Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBoard Decision of Request 1-28-2015 , PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOARD DECISION OF REQUEST el) P&ZRequest No. O/5 - 6 \ Date Request to be considered by the Board: G 0/C BOARD ACTION TAKEN: Approved as Submitted and Presented Approved with the ollowing condition(s): AL2 ±a f d Postponed for Additional Information Denied for the following reason(s): Note: Refer- - City Code Sections: 22-43 (b), Expiration of Approval; 22-45,Appeal of the Board's deer Signatu of Chairperson 4 v it 1C-Q. Printed name of Chairperson Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes January 28, 2015 Assistant City Attorney Kopp swore in all participants speaking at the meeting. Mr. Dickey thanked audience members for attending the meeting. He presented Staffs mport/photos showing the site and surrounding areas. Mr. Dickey indicated the audience would be seeing everything the Board Members have seen and spoke of "full disclosure." He stated the proposed development consists of a 4,673 square foot, retail convenience store that includes seven fueling islands (fourteen fueling pumps) under a detached canopy. The project includes twenty-six parking spaces including one handicap space. A 5 -foot wide, concrete sidewalk is proposed along So. Cape Shores Drive. Mr. Dickey noted: the area that jogs out slightly to the south is to save a large tree located on the site; a 6 -foot masonry wall is proposed along the northern portion of the stormwater pond as part of the required buffer with adjacent residential uses; the proposed building is located on a 1.41 acre parcel, which has frontage on N. Atlantic Avenue and So. Cape Shores Drive; the criteria for Sections 110-39 (c) and 110-334(c)(3) of the City's Code was explained. The subject property is zoned Cl. Mr. Dickey indicated Section 110-39(c)(1) requires all special exception requests demonstrate that the proposed project's traffic -generating characteristics will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate area. The traffic level of service (LOS) is an indication of how any given road is operating. Service levels range from A to F, with level A representing a condition of least delay. The City's adopted LOS standard is E. Mr. Dickey explained if the level of service drops below a level E for the road, the City can place a Moratorium on development until the level of service is corrected. A traffic study has been performed. Mr. Dickey explained that an additional 92 trips would be added to the existing number of 2,509 Peak Hour trips. With these additional trips added, the level of service will remain at a level C. Mr. Dickey read the seven provisions between the Cape Shores Association Board, the property owner (B&B Enterprises), and the developer, Cumberland Farms. Additional City approvals are needed to construct the proposed development. These include: site plan approval, which will require a public hearing before the Planning & Zoning Board; notification of owners, within 500 feet of property, by mail when the hearing is scheduled; a Tree Removal Permit, which will require a public hearing before the City Council. Mr. Dickey stated a date has not been set for this public hearing. Additionally, there will be an administrative concurrency review which evaluates a project's effect on traffic, water & sewer services, etc., and an administrative Site Development Permit, which deals with issues pertaining to erosion control and sedimentation. Mr. Dickey stated that Staff recommends approval of Special Exception No. 2015-01 to the Board of Adjustment subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to any development activity on-site, the applicant will cause an assessment to be conducted, consistent with applicable rules, to determine the existence of any Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes January 28, 2015 historical/cultural resources on the proposed development site. Should the assessment determine the existence of said resources, a mitigation/remediation plan, consistent with applicable rules, shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Hours of operation shall be limited to opening no earlier than 5:00 a.m. and closing no later than 12:00 a.m., seven days a week. 3. Any outside seating and/or dining areas shall be located on the southern side of the main structure as shown on the attached site plan. 4. All outside lighting shall contain appropriate shielding and direct light away from the north side of the property. 5. Any air and/or vacuum equipment located on the property shall be on the south side of the main structure as shown on the attached site plan. Additional comment #6 was added by Assistant City Attorney Kim Kopp and Mr. Dickey 6. As a condition of approval of Special Exception 2015-01, a Lot Split Application for the proposed 1.41 acre tract will be submitted and considered by the City as set forth in Chapter 98 of the City Code. Failure to obtain approval by the City of such lot split, pursuant to Chapter 98, shall render this special exception null and void. Discussion ensued and included: attachments included in the Agenda Packet and what they represented; the overlay and placement of the building; how the applicant needs to meet the requirements; how the project is in compliance with the standards of the Code; how issues pertaining to compliance regarding vehicle parking, maintenance of the property, etc., will be addressed by Code Enforcement if necessary; the Binding Development Plan has been added to the packet for informational purposes only; the black bar on the Cape Shores exit shown on the site plan is a stop bar where traffic must stop; when an individual wants to create a new parcel by splitting the property, an application for a lot split must be submitted to Community Development; the photos showing the part of the property in question; explanation of the individual lots were explained by property owner Bob Baugher. Mr. Russell referenced a letter that was being entered into record by Attorney Kimberly Bonder Rezanka. Attorney Kopp mentioned that the letter had not been presented to the applicant or to the property owner, prior to the meeting, due to the fact that the letter was received late on the day of the Board meeting. Mr. Dickey read the letter dated January 28, 2015, and indicated that nothing contained in the letter has caused any concern not to proceed with this application. Discussion ensued and included: cross -access easement and how Mr. Dickey encouraged the applicant to consider them to allow parcels to be connected and keep traffic off of AlA; this issue is not a Code requirement, but something that is beyond the requirements set forth in the Code; this issue will be addressed at site plan approval if the process continues to that point; the site plan being discussed is for informational purposes only, meaning not binding on the