Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Packet 08-21-2001
City of Cape Canaveral CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY HALL ANNEX 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida TUESDAY August 21, 2001 7:00 PM AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: CONSENT AGENDA: 1. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of August 7, 2001. 2. Bid Award for RFP No. 01-09, Tennis Court Resurfacing, to Nidy Company in the amount of $14,900. 3. Proposed Annual Reindeer 5K Run. 4. Washington Park Decorative Sidewalk in the Amount of $26,340 to J & S Curb and Concrete. CONSIDERATIONS: 5. Petition for Action to Abandon a Portion of the Harbor Drive Road Right - of -Way. 6. Economic Development Commission, Board Member Appointment. ORDINANCE: Second Public Hearing 7. Motion to Adopt: Ordinance No. 01-02, Establishing a Fire/Rescue Services Referendum Question for the November 2001 Election. RESOLUTIONS: 8. Motion to Adopt: Resolution No. 01-25, Supporting Recommendations for Future Transportation Improvements in the City of Cape Canaveral. 105 Polk Avenue • Post Office Box 326 • Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-0326 Telephone (321) 868-1200 • FAX (321) 799-3170 e fcn.state.fl.us/cape/ e-mail: cape@iu.net City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 21, 2001 Page 2 9. Motion to Adopt: Resolution No. 01-26, Amendment to the Escrow Agreement with Downs Development Corporation and the Villages of Seaport Master Association. DISCUSSION: 10. Fire Hydrant Fees. REPORTS: 1. City Manager 2. Staff 3. City Council AUDIENCE TO BE HEARD: Comments will be heard on items that do not appear on the agenda of this meeting. Citizens will limit their comments to five (5) minutes. The City Council will not take any action under the "Audience To Be Heard" section of the agenda. The Council may schedule such items as regular agenda items and act upon them in the future. ADJOURNMENT: Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, the City hereby advises the public that: If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, that person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not constitute consent by the City for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by law. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City ClerKs office (868-1221) 48 hours in advance of the meeting. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY HALL ANNEX 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida TUESDAY August 7, 2001 7:00 PM MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Council Members Present: Mayor Pro Tem Buzz Petsos Mayor Rocky Randels Larry Weber Richard Treverton Council Members Absent Burt Bruns Others Present: Bennett Boucher, City Manager Mark McQuagge, City Attorney Susan Stills, City Clerk Andrea Bowers, City Treasurer Ed Gardulski, Public Works Director PRESENTATION: Linda Frank, Waste Management Camp Chance Check for Brevard CO. Sheriffs Office Mr. David Schoenberger, General Manager of Waste Management, presented a check for $850.00 to Officer Dee Meisner and Officer Pam Hibbs for Camp Chance. Camp Chance had 52 attendees from Cape Canaveral during its week of service. Officer Hibbs who initiated the idea of Camp Chance related some of the learning experiences and life changing stories about those who attended the camp. The program allowed the children a chance to become familiar with Law Enforcement in a friendly setting. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor Randels requested if any member of the Council, staff or interested party desired to remove an item from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Mr. Treverton requested to remove Item No. 4 from the Consent Agenda. A motion was made by Mr. Weber and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos to approve Consent Agenda Items No. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For, Mayor Randels, For, Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 2 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of July 17, 2001. 2. Bid Award for Bid No. 01-07, Sewage Force Main and Gravity Sewer Line to Prime Construction Group, Inc. in the Amount of $136,481. 3. Bid Award for Bid No. 01-08, Sewage Lift Station No. 4 Replacement to Santa Cruz Construction, Inc. in the Amount of $109,997.22. 5. Award Bid #01-04, for Concrete Construction Services, to J & S Curb/Concrete. 6. Construction Inspection Services for Lift Station #4 and Sewer Main Projects. 4. Cancellation of Bid Award #01-04, for Washington Avenue Sidewalk. A motion was made by Mr. Treverton and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos to approve the Cancellation of Bid Award #01-04, for the Washington Avenue Sidewalk Leaving Settlement Conditional to Negotiations. Mr. Treverton questioned why the contract was being revoked. Mr. Gardulski explained that the cost to hire a person experienced in the decorative detailing exceeded the contractor's price. Mr. Treverton asked if the concrete installed would be removed. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos expressed his concern that the cost of the installed concrete was excessive for the amount of work performed. Mayor Randels asked the City Attorney if the City was obligated to pay for the concrete installed. Attorney McQuagge deferred to the Public Works Director on the amount for the materials used. Mayor Randels clarified that Mr. Gardulski would negotiate if the cost to remove the concrete installed could be subtracted from the price. Mayor Randels clarified for Mr. Nicholas that the bid would now go to the next lowest bidder, J & S Curb and Concrete. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. ORDINANCES: 7. Motion to Approve: Ordinance No. 01-01, Establishing a Police Protection Referendum Question for the November 2001 Election, for second reading. Mayor Randels read the Ordinance by title. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUBMITTING TO THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY A REFERENDUM QUESTION REGARDING THE MODIFICATION OF AN AD VALOREM TAX FOR POLICE PROTECTION; ESTABLISHING THE DATE FOR THE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; REPEALING ALL PORTIONS OF THE CODE IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 3 Discussion opened prior to a motion. Mr. Boucher referred to statistics submitted by the Sheriff's office for the years 1996 through 2000. Mayor Randels clarified that the data depicted calls for service only. Mr. Treverton stated the he referred to the CAFR for information on the City's fiscal standing and found the City in good financial standing. Mr. Weber reviewed Building Department data and expressed concern with raising taxes in light of new development. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos expressed that a referendum for Fire/Rescue is necessary due to increased staffing needs. Commander (Cmdr.) McGee explained for the Council that case reports were not generated in the data for calls for service. Cmdr. McGee said that the data shown depicts calls from the main call center. Mayor Randels stated that he could not support three tax increases: Police Services and Fire/Rescue now and Stormwater Utility in the near future. Mr. Francis Kuhns, 102 E. Central Blvd., asked for the official percentage of the City's budget that applies to Law Enforcement. Ms. Bowers stated that she would provide Mr. Kuhns with that information. Mr. Kuhns expressed concern with SWAT capability in a small jurisdiction such as Cape Canaveral. Mr. Kuhns expressed that he is not displeased with present Law Enforcement however he desired to see the City have greater control. Mr. Nicholas questioned the amount of millage to dollars. Mr. Boucher stated that a .25 percent millage increase would provide $118,130 in additional funds. Martha Carroll, 112 Washington Avenue, asked if police protection would increase if the referendum does not pass. Mayor Randels explained that due to the 13 percent increase in the City's revenue, the City is able to its maintain the present level of service. Mr. Boucher pointed out the future staffing projections and the need for specific referendum language in order to support the need for the tax. Council agreed by consensus not to proceed with a referendum for modification of an Ad Valorem Tax for Police Protection. This ordinance failed for lack of a motion. 8. Motion to Approve: Ordinance No. 01-02, Establishing a Fire/Rescue Services Referendum Question for the November 2001 Election, for second reading. Mayor Randels read the Ordinance by title. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUBMITTING TO THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY A REFERENDUM QUESTION REGARDING THE MODIFICATION OF AN AD VALOREM TAX FOR FIRE/RESCUE SERVICES; ESTABLISHING THE DATE FOR THE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; REPEALING ALL PORTIONS OF THE CODE IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos and seconded by Mr. Weber to approve Ordinance No. 01-02, Establishing a Fire/Rescue Services Referendum Question for the November 2001 Election, for a second reading. Mr. Boucher referred to data submitted by Chief Sargeant. Mayor Randels stated that the Fire/Rescue has increased in the amount of medical service calls. Mr. Boucher stated that National Fire Protection Association City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 4 adopted a new requirement. Mayor Randels explained the new 2 -in/ 2 -out staff requirement with one in command in response to structure fires. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos stated that more funds would be needed from the General Fund to meet the requirement of this service. Mr. Treverton expressed that he was in favor of a tax increase for Fire/Rescue services up to one mill. Mayor Randels clarified that Council could not lobby for the referendum to the electorate. Mayor Randels explained that if the referendum passed the future Council would decide how to spend the funds for the service. For the record, Mayor Randels spoke in favor of the tax increase. Mr. Boucher restated that the language in the referendum would need to specifically state the need for the increase. Mayor Randels explained for Mr. Weber that the City does not own the Fire station and maintenance for the building is done through the Fire contract. Attorney McQuagge stated that three additional personnel and capital equipment would be included in the referendum language. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. RESOLUTIONS: 9. Motion to Adopt: Resolution No. 01-15, Dedication of Public Utility Easement from Suzanne E. Jamieson. Mayor Randels read the resolution by title. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA; DEDICATION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FROM SUZANNE E. JAMIESON FOR THE PURPOSE OF LOCATING PUBLIC UTILITIES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. A motion was made by Mr. Weber and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos to adopt Resolution No. 01-15, Dedication of a Public Utility Easement from Suzanne E. Jamieson. Mayor Randels referred to the map submitted by Public Works in order to explain the scope of the project. Discussion followed in that the owner civic mindedly agreed to provide the easement. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. 10. Motion to Adopt: Resolution No. 01-23, Amending the 2000/2001 Budget and City Treasurer's Quarterly Report. Mayor Randels read the resolution by title. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA; AMENDING THE ANNUAL GENERAL FUND, SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND, AND SPECIAL REVENUE FUND BUDGETS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2000, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,2001; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos and seconded by Mr. Weber to adopt Resolution No. 01-23, Amending the Annual General Fund, Sewer Enterprise Fund and Special Revenue Fund Budgets for the Fiscal Year Beginning October 1, 2000 and Ending September 30, 2001. Ms. Bowers explained the increase in development has offset City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 5 spending with most funds allocated to Contingency. Mayor Randels clarified the increases for the audience. Ms. Bowers explained that dedicated Capital Expansion Funds were set aside however purchases were not made which left money for the Contingency Fund. Mayor Randels commented favorably on the detailed analysis data that the City Treasurer submitted. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. DISCUSSION: 11. General Fund Reserve Policy. Mayor Randels questioned why there are unallocated as well as allocated reserves. Mayor Randels asked why not leave the savings as is and use cash on hand for expenses? Mr. Boucher explained that the concept is to appropriate funding with foresight toward priority projects. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos expressed concern with sufficient funding in the Escrow account and stated the need for six months capital in reserves. Mr. Treverton asked for an estimate on street paving. Mr. Boucher approximated $80,000 per mile and $1.2 million total. Council agreed to increase the street paving escrow by $200,000 and add $100,000 to the Emergency Fund, with a future goal of $1.5 million. A motion was made by Mr. Treverton and seconded by Mr. Weber to set aside $200,000 per year for the paving portion and $100,000 for financial emergencies in the General Fund Reserve. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. 12. Sewer Main Cost Share. Mr. Gardulski outlined a sample policy for utility line cost sharing, and expressed concern for the hardship on the three families with septic service on Oak Lane and asked for Council's consideration to share the cost of the sewer installation. Mr. Gardulski pointed out the Gravity Main portion of the Oak Lane project. He stated that La Cantina and Circle K are currently on the sewer system. Mayor Randels related how a similar project was done on Long Point Road with a 12 -month payment plan. Mr. Treverton asked if the City could pay for the cost of the line since this was part of the total sewer renovation concept. Mayor Randels commented on fair application of the ordinance in light of past assessments. Mr. Gardulski replied that he researched with St. John's for funding. Mayor Randels stated that he knew of a funding source. Mayor Randels summarized that the consensus is to continue to follow the policy written in the City code Section 78.75. Mr. Boucher stated that a special assessment is required of the affected property owners. Ms. Bowers commented that a 12 -month period is rather stringent for payment and said that three -to -five years seem appropriate. Mr. Boucher stated that staff would develop some financing options along the lines of a special assessment. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 6 13. Legislative Action Items for the Space Coast League of Cities. Mayor Randels requested items from the Council to submit to the Space Coast League of Cities committee meeting in Orlando. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos requested addressing fireworks sales. Mayor Randels related that usage is also a concern. Mr. Treverton concurred. Mr. Boucher recommended stricter domestic violence penalties. Mr. Weber recommended stricter litter laws and fines. 14. City Hall Expansion Options. Mayor Randels expressed the need to proceed with some action on the City Hall expansion. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos questioned the status of using the Library for additional space. Mayor Randels explained that Tom Jenkins, County Manager asked the City to move away from this request. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos stated that the City invested $73,000 in the expansion project and the City should have access to its use. Mr. Boucher related the concerns of Catherine J. Schweinsberg, Library Services Director. Mayor Randels directed the City Manager to insist on an explanation. Mr. Nicholas replied that the City relies on the County for operations and maintenance. Mr. Treverton expressed that the Library community room is beneficial for the residents. He also expressed that the bay areas should remain for storage. Mr. Treverton spoke in favor of purchasing the property adjacent to City Hall for the Building Department. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos expressed leaving the bay for storage as well however he spoke in favor of using Council chambers for the Building Department and moving the Chambers to the Library meeting room. Mr. Boucher stated that, 1) an answer from the County Manager on using the Library Meeting Room and 2) an appraisal on the property at 160 Polk Avenue are two courses of action. Mr. Nicholas asked if expansion of the current building was abandoned. Mayor Randels replied that no support was shown to expand the existing City Hall. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos stated that using the Xeriscape Park became a point of division. Council directed the City Manager to proceed with findings on the previous two courses of action. REPORTS: City Manager Proposed Reindeer Run Partnership w/Canaveral Port Authority. Mr. Boucher reported that the Business and Cultural Development Board recommended partnering with Canaveral Port Authority for this year's Reindeer Run event only. Mr. Barzelatto's memo outlined how this event would be co- sponsored. Mr. Weber stated that although he favored a co-sponsorship he was concerned with a loss of promotional control. He related how the Board expended great effort in initiating the event. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos concurred with Mr. Weber's concern in that the City invested much time and effort to build the event over previous years. Mr. Treverton asked if the Board chair could explain its rationale to the Council at the next meeting City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 7 2. Staff City Clerk • No report. City Attorney • Attorney McQuagge reported that the City of Cocoa Beach held a closed executive session to discuss whether the Commission should accept or reject the interlocal agreement resolution. He stated that under Chapter 164 we are required to mediate. An agreement was made to submit two names for mediators, Dwight Severs and Rick Torpey. He said that no response is forthcoming from Attorney Sachs regarding mediation, under Chapter 164, the court would appoint arbitration by a third party, if the parties were unable to pick a mediator. Attorney McQuagge informed that the executive session was held in violation of sunshine law. Mr. Boucher requested a copy of the transcript from the Cocoa Beach City Clerk's office in that since we are not in litigation, Cape Canaveral is privy to the records. Attorney McQuagge stated that the Cocoa Beach City Clerk would need to provide what statutory provision was used to deny access to the records requested. Attorney McQuagge asked for the appropriate civil remedy to pursue in order to obtain the transcripts prior to mediation. If Cocoa Beach does not provide records, Attorney McQuagge would like to tum the matter over to the State Attorney's office for action. Council directed staff to allow Cocoa Beach time to consult with their legal counsel and City Commission and afford them the opportunity to respond to the public records request before the City takes any legal action on this matter. Mr. Boucher related that a joint resolution would require a vote at a public meeting. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos and seconded by Mr. Treverton to extend the meeting to no later than 10:30 P.M. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. 3. City Council Mr. Weber • Mr. Weber thanked the Police Department for the National Night Out. • Mr. Weber recognized the City Clerk's attendance at her first year in the Florida Public Personnel Academy. • Mr. Weber asked if there was any to way to reduce the paper flow and provide this information electronically. The Clerk's office will work on this issue. Mr. Treverton • Mr. Treverton reported on using his laptop computer and agreed with further use of electronic communication. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 8 Mayor Pro Tem Petsos Mayor Pro Tem Petsos asked the City Manager for the status on the broken sidewalks on Pierce Avenue and on Cherie Down Park due to new construction. He requested a letter regarding what can be done and if not, to provide an explanation. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos asked for a date from Florida Power and Light on the street light installation on N. Atlantic and SR A1A. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos asked the City Treasurer to provide data for the fire hydrant rental for the next Council meeting. Mayor Randels • Mayor Randels questioned the status on the insurance claims regarding Joyce Stachel, the First Interstate swimming pool and Geraldine Miller. Mr. Boucher replied that Council was provided a copy of Attorney McQuagge's opinion on the Stottler property. He also responded that the Stachel case was extended into September and depositions are in progress on the Miller case. • Mayor Randels referred to a fax from Citizens for Florida's Waterways. Ron Pritchard requested to address the Council. Council members did not support this request. • Mayor Randels reported that Longboat Key has an ordinance on invasive plants making it illegal for homeowner's to grow such plants. Mayor Randels asked if there were any interest? Mr. Boucher responded that he would look into current City code. • Mayor Randels announced that the Brevard County delegation of the State legislators would hold a meeting and asked if Council had any items to forward. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos responded that legislative items would proceed through the Space Coast League of Cities. • Mayor Randels reported that Troy Rice of St. John's River Water Management needed feedback regarding available funding for a baffle box on International Drive. Mr. Boucher responded that Gordon England and Ed Gardulski are working on the application. • Mayor Randels referred to a letter from Mr. Hans Saurenmann. Mr. Boucher responded that the Public Works Director wrote a report on the City's action taken and a copy was submitted to the City Attorney. The City Attorney responded that the City cleared pepper trees within the right-of-way. Mr. Boucher responded that Mr. Saurenmann did not identify his damages. • Mayor Randels reported that the Wildflower license plate ranks 17th of the license plates purchased out of 54 specialty license plates. • Mayor Randels asked if notification of Council's action on the Ridgewood pedway concept at the previous City Council meeting was provided to homeowner groups. Mr. Boucher responded that the minutes were adopted at this meeting and copies would be forwarded to those interested parties. • Mayor Randels reported that the Ocean Oaks Condominium Association asked for a proposal for a Quitclaim deed of the 50 -foot right-of-way on Ridgewood Avenue. Mr. Boucher responded that this request would first proceed to the Planning and Zoning Board. • Mayor Randels inquired about the Ridgewood road presentation to the Villages of Seaport and asked if Tom Downs received notification of the Council's decision to allow the easement to expire. Members affirmed Mr. Down's presence at the meeting when City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 9 the action was taken. Mr. Boucher responded that the escrow agreement would be an item on the next agenda. Mayor Randels reported a project by the St. John's River Water Management District to install a 30 -inch water main along SR 528 extending into the Port Canaveral. Mayor explained that just north of State Road 3, the County has a new sewer treatment plant and reclaimed water is injected into the ground. Mayor Randels would like to propose to the County a reclaimed water line from State Road 3 to the Port branching into the City's line. He explained how this proposed line could benefit Port, Cape Canaveral, Cocoa Beach as well as Patrick Air Force Base who receives water from Cocoa Beach. Mayor Randels explained that the line could be installed during the open -trenching process. Attorney McQuagge was not able to explain any affects of this proposal on the interlocal agreement. • Mr. Weber inquired about mowing on Ridgewood Avenue behind Cape View Elementary School. Mr. Boucher responded that he would look into the status. AUDIENCE TO BE HEARD: Mr. Leo Nicholas Mr. Nicholas asked if the City would notify Harbor Heights residents of the sewer line installation. Mr. Nicholas questioned if consideration was given to any affect of new development on the City's sewer capacity. Mr. Boucher responded the quarterly concurrency data is performed that encumbers new development. Mr. Boucher replied to Mr. Nicholas that the total monthly average is 900,000 gallons per day and is the City is permitted for 1.8 million gallons per day. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 10:40 P.M. Rocky Randels, MAYOR Susan Stills, CITY CLERK Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA Heading Consent Item 2 No. Exhibits Attached: AGENDA REPORT CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: CONSENT: AWARD NO. 01-09, TENNIS COURT RESURFACING, TO THE NIDY COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,900 DEPT./DIVISION: PARKS & RECREATION Requested Action: City Council consider the award of Bid No. 01-09, tennis court resurfacing, to the Nidy Company in the amount of $14,900 as recommended by the recreation director. Summary Explanation & Background: See attached memo from the recreation director. I recommend approval. Exhibits Attached: Recreation director's memo and supporting documents CityM e s Office / ' Department PARKS & RECREATION - l mydocum t7ad ncil\meeting\2001\08-21-01\01-09.doc CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 7300 N. ATLANTIC AVENUE * P.O. BOX 326 (321) 8684227 E-mail address: parkuree@iu.net MEMO TO: City Manager, Mayor & Couneilmembers FROM: Nancy Hanson, Parks & Recreation Director DATE: August 16, 2001 RE: Tennis Court Repair/Resarfacing Contract The bid opening for the repair & resurfacing of the tennis courts was held at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 12, 2001. The low bidder, D & B Tennis of Sebring, bid a resurfacing product, Sport Surfaces International, Inc., not the material of choice, California Products. The next lowest bidder, The Nidy Company, uses California Products exclusively. Using California Products gives the City a double warranty, from the contractor as well as from California Products, both of who has an excellent reputation among the recreators in the state. Our tennis courts have been resurfaced by both The Nldy Company, and more recently, D & B Tennis (in 19997). With the severity of the problems with our courts, I feel much more confident that the Nidy Company has the capability of properly repairing & resurfacing our courts. Nidy is located in Sanford and has been in the business of building and repairing/resurfacing tennis and shuffleboard courts since 1924. It has been my experience with The Nidy Company that generally the job is done right the first time but if there is a problem, they are very responsive and correct any problems immediately. I strongly recommend that the contract for repairing/resurfaeing the five tennis courts at the Recreation Center be awarded by the Nidy Company in the amount $14,900.00. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida RESULTS OF BID OPENING DATE: h: � =::Z) TIME: —Lc -6- � 4 PLACE: _A�'i Staff Present:,-jjq,,; -,-4, j4 t4,444 ete. i,� ITEM(S) FOR WHICH BIDS WERE RECEIVED: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. Ul -4 � ern d"'f� COMPANY CITY & STATE L✓ L'.'�-I �'-�� > 1%I c� . C - /n' .e �,r u.' IJ t' LL PROPOSAL TENNIS COURTS RESURFACING Five Courts RFP NO. 01-09 Proposal of: (Name) The Nidy Company P. 0. Box 730 Sanford, FL 32771 (Address) to provide the City of Cape Canaveral with "Tennis Courts Resurfacing". The City of Cape Canaveral is located in Central Brevard County on the East Coast of Florida. TO: Susan Stills, City Clerk City of Cape Canaveral 105 Polk Avenue Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 The undersigned PROPOSER has carefully examined the Contract Documents, and is 'familiar with the nature and extent of the service required. The undersigned agrees to perform the requested service, in the manner prescribed therein, in accordance with The Contract Documents. Proposer shall attach a Proposal Sheet to this Form describing the work to be performed. TOTAL COST: $14,900.00 City of Cape Canaveral, Florid Tennis Court Resurfacing Proposal Page 2 The undersigned also agrees as follows: 1. The contract will be effective immediately upon approval by the City Council. 2. Terms, conditions and rates proposed must be binding for 120 days from Proposal due date. Dated this 13th day of August , 2001. Respectfully submitted, The Nidy Company (Company or corporation name) P. 0. Box 730 (Street address, P.O. Box) Sanford, FL 32772 (C^ynn. de) B , President Y (Signature, Title) J S COURT A,y iiJ 1 NNI� � ow cL' 1924 BUILDERS ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 730 2300 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD SANFORD, FLORIDA 32772-0730 TELEPHONE (407) 330-9466 PROPOSAL City of Cape Canaveral RFP NO. 01-09 Atm: Susan Stills, City Clerk DATE: August 13, 2001 105 Polk Avenue Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 ars, Our price for work on five (5) tennis courts, as noted below, is the lump sum of Fourteen Thousand Nine Hundred and 00/100 dollars ($14,900.00). Payment to be upon completion. Price subject to change after 30 =acC_e!3ar; days. a .�5a1 SCOPE OF WORK 1) Clean surface of courts to remove dirt and mold. �askettar 2) Machine sand surface of courts. 3) Patch large open cracks 1/16" or larger with acrylic patch mix. =asaoa l 4) Install a 6" wide fiberglass membrane over repaired cracks. 5) Flood courts with water and after all surrounding areas have dried, patch remaining areas holding water over ttlny r3reer's the thickness of a nickel with acrylic patch mix. 6) Apply one (1) coat of Acrylic Resurfacer over entire surface of courts. v'r„a!�,,e Goat surface of courts. 7) Apply three (3) coats of California Products Corporation Fortified Plexipave color coating over entire a_ ale Tennis surface of courts. 8) Paint regulation tennis court markings with white textured line paint. 3oCCe 9) Paint existing net posts. 10) Reinstall five (5) existing tennis nets. Mu!tlpL:rpcse SPECIAL NOTE: Should owner request additional coating material applied or other work performed to ,V 1e1baii surface of court which is not outlined in items 1 - 10, it will be at extra cost. Contractor does not warrant Horseshoe existing cracks or new cracks from coming thru new color system. -ootoail By owner or other Provide access for equipment and water as required. Cl Lou BORDER COLOR SELECTION: INBOUNDS ness Trails ,ACCEPTED DATE eC=C3-552 the parties agree that in the event that payment is not made as provided herein, Contactor may terminate this contract, refuse to complete any work remaining pursuant to the contract, an any alternate proposals, amendments, changes, or modifications thereto, and sue for the payment due, plus any work performed by contractor up until the date of termination, including a reasonable profit and overhead, tour costs, attorney's fees (including attorney's fees incurred in arbitration and administrative proceedings and all state and federal actions and appeals), and interest at the rate of I'/ % per month, 18% per year. In the event of litigation of this contract, venue of same shall lie in Seminole County, Florida and the prevailing parry shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs from the non -prevailing party. Insurance Certificates and Licenses Provided upon Request *Any changes or additions to standard coverage at additional cost The Nidy C,�qapany .� By , Lee Steele, Director of Tennis Sales DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION IDENTICAL TIE BIDS — In accordance with F.S. 287.087, preference shall be given to businesses with drug—free workplace programs. Whenever two or more bids that are equal with respect to price, quality, and service are received by the ;State or by any political subdivision for the procurement of commodities or contractual services, a bid received from a business that certifies that it has implemented a drug-free workplace program shall be given preference in the award process. Established procedures for processing tie bids will be followed if none of the tied vendors have a drug-free workplace program. In order to have a drug—free workplace program, a business shall: 1. Publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition. 2. Inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's policy of maintaining a drug—free workplace, any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs, and the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. 3. Give each employee engaged in providing the commodities or contractual services that are under bid a copy of the statement specified in subsection (1). 4. In the statement specified in subsection (1), notify the employees that, as a condition of working on the commodities or contractual services that are under bid, the employee will abide by the terms of the statement and will notify the employer of any conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, any violation of chapter 893 or of any controlled substance law of the Untied States or any state, for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction. 5. Impose a sanction on, or require the. satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program if such is available in the employee's community, by any employee who is so convicted. 6. Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug—free workplace through implementation of this section. As the person authorized to sign the statement, I certify that this firm complies fully with the above requirements. The Nidy Comp Lynn S. Nidy, President City of Cape Canaveral 1EQUEST FOR BID 5 COURT RESURFACING (Five courts) NO. 01-09 Notice is hereby given that sealed bids will be received by the City Clerk, City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida until 2:00 P.M. on August 14, 2001, at which time bids will be publicly opened and read immediately after the closing time in the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida for the following: REQUEST FOR BID NO. 01-09 TENNIS COURTS RESURFACING No bids shall be received after the time and date specified. All bids must be in compliance with the specifications as announced. The City reserves the right to withdraw this request for bid at any time to protect its best interests. All interested parties are asked to contact the City Clerk's Office at (321) 868-1221 to request bid forms and specifications. All bids must be submitted on forms provided by the City. Bids must be enclosed, sealed and marked on the outside of the envelope with Bid No. 01-09 and the name of the Bid, and mailed or hand delivered to the Office of the City Clerk, Cape Canaveral, P.O. Box 326, 105 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals (or part thereof) received as a result of this Bid. The City also reserves the right to waive informalities or technicalities or to award in the best interest of the City and to negotiate in strict accordance with the laws and ordinances governing the City. Susan Stills, CMC City Clerk City of Cape Canaveral 105 Polk Avenue • Post Office Box 326 • Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-0326 Telephone (321) 868-1200 • FAX (321) 799-3170 • fcn.state.fl.us/cape/ e-mail: cape@iu.net City of Cape Canaveral INSTRUCTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TENNIS COURT RESURFACING PROJECT/CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL (Five Tennis Courts) All materials intended for installation on site must arrive in unopened, clearly marked containers. The Recreation Director reserves the right to examine any container and reject those that are not in compliance with the requirements in this contract. All materials that are stored on City property and are intended for installation, shall remain the property of, and be in control of, the contractor. Any damage to City property due to improper storage shall be remedied by the contractor. Should an accident occur, the contractor shall remove the soil to the depth required to recapture the spillage, dispose of the contaminated soil and replace it with clean fill. All containers, machinery, and tools shall be removed from the site within 24 hours after completion of the project and prior to the processing of any invoice for final payment All damage to grass and shrubs occurring within a distance of 6" from the edge of any surface which occurs as a result of the contractors application of materials shall be remedied by the contractor at no additional cost to the City of Cape Canaveral. Repairs made as a result of damage must be guaranteed for a period of 90 days. Should the replacement grass or shrub die in that period, the contractor shall replace the materials continually until the area is re-established. The owner will only continue standard and customary practices for maintenance of the areas during re-establishment period, owners personnel shall not be tasked with extraordinary watering or maintenance. SPECIFICATIONS MATERIAL HANDLING AND STORAGE A. Store materials in accordance with manufacturer's instructions: protect from extremes of weather, temperature, moisture and other damage. 105 POLK AVENUE 0 POST OFFICE BOX 326 • CAPE CANAVERAL. FL 329200326 B. Deliver materials to site in manufacturer's original sealed containers with proper labels attached. PRODUCTS Acceptable Manufacturers A. California Products Corporation. B. Other Manufacturers: Submit substitution request if in accordance with these specifications. C. Materials: 1. Patching Mix (Court Patch Binder) for the use in cracks, holes, depressions (bird baths) and other imperfections in the surface. This material will be used in accordance with manufacture's specifications with regard to sand sizes, prime coats, and depth of depression, hold or crack. 2. Cracks filler -for use in fine cracks and for minor cosmetic thin repairs and fills prior to filler course. 3. 100% Acrylic Filler Course (Acrylic Resurfacer) Description: The Filler Course (Acrylic Resurfacer) shall be California Acrylic Resurfacer or an approved equal and consist of a 100% acrylic emulsion binder containing no vinyl co -polymerization constituent and no asbestos fillers. The product shall contain no less than 4% attapulgite and have a pigment volume concentration not to exceed 9.5%. 4. Description - Job Mixed Fortified Plexipave color base or approved equal blended in accordance with the manufacturer's specification number 10.12 shall consist of lightfast mineral oxide pigments and fillers, uniformly dispersed in a non -oxidizing 100% acrylic base. D. Material Specifications: 1. California Acrylic Resurfacer - 1. Percent solids by weight (minimum) 26.7% 2. Percent solids by volume (minimum) 22.9% 3. Weight per gallon (minimum) 8.7-8.91bs. 2. Court Patch Binder 1. Percent solids by weight 46.5% 2. Percent solids by volume (minimum) 44.0% 3. Weight per gallon 8.7-8.9 lbs. 3. Crack Filler 1. Percent solids by weight (minimum) 85.6% 2. Percent solids by volume (minimum) 73.6% 3. Weight per gallon (minimum) 15 lbs. 4. Plexichrome - A 100% acrylic emulsion binder containing no -2- vinyl co -polymerization constituent. It is totally asbestos free and contains no less than 8% by weight Chrome Oxide Green pigment (other colors and their pigments correspond) and has a pigment volume concentration not exceeding 35%. 1. Percent solids by weight (minimum) 36.5% 2. Percent solids by volume (minimum) 23.8% 3. Weight per gallon 10.0-10.2 lbs. 5. Plexipave Color Base - A 100% acrylic emulsion binder containing no vinyl co -polymerization constituent. It is totally asbestos free and contains no more than 63% Silica Sand (highly graded and rounded) and no more than 10% Aluminum Silicates. Pigment volume concentration does not exceed 76%. 1. Percent solids by weight (minimum) 74% 2. Percent solids by volume (minimum) 58.6% 3. Weight per gallon (minimum) 13.1-14.1 lbs. 6. Storage Stability - After 30 days storage in a sealed container at normal temperatures (50 degrees F-90 degrees F) the product shall not become hard packed no show signs of mold growth or spoilage. APPLICATION SPECS -ASPHALT SURFACES-PLEMPAVE SYSTEM Description: The specification covers the application of a new wearing surface texture for Plexipave Tennis Courts and new or existing asphalt concrete tennis courts that have a sound, well -drained base of adequate thickness and stability. Existing surfaces should be properly sloped for good drainage, and free from cracks. The process consists of the repair of any minor depressions, followed by application of the Plexipave System. NOTE: The success of the all-weather characteristics of resurfacing is dependent on a sound base (with good drainage) and asphalt concrete meeting the requirements of the National Asphalt Paving Association and the -U.S. Tennis Court and Track Builders Association. Surface variation should not exceed 1/8" in 10 ft. when measured in any direction with a straightedge and a slope of one inch in 10 ft., all in one plane. MATERIALS 1. Plexipave Court Patch Binder - Shall comply, with the Specification 10.14 of California Products Corporation. 2. Plexipatch - Shall comply with the Specification 10.21 of California Products Corporation. 3. Fiberglass Membrane. eco 4. Acrylic Resurfacer - Shall comply with the Specification 10.8 of California Products Corporation. 5. Plexipave Acrylic Filler Coats - Shall conform to Specification 10.5 of California Products Corporation. 6. Plexichrome Acrylic Finish Coat - Shall conform to Specification 10.1 of California Products Corporation. 7. Plexicolor Line Paint - Shall conform to Specification 10.4 of California Products Corporation. S. Water - The water used in all mixtures shall be fresh and potable and will be provided by the City of Cape Canaveral 1.1 Surface Preparation: The surface to be coated must be sound, smooth, and free from dust, dirt, and oily materials. All mildew is to be removed by means of power scrubbing or pressure washing with use of diluted chlorine. 1.2 All cracks 1/8" or greater in width shall be cleaned out and filled with acrylic patch material. All repaired areas shall be flush with surrounding surfacing. If not they shall be ground or sanded as needed to make them flush and even. 1.3 Patching: Prior to the application of surfacing materials, the entire surface should be checked for minor depressions or irregularities. After the courts have been flooded, any depressions covering a nickel shall be corrected by the following method. Depressions and irregularities shall be filled with Court Patch Binder according to specifications using the following mix: 100 lbs. 60-80 mesh silica sand (dry) 3 gallons Plexipave Court Patch Binder 1 to 2 gallons Portland Cement (dry) (depending on humidity and temperature) Tack Coat - Tack coat is necessary under patches only and shall be as follows: Plexipave Court Patch Binder diluted 1 part Court Patch binder to 2 parts water and allow to thoroughly dry prior to patching. 2.0 Fiberglass Installation• Fiberglass shall be installed over the prepared cracks. The fiberglass shall be 10x20 mesh resin coated, minimum 6" wide. The fiberglass shall be rolled out into Plexibond or Acrylic Resurfacer and stretched tight; the tack coat shall be applied using a "wet on wet" method. Tack coat shall be diluted per manufacturers recommendation. -4- 3.0 Surface Course Preparation: In order to thoroughly mask and embed the fiberglass membrane, a rnimmum of two coats of California Acrylic Resurfacer shall be placed on the cured fiberglass membrane. The application rate per coat shall be .05-.07 gallons per square yard prior to dilution. One full application of Acrylic Resurfacer shall be applied to entire court surface after coating with fiberglass. Dilute with water and sand utilizing the following mix: Acrylic Resurfacer 55 gallons Sand (60-80 mesh) 600-900 lbs. Water 20-40 gallons NOTE: Additional coats may be necessary to completely hide the texture of the fiberglass membrane. If finer sand is used, do not exceed 700 lbs. per 55 gallons of Acrylic Resurfacer. 4.0 Plexipave Color Base & Plexichrome• Fortified Plexipave shall be applied by rubber -bladed squeegee on the clean, dry surface in 3 applications to obtain a total quanity of not less than .15 nor more than .23 gallons per square yard of area, based on the material prior to any dilution. No application shall be covered by a succeeding application until thoroughly cured. Fortified Plexipave shall be blended utilizing the following mix: Plexipave Color Base 30 gallons Plexichrome 20 gallons Water 20 gallons The diluted material shall be homogeneous. Segregation before or during application will not be permitted. The finished surface shall have a uniform appearance and be free from ridges and tool marks. 4.1 Playing Lines: Four hours minimum after completion of the color coating resurfacing, 2 -inch wide playing lines with 3" base line shall be accurately located, marked and painted with Plexicolor textured line paint as specified by the U.S. Tennis Association. 4.2 Paint Paint tennis posts and ratchet reels with green metal paint. Weather Limitations: No parts of the construction involving the Plexipave System conducted during rainfall, or when rainfall is imminent. The air temperature must be at least 50 degrees F and rising. Do not apply when surface temperature is above 140 degrees F. -5- Note: Contractor will note any additional repairs to tennis courts that is not covered under the above work and price separately. PECIAL PROVISIONS FOR TENNIS COLiRT RESURFACIN t. Contractor Qualification - Bids will only be considered from firms regularly engaged in this type of work and who have an established reputation in the construction and resurfacing of tennis courts. The contractor shall furnish to the satisfaction of the owner, proof of previous experience in all-weather tennis court construction and resurfacing. 2. EXPERIENCE - The Contractor will submit a list of all-weather tennis courts they have constructed or resurfaced during the past three years. The list shall contain: owner, location, number of courts, and year constructed or resurfaced. 3. MATERIALS - All materials used shall be from a manufacturer that has regularly engaged in the manufacturing of these products for a minimum of five years and must meet the product specifications attached. The manufacturer will provide written information to the owner that all products used are 100% acrylic latex systems (no vinyl combination systems) and are free of asbestos fillers. This system is composed of a color concentrate and a neutral non -pigmented acrylic with round sand. A color concentrate mixed with local sand will not be considered equal. If other than the standard specified, the contractor shall submit at least four days prior to the bid date, at their own expense, a complete typewritten list of all such proposed substitutions together with sufficient data, drawings, samples, literature, and other detailed information as will demonstrate to the satisfaction of the owner that the proposed substitute material is equal in quality and utility of any proposed material, such test shall be made at the expense of the contractor by an established and unbiased testing laboratory approved by the owner. The all-weaiher surfacing materials specified herein are products of California Products Corporation, 169 Waverly Street, Cambridge, MA 02139 or an approved equal. The specification requires the provision of a complete surfacing system of specially formulated materials, each compatible with the other, which, when properly installed, will produce a high-quality of all-weather surface. Under no circumstances will a surfacing system comprised of several products produced or manufactured from different sources be considered. 4. METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION - The filler and finish courses shall be applied by squeegees and brooms. Mechanical spray equipment and spreaders will not be permitted. All materials will be delivered to the job site in their original unopened containers where they will be checked by the owner. All methods of construction must be submitted to the owner for approval. Manufacturer's direct representative must be readily available to the owner during resurfacing. 5. OWNER'S RIGHT TO TEST MATERIAL - The owner reserves the right to sample materials both as delivered to the job site in unopened drums and after dilution and mixing prior to applications. Such testing shall be by an independent laboratory of the owner's choice to assure that the materials meet the standards set by this specification. 6. SURFACING SYSTEM SHALL BE ASBESTOS FREE - Contractor must complete and sign an asbestos free affidavit before final inspection. Failure to do so constitutes non-compliance with these specification. 7. MSS DOCUMENTATION - Upon request, contractor must be able to provide Material Safety Data Sheet documentation for all materials used to satisfy contract. 8. SUBMISSION OF SUBSTITUTE MATERIALS - If other than products specified, the contractor shall submit at least ten 0 0) working days prior to the bid date a complete type written list of all such proposed substitutions together with sufficient data, drawings, samples, literature, and other detailed information as will demonstrate to the satisfaction of the owner that the proposed substitute material is equal in quality to the originally specified. -7- Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA Heading Consent Item 3 No. event, and they have no intention of turning this event over to another agency. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: CONSENT: PROPOSED ANNUAL REINDEER 5K RUN DEPT./DIVISION: LEGISLATIVE Requested Action: City Council consider approval of the Business & Cultural Development Board's recommendation regarding the annual Reindeer 5K Run. Summary Explanation & Background: City Council had asked for clarification that this would remain a City of Cape Canaveral community event to benefit the United Way of Brevard County. Both the board and the United Way plan and prepare for this annual event, and they have no intention of turning this event over to another agency. NOTE* An outdoor entertainment permit will have to be considered at a later date. I recommend approval. Exhibits Attached: United Way's letter dated 8/15/01; Board's memo dated 7/23/01 City is Office Department LEGISLATIVE cayx,YfPrim\mydocu#ie &id.council\meeting\2001\08-21-01\5k.doc AUG -15-01 WED J5:22 PM UN TED WAY OF 3REVARD FAX NO. 4075312007 P. 01 August 15, 2001 Mr, Bennett Boucher City Manager City of Gape Canaveral 105 Yolk Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-0326 Dear Bennett: Per my recent conversation with Kim McIntire regarding the concerns of the Cape Canaveral City Council with regard to changes to the Reindeer Run, I would like to present the position of our lJnited Way. The Reindeer Run has truly become a special fundraising event. In five years, city staff has grown the event into one in which the City Council should take great pride. Our United Way has worked hand in hand with your staff to ensure the continued success of the event. The 2000 event was tremendous. Having been selected as a Space Coast Runners Runner of the Year Series event really provided the event with a new level of respectability. I believe that as the 2000 event iuoro than double in participation is testimony to that fact. However, this drastic change also brought to light several issues o.fconcern such as: • Parking • back of bathroom facilities (those at the park were insufficient for the number of attendees — several were blocked up before the race even began) • Traffic Control • Rain contingency As you may remember, staff met with you to discuss possible changes that could be ,rade to the event to make it even better, attempting to address these issues. One oftlic thoughts was that having Port Canaveral as a sponsor would enable us to better address these issues, Our United Way remains supportive of the Reindeer Run and in the City of Cape Canaveral as the load entity responsible for the success of the event. Adding Port Canaveral as a sponsor of the event would only help to continue the success we have been witness to over the past Five years. AUG -15-31 WED 35,23 PM UNITED 'JAY CF 3REVARD FAX N0. 4076312007 P. 312 I hope this helps better explain the thought process that staff undertook when attempting to improve the Reindeer Run, Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact ono at 631-2740. Sincerely, Suzanne A. Sparling Vice President, Communication United Way of Brevard County, Inc. City Manager's Office Memo To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL From: JOVAN BARZELATTO, CHAIRMAN, BUSINESS & CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD CC: BENNETT C. BOUCHER, CITY MANAGER Date: July 23, 2001 Re: PROPOSED REINDEER RUN PARTNERSHIP WITH CANAVERAL PORT AUTHORITY At our July 18, 2001 meeting, the board unanimously voted to forward the following recommendation to the Cape Canaveral City Council: That the City of Cape Canaveral enter into a Reindeer Run 5K Run & Walk partnership with the Canaveral Port Authority. Staff reported that this proposed partnership was presented and unanimously approved by the port commissioners at their July 18, 2001 meeting. This change of venue would allow the participants to view the new landscaping and construction at the port as well as the improvements made to Jetty Park. The proposed staging area and start/finish of the event would be at Cruise Terminal 4 where there is ample parking. The proposed course would commence at the cruise terminal and take the participants through the port and out onto N. Atlantic Avenue, into the City of Canaveral to the Harbor Heights subdivision. Participants would loop around the entrance median back onto N. Atlantic Avenue and proceed through scenic Jetty Park, ending at the cruise terminal. The board is also recommending that the event commence at 8:30 a.m. Commitments have been received from port security, the CCVFD and Sheriff's Department to provide assistance with traffic control, street closures and use of police/fire rescue equipment. The Business & Cultural Development Board has always stressed the importance of including the port in city events and we feel this would be a "win/win" situation. We respectfully request approval to enter into a partnership with the Canaveral Port Authority for the 6t' Annual Reindeer 5K Run & Walk. 0 Page 1 Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA Heading Consent Item 4 No. Exhibits Attached: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: CONSENT: WASHINGTON PARK DECORATIVE SIDEWALK PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,340 TO J&S CURB & CONCRETE DEPT./DIVISION: PUBLIC WORKS Requested Action: City Council authorize the Washington Park decorative sidewalk project to J&S Curb & Concrete in the amount of $26,340, as recommended by the public works director. Summary Explanation & Background: J&S Curb & Concrete has the city bid for this type of work and funding is to be appropriated from the beautification fund. Exhibits Attached: Public works director's memo dated 08-16-01 City Ma r' Office" Department PUBLIC WORKS cap n�dnydoc ments\a ouncit\meeting\2001\08-21-01\j&s.doc MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett C. Boucher City Manager FROM: Ed Gardulski Public Works Director DATE: August 16, 2001 SUBJECT: City Council Agenda Item for August 21, 2001 Washington Park Decorative Sidewalk Project Award On August 7 h, 2001 City Council awarded the Bid 01-04 to the J&S Curb as the City of Cape Canaveral annual concrete contractor. In addition, it was the Council's desire for staff to construct a 5 -foot wide colored imprinted sidewalk located at the Washington Park. J&S Curb has agreed to construct a 5 -foot sidewalk at the unit bid price. The following is a summary of the cost for the sidewalk: 75 yard of concrete for imprinted design is $19,743.75, the additional red color for 75 yards of concrete is $6,595.50, for a total project cost of $26,339.25. Recommend the construction of the Washington Park sidewalk project by J&S Curb for the amount not to exceed $26,339.25, the appropriation of the necessary funds and wave the City's building permit fee. 4 I IL I lafflic"MIM Mg. 1707 Ebi St. Suite D Rockledge, FL 32955 321-632-5333 ( Phone 311-53 1 Fax NAME;ADDRESS City of cape CMMveral Ed Gwwde"Id 86114240 7"-49M Estimate DATE ESTIMATE NO 149 PROJECT AUG 15 20101 DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QTY TOTAL hanuM 1200 LF of 3'4' didewWk Colored coscrew whh fiber mesh 26339.25 1 26,339.25 TOTAL SIGNA7URE $26339-25 Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA Heading Considerations Item 5 No. 20 -ft. emergency fire lane, and drafting of an ordinance. AGENDA REPORT CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION: PETITION FOR ACTION TO ABANDON A PORTION OF THE HARBOR DRIVE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DEPT./DIVISION: LEGISLATIVE Requested Action: City Council review the petition for action to abandon a portion of the Harbor Drive road right-of-way. Petitioners are Mrs. Rhonda Lee and Mr. Raymond McGhee. Summary Explanation & Background: The next step in the process is to send this item to the Planning & Zoning Board for a recommendation. There will be a cost to the city for survey work, obtaining proper legal descriptions and reserving utility easements and a 20 -ft. emergency fire lane, and drafting of an ordinance. Exhibits Attached: Petition; City codes City agpes Office Department LEGISLATIVE c im\mydoc ments council\meeting\2001\08-21-01\harbor.doc Re: Petition for Abandonment Dear Honorable City Council, It is respectfully requested that the lot located east of lot 100 and west of lot 19 on Harbor Drive be abandoned. This lot is a right of way and the city council has determined that a roadway is not going to be built on this property. It is further requested that the location of the 20 ft. width of emergency fire lane requested by the fire department be retained by the city and located in the center of the lot runrling north and south. It is noted that the city is to retain any utility easement required with the remaining portion of the lot being divided equally between the adjacent property owners. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, M�N. Mc h� e Peel 396 Harbor Dr. Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 o a Lee 400 Harbor Dr. Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 cc: City Manager :i3U 1'V Ma) 1 T� August 14, 2001 r City Council City Hall Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Re: Petition for Abandonment Dear Honorable City Council, It is respectfully requested that the lot located east of lot 100 and west of lot 19 on Harbor Drive be abandoned. This lot is a right of way and the city council has determined that a roadway is not going to be built on this property. It is further requested that the location of the 20 ft. width of emergency fire lane requested by the fire department be retained by the city and located in the center of the lot runrling north and south. It is noted that the city is to retain any utility easement required with the remaining portion of the lot being divided equally between the adjacent property owners. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, M�N. Mc h� e Peel 396 Harbor Dr. Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 o a Lee 400 Harbor Dr. Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 cc: City Manager Page 1 0l' 1 Click Action: Parcel Info -1 Distance B _71 Vlew Decrea-se ZN)m Bar IACllal Vie,, RaI1LeI Du)caee r: Map (-Aerial - r -F -..1 Change Locate - `LyQ Parcel ID Locate S y 18 Zoom tO Brevard County Go =1041E103 105 ' 104 103 102 1101 100 - _ - -Printable Version 19 Map Preview 96 97 98 99 f� Check below then Update 38 36 35 Ir j r Parcels r GoliCourses �� { 60 f Schools f Libraries � — J 37 , 34 r'-RoadNames f Sections � 1 F Water Update --- - - E. http://205.172.172.144/webmap/temp/graFrame200lO81008l7454935.html 08/10/2001 DocumentFrame PART II CODE OF ORDINANCES Chapter 66 STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES* ARTICLE Il. STREETS* DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 66-27. Speed bumps, Secs. 66-28--66-35. Reserved. DIVISION 2. ABANDONMENT Sec. 66-36. Authority. Page 1 of 2 The city council, with respect to property under its control, may in its own discretion and of its own motion or upon the request of any agency of the state, county or of the federal government or upon petition of any person is authorized and empowered to: (1) Vacate, abandon, discontinue and close any existing public street, alleyway, road, highway or other place used for travel or any portion thereof, other than a state, county or federal highway or road, and to renounce and disclaim any right of the city and the public in and to any land in connection therewith; (2) Renounce and disclaim any right of the city and the public in and to any land or interest therein acquired by purchase, gift, devise, dedication or prescription for street, alleyway, road or highway purposes, other than lands acquired for state, county and federal highways; and (3) Renounce and disclaim any right of the city and the public in and to land, other than land constituting or acquired for a state, county or federal highway, delineated on any recorded map or plat as a street, alleyway, road or highway. (Code 1981, § 501.05(A)) Sec. 66-37. Petition for action. The request for abandonment of any street by any agency of the state, county or of the United States or of any person to the city council to take action shall be in writing and shall be by petition on a form provided by the city. (Code 1981, § 501.06) Sec. 66-38. Petition procedure. (a) The petition for requests for abandonment of city streets shall be filed with the city clerk. The petition is reviewed by the planning and zoning board. The planning and zoning board shall issue a recommendation. .(b) The planning and zoning board's recommendation shall be presented to the city council for review. The city council shall review the recommendation and approve or disapprove the petition. (Code 1981, § 501.07) Sec. 66-39. Ordinance required. Before any such street shall be closed and vacated or before any right of interest or the city or public in any land delineated on any recorded map or plat as a street shall be renounced and disclaimed, the city council shall adopt an ordinance. The ordinance shall be recorded in the records of the county. (Code 1981, § 501.06) Secs. 66-40--66-60. Reserved. http://£../om_isapi.dll?infobase=12642.nfo&record={B02}&softpage=newDocumentFram 08/17/2001 Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA Heading Considerations Item See attached correspondence. No. Exhibits Attached: AGENDA REPORT CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION: ECONOMIC DEVEOPMENT COMMISSION, BOARDMEMBER APPOINTMENT DEPT./DIVISION: LEGISLATIVE Requested Action: City Council select a representative to serve on the Economic Development Commission Board of Directors for the 2001-02FY. Summary Explanation & Background: See attached correspondence. Please advise. Exhibits Attached: EDC letter dated 08-08-01 City M;gei's Office %z Department LEGISLATIVE cape- im\mydocu ents\ad uncil\meeting\20011,08-21-01\edc.doc ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION or Florida's Space Coast August 8, 2001 To: Mayor Rocky Randels City of Cape Canaveral Appointed By: Municipality Level From: Randy Harris, Chair EDC of Florida's Space Coast Re: Board Appointments for FY 2001-2002 The EDC is in the process of determining the individual representative from each organization that will be serving on our Board of Directors for the Fiscal Year 2001-2002. The term of this appointment will take effect on October 1, 2001 and conclude on September 30, 2002. In accordance with our By -Laws (section attached), on an annual basis, each individual organization that holds a seat on the EDC's Board of Directors is required to provide written notification of their new appointment. We do understand, however, that many of the organization will be re -appointing their current designated person, but we are still required to collect written notification for our permanent files. Please fully complete the following information below and return by Friday. September 14, 2001. In order to conduct proper business for the EDC, all organizations are required to provide this information in accordance with the EDC's Fiscal Year, not that of each individual organization. FY 2001-2001 Board of Directors Appointment Name: - Appointed by: Company: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Preferred Method of Communication: ❑ E-mail as stated above ❑ Fax ❑ Phone Please return this form via fax or email by Friday. September 14. 2001 to mchase(&SpaceCoastEDC.org or (321) 633-4200. Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA Heading Ordinance 2"d public capital equipment. hearing Item 7 No. requirement for fighting structural fires. AGENDA REPORT CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 01-02, ESTABLISHING A FIRE/RESCUE SERVICES REFERENDUM QUESTION FOR THE NOVEMBER 2001 ELECTION DEPT./DIVISION: LEGISLATIVE Requested Action: City Council consider adoption of this ordinance that would place a referendum question on the November ballot seeking voter approval of an additional (1) of millage for fire/rescue services to fund (3) additional personnel and capital equipment. Summary Explanation & Background: At the 8/7/01 council meeting it was agreed upon to propose an additional (1) millage to the existing 0.5 millage rate. These funds will be used for future capital needs and to hire (3) additional personnel to meet the NFPA staffing requirement for fighting structural fires. Exhibits Attached: Supporting documentation; Ordinance No. 01-02 City Man s Office Department LEGISLATIVE tcape-ntUciocume tslacil\meeting 2001\08-21-01101-02.doc ORDINANCE NO. 01-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUBMITTING TO THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY A REFERENDUM QUESTION REGARDING THE MODIFICATION OF AN AD VALOREM TAX FOR FIRE/RESCUE SERVICES; ESTABLISHING THE DATE FOR THE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; REPEALING ALL PORTIONS OF THE CODE IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. TO BE ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVREAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. A Fire/Rescue Services Referendum shall be submitted to the electors of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, at the November 6, 2001, Municipal Election. Section 2. The Fire/Rescue Services Referendum shall consist of one referendum question, which shall be in the following form: Fire/Rescue Services Referendum Question Shall the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, be authorized to increase the ad valorem tax dedicated to fire/rescue services related to capital equipment expenditures and the addition of (3) personnel to comply with the National Fire Protection Association National Staffing standards by an amount not exceeding 1_5 mill from the present levy of .5 mill on all real property located within the City of Cape Canaveral for budgets beginning with the fiscal year commending October 1, 2002. Yes No Section 3. The City Clerk shall advertise the proposed referendum question pursuant to Florida Statutes. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida Ordinance No. 01-02 Page 2 ADOPTED BY the City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida, this _ day of , 2001. ATTEST: Susan Stills, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kohn Bennett, CITY ATTORNEY Rocky Randels, MAYOR FOR AGAINST Burt Bruns Buzz Petsos Rocky Randels Richard Treverton Lary Weber \\Cape-nt\cityclerk\CityClk\Ordinances\Fire-Rescue Services Referemdum Question 01-02.doc Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF BREVARD Before the undersigned authority personally appeared MAUREEN FARR who on P&O ADM7295%-8/1IMM oath says that she is LEGAL ADVERTISING CLERK NOTICE OF of the FLORIDA TODAY , a newspaper published in Brevard County, Florida;that RY CCoound HEARINGIC The hy Of cave caiaveral, Florida wol hold a Pwic Hearing for ft attached copy of advertising being a LEGAL NOTICE Purthe No. 011--WinMeCCNyHaxpft � — 111 Pak Avenue, Cape Ca- (AD#729556-5122.36) the matter of naveral, Florida at 7:00 pm., an ate. ta X211 nsPecled in tis entirety in fhe CtiY aws CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL � ( Monday -Friday). in the Court AN ORDINANCE .OF TME ORDINANCE 01-02 CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BARD COUNTY, FLOR- IDA, SUBMITTING TO THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY A REFERENDUM QUESTION REGARDING THE M0DIFKA- was published in the FLORIDA TODAY NEWSPAPER T1ON OF AN AD VALOREM TAX FOR FIRE/RESCUE SERVICES; ESTABLISHING THE DATE FOR THE PRO- in the issues of AUGUST 11, 2001 POSED REFERENDUM DIRECTING aTMEs� ADVERTISE PROPOSED ENDUM QUESTION;- REE ING ALL PORTIONS OF THE CODE IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AM Affiant further says that the said FLORIDA TODAY NEWSPAPERRO IDING FOR AN EFFEc- is a newspaper in said Brevard County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has FI Sfakft fhe by Ae advisesf PWICfivat Naw- san decides to appeal any Clad- r heretofore been continuously published in said Brevard County, Florida, regularly as slan made by Ihe Cly Candi , wm„esae<rtea,y,nenercon.; sldaed at fids me n% Ihat p stated above, and has been entered as periodicals matter at the post office in Person wlti need a record d the Pror�dnDs and.1--Ch a„F! PM ir18f person might need to ; ensure fhat a verbatim record MELBOURNE in said Brevard County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding d fhe pmceedrups Is made, ; W"M record In 9. testi the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that is to tie- b d T"ft ! notice does not aonustihae con- sent by file CRY for ft Inko. she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, ducnan or admission into evidence of otiiawise hadmis- Sbk for Invievad evidence, nor commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in doesIt a�nnwizeat or allowed by law. %sorawn said newspaper.Pak In Vy oeer&gs should coMad tine cry IF (� d 1,9. P 0/Y l ll /1 hoer; s omce ce f #* ae � h advar� of fhe meef- �^ (Signature of Affiant) Susan SRI&Cyc CRY ClarkSworn to and subscribed before this this 11TH day of AUGUST, 2001 P&O 0f -R LINDA B RAUD #O{F%Y Q COMMISSION NUMBER DD015812 FOF F1 O�`O MY COMMISSION EXPIRES — MAY 4.2005 Personally Known Type Identification Produced (Signature of Notary Public) LINDA L. BRAUD (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) or Produced Identification City of Cape Canaveral Fire / Rescue Services Referendum Question Information The City of Cape Canaveral has placed a referendum question on the ballot for this election to increase the property tax (millage rate) for Fire / Rescue Services. This is due to the following reasons; • The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) recently passed a new national staffing standard (NFPA 1720) that affects the operation of our volunteer fire department. This new standard requires the following be implemented when fighting a structural fire. "Upon assembling the necessary resources, at the emergency scene, the fire department shall have the capability to safely initiate an initial attack within 2 minutes 90 percent of the time." [Section 4.2.2.1 "Initial attack operations shall be organized to ensure that at least four members shall be assembled before initiating interior fire suppression operations at a working structural fire." [Section 4.2.2.2] effective 7-31-01. • Our Fire Chief has indicated that additional personal will have to be hired to meet this new standard at an annual cost of S 182,500. • The proposed fie protection cost for the 2001-02 FY is S 455,700. • Calls for Fire / Rescue services have increased 17% over the last (5) years from 1,382 in 1996 to 1,617 in 2000. CAPE CANAVERAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPAI Saxdxg the ci * ofCape Caesar "1 & Canavav1 Port Arrthosuy ,a MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett Boucher, City Manager FROM: David J. Sargeant, Fire Chief DATE: 19 July 2001 RE: Five Year Budgetary Needs Please find the updated five (5) year capital budget attached. Not addressed in this budget, is the need for upgrade or the building of a new station. Our station was built in 1962, and has been renovated several times. As you are aware, we are in need of a new station and are out of room. We have not received any estimates to this date. However, our station at the port cost approximately 1.3 million. As far as personnel needs are concerned, we are in need of three (3) additional personnel at this time, and anticipate the need for one (1) additional 8-5 person in the next five (5) years. Three (3) additional shift personnel will cost approximately $150,000, and the additional 8-5 person would cost approximately $65,000 annually. The shift personnel cost would need to be absorbed entirely by the city. The 8-5 person would be a 50/50 split. I request that you consider adding one of the three (3) shift personnel each year, for the next three (3) years, starting this coming fiscal year. With these additional paid employees, I would also suggest a modification to the contract to protect the city. I believe the contract should be modified to state that `CCVFD, Inc. shell not employ more paid personnel than volunteer personnel.' I believe this will protect the city from having to comply with NFPA 1710. It will also protect the volunteers from being eliminated. I am not sure that these, and all other future needs, can't be funded with the current tax and growth, if the sheriffs tax is increased. However, if needed, I would support your efforts to increase the fire tax if council so desired. si 190 JACKSON AVENUE a CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA 32920 a (407) 783-4777 • FAX (407) 783-5398 a oo s2 8970 COLUMBIA ROAD • CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA 32920 • (407) 783 424 •FAX (407) 783-4887 CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL 2001-2002 BUDGET DETAILED FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL PURCHASES 81 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) DEPARTMENT/PROJECT FY 01/02 FY 02/03 FY 03/04 FY 04/05 FY 05/06 FIRE DEPARTMENT: ALS/EMS EQUIPMENT (G,I) 15,000 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT (1) 22,000 23,000 24,000 25,000 26,000 SEADOO BOAT REPLACEMENT 12,500 1/2 STAFF REPLACEMENT VEHICLES (G,I) 12,500 12,500 12,500 1/2 NEW PUMPER 200,000 800 MHz RADIO REPLACEMENT (G,I) 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT (G,I) 2,500 3,500 4,500 5,500 6,500 LADDER TRUCK (G,D) 37,825 37,825 37,825 37,825 37,824 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: 89,825 91,825 93,825 95,825 270,324 81 W W $slell+$Ora..a a •• -: 16 W: 0 Q •dap� r 09 r Z W IL 2 = Z Q 3 S M a W o 9 C$�$ 0; Q S N � Z H r N W 0 No �� cq Ci m W � UJ M mUj Q1 N ZGo N c7 In gt r "Wo W q v�e�ic�c M� ¢ �ZW ca QW I.-Ro CL� F- J d r N�Q t9 �ooaofl- a)ir y U Z ' v 0 � cl C-4COD,� a >-er m m H UA J . � W �a�p W 8$88p Zd k5 V) h x OCC.= v Z W 0 No �� UUz z LC)W 1A N�e+i�M dV � ��cDc�n �Q Z W� J cc O �w a (D Co v ui .- 00 to p Q r N ID 1- M N IA W d P Noq!col o m o fcomo��p� U it r "Wo W q v�e�ic�c M� ¢ �ZW ca QW I.-Ro CL� d p t9 �ooaofl- a)ir y U Z ' Ico v 0 � cl C-4COD,� a >-er } . FL League of Cities 7/27/01 3:14: PAGE 2/3 RightFAX Florida League of Cities Federal Action Strike Team TO: Key Offida s FAST Membens tAcal/Rsgio■al League Qmtacs FROM: Jobe 7boaas, Dbectasr Legislative and Peblk Affairs DATE: Jelly 27, 2001 SUBJECT: Fire And EMS Deployment Standards Apprnved By N- "A Standards On July 17, the Standards Council of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) announced its decision to issue two new standards concerning the deployment of fine department personnel m career and volunteer departments, adding an important amendment desired to allow kxal governments real and subsantid 8exbdity in the way they provide fire and etseergency medical services. The announcement tame a week after a large coalition of national, regional, and sate local government, fire service, and taxpayer groups expressed their concerns at a Council hearing on the standards. The broadly-based National Local Government and Taxpayer Coalition includes 7 national IOW goverrnnet, personnel and risk rnanagemet associations; 43 state municipal leagues; 22 organiatioru representing sate and district fire chide, volunteers and firefighters, efghters, 1 I other regional, state and level organisations such as the Calibrnia State Association of Counties and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association; and 198 individual counties, cites, towns and villages. In a written briefing and oral argument, the Coalition told the NFPA Standards Council that the proposed sang and respoine time standards were seriously Sawed because they imposed rigid constraints and crushing financial burden on kxai governments' provision of fire and emergency services. The Coalition also showed that the ?FPA technical committees which developed the standards excknded local elected and chief appointed officials, finned to accommodate the needs and viewpoints of local governments and taxpayers, and ignored any scientist basis for the standards. The Coalition asked the Council not to issue the standards and Arte the technical committee under new leadership in order to begin the process of developing true consensus standards based on rigorous scientific analysis. Test Mee 1ss 1757 0 Talsisseti Fbwiia 32M • (SM 222-%% 6 Sa=on 27x-5331 TAX" 222-3Mf FL League of Cities 7/27/01 3:14: PAGE 3/3 RightFAX FAST Alert Psae Two The specific standards approved by the Council are NFPA 1710, Stn xkwd far the OrgrAiizatian cad Deploy ww of Fire SWressio n Opawims. E neigrmy Madkd Opentiom and Special Operatiau to the Public by Caren Fire Depofteml, and NFPA 1720, Stcamirrd far the Orgrmimim and Dq*94m" of Fin Ss ffression Opamor , Ewergrnry Medical Operations, and Specmd Operations to the Public by VohaWeer Fire Depwownts. NFPA 1710 prescribes strict staffing and msponse times for career fire departments. DTPA 1720 is its counterparts for volunteer fire departments, but its requirements an less prescriptive [Amendment Responds to Coalition's Appeal] In approving the standards, the Standards Council announced two important measures that appear to respond directly to the Coalition's appeal. First, the Council approved the issuarre of both A'FPA 1710 and 1720 only after adding the following suppkmental langw9e eonrcerr>ing the acceptability of alternative approaches to providing fin and emergency medical services other than the ones set out in the standards: "1.3 Egxiw %wj Nodmg w this staidard is untended to prohibit the we of system% mdhodsy or gpraodws of egwiw kw a sqerior perfannmice to those pr albed w this Awdard Technical doraow oration shall be subrwared to the Awhormy HavmgJurudictim to demonstrate eguimkricy." By its town, this amendment allows alternative "systems, methods or approaches" to be implemented by local BDvernmarts, and allows local ggvernments to review and make the final decision on the adequacy of such alternative approaches. Members of the Coalition will conian to study tins provision in an effort to accurately assess its implications. Second, the Council directed that the technical committees responsible for NFPA 1710 and 1720 begin review and revision of the standards on a thine -year cycle (the speediest possible timetable under NPFA's ndes), and report to the 2004 Am- Meeting If the NFPA honors its stated commitment to balance cows -based decision-making this may allow local governments, voters and taxpayers to have their first meaningful opportunity to participate in the standards Pew According to NFPA regulations, the parties to the NFPA 1710 and 172D appeal have 15 days from the date of the actual Standards Council decision (July l 1) to file a notice of intent to petition the NFPA Board of Directors. In the meantime, the standards will go into effect on 31 unless stayed, modified, or withdrawn by the board of directors. The members of the Coa t'iat rappealed NEPA 1710 and 1720 preparing to appeal the revised standards to the NFPA Board of Directors. The text of the Council's announce of their decision can be found ar http://wwwmfpa.org/Codat For additional inibnntiort please call myself or Allison Payne at the League office at (800) 342- 8122. Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA Heading Resolutions Item 8 No. Planing organization. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 01-25, SUPPORTING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVAERAL DEPT./DIVISION: LEGISLATIVE Requested Action: City Council adopt Resolution No. 01-25, supporting recommendations for future transportation improvements along the SR A I corridor within the City of Cape Canaveral. Summary Explanation & Background: Keith and Schnars, PA has provided the attached recommendations for improvements to SR AIA as a result of public participation during the arterial investments study commissioned by FDOT and the Brevard Metropolitan Planing organization. I recommend approval. Exhibits Attached: Resolution No. 01-26 and supporting documentation City BVI ger' Office Department LEGISLATIVE cape- ydocume sta min nci\meeting\2001\08-21-01\01-25.doc RESOLUTION NO. 01-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT IN THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL. WHEREAS, projections for land use and socio-economic data through 20 show an increase in both employment and population, and the subsequent increase in the need for transportation facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in cooperation with the Brevard Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), have conducted the State Road AIA (Atlantic Avenue) Arterial Investment Study (AIS) from State Road 404 (Pineda Causeway) to State Road 401 (Cape Road), including the segment of SR AIA located within the boundaries of the City of Cape Canaveral, for the purpose of exploring multi -modal transportation solutions to accommodate future transportation needs; and WHEREAS, there have been many opportunities for the public to participate and have input in the process of developing these recommendations through three public workshops, an interactive web page created exclusively for the project, numerous presentations at public meetings including three presentations to each of the municipal Commission/Council boards within the study area, and articles published in a newsletter created exclusively for the project; and WHEREAS, the Brevard MPO has, with recommendations from the City Commissions and City Councils within the study area, appointed citizens to serve on the Local Citizens Advisory Committee (LCAC) and city staff to serve on the Study Technical Advisory Team (STAT) and these local representatives have participated in the public involvement process developed for the SR AIA Arterial Investment Study; and WHEREAS, study recommendations from this AIS include those items listed in Attachment "A", and illustrated graphically in Attachment "B", and WHEREAS, at their July 11th meetings, the STAT and LCAC finalized their endorsement of the improvements defined in Attachments "A" and "B" based on the public support received at the May 2"d, 2001, and 3`d, 2001 public workshops, and comments of record received to date; and WHEREAS, consistent with the public involvement criteria established for the project study, the final set of public workshops, of a series of three, were held on August and 2001. At which workshops, strong public support and acceptance of the proposed improvements was again established; and City of Cape Canaveral, Florida Resolution No. 01-25 Page 2 WHEREAS, upon approval, these recommended projects could be implemented by FDOT, Brevard County, the City of Cocoa Beach, the City of Cape Canaveral Patrick Air Force Base, Canaveral Port Authority, and the Space Coast Area Transit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the City of Cape Canaveral hereby proclaims support for the proposed "Preliminary Concepts" of the MS and urges the MPO to endorse the recommendations, while giving specific consideration to the economic and environmental impacts of all recommendations prior to implementation. ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral this _ day of , 2001. Rocky Randels, MAYOR ATTEST: FOR AGAINST Burt Bruns Susan Stills, CITY CLERK Buzz Petsos Rocky Randels Richard Treverton APPROVED AS TO FORM: Larry Weber Kohn Bennett, CITY ATTORNEY \\Cape-nt\citycler,k\CityClk\Resolutions\SR A1A Supporting Improvements.doc ATTACHMENT "A" STATE ROAD AlA ARTERIAL INVESTMENT STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRANSPORTATION In general there are six major improvements being proposed: A. Changing SR AIA from a rural to an urban cross-section, and implementing access management measures B. Revamping the streetscape in Downtown Cocoa Beach C. Major Intersection Improvements at SR 520, N. Atlantic Ave. and Astronaut Blvd., and at the Pineda Causeway D. Implementing a bicycle /pedestrian network for the entire corridor E. Enhancing public transit and multi -modal facilities, and, F. Implementing a storm water management plan for SR AIA The six improvements listed above incorporate, but are not limited to, the following types of features: 1. Urban Cross-section/curb and gutter 2. Bicycle/pedestrian facilities, such as, sidewalks, paths, bike lanes, etc. 3. Bicycle links with existing facilities 4. Storm Water facilities 5. Aesthetic Enhancements, such as • Median and roadside landscaping • Streetscape enhancements 6. Bus bays where feasible, and bus shelters 7. On -street parking designations in downtown Cocoa Beach 8. Access aisles and on -street parking in certain locations in the one-way pair areas 9. Bulb -outs to enhance pedestrian safety 10. Coordinated traffic signal timing 11. New SCAT Trolley System 12. Implementation of Access Management Measures 13. General intersection improvements 14. Enhanced pedestrian crossings and/or pedestrian overpass near SR 520 15. Extended left -turn bays and an additional SB through lane at SR 520 16. Elimination of free-flowing south bound right turn at SR 520 17. Relocation of conflicting utilities 18. Street lighting concepts ATTACHMENT "B" Graphic Illustrations Design Solutions A. Re -design intersection w/ continuous turbo thru lane and physical Intersection Problems barrier separation B. Park entrance is relocated further north away from intersection to allow 1. High crashes at SR Al A and Pineda Causeway C. for adequate distances for maneuvering 2. Conflicts exist with park entrance's proximity to intersection Reduce the size of the raised traffic island at the NW corner and provide 3. Evacuation vulnerability a stripped area for dual northbound lefts during evacuations L_ EXIST. E%IS, RAY LINEd It SHLDR 17 1VRhV aFLEFr . NE 9HlDR Soo s' S8 7 4' �� TURN LANE4' 2 SOD JMIES SwN SWNF SHLDR PAVr. SHIOR. SWALE VARIES PAVi TaA0CK5 t t BLOCKS-. Cal 1U r 12' �. 12 r 15.5' �4 12' tl 12' 4' 3' 10'I .51 i !�— Existing R/W Uns Existing RJW Line^� j RI (45.751 RIW(64.25') QConstructlon —« Q Posted Speed: i45 mph PAFB Exist. Wall To Remain To Remain Bike Sidewalk 1 Lana swe Lane i Stormwater' S ; 5' Q Nlanagemant 8' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 8' T 1T � — Existing R/W Line ---- ._-- --- -- Existing R/W Uns %Construction Problems/Issues 1. Missing links in sidewalk system 2. High posted speed (55 mph) 3. No landscaping in median or roadside 4. No dedicated bicycle facilities 5. Need signalized/striped pedestrian crossings at the PAFB North Gate and at the south end to the public park 6. Inadequate stormwater collection/treatment system (no swales between PAFB Central Gate to S. 35th Street) 7. Center scramble lane creates conflicts with other vehicles Solution A. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network w/ bike lanes and 10' enhanced sidewalk B. New urban cross-section w/ medians requires lower posted speed (45 mph w/ FDOT approval) C. New cross section provides for landscaping D. New cross-section provides for on -street bike lanes and a 10' wide sidewalk will be on east side E. Proposed bicycle/pedestian network F. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities G. Center scramble lane removed and replaced w/ median for streetscaping and roadway separation Alternative Option A. Maintains existing roadway pavement B. Adds wider paved shoulders for bike lanes C. Adds 8'- 10' wide sidewalk consistent with proposed bike/pedestrian master plan D. Provides for drainage improvements E. No landscape median is provided and only limited landscaping is provided in adjacent ROW F Less expensive than proposed cross-section G. Narrow travel lanes U Existing Typical Section N Problems/Issues 1. Missing links in sidewalk system 2. Higher posted speed (55 mph) 3. No landscaping in median or roadside 4. No dedicated bicycle facilities 5. Need signalized/striped pedestrian crossings at the PAFB North Gate and at the south end to the public parking 6. Inadequate stormwater collection/treatment system (no swales between PAFB Central Gate to South 35th Street) Solutions A. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network B. New urban cross-section w/ medians requires lower posted speed (45 mph) aw�alk C. New cross section provides for landscaping D. New cross section provides for on -street bike lanes and a 10' wide sidewalk will be on east side E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities 12, E ISUng R!W Une' Edeting RN Une R/W Varku (49'10 849. i R/W Vanes (51' 10 NJ� QConstrudlion 6 Proposed Urban Cross Section Sidewalk RAY : USE VARIES i Variea 1r 11, Existing — m R/W Line R/W (509 QConstruction J 11' 1 11'. 4' Stormwater Management Existing i R W Line g Proposed 4 -lane Urban Divided (ShiKed East) Problems/issues 1. Conflicting left -turn movements 2. Limited Access management - large paved areas without joint access 3. No sidewalks or designated bicycle lanes 4. No landscaping in median or roadside 5. Roadside shoulders degraded and compacted 6. Lack of paved turnouts/entrances 7. Too many utilities in corridor/visual clutter/transmission lines along SR Al 8. Beach parking needed; Few parking spaces avilable or nonexistent Solution A. New urban cross-section w/ medians limit left -turn movements B. New urban cross-section will incorporate access management C. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network w/ bike lanes and enhanced sidewalk D. New cross section provides for landscaping E. New urban cross section will provide new curb and gutter F. New curb and gutter cross section will incorporate paved turnouts/entrances G. New cross section incorporates streetscape enhancements H. The County will be notified of need to secure additional land for parking ;IF\ �iTH ,ra scwvnxs, ea PROPOSED CONCEPTS rs-mrevr sRvr SHLlpR,� S WIREMr LEF ,RN URE SHlD0. VN 1E8 I t Sidewalk RAY : USE VARIES i Variea 1r 11, Existing — m R/W Line R/W (509 QConstruction J 11' 1 11'. 4' Stormwater Management Existing i R W Line g Proposed 4 -lane Urban Divided (ShiKed East) Problems/issues 1. Conflicting left -turn movements 2. Limited Access management - large paved areas without joint access 3. No sidewalks or designated bicycle lanes 4. No landscaping in median or roadside 5. Roadside shoulders degraded and compacted 6. Lack of paved turnouts/entrances 7. Too many utilities in corridor/visual clutter/transmission lines along SR Al 8. Beach parking needed; Few parking spaces avilable or nonexistent Solution A. New urban cross-section w/ medians limit left -turn movements B. New urban cross-section will incorporate access management C. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network w/ bike lanes and enhanced sidewalk D. New cross section provides for landscaping E. New urban cross section will provide new curb and gutter F. New curb and gutter cross section will incorporate paved turnouts/entrances G. New cross section incorporates streetscape enhancements H. The County will be notified of need to secure additional land for parking ;IF\ �iTH ,ra scwvnxs, ea PROPOSED CONCEPTS rs-mrevr sRvr Posted Speelk 35 mph 6 W Line i 12.5' -i- e' - 1, 12' gconatruction 10.5' Proposed Cross Section 2 52' Urban Section w/ Closed Drainage (Looking North) RNV LINE VARIES Bike Lens SHLOR, 1 Swale as 'Sidewalk Neided 1 1 Sidewalk 6 W Line i 12.5' -i- e' - 1, 12' gconatruction 10.5' Proposed Cross Section 2 52' Urban Section w/ Closed Drainage (Looking North) RNV LINE VARIES SHLOR, SH VARIEB PAVT. PA\rrV7. t t Posted Speed: 35 mph Bike Pe'kIII n Lone+j Sud ii#i Sidewalk* Parking iC I Stonnwetrr ;Menagemant +/-)22- J6' 6' 12' 1 12' 1 6' 6' i' (+! Existingt R/W Line i, R/W (2a') ri• RIW (32') �~ R/WLine 7 4.Construction RM! LINE Proposed Cross Section 60' Urban Section w/ Piping and Parking 14 (Looking South) Problems/issues 1. Congestion 2. Poor access management - numerous, closely spaced driveways 3. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle facilities 4. Flooding - lack of stormwater/treatment facilities - water flows onto private property 5. Need to improve traffic circulation 6. Evacuation/emergency access vulnerability 7. Roadside shoulders degraded and compacted 8. Little or no landscaping 9. Lack of streetscape amentities 10. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic Solution A. Overall corridor improvements will alleviate congestion B. New cross section will help organize access points C. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network includes bike lanes and sidewalks D. New urban cross-section includes storm water facilities E. Overall corridor improvements will improve circulation F. New urban cross-section will provide new curb and gutter G. New cross section provides for landscaping H. New cross section incorporates streetscape enhancements I. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated Problems/issues 1. Congestion 2. On -street parking is needed in certain areas and on -street parking is inappropriate in certain locations 3. Need additional off-street parking (interior block) 4. Poor Access Management - numerous, closely spaced driveways 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle facilities 6. Flooding - lack of stormwater/treatment facilities - water flows onto private property 7. Obstructed visual triangles 8. Need to improve traffic circulation 9. Evacuation/emergency access vulnerability 10. Roadside shoulders degraded and compacted 11. Little or no landscaping 12. Lack of streetscape amentities 13. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic Solution A. Overall corridor improvements will alleviate congestion B'New cross section provides specific parking designations C. Facilities are being provided through City program D. New cross section will help organize access points E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities G. New cross section provides specific parking designations H. Overall corridor improvements will improve circulation I. New urban cross-section will provide new curb and gutter J. New cross section provides for landscaping K. New cross section incorporates streetscape enhancements L. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated Sidewalk only provided on west side of street due to the numerous driveways and conflict points OTHER OPTIONS EXPLORED Q—Stonnwater R W Line :1 1. V r (LConstruction 71' Rural Section w/ Swales 16 (Looking North) Posted Speed: 35 mph;,; Option 1 > Requires a wider cross-section since it provides for additional stormwater swales. With the additional swales stormwater can be more easily accommodated without relying solely on ex - filtration systems which often involve higher installation and maintenance costs. > Shifts travel lanes 12.5 ft to the west and sidewalks closer to the right-of-way Option 2 )o- Provides for a rural cross-section and an open drainage system. An extension of cross section recently constructed to the south. > Requires sidewalks to be constructed closer to right-of-way lines because of clear zone requirements for rural cross sections. Greatest impact to adjacent properties. > Shallow swales limit stormwater treatment volumes because of swale width and closely spaced driveways. Requires additional inlets for stormwater collection or side drains below driveways. Option 1 > This option is the same as the preferred option with the exception that there are no provisions for parking provided, and it includes a sidewalk on both sides of the street. ;�, �--. I@Tlii and SCHN�AS. PA PROPOSED CONCEPTS �rrvcrm+arr MDY Posted $peed 35 mph alk► Ears Sidewalk �Ifr Curb and Gutter 1 Sidewalk K Q—Stonnwater R W Line :1 1. V r (LConstruction 71' Rural Section w/ Swales 16 (Looking North) Posted Speed: 35 mph;,; Option 1 > Requires a wider cross-section since it provides for additional stormwater swales. With the additional swales stormwater can be more easily accommodated without relying solely on ex - filtration systems which often involve higher installation and maintenance costs. > Shifts travel lanes 12.5 ft to the west and sidewalks closer to the right-of-way Option 2 )o- Provides for a rural cross-section and an open drainage system. An extension of cross section recently constructed to the south. > Requires sidewalks to be constructed closer to right-of-way lines because of clear zone requirements for rural cross sections. Greatest impact to adjacent properties. > Shallow swales limit stormwater treatment volumes because of swale width and closely spaced driveways. Requires additional inlets for stormwater collection or side drains below driveways. Option 1 > This option is the same as the preferred option with the exception that there are no provisions for parking provided, and it includes a sidewalk on both sides of the street. ;�, �--. I@Tlii and SCHN�AS. PA PROPOSED CONCEPTS �rrvcrm+arr MDY � R.W vAwEe (zs' 16D7 � 6b' low IXI9Ti�^.. CONC.9W�(.I P_DR NEWAY _'_}J(let. WI DRNEWAY 11' 11' 11' ORAY LINE R lNE PARKRIG PuiKINp ' l ' ` culla a our*ER tulle a otrneR "' FXIST.�� RlW uNE e PNWNO e' PNUUNO 21 Existing 2 -Lane w/ Turn Lane Typical Section 23 Existing Typical Section Problems/Issues 1. Need facilities for traffic calming along Minutemen Causeway (bulbouts, median divider, brick pavers, etc.) 2. Need improved sidewalks/bike lanes to connect "Town Center" to residential neighborhoods 3. Need demand responsive signal timing 4. Need improved bus routes to reduce parking needs and congestion 5. Lack of streetscape amenities 6. Inadequate striping for parking 7. Evacuation vulnerability 8. Inadequate stormwater treatment 9. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic Solutions A. Streetscape plan calls for bulb -outs and aesthetic enhancements as well as improvements to enhance pedestrian safety B. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network extends out to connect w/ bike route on south side of Minutemen Causeway C. Demand responsive signal timing currently under implementation as a result of this study D. New SCAT trolley system to enhance ridership E. New cross section incorporates streetscape enhancements F. Proposed streetscape plan designates specific parking G. Overall corridor improvements will improve circulation H. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities I. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated Problems/Issues 1. Flooding in areas with existing stormwater facilities; inadequate treatment 2. Roadside shoulders degraded and compacted 3. Many shoulders are unpaved 4. Parking in road right-of-way; striping needed 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system 6. No landscaping 7. No Access Management - large unpaved areas with conflicting movements 8. Lack of streetscape amenities 9. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic Solution A. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities B. New urban cross-section will provide new curb and gutter C. Proposed streetscape plan designates specific parking/isolates parking from through traffic movement D. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network E. New cross section provides for landscaping F Access management strategies will be employed in design development G. New cross section incorporates streetscape enhancements H. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated Q 1arnta�M SCI1NnR5, PA. „a,,a,gA"�"� OF MLA''SPORmr— PROPOSED CONCEPTS L ......... aw.�. Ana Pw.ecro s.n..L. Arzrrnue �"��1° iNYFS1MEM 6'fLDY B4.-- - - �FT BGD NRN W F ivMIE9 VMIEBBHLD0. 811— VMIE RW MW ® L 3113M G EABnNG $IDE. BIDEWIW( (INiERMnTEIfn IKMMMMTN.� (INIERMRTENT) Transmission Pols to Remain Bike Bike Sidewal "no & 4 4`n i Ye�rlea 4'1-11' 11' h 19.5' 1 11 11 r1 4_I 8 Existing—.i 1 i.— Existing R/W Linei- 16,25' I R/W Line M32MProposed Cross Section 4 -Lane Urban Divided Shifted East �XIB= Rm LINE Relocated hanamisslon Pole CURB i OUT'fER J EXISTING 810EWNJ INTERMITTENT Sidewalk Bike Side Ik tLane \vy �✓ LI i� Lane 1 4 11 11 11 19 _L 1 V 1 11 14�8 Exlsting I' Exlating R/W Line R/W Llne IL Proposed Cross -Section 4 -Lane Urban Divided w/ Extended Intersection P34MImprovement of Additional Southbound Lane Problems/Issues 1. Conflicting left -turn movements 2. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale, and treatment system to convey runoff 3. Need a primary dedicated bicycle facility with feeder routes 4. Inadequate turn lane storage 5. Too few right turn lanes 6. Need warning signs for approaching signals and major side streets 7. Little or no landscaping 8. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic Solutions A. New urban cross-section w/ medians limit left -turn movements B. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities C. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network includes bike lanes, feeder routes, and enhanced sidewalks D. Urban cross section w/ median will provide clearly delineated left turn bays with adequate storage lengths E. Right turn bays will be provided where required and where they do not conflict w/ bicycle/pedestrian facilities F. A signage plan will be part of design development G. New cross section provides for landscaping H. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated Problems/Issues 1. Traffic congestion and circulation problems 2. Inadequate left turn lane at Marion Lane 3. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive signal timing problems 4. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system and unsafe pedestrian crossing conditions 5. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic 6. Need facilities for traffic calming 7. Evacuation vulnerability Solution A. If approved, intersection improvements at SR 520, Marion Lane, and proposed signage plan and third southbound thru lane will improve circulation B. Proposed improvements to the Marion Lane intersection and extending length of northbound left turn bays. Retrofitting traffic with proposed signage plan to reduce the number of vehicles turning left into surf shops. C. Light synchronization currently under implementation as a result of this study D. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network E. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated F. Provide streetscape and pedestrian enhancements to induce traffic calming G. Overall corridor improvements will improve circulation 3 KFIIFi end scrttunns. FA PROPOSED CONCEPTS MMB ExIST1NG BWEIYN.K CURB i GUTTER 8 GUTTEa INTERMnTENi MEMMM, TV Relocated hanamisslon Pole CURB i OUT'fER J EXISTING 810EWNJ INTERMITTENT Sidewalk Bike Side Ik tLane \vy �✓ LI i� Lane 1 4 11 11 11 19 _L 1 V 1 11 14�8 Exlsting I' Exlating R/W Line R/W Llne IL Proposed Cross -Section 4 -Lane Urban Divided w/ Extended Intersection P34MImprovement of Additional Southbound Lane Problems/Issues 1. Conflicting left -turn movements 2. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale, and treatment system to convey runoff 3. Need a primary dedicated bicycle facility with feeder routes 4. Inadequate turn lane storage 5. Too few right turn lanes 6. Need warning signs for approaching signals and major side streets 7. Little or no landscaping 8. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic Solutions A. New urban cross-section w/ medians limit left -turn movements B. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities C. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network includes bike lanes, feeder routes, and enhanced sidewalks D. Urban cross section w/ median will provide clearly delineated left turn bays with adequate storage lengths E. Right turn bays will be provided where required and where they do not conflict w/ bicycle/pedestrian facilities F. A signage plan will be part of design development G. New cross section provides for landscaping H. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated Problems/Issues 1. Traffic congestion and circulation problems 2. Inadequate left turn lane at Marion Lane 3. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive signal timing problems 4. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system and unsafe pedestrian crossing conditions 5. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic 6. Need facilities for traffic calming 7. Evacuation vulnerability Solution A. If approved, intersection improvements at SR 520, Marion Lane, and proposed signage plan and third southbound thru lane will improve circulation B. Proposed improvements to the Marion Lane intersection and extending length of northbound left turn bays. Retrofitting traffic with proposed signage plan to reduce the number of vehicles turning left into surf shops. C. Light synchronization currently under implementation as a result of this study D. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network E. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated F. Provide streetscape and pedestrian enhancements to induce traffic calming G. Overall corridor improvements will improve circulation 3 KFIIFi end scrttunns. FA PROPOSED CONCEPTS 3 ne 2 Lane 1 ' c Walgreens F35SR A1A Aerial plan View Marion Lane - Alternate Option 36 (No Southbound Left) o.rttarcvr oeruvsrort�mnm{'.o sins oeewnr PROPOSED CONCEPTS ^b rP I@TI}i and SCHNARS, PA yaww iA ARI'EaW. pYEaIVOY s SOD 4' VARIES VARIES SHIRR PAVT. i RAV VARIES (86.1 T - 1101RECT. LEF TURN LANE EXISTING SIDEWALK 3% Existing Typical Section LINE 1V 4' SDD 4' r SHLOR. VARIES VARIES PAVT. EXISTING SIDEWALK (INTERAInTENT) Existing RW U. ¢Construction—•t Proposed Cross Section 3g 4 -Lane Urban Divided (Shifted East) Existing RMI Una Problems/Issues 1. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics 2. No Access Management provided - excessive number of curb cuts 3. Too many utilities in corridor/visual clutter/transmission lines along SR Al A 4. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive timing problems 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system 6. Too many obstructions in sidewalks 7. Strip centers negatively impact the visual theme of the corridor 8. Lack of pedestrian crossings 9. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale, and treatment system to convey runoff 10. Too few right turn lanes 11. Need warning signs for approaching signals and major side streets 12. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic 13. Emergency Access vulnerabiliy Solutions A. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements B. Access management strategies will be employed in design development C. Relocation of utilities will be reviewed in design development D. Light synchronization currently under implementation as a result of this study E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities Right turn bays will be provided where required and where they do not conflict w/ bicycle/pedestrian facilities G. A signage plan will be part of design development H. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated I. New cross section will provide clarity to traffic movements I�mi and sCHNAAs, PA,°q�"°t'or m,wsrortr"nav PROPOSED CONCEPTS c .. ................... ....... cawry awwrn+acc.o S.R.A1AA EARL Lr1a1EM bT1AY �i�— Exisr. RrW 1,007 � RAY ii Late EXIST.�� I I LINE 24' SFDIRECT. 21' fi' SOD 4' 17 LE TURN LANE 1S 4' SOD VARIES VARIES SHLDR LINE it' 19.5' SHLDIR VARIES SOD SHL00. PAVi.' SIDEWALK (INTERM=NT) EXISTING Iffamm SIDEWALK (INTERAITTT hm Transmissionf*T --.—. Pole to Remeln �ele walk 1 R/W Una Bike aw �e N— Existing A/W Uhe R/W (5W) Proposed Cross Section r52 4 -Lane Urban Divided (Shifted West) � RrW 1,007 � ii Late EXIST.�� I EXIST. 24' Bike 21' LINE RAV 17 tY 1S 17 —.1 Al' LINE it' 19.5' 11' SOD SHL00. PAVi.' SFiIDR PAVT. � VARIES -7 i VARIES 1 * I EXIST. RAY IV IV 10, LWE SHDRECT. 90D 1'LEFr�.� TU LANE 4' 90D ES VARIES I. SHLDR. VARIES VARIES PA . PPAAVLT. EXISTING E%L9TRNi SIDEWALK SIDEWALK (INTERMRTENT) (INTERMRTE11n Existing R/W Line QConstruction Existing R/W Line Problems/Issues 1. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics 2. No Access Management provided - excessive number of curb cuts 3. Too many utilities in corridor/visual clutter/transmission lines along SR A1A 4. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive signal timing problems 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system 6. Too many obstructions in sidewalks 7. Strip centers negatively impact the visual theme of the corridor 8. Lack of pedestrian crossings 9. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale, and treatment system to convey runoff 10. Too few right turn lanes Solutions A. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements B. Access management strategies will be employed in design development C. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements D. Light synchronization currently under implementation as a result of this study E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements G. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities H. Right turn bays will be provided where required and where they do not conflict w/ bicycle/pedestrian facilities Problems/issues 1. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics 2. No Access Management provided - joint access needed 3. Too many utilities in corridor/visual clutter/transmission lines along SR AIA 4. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive signal timing problems 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system 6. Lack of pedestrian crossings 7. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale, and treatment system to convey runoff 8. Too few right turn lanes 9. Need warning signs for approaching signals and major side streets 10. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic 11. Unexpected southbound left turn into Purcell's Carpet from the thru lane just south of the new interchange. Motorists violate the double yellow pavement stripes Solution A. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements B. Access management strategies will be employed in design development C. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements D. Light synchronization currently under implentation as a result of this study E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities G. Right turn bays will be provided where required and where they do not conflict w/ pedestrian facilities H. A signage plan will be part of design development I. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated J. New urban cross-section w/ medians limit left -turn movements and SCHNARS, P.ADrrinnwavror'nwvspanr. PROPOSED CONCEPTS TON Bike ii Late Bike ewak 1 4q? !J 4I 11 MLL le 111 —.1 Al' 11' it' 19.5' 11' QConstruction Existing R/W Line Problems/Issues 1. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics 2. No Access Management provided - excessive number of curb cuts 3. Too many utilities in corridor/visual clutter/transmission lines along SR A1A 4. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive signal timing problems 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system 6. Too many obstructions in sidewalks 7. Strip centers negatively impact the visual theme of the corridor 8. Lack of pedestrian crossings 9. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale, and treatment system to convey runoff 10. Too few right turn lanes Solutions A. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements B. Access management strategies will be employed in design development C. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements D. Light synchronization currently under implementation as a result of this study E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements G. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities H. Right turn bays will be provided where required and where they do not conflict w/ bicycle/pedestrian facilities Problems/issues 1. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics 2. No Access Management provided - joint access needed 3. Too many utilities in corridor/visual clutter/transmission lines along SR AIA 4. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive signal timing problems 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system 6. Lack of pedestrian crossings 7. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale, and treatment system to convey runoff 8. Too few right turn lanes 9. Need warning signs for approaching signals and major side streets 10. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic 11. Unexpected southbound left turn into Purcell's Carpet from the thru lane just south of the new interchange. Motorists violate the double yellow pavement stripes Solution A. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements B. Access management strategies will be employed in design development C. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements D. Light synchronization currently under implentation as a result of this study E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities G. Right turn bays will be provided where required and where they do not conflict w/ pedestrian facilities H. A signage plan will be part of design development I. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated J. New urban cross-section w/ medians limit left -turn movements and SCHNARS, P.ADrrinnwavror'nwvspanr. PROPOSED CONCEPTS TON Problems/Issues 1. Northbound pavement cross slope is too steep and limits sight distance 2. Missing links in sidewalk and bicycle system 3. No access management provided, excessive number of curb cuts; Too many conflict points on SR Al A 4. International Drive is not aligned with signalized intersection at N. Atlantic Ave. and Astronaut Blvd. - left turning maneuvers are unsafe 5. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale and treatment system to convey runoff 6. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics Solutions A. Construct a longer and flatter curve on SR Al A that will improve sight distance and make turning maneuvers more comfortable B. Proposed bicycle and pedestrian network C. Access management strategies will be employed in design development .� Opportunities exist for �, redevelopment and consolidating access. New cross section will provide clarity to traffic movements D. Re -align International Drive with N. Atlantic` ,rte Ave/Astronaut Blvd. All turning maneuvers occur at a signalized intersection E. Re -alignment of International Drive creates an opportunity for attractive stormwater management areas. New urban cross section includes stormwater management facilities F. New roadway cross section and re -alignment incorporates streetscape enhancements I 55 Option 1: Re -alignment of International Drive Problems/Issues 1. Northbound pavement cross slope is too steep and limits sight distance 2. Missing links in sidewalk and bicycle system 3. No access management provided excessive number of curb cuts; Too 4. many conflict points on SR Al 5. International Drive is not aligned with signalized intersection at N. Atlantic Ave. and Astronaut Blvd.- left turning maneuvers are unsafe 6. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale and treatment system to convey runoff 7. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics Solutions A. Construct a longer and flatter curve on SR Al A that will improve sight distance and make turning maneuvers more comfortable B. Proposed bicycle and pedestrian network C. Access management strategies will be employed in design development. Opportunities exist for redevelopment and consolidating access. New cross section will provide clarity to traffic movements D. U-turn bays used in lieu of re -alignment. Minimal impact to First Union Bank, vacant IBM building and Cape Gardens E. New urban cross section includes stormwater management facilities F. New roadway cross section incorporates streetscape enhancements OSGD CONGUTS Access Aisle Applications For One-way Pair 1. V—t Existing 9.W�1 � Exlsdng }/ RIWUne R(WUneN 4 4 rNtural u F& Ground One -Way -1 CurbJ Curb and Gutter- I Access Aisle Type D Type F J (Parallel Parking Sidewalk As Necessary) e S. Orlando Avenue ► Proposed access aisle plan designates specific parking/isolates parking from through traffic movement ► New urban cross section includes stormwater facilities, curb and gutter, bike lanes, and enhanced sidewalks ► One-way operation with exit to side street to minimize disruption of traffic flow on SR A1A ► Angled parking beyond the right-of-way line requires coordination with property owners > Another location identified for application of this concept is between 15th Street South and Myrtle Avenue I 3 Proposed Cross Section (Lookimomm ng North) S. Atlantic Avenue > Proposed access aisle plan designates specific parking/isolates parking from through traffic movement > New urban cross section includes stormwater facilities, curb and gutter, bike lanes, and enhanced sidewalks > One-way operation with exit to side street to minimize disruption of traffic flow on SR Al A > Angled parking beyond the right-of-way line requires coordination with property owners KEITH e�id SCHNAPS. P.A. ,,,,o,"wOP mNasoxrnav PROPOSED CONCEPTS PALe1M Meeting Type: Regular '.Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA Heading Resolutions Item 9 No. Summary Explanation & Background: AGENDA REPORT CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO.01-26 AMENDMENT TO ESCROW AGREEMENT WITH DOWNS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND THE VILLAGES OF SEAPORT MASTER ASSOCIATION DEPT./DIVISION: LEGISLATIVE Requested Action: City Council consider the approval of this resolution that will amend the existing escrow agreement and provide the reallocation of the escrow funds as follows: S 15,619.40 — Reallocated for the N. Atlantic Avenue and West Central Blvd. intersection improvements, S41,900.00 — Reallocated for center turn lane improvements on N. Atlantic Avenue in front of the Villages of Seaport's main entrance. Summary Explanation & Background: City Council has decided to let the Ridgewood Avenue road reservation expire on 10/1/01; therefore, these funds can be reallocated for a more appropriate use to help improve traffic flow in and around the Villages of Seaport development. I recommend approval. Exhibits Attached: Resolution and amended escrow agreement. Citi Manaeer,'s'Offiee Department LEGISLATIVE caP- ydocu nts\a c uncil\meeting\2001\08-21-01\downsdev.doc To: Ber+nett Boucher From: Thomas Downs, CC1M Re- Esc. -ow agreement Dear Bennett, The escrow agreement incorrectly identifies the proper ownership entity_ Please correct to Downs Development Corporation/Seaport. With regard to the disbursement of funds, I believe the dollars disbursed (approx. $4,000.04) to close .:;:.units within the couple years should be released immediately. I feel it is not equitable for the city to release funds on their behalf and hold funds any longer on lelaclf. cif any stipulations. I am not adverse to the city retaining some funds; say $15000 until completion but to retain anymore is neither equitable nor fair. I biffefor respectfully submit the release of funds simultaneous to your release as part :oaf ftug agreement. Warme,`t regards, Thoma: IJowns, CC1M ................... ICS 9PVd NOIIVl iOdaO'J SNMOG Z6L09L9L©t ©t :t Z I©©-C/9I/80 RESOLUTION NO. 01-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN AMENDED AGREEMENT WITH DOWNS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC. AS SUCCESSOR TO MAXI -HOMES OF AMERICA AND THE VILLAGES OF SEAPORT MASTER, ASSOCIATION FOR THE REALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO FINANCE INTERSECTION CONFIGURATION AT W. CENTRAL BOULEVARD AND NORTH ATLANTIC AVENUE AND THE COMPLETION OF A TURNING LANE ON N. ATLANTIC AVENUE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, as follows: SECTION 1. The Mayor and the City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute an agreement with Downs Development Corporation, Inc. as successors to Maxi -Homes of America and the Villages of Seaport Master, Association for the reallocation of escrow funds to finance intersection configuration at W. Central Boulevard and North Atlantic Avenue and completion of a turning lane at N. Atlantic Avenue. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida this day of , 2001. Rocky Randels, MAYOR ATTEST: FOR AGAINST Burt Bruns Susan Stills, CITY CLERK Buzz Petsos Rocky Randels Richard Treverton APPROVED AS TO FORM: Larry Weber Kohn Bennett, CITY ATTORNEY \\Cape-nt\cityclerk\CityClk\Resolutions\DOWNS Escrow Agreement Res.doc LAW OFFICES AMARI & THERIAC, P.A. Attorneys and Counselors At Law Richard S. Amari Kohn Bennett Bradly Roger Bettin, Sr. Mitchell S. Goldman J. Wesley Howze David R. Martin Matthew J. Monaghan Mark N. McQuagge Mark S. Peters David M. Presnick Charles R. Steinberg James S. Theriac, III Of Counsel: Mary E. Lytle, P.A. Mr. Bennett Boucher, City Manager City of Cape Canaveral P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 RE: VILLAGES OF SEAPORT Dear Bennett: Reply to: Cocoa Post Office Box July 18, 2001 Mariner Square 96 Willard Street, Suite 302 Post Office Box 1807 Cocoa, Florida 32923-1807 Telephone (321) 639-1320 Fax (321) 639-6690 Imperial Plaza Suite B104 6769 N. Wickham Road Melbourne, Florida 32940 Telephone (321) 259-6611 Fax (321) 259-6624 Based on the position of the City Council with regard to any proposal for a pedway/walkway from the Ridgewood Avenue extension to Jerry Park, I feel as though we should return our attentions to the execution of the Escrow Agreement between Villages of Seaport and the City. As you are aware, we previously provided a proposal in the form of a resolution to accept escrowed monies and apply same to specifically designated projects within the City limits. rtease re"v'1f-W your Ur fllc �lllti 1011`Ld(l me i� t 1Si IiSS tale 1:'X tiptJiilpnaie Step. Sincerely, �'J' Mark McQuagge MM:mem LAW OFFICES AMARI & THERIAC, P.A. Attorneys and Counselors At Law Richard S. Amari Kohn Bennett Bradly Roger Bettin, Sr. Mitchell S. Goldman J. Wesley Howze David R. Martin Matthew J. Monaghan Mark N. McQuagge Mark S. Peters David M. Presnick Charles R. Steinberg James S. Theriac, III Of Counsel: Mary E. Lytle, P.A. Mr. Bennett Boucher, City Manager City of Cape Canaveral P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 RE: VILLAGES OF SEAPORT Dear Bennett: Reply to: Cocoa Post Office Box August 3, 2001 Mariner Square 96 Willard Street, Suite 302 Post Office Box 1807 Cocoa, Florida 32923-1807 Telephone (321) 639-1320 Fax (321) 639-6690 Imperial Plaza Suite B104 6769 N. Wickham Road Melbourne, Florida 32940 Telephone (321) 259-6611 Fax (321) 259-6624 Enclosed, please find the First Amendment to Escrow Agreements in regard to the Villages of Seaport. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office. Sincerely, Mark McQuagge MMem Enclosure as indicated FIRST AMENDMENT TO ESCROW AGREEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 2001 by and between DOWNS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC. as successor in interest to Maxi - Homes of America, a joint venture, hereinafter referred to as "DOWNS" the CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and VILLAGES OF SEAPORT MASTER, "ASSOCIATION". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Maxi -Homes of America, predecessor in interest to DOWNS, and the CITY entered into that certain Escrow Agreement dated February 19, 1985 in conjunction with the approval of that certain site plan for the Villages of Seaport, which Escrow Agreement provided in part that Maxi -Homes, as the developer, would escrow with the CITY, certain sums to be used for the construction of traffic signalization on North Atlantic Avenue, as well as funds to pave the Ridgewood extension running through the Villages of Seaport ("Escrow Agreement #1"); and WHEREAS, Maxi -Homes of America and the CITY also entered into that certain Escrow Agreement dated July 30, 1987, executed in conjunction with the same site plan which provided for the payment of sums by Maxi -Homes to the CITY for the escrow of funds to pave a sidewalk along entire length of the proposed Ridgewood extension as aforementioned, ("Escrow Agreement 4r'2"); and WHEREAS, DOWNS has become the successor in interest as the developer of the Villages of Seaport, and as such, desires to amend certain sections of Escrow Agreement #1 and Escrow Agreement #2, hereinafter collectively referred to as the "ESCROW AGREEMENTS", and WHEREAS, the CITY agrees to amend the ESCROW AGREEMENTS as the amendments are in conformance with it's comprehensive plan inasmuch as the CITY has amended it's plans to extend Ridgewood Avenue through the Villages of Seaport project, and replace it with a pedway, and WHEREAS, the ASSOCIATION joins in the execution hereof to express its' consent to the terms hereof. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. The parties agreed that the following sums have been collected to date with referenced to the ESCROW AGREEMENTS: A. $35,900.00 for the paving of the Ridgewood Avenue extension. B. $15,619.40 for North Atlantic Avenue signalization. C. $6,000.00 for paving of sidewalks. 3. The parties hereby agree to reallocate the escrowed sums as provided in Section 2 above, as follows: A. The sum of $15,619.40 shall be reallocated for the purchase and construction of the traffic signal and intersection configuration at the corner of Central Avenue and North Atlantic Avenue. This project shall be accomplished by the CITY, and therefore, these funds shall be released to the CITY for their use. B. The balance of the fund collected in escrow shall be utilized for a center turning lane to be constructed on North Atlantic Avenue in front of the Villages of Seaport. This project shall be accomplished by DOWNS and Brevard County and therefore, the funds shall be held in escrow by the CITY until the project is completed. 4. The parties hereto agree that all provisions of the ESCROW AGREEMENTS requiring that additional funds be placed into escrow be terminated. 5. The Agreement shall be binding on successors and assigns of both parties. 6. All other provisions of the ESCROW AGREEMENTS not modified hereby shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties now execute this Agreement on the date above first written. ATTEST: DOWNS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC. AS SUCCESSOR TO MAXI -HOMES OF AMERICA, a joint venture ATTEST: City Clerk ATTEST: C CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, a municipal corporation Mayor Memo To: Planning and Zoning Board From: Bennett Boucher, City Manager ��)e CC: Mayor and City Council Mem Morris Reid, Building Official Date: March 20, 2001 Re: Villages of Seaport Escrow agreements. The City of Cape Canaveral has received a request from the Villages of Seaport to modify the existing escrow agreements as indicated in their attached correspondence. The escrow agreement enacted in 1985 provides that the developer shall pay an amount not exceeding $55,000 for traffic light improvements on N. Atlantic Ave. The method of payment is $100 per unit at the time of issuance of a certificate of occupancy. To date $15,619.40 is still available; funds were utilized to install the traffic light that is currently at the intersection of N. Atlantic Ave. and W. Central Blvd. The City of Cape Canaveral is working with Brevard County to construct left turn lanes for the north and southbound sections of N. Atlantic Ave. at this intersection. Our city engineers estimate the construction cost at $109,250. The 1985 escrow agreement also provided that a payment of $100 per unit at the time of issuance of a certificate of occupancy be collected and used for the Ridgewood Ave roadway extension. The amount collected to date is $35,900. The 1987 escrow agreement provided that $12,000 be paid by the developer for sidewalks along the Ridgewood Ave. extension. To date only the $6,000 initial payment has been collected. The Ridgewood Ave. roadway extension is no longer within the City of Cape Canaveral's comprehensive plan, see attached future traffic map. 0 Page 1 f The City Attorney has reviewed this request, and advised that the Planning and Zoning Board needed to review and comment on this request before it goes before the City Council for consideration. This is an ongoing project and there will be a future request by the developer to modify the existing site plan for the construction of the two five story buildings. I would recommend that any modification of these escrow agreements keep in place the intent of improving the traffic and pedestrian flow in and around this development. Representatives from the developer and the homeowners association will be in attendance to address any questions that you all may have about their request to modify these escrow agreements. 0 Page 2 16 W W LL a NW I.L LL Q Z W 2 W J a 2 O W CD L LL O Z c N Y N c Cc C � O N UN ca N L LL CD L C cc O= Z ci O W L O N c �, Cc EN -v O _3: O L c O •N vi �U w N CO co N L N E :r > U w O Q (D cc cn O O a� U C cc c O O a C_ c0 N AlU N N N N a- a) N U c cc c Alu N L LL O Z C N Y to CU c O N U N CQ N L LL O r L c N 4-- 0 O = Z 0 U) ca ca cu �0) CUCd C CL N Q.' z o C N c o cO 4 O QQ U) N Co b O O N � N Q U c cc c O O rn c cc N Q' c U N U) cc n 0 c m O U c cc c '2 L Lel O N co a O U c c6 c u a� L_ O Z c N � N cc C '(14 N UN ca (1) LLL L c cc w '+ O = Z CL O cc cc c L N c6 N N c 0 _ O N Q' N N O L1 O_ El a 2 m o� a) )° w m\� ® � ■ / o c m = — o5o c c . � 3 k\ b a t co 2 2��� ƒ k.0k 7E -) k/ f Uca k 04 R C) m q S o» q �22�f 772 \ 0T Cc (DL C)E COaa) ca E 222\ Q�3E2 �©=2 E LL 40- k o c U a) CL0> 7- 8 i cc \ k = 2 = c 0 $ E Eca cc »c �§ 3E'D k k[ k/ / = " �a00 D 20 $ 00) 06 2 E W c° w a x �CL 75 E/ w $ .2o _ a <® 2 k§ a k 0 101 t¥ k\ § � 2 \ 2CD a c § m Z E cco F CD % 5 E 8/® a f �� f0w �\ c g/ /\ 2CD 0 kk kJ\0cc 2 E = R$ m c 0 t� c E �m Fs a §2 t cc � d k -0 k=kk/ f» c m = � \ § k « Q. k . ; < m @ 2 ° � x & cc � c S S cu $ - S ®$ % % d J n § 7� \ % 2/ a J <e IaOf a N 0 J O LL U) a N H Z LL O z 3 a W m w H a x w a a - z z Q a J W a z U W a U LL O U w 2 H a� qq ti N d' N Q1 a W } w IL M N ti N O W) N w! co N N U) F - z LU CL w Q U J H H Z 2 W LL as 2 W 2 LL H O W o Q � as U Z Om H Q U W W > J W OU U OwC 0 NLLJJ J H W Z Q v) GQ. W a O O W�- a ww O 1i LL W H H Z a, 0O ULL Ln W a Y wF- J LL O wO VW W J m J U d W J J vi CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY HALL ANNEX 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida TUESDAY August 7, 2001 7:00 PM MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Council Members Present: Mayor Pro Tem Buzz Petsos Mayor Rocky Randels Larry Weber Richard Treverton Council Members Absent Burt Bruns Others Present: Bennett Boucher, City Manager Mark McQuagge, City Attorney Susan Stills, City Clerk Andrea Bowers, City Treasurer Ed Gardulski, Public Works Director PRESENTATION: Linda Frank, Waste Management Camp Chance Check for Brevard CO. Sheriff's Office Mr. David Schoenberger, General Manager of Waste Management, presented a check for $850.00 to Officer Dee Meisner and Officer Pam Hibbs for Camp Chance. Camp Chance had 52 attendees from Cape Canaveral during its week of service. Officer Hibbs who initiated the idea of Camp Chance related some of the learning experiences and life changing stories about those who attended the camp. The program allowed the children a chance to become familiar with Law Enforcement in a friendly setting. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor Randels requested if any member of the Council, staff or interested party desired to remove an item from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Mr. Treverton requested to remove Item No. 4 from the Consent Agenda. A motion was made by Mr. Weber and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos to approve Consent Agenda Items No. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 2 1. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of July 17, 2001. 2. Bid Award for Bid No. 01-07, Sewage Force Main and Gravity Sewer Line to Prime Construction Group, Inc. in the Amount of $136,481. 3. Bid Award for Bid No. 01-08, Sewage Lift Station No. 4 Replacement to Santa Cruz Construction, Inc. in the Amount of $109,997.22. 5. Award Bid #01-04, for Concrete Construction Services, to J & S Curb/Concrete. 6. Construction Inspection Services for Lift Station #4 and Sewer Main Projects. 4. Cancellation of Bid Award #01-04, for Washington Avenue Sidewalk. A motion was made by Mr. Treverton and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos to approve the Cancellation of Bid Award #01-04, for the Washington Avenue Sidewalk Leaving Settlement Conditional to Negotiations. Mr. Treverton questioned why the contract was being revoked. Mr. Gardulski explained that the cost to hire a person experienced in the decorative detailing exceeded the contractor's price. Mr. Treverton asked if the concrete installed would be removed. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos expressed his concern that the cost of the installed concrete was excessive for the amount of work performed. Mayor Randels asked the City Attorney if the City was obligated to pay for the concrete installed. Attorney McQuagge deferred to the Public Works Director on the amount for the materials used. Mayor Randels clarified that Mr. Gardulski would negotiate if the cost to remove the concrete installed could be subtracted from the price. Mayor Randels clarified for Mr. Nicholas that the bid would now go to the next lowest bidder, J & S Curb and Concrete. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. ORDINANCES: 7. Motion to Approve: Ordinance No. 01-01, Establishing a Police Protection Referendum Question for the November 2001 Election, for second reading. Mayor Randels read the Ordinance by title. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUBMITTING TO THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY A REFERENDUM QUESTION REGARDING THE MODIFICATION OF AN AD VALOREM TAX FOR POLICE PROTECTION; ESTABLISHING THE DATE FOR THE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; REPEALING ALL PORTIONS OF THE CODE IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 3 Discussion opened prior to a motion. Mr. Boucher referred to statistics submitted by the Sheriff's office for the years 1996 through 2000. Mayor Randels clarified that the data depicted calls for service only. Mr. Treverton stated the he referred to the CAFR for information on the City's fiscal standing and found the City in good financial standing. Mr. Weber reviewed Building Department data and expressed concern with raising taxes in light of new development. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos expressed that a referendum for Fire/Rescue is necessary due to increased staffing needs. Commander (Cmdr.) McGee explained for the Council that case reports were not generated in the data for calls for service. Cmdr. McGee said that the data shown depicts calls from the main call center. Mayor Randels stated that he could not support three tax increases: Police Services and Fire/Rescue now and Stormwater Utility in the near future. Mr. Francis Kuhns, 102 E. Central Blvd., asked for the official percentage of the City's budget that applies to Law Enforcement. Ms. Bowers stated that she would provide Mr. Kuhns with that information. Mr. Kuhns expressed concern with SWAT capability in a small jurisdiction such as Cape Canaveral. Mr. Kuhns expressed that he is not displeased with present Law Enforcement however he desired to see the City have greater control. Mr. Nicholas questioned the amount of millage to dollars. Mr. Boucher stated that a .25 percent millage increase would provide $118,130 in additional funds. Martha Carroll, 112 Washington Avenue, asked if police protection would increase if the referendum does not pass. Mayor Randels explained that due to the 13 percent increase in the City's revenue, the City is able to its maintain the present level of service. Mr. Boucher pointed out the future staffing projections and the need for specific referendum language in order to support the need for the tax. Council agreed by consensus not to proceed with a referendum for modification of an Ad Valorem Tax for Police Protection. This ordinance failed for lack of a motion. 8. Motion to Approve: Ordinance No. 01-02, Establishing a Fire/Rescue Services Referendum Question for the November 2001 Election, for second reading. Mayor Randels read the Ordinance by title. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUBMITTING TO THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY A REFERENDUM QUESTION REGARDING THE MODIFICATION OF AN AD VALOREM TAX FOR FIRE/RESCUE SERVICES; ESTABLISHING THE DATE FOR THE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; REPEALING ALL PORTIONS OF THE CODE IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos and seconded by Mr. Weber to approve Ordinance No. 01-02, Establishing a Fire/Rescue Services Referendum Question for the November 2001 Election, for a second reading. Mr. Boucher referred to data submitted by Chief Sargeant. Mayor Randels stated that the Fire/Rescue has increased in the amount of medical service calls. Mr. Boucher stated that National Fire Protection Association City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 4 adopted a new requirement. Mayor Randels explained the new 2 -in/ 2 -out staff requirement with one in command in response to structure fires. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos stated that more funds would be needed from the General Fund to meet the requirement of this service. Mr. Treverton expressed that he was in favor of a tax increase for Fire/Rescue services up to one mill. Mayor Randels clarified that Council could not lobby for the referendum to the electorate. Mayor Randels explained that if the referendum passed the future Council would decide how to spend the funds for the service. For the record, Mayor Randels spoke in favor of the tax increase. Mr. Boucher restated that the language in the referendum would need to specifically state the need for the increase. Mayor Randels explained for Mr. Weber that the City does not own the Fire station and maintenance for the building is done through the Fire contract. Attorney McQuagge stated that three additional personnel and capital equipment would be included in the referendum language. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For, Mayor Randels, For; Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. RESOLUTIONS: 9. Motion to Adopt: Resolution No. 01-15, Dedication of Public Utility Easement from Suzanne E. Jamieson. Mayor Randels read the resolution by title. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA; DEDICATION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FROM SUZANNE E. JAMIESON FOR THE PURPOSE OF LOCATING PUBLIC UTILITIES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. A motion was made by Mr. Weber and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos to adopt Resolution No. 01-15, Dedication of a Public Utility Easement from Suzanne E. Jamieson. Mayor Randels referred to the map submitted by Public Works in order to explain the scope of the project. Discussion followed in that the owner civic mindedly agreed to provide the easement. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. 10. Motion to Adopt: Resolution No. 01-23, Amending the 200012001 Budget and City Treasurer's Quarterly Report. Mayor Randels read the resolution by title. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA; AMENDING THE ANNUAL GENERAL FUND, SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND, AND SPECIAL REVENUE FUND BUDGETS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2000, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,2001; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos and seconded by Mr. Weber to adopt Resolution No. 01-23, Amending the Annual General Fund, Sewer Enterprise Fund and Special Revenue Fund Budgets for the Fiscal Year Beginning October 1, 2000 and Ending September 30, 2001. Ms. Bowers explained the increase in development has offset City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 5 spending with most funds allocated to Contingency. Mayor Randels clarified the increases for the audience. Ms. Bowers explained that dedicated Capital Expansion Funds were set aside however purchases were not made which left money for the Contingency Fund. Mayor Randels commented favorably on the detailed analysis data that the City Treasurer submitted. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. DISCUSSION: 11. General Fund Reserve Policy. Mayor Randels questioned why there are unallocated as well as allocated reserves. Mayor Randels asked why not leave the savings as is and use cash on hand for expenses? Mr. Boucher explained that the concept is to appropriate funding with foresight toward priority projects. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos expressed concern with sufficient funding in the Escrow account and stated the need for six months capital in reserves. Mr. Treverton asked for an estimate on street paving. Mr. Boucher approximated $80,000 per mile and $1.2 million total. Council agreed to increase the street paving escrow by $200,000 and add $100,000 to the Emergency Fund, with a future goal of $1.5 million. A motion was made by Mr. Treverton and seconded by Mr. Weber to set aside $200,000 per year for the paving portion and $100,000 for financial emergencies in the General Fund Reserve. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. 12. Sewer Main Cost Share. Mr. Gardulski outlined a sample policy for utility line cost sharing, and expressed concern for the hardship on the three families with septic service on Oak Lane and asked for Council's consideration to share the cost of the sewer installation. Mr. Gardulski pointed out the Gravity Main portion of the Oak Lane project. He stated that La Cantina and Circle K are currently on the sewer system. Mayor Randels related how a similar project was done on Long Point Road with a 12 -month payment plan. Mr. Treverton asked if the City could pay for the cost of the line since this was part of the total sewer renovation concept. Mayor Randels commented on fair application of the ordinance in light of past assessments. Mr. Gardulski replied that he researched with St. John's for funding. Mayor Randels stated that he knew of a funding source. Mayor Randels summarized that the consensus is to continue to follow the policy written in the City code Section 78.75. Mr. Boucher stated that a special assessment is required of the affected property owners. Ms. Bowers commented that a 12 -month period is rather stringent for payment and said that three -to -five years seem appropriate. Mr. Boucher stated that staff would develop some financing options along the lines of a special assessment. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 6 13. Legislative Action Items for the Space Coast League of Cities. Mayor Randels requested items from the Council to submit to the Space Coast League of Cities committee meeting in Orlando. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos requested addressing fireworks sales. Mayor Randels related that usage is also a concern. Mr. Treverton concurred. Mr. Boucher recommended stricter domestic violence penalties. Mr. Weber recommended stricter litter laws and fines. 14. City Hall Expansion Options. Mayor Randels expressed the need to proceed with some action on the City Hall expansion. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos questioned the status of using the Library for additional space. Mayor Randels explained that Tom Jenkins, County Manager asked the City to move away from this request. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos stated that the City invested $73,000 in the expansion project and the City should have access to its use. Mr. Boucher related the concerns of Catherine J. Schweinsberg, Library Services Director. Mayor Randels directed the City Manager to insist on an explanation. Mr. Nicholas replied that the City relies on the County for operations and maintenance. Mr. Treverton expressed that the Library community room is beneficial for the residents. He also expressed that the bay areas should remain for storage. Mr. Treverton spoke in favor of purchasing the property adjacent to City Hall for the Building Department. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos expressed leaving the bay for storage as well however he spoke in favor of using Council chambers for the Building Department and moving the Chambers to the Library meeting room. Mr. Boucher stated that, 1) an answer from the County Manager on using the Library Meeting Room and 2) an appraisal on the property at 160 Polk Avenue are two courses of action. Mr. Nicholas asked if expansion of the current building was abandoned. Mayor Randels replied that no support was shown to expand the existing City Hall. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos stated that using the Xeriscape Park became a point of division. Council directed the City Manager to proceed with findings on the previous two courses of action. REPORTS: 1. City Manager • Proposed Reindeer Run Partnership w/Canaveral Port Authority. Mr. Boucher reported that the Business and Cultural Development Board recommended partnering with Canaveral Port Authority for this year's Reindeer Run event only. Mr. Barzelatto's memo outlined how this event would be co- sponsored. Mr. Weber stated that although he favored a co-sponsorship he was concerned with a loss of promotional control. He related how the Board expended great effort in initiating the event. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos concurred with Mr. Weber's concern in that the City invested much time and effort to build the event over previous years. Mr. Treverton asked if the Board chair could explain its rationale to the Council at the next meeting City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 7 2. Staff City Clerk • No report. City Attorney • Attorney McQuagge reported that the City of Cocoa Beach held a closed executive session to discuss whether the Commission should accept or reject the interlocal agreement resolution. He stated that under Chapter 164 we are required to mediate. An agreement was made to submit two names for mediators, Dwight Severs and Rick Torpey. He said that no response is forthcoming from Attorney Sachs regarding mediation, under Chapter 164, the court would appoint arbitration by a third party, if the parties were unable to pick a mediator. Attorney McQuagge informed that the executive session was held in violation of sunshine law. Mr. Boucher requested a copy of the transcript from the Cocoa Beach City Clerk's office in that since we are not in litigation, Cape Canaveral is privy to the records. Attorney McQuagge stated that the Cocoa Beach City Clerk would need to provide what statutory provision was used to deny access to the records requested. Attorney McQuagge asked for the appropriate civil remedy to pursue in order to obtain the transcripts prior to mediation. If Cocoa Beach does not provide records, Attorney McQuagge would like to tum the matter over to the State Attorney's office for action. Council directed staff to allow Cocoa Beach time to consult with their legal counsel and City Commission and afford them the opportunity to respond to the public records request before the City takes any legal action on this matter. Mr. Boucher related that a joint resolution would require a vote at a public meeting. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Petsos and seconded by Mr. Treverton to extend the meeting to no later than 10:30 P.M. Motion carried 4-0 with voting as follows: Mayor Pro Tem Petsos, For; Mayor Randels, For; Mr. Treverton, For and Mr. Weber, For. 3. City Council Mr. Weber • Mr. Weber thanked the Police Department for the National Night Out. • Mr. Weber recognized the City Clerk's attendance at her first year in the Florida Public Personnel Academy. • Mr. Weber asked if there was any to way to reduce the paper flow and provide this information electronically. The Clerk's office will work on this issue. Mr. Treverton • Mr. Treverton reported on using his laptop computer and agreed with further use of electronic communication. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 8 Mayor Pro Tem Petsos Mayor Pro Tem Petsos asked the City Manager for the status on the broken sidewalks on Pierce Avenue and on Cherie Down Park due to new construction. He requested a letter regarding what can be done and if not, to provide an explanation. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos asked for a date from Florida Power and Light on the street light installation on N. Atlantic and SR AIA. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos asked the City Treasurer to provide data for the fire hydrant rental for the next Council meeting. Mayor Randels • Mayor Randels questioned the status on the insurance claims regarding Joyce Stachel, the First Interstate swimming pool and Geraldine Miller. Mr. Boucher replied that Council was provided a copy of Attorney McQuagge's opinion on the Stottler property. He also responded that the Stachel case was extended into September and depositions are in progress on the Miller case. • Mayor Randels referred to a fax from Citizens for Florida's Waterways. Ron Pritchard requested to address the Council. Council members did not support this request. • Mayor Randels reported that Longboat Key has an ordinance on invasive plants making it illegal for homeowner's to grow such plants. Mayor Randels asked if there were any interest? Mr. Boucher responded that he would look into current City code. • Mayor Randels announced that the Brevard County delegation of the State legislators would hold a meeting and asked if Council had any items to forward. Mayor Pro Tem Petsos responded that legislative items would proceed through the Space Coast League of Cities. • Mayor Randels reported that Troy Rice of St. John's River Water Management needed feedback regarding available funding for a baffle box on International Drive. Mr. Boucher responded that Gordon England and Ed Gardulski are working on the application. • Mayor Randels referred to a letter from Mr. Hans Saurenmann. Mr. Boucher responded that the Public Works Director wrote a report on the City's action taken and a copy was submitted to the City Attorney. The City Attorney responded that the City cleared pepper trees within the right-of-way. Mr. Boucher responded that Mr. Saurenmann did not identify his damages. • Mayor Randels reported that the Wildflower license plate ranks 17'' of the license plates purchased out of 54 specialty license plates. • Mayor Randels asked if notification of Council's action on the Ridgewood pedway concept at the previous City Council meeting was provided to homeowner groups. Mr. Boucher responded that the minutes were adopted at this meeting and copies would be forwarded to those interested parties. • Mayor Randels reported that the Ocean Oaks Condominium Association asked for a proposal for a Quitclaim deed of the 50 -foot right-of-way on Ridgewood Avenue. Mr. Boucher responded that this request would first proceed to the Planning and Zoning Board. • Mayor Randels inquired about the Ridgewood road presentation to the Villages of Seaport and asked if Tom Downs received notification of the Council's decision to allow the easement to expire. Members affirmed Mr. Down's presence at the meeting when City of Cape Canaveral, Florida City Council Regular Meeting August 7, 2001 Page 9 the action was taken. Mr. Boucher responded that the escrow agreement would be an item on the next agenda. Mayor Randels reported a project by the St. John's River Water Management District to install a 30 -inch water main along SR 528 extending into the Port Canaveral. Mayor explained that just north of State Road 3, the County has a new sewer treatment plant and reclaimed water is injected into the ground. Mayor Randels would like to propose to the County a reclaimed water line from State Road 3 to the Port branching into the City's line. He explained how this proposed line could benefit Port, Cape Canaveral, Cocoa Beach as well as Patrick Air Force Base who receives water from Cocoa Beach. Mayor Randels explained that the line could be installed during the open -trenching process. Attorney McQuagge was not able to explain any affects of this proposal on the interlocal agreement. • Mr. Weber inquired about mowing on Ridgewood Avenue behind Cape View Elementary School. Mr. Boucher responded that he would look into the status. AUDIENCE TO BE HEARD: Mr. Leo Nicholas Mr. Nicholas asked if the City would notify Harbor Heights residents of the sewer line installation. Mr. Nicholas questioned if consideration was given to any affect of new development on the City's sewer capacity. Mr. Boucher responded the quarterly concurrency data is performed that encumbers new development. Mr. Boucher replied to Mr. Nicholas that the total monthly average is 900,000 gallons per day and is the City is permitted for 1.8 million gallons per day. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 10:40 P.M. Rocky Randels, MAYOR Susan Stills, CITY CLERK Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA Heading Consent Item 2 No. Exhibits Attached: AGENDA REPORT CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: CONSENT: AWARD NO. 01-09, TENNIS COURT RESURFACING, TO THE NIDY COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,900 DEPT./DIVISION: PARKS & RECREATION Requested Action: City Council consider the award of Bid No. 01-09, tennis court resurfacing, to the Nidy Company in the amount of $14,900 as recommended by the recreation director. Summary Explanation & Background: See attached memo from the recreation director. I recommend approval. Exhibits Attached: Recreation director's memo and supporting documents City M Office i ' Department PARKS & RECREATION 11 ydocum tsl�il\meeting\2001\08-21-01\01-09.doc CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 7'300 N. ATLANTIC AVENUE * P.O. BOX 326 (321) 868422' E-mail address: parknrecou.net MEMO TO: City Mangier, Mayor & Councihnembers I FROM: Nancy Hanson, Parks & Recreation Director /, DATE: August 16, 2001 RE: Tennis Court. Repair/Resurfacing Contract The bid opening for the repair & resurfacing of the tennis courts was held at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 12, 2001. The low bidder, D & B Tennis of Sebring, bid a resurfacing product, Sport Surfaces International, Inc., not the material of choice, California Products. The next lowest bidder, The Nidy Company, uses California Products exclusively. Using California Products gives the City a double warranty, from the contractor as well as S-om California Products, both of who has an excellent reputation among the reereators in the state. Our tennis courts have been resurfaced by both The Nidy Company, and more recently, D & B Tennis (in 19997). With the severity of the problems with our courts, I feel much more confident that the Nidy Company has the capability of properly repairing & resurfacing our courts. Nidy is located in Sanford and has been in the business of building and repairing/resurfaeing tennis and shuffleboard courts since 1924. It has been my experience with The Nidy Company that generally the job is done right the first time but if there is a problem, they are very responsive and correct any problems immediately. I strongly recommend that the contract for repairing/resurfacing the five tennis courts at the Recreation Center be awarded by the Nidy Company in the amount $14,900.00. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida RESULTS OF BID OPENING DATE:��4 TIME: PLACE: �,, �� IV411 Staff Presenter,5,,„,_�A„ 4 &, dzea� ITEM(S) FOR WHICH BIDS WERE RECEIVED: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. /)) -d � - n Y d','<f COMPANY CITY & STATE 6, .%Hd,e 5v,l u, e , CL PROPOSAL TENNIS COURTS RESURFACING Five Courts RFP NO. 01-09 Proposal of: (Name) The Nidy Company P. 0. Box 730 Sanford, FL 32771 (Address) to provide the City of Cape Canaveral with "Tennis Courts Resurfacing". The City of Cape Canaveral is located in Central Brevard County on the East Coast of Florida. TO: Susan Stills, City Clerk City of Cape Canaveral 105 Polk Avenue Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 The undersigned PROPOSER has carefully examined the Contract Documents, and is familiar with the nature and extent of the service required. The undersigned agrees to perform the requested service, in the manner prescribed therein, in accordance with The Contract Documents. Proposer shall attach a Proposal Sheet to this Form describing the work to be performed. TOTAL COST: $14,900-00 City of Cape Canaveral, Florid Tennis Court Resurfacing Proposal Page 2 The undersigned also agrees as follows: 1. The contract will be effective immediately upon approval by the City Council. 2. Terms, conditions and rates proposed must be binding for 120 days from Proposal due date. Dated this 13th day of August .3 2001. Respectfully submitted, The Nidy Company (Company or corporation name) P. 0. Box 730 (Street address, P.O. Box) Sanford, FL 32772 (City, Sta , code) B ynn S. Nidy, President Y (Signature, Title) _marc acC all -!andball 3asketball �a S20al -,nln^ Greers .AinlaY. 'e Golf 'acdie Tennis 3 icce Multipurpose ollecball lasesnoe -co'bai For L_s J L— Gcf.- P.O. BOX 730 SANFORD, FLORIDA 32772-0730 PROPOSAL City of Cape Canaveral Attn: Susan Stills, City Clerk 105 Polk Avenue Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 CHIS COUNT A,y Gl v 8t1IL0.FS ASSOCIATION 2300 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TELEPHONE (407) 330-9466 RFP NO. 01-09 DATE: August 13, 2001 Our price for work on five (5) tennis courts, as noted below, is the lump sum of Fourteen Thousand Nine Hundred and 00/100 dollars ($14,900.00). Payment to be upon completion. Price subject to change after 30 days. SCOPE OF WORK 1) Clean surface of courts to remove dirt and mold. 2) Machine sand surface of courts. 3) Patch large open cracks 1/16" or larger with acrylic patch mix. 4) Install a 6" wide fiberglass membrane over repaired cracks. 5) Flood courts with water and after all surrounding areas have dried, patch remaining areas holding water over the thickness of a nickel with acrylic patch mix. 6) Apply one (1) coat of Acrylic Resurfacer over entire surface of courts. surface of courts. 7) Apply three (3) coats of California Products Corporation Fortified Plexipave color coating over entire surface of courts. 8) Paint regulation tennis court markings with white textured line paint. 9) Paint existing net posts. 10) Reinstall five (5) existing tennis nets. SPECIAL NOTE: Should owner request additional coating material applied or other work performed to surface of court which is not outlined in items 1 - 10, it will be at extra cost. Contractor does not warrant existing cracks or new cracks from coming thru new color system. By owner or other Provide access for equipment and water as required. COLOR SELECTION: INBOUNDS BORDER -l:,ess Trails ACCEPTED DATE the parties agree that in the event that payment is not made as provided herein, Contractor may terminate this contract, refuse to complete any work remaining pursuant to the contract, and any alternate proposals, amendments, changes, or modifications thereto, and sue for the payment due, plus any work performed by contractor up until the date of termination, including a reasonable profit and overhead, court costs, attorney's fees (including attorney's fees incurred in arbitration and administrative proceedings and all state and federal actions and appeals), and interest at the rate of 1 Y•-% per month, 18% per year. In the event of litigation of this contract, venue of same shall lie in Seminole County, Florida and the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs from the non -prevailing party. Insurance certificates and Licenses Provided upon Request *Any changes or additions to standard coverage at additional cost Th, _ _. ' " By DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION IDENTICAL TIE BIDS — In accordance with F.S. 287.087, preference shall be given to businesses with drug—free workplace programs. Whenever two or more bids that are equal with respect to price, quality, and service are received by the :State or by any political subdivision for the procurement of commodities or contractual services, a bid received from a business that certifies that it has implemented a drug-free workplace program shall be given preference in the award process. Established procedures for processing tie bids will be followed if none of the tied vendors have a drug-free workplace program. In order to have a drug—free workplace program, a business shall: Publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition. 2. Inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's policy of maintaining a drug—free workplace, any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs, and the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. 3. Give each employee engaged in providing the commodities or contractual services that are under bid a copy of the statement specified in subsection (1). 4. In the statement specified in subsection (1), notify the employees that, as a condition of working on the commodities or contractual services that are under bid, the employee will abide by the terms of the statement and will notify the employer of any conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, any violation of chapter 893 or of any controlled substance law of the Untied States or any state, for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction. 5. Impose a sanction on, or require the. satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program if such is available in the employee's community, by any employee who is so convicted. 6. Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug—free workplace through implementation of this section. As the person authorized to sign the statement, I certify that this firm complies fully with the above requirements. The Nidy C Lynn S. Nidy, President City of Cape Canaveral tEQUEST FOR BID i COURT RESURFACING (Five courts) NO. 01-09 Notice is hereby given that sealed bids will be received by the City Clerk, City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida until 2:00 P.M. on August 14, 2001, at which time bids will be publicly opened and read immediately after the closing time in the City Hall Annex, 111 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, Florida for the following: REQUEST FOR BID NO. 01-09 TENNIS COURTS RESURFACING No bids shall be received after the time and date specified. All bids must be in compliance with the specifications as announced. The City reserves the right to withdraw this request for bid at any time to protect its best interests. All interested parties are asked to contact the City Clerk's Office at (321) 868-1221 to request bid forms and specifications. All bids must be submitted on forms provided by the City. Bids must be enclosed, sealed and marked on the outside of the envelope with Bid No. 01-09 and the name of the Bid, and mailed or hand delivered to the Office of the City Clerk, Cape Canaveral, P.O. Box 326, 105 Polk Avenue, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals (or part thereof) received as a result of this Bid. The City also reserves the right to waive informalities or technicalities or to award in the best interest of the City and to negotiate in strict accordance with the laws and ordinances governing the City. Susan Stills, CMC City Clerk City of Cape Canaveral 105 Polk Avenue • Post Office Box 326 • Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-0326 Telephone (321) 868-1200 • FAX (321) 799-3170 • fcn.state.fl.us/cape/ e-mail: cape@iu.net City of Cape Canaveral ) SPECIFICATIONS FOR TENNIS COURT IROJECT/CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL (Five Tennis Courts) All materials intended for installation on site must arrive in unopened, clearly marked containers. The Recreation Director reserves the right to examine any container and reject those that are not in compliance with the requirements in this contract. All materials that are stored on City property and are intended for installation, shall remain the property of, and be in control of, the contractor. Any damage to City property due to improper storage shall be remedied by the contractor. Should an accident occur, the contractor shall remove the soil to the depth required to recapture the spillage, dispose of the contaminated soil and replace it with clean fill. All containers, machinery, and tools shall be removed from the site within 24 hours after completion of the project and prior to the processing of any invoice for final payment. All damage to grass and shrubs occurring within a distance of 6" from the edge of any surface which occurs as a result of the contractors application of materials shall be remedied by the contractor at no additional cost to the City of Cape Canaveral. Repairs made as a result of damage must be guaranteed for a period of 90 days. Should the replacement grass or shrub die in that period, the contractor shall replace the materials continually until the area is re-established. The owner will only continue standard and customary practices for maintenance of the areas during re-establishment period, owners personnel shall not be tasked with extraordinary watering or maintenance. SPECIFICATIONS MATERIAL HANDLING AND STORAGE A. Store materials in accordance with manufacturer's instructions: protect from extremes of weather, temperature, moisture and other damage. 105 POLK AVENUE 0 POST OFFICE BOX 326 • CAPE CANAVERAL. FL 329200326 B. Deliver materials to site in manufacturer's original sealed containers with proper labels attached. PRODUCTS Acceptable Manufacturers A. California Products Corporation. B. Other Manufacturers: Submit substitution request if in accordance with these specifications. C. Materials: 1. Patching Mix (Court Patch Binder) for the use in cracks, holes, depressions (bird baths) and other imperfections in the surface. This material wi71 be used in accordance with manufacture's specifications with regard to sand sizes, prime coats, and depth of depression, hold or crack. 2. Cracks filler -for use in fine cracks and for minor cosmetic thin repairs and fills prior to filler course. 3. 100% Acrylic Filler Course (Acrylic Resurfacer) Description: The Filler Course (Acrylic Resurfacer) shall be California Acrylic Resurfacer or an approved equal and consist of a 100% acrylic emulsion binder containing no vinyl co -polymerization constituent and no asbestos fillers. The product shall contain no less than 4% attapulgite and have a pigment volume concentration not to exceed 9.5%. 4. Description - Job Mixed Fortified Plexipave color base or approved equal blended in accordance with the manufacturer's specification number 10.12 shall consist of lightfast mineral oxide pigments and fillers, uniformly dispersed in a non -oxidizing 100% acrylic base. D. Material Specifications: 1. California Acrylic Resurfacer - 1. Percent solids by weight (minimum) 26.7% 2. Percent solids by volume (minimum) 22.9% 3. Weight per gallon (minimum) 8.7-8.9 lbs. 2. Court Patch Binder 1. Percent solids by weight 46.5% 2. Percent solids by volume (minimum) 44.0% 3. Weight per gallon 8.7-8.9 lbs. 3. Crack Filler 1. Percent solids by weight (minimum) 85.6% 2. Percent solids by volume (minimum) 73.6% 3. Weight per gallon (minimum) 15 lbs. 4. Plexichrome - A 100% acrylic emulsion binder containing no vinyl co -polymerization constituent. It is totally asbestos free and contains no less than 8% by weight Chrome Oxide Green pigment (other colors and their pigments correspond) and has a pigment volume concentration not exceeding 35%. 1. Percent solids by weight (minimum) 36.5% 2. Percent solids by volume (minimum) 23.8% 3. Weight per gallon 10.0-10.2 lbs. 5. Plexipave Color Base - A 100% acrylic emulsion binder containing no vinyl co -polymerization constituent. It is totally asbestos free and contains no more than 63% Silica Sand (highly graded and rounded) and no more than 10% Aluminum Silicates. Pigment volume concentration does not exceed 76%. 1. Percent solids by weight (minimum) 74% 2. Percent solids by volume (minimum) 58.6% 3. Weight per gallon (minimum) 13.1-14.1 lbs. 6. Storage Stability - After 30 days storage in a sealed container at normal temperatures (50 degrees F-90 degrees F) the product shall not become hard packed no show signs of mold growth or spoilage. APPLICATION SPECS -ASPHALT SURFACES-PLEMPAVE SYSTEM Description: The specification covers the application of a new wearing surface texture for Plexipave Tennis Courts and new or existing asphalt concrete tennis courts that have a sound, well -drained base of adequate thickness and stability. Existing surfaces should be properly sloped for good drainage, and free from cracks. The process consists of the repair of any minor depressions, followed by application of the Plexipave System. NOTE: The success of the all-weather characteristics of resurfacing is dependent on a sound base (with good drainage) and asphalt concrete meeting the requirements of the National Asphalt Paving Association and the US. Tennis Court and Track Builders Association. Surface variation should not exceed 1/8" in 10 ft. when measured in any direction with a straightedge and a slope of one inch in 10 ft., all in one plane. 1. Plexipave Court Patch Binder - Shall comply with the Specification 10.14 of California Products Corporation. 2. Plexipatch - Shall comply with the Specification 10.21 of California Products Corporation. 3. Fiberglass Membrane. -3- 4. Acrylic Resurfacer - Shall comply with the Specification 10.8 of California Products Corporation. 5. Plexipave Acrylic Filler Coats - Shall conform to Specification 10.5 of California Products Corporation. 6. Plexichrome Acrylic Finish Coat - Shall conform to Specification 10.1 of California Products Corporation. 7. Plexicolor Line Paint - Shall conform to Specification 10.4 of California Products Corporation. S. Water - The water used in all mixtures shall be fresh and potable and will be provided by the City of Cape Canaveral. 1.1 Surface Preparation: The surface to be coated must be sound, smooth, and free from dust, dirt, and oily materials. All mildew is to be removed by means of power scrubbing or pressure washing with use of diluted chlorine. 1.2 All cracks 1/8" or greater in width shall be cleaned out and filled with acrylic patch material. All repaired areas shall be flush with surrounding surfacing. If not they shall be ground or sanded as needed to make them flush and even. 1.3 Patching: Prior to the application of surfacing materials, the entire surface should be checked for minor depressions or irregularities. After the courts have been flooded, any depressions covering a nickel shall be corrected by the following method. Depressions and irregularities shall be filled with Court Patch Binder according to specifications using the following mix: 100 lbs. 60-80 mesh silica sand (dry) 3 gallons Plexipave Court Patch Binder 1 to 2 gallons Portland Cement (dry) (depending on humidity and temperature) Tack Coat - Tack coat is necessary under patches only and shall be as follows: Plexipave Court Patch Binder diluted 1 part Court Patch binder to 2 parts water and allow to thoroughly dry prior to patching. 2.0 Fiberglass Installation: Fiberglass shall be installed over the prepared cracks. The fiberglass shall be 10x20 mesh resin coated, minimum 6" wide. The fiberglass shall be rolled out into Plexibond or Acrylic Resurfacer and stretched tight; the tack coat shall be applied using a "wet on wet" method. Tack coat shall be diluted per manufacturers recommendation. -4- 3.0 Surface Course Preparation: In order to thoroughly mask and embed the fiberglass membrane, a minimum of two coats of California Acrylic Resurfacer shall be placed on the cured fiberglass membrane. The application rate per coat shall be .05-.07 gallons per square yard prior to dilution. One full application of Acrylic Resurfacer shall be applied to entire court surface after coating with fiberglass. Dilute with water and sand utilizing the following mix: Acrylic Resurfacer 55 gallons Sand (60-80 mesh) 600-900 lbs. Water 20-40 gallons NOTE: Additional coats may be necessary to completely hide the texture of the fiberglass membrane. If finer sand is used, do not exceed 700 lbs. per 55 gallons of Acrylic Resurfacer. 4.0 Plexipave Color Base & Plexichrome: Fortified Plexipave shall be applied by rubber -bladed squeegee on the clean, dry surface in 3 applications to obtain a total quanity of not less than .15 nor more than .23 gallons per square yard of area, based on the material prior to any dilution. No application shall be covered by a succeeding application until thoroughly cured. Fortified Plexipave shall be blended utilizing the following mix: Plexipave Color Base 30 gallons Plexichrome 20 gallons Water 20 gallons The diluted material shall be homogeneous. Segregation before or during application will not be permitted. The finished surface shall have a uniform appearance and be free from ridges and tool marks. 4.1 Playing Lines: Four hours minimum after completion of the color coating resurfacing, 2 -inch wide playing lines with 3" base line shall be accurately located, marked and painted with Plexicolor textured line paint as specified by the U.S. Tennis Association. 4.2 Paint: Paint tennis posts and ratchet reels with green metal paint. Weather Limitations: No parts of the construction involving the Plexipave System conducted during rainfall, or when rainfall is imminent. The air temperature must be at least 50 degrees F and rising. Do not apply when surface temperature is above 140 degrees F. -5- Note: Contractor will note any additional repairs to tennis courts that is not covered under the above work and price separately. SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR TENNIS COURT RESURFACING t. Contractor Qualification - Bids will only be considered from firms regularly engaged in this type of work and who have an established reputation in the construction and resurfacing of tennis courts. The contractor shall furnish to the satisfaction of the owner, proof of previous experience in all-weather tennis court construction and resurfacing. 2. EXPERIENCE-- The Contractor will submit a list of all-weather tennis courts they have constructed or resurfaced during the past three years. The list shall contain: owner, location, number of courts, and year constructed or resurfaced. 3. MATERIALS - All materials used shall be from a manufacturer that has regularly engaged in the manufacturing of these products for a minimum of five years and must meet the product specifications attached. The manufacturer will provide written information to the owner that all products used are 100% acrylic latex systems (no vinyl combination systems) and are free of asbestos fillers. This system is composed of a color concentrate and a neutral non -pigmented acrylic with round sand. A color concentrate mixed with local sand will not be considered equaL If other than the standard specified, the contractor shall submit at least four days prior to the bid date, at their own expense, a complete typewritten list of all such proposed substitutions together with sufficient data, drawings, samples, literature, and other detailed information as will demonstrate to the satisfaction of the owner that the proposed substitute material is equal in quality and utility of any proposed material, such test shall be made at the expense of the contractor by an established and unbiased testing laboratory approved by the owner. The all-weaiher surfacing materials specified herein are products of California Products Corporation, 169 Waverly Street, Cambridge, MA 02139 or an approved equal. The specification requires the provision of a complete surfacing system of specially formulated materials, each compatible with the other, which, when properly installed, will produce a high-quality of all-weather surface. Under no circumstances will a surfacing system comprised of several products produced or manufactured from different sources be considered. 4. METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION - The filler and finish courses shall be applied by squeegees and brooms. Mechanical spray equipment and spreaders will not be permitted. All materials will be delivered to the job E� site in their original unopened containers where they will be checked by the owner. All methods of construction must be submitted to the owner for approval. Manufacturer's direct representative must be readily available to the owner during resurfacing. 5. OWNER'S RIGHT TO TEST MATERIAL - The owner reserves the right to sample materials both as delivered to the job site in unopened drums and after dilution and nuxing prior to applications. Such testing shall be by an independent laboratory of the owner's choice to assure that the materials meet the standards set by this specification. 6. SURFACING SYSTEM SHALL BE ASBESTOS FREE - Contractor must complete and sign an asbestos free affidavit before final inspection. Failure to do so constitutes non-compliance with these specification. 7. MSS DOCUMENTATION - Upon request, contractor must be able to provide Material Safety Data Sheet documentation for all materials used to satisfy contract. 8. SUBMISSION OF SUBSTITUTE MATERIALS - If other than products specified, the contractor shall submit at least ten 0 0? working days prior to the bid date a complete type written list of all such proposed substitutions together with sufficient data, drawings, samples, literature, and other detailed information as will demonstrate to the satisfaction of the owner that the proposed substitute material is equal in quality to the originally specified. -7- Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA Heading Consent Item 3 No. event, and they have no intention of turning this event over to another agency. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: CONSENT: PROPOSED ANNUAL REINDEER 5K RUN DEPT./DIVISION: LEGISLATIVE Requested Action: City Council consider approval of the Business & Cultural Development Board's recommendation regarding the annual Reindeer 5K Run. Summary Explanation & Background: City Council had asked for clarification that this would remain a City of Cape Canaveral community event to benefit the United Way of Brevard County. Both the board and the United Way plan and prepare for this annual event, and they have no intention of turning this event over to another agency. NOTE* An outdoor entertainment permit will have to be considered at a later date. I recommend approval. Exhibits Attached: United Way's letter dated 8/15/01; Board's memo dated 7/23/01 City 's Office Department LEGISLATIVE ca Kim\myaocu ents fain\council\meehng\20UI\08-21-0I\5k.doc AUG -15-;7i WED J5:22 PM UNITED WAY OF BREVARD FAX .40. 4075312007 P. 01 August 15, 2001 Mr,l3ennett Boucher City Manager City of Gape Canaveral 105 Poll, Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-0326 Dear Bennett; Per my recent conversation with Kim McIntire regarding the concerns of the Cape Canaveral City Council with regard to changes to the Reindeer Run, I would like to present the position of our United Way, The Reindeer Run has truly become a special fundraising event. In five years, city staff has grown the event into one in which the City Council should take great pride. Our United Way has worked hand in hand with your staff to ensure the continued success of the event. The 2000 event was tremendous, having been selected as a Space Coast Runners Runner of the Year Series event really provided the event with a new level of respectability. I believe that as the 2000 event inorc than double in participation is testimony to that fact. However, this drastic change also brought to light several issues of concern such as. • Parking • back of bathroom facilities (those at the park were insufficient for the number of attendees — several were blocked up before the race even began) • 1'raffic Control • main contingency As you may remember, staff met with you to discuss possible changes that could be made to the event to make it even better, attempting to address these issues. One of the thoughts was that having Port Canaveral as a sponsor would enable us to better address these issues. Our United Way remains supportive of the Reindeer Run and in the City of Cape Canaveral as the load entity responsible for the success of the event. Adding fort Canaveral as a sponsor of the event would only help to continue the success we have been witness to over the past five years. AUG -15-01 WED 3523 PM UN:TED JAY CF 3REVARD FAX N0. 4076312007 P. 32 X hope this holps better explain the thought process that staff undertook when attempting to improve the Reindeer Runt. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact Inc at 631-2740. Sincerely, Suzanne A. Sparling Vicc President, Communication United Way of Brevard County, Inc. City Manager's Office Memo To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL From: JOVAN BARZELATTO, CHAIRMAN, BUSINESS & CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD CC: BENNETT C. BOUCHER, CITY MANAGER Date: July 23, 2001 Re: PROPOSED REINDEER RUN PARTNERSHIP WITH CANAVERAL PORT AUTHORITY At our July 18, 2001 meeting, the board unanimously voted to forward the following recommendation to the Cape Canaveral City Council: That the City of Cape Canaveral enter into a Reindeer Run 5K Run & Walk partnership with the Canaveral Port Authority. Staff reported that this proposed partnership was presented and unanimously approved by the port commissioners at their July 18, 2001 meeting. This change of venue would allow the participants to view the new landscaping and construction at the port as well as the improvements made to Jetty Park. The proposed staging area and start/finish of the event would be at Cruise Terminal 4 where there is ample parking. The proposed course would commence at the cruise terminal and take the participants through the port and out onto N. Atlantic Avenue, into the City of Canaveral to the Harbor Heights subdivision. Participants would loop around the entrance median back onto N. Atlantic Avenue and proceed through scenic Jetty Park, ending at the cruise terminal. The board is also recommending that the event commence at 8:30 a.m. Commitments have been received from port security, the CCVFD and Sheriffs Department to provide assistance with traffic control, street closures and use of police/fire rescue equipment. The Business & Cultural Development Board has always stressed the importance of including the port in city events and we feel this would be a "win/win" situation. We respectfully request approval to enter into a partnership with the Canaveral Port Authority for the 6h Annual Reindeer 5K Run & Walk. 0 Page 1 Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA Heading Consent Item 4 No. Exhibits Attached: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: CONSENT: WASHINGTON PARK DECORATIVE SIDEWALK PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,340 TO J&S CURB & CONCRETE DEPT./DIVISION: PUBLIC WORKS Requested Action: City Council authorize the Washington Park decorative sidewalk project to J&S Curb & Concrete in the amount of $26,340, as recommended by the public works director. Summary Explanation & Background: J&S Curb & Concrete has the city bid for this type of work and funding is to be appropriated from the beautification fund. Exhibits Attached: Public works director's memo dated 08-16-01 City M Office j' Department PUBLIC WORKS cap 'm'vmvdoc mentsa ouncil\meeting\2001\08-21-01\j&s.doc MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett C. Boucher City Manager FROM: Ed Gardulski Public Works Director DATE: August 16, 2001 SUBJECT: City Council Agenda Item for August 21, 2001 Washington Park Decorative Sidewalk Project Award On August 7 h, 2001 City Council awarded the Bid 0 1 -04 to the J&S Curb as the City of Cape Canaveral annual concrete contractor. In addition, it was the Council's desire for staff to construct a 5 -foot wide colored imprinted sidewalk located at the Washington Park. J&S Curb has agreed to construct a 5 -foot sidewalk at the unit bid price. The following is a summary of the cost for the sidewalk: 75 yard of concrete for imprinted design is $19,743.75, the additional red color for 75 yards of concrete is $6,595.50, for a total project cost of $26,339.25. Recommend the construction of the Washington Park sidewalk project by J&S Curb for the amount not to exceed $26,339.25, the appropriation of the necessary funds and wave the City's building permit fee. I a 8 lefflomfell Inc. 1707 Elm St. Suite L) Rockledge, FL 32955 321-6321-5333 ( Phone 321-614-5744 1* Fax NAME; ADDRESS City -of terve 6a80,wwmd lEd CvwdalsM 8611-1240 7"-49W Estimate DATE ESTIMATE NO PROJECT .AUG 15 2001 _.. ._- - — ----- T--'* _ --- ' -'- ' ' ' L)ESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QTY humill 1200 LF of 5'4" dddewWk Colored conwete wlffi Iftw mesh 26339.25 TOTAL SIGMA -URE 026339-25 Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA Heading Considerations Item 5 No. 20 -ft. emergency fire lane, and drafting of an ordinance. AGENDA REPORT CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION: PETITION FOR ACTION TO ABANDON A PORTION OF THE HARBOR DRIVE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DEPT./DIVISION: LEGISLATIVE Requested Action: City Council review the petition for action to abandon a portion of the Harbor Drive road right-of-way. Petitioners are Mrs. Rhonda Lee and Mr. Raymond McGhee. Summary Explanation & Background: The next step in the process is to send this item to the Planning & Zoning Board for a recommendation. There will be a cost to the city for survey work, obtaining proper legal descriptions and reserving utility easements and a 20 -ft. emergency fire lane, and drafting of an ordinance. Exhibits Attached: Petition; City codes City 1Varfag�''s Office Department LEGISLATIVE _cagvKim,myaoc mentsv councilvmeeting\2001M-21-U1\harbor.doe j 'i710N_ loa.vor City Hall Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Re: Petition for Abandonment Dear Honorable City Council, It is respectfully requested that the lot located east of lot 100 and west of lot 19 on Harbor Drive be abandoned. This lot is a right of way and the city council has determined that a roadway is not going to be built on this property. It is further requested that the location of the 20 ft. width of emergency fire lane requested by the fire department be retained by the city and located in the center of the lot rwuiing north and south. It is noted that the city is to retain any utility easement required with the remaining portion of the lot being divided equally between the adjacent property owners. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, �Vceh*eeelon 396 Harbor Dr. Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 o a Lee 400 Harbor Dr. Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 cc: City Manager August 14, 2001 c:::s D City Council---�----- City Hall Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Re: Petition for Abandonment Dear Honorable City Council, It is respectfully requested that the lot located east of lot 100 and west of lot 19 on Harbor Drive be abandoned. This lot is a right of way and the city council has determined that a roadway is not going to be built on this property. It is further requested that the location of the 20 ft. width of emergency fire lane requested by the fire department be retained by the city and located in the center of the lot rwuiing north and south. It is noted that the city is to retain any utility easement required with the remaining portion of the lot being divided equally between the adjacent property owners. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, �Vceh*eeelon 396 Harbor Dr. Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 o a Lee 400 Harbor Dr. Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 cc: City Manager Parcel Info � 0 .� -View -- .ick Action: Distance Dccreaec Axxn Ilam Ac,ial V,e%v Range I Inueas • Map Aerial ,~''�, .t i�vir�'i�►:`>2t:'%1:•i�ti.Ji�::.-�,--�r::l (hanna .-C\JG��4a4 '4105 1104 � 103 1 102 1101 i 100 I 96 X9798 99 ;� 1 �38 36 35 � / 37 34 � I Locate - -- Parcel ID - Locate 1 s Zoom to Brevard County -j Go -Printable Version 19 Map IPreview Check below then Update Parcels r GollCou-ses 60 Schools r Libraries r RoadNames r Sections �n Water Update elp Legend Page 1 o1', l http://205.172.172.144/webmap/temp/graFrame2001081008 l7454935.litml 08/10/2001 DocumentFrame PART II CODE OF ORDINANCES Chapter 66 STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES* ARTICLE II. STREETS* DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 66-27. Speed bumps, Secs. 66-28--66-35. Reserved. DIVISION 2. ABANDONMENT Sec. 66-36. Authority. Page 1 of 2 The city council, with respect to property under its control, may in its own discretion and of its own motion or upon the request of any agency of the state, county or of the federal government or upon petition of any person is authorized and empowered to: (1) Vacate, abandon, discontinue and close any existing public street, alleyway, road, highway or other place used for travel or any portion thereof, other than a state, county or federal highway or road, and to renounce and disclaim any right of the city and the public in and to any land in connection therewith; (2) Renounce and disclaim any right of the city and the public in and to any land or interest therein acquired by purchase, gift, devise, dedication or prescription for street, alleyway, road or highway purposes, other than lands acquired for state, county and federal highways; and (3) Renounce and disclaim any right of the city and the public in and to land, other than land constituting or acquired for a state, county or federal highway, delineated on any recorded map or plat as a street, alleyway, road or highway. (Code 1981, § 501.05(A)) Sec. 66-37. Petition for action. The request for abandonment of any street by any agency of the state, county or of the United States or of any person to the city council to take action shall be in writing and shall be by petition on a form provided by the city. (Code 1981, § 501.06) Sec. 66-38. Petition procedure. (a) The petition for requests for abandonment of city streets shall be filed with the city clerk. The petition is reviewed by the planning and zoning board. The planning and zoning board shall issue a recommendation. .(b) The planning and zoning board's recommendation shall be presented to the city council for review. The city council shall review the recommendation and approve or disapprove the petition. (Code 1981, § 501.07) Sec. 66-39. Ordinance required. Before any such street shall be closed and vacated or before any right of interest or the city or public in any land delineated on any recorded map or plat as a street shall be renounced and disclaimed, the city council shall adopt an ordinance. The ordinance shall be recorded in the records of the county. (Code 1981, § 501.06) Secs. 66-40--66-60. Reserved. http://f...Iom_isapi.dll?infobase=12642.nfo&record={BO2}&softpage=newDocumentFram 08/17/2001 Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA Heading Considerations Item 6 No. Exhibits Attached: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION: ECONOMIC DEVEOPMENT COMMISSION, BOARDMEMBER APPOINTMENT DEPT./DIVISION: LEGISLATIVE Requested Action: City Council select a representative to serve on the Economic Development Commission Board of Directors for the 2001-02FY. Summary Explanation & Background: See attached correspondence. Please advise. Exhibits Attached: EDC letter dated 08-08-01 City.Iageres Office j Department LEGISLATIVE r 'p�Kummyuocu emsr raa srcounctnmeeungwo t \uu-z t -u t \eac.aoc ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION or Florido's space coast August 8, 2001 To: Mayor Rocky Randels City of Cape Canaveral Appointed Sr. Municipality level From: Randy Harris, Chair EDC of Florida's Space Coast Re: Board Appointments for FY 2001-2002 The EDC is in the process of determining the individual representative from each organization that will be serving on our Board of Directors for the Fiscal Year 2001-2002. The term of this appointment will take effect on October I, 2001 and conclude on September 30, 2002. In accordance with our By -Laws (section attached), on an annual basis, each individual organization that holds a seat on the EDC's Board of Directors is required to protide written notification of their new appointment. We do understand, however, that many of the organization will be re -appointing their current designated person, but we are still required to collect written notification for our permanent files. Please fully complete the following information below and return by FridM 2spternbgr 14. 2001. In order to conduct proper business for the EDC, all organizations are required to provide this information in accordance with the EDC's Fiscal Year, not that of each individual organization. Name: Appointed by: Company: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Preferred Method of Communication: ❑ E-mail as stated above ❑ Fax ❑ Phone Please return this form via fax or email by Friday. September 14. 2001 to m ase ScaceCoastEDC.org or (321) 633-4200. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Of Florida's Space coast Review of EDC By -Laws as it relates to Board of Directors and Appointments 5.0 Function. The Board of Directors is vested with the management of the business and affairs of THE EDC and all corporate powers shall be exercised by or under the authority of the Board subject to law, Articles of Incorporation, and these By -Laws. 5.1.0 Oualifications. Directors shall be residents of Brevard County, Florida, and shall normally be the senior official of a company, agency head, or member of an agency Board of Directors, located in the Brevard County area. Directors shall enter into an affirmative undertaking with THE EDC to serve corporate purposes with fidelity and integrity. 5.2.0 Structure of the Board. Until further amendment of these By -Laws, the number of Directors shall be no more than one hundred (100). 5.3.0 Composition of the Board of Directors* (*Only Relating Appointment By -Law is included here) 5.3.6.0 Third Highest Dues Paying Category. Those organizations of THE EDC belonging to the membership category requiring the third highest payment of dues shall each appoint one representative to the Board of Directors. 5.3.16.0 Appointing Authority Must be a Member. Each entity having the right to appoint a member of the Board of Directors as hereinabove set forth must be a member in good standing of THE EDC in order to make such an appointment. In the event such entity is not a member in good standing, then its right to appoint a member of the Board of Directors pursuant to these By -Laws shall be void. 5.3.17.0 Unpaid Appointees. Those members appointed to the Board of Directors by the Chambers of Commerce or by the local economic development organizations pursuant to Sections 5.3.2.0 and 5.3.3.0 shall not be salaried employees of the entities making such appointments but rather shall be unpaid members of the governing boards of such entities. 5.3.18.0 Removals. A Director may be removed from office when such action will serve the best interest of THE EDC. The Board of Directors shall initiate removal proceedings. Removal of a Director shall require written notice to each Director of the meeting and it's purpose, and the affirmative vote of 3/4 of the Directors present at such meeting, providing a quorum of voting members are present. Such removal shall be without prejudice to any contract rights of the Director so removed. 5.3.19.0 Vacancies. Vacancies in any of the appointive categories shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment to fill the unexpired term. 5.3.20.0 Terms of Office. General membership Directors shall be elected or appointed for three year terms, commencing October I of the calendar year after election or appointment. Initial terms shall be staggered for one, two and three year terms. Initial terms shall be drawn by lot in each appointment or elective category. 5.3.21.0 Expiration. When the term of a Director expires, that Director shall continue in office until a successor is appointed or elected and qualifies. Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA Heading Ordinance 2nd public capital equipment. hearing Item rate. No. requirement for fighting structural fires. AGENDA REPORT CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 01-02, ESTABLISHING A FIRE/RESCUE SERVICES REFERENDUM QUESTION FOR THE NOVEMBER 2001 ELECTION DEPT./DIVISION: LEGISLATIVE Requested Action: City Council consider adoption of this ordinance that would place a referendum question on the November ballot seeking voter approval of an additional (1) of millage for fire/rescue services to fund (3) additional personnel and capital equipment. Summary Explanation & Background: At the 8/7/01 council meeting it was agreed upon to propose an additional (1) millage to the existing 0.5 millage rate. These funds will be used for future capital needs and to hire (3) additional personnel to meet the NFPA staffing requirement for fighting structural fires. Exhibits Attached: Supporting documentation; Ordinance No. 01-02 City Ian s Office ? Department LEGISLATIVE (cape-nt\ki 'docume is\a`dmicil\meeting\2001\08-21-01\01-02.doc __ _- ORDINANCE NO. 01-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUBMITTING TO THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY A REFERENDUM QUESTION REGARDING THE MODIFICATION OF AN AD VALOREM TAX FOR FIRE/RESCUE SERVICES; ESTABLISHING THE DATE FOR THE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; REPEALING ALL PORTIONS OF THE CODE IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. TO BE ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVREAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. A Fire/Rescue Services Referendum shall be submitted to the electors of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, at the November 6, 2001, Municipal Election. Section 2. The Fire/Rescue Services Referendum shall consist of one referendum question, which shall be in the following form- Fire/Rescue Services Referendum Question Shall the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, be authorized to increase the ad valorem tax dedicated to fire/rescue services related to capital equipment expenditures and the addition of (3) personnel to comply with the National Fire Protection Association National Staffing standards by an amount not exceeding 1_5 mill from the present levy of .5 mill on all real property located within the City of Cape Canaveral for budgets beginning with the fiscal year commending October 1, 2002. Yes No Section 3. The City Clerk shall advertise the proposed referendum question pursuant to Florida Statutes. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. City of Cape Canaveral, Florida Ordinance No. 01-02 Page 2 ADOPTED BY the City of Cape Canaveral, Brevard County, Florida, this day of , 2001. ATTEST: Rocky Randels, MAYOR FOR AGAINST Burt Bruns Susan Stills, CITY CLERK Buzz Petsos Rocky Randels Richard Treverton APPROVED AS TO FORM: Larry Weber Kohn Bennett, CITY ATTORNEY 11Cape-ntlcityclerk\CityClk\Ordinances\Fire-Rescue Services Referemdum Question 01-02.doc Published Daily STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF BREVARD Before the undersigned authority personally appeared MAUREEN FARR who on ADyT19556-8/11.TD01 oath says that she is LEGAL ADVERTISING CLERK NOTICEOF of the FLORIDA TODAY , a newspaper published in Brevard County, Florida;that The Choy C�anrgaf HEARING of cape Ceraveral, Florida vdh WPM °omm the attached copy of advertising being a LEGAL NOTICE Of a*mv rm Ne.e)-osl'meah•Hall Arror, 111 Pok Avenue, Cafe Ca- (AD#729556-$122.36) the matter of naveral Fkrlda at M Pjnr on . W 21 T inspecledh ns wdkwv in ft aN Clerk's CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL OM- anrw recwar wakrw hours (&M &M 10 &W pnt, Monday-FrlCav). in the Court ORDINANCE NO.U1-M AN ORDINANCE OF THE ORDINANCE 01-02 CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLDR- IDA, SUBMITTING To THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY A REFERENDUM QUESTION REGARDING THE MODIFICA- nON OF AN AD VALOREM was published in the FLORIDA TODAY NEWSPAPERSERVICES; TAX FOR FIRE/RESCUE ESTABLISHING in the issues of AUGUST 11, 2001 THE DATE FOR THE PRO- POSED REFERENDUM DIREDE aQUEESTION;; PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; REPEALING ALL PORTIONS OF THE CODE IN Affiant further says that the said FLORIDA TODAY NEWSPAPER CONFLICT TH; AM PROVIDING FOR TIVEDAM is a newspaper in said Brevard County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has ty>wto Pursuant to Sewn 2d MOS Fk.ktastahPWICealy aw- mpea rya heretofore been continuously published in said Brevard County, Florida, regularly aswhh, sloe made by the CNV Caunca ; to any,,, oan- sklered at this rileetkp hist k stated above, and has been entered as periodicals matter at the post office in Perm will need a reCOfd ofthet ,dacuc,, Rmaadros ._fnvuF# POSE NW Person night raw toensure #W ; MELBOURNE in said Brevard County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding of is m` e*,! Wfth record hdudes be test" - the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that Is to be based This ronce does nd Consthuft cor . sent by Itie atv for ft hho.. i she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, ducnon or admission Into evidence of oWevAss tnedmis- sbie for Irrewart evidence, nor commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in dm Itapp"a tze mor by Iaw. Ptrs Ott said newspaper.hh _� am of Ine now pro.; ceedY+os should octad the coy 48 (Signature of Affiant) v„5,� as aeric Sworn to and subscribed before this this 11TH day of AUGUST, 2001 &O'p,RYP&<� OFFICIALNOTARY SEAL 9 LINDA L BRAUD COMMISSION NUMBER 00015812 MYCOMMISSIONEXPfRES OF f`O 1AAV I Personally Known Type Identification Produced (Signature of Notary Public) L.BRAUD (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) or Produced Identification City of Cape Canaveral Fire / Rescue Services Referendum Question Information The City of Cape Canaveral has placed a referendum question on the ballot for this election to increase the property tax (millage rate) for Fire / Rescue Services. This is due to the following reasons; • The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) recently passed a new national staffing standard (NFPA 1720) that affects the operation of our volunteer fire department. This new standard requires the following be implemented when fighting a structural fire. "Upon assembling the necessary resources, at the emergency scene, the fire department shall have the capability to safely initiate an initial attack within 2 minutes 90 percent of the time." [Section 4.2.2.1 "Initial attack operations shall be organized to ensure that at least four members shall be assembled before initiating interior fire suppression operations at a working structural fire." [Section 4.2.2.2] effective 7-31-01. • Our Fire Chief has indicated that additional personal will have to be hired to meet this new standard at an annual cost of S 182,500. • The proposed fire protection cost for the 2001-02 FY is S 455,700. • Calls for Fire / Rescue services have increased 17% over the last (5) years from 1,382 in 1996 to 1,617 in 2000. CAPE CANAVERAL VOLUNTEER FIRE Serving the cid► of Cape Canauernl & Canaucral Port Aadority MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett Boucher, City Manager FROM: David J. Sargeant, Fire Chief DATE: 19 July 2001 RE: Five Year Budgetary Needs Please find the updated five (5) year capital budget attached. Not addressed in this budget, is the need for upgrade or the building of a new station. Our station was built in 1962, and has been renovated several times. As you are aware, we are in need of a new station and are out of room. We have not received any estimates to this date. However, our station at the port cost approximately 1.3 million. As far as personnel needs are concerned, we are in need of three (3) additional personnel at this time, and anticipate the need for one (1) additional 8-5 person in the next five (5) years. Three (3) additional shift personnel will cost approximately $150,000, and the additional 8-5 person would cost approximately $65,000 annually. The shift personnel cost would need to be absorbed entirely by the city. The 8-5 person would be a 50150 split. I request that you consider adding one of the three (3) shift personnel each year, for the next three (3) years, starting this coming fiscal year. With these additional paid employees, I would also suggest a modification to the contract to protect the city. I believe the contract should be modified to state that `CCVFD, Inc. shed) not employ more paid personnel than volunteer personnel! I believe this will protect the city from having to comply with NFPA 1710. It will also protect the volunteers from being eliminated. I am not sure that these, and all other future needs, can't be funded with the current tax and growth, if the sheriffs tax is increased. However, if needed, I would support your efforts to increase the fire tax if council so desired. aeon st 190 JACKSON AVENUE • CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA 32920 • (407) 7834777 • FAX (407) 783-5398 aeon #2 8970 COLUMBIA ROAD • CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA 32920 • (407) 783-4424 • FAX (407) 7834887 CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL 2001-2002 BUDGET DETAILED FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL PURCHASES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) DEPARTMENT/PROJECT FY 01/02 FY 02/03 FY 03/04 FY 04/05 FY 05/06 FIRE DEPARTMENT: ALS/EMS EQUIPMENT (G,I) 15,000 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT (1) 22,000 23,000 24,000 25,000 26,000 SEADOO BOAT REPLACEMENT 12,500 1/2 STAFF REPLACEMENT VEHICLES (G,I) 12,500 12,500 12,500 1/2 NEW PUMPER 200,000 800 MHz RADIO REPLACEMENT (G,I) 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT (G,I) 2,500 3,500 4,500 5,500 6,500 LADDER TRUCK (G,D) 37,825 37,825 37,825 37,825 37,824 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: 89,825 91,825 93,825 95,825 270,324 81 W W as a P a 16 N W r g f9 C Q 0 �+ftoaDr!"f r r Z W IL H Z Z 0 3 < N W o tlON�A1�0 H 4 r N W WJ Z W 9 UA uj �= m w40 W Q i H W OD IS SS $*e**at at � W N «�mvrn W 4 VIL Z ;o N CV) 40 CL N o v vi c C-1 IR c N CO 0 r 100V)o1'-� NOD0 W b ai Nvv<Deto A�C4 > SS W w Q ���IW W J �p V F 4l Z ZWCV) N N N N N.-.-� �.- U) a} m �- W � OM $.- Go I N Cli 'I N W� F d .-�c-4mgw WW la V us W p S S pp O g O C C N V Z W Zed $*e**at at ri ricc _ W 4 VIL Z W � J W O 1► a C5 Co V 'i .- OD W $� �q CL N o v vi c C-1 IR c N 0 r 100V)o1'-� NOD0 W b ai Nvv<Deto A�C4 > SS W ~ d Q Z W V F 4l Z moi FL League of Cities 7/27/01 3:14: PAGE 2/3 RightFAX Florida League of Cities Federal Action Strike Team TO: Key Okla FAST Members I ocal/Rgomal I,eagme Caotscs FROM: Jelin Tboaas, Diecter Leodadve and Pelik AA'aies DATE: July 27, 2861 SUBJECT: Farre Aad EMS Deplayeot Standards Approved By N- "A Standards On July 17, the Standards Council of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) announced its decision to issue two new standards concerning the deployment of fire department personnel in career and vokmmeer departments, adding an important amendment designed to allow local governments real and substantial Saabifity in the way they Provide fire and emergency medical services. The an luncement came a week after a large c oahbon of notions), regional, and state local government, fire service, and taxpayer groups expressed their concerns at a Council hearing on the standards. The broadly-based National Local Goverr><r>er t and Taxpayer Coalition includes 7 national local govemment, personnel and risk management associations; 43 stn municipal leagues; 22 organizations representing state and district fin chide, volunteers and 6refiglites; i t other, regional, state and level organiaations such as the California State Association of Counties and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association; and 198 individual counties, cites, towns and villages. In a written briefing and oral argument, the Coalition told the NFPA Standards Council that the proposed su ing and response tune standards were seriously Sawed because they imposed rigid constraints and cnoliing financial budens on kxal governments' provision of fire and emergency services. The Coalition also showed that the NFPA technical committees which developed the standards excluded local elected and chief appointed officials, fiWW to accommodate the needs and viewpoints of local 8Dvernmemts and taxpayers, and ignored any scantific basis for the standards. The Coalition asked the Council not to issue the standards and reconstitute the technical commidtoe under new baderskp, in order to begin the process of developing true consensus standards based on ngorous scien"k analysis )tit Oflfoe tier; 1757 • Taiisoeq ft riia 32302 ' (ft) 222-99M • S� 27>FSi31 FAX (I" 222-3fa6 FL League of Cities 7/27/01 3:14: PACE 3/3 RightFAX FAST Alert Pie Two The spvc& standards approved by the Council are NFPA 1710, Stmsdard far the Orswda tion and Deplopmew of Fire Safppressrcn Operntians, Emergency Ma cul Operairiom and Special Opff otions to the Public by Career Fire Depwnmemi, and NTPA 1720, Swxivd far the Orgrar miw and Dg)loywmart of Fft Sappressk n Operatiorm Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Op"ims to the Public by Vohorteer Fire Depnarawnts. NFPA 1710 pescrnbes strict gaffi and response times for career fire departments. NFPA 1720 is its counterparts for volunteer fire departments, but its requirements an less prescriptive [Amendment Responds to Coalition's Appeal) In approving the standards, the Standards Council announced two important measures that appear to respond directly to the Coalition's appeal. First, the Council approved the issuance of both NFPA 1710 and 1720 only ager adding the following supplemental language cormMling the acceptability of alternative appvaches to providing fire and emeWncy medical services other than the ones set out in the standards: "1.3 Egnrirra/ewej Ndhitug isr this staudad is ittencled to pralnibrt the erne of systerms, mdho4 or qp wches of equnukmt a sgwwr perfamrance to thane p►e a*ed ere this standwd Ted wCal docu mMatim shall be submitted to the Awharity Hamg.hviuketim to dexatstrate egeiwkncy " By its tern's,, this ancudne nt allows alternative "systens, methods or approaches" to be inVkM*nted by local gcrverrrownts, and allows local SpverrnVM to mwew and make the final decision on the adequacy of such alternative approaches. Members of the Coalition will continue to study this provision in an effort to accurately assess its implications. Second, the Council directed that the technical connnittees respormbk for NFPA 1710 and 1720 begin review and revision of the standards on a three-year cycle (the speediest possbk tiimetabk under NPFA's rules)', and report to the 2004 Amw Meeting If the NFPA boors its stated commitment to babow, conmwsrs-based decision -malting, this may allow local 8oven ments, voters and taxpayers to have their first meaningful opportunity to participate in the standards PMCM According to NTPA regulations, the parties to the NTPA 1710 and 1720 appal have 15 days from the date of the actual Standards Council decision (July 11) to file a notice of intent to petition the NFPA Board of Directors. In the meantime, the standards wig 9D into effect on 31 unless stayed, modified, or withdrawn by the board of directors. The nee - I F 1 of the Coa� that appealed NFPA 1710 and 1720 preparing to appeal the revised standards to the NFPA Board of Directors. The text of the Council's announcement of their decision can be found ar hup://www.nfps-orgtCodes/ For additional irdornnation, pieax call myself or Allison Payne at the league office at (800) 342- 8122. Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA Heading Resolutions Item 8 No. Planing organization. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 01-25, SUPPORTING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVAERAL DEPT./DIVISION: LEGISLATIVE Requested Action: City Council adopt Resolution No. 01-25, supporting recommendations for future transportation improvements along the SR A I corridor within the City of Cape Canaveral. Summary Explanation & Background: Keith and Schnars, PA has provided the attached recommendations for improvements to SR AIA as a result of public participation during the arterial investments study commissioned by FDOT and the Brevard Metropolitan Planing organization. I recommend approval. Exhibits Attached: Resolution No. 01-26 and supporting documentation City 1VI ger's(Office i Department LEGISLATIVE cape- irh\mydocumerVtstadmin Heil\meeting\2001\08-21-01\01-25.doc RESOLUTION NO. 01-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT IN THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL. WHEREAS, projections for land use and socio-economic data through 20 show an increase in both employment and population, and the subsequent increase in the need for transportation facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in cooperation with the Brevard Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), have conducted the State Road AIA (Atlantic Avenue) Arterial Investment Study (AIS) from State Road 404 (Pineda Causeway) to State Road 401 (Cape Road), including the segment of SR AIA located within the boundaries of the City of Cape Canaveral, for the purpose of exploring multi -modal transportation solutions to accommodate future transportation needs; and WHEREAS, there have been many opportunities for the public to participate and have input in the process of developing these recommendations through three public workshops, an interactive web page created exclusively for the project, numerous presentations at public meetings including three presentations to each of the municipal Commission/Council boards within the study area, and articles published in a newsletter created exclusively for the project; and WHEREAS, the Brevard MPO has, with recommendations from the City Commissions and City Councils within the study area, appointed citizens to serve on the Local Citizens Advisory Committee (LCAC) and city staff to serve on the Study Technical Advisory Team (STAT) and these local representatives have participated in the public involvement process developed for the SR AIA Arterial Investment Study; and WHEREAS, study recommendations from this AIS include those items listed in Attachment "A", and illustrated graphically in Attachment "B"; and WHEREAS, at their July 11 th meetings, the STAT and LCAC finalized their endorsement of the improvements defined in Attachments "A" and "B" based on the public support received at the May 2"d, 2001, and 3rd, 2001 public workshops, and comments of record received to date; and WHEREAS, consistent with the public involvement criteria established for the project study, the final set of public workshops, of a series of three, were held on August and 2001. At which workshops, strong public support and acceptance of the proposed improvements was again established; and City of Cape Canaveral, Florida Resolution No. 01-25 Page 2 WHEREAS, upon approval, these recommended projects could be implemented by FDOT, Brevard County, the City of Cocoa Beach, the City of Cape Canaveral Patrick Air Force Base, Canaveral Port Authority, and the Space Coast Area Transit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the City of Cape Canaveral hereby proclaims support for the proposed "Preliminary Concepts" of the MS and urges the MPO to endorse the recommendations, while giving specific consideration to the economic and environmental impacts of all recommendations prior to implementation. ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral this _ day of , 2001. Rocky Randels, MAYOR ATTEST: FOR AGAINST Burt Bruns Susan Stills, CITY CLERK Buzz Petsos Rocky Randels Richard Treverton APPROVED AS TO FORM: Larry Weber Kohn Bennett, CITY ATTORNEY \\Cape-nt\cityclerk\CityClk\Resolutions\SR A1A Supporting Improvements.doc ATTACHMENT "A" STATE ROAD AIA ARTERIAL INVESTMENT STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRANSPORTATION In general there are six major improvements being proposed: A. Changing SR AIA from a rural to an urban cross-section, and implementing access management measures B. Revamping the streetscape in Downtown Cocoa Beach C. Major Intersection Improvements at SR 520, N. Atlantic Ave. and Astronaut Blvd., and at the Pineda Causeway D. Implementing a bicycle /pedestrian network for the entire corridor E. Enhancing public transit and multi -modal facilities, and, F. Implementing a storm water management plan for SR AIA The six improvements listed above incorporate, but are not limited to, the following types of features: 1. Urban Cross-section/curb and gutter 2. Bicycle/pedestrian facilities, such as, sidewalks, paths, bike lanes, etc. 3. Bicycle links with existing facilities 4. Storm Water facilities 5. Aesthetic Enhancements, such as • Median and roadside landscaping • Streetscape enhancements 6. Bus bays where feasible, and bus shelters 7. On -street parking designations in downtown Cocoa Beach 8. Access aisles and on -street parking in certain locations in the one-way pair areas 9. Bulb -outs to enhance pedestrian safety 10. Coordinated traffic signal timing 11. New SCAT Trolley System 12. Implementation of Access Management Measures 13. General intersection improvements 14. Enhanced pedestrian crossings and/or pedestrian overpass near SR 520 15. Extended left -turn bays and an additional SB through lane at SR 520 16. Elimination of free-flowing south bound right turn at SR 520 17. Relocation of conflicting utilities 18. Street lighting concepts ATTACHMENT `B" Graphic Illustrations Design Solutions IJ'L:;; A. Re -design intersection w/ continuous turbo thru lane and physical Intersection Problems barrier separation B. Park entrance is relocated further north away from intersection to allow 1. High crashes at SR Al A and Pineda Causeway C. for adequate distances for maneuvering 2. Conflicts exist with park entrance's proximity to intersection Reduce the size of the raised traffic island at the NW corner and provide 3. Evacuation vulnerability a stripped area for dual northbound lefts during evacuations RM(10D)i I SO i` EAST. EMT. -J RAY UNE PLVER t UR/NL1E' SHLOR 8I0IRECT. SHLDR. PAVER SOD S S2' 2 !' L� TURN LANE 4' 7 SOD VARIES SWK SWALE SHLDR SHIDR SWALE VARIES PAV. PAW. SHOCKS eLiI — ZROCK 4' BALLAST Existing Typical SectionRDCK ao,te4'sl04e 45 00 j 1AeMgsmeEtl is ol - Existing R!W Une ExlsUng R/W Une'.. R/W (45.757 .i. R/W 154.259 r3JEE Proposed Urban Cross Section Stormwater' S ; 5, 0 M•fle9B1f1°�t 5' 10' 10' 10' 10' 1 in, e' 7' Existing R/W Une _ '• EdWng RIW Une q Construction Problems/Issues 1. Missing links in sidewalk system 2. High posted speed (55 mph) 3. No landscaping in median or roadside 4. No dedicated bicycle facilities 5. Need signalized/striped pedestrian crossings at the PAFB North Gate and at the south end to the public park 6. Inadequate stormwater collection/treatment system (no swales between PAFB Central Gate to S. 35th Street) 7. Center scramble lane creates conflicts with other vehicles Solution A. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network w/ bike lanes and 10' enhanced sidewalk B. New urban cross-section w/ medians requires lower posted speed (45 mph w/ FDOT approval) C. New cross section provides for landscaping D. New cross-section provides for on -street bike lanes and a 10' wide sidewalk will be on east side E. Proposed bicycle/pedestian network F. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities G. Center scramble lane removed and replaced w/ median for streetscaping and roadway separation Alternative Option A. Maintains existing roadway pavement B. Adds wider paved shoulders for bike lanes C. Adds 8'- 10' wide sidewalk consistent with proposed bike/pedestrian master plan D. Provides for drainage improvements E. No landscape median is provided and only limited landscaping is provided in adjacent ROW F Less expensive than proposed cross-section G. Narrow travel lanes ...,..., w ...,...,.., ,r KER}i and SCtMARS, P.A °ernmN°vr °PTrwvsA>� n°v PROPoSED CONCEPTS a w�O roar INVPb PM SfWY' 5 Existing Typical Section Posted Speed: 45 mph Curb and Gutter SHLOR. - - Bike Lane SHIRR. ! yyp0. ,VNiIEE VMIES VNUEB PAVT. t VMI ES i 5 Existing Typical Section Posted Speed: 45 mph Curb and Gutter SHLOR. - - Bike Lane SHIRR. ! 'I Q Q AQ- r O J tz• 12' L Existing R/W Line R/W VOrbs (48• to 841 QConstruction 60 Proposed Urban Cross Section Exutleg:RIW R� SHLOR. ewlREcr. QEF 'RN IANE SHIRR. VMIES 'I GAYr. r PAVT. t VARIES LProposed 4 -Lane Urban Divided (Shifted East) Problems/Issues 1. Missing links in sidewalk system 2. Higher posted speed (55 mph) 3. No landscaping in median or roadside 4. No dedicated bicycle facilities 5. Need signalized/striped pedestrian crossings at the PAFB North Gate and at the south end to the public parking 6. Inadequate stormwater collection/treatment system (no swales between PAFB Central Gate to South 35th Street) Solutions A. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network B. New urban cross-section w/ medians requires lower posted speed (45 mph) C. New cross section provides for landscaping D. New cross section provides for on -street bike lanes and a 10' wide sidewalk will be on east side E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities Problems/Issues 1. Conflicting left -turn movements 2. Limited Access management - large paved areas without joint access 3. No sidewalks or designated bicycle lanes 4. No landscaping in median or roadside 5. Roadside shoulders degraded and compacted 6. Lack of paved turnouts/entrances 7. Too many utilities in corridor/visual clutter/transmission lines along SR Al 8. Beach parking needed; Few parking spaces avilable or nonexistent Solution A. New urban cross-section w/ medians limit left -turn movements B. New urban cross-section will incorporate access management C. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network w/ bike lanes and enhanced sidewalk D. New cross section provides for landscaping E. New urban cross section will provide new curb and gutter F New curb and gutter cross section will incorporate paved turnouts/entrances G. New cross section incorporates streetscape enhancements H. The County will be notified of need to secure additional land for parking sI� �xm aw scxHMs; ea PROPOSED CONCEPTS MRur EXIST. RAY RAN i LINE LINE I 5[ln 11' 11' d' Mn VARIES SPAVT. VARIES milExisting Typical Section (Looking North) Proposed Cross Section 12 52' Urban Section w/ Closed Drainage (Looking North) RISK LINE VARIES SHIRR, SHLDR. VARIES PAVT. PAVT t t Posted Speed: 35 mph Bike RAY LINE QConstruction Proposed Cross Section 60' Urban Section w/ Piping and Parking 14 (Looking South) Problems/Issues 1. Congestion 2. Poor access management - numerous, closely spaced driveways 3. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle facilities 4. Flooding - lack of stormwater/treatment facilities - water flows onto private property 5. Need to improve traffic circulation 6. Evacuation/emergency access vulnerability 7. Roadside shoulders degraded and compacted 8. Little or no landscaping 9. Lack of streetscape amentities 10. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic Solution A. Overall corridor improvements will alleviate congestion B. New cross section will help organize access points C. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network includes bike lanes and sidewalks D. New urban cross-section includes storm water facilities E. Overall corridor improvements will improve circulation F. New urban cross-section will provide new curb and gutter G. New cross section provides for landscaping H. New cross section incorporates streetscape enhancements I. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated Problems/Issues 1. Congestion 2. On -street parking is needed in certain areas and on -street parking is inappropriate in certain locations 3. Need additional off-street parking (interior block) 4. Poor Access Management - numerous, closely spaced driveways 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle facilities 6. Flooding - lack of stormwater/treatment facilities - water flows onto private property 7. Obstructed visual triangles 8. Need to improve traffic circulation 9. Evacuation/emergency access vulnerability 10. Roadside shoulders degraded and compacted 11. Little or no landscaping 12. Lack of streetscape amentities 13. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic Solution A. Overall corridor improvements will alleviate congestion B. New cross section provides specific parking designations C. Facilities are being provided through City program D. New cross section will help organize access points E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities G. New cross section provides specific parking designations H. Overall corridor improvements will improve circulation I. New urban cross-section will provide new curb and gutter J. New cross section provides for landscaping K. New cross section incorporates streetscape enhancements L. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated - Sidewalk only provided on west side of street due to the numerous driveways and conflict points y��rtTi ana scrn+nas, Pa. ,°�"nnxevrov rrtwsrortmnav PROPOSED CONCEPTS g.......................... �.m �,.,ti..�Kr. s.a..sra artrenur. OTHER OPTIONS EXPLORED A.Llne� L ti - IK Stormwater I. Management IS 68' Urban Section w/ Pipe and Swale (Looking North) ¢,Con,tructlon 71' Rural Section w/ Swales 16 (Looking North) Posted Speed: 3S rnp (+/-) 22' Exdeting R/W Line QConetruction Option 1 > Requires a wider cross-section since it provides for additional stormwater swales. With the additional swales stormwater can be more easily accommodated without relying solely on ex - filtration systems which often involve higher installation and maintenance costs. > Shifts travel lanes 12.5 ft to the west and sidewalks closer to the right-of-way Option 2 > Provides for a rural cross-section and an open drainage system. An extension of cross section recently constructed to the south. • Requires sidewalks to be constructed closer to right-of-way lines because of clear zone requirements for rural cross sections. Greatest impact to adjacent properties. > Shallow swales limit stormwater treatment volumes because of Swale width and closely spaced driveways. Requires additional inlets for stormwater collection or side drains below driveways. Option 1 > This option is the same as the preferred option with the exception that there are no provisions for parking provided, and it includes a sidewalk on both sides of the street. PROPOSED CONCCPTS wemeaiu Posted $peed: 35 mph' Bike Cane Sidewalk �j 'jiJi" Curb and Gutter 1 � , Sidewalk A.Llne� L ti - IK Stormwater I. Management IS 68' Urban Section w/ Pipe and Swale (Looking North) ¢,Con,tructlon 71' Rural Section w/ Swales 16 (Looking North) Posted Speed: 3S rnp (+/-) 22' Exdeting R/W Line QConetruction Option 1 > Requires a wider cross-section since it provides for additional stormwater swales. With the additional swales stormwater can be more easily accommodated without relying solely on ex - filtration systems which often involve higher installation and maintenance costs. > Shifts travel lanes 12.5 ft to the west and sidewalks closer to the right-of-way Option 2 > Provides for a rural cross-section and an open drainage system. An extension of cross section recently constructed to the south. • Requires sidewalks to be constructed closer to right-of-way lines because of clear zone requirements for rural cross sections. Greatest impact to adjacent properties. > Shallow swales limit stormwater treatment volumes because of Swale width and closely spaced driveways. Requires additional inlets for stormwater collection or side drains below driveways. Option 1 > This option is the same as the preferred option with the exception that there are no provisions for parking provided, and it includes a sidewalk on both sides of the street. PROPOSED CONCCPTS wemeaiu PAY VARIEB (Ib -1W� as i ms ' EX18T. CAYC. SWIV LONC.8W1(I ^(IRT p1ENEWAY ��, pENEWAY � PAV E RVWNG RWKINO t t I I � l wart a ourTsn cuPR a cwrreP � i 21 Existing 2 -Lane wl Turn Lane Typical Section 22 23 existing rypicai section Problems/Issues 1. Need facilities for traffic calming along Minutemen Causeway (bulbouts, median divider, brick pavers, etc.) 2. Need improved sidewalks/bike lanes to connect "Town Center" to residential neighborhoods 3. Need demand responsive signal timing 4. Need improved bus routes to reduce parking needs and congestion 5. Lack of streetscape amenities 6. Inadequate striping for parking 7. Evacuation vulnerability 8. Inadequate stormwater treatment 9. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic Solutions A. Streetscape plan calls for bulb -outs and aesthetic enhancements as well as improvements to enhance pedestrian safety B. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network extends out to connect w/ bike route on south side of Minutemen Causeway C. Demand responsive signal timing currently under implementation as a result of this study D. New SCAT trolley system to enhance ridership E. New cross section incorporates streetscape enhancements F Proposed streetscape plan designates specific parking G. Overall corridor improvements will improve circulation H. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities I. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated Problems/Issues 1. Flooding in areas with existing stormwater facilities; inadequate treatment 2. Roadside shoulders degraded and compacted 3. Many shoulders are unpaved 4. Parking in road right-of-way; striping needed 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system 6. No landscaping 7. No Access Management - large unpaved areas with conflicting movements 8. Lack of streetscape amenities 9. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic Solution A. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities B. New urban cross-section will provide new curb and gutter C. Proposed streetscape plan designates specific parking/isolates parking from through traffic movement D. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network E. New cross section provides for landscaping F Access management strategies will be employed in design development G. New cross section incorporates streetscape enhancements H. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are �rsertti aad saiN,vas, FA ao.a,�„rP'nTwcvr oaTnwsPortrnriav PROPOSED CONCEPTS .• NYLSTV EAT stI.'oY EwB� uxE—�I J E m iv is � BI-gRECT i V/ S i V/3UE9 BNlD0. WNr. Ili + I � �� NFNLWE � 8N 1 MVT � 800 VMI s I'd V -IE.! I ® L 3 DM 810-. M"- mrtEwamErrtl alvEwux Pxn:RMmEHi) Transmission Pols N— Existing i R/W Lingo QConstruolion 32Proposed Cross Section 4 -Lane Urban Divided (Shifted East) EMT ww UNE 33 Existing Typical Section Relocated Ttensm"on Polo Sidewalk Bike 7 11 77-77�' Existing R/W Line R/W 154.5') q¢ gpnstruction —4 4 Ike no 1 1 4 7777.7 Existing — R/W Line Proposed Cross -Section 4 -Lane Urban Divided w/ Extended Intersection M34 Mimprovernent of Additional Southbound Lane Problems/Issues 1. Conflicting left -turn movements 2. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale, and treatment system to convey runoff 3. Need a primary dedicated bicycle facility with feeder routes 4. Inadequate turn lane storage 5. Too few right turn lanes 6. Need warning signs for approaching signals and major side streets 7. Little or no landscaping 8. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic Solutions A. New urban cross-section w/ medians limit left -turn movements B. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities C. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network includes bike lanes, feeder routes, and enhanced sidewalks D. Urban cross section w/ median will provide clearly delineated left turn bays with adequate storage lengths E. Right turn bays will be provided where required and where they do not conflict w/ bicycle/pedestrian facilities F. A signage plan will be part of design development G. New cross section provides for landscaping H. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated Problems/Issues 1. Traffic congestion and circulation problems 2. Inadequate left turn lane at Marion Lane 3. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive signal timing problems 4. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system and unsafe pedestrian crossing conditions 5. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic 6. Need facilities for traffic calming 7. Evacuation vulnerability Solution A. If approved, intersection improvements at SR 520, Marion Lane, and proposed signage plan and third southbound thru lane will improve circulation B. Proposed improvements to the Marion Lane intersection and extending length of northbound left turn bays. Retrofitting traffic with proposed signage plan to reduce the number of vehicles turning left into surf shops. C. Light synchronization currently under implementation as a result of this study D. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network E. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated F Provide streetscape and pedestrian enhancements to induce traffic calming G. Overall corridor improvements will improve circulation PROPOSED CONCE �xEini and scHNARS, P.w Aaorn�mBrcvr wrnwsronrnav PTS rrvesm�e�rrsnmr 3 ne 2 Lane 1 ,r Walgreens IT { 35 SR A1A Aerial Plan View Marion Lane - Alternate Option 36 (No Southbound Left) roronernmMrvr oerruvsvom.'+nar' PROPoSCD CONCEPTS raro Iff.1T}i end SCHNARS, PA. . ruunr nrw�uu mo�cro •••••••. •••••••• • •• 9.II.AIAAIREIIW. 1of1 7�l F > Vdiasia fin° ," A Problems/Issues 3 r 1. Lack of identity to welcome visitor - aesthetics 2. Traffic congestion and circulation problems Columbia Latta p; 3. Weaving problems at SR 520 and Marion Lane 4. Inadequate turn lane storage for northbound left turns r� I onto westbound SR 520 5. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive signal timing problems � 6. Merge lane problems (SR 520 to Marion Lane) 7. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system and unsafe €, seacn�m",, pedestrian crossing conditions wave a 8. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic 9. Need facilities for traffic calming 10. Evacuation vulnerability o: 11. Lack of on -street parking on SR 520 between SR Al A and t Ocean Beach Blvd } Solutions A. Streetscape enhancements a B. If approved, intersection improvements at SR 520, Marion Lane, and proposed signage plan and third southbound thru-lane will improve circulation Y C. Light synchronization currently under implementation as a " result of this study D. Elimination of both free-flowing right turns at SR 520 and merge lanes on SR Al E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network, and enhanced pedestrian crossing c7 F. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are f 51' r specifically designated G. Provide streetscape and pedestrian enhancements to induce traffic calming UWM°.° H. Overall corridor improvements will improve circulation ,r Walgreens IT { 35 SR A1A Aerial Plan View Marion Lane - Alternate Option 36 (No Southbound Left) roronernmMrvr oerruvsvom.'+nar' PROPoSCD CONCEPTS raro Iff.1T}i end SCHNARS, PA. . ruunr nrw�uu mo�cro •••••••. •••••••• • •• 9.II.AIAAIREIIW. 1of1 RAV VARIES LINE uri� m +a m m is B -0IRECT. 5' SODAs LE RN LANEVARIES VARIES SSV 0. VARIE9 PAVT. 7,1 t EXISTING SIDEWALK (INTERMITTENT) 3% Existing Typical Section IvaAes 4' 11' 11' X18.5" 1T 11' a' H' i Existing Existing R/W Line i R i )W um R/W (60). R1W (50) i QConstruction- q Proposed Cross Section 38 4 -Lane Urban Divided (Shifted East) Problems/Issues 1. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics 2. No Access Management provided - excessive number of curb cuts 3. Too many utilities in corridor/visual clutter/transmission lines along SR A1A 4. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive timing problems 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system 6. Too many obstructions in sidewalks 7. Strip centers negatively impact the visual theme of the corridor 8. Lack of pedestrian crossings 9. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale, and treatment system to convey runoff 10. Too few right turn lanes 11. Need warning signs for approaching signals and major side streets 12. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic 13. Emergency Access vulnerabiliy Solutions A. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements B. Access management strategies will be employed in design development C. Relocation of utilities will be reviewed in design development D. Light synchronization currently under implementation as a result of this study E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities Right turn bays will be provided where required and where they do not conflict w/ bicycle/pedestrian facilities G. A signage plan will be part of design development H. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated I. New cross section will provide clarity to traffic movements KEnN and SCNNARS, FA,°,a��OK °rnewswmrrrav PROPOSCD CONCEPTS r52=4-Lane Proposed Cross Section Urban Divided (Shifted West) �E%18T. LI N' LINE WD VARIES i i i LME RAY (tOD IX 24' ZI' RM LH 17 12' 2 r L 8FLDlR PAVi. l * SW.DR_MVT VARIES 1 ` I 1 R/W (,ORj EXIST. RAY UNE VARIES SFlOR PAVT. EXISTING SIDEWALI( (INTERMITTENT) SFDSIEDT. i L LANE ' TULANE RM' I EXIST SH�LOr t LINE RM LINE BLDIRECT. s' SOD <' TURA LANE t' SOD VARIES VARIES SHLDR. SNLDR. VARIES VARIES t EXISMND SIDEWALK11 ERMnTENi1 ExlsnNc 810EWALX (INTERMfTTENf) > - -----Jn - Transmission Pole to RemaBike Side�k WeJ idewalk y y , Lae.�4' 11'11'195' 11' 11' 4'JIGS I Existing—.1 I k--- Existing R!W Llne i i R!W Lina r52=4-Lane Proposed Cross Section Urban Divided (Shifted West) �E%18T. LI N' LINE WD VARIES i i i LME RAY (tOD IX 24' ZI' RM LH 17 12' 2 r L 8FLDlR PAVi. l * SW.DR_MVT VARIES 1 ` I 1 R/W (,ORj EXIST. RAY UNE VARIES SFlOR PAVT. EXISTING SIDEWALI( (INTERMITTENT) VARIES EXISTING 81DEWALX (INTeWM ENT) Problems/Issues 1. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics 2. No Access Management provided - excessive number of curb cuts 3. Too many utilities in corridor/visual clutter/transmission lines along SR A1A 4. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive signal timing problems 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system 6. Too many obstructions in sidewalks 7. Strip centers negatively impact the visual theme of the corridor 8. Lack of pedestrian crossings 9. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale, and treatment system to convey runoff 10. Too few right turn lanes Solutions A. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements B. Access management strategies will be employed in design development C. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements D. Light synchronization currently under implementation as a result of this study E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements G. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities H. Right turn bays will be provided where required and where they do not conflict w/ bicycle/pedestrian facilities Problems/Issues 1. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics 2. No Access Management provided - joint access needed 3. Too many utilities in corridor/visual clutter/transmission lines along SR Al 4. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive signal timing problems 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system 6. Lack of pedestrian crossings 7. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale, and treatment system to convey runoff 8. Too few right turn lanes 9. Need warning signs for approaching signals and major side streets 10. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic 11. Unexpected southbound left turn into Purcell's Carpet from the thru lane just south of the new interchange. Motorists violate the double yellow pavement stripes Solution A. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements B. Access management strategies will be employed in design development C. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements D. Light synchronization currently under implentation as a result of this study E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities G. Right turn bays will be provided where required and where they do not conflict w/ pedestrian facilities H. A signage plan will be part of design development I. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated J. New urban cross-section w/ medians limit left -turn movements �- la'nti sew seTllvnas, EwDrvinTNwrorinwsvonTnnav PROPOSED CONCEPTS ........................... �o,.,� .,,...�..a.o s.n. elAAmenuL �.1u'r m -Dv SFDSIEDT. i L LANE ' TULANE i SH�LOr t VARIES EXISTING 81DEWALX (INTeWM ENT) Problems/Issues 1. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics 2. No Access Management provided - excessive number of curb cuts 3. Too many utilities in corridor/visual clutter/transmission lines along SR A1A 4. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive signal timing problems 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system 6. Too many obstructions in sidewalks 7. Strip centers negatively impact the visual theme of the corridor 8. Lack of pedestrian crossings 9. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale, and treatment system to convey runoff 10. Too few right turn lanes Solutions A. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements B. Access management strategies will be employed in design development C. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements D. Light synchronization currently under implementation as a result of this study E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements G. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities H. Right turn bays will be provided where required and where they do not conflict w/ bicycle/pedestrian facilities Problems/Issues 1. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics 2. No Access Management provided - joint access needed 3. Too many utilities in corridor/visual clutter/transmission lines along SR Al 4. Traffic signal spacing and demand responsive signal timing problems 5. Missing links in sidewalk/bicycle system 6. Lack of pedestrian crossings 7. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale, and treatment system to convey runoff 8. Too few right turn lanes 9. Need warning signs for approaching signals and major side streets 10. No bus bays; stopping buses impede flow of traffic 11. Unexpected southbound left turn into Purcell's Carpet from the thru lane just south of the new interchange. Motorists violate the double yellow pavement stripes Solution A. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements B. Access management strategies will be employed in design development C. New roadway cross-section incorporates streetscape enhancements D. Light synchronization currently under implentation as a result of this study E. Proposed bicycle/pedestrian network F. New urban cross-section includes stormwater facilities G. Right turn bays will be provided where required and where they do not conflict w/ pedestrian facilities H. A signage plan will be part of design development I. Bus bays will be provided where ROW allows and stops are specifically designated J. New urban cross-section w/ medians limit left -turn movements �- la'nti sew seTllvnas, EwDrvinTNwrorinwsvonTnnav PROPOSED CONCEPTS ........................... �o,.,� .,,...�..a.o s.n. elAAmenuL �.1u'r m -Dv Problems/Issues 1. Northbound pavement cross slope is too steep and limits sight distance 2. Missing links in sidewalk and bicycle system 3. No access management provided, excessive number of curb cuts; Too many conflict points on SR A1A 4. International Drive is not aligned with signalized intersection at N. Atlantic Ave. and Astronaut Blvd. - left turning maneuvers are unsafe 5. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale and treatment system to convey runoff 6. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics Solutions , A. Construct a longer and flatter curve on SR Al A that will improve sight ' distance and make turning maneuvers more comfortable B. Proposed bicycle and pedestrian network > , C. Access management strategies will be employed in design development Opportunities exist for redevelopment and consolidating access. New cross section will provide clarity to traffic movements D. Re -align International Drive with N. Atlantic , Ave/Astronaut Blvd. All turning maneuvers occur at a signalized intersection E. Re -alignment of International Drive creates an opportunity for attractive stormwater management areas. New urban cross section includes stormwater management facilities F New roadway cross section and re -alignment incorporates streetscape enhancements Problems/Issues CP" r MAiLWlIC AMI AMMUT ELM rJS Option 1: Re -alignment of International Drive 1. Northbound pavement cross slope is too steep and limits sight distance 2. Missing links in sidewalk and bicycle system 3. No access management provided excessive number of curb cuts; Too 4. many conflict points on SR Al 5. International Drive is not aligned with signalized intersection at N. Atlantic Ave. and Astronaut Blvd.- left turning maneuvers are unsafe 6. Flooding in areas; inadequate storm drainage, swale and treatment system to convey runoff 7. Lack of identity to welcome the visitor - aesthetics Solutions A. Construct a longer and flatter curve on SR Al that will improve sight distance and make turning maneuvers more comfortable B. Proposed bicycle and pedestrian network C. Access management strategies will be employed in design development. Opportunities exist for redevelopment and consolidating access. New cross section will provide clarity to traffic movements D. U-turn bays used in lieu of re -alignment. Minimal impact to First Union Bank, vacant IBM building and Cape Gardens E. New urban cross section includes stormwater management facilities F. New roadway cross section incorporates streetscape enhancements Osco CONCEM InCRIL w°e;Me�vrsnmr Access Aisle Applications For e - One-wav S. Orlando Avenue ► Proposed access aisle plan designates specific PJW am RAV QM9 3.93' Fxisnna parking/isolates parking from through traffic movement V -R= RMLhe , ► New urban cross section includes stormwater facilities, I 2a V ill, it, ' W curb and gutter, bike lanes, and enhanced sidewalks + > 22 1 �4► One-way operation with exit to side street to minimize �o�nd disruption of traffic flow on SR Al Angled parking beyond the right-of-way line requires o�awav curb C�rband���.r coordination with property owners Access Aisle rypao TY Side (Parallel Parking Sidewalk ► Another location identified for appiapplication of this concept As Necessary) is between 15th Street South and Myrtle Avenue [M n (Looking South)_ r18C Proposed Cross Section (Looking North) S. Atlantic Avenue > Proposed access aisle plan designates specific parking/isolates parking from through traffic movement > New urban cross section includes stormwater facilities, curb and gutter, bike lanes, and enhanced sidewalks > One-way operation with exit to side street to minimize disruption of traffic flow on SR A1A > Angled parking beyond the right-of-way line requires coordination with property owners �. r�rM .,m scNrv�Ps, Pn.nweaueP¢mrornwsroPnnw PROPOSED CONCEPTS Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Date: 08-21-01 AGENDA Heading Resolutions Item 9 No. Summary Explanation & Background: AGENDA REPORT CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO.01-26 AMENDMENT TO ESCROW AGREEMENT WITH DOWNS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND THE VILLAGES OF SEAPORT MASTER ASSOCIATION DEPT./DIVISION: LEGISLATIVE Requested Action: City Council consider the approval of this resolution that will amend the existing escrow agreement and provide the reallocation of the escrow funds as follows: S 15,619.40 — Reallocated for the N. Atlantic Avenue and West Central Blvd. intersection improvements, S41,900.00 — Reallocated for center turn lane improvements on N. Atlantic Avenue in front of the Villages of Seaport's main entrance. Summary Explanation & Background: City Council has decided to let the Ridgewood Avenue road reservation expire on 10/1/01; therefore, these funds can be reallocated for a more appropriate use to help improve traffic flow in and around the Villages of Seaport development. I recommend approval. Exhibits Attached: Resolution and amended escrow agreement. Cit�Manager's'OfGce Department LEGISLATIVE cape- ydocu ' nts\a c 6nci1\meeting\2001\08-21-01\downsdev.doc To: Bennett Boucher From: Thomas Downs, CCIM Re: Escow ow agreement Dear Bennett, ooVAM tnYedmew Prop"M I=. Dower Dovolopn= a Capp. Downs Pcopwty blKWVn3 t im, 777 Hwy AIA #2011ndi =*k 17..32903 11xunae m Downs, CCIM Pry! CEO The escrow agreement incorrectly identifies the proper ownership entity_ Please correct to Downs Development Corporation/Seaport. With regard to the disbursement of funds, I believe the dollars disbursed (approx $4,004.00) to close ::.units within the couple years should be released immediately. I feel it is not equitable for the city to release funds on their behalf and hold funds any longer on behalf of any stipulations. I am not adverse to the city retaining some funds; say 11 .00(' :until completion but to retain anymore is neither equitable nor fair_ I AheFefore tespectfully submit the release of funds simultaneous to your release as part. ofthis agreement. Warmest regards, ThomasoCC1M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TO dnhd Nozlbdoddo2) 94MOa C-6L09L9L©r ©V:rl ta06-i9ii80 RESOLUTION NO. 01-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN AMENDED AGREEMENT WITH DOWNS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC. AS SUCCESSOR TO MAXI -HOMES OF AMERICA AND THE VILLAGES OF SEAPORT MASTER, ASSOCIATION FOR THE REALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO FINANCE INTERSECTION CONFIGURATION AT W. CENTRAL BOULEVARD AND NORTH ATLANTIC AVENUE AND THE COMPLETION OF A TURNING LANE ON N. ATLANTIC AVENUE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida, as follows: SECTION 1. The Mayor and the City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute an agreement with Downs Development Corporation, Inc. as successors to Maxi -Homes of America and the Villages of Seaport Master, Association for the reallocation of escrow funds to finance intersection configuration at W. Central Boulevard and North Atlantic Avenue and completion of a turning lane at N. Atlantic Avenue. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Cape Canaveral, Florida this day of , 2001. Rocky Randels, MAYOR ATTEST: FOR AGAINST Burt Bruns Susan Stills, CITY CLERK Buzz Petsos APPROVED AS TO FORM: Rocky Randels Richard Treverton Larry Weber Kohn Bennett, CITY ATTORNEY \\Cape-nt\cityclerk\CityClk\Resolutions\DOWNS Escrow Agreement Res.doc LAW OFFICES AMARI & THERIAC, P.A. Attorneys and Counselors At Law Richard S. Amari Kohn Bennett Bradly Roger Bettin, Sr. Mitchell S. Goldman J. Wesley Howze David R. Martin Matthew J. Monaghan Mark N. McQuagge Mark S. Peters David M. Presuick Charles R. Steinberg James S. Theriac, III Of Counsel: Mary E. Lytle, P.A. Mr. Bennett Boucher, City Manager City of Cape Canaveral P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 RE: VILLAGES OF SEAPORT Dear Bennett: Reply to: Cocoa Post Office Box July 18, 2001 Mariner Square 96 Willard Street, Suite 302 Post Office Box 1807 Cocoa, Florida 32923-1807 Telephone (321) 639-1320 Fax (321) 639-6690 Imperial Plaza Suite B104 6769 N. Wickham Road Melbourne, Florida 32940 Telephone (321) 259-6611 Fax (321) 259-6624 Based on the position of the City Council with regard to any proposal for a pedway/walkway from the Ridgewood Avenue extension to Jerry Park, I feel as though we should return our attentions to the execution of the Escrow Agreement between Villages of Seaport and the City. As you are aware, we previously provided a proposal in the form of a resolution to accept escrowed monies and apply same to specifically designated projects within the City limits. Fiease reb'lf;w your file dllli cuidau me ik• ulScuss the t,;.xt Up';IOviiaie step. Sincerely, 11.4, Mark McQuagge MM:mem LAW OFFICES AMARI & THERIAC, P.A. Attorneys and Counselors At Law Richard S. Amari Kohn Bennett Bradly Roger Bettin, Sr. Mitchell S. Goldman J. Wesley Howze David R. Martin Matthew J. Monaghan Mark N. McQuagge Mark S. Peters David M. Presnick Charles R. Steinberg James S. Theriac, III Of Counsel: Mary E. Lytle, P.A. Mr. Bennett Boucher, City Manager City of Cape Canaveral P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 RE: VILLAGES OF SEAPORT Dear Bennett: Reply to: Cocoa Post Office Box August 3, 2001 Mariner Square 96 Willard Street, Suite 302 Post Office Box 1807 Cocoa, Florida 32923-1807 Telephone (321) 639-1320 Fax (321) 639-6690 Imperial Plaza Suite B104 6769 N. Wickham Road Melbourne, Florida 32940 Telephone (321) 239-6611 Fax (321)259-6624 Enclosed, please find the First Amendment to Escrow Agreements in regard to the Villages of Seaport. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office. Sincerely, Mark McQuagge MQem Enclosure as indicated FIRST AMENDMENT TO ESCROW AGREEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 2001 by and between DOWNS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC. as successor in interest to Maxi - Homes of America, a joint venture, hereinafter referred to as "DOWNS" the CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and VILLAGES OF SEAPORT MASTER, "ASSOCIATION". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Maxi -Homes of America, predecessor in interest to DOWNS, and the CITY entered into that certain Escrow Agreement dated February 19, 1985 in conjunction with the approval of that certain site plan for the Villages of Seaport, which Escrow Agreement provided in part that Maxi -Homes, as the developer, would escrow with the CITY, certain sums to be used for the construction of traffic signalization on North Atlantic Avenue, as well as funds to pave the Ridgewood extension running through the Villages of Seaport ("Escrow Agreement #I"); and WHEREAS, Maxi -Homes of America and the CITY also entered into that certain Escrow Agreement dated July 30, 1987, executed in conjunction with the same site plan which provided for the payment of sums by Maxi -Homes to the CITY for the escrow of funds to pave a sidewalk along entire length of the proposed Ridgewood extension as aforementioned, ("Escrow Agreement 42"); and WHEREAS, DOWNS has become the successor in interest as the developer of the Villages of Seaport, and as such, desires to amend certain sections of Escrow Agreement 41 and Escrow Agreement 42, hereinafter collectively referred to as the "ESCROW AGREEMENTS", and WHEREAS, the CITY agrees to amend the ESCROW AGREEMENTS as the amendments are in conformance with it's comprehensive plan inasmuch as the CITY has amended it's plans to extend Ridgewood Avenue through the Villages of Seaport project, and replace it with a pedway, and WHEREAS, the ASSOCIATION joins in the execution hereof to express its' consent to the terms hereof. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. The parties agreed that the following sums have been collected to date with referenced to the ESCROW AGREEMENTS: A. $35,900.00 for the paving of the Ridgewood Avenue extension. B. $15,619.40 for North Atlantic Avenue signalization. C. $6,000.00 for paving of sidewalks. 3. The parties hereby agree to reallocate the escrowed sums as provided in Section 2 above, as follows: A. The sum of $15,619.40 shall be reallocated for the purchase and construction of the traffic signal and intersection configuration at the corner of Central Avenue and North Atlantic Avenue. This project shall be accomplished by the CITY, and therefore, these funds shall be released to the 'iTY for their use. B. The balance of the fund collected in escrow shall be utilized for a center turning lane to be constructed on North Atlantic Avenue in front of the Villages of Seaport. This project shall be accomplished by DOWNS and Brevard County and therefore, the funds shall be held in escrow by the CITY until the project is completed. 4. The parties hereto agree that all provisions of the ESCROW AGREEMENTS requiring that additional funds be placed into escrow be terminated. 5. The Agreement shall be binding on successors and assigns of both parties. 6. All other provisions of the ESCROW AGREEMENTS not modified hereby shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties now execute this Agreement on the date above first written. ATTEST: DOWNS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC. AS SUCCESSOR TO MAXI -HOMES OF AMERICA, a joint venture ATTEST: IN CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, a municipal corporation By: City Clerk ATTEST: IN Mayor To: Planning and Zoning Board From: Bennett Boucher, City Manager CC: Mayor and City Council Mem Morris Reid, Building Official Date: March 20, 2001 Re: Villages of Seaport Escrow agreements. The City of Cape Canaveral has received a request from the Villages of Seaport to modify the existing escrow agreements as indicated in their attached correspondence. The escrow agreement enacted in 1985 provides that the developer shall pay an amount not exceeding $55,000 for traffic light improvements on N. Atlantic Ave. The method of payment is $100 per unit at the time of issuance of a certificate of occupancy. To date $15,619.40 is still available; funds were utilized to install the traffic light that is currently at the intersection of N. Atlantic Ave. and W. Central Blvd. The City of Cape Canaveral is working with Brevard County to construct left turn lanes for the north and southbound sections of N. Atlantic Ave. at this intersection. Our city engineers estimate the construction cost at $109,250. The 1985 escrow agreement also provided that a payment of $100 per unit at the time of issuance of a certificate of occupancy be collected and used for the Ridgewood Ave roadway extension. The amount collected to date is $35,900. The 1987 escrow agreement provided that $12,000 be paid by the developer for sidewalks along the Ridgewood Ave. extension. To date only the $6,000 initial payment has been collected. The Ridgewood Ave. roadway extension is no longer within the City of Cape Canaveral's comprehensive plan, see attached future traffic map. 0 Page 1 I The City Attorney has reviewed this request, and advised that the Planning and Zoning Board needed to review and comment on this request before it goes before the City Council for consideration. This is an ongoing project and there will be a future request by the developer to modify the existing site plan for the construction of the two five story buildings. I would recommend that any modification of these escrow agreements keep in place the intent of improving the traffic and pedestrian flow in and around this development. Representatives from the developer and the homeowners association will be in attendance to address any questions that you all may have about their request to modify these escrow agreements. 0 Page 2 16 W W LL 1�- Z � D � 2 W w M Q I-- Z W z W J a. 2 O I-- 0) a. W � U) \ CL 0 k _ cu8 k $ Lel � cc cck '2 Lol § ca � 0 0 / J k / � a k c k U- 0 §k kk @ 2 0 2 /CD LL 4-- 0 2 0 m m cc cc � k k CD § k CD / CD k « 2-11 cc \ e 2 i 32 a 2 2 e2 c ƒ k /W \a) cc ccC 0 / / / 0 t cc o E j 0 I / $ 2\72 00 �. $ IML �Ro 0CM d3 kik CU / \ In . o f0= f G §E E L� - / E ca�5® a ca § / k $ r- 0 # @ . a / w /\2 Sad ƒcn §k k 0 E c o E CD 0 � § cu a� k 2 a) E \ \ CL 0 k _ cu8 k $ Lel � cc cck '2 Lol § ca � 0 0 / J k / � a k c k U- 0 §k kk @ 2 0 2 /CD LL 4-- 0 2 0 m m cc cc � k k CD § k CD / CD k « All. k / q 6 2 m @ LL C 0w� di kca )0 ■ �� c > cc = CL 5 7730 .c c r_ 3 %\@ a 2 7 7 3� R S 5 g2c5 &2EK 2� �E_� c o—° F� L ®ƒ a �= 6 0U 0 � @ _ _ E C �U� E \ o >1�2\ v C& CU 0) Q)/(D§ E C) Ems% CL o= ■ E� 2� 2 —qq� _ Dc4 a®% Eƒ\v ° mU@ k t2/ 3 3 7 4- 7 S \\ 0 = 2 c / f 0 m E E @ ca0 (D§ SEa ECL 2 g o$ b 2 7 2 e=_° 0 6 S ® D J 0 ° 2 0 5 § e t k E 0 E $ w c e § CL E $ ° t / /k �k\ o w 0) \�7e e$ cc° CDCL k S / @ E 7owm (Dn 2 CL c g CO 4-- C— m d§ a 2\ m 0 °§ = c = R ( o t E E / a CD & ( / 2 ° @ /$-% 2 7 C F $ § o& f R 2 o a co ~ 2/ c f g kf �x4 m« ®oSS /ccCD 0 % 5°@ \ 0 t a)> Q / 2 R 7 j —/ mo o « e I £ ƒ L >' N C C p � N O wn o i Eomaami L � 0 0� o Z sz 3 N c — N .o N 69 O Vj w Z p U - 00 L > CA p 0 0 Z X — O C O CC .L O c V cc N N Occ " O U M t > com CD �..CD .. C L O CU p E �, N s= W � (Q 4 a) L H� o 2 x E am o L Q � o O v•. 3 L C U I > m L >' N C p � wn o i Eomaami L � 0 0� o Z sz 3 N °' (DE o o aE) .o N 69 O Vj w Z O p c0 ` . CU CU L ca O ca N> O- L > CA p 0 0 Z X O N p M� O C O CC .L O V cc N N CII 7 O N �; 0 0 "' Q C to p «L• >. U t t > com CD �..CD .. L O CU p E �, N s= X +_ N 0 3 a 0 o rn �a� Q ��t'�'o o " > H� o L � E C CC E U w a F— N p CL 7 V O m l0 to N O O_ ` O p V O CCp m U> ti" k o O v•. 3 L C U I > m r to C O. '4 O O CZ Q Q m Z O O) C N O V C Q Q 'a N L vi O L _ E CV p i O O, N N" V O y �'CU .. Cc a00 (D Cc6 O' O CO U Cn a a 0o q* to ti N et N C) 1- CO) ItiT t Q w w a m N 11 ti N 40 IxO N Go N N 61% N _ z W a W 0 a H z 0 i w LL I— w _ H w _ U z 0 H W J J U 0 N W _ F - z a � V1 W Q � 2 � LL LLLL w OW ire � o � H U W O J m LL a W LU > O H W Uw W J Cl LU W J U) O LU UJ W= On ww` ''r^ vI 0 �a FLU - M M= 0 W w ~ Y N z J a O U 00 F - w o J J O J U m a W W a H z W IL c!1 J W _ U _ T 0 �i N N 13 w W z M a J H Z w _ H