HomeMy WebLinkAboutRE Comments on Young Subdivision RequestHere is the attachment (sample agreement) I mentioned. Thanks,
Kimberly Romano Kopp, Esq., LEED AP
Brown, Garganese, Weiss & D’Agresta
Senior Attorney
111 N. Orange Ave., Suite 2000
P.O. Box 2873
Orlando, Florida 32802-2873
Phone (407) 425-9566
Fax (407) 425-9596
Kissimmee (321) 402-0144
Cocoa (866) 425-9566
Website: www.orlandolaw.net <http://www.orlandolaw.net/>
Email: kkopp@orlandolaw.net <mailto:kkopp@orlandolaw.net>
Any incoming e-mail reply to this communication will be electronically
filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result
in such reply being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our
site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we may not
receive your reply and/or we may not receive it in a timely manner.
Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are
particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains
privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this
e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and
delete it from your system. Thank you.
From: Kim Kopp
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 2:39 PM
To: David Dickey (D.Dickey@cityofcapecanaveral.org); Jeff Ratliff
(J.Ratliff@cityofcapecanaveral.org); John Cunningham
(jcunningham@ccvfd.org); Michael German
(M.German@cityofcapecanaveral.org)
Subject: Comments on Young Subdivision Request
Dave,
Based on my review, the plat (and in some cases the title opinion as
well) should be modified to address the below issues from a legal
perspective.
1. My first comment is that the legal description on the plat and
the title opinion should both be revised to include only that property
owned by the applicant. Therefore, the legal should not include the
Young’s existing easement on the Marino property. The only property
that may be subdivided is property owned by the applicant. The plat
should include a note or notes referencing the other easement(s) that
provide access from the subject proposed lots out to Holman Road, but it
should be clear that such easement(s) are not a part of the plat itself.
On a side note, the City need not get into civil matters between the
parties involving any such easement(s) as we have discussed.
2. Additionally, I question why the title opinion and plat don’t
reflect the language set forth in the Jahn/Butler deed (page 2), which
in effect provides that the Young’s existing easement on the Marino
property is a non-exclusive, perpetual easement and covenant running
with the land, however, should the Grantee or his assigns ever secure
access to the subject property by other means, the easement shall
terminate. This language is included on the instrument that conveyed
the easement (Jahn deed). Unless the applicant or attorney preparing
the title opinion provides me with information to the contrary, this
should also be included in the plat notes.
3. Modify the plat dedication to be clear as to which easement is
being dedicated (the proposed easement on Lot 1). Again, it needs to be
clear that the other easements depicted on the plat are not a part of
the plat or dedication (because they are not owned by the Youngs).
4. The applicant should provide to the City a separate, recorded
legal instrument establishing the 20 foot Access/Utility Easement
located on the proposed .45 acre Lot 1. I have a form that we can
provide to the property owner as an example. It is attached to this
email, and while it is not in final form and would need to be further
tweaked, it provides a good starting point. See my next comment and
note that the City could also address its concerns with respect to fire
sprinklers and emergency access in this document.
5. It is my understanding that the Fire Marshall has determined
that the 20 foot access easements are sufficient for provision of
emergency services provided that there are fire sprinklers in any new
construction on Lot 2. I would recommend including this as a note on
the plat, and having the fire marshall review again for sufficiency.
6. As discussed, the City needs to review and determine whether
it can serve the proposed Lot 2 via the currently existing utility
infrastructure and easements.
Please let me know if I may further assist. Thanks,
Kimberly Romano Kopp, Esq., LEED AP
Brown, Garganese, Weiss & D’Agresta
Senior Attorney
111 N. Orange Ave., Suite 2000
P.O. Box 2873
Orlando, Florida 32802-2873
Phone (407) 425-9566
Fax (407) 425-9596
Kissimmee (321) 402-0144
Cocoa (866) 425-9566
Website: www.orlandolaw.net <http://www.orlandolaw.net/>
Email: kkopp@orlandolaw.net <mailto:kkopp@orlandolaw.net>
Any incoming e-mail reply to this communication will be electronically
filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result
in such reply being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our
site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we may not
receive your reply and/or we may not receive it in a timely manner.
Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are
particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains
privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this
e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and
delete it from your system. Thank you.
Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written
communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral
officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or
media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email
addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address
released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic
email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing