, Tim Davis Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing <Agenda Cover Sheet.docx> <139 Oak Lane Attachments.pdf> Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing 02001F