Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGrowth Mgmt Legislation 2005SCHOOL CONCURRENCY C> FP P: IL-.<=- FU C>1�0�: S r 2005 Growth Management Legislation The most significant change in Florida's growth management laws since 1985. Among the growth management reforms included in the law, it requires all local governments to implement school concurrency by adopting a Public School Facilities Element into its comprehensive plan no later than 12/1/08. KEY POINTS Three main elements — Roads / Water / Schools What is it for? Insure that services are "concurrent' 'with growth. Will this stop growth? No. It will require that the impact of Implann growth pay its fair share of the cost of the impact. Are vested developments affected by this? No. Vested developments are included in the planned growth based on agreed absorption rates. Does everyone have to do this? Melbourne Village has bem exempted. Grant / Valkaria will be exempted. What happens if I don't agree to participate? No Comprehensive Plan changes will be approved by the DCA. Pilot Districts DCA selected 6 pilot districts (Hillsborough, Indian River, Lake, Sarasota St. Johns and Walton) and awarded a $200,000 grant to each district to assist with an accelerated schedule. School Board Consultants Kimley Horn & Associates / Leo Noble / Jeanne Mills & Associates / Mamco / Dr. Ron Schultz Consultants for Indian River County (Pilot District), Palm Beach County, Osceola County, etc. SCHOOL CONCURRENCY TERMS Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning (]LA) The existing ILA must be revised to include school concurrency and must be signed by all parties. Public School Facility Element (PSFE) A PSFE must be adopted into all Comprehensive Plans. Concurrency Service Area (CSA) School boundaries / Adjacent CSA's as the second test. Level of Service (LOS) Financially feasible / Tiered from existing to 100%. Proportionate Share Mitigation (PSM) First 3 years of plan is considered current. ISSUES Growth Projections The number of new students in the CSA's, based upon agreed population projections and student generation rates. Four sets of projections. Student generation rates are based on the Census 2000 data / verified by demographer. Charter Schools Not currently included in projections. Can be used as PSM if compliant with SREF standards. 4� u U. An 0 0 0 z u CM AM Hypothetical Level of Service Acheivement E&T.I.YA 125% 25% 122% 20% 115% 15% 0 112% 110% 10% 107% 105% 105% 05% 1000 100%100% 100%100%100% 00% 95% 90% 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 N Elementary N Middle 5 High Student Growth Projections Not Including Charter Schools and Special Centers Q,000 10,000 18,000 ",00� '6,000 -..000� 4.000 ilill0000p 2,000 0,000 8,000 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 11*�State (CO -FTE / 97.4%) "OO�Brevard School District 0"b�Kirnley Horne —,*—Aggregate Municipalities �Early Count 2006] SCHOOL CONCURRENCY C> P r>.,M:r. SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES June 24, 2005: Growth Management legislation (SB 360) was signed into law by Governor Bush. March 17,2006: Brevard Public Schools hires Kimley Horn as the Growth Management Consultant. June 16, 2006: Brevard Public Schools hosts a meeting of the Planners from the County and the municipalities to discuss the Growth Management legislation. August 15, 2006: Brevard Public Schools hosts a meeting with the Brevard County Public Management Association to discuss the Growth Management legislation. A draft of the ILA is issued. September 27, 2006: Brevard Public Schools hosts a meeting with the managers and planners from the County and the municipalities to discuss the Growth Management legislation. A draft of the Student Growth Projections is issued. October 13, 2006: Final ILA comments are due from the County and the municipalities. October 19, 2006: Brevard Public Schools will host a meeting with the managers and planners from the County and the municipalities to discuss the ILA comments. A draft of the PSFE will be issued. November 1, 2006: Brevard Public Schools will issue a draft of the Financial Feasibility Analysis. November 2006 — March 2007: Brevard Public Schools will work with local governments to resolve all issues. TBD: Workshop for School Board / staff and elected officials / staff of local governments to address any remaining issues. Suggested forum — the Summit meeting scheduled for 1/19/06. March 2007: Agreement on the Interlocal Agreement and a School Concurrency Element with related modifications to existing Comprehensive Plan elements. Aprfl 2007 — March 2008: Approval of the revised Interlocal Agreement by the DCA and adoption by the School Board and all local governments. Incorporation of a School Concurrency Element and modification of existing Comprehensive Plan elements as necessary to address school concurrency in the Comprehensive Plans of all local governments and approval by the DCA. Growth Management Workshop for School Concurrency The Brevard County School District, the Brevard County Commission, And The Participating* Municipalities of Brevard County SUMMARYPAGE There are three main cmponerts to the school concurrency Pan that are required to be included in the, updated Intedocal Agreement for Coordinated Planning and S&nol Carx;urrency (ILA): 1) Financial feasibility of the School Dstrict Five -Year Capital Facilities Work Program; 2) %gulatory review of all new residential projects; and 3) Joint planning Wth Cities, the Carty and the School [District. N/Iore guidarooe is provided through the statutes. The following summarizes the components of interlocal agreement for school concurrency: Update the existing Public School Interlocal Agreement (ILA) for Facility Planning to include school ouxurrency. The ILA Wil detail the specific responsibilities of the School Board, the Carty and the Cities to address the tin-dy delivery of adequate public school facilities at ft adopted level of ser\Ace inducing: dose coordinaton aimong the pates at the level of land use planning, development approval, and school facility planning, based on a finai-icially feasible School [District Capital Facilities Work Program (Sections 163.3177(6)(h)(1), 163.31777, F.S. and 163.3180(13), F.S.) • The ILA WII address the annual update a fina-xially feasible Public School Capital Facilities \Abrk Program; identify and include this program in the ILA and an amended Capital Improvements Element of the County and the Cities comprehensive plans. (Section 163.3180(13)(d)l., F.S.) • The ILA \AhII establish public school Caurercy Ser\Aoe Areas ( to define the geogaphic bouriclaries in mhch school ooncurrerr-y is measured, and include the CSAs in the updated ILA and in the supporting data and analysis for the new Public Sd-iod Facilities Element of the comprehensive plans. (Sections 163.3180(13)(c) and 163.3180(13)(g)(5), F.S.) • The ILA \AAII call for the adoption of Level -of -Service (LOS) standards to establish mia;NdrTurn pernissible school utilization rates relative to capacity, and will include those LOS stanclads in the updated ILA and in the new Public Sdxxi Facilities Element and the amended Capital Improvements Element of the comprehensive plans. (Section 163.3180(13)(b), F.S.) • The ILAWII call for the adoption of a new Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) into the County's and the Oties� omprehensive plans consistent vvith the ILA and those adopted by the other local governryents within the County. (Sections 163.3180(13)(a) and 163.3177(12), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.025, F.A.C.) • The ILAWII call for the School [District's Pegulatory Reviewof %sidential Development, in accordance Wth 163.3180(13)(g)6, for school capacity and issuance of cletermination letter. A student generation multiplier wII be used to determine the nevv student in -pad generated from a residential development on public schools. The updated ILA WII call for the establishment of Proportionate -Share Mtiqation methodology and opitions to be included in the PSFE and the ILA. (Section 163.3180(13)(e), F.S.) The ILA WII require an amendment to the Capital InTrovements Ben -at of the Carty and the Cities compi4wisive plans to include the School Dstrict's Five -Year C.-Otal Facilities Program (Section 163.3180(13)(d)l., F.S.) The ILA \AAII require the amending of the Intempyernmental Coordination Element of the corrprehensive plan, if necessary, as set forth in Section 163.3184, F.S. *The Town of Melbourne Village qualifies for exemption from the ILA for School Concurrency at this time.