Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOA Agenda Packet 8-23-2016 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING CAPE CANAVERAL PUBLIC LIBRARY 201 POLK AVENUE AUGUST 23, 2016 6:00 P.M. AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Any member of the public may address any items that do not appear on the agenda and any agenda item that is listed on the agenda for final official action by the-Planning&Zoning Board excluding public hearing items which are heard at the public hearing portion of the meeting, ministerial items (e.g. approval of agenda, minutes, informational items), and quasi-judicial or emergency items. Citizens will limit their comments to three(3)minutes. The Planning & Zoning Board will not take any action under the "Reports and Open Discussion" section of the agenda. The Planning&Zoning Board may schedule items not on the agenda as regular items and act upon them in the future. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes: February 25,2016. 2. Quasi-Judicial and/or Public Hearing: Motion Re: Variance Requests No. 16 - 02— 127 Oak Lane — John Dismore — Applicant. To allow for a 4 ft. setback from an adjacent residential lot line rather than the 8 feet required by Section 110-297(a)(2), City Code. 3. Quasi-Judicial and/or Public Hearing: Consideration of Special Exception No. 2016-03 to authorize an Automotive Service Station(Cumberland Farms)in the C- 1 zoning district, per City Code of Ordinances, Section 110-334(c) — Chris Ossa, P.E.,Applicant- (8000 Astronaut Boulevard). Board of Adjustment Meeting Agenda August 23,2016 Page 2 REPORTS AND OPEN DISCUSSION: ADJOURNMENT: Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes,the City hereby advises the public that: If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of Adjustment with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings,and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not constitute consent by the City for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence,nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by law. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act: all interested parties may attend this Public Meeting. The facility is accessible to the physically handicapped. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in the proceedings should contact the Community Development Department (868-1222, ext. 15) 48 hours in advance of the meeting. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Olt° MEETING MINUTES February 25. 2016 A Meeting of the Board of Adjustment was held on February 25, 2016, at the Cape Canaveral Public Library, 201 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida. The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Chairperson Arvo Eilau. The Secretary called the roll. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT Arvo Eilau Chairperson Douglas Raymond Vice Chairperson Desmond Wassell George Sweetman Joe Elliott Linda Brown MEMBERS ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT Kimberly Kopp Assistant City Attorney David Dickey Community Development Director Patsy Huffman Board Secretary PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: None NEW BUSINESS: 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes—January 7, 2016. Motion by Ms. Brown,seconded by Mr. Sweetman to approve the Meeting Minutes of January 7, 2016. Vote on the motion carried unanimously. 2. Quasi-Judicial and/or Public Hearing: Consideration of Adjustment Re: Special Exception No. 12-01 (Amendment) to authorize a setback reduction of the outdoor display area in the C-1 zoning district, per City Code of Ordinances, Section 110-334 (c)(8), Special Exceptions permissible by the Board of Adjustment — AlA Beach Rentals,LLC,Applicant-6811 N.Atlantic Avenue. Mr. Dickey presented Staffs report/photos. This application is to amend Special Exception No. 2012-01 that authorized the establishment of A 1 A Beach Rental. Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes February 25,2016 01111 On April 5, 2012, the Board of Adjustment approved Special Exception No. 2012-01 to allow a retail store and the use of outside display areas in the C-1 zoning district per Sec. 110-334(cx8)of the City Code. The approval was conditioned as follows: 1. The Display area shall be limited to 446 sf in total area; 2. The Display area shall be in substantial accordance with the attached Site Plan that depicts the location of the display area(s); 3. Displays shall be limited to beach rental equipment to include: surfboards, paddle boards. bicycles,canoes,kayaks and a canoe/kayak trailer; and 4. All rental equipment/display is to be brought inside the building after operating hours with the exception of the licensed canoe/kayak trailer. The request under consideration is to amend Condition #2 of the approved Special Exception. Applicant is requesting the condition be amended to allow display area under/adjacent to the existing pole sign.This would have the effect of reducing the setback to zero. Currently,the display area is setback 50 feet from A 1 A right-of-way line as required in Condition #2. This requirement resulted from Sec. 110-536 (I) and Sec. 110-334(c)(8) which state that an outside display area associated with a retail store must meet the same setbacks as the principal building.However,with the recent expansion of EOOD(which included this property),the setback requirement from A 1 A ROW has been reduced from 50 feet to 15 feet. Staff recommends approval of amendment to Special Exception No. 2012-01, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Display area shall be limited to 446 sf in total area: 2. The Display area shall be setback a minimum of 15 feet from AlA right-of-way line; 3. Displays shall be limited to beach rental equipment to include: surfboards, paddle boards, bicycles,canoes,kayaks and a canoe/kayak trailer;and 4. All rental equipment/display is to be brought inside the building after operating hours with the exception of the licensed canoe/kayak trailer. Discussion ensued to include adjacent properties; right of way; location of kayak trailer; meeting setbacks; delivery trucks; property posting; impact on vegetation; screening and buffering; visibility by cars traveling along A IA and ways to help this applicant be competitive. David Lane was sworn in by Assistant Attorney Kopp. Mr. Lane feels any type of buffering would hinder his request. He would abide by the 15-foot setback with conditions, if approved. Mr. Eilau opened the meeting to the public. Mr. Eilau closed the meeting to the public. 2 Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes February 25,2016 Olt NV I Discussion ensued to include the need for Applicant to maintain the 15-foot setback, ways to demonstrate setback line; Code Enforcement involvement, if any; moving display items indoors after hours;types of items on display and commending the Applicant for reaching out to adjacent business owners. Motion by Ms. Brown, seconded by Mr. Wassell to recommend approval to include the recommended conditions listed above. 3. Ouasi-Judicial and/or Public Hearing: Consideration and Recommendation to Board of Adjustment Re: Special Exception No. 2016-02 to authorize a single-family home in the C-1 zoning district, per City Code of Ordinances, Section 110-334, Special Exceptions permissible by the Board of Adjustment—Matthew Olenick—Owner— 110& 112 Ocean Garden Lane. Mr. Dickey presented Staffs report/photos.The application is for approval of a Special Exception for construction of a single-family home on lots 5 & 6 within Ocean Gardens Wave One subdivision. This subdivision is built-out with single and two-family homes (primarily attached townhouses). The Applicant is proposing to construct the home on two lots which are zoned C-1 and together comprise .26 acres. Section 110-334 of City Code requires approval of a Special Exception for residential development in C-1 zoning district. Surrounding uses are all residential although zoned commercial. In March 1990, Board of Adjustment approved Special Exception No. 90-2, which authorized construction of townhouses. The majority of lots have been utilized for townhome development. There are two single-family homes built in this development. Staff recommened approval of Special Exception No. 2016-02 to Board of Adjustment. Assistant Attorney Kopp stressed the need to consider the Special Exception request to allow a residential use in a commercial zone, using the City Code only. Assistant Attorney Kopp swore in the Applicant. Chris Sell, acting on behalf of the property owner, explained how he became involved in this process. He would be the person building on this lot. Staff explained that this Special Exception would remain with the property, if approved. Mr.Eilau opened the meeting to public participation. Assistant Attorney Kopp swore in the speakers. Tim Maitland spoke of Applicant meeting criteria for the HOA and concerns with drainage. 3 Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes February 25, 2016 Susan Nassoiy spoke of working with Applicant to meet HOA criteria. 101)i° The meeting was closed to public participation. Motion by Mr. Wassell, seconded by Mr. Douglas to recommend approval. Vote on the motion carried unanimously. REPORTS AND OPEN DISCUSSION: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion by Ms. Brown, seconded by Mr. Sweetman to adjourn the meeting at 7:25 p.m. Vote on the motion carried unanimously. Approved on this day of ,2016. Arvo Eilau, Chairperson Patsy Huffman, Board Secretary 4 WI:":' City of Cape Canaveral Ai tAr N I Board of Adjustment Meeting Date: 8/23/2016 Item No. 3.0 Subject: Variance No. 2016-02 is a request to reduce the eastern side yard from the required 8 feet to 4 feet. The subject parcel contains a single-family residence and has an address of 127 Oak Lane (Attachment 1). Department: Community Development (CD) Applicant/Owner: John Dismore/Sheropa, LLC Summary: The applicant is requesting a variance to the eastern side yard setback from the required 8 feet to 4 feet. The subject parcel contains a single-family house and has an address of 127 oak Lane (Attachment 2). The property is zoned C-1, which is required to meet R-2 standards when developing in a residential manner. On October 6,2015,the City issued a building permit for the construction of a house at 127 Oak Lane. The permit was issued in reliance upon a survey from Walker Surveying, a licensed surveyor in the state of Florida, which indicated compliance with City Code requirements, including property lines, setbacks, the location of improvements, etc. The permit application also included a warranty deed, with a legal description consistent with the survey. Subsequent to the issuance of the building permit, there were suggestions by adjacent property owners that the submitted survey was incorrect. The City requested documentation in support of this claim. A second survey was submitted to the City by the resident of 123 Oak Lane on or around January 15,2016. This survey was conducted by Riehl Reliable Surveying and Mapping and it did show a conflict with the Walker survey. The conflict centered on the location of the shared side property line between 123 and 127 Oak Lane. The two surveys indicate a discrepancy of 4 feet on where the property line is located. The applicant has reported that an attempt to purchase a four foot section of property from the owner of 123 Oak Lane has been unsuccessful. Therefore, the applicant has submitted a revised survey showing the property line in question shifting 4 feet to the west of the original location (Attachment 3). This is in accordance with the Riehl survey and results in a four (4) foot side yard setback to the house on 127 Oak Lane. For this purpose,a variance of 4 feet to the required 8 foot setback is being requested. Sec. 110-37 of the City Code establishes certain criteria that must be evaluated when a variance is being considered. For a detailed analysis of the requested variance's compliance with the criteria,please see the attached Staff Analysis and Worksheet (Attachment 5). Subject Property Future Land Use/Zoning Designation: Residential/C-1 Surrounding zoning: North—C-1 South—C-1 East—C-1 West—C-1 Board of Adjustment Meeting Date: 8/23/2016 Variance No. 2016-02 Page 2 of 2 Surrounding uses: North—Multi-family Residential South— Single-family residential East—Single-family Residential West— Single-family Residential Attachments: 1 —Location Map 2—Application 3 —Updated Survey—8/11/16 4—Site Photos 5 — Staff Analysis and Worksheet—Variance No. 2016-02 The CD Staff recommends that the Board of Adjustment take the following action(s): Approve a four(4) foot side yard setback variance to the required eight(8) feet to allow for a 4 foot setback on the east side yard. Approved by CD Director: David Dickey ---\-9 Date: (, I v I Attachment 1 P .' ''_ 4i .tet' •,.> .„.11:,IF .,,,.. '1 ' t• izt, , * '..:4-e. , . .. iii, ,, ! I1 r .„ -.....iiiir.,--,------ 4111 Jdrx_Art A.A. l /_ -- . Attachment 2 • City of Cape Canaveral VARIANCE Instruction Sheet A pre-application meeting with the Community Development Planner is required prior to completion and submittal of a Variance application. The Variance shall be prepared in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 110, Sections 110-36 & 110-37 of the Code. To access the Code, visit http://www.citvofcapecanaveral.orq, highlight City Departments, highlight City Clerk, click on City Code of Ordinances; click on http://www.municode.com and then click on Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances. This application packet must be completed, legible and submitted with all required documents referred to herein, to the City of Cape Canaveral, Community Development Department, 110 Polk Avenue, PO Box 326, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920. You and/or your representative are required to attend the meetings in which your request will be considered. You will be notified of the dates and times of meetings. Meetings are held at the Cape Canaveral Public Library, 201 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920, unless otherwise stated. The following items must be included for there to be a complete and reviewable submittal. If all items are not included at time of submittal, the application will not be accepted. VARIANCE Submittal Checklist 1. Completed application & worksheet. 2. Power of Attorney, if applicant is not the owner. 3. >\/ Payment of application fee and escrow deposit. 4. Radius package from Brevard County, including: a radius map, three (3) lists of properties located within 500 ft. of the subject property; one (1) set of mailing labels (instructions on page 6). 5. Property survey showing legal description and subject property boundaries. 6. Copy of recorded deed or Opinion Title for subject property. Variance Application-01/2015 Page 2 g City of Cape Canaveral VARIANCE Information Sheet Description of Request: (Insure that the specific Code sections of the zoning ordinance that allow and support your request are noted). If necessary, attach separate sheet. Set. Cc' .CIC eA Address of request: in Uc.V Qse arx.,coesC�` 1 rL 3N Z() Name of Project (if applicable): }J I A Legal description: Lot(sA.25 Block SubdivisionTQ V\-((\S Section 2.4 Township 3.1 Range 'LI FLU and Zoning designations: I * - • • • •• i • t..' a - •L Statement of Fact: I, fkir r MC31 l_ , being duly sworn, depose and say that: I am the property owner. X 1 am the owner(s) designated agent. (attach notarized letter of authorization). Owner(s) Name: &VS-CVC). LLL Mailing Address: goo i'\CX'\-1Q'C-oC C'ce @rcc \ , Ft 32 20 Phone number(s): Email(s): Designated Agent Information (if applicable): Name of Designated Agent: 30\--y\ 'bC e._ Mailing Address: 7(jL13 1�.. resh\`C e, is cue v\\\c\baucr\r„V1 32Vol Phone number(s): 3 Zl L1 W 32_ >3 Variance Application-01/2015 Page 3 Email(s): ai0C-30,,beGCAN 1Z,3p and • (...0(YA City of Cape Canaveral VARIANCE Information Sheet—Cont'd I hereby attest that all information, sketches and data contained and made part of this request are honest and true to t best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of Applicant: State of Flo 'da County of x.toad Sworn to and sub ibed before me on this ICI day ofZIA\I 2016by &\\(\in a♦C�r , ho is personally known, or ❑ roduced i.d. —Type'b Signature of Notary: Notary Seal: BRANDY DENISE TORRES MY COMMISSION A�FF084703 / EXPIRES January 21.2018 t407)—3-0;o163 0163 F1orlorNotr. Srrvtce.com •Variance Application-01/2015 Page 4 AUTHORIZATION TO ACT AS APPLICANT I, Patrick T. Lee as President of Sheropa LLC, authorize John Dismore to act as applicant, Representing me, in Public Hearings before the City of Cape Canaveral pertaining to Land Use issues, including but not limited toyarispce proceedings. as - T , Patrick T. Lee President Sheropa LLC STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF BREVARD The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this21 day of 2016 by Patrick T. Lee Driver License number L000-678-50-347-0 ow.d, MARY GAL Commission I FF 29265J/J(liti) , . My Commission Expires °/ "k"„.04 fir" June 19, 2017 ,V/ if NOTARY PUBLIC 47' My commission expires: /� / , i 4 City of Cape Canaveral VARIANCE Application & Worksheet Variances are to be authorized where they are not contrary to the public interest and where, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the terms of the Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. The Ordinance sets forth specific conditions which must all be demonstrated by the applicant before the Board empowered to grant the Variance. If the applicant cannot satisfactorily address all of the following, this should serve as a preliminary indication that the application may be rejected. The conditions are as follows and items (A) through (F) must be answered in full. (City Code Section 110-62). • A. That special conditions and circumstances exist, which are unique to the land, structure or building involved and are not applicable to other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. See attached B. That literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district and would put unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. See attached C. That the special conditions and circumstances referred to in item (A) above do not result from the actions of the applicant. See attached Variance Application-01/2015 Page 5 City of Cape Canaveral VARIANCE Application &Worksheet— Cont'd D. That granting the Variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privileges that are denied by the Ordinance to other lands, structures or building in the same district. See attached E. That the reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the Variance, and that the Variance, if granted, is the minimum that would make possible use of the land, building or structure_ See attached F. That the granting of the Variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Code and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. See attached While these conditions may seem unduly harsh and stringent to the individual applicant, it must be remembered that the Zoning Ordinance was enacted for the benefit of the community as a whole and requires an organized and controlled pattern of the community's development. It should be noted that the difficulties or hardships relied upon must be unique to that particular property (e.g. peculiar lot shape) not general in character, since difficulties or hardships shared with others in the area go to the reasonableness of the zoning generally, and will not support a Variance. If the hardship is one that is common to that area, the remedy is to seek a change of the zoning classification for the neighborhood. Variance Application-01/2015 Page 6 APPLICANT & WORKSHEET- VARIANCE FOR 127 OAK LANE/ SHERPA LLC Response to questions: A. That special conditions and circumstances exist, which are unique to the land, structure, or building involved and are not applicable to the other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. On 6/28/2016 the applicant purchased four lots on Oak Lane. The applicant received a title policy for the four lots as well as recored deed. The applicant had a survey done on all the lots that reflected the dimensions of the property as stated in the deed and the title policy. Turnkey Construction permitted a single family residence that met all setbacks according to our deed, survey and title policy. B. That the literal interpretation of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would deprive the applicant of the rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district and would put unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. After starting construction on the house, about the time trusses were being installed, we were presented with a survey from people that were considering the purchase the home next door ( 123 Oak Lane.) They stated that our rear property stake was on the lot they were considering. At this time we contacted our survey company (Walker Land Surveying, Inc) and asked them to check the survey. John Walker checked our survey and stated it matched our deed..in which case it did indeed. At this point Turnkey Construction proceeded on with the construction process. On January 19,2016 the survey company ( Riehl Reliable) that had been hired by the property owners next door (123 OakLane) called Walker Land Surveying and also emailed John Walker a copy of his survey showing overlapping survey. During this time the construction on the house had already passed the electrical rough, mechanical rough and shingles had been installed. If their survey is correct then our setback is roughly 4ft rather than the 8th the city requires. This creates the hardship. C. That the special conditions and circumstances referred to in item (A) above do not result from the actions of the applicant. The applicants not responsible for the overlapping survey that concert with the deed, Title policy and survey. D. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privileges that are denied by the ordinance to other lands, structures or building in the same district. We can not comply with the setbacks set at 8ft at this point. We have offered to to purchase the the portion of the lot next door to rectify the situation. The new owners of 123 Oak lane have no interest in selling a portion of the lot for what we feel is more than a fair offer. E. That the reason set fourth in the application justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance, if granted, is the minimum that would make possible use of the land, building or structure. The variance we are seeking is the bare minimum and without the variance the applicant will not be able to complete the construction and CO the house. PLAT OF LAND SURVEY FOR and/or CERTIFIED TO: John Dismore Attachment 3 DESCRIPTIONS AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 8, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF TUT£NS SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 22, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE RUN S 00'5429"E, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LO7 B, A DISTANCE OF 66.00 FT, THENCE RUN N 89'3833" W AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT B, A DISTANCE OF 510.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FT, THENCE RUN N 00'5429" W, A DISTANCE OF 128.50 IT, THENCE RUN S 89'.1833"E, A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FT THENCE RUN S 00'5429"E, A DISTANCE OF 128.50 FT TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 4 OAK LANE Ey 5 6 GRAVEL R/W VARIES PUBLIC- - 0" "1. 6 EDGE OF PAVEMENT (B.B)5' 89°38'33" E 80.00 REC. 5/8'LX REC 5/8"IR I INEW PROPERTY o1. _22LINE PER O 22 7 ORB 577; PC. 7411 'II11.5 CONC. I 83� 97 01103 I c' 6.0°= ONE STORY I w PC. RESIDENCE P. o (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) N.E. CORNER m O V. j O OF LOT B u�N� FORMS EL.,7.9.1 `t �N< E1/4V'� 17'ABOVE ROAD �,i I by ,PZ C.Z1•••, m 177 ti •Y co ItiO, •4, O LL6 13.0 Di vC 8.6 ti NO I Ir CONC.r ' o I W I m 32.7 '<-11.3 p J % N 1.D I No�4. 3y I PROPERTY LINE PAR O O ORB 6901, PC. e632 ko(p i Z w 0�13 0 PARCEL A.25- I P.O.B. to I • / °A6 i x`60 11.35 - REC. 5/8"LR. 14 4 ��JJ 5. 68.6 NEC.XE5/B"/.R 510.1 D 52°� °6`' 4° N 89.38 " W 6\° 66°� N 89'38 33"' W LOT 8 LOT 7 107'6 OCEAN GARDENS WAVE ONE (PR 38, PAGE 72) 0. 0' • WALKER LAND SURVEYING, INC" rK iatotsto tt oat atttn amen no,Ma wren Iain % 5.II Trtwc.. N \ `i' s1rM1.1.t tr alas r T.Rare..omta a suvrrat.ea 10.000(3 D 0001(( .. ...t 9,i -� *11 tat(+alMit•1.,,vt 5105 r,Rn... r•a 4'.rru.Tt-vr.nary tn.n?[s� ` I u1.eu nDt(we nuott(vane a1.rviRees tai..Yr1u wevtT rt r,v.1•a Mg 413 ODvt!v....WO.01550 rill[D/t1.U1T a1(1.aDt(TO T.AI,TS r S OiX N GRDx.S QGf�M r �` +r.t CT.*LCTICTR t Q[moons,IDT rraC?Tqs mom, (ARY . u.411.(00.1..tic1.alrIYTS Ws(Wsati3r[L uot[is mnv em sowsowWX ,yE i. AM. .�� • ml.411.(00.1.. r Masa./911K 4 Tr Wert.Cs .tt Man.,O Mit OL DL+a,t ' Do3tR as MS ono.r raw Dnp Cal,. fin' 4 ;?..-0 i 5 DTr.a4D1 VOA.rat Tia.tc31a v nND.Srt.ort.tato DCLLa.at t Tato TO Jg aODOTK,a alwas lYct I_1_, l7,• 2 I =,71...A......0...MC ma.M WOT/wa Ot9KIK KI,Ga MM 4/11.1.1.ut.tli lraml ." • 7 t+aala(o axr,+.aMar .SOUTH R/W LO02•OF OAK LANE =Ix 4S+ L LMt+cs rte a M LEGEND ' 'I WYI4.rIt cat .e.ans1R1..15(03 antevrt 50.n. wr. .u, m-t..-,.w ark •4:tL1 1.Kmm%w . VLrsY IC LY!DOW M USED O.T.0 sMD.MRi and)07*01 1.4.faea3,s&eVc'i 18 6h0 ie m ct.fTpn TO nas vPv[r li K-ic u.on. a in , F--- -.?O•-� .ttp{r( tnT/t(r. 1.ro war ri43 Ort min,.a m Woi T.uc •L,c .tAQD mtictt v slat US TO!]Lt /-1.D-1J aiaa W 4 a. pI ++L boa D!�-16 ri 3rr row • DOES.NOT1, T'OT Rf1'_ >-P-ID mr i Tori•Tr tat OrMe K•.rgtc,r__ a an.TK itrNatD1.( ID- !F oAe VI rtQ v� Val.Iliac+aVnat MC.Ks t.at b MG .Z' rtir _ 11`- 11 N'MfMM --. 1.0009[Al1JE w (-J-Ba __ /�!!"!D e• .. _�.__ _..._.._....Wef+D� MKa• oW MIL. 10...10 r.. nH i !i Attachment 4 y Jt b i. !( .!..' ,11';...i."70,:,!' ,y q l1.? v ?:r ` :r,^C+ l •i t r1 2. S • t.s ////� /'/. .� .. •moi.• i'., S # sraV.14 - r;' ' • ' • ,\ '• fit ».f * 4.,� y • • ,. r 44'41 r oR .. 4t kyr, Rte ' 1' " er ... ...r . adv i^ Ky .1,64 < . ti iporitc...atili • . ..... •••••.-;AF,- -NN —• '\ ''' • - • i .. . ... i . •rrriaii pi / fro r • ......--J_, . i • . t.1."-- ' e" 0P- P. / ' Et •.7 • .. _ tI , ' /Cr% • '' „„ 4.—.. , .0. • • --.. .... • -. ...i. ' •,..:• , allifithistmeiamilinarm,., 1 I I I , - . - - __• .. -,.. .... . .... ‘.., •• ..—:"*"' —. , 1:••• .,•—•'''...''... • /• .. .... — . . '\•`,••,..‘ • . . • . - , .- ' .• 4- 1 It •• * ,. . . ,,J•47101111111 . . - .-- - '''fP'`dlii4.10"."4". '•44''•(*..A.''--. '..z,: F.!, ,. . •• • .. ..• . '• .t.'''. .. ' . ''-•.. • ' - :;A ,...0 . • o;...— ''..;--. -''':;-;;TAVTNI., . '' .' ''''''. . s,:r2,7 '''., ..• • ''' , ....40(1, , , ' ...,,c71.-44i •.15'-1 i• • . 1...,....., . •,y.' - -r, 4 z. ,r, • .',411Vf:-•."1•PC__ el..4":. . ' ' ,, : '-,,,'.4-1k, . •''''.- . 44; . *. -4'"?'". • .4"' v'',`-1474*,411VE* •. 441...:...e t'";., •'t se. : . .'. .,.. CP:If,• .3%.:,-,.r'..'.'. '. ' . .*: '% : ,e, ' ''.• ..... jf.,'. :,<' ` ' ' ' ' '''';',., of.4I"" ....At , '..4.1..r,.:"4. i i, . ';',4":E:.'.(..V.4. ..'- ""'',ge4' .: ' ''.* -'7,.•--:,...4•••/-- ...7. - 1":I.. •'!":)1 1: ,'''',;4'..**--'. •- •:1!"' -.•:' , • . •••• . ,'-' , ''''' •• ! f• . ' ., 4Ii ..„, t,...,e ...k- 'i t •- • • 4 . I or 11 i4"!::1 *. * .tr . ' '- - '. g' .e.s .,.. , . . . ,ak• n . . . e ..e. , i . -*fr.,. ' A ,v 1.1..,•. :_1` .,., , .• . --._ II Attachment 5 City of Cape Canaveral Variance Worksheet Variance No. 2016-02 Variance means the relaxation of the terms of Chapter 110 when such variance will not be contrary to the public interest and when, conditions are peculiar to the property and not the result of the actions of the applicant, and a literal enforcement of the code would result in unnecessary and undue hardship. All variance recommendations and final decisions shall be based on an affirmative finding as to each of the following criteria: 1. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are unique to the land, structure or building involved and are not applicable to other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. The conflicting surveys have created a situation that is unique to the land and is not applicable to surrounding properties. As a result, the subject parcel does not meet the minimum side yard setback requirements of the R-2 zoning district. 2. That literal interpretation of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district and would cause unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. The R-2 side setback requirement requires that an applicant have a minimum of eight (8) feet of setback from the side lot line. However, due to conflicting property surveys, the more restrictive survey shows a four foot side lot setback for the principle structure. Thus, the current setback requirement would deprive the applicant rights enjoyed by other properties in the immediate area. 3. That the special conditions and circumstances referred to in item (1) above do not result from the actions of the applicant. When the applicant applied for the building permit, a survey was submitted indicating compliance with R-2 zoning standards. Also, a warranty deed was submitted that indicated the same legal description as the survey. It was only after this was it determined that the side yard setback was not met. 4. That granting the Variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privileges that are denied by the ordinance to other lands, structures or building in the same district. Approval of the requested variances would not confer any special privileges on the applicant that are not enjoyed by other properties or structures in the surrounding neighborhood. It will only provide only the rights that adjacent property owners currently enjoy. 5. That the reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the Variance, and that the Variance, if granted, is the minimum that would make possible use of the land, building or structure. The applicant has provided relevant and appropriate arguments that do speak to the requisite criteria. The requested variance is the minimum to meet the required setback standards. 6. That the granting of the Variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the zoning code will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent of the zoning code and will only provide for a single-family residence—similar to what currently exists in the immediate area. The larger home will only enhance the neighborhood and surrounding property values. Also, the home to the east of the subject parcel is approximately 20 feet from its western side property line. If the variance is approved, the separation between the two structures will be 24 feet. �� y City of Cape Canaveral J ;� • `• Board of Adjustment Meeting Date: 08/23/2016 Item No. Subject: Special Exception Request No. 2016-03 — An Automotive Service Station in the C-1 Zoning Category—8000 Astronaut Boulevard (Cumberland Farms). Department: Community & Economic Development (C&ED) Applicant/Owner: Chris Ossa, P.E./Mary M. Crowder Trust Summary: This application is for the construction and operation of an automotive service station (Cumberland Farms) located at 8000 Astronaut Boulevard (Attachment 1). The proposed development consists of a 4,928 square foot, retail convenience store that includes six fueling islands (12 fueling pumps) under a detached canopy. The project includes 22 parking spaces including 1 handicap space. A 325 square foot outdoor seating area is proposed adjacent to the southeast corner of the building (Attachment 2). The project is located on a 1.42 acre parcel,which has frontage on Astronaut Boulevard and N. Atlantic Avenue (Attachment 3). Sec. 110-39 (c) of the City Code establishes certain criteria that must be evaluated when a recommendation from the Planning & Zoning Board to the Board of Adjustment is being considered. For a detailed analysis of these criteria, see Attachment 4. The proposal meets these minimum standards. With the adoption of ord. No. 11-2015, the City Council established specific regulations dealing with automotive service stations. A notable provision of the ordinance was to only allow new stations in the M-1 zoning district. However, the ordinance also established that all existing service stations that were lawfully permitted through the City's special exception process prior to November 17, 2015, would be considered a lawful, conforming use, regardless of the zoning district it is within. In addition, the ordinance provided that existing stations could expand to 16 fueling stations if it is located on a single lot of at least one acre and with at least 275 feet of single street frontage. The subject parcel/request meets these requirements. Subject Property Future Land Use/Zoning Designation: Cl Surrounding zoning: North—C l South—C 1 East—C 1 West—Cl Surrounding uses: North—Retail South—Retail East—Retail/Office West—Vacant As required by Sec. 110-39(c)(1), all special exception requests must demonstrate that the project's traffic-generating characteristics will not adversely impact land use activities in the Board of Adjustment: 08/23/2016 Special Exception No. 2016-03 Page 2 of 3 immediate area. A traffic study was conducted by McMahon Transportation Engineers & Planners dated March 17, 2016 (Attachment 6) detailing the impacts of the proposed project. The study indicates that the proposed development will generate 615 net new daily trips, 27 net new AM peak hour trips, and 51 net new PM peak hour trips. SR Al A (Astronaut Boulevard), which provides the primary access to the project, is operating at a LOS of C with a current count of 1,196 (north bound) and 1,388 (south bound) peak hour trips. The analyzed roadway segments will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service with the proposed development. On April 20, 2016, the City's Community Appearance Board granted a Level 1 approval for the proposed development. The Boards role is to review proposed development to ensure that it is consistent and furthers the community's architectural standards and enhances existing development. On July 27, 2016, the City's Planning & Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval of Special Exception No. 2016-03 and site plan approval. There will be additional City approvals needed to construct the proposed development. These include: an administrative concurrency review and an administrative Site Development Permit. Attachments: 1 —Location Map/Street View 2—Rendered Elevation 3 —Site Plan 4 - Staff Analysis and Worksheet— Sec. 110-39(c) 5 — Special Exception 2016-03 Application Packet 6—Traffic Analysis—March 17, 2016 The CD Staff recommends that the Board of Adjustment take the following action: Recommend approval of Special Exception No. 2016-03, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the City's issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, Cumberland Farms shall record with the Clerk of Brevard County a temporary signage, landscaping, public amenity and utility easement ("Temporary Easement"), as depicted in the hatched area on the site plan, to the City of Cape Canaveral, in a form acceptable to the City, to run concurrent with the land for the term of the Cumberland Farms lease and any future Cumberland Farms sub-lessees. Such easement agreement shall include the flowing definitions: Signage—as authorized by City Code Chapter 94. Landscaping — as authorized by City Code Chapter 110, Article X, Economic Opportunity Overlay District. Public Amenity — a publicly interactive and/or publicly aesthetic enhancement. Examples include sidewalk, pedway, outdoor furniture, courtyard, bike rack, clock tower, fountain, public art. Specifically excluded: public restroom facilities and utility equipment serving property outside of the easement area. Utility — electric and/or plumbing equipment serving only the easement area. Board of Adjustment: 08/23/2016 Special Exception No. 2016-03 Page 3 of 3 Specifically excluded: service equipment for sewer, telephone, cable television, and gas. 2. Prior to the City's issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, Cumberland Farms shall record with the Clerk of Brevard County, in a form acceptable to the City, an agreement to convert the Temporary Easement to a Perpetual Easement should the Tenant or any future Cumberland Farms sub-tenant become owner of the property. Approved by CD Director: David Dickey �1 Date: 8 . \( . 1 Attachment 1 loopik • " �. :ti1C�:z: 3 ur r. t.•,},,4 It 11,r1171,_ ..,"XX k1-:f"/ .,,. r mac:: 1 j . - .. ilk,, •_ .A ,...,,--' . •\ , - -, -_, :.. , w a... •••,,, .......". ts,ii '., . ':• t ,,,2 , , , , .\ Iiiiik.'\k' '''''''''''''' $4.11for‘ far'' :.. , a• v f?!C'��""".M"'.. '• • iiiill r• t+PI {�k{ . ' �r •„ N .+ S;iM ' I_; Ci id Attachment 1 ...-, ,„ • • . „. .. , ,...,.. , ,. ,. ... _ , . V.7 I sh , '-'''''4\';''''' r..."' . • e .,. ' ,'. 42 - ...t , _ . .,„„. I 4,;,,jr.6.1111111.11101. '•,,s All°"..C.', VA?, 4,,r-., - a 4,,,,y,*, -..._ ,,,,• : •. r......,. „.,*„,, ,'•IF, 4744"Wiiirfirill,c4, i- tor• :-4 .''' ..!...!'"'•.•- , f AVIS. gill ,, .•• . . '.'w,,':'.-'-',-..:;;*,\''' '',s;4--,.• WI . ;A. • .1..;''':,i,;0',,<•:..4:.,• . :5;„. —. . . ..... . , • , . ,-,.kk;•A,,,,,. 5? *, ..„61. .-",,a,......,,„, — • 5,,__.... .....••••• ;_,....„.•-•„4 cc:.„.„4r,-7..,,s......•. - ,-,,.., 411111%tr ' . ' 1'"''''''''''''.46 ,r- - 4.i",:' 's,-.=1,., Igiitr..,- ''.,,,' ..,, :• . ' '"*‘,4„,_ 1.--, ... ,• tt;'''.4.c.,,g ' ,.',...*: ,fitli',r. , ,.v,-..,4*40-.-..i, -K-c-,-,.,,,,.‹. .. „, ( ,00c,lic earth. Looking North .._. . .._, ..,„ , J4,1 •.. ... • .., . ,. e . ...., .. • . , :27.73: atimmir....a...,.._-_ Araili..1 ..,,...X...... . ,.A1.-• , .1 :e.,„ar—:,"" .,ct,A. . .44. ',,,,,. ...1i...., ..,..,,, .. Al I I PI II I I• I 1 Mk I t,, I fir.iihNiNr,, . -4 - .44 t4F4, -1,20114Wr ... pp t 1 .. , .., . . . k ••• - . ,' -- i, e.r.14', • ......" ,,,,,..- .4. . . 0 . 0,......, • . Looking Southeast .. Attachment 1 , . , ... , . , ,1/4- ; . ..., . - n..i. -•• L - .4 . • . i0.11 .... woo. --...„4 I ••,•,.., ,... ,,,;-•- .• lat. A** — itiftSM ... • .. 6' ,L _ _ .111 4,..1 4'......, ' '. ....I .dotep4glit.... V.?,..... * . .r c..411. • 1; 110.1- fl - ' • 4 ,.-- ...,, , - 1 "-:- '... ---.11.......!, , - , k• ''''' '..-: . ... -, ,,. • . _ „ , ..• sio \ !. - - • Looking South — N. Atlantic Ave. . , .., ;,,.. . 0.-..i • .t ,... . $ , . „,/,..41 •rt r ',. • 4 • , .-` , ' <-4 4 t. • , ,‘•L',' -.. 400,i,*— ) • ow -- 41,`,„0 , ' i '7,, " ' -,c:.f ., •-• _ - . .r. 4, •t•t',.. • , • •. - ' • .A .„ • 4;!. , 4..... — -.• , , .,.,j1 • . , 1- ' /4, 7 ' . ^ • ,, . - •'''''' • ' ' A MI MOUE ,s • ,-- ••t IQ -ip..,, /• i7 ......-,,se --7- ''''' - • " - 0 .-• — A...'-' ::-'` h.'''' '....' • ,- '17:.144' iiale' •.•"•,' i"0 75% . '''. ilt.' .,.,,,- - ' •;'''' ' •_ -: ••• • .,:- 4.. , de I.. t1. it• , , • „„4-4 , 4, '''"° ',,,, „''-•',.., , „,- ;,. '.'$ 'Al* ., , ,s i , ', '','-; ,.artH• . . :*,:.- L.... ,,..A.c..g... Looking \Vest Attachment 2 , . .._ • r s;, aiiik p in si Y.•, �.� :/rte _ ,. . yy a s ...... :ow ->. t'.`,....•• ilk _. a Rendering — looking northeast Attachment 3 �r._. -_ `=-_ .__._.___ -.l._- - = -__-..- ,,....,., 1 'i I� ' I f- 7►►t �« +_ __ � - �_vsntrrw.e-I �+�.sr ----- ---t s‘..„. 1 ......„.... ` \r Y t I '1. % \ \ c 0 I 1 i. i . \ . ‘.... . . I 1 ,„ , Irt, I ( ��M E 4 1$ 1 ! ;I( 1'' Mae \ i ttli i ', . 4 ;• CN ---...--'1:-7:1?)?..� ti SOW" i \ E0.iM112 Mlb.i fD M&MIr. DI Ni • �WIDoW.ST1IPMG / V der 06 ow die, j ootocet MM1.c6i�ftlA 1r .. 1.T. �%' tow ret ilia 6, 1 \;..E.rirrIntr; •N \:4\ __‘,.,doi 01111111.iiii s I , . ,, ‘ I S 4 4 I 1 I; ,:, I 015 MS i 4� 1 1MOO i 2/ , 6i li Y 4 ! \ \ DE+1tlING raraTE / .�■ \ TT l kaatt c:1108 � '�. \ RW t / �` 66' \\ I 14 !Ns y.. r, \ CAxGFYrSEt'DETAt:.00...grop iris, / • \ ,.► �r �� �..i1 i Girl ti a t a CM,: I MN .'.Me - 4 \\aa6s►on � \ ..!,r 7 4 - ,1 i \ros a \. ':,:;,.t� .�•.,.��.:» :• . oatd` y f �.,1 it�nou� y�" \\ YY•••,8 •. .•' .:741•' ••, '• • Y , , '. • J x r I T �md V Cr- �\. ` SL it ''SS�� \. 1.10.11PDE i .. t I' ��.emelt oweDIDCRIN4 •<F Woune* J} y i� t ,IG NOTES SEE GENEflk..01,,,EE1 \ ` \ j \ 1167 ♦ ,41\ \ • ''�• ��� / , von Poo?stmouID.POGf1GAncod stnon 1� ` • . 6• 1p1 VRP09ES04.y Rem+TOo.lerM/4P1A/GMOR ''\\ �* * � p '- 4A0.E9,74.4.1.lK LOCOED aIM,DET,E1L wry,'A DE914N SPEED OF NIP,OR tlSS,TIE •\4""1" •` `\ llttt f Orr.*CAB.Trk b'OR 1,-.016 FEET "\ { it* 11 II re:TO ttlOUC AJC SWATS PROSSATI, \ ,. \ T, I Wi 2 P ,YUI,L OE P1911.-,0T FCE\4133.FOR t V AT Of 11.4T 0G41 ^SED M OR OTIC1 ` \ 1 l •', 'AAT Of AVM'MIG A1CGA4a 0e CttN+NC DRr \ KOI f A S01.7M LL Oe'<wo b)FRP.,Rer...me T ‘ \ \i Ij L�eRM SIDEWALK TWITMYE OEE/1EN0WATiD) '� '' / i ]EYrAiR TOAYRM114110f 96\MMYRO TN \" s%� + � os"• �I e mem Tx WINREA OR 024 ` • i/ • CRW1.r 9MALLOE MACOOMANC01MTATIC .. ` MOT STACARD 921CO AT1G14 PDR ROAD ;'+�' .' . . . /. . TY AGtgYODATIGNWWIIK, \\ �.lT1� _ 47 ,yrr '1oN 1Y1T1l1 TIl FOOT R41ti1f.Y.Wv SMALL • \�„ ,\0 ` \ is �� Tt \`y• Mere aE 91/01217110 TO NI.DOT;NOW rC .,\ 11 ^ esu r. ,, E 1 1 Attachment 4 Staff Analysis and Worksheet—Sec. 110-39(c) Special Exception No. 2016-03 All special exception recommendations and final decisions shall be based on the following criteria to the extent applicable: 1. Land Use and Zoning a. Is the requested SE consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan? Yes, the subject property in situated in the Astronaut Boulevard/N. Atlantic Avenue commercial corridor. The proposed use is a continuation of the commercial development pattern in the area and is consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan which seeks to ensure the proper relationship among various land uses (Goal LU-1). b. Is the requested SE consistent with the intent of the zoning district in which it is sought? The proposed use is consistent with the C-1 zoning district as defined in Sec. 110-331 of the City's Code, which states (underline added): The requirements for the C-1 low density commercial district are intended to apply to an area adjacent to major arterial streets and convenient to major residential areas. The types of uses permitted are intended to serve the consumer needs of nearby residential neighborhoods, as well as the commercial needs of the motorist. Lot sizes and other restrictions are intended to reduce conflict with adjacent residential uses and to minimize the interruption of traffic along thoroughfares. c. Will the SE meet all the requirements of the zoning district in which the request is to be located, such as: lot requirements, building setbacks, lot coverage, height, buffers, off- street parking, signs, storage, landscaping,etc.? Yes,the special exception is consistent with applicable zoning standards as contained in Sec. 110 of the City Code. 2. Impact to Surrounding Properties a. Is the proposed special exception compatible and harmonious with properties and uses in the surrounding area? Explain why. Yes, the proposed use is consistent and compatible with adjacent uses. The subject parcel is within a much larger C-1 district that represents the City's main commercial corridor. The surrounding properties have primarily developed with commercial uses that would typically be located along a major arterial road(SRA1A). SR AIA is the main north-south route through Brevard County's coastal communities and serves its residents and visitors. The proposed use will meet applicable zoning standards to include those associated with off-site glare, noise, buffering, landscaping, traffic generation, etc. On April 20, 2016, the City's Community Appearance Board approved a Level 1 Application for the subject project. This approval required the CAB to consider if the proposed plans and specifications of the project are in harmony with the established character of other buildings and structures in the surrounding area. b. Will the scale and intensity of the proposed special exception be compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses? Yes, see response to 2 a. above. c. Will the traffic volume and type adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity? No. Attachment 6 to this application includes a traffic analysis that demonstrates that the proposed development will generate an additional 615 net new daily trips, 27 net new AM peak hour trips, and 51 net new PM peak hour trips. Astronaut Boulevard (SR AlA), which provides the primary access to the project, is operating at a LOS of C with a current count of 1,196(north bound) and 1,388(south bound)peak hour trips. The analyzed roadway segments will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service with the proposed development. d. Will the proposed special exception create any adverse impacts to other properties in the surrounding area? Address the creation of noise, light, vibration, odor, stormwater runoff, or other offsite impacts that would not have been created had the property been developed as a principal use? No. As shown on the site plan, all service areas including loading areas and dumpsters are located on the eastern side of the building, opposite the multi family to the west. Dumpsters will be enclosed consistent with City code. Parking and traffic circulation are designed to have minimum impact to other properties in the surrounding area. Stormwater runoff is addressed by retention ponds located in the southern and northwestern area of the site. e. Will there be adequate screening, buffers, landscaping, open space, off-street parking, other similar site improvements to mitigate any adverse impacts of the special exception? Yes, site improvements will meet applicable Code requirements to address possible off-site impacts. Specifically, a 10 foot landscape buffer will be installed along the property's frontage of Astronaut Boulevard and N. Atlantic Avenue. In addition, the applicant has designated an area to the south end of the property for public use. Tentative plans include a seating area with a plaque discussing the N. Atlantic corridor. f. Will the size and shape of the site, the proposed access, internal circulation, and design enhancements be adequate to accommodate the proposed scale and intensity of the special exception requested? Yes, see the attached site plan. g. Are signs and exterior lighting designed and located so as to promote traffic safety and to minimize any undue glare or incompatibility with adjoining properties? Yes. City Code requires the use of shields to direct light downward to reduce the spillover effect onto adjacent properties. h. What are the hours of operation and how will they impact surrounding properties? The operating hours for this location will be 24 hours a day, seven days a week. As indicated above, this property is located within the City's main commercial corridor that contains uses similar in nature to the proposed use. Cape Gardens,a multi family project is located across Astronaut Boulevard to the west of the proposal. A significant landscaped berm has been installed that buffers the units from off-site noise and lighting impacts. 3. Traffic and Parking a. Is there adequate off-street parking? Yes, the site plan includes the number of parking spaces as required in Sec. 110-491 of the City's Code. b. Is there adequate ingress and egress, with particular reference to auto and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow, and emergency access? Yes, the project is proposed to be accessed at three points. Two on Astronaut and one on N.Atlantic. All traffic circulation has been reviewed and approved by the City's public safety officials. c. What type and how much traffic will the special exception generate?See the attached traffic analysis. d. Are there adequate loading and unloading areas? Yes. 4. Public Services a. Are adequate utilities available? Location and capacity. Yes. Public utilities are available to the site. A concurrency review will be required as part of the project review. b. Will the proposed special exception create any unusual demand for police, fire, or emergency services? No. c. Will the proposed special exception have an adverse impact on public services, including water, sewer, surface water management, parks and recreation, streets,public transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities? No. d. Are there adequate refuse facilities for the proposed special exception and is the dumpster properly located and screened? Yes. Dumpsters will be located in the northeastern portion of the site and will be screened from public view consistent with Sec. 110-488(d) of the City Code. 5. Miscellaneous Impacts a. Will the proposed special exception have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation, wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards? Development of the site will meet local, state and federal requirements. b. Will the proposed special exception have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources? As the proposed project is the redevelopment of an existing automotive service station, it is not anticipated that any adverse impacts to natural and/or cultural resources will occur. c. Will the proposed special exception have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment and property values?No. d. Will the proposed special exception have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, including a variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality? It is anticipated that the proposed project will have a positive impact on the quality of the neighborhood by fully utilizing the site and removing structures that are obsolete. Attachment 5 CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL 00E Aid 4) /r4% CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION PACKET Instruction sheet ..2 Submittal Checklist 2 Information Sheet 3 & 4 Worksheet 5, 6 & 7 Radius Package Instructions .8 JUN 23ZOE Special Exception Application -4/2015 Page 1 City of Cape Canaveral SPECIAL EXCEPTION Instruction Sheet A pre-application meeting with the Community Development Director is required prior to completion and submittal of a Special Exception application. The Special Exception application shall be prepared in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 110, Sections 110-38 & 110-39 of the Code. To access the Code, visit http://www.cityofcapecanaveral.orq, highlight City Departments, highlight City Clerk, click on City Code of Ordinances; click on http://www.municode.com then click on Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances. You and/or your representative are required to attend the meetings at which your request will be considered. You will be notified of the dates and times of meetings. Meetings are held at the Cape Canaveral Public Library, 201 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920, unless otherwise stated. The following items must be included for there to be a complete and reviewable submittal. If all items are not included at the time of submittal, the application will not be accepted. Special Exception Application Submittal Checklist 1. V Completed Information Sheet. 2. VAuthorization to represent property owner, if applicant is not the owner. VPayment If tenant: Notarized letter of authorization. If other: Written Power of Attorney.3. of an application fee ($250.00) which is non-refundable, and an Escrow deposit fee ($1800.00) to cover costs of application review, notification of surrounding property owners, etc., is required. Any funds not used will be returned VRadius to the applicant.4. Package from Brevard County, including: a radius map, three (3) lists of properties located within 500 ft. of the subject property; one (1) set of mailing labels VLegal (instructions on page 8).5. description along with certified survey or map from Brevard County Property VCopyAppraiser depicting property boundaries.6. of recorded deed or Opinion Title for subject property. 7.VCertified Certified survey or site plan (scaled drawing of subject property depicting boundaries, all structures, and parking). Special Exception Application -4/2015 Page 2 xi i • . . City of Cape Canaveral SPECIAL EXCEPTION Information Sheet Description of Request: (Insure that the specific Code sections of the zoning ordinance r that allow and support your request are noted). If necessary, attach separate sheet. A 4,928 sq. ft. convenience store with 6 fuel pumps Address of requested Special Exception: 8000 Astronaut Blvd, Cape Canaveral FL 32920 Name of Project (if applicable): Cumberland Farms Legal description: Lot(s) 0000.00BIock 00287.0 Subdivision 00 Section 23 _ Township 24 Range 37 Future Land Use and Zoning designations: C-1 Low Density Commercial District Owner and Applicant Information: I am the property owner. _ VI am a tenant. (Attach notarized letter of authorization). I am authorized agent other than a tenant: (Attach Written Power of Attorney) Owner(s) Name: Mary M Trust, The Crowder Mailing Address: 719 Garden St, Titusville FL 32796 Phone number(s): Email(s): Authorized Agent Information (if applicable): Name of Authorized Agent: Chris Ossa, P.E. Mailing Address: 7175 Murrell Road, Melbourne FL 32940 Phone number(s): (321) 775-6651 Email(s): christian.ossa@atkinsglobal.com Special Exception Application -4/2015 Page 3 City of Cape Canaveral SPECIAL EXCEPTION Information Sheet—Cont'd I hereby attest that all information, s -tches and data contained and made part of this request are honest and true to t - - -st of my kno •ge and belief. Signature of Applicant: —= State of Florida County of Vu,�-t.� Sworn to and subscribed before me on this �-3r°tday of 24i by Chii t5 ec,st.,, ass .. , ❑ who is personally known, or 8'produced i.d. —Type of i.d. F106 D4it/ 5 CAoeJ1 -- Signature of Notary: JQIt3/-,jjj , Notary Seal: 14%Y Kristina A.Frost State of Florida ;„a. t My Commission#EE 213533 Expires;July 2,2016 Special Exception Application-4/2015 Page 4 . tea. FARMSallthedand June 22,2016 AUTHORIZATION Project Name: Cumberland Farms Project Location: AlA&North Atlantic(a/k/a 8000 Astronaut Boulevard) Cape Canaveral, FL Dear Sirs: Atkins North America, Inc. is the authorized agent for Cumberland Farms, Inc. to handle all site-related permit applications for the Cumberland Farms development project located at A1A& North Atlantic, (a/k/a 8000 Astronaut Boulevard), Cape Canaveral, Florida. Cumberland Farms, Inc. By: a11.41.401-1,1123;f1 Kathleen A.Sousa Senior Pipeline Manager Commonwealth of Massachusetts County of Middlesex The above instrument was acknowledged before me this 22nd day of June, 2016, by Kathleen A. Sousa, Senior Pipeline Manager, Cumberland Farms, Inc.,who is personally known to me, and who did take an oath. • r 61. L t tt.9111: t&iri L )(fit 2 i •2 My Commission Expires: Notary Public 9Yp Cumberland Farms, Inc. Nal�ry Public 100 Crossing Boulevard,Framingham, MA 01702 �>N OF cMusErts 508-270-1400 My Commission Expires www.cumberlandfarms.com January 21. 2022 City of Cape Canaveral,FL Agent Authorization Form n4 e 6*C Alia wt Cf°` ` 17:"A4 I/WE,(PRINT PROPERTY OWNER NAME) AS THE OWNER(S)OF THF.REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, coot> Av4v0vK..4Qw�--i , DO HEREBY AUTHORIZ TO ACT AS MY/OUR AGENT(PRINT AGENT'S NAME),, 64; 4;s FOR APPLICANT,...L.A__•=ke...L.4 •,Ms TO EXECUTE ANY PETITION. OR OTHER DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO AFFECT THE APPLICATION APPROVAL REQUESTED ND MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, ,AND TO APPEAR ON MY/OUR BEH LP BEFORE NY ADMINISTRATIVE OR LEGISLATIVE BODY IN THE COUNTY CONSID ,RING THIS APPLICATION AND TO ACT IN ALT,RESPECTS AS OUR AGENT IN MATTERS PERTA IN©TO THE APPLICATION. • Datt �otLo ./ ' l L. 141 X1/6412: lis j ( Si a c of Property Owner Print Name Pro. rty Owner , kta � .Ct { Date: Signature of Property Owner Print Name Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA: COUNTY OF . I certify that the foregoing instrumentmm a ed be rg�mo, this t� day of byJr^ri4 u)' fl be ; l e s peL f known tS i —h t6th ccd as identification and did/did not take an oath. Wimess my hand and official seal in the county and state stated above on the day of in the year . 1 . . / 00011004ft, 9).44A,- I X04%.•SSp' s :*1Signature of Notary Public •(Notary Seal) a*• 0� ; f Notary Public for the State of Flom dal 7nniTnn T79 YV4 c7:bn QTA7i77/PA ATKINS 7175 Nath Mterka,Inc - 7175 Murrell Road Melbourne,Florida 32940 Tielephonrr:+1321.242.4942 Fax:+1.321.242.6101 www.MicinsglobaLoom/northamerica June 29,2016 David Dickey Community Development Director City of Cape Canaveral Phone: 321-868-1222 Project Name: Cumberland Farms—8000 Astronaut Blvd. RE: RESPONSES TO SPECIAL EXCEPTION WORKSHEET: Nature of Special Exceotioq Describe what you are proposing to do and why. Describe in writing and prepare site plans, floor plans, architectural renderings, photos, etc. as necessary to fully describe the Special Exception requested. Cumberland Farms, Inc. is proposing the redevelopment of the existing gas station located on 8000 Astronaut Blvd in the City of Cape Canaveral. The proposed redevelopment includes a new 4,928 sf convenience store with 325sf of outdoor seating and 6 dispensing pumps. The proposed site will he equipped with (2_ 20K split underground storage tanks, fueling canopy, outdoor seating, air/vac tower, bike rack& dumpster enclosure. imoact to surrounding oroaerties 1. Is the proposed Special Exception compatible and harmonious with properties and uses in the surrounding area? Explain why. Yes, the proposed project will redevelop an existing service station with a new more aesthetically pleasing convenience store gas station. No change in the current use is proposed with this project. 2. Will the scale and intensity of the proposed Special Exception be compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses? Yes, the scale and intensity of the proposed redevelopment is compatible and harmonious with the adjacent land uses. Currently all surrounding parcels are CI, no changes to zoning or land uses are proposed with this project. Page 1 of 5 City of Cape Canaveral —Special Exception Worksheet Responses 3. Will the traffic generated, volume and type, adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity? A traffic study was completed and submitted to the City as part of the site plan approval package. The traffic study communicated no adverse impacts to the immediate vicinity of the project site due to the proposed improvements. 4. Will the proposed Special Exception create any adverse impacts to other properties in the surrounding area? Address the creation of noise, light, vibration, odor, traffic, stormwater runoff or other offsite impacts. The proposed redevelopment is not intended to adversely impact the surrounding properties with the creation of additional: • Noise: not anticipated due to the existing use and proposed use being the same. • Light: proposed lighting will conform to the City's lighting code. • Odor: no adverse odor is anticipated • Tragic: traffic study completed did not forecast adverse impacts to surrounding traffic. • Stormwater: drainage design of the proposed project is intended to attenuate all of the site stormwater runoff within the site. 5. Will there be adequate screening, buffers, landscaping open space, etc. to mitigate any adverse impacts of the Special Exception? The design intent of the prgject is to meet the City's design standards for C-1 zoning and the A 1 A economic opportunity overlay district's rules and regulations. The_project will conform to both sets of regulations regarding but not limited to screening, buffers, ct: landscaping. 6. Will the size and shape of the site, the proposed access, internal circulation and design enhancements be adequate to accommodate the proposed scale and intensity of the Special • Exception requested? Yes,geometricparameters have been desed to harmoniously interface our client's internal circulation re_quirements with that to the offsite characteristics. Cumberland Farms design standards are catered to the convenience of its customers accessing and maneuvering throughout the site. 7. Are signs and exterior lighting designed and located so as to promote traffic safety and to minimize any undue glare or incompatibility with adjoining properties? Yes, point of purchase sign, canopy lighting, site lighting and store lighting have been designed to meet the City's lighting code. Clear sight lines with respect to signs are intended to adequately address safety. Page 2 of 5 City of Cape Canaveral- Special Exception Worksheet Responses 8. What are the hours of operation and how will they impact surrounding properties? The Cumberland Farms convenience store and gas station services are intended to he opened 24 hours --- 7 days a week. The immediate surround uses are all zoned C-I commercial therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. Traffic and Parking • 9. Is there adequate off-street parking? Yes, C-1 zoning requires that I parking space per 300 Al convenience store be provided equaling 17 off-street parkin spaces required. The proposed project will provide 22 off street parking spaces and 12 fueling positions. 10. Is there adequate ingress and egress, with particular reference to auto and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and emergency access? Yes, there will be 3 points of ingress and 2 points of egress on the site. (2) driveway ((I)- right-in/right-out & (I) right-in) off AIA and (1) driveway off N. Atlantic (full access). All driveways are design to meet Florida Department of Transportation design standards and City standards. In addition, the Cumberland Farms site are desiinfor the access of a fueling tanker truck. The tanker trucks design parameters exceed the minimums for emergency vehicle access. 11. What type and how much traffic will the Special Exception generate? Commuter tragic is expected at redevelopment. The results of the traffic study indicate that offsite surrounding roadways segments are expected to operate at an acceptable level of service with excess capacity on the surrounding roadways. 12. Are there adequate loading and unloading areas? Yes, loading area is proposed on the east side of the store. The loading area is not in the stores travel aisles in order to not interrupt costumer tragic. public Service 13.Are there adequate utilities available including location and capacity? Yes, the City's sanitary sewer system will he utilized as well as the City of Cocoa's potable water services both within the west shoulder of N. Atlantic. N. Atlantic improvement projects will make reuse water available to the proposed site. A reuse connection is proposed for irrigation. Page 3 of 5 City of Cape Canaveral—Special Exception Worksheet Responses 14.Will the proposed Special Exception create any unusual demand for police, fire or emergency services? Unusual demand for police, fire or emergency services is not anticipated due to the • redevelopment of this site. • • 15.Will the proposed Special Exception have an adverse impact on public services, including water, sewer, surface water management, parks and recreation, streets, public transportation,marina and waterways,and bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Adverse impacts on public services including water, sewer, surface water management, parks and recreation, streets, public transportation, marina and waterways and bicycle and pedestrianfacilities is not anticipated due to the proposed redevelopment. • 16.Is there adequate refuse facility for the use and is the dumpster properly located and • screened? Yes, the dumpster is properly located and screening will he provided via required landscaping. Miscellaneous lmoact 17. Will the proposed Special Exception have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation. wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation and flood hazards? No adverse impacts are anticipated with the proposed redevelopment to the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation, wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation and flood hazards • 18.Will the proposed Special Exception have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources? No adverse impact is anticipated on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. 19.Will the proposed Special Exception have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment and property values? No adverse impacts on an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment and property values are anticipated. Page 4 of S City of Cape Canaveral — Special Exception Worksheet Responses 20. Will the proposed Special Exception have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, including a variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality? No, adverse impacts on housing and social conditions, includinga variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality are anticipated due to proposed redevelopment. If you require any additional information or have any questions,please contact me at(321) 775- 6651 or christian.ossa(atkinsglobal.com. We look forward to having a great project come to fruition. Sincerely, Chris Ossa, PE Senior Engineer Page 5 of 5 • i: 4'` 44/ C-y Low DENSITY i fi. V COMMERC!M DISTRLCT 1 i ,,,i) • SITE DATA ` * • '` , ar . • ooaw : .w I• ..,. .., ..owsn+o . ..../ ... C � f' t y . . . JA0awe IMO/9 I VI i.. ' / 3 s / 'L k' , l .. ' l _ ' � . _ + III w �r':; 'fi , i.....-- . ! ; . HW YAM , ale A R. i‘ ,... '4 .; t.••• . 'DISTRICT • 7 ' : ' 't '. t 4 r - •t?3. is 00..............► Attachment 6 AmcmAHoN McMAHON ASSOCIATES, INC. 2090 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd I Suite 400 I West Palm Beach, FL 33409 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS & PLANNERS p 561-840-8650 I f 561-840-8590 mcmahonassociates.com PRINCIPALS Joseph W.McMahon,P.E. March 17,2016 Joseph J.DeSantis,P.E.,PTOE John S.DePalma William T.Steffens Casey A.Moore,P.E. Gary R.McNaughton,P.E.,PTOE VIA E-MAIL ASSOCIATES John J.Mitchell,P.E. Christopher J.Williams.P.E. Kathleen Sousa R.Trent Ebersole,P.E. Cumberland Farms Matthew M.Kozsuch,P.E. 100 Crossing Boulevard Maureen M.Chlebek,P.E.,PTOE Framingham, MA 01702 RE: Cumberland Farms—SR-AlA and North Atlantic Avenue Traffic Analysis McMahon Project No.N16120.01 Dear Ms.Sousa: McMahon Associates, Inc. (McMahon) has completed a traffic impact analysis associated with the redevelopment of a site located on the north corner of the intersection of SR-AlA and North Atlantic Avenue, in the City of Cape Canaveral, as shown on Figure 1. The site currently includes an automotive care center with three (3) bays (two [2] inside and one [1] outside), a 527 square feet convenience market and a one-stall car wash facility. The proposed development, with an anticipated buildout year of 2017, will include a Cumberland Farms gas station with 4,928 square feet of convenience store and 12 fueling positions. The site plan is attached in Appendix A. Trip Generation Analysis Trip generation estimates were developed for the existing and proposed land uses based on rates and/or equations from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. Some information was not available from ITE, in those instances, assumptions were made. They include the following: The daily trip rate for the automotive care center was based on assuming that the PM peak rate is 10 percent of the daily rate; The in/out split for the automotive care center PM peak hour was based on the AM peak hour split; The daily trip rate for convenience market was based on assuming that the PM peak rate is 10 percent of the daily rate; The pass-by rate for LU 852 was based on the pass-by rate for LU 851; and the pass-by rate for daily condition for gas station with convenience market was based on the PM peak hour pass-by rate. Results of the analysis, summarized in Table 1, indicate that the proposed development is expected to generate an increase of 615 net new daily trips, 27 net new AM peak hour trips, and 51 net new PM peak hour trips. Excerpts from ITE are attached in Appendix B. Corporate Headquarters: Fort Washington, Pennsylvania Serving the East Coast from 13 offices throughout New England, the Mid-Atlantic, and Florida . -; ,, • ,!''... • r• 5,tiff.c,,t,..10," , ,, - V • , ._ .4 1.. ',71 ., ' •% i•VkitWs 1, ••-•.• • ,1,4.....s...,.:.c, U, .. . 4 I',,, 4 t;4,, 1 > ., ko, ". -" . ...„.....), ...we._z... ,.. , i ...! i I .; • 41` , i. ' ri ,,1 i lit ,,,,..„,,,A,. , telt 2 ipl• , ,44 . ' ---, -' •.., f. ., ',....'. 4,...4 V.. ..''' 114 ..! j., ' '„,,,,,‘.1.,5•42± / •2,,s4,' ;-• , • .: :: .,t t• , , , - :::., , • - A. f , 4., „ ,6 ,1,.• ,..,,,-,,a,, • t ,'. NIS ',f , , •',1,, ..,-..•, ,,1".. ',1,Z4 r ! ;'rt 7.- • ,•,., AL,Ar` mpg ow Jot • . , •,,,,-,401#44-41t,„ • '..• ' .; '; ''. 2 '1 '7;'-" ."'' * 1, 4h . - `-117-,'Pe • 14. .1 ','''''' - 'c' • A • 4 It 1 4 ... 's . i 4 . . ,'' .1. *Of i :4!",.• A .., AIM 1 ' 4 • ‘ • '1.. . * i t••••2,..- .1-7,-,, -,,, 40..."..... • ' 5, ' - . • - -. ME 4V * ,,, of b 6t4 NIA i3 yo,. ; ' ,,,....,-; —••• (4 WM*Ailit rah.di....pow. . - ..; ,:,' .t.t:ft.... *"... Maillililar.i. ' Air ' - ,. ,. IN „,,,,, ill'. •,„•,/,*;A 1 ' I: AV— „' f':. ., - ' ,_,..• ' t • ,‘, "!.- ma I'm - , ..,R-A- wow mi ,.:(,,a.4;,•;ips* , . zo, - •••••77 ',.. -NI ,:„, , -11). ' IL-- v.., •,...,( , IA ,-• 01;111.11ir:.11111.1712 ah 0 , A..,4„ . 14": 1. .1.4'4'1 f" r ' •;— ,,,, , ,s,:,. ' A, 173"-- T-T.— .1. -, , tri..ri. -- t ' i ..• '. , •,• . . .,. --... r 4 '• '.. ' '2 4 .' ' 4' 4• ? " ha if*#.4,1, ti .., 4.1;.-.11. .w. , -., .. ,,.. .,..„.. .. ..;.. -TP.H\ • — - 14., . 1,,,,. •fa- 1•;:r.,..,.s.... Wpshington kiient . ; , ..,••• .. _ ., , v„ . no .., . 1 • f":,' II. 4 —I — IP AP '1,„ • ' U WI kl, .4 If, ili .• ,A4046.et.; • — . * ... .4' i,i'''I , • • ° '.! Ait-•''' - ' AMIN "--', a' milt w.:. 41- , - .4.1 - ** , .: ".. • witti , , fl 44, •,.., t ....-,,,. • - „ ,—,iti= 1.1 ,..-, N't‘, it'''. °I.L.Alk, Wilkri. 1.,"!‘''..71' t: ii i , 'IOt ” a 4 #•.5:11'n4:411L ,40:''' 17 ' 1. 11 7-1110, 11$ 4,, 4400 f 1' —* tiff111,1 -,•111.4.; 414°—L t ' •1144f 4..li Mr! 401 414 41 '`'''1" ' -`,.t.t.:, • Plias 400, 1 c,4 ...!",, • ' ' ''- ..--• Averitie _tr7ce :71 ,A,_ .,.• ,e,'...14, i:;"'04 a.i _d.. 54" A 1144494z144 .. II II If iPv- it.S, : r,.. 1 ball 1 i Ir .... i I Cis s i liff4j::7-,7•H„,,,, +4, ;*k , t-• , . . nr, 1,Y111P•w"'"'" '' , , • I—I:: 4,-,;''1: 7 st : l 4'' ii• '4',,,,E, ate. .11.7 ‘ l\ ' . ..---•.,,,...; •/ I i, - ' : AillUk,',JIICbioidillAM.III ;?, . f•;el . . - . 2 , ..... , N, '°. • -•* a ,. „ ,, L. , ., 2. ..,....,-.I-414- ..' \ ..-: ..., r.), :, • .. ,41 V • • , .„.., \ ,,', ",':',b.ie „, v-- 1- ??, ' , .- .:, e .i V: , . , ,,*., s;,. .!• : ., 's•! Fl ..v( •,,4,.;•%*.......- „.,. • - .4,,:,:i;40,:, # ' '. ' . ” - ' '. :: „.. A ' i ‘ ' * •Im. . oil c•••,..4-• ,, ‘ 1 - — 4. • .... ., \ . 8. i ;--- , , --'-' 4 •--- 6liti ',.,, 4. NNI\vi, I ., - . b 1St ‘ '%.4' ' I .. " b....• /411° I . • - .\ . • ‘ .7. . ‘,. `..... , , . . 1 ' -:..., ' , . . -.ic•p.".*er ',.,, . Figure 1 Location Aerial Photograph tranzummazzaziatiazsu jaaltiMCMAH. O. N Cumberland Farms- SR-A1A at North Atlantic Avenue Traffic Analysis City of Cape Canaveral,Florida TABLE I TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS CUMBERLAND FARMS-SR-AIA AT NORTH ATLANTIC AVENUE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DAILY IIETRIP GE NL11A110> IOIAL IRL'S rAsS6Y°1 NEN TRIPS I(�I'I,I INTENSITY I� ut'I CODE RATEn' IN OUT TOTAL IN OM TOTAL IS OVT TO1 AI -----------_- _ Automotive Cue Center°I MEI MEMO=MEM MEM®00000m©o m®� 0--®'' 0©NEB—©—MEM m=T- 10600(%) MEIN©©RIM 0000 EMI©m PROPOSED USE _--_________--_ EIMEEIMIEMMIE=SEI�0 '®Om-®WEN NMm Om- NET DIFFERENCE _----D©EZ1®© 943 _ 306 EMI= AM PEAK HOUR I AND L, ITE hI I SSIII' TRIPCENERATION IN OUTTOTAL TRIPS 1'15W' \111'1 lull CODE. RATE"' IN OUT 101A1 I:\ OT TOT AI. • IA OUI 101AI ®®tom mm©©©MEMEMN© Convenience Marker('' m® '® '� '100—©©—' —©©0 IMME EMI® —oEMI MEM 000NEM om000 PROPOSEesrenD USE ----------___ NET DIFFERENCE _----11:1= 93 ©®IE1_®E311© PM PEAK HOUR I d�UI>I III ICs�•II1 EIUPCENERATION 1.\ UCI TOTAl.111111 t1(mil', PASS.EO I NUI R\1t' 1N OUT '10'1 AI. IN OU T 101.51 1. I'I -_------------- Automotive Cate Centes WEE MIME,®MEM©MEN= EM©©— m OMB 01:===Ell EEO oMEI EMI 0 EMI ME EMS©00 m®MMEM—Wim©©0000mo IMM v PROPOSED USE _---------- --- rEEEIM—NIEMEN IMMEINU-0 '®------EMI©—© NET DIFFERENCE ----_ IZEIRSI® 440 b 80 �,{®®® (1)Sours.Institute d n irarort.tian Engineers'Trip Generator Manual,9th Edition,Volume 3. V\MCI AHO N (2)Da y trip rag for Automotive Cue Came based an amanita Out the PM peak rate 410%44 the daily rate. (3)layout split los Automotive Cue Center PM peak Mur based on AM peak hour split. • (4)Duly trip rate for COIWII*nce Madan based on assuming that the PM peak rag 410%44 the doily rate. (5)Party rag far LU S52 bated an LU 851. (6)Party ng for daily cadkion based an PM peak Mur condnion. • • F:1F 116120N_CumberlendFarmcSR-ALAondNMMthMkAvenuf16I20N_0l(Tr Malyai*Nnaye'6Ttlleards Kathleen Sousa March 17,2016 Page 4 Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway capacity analysis was performed based on Section 86-6, "Criteria for evaluation of levels of service of public facilities," of the City of Cape Canaveral Code of Ordinances, which is included in Appendix C. Based on the net new increase in peak hour trips, the traffic study is required to analyze the capacity impacts at five (5) City traffic count stations. One (1) shall be at the northern extreme of State Highway AlA within the city limits, one (1) shall be at the southern extreme of State Highway A1A within the city limits and the other three (3) shall be taken at stations nearest the development, which are not located on State Highway AlA. The evaluation of available capacity at each traffic count station must include an assessment of existing traffic volumes, previously approved project traffic volumes and existing Level of Service E service volumes. The evaluation for each traffic count station is to be on a PM peak hour or AM peak hour directional basis, whichever is higher. Table 2 summarizes the roadway capacity analysis. Information for the roadway name, roadway segment, count location number, number of lanes, roadway service volume, 2014 peak hour volume and approved development trips were based on the City of Cape Canaveral 2014 Transportation Conditions Update, excerpts of which are attached in Appendix C. The 2014 peak hour volume was based on the average of the AM peak hour volume and the PSWA peak hour volume, per the TIS guidelines. The project distribution for the site, graphically shown on Figure 2, was based on a review of travel patterns on the roadway network, roadway characteristics, roadway connectivity to areas outside the City, and coordination with City staff. Project trips were assigned to the roadway segments based on the distribution and trip generation analyses and were based on the worst case traffic conditions, which are expected during the PM peak hour. Results of the analysis indicate that all roadway segments are expected to operate at an acceptable level of service with excess capacity on the roadways. Conclusion Based on the analysis contained herein, the analyzed roadway segments are expected to operate at an acceptable level of service with the proposed redevelopment. All analyzed roadways will have excess roadway capacity after the addition of project traffic from the redevelopment of the existing site to a Cumberland Farms gas station. TABLE 2 ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS CUMBERLAND FARMS-SR-ATA AT NORTH ATLANTIC AVENUE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COUNT NUMBER 2014 YEAR APPKO\11� 0031)1%A) AUOIeiED ROADWAY SERVICE PRORCI PROJK'lIt)1 tl PEAK OM(lIt l\ ROAOIyAl SEGMENT' LOCATION Of 1,1 HOUR OLtlEL01.311',1I\:UIT 78115°r \'ldLU51L EXCESS CAPACITY N.1111 LOS." VOLUME"' - UISTWBUTION NUMBER"' LANES"' VOLUME' 7RIPs" SR AIA ri= 1 4W 0 2,000 NB 1,170 229 25% at 7 1.406 591 O 2.000 58 1,286 323 25% In6 1,615 385 5R A1A Grouter St to McKinley Ave 4 4w E 2,000 NB 1,196 287 55% In 13 1,496 504 E 2,000 SB 1,388 216 55% at 15 1,619 381 tionh At1aNk CenlnlBlvd to SR MA 6 21 E 800 NB 347 158 20% Out5 507 293 Avenue E 800 SB 240 116 20% 6. 5 361 439 Central SR AIA to Nonh Ai Wok Ave 7 21 E 800 EB 93 130 5% N1 224 576 Boulevard k 803 WB 89 103 5% a1 1 193 607 Ridgewood Central Blvd to Madhon Ave 9 2L E 800 NB 6) 21 5% Out 1 83 717 Avenue E 800 SB 72 17 5% H1 90 710 tI)Inlo.trunon lot Roadway N..,.Ro.dway Sesmenl Cant Loodtc.Numbw,Numbatol Lane,Adu(aed L05.Roadway Seder Volume and Appw.ed 0e..4.pnwnt T.1 bawd on the Cm a/Cape Cowen,loll TnMpvnatbn Condemn.Update t M�MANON (212014 peak hour oohsm. .bated .wmp of AA peek bar and P5WA peek hp,.pet 11w tlpt...r T3 pr (3)Protect tap bumf m the waw ort ned neer top inmate.whdh mottoes to the PM peak hour. F 1FL116120N CumbodandFatrna_SR.AIAandNorthAllanliCAvenuN18120N_011TIIIBC#a lyII.WrwlystsTadw els n N NTS 25% �` �}/ .�' C A,.... -f,w` #{ r r. r2b1'0 c v "� •.. 4P "'• .+ .#. :� a" .}* • w .f P 1% a �` ;* q^w.!.: }e A6 . .i ...i4, 'R4 i''' • S * 5 X.' A•01.Er'„Y e'2. ,s. , li .- "tom .• �dtar. 5,0 rt,. i; �. '.. r s :ss ; . „,,,,, .0--•••• ...7. ,,..„ , , ,. ,.. ,..(;.‘,.,,*,4,•,..,. .. 3 ..7,..,..,. ,'''S.,. :..„.: , . 4%404- %. t„.....„17, a 3,1 u1,114,24.„ „, , „iii,,,,7,4,...:„.4 Al.4..t.„ . 4 f,,A.,• t,. t,. z24 ). ..-n .,�.x t)tc::,, .4 „as gi ? ” x,;,.v,t" '�' ,v p.j,4 n wvt'''' ,, '� ', - 4S►Y•towIti*ve �a„ i .rir. '' '. Edi.; ' '� `. ; Ian,ri )4",11.„-... ♦ 1 ... '- ,40., ate, . .,� ,: s St, a ,__.;r� W = . . � 11• H.. 5% gshniuY"'"'.wt. O t 4_5 '#.- " " W ',11 V. '" , 1r ��. R • , "AC �Bei r 'M i ' Jt{!{�j w.• �' a ;14 II. ' . .wkiy. :.. , rit .a C•. l • x r sf , ,.,. s tritilb ' -, w .. . .air i►ft+ w4jyot $ ti~ tot. ; o[ i r # ., '�Q1Ai k..tw M $'!i I� e • 10-**01 a 11.11r1r s• 'k; A of , _ t. 1, 't I as.* .4'' r•s pp .. �'lit..... . „um,- ..,fir r 1i• r t �. C: t"" t 10sr _;4 � Ir.. l II. "A, - lilt!4,,' . 111:17,.., a �_� +wortia x—x<ts-7ra ,b r,-. .,..,yf• '�. 1"7+Rs� L.161 " _ - Milli,':• i x)q m �;I Y ii" ! r l� ' :10 . . ,+t... 4! 1414).0 i _•s NV" 1'1;1 Figure 2 Project Distribution 1.McMAHON Cumberland Farms-SR-AlA at North Atlantic Avenue Traffic Analysis . City of Cape Canaveral,Florida Kathleen Sousa March 17,2016 Page 7 Should you have any questions or comments regarding these findings, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Natalia Thais Lercari,P.E. Professional Engineer License No. 68205 State of Florida, Board of Professional Engineers Certificate of Authorization No.4908 NTL/amp Enclosure F:\FL\16120N_CumberlandFarms_SR-AI AandNorthAtlanticAvenue\16120N_01\Admin\ItrKS03171 6.doc