HomeMy WebLinkAboutFW Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln (4)FYI
Anthony A. Garganese, Managing Shareholder
Board Certified City, County & Local Government law
111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000
Orlando, Florida 32801
P.O. Box 2873 (32802-2873)
Phone (407) 425-9566
Fax (407) 425-9596
Kissimmee (321) 402-0144
Cocoa (866) 425-9566
Ft. Lauderdale (954) 670-1979
Website: www.orlandolaw.net <http://www.orlandolaw.net/>
Email: agarganese@orlandolaw.net
Any incoming e-mail reply to this communication will be electronically
filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result
in such reply being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our
site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we may not
receive your reply and/or we may not receive it in a timely manner.
Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are
particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains
privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this
e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and
delete it from your system. Thank you.
From: Anthony A. Garganese
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 11:51 AM
To: 'Todd Morley'
Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Yes. They have two distinct, but related problems; (1) remediation
for the removal of the specimen tree; and (2) code enforcement. Both
have to be resolved. Hopefully, you can resolve cumulatively in one
settlement prior to going to the code board.
Anthony A. Garganese, Managing Shareholder
Board Certified City, County & Local Government law
111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000
Orlando, Florida 32801
P.O. Box 2873 (32802-2873)
Phone (407) 425-9566
Fax (407) 425-9596
Kissimmee (321) 402-0144
Cocoa (866) 425-9566
Ft. Lauderdale (954) 670-1979
Website: www.orlandolaw.net <http://www.orlandolaw.net/>
Email: agarganese@orlandolaw.net <mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net>
Any incoming e-mail reply to this communication will be electronically
filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result
in such reply being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our
site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we may not
receive your reply and/or we may not receive it in a timely manner.
Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are
particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains
privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this
e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and
delete it from your system. Thank you.
From: Todd Morley [mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 11:06 AM
To: Anthony A. Garganese
Subject: Re: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Anthony,
Ok. That would get us to:
• 92 inches (46 dbh x 2) of trees planted, or
• $4600 contribution to the tree bank @ $50 per inch (92x50=$4600), or
• A combination of plantings and tree bank contribution.
Including the $5000 authorized by 162 and the $500 penalty, we have a
starting point demand of just over $10K.
Am I on track?
Thanks
Todd
Todd Morley, Director
Economic Development Dept.
City of Cape Canaveral
110 Polk Ave.
P.O. Box 326
Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
(321) 868-1222 x14
t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/FZsScygwrhojoood7bbbNKVJZYQsEzC4PhOrvvd7a8VxNMS-
-qekhP3a9JZYQsI6zBxAQsCZ8X4zIfFUaH4_o8lfQNMddRyvI4aDWoU6CTCnnNTIfZvAm3hO
OZRXBQSkrYCYed7b_bnhIyyHssPOEuvkzaT0QSyr76XYCONtxdZZBcTsS02JapqHJJm-SMQP
YtfU02rDOJoD-m1lFjbltJGTSS6CvzF_00jrwV-XxI5-Aq81xrXil-1Ew1cvYQgrcQg8ICzA
QglQGq80H0SOyrLiF->
On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Anthony A. Garganese
<agarganese@orlandolaw.net <mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net> > wrote:
Todd, given the developer must remove the specimen tree under
the circumstances, my thought regarding remediation is to use 102-41(b).
That section provides that the city has a right to impose remediation
for the removal of a specimen tree at a maximum 2 to 1 ratio per dbh.
As such, take the dbh of the removed tree and multiply by 2 as a
starting point demand.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, specimen
trees shall not be removed except for extraordinary circumstances and
hardships and only by final permit approved by the city council. As a
condition of removal of any specimen tree, the city council shall have
the right to require that replacement trees be planted or a contribution
to the tree bank be made in accordance with section 102-43
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr3x0SyMCMMMqemmnztPrXVEVh7c9CzAS--qekhP3zxJZY
QsEzC6kjrXVEVod7b39EVdWhS97ovjMlm9-MgGvFzwqrH4_o8lfQNMddLcKLzLovW_8I6zBB
XHTbFIETVdUsqen-mKzp55mUVDBgY-F6lK1FJcSedTVdByX2rXXapKVIDeqR4IMFOHs9mGx_
bUv8x7oBI5MHBJmYlJIdc_7jYJl3WpqG7yJnhmIk9gS5LEixl3MR0Uo2MO5h0e6x8c2EA5Qr
FxAq5h05wAd3gi2MI2Nke3gOC5h0i2EGc8TjbIcwA5wIq2gjdPVmIj_b0GQFBGKSRrXr3jfN
Q_w09JMs_tMS2_id40MJZFa_0Qg0Cf-q8dCq84mjhOq8aWld40lwrphdWd2CjnQ7> ,
except replacement and/or tree bank contribution shall be based on a
maximum of a two-to-one ratio of cumulative diameter (dbh) basis of
specimen trees removed using the data in Table 1.
Regards,
Anthony A. Garganese
Sent from IPad
On Feb 19, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Todd Morley
<T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote:
Anthony,
Thanks. Additionally, Section 102-38(b)(1) imposes a
$500 fine for the removal of a specimen tree.
Trying to apply remedial requirements is challenging.
Section 102-49(b) requires a restoration plan and gives
three choices:
1. Replacement of same size tree (not practical at
46” dbh), or
2. A 4X payment to the tree bank. However, for this
size of tree, there is no dollar amount provided. The table says “To be
preserved”.
3. Planting four desirable species in accordance
with section 102-54. However, for this size of tree, there is no number
of replacement trees specified. The table says “To be preserved”.
I’m trying to arrive a logical, reasoned approach to
remediation.
Any help? I am available to discuss today
Todd
Todd Morley, Director
Economic Development Dept.
City of Cape Canaveral
105 Polk Ave.
P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
(321) 868-1220 x 330
t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/1jWVIp6zqb2r38V5UQsK6XCTTPhOyeojd79JZYQsEzC773rX
VEVh7ccECTTPhOMqem6jhOrQzIieM-DwGIjZwxk_j70QTm9-MgGvFzwqrs8npsZx_HYMyCes
soWZOXBT-7nKUMejVqWdAklrIcYG7DR8OJMddECTPt-jpoKMC--OCrKr01mBcJlSSHvroqp-
eDY01MTfBqNfYI2HiCmGXrlLJIdc_7j-00CQhRS7PhOr1oQAq81xrXil-1Ew1cvYQgrcQg8I
CzAQglQGq80H0SOyrrLnEnLxL>
“If it is to be, it is up to me”
<image001.png>
From: Anthony A. Garganese
[mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 5:57 AM
To: Todd Morley
Cc: David Dickey; David Greene
Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Importance: High
Todd,
I’ve given this one some significant thought. It
appears that the developer intentionally damaged the tree before
applying for the requisite tree removal permit. The tree now appears to
be so far damaged and so close to the structure under construction that
it must come down or the structure removed in favor of trying to save
the tree that will forever be disfigured. As such, at this stage of
your investigation and case study, this appears to be a classic case of
an intentional violation of the City Code which is irreparable or
irreversible. Therefore, one approach to take is as follows:
1. Due to the intentional damage of the tree, the
tree no longer fits the definition of a specimen tree. As such, the
final removal of the tree does not require City Council approval.
However, as you pointed out, the violation requires that Staff impose
remedial action upon the developer under section 102-41.
2. In addition, and in conjunction with the
remedial action, Staff should promptly serve upon the developer a notice
of code violation for the intentional violation of the tree ordinance
and seek a fine not to exceed $5,000 for an irreparable or irreversible
violation of the City Code. Section 162.09(2)(a), Florida Statutes
provides:
A fine imposed pursuant to this section shall not exceed
$250 per day for a first violation and shall not exceed $500 per day for
a repeat violation, and, in addition, may include all costs of repairs
pursuant to subsection (1). However, if a code enforcement board finds
the violation to be irreparable or irreversible in nature, it may impose
a fine not to exceed $5,000 per violation.
(b) In determining the amount of the fine, if any, the
enforcement board shall consider the following factors:
1. The gravity of the violation;
2. Any actions taken by the violator to correct the
violation; and
3. Any previous violations committed by the violator.
3. You did not indicate in your email whether the
construction has been completed and a certificate of occupancy issued by
the City. If the certificate of occupancy has not been issued, the City
should seriously evaluate whether it should require the developer to
complete the remedial action and payment of the code enforcement fine
PRIOR to issuance of the certificate of occupancy or prior to issuing
any other final building inspections on the project. Once the notice of
code violation is served, you could attempt to settle (payment in full
in exchange for a release) the fine issue and dismiss the case before
the matter is actually heard by the Code Board in order to expedite a
final resolution of the matter. However, any agreed upon settlement
should be approved by the City Manager using the $5,000 cap and factors
stated above and should be commensurate with the egregious nature of the
violation that resulted in adversely affecting the Council’s
jurisdiction to make determinations regarding the protection of specimen
trees. The later point cannot be overemphasized because if this
situation were to frequently occur without appropriate sanctions imposed
by the City, the Council’s jurisdiction over these matters could be
severely diminished if developers found it easier to pay a small penalty
than protecting specimen trees as required by City Code.
If you have any questions on this matter, please
follow-up with a phone call so we can talk it through.
Regards,
Anthony
<image005.gif>
Anthony A. Garganese, Managing Shareholder
Board Certified City, County & Local Government law
111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000
Orlando, Florida 32801
P.O. Box 2873 (32802-2873)
Phone (407) 425-9566
Fax (407) 425-9596
Kissimmee (321) 402-0144
Cocoa (866) 425-9566
Ft. Lauderdale (954) 670-1979
Website: www.orlandolaw.net
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr3zqb2r38V5UQsK6XCTTPhOyeojd79JZYQsEzC773rXVE
Vh7ccECTTPhOMqem6jhOrQzIieM-DwGIjZwxk_j70QTm9-MgGvFzwqrs8npsZx_HYMyCesso
WZOXBT-7nKUMejVqWdAklrIcYG7DR8OJMddFCTPt-jpoKMC--OCrKr01lyvI4aDWoU6UrDOJ
oD-m1lFjbltJGTSS6CvzF_00jq8WX3VEVdwIqid40MJZFa_0Qg0Cf-q8dCq84mjhOq8aWld4
0lwrphdIZnZvnZI>
Email: agarganese@orlandolaw.net
<mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net>
Any incoming e-mail reply to this communication will be
electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering
process may result in such reply being quarantined (i.e., potentially
not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that
reason, we may not receive your reply and/or we may not receive it in a
timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending communications
to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other
than e-mail.
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to
it, contains privileged and confidential information intended only for
the use of the individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the
reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the
sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.
From: Todd Morley
[mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 2:04 PM
To: Anthony A. Garganese
Cc: David Dickey
Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Anthony,
Any news on this one?
Thanks,
Todd
Todd Morley, Director
Economic Development Dept.
City of Cape Canaveral
105 Polk Ave.
P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
(321) 868-1220 x 330
t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/1jWVIqdEI9ILCzB-X3xKVJZYQsEzC4PhOrvvd7a8VxNMS--q
ekhP3a9JZYQsI6zBxAQsCZ8X4zIfFUaH4_o8lfQNMddRyvI4aDWoU6CS4T7ZgovW_8zATATx
TnKnjhhLOrPz339EVVqWdAkRrEKsG7DR8OJMddECSjt-jpoKMC--OCrKr01mBcJlSSHvroqp
-eDY01MTfBqNfYI2HiCmGXrlLJIdc_7j-00CPhOyMMYr1oQAq81xrXil-1Ew1cvYQgrcQg8I
CzAQglQGq80H0SOyrCK4M>
“If it is to be, it is up to me”
<image006.png>
From: Anthony A. Garganese
[mailto:agarganese@orlandolaw.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 9:28 AM
To: Todd Morley
Cc: Anthony Garganese; David Dickey
Subject: Re: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Hi Todd. I remember when it was pulled. I need to
analyze this situation and the applicable code provisions because I see
a potential overlap of jurisdictional duties between the code board and
council that I want to think through. I'll be in touch.
Regards,
Anthony A. Garganese
Sent from IPad
On Jan 27, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Todd Morley
<T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote:
Anthony,
You may recall that an item was pulled from the
December City Council agenda.
It was a request for Council to approve the
removal of a specimen tree at 139 Oak Ln.
Background:
A building permit application was filed with the
City to construct a new home. The submittal included plans and a survey
showing the intended location of the house.
The tree in question was indicated on the survey
as being in the proposed rear yard.
Because of its distance from the proposed
structure (approx. 10 ft.) it appeared to be intended for preservation.
There was no indication that it was proposed for removal.
The building permit to construct the home was
issued.
Several weeks later, the footings were dug and
concrete forms were put in place.
As required, the developer called for a slab
inspection prior to pouring the concrete slab. He submitted the
required “Form-Board Survey”.
The Form-Board Survey (the 2nd survey now
submitted) again indicated that the tree was approximately 10 ft. away
from the structure.
However, during the site inspection it was noted
that the tree was actually less than one ft. away from the structure
(form boards were in place).
The developer was contacted. He indicated that
he would need to remove the tree. He was informed that City Council
approval would be required prior to removal because the tree was a
Specimen Tree.
The slab inspection was approved with the
understanding that developer would timely submit an application to
remove the tree.
He subsequently submitted the attached tree
removal permit application. Staff prepared the attached Agenda Cover
Sheet.
The item was removed from the agenda because it
was discovered on the date of the Council meeting that the developer had
recently cut a large notch out of the side of the tree and had removed
more than 1/3 of the canopy to continue the construction of the new home
(concrete block walls were now up and the roof structure was complete).
The City Arborist was requested to inspect the
damage to the tree.
He reported that:
· The notching alone would not kill the
tree,
· The tree was so close to the structure
that it could cause damage to the structure,
· More than 1/3 of the canopy had been
removed,
· 24” of fill dirt was placed around the
house foundation and the base of the tree, and
· The combination of all of these items
will affect the overall life span of the tree.
These findings indicate violations of a number
of code sections [Sec. 102-44(d), (g) and (h)].
In a normal situation, the survey would have
accurately depicted the proximity of the tree to the proposed structure
and the developer would have indicated the need for removal and applied
for City Council approval prior to commencing construction.
When asked to explain the course of events, the
developer indicated that:
· He was unaware of the error in the
surveys until the form boards were in place.
· It was at that time that he realized the
tree needed to be removed.
· He continued construction despite the
pending approval, assuming the Council would approve the removal of the
tree.
Where to go from here.
Sec. 102-41 states:
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
division, specimen trees shall not be removed except for extraordinary
circumstances and hardships and only by final permit approved by the
city council. As a condition of removal of any specimen tree, the city
council shall have the right to require that replacement trees be
planted or a contribution to the tree bank be made in accordance with
section 102-43, except replacement and/or tree bank contribution shall
be based on a maximum of a two-to-one ratio of cumulative diameter (dbh)
basis of specimen trees removed using the data in Table 1.
It is probably a forgone conclusion that City
Council would approve the removal. After all, the tree is so close to
the house that it is going to have to be removed.
Council would certainly require mitigation.
Are you of any other avenue whereby this item
could be a straightforward Code Enforcement process (without Council
involvement)?
Sec. 102-49 – Remedial Action - provides a
method for Staff to deal with violations.
I look forward to discussing with you.
Todd
Todd Morley, Director
Economic Development
City of Cape Canaveral
110 Polk Ave.
P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
(321) 868-1222 x14 (321) 868-1247 (fax)
t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/5fHCN8e6zqb2qrbzz39EVdTdLLCzB4sMCqejrXVEVh7cee6T
TPhOyeophdLLCzBwQsIcCzATF7oAtxZf1loDX12F-Ce1FKIjZwxk_j70QSywUqehRC7-LPa8
VB7HTbFIInVNdxZ7BHEShjlKqenel3PWApmU6CQjqpK_9IInojvvpjdTdw0HiCmGXrlLJIdc
_7j-00UrDOJoD-m1lFjbltJGTSS6CvzF_00jrzP0VZcQsCNs1kzh0cbvqiLMd409z_Cy3pCy
15AQsCy2KBjh05o6Skjv5Ycdj9Jb777>
“If it is to be, it is up to me”
From: Jeff Ratliff
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 2:57 PM
To: Todd Morley
Cc: Kay McKee; Tim Davis
Subject: RE: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Todd:
I spoke with Kay and Tim:
Tim was asked to do a follow-up inspection of
the specimen oak tree at 139 Oak Lane. The construction company at the
property had to cut a notch in the trunk of the oak tree to finish the
construction of the house. The question is - will these activities kill
the oak tree? The notch alone will not kill the tree, but the
construction company also cut more than 1/3 of the canopy. Fill dirt was
also placed around the house foundation and the base of the tree. The
combination of all of these items will affect the overall life span of
the tree.
Also:
1). Cutting more than 1/3 of the canopy of an
oak tree at one time is not good practice.
2). Changing the original grade more than six
inches around the base of a tree can affect its health – the
construction company raised the grade approximately 24 inches.
All of these items may not kill the tree, but
will most likely affect the life span of the oak tree.
Thanks,
Jeff
From: Todd Morley
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 11:25 AM
To: Jeff Ratliff
Subject: FW: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Jeff,
I would like to talk with you about this.
Are you available for a call?
Todd
Todd Morley, Director
Community & Economic Development Dept.
City of Cape Canaveral
110 Polk Ave.
P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
(321) 868-1222 x14 (321) 868-1247 (fax)
t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org
<mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org>
www.cityofcapecanaveral.org
<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr4x8gdEI9FIKeccCzATsS--qekhP2pEVdLLCzB4sMUUrv
vd7a8VxB4S--qem3hOMOqejuAtyhS7QY5lyvI4aDWoU6CWNfS25jZcs3jqa3xEV7movW_cEz
CkuLsKCONvD4S7QumKzp5dmVEVsVkffGhBrwqrjdFCXYCONtxdZZBcTsS02JapqHJJm-SMQP
YtfU03xKvaRyvVo5mBcJlSSHvroqp-eDY01dKfc3DQPhOr5M5id40MJZFa_0Qg0Cf-q8dCq8
4mjhOq8aWld40lwrphdIcZQwnhI>
“If it is to be, it is up to me”
From: Tim Davis
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 9:00 AM
To: Todd Morley; Michael German
Subject: Specimen Tree at 139 oak Ln
Good morning,
This e-mail is for the follow up inspection of
the specimen tree.You were concerned about the notch cut out of the
trunk next to the roof. I don’t think the notch or the trimming they
have done will kill the tree and have not seen any die back in the
canopy. The tree is so close to the house it could cause problems to
the roof or foundation in the future. If you need any more information,
please call me(321-863-7341).
Thanks,
Tim Davis
Florida has a very broad public records law. As
a result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As
a result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As
a result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As
a result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As
a result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As
a result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
<Agenda Cover Sheet.docx>
<139 Oak Lane Attachments.pdf>
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a
result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a
result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a
result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a
result, any written communication created or received by the City of
Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the
public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida
Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email
address released in response to a public-records request, do not send
electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or
in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any
written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral
officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or
media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email
addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address
released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic
email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written
communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral
officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or
media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email
addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address
released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic
email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written
communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral
officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or
media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email
addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address
released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic
email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing
Ἑ⼚卙꽐鋼鍏ꇊ遬睴샌烬邠탧琰쬐扠鰲다燞獭ꥏ꩟ﱫㄨÓ哬ᛑㆱ濼콶텁꿕眰�쬻⡳팲츀킠펀뽁量惦拌㾨ྯ岪ꍂꭨ챵拀섰釦�뚿鏯炏吏뷟䣱逰新畦ꉬ捤憠맳鳕疠셭켰킐￡턯놭닝뇍拜쳹柀�듕⿓顐䶺�쾔콻�㾖侗뿿饏驯魿鲏鶟캯鿿ￏ�ﾢྤᾥ⾦輚�釿뭟뱟졯�쪿쭟챯ｿ迍鿎꿏뿐쿑缪�틿팟퐯혟䱟��螂ꃁ郄僛丠睥鿛�暯聡쿳衱恷僅启•ぷ勰칀ﴰ꯰楀빧칀︷ァ偀걩ₐ彥へ愰弐鴱땳
着摐眺굠⃰e�朰P慀襄Ȱ㉠㢀㔳밸㤰怂탲⇿굮 ‑냹Ⴥ忤詯煯牿ޏﱿ�槫য়�䄶郄탲��⼿릡礰�쀅漌�ڏ璟⽏樋璯Ჯ｟忰濱翲迳�漩་ടฯ༿၏ᅟቯ鸔佒兓邬き╠얀륓眠什汰釽鼕꼖ᢿ⻟ᮿ㿿ḿ䄟｟㼠伡弢漣缤輥鼦꼧⣿ⲿ⩿䷟⳿⼏〟Ｏ㼱伲弳漴缵輶쁓킸웙⁑奃쉰曰냸녜槾恕邬燸烷悫☺⦸潌탁킲�ꂲ灙쑮䰳眠伽弾䇿䃿捿擯䏿枯伟借Ｏ⽪佒佬潔㿗轖齗꽘刺隷ᐿ㫏㮟㲯抿梿潧潽ཨ轿
㽅但彇䣿䥯䩿䮏䲟䶯澿烏翟佖ｲུή轚汷r䀸牏낍ꀁꀷ₺滤㡵叡嵵욀�怀侽徾ྌኍ簱�ﷰ�㣐薰靿镞詰㔐悴걯䚐䀁㏴̲龙꾚뾛쾜綰⹐㡏례磐낖㢸㌷佞鸨ⴲ⊤鼩ꁏꅟꉯ蝿肣㐨㜰내㓲聺㤭ၼ⁼ྨᾩꫣ紿慆¤몬ꇭ궏꺯꾿냏緟楋り쐠갰麑ㇰ膧䀂租댠됯딿뙏絟烸쁵懮澤羥讦괸거룸⿿ྺΆ⾼㡴䱀빡㩵鸡軀꜐괰㑐㚠〷ㄭ恶섹읟濂翃迄坽빥隰뺁谺籭缟檿鹜棐퀹昆傊悘灴⼺먯텷⸠ΞŢ㠮⽴]蹴퀒톿냸်扸㩦줐趀à䡻偙剅
䥌亘⁋�맑絽針㨉爐硳峐晣ﰱ畜ち迎ﾍྏᾐ釟鈯錿�ퟹ璟忌濍苏聟⾟筡�ﾏ鿜꿝뿞쿟�濩俈즷쩟衯䖃킊惮봺�꾾誦⿏㛐穴裠ﴰ瘸텀푬햏횟ﲦﶯﾾ�뼁훣濨㿨뿺忪櫽疘�轸齹꽺ᢁ࢚ᆿ良菟蓯蛿／ᾇ⾈㾉侊律鿚￫齱䌝倝榠忯濰鞂ốൟ寧♯⼏켒�５༗弫⼙ᬿᱏᵟ㉯῟↟ﾯ뼢켣�缩輪ᄯ㧏㪟㰯巌㌐〿ゕ睥彵潶㕦䇹䆉幮䶐镐ꢠ攠⃢惐異惒퉯桠肷7Pﵭ慩崐䨀愀蘰镢斠瑣䩲￠ᅒ끒⁞⁝ 〿䁝
迶飿䜟啿㔣䫀㗐䊰㸿嘢䙸流潘罙塠鸟ⴑ堀屏婏癩物畲‿轞齟硝깔剨匰僵瀢恓գ遑끏惐摰䁉捵偨勅僠㸢⼐怲⁉䁒者Ꝥ椰傞㹰阰刀區㹮倰旁榐灨酤䳿䤁陀撂厑겱廰옕�‷桹晡킑慠≐懻애䛀兞恑酤逷渺傞長旀槢ｹ쉪푐ᕞ�삕肖셏轔嗿嚟垯麵勐띀凐㜁쫠ծ犀샅捁၍テ僿鹰灐䤁걀ౠ桰ｰ၍낞䅌‿≐뭑凿冐愱儠晰㋡镠﯀鄵䁒ౣ㉰兠뜁榰䁴ᅨ끪煶ᄿ䁒澽拑녶mꅺ〾䱨ａŮぉ摐걡罳轴Ｇ⳿䗿䚿ハㄯ㈿㍏㑟ｯ缵輶鼷꼸
Ὀ⽉㽊佋䳗䵟乯ⁿ䂽ｮ욀０䍩ၫ끏ዌ灤腑摐黿鹐帑瀁힑洰뜑緐１ㅑၫ傞텸悍⇖入䁪攀橧魢碡駑侗⅘႐䍒郵Ⅹ灨낔叿淒毓愰橡膰ꇐ讐 ち杤泠猨廿楑録耰脟鄯坏䂵콀킷늠厡ꕿ䤠秿ꄢ髣俧净榐ꋂꀔ祥Ū灩郿낓炛㖡･끼聬송炍芜Ⅶ槻砀拱懆≘䅬䅪፥狿兑ꬳ갟砣笢羒쬑ꍩ倿郿灨ٮ鍹割遑鎿匐兀攁兡扰ᅫ擾鎨≸聤텯ݪ즩쾣꒿ꗟ埯暵㾑匰牠鏿轐牠儱哐欠儠ﴁ惐镴ꃠ꼡秇院鬑垒䅬⃒㍲卦浠鹳鍹갠엠擀湱潫걡澆ｆ�켻�㻿響䀏
쏯뢿챯茯萏？⾅쿁�很澉羊辋龌跫쒯を凐ꈯ퍱ퟏ俚龎꾏뾐࿄⿆㿇죿쥏쩟쭯퀿䈯䎟ﾯ近鿒꿓뿔쿕�濯ဟ�紐竟拦腷ヨ胥쩥［ⵤけ㩰郠ႚ栁⍰㕂㑃䙄ₖᓥ僽睤㪢ﰢ〠酦ῡ忟ѯ㳞ࡢ披뿪铿吖硡ࡰ坠뷩ష䘉熿Ｚ㿱俲۾ꋰᨋἍ༯ဿᅏ፯摿潂ʹ‰ᬐ髰孀༊癵桀偰ݦ僠冂㨰哴∮䂤퀛⁒灾こ逛ᆶhჩ潧뷩Ⴌꁸ苫硦鶠璁笀奈䕐䱒㱉䭎做뼤켥퐦絽硱犠峰晣ㇼ籜ర⤉⫏⛟᧓휟�鼙ᬘ嵀�㊻ㇲ탦
꤈驜뼐偨忶븴⼣Ἃ朹楓缱鼘夲鄔ꂙ恱炛콆䂲偡ヶ䂚〲炛ᔣǀㆠ〺䵁㛿㣿㤏㨟㬯㰿䕏≨罐㼾伿蝝遏恑倝䂚惀朰逛Ⴎㅅ⽃䐿䔿䙏䝟䡯㵿畷幢橪㸐䬯崯剸醚㝓ㄦ煶ꀛ灔歐ㄳ樹憰샀牌Ｏ４༖ἱ濴翵轐鿷弅��拯摟斿曏柟棯켆�快⽛翭迮鿯峿徇惯拿挏搟洯著罯罰뽻꽭뽮콯핌Ｌ影潲彶潷罸轹齺齿槿檏殟貯粏緯迿郟쟯⾁㾂ᾓ传쁫뽣뽷⣀‰ゞ䂿ꂡ놜ᓿ藬蚿蟏裟觯诿谏？⾕㾎侏ᾢ澑羒输羦锟隯ꢿꦯ玿⎃㈸㋤琶㤛ℵ嚩͡☀뵣든⠠帴搀桢䅸⧠끙
‶ｴᅙ悚킻逛䆵낻ჩﾮ珿瓟鯯鰏鴟鸯鼿띏Ｏ澡羪辣龤᾽羿쾧쾭싿쏏곟괏옟꼏뀿⅏窸눤゠〚倜瑵ᵩ驐驱뉰덐것戠逛칀㖰〚♟윰닰눢嚀硠パﴽ쏎됩땯뙿랏뢟릯쾺�俕ﾽ࿇῀⿁㿂�쒟앟죿즟霯࿓�Ჱ콁洑͢肙닏憳儂悚逛ခ탻콨⸪⿕㿖俗������ￏ忻￢￨꿾뿿㿧俨ǿ犯Ｏ㿸俹忺漃翼追輂뼒ڿᚿ̏ӯۿᤏ䥇닩氰⡵枱Ꮠ⇑懮郏M둺큀⊠聜폮生凑瀦〈ㅁ矞す炙逦䁙⠠鮠狮骀搰ᵥ�Ǯ驪驐漰鄦냎
ᏽ䯰翰Ἂ⼋뿴⠏ᄟᨯጿᑏ／漰輗輝뼳켴켛�Ｖ⣿ࢿ⛯➏⪟⬟Ⱟⴿｏ弮漯缸輱鼲潅콇켵㮿䯏㠟㫿㬏茟淉뀞妃쾰狑捡㽫켼㷿䇟䋏䏟䓯䛿伏䠟Ｏ㽉佊潜潌罍뽟콠꽐凯抿駿큒珐코�埿姿娏嬟搯崿幏彟ｯཱ轡齢彴潵콥�齷駱潐摤潩罪轫齬淿溯澿磏營狯瓿蔏ﾏ⽶㽷�潺罻ᾌ밼ㄦ傀牢즐汜斀⾃㙾ဿ⾎�鐧雿紅₢⁍汀儢楄烐콣軰結ｾྀᾁ⾂쾘侄徍羊譿ꆏꎏ軯辿ꛏꜟ䔢콓楐魣斀퀢㡬灯≭⌀곰烠ｴ鰥ﾜྞᾟ⾠㾡侢徣ꣿꕟꙿ떏ꦯ꪿룏첶楃䀢爤
慃惑醾⋿┐밑궐꿿뀏넟눯＿侳徴徹澆羇辈⿇꾶럿쪿쭿몏믯췿₿죐탰倠汯郯≁◐ﾟ㼿佀쾿�ￂ࿄࿗웿켯젿쥏��챟튏ᾏ꿢뿣쿐�⹐O潂⁸㈳㛾翗还鿙꿚뿛쿜��㽯翸翨迩꿺鶾怢䱆㤱ￏ�㿻⿶鼇）勵｟ൟ๏ﵟﺟႯ⢎ㅀ 㘸ⴸㆄᜲ†ㅸȴ＿伃弄漅缆輇鼈꼑뼊῟฿ჿ∏⎏༿伔켥泗懕愼栠鯭暰뀩〪ᡩᠠ궰닐魭䀣빣븱捰놾⸫뿀⸕ₛ⩧晬㕩Ⴍ❤昂肘瑳笀奈䕐䱒㡉䭎ⴠ⽯絵鄰獲‘捜就汵耜䜫↿ힿ㡁ퟏ
Ɏᨀ愁ᮟᲯᶿỏ⟟＠强ང⼤㼥彇潈漨⤟䩿䮟ⲯ횪琐㩰⼰振㙰㟐暰烔悬䙭⽐婆s捓杹牷潨櫄呯撐户〲嘀婊兙䕳z㑃桐牏癶吁懀嘸乸卍ⴀ焭步偨г㥡䍕㙉䉺ɸ啁䍰㡚㑘z晉商䡡弴潠永兦遖쁽R癹㑉䑡潗唀䌶䍔湮艎塔媐䅶㍭伀剚䉘卑奲奃呥忁䁢桮祉䡹過P䕏癵穫呡もꁛ特㘷存à乏硴婤䉚捄協ヰ䨲낾q䩈浊匭免倔홙啠䑲O潊ⵄㅭ䙬樄㵢䨠呇卓威癀䙺た樰爀噷堭䥸5䄭㡱砱塲㊃ថ䔀ㅷ癣恕月捲ꁣ䤸穃堡最公扇゠ࡈ匰嵏䲰䙩Ｍ�潒罓轔
齕꽖埿墿姏嫟寯巿帏弟缯㽠佡形潣罤Ｔਸ਼ｷ}ၩ漷缸輹佇꼻뼼㷿㻏㿟䃯胿䎯䰟䔯＿但侊律澌羍辎龏郿醯銿䧏俟雟䴟丏⍏ㄠ禐့䈭뀯ၧⵘ潢邬⸐ぞ삭潏龙頱戱狒妟汜ၧ蝥苏鏖烕湏ꀁ扥냓㦦送ဂ㔱送굡傀㨲㤵ꃫō䆐궫橰渐傾䟠ᆞ뽹攀빳퓐莟픐㳩ꏟ償㉏驦Ꞡ䂖¿擺ე絡ꈠ鿐昽ㅟￏ꾬뢭㽻ਸ਼徱욭쾔콿腟헯月䪩렾簸鹲斀舺莏蒟薯쾆ྣᾚ⾓㾔Ᾰ쿄鞃癮澠正畱鷗㊍械㕀ʟ鸻찌ﾳ侟⿈㿉쾗鿎꿏뿐쿑퉿폟鯯鱏佟띟ꈦ㎰㛪那橔摠送ゞ䀁ꗧꘐð
擠ť쩀ð냘畭°删㘐Ǡꏝ槡�劂㻠굵��網祀異�°ခꝣǠ涐ェ疼ꉧ�듑꿑柑틞焕槀Ⴆꝩ‐獩㘝澰惠郆ⴲ〴⠱⥢⾺扮�ꦐ屙愧혰哸桖ᆦ烃킼ﹶ�鷔Ⲡ�㬰¦탞�烐筯嫣㙦���⃰緿�ꎖ�ꊢ㘗�샘⏠ᆦ�筐ꂥ㋤��摡扜䅬⃤�捵Ũ�欰㓟䇴燧괔�북榰烴Ꝭ戰ェ肿鏪燡ꋿ析ꘐ��균ﺠ봮븯뼿쁏셟쉯썿ﾏ뿗꿅뿆쿇輄࿕ῖ�ࣿ��ୟ�ﱶｏ忶贑㿿伀弁漕缃輌ڟᳯॏ῟㾯Ἆﾝ
࿎輐倏睴緽桐狡ϣုェ倨생⓻猓틣폸ᇤㄢ팬ꖯ�汐6⡮탺⣹硥냡鏬逰愠톯這ェᯡϺ⿰懲㊐塚꾴뜠~6凞絭Ꙑ瀀ዩ刺晴槷絰繀｢郲鄫싣翮迯弣ꗱꜪ�㛡⽍ｐ◟ၒニ⃡㋟ᆦၒ憠냡퇩慁ꘟ易㞱椠畢�戣⽫ￒ耏惫Ⴅ聁鋡簟⯰ꨱ冿棯殬䬭爈砳䵹䵃䨃沐涐湭瑺Ő選䕖桖挷錹텹杬硺欶ꁷ䬓橒㍢䬹摰桗匈㜹ჟ䵪浬㤀䴭䝧䙶ࡺ煷湲䲚䭣摌㔳ÄZᚫ