Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRe Updating ordinances Re Taking this to committee Re Tree ordinance and replacements Re Florida Sunshine Law request Re Tree Removal (2)Happy too, if I could find it. I am referring to what Glenn wrote, "Briefly, tree permits for removal of dead tree(s); can be removed without replacementconsideration, City Code of Ordinance, Section 102-40. (a).(4): Where is this written in the ordinance? That there is no replacement reconsideration? Also I want to address the historic preservation ordinance dealing with known archaeological sites. Can you send me the ordinance as it stands with that? Attached is the historic roster for all of Brevard County and you will see Br1936. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Todd Morley <T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote: Good Morning Ray, It would really help if you could make your suggested revisions in underline and strikethrough format. Thanks, Todd Todd Morley Community & Economic Development Director City of Cape Canaveral 7510 N. Atlantic Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1222 x14 (321) 868-1247 (fax) t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://www.cityofcapecanaveral.org/> “If it is to be, it is up to me” From: Ray Osborne [mailto:rko153@gmail.com <mailto:rko153@gmail.com> ] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 9:20 PM To: Todd Morley Cc: Barry Brown; Neale, Rick; Susan Chapman; Glenn Pereno Subject: Re: Updating ordinances?, Re: Taking this to committee, Re: Tree ordinance and replacements, Re: Florida Sunshine Law request, Re: Tree Removal Thanks for the email addressing this issue of trees. Still I'd like to address historic preservation as well but we can leave that for a separate email. Below is the code. This seems fine as I read it but what got me started with this is when Glenn wrote, "Briefly, tree permits for removal of dead tree(s); can be removed without replacementconsideration, City Code of Ordinance, Section 102-40. (a).(4): We have many dead trees granted they need to be replaced. And we have many invasive species and they need to be replaced. But replaced with native species. The one's listed in Sec. 102-52. List of desirable species and plants. It's easy math, if we remove trees even if they are dead (and there is a lot with the bay laurel disease) and we remove invasive species trees then we will have a loss of total tree count in our community. We need to replace them with a positive solution and that would be replace them with the ones listed in Sec 102-52. Heck if we are to make a positive impact against climate change and local pollution we need to plant natives more than just one for one. Every neighbor who has a dead bay laurel we should give them a native. Here is a copy of the section I was talking about, (d) Tree replacement guidelines. (1) Each tree removed or destroyed shall be replaced by a desirable tree or such other tree properly approved by permit, or in the alternative, property owners and developers shall pay to the city's tree bank $250.00 per tree removed or destroyed. (2) The replacement trees shall be a minimum of four inches dbh and shall be on the desirable species list under this division. On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Todd Morley <T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:T.Morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote: Ray, Please take a look at the tree code (attached) and let me know which section you would like to see revised. You can send your revision suggestions to me. Thanks, Todd Todd Morley Community & Economic Development Director City of Cape Canaveral 7510 N. Atlantic Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1222 x14 (321) 868-1247 (fax) t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:t.morley@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://www.cityofcapecanaveral.org/> “If it is to be, it is up to me” <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=604138a2e1&view=att&th=13ef2e 8a1d3becd2&attid=0.1&disp=emb&realattid=e421afd9d76e20bb_0.0.1&zw&atsh=1 > From: Ray Osborne [mailto:rko153@gmail.com <mailto:rko153@gmail.com> ] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:24 AM To: Barry Brown; Neale, Rick Cc: Susan Chapman; Todd Morley; Glenn Pereno Subject: Updating ordinances?, Re: Taking this to committee, Re: Tree ordinance and replacements, Re: Florida Sunshine Law request, Re: Tree Removal Barry, I'd like to suggest we open up items at the next Business and Economic Development meeting for discussion on an updated Historic Preservation Ordinance and a Tree Replacement Ordinance. I notice these meetings are usually held at 3:pm, may I suggest that this particular meeting be arranged for later in the day when an audience from the community be permitted to make comments? On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Ray Osborne <rko153@gmail.com <mailto:rko153@gmail.com> > wrote: Barry meet Rick Neale with Florida Today, and Rick meet Barry Brown.the city planner. I just got off the phone with Rick about a possible good news story about our city reaching out to the community about updating its tree ordinance and protecting a local archaeological site. He believe the story may have merit and will create interest with readers. I'm asking him to call you about the city's plans for the town hall forum on this issue. On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Ray Osborne <rko153@gmail.com <mailto:rko153@gmail.com> > wrote: As per my previous email, I direct this email now Barry Brown. Barry, I will call you about this but first I want to send you an official email. These are my talking points and will give you an opportunity to address them. The existing tree ordinance by the city is out of date with the issues and values facing not only our local community but our global community too. I officially request that it be taken to committee to enable members of our community to voice their opinion in a town hall forum. Can you give me the date that this tree ordinance was adopted and made into law with our municipal code? <official request. Bear in mind we are a listed as tree city with the Arbor Day Foundation which means that we should place particular importance to this resource. This is about the landing clearing that will happen soon to one of the few remaining wooded areas in our city that is being undertaken by B&B Enterprises on the land adjacent to Cape Shores. 1) Removal and non-replacement with native tree interferes with the biodiversity we have enjoyed in our community. Many migratory birds settle in the trees of this area and Ospreys landings are a common occurrence 2) Native trees provide a powerful defense against global warming and climate change as they take in carbon dioxide and replace it with oxygen. 3) Trees and their root structures provide a strength to the soil and prevent storm water run off naturally. 4) Winds from storms are tempered by trees and prevent higher winds hitting Merritt Island and the mainland. 5) There will be other benefits that will be disclosed at our town hall form. 2) I should also point out that his land is archaeology sensitive. Documents from the state preservation officer indicates their interest in this parcel and site registered as BR1936 and their historic roster for our area indicates a strong possibility of ancient human remains. See attached roster and letter from the state. I trust the city is prepared to continue in the spirit of letting democracy prevail and that all citizens of our great community be allowed to be heard on this matter. Please take this as an official request to take this matter to committee. On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Glenn Pereno <G.Pereno@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:G.Pereno@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote: Ray: Briefly, tree permits for removal of dead tree(s); can be removed without replacement consideration, City Code of Ordinance, Section 102-40. (a).(4): Sec. 102-40. - Permit criteria; exemptions; standards of review. (a): Permitted criteria. Upon receipt of a completed application and verification by the building official, the building official may, after applying the standards of review set forth in subsection (c), issue a land clearing permit under any one of the following conditions:…………… (4):Trees severely diseased, severely injured or dead. For the purpose of clarity, a Specimen Tree is defined as: CCCO, Sec. 102-36. - Definitions. Specimen tree means a tree having a caliper of 24 inches or more in diameter. Specimen trees shall not include undesirable, dead, or diseased trees, or trees that are structurally unsound and cannot recover from pruning. In closing, please contact Barry Brown; Planning and Zoning Director: 321-868-1222 ext. 11 <tel:321-868-1222%20ext.%2011> to discuss your request to take this matter a committee. Respectfully, <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=604138a2e1&view=att&th=13ece3 ee8e001191&attid=0.1&disp=emb&realattid=e1d20dfccab1e79d_0.1&zw&atsh=1> Glenn Pereno, Building Official Community & Economic Development Department City of Cape Canaveral 7510 N. Atlantic Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1222 x12 (321) 868-1247 (fax) g.pereno@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:g.pereno@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://www.cityofcapecanaveral.org/> "What a Man does for himself dies with him, but what a Man does for his community Lives forever" Author Unknown From: Ray Osborne [mailto:rko153@gmail.com <mailto:rko153@gmail.com> ] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:15 PM To: Glenn Pereno Cc: Duree Alexander; Angela Apperson; Brian Palmer; Susan Chapman Subject: Tree ordinance and replacements, Re: Florida Sunshine Law request, Re: Tree Removal Hello Glenn, I'm following up with my communication with you on May 15. (a week ago) Please treat this as a public record request. I've seen the report but not seen what native species trees are on this parcel. Are any natives being removed that are not dead? What if any natives are replacing the evasive and dead trees? The replacement plan is what I wanted to review. http://floridasnature.com/florida%20trees1.htm <http://floridasnature.com/florida%20trees1.htm> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Ray Osborne <rko153@gmail.com <mailto:rko153@gmail.com> > wrote: Glenn, I spoke to some more local residents who also favor am upgrade of the tree ordinance. The want to be represented to on this issue. And I appreciate you telling me in person today how this is done. Will this be set up with a city committee next? Obviously this needs to be done before further trees are removed so will the permits on the B&B enterprises be delayed for a bit? On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Ray Osborne <rko153@gmail.com <mailto:rko153@gmail.com> > wrote: Thanks for the email, Glenn. This may be the city ordinance on trees but it demonstrates that the removal and non replacement with native tree species is out of date and out of touch with the values and wishes of our community as a whole. Bear in mind we are a listed as tree city with the Arbor Day Foundation. As I said removal and non-replacement with native tree interferes with the biodiversity we have enjoyed in our community. And also eliminates a powerful defense again global climate warming. Trees take in carbon dioxide and replace it with oxygen. So I will go on record as objecting to this move without community discussion on this matter. When this ordinance was drafted the over-development of our community had not taken place, now it is. This wooded area is one of the last remaining wooded areas. Please take this as an official request to take this matter to committee. There is a lot at stake here, as my area will lose it's natural charm unless healthy native species trees are not replacing the dead and evasive ones that will be removed. The City is sensitive to your concerns in this matter. Based on City Code of Ordinances, dead trees may be removed through the permit process; Section 102.40 (a) (4), and with respect to evasive tree such as, Brazilian Pepper tree(s) these trees may be removed without further review or permitting; Section 102.40 (b) (6). Respectfully, <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=604138a2e1&view=att&th=13ece3 ee8e001191&attid=0.1&disp=emb&realattid=e1d20dfccab1e79d_0.1&zw&atsh=1> Glenn Pereno, Building Official Community & Economic Development Department City of Cape Canaveral 7510 N. Atlantic Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1222 x12 (321) 868-1247 (fax) g.pereno@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:g.pereno@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://www.cityofcapecanaveral.org/> "What a Man does for himself dies with him, but what a Man does for his community Lives forever" Author Unknown From: Ray Osborne [mailto:rko153@gmail.com <mailto:rko153@gmail.com> ] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 1:04 PM To: Duree Alexander; Angela Apperson Cc: Glenn Pereno; Brian Palmer Subject: Re: Florida Sunshine Law request, Re: Tree Removal Hello, regarding our communication from last week. I'd like to know if before these tree permits are issued if it can be taken to committee at the city level for discussion? On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Duree Alexander <D.Alexander@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:D.Alexander@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote: Ray, I am in receipt of your request. Duree Alexander, Code Enforcement Officer City of Cape Canaveral Code Enforcement Department 7510 N. Atlantic Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1222 x13 (321) 868-1247 (fax) d.alexander@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:d.alexander@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://www.cityofcapecanaveral.org/> <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=604138a2e1&view=att&th=13ece3 ee8e001191&attid=0.2&disp=emb&realattid=e1d20dfccab1e79d_0.2&zw&atsh=1> From: Ray Osborne [mailto:rko153@gmail.com <mailto:rko153@gmail.com> ] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 12:44 PM To: Duree Alexander Subject: Florida Sunshine Law request, Re: Tree Removal Thanks Duree, and also please add the letter I submitted from the state. Please also note that I appreciate all email sent to me be in private BCC. If there is a public record Sunshine law request that is fine but I don't think my communication with you needs to be shared with everyone without this request. Please acknowledge my request, On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Duree Alexander <D.Alexander@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:D.Alexander@cityofcapecanaveral.org> > wrote: Ray & John, This email is to inform you that the City has approved a permit for B & B Enterprises of Cape Canaveral, LLC, to remove dead Bay Trees from several parcels owned by B & B Enterprises. These trees have been identified by the property owner(s), and inspected by the City Arborist, and Staff to ensure code compliance. Ray, your Public Records Request if forth coming. Duree Alexander, Code Enforcement Officer City of Cape Canaveral Code Enforcement Department 7510 N. Atlantic Ave. P.O. Box 326 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 (321) 868-1222 x13 (321) 868-1247 (fax) d.alexander@cityofcapecanaveral.org <mailto:d.alexander@cityofcapecanaveral.org> www.cityofcapecanaveral.org <http://www.cityofcapecanaveral.org/> <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=604138a2e1&view=att&th=13ece3 ee8e001191&attid=0.2&disp=emb&realattid=e1d20dfccab1e79d_0.2&zw&atsh=1> Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing. Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing. Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing. Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing. Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing. Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Cape Canaveral officials and employees will be made available to the public and/or media upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing. ﶑翽勺ﹷ忞쿵ﯜォ鶰憎ﻷ羥뿜￟⿴䷸쇿勵箿뿷ﵜ뼕窴࿼ꧾﱯ쳷祿ꟹ㏽ソ鿛諽⦅㯿嫾绿绋忥ᗼ쎿ﵫ翇w濩߲矼k�㿸㷸짾ﰿC�߿봿︻ᄉ㿬럸꯼伾藿︷_ョ鿞対�얿﷟찟ﻯU翅迺ㇼ�ﺷ㿑矶⏽ᅬ㿾滾ﺵἇ㗿ﲏ㿾鯳훽マ㿂뿬✏翋↓쟺￯뿝濾柾S퇮ᅦ⿲﷟뮅ﳿ籟�믿�﫟짹ﰻ翾⿑鏸돾ﱗ㼏㿳鋿皿毲觾�㿰韸慨뿉俪蛿濲Ὸ黾ﶗ彧�텿麯䗿썿畯럸釾ﯟﵫ쓚翸Ῡﳮ￁컖꿾᯷윐뫾ᆵ鉫싼 �ﳍ﹫뼑볝坭귞춦籪瑉衯땩�鷹쭿ﳗ羿�ꏗ뼟꿖毹ᳬ돣秗玴忩ᄡᇽ層듺茮꼊곸牲꘼챖뾩䛼褻ﻗ瘍፾ꊛ徯⒇ퟠణﳟ⇗ﳎ绋鷻훟ﶯ﹛潆὞ꌓ氝滯뿟釗徊࿻菾赿볯嗽췿﷯㲏鷽カ﬿㾓ΰ䏼뫾麝퍿⽻쏿忎ﯺ叽쳿犯﹛뾗ꯎﱿ뾻쇆ﶟ翓诪ﭟ{�쇣﫯櫥࿷鿺�㾃濲꿽꯾ﺿ꿅賾뼗뿛埲ﱿߢ썿駟=澲௽﴿ッセ�짻縟럴刺ﭿﶿ缟￷߾뛾ﱿﺗ羊㟱௺ꟾ﫿¦=䣣Ⲳ礱卩ﯞ꩓멗꜆䔋Ѐₛ蛁舄འ汆霶㭈䤚啙吉댮 댲戀뷤�篞뷯�瓩뤺⌲怋瞳퉖Č䕔ắ諭缝菇羏ᷱ篿࿧뗹䯾ﺿ翤ퟺ귾缻濔ﻫ﹜嵑︹酙뺌寝究杷㩛藽男﫲酆导湞ﭽ￟练ꞻ￯習௺뾧￰쿤駻ﳟ㟠�檿쟵ᅤ仯�㕿嗹텿ᆳ꯾ﲟ덝ﰗᄏ�㿭㿹ﯾﲃ=�ﵸ縋鿟뼹ﯿ뫿챿←掠㿢ﵼﴇ缥並￧缍韻ۼ�嗹쏿ཇ㾞﹉ナ鿰巸뇾ᆱ࿺㷾罗羚缵뿰◼쵿缟￿௺诿￯꿴៻㿶߽賿﫿ﻧ往篵韾ﺿ뿴菽承韹勵︻�﾿3徽⿯⏺﹞뼹㯸솿뱯㯳㏿ �埶퟾ﳫ뿕鿧럽ﵬ罗濢ퟳ︽彏뽗뿗コᅬꯛ럼᧾뾣돷뿺ﱝ埠㛽엿ﰯ→ᅥ쿱ﵾﹷꎞ﴿뫯毾꿾忕Ꝼꗽ﹏螻勞�뿦緸�淟濾᫽큿濉䟶䇾啯D鶙ﲟ⊚᯹酙뗼繶鶍≻ꎌ澝泭䗽隷ﻝ辈蒆涱왩냛Ǹۄﰉﻵ审坾㄂翋믤뿕꿕纙㿯ﺺᄃ鶐ﳿ羻㿻鏿赿￯￧翹韢⛿훿﷿뺫蟸䷮繶翳埼뾴뿣ꟶ߼﾿鞟雾鳏ϾO㿹뿴菼�ﲯ俸鼭﫯躳﷏뫽啗籷㯹滾 ̄쯣纏�쿻㛼奔ソ딛탿ﻟッ짬蘭㜏퉿띇뿱⿶돽烈W㿊컱隷뱢᷾綿俼ﭿ 鱯料긷ꋾ餏6迧诽챿듿篾﷏羷濕헾ﰯ뉳羽ߠ횿ヒ羈⿠䟹�䚏ﻯﯥ羗鿟ﳒ뾾⿾゙짖マウ뿙꿲迭经�﩯ﰇ矠⟻￳쿱៸w퇭勵翋忣쯽店ꋾῢﲾ㟺◿ワﱹ뿉⟽㗼﫟翵뿱�귽︯﹏뿼謁ế퇿ﵿ῎᛼ʤ矾ő⦿㹥�过ꣿﳟ㹟忺ᄃ翝篸ᓺ痻͈責ャ뾆䟥픧뫪⸮淦㖺鎽㻮ﴠ颢嗖鵓啉욯뾻鉷뿆啍궋巾繷餗�緎꫿�磴컝몫꽨ạ㸞򆇝秙潡睧�ﺮ珹톀ꚍ퟼ﯺ翕벿᷸ﺷ㿂�럯�◼?ᄏ￾ᅴꟵ_kᅫ쿫䯿ꏒ烈뾉쿤䯽쓾怿ﲿ癤㿽痼ラ鯴 勵ッ㾼矢ᏺ싿濼쟽ﻟ ̄罍㿍뿥㏺뇾灿ﳻ紐ﻏẗﺍ�濨뷿ﰿ뿬蹌︎톌뵟絛컯탾GῩ鯶뷾乿嗹ퟶ⇽7�콗﬿魯︝⼹ꝿ�矠귻싾謹ﲿ㾓课ﻏﰇ뿞﹮︗࿎ﵞ뾑꿲ῼ듿=翕꯰뿓迵菾쇾g鯝�翰闾堿⾴웾ﮟ縳ﵷ븵⟻ǽ菅﫷縭쟽錄罿埯旿짧ﱗ缫俰ﱿ฻뽿븏痺鷾︛㾠�鯺茶缫慎緷쿼緼폿纗ﺷ罺㿸럽垦︟ꨟ皫粿࿧䯾霠'㬹烈ﴇ�韻v兣׿︿뼓럴寺︓翯⿶羮蟷샜곣︕￴㟪蟼﹧ﯿ ﳗﻝꮭﳟﶗ羾�ﰗニ퇬ﮯG网㿢}ラ믩濨诿^⚧﹯蝳㾇埵奔线얷o罳翍쳾뾿쟻︗ꭦﺟサ�쯢껟蟸迾㿤췽⩿馿羚■侩ﰞ�䃿៾᛿챿ﻯ些틿寧矦嗺﴿ﱯ뿖헬띟�쿿ﶷﻟ诳㟲觾￯徟鏽ソ勵ῼﶏ뽑鿳忢鷿굿ﲿﹿﺃ徣濻�Oロ翽믪䏿빏ﱷ뽭훶ソiᅥ᯴觼﫯S뿱쇶㿨쇻嵗ꟽ羗꿑⿱/鼫ㇾ퇿濱埱￝�꟱�뿱㯶㫽�畟叼甿惯엹伛컾⿤헾ﵿ゚뺝⯺v濮ﲏ흓寧ﲯꑅ︕牑︎畆縌㟺돼ﲿ纇�꿹 췽鷿𧻓쾋︿䱻[꥜鶄쥏�緟뾰뮿܏咞�䚧ﰥ翁ﰲ㮖㦿縍妻✳ꁗ纥㍾ℶ气﫼ꋙ칚昌჉䍦�亣썻�處㯱�狌㹶跠₠毭�騘㟤䵠迲現Ῡ蟽쯑'뿈믶뿥믰�ﳿ纷엲﷧羝�イﭺﻇ�忠ﺟ翓忧뿾퟾ﰿﱯ翍鿜韱﫼ﯿ﩯ﱷ꼡鳾羅︧�Ῥ꯿ꇾ῭⟶ﺼ=韞ﯿퟬꏼﭟ욿璘อﱞﱏg査ﹿ濠࿾뾧迾︟�ウ忳硯⯶渾셾g鏬ﻟﰗ�紐w習럩⟼ﭾﴗ譺o齝﻾﹏翻鿨돾῿쥿ᅮ២ⷿ뿝꿫࿸量ﱟ︟뾹濫翺�잻ᵟ틼ﻷ Oᄈﺹ￝忚극뾻Έ埸ᅫ徳퇺럼⿽ﲧ뺞ﳺ︯࿲ꏻ퓿먟엸췿ﶏ㿪ퟢ◾ﶟẋ鹗姿�롿鿽ﵫ뼎ﻩ럸᯸勺羝ꯡ鿪�뗻틿ﳗ턖៣ﳆ忰럥䱾髟௴쫥赿蝟푃履ꄷ쇤ᄏ齯廼￟缷翽뿾䗾﫟罭徛࿽꫿翗컰潯寧纭徭㟧׺꿉﫱壗롓ᱫﳯ烸씷ﵠ㮺㚿鋤�㿴追�ﮯﵷm濍᯸○翋ῑ㤽퟽荿敗㿹︵ᄉ菷Ὧ诿ﭿ῱꿺ꟾ빏꯾ﻟﻧヒ⿹嗺錄籷俻ﳻﭷᅬ��쇻ﺿ㼶ⷸ�ﴧホ濝ﷰ/ﺓ㿮篾ꝿow㿴�Oモテ迻珺뽿 心⣸᷽㳟㿸쥾ﯯ{ᄅ뿨㯷৽叿翱￧︧�奔睯៶찿컿︗-㿗寵᷼쓿﷏뼓῿請・뿌ퟻ⇾忋�翋뿻꿻忺裿黇姼ﰯ諫ﰟᅪ⟰瓟믾蘭받㏽쭿﩯쿴׾著ṛꗼ탿띟ﳷᆴ컦䳏譾ﱯ΅鿿쿿ᅪ�翠叾窏퓼ﮯﻻモ뿢埱�勞�ﱽᆱ﹟︧樂ﯷ濖鯾ﳮ뼡㷮敒ꎿ놨笤៶돼溜築訙꿿ನﮧ�ᓿ틑﯏珸ﶧᥙ纇毿簏ꍿᅬ翁쇆ﻻE㿋ῼ߾틿ﭟᄃ￱_亮」ᇿ俿獿⯽�摒뿩�鯹憎뿅㿡俵ힿﲟ緻寴퟾ﱗ鿸럿 ︿缏ײַ纇�毸훿�ﰯ☫灿ﵶ众量迲폺ꗿ뿥俿藾쫿뼓旹ﺬﲘ︯縳㾛꿺ﻼﰟ㴯]ᅬ鿝௼콾⻷띿폱徝㿣㟿쥾︯翓翳鷾틿�鿰ꏾ뷾磟柽ラ烈羳쿺叹뽾忧헿翝篵ﯟ绽埿楿ﶳラ羽ﱯﷇ뿶﬿ﰛ缻忎缾ᆳ⾫믾¬ﻼ俶ﳯ菄㾃鿶癸寶槿O뾬韩ᅬ羲㿳뇸瑟ﻑ圅�ﳯ뾇㏽鯿㿷ꏾﴗᅥ罓ﰧ羆濛귿틿_뾇→埰ǿ￙돤呿ꉜﳗ術缢趂﹝Ϟ踰쬤錒㚗뷥ꔿꕺ火傺䀄র氒⁈쑠獦뒎醣喔䂕㋥늫㌮​�篞뷯��亝鎧 ῿㌮²笶╧擭჏啀迤㼟达ᄟ瘦쩱翠럸ﻟᅲ韼쏿럢셾著﷧ᄉ鿢翶栎뾾鼚'㯅䔇좵�旾᜿꿺⳯廼亮鹵㳮慄]ꎢ῱죱ﰋؖ䜎ꭾַ봾ꪻ��眶!翠﷢฽뼈⋴鏑�䛃뾢ῖ佱廡嵝驒ް趰蓅'￶ꟸﰟ뾹鿯寵ス닍࿸굿ﲿ罛뿵迺�毽샿뼷뿱ﱷ㽯忽웼謹ﵷ긝ﺎ鱗️㾶韽ㇾ狿迲ꇽ湿䯾ꣾ㾗㏱졿︫ﳟ﹋�鿷뗹v⿂缬뿛헯ラ￑�鿹엽�뱟࿸羓蟶싽믷꯷跿﷟뼇鿟ᗼ謹ラ윯쎿돕ﺿᅴ鿞﹛㿞_�亮绻㾝篡䖿毾퟿ ﱏ罋濱쟴�ソﶿ/u濒寰ﻟ籷迷鷾﷯ﳿ﹫￈꿮ﱻ➝ッ㹿ﯽ⦅忏ⷽᄋﲾ砟ᄑッᅮ꿕ﴷ繵瞽韋ᄋ㿞뿷魯㾩�㾓埨㻼㿨쿻샿緯㿧믟῾慨ᅢ�ﭨ絯뷹蘭缽�꿻埽茶㿮쿼矿뾋쇰ﳫꓓV쩱쇼ﭿ柿掔ᩝ⿻菺诿�᫊귔獟ퟷ뗿鹩ᆩ곌﵎ﶏ믚醿㦟퐧忝濮ﭿ룼�뤥쵾뿯ﹺ️뼞矴㷽봿㱷◻퍿쬯噷⯞톿擮࿧诸﴾蛉鑧⽲髈䩯薫괕떯誔楏ⶵ侧福鼜뾥ㆯ㖦붣︗뽁⃛띧ꯗꋪ囎⾮⇼ﱗ�쟾疿缷迹跾対﷿ ﳻ=뿛俹ㇽ￯ᅬ羫꿛짾䶏핿�㏿뫿䇙炙열o뾁異黟濼﹋的ッ뼞�濻⏽컿鍯現ﱟ缗ﺷ￟�矵俸迸矾闿ﶟ诶ﯗﺭ㿾뿢쏸柛쵿鵛韗翳「ﶷ縟翁翾㺬/翺鿬쿸ꃾ翥⟹쟾�翫࿾�闾幏�゚뿩濙韸菾/㯽ッ￟寷⛽Ἳㇿ佇裿ᄏ诖憎￟︝ᆵ矪⟸�﮿ﻯ༕ꗾ﾿罏ᯱ竽㍟ⷽ㺯㟤쯿﷾엦꿾ᄑ겧췾�矺ッン뿡럯闹ᶟ폽﮷﹣羭߼돿璘繟ޛ羧�떿鿼�伇齾羣迻귻赾ﹿ㽛㯿萿ꊜﳗ滕纾�ﳗᆪ찊銳 賒判ꍿ့縄툭缱率먛鶅鍟켘꛾��﾿ꑓ㵽﯆縭�쿬㿞럱쫼ﭏ躗゙澷곾ଈ盼㧟ﯙ翇㿇�ﺷ﻽韈쮿忩ꟾꇾ→Ῥ䯸枫徫篴◽ﳿ῱音쳿笯ퟳ싾ﵿ࿢罍翕뿼ᄋ羽埣藿�ﺿヌ㿂㟨簷忿�諾缷뿴篾料ﹳ�Ῥ뇾ᄏ뿜뿳跼靏︯뾙犯﹇│矠㰷菿냿꫿�ﯟ︗缙ῒ폼畿៶ﯼ﨟ﵿ弟曽햿煟돿齏ﵮ❝ﲿ︛轹엾�来ﹷ麝揽﫯鿏໼﹏㾜濡꿸ﱾﺿ닯㾳追䏼쿾﷛얲ޓ흿ᄏ诞�෽ﳿ翃췰ﺯ︍㿕鿡鯼罞埫 ﱟ鿉廾ﵷ뾽忶忰텽盼�᯷﾿￯绛翟矻ﰻ翦忾�᯼ﺯ㻟뿹纷ꏲ⿱㢼ᅫ㿛濽韼ﰞョ�᫿욿᏿