HomeMy WebLinkAboutTree Removal Application City of Cape Canaveral
Community Development Department
fi1iN QF'
VERAL
May 12, 2015
Patrick Lee
Turnkey Construction Planners
400 Harbor Drive
Cape Canaveral, FL
RE: APPLICATION FOR TREE REMOVAL— 127 OAK LANE
Dear Mr. Lee:
Staff has reviewed the submitted tree removal application for the removal of a Live Oak Tree located
on the vacant lot known as 127 Oak Lane. The Oak Tree has been inspected by 'fins Davis, the City
Arborist, and lie has determined that the tree is a hazardous tree dine to the severe truck decay and
visible termites and carpenter ant infestation. At the time of the inspection the tree was measured to be
thirty-five (35) inches in diameter at breast height (dbh), however, by definition hazardous trees are
not classified as a Specimen Tree.
The tree is exempt from perrniting pursuant to:
Section 1.02-40, (b), (3) (6) (9) - Permit Exceptions. The following tree removal activities are exempt from
the pen-nit requirements of this division.
(3) The emergency removal of a dead, hazardous, or seriously damaged tree, to mitigate and imminent
threat to the health, safety, and welfare of the property owner or the general public. Prior to any emergency
removal, the property owner shall be required to docurrrent the immediate threat requiring emergency
removal. At the time of the inspection Staff documented and photographed the tree.
(6) The removal of any plant or tree that is an invasive or undesirable species as set forth in Section
102-53.
(9) Any parcel subject to a City development order authorizing the construction of a new residential
single-family dwelling unit, duplex or triplex, or a subdivision with three or less single-family
dwelling units. These parcels shall remain subject to the provisions of Section 102-41 and 102-45
(attached).
110 Polk Avenue—P.O. Box 326—Cape Canaveral,FI.., 32926-032.6
Telephone(321) 868-1222—Fax (321) 868-1247
wwvwF.c.t a e� array r a, . 1g e-maild.aiexande WgityofCapec array°aLM
Patrick Lee
May 12,.2015
Page 2
The City Places a higli priority on its natural environment and I am available if you have any questions
related to this matter. I may be reach at 321-868-122.2, ext. 13.
Sincerely,
Duree Alexander
Code Enforcement Officer
Encs:
(1) Section 10.2-41 & 102-45
(2) Tree Removal Application
Cc: Ron Ables
110 Polk Avenue-P.C. Box 326 - Cape Canaveral,FL 32920-0326
Telephone (321) 868-1222 Fax (321) 868-1247
rvw .cit eca��ayeral slz e-mail d.a exa7td,�� gt offc4l ecaAorgorg
Cape Canaveral, FL Code of Ordinances Page 1 of I
Exhibit#I
Sec.102-41 Specimen trees,
(a) Specimen trees shall be preserved or relocated on site to the greatest extent feasible.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this division,specimen trees shall not be removed except for extraordinary circumstances
and hardships and only by final permit approved by the city council.As a condition of removal of any specimen tree,the city council
shall have the right to require that replacement trees be planted or a contribution to the tree bank be made in accordance with
section 10.2-43 except replacement and/or tree bank contribution shall be based on a maximum of a two-to-one ratio of cumulative
diameter(dbh)basis of specimen trees removed using the data in Table 1.
(c) In reviewing an application for firial permit to remove a specimen tree,,the city council shall consider the following:
(1) Whether the site design,as determined by a preland-clearing inspection,are feasible to avow the use permitted,as established
by the applicable zoning district regulations.Streets,rights-of-way,easements,utflities,lake perimeters and lot lines shall be
shifted whenever possible to preserve trees.
(2) Whether the specimen tree is located within the footprint of the proposed structure or if more than one-third of the specimen
tree canopy would be required to be removed in order to accommodate the proposed structure,and whether or not it is
feasible to relocate the structure,
(3) Whether the location of the specimen tree prevents any access to the property from a publicly dedicated and maintained
roadway,or whether the tree constitutes a hazard to pedestrian or vehicular traffic that cannot be mitigated without removing
the tree,
(4) Whether the location of the specimen tree interferes with or prevents the construction of utility lines,drainage facilities,
roadways or required vehicular use area which cannot be pra(ticalfy relocated or rerouted,
(5) Whether the specimen tree is diseased,weakened by age,storm,fire or other injury so as to pose a danger to persons,
property,site improvements or other trees.
(Ord.No.05-2005,§Z 4-19-05;Ord,No. 12-2009,§2,1-s-I o)
about:blank 5/29/2015
Cape Canaveral,FL Code of Ordinances Page I of I
Exhibit#2
Sec.102-45.-minimum tree requirement,
No certificate of occupancy shall be issued on the types of construction indicated below unless the underlying parcel has at least the
required minimum number of approved trees:
(a) Any new single-family,duplex or triplex dwelling unit on a lot of less than 7,500 square feet:not fewer than two trees.Each tree
shall beat least eight feet talf with one and one-half inch dbh minimum and a two-Foot spread.Palm trees shall have at least six
feet of clear trunk.
(b) Any new single-family,duplex,and triplex dwelling unit on a lot equal to 7,500 square feet or greater:not fewer than two trees
plus one additional tree for each 4,000 square feet or fraction thereof over 7,500 square feet.Each tree shall beat least eight
feet tall with one and one-half inch dbh minimum and a two-foot spread.Palm trees shall have at least six feet of clear trunk.
(c) Any commercial,industrial,multifamily or other structure requiring site plan approval under the city land development
regulaVons:no fewer than sox trees or four trees per acre,whichever is greater.
(Ord.No.05-2005,§Z 4-19-05;Ord No. 12-2009,52,1-5-10)
about:blank 5/29/2015
CITY O�F CAPE CANAVERAL Tracking#IS_QG:_Q0
Date: 12
PERMIT APPLICA #TION Permit#_
IM/ FOR THE REMOVAL OFTREES
9
Authority.- City of Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances sec. 102-37(c)
(3,21) 868-1222
City of Cape Canaveral Building Department 7510 N.Atlantic Ave, Cape Canaveral,FL 32920
You may download this application:www.cityofeapecanaveral.o You may fax to: (321)868-1247. Important: Please complete the checklist
on this form and provide documentation as indicated. A copy of contract may be required. Applications will not be accepted unless complete,
APPLICANT WILL BE CALLED WHEN PERMIT IS READY.
(Contractor or Owner is required to sign for the permit,unless indicated otherwise by affidavit. J.D.maybe required)
Address of Job Site,
Legal description of Prop TWN: RNC. SEC/ SUDD- 13LK: LOT: PG:
Property Owner Naint 112 OWLSS: 7
U
Contractor Name: Ire :t�e of Company:
Address:
State License No.: Phone(office).- Phone(ceftagerj. ax.,
Please check all that apply(proof may be required). Of the tree(s)to be removed,are all the trees: dead? diseased?
suffering from severe structural defects? posing a clear and obvious safe�- ar,
Please clarify the reason tree(s)must be removed
Do you plan to relocate the tree(s)or re-plant new tree(s)? Please describe:
;t freight(4 1/2 feet above—grade)
Notes. d.b.h.is di� eter�abre
Caliper is the measurement of a tree 12 inches from the soil level.
A Specimen Tree is one with a 24"or greater caliper measurement.
City Council shall have final approval authority for the removal of Specimen'frees.
Type of Residential Quantity of Of the trees planned for removal, Sum total dbh of all inches Valuation of
Building built or proposed protected/native how many have caliper of all protected/native tree removal
o tWe property trees over 3"dbh measurement of 24"or larger? trees to be removed work
to be removed
Single Family Residence �11715 $
Townhome
Apartment
Other(specify)
Permit Appucation Checklist Notes
Completed Permit Application
A plan showing location and sizes of trees to be to and planted &bowing all existing/proposed construction and landscaping
Contractor's State License Record will be kept on file after initial submittal
Current Worker's Com .-Policy/E?Le�fion... Record will be kept on file after initial submittal
Ci Council Approval if needed-please attach gMroval minute
Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the tree removal and replacement work as indicated. I certify that no
work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the
standards of all laws regulating tree removal in this jurisdiction. A copy of the permit shall be posted on-site until all tree
removal activities are,complete. By signing, applicant affirms that all above is true and correct and that he/she is an
authorized agent of the Contractor and/or the Owner and has 11h;,eauthori, oppjy f�r this pqwjit
Applicant Applicant's Signa
's Name. D
16-24_Ile ate:
Nota �eonly�Wlthe S of H Cpunty of Brevard sworn and subscribed before me this day of 20
by_ 01
Printed name of Applicant who produced identification'. or
is personally known to me,
Signature-"Notary Public At Large
GABldg.Dept.Forms\BP Appl.Removal of Trees(3 A.U.) This form may be duplicated.
ork
,N Order
Vie, qct Dtft l�hne h!'umbreiorl
RE
'--ER REQUEST: Treft Application - 127 Oall litime- Per cation
Attached
i
equ t
d' AssIq�r�otl Twp l r�%
Beginning peticrrr baa : .
Tote1 Mows: Hourly Rate: Labor Costs:
Total Material Cos bst:
Barker's Not
EMEL VEE5 0 ,5
0y McAllister
Tim Davis 01.0
0 Alvie Hicks Cl 1,5
0 Steven Knapp [1 ? HOURS
0 Thomas lei l;olio
5 PER
0 Chris Robins InniatesPERSONM
1-13
0 Kay McKee
'i COLLECTION /RECLAIM WATER � 114
❑ ''vacant
Chuck Cordearo Other
0 Troxel Fitzpatrick
Shundell Lang DateStarted:
0 Shawn Jordan
Bb McCullum.
PUBLICWORKS,
t=7 7effl'ltatll "
0 Lonnie Dunn ate o pleted:
D June Clark
LEISURE S It'VI+CI
0 Yap►Anderson
OTHER: FORM VER 3.0.4YI3
A Photographic Guide to the Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas
�. TREE HAZARD2nd Edition
Site/Address".
tRcl fArING: i
Map/Location: Alt
+
Owner:public private unknown l allure a Size + argot = Ha rd
_ ever Potential of pari Hating Rating
Date: - lnspeotor, Immediate actmonD needed
Cate of last inspection: " Needs further inspection
TREE CHARACTERISTI Dead,tiie
Tree : Species: wra
DOW � #of trunks: Height: Spread: �
Form,. C generally symmetric C:minor asymmetry ,��ajor asymmetry 0 stump sprout u stag-headed
Crown truss: 21ominant ❑co-dominant 0 intermediate Ci suppressed �'�
Live crown ratio: % ,age class: 0young 7 sarni-mature (l i�
mature 0101V -mature/senescant
Pruning history: 0 cr yin cPeaned 11excsssrvely thinned C_taooed 0 crown raised 0 pollarded C crown reduced Cl flush cuts C:cabledtbraced
Zone C multiple pruning events Approx,J+a:es:
SpecialValue: C specimen O hlemtage/histonc O wildlife r unusual O street tree C3 screen Cl shadeindigenous protected by gov.agency
TREE HEALTH
Foliage color normal CVso
otic �necrotic Epicorrnics? N Grtiwath obstructlrans:
Foliage density,. C normal se Leaf size-;X
normal l=]small 0 stakes 0 vwireitie
s 0 signs 0 cables
,Annualshoot growth; C excellent O average poorig Bleback? C c pavern nt 0 guards
Woundwrood developments Cl excellent 0 average poor C none.
atlter
'vigor class: 0 excellent ::average 'fair poor
t
Major pests/diseases: r mA
i arvi aLvukr
SITE CONDITIONS
Site Character
o: residence C ra sed dl C inousrr;a `ped¢ pen space hatu�raI woodlan crest
®o
Landscape parkway C container mound C,lawn C7 shrub border C wind break
�lrrrgatarun; rirane adequate c made trate C excessive C trunk wetited
ffecepl elle tii ttprlbance? Y hl ®co stru on 0 soil oisrlrbance :]grade change 0line clearing site clearing
%dripline paved: 0% 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-1061% Pavement lifted? Y,
%dripline w/fill Sol1: C°"� i0-25 % 25-50% 50--75% 75-100%
yl °7n dmpfine grade lowered: g°o tC-25'% 25-50%
50-75% 7r-100%
Soil problems: 0 drainage' 0 shallow Cl compacted droughty 0 saline alkaline<0 acidic 13 small volume :0 disease center: 0 hist
_ ol of it
Ki
__ _ --_.-,_ w
l day 0 ixpao ive _slope aspect:
tree Exposure to wwin01 ghtsim le nage 0 line-of-sight C view Cl overhead lines C1 underground utilities Cl traf'''fic 0 adjacent veg. ,
g ❑b low csitopy CJ above canopy C recentlyexpo d CI uvantfward,canopy edge Cl area prone to windthrowu
Prevailing wind direction: Occurrence of snovwllce storms never Cl seldom O regularly
TARGE
"o' "e; nder Flee:" 0 buildin 11parlGing —traffic C1 pedestrian C recreation C landscape CI hardscape Osmallfeatures C1 utility iliacs
Can larget be moved? Y Can use be restricted? C
Occupancy: D occasional use ❑intermittent use frequent use' coaistant use
The International Society,oil, boritultore assumes no responsib0i,ty,lor conclusions or recommendations derived from use of this form. "
TREE DEFECT
R 0 0 T DEFECTS:
Suspect root roil: Y Mush room/cortklbracket present: Y IO:
Exposed roofs: a severe- 0 moderate 210011w,
undermined:: O severe; r�t moderate" O lowJ
Root pruned: distance from trunk Root area affected: - a 5'n Buttress wounded: Y When:
,,// r
Restricted root area: ❑severe 0;0ee ovw Potential for root failure: 0 severe , °immoderate 0 low
LEAN.,� deg,from vertical natural n unnatural 0 self-corrected Soil heaving: Y
Decay to plane of Mea : N loots broken Y Srrl9 cracking: Y
Compounding factors: Lor.,
'� Lean severity: tesevere C7 moderati low
CROWN DEFECTS., Indicate presence of individual defects and rate their severity(s=severe,m=moderate,I=tow)
DEFECT ROOT CRtfwfB TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES
Poor lager A
Boyar.swwee
CodominanMorks A111? L
Multiple attachments IAlf L
Included hark I
Excessive end jjjht 16 L.
Cracksis lits l
Hangers
GirdWounds/seam ndsdseam
Decav L 45
Cavi
Conks/mushraom bracket
Bleedin sap filowr
i
Loose/cracked bark
Nesting holelbee hive
Deadwood/stubs
Borers/termiteslants
Cankers! all'slbuds _ �,� 115
r.
Previous failure
HAZARD RATING
Tree part most Iikely to fa& Failure potential: t-low;2-medium„3-high:4-severe
_ __ _ _
Inspection period: �. annual. biannual other Size or part 3-,.18- f15 45-7 2=6),,4 ( 3T cm):
' _.._._ S_1R•3I.1"'(45-�a cm),4-a3D"(75 cm)
=enure Potential+Size of Part+Target Pating-Hazard zing
Target rating: 1 -occasional use;2 intermittent use,
+ 3-frequent use;4 constant use
HAZARD ABATEMENT
Prune 0 remove defective part 0 reduce end weight O crown clean O thin -D raise canopy O crouwn reduce ❑restructure 0 shape
CablejSrace. inspect further. ,0 rout crown O decay D aerial O monil
Remove tree: Y N Replace? Y N Move target: Y Other
Effect on adjacent tre s: n e 0evalu
_._
Notification., owner manager gowerningagenr safe: _` !
COMMENT
d`.. Ever 7� r 5 a - e InIn over
4 ` e -e-
�e o54
e. e4v4o'k
A Photographic Grids to the Evaluation of Hazard Trues Jn Urdan Areas ,
TREE HAZARD
Z 770 , 2nd iIfflOf9
S9t't1'AddrB$^a:A
a Oyer HA713 RATIN!
Fails' _
d�rnera public _. privateink wn;. ._ o + .Size �� Target - ilaaani
. of er Failure—�- ___ potential of pari Rating hating
WWIImmediate action needed
Date of last inspection deeds further inspection
., dead tree
THEEC EM CS
Tree 1: _ Species:
fIBN: '#of trunks: Height .- Spread
Form: C.,generZbOminant
metric C minor asymmetry ajor asymmetry Cl stump sprout G stag-headed
Crown class.„ 0 co-dominant Ci intermediate Csuppressed
Live crowvrr ratio: 400 % Age clan: O young serni-mature C3 mature ver-maturelsenescent
Pruning history�-' ❑cr ni cleaned !,'excessively thinned
t000ed 171 crown raised Cl pollarded CJ crown reduced 0 flush cuts cataledlbraced
none C multiple pruning events Approx.dz:es:
Special Value: C specimen Ci heritage/historic 0 wildlife `unusual Ci street tree C3 screen Cl shadend` mous
�I protected by gov.agency
TREE HEALTH
Foliage density- �normal Wsparse ��crotec � rnlrs? fJ Growth obstructions-
Foliage
a color. normal O chlo c 7i ne icor
p
p eat size. normal 0 small Ci stakes 0 wiref'es L signs 0 cables
Annual shoot growth; 0 excellent average 0 poor ig Blebaclr? Y N Cl cu averment 0 guards
gads
Woundwood development C7 exceltent D averarde poor C3 none Cher e
Vigor class: Cl excellent average -fair oar
Major pesWdiseases: f a s r
SITE CONBITIONS
5ile Character: C1 residence n commercial C'inoustrial park Cl open space atural =oodlan`dVorest���
�Landscape type: parkway Cr raised'bed 0 container mound 0 lawn 11 shrub border C wind break
gatran: one Ciadequate C inadequate C excessive trunk wettled
Recent site disturbance? Y nl CI construction 0 soil oistirbance 0 grade change 0 tine clearing site clearing
*dripline paved: 0j% 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% Pavement lifted? Y N
*dripline w/fill.sail: 0% 10-25% 25-50% %75% 75-100%
%dripline grade lowered: 10-=5% 50% 5075% 7' 00%
Soil
g n 9_ �..__.._. ._.___..__...__._..____.__. �.____ . ___ __ _ ._ _
problems: drainage Cl shal[o�w compacted rou h 0 saline atkalline 0 acidic CI small volume 0 disease center 0 history of fail
Ci clad Cl e�cpansivr slope as a t.
Obstructions: 0lights signage 0 line-of-sight 0 view Cl overhead lines Cl underground utilities ®traffic C)adjacent veg. .
Exposure to wind: single tree Cl be ow canopy Cl above canopy [Irecently exposed P7 windward,canopy edge Cl area prone to windthroww
Prevailing wind,direction: Occurrence of snowlice storms O never O seldom Cl regularly
ARPET
Ilse tinder Tree: O building Elparking --traffic O pedestrian C recreation lI landscape O hardscape C small fealures 'Cl utility lines
Can target be moved? Y ' Can use be restricted? Y Pr
Occupancy. 71 occasional use 0 intermittent use O frequent usecl�t use
The International Society of Arboriculture assumes no responsibility for conclusions or recommendations derived from use of this form.
TREE DEFECTS
P 0 0 T D fECTS;
Suspect toot rot: Y t hlushroorn/canklhracke seat: Y r> 10:
Exposed roots: 0 severe 0 moderate ow Undermined: 0 severe 0 moderate wd
Root pruned: distance from trunk Ro;�Iolw_"
ected: % Buttress wounded: Y When:
r
Restricted root area: O severe 0:aturall
ern Potential for idol failure., O severe 0 moderate ow
LEAH:�_ deg.from vertical 0 unnatural 0 self-corrected Soil heaving: Y
Decay in plane of lean:(VN Roots broken Y N Soil cracking: Y N
Compounding factors: ! — caZo Lean severity: Ersevere O moderate 0low
CROWN DEFECTS: Indicate presence of individual detects and rate their severity(s-severe,m moderate,I=lawn)
DEFECT ROOT CROWN T UNK SCA OLDS BRANCHES 1
Poor taoer
Bow.sweep
Codomrnantsforks
Multiple attachments
Included bark 9
Excessive end wes fitA11A Z_
Cracksls tits
Hangers
Girdlin -
Woundslseam
Decay
Cavity
Conkslmushroomslbracket
Bleedm sap flow
Loose/cracked baric
�I
_Nestlnq holelbee hive
Deadwood/stubs
Bore rsltermdeslants
Cankersr alls/buris
Previous failure
HAZARD 'RATING
"free part most likely to faiL Failure potential: 1 -low,3-medium:3-high;4-severe
p __.._Slze�of part 1 ;-<6'f 15 cm):2.6-18"'(15-415 cm);
period: ,annual biannual
Inspection nnual rather
=juur�Potential+Size of Dart+Target R ing=Hazard ing 3-18-341"(45-76 cin),4->30'(75 cm)
+ * _ / Target rating: 1 -occasional use;2 intermittent use;
d 3-frequent use,4-constant use f
HAZARD ABATEMENT �
Prune O remove detective part 0 reduce end weight O crown clean 0 thin O raise canopy O crownn reduce O restruwcture O shape
Catule,ffirace: Inspect further O root crown O decay O aerial O mond
Remove tree: (2) N Replace) Y N Move target: Y Other;
Effect on adjacent trees: none
Oe�overningagency
Notification: Downer Omanager Date: 'A ` .
COMMENTS
RAr OF LANG 5URKY FOR rrndlar CERnRrD TO,, rrn Cr`�aretrxr
DESCMPRONS AS fMLOtWS,,
COMMENCE AT THE'NORTHEAST CORNET; OF Lor 8 ACCORDING TO rHE PLAT Or TilwNs susDjws1oA, RECORDrO IN PLAT
K t. PAGE 22, OF "'PUBLIC RECORDS OF B�REVARD CC7�JNr, FLORAX THENCE RLIN S 00'54229"& ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF S4IO LOT B A DISTANCE OF 66.00 FT rH--NCr RUN N 89•,38','j- W AN PARALLEL 7"O THE AFH LINE Or
SAID tor 8, A, DISTANCE OF 510 IO FEET rD rHE POINT C7F BI C/NNrN(� rla BGS CDNTiHdIE ACnNG IIID L1NE� DISTANCE
OF 80.C9O F7 rHENGE RUN N LI[a' 429' A DISTANCE"OF 128,50 f7; MEWE RAIN S 89W'33 jr A OVSU rCr OF
6000 R,, 7HENCE RUN S 00'5CP9",E A DISTANCE Do 1.-8,50 Fr rO rHE po#Vr OF BEC:INNrNiG:
6,64 OAK LANE 1.31
crrA c PUBLIC, VARIES_ ��•
c " 8r38'3'3" E EDGE OF PAPUWVT
JAZAM. 51 LIZ R6C 618 t R.
PIS
94'CONC,zvM
Mo
" a4
ht Al
co
' OF,,or
04"ABOVS TIS '
O 6a
01 rrr.
. N
f 19
xl.o
1o'' aok
U
P P.aB
CEL A.25
80.0 � 518'"ria � 510.10
NT
82-10" oaks
Rec ;510 IR N
i
8 88 8 +888
tDr8 LOT r LOT s
OCEAN CARDENS MAVE ONE
41,
VALKER LAND SURVEYNG, INC.
ATxa s. a win,kwwawnri' 914'.rx or W
,r,
aws am �� a "ow; � w aA. �` r�rs xawgarK.
6 ItTN�3 rum IM r' aka l w x=I To
6w1MT, am Mal 10a Ws9WQ"M=M MMIMM.wwrW w"49°1ww,CAS
xMkY�J ..'MID[!am 4 J M VP
aw
Mam , ,R... W YWNk IIDAkwkO
s.Y, rnA+n M .1m5uG ,�M pb.IG dltl' R14S"A cp I ttomm
.
WIMAM=OM KAT NO WAVAN MM tn*Wj=VQW
w Y -M4 niv dB 0710
mma ID Tom fdtlko*ww1Wti[VM
MCS 6R UOUNALW
wl 1V�w ®frSk w1' kis�,'SCb[
9'f19Flt VWY
ANN
kAbw, 4 4t k aaaw _ r
craw D9 ra °,.�vsrrmo wzr o
w PLW
r, nwc Ya nmaw
I
l� I
'i
1>(
+ �I
i I
i
pp r
II�,
marl
0m
�I
� i r
w 4A
mrva a;,m�i, p
a
u
a
l
n
4i
V
,r
it
F
i
� 2
co /\}
N
\
<
NO :
/§ (?\
��.
f� IIU' G1f
Jii o �4
Ir
Mxin
y
19=!(i5
1�fFlr
( r J
J'
1�
�r
I
1�'
� / r
yir/�"UW����� IP
r
ri r d i
H r
r��f/ +�o �l /,,,,�yl ���'`"� itJ � bS 9%,, � Yd^w ry S�✓ i'� �� i° S ,,,✓ J / n rjY' � � ,:r N'
Or
+ efr•
"Vi
r e
r
J
r
r '
y
/F
r
i
y
�rr
f
r